From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 4 02:45:15 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 4 02:45:18 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1095418 ] Invalid spam folder Message-ID: Bugs item #1095418, was opened at 2005-01-04 08:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1095418&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martin Amada (martinamada) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Invalid spam folder Initial Comment: Hello, I have been using Spambayes binary version .9 successfully for many months, running Outlook 2000 under Windows 98. I'm now getting the following error message consistently, even after uninstalling the program and installing version 1.01. I have been through the bug reports and troubleshooting guide and have not found an answer. ****** The spam folder is invalid. Not found exception:Exception0x8004010a (MAP_E_OBJECTDELETED):OLE error Ox8004010a Do you wish to reconfigure? Yes? No? ****** I have tried reconfiguring and resetting the configuration, and deleting the .ini file in the directory. I keep getting the same error message. The most recent log file is attached. I hope you can help. Martin Amada ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1095418&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 4 03:07:11 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 4 03:07:14 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1095418 ] Invalid spam folder Message-ID: Bugs item #1095418, was opened at 2005-01-04 14:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1095418&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martin Amada (martinamada) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Invalid spam folder Initial Comment: Hello, I have been using Spambayes binary version .9 successfully for many months, running Outlook 2000 under Windows 98. I'm now getting the following error message consistently, even after uninstalling the program and installing version 1.01. I have been through the bug reports and troubleshooting guide and have not found an answer. ****** The spam folder is invalid. Not found exception:Exception0x8004010a (MAP_E_OBJECTDELETED):OLE error Ox8004010a Do you wish to reconfigure? Yes? No? ****** I have tried reconfiguring and resetting the configuration, and deleting the .ini file in the directory. I keep getting the same error message. The most recent log file is attached. I hope you can help. Martin Amada ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-04 15:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are you trying to select a spam folder in the Deleted Items folder? That's not valid, so if so, please try selecting a different spam folder. Otherwise, try running scanpst (Inbox Repair Tool) over the pst file that the spam folder is in. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1095418&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 4 03:16:30 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 4 03:16:34 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1093901 ] autopreview pane now turned on Message-ID: Bugs item #1093901, was opened at 2005-01-01 10:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1093901&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Urban-Lurain (urban-lurain) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: autopreview pane now turned on Initial Comment: Win XP Pro, SP2. Outlook 2002. SB 1.0.1 IMAP client. After installing this version to watch my Inbox, outlook keeps enabling the autopreview on this folder. I turn it off, switch folders, and when I come back to this folder, it is turned on again. It does not do this on any other folders. It did not do this before in installed this. I had been running version 0.8 for well over a year an never had this problem. I run this account as a limited user. However, the installation documentation was vague. It said that it would only work on the account from which it was installed, but did not specify that one needed admin privs to install. So, I granted this account admin privs, installed and configured spambayes, then logged out and changed the account back to a limited user. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-04 15:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't see that behaviour here (also XP Pro SP2 and Outlook 2002). Could you do this again (to generate any log entries) and then attach your most recent log file to this tracker? You shouldn't need admin rights to install - just rights to write to the various directories and the HKEY_LOCAL_USER registry. What happened when you tried to install? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1093901&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 7 13:30:20 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 7 13:30:23 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1097820 ] Saving options -> Msg for Review disapear Message-ID: Bugs item #1097820, was opened at 2005-01-07 12:30 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1097820&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Saving options -> Msg for Review disapear Initial Comment: When I go to the options-page and save options (I must not change any options to reproduce the problem), all messages in the review page disappear. All additional columns also disappear, I only see the columns Subject, From, Discard, Defer, Ham and Spam. After restart I see all the other colums (To, CC, Received and Score) again. I see the messages again after exit and restart of SpamBayes. I use: SpamBayes 1.0.1 on Windows 2000 Firefox 1.0 Eudora 6.2.0.14 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1097820&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 7 13:31:56 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 7 13:32:05 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1097820 ] Saving options -> Msg for Review disappear Message-ID: Bugs item #1097820, was opened at 2005-01-07 12:30 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by daniel101172 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1097820&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: Saving options -> Msg for Review disappear Initial Comment: When I go to the options-page and save options (I must not change any options to reproduce the problem), all messages in the review page disappear. All additional columns also disappear, I only see the columns Subject, From, Discard, Defer, Ham and Spam. After restart I see all the other colums (To, CC, Received and Score) again. I see the messages again after exit and restart of SpamBayes. I use: SpamBayes 1.0.1 on Windows 2000 Firefox 1.0 Eudora 6.2.0.14 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1097820&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 7 18:07:33 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 7 18:07:38 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-972359 ] some 100% SPAM sent to unsure Message-ID: Bugs item #972359, was opened at 2004-06-14 02:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by traal42 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972359&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: some 100% SPAM sent to unsure Initial Comment: (This is a continuation of Bugs item #923921. I am opening a new bug report so that I can upload related files.) About 5-10% of all 100%-spam gets shifted to the "Possible Spam" folder rather than the "Spam" folder. - I received a message which was sent to the "unsure" folder. I then ran "show spam clues" on it, which showed that it was 100% SPAM (see attached file). I then manually ran "filter messages..." on the unsure folder and it correctly detected the message as SPAM and moved it to the correct folder. *No* training was done between the time the message arrived and the time that I performed these steps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Derek Hofmann (traal42) Date: 2005-01-07 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=662400 I'm also getting 0% spam mails going to Unsure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 04:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 923921 ] 100% Spam moved only to ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 03:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. I wonder whether my one was a wierd fluke (I still have the clues message in my drafts folder...) since it doesn't have the content-type stuff, and these others do. Noting dupe in: [ 981750 ] 100% SPAM in possible SPAM folder https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=981750 (That tracker includes another example msg). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-29 05:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I have never seen this before, but did today (as in spambayes-dev message). Attached is the message that it happened with. Let me know if you need anything else (I saved the spam clues message so have that, but the log (ie. contents of the trace window in Pythonwin) are gone now, but I assure you it had nothing odd). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 07:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This will be an error in our 'content-type' magic. If I look at the headers for this message, as shown by Outlook's View->Options, I see: """ Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from mx56.dadoihag.us ([64.136.98.56]) by proxy.danz.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:39:09 -0700 From: "United Coalition" To: " " Subject: 1 Minute Mortgage Application Here Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 20:39:07 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A" Return-Path: SarahAllen@mx56.dadoihag.us X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jun 2004 01:39:10.0757 (UTC) FILETIME=[64083550:01C451B0] ------=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ------=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ------=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A-- """ That doesn't look right (to me) for the headers, and I suspect is what is causing the tokenizer to not see all the tokens when filtered, but it *does* see them all for 'spam clues' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972359&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 7 19:18:36 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 7 19:18:39 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1098054 ] No more training on new mails Message-ID: Bugs item #1098054, was opened at 2005-01-07 19:18 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1098054&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alain (alain_38) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: No more training on new mails Initial Comment: New messages are counted but none of them is classified nor available for training. They are sent as ham to the email client (Outlook Express). All these messages show the same following information in their headers: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 475, in onRetr . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 190, in chi2_spamprob . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 493, in _getclues . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 508, in _worddistanceget . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 308, in probability .AssertionError This problem occurred for the first time when running 1.0rc2. I installed 1.0.1 over it hoping that it would fix the bug. I have 3 PCs running pop3proxy SpamBayes (2 Windows XP, 1 Windows 2000, all Pro versions) and only one of them has this bug. This one is running XP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1098054&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 7 20:36:20 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 7 20:36:26 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1098054 ] No more training on new mails Message-ID: Bugs item #1098054, was opened at 2005-01-07 13:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1098054&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alain (alain_38) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: No more training on new mails Initial Comment: New messages are counted but none of them is classified nor available for training. They are sent as ham to the email client (Outlook Express). All these messages show the same following information in their headers: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 475, in onRetr . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 190, in chi2_spamprob . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 493, in _getclues . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 508, in _worddistanceget . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 308, in probability .AssertionError This problem occurred for the first time when running 1.0rc2. I installed 1.0.1 over it hoping that it would fix the bug. I have 3 PCs running pop3proxy SpamBayes (2 Windows XP, 1 Windows 2000, all Pro versions) and only one of them has this bug. This one is running XP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-01-07 14:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Near as I can tell, this error occurs if a token in your training database indicates that it has been trained more times than the actual number of messages that you have trained on. Since a given token is only trained once per message, this should never happen. What this usually comes down to is that your training data is now out of whack and there really isn't anything that can be done to repair it. The only workaround, unfortunately, is to retrain SpamBayes from scratch. If you make regular backups then you might be able to find a backup of your training data before the problem occurred and go back to that version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1098054&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 10 00:20:05 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 10 00:20:12 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1098054 ] No more training on new mails Message-ID: Bugs item #1098054, was opened at 2005-01-08 07:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1098054&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alain (alain_38) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: No more training on new mails Initial Comment: New messages are counted but none of them is classified nor available for training. They are sent as ham to the email client (Outlook Express). All these messages show the same following information in their headers: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 475, in onRetr . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 190, in chi2_spamprob . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 493, in _getclues . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 508, in _worddistanceget . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 308, in probability .AssertionError This problem occurred for the first time when running 1.0rc2. I installed 1.0.1 over it hoping that it would fix the bug. I have 3 PCs running pop3proxy SpamBayes (2 Windows XP, 1 Windows 2000, all Pro versions) and only one of them has this bug. This one is running XP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-10 12:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Closing as Kenny's diagnosis is correct. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-01-08 08:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Near as I can tell, this error occurs if a token in your training database indicates that it has been trained more times than the actual number of messages that you have trained on. Since a given token is only trained once per message, this should never happen. What this usually comes down to is that your training data is now out of whack and there really isn't anything that can be done to repair it. The only workaround, unfortunately, is to retrain SpamBayes from scratch. If you make regular backups then you might be able to find a backup of your training data before the problem occurred and go back to that version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1098054&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 10 00:22:01 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 10 00:22:08 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1097820 ] Saving options -> Msg for Review disappear Message-ID: Bugs item #1097820, was opened at 2005-01-08 01:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1097820&group_id=61702 >Category: pop3proxy Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Saving options -> Msg for Review disappear Initial Comment: When I go to the options-page and save options (I must not change any options to reproduce the problem), all messages in the review page disappear. All additional columns also disappear, I only see the columns Subject, From, Discard, Defer, Ham and Spam. After restart I see all the other colums (To, CC, Received and Score) again. I see the messages again after exit and restart of SpamBayes. I use: SpamBayes 1.0.1 on Windows 2000 Firefox 1.0 Eudora 6.2.0.14 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-10 12:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem with additional columns disappearing is a known bug and is fixed in CVS (so will be fixed in 1.0.2 and 1.1). I don't believe the messages disappearing problem is the same, however - at least I never experienced this when tracking down the other bug. Do the messages appear in the review list after you restart SpamBayes? Do you get any error messages in the log? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1097820&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 10 21:35:16 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 10 21:35:28 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1097820 ] Saving options -> Msg for Review disappear Message-ID: Bugs item #1097820, was opened at 2005-01-07 12:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by daniel101172 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1097820&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Saving options -> Msg for Review disappear Initial Comment: When I go to the options-page and save options (I must not change any options to reproduce the problem), all messages in the review page disappear. All additional columns also disappear, I only see the columns Subject, From, Discard, Defer, Ham and Spam. After restart I see all the other colums (To, CC, Received and Score) again. I see the messages again after exit and restart of SpamBayes. I use: SpamBayes 1.0.1 on Windows 2000 Firefox 1.0 Eudora 6.2.0.14 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) Date: 2005-01-10 20:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1191290 Yes, after I restart SpamBayes, the messagees appear in the review list. What log do you mean? I found no logfile in the SpamBayes path and no logfile in the "Documents and Settings" path. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-09 23:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem with additional columns disappearing is a known bug and is fixed in CVS (so will be fixed in 1.0.2 and 1.1). I don't believe the messages disappearing problem is the same, however - at least I never experienced this when tracking down the other bug. Do the messages appear in the review list after you restart SpamBayes? Do you get any error messages in the log? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1097820&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 10 21:55:16 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 10 21:55:22 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1097820 ] Saving options -> Msg for Review disappear Message-ID: Bugs item #1097820, was opened at 2005-01-07 12:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by daniel101172 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1097820&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Saving options -> Msg for Review disappear Initial Comment: When I go to the options-page and save options (I must not change any options to reproduce the problem), all messages in the review page disappear. All additional columns also disappear, I only see the columns Subject, From, Discard, Defer, Ham and Spam. After restart I see all the other colums (To, CC, Received and Score) again. I see the messages again after exit and restart of SpamBayes. I use: SpamBayes 1.0.1 on Windows 2000 Firefox 1.0 Eudora 6.2.0.14 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) Date: 2005-01-10 20:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1191290 I did some more tests and maybe I found something new that can help you... I did the following steps: 1. trained on all messages, so the review list is empty. 2. received one Mail with subject "test1" 3. saved the configuration on the configuration page 4. received another mail with subject "test2" The result is: I can see the message with subject "test2" in the review list. I connot see the message with subject "test1" in the review list. The additional columns are not visible. Then I restart Spambayes: I can see the message with subject "test1" in the review list. I connot see the message with subject "test2" in the review list. The additional columns are visible. Then I hit "save" on the configuration page again: I can see the message with subject "test2" in the review list. I connot see the message with subject "test1" in the review list. The additional columns are not visible. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) Date: 2005-01-10 20:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1191290 Yes, after I restart SpamBayes, the messagees appear in the review list. What log do you mean? I found no logfile in the SpamBayes path and no logfile in the "Documents and Settings" path. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-09 23:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem with additional columns disappearing is a known bug and is fixed in CVS (so will be fixed in 1.0.2 and 1.1). I don't believe the messages disappearing problem is the same, however - at least I never experienced this when tracking down the other bug. Do the messages appear in the review list after you restart SpamBayes? Do you get any error messages in the log? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1097820&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 10 23:48:09 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 10 23:48:25 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1097820 ] Saving options -> Msg for Review disappear Message-ID: Bugs item #1097820, was opened at 2005-01-08 01:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1097820&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Saving options -> Msg for Review disappear Initial Comment: When I go to the options-page and save options (I must not change any options to reproduce the problem), all messages in the review page disappear. All additional columns also disappear, I only see the columns Subject, From, Discard, Defer, Ham and Spam. After restart I see all the other colums (To, CC, Received and Score) again. I see the messages again after exit and restart of SpamBayes. I use: SpamBayes 1.0.1 on Windows 2000 Firefox 1.0 Eudora 6.2.0.14 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-11 11:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you're using the binary, then the log files are saved in the windows temp directory (I don't recall where this is with Win2k - maybe C:\Windows\Temp? Maybe C:\Documents and Settings\{username}\Local Settings\Temp like XP?). They are called SpamBayesServerX.log where X is 1 to 5. If you're running from source then all log data is output to the console window. I'll try and duplicate this behaviour when I get a chance (later today, hopefully). My best guess right now: You've set the locations for the cache directories to be somewhere other than the defaults. The bug that causes the columns to disappear causes some of the defaults to be reloaded until the next restart. This might mean that the default cache directory locations are used, which would explain the behaviour. You could test this by checking the default locations (C:\Documents and Settings\{username}\Application Data\SpamBayes\Proxy\pop3proxy_ham_cache on XP, I think Win2K is similar). They should have the test2 message, but not the test1 message, which should be in your configuration-file-specified location. Anyway, I can check this later, but I suspect that might be the case. The workaround would be to restart after any config changes (until 1.0.2 is out later this month). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) Date: 2005-01-11 09:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1191290 I did some more tests and maybe I found something new that can help you... I did the following steps: 1. trained on all messages, so the review list is empty. 2. received one Mail with subject "test1" 3. saved the configuration on the configuration page 4. received another mail with subject "test2" The result is: I can see the message with subject "test2" in the review list. I connot see the message with subject "test1" in the review list. The additional columns are not visible. Then I restart Spambayes: I can see the message with subject "test1" in the review list. I connot see the message with subject "test2" in the review list. The additional columns are visible. Then I hit "save" on the configuration page again: I can see the message with subject "test2" in the review list. I connot see the message with subject "test1" in the review list. The additional columns are not visible. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) Date: 2005-01-11 09:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1191290 Yes, after I restart SpamBayes, the messagees appear in the review list. What log do you mean? I found no logfile in the SpamBayes path and no logfile in the "Documents and Settings" path. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-10 12:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem with additional columns disappearing is a known bug and is fixed in CVS (so will be fixed in 1.0.2 and 1.1). I don't believe the messages disappearing problem is the same, however - at least I never experienced this when tracking down the other bug. Do the messages appear in the review list after you restart SpamBayes? Do you get any error messages in the log? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1097820&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 11 00:42:56 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 11 00:43:12 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1097820 ] Saving options -> Msg for Review disappear Message-ID: Bugs item #1097820, was opened at 2005-01-07 13:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by daniel101172 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1097820&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Saving options -> Msg for Review disappear Initial Comment: When I go to the options-page and save options (I must not change any options to reproduce the problem), all messages in the review page disappear. All additional columns also disappear, I only see the columns Subject, From, Discard, Defer, Ham and Spam. After restart I see all the other colums (To, CC, Received and Score) again. I see the messages again after exit and restart of SpamBayes. I use: SpamBayes 1.0.1 on Windows 2000 Firefox 1.0 Eudora 6.2.0.14 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) Date: 2005-01-11 00:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1191290 Your guess was right. I set the locations for the cache directories to another location. I did the same test with the default directories and the messages don't disappear. Thank you for your fast solution. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-10 23:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you're using the binary, then the log files are saved in the windows temp directory (I don't recall where this is with Win2k - maybe C:\Windows\Temp? Maybe C:\Documents and Settings\{username}\Local Settings\Temp like XP?). They are called SpamBayesServerX.log where X is 1 to 5. If you're running from source then all log data is output to the console window. I'll try and duplicate this behaviour when I get a chance (later today, hopefully). My best guess right now: You've set the locations for the cache directories to be somewhere other than the defaults. The bug that causes the columns to disappear causes some of the defaults to be reloaded until the next restart. This might mean that the default cache directory locations are used, which would explain the behaviour. You could test this by checking the default locations (C:\Documents and Settings\{username}\Application Data\SpamBayes\Proxy\pop3proxy_ham_cache on XP, I think Win2K is similar). They should have the test2 message, but not the test1 message, which should be in your configuration-file-specified location. Anyway, I can check this later, but I suspect that might be the case. The workaround would be to restart after any config changes (until 1.0.2 is out later this month). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) Date: 2005-01-10 21:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1191290 I did some more tests and maybe I found something new that can help you... I did the following steps: 1. trained on all messages, so the review list is empty. 2. received one Mail with subject "test1" 3. saved the configuration on the configuration page 4. received another mail with subject "test2" The result is: I can see the message with subject "test2" in the review list. I connot see the message with subject "test1" in the review list. The additional columns are not visible. Then I restart Spambayes: I can see the message with subject "test1" in the review list. I connot see the message with subject "test2" in the review list. The additional columns are visible. Then I hit "save" on the configuration page again: I can see the message with subject "test2" in the review list. I connot see the message with subject "test1" in the review list. The additional columns are not visible. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) Date: 2005-01-10 21:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1191290 Yes, after I restart SpamBayes, the messagees appear in the review list. What log do you mean? I found no logfile in the SpamBayes path and no logfile in the "Documents and Settings" path. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-10 00:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem with additional columns disappearing is a known bug and is fixed in CVS (so will be fixed in 1.0.2 and 1.1). I don't believe the messages disappearing problem is the same, however - at least I never experienced this when tracking down the other bug. Do the messages appear in the review list after you restart SpamBayes? Do you get any error messages in the log? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1097820&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 11 00:46:42 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 11 00:46:46 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1097820 ] Saving options -> Msg for Review disappear Message-ID: Bugs item #1097820, was opened at 2005-01-08 01:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1097820&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Saving options -> Msg for Review disappear Initial Comment: When I go to the options-page and save options (I must not change any options to reproduce the problem), all messages in the review page disappear. All additional columns also disappear, I only see the columns Subject, From, Discard, Defer, Ham and Spam. After restart I see all the other colums (To, CC, Received and Score) again. I see the messages again after exit and restart of SpamBayes. I use: SpamBayes 1.0.1 on Windows 2000 Firefox 1.0 Eudora 6.2.0.14 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-11 12:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for the confirmation. That means that this is solved by the fix for the column disappearing problem, so I'll close this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) Date: 2005-01-11 12:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1191290 Your guess was right. I set the locations for the cache directories to another location. I did the same test with the default directories and the messages don't disappear. Thank you for your fast solution. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-11 11:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you're using the binary, then the log files are saved in the windows temp directory (I don't recall where this is with Win2k - maybe C:\Windows\Temp? Maybe C:\Documents and Settings\{username}\Local Settings\Temp like XP?). They are called SpamBayesServerX.log where X is 1 to 5. If you're running from source then all log data is output to the console window. I'll try and duplicate this behaviour when I get a chance (later today, hopefully). My best guess right now: You've set the locations for the cache directories to be somewhere other than the defaults. The bug that causes the columns to disappear causes some of the defaults to be reloaded until the next restart. This might mean that the default cache directory locations are used, which would explain the behaviour. You could test this by checking the default locations (C:\Documents and Settings\{username}\Application Data\SpamBayes\Proxy\pop3proxy_ham_cache on XP, I think Win2K is similar). They should have the test2 message, but not the test1 message, which should be in your configuration-file-specified location. Anyway, I can check this later, but I suspect that might be the case. The workaround would be to restart after any config changes (until 1.0.2 is out later this month). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) Date: 2005-01-11 09:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1191290 I did some more tests and maybe I found something new that can help you... I did the following steps: 1. trained on all messages, so the review list is empty. 2. received one Mail with subject "test1" 3. saved the configuration on the configuration page 4. received another mail with subject "test2" The result is: I can see the message with subject "test2" in the review list. I connot see the message with subject "test1" in the review list. The additional columns are not visible. Then I restart Spambayes: I can see the message with subject "test1" in the review list. I connot see the message with subject "test2" in the review list. The additional columns are visible. Then I hit "save" on the configuration page again: I can see the message with subject "test2" in the review list. I connot see the message with subject "test1" in the review list. The additional columns are not visible. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daniel Weing?rtner (daniel101172) Date: 2005-01-11 09:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1191290 Yes, after I restart SpamBayes, the messagees appear in the review list. What log do you mean? I found no logfile in the SpamBayes path and no logfile in the "Documents and Settings" path. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-10 12:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem with additional columns disappearing is a known bug and is fixed in CVS (so will be fixed in 1.0.2 and 1.1). I don't believe the messages disappearing problem is the same, however - at least I never experienced this when tracking down the other bug. Do the messages appear in the review list after you restart SpamBayes? Do you get any error messages in the log? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1097820&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 12 23:54:30 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 12 23:54:32 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1101281 ] imapfilter with mysql on mac has assertion error Message-ID: Bugs item #1101281, was opened at 2005-01-12 22:54 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1101281&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: jscott (jscottjfs) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imapfilter with mysql on mac has assertion error Initial Comment: Using persistent_use_database=False trains OK Keeping everything else the same, and switching to mysql leads to the following errors (or similar assertion errors involving nspam instead) after a couple minutes of training. the mysql database has this: mysql> describe bayes; +-------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +-------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | word | varchar(255) | | PRI | | | | nspam | int(11) | | | 0 | | | nham | int(11) | | | 0 | | +-------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ and mysql> select count(word) from bayes; +-------------+ | count(word) | +-------------+ | 20125 | +-------------+ so everything is working well. Then, somehow, the training training runs amuck crashing imapfilter and giving this: [dhcp-235-023:~/spambayes-1.0.1/scripts] jscott% python sb_imapfilter.py -c -t -l -5 SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.5 (November 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Traceback (most recent call last): File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 924, in ? run() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 914, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 785, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 703, in Filter evidence=True) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues tup = self._worddistanceget(word) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 508, in _worddistanceget prob = self.probability(record) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 308, in probability assert hamcount <= nham AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1101281&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 13 00:13:10 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 13 00:13:15 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1101281 ] imapfilter with mysql on mac has assertion error Message-ID: Bugs item #1101281, was opened at 2005-01-13 11:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1101281&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: jscott (jscottjfs) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imapfilter with mysql on mac has assertion error Initial Comment: Using persistent_use_database=False trains OK Keeping everything else the same, and switching to mysql leads to the following errors (or similar assertion errors involving nspam instead) after a couple minutes of training. the mysql database has this: mysql> describe bayes; +-------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +-------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | word | varchar(255) | | PRI | | | | nspam | int(11) | | | 0 | | | nham | int(11) | | | 0 | | +-------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ and mysql> select count(word) from bayes; +-------------+ | count(word) | +-------------+ | 20125 | +-------------+ so everything is working well. Then, somehow, the training training runs amuck crashing imapfilter and giving this: [dhcp-235-023:~/spambayes-1.0.1/scripts] jscott% python sb_imapfilter.py -c -t -l -5 SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.5 (November 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Traceback (most recent call last): File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 924, in ? run() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 914, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 785, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 703, in Filter evidence=True) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues tup = self._worddistanceget(word) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 508, in _worddistanceget prob = self.probability(record) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 308, in probability assert hamcount <= nham AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-13 12:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem is that nham (nspam) is meant to be the total number of ham (spam) messages that you have trained. It looks like it's 0 above, which is not good. Offhand, I'm not sure what would cause this - updating the nham/nspam values is done at the same time as the token counts, so if one is wrong, they really ought to both be. I'll try and find time to try and replicate this here later today and update with what happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1101281&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 13 01:54:03 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 13 01:54:08 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1101281 ] imapfilter with mysql on mac has assertion error Message-ID: Bugs item #1101281, was opened at 2005-01-13 11:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1101281&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: jscott (jscottjfs) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imapfilter with mysql on mac has assertion error Initial Comment: Using persistent_use_database=False trains OK Keeping everything else the same, and switching to mysql leads to the following errors (or similar assertion errors involving nspam instead) after a couple minutes of training. the mysql database has this: mysql> describe bayes; +-------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +-------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | word | varchar(255) | | PRI | | | | nspam | int(11) | | | 0 | | | nham | int(11) | | | 0 | | +-------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ and mysql> select count(word) from bayes; +-------------+ | count(word) | +-------------+ | 20125 | +-------------+ so everything is working well. Then, somehow, the training training runs amuck crashing imapfilter and giving this: [dhcp-235-023:~/spambayes-1.0.1/scripts] jscott% python sb_imapfilter.py -c -t -l -5 SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.5 (November 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Traceback (most recent call last): File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 924, in ? run() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 914, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 785, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 703, in Filter evidence=True) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues tup = self._worddistanceget(word) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 508, in _worddistanceget prob = self.probability(record) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 308, in probability assert hamcount <= nham AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-13 13:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (Opps. I skimmed your message too fast - there aren't any values for nspam/nham there, just the defaults). Most of my earlier comment is still correct, anyway. Try having a look (select * from bayes where word="saved state") at the nham/nspam values. They should be at least as large as any individual counts. You can manually correct them if you like, but it's generally a better idea to retrain from scratch. This might be a one-off problem, but if it does reoccur then we can try and figure out what's causing the problem. You could also try using spambayes from CVS, which has a much improved sb_imapfilter (which will be in the 1.1 release). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-13 12:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem is that nham (nspam) is meant to be the total number of ham (spam) messages that you have trained. It looks like it's 0 above, which is not good. Offhand, I'm not sure what would cause this - updating the nham/nspam values is done at the same time as the token counts, so if one is wrong, they really ought to both be. I'll try and find time to try and replicate this here later today and update with what happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1101281&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 13 02:08:47 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 13 02:09:18 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-956834 ] Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions Message-ID: Bugs item #956834, was opened at 2004-05-20 04:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=956834&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hans Otten (haotten) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions Initial Comment: I have been using Spambayes for a while and when I upgraded to the 0.8 release everything worked fine until I highlighted an email that spambayes had not caught and clicked on the "Delete as Spam" button. Outlook crashed and I had to restart. Then I discovered if I try to access any SpamBayes function Outlook immediatly crashes. I just upgraded to rc1 and the same thing still occurs. Please note that the SpamBayes is still properly removing the spam. I have attached the log file, where I noticed several Eeek statements and the following error : only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-13 14:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Someone experiencing this problem just reported on spambayes@python.org that uninstalling both SpamBayes and Outlook, and then reinstalling both fixed the problem. If anyone here is still trying to get this to work, you could try that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-27 11:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also: [ 961019 ] Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field I suspect that these are duplicates, but although they both have the "only expecting one row" problem, the other problems seem qutie different. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hans Otten (haotten) Date: 2004-06-08 02:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=229205 Here is the attached Log file... Sorry about that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Benjamin Curtis (bcurtis) Date: 2004-06-03 03:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11944 I couldn't find a log file -- do I have to enable that? If so, how? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 12:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No log file attached. Could either of you attach the log file? (Don't forget to tick the wee box!). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Benjamin Curtis (bcurtis) Date: 2004-05-28 07:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11944 I am also experiencing this problem. 1.0rc1 binary with Outlook 2003 using Exchange. It sorts out spam just fine, but if I click on the SpamBayes drop-down menu button from the toolbar Outlook crashes (every time). Great product otherwise! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=956834&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 13 13:17:21 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 13 13:17:30 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1101281 ] imapfilter with mysql on mac has assertion error Message-ID: Bugs item #1101281, was opened at 2005-01-12 22:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jscottjfs You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1101281&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: jscott (jscottjfs) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imapfilter with mysql on mac has assertion error Initial Comment: Using persistent_use_database=False trains OK Keeping everything else the same, and switching to mysql leads to the following errors (or similar assertion errors involving nspam instead) after a couple minutes of training. the mysql database has this: mysql> describe bayes; +-------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +-------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | word | varchar(255) | | PRI | | | | nspam | int(11) | | | 0 | | | nham | int(11) | | | 0 | | +-------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ and mysql> select count(word) from bayes; +-------------+ | count(word) | +-------------+ | 20125 | +-------------+ so everything is working well. Then, somehow, the training training runs amuck crashing imapfilter and giving this: [dhcp-235-023:~/spambayes-1.0.1/scripts] jscott% python sb_imapfilter.py -c -t -l -5 SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.5 (November 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Traceback (most recent call last): File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 924, in ? run() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 914, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 785, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 703, in Filter evidence=True) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues tup = self._worddistanceget(word) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 508, in _worddistanceget prob = self.probability(record) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 308, in probability assert hamcount <= nham AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: jscott (jscottjfs) Date: 2005-01-13 12:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1196022 Retraining from scratch isn't an option, since this error occurs on initial training with the mysql database, every time. Although I blow away the hammie and message files, and recreate the spambayes database everytime I start a new attempt, perhaps there is an initialization step for the mysql database that I don't know about? It may be a one off. I'll try another couple of training folders to see if the corruption could be caused by a pathological message in my baseline training folders. Still, hard to see how that would affect mysql, but not the pickle. mysql> select * from bayes where word="saved state"; +-------------+-------+------+ | word | nspam | nham | +-------------+-------+------+ | saved state | 263 | 156 | +-------------+-------+------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from bayes where nham > 156; +----------+-------+------+ | word | nspam | nham | +----------+-------+------+ | subject: | 208 | 177 | +----------+-------+------+ 1 row in set (0.30 sec) mysql> select * from bayes where nspam > 263; Empty set (0.10 sec) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-13 00:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (Opps. I skimmed your message too fast - there aren't any values for nspam/nham there, just the defaults). Most of my earlier comment is still correct, anyway. Try having a look (select * from bayes where word="saved state") at the nham/nspam values. They should be at least as large as any individual counts. You can manually correct them if you like, but it's generally a better idea to retrain from scratch. This might be a one-off problem, but if it does reoccur then we can try and figure out what's causing the problem. You could also try using spambayes from CVS, which has a much improved sb_imapfilter (which will be in the 1.1 release). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-12 23:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem is that nham (nspam) is meant to be the total number of ham (spam) messages that you have trained. It looks like it's 0 above, which is not good. Offhand, I'm not sure what would cause this - updating the nham/nspam values is done at the same time as the token counts, so if one is wrong, they really ought to both be. I'll try and find time to try and replicate this here later today and update with what happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1101281&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 13 16:17:46 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 13 16:17:52 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1101281 ] imapfilter with mysql on mac has assertion error Message-ID: Bugs item #1101281, was opened at 2005-01-12 22:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jscottjfs You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1101281&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: jscott (jscottjfs) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: imapfilter with mysql on mac has assertion error Initial Comment: Using persistent_use_database=False trains OK Keeping everything else the same, and switching to mysql leads to the following errors (or similar assertion errors involving nspam instead) after a couple minutes of training. the mysql database has this: mysql> describe bayes; +-------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +-------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ | word | varchar(255) | | PRI | | | | nspam | int(11) | | | 0 | | | nham | int(11) | | | 0 | | +-------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+ and mysql> select count(word) from bayes; +-------------+ | count(word) | +-------------+ | 20125 | +-------------+ so everything is working well. Then, somehow, the training training runs amuck crashing imapfilter and giving this: [dhcp-235-023:~/spambayes-1.0.1/scripts] jscott% python sb_imapfilter.py -c -t -l -5 SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.5 (November 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Traceback (most recent call last): File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 924, in ? run() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 914, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 785, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 703, in Filter evidence=True) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues tup = self._worddistanceget(word) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 508, in _worddistanceget prob = self.probability(record) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 308, in probability assert hamcount <= nham AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: jscott (jscottjfs) Date: 2005-01-13 15:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1196022 Tried two different training folders with no messages in common with the first attempt. Assertion failed on nspam this time (although it looks like nham was headed for a fall, too). Here are the database numbers followed by the traceback. If I get a chance, I'll try the CVS version of imapfilter. Also, I'm using the mysql-python 0.9.3 (I think) downloaded via the MacPython package manager database. I see they've moved on to version 1.0 for the new year. mysql> select count(word) from bayes; +-------------+ | count(word) | +-------------+ | 13850 | +-------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from bayes where word="saves state"; Empty set (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from bayes where word="saved state"; +-------------+-------+------+ | word | nspam | nham | +-------------+-------+------+ | saved state | 129 | 339 | +-------------+-------+------+ 1 row in set (0.01 sec) mysql> select * from bayes where nspam > 129; +---------------------+-------+------+ | word | nspam | nham | +---------------------+-------+------+ | header:Message-ID:1 | 130 | 339 | +---------------------+-------+------+ 1 row in set (0.09 sec) mysql> select * from bayes where nham > 339; +----------+-------+------+ | word | nspam | nham | +----------+-------+------+ | subject: | 99 | 468 | +----------+-------+------+ 1 row in set (0.08 sec) SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.5 (November 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Traceback (most recent call last): File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 924, in ? run() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 914, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 785, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "sb_imapfilter.py", line 703, in Filter evidence=True) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues tup = self._worddistanceget(word) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 508, in _worddistanceget prob = self.probability(record) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 311, in probability assert spamcount <= nspam AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: jscott (jscottjfs) Date: 2005-01-13 12:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1196022 Retraining from scratch isn't an option, since this error occurs on initial training with the mysql database, every time. Although I blow away the hammie and message files, and recreate the spambayes database everytime I start a new attempt, perhaps there is an initialization step for the mysql database that I don't know about? It may be a one off. I'll try another couple of training folders to see if the corruption could be caused by a pathological message in my baseline training folders. Still, hard to see how that would affect mysql, but not the pickle. mysql> select * from bayes where word="saved state"; +-------------+-------+------+ | word | nspam | nham | +-------------+-------+------+ | saved state | 263 | 156 | +-------------+-------+------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from bayes where nham > 156; +----------+-------+------+ | word | nspam | nham | +----------+-------+------+ | subject: | 208 | 177 | +----------+-------+------+ 1 row in set (0.30 sec) mysql> select * from bayes where nspam > 263; Empty set (0.10 sec) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-13 00:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (Opps. I skimmed your message too fast - there aren't any values for nspam/nham there, just the defaults). Most of my earlier comment is still correct, anyway. Try having a look (select * from bayes where word="saved state") at the nham/nspam values. They should be at least as large as any individual counts. You can manually correct them if you like, but it's generally a better idea to retrain from scratch. This might be a one-off problem, but if it does reoccur then we can try and figure out what's causing the problem. You could also try using spambayes from CVS, which has a much improved sb_imapfilter (which will be in the 1.1 release). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-12 23:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem is that nham (nspam) is meant to be the total number of ham (spam) messages that you have trained. It looks like it's 0 above, which is not good. Offhand, I'm not sure what would cause this - updating the nham/nspam values is done at the same time as the token counts, so if one is wrong, they really ought to both be. I'll try and find time to try and replicate this here later today and update with what happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1101281&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 13 17:03:15 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 13 17:03:20 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1101734 ] popup when processing Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1101734, was opened at 2005-01-13 17:03 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1101734&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: remy_h (remy_h) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: popup when processing Initial Comment: Hello, I could not live without SpamBayes 's Outlook addin today , and I know that localization will be included in next release. Therefore , I think the outlook's addin miss one thing ( I haven't found in requests ...and I hope my search was good ;o) as it doesn't run as proxy : IMO, make a pop-up appears when new/unread mails are checked by SpamBayes will be very useful, when users launch outlook and their mailbox is full with new mails. This pop-up could says "Please wait while SpamBayes is proceeding" ( or something else, as my english is certainly bad ;o) Also , this functionnality could be disabled in SpamBayes Manager. I don't know if this is possible ( I don't have any developpment knowledge ) but I'd appreciate it. Anyway , I'd like to congratulate all of the SpamBayes team members for this great software. Regards Remy remy_h@users.sourceforge.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1101734&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 17 04:22:42 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 17 04:22:49 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-744558 ] Add "Delete As Spam" button to Outlook inspector w Message-ID: Feature Requests item #744558, was opened at 2003-05-28 09:29 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=744558&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Raabe (mraabe) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: Add "Delete As Spam" button to Outlook inspector w Initial Comment: The "Delete As Spam" button that the addin adds to the toolbar in Outlook's main explorer window should also be added to the toolbar in each email inspector window as well. I.e., when you double-click on an email and are viewing it in its own window, you should have the option right there to delete it as spam, instead of having to return to the explorer window to do so. It's of lesser importance, but it may make sense to add the "Anti-Spam" dropdown button to the inspector window as well. I tried adding the buttons myself, which caused me to discover bug #744550 (where Outlook's Tools/Customize dialog is broken). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: arkitekt1 (arkitekt1) Date: 2004-10-08 08:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1135013 I believe this would be a valuable added feature - especially for those of us using Outlook add-ons such as Neo Email Organizer (http://www.caelo.com/a/rl.php3?i=A963D) - this is a great program but I end up losing the benefit of SpamBayes because when I double click the messages to open them the Delete As Spam button isn't available ... I have to go back to Outlook and find the email and designate it as spam. NEO itself does have some spam type features that help - I can drag the email to a folder designated as spam (junk email folder that I set with SpamBayes) and it ignores that folder. But it would be even better to have the Delete As Spam feature built right into each email interface. I don't know how difficult this would be, but it would be a great addition in functionality for people like myself using an add-on interface. Thanks for your consideration ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=744558&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 17 04:27:29 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 17 04:27:34 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1032744 ] Outlook 2003: does not "mark as read" in folder list Message-ID: Bugs item #1032744, was opened at 2004-09-23 03:43 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032744&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ducem Barr (ducembarr) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003: does not "mark as read" in folder list Initial Comment: I recently switched to Outlook 2003 SP1 and re-run the SpamBayes configuration wizard. Everything works fine, but I noticed that Spambayes has stopped marking spam messages as read, although the option is set. To be more specific: messages are marked as not read in the folder list (i.e. folder name is set bold and number of unread mails is shown), but the message appears as read inside of the folder. This applies to messages filtered automatically in the Inbox. On the other hand, "Junk suspects" stay unread on both accounts even when classified manually as spam via "Delete as Spam". I searched the help files, FAQs and bug messages and have found nothing so far. Has anyone got a solution for this weird behavior ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-17 16:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe this is a case of the rather common problem where Outlook updates lag behind where they should be. It occurs with Outlook 2002 (I see it) as well as 2003 - always Exchange, I think. Unfortunately, no-one seems to have a solution at this point in time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ducem Barr (ducembarr) Date: 2004-10-15 21:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=880328 Thanks, anadelonbrin, for the enquiry. No, the Outlook folder list does not lag behind in anything else but SpamBayes. And yes, it is a local pst, pulling emails from a pop3 server. Background filtering is on (2 & 1 secs), only for folders that receive new mail. Spambayes has produced zero error messages. I use 1.0 rc2. Any ideas what causes the bug ? Ducem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 16:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This sounds like something Outlook is doing, rather than SpamBayes. Essentially the problem is that the message is marked as read, but the folder list isn't updated, right? (To mark as read with the "Delete as Spam" button, you have to turn a separate option on, in the Training tab of the SpamBayes Manager). Do you ever see the folder list lagging behind when you manually mark messages as read? Is this a local pst, IMAP server, Exchange, hotmail...? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032744&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 17 16:56:15 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 17 16:56:18 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1103976 ] Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Message-ID: Bugs item #1103976, was opened at 2005-01-17 10:56 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: robert (elitemrp) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Initial Comment: I first ran into this problem a few months ago at work. But at the time I thought it was related to a custom program we run here. But now I noticed I can easily reproduce the problem on any computer running SpamBayes+Outlook 2003 on Windows XP. Basically, I will open Outlook via the icon to read mail. I will then close Outlook, and if I have Task Manager open, I will see that Outlook.exe closes correctly. Now if I launch a mailto: link (or use a program that launches a new mail), where the Compose Mail window opens, but not the actual outlook program, the problem occurs. If I close the compose mail window, by either clicking Send, or closing it without sending, the OUTLOOK.EXE task will not exit. If I launch Outlook again, I'll now have multiple instances of OUTLOOK.EXE in task manager. Now the multiple instances is what caused the problem with our custom software at work, but that has nothing to do with the fact that Outlook does not exit correctly when running Spambayes and having a program/mailto link open the Compose Mail window. Yes I realize there have been 2 previous tickets about OUTLOOK.EXE closing, but none came to the conclusion that it's caused by a Compose Mail window. And both are closed without a solution. I have tested this on several computers and have tried multiple things to try to fix it (such as renaming extend.dat and other files) and nothing seems to work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 19 19:10:30 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 19 19:10:33 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-741250 ] mboxtrain can truncate your mailbox Message-ID: Bugs item #741250, was opened at 2003-05-21 10:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by olneytj You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741250&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: mboxtrain can truncate your mailbox Initial Comment: There is code in mboxtrain to rewrite the mailbox which looks like try: os.ftruncate(f.fileno(), 0) f.seek(0) except: # If anything goes wrong, don't try to write print "Problem truncating mbox--nothing written" raise If the ftruncate() call succeeds but the seek() call fails, the user would be left with an empty mailbox. I think the code should write a temporary mailbox then rename it only if the complete write operation is successful. Furthermore, bare except clauses should be avoided unless you really can't anticipate all the exceptions which might be raised. No patch yet. I'll try to come up with something. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: K7TJO (olneytj) Date: 2005-01-19 10:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1005844 This is still a problem. If you come up with a way to patch it, it would be wonderful. As it is now, I have to run it from a script that does the copy first to a new file then trains on that. If it fails, at least I still have the original. It seems to truncate on some attribute of messages that used to occur but hasn't occured in the last 4 years. If I move out the oldest messages into a different file, and train, all is fine. TJ Olney ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jean-Marc Valin (jmvalin) Date: 2004-12-15 22:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1494 I tried to pin down the problem. I came up with this small file: http://people.xiph.org/~jm/spam.mbox When doing: sb_mboxtrain.py -f -d spam.db -s spam.mbox I get: Training spam (spam.mbox): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 0 out of 0 messages and the file gets truncated to (in this case) zero bytes. There seem to be several emails in my spam folder that trigger that bug. In the end, spambayes becomes completely unusable for me since I have to way to train a database without spending hours to remove each email that triggers the bug. In case it matters, I'm running debian unstable and spambayes 1.0.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jean-Marc Valin (jmvalin) Date: 2004-12-15 22:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1494 I'm not sure whether my problem is related to that bug, but it seems close. When I train with mboxtrain, my spam folder gets truncated too. From the more than 10,000 emails in the folder, only 433 are trained and at the end, the mbox file is shortened from 147 MB to about 3 MB. Only the spam folder seems to be affected. I tried using -g instead of -s (to see if it's with the file or the flag) and the problem is still there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741250&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:17:12 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:17:17 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1103976 ] Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Message-ID: Bugs item #1103976, was opened at 2005-01-18 04:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: robert (elitemrp) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Initial Comment: I first ran into this problem a few months ago at work. But at the time I thought it was related to a custom program we run here. But now I noticed I can easily reproduce the problem on any computer running SpamBayes+Outlook 2003 on Windows XP. Basically, I will open Outlook via the icon to read mail. I will then close Outlook, and if I have Task Manager open, I will see that Outlook.exe closes correctly. Now if I launch a mailto: link (or use a program that launches a new mail), where the Compose Mail window opens, but not the actual outlook program, the problem occurs. If I close the compose mail window, by either clicking Send, or closing it without sending, the OUTLOOK.EXE task will not exit. If I launch Outlook again, I'll now have multiple instances of OUTLOOK.EXE in task manager. Now the multiple instances is what caused the problem with our custom software at work, but that has nothing to do with the fact that Outlook does not exit correctly when running Spambayes and having a program/mailto link open the Compose Mail window. Yes I realize there have been 2 previous tickets about OUTLOOK.EXE closing, but none came to the conclusion that it's caused by a Compose Mail window. And both are closed without a solution. I have tested this on several computers and have tried multiple things to try to fix it (such as renaming extend.dat and other files) and nothing seems to work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Have you tried this without SpamBayes installed? I get the same behaviour without SpamBayes, which says to me it's an Outlook problem, not a SpamBayes one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:20:01 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:20:05 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1053223 ] Blackberry faster than SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #1053223, was opened at 2004-10-25 04:06 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1053223&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Blackberry faster than SpamBayes Initial Comment: I've been running SpamBayes for over a year on Outlook (now XP SP3). I've also had a BlackBerry for three years (have had a 7780 since the summer). Over time, I've noticed ever more Spam hitting my BlackBerry, even though when I get home and check my Outlook Inbox it is not there, but (correctly) in the Spam folder. And recently I've noticed that when I select an email in the "maybe SPAM" folder and click the "Delete as Spam" button, it takes several seconds to move it to the SPAM folder. So I'm guessing SpamBayes has a linear (or worse than linear) time algorithm for updating the spam database. SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0 (July 2004) reports that this training database status: Database has 30326 good and 16916 spam. I assume one solution is for me to delete the databases and retrain. Have you also considered some kind of automatic pruning to keep the databases manageable? Here are the SB DB file sizes: 1,316 default_bayes_customize.ini 42,049,536 default_bayes_database.db 2,506,752 default_message_database.db 3,521 MS Exchange Settings.ini Of course the other possibility is to modify your DB algorithms so their running time is O(LogN) or faster... Thank you! --Ben Slivka ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1. Well, you do select the messages that end up in the db, even though you don't do anything else. Perhaps adjusting the thresholds might help? Or enabling the [Classifier] x-use_bigrams option? (Open the default_bayes_customize.ini file in the data directory, and add the appropriate lines; to be effective, this does need a retrain). 2. There aren't any other files, so this is rather perplexing. There have been a couple of other reports of slowdowns on the spambayes@python.org list recently, which also are unresolved at the moment. I'll update this once more is figured out. 3. Not much, at the moment :(. Have you seen the material at ? That's mostly what we have on training at the moment, or at least a good (lengthy) summary. Typically the action is to retrain from scratch. We're still looking into it, really. 5. Sorry. I was under the impression that even with the binary you could switch to a pickle, but a glance at the code indicates that I was wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka) Date: 2004-10-26 14:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=856287 Dear Tony, Thank you for the thorough response. 1) I didn't create the database -- that is happening "under the covers". I assume SpamBayes built up that database all on its own? I'm just an "end user" and I get a lot of email (and, unfortunately, a lot of spam -- ben **at** slivka **dot** com is too easy to figure out, I guess). And there is no obvious way in the user interface for me to shrink or prune the database. 2) I deleted the database files -- it didn't change the classification speed at all -- it's still noticeably slower than it was when I first installed SpamBayes (in 2003). Are their some other files or registry settings I should reset/delete? 3) So you would have to redesign your database schema -- I get that. But what advice to you have for users when the DB gets "too large"? 4) I'm all for you all experimenting with new techniques and training regimines! 5) I installed the Windows binary -- I'm not looking to experiment with other database choices! Thank you! --Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-26 14:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1. ~47000 messages is a very large database. Generally, it seems that the best results can be obtained from quite small (under 1000) databases, which would remove this problem. The wiki has a lot of stuff about training strategies. 2. Classification time shouldn't be particularly related to the db size (training certainly is). I don't know what the system is that sends mail to the BlackBerry, but perhaps adjusting the background filtering options could help with this problem? 3. There has been a little investigation into expiring messages, but the research hasn't shown that it's particularly helpful. One major problem is that SpamBayes relies on bags of tokens being added/removed as a set. This means that if we were to prune the database we would want to remove whole messages, not individual tokens. At the moment we don't store this information, so it would mean a whole new database/table. 4. Alternate training regimes, which keep the database size small, like 'train to exhaustion', are likely to be the best solution for this sort of problem. The 1.1 release of SpamBayes will almost certainly have some sort of support for (more easily) trying out different training regimes with the Outlook plug-in/sb_server. 5. The database is user-selected. By default bsddb is used (I have no idea what the access times for bsddb are meant to be, but I'm google could pull up something). You can, however, use a pickle, MySQL, or Postgres SQL. Any of these might help, depending on your exact requirements. A pickle takes a lot more memory, and will be slow to load/save, but very fast otherwise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1053223&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:21:19 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:21:48 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-747107 ] SpamBayes leaves duplicate messages Message-ID: Bugs item #747107, was opened at 2003-06-02 06:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747107&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric Brown (ericbr) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes leaves duplicate messages Initial Comment: I am subscribed to a number of different mailing lists, and I have a number of Outlook rules (set up via Rules Wizard) to route the different mailing lists into different folders. When the rules are of the form: Apply this rule after the message arrives with <words> in the subject move it to the <specified> folder and a matching message comes in, SpamBayes seems to leave multiple copies of that message in the inbox. This is very frustrating. If the rule is of the form: Apply this rule after the message arrives sent to <email address> move it to the <specified> folder and a matching message comes in, duplicate messages do not occur. So it seems to be some sort of odd interaction with Outlook Rules. I'm running Outlook 2002 SP 2 on Windows XP SP 1a (with current hotfixes). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is really out of date now. If anyone is experiencing this with 1.0.1, please set the status back to 'open'. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Len Fowler (sc_sixx) Date: 2004-02-15 07:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=975615 I'm running SpamBayes Outlook Addin version 0.81 I am also running into the multiple mail items left in my inbox problem. I usually receive 1 email from a mailing list and it ends up showing in Outlook 2 or 3 times. All have the same to: address and all are received at the same time. I've tried uninstalling and reinstalling the plugin, which resolves the issue for a day or so. I've also tried re-training several times but the problem still keeps showing back up. BTW, I have no Outlook rules set up. Please help... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-02 16:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Reported with 0.81 by "Brooks Page" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 14:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 No word from the user, and I'm fairly certain the timer will fix this anyway ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-31 13:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I would be very interested to know if version 006 works with save_spam_info = True - it very well might. It would be great if you could let me know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Brown (ericbr) Date: 2003-07-23 02:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=783913 I installed both versions 4 and 5 of the binary, and set the save_spam_info to False. So far, it seems to have fixed the problem, although I'd like to give it a full day of email to verify (because it doesn't always happen). However: for some reason, the SpamBayes configuration dialog doesn't pop up when I click the spambayes button. This happens on Outlook XP on Windows XP. I'll put a new bug in on this; just thought you should know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-21 22:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I have released version 4 of the binary. There is a new option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration' guide. If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no longer attempt to save anything back into the message. Please try this new version with this option set to False, and see if the behavior of this bug changes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-21 01:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I just checked in a new option that can be set - filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation for more details. If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not attempt to save the spam score or other information as it filters. You may like to try this option when you can, to see if it has any effect on this bug. You can try it immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release is made. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-07 10:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No, installing 003 over the top of 002 should work fine. I don't have any more answers, sorry, but no doubt Mark will look into this when he gets a chance. Stay tuned! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eric Brown (ericbr) Date: 2003-07-05 09:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=783913 Anadelon: Outlook junk mail rules are turned off; spam is Moved to Junk Mail. I just ran the release 003 of the plugin, and I'm still seeing the problem. (I didn't bother uninstalling release 002 - is that a problem?) Eric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brent Rockwood (dnaguy) Date: 2003-07-05 03:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=18879 It appears the problem lies between the keyboard and chair. :) I seem to have overlooked the option to move messages instead of copying. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-04 15:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 In addition, the log file seems to indicate that you are using release 002 of the plugin. If you haven't already, could you try release 003 and let us know if the problem still occurs? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-04 15:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Eric, do you have the Outlook junk mail rules turned on? If you do, would both of you be able to try turning them off (they aren't all that much use if you are using spambayes anyway), and seeing if this resolves the problem? In addition, forgive me if you've checked this, but in the spambayes filter setup, do you have "move" selected rather than "copy"? (It's an odd problem that IIRC we have heard before, but I'm using the same version of Windows and Outlook, and have rules of that form, and don't notice this problem). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brent Rockwood (dnaguy) Date: 2003-07-04 03:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=18879 I am also having this problem. I have not tested it with various rule types, but I believe it is occurring in conjunction with the Outlook "Junk E-mail" feature. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747107&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:22:23 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:22:26 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1106457 ] bsddb185 has to be covered in dbmstorage.py Message-ID: Bugs item #1106457, was opened at 2005-01-20 19:22 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106457&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: bsddb185 has to be covered in dbmstorage.py Initial Comment: In python2.3 at least under FreeBSD whichdb can return "bsddb185". This dbm type has to be covered in open_funcs, lest the infamous "NoneType' object has no attribute 'spamprob'" occurs: def open_db185hash(*args): """Open a bsddb185 hash.""" import bsddb185 return bsddb185.hashopen(*args) and in open_funcs: "bsddb185": open_db185hash, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106457&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:22:03 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:22:30 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793830 ] Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting Message-ID: Bugs item #793830, was opened at 2003-08-24 05:41 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting Initial Comment: Hi, I use Outlook Plugin Version 007. It is used in an Environment of a central Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server to which I connect with an Outlook 2000 client. I observe that when starting the client, all messages in the Inbox that arrived during the time period where the Client was unavailable are filtered by SpamBayes, ***except*** the last one that arrived. It is unfiltered and shown with 0% rate. When manually rating (Show spam clues...), the rate indicates that it is clearly Spam. Also performing a complete rating/filtering (Filter now) rates the message correctly and moves it accordingly. If Outlook is permamently running, I do not observe such effect. It seems to be related to the code initially examining the Inbox when starting Outlook. Juergen Kremp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Date: 2004-07-20 01:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=850764 I got new hardware with changed operating system (Microsoft Windows XP Professional) and installed 1.0rc1. In this configuration, the problem does not occur. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-02-10 03:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I believe this is the same as bug #876281. As far as I can tell, having only started looking at Python and the SpamBayes Windows code yesterday, here is why this happens: 1. When SB starts, it (eventually) invokes BayesManager.EnsureOutlookFieldsForFolder() for each folder. This method finds the first MalItem in the specified folder and looks for the "Spam" UserProperty attached to that MailItem. If the MailItem does not have the "Spam" UserProperty, SB adds the UserProperty to the MailItem, causing the MailItem to have a Spam score of 0. 2. In trying to process missed messages, SB invokes MAPIMsgStoreFolder.GetNewUnscoredMessageGenerator(), which excludes any MailItem that already has the "Spam" UserProperty from processing. Voila. The item most recently received in a folder while SB was not running is automatically assigned a score of 0 and not filtered. Apparently, there isn't a clean way to detect if a folder has a particular user defined field. So, the only way to check for the presence of the user defined field in the folder is to check the items in the folder. SB (correctly) assumes that adding the UserProperty to the first MailItem will force the creation of the user defined field in the folder. However, this is not a benign act. Possible solutions: * Don't force the creation of the user defined field until SB has an actual score to store. However, I fear there may be a great number of places in the code that assume the Spam field already exists. For example, GetNewUnscoredMessageGenerator() certainly makes this assumption. The error resulting from the lack of the Spam field could be trapped, but I don't know the code well enough to find all the places where the absence of the field might be a problem. Nonetheless, this seems to be the correct solution to me. * EnsureOutlookFieldsForFolder() could check more than just the first MailItem in the folder. However, this doesn't avoid the problem if every message in the folder is a missed message. * If SB is going to force the creation of the Spam field, go ahead and filter the message. Aside from not being terribly clean, its not clear to me that enough of the code has been initialized by this point to filter a message. * If SB is going to force the creation of the Spam field, initialize it to a value that is easily detected as unscored, for example -1. However, I'm not confident that the code doesn't depend on 0 <= Spam <= 100. In addition, I don't know how many places in the code would have to be changed to recognize this value. * Change the minimum score to 0.0001, or the like, and detect a score of 0 as an unscored message. Kludgey and one would still have to find all of the places where something with a ham-like score (or any score) is excluded from further filtering (e.g., addin.ProcessMessage()). * Since OutlookAddin.ProcessMissedMessages() only _seems_ effectively to be invoked at startup, it could be modified to always process the first MailItem if the item is unread and has a score of exactly zero. Again, kludgey, but at least the kludge is confined to a single place. On the other hand, it looks to me like SB has already hooked into the folders it is watching at this point. if SB is filtering in the background, I suspect that any mail received before the "processing start delay" expires would bump the improperly flagged message out of the first position. Hmmm. * One could treat anything with a score of 0 as an unscored message, but it isn't really desirable to rescore all of those messages, since the majority of them have presumably already been filtered correctly. Any feedback from someone who actually knows the code? ---Jim ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-30 18:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-30 17:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-30 17:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-30 17:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-10 00:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 I have confirmed this running Windows XP Home and Outlook 2002 sonnecting to a POP / SMTP server. Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Marrett (jmarrett) Date: 2003-10-24 01:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=642463 I am experiencing the same problem with SpamBayes version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) connected to Microsoft Exchange server 5.5. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Date: 2003-10-11 01:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=850764 I installed Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003). It shows the same effect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:24:46 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:24:51 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-806915 ] Hotmail "Recover From Spam" puts email into pst fi Message-ID: Bugs item #806915, was opened at 2003-09-16 14:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806915&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jose Gutirrez (image57) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hotmail "Recover From Spam" puts email into pst fi Initial Comment: i have outlook xp at home with just hotmail as an account. outlook makes you have a pst file regardless if you use it or not. I have the possible spam going to a folder in the hotmail tree. when i hit recover from spam, it transports to the Personal Folder's Inbox, not back to the Hotmail Inbox. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is obviously a problem where the original folder cannot be saved with the message. 1.1 will fix this as that information is also stored in the message info db, so closing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jose Gutirrez (image57) Date: 2003-10-30 08:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=686578 Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 69 spam and 26 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ********************************************** **** The timer is enabled, but one of the timer intervals values is zero You must set both intervals before the timer will enable SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder SpamBayes Junk Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 0.376305ms FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating Moving and spam training message 'Reservation ID 3830285' - Training on message 'Reservation ID 3830285' - trained as spam Current version is 0.81, latest is 0.81. Message 'Extended auto warranties-best coverage and great values' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Re: Losing weight impossible? pge' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Receipt for your Auction Money Request' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'You have received a credit card payment' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Check out hot pics of singles from your area' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 're: Hunter' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message '=(' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Maybe it's Your Resume' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'RED's 4th Annual Halloween Bash - 10.31.2003' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Handspring.com order confirmation (#031022-900739)' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Handspring.com order confirmation (#031022-900745)' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Handspring.com order confirmation (#031022-900748)' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message '[Ticket#: 2003102210000059] Re: treo600 support' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Broadband low as $3.05/month* more than AOL dial-up!' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure' Moving and spam training message 'Broadband low as $3. 05/month* more than AOL dial-up!' - Training on message 'Broadband low as $3.05/month* more than AOL dial-up!' - trained as spam Message 'Tonight!!! - Miguel Migs / LTJ Bukem / Proton Radio' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message '[Ticket#: 2003102210000059] Re: treo600 support' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Your Daily Feedback Report' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Fw: Fall Allergies and Exercise Induced Asthma' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'We help change your tomorrow' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Dice JobAlert for Agent Primary' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'comments...' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure' Unable to determine source folder for message 'comments...' - restoring to Inbox Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training message 'comments...' - Training on message 'comments...' - trained as good ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 12:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This is a dupe of https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=786212&group_id=61702&atid=498103, although that bug doesn't specifically mention Hotmail. If possible, could you attempt this operation again, then attach a log of that session to that bug - see the "troubleshooting guide" for details on how to locate the log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806915&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:27:04 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:27:12 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-842182 ] email not deleted from server Message-ID: Bugs item #842182, was opened at 2003-11-15 04:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842182&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Larry Aaronson (gi234201) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: email not deleted from server Initial Comment: Running 0.81 outlook plugin with OutlookXP. Things worked well for a day. The plugin now downloads and processes mail, but does not remove email from the pop server. I'm running my own mail server on Windows Server 2003. Outlook is on the same machine as the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 773364 ] "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: h p oehrli (hpoehrli) Date: 2004-06-16 03:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1063984 Outlook 2000 on a W2K fully updated Laptop Pentium 2 When closing Outlook which is configured for delete the files of the DELETED folder on the providers memory, no such delete at the providers happen anymore (some months now). The mass of spam-mails and the other DELETED-folders files have to be deleted manually at the provider. No multiple download of read messages occure here! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: h p oehrli (hpoehrli) Date: 2004-06-16 03:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1063984 Outlook 2000 on a W2K fully updated Laptop Pentium 2 When closing Outlook which is configured for delete the files of the DELETED folder on the providers memory, no such delete at the providers happen anymore (some months now). The mass of spam-mails and the other DELETED-folders files have to be deleted manually at the provider. No multiple download of read messages occure here! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Frantz (kruzty) Date: 2004-01-17 06:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=428020 I have this problem as well. I've found that in the following cases the email will not be removed from the server upon deletion: - categorized as spam - not categorized, trained as spam - suspected spam, trained as spam It will remove it when: - not categorized - suspected spam, not trained - suspected spam, trained as ham The only case I haven't tested is if it is categorized as spam and trained has ham. Basically, it looks like the message is altered when it is considered spam whether or not the "save spam score" is checked. I took a peak at the code, but didn't see anything obvious. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 14:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'd still really like a log from a session where this happens ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Trevor Banks (twbanks) Date: 2003-12-03 13:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=922526 I'm running the compiled Outlook add-in, and am having the same issue. However, it doesn't always do this. Occasionally it leaves messages so they get downloaded again, other times it deletes them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-11-28 01:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please attach a log for a session where this happens. I'm hoping there is something in there related. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Larry Aaronson (gi234201) Date: 2003-11-27 08:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=909259 Quick follow-up. I'm running the source code version now. The problem of emails not being deleted also exists when I check a remote POP server. The mail stays on the server and is downloaded again and again to Outlook when I do a send/receive. IMAP seems to be okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=842182&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:28:02 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:28:57 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-773364 ] "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail Message-ID: Bugs item #773364, was opened at 2003-07-18 12:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail Initial Comment: In Outlook's account properties, you can choose to leave a copy of retrieved mail on the server, and to remove that copy when the mail is deleted from the "Deleted Items" folder. However, this does not seem to be working with mail that has been checked by SpamBayes. When I delete a mail from the "Certain Spam" folder, it is moved to "Deleted Items" as expected, but when the "Deleted Items" folder is emptied, the copy remains on the server. I've tried the same thing with mail that has not been checked by SpamBayes, and it gets deleted from the server as expected. It seems that Outlook cannot tell that the filtered mail is the same as the one on the server. Perhaps this is because of the addition of the spam score to the local copy? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 842182 ] email not deleted from server http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=842182&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 859333 ] Outlook will not remove read messages from server ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Severin Sampson (sevsamp) Date: 2003-12-13 17:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=930199 I just submitted another bug message with this same thing, sorry didn't see this one before submitting. I have email set to delete after 5 days, outlook never removes ANY mail from the server, ever. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog) Date: 2003-07-31 11:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=231995 OK, the save_spam_info option now appears to be doing what it is meant to do, but it hasn't solved the "delete from server" problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog) Date: 2003-07-30 10:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=231995 Ah, OK. I didn't know about that website. I've now got v0.6 installed. I'll report back when I've seen some spam (shouldn't be too long). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-30 10:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are you running the plugin from source? (and in particular, the 1.0a4 release?) If you are: this doesn't include the most recent changes to the Outlook plugin. The only way to get them is to get hold of the cvs source or the binary installer from Mark's website. (Although there have been a great number of improvements to the Outlook plugin since 1.0a4, there hasn't been much changed elsewhere, so it's not really worth releasing a 1.0a5 since most Outlook people use the binary or CVS). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog) Date: 2003-07-30 09:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=231995 OK, I've tried it, but it has not solved the problem. I've added the save_spam_info:False to the ini file, but I'm not sure that it's doing what it's meant to. The spam score column is still working as it did before; I would have thought that this would stop working with that option set. Anyway, it still isn't deleting from the server. On the other hand, I'm not certain I have the right version running. I tried uninstalling the plugin, and rebuilding it from the pre-release 4 files, but the SpamBayes Manager dialog still says version 0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-29 17:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 The latest binary version has the ability to disable saving the spam score with each message. Can you try this version and see if the behaviour changes? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-21 22:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I have released version 4 of the binary. There is a new option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration' guide. If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no longer attempt to save anything back into the message. Please try this new version with this option set to False, and see if the behavior of this bug changes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-21 01:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I just checked in a new option that can be set - filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation for more details. If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not attempt to save the spam score or other information as it filters. You may like to try this option when you can, to see if it has any effect on this bug. You can try it immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release is made. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:30:17 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:30:21 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797064 ] Problems moving messages between pst and Exchange Message-ID: Bugs item #797064, was opened at 2003-08-29 13:08 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797064&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Problems moving messages between pst and Exchange Initial Comment: If a message's clues are viewed when on the Exchange server, and compared to the same message moved to a pst file, the clues are not the same. It appears (I haven't examined closely yet; can do on request) that on Exchange the html part of the message is used, and in the pst, it isnt'. Probably related to this is the problem that moving a message back and forwards between Exchange and a pst file (showing clues each time) results in an ever- increasing number of tokens. It doesn't appear to be the PR_SEARCH_KEY changing: >>> key1 = "PR_SEARCH_KEY : '\n\x02\xde\xfd7\xf6 \xa7A\x93\xfd\xf3\xb1\xfeA\x16\xf9'" >>> key2 = "PR_SEARCH_KEY : '\n\x02\xde\xfd7\xf6 \xa7A\x93\xfd\xf3\xb1\xfeA\x16\xf9'" >>> key1 == key2 True Next thing to try? :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-06 15:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are we going to be able to get identical token streams? Attached are two 'show clues' messages, for the same message, on a pst and on Exchange. 26 clues for one, and 28 for the other. This is a plain text message. The extra two clues arise because Exchange html'ises the plain text message and so the words in the subject also appear in the body. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-31 17:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 The underlying bug seems to be https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=798029&group_id=61702&atid=498103 - however, as it looks like we will be almost "hand-crafting" the HTML of the message, I will leave this open, as we may still end up with bugs if the html we generate isn't identical (token-wise) to the MS one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-30 21:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The dump_props are attached. If I just move the messages about, doing 'show clues', then no training takes place. I think my original comment was wrong - trying now, I get the same number of tokens no matter how many times I move (although the exchange count and pst count are different). Anyway, the log (at verbose=1) doesn't show anything apart from the "already trained as ham" message. If I train a message I get not that much more. pst first: """ Training on message 'Re: comparing 2 images' - trained as spam Saving bayes database with 4637 spam and 410 good messages -> C:\Documents and Settings\tameyer.MASSEY\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db -> C:\Documents and Settings\tameyer.MASSEY\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db Saved databases in 896.138ms """ and moving it back to Exchange: """ Training on message 'Re: comparing 2 images' - trained as good Saving bayes database with 4636 spam and 411 good messages -> C:\Documents and Settings\tameyer.MASSEY\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db -> C:\Documents and Settings\tameyer.MASSEY\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db Saved databases in 850.026ms """ Does this help? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797064&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:30:52 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:30:54 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-801416 ] outlook crash when customizing field view. Message-ID: Bugs item #801416, was opened at 2003-09-06 10:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801416&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Josh Reznick (invizabul) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: outlook crash when customizing field view. Initial Comment: I'm using Win2k SP3 to run OfficeXP, and connecting to an Exchange Server. After installing the plugin, outlook crashes any time I try to add/edit fields in the Customize Current View option... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 16:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Does this happen for all folders, or just folders managed by SpamBayes? What version of the addin are you using? works for me here on Outlook 2000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=801416&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:32:19 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:32:22 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-913583 ] problems when syncing pocketpc Message-ID: Bugs item #913583, was opened at 2004-03-11 05:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=913583&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom Kludy (tomkludy) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: problems when syncing pocketpc Initial Comment: When a new email arrives, it is immediately synced (through activesync) to my pocketpc. If it is spam, spambayes then moves it to the "spam" folder. However activesync doesn't recognize that the email has moved, and doesn't remove it from my pocketpc. The result is that I get no spam on my PC but every spam shows up in the inbox on my pocketpc, and forcing a resync in activesync does not fix the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The new functionality in 1.1 should fix this: you can have spambayes move all ham into a particular folder and sync that. (Even the Inbox if you set things up right). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 16:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem here (I think) is that ActiveSync gets hold of the mail before SpamBayes does. Can you set ActiveSync to only sync certain folders? In that case this would be fixed if you could specify moving good mail to another folder (this is an existing feature request, and probably one that will make it into 1.1). If you move messages manually and do a resync, do they move on the pocketpc? If so, then maybe there's something additional we can do when moving messages to fix this. I don't know what, though, so this wouldn't be a quick fix... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tom Kludy (tomkludy) Date: 2004-11-04 04:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=306121 No, it doesn't seem to make a difference ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Is this solved by the background filtering function with newer releases? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=913583&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:33:03 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:33:09 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-857990 ] Net Folders Message-ID: Bugs item #857990, was opened at 2003-12-11 15:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857990&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Morrison Lafreniere (jmlafreniere) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Net Folders Initial Comment: When the client uses Outlook 2000 with the Net Folders feature enabled (shares calendars and contacts amongst users), every time there is a synchronization (an email with the form #Net Folders - ... appears), Outlook returns an error message concerning the form that couldn't be opened correctly. The message appears for every message of this kind. Does not affect the shares nor the SpamBayes filter, but annoying for the user, as it could be repeated many times during the day. Thanks for your help. ... Lorsque le client utilise Outlook 2000 avec la fonction Dossiers Partag?s activ?e (partage de calendriers et contacts entre les utilisateurs), ? chaque fois qu'une synchronisation est effectu?e (un message avec la forme #Dossier Partag?s - ... appara?t), Outlook donne un message d'erreur concernant un formulaire qu'il n'a pu ouvrir correctement. Le message appara?t ? chaque fois qu'un message de synchro est re?u. Ceci n'affecte ni les partages ni le filtrage de SpamBayes, mais est plut?t fatigant pour l'utilisateur, car ce message peut r?appara?tre plusieurs fois dans une journ?e. Merci de votre aide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2003-12-30 12:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 This is tough since I do not speak french, but I searched the French MS site and came up with some possibilities. See if this might be of some help. It relates specifically to forms, and comes from the Microsoft France site. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;fr;290657 This The english version is here: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb; [LN];290657 It would appear that it may have something to do with the Macro Security level. Try setting Macro Security to LOW in order to eliminate the message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Morrison Lafreniere (jmlafreniere) Date: 2003-12-12 17:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=928614 The error message (in french) is the following: "Impossible d'ouvrir le formulaire personnalis?. Outlook utilisera un formulaire Outlook ? la place." Which means approximately this: "Cannot open custom form. Outlook will use an Outlook form instead." It's an Outlook error message, but it happens only when using Net Folders and SpamBayes. If I uninstall one of them, I don't get the message... but I need both installed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-12 12:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 What exactly is this message? If the message is displayed by SpamBayes, then please attach a log for the session (see the "Troubleshooting Guide" for details) - this log will have the information we need to diagnose. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=857990&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:38:54 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:38:59 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-810344 ] On Mac OS X, should use 'dbm' instead of gdbm or bsddb Message-ID: Bugs item #810344, was opened at 2003-09-22 12:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810344&group_id=61702 >Category: None >Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Timothy O'Malley (thisistimo) >Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: On Mac OS X, should use 'dbm' instead of gdbm or bsddb Initial Comment: The Mac OS X download for Python 2.3 does not have the gdbm, bsddb, or bsddb3 modules. It does, however, have a 'dbm' module. The dbmstorage.py file should be updated to fallback to the dbm module if there are no gdbm, bsddb, or bsddb3 modules as a way to support Mac OS X. There is patch attached to fix this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Skip: assigning to you since you're the only developer that I know has a mac :) Is this correct? Would this hurt? If not, I don't see why we couldn't add this (although people can always install bsddb or use a pickle). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=810344&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:39:34 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:39:44 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-916271 ] Outlook 2003 = Permanent SpamBayes Toolbar Message-ID: Bugs item #916271, was opened at 2004-03-15 15:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=916271&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Cox (dcox) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 = Permanent SpamBayes Toolbar Initial Comment: I have customized my outlook 2003 toolbar by moving the spam/ham buttons from the SpamBayes toolbar to the main toolbar. I have then closed the SpamBayes toolbar. Whenever Outlook is restarted, the SpamBayes toolbar is back on again. Can I get the wooden stake option to keep it off? :) (BTW - Great job everyone - keep up the good work) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you check the logs, do you get the "recreating toolbar" message each time you startup? I suspect that this is a symptom of that problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=916271&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:44:00 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:44:05 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-797679 ] Recovered Mails filtered again Message-ID: Bugs item #797679, was opened at 2003-08-30 17:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797679&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recovered Mails filtered again Initial Comment: Hi, I don't know if this a bug or a design problem, so I posting it here. When I recover a mail from Spam Folder in my opinion it should be marked as good on the database. I have reapperaing mails, which we're marked as spam. But no matter how often I recover them from spam, the next mail from these events will be filtered again. Is this the normail behaviour or a known problem? Thanks Jan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Yikes - this is very out of date. This looks like a training imbalance problem (though it's so old it doesn't have the counts). If there is still a problem, please set the status back to 'open'. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Date: 2003-09-08 18:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855408 Hi, here is the "clues" log from today morning. Sorry for the XXX, but for security reasons I have to blank some things. But I've tried to change so little as possible. Jan Spam Score: 0.512408 word spamprob #ham #spam '*H*' 0.276798 - - '*S*' 0.301613 - - 'skip:a 10' 0.180202 726 27 'ppp0' 0.198911 4 0 'header:Message-Id:1' 0.22653 324 16 'inet' 0.243728 21 1 'subject:New_Home_IP' 0.271305 18 1 '1,3d0' 0.284601 2 0 'x-mailer:none' 0.321254 932 75 'skip:e 20' 0.369228 21 2 'reply-to:none' 0.380298 1063 111 'to:2**0' 0.625257 545 155 'header:Date:1' 0.63781 583 175 'to:no real name:2**0' 0.643686 448 138 'header:From:1' 0.648059 583 183 'protocol' 0.749747 5 3 'to:addr:jan.albrecht' 0.86241 116 125 'header:Received:3' 0.869959 77 89 'to:addr:XXX.de' 0.891541 116 164 Message Stream: Received: from mx2.XXX.de ([XX.XX.XX.XX]) by mx2.XXX.de with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version XXX) id SPB4HM05; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 04:59:55 +0200 Received: from XXX.XXX.XX.XXX by mx2.XXX.de (InterScan E- Mail VirusWall NT); Mon, 08 Sep 2003 04:59:55 +0200 Received: (from root@localhost) by tower.center.bluecove (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id h88303h17065 for jan.albrecht@XXX.de; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 05:00:04 +0200 Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 05:00:04 +0200 From: root <root@tower.center.bluecove> Message-Id: <200309080300.h88303h17065@tower.center.bluecove> To: jan.albrecht@XXX.de Subject: New_Home_IP 1,3d0 < ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol < inet addr:XXX.XXX.XX.XXX P-t-P:XXX.X.XX.XX Mask:255.255.255.255 < Message Tokens: 29 unique tokens '1,3d0' 'cc:none' 'content-type:text/plain' 'from:addr:root' 'from:addr:tower.center.bluecove' 'from:name:root' 'header:Date:1' 'header:From:1' 'header:Message-Id:1' 'header:Received:3' 'header:Subject:1' 'header:To:1' 'inet' 'link' 'message-id:@tower.center.bluecove' 'ppp0' 'protocol' 'reply-to:none' 'sender:none' 'skip:a 10' 'skip:e 20' 'skip:m 20' 'skip:p 10' 'subject:New_Home_IP' 'to:2**0' 'to:addr:XXX.de' 'to:addr:jan.albrecht' 'to:no real name:2**0' 'x-mailer:none' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 16:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please attach the "clues" for one of these messages? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jan Albrecht (jaal2001) Date: 2003-09-05 17:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=855408 Hi, no, it's not exactly the same mail. The Mail contains the follwoing entries: 2c2 < inet addr:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX P-t- P:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX Mask:YYY.YYY.YYY.YYYY --- > inet addr:MMM.MMM.MMM.MMM P-t- P:MMM.MMM.MMM.MMM Mask:NNN.NNN.NNN.NNN The X and M differs from mail to mail, as the're dynamic IP's. The other parts of the mail are the same. When I do a "recover from spam" with this mail, the score does not shift ti zero. The score goes back from 60% to 59%. The log is attached. Let me know, if you need more information. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-01 20:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Are you trying to repeatedly train the exact same mail, or a new, similar one? You can't train the same message multiple times. Each time you train, you should notice the "spam score" shift back towards zero. It may not shift enough to have it considered good, but it should shift. It is does, then it will eventually learn. If it doesn't, then we have a bug - but I will need the log file from a session where you have tried to perform this training. If you do submit the log file, please reset the bug status to "open" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=797679&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:45:13 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:45:19 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-802530 ] Unable to review messages this morning Message-ID: Bugs item #802530, was opened at 2003-09-09 03:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802530&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a5 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Denis Pelletier (dpellet) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to review messages this morning Initial Comment: I used spambayes (Alpha release 4) for a couple of weeks and everything was working perfectly. This morning I tried to use the Review messages page and I'm getting the following error message: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "./spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 453, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "./spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 402, in onReview messageInfo = self._makeMessageInfo(message) File "./spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 502, in _makeMessageInfo messageInfo.bodySummary = self._trimHeader(text, 200) File "./spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 195, in _trimHeader sections = email.Header.decode_header(field) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Header.py", line 67, in decode_header if not ecre.search(header): RuntimeError: maximum recursion limit exceeded The last time I reviewed the cached messages was 24 hours ago and I received about twenty messages since then. Upgrading to Alpha release 5 does not solve the problem. I'm using Spambayes under Mandrake Linux 9.1. Denis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-30 16:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you were able to track down the particular email that it's choking on, that would be great. If (in your config file), you set [globals]verbose to True, then you'll get the ids printed out as they are loaded, so it will probably stop right before/after the problem one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Denis Pelletier (dpellet) Date: 2003-09-10 01:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=861858 This morning, I was able to review/train on today's email. After doing that, I got again the same error (RuntimeError: maximum recursion limit exceeded) when trying to review what are now yesterday's email. So I guess that spambayes is chocking on an email. Does anyone want to have a look at my database? Denis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=802530&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:46:05 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:46:11 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-897549 ] Multiple Emails left in Inbox Message-ID: Bugs item #897549, was opened at 2004-02-16 07:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=897549&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Len Fowler (sc_sixx) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Multiple Emails left in Inbox Initial Comment: I see that this has been reported before but I didn't see a fix for it.. I seem to have a recurring problem with the SpamBayes Outlook Plugin (ver. 0.81) where it will created multiple copies of the same message. I've uninstalled/reinstalled a couple of times and this has resolved the problem for short periods of time but it always comes back to haunt me. I've also retrained it (with rebuild entire db on and off), changed the filter settings, etc. Nothing seems to fix it permanently. I have no Outlook rules set up and the filters are set to move the messages, not copy. The only other thing I've noticed is that these multiple messages only seem to appear on mail that are from mailing lists or forum thread update notifications. I'm attaching all relevant log and ini files that I think are related to SpamBayes Any help is greatly appreciated SC_Sixx ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-16 13:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It seems unlikely, but 1.0a9 could have fixed this. Are you able to try that and see if it has? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=897549&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:53:33 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:53:37 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1092896 ] Can't Reinstall SpamBayes Message-ID: Support Requests item #1092896, was opened at 2004-12-30 08:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1092896&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: markinkc (markinkc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't Reinstall SpamBayes Initial Comment: Here's a tricky one. I had both Outlook 2002 and Outlook 2003 installed on my system. I had SpamBayes installed on Outlook 2002. It appeared installed on Outlook 2003 too, but didn't work. I uninstalled Outlook 2002 (actually all of Office 2002). SpamBayes appeared to be installed in Outlook 2003, but didn't work, so I tried (in the following order): 1 - Reinstalling SpamBayes. 2 - Uninstalling and Reinstalling SpamBayes 3 - Repairing Outlook2003, then uninstalling & reinstalling SpamBayes 4 - Uninstalling both SpamBayes and Outlook 2003, then reinstalling both. 5 - Deleting the SpamBayes data folder and reinstalling SpamBayes. Nothing seems to work. The SpamBayes installer runs and says it has completed successfully, but the SpamBayes manager does not appear when Outlook launches and it is not in the Outlook toolbar. I'm thinking there's a bad registry entry left over from Outlook 2002, but have no clue what to look for. Any suggestions? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you uninstall SpamBayes and search through the registry are there any keys left with "spambayes" in them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1092896&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 04:55:58 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 04:56:01 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-938072 ] Utility to check if two spam are the same Message-ID: Patches item #938072, was opened at 2004-04-20 05:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=938072&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Remi Ricard (papadoc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Utility to check if two spam are the same Initial Comment: Hi, This is a file created by Skip sent to me by email. I did some minor modification (i.e. removing some fix path). This file can be used after sb_filter in a procmail mail environment. When a spam is discovered a "check sum" is done on it and the checksum is compared to the list of the check sum of previous spam. If a match is found. The email can be discarded since the mail already exist. I don't know if we should wait for Skip to say if he want or not to include this file ? Remi ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This was checked into CVS at some point, so closing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=938072&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 05:07:45 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 05:07:52 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-821011 ] Show db content Message-ID: Feature Requests item #821011, was opened at 2003-10-10 19:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=821011&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Markus Renschler (mare) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Show db content Initial Comment: It would be great to get access a list of all the tokens stored in the db and their spam probability number. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't think that it's really feasible to add displaying the entire database within Outlook - it's just too big to fit anywhere conveniently. However, we could add a "export database to CVS" command to the SpamBayes menu both in Outlook and the pop3proxy tray app. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-14 10:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I realise you're asking for a GUI tool to do this, but in case you don't know about it, there is a script in the source releases (1.0a6, for example) that will do this for you (almost). You want the db_expimp.py script. Simply feed it the location of your database and export to a flat text file. You can then open this file in Excel, or whatever, and see the various tokens. Note that this *doesn't* give you the probability because the database doesn't store the probability - it stores the counts for the number of ham and spam messages that the token has been seen in. You will get this exported. If you want to convert this to a probability, then you can simply plug those numbers in to the formula that calculates the probability (it's in classifier.py in the source release). Excel can do this for you, too :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=821011&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 05:11:45 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 05:11:48 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-804227 ] Confusing error message when "unsure" folder is un Message-ID: Bugs item #804227, was opened at 2003-09-11 19:54 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804227&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 1 Submitted By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) >Summary: Confusing error message when "unsure" folder is un Initial Comment: I am using Outlook with Exchange. I was working in "offline mode". During synchronisation with the server, I regularly get an error from SB : "Moving the message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error. Exception 0x80040119 (MAPI_E_EXTENDED_ERROR) : OLE error 0x80040119 It is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity This message will not be reported again until SB is restarted" I see as well that some of the messages in my inbox have "synchronisation error". I assume that this is caused by SB updating the offline messages during the synchronisation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-16 02:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 what I meant by "suspect" folder is the folder where SB moves unsure emails. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-15 20:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 I believe that this message is displayed because my "suspect" folder was setup to be available only when online. When I work offline, when SB attempts to move a message to the suspect folder, it obviously cannot move it. Obviously, SB cannot move the message. Could you however attempt to have a user-friendlier message : it would help, at a minimum, to display the name of the source and target folders... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2003-09-11 22:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 log attached ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-11 22:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you please attach a log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=804227&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 05:12:36 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 05:12:41 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-854547 ] Incorrect "No filterable mail items are selected" error Message-ID: Bugs item #854547, was opened at 2003-12-05 19:21 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Summary: Incorrect "No filterable mail items are selected" error Initial Comment: This message doesn't filter as part of a training set. I then put this single message into a folder and tried to train on it. I got a text box saying, "No filterable mail items are selected" and the log file had only the entry, "ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' ". I exported the message in Outlook 2000 format and attached it here. The message has two zip file attachments, which comprise the bulk of its size. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 955934 ] e-mail is not filterable https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=955934&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-01 16:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 925428 ] No Filterable mail items are selected ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-19 17:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 None that I know of, unfortunately. This was an oddball, but since it happened with no other (apparent) external cause and was repeatable, I submitted the bug report. AFAIK, this message was received the same as all my others: through POP3 (simple auth) queried every five minutes. Though this is probably not terribly relevant, my setup is: Win2K SP4 Outlook2K SP3 Kaspersky AV 4.5 BlackICE Defender 3.6cbz BOClean 4.11 AdAware Plus 6.181 Cisco 827 Router/DSL Modem 1.5Mbps DSL connection >From what I can tell, Kaspersky AV grabs port 110 traffic directly from the TCP socket and proxies it back to the application level (somehow with the same port number). Since there was no virus associated with this message, I don't think that's relevant either. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 16:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks for the props Tony. I can't see a good way around this though, unless we drop the restriction completely, which I think would be bad. Seth - how many other messages have you seen this happen with? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-09 14:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's clueless, but I forgive you <wink>. MAPI isn't how Outlook gets the messages (I suspect you're thinking of IMAP), but a way to communicate with Outlook. The props attachment is basically the information that Outlook stores about that message. The problem is determining whether a message was received, or created by the user (in which case it's not filterable). The current theory is that it needs to have one of two properties, and your message has neither. Mark may need a new theory ;) The "Tony Meyer" stuff coems about because Outlook must have modified it a bit when I dragged it into the inbox (I suppose I did place it on an exchange server). Not enough to change the non-filterable status, but enough to contaminate it a bit. And yes, I'm at Massey University in NZ - the Auckland campus, though, not the Palmerston North (or Wellington) ones. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-09 14:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 I don't know the source code, so forgive the following comment if it's clueless. This message was downloaded via POP3, as neither of my ISP's supports MAPI. Since Outlook deals with POP3 and MAPI, I have no idea if it internally changes all messages as MAPI with the POP3 ones having limited properties as they don't exist as copies in remote directories. BTW, what's all the Tony Meyer stuff in the headers of the Seal_Props.txt file? Are you at the University of Massey in NZ? Friends of mine lived there a few years ago, liked it a lot. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-09 14:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It fails the "was received test" (i.e. there doesn't appear to be PR_TRANSPORT_MESSAGE_HEADERS_A or PR_RECEIVED_BY_ENTRYID). I've attached a dump_props, but this reaches the limit of my MAPI understanding ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-07 09:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 I downloaded the msg and dragged it from Explorer into an Outlook folder. I can confirm that the Outlook addin doesn't believe it's filterable, but don't know why not. The only new entry in the log file is ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' after I select it and try to do the "show spam clues" bit. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-06 10:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 It was a regular email message sent to me by a regular correspondent. After deleting the two zip files attached, it still won't filter, so I have attached the bare message for you exported in Outlook 2000 .msg format, whatever that is. Though Outlook shows the message as 3K in size, the exported .msg file is 15.5K. Hopefully, you can import it and end up with the same message that I have inside Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-05 21:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is the message a non-delivery report of any kind? Or was it originally created by you? If so, it is "by design". Otherwise, you will probably find it still fails without the .zip attachments - try deleting them, trying again, and if it still fails, attach the smaller message. If all else fails, mailing to me is fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Seth Goodman (sethg) Date: 2003-12-05 19:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=566296 Apparently I can't attach the file, as it is larger than the SF limit. I will email anyone the file who asks for it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=854547&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 05:28:04 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 05:28:10 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-936821 ] sb_mboxtrain.py requires writeaccess to mbox Message-ID: Bugs item #936821, was opened at 2004-04-17 20:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936821&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: PieterB (pieterb) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py requires writeaccess to mbox Initial Comment: This is tested with spambayes1.0b1.1, which isn't listed in the Group pulldownbox on sourceforge (yet). At our system we use a spamtrap which catches a lot of spam. I want to use that spammailbox for improving spambayes. When I try to learn from this read-only mbox I get the following traceback: Training spam (/var/mail/spamtrap): Reading as Unix mbox Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 350, in ? main() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 341, in main train(h, s, True, force, trainnew, removetrained) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 265, in train mbox_train(h, path, is_spam, force) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 172, in mbox_train f = file(path, "r+b") IOError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/mail/spamtrap' It can be fixed by first trying to open the file readonly, and when that fails open the file for 'r+b'. In the method mbox_train from sb_mboxtrain.py, use the following code. # Open and lock the mailbox. Some systems require it be opened for # writes in order to assert an exclusive lock. try: # opening the file read only f = file(path, "rb") fcntl.flock(f, fcntl.LOCK_EX) except: # opening file fails f = file(path, "r+b") fcntl.flock(f, fcntl.LOCK_EX) This makes spambayes start learning from the mbox. Unfortuately, spambayes really wants to write to the mailbox and it fails: Training spam (/var/mail/spamtrap): Reading as Unix mbox 3960Problem truncating mbox--nothing written Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 355, in ? main() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 346, in main train(h, s, True, force, trainnew, removetrained) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 270, in train mbox_train(h, path, is_spam, force) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 202, in mbox_train os.ftruncate(f.fileno(), 0) IOError: [Errno 22] Invalid argument This can be fixed by setting Headers:include_trained to false, e.g. /usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py -o Headers:include_trained:False - p /home/foobar/var/spambayes.db -s /var/mail/spamtrap I would expect sb_mboxtrain.py not to open files for writing if it's not necessary/requested. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 17:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This seems fine, as long as the systems that do require opening for write raise some sort of exception that we can catch (a bare except is not a good idea). If anyone has such a system, or knows what the exception would be, please add a comment! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=936821&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 05:31:05 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 05:31:11 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-698796 ] mboxtrain.py crashes on some mbox data Message-ID: Bugs item #698796, was opened at 2003-03-07 05:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=698796&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jean-Marc Valin (jmvalin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: mboxtrain.py crashes on some mbox data Initial Comment: I'm trying to train a spam database and I'm experiencing crashes with mboxtrain.py. I'm attaching three mbox's (simplified to their offending e-mail) that produce the crash. This happens with both CVS and the last nightly build (tried both python 2.2 and 2.3a2). The message printed is: Traceback (most recent call last): File "mboxtrain.py", line 284, in ? main() File "mboxtrain.py", line 271, in main train(h, g, False, force) File "mboxtrain.py", line 209, in train mbox_train(h, path, is_spam, force) File "mboxtrain.py", line 140, in mbox_train for msg in mbox: File "/opt//lib/python2.3/mailbox.py", line 35, in next return self.factory(_Subfile(self.fp, start, stop)) File "/software/spambayes/spambayes/mboxutils.py", line 116, in get_message msg = email.message_from_string(obj) File "/opt//lib/python2.3/email/__init__.py", line 52, in message_from_string return Parser(_class, strict=strict).parsestr(s) File "/opt//lib/python2.3/email/Parser.py", line 75, in parsestr return self.parse(StringIO(text), headersonly=headersonly) File "/opt//lib/python2.3/email/Parser.py", line 64, in parse self._parsebody(root, fp, firstbodyline) File "/opt//lib/python2.3/email/Parser.py", line 239, in _parsebody msgobj = self.parsestr(part) File "/opt//lib/python2.3/email/Parser.py", line 75, in parsestr return self.parse(StringIO(text), headersonly=headersonly) File "/opt//lib/python2.3/email/Parser.py", line 64, in parse self._parsebody(root, fp, firstbodyline) File "/opt//lib/python2.3/email/Parser.py", line 146, in _parsebody boundary = container.get_boundary() File "/opt//lib/python2.3/email/Message.py", line 701, in get_boundary boundary = self.get_param('boundary', missing) File "/opt//lib/python2.3/email/Message.py", line 566, in get_param for k, v in self._get_params_preserve(failobj, header): File "/opt//lib/python2.3/email/Message.py", line 516, in _get_params_preserve params = Utils.decode_params(params) File "/opt//lib/python2.3/email/Utils.py", line 337, in decode_params charset, language, value = decode_rfc2231(EMPTYSTRING.join(value)) File "/opt//lib/python2.3/email/Utils.py", line 283, in decode_rfc2231 charset, language, s = s.split("'", 2) ValueError: unpack list of wrong size ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 17:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 963134 ] sb_mboxtrain.py fails to output some messages http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=963134&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=698796&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 05:30:43 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 05:33:55 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-963134 ] sb_mboxtrain.py fails to output some messages Message-ID: Bugs item #963134, was opened at 2004-05-31 01:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963134&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Doug Hellmann (doughellmann) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py fails to output some messages Initial Comment: Apparently some messages which can be processed by sb_mboxtrain.py cannot be converted back to text to be written to the output file. An example traceback is: Training spam (/path/to/mailbox): Reading as Unix mbox 270Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 315, in ? main() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 306, in main train(h, s, True, force, trainnew, removetrained) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 230, in train mbox_train(h, path, is_spam, force) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_mboxtrain.py", line 162, in mbox_train outf.write(msg.as_string(True)) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/email/Message.py", line 130, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 102, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 130, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 156, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 199, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: See attached for an mbox will several sample messages that produce this problem and a (overly) simple patch to sb_mboxtrain.py that at least works around the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 17:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 698796 ] mboxtrain.py crashes on some mbox data http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=698796&group_id=61702&atid=498103 (Different malformation, but same issue). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-31 11:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This particular problem (the one that raises TypeError) is handled by mboxtrain in cvs, so will not be a problem from the next release. Longer term, the Python email package 2.5 (in Python 2.4) is much better at handling malformed messges, so that will solve a lot of these problems (assuming that you can move to that, or that we bundle the necessary bit). What mboxtrain actually does when it fails is another issue, though, which I'm not at all qualified to decide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963134&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 05:35:28 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 05:35:30 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1106457 ] bsddb185 has to be covered in dbmstorage.py Message-ID: Bugs item #1106457, was opened at 2005-01-21 16:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106457&group_id=61702 >Category: None Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: bsddb185 has to be covered in dbmstorage.py Initial Comment: In python2.3 at least under FreeBSD whichdb can return "bsddb185". This dbm type has to be covered in open_funcs, lest the infamous "NoneType' object has no attribute 'spamprob'" occurs: def open_db185hash(*args): """Open a bsddb185 hash.""" import bsddb185 return bsddb185.hashopen(*args) and in open_funcs: "bsddb185": open_db185hash, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 17:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks; fixed in dbmstorage.py r1.13 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106457&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 05:36:13 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 05:36:16 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1019797 ] some spam repeatably crashes sb_filter.py Message-ID: Bugs item #1019797, was opened at 2004-09-01 03:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019797&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Pending Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathan Kurz (nkurz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: some spam repeatably crashes sb_filter.py Initial Comment: I'm running Python 2.3.1 on Linux, processing my mail with procmail. Recently I've been getting spam that crashes sb_filter.py. Failure can be repeated from the command line. Seems to affect only mail that SpamAssassin has tagged as spam. Repeatable for any message that fails. I had this problem starting 2 weeks ago with Source 1.0rc1, upgraded to Source 1.0rc2 and problem persists. Affects ~10% of messages. (note: no option for Source 1.0rc2 in reporting form) Backtrace looks looks like this: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 257, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 253, in main result = mboxutils.as_string(msg, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/mboxutils.py", line 170, in as_string parts.append(part.as_string()) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Message.py", line 130, in as_string g.flatten(self, unixfrom=unixfrom) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 103, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 131, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 157, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 298, in _handle_message g.flatten(msg.get_payload(0), unixfrom=False) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 103, in flatten self._write(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 131, in _write self._dispatch(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 157, in _dispatch meth(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/email/Generator.py", line 200, in _handle_text raise TypeError, 'string payload expected: %s' % type(payload) TypeError: string payload expected: Test message attached. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 17:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-05 11:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ok, now I'm even more confused! You're right - the attached message appears to parse fine. However, with Python 2.2.3/2.3.4/2.4b2 and (unpatched) spambayes 1.0 (which didn't change from 1.0rc2) sb_filter filters this fine for me - I can't duplicate that traceback at all. Do you definately get the traceback with unpatched mobxutils with the spam.test attached here? I am on a different OS, but I can't see how that would effect this... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nathan Kurz (nkurz) Date: 2004-11-04 17:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=965823 I'm fine with keeping it as a local patch if indeed the message is malformed, but I'm not sure if it is. Can you take a look at the spam.test I attached originally and confirm that it is not to spec? To my untrained eye it looks legal. If it's broken due to SpamAssassin, I'll report it as a bug there if the breakage exists in their latest version. Thanks! Nathan Kurz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 16:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (I see that I wasn't correct when I guessed what type of malformation it was - the code handles one that generates a TypeError, but in a different part of the message). The general rule at the moment seems to be that we won't patch for any specific malformations (because we'd just be duplicating the email package folk's work, and eventually people will be able to use email 3.0/Python 2.4), except in cases where there is a flood of a particular type. Since you have a patch that works for you, I'm inclined to leave this unless there are more people bumping into the problem. (Once we start patching for malformed messages, there's really nowhere to stop). If you feel this is a mistake, say so and I (or another developer) can probably be convinced otherwise :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nathan Kurz (nkurz) Date: 2004-11-04 07:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=965823 Sorry for the lack of response. After your last comment, I tried a number of things and intended to report back after testing it for a while. Problem seems to be with multipart messages that have been passed through SpamAssassin and tagged as spam. Somehow, the quoting of the multipart messes up SpamBayes. Yes, I'm using 1.0rc2. No, I can't switch currently to Python 2.4. The attached patch seems to work for me, at least I haven't had any apparent problems since applying it a couple months ago. Probably kludgy, though, and I am not a Python programmer. Thanks for your follow up. Nathan Kurz ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I thought that sb_filter handled these ok with 1.0rc2 - is that definately the version you are using? If you are able/willing to use Python 2.4, you will stop having these problems, BTW. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1019797&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 09:01:13 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 09:01:16 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1106527 ] Installation Error on WinXP SP2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1106527, was opened at 2005-01-21 09:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106527&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thor (rkutsch) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Installation Error on WinXP SP2 Initial Comment: Hi, when i execute the spambayes-1.0.1.exe file the following error is display (see screenshot) best regards, Reiner ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106527&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 09:44:20 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 09:44:27 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-973376 ] Make "Delete as Spam" *really* Delete the email Message-ID: Feature Requests item #973376, was opened at 2004-06-15 17:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jclutterbuck You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=973376&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lance (lancevictor) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Make "Delete as Spam" *really* Delete the email Initial Comment: Proposed change in functionality: If SpamBayes automatically detects spam, it moves it to the Spam folder (where I can go to verify that it really was spam). On the other hand if *I* select a message and click "Delete As Spam" I'd like the message to be moved to my deleted folder (ie: a human has already verified that it really is spam and it can safely be deleted completely, not moved to "spam"). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Clutterbuck (jclutterbuck) Date: 2005-01-21 08:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=132548 I totally agree. I have been using SpamBayes plugin for Outlook for about a month as I get up to 40 SPAM a day. I habitually check and clear my spam folder as I still get the odd false positive message. Messages that I remove from Suspects and (rarely) Inbox using 'Delete as Spam' are moved to my Spam folder where I then have to delete them again. I would like an option so that 'Delete as Spam' trains SB that it is spam and then deletes it. This delete could either move it to Deleted Items or permanently it - is this a secondary option? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-07 07:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It looks like from 1.1 the buttons will be called "Spam" and "Not Spam". However, I presume that you'd still like this functionality - and it would fit more nicely with that change, IMO. I suppose we could add a "move to Deleted Items" option where the "mark as read" options are. My main question is whether there is a need for this given that you are presumably clearing out (somehow) the spam folder anyway, does it matter if there are a few extra emails as well? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-09-21 16:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 I must agree, in fact I actually wanted to post same thread :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=973376&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 12:49:32 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 12:49:37 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1103976 ] Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Message-ID: Bugs item #1103976, was opened at 2005-01-17 10:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by elitemrp You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: robert (elitemrp) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Initial Comment: I first ran into this problem a few months ago at work. But at the time I thought it was related to a custom program we run here. But now I noticed I can easily reproduce the problem on any computer running SpamBayes+Outlook 2003 on Windows XP. Basically, I will open Outlook via the icon to read mail. I will then close Outlook, and if I have Task Manager open, I will see that Outlook.exe closes correctly. Now if I launch a mailto: link (or use a program that launches a new mail), where the Compose Mail window opens, but not the actual outlook program, the problem occurs. If I close the compose mail window, by either clicking Send, or closing it without sending, the OUTLOOK.EXE task will not exit. If I launch Outlook again, I'll now have multiple instances of OUTLOOK.EXE in task manager. Now the multiple instances is what caused the problem with our custom software at work, but that has nothing to do with the fact that Outlook does not exit correctly when running Spambayes and having a program/mailto link open the Compose Mail window. Yes I realize there have been 2 previous tickets about OUTLOOK.EXE closing, but none came to the conclusion that it's caused by a Compose Mail window. And both are closed without a solution. I have tested this on several computers and have tried multiple things to try to fix it (such as renaming extend.dat and other files) and nothing seems to work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: robert (elitemrp) Date: 2005-01-21 06:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1198932 Yes, it only happens with SpamBayes installed. I install SpamBayes, set up the toolbar, etc Close Outlook, type mailto:blah@blah.com in a browser or click a mail link and it opens the Compose Mail window. Once I close this window, Outlook.exe ramains in the task list. If I click another mailto link I'll have 2 stuck open, then 3, etc If I have only 1 process loaded and it's the main Outlook window, when I click a mailto link it will work fine since it doesn't load a separate outlook.exe process. It only does this when the main outlook program isn't loaded. Once I uninstall SpamBayes or uncheck it in the COM Add-Ins area in Outlook, this problem goes away. As soon as I close a Compose Mail window, OUTLOOK.EXE terminates correctly. I've tried this on several PCs, some with fresh installs of XP/ Outlook, some with several months old installs and other applications, it's the same on each. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-20 22:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Have you tried this without SpamBayes installed? I get the same behaviour without SpamBayes, which says to me it's an Outlook problem, not a SpamBayes one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 21:03:29 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 21:03:34 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1106457 ] bsddb185 has to be covered in dbmstorage.py Message-ID: Bugs item #1106457, was opened at 2005-01-20 19:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by leobru You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106457&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code - CVS Status: Closed Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: bsddb185 has to be covered in dbmstorage.py Initial Comment: In python2.3 at least under FreeBSD whichdb can return "bsddb185". This dbm type has to be covered in open_funcs, lest the infamous "NoneType' object has no attribute 'spamprob'" occurs: def open_db185hash(*args): """Open a bsddb185 hash.""" import bsddb185 return bsddb185.hashopen(*args) and in open_funcs: "bsddb185": open_db185hash, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2005-01-21 12:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 open_db185hash apparently needs to be present in open_best as well, as bsddb185 can be the only one available; otherwise sb_dbexpimp.py might not work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-20 20:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks; fixed in dbmstorage.py r1.13 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106457&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 21 21:04:10 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 21 21:04:15 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1106457 ] bsddb185 has to be covered in dbmstorage.py Message-ID: Bugs item #1106457, was opened at 2005-01-20 19:22 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by leobru You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106457&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Open Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: bsddb185 has to be covered in dbmstorage.py Initial Comment: In python2.3 at least under FreeBSD whichdb can return "bsddb185". This dbm type has to be covered in open_funcs, lest the infamous "NoneType' object has no attribute 'spamprob'" occurs: def open_db185hash(*args): """Open a bsddb185 hash.""" import bsddb185 return bsddb185.hashopen(*args) and in open_funcs: "bsddb185": open_db185hash, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2005-01-21 12:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 open_db185hash apparently needs to be present in open_best as well, as bsddb185 can be the only one available; otherwise sb_dbexpimp.py might not work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-20 20:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks; fixed in dbmstorage.py r1.13 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106457&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 24 06:53:32 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 24 06:53:41 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1103976 ] Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Message-ID: Bugs item #1103976, was opened at 2005-01-18 04:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: robert (elitemrp) >Assigned to: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Summary: Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Initial Comment: I first ran into this problem a few months ago at work. But at the time I thought it was related to a custom program we run here. But now I noticed I can easily reproduce the problem on any computer running SpamBayes+Outlook 2003 on Windows XP. Basically, I will open Outlook via the icon to read mail. I will then close Outlook, and if I have Task Manager open, I will see that Outlook.exe closes correctly. Now if I launch a mailto: link (or use a program that launches a new mail), where the Compose Mail window opens, but not the actual outlook program, the problem occurs. If I close the compose mail window, by either clicking Send, or closing it without sending, the OUTLOOK.EXE task will not exit. If I launch Outlook again, I'll now have multiple instances of OUTLOOK.EXE in task manager. Now the multiple instances is what caused the problem with our custom software at work, but that has nothing to do with the fact that Outlook does not exit correctly when running Spambayes and having a program/mailto link open the Compose Mail window. Yes I realize there have been 2 previous tickets about OUTLOOK.EXE closing, but none came to the conclusion that it's caused by a Compose Mail window. And both are closed without a solution. I have tested this on several computers and have tried multiple things to try to fix it (such as renaming extend.dat and other files) and nothing seems to work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-24 18:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Maybe this is specific to Outlook 2003 then? Kenny: you've got 2003, right? Can you try and replicate this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: robert (elitemrp) Date: 2005-01-22 00:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1198932 Yes, it only happens with SpamBayes installed. I install SpamBayes, set up the toolbar, etc Close Outlook, type mailto:blah@blah.com in a browser or click a mail link and it opens the Compose Mail window. Once I close this window, Outlook.exe ramains in the task list. If I click another mailto link I'll have 2 stuck open, then 3, etc If I have only 1 process loaded and it's the main Outlook window, when I click a mailto link it will work fine since it doesn't load a separate outlook.exe process. It only does this when the main outlook program isn't loaded. Once I uninstall SpamBayes or uncheck it in the COM Add-Ins area in Outlook, this problem goes away. As soon as I close a Compose Mail window, OUTLOOK.EXE terminates correctly. I've tried this on several PCs, some with fresh installs of XP/ Outlook, some with several months old installs and other applications, it's the same on each. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Have you tried this without SpamBayes installed? I get the same behaviour without SpamBayes, which says to me it's an Outlook problem, not a SpamBayes one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 24 06:57:07 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 24 06:57:09 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1106457 ] bsddb185 has to be covered in dbmstorage.py Message-ID: Bugs item #1106457, was opened at 2005-01-21 16:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106457&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: bsddb185 has to be covered in dbmstorage.py Initial Comment: In python2.3 at least under FreeBSD whichdb can return "bsddb185". This dbm type has to be covered in open_funcs, lest the infamous "NoneType' object has no attribute 'spamprob'" occurs: def open_db185hash(*args): """Open a bsddb185 hash.""" import bsddb185 return bsddb185.hashopen(*args) and in open_funcs: "bsddb185": open_db185hash, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-24 18:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Added; thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2005-01-22 09:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 open_db185hash apparently needs to be present in open_best as well, as bsddb185 can be the only one available; otherwise sb_dbexpimp.py might not work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 17:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks; fixed in dbmstorage.py r1.13 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106457&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 24 07:00:56 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 24 07:01:02 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1106527 ] Installation Error on WinXP SP2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1106527, was opened at 2005-01-21 21:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106527&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thor (rkutsch) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Installation Error on WinXP SP2 Initial Comment: Hi, when i execute the spambayes-1.0.1.exe file the following error is display (see screenshot) best regards, Reiner ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-24 19:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you please either type the text of the error dialog into a comment here (so I can use babelfish to translate it) or provide a translation into English? Have you checked to see that the file downloaded correctly? The most basic way to do that is to see that the file size matches that on the downloads page. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106527&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 24 11:36:41 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 24 11:36:46 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1106527 ] Installation Error on WinXP SP2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1106527, was opened at 2005-01-21 09:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rkutsch You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106527&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thor (rkutsch) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Installation Error on WinXP SP2 Initial Comment: Hi, when i execute the spambayes-1.0.1.exe file the following error is display (see screenshot) best regards, Reiner ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thor (rkutsch) Date: 2005-01-24 11:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1201656 Windws-Titel: 16-Bit MS-DOS sub-system path to the excute File The NTVDM-CPU has detected a unknown command. Hex ... Button Close and Ignore ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-24 07:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you please either type the text of the error dialog into a comment here (so I can use babelfish to translate it) or provide a translation into English? Have you checked to see that the file downloaded correctly? The most basic way to do that is to see that the file size matches that on the downloads page. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106527&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 24 17:23:37 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 24 17:23:42 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1103976 ] Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Message-ID: Bugs item #1103976, was opened at 2005-01-17 10:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: robert (elitemrp) Assigned to: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Summary: Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Initial Comment: I first ran into this problem a few months ago at work. But at the time I thought it was related to a custom program we run here. But now I noticed I can easily reproduce the problem on any computer running SpamBayes+Outlook 2003 on Windows XP. Basically, I will open Outlook via the icon to read mail. I will then close Outlook, and if I have Task Manager open, I will see that Outlook.exe closes correctly. Now if I launch a mailto: link (or use a program that launches a new mail), where the Compose Mail window opens, but not the actual outlook program, the problem occurs. If I close the compose mail window, by either clicking Send, or closing it without sending, the OUTLOOK.EXE task will not exit. If I launch Outlook again, I'll now have multiple instances of OUTLOOK.EXE in task manager. Now the multiple instances is what caused the problem with our custom software at work, but that has nothing to do with the fact that Outlook does not exit correctly when running Spambayes and having a program/mailto link open the Compose Mail window. Yes I realize there have been 2 previous tickets about OUTLOOK.EXE closing, but none came to the conclusion that it's caused by a Compose Mail window. And both are closed without a solution. I have tested this on several computers and have tried multiple things to try to fix it (such as renaming extend.dat and other files) and nothing seems to work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-01-24 11:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Yep, I was able to confirm this problem on Outlook 2003. If I activate a mailto link with SpamBayes loaded and enabled, OUTLOOK.EXE will not exit when I close the compose window. If I disable SpamBayes filtering from SpamBayes Manager, OUTLOOK.EXE still doesn't exit. If I completely disable loading of SpamBayes from the COM Add-ins dialog then OUTLOOK.EXE closes properly when I close the compose window. I'll look into this further when I get a chance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-24 00:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Maybe this is specific to Outlook 2003 then? Kenny: you've got 2003, right? Can you try and replicate this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: robert (elitemrp) Date: 2005-01-21 06:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1198932 Yes, it only happens with SpamBayes installed. I install SpamBayes, set up the toolbar, etc Close Outlook, type mailto:blah@blah.com in a browser or click a mail link and it opens the Compose Mail window. Once I close this window, Outlook.exe ramains in the task list. If I click another mailto link I'll have 2 stuck open, then 3, etc If I have only 1 process loaded and it's the main Outlook window, when I click a mailto link it will work fine since it doesn't load a separate outlook.exe process. It only does this when the main outlook program isn't loaded. Once I uninstall SpamBayes or uncheck it in the COM Add-Ins area in Outlook, this problem goes away. As soon as I close a Compose Mail window, OUTLOOK.EXE terminates correctly. I've tried this on several PCs, some with fresh installs of XP/ Outlook, some with several months old installs and other applications, it's the same on each. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-20 22:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Have you tried this without SpamBayes installed? I get the same behaviour without SpamBayes, which says to me it's an Outlook problem, not a SpamBayes one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 24 17:42:01 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 24 17:42:04 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1108457 ] SpamBayes Security Message-ID: Support Requests item #1108457, was opened at 2005-01-24 16:42 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1108457&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Aldo Borrione (aldox62) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayes Security Initial Comment: I would like to know how SpamBayes behaves when dealing with spams containing hidden pieces of malicious code. Does SpamBayes open the messages the way Outlook opens them ? Is there the risk that the filtering process trigger some unwanted code execution within Outlook ? I believe a statement about this issue is important, this is the first question I am asked when installing the filter. BTW: Works great ! A- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1108457&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 24 19:04:44 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 24 19:04:46 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1108518 ] Oracle Collaboration Suite integration Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1108518, was opened at 2005-01-24 13:04 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1108518&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patrick Schipper (pqschipper) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Oracle Collaboration Suite integration Initial Comment: Has anyone given thought to making SpamBayes work with the Oracle Collaboration Suite (OCS)/MS Outlook connector plugin? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1108518&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 24 23:35:34 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 24 23:35:37 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1108518 ] Oracle Collaboration Suite integration Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1108518, was opened at 2005-01-24 13:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1108518&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patrick Schipper (pqschipper) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Oracle Collaboration Suite integration Initial Comment: Has anyone given thought to making SpamBayes work with the Oracle Collaboration Suite (OCS)/MS Outlook connector plugin? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-01-24 17:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I'm not aware of any of the developers that have access to that configuration. Have you tried setting up SpamBayes in that environment? If it didn't work, did you get any particular error messages? Can you send the SpamBayes logs? SpamBayes uses standard Outlook mechanisms to detect and process new mail. Because of this, it works with all of the standard access methods that Outlook supports (POP3, IMAP, Exchange, Hotmail). If Oracle places new messages into an Outlook folder, SpamBayes should be able to process them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1108518&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 24 23:38:33 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 24 23:38:37 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1108457 ] SpamBayes Security Message-ID: Support Requests item #1108457, was opened at 2005-01-24 11:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1108457&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Aldo Borrione (aldox62) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayes Security Initial Comment: I would like to know how SpamBayes behaves when dealing with spams containing hidden pieces of malicious code. Does SpamBayes open the messages the way Outlook opens them ? Is there the risk that the filtering process trigger some unwanted code execution within Outlook ? I believe a statement about this issue is important, this is the first question I am asked when installing the filter. BTW: Works great ! A- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-01-24 17:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 SpamBayes does not execute any script code or attachments found in a message. It also does not display any of the HTML content, so it cannot trigger Web bugs or other tracking mechanisms that a spammer might put in the message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1108457&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 25 00:22:23 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 25 00:22:29 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1103976 ] Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Message-ID: Bugs item #1103976, was opened at 2005-01-18 04:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: robert (elitemrp) Assigned to: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Summary: Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Initial Comment: I first ran into this problem a few months ago at work. But at the time I thought it was related to a custom program we run here. But now I noticed I can easily reproduce the problem on any computer running SpamBayes+Outlook 2003 on Windows XP. Basically, I will open Outlook via the icon to read mail. I will then close Outlook, and if I have Task Manager open, I will see that Outlook.exe closes correctly. Now if I launch a mailto: link (or use a program that launches a new mail), where the Compose Mail window opens, but not the actual outlook program, the problem occurs. If I close the compose mail window, by either clicking Send, or closing it without sending, the OUTLOOK.EXE task will not exit. If I launch Outlook again, I'll now have multiple instances of OUTLOOK.EXE in task manager. Now the multiple instances is what caused the problem with our custom software at work, but that has nothing to do with the fact that Outlook does not exit correctly when running Spambayes and having a program/mailto link open the Compose Mail window. Yes I realize there have been 2 previous tickets about OUTLOOK.EXE closing, but none came to the conclusion that it's caused by a Compose Mail window. And both are closed without a solution. I have tested this on several computers and have tried multiple things to try to fix it (such as renaming extend.dat and other files) and nothing seems to work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-25 12:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks Kenny :) I don't really know what might be causing this, but I guess you could start by checking to see if the spambayes log gets to the "addin terminating" part. Let me know if I can help at all (though I don't have OL2003 anywhere). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-01-25 05:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Yep, I was able to confirm this problem on Outlook 2003. If I activate a mailto link with SpamBayes loaded and enabled, OUTLOOK.EXE will not exit when I close the compose window. If I disable SpamBayes filtering from SpamBayes Manager, OUTLOOK.EXE still doesn't exit. If I completely disable loading of SpamBayes from the COM Add-ins dialog then OUTLOOK.EXE closes properly when I close the compose window. I'll look into this further when I get a chance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-24 18:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Maybe this is specific to Outlook 2003 then? Kenny: you've got 2003, right? Can you try and replicate this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: robert (elitemrp) Date: 2005-01-22 00:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1198932 Yes, it only happens with SpamBayes installed. I install SpamBayes, set up the toolbar, etc Close Outlook, type mailto:blah@blah.com in a browser or click a mail link and it opens the Compose Mail window. Once I close this window, Outlook.exe ramains in the task list. If I click another mailto link I'll have 2 stuck open, then 3, etc If I have only 1 process loaded and it's the main Outlook window, when I click a mailto link it will work fine since it doesn't load a separate outlook.exe process. It only does this when the main outlook program isn't loaded. Once I uninstall SpamBayes or uncheck it in the COM Add-Ins area in Outlook, this problem goes away. As soon as I close a Compose Mail window, OUTLOOK.EXE terminates correctly. I've tried this on several PCs, some with fresh installs of XP/ Outlook, some with several months old installs and other applications, it's the same on each. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Have you tried this without SpamBayes installed? I get the same behaviour without SpamBayes, which says to me it's an Outlook problem, not a SpamBayes one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 25 00:31:04 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 25 00:31:07 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1106527 ] Installation Error on WinXP SP2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1106527, was opened at 2005-01-21 21:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106527&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thor (rkutsch) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Installation Error on WinXP SP2 Initial Comment: Hi, when i execute the spambayes-1.0.1.exe file the following error is display (see screenshot) best regards, Reiner ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-25 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Did you check that it was downloaded correctly? I don't know why it would be trying to run in a 16-Bit MS-DOS sub-system. The installer is a 32-Bit GUI application. Did you just download it and then double-click it, or did you do something else first? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thor (rkutsch) Date: 2005-01-24 23:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1201656 Windws-Titel: 16-Bit MS-DOS sub-system path to the excute File The NTVDM-CPU has detected a unknown command. Hex ... Button Close and Ignore ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-24 19:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you please either type the text of the error dialog into a comment here (so I can use babelfish to translate it) or provide a translation into English? Have you checked to see that the file downloaded correctly? The most basic way to do that is to see that the file size matches that on the downloads page. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106527&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jan 25 09:36:57 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jan 25 09:37:02 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1106527 ] Installation Error on WinXP SP2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1106527, was opened at 2005-01-21 09:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rkutsch You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106527&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thor (rkutsch) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Installation Error on WinXP SP2 Initial Comment: Hi, when i execute the spambayes-1.0.1.exe file the following error is display (see screenshot) best regards, Reiner ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thor (rkutsch) Date: 2005-01-25 09:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1201656 Hi, I load the file 3 or 4 time down, and tempted to execute the file. And all time comes the error message. I don't make a md5 check. When i have time i will do it. bye, reiner ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-25 00:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Did you check that it was downloaded correctly? I don't know why it would be trying to run in a 16-Bit MS-DOS sub-system. The installer is a 32-Bit GUI application. Did you just download it and then double-click it, or did you do something else first? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thor (rkutsch) Date: 2005-01-24 11:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1201656 Windws-Titel: 16-Bit MS-DOS sub-system path to the excute File The NTVDM-CPU has detected a unknown command. Hex ... Button Close and Ignore ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-24 07:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you please either type the text of the error dialog into a comment here (so I can use babelfish to translate it) or provide a translation into English? Have you checked to see that the file downloaded correctly? The most basic way to do that is to see that the file size matches that on the downloads page. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106527&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 26 00:02:40 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 26 00:02:42 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1109452 ] Make install for all users an option in installer Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1109452, was opened at 2005-01-26 12:02 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1109452&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Make install for all users an option in installer Initial Comment: A suggestion on spambayes@python.org from Johan Geertsma is to make installing for all users an option in the Inno installer. This makes sense to me, since it's a reasonably common request and (being off by default) shouldn't confuse people that don't need it. I'll try and get this done for 1.1 (a1, hopefully). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1109452&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 26 02:28:06 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 26 02:28:09 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1109526 ] Can't Move the items Message-ID: Bugs item #1109526, was opened at 2005-01-25 17:28 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1109526&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: thsobota (thsobota) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't Move the items Initial Comment: Microsoft Outlook cannot move items in the "look for" pane. Suppose I want to find all messages in my outbox that I sent to a particular company and move them to a different folder. In out look I click the "Find" button. This opens the "look for". I type "larc.nasa.gov" in the box because I want to find all messages that I sent to people at NASA Langley Research Center. I click "Find now" and outlook finds all messages with that search string. I now try to drag a message to my NASA Langley folder and Outookk pops up a box that says "Can't move the items" If I uninstall SpamBayes, then I can perform this operation. I am using Microsoft Outlook 2002 sp2 with Exchange Server. I have tried this on three different computers with the same result. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1109526&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 26 02:31:27 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 26 02:31:30 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785089 ] Can't move items from Advanced Find Message-ID: Bugs item #785089, was opened at 2003-08-08 11:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785089&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Curt Finley (cmfinley) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't move items from Advanced Find Initial Comment: I'm not positive that this behavior was caused by spambayes but I just installed it this morning and noticed the following. I did a search for a message using the advanced search tool. It brought up a list of messages matching the search. I tried to drag the message from the search folder to a different folder and got a message "Can't move the items." I can however move the message as long as it isn't in the search window. I'm using Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2, Windows XP Pro SP1, and the latest version of the Outlook spambayes plugin. Sorry, I can't seem to find the spambayes version number anywhere. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-26 14:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 1109526 ] Can't Move the items https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1109526&group_id=61702 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-09-30 16:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 The true cause is probably identified here: http://www.tech- archive.net/Archive/Outlook/microsoft.public.outlook.program_ addins/2004-02/0052.html although that poor source never got a reply. Almost certainly an Outlook 2002 bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-30 16:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 FWIW, the problem doesn't occur with Outlook 2000 SR1 (as the MS article indicates). Thanks for finding that Tim (I should have thought to look!). Given how vague that is ("a conflict") it seems unlikely that we'd be able to do anything about this. Their workaround is the same as mine, too. So I'll close this - anyone searching in future will find it and these comments anyway. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-09-30 16:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Here's a pretty useless MS article about the symptom: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-09-30 16:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 No problem under OL 2003 SP1 + Win XP Pro SP2. Dragging one msg from Advanced Find to a folder works fine, doesn't matter whether SB is or isn't watching the source and/or destination folders; dragging dozens of msgs at the same time also works fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I get this problem too, and if I uninstall SpamBayes it goes away, so it presumably is our fault. I'm not sure where to look for the cause of this, though. It occurs even when moving to & from folders that we are not hooking. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785089&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 26 02:31:31 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 26 02:31:34 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1109526 ] Can't Move the items Message-ID: Bugs item #1109526, was opened at 2005-01-26 14:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1109526&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: thsobota (thsobota) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Can't Move the items Initial Comment: Microsoft Outlook cannot move items in the "look for" pane. Suppose I want to find all messages in my outbox that I sent to a particular company and move them to a different folder. In out look I click the "Find" button. This opens the "look for". I type "larc.nasa.gov" in the box because I want to find all messages that I sent to people at NASA Langley Research Center. I click "Find now" and outlook finds all messages with that search string. I now try to drag a message to my NASA Langley folder and Outookk pops up a box that says "Can't move the items" If I uninstall SpamBayes, then I can perform this operation. I am using Microsoft Outlook 2002 sp2 with Exchange Server. I have tried this on three different computers with the same result. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-26 14:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 785089 ] Can't move items from Advanced Find http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=785089 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1109526&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 26 02:34:03 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 26 02:34:05 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1109526 ] Can't Move the items Message-ID: Bugs item #1109526, was opened at 2005-01-25 17:28 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by thsobota You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1109526&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Open >Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: thsobota (thsobota) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't Move the items Initial Comment: Microsoft Outlook cannot move items in the "look for" pane. Suppose I want to find all messages in my outbox that I sent to a particular company and move them to a different folder. In out look I click the "Find" button. This opens the "look for". I type "larc.nasa.gov" in the box because I want to find all messages that I sent to people at NASA Langley Research Center. I click "Find now" and outlook finds all messages with that search string. I now try to drag a message to my NASA Langley folder and Outookk pops up a box that says "Can't move the items" If I uninstall SpamBayes, then I can perform this operation. I am using Microsoft Outlook 2002 sp2 with Exchange Server. I have tried this on three different computers with the same result. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-25 17:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 785089 ] Can't move items from Advanced Find http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=785089 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1109526&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 26 02:51:58 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 26 02:52:00 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1109526 ] Can't Move the items Message-ID: Bugs item #1109526, was opened at 2005-01-26 14:28 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1109526&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: thsobota (thsobota) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Can't Move the items Initial Comment: Microsoft Outlook cannot move items in the "look for" pane. Suppose I want to find all messages in my outbox that I sent to a particular company and move them to a different folder. In out look I click the "Find" button. This opens the "look for". I type "larc.nasa.gov" in the box because I want to find all messages that I sent to people at NASA Langley Research Center. I click "Find now" and outlook finds all messages with that search string. I now try to drag a message to my NASA Langley folder and Outookk pops up a box that says "Can't move the items" If I uninstall SpamBayes, then I can perform this operation. I am using Microsoft Outlook 2002 sp2 with Exchange Server. I have tried this on three different computers with the same result. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-26 14:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 785089 ] Can't move items from Advanced Find http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=785089 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1109526&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 26 11:49:38 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 26 11:49:42 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1032744 ] Outlook 2003: does not "mark as read" in folder list Message-ID: Bugs item #1032744, was opened at 2004-09-22 15:43 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ducembarr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032744&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ducem Barr (ducembarr) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003: does not "mark as read" in folder list Initial Comment: I recently switched to Outlook 2003 SP1 and re-run the SpamBayes configuration wizard. Everything works fine, but I noticed that Spambayes has stopped marking spam messages as read, although the option is set. To be more specific: messages are marked as not read in the folder list (i.e. folder name is set bold and number of unread mails is shown), but the message appears as read inside of the folder. This applies to messages filtered automatically in the Inbox. On the other hand, "Junk suspects" stay unread on both accounts even when classified manually as spam via "Delete as Spam". I searched the help files, FAQs and bug messages and have found nothing so far. Has anyone got a solution for this weird behavior ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Ducem Barr (ducembarr) Date: 2005-01-26 10:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=880328 I repeat, to me it is no "lag behind" problem. Although "Mark spam as read" is on, spam is only marked read in the right-hand panel, not in the folder list. Following your suggestion, I left some messages for hours in the Junk E-Mail folder, waiting for a lag to manifest. Nothing happened. In the meantime, I have updated to 1.0.1 ; that changed nothing with respect to this problem, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-17 03:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe this is a case of the rather common problem where Outlook updates lag behind where they should be. It occurs with Outlook 2002 (I see it) as well as 2003 - always Exchange, I think. Unfortunately, no-one seems to have a solution at this point in time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ducem Barr (ducembarr) Date: 2004-10-15 08:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=880328 Thanks, anadelonbrin, for the enquiry. No, the Outlook folder list does not lag behind in anything else but SpamBayes. And yes, it is a local pst, pulling emails from a pop3 server. Background filtering is on (2 & 1 secs), only for folders that receive new mail. Spambayes has produced zero error messages. I use 1.0 rc2. Any ideas what causes the bug ? Ducem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 03:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This sounds like something Outlook is doing, rather than SpamBayes. Essentially the problem is that the message is marked as read, but the folder list isn't updated, right? (To mark as read with the "Delete as Spam" button, you have to turn a separate option on, in the Training tab of the SpamBayes Manager). Do you ever see the folder list lagging behind when you manually mark messages as read? Is this a local pst, IMAP server, Exchange, hotmail...? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032744&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 26 17:28:21 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 26 17:28:24 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1110009 ] Installation issues with 1.0.2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1110009, was opened at 2005-01-26 11:28 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1110009&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Sutcliffe (ir0nh34d) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Installation issues with 1.0.2 Initial Comment: After the files have been transfered, during the post-install setup, I got an error message stating it could not find python24.dll when it tried to register the Outlook plugin. I noticed in the bin directory that python23.dll was there. I installed ActivePython to overcome the problem of the missing the DLL, but ran in to another problem again when it tried to register the plugin. According to outlook_addin_register.exe.log: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 2, in ? zipimport.ZipImportError: can't find module 'os' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1110009&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 26 18:45:01 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 26 18:45:04 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1032744 ] Outlook 2003: does not "mark as read" in folder list Message-ID: Bugs item #1032744, was opened at 2004-09-22 11:43 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032744&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ducem Barr (ducembarr) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003: does not "mark as read" in folder list Initial Comment: I recently switched to Outlook 2003 SP1 and re-run the SpamBayes configuration wizard. Everything works fine, but I noticed that Spambayes has stopped marking spam messages as read, although the option is set. To be more specific: messages are marked as not read in the folder list (i.e. folder name is set bold and number of unread mails is shown), but the message appears as read inside of the folder. This applies to messages filtered automatically in the Inbox. On the other hand, "Junk suspects" stay unread on both accounts even when classified manually as spam via "Delete as Spam". I searched the help files, FAQs and bug messages and have found nothing so far. Has anyone got a solution for this weird behavior ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-01-26 12:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The default behavior for the "Junk E-mail" folder in Outlook 2003 is to display the total number of messages, not the number of unread messages. In this mode, Outlook will bold the folder name if there are *any* messages in the folder, and the number to the right of the folder name will be the total message count. This can be a little confusing because if you do a right-click/Properties on the "Junk E-mail" folder, Outlook may tell you that it is showing number of unread messages even though it isn't. If you switch the setting to show total and close the Properties dialog, then open it again and change the setting back to show unread then the setting should get changed. The easiest way to tell the difference is to look at how the number is displayed. If the number is in square brackets (e.g. "[2]") then you are seeing the total number of messages. If the number is in normal parentheses (e.g. "(2)"), then you are seeing the number of unread messages. Regarding marking messages as read when you click "Delete as Spam", this is controlled by a different setting than marking classified spam as unread. Look on the Training tab in SpamBayes Manager. In the Incremental Training section, you should see a setting for "Clicking 'Delete as Spam' button should". Is this set to "mark the message as read" or to "not change the message"? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ducem Barr (ducembarr) Date: 2005-01-26 05:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=880328 I repeat, to me it is no "lag behind" problem. Although "Mark spam as read" is on, spam is only marked read in the right-hand panel, not in the folder list. Following your suggestion, I left some messages for hours in the Junk E-Mail folder, waiting for a lag to manifest. Nothing happened. In the meantime, I have updated to 1.0.1 ; that changed nothing with respect to this problem, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-16 22:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe this is a case of the rather common problem where Outlook updates lag behind where they should be. It occurs with Outlook 2002 (I see it) as well as 2003 - always Exchange, I think. Unfortunately, no-one seems to have a solution at this point in time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ducem Barr (ducembarr) Date: 2004-10-15 04:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=880328 Thanks, anadelonbrin, for the enquiry. No, the Outlook folder list does not lag behind in anything else but SpamBayes. And yes, it is a local pst, pulling emails from a pop3 server. Background filtering is on (2 & 1 secs), only for folders that receive new mail. Spambayes has produced zero error messages. I use 1.0 rc2. Any ideas what causes the bug ? Ducem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-12 23:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This sounds like something Outlook is doing, rather than SpamBayes. Essentially the problem is that the message is marked as read, but the folder list isn't updated, right? (To mark as read with the "Delete as Spam" button, you have to turn a separate option on, in the Training tab of the SpamBayes Manager). Do you ever see the folder list lagging behind when you manually mark messages as read? Is this a local pst, IMAP server, Exchange, hotmail...? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032744&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 26 19:21:21 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 26 19:21:25 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1032744 ] Outlook 2003: does not "mark as read" in folder list Message-ID: Bugs item #1032744, was opened at 2004-09-22 15:43 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ducembarr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032744&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ducem Barr (ducembarr) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003: does not "mark as read" in folder list Initial Comment: I recently switched to Outlook 2003 SP1 and re-run the SpamBayes configuration wizard. Everything works fine, but I noticed that Spambayes has stopped marking spam messages as read, although the option is set. To be more specific: messages are marked as not read in the folder list (i.e. folder name is set bold and number of unread mails is shown), but the message appears as read inside of the folder. This applies to messages filtered automatically in the Inbox. On the other hand, "Junk suspects" stay unread on both accounts even when classified manually as spam via "Delete as Spam". I searched the help files, FAQs and bug messages and have found nothing so far. Has anyone got a solution for this weird behavior ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Ducem Barr (ducembarr) Date: 2005-01-26 18:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=880328 kpitt, you're the man! So in the end the solution is simple: switch to "show number of unread messages" in the folder properties. I've just done that, and everything's fine now. Thanks a lot! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-01-26 17:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The default behavior for the "Junk E-mail" folder in Outlook 2003 is to display the total number of messages, not the number of unread messages. In this mode, Outlook will bold the folder name if there are *any* messages in the folder, and the number to the right of the folder name will be the total message count. This can be a little confusing because if you do a right-click/Properties on the "Junk E-mail" folder, Outlook may tell you that it is showing number of unread messages even though it isn't. If you switch the setting to show total and close the Properties dialog, then open it again and change the setting back to show unread then the setting should get changed. The easiest way to tell the difference is to look at how the number is displayed. If the number is in square brackets (e.g. "[2]") then you are seeing the total number of messages. If the number is in normal parentheses (e.g. "(2)"), then you are seeing the number of unread messages. Regarding marking messages as read when you click "Delete as Spam", this is controlled by a different setting than marking classified spam as unread. Look on the Training tab in SpamBayes Manager. In the Incremental Training section, you should see a setting for "Clicking 'Delete as Spam' button should". Is this set to "mark the message as read" or to "not change the message"? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ducem Barr (ducembarr) Date: 2005-01-26 10:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=880328 I repeat, to me it is no "lag behind" problem. Although "Mark spam as read" is on, spam is only marked read in the right-hand panel, not in the folder list. Following your suggestion, I left some messages for hours in the Junk E-Mail folder, waiting for a lag to manifest. Nothing happened. In the meantime, I have updated to 1.0.1 ; that changed nothing with respect to this problem, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-17 03:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe this is a case of the rather common problem where Outlook updates lag behind where they should be. It occurs with Outlook 2002 (I see it) as well as 2003 - always Exchange, I think. Unfortunately, no-one seems to have a solution at this point in time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ducem Barr (ducembarr) Date: 2004-10-15 08:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=880328 Thanks, anadelonbrin, for the enquiry. No, the Outlook folder list does not lag behind in anything else but SpamBayes. And yes, it is a local pst, pulling emails from a pop3 server. Background filtering is on (2 & 1 secs), only for folders that receive new mail. Spambayes has produced zero error messages. I use 1.0 rc2. Any ideas what causes the bug ? Ducem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 03:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This sounds like something Outlook is doing, rather than SpamBayes. Essentially the problem is that the message is marked as read, but the folder list isn't updated, right? (To mark as read with the "Delete as Spam" button, you have to turn a separate option on, in the Training tab of the SpamBayes Manager). Do you ever see the folder list lagging behind when you manually mark messages as read? Is this a local pst, IMAP server, Exchange, hotmail...? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032744&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jan 26 23:44:52 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jan 26 23:44:56 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1110009 ] Installation issues with 1.0.2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1110009, was opened at 2005-01-27 05:28 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1110009&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Sutcliffe (ir0nh34d) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Installation issues with 1.0.2 Initial Comment: After the files have been transfered, during the post-install setup, I got an error message stating it could not find python24.dll when it tried to register the Outlook plugin. I noticed in the bin directory that python23.dll was there. I installed ActivePython to overcome the problem of the missing the DLL, but ran in to another problem again when it tried to register the plugin. According to outlook_addin_register.exe.log: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 2, in ? zipimport.ZipImportError: can't find module 'os' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-27 11:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks - 1.0.2 isn't released yet (if you check the website, you'll see that it says that 1.0.1 is the latest version). The files are visible via sourceforge, but they're still being tested. Once 1.0.2 is considered ready the website will be updated and an announcement will be made on spambayes-announce@python.org. (This bug has been identified and fixed; thanks). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1110009&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 27 05:33:14 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 27 05:33:16 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1110421 ] V1.0.2 will not install - Proxy/Server Message-ID: Support Requests item #1110421, was opened at 2005-01-26 23:33 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110421&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: sbutler (sheldonbutler) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: V1.0.2 will not install - Proxy/Server Initial Comment: V1.0.2 will not upgrade V1.0.1 or install after a full uninstall of V1.0.1. Searched registry and removed all spambayes instances and sb_tray.exe still would not run. Reverted back to V1.0.1 which installed and runs perfectly. Appears build may be corrupt. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110421&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 27 05:37:55 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 27 05:37:58 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1110421 ] V1.0.2 will not install - Proxy/Server Message-ID: Support Requests item #1110421, was opened at 2005-01-27 17:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110421&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: sbutler (sheldonbutler) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: V1.0.2 will not install - Proxy/Server Initial Comment: V1.0.2 will not upgrade V1.0.1 or install after a full uninstall of V1.0.1. Searched registry and removed all spambayes instances and sb_tray.exe still would not run. Reverted back to V1.0.1 which installed and runs perfectly. Appears build may be corrupt. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-27 17:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Did you get any error messages? At what point did things go wrong? Where you trying to install the Outlook plug-in or sb_server? What version of Windows are you using? Does the spambayes log contain any information? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110421&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 27 07:49:44 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 27 07:49:47 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1110469 ] MSVCR71.dll not found Message-ID: Support Requests item #1110469, was opened at 2005-01-26 23:49 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110469&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: bweaver (bcweaver59937) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: MSVCR71.dll not found Initial Comment: While attempting to install SpamBayes v1.0.2 on a WinXP SP2 system, the installation process fails near the end with the following pop-up window: Title Bar: "outlook_addin_register.exe - Unable to Locate Component" Message: "This application has failed to start because MSVCR71.dll was not found. Re-installing the application may fix this problem." Re-installation attempts were unsuccessful, however. It appears that I am missing a needed DLL from the Microsoft Visual-C Runtime environment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110469&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 27 16:00:03 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 27 16:00:10 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1110421 ] V1.0.2 will not install - Proxy/Server Message-ID: Support Requests item #1110421, was opened at 2005-01-26 23:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sheldonbutler You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110421&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: sbutler (sheldonbutler) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: V1.0.2 will not install - Proxy/Server Initial Comment: V1.0.2 will not upgrade V1.0.1 or install after a full uninstall of V1.0.1. Searched registry and removed all spambayes instances and sb_tray.exe still would not run. Reverted back to V1.0.1 which installed and runs perfectly. Appears build may be corrupt. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: sbutler (sheldonbutler) Date: 2005-01-27 10:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1117548 One or more of your download sites have been compromised! This site: URL http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/spambayes/spambayes-1.0.2.exe file size is BIGGER. Please check this out immediately. I had a trojan this morning, which may or may not be from this bigger file, but please look into it. When I downloaded it from another site, it installs perfectly and runs correctly... Please also include a MD5 value on the main page so we can verify the downloads from the many sites you post to. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-26 23:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Did you get any error messages? At what point did things go wrong? Where you trying to install the Outlook plug-in or sb_server? What version of Windows are you using? Does the spambayes log contain any information? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110421&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jan 27 20:50:04 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jan 27 20:50:18 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1110985 ] Slow speed when scoring email Message-ID: Support Requests item #1110985, was opened at 2005-01-27 14:50 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110985&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mike Hacker (mphacker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Slow speed when scoring email Initial Comment: I am running version 1.0.1 of Spambayes plug-in for Outlook on Windows XP Professional with 1GB of ram. When I open Outlook and it connects to my pop server it seems to take a very long time to download and score the email messages. During this time I notice that the hard drive is working very hard and Outlook becomes unresponsive. I usually have about 60 - 70 email messages on the pop server when I connect to download. My database has 923 good and 458 spam messages. The accurace rate is about perfect, but the speed really makes checking my email a long process. I have tired using both with and without the background filter. I prefer to not use the background filter. If I leave Outlook open, it seems to process the incoming messages fine. I only see the slowdown when Outlook is downloading several emails at once. I have seen some references to using alternate databases. Would that help increase the speed? If so, what databases are supported on Windows and how do I change the database it uses? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110985&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 28 00:48:16 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 28 00:48:18 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1110469 ] MSVCR71.dll not found Message-ID: Support Requests item #1110469, was opened at 2005-01-27 19:49 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110469&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: bweaver (bcweaver59937) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: MSVCR71.dll not found Initial Comment: While attempting to install SpamBayes v1.0.2 on a WinXP SP2 system, the installation process fails near the end with the following pop-up window: Title Bar: "outlook_addin_register.exe - Unable to Locate Component" Message: "This application has failed to start because MSVCR71.dll was not found. Re-installing the application may fix this problem." Re-installation attempts were unsuccessful, however. It appears that I am missing a needed DLL from the Microsoft Visual-C Runtime environment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-28 12:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry - the installer is faulty. For the moment, please reinstall 1.0.1. A 1.0.3 release that fixes this problem should be out later today. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110469&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 28 00:53:05 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 28 00:53:08 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1110421 ] V1.0.2 will not install - Proxy/Server Message-ID: Support Requests item #1110421, was opened at 2005-01-27 17:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110421&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: sbutler (sheldonbutler) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: V1.0.2 will not install - Proxy/Server Initial Comment: V1.0.2 will not upgrade V1.0.1 or install after a full uninstall of V1.0.1. Searched registry and removed all spambayes instances and sb_tray.exe still would not run. Reverted back to V1.0.1 which installed and runs perfectly. Appears build may be corrupt. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-28 12:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The OP's problem is very likely to be another case of the mscvrt71.dll problem, so closing. For the meantime please use 1.0.1 or wait for 1.0.3 (I should be able to get this out in a couple of hours). Re: the 'compromise': downloading the file at that URL gives me a file of size 3414543 - this is the same size as listed on the sf.net files page and . What size do you get? There is a MD5 checksum on (and has been since the 1.0.1 release) and also a pgp sig for the releases, which you can use to verify them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: sbutler (sheldonbutler) Date: 2005-01-28 04:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1117548 One or more of your download sites have been compromised! This site: URL http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/spambayes/spambayes-1.0.2.exe file size is BIGGER. Please check this out immediately. I had a trojan this morning, which may or may not be from this bigger file, but please look into it. When I downloaded it from another site, it installs perfectly and runs correctly... Please also include a MD5 value on the main page so we can verify the downloads from the many sites you post to. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-27 17:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Did you get any error messages? At what point did things go wrong? Where you trying to install the Outlook plug-in or sb_server? What version of Windows are you using? Does the spambayes log contain any information? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110421&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 28 05:09:51 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 28 05:09:54 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1110421 ] V1.0.2 will not install - Proxy/Server Message-ID: Support Requests item #1110421, was opened at 2005-01-26 23:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sheldonbutler You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110421&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: sbutler (sheldonbutler) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: V1.0.2 will not install - Proxy/Server Initial Comment: V1.0.2 will not upgrade V1.0.1 or install after a full uninstall of V1.0.1. Searched registry and removed all spambayes instances and sb_tray.exe still would not run. Reverted back to V1.0.1 which installed and runs perfectly. Appears build may be corrupt. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: sbutler (sheldonbutler) Date: 2005-01-27 23:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1117548 Here is the log of my download, and the file I ran - which did not start up after install - was this larger size. Oh well, I will pay attention to the MD5 and file size from now on. Just wanted to alert you to the possible compromise... URL http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/spambayes/spambayes-1.0.2.exe Comment spambayes-1.0.2.exe Referer http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/spambayes/spambayes-1.0.2.exe?use_mirror=voxel Resume Yes Local File C:\Down\spambayes-1.0.2(2).exe File Date 01/26/05 22:52:35 File Size 3604826 Completed 3604826 Total Time 00:00:17 Average Speed 207.08 KB/s Create Time 01/26/05 19:38:43 Complete Time 01/26/05 19:39:03 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-27 18:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The OP's problem is very likely to be another case of the mscvrt71.dll problem, so closing. For the meantime please use 1.0.1 or wait for 1.0.3 (I should be able to get this out in a couple of hours). Re: the 'compromise': downloading the file at that URL gives me a file of size 3414543 - this is the same size as listed on the sf.net files page and . What size do you get? There is a MD5 checksum on (and has been since the 1.0.1 release) and also a pgp sig for the releases, which you can use to verify them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: sbutler (sheldonbutler) Date: 2005-01-27 10:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1117548 One or more of your download sites have been compromised! This site: URL http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/spambayes/spambayes-1.0.2.exe file size is BIGGER. Please check this out immediately. I had a trojan this morning, which may or may not be from this bigger file, but please look into it. When I downloaded it from another site, it installs perfectly and runs correctly... Please also include a MD5 value on the main page so we can verify the downloads from the many sites you post to. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-26 23:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Did you get any error messages? At what point did things go wrong? Where you trying to install the Outlook plug-in or sb_server? What version of Windows are you using? Does the spambayes log contain any information? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110421&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 28 13:29:30 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 28 13:29:32 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1111396 ] DLL Missing Error Message-ID: Bugs item #1111396, was opened at 2005-01-28 13:29 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1111396&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pallieter Koopmans (pallieter) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: DLL Missing Error Initial Comment: When (re)installing spambayes-1.0rc2.exe all goes well, but when I try spambayes-1.0.2.exe I get a DLL missing error (msvcr71.dll). I re-downloaded the .exe again and tried after a reboot; same result. PS: 1.0.2 is missing from the "group" dropdown in the "submit a bug report form". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1111396&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jan 28 22:01:10 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jan 28 22:01:12 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1111396 ] DLL Missing Error Message-ID: Bugs item #1111396, was opened at 2005-01-28 07:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1111396&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pallieter Koopmans (pallieter) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: DLL Missing Error Initial Comment: When (re)installing spambayes-1.0rc2.exe all goes well, but when I try spambayes-1.0.2.exe I get a DLL missing error (msvcr71.dll). I re-downloaded the .exe again and tried after a reboot; same result. PS: 1.0.2 is missing from the "group" dropdown in the "submit a bug report form". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-01-28 16:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Dupe of [ 1110469 ] There was a problem with the 1.0.2 installer. A 1.0.3 release is now available that fixes this problem. Please download the updated version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1111396&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jan 30 23:21:52 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jan 30 23:21:58 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1111396 ] DLL Missing Error Message-ID: Bugs item #1111396, was opened at 2005-01-29 01:29 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1111396&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pallieter Koopmans (pallieter) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: DLL Missing Error Initial Comment: When (re)installing spambayes-1.0rc2.exe all goes well, but when I try spambayes-1.0.2.exe I get a DLL missing error (msvcr71.dll). I re-downloaded the .exe again and tried after a reboot; same result. PS: 1.0.2 is missing from the "group" dropdown in the "submit a bug report form". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-01-29 10:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Dupe of [ 1110469 ] There was a problem with the 1.0.2 installer. A 1.0.3 release is now available that fixes this problem. Please download the updated version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1111396&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 31 10:34:46 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 31 10:34:48 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113061 ] Spambayes can INCREASE spam - change required Message-ID: Bugs item #1113061, was opened at 2005-01-31 09:34 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113061&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: the-moog (the-moog) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes can INCREASE spam - change required Initial Comment: Hi, Spambayes defaults to scanning one folder for incomming email, usually 'inbox', then moving that email to a different folder if it is detected as spam - as we all know, this works very well. If you have auto-preview turned on, then the email is moved AFTER the preview, meaning that any embedded HTML in the email is processed. This email can make a connection to a remove server, effectively authenticating the email address as valid for the spammer. The solutuion should be to change the way Spambayes filters email in outlook, either by using a temporary inbox and email rules, or by disabling HTML or auto-preview before the email is checked. Since installing spambayes my daily quantity of spam has doubled!! Regards, Jason (the-moog) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113061&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 31 12:32:17 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 31 12:32:19 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113106 ] Spambayes can INCREASE spam - change required Message-ID: Bugs item #1113106, was opened at 2005-01-31 11:32 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113106&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: the-moog (the-moog) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes can INCREASE spam - change required Initial Comment: Hi, Spambayes defaults to scanning one folder for incomming email, usually 'inbox', then moving that email to a different folder if it is detected as spam - as we all know, this works very well. If you have auto-preview turned on, then the email is moved AFTER the preview, meaning that any embedded HTML in the email is processed. This email can make a connection to a remove server, effectively authenticating the email address as valid for the spammer. The solutuion should be to change the way Spambayes filters email in outlook, either by using a temporary inbox and email rules, or by disabling HTML or auto-preview before the email is checked. Since installing spambayes my daily quantity of spam has doubled!! Regards, Jason (the-moog) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113106&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 31 22:59:09 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 31 22:59:12 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113061 ] Spambayes can INCREASE spam - change required Message-ID: Bugs item #1113061, was opened at 2005-01-31 22:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113061&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: the-moog (the-moog) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes can INCREASE spam - change required Initial Comment: Hi, Spambayes defaults to scanning one folder for incomming email, usually 'inbox', then moving that email to a different folder if it is detected as spam - as we all know, this works very well. If you have auto-preview turned on, then the email is moved AFTER the preview, meaning that any embedded HTML in the email is processed. This email can make a connection to a remove server, effectively authenticating the email address as valid for the spammer. The solutuion should be to change the way Spambayes filters email in outlook, either by using a temporary inbox and email rules, or by disabling HTML or auto-preview before the email is checked. Since installing spambayes my daily quantity of spam has doubled!! Regards, Jason (the-moog) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-01 10:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 1113106 ] Spambayes can INCREASE spam - change required ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113061&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jan 31 23:03:37 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jan 31 23:03:39 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113106 ] Spambayes can INCREASE spam - change required Message-ID: Bugs item #1113106, was opened at 2005-02-01 00:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113106&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: the-moog (the-moog) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes can INCREASE spam - change required Initial Comment: Hi, Spambayes defaults to scanning one folder for incomming email, usually 'inbox', then moving that email to a different folder if it is detected as spam - as we all know, this works very well. If you have auto-preview turned on, then the email is moved AFTER the preview, meaning that any embedded HTML in the email is processed. This email can make a connection to a remove server, effectively authenticating the email address as valid for the spammer. The solutuion should be to change the way Spambayes filters email in outlook, either by using a temporary inbox and email rules, or by disabling HTML or auto-preview before the email is checked. Since installing spambayes my daily quantity of spam has doubled!! Regards, Jason (the-moog) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-01 11:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes doesn't do anything with any remote content in messages (unless you specifically enable experimental options). It also doesn't open any messages in the preview pane (that's for human users, not machines that can access the message directly). You can even see this - open the Inbox and watch it while mail is processed - it arrives in the Inbox and after the background filtering delay SpamBayes processes it - ham is given a score and stays where is is, and unsure/spam is scored and move out. The preview pane will never change from the original message. It is fairly certain that the increase in spam is unrelated to SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113106&group_id=61702