[spambayes-dev] Regarding the WatchGuard article about SpamBayes
Skip Montanaro
skip at pobox.com
Fri Aug 15 15:14:57 EDT 2003
Neale Pickett sent a copy of your article about SpamBayes to the SpamBayes
developers mailing list. I skimmed it and thought I would send you a little
feedback:
1. You mention that it might not scale well for large organizations. I
assume you stated this because the Outlook plugin must be installed on
the users' computers. I agree installation might be troublesome, however
on the plus side, since the plugin runs on the client machines, it's not
going to burn up your mail servers' cpus. From that perspective it
probably scales better than a server-based solution. It also has the
added functional benefit that unlike most centralized solutions,
SpamBayes allows each user to define what is and is not spam to them.
2. You linked directly to the 006 version of the installer. Note that the
007 version has already been released. You'd be much better off linking
to the Windows page on the SpamBayes website:
http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/windows.html
3. I'm sure most of your readers use Windows & Outlook, but it might be
worth noting that there are a number of other SpamBayes applications
which allow you to integrate the technology into other platforms (Unix,
Mac, etc) or with other mail readers. In particular, there are POP3 and
IMAP proxies (both of which are controlled via a web interface) and a
simple filter which takes a message on stdin, scores it, and writes it to
stdout with the score carried in a new header.
--
Skip Montanaro
Got gigs? http://www.musi-cal.com/
Got spam? http://spambayes.sf.net/
More information about the spambayes-dev
mailing list