From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 1 01:36:31 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 1 01:36:34 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113588 ] remove disableNXShowUI Message-ID: Bugs item #1113588, was opened at 2005-02-01 00:36 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113588&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: giulio53 (giulio53) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: remove disableNXShowUI Initial Comment: in reference Bugs item 988095, I have a similar problem with MS publisher. I was building a website and everytime I wanted to preview the website, norton Antivirus would start to check the file. So to save time I stopped Norton from doing its check up. From that point on "disable NXshowUI" will not allow me to preview the website or save it as a .html file. In the "Data Execution Prevention" Tab I have now entered Publisher 98 to be exempted from NX, but it was not enough to solve the problem. I would like to change the registry like Paul Quinn suggested. I must admit I am not as clever as you are, could somebody be so kind put in simpler form?? Paul Quinn suggests entering a new string key, its name being the full path to the program, in my case "C:\program files\microsoft office\office\MSPUB.EXE", the registry would not accept it because of the backlashes. Do I have to enter it in DOS ?? How would you write it in DOS?? and its value should be "DisableNXShowUI", I am assuming he means a DWORD value, am I correct?? I hope you can excuse my ignorance but I am stuck and you are the only ones who seem to have tackled this problem ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113588&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 1 01:44:39 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 1 01:44:42 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113588 ] remove disableNXShowUI Message-ID: Bugs item #1113588, was opened at 2005-02-01 13:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113588&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: giulio53 (giulio53) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: remove disableNXShowUI Initial Comment: in reference Bugs item 988095, I have a similar problem with MS publisher. I was building a website and everytime I wanted to preview the website, norton Antivirus would start to check the file. So to save time I stopped Norton from doing its check up. From that point on "disable NXshowUI" will not allow me to preview the website or save it as a .html file. In the "Data Execution Prevention" Tab I have now entered Publisher 98 to be exempted from NX, but it was not enough to solve the problem. I would like to change the registry like Paul Quinn suggested. I must admit I am not as clever as you are, could somebody be so kind put in simpler form?? Paul Quinn suggests entering a new string key, its name being the full path to the program, in my case "C:\program files\microsoft office\office\MSPUB.EXE", the registry would not accept it because of the backlashes. Do I have to enter it in DOS ?? How would you write it in DOS?? and its value should be "DisableNXShowUI", I am assuming he means a DWORD value, am I correct?? I hope you can excuse my ignorance but I am stuck and you are the only ones who seem to have tackled this problem ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-01 13:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does this have anything at all to do with SpamBayes? It doesn't appear so - but if I missing something, please elaborate and set the status back to "Open". This really is the wrong place to be asking for help with MS Publisher and/or NX protection. If you can't find a better place, then perhaps you could contact Paul Quinn and ask him directly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113588&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 1 01:45:57 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 1 01:46:00 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113593 ] 100% SPAM messages pass through Message-ID: Bugs item #1113593, was opened at 2005-02-01 01:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113593&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Viktor Ferenczi (complex) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 100% SPAM messages pass through Initial Comment: I'm a happy user of spambayes since the 1.0.0 version. Currently I'm using spambayes 1.0.3 in concert with MS Outlook 2002 SP2. My filter is traned with about 1000 good and 1500 spam messages. SPAM score settings used: 0..15%: HAM 15..80%: Unsure 80..100%: SPAM I found an interesting behaviour of spambayes several months ago. Messages with 99.97% combined SPAM score are correctly categorized as SPAM, but others with 100% score are categorized as Unsure. These messages always appears to be SPAM for me, so I deleted them as SPAM using the spambayes toolbar. They should be categorized as SPAM. Is it a bug in spambayes? Most of my incoming mail is Hungarian, so nearly every non-Hungarian mail is spam. This trains the filter to separate languages rather than spam and no-spam. It yields very efficient SPAM detection and offten 100% SPAM scores. I think this can be the root of my problem. This behaviour can affect every and all non English speaking users. I've attached an example mail with 100% SPAM clue. SPAM clues reported by spambayes are included. The bug occours with increasing probability as time goes on. OS: WinXP Prof SP1 Office: MS Office XP SP2 - Hungarian version Virus and spyware protection is actively used and maintained. Thanks for your help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113593&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 1 01:53:49 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 1 01:53:53 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113588 ] remove disableNXShowUI Message-ID: Bugs item #1113588, was opened at 2005-02-01 00:36 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by giulio53 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113588&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Open >Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: giulio53 (giulio53) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: remove disableNXShowUI Initial Comment: in reference Bugs item 988095, I have a similar problem with MS publisher. I was building a website and everytime I wanted to preview the website, norton Antivirus would start to check the file. So to save time I stopped Norton from doing its check up. From that point on "disable NXshowUI" will not allow me to preview the website or save it as a .html file. In the "Data Execution Prevention" Tab I have now entered Publisher 98 to be exempted from NX, but it was not enough to solve the problem. I would like to change the registry like Paul Quinn suggested. I must admit I am not as clever as you are, could somebody be so kind put in simpler form?? Paul Quinn suggests entering a new string key, its name being the full path to the program, in my case "C:\program files\microsoft office\office\MSPUB.EXE", the registry would not accept it because of the backlashes. Do I have to enter it in DOS ?? How would you write it in DOS?? and its value should be "DisableNXShowUI", I am assuming he means a DWORD value, am I correct?? I hope you can excuse my ignorance but I am stuck and you are the only ones who seem to have tackled this problem ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-01 00:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does this have anything at all to do with SpamBayes? It doesn't appear so - but if I missing something, please elaborate and set the status back to "Open". This really is the wrong place to be asking for help with MS Publisher and/or NX protection. If you can't find a better place, then perhaps you could contact Paul Quinn and ask him directly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113588&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 1 01:54:30 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 1 01:54:36 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113593 ] 100% SPAM messages pass through Message-ID: Bugs item #1113593, was opened at 2005-02-01 13:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113593&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Viktor Ferenczi (complex) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 100% SPAM messages pass through Initial Comment: I'm a happy user of spambayes since the 1.0.0 version. Currently I'm using spambayes 1.0.3 in concert with MS Outlook 2002 SP2. My filter is traned with about 1000 good and 1500 spam messages. SPAM score settings used: 0..15%: HAM 15..80%: Unsure 80..100%: SPAM I found an interesting behaviour of spambayes several months ago. Messages with 99.97% combined SPAM score are correctly categorized as SPAM, but others with 100% score are categorized as Unsure. These messages always appears to be SPAM for me, so I deleted them as SPAM using the spambayes toolbar. They should be categorized as SPAM. Is it a bug in spambayes? Most of my incoming mail is Hungarian, so nearly every non-Hungarian mail is spam. This trains the filter to separate languages rather than spam and no-spam. It yields very efficient SPAM detection and offten 100% SPAM scores. I think this can be the root of my problem. This behaviour can affect every and all non English speaking users. I've attached an example mail with 100% SPAM clue. SPAM clues reported by spambayes are included. The bug occours with increasing probability as time goes on. OS: WinXP Prof SP1 Office: MS Office XP SP2 - Hungarian version Virus and spyware protection is actively used and maintained. Thanks for your help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-01 13:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Any message with a score over your spam threshold (80%) should be moved to the spam folder. Could you please attach a log for a period when this isn't the case to the tracker? (SpamBayes->SpamBayes Manager->Advanced->Diagnostics->View Log) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113593&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 1 01:59:11 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 1 01:59:14 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113588 ] remove disableNXShowUI Message-ID: Bugs item #1113588, was opened at 2005-02-01 13:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113588&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: giulio53 (giulio53) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: remove disableNXShowUI Initial Comment: in reference Bugs item 988095, I have a similar problem with MS publisher. I was building a website and everytime I wanted to preview the website, norton Antivirus would start to check the file. So to save time I stopped Norton from doing its check up. From that point on "disable NXshowUI" will not allow me to preview the website or save it as a .html file. In the "Data Execution Prevention" Tab I have now entered Publisher 98 to be exempted from NX, but it was not enough to solve the problem. I would like to change the registry like Paul Quinn suggested. I must admit I am not as clever as you are, could somebody be so kind put in simpler form?? Paul Quinn suggests entering a new string key, its name being the full path to the program, in my case "C:\program files\microsoft office\office\MSPUB.EXE", the registry would not accept it because of the backlashes. Do I have to enter it in DOS ?? How would you write it in DOS?? and its value should be "DisableNXShowUI", I am assuming he means a DWORD value, am I correct?? I hope you can excuse my ignorance but I am stuck and you are the only ones who seem to have tackled this problem ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-01 13:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please don't change the resolution/status unless you can outline a way in which this is an issue with SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-01 13:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does this have anything at all to do with SpamBayes? It doesn't appear so - but if I missing something, please elaborate and set the status back to "Open". This really is the wrong place to be asking for help with MS Publisher and/or NX protection. If you can't find a better place, then perhaps you could contact Paul Quinn and ask him directly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113588&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 1 11:40:07 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 1 11:40:09 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113863 ] sb_tray eats all cpu time Message-ID: Bugs item #1113863, was opened at 2005-02-01 11:40 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_tray eats all cpu time Initial Comment: After some time sb_tray.exe eats all cpu time. I tries 1.0.2 and 1.0.3. I have Celeron 2 GHz with 512 MB RAM, XP/SP2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 1 12:09:25 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 1 12:09:28 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113863 ] sb_tray eats all cpu time Message-ID: Bugs item #1113863, was opened at 2005-02-01 11:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cloggy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_tray eats all cpu time Initial Comment: After some time sb_tray.exe eats all cpu time. I tries 1.0.2 and 1.0.3. I have Celeron 2 GHz with 512 MB RAM, XP/SP2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-01 12:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 I had a similar problem that last couple of days when my mail provider was down. It seems that, when it is not possible for sb_tray to access to the mailprovider, it enters a CPU and I/O write loop (many many millions of I/O writes...don't know where to but the number was really astonishing). I'm using Windows/XP PE SP1 and Spambayes 1.0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 1 16:10:04 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 1 16:10:07 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1114042 ] Hard delete button Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1114042, was opened at 2005-02-01 15:10 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1114042&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Teckelman (teckelman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Hard delete button Initial Comment: I like to view my spam mails to check if its is realy spam. After I removed all non spam messages I perforn a Ctrl- A and Shift-Delete to hard remove all the spam. Is it possible to add a button to hard delete the spam from the junk and suspect folders? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1114042&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 2 00:22:46 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 2 00:22:49 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1114042 ] Hard delete button Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1114042, was opened at 2005-02-02 04:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1114042&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Teckelman (teckelman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Hard delete button Initial Comment: I like to view my spam mails to check if its is realy spam. After I removed all non spam messages I perforn a Ctrl- A and Shift-Delete to hard remove all the spam. Is it possible to add a button to hard delete the spam from the junk and suspect folders? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-02 12:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1.1 includes an "empty spam folder" item in the SpamBayes menu. We really don't want to clutter up the toolbar with something like this. (BTW deleting items in the unsure folder wouldn't make sense, since there's an equal chance of those being ham or spam, and you wouldn't want to delete ham). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1114042&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 2 00:30:25 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 2 00:30:28 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113863 ] sb_tray eats all cpu time Message-ID: Bugs item #1113863, was opened at 2005-02-01 23:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_tray eats all cpu time Initial Comment: After some time sb_tray.exe eats all cpu time. I tries 1.0.2 and 1.0.3. I have Celeron 2 GHz with 512 MB RAM, XP/SP2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-02 12:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Janusz, would this also be the case for you? (i.e. that the POP3 server was unavailable) I cannot duplicate this here, however. Attaching a log file for the period when this occured would really help. The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-02 00:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 I had a similar problem that last couple of days when my mail provider was down. It seems that, when it is not possible for sb_tray to access to the mailprovider, it enters a CPU and I/O write loop (many many millions of I/O writes...don't know where to but the number was really astonishing). I'm using Windows/XP PE SP1 and Spambayes 1.0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 2 05:37:38 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 2 05:37:45 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1036970 ] Allow Outlook plugin to move ham to a designated folder Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1036970, was opened at 2004-09-29 05:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jdedrick You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1036970&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jesse Pelton (jessepelton) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Allow Outlook plugin to move ham to a designated folder Initial Comment: It would be nice to be able to move ham messages from wherever SpamBayes finds them to a user-specified folder. There are at least two scenarios where this would be useful: - When Exchange is configured to filter messages, it puts what it considers to be certain/possible junk in Junk/Junk candidates folders. Since its filtering isn't as good as SpamBayes (when well-trained), it's helpful to have SpamBayes filter the Junk folders and put real spam elsewhere. Without the ability to move ham, though, any ham remains in the Junk folders. - Guaranteeing the order of processing of Outlook rules and SpamBayes filtering. See http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2004-September/014781.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: jhd (jdedrick) Date: 2005-02-01 20:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1210159 Glad to hear this is going to make it. I don't think that this will be a rarely used feature, as it's the only reliable way to make Spambayes interact predictably with Outlook rules. This will enable a number of good things, for example reliable forwarding/synching of only filtered messages to a blackberry or PDA. Suggest you reconsider and put a button on the dialog, but either way I'm delighted to have the functionality. When will 1.1 be available? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-07 20:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I've added code to allow this (it will appear in 1.1). At the moment this can only be conifgured by manually editing the Outlook.ini (or {profilename}.ini) file, since there isn't really any room for another set of options in the Manager dialog at the moment. I don't want to resize the dialog just for this, since it's not likely to be used much and is really and advanced option. However, if it does get resized for something else, I'll see if this will then fit. Leaving open until then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1036970&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 2 05:46:22 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 2 05:46:28 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1036970 ] Allow Outlook plugin to move ham to a designated folder Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1036970, was opened at 2004-09-30 00:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1036970&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jesse Pelton (jessepelton) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Allow Outlook plugin to move ham to a designated folder Initial Comment: It would be nice to be able to move ham messages from wherever SpamBayes finds them to a user-specified folder. There are at least two scenarios where this would be useful: - When Exchange is configured to filter messages, it puts what it considers to be certain/possible junk in Junk/Junk candidates folders. Since its filtering isn't as good as SpamBayes (when well-trained), it's helpful to have SpamBayes filter the Junk folders and put real spam elsewhere. Without the ability to move ham, though, any ham remains in the Junk folders. - Guaranteeing the order of processing of Outlook rules and SpamBayes filtering. See http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2004-September/014781.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-02 17:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry - this hasn't been updated for a bit. The dialog has been remodelled and you can configure this from it now (which means this can be closed). There's an estimate for the timeline here: (also one here: ) As you can see, it's a little behind since 1.1 was hoped to be out at the end of January, and it's the start of Feb. If you push all the dates back a week, that would be a reasonable guess. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: jhd (jdedrick) Date: 2005-02-02 17:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1210159 Glad to hear this is going to make it. I don't think that this will be a rarely used feature, as it's the only reliable way to make Spambayes interact predictably with Outlook rules. This will enable a number of good things, for example reliable forwarding/synching of only filtered messages to a blackberry or PDA. Suggest you reconsider and put a button on the dialog, but either way I'm delighted to have the functionality. When will 1.1 be available? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-08 17:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I've added code to allow this (it will appear in 1.1). At the moment this can only be conifgured by manually editing the Outlook.ini (or {profilename}.ini) file, since there isn't really any room for another set of options in the Manager dialog at the moment. I don't want to resize the dialog just for this, since it's not likely to be used much and is really and advanced option. However, if it does get resized for something else, I'll see if this will then fit. Leaving open until then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1036970&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 2 08:54:02 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 2 08:54:06 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113863 ] sb_tray eats all cpu time Message-ID: Bugs item #1113863, was opened at 2005-02-01 11:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jpiw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_tray eats all cpu time Initial Comment: After some time sb_tray.exe eats all cpu time. I tries 1.0.2 and 1.0.3. I have Celeron 2 GHz with 512 MB RAM, XP/SP2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-02 08:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 Yes, it's possible. Log file doesn't look very interesting: Service not available. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 8110 is proxying pop3.go2.pl:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception .... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-02 00:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Janusz, would this also be the case for you? (i.e. that the POP3 server was unavailable) I cannot duplicate this here, however. Attaching a log file for the period when this occured would really help. The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-01 12:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 I had a similar problem that last couple of days when my mail provider was down. It seems that, when it is not possible for sb_tray to access to the mailprovider, it enters a CPU and I/O write loop (many many millions of I/O writes...don't know where to but the number was really astonishing). I'm using Windows/XP PE SP1 and Spambayes 1.0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 2 11:52:13 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 2 11:52:18 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1103976 ] Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Message-ID: Bugs item #1103976, was opened at 2005-01-17 10:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by spambayes411 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: robert (elitemrp) Assigned to: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Summary: Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Initial Comment: I first ran into this problem a few months ago at work. But at the time I thought it was related to a custom program we run here. But now I noticed I can easily reproduce the problem on any computer running SpamBayes+Outlook 2003 on Windows XP. Basically, I will open Outlook via the icon to read mail. I will then close Outlook, and if I have Task Manager open, I will see that Outlook.exe closes correctly. Now if I launch a mailto: link (or use a program that launches a new mail), where the Compose Mail window opens, but not the actual outlook program, the problem occurs. If I close the compose mail window, by either clicking Send, or closing it without sending, the OUTLOOK.EXE task will not exit. If I launch Outlook again, I'll now have multiple instances of OUTLOOK.EXE in task manager. Now the multiple instances is what caused the problem with our custom software at work, but that has nothing to do with the fact that Outlook does not exit correctly when running Spambayes and having a program/mailto link open the Compose Mail window. Yes I realize there have been 2 previous tickets about OUTLOOK.EXE closing, but none came to the conclusion that it's caused by a Compose Mail window. And both are closed without a solution. I have tested this on several computers and have tried multiple things to try to fix it (such as renaming extend.dat and other files) and nothing seems to work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gil (spambayes411) Date: 2005-02-02 05:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1210353 I've discovered this is not limited to the mailto function. I use a program called SynchPST to keep outlook sychronized between my home computer and my laptop. When SynchPST opens, I see it in the task manager and it opens Outlook as well. After I synch my PST files, I close SynchPST. It closes but Outlook remains in the task manager. If the Spambayes add-in is not loaded, then both SynchPST and Outlook quit as they should. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-24 18:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks Kenny :) I don't really know what might be causing this, but I guess you could start by checking to see if the spambayes log gets to the "addin terminating" part. Let me know if I can help at all (though I don't have OL2003 anywhere). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-01-24 11:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Yep, I was able to confirm this problem on Outlook 2003. If I activate a mailto link with SpamBayes loaded and enabled, OUTLOOK.EXE will not exit when I close the compose window. If I disable SpamBayes filtering from SpamBayes Manager, OUTLOOK.EXE still doesn't exit. If I completely disable loading of SpamBayes from the COM Add-ins dialog then OUTLOOK.EXE closes properly when I close the compose window. I'll look into this further when I get a chance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-24 00:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Maybe this is specific to Outlook 2003 then? Kenny: you've got 2003, right? Can you try and replicate this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: robert (elitemrp) Date: 2005-01-21 06:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1198932 Yes, it only happens with SpamBayes installed. I install SpamBayes, set up the toolbar, etc Close Outlook, type mailto:blah@blah.com in a browser or click a mail link and it opens the Compose Mail window. Once I close this window, Outlook.exe ramains in the task list. If I click another mailto link I'll have 2 stuck open, then 3, etc If I have only 1 process loaded and it's the main Outlook window, when I click a mailto link it will work fine since it doesn't load a separate outlook.exe process. It only does this when the main outlook program isn't loaded. Once I uninstall SpamBayes or uncheck it in the COM Add-Ins area in Outlook, this problem goes away. As soon as I close a Compose Mail window, OUTLOOK.EXE terminates correctly. I've tried this on several PCs, some with fresh installs of XP/ Outlook, some with several months old installs and other applications, it's the same on each. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-20 22:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Have you tried this without SpamBayes installed? I get the same behaviour without SpamBayes, which says to me it's an Outlook problem, not a SpamBayes one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 00:07:53 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 00:07:56 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1115105 ] Binary will not work with NT Message-ID: Bugs item #1115105, was opened at 2005-02-03 12:07 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115105&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Binary will not work with NT Initial Comment: It appears that the binary (1.0.2 and 1.0.3, but not 1.0.1) will work work with NT. This is probably the result of a pywin32 change (although it might be the Python 2.4 change). It needs to be resolved for 1.1 (and maybe a 1.0.4, if it's worth doing that). Two confirmed cases are: Window NT 1.0 (Build 1381, Service Pack 6) and Outlook 2000 SR-1 (9.0.0.3821). WinNT 4.0 SP 6a plus hotfixes and Microsoft Outlook 2002 SP 3 plus hotfixes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115105&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 00:17:05 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 00:17:09 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1115105 ] Binary will not work with NT Message-ID: Bugs item #1115105, was opened at 2005-02-02 15:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by taed You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115105&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Binary will not work with NT Initial Comment: It appears that the binary (1.0.2 and 1.0.3, but not 1.0.1) will work work with NT. This is probably the result of a pywin32 change (although it might be the Python 2.4 change). It needs to be resolved for 1.1 (and maybe a 1.0.4, if it's worth doing that). Two confirmed cases are: Window NT 1.0 (Build 1381, Service Pack 6) and Outlook 2000 SR-1 (9.0.0.3821). WinNT 4.0 SP 6a plus hotfixes and Microsoft Outlook 2002 SP 3 plus hotfixes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Taed Wynnell (taed) Date: 2005-02-02 15:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1025617 The buttons do appear in Outlook, however, they are non- functional and no filtering occurs. The log file contains only the following: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115105&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 00:55:11 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 00:55:14 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1115105 ] Binary will not work with NT Message-ID: Bugs item #1115105, was opened at 2005-02-03 12:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115105&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Binary will not work with NT Initial Comment: It appears that the binary (1.0.2 and 1.0.3, but not 1.0.1) will work work with NT. This is probably the result of a pywin32 change (although it might be the Python 2.4 change). It needs to be resolved for 1.1 (and maybe a 1.0.4, if it's worth doing that). Two confirmed cases are: Window NT 1.0 (Build 1381, Service Pack 6) and Outlook 2000 SR-1 (9.0.0.3821). WinNT 4.0 SP 6a plus hotfixes and Microsoft Outlook 2002 SP 3 plus hotfixes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 12:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The first case above should be NT 4.0, not 1.0. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Taed Wynnell (taed) Date: 2005-02-03 12:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1025617 The buttons do appear in Outlook, however, they are non- functional and no filtering occurs. The log file contains only the following: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115105&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 02:01:13 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 02:01:17 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-892634 ] Outlook plugin won't score/filter msgs in 2nd PST file Message-ID: Bugs item #892634, was opened at 2004-02-08 11:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=892634&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Stanley (dbstanley) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook plugin won't score/filter msgs in 2nd PST file Initial Comment: Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5606) Windows XP Pro, all updates installed SpamBayes Outlook plugin v0.81 The SpamBayes plugin seems to score and automatically filter only messages in one PST file, if multiple PST files are used with Outlook. My main PST files ("Personal Folders") has only the standard folders (Inbox, Outbox, Sent Items, Junk E-Mail, Junk Suspects, Drafts, Deleted Items). I have another PST file (okay, actually I have 3 more) with several folders. I have Outlook rules set up to move messages into a few of these folders "after they arrive." I have set up SpamBayes to filter 3 of these folders (in the 2nd PST), as well as the Inbox folder in the main PST file. Although messages that end up in my Inbox folder are being scored and automatically filtered, messages in the second PST files are not. The "Spam" field shows nothing (blank) for messages in filtered folders in the second PST file. However, the "Show Spam clues for current message" option shows high scores (100% in some cases) for Spam messages in these folders. If I force filter-these messages using the "Filter Messages..." option, the Spam messages are filtered and moved to the Junk E- mail folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 14:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2004-12-30 05:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 Hmm, in RFE [ 829602 ] Multiple Inboxes seem to be mishandled, I noted that all of the exchange inboxes get processed and sent to the primary Inbox, Bayes_Spam or Bayes_NotSure folder depending, of course, on the score. The secondary mailboxes do not get items in their inboxes if SpamBayes is active, and do get their mail if it is not, as I remember. I am not currently running SpamBayes on my new locked down corporate workstation, still trying to get it on the "approved list". Security is sooooo much fun. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-16 13:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 In addition, are you using background filtering? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-08 14:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you please attach a log file that covers a period where mail arrives in a folder that should be filtered, but isn't? The plug-in will find the latest log for you via the "Diagnostics" button on the Advanced tab of the Manager, or the FAQ and troubleshooting guide explain where to find it manually. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=892634&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 02:02:26 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 02:02:29 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-939050 ] Outlook 2003 crashes upon start Message-ID: Bugs item #939050, was opened at 2004-04-21 16:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=939050&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code 1.0b1 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Berto (rwainberg) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003 crashes upon start Initial Comment: After loading SpamBayes, Outlook 2003 crashes. "Outlook has recovered from a serious error...". Log file: Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\[username]\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\[username]\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0b1 (April 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 14:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-04 15:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you uninstall SpamBayes and then open Outlook and click on the down arrow next to the help icon on the standard toolbar, does Outlook crash? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=939050&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 02:14:46 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 02:14:52 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-843521 ] E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #843521, was opened at 2003-11-17 12:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ramjee_t You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Bill Van Buren (billvb) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes Initial Comment: system: win XP Pro, AMD 2.1 GHz, 512 RAM. Outlook 2003 When I launch Outlook 2003, I get the following error message: "There was an error initializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure and re-enable this plugin. Error details: Could not warch the specified folders" I have reinstalled the plugin, and reconfigured multiple times, but I can't get it to properly initialize, or to check messages when they arrive after I've manually enabled SpamBayes from the configuration menu. It works great when I manually request filtering of a directory though! I look forward to getting it working as intended. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ram (ramjee_t) Date: 2005-02-03 06:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1210917 Is there a solution for this yet. If yes can it be shared with me... I am facing a similar problem with my add-in. It will help me a lot. Thanks Ram ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-04-26 17:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is anyone still seeing this bug with the latest versions? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Greg Bonzek (cantics) Date: 2003-12-23 18:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=936787 This exact thing started for me when I upgraded to Exchange 2003. Clients are Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2002, both running on XP Pro, sp1. I have yet to figure out a fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 10:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I struck a very similar issue myself recently, and found a way I could "mis-configure" my profile such that Outlook displayed an error message at startup, then immediately shut down. But I found an almost identical error to this in my log. The new version will be more graceful should it get this error. No messagebox will be shown, and SpamBayes will not be disabled. The log will get a bit of noise. I've also moved some of the initialize code to a "startup complete" event, in the hope that this will actually stop the error happening in the first place. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 12:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 2 other dupes: [ 831291 ] Loads with error - "Could not watch the specified folders" [ 831123 ] error initializing outlook addin Adding this to the "common bugs" list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 11:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Noting dupe in 848622 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 02:59:50 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 02:59:52 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113863 ] sb_tray eats all cpu time Message-ID: Bugs item #1113863, was opened at 2005-02-01 23:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_tray eats all cpu time Initial Comment: After some time sb_tray.exe eats all cpu time. I tries 1.0.2 and 1.0.3. I have Celeron 2 GHz with 512 MB RAM, XP/SP2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 14:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ah, the unhandled exception bits are very interesting! Could you please attach an example of such a log to the tracker? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-02 20:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 Yes, it's possible. Log file doesn't look very interesting: Service not available. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 8110 is proxying pop3.go2.pl:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception .... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-02 12:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Janusz, would this also be the case for you? (i.e. that the POP3 server was unavailable) I cannot duplicate this here, however. Attaching a log file for the period when this occured would really help. The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-02 00:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 I had a similar problem that last couple of days when my mail provider was down. It seems that, when it is not possible for sb_tray to access to the mailprovider, it enters a CPU and I/O write loop (many many millions of I/O writes...don't know where to but the number was really astonishing). I'm using Windows/XP PE SP1 and Spambayes 1.0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 03:00:32 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 03:00:35 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1106527 ] Installation Error on WinXP SP2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1106527, was opened at 2005-01-21 21:01 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106527&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thor (rkutsch) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Installation Error on WinXP SP2 Initial Comment: Hi, when i execute the spambayes-1.0.1.exe file the following error is display (see screenshot) best regards, Reiner ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thor (rkutsch) Date: 2005-01-25 21:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1201656 Hi, I load the file 3 or 4 time down, and tempted to execute the file. And all time comes the error message. I don't make a md5 check. When i have time i will do it. bye, reiner ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-25 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Did you check that it was downloaded correctly? I don't know why it would be trying to run in a 16-Bit MS-DOS sub-system. The installer is a 32-Bit GUI application. Did you just download it and then double-click it, or did you do something else first? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thor (rkutsch) Date: 2005-01-24 23:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1201656 Windws-Titel: 16-Bit MS-DOS sub-system path to the excute File The NTVDM-CPU has detected a unknown command. Hex ... Button Close and Ignore ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-24 19:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you please either type the text of the error dialog into a comment here (so I can use babelfish to translate it) or provide a translation into English? Have you checked to see that the file downloaded correctly? The most basic way to do that is to see that the file size matches that on the downloads page. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106527&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 03:00:59 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 03:01:02 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1093901 ] autopreview pane now turned on Message-ID: Bugs item #1093901, was opened at 2005-01-01 10:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1093901&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Urban-Lurain (urban-lurain) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: autopreview pane now turned on Initial Comment: Win XP Pro, SP2. Outlook 2002. SB 1.0.1 IMAP client. After installing this version to watch my Inbox, outlook keeps enabling the autopreview on this folder. I turn it off, switch folders, and when I come back to this folder, it is turned on again. It does not do this on any other folders. It did not do this before in installed this. I had been running version 0.8 for well over a year an never had this problem. I run this account as a limited user. However, the installation documentation was vague. It said that it would only work on the account from which it was installed, but did not specify that one needed admin privs to install. So, I granted this account admin privs, installed and configured spambayes, then logged out and changed the account back to a limited user. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 15:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-04 15:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't see that behaviour here (also XP Pro SP2 and Outlook 2002). Could you do this again (to generate any log entries) and then attach your most recent log file to this tracker? You shouldn't need admin rights to install - just rights to write to the various directories and the HKEY_LOCAL_USER registry. What happened when you tried to install? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1093901&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 03:04:55 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 03:05:02 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-815205 ] unsigned macro dialog raised Message-ID: Bugs item #815205, was opened at 2003-10-01 04:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=815205&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Barth (wbarth1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: unsigned macro dialog raised Initial Comment: unlike 0.7 version 0.81 raises the unsigned macro dialog requiring the user to " enable macros" to proceed after starting Outlook (Outlook 2000 sp3). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 15:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Can anyone confirm whether this happens with 1.0 or later? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dean Gallea (gallde) Date: 2003-12-24 12:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=937108 I get this behavior as well, with Outlook 2002 on XP Pro SP-1, all latest updates, networked DSL connection to ISP. It does NOT happen at my workplace PC, which is Outlook 2000 connected through Exchange Server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=815205&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 03:07:38 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 03:07:43 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-843521 ] E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #843521, was opened at 2003-11-17 19:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Bill Van Buren (billvb) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes Initial Comment: system: win XP Pro, AMD 2.1 GHz, 512 RAM. Outlook 2003 When I launch Outlook 2003, I get the following error message: "There was an error initializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure and re-enable this plugin. Error details: Could not warch the specified folders" I have reinstalled the plugin, and reconfigured multiple times, but I can't get it to properly initialize, or to check messages when they arrive after I've manually enabled SpamBayes from the configuration menu. It works great when I manually request filtering of a directory though! I look forward to getting it working as intended. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 15:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I gather from the comment history that Mark believed that he managed to change things to gracefully handle this, if you call that a solution. You are welcome to examine the code to see what it does. Setting the status to "pending", since no-one has indicated that they are seeing this these days within the last 9 months. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ram (ramjee_t) Date: 2005-02-03 14:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1210917 Is there a solution for this yet. If yes can it be shared with me... I am facing a similar problem with my add-in. It will help me a lot. Thanks Ram ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-04-26 23:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is anyone still seeing this bug with the latest versions? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Greg Bonzek (cantics) Date: 2003-12-24 01:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=936787 This exact thing started for me when I upgraded to Exchange 2003. Clients are Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2002, both running on XP Pro, sp1. I have yet to figure out a fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 17:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I struck a very similar issue myself recently, and found a way I could "mis-configure" my profile such that Outlook displayed an error message at startup, then immediately shut down. But I found an almost identical error to this in my log. The new version will be more graceful should it get this error. No messagebox will be shown, and SpamBayes will not be disabled. The log will get a bit of noise. I've also moved some of the initialize code to a "startup complete" event, in the hope that this will actually stop the error happening in the first place. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 19:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 2 other dupes: [ 831291 ] Loads with error - "Could not watch the specified folders" [ 831123 ] error initializing outlook addin Adding this to the "common bugs" list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 19:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Noting dupe in 848622 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 03:08:18 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 03:08:21 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1092896 ] Can't Reinstall SpamBayes Message-ID: Support Requests item #1092896, was opened at 2004-12-30 08:51 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1092896&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: markinkc (markinkc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't Reinstall SpamBayes Initial Comment: Here's a tricky one. I had both Outlook 2002 and Outlook 2003 installed on my system. I had SpamBayes installed on Outlook 2002. It appeared installed on Outlook 2003 too, but didn't work. I uninstalled Outlook 2002 (actually all of Office 2002). SpamBayes appeared to be installed in Outlook 2003, but didn't work, so I tried (in the following order): 1 - Reinstalling SpamBayes. 2 - Uninstalling and Reinstalling SpamBayes 3 - Repairing Outlook2003, then uninstalling & reinstalling SpamBayes 4 - Uninstalling both SpamBayes and Outlook 2003, then reinstalling both. 5 - Deleting the SpamBayes data folder and reinstalling SpamBayes. Nothing seems to work. The SpamBayes installer runs and says it has completed successfully, but the SpamBayes manager does not appear when Outlook launches and it is not in the Outlook toolbar. I'm thinking there's a bad registry entry left over from Outlook 2002, but have no clue what to look for. Any suggestions? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-21 16:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you uninstall SpamBayes and search through the registry are there any keys left with "spambayes" in them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1092896&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 03:11:38 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 03:11:41 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1110985 ] Slow speed when scoring email Message-ID: Support Requests item #1110985, was opened at 2005-01-28 08:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110985&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mike Hacker (mphacker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Slow speed when scoring email Initial Comment: I am running version 1.0.1 of Spambayes plug-in for Outlook on Windows XP Professional with 1GB of ram. When I open Outlook and it connects to my pop server it seems to take a very long time to download and score the email messages. During this time I notice that the hard drive is working very hard and Outlook becomes unresponsive. I usually have about 60 - 70 email messages on the pop server when I connect to download. My database has 923 good and 458 spam messages. The accurace rate is about perfect, but the speed really makes checking my email a long process. I have tired using both with and without the background filter. I prefer to not use the background filter. If I leave Outlook open, it seems to process the incoming messages fine. I only see the slowdown when Outlook is downloading several emails at once. I have seen some references to using alternate databases. Would that help increase the speed? If so, what databases are supported on Windows and how do I change the database it uses? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 15:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Users of the 1.0.x binaries cannot change which database type is used, sorry. (1.1, when it is out, will allow this). The database types that are supported are: bsddb (the default), pickle, mySQL, postgreSQL, ZODB, and ZOE (not fully tested yet). A pickle will take more memory, and will be slower to load/store the database, but will be faster in scoring. I have no idea whether the SQL/ZODB database backends would be faster than bsddb or not. However, it really shouldn't be that slow. What do you call a "very long time"? Does the log have any error messages? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110985&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 03:18:39 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 03:18:44 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-843521 ] E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #843521, was opened at 2003-11-17 12:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ramjee_t You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Bill Van Buren (billvb) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes Initial Comment: system: win XP Pro, AMD 2.1 GHz, 512 RAM. Outlook 2003 When I launch Outlook 2003, I get the following error message: "There was an error initializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure and re-enable this plugin. Error details: Could not warch the specified folders" I have reinstalled the plugin, and reconfigured multiple times, but I can't get it to properly initialize, or to check messages when they arrive after I've manually enabled SpamBayes from the configuration menu. It works great when I manually request filtering of a directory though! I look forward to getting it working as intended. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ram (ramjee_t) Date: 2005-02-03 07:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1210917 Great... But can you please let me know, how do i look at the code. I am new to sourceforge. Thanks Ram ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 07:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I gather from the comment history that Mark believed that he managed to change things to gracefully handle this, if you call that a solution. You are welcome to examine the code to see what it does. Setting the status to "pending", since no-one has indicated that they are seeing this these days within the last 9 months. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ram (ramjee_t) Date: 2005-02-03 06:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1210917 Is there a solution for this yet. If yes can it be shared with me... I am facing a similar problem with my add-in. It will help me a lot. Thanks Ram ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-04-26 17:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is anyone still seeing this bug with the latest versions? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Greg Bonzek (cantics) Date: 2003-12-23 18:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=936787 This exact thing started for me when I upgraded to Exchange 2003. Clients are Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2002, both running on XP Pro, sp1. I have yet to figure out a fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 10:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I struck a very similar issue myself recently, and found a way I could "mis-configure" my profile such that Outlook displayed an error message at startup, then immediately shut down. But I found an almost identical error to this in my log. The new version will be more graceful should it get this error. No messagebox will be shown, and SpamBayes will not be disabled. The log will get a bit of noise. I've also moved some of the initialize code to a "startup complete" event, in the hope that this will actually stop the error happening in the first place. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 12:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 2 other dupes: [ 831291 ] Loads with error - "Could not watch the specified folders" [ 831123 ] error initializing outlook addin Adding this to the "common bugs" list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 11:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Noting dupe in 848622 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 03:19:04 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 03:19:07 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1081787 ] Adding the version only to sb_filter.py Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1081787, was opened at 2004-12-09 14:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1081787&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: Matthew Vickers (matthew_vickers) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Adding the version only to sb_filter.py Initial Comment: Hi Folks, Doing some integeration of Spambayes into our network email gateway and I needed the version only to be printed to the console i.e sb_filter -v. I have modified the source of sb_filter.py to include the version commandline option. Mabey someone else out there needs this small functionality or it could be placed into the CVS tree. def version(): print >> sys.stderr, get_version_string("sb_filter"), "with engine %s" % get_version_string() sys.exit(1) and in the main() function Added a "v" to the getopt arguments opts, args = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:], 'hxd:p:nfvgstGSo:', ['help', 'examples', 'option=']) Added the following into the else if statements elif opt == '-v': version(); Regards all. Matt. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 15:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 sb_filter.py -h prints out the version information above the usage information. Is that not sufficient? (piping the output through some sort of filter could give just the version). If there's some reason that just the version by itself would be good, please let me know and I'll add it for 1.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1081787&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 03:42:22 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 03:42:25 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1031959 ] Silent mode for installation Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1031959, was opened at 2004-09-22 03:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1031959&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Soulin (soulin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Silent mode for installation Initial Comment: I think ability to create unattended/silent installation could be really great. Define what you want install (Outlook plugin only), where you want to install it, what will be the names of Spam and Suspected spam mail directories etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 15:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe you can actually do some of this already with the Inno installer. You can use "/SP", "/SILENT", "/VERYSILENT", "/SUPPRESSMSGBOXES" to be silent, for example, and there are also options for selecting components. The Inno website probably has a list, or I can put one somewhere (it's in the Inno help). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-14 20:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You're most welcome to do so, of course! If you're willing to, then submitting any created script back to the project as a patch would be gratefully received. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-10-14 19:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 Hi anadelonbrin! The main point is to make SpamBayes useful for organizations. With need of manual install it is almost useless for mass deployment :( I will try to create .msi file if U dont mind ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 16:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You could do some of this yourself. If you install it once, you'll have the necessary files, which you can copy to the appropriate place with a script. To register the addin, you can get the script to run the outlook_addin_register.exe file, which will do the registration. That should be all you need to do the install. Configuring SpamBayes is a bit trickier. You can easily manually create the configuration file (the *.ini file in the data directory), and it's easy to enter in any of the options except for folders. Folders are difficult because they are not specified by name, but by Outlook's store & entry ids (open up a *.ini file and take a look). Given that you'd have to specify these anyway, I'm not sure what the benefit of doing this outside of the Wizard would be. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1031959&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 04:15:46 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 04:15:50 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1081787 ] Adding the version only to sb_filter.py Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1081787, was opened at 2004-12-09 12:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by matthew_vickers You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1081787&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Matthew Vickers (matthew_vickers) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Adding the version only to sb_filter.py Initial Comment: Hi Folks, Doing some integeration of Spambayes into our network email gateway and I needed the version only to be printed to the console i.e sb_filter -v. I have modified the source of sb_filter.py to include the version commandline option. Mabey someone else out there needs this small functionality or it could be placed into the CVS tree. def version(): print >> sys.stderr, get_version_string("sb_filter"), "with engine %s" % get_version_string() sys.exit(1) and in the main() function Added a "v" to the getopt arguments opts, args = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:], 'hxd:p:nfvgstGSo:', ['help', 'examples', 'option=']) Added the following into the else if statements elif opt == '-v': version(); Regards all. Matt. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Matthew Vickers (matthew_vickers) Date: 2005-02-03 14:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1174624 Hi anadelonbrin, There was no "good" reason why we needed this except to place the version in the email header. I could have piped the output through a filter but as most other command line programs print a version with -v I thought that sb_filter could use it. Matt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 13:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 sb_filter.py -h prints out the version information above the usage information. Is that not sufficient? (piping the output through some sort of filter could give just the version). If there's some reason that just the version by itself would be good, please let me know and I'll add it for 1.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1081787&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 04:17:21 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 04:17:30 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-843521 ] E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #843521, was opened at 2003-11-17 19:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Bill Van Buren (billvb) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: E_FAIL exception watching folders disables SpamBayes Initial Comment: system: win XP Pro, AMD 2.1 GHz, 512 RAM. Outlook 2003 When I launch Outlook 2003, I get the following error message: "There was an error initializing the Spam plugin. Spam filtering has been disabled. Please re-configure and re-enable this plugin. Error details: Could not warch the specified folders" I have reinstalled the plugin, and reconfigured multiple times, but I can't get it to properly initialize, or to check messages when they arrive after I've manually enabled SpamBayes from the configuration menu. It works great when I manually request filtering of a directory though! I look forward to getting it working as intended. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 16:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Either go to the "Files" page and download the source (.zip or .tar.gz) or if you would rather use click, go to the "CVS" page, and follow the instructions there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ram (ramjee_t) Date: 2005-02-03 15:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1210917 Great... But can you please let me know, how do i look at the code. I am new to sourceforge. Thanks Ram ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 15:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I gather from the comment history that Mark believed that he managed to change things to gracefully handle this, if you call that a solution. You are welcome to examine the code to see what it does. Setting the status to "pending", since no-one has indicated that they are seeing this these days within the last 9 months. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ram (ramjee_t) Date: 2005-02-03 14:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1210917 Is there a solution for this yet. If yes can it be shared with me... I am facing a similar problem with my add-in. It will help me a lot. Thanks Ram ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-04-26 23:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is anyone still seeing this bug with the latest versions? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Greg Bonzek (cantics) Date: 2003-12-24 01:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=936787 This exact thing started for me when I upgraded to Exchange 2003. Clients are Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2002, both running on XP Pro, sp1. I have yet to figure out a fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 17:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I struck a very similar issue myself recently, and found a way I could "mis-configure" my profile such that Outlook displayed an error message at startup, then immediately shut down. But I found an almost identical error to this in my log. The new version will be more graceful should it get this error. No messagebox will be shown, and SpamBayes will not be disabled. The log will get a bit of noise. I've also moved some of the initialize code to a "startup complete" event, in the hope that this will actually stop the error happening in the first place. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 19:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 2 other dupes: [ 831291 ] Loads with error - "Could not watch the specified folders" [ 831123 ] error initializing outlook addin Adding this to the "common bugs" list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-03 19:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Noting dupe in 848622 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=843521&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 05:00:18 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 05:00:20 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1110985 ] Slow speed when scoring email Message-ID: Support Requests item #1110985, was opened at 2005-01-27 14:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mphacker You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110985&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mike Hacker (mphacker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Slow speed when scoring email Initial Comment: I am running version 1.0.1 of Spambayes plug-in for Outlook on Windows XP Professional with 1GB of ram. When I open Outlook and it connects to my pop server it seems to take a very long time to download and score the email messages. During this time I notice that the hard drive is working very hard and Outlook becomes unresponsive. I usually have about 60 - 70 email messages on the pop server when I connect to download. My database has 923 good and 458 spam messages. The accurace rate is about perfect, but the speed really makes checking my email a long process. I have tired using both with and without the background filter. I prefer to not use the background filter. If I leave Outlook open, it seems to process the incoming messages fine. I only see the slowdown when Outlook is downloading several emails at once. I have seen some references to using alternate databases. Would that help increase the speed? If so, what databases are supported on Windows and how do I change the database it uses? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mike Hacker (mphacker) Date: 2005-02-02 23:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=197513 I haven't timed the exact speed, but it just seems like when running the plugin Outlook and the whole computer comes to a crawl when it does the scoring after Outlook is first started. This is when I usualy have 50+ email messages coming in. The speed of scoring the individual messages that come in after that seem to happen really quick. I am probably just seening the multipled effect of the time it takes to score. I did grab the latest (as of last 2/1/05) from CVS and noticed the code for the mysql database. Does the CVS version support the mysql? If so, what are the keys that needs to be added to the INI to specify the dbtype, database, login and password? I was trying to figure out if adding support for Microsoft SQL Server / MSDE could be easily added. The code looks pretty easy to extend for other databases. I don't think it would be a big deal since you are using standard SQL. The only problem I saw was that Python really doesn't seem to have an interface into Microsoft SQL. I would imagine that MS SQL support would be simple to add if anyone has a library for connecting to MS SQL. Anyways, thanks for an excellent product! I couldn't survive a day without it. :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-02 21:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Users of the 1.0.x binaries cannot change which database type is used, sorry. (1.1, when it is out, will allow this). The database types that are supported are: bsddb (the default), pickle, mySQL, postgreSQL, ZODB, and ZOE (not fully tested yet). A pickle will take more memory, and will be slower to load/store the database, but will be faster in scoring. I have no idea whether the SQL/ZODB database backends would be faster than bsddb or not. However, it really shouldn't be that slow. What do you call a "very long time"? Does the log have any error messages? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1110985&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 09:33:28 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 09:33:30 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113863 ] sb_tray eats all cpu time Message-ID: Bugs item #1113863, was opened at 2005-02-01 11:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cloggy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_tray eats all cpu time Initial Comment: After some time sb_tray.exe eats all cpu time. I tries 1.0.2 and 1.0.3. I have Celeron 2 GHz with 512 MB RAM, XP/SP2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-03 09:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Unplug your PC from the Internet and triy to read the emails/connect to the pop3 server and it wil enter a loop. Here some details from the logfile: User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception ..and the unhandled exceptions goes on and on and on.. I think that writing these warnings is the I/O loop I already mentioned earlier. Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 02:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ah, the unhandled exception bits are very interesting! Could you please attach an example of such a log to the tracker? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-02 08:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 Yes, it's possible. Log file doesn't look very interesting: Service not available. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 8110 is proxying pop3.go2.pl:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception .... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-02 00:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Janusz, would this also be the case for you? (i.e. that the POP3 server was unavailable) I cannot duplicate this here, however. Attaching a log file for the period when this occured would really help. The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-01 12:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 I had a similar problem that last couple of days when my mail provider was down. It seems that, when it is not possible for sb_tray to access to the mailprovider, it enters a CPU and I/O write loop (many many millions of I/O writes...don't know where to but the number was really astonishing). I'm using Windows/XP PE SP1 and Spambayes 1.0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 11:50:27 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 11:50:30 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1106527 ] Installation Error on WinXP SP2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1106527, was opened at 2005-01-21 09:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rkutsch You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106527&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thor (rkutsch) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Installation Error on WinXP SP2 Initial Comment: Hi, when i execute the spambayes-1.0.1.exe file the following error is display (see screenshot) best regards, Reiner ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Thor (rkutsch) Date: 2005-02-03 11:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1201656 hi, you can close the bug, it was a broken download. The file size was ok. best regards reiner ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thor (rkutsch) Date: 2005-01-25 09:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1201656 Hi, I load the file 3 or 4 time down, and tempted to execute the file. And all time comes the error message. I don't make a md5 check. When i have time i will do it. bye, reiner ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-25 00:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Did you check that it was downloaded correctly? I don't know why it would be trying to run in a 16-Bit MS-DOS sub-system. The installer is a 32-Bit GUI application. Did you just download it and then double-click it, or did you do something else first? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thor (rkutsch) Date: 2005-01-24 11:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1201656 Windws-Titel: 16-Bit MS-DOS sub-system path to the excute File The NTVDM-CPU has detected a unknown command. Hex ... Button Close and Ignore ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-24 07:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you please either type the text of the error dialog into a comment here (so I can use babelfish to translate it) or provide a translation into English? Have you checked to see that the file downloaded correctly? The most basic way to do that is to see that the file size matches that on the downloads page. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106527&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 13:56:54 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 13:56:56 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113863 ] sb_tray eats all cpu time Message-ID: Bugs item #1113863, was opened at 2005-02-01 11:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jpiw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_tray eats all cpu time Initial Comment: After some time sb_tray.exe eats all cpu time. I tries 1.0.2 and 1.0.3. I have Celeron 2 GHz with 512 MB RAM, XP/SP2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-03 13:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 In my log is nothing more, only "warning: unhandled exception" line repeated to 100 MB file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-03 09:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Unplug your PC from the Internet and triy to read the emails/connect to the pop3 server and it wil enter a loop. Here some details from the logfile: User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception ..and the unhandled exceptions goes on and on and on.. I think that writing these warnings is the I/O loop I already mentioned earlier. Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 02:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ah, the unhandled exception bits are very interesting! Could you please attach an example of such a log to the tracker? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-02 08:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 Yes, it's possible. Log file doesn't look very interesting: Service not available. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 8110 is proxying pop3.go2.pl:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception .... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-02 00:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Janusz, would this also be the case for you? (i.e. that the POP3 server was unavailable) I cannot duplicate this here, however. Attaching a log file for the period when this occured would really help. The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-01 12:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 I had a similar problem that last couple of days when my mail provider was down. It seems that, when it is not possible for sb_tray to access to the mailprovider, it enters a CPU and I/O write loop (many many millions of I/O writes...don't know where to but the number was really astonishing). I'm using Windows/XP PE SP1 and Spambayes 1.0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 15:49:08 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 15:49:10 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1108518 ] Oracle Collaboration Suite integration Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1108518, was opened at 2005-01-24 13:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pqschipper You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1108518&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patrick Schipper (pqschipper) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Oracle Collaboration Suite integration Initial Comment: Has anyone given thought to making SpamBayes work with the Oracle Collaboration Suite (OCS)/MS Outlook connector plugin? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Patrick Schipper (pqschipper) Date: 2005-02-03 09:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1203728 Sorry for the delay... I've had to rely on an IT guy to get the log files created. Thanks! Patrick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-01-24 17:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I'm not aware of any of the developers that have access to that configuration. Have you tried setting up SpamBayes in that environment? If it didn't work, did you get any particular error messages? Can you send the SpamBayes logs? SpamBayes uses standard Outlook mechanisms to detect and process new mail. Because of this, it works with all of the standard access methods that Outlook supports (POP3, IMAP, Exchange, Hotmail). If Oracle places new messages into an Outlook folder, SpamBayes should be able to process them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1108518&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 18:54:05 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 18:54:10 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-892634 ] Outlook plugin won't score/filter msgs in 2nd PST file Message-ID: Bugs item #892634, was opened at 2004-02-07 16:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bpu_webguy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=892634&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Stanley (dbstanley) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook plugin won't score/filter msgs in 2nd PST file Initial Comment: Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5606) Windows XP Pro, all updates installed SpamBayes Outlook plugin v0.81 The SpamBayes plugin seems to score and automatically filter only messages in one PST file, if multiple PST files are used with Outlook. My main PST files ("Personal Folders") has only the standard folders (Inbox, Outbox, Sent Items, Junk E-Mail, Junk Suspects, Drafts, Deleted Items). I have another PST file (okay, actually I have 3 more) with several folders. I have Outlook rules set up to move messages into a few of these folders "after they arrive." I have set up SpamBayes to filter 3 of these folders (in the 2nd PST), as well as the Inbox folder in the main PST file. Although messages that end up in my Inbox folder are being scored and automatically filtered, messages in the second PST files are not. The "Spam" field shows nothing (blank) for messages in filtered folders in the second PST file. However, the "Show Spam clues for current message" option shows high scores (100% in some cases) for Spam messages in these folders. If I force filter-these messages using the "Filter Messages..." option, the Spam messages are filtered and moved to the Junk E- mail folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2005-02-03 11:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 My original comment was about my Work OL2000 W2K setup with multiple Exchange 5.5 mailboxes. Since with IMAP4 or POP3 servers in OL workgroup setups has a "deliver mail to this account" option, I hadn't paid too much attention to this issue on the home W2K OL2000 then OL2003 setup. Haven't tested yet under XP SP2 & OL2003 and exchange, yet, since I have not gotten approval to have it installed becasue of Homeland Security requirements. I could surely use it, again, no matter what because I'm now the lead Spam cop in the company........ -hal ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-02 19:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2004-12-29 10:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 Hmm, in RFE [ 829602 ] Multiple Inboxes seem to be mishandled, I noted that all of the exchange inboxes get processed and sent to the primary Inbox, Bayes_Spam or Bayes_NotSure folder depending, of course, on the score. The secondary mailboxes do not get items in their inboxes if SpamBayes is active, and do get their mail if it is not, as I remember. I am not currently running SpamBayes on my new locked down corporate workstation, still trying to get it on the "approved list". Security is sooooo much fun. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-15 18:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 In addition, are you using background filtering? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-07 19:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you please attach a log file that covers a period where mail arrives in a folder that should be filtered, but isn't? The plug-in will find the latest log for you via the "Diagnostics" button on the Advanced tab of the Manager, or the FAQ and troubleshooting guide explain where to find it manually. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=892634&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 19:00:11 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 19:00:18 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1103976 ] Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Message-ID: Bugs item #1103976, was opened at 2005-01-17 09:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bpu_webguy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: robert (elitemrp) Assigned to: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Summary: Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Initial Comment: I first ran into this problem a few months ago at work. But at the time I thought it was related to a custom program we run here. But now I noticed I can easily reproduce the problem on any computer running SpamBayes+Outlook 2003 on Windows XP. Basically, I will open Outlook via the icon to read mail. I will then close Outlook, and if I have Task Manager open, I will see that Outlook.exe closes correctly. Now if I launch a mailto: link (or use a program that launches a new mail), where the Compose Mail window opens, but not the actual outlook program, the problem occurs. If I close the compose mail window, by either clicking Send, or closing it without sending, the OUTLOOK.EXE task will not exit. If I launch Outlook again, I'll now have multiple instances of OUTLOOK.EXE in task manager. Now the multiple instances is what caused the problem with our custom software at work, but that has nothing to do with the fact that Outlook does not exit correctly when running Spambayes and having a program/mailto link open the Compose Mail window. Yes I realize there have been 2 previous tickets about OUTLOOK.EXE closing, but none came to the conclusion that it's caused by a Compose Mail window. And both are closed without a solution. I have tested this on several computers and have tried multiple things to try to fix it (such as renaming extend.dat and other files) and nothing seems to work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2005-02-03 12:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 One other source of hanging OL up, with or without Spambayes is ActiveSync for your PDA, celll phone or whatever. AS does tend to work behind your back, a little bit. One of the reasons I love Process Explorer from System Internals... -h ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gil (spambayes411) Date: 2005-02-02 04:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1210353 I've discovered this is not limited to the mailto function. I use a program called SynchPST to keep outlook sychronized between my home computer and my laptop. When SynchPST opens, I see it in the task manager and it opens Outlook as well. After I synch my PST files, I close SynchPST. It closes but Outlook remains in the task manager. If the Spambayes add-in is not loaded, then both SynchPST and Outlook quit as they should. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-24 17:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks Kenny :) I don't really know what might be causing this, but I guess you could start by checking to see if the spambayes log gets to the "addin terminating" part. Let me know if I can help at all (though I don't have OL2003 anywhere). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-01-24 10:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Yep, I was able to confirm this problem on Outlook 2003. If I activate a mailto link with SpamBayes loaded and enabled, OUTLOOK.EXE will not exit when I close the compose window. If I disable SpamBayes filtering from SpamBayes Manager, OUTLOOK.EXE still doesn't exit. If I completely disable loading of SpamBayes from the COM Add-ins dialog then OUTLOOK.EXE closes properly when I close the compose window. I'll look into this further when I get a chance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-23 23:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Maybe this is specific to Outlook 2003 then? Kenny: you've got 2003, right? Can you try and replicate this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: robert (elitemrp) Date: 2005-01-21 05:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1198932 Yes, it only happens with SpamBayes installed. I install SpamBayes, set up the toolbar, etc Close Outlook, type mailto:blah@blah.com in a browser or click a mail link and it opens the Compose Mail window. Once I close this window, Outlook.exe ramains in the task list. If I click another mailto link I'll have 2 stuck open, then 3, etc If I have only 1 process loaded and it's the main Outlook window, when I click a mailto link it will work fine since it doesn't load a separate outlook.exe process. It only does this when the main outlook program isn't loaded. Once I uninstall SpamBayes or uncheck it in the COM Add-Ins area in Outlook, this problem goes away. As soon as I close a Compose Mail window, OUTLOOK.EXE terminates correctly. I've tried this on several PCs, some with fresh installs of XP/ Outlook, some with several months old installs and other applications, it's the same on each. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-20 21:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Have you tried this without SpamBayes installed? I get the same behaviour without SpamBayes, which says to me it's an Outlook problem, not a SpamBayes one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 19:03:48 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 19:03:56 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-968069 ] SpamBayes causes OL2003 to crash when launched by ActiveSync Message-ID: Bugs item #968069, was opened at 2004-06-07 04:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bpu_webguy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=968069&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alun (aluncarp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes causes OL2003 to crash when launched by ActiveSync Initial Comment: I am using SpamBayes RC1 but this happened in previous versions. If I plug in my PDA without Outlook running ActiveSync will launch Outlook to perform synchronisation. Outlook then encouters a serious error when opening the add-in spambayes. If I launch Outlook before plugging in my PDA everything is fine, if I disable the spambayes add-in Outlook launches fine from ActiveSync. System details: Windows XP Pro SP1, 768 MB RAM, Outlook 2003 All with latest hot fixes/updates. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2005-02-03 12:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 I have had no problem with Active Sync 3.5 to 3.8 with my CE 3.0 2002 device and OL2000 then OL2003 in workgroup mode. OL does remain open if ActiveSync is resident, and ususally closes if it is not. -h ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=968069&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 22:35:22 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 22:35:26 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1106527 ] Installation Error on WinXP SP2 Message-ID: Bugs item #1106527, was opened at 2005-01-21 21:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106527&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thor (rkutsch) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Installation Error on WinXP SP2 Initial Comment: Hi, when i execute the spambayes-1.0.1.exe file the following error is display (see screenshot) best regards, Reiner ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-04 10:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for the update! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thor (rkutsch) Date: 2005-02-03 23:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1201656 hi, you can close the bug, it was a broken download. The file size was ok. best regards reiner ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thor (rkutsch) Date: 2005-01-25 21:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1201656 Hi, I load the file 3 or 4 time down, and tempted to execute the file. And all time comes the error message. I don't make a md5 check. When i have time i will do it. bye, reiner ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-25 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Did you check that it was downloaded correctly? I don't know why it would be trying to run in a 16-Bit MS-DOS sub-system. The installer is a 32-Bit GUI application. Did you just download it and then double-click it, or did you do something else first? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thor (rkutsch) Date: 2005-01-24 23:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1201656 Windws-Titel: 16-Bit MS-DOS sub-system path to the excute File The NTVDM-CPU has detected a unknown command. Hex ... Button Close and Ignore ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-24 19:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you please either type the text of the error dialog into a comment here (so I can use babelfish to translate it) or provide a translation into English? Have you checked to see that the file downloaded correctly? The most basic way to do that is to see that the file size matches that on the downloads page. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1106527&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 3 22:42:04 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 3 22:42:07 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1108518 ] Oracle Collaboration Suite integration Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1108518, was opened at 2005-01-25 07:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1108518&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patrick Schipper (pqschipper) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Oracle Collaboration Suite integration Initial Comment: Has anyone given thought to making SpamBayes work with the Oracle Collaboration Suite (OCS)/MS Outlook connector plugin? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-04 10:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You could get rid of the problem with the spam field by turning writing to that off. However, the invalid entry id problem will probably still be there. If that's something specifically related to Oracle, then I don't know whether there's anything we can do about that (since, as Kenny said, I don't believe any of us have access to that configuration). OTOH, there are other people with invalid entry id problems, so maybe there will be a common solution. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patrick Schipper (pqschipper) Date: 2005-02-04 03:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1203728 Sorry for the delay... I've had to rely on an IT guy to get the log files created. Thanks! Patrick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-01-25 11:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I'm not aware of any of the developers that have access to that configuration. Have you tried setting up SpamBayes in that environment? If it didn't work, did you get any particular error messages? Can you send the SpamBayes logs? SpamBayes uses standard Outlook mechanisms to detect and process new mail. Because of this, it works with all of the standard access methods that Outlook supports (POP3, IMAP, Exchange, Hotmail). If Oracle places new messages into an Outlook folder, SpamBayes should be able to process them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1108518&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Feb 4 02:08:54 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Feb 4 02:08:56 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1115876 ] Outlook problems with slurp experimental options enabled Message-ID: Bugs item #1115876, was opened at 2005-02-03 20:08 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115876&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: John (johnf3) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook problems with slurp experimental options enabled Initial Comment: I played around a bit with the experimental Spambayes options and ran into some quirks. When I enabled the x-only_slurp_base and x-slurp_urls options and restarted Outlook I got several errors: - The Outlook reminder service did not start - POP3 email retrieval failed - When I opened the Spambayes manager the lists of folders to scan for spam and ham was corrupt (i.e. several folders said . I changed the options back to FALSE and restarted Outlook and the errors went away and the file folders looked fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115876&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Feb 4 19:01:22 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Feb 4 19:01:24 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1116348 ] Play sound When non-spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1116348, was opened at 2005-02-04 12:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1116348&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kenneth Hester (kennethhester) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Play sound When non-spam received Initial Comment: Play a sound when a non-spam message is received. If I tell Outlook to play a sound when a new message arrives it plays one every time a spam message arrives. Spam bayes could play one just when a non-spam message arrives. There could be a configuration option to do this for good emails and/or questionable emails. Another nice feature would be to control the new-mail taskbar icon, cursor changing and window flashing that Outlook normally does. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1116348&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 5 07:42:19 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 5 07:42:21 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1116710 ] BUG 1113863 Message-ID: Bugs item #1116710, was opened at 2005-02-05 06:42 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1116710&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: whatever697797 (whatever697797) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: BUG 1113863 Initial Comment: Running Spambayes 1.0.3 as previous user. Also running WinXP Home with SP2, Celeron, 512 RAM, etc. Also encountering this bug. When I fire off my VPN software, thus denying Spambayes access to the network, my SB logfile fills to capacity. 64GB last time - yes that is a 'G'. Is there some way to turn off logging, or to limit the size of the logfile? This makes Spambayes unusable for me. If I leave my PC unattended and the network goes down for any reason, I now have a machine whose storage space is completely filled by one SB logfile. That's not right. No sense in attaching the log. Looks just as everyone else has described: "Unhandled Exception" 8 billion times. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1116710&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Feb 6 17:58:50 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Feb 6 17:58:58 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1116348 ] Play sound When non-spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1116348, was opened at 2005-02-04 13:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1116348&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kenneth Hester (kennethhester) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Play sound When non-spam received Initial Comment: Play a sound when a non-spam message is received. If I tell Outlook to play a sound when a new message arrives it plays one every time a spam message arrives. Spam bayes could play one just when a non-spam message arrives. There could be a configuration option to do this for good emails and/or questionable emails. Another nice feature would be to control the new-mail taskbar icon, cursor changing and window flashing that Outlook normally does. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-02-06 11:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Dupe of RFE [ 800487 ] This feature has already been added in latest CVS and will be available in version 1.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1116348&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 7 02:23:18 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 7 02:23:23 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1116710 ] BUG 1113863 Message-ID: Bugs item #1116710, was opened at 2005-02-05 19:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1116710&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: whatever697797 (whatever697797) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: BUG 1113863 Initial Comment: Running Spambayes 1.0.3 as previous user. Also running WinXP Home with SP2, Celeron, 512 RAM, etc. Also encountering this bug. When I fire off my VPN software, thus denying Spambayes access to the network, my SB logfile fills to capacity. 64GB last time - yes that is a 'G'. Is there some way to turn off logging, or to limit the size of the logfile? This makes Spambayes unusable for me. If I leave my PC unattended and the network goes down for any reason, I now have a machine whose storage space is completely filled by one SB logfile. That's not right. No sense in attaching the log. Looks just as everyone else has described: "Unhandled Exception" 8 billion times. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 14:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 1113863 ] sb_tray eats all cpu time https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=1113863 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1116710&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 7 02:27:41 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 7 02:27:44 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113863 ] sb_tray eats all cpu time Message-ID: Bugs item #1113863, was opened at 2005-02-01 23:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_tray eats all cpu time Initial Comment: After some time sb_tray.exe eats all cpu time. I tries 1.0.2 and 1.0.3. I have Celeron 2 GHz with 512 MB RAM, XP/SP2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 14:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 1116710 ] BUG 1113863 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1116710&group_id=61702 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-04 01:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 In my log is nothing more, only "warning: unhandled exception" line repeated to 100 MB file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-03 21:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Unplug your PC from the Internet and triy to read the emails/connect to the pop3 server and it wil enter a loop. Here some details from the logfile: User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception ..and the unhandled exceptions goes on and on and on.. I think that writing these warnings is the I/O loop I already mentioned earlier. Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 14:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ah, the unhandled exception bits are very interesting! Could you please attach an example of such a log to the tracker? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-02 20:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 Yes, it's possible. Log file doesn't look very interesting: Service not available. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 8110 is proxying pop3.go2.pl:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception .... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-02 12:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Janusz, would this also be the case for you? (i.e. that the POP3 server was unavailable) I cannot duplicate this here, however. Attaching a log file for the period when this occured would really help. The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-02 00:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 I had a similar problem that last couple of days when my mail provider was down. It seems that, when it is not possible for sb_tray to access to the mailprovider, it enters a CPU and I/O write loop (many many millions of I/O writes...don't know where to but the number was really astonishing). I'm using Windows/XP PE SP1 and Spambayes 1.0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 7 02:29:13 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 7 02:29:17 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113863 ] sb_tray eats all cpu time Message-ID: Bugs item #1113863, was opened at 2005-02-01 23:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_tray eats all cpu time Initial Comment: After some time sb_tray.exe eats all cpu time. I tries 1.0.2 and 1.0.3. I have Celeron 2 GHz with 512 MB RAM, XP/SP2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 14:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Why are you trying to check for mail when a network connection is unavailable? If you didn't try to check for new mail, then the error wouldn't occur and the log entry would not be created. I'm relucant to disable the printing of this error when it is a valid error and should be reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 14:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 1116710 ] BUG 1113863 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1116710&group_id=61702 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-04 01:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 In my log is nothing more, only "warning: unhandled exception" line repeated to 100 MB file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-03 21:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Unplug your PC from the Internet and triy to read the emails/connect to the pop3 server and it wil enter a loop. Here some details from the logfile: User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception ..and the unhandled exceptions goes on and on and on.. I think that writing these warnings is the I/O loop I already mentioned earlier. Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 14:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ah, the unhandled exception bits are very interesting! Could you please attach an example of such a log to the tracker? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-02 20:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 Yes, it's possible. Log file doesn't look very interesting: Service not available. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 8110 is proxying pop3.go2.pl:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception .... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-02 12:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Janusz, would this also be the case for you? (i.e. that the POP3 server was unavailable) I cannot duplicate this here, however. Attaching a log file for the period when this occured would really help. The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-02 00:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 I had a similar problem that last couple of days when my mail provider was down. It seems that, when it is not possible for sb_tray to access to the mailprovider, it enters a CPU and I/O write loop (many many millions of I/O writes...don't know where to but the number was really astonishing). I'm using Windows/XP PE SP1 and Spambayes 1.0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 7 05:42:26 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 7 05:42:29 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1115876 ] Outlook problems with slurp experimental options enabled Message-ID: Bugs item #1115876, was opened at 2005-02-04 14:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115876&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: John (johnf3) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Outlook problems with slurp experimental options enabled Initial Comment: I played around a bit with the experimental Spambayes options and ran into some quirks. When I enabled the x-only_slurp_base and x-slurp_urls options and restarted Outlook I got several errors: - The Outlook reminder service did not start - POP3 email retrieval failed - When I opened the Spambayes manager the lists of folders to scan for spam and ham was corrupt (i.e. several folders said . I changed the options back to FALSE and restarted Outlook and the errors went away and the file folders looked fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 17:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you still have the log file for this time? If so, it would be great if you could attach it here. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115876&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 7 09:15:45 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 7 09:15:50 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113863 ] sb_tray eats all cpu time Message-ID: Bugs item #1113863, was opened at 2005-02-01 11:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cloggy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_tray eats all cpu time Initial Comment: After some time sb_tray.exe eats all cpu time. I tries 1.0.2 and 1.0.3. I have Celeron 2 GHz with 512 MB RAM, XP/SP2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-07 09:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Tony, I did not know that my mailprovider was down and I'm not going to verify it each time I want to use my email program. I figured that out after sbtray was using all my cpu cycles and filling up my disk space. The error logging should not be turned off but repeating the same error line endlessly should be avoided...;-) Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 02:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Why are you trying to check for mail when a network connection is unavailable? If you didn't try to check for new mail, then the error wouldn't occur and the log entry would not be created. I'm relucant to disable the printing of this error when it is a valid error and should be reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 02:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 1116710 ] BUG 1113863 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1116710&group_id=61702 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-03 13:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 In my log is nothing more, only "warning: unhandled exception" line repeated to 100 MB file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-03 09:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Unplug your PC from the Internet and triy to read the emails/connect to the pop3 server and it wil enter a loop. Here some details from the logfile: User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception ..and the unhandled exceptions goes on and on and on.. I think that writing these warnings is the I/O loop I already mentioned earlier. Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 02:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ah, the unhandled exception bits are very interesting! Could you please attach an example of such a log to the tracker? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-02 08:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 Yes, it's possible. Log file doesn't look very interesting: Service not available. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 8110 is proxying pop3.go2.pl:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception .... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-02 00:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Janusz, would this also be the case for you? (i.e. that the POP3 server was unavailable) I cannot duplicate this here, however. Attaching a log file for the period when this occured would really help. The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-01 12:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 I had a similar problem that last couple of days when my mail provider was down. It seems that, when it is not possible for sb_tray to access to the mailprovider, it enters a CPU and I/O write loop (many many millions of I/O writes...don't know where to but the number was really astonishing). I'm using Windows/XP PE SP1 and Spambayes 1.0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 7 10:18:38 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 7 10:18:43 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113863 ] sb_tray eats all cpu time Message-ID: Bugs item #1113863, was opened at 2005-02-01 11:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cloggy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_tray eats all cpu time Initial Comment: After some time sb_tray.exe eats all cpu time. I tries 1.0.2 and 1.0.3. I have Celeron 2 GHz with 512 MB RAM, XP/SP2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-07 10:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Tony, I did not know that my mailprovider was down and I'm not going to verify it each time I want to use my email program. I figured that out after sbtray was using all my cpu cycles and filling up my disk space. The error logging should not be turned off but repeating the same error line endlessly should be avoided...;-) Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-07 09:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Tony, I did not know that my mailprovider was down and I'm not going to verify it each time I want to use my email program. I figured that out after sbtray was using all my cpu cycles and filling up my disk space. The error logging should not be turned off but repeating the same error line endlessly should be avoided...;-) Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 02:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Why are you trying to check for mail when a network connection is unavailable? If you didn't try to check for new mail, then the error wouldn't occur and the log entry would not be created. I'm relucant to disable the printing of this error when it is a valid error and should be reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 02:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 1116710 ] BUG 1113863 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1116710&group_id=61702 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-03 13:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 In my log is nothing more, only "warning: unhandled exception" line repeated to 100 MB file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-03 09:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Unplug your PC from the Internet and triy to read the emails/connect to the pop3 server and it wil enter a loop. Here some details from the logfile: User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception ..and the unhandled exceptions goes on and on and on.. I think that writing these warnings is the I/O loop I already mentioned earlier. Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 02:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ah, the unhandled exception bits are very interesting! Could you please attach an example of such a log to the tracker? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-02 08:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 Yes, it's possible. Log file doesn't look very interesting: Service not available. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 8110 is proxying pop3.go2.pl:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception .... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-02 00:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Janusz, would this also be the case for you? (i.e. that the POP3 server was unavailable) I cannot duplicate this here, however. Attaching a log file for the period when this occured would really help. The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-01 12:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 I had a similar problem that last couple of days when my mail provider was down. It seems that, when it is not possible for sb_tray to access to the mailprovider, it enters a CPU and I/O write loop (many many millions of I/O writes...don't know where to but the number was really astonishing). I'm using Windows/XP PE SP1 and Spambayes 1.0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 7 10:42:34 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 7 10:42:39 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113863 ] sb_tray eats all cpu time Message-ID: Bugs item #1113863, was opened at 2005-02-01 11:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jpiw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_tray eats all cpu time Initial Comment: After some time sb_tray.exe eats all cpu time. I tries 1.0.2 and 1.0.3. I have Celeron 2 GHz with 512 MB RAM, XP/SP2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-07 10:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 I agree, for me looks like connection is established, but later breaks - my email client reports about too long inactivity time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-07 10:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Tony, I did not know that my mailprovider was down and I'm not going to verify it each time I want to use my email program. I figured that out after sbtray was using all my cpu cycles and filling up my disk space. The error logging should not be turned off but repeating the same error line endlessly should be avoided...;-) Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-07 09:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Tony, I did not know that my mailprovider was down and I'm not going to verify it each time I want to use my email program. I figured that out after sbtray was using all my cpu cycles and filling up my disk space. The error logging should not be turned off but repeating the same error line endlessly should be avoided...;-) Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 02:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Why are you trying to check for mail when a network connection is unavailable? If you didn't try to check for new mail, then the error wouldn't occur and the log entry would not be created. I'm relucant to disable the printing of this error when it is a valid error and should be reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 02:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 1116710 ] BUG 1113863 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1116710&group_id=61702 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-03 13:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 In my log is nothing more, only "warning: unhandled exception" line repeated to 100 MB file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-03 09:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Unplug your PC from the Internet and triy to read the emails/connect to the pop3 server and it wil enter a loop. Here some details from the logfile: User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception ..and the unhandled exceptions goes on and on and on.. I think that writing these warnings is the I/O loop I already mentioned earlier. Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 02:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ah, the unhandled exception bits are very interesting! Could you please attach an example of such a log to the tracker? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-02 08:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 Yes, it's possible. Log file doesn't look very interesting: Service not available. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 8110 is proxying pop3.go2.pl:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception .... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-02 00:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Janusz, would this also be the case for you? (i.e. that the POP3 server was unavailable) I cannot duplicate this here, however. Attaching a log file for the period when this occured would really help. The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-01 12:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 I had a similar problem that last couple of days when my mail provider was down. It seems that, when it is not possible for sb_tray to access to the mailprovider, it enters a CPU and I/O write loop (many many millions of I/O writes...don't know where to but the number was really astonishing). I'm using Windows/XP PE SP1 and Spambayes 1.0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 7 14:39:41 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 7 14:39:46 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1115876 ] Outlook problems with slurp experimental options enabled Message-ID: Bugs item #1115876, was opened at 2005-02-03 20:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by johnf3 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115876&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: John (johnf3) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Outlook problems with slurp experimental options enabled Initial Comment: I played around a bit with the experimental Spambayes options and ran into some quirks. When I enabled the x-only_slurp_base and x-slurp_urls options and restarted Outlook I got several errors: - The Outlook reminder service did not start - POP3 email retrieval failed - When I opened the Spambayes manager the lists of folders to scan for spam and ham was corrupt (i.e. several folders said . I changed the options back to FALSE and restarted Outlook and the errors went away and the file folders looked fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: John (johnf3) Date: 2005-02-07 08:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1211752 What's the log file name? I'll take a look and see if I have it, or try and duplicate the issue again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-06 23:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you still have the log file for this time? If so, it would be great if you could attach it here. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115876&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 7 22:07:04 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 7 22:07:08 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1115876 ] Outlook problems with slurp experimental options enabled Message-ID: Bugs item #1115876, was opened at 2005-02-04 14:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115876&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: John (johnf3) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Outlook problems with slurp experimental options enabled Initial Comment: I played around a bit with the experimental Spambayes options and ran into some quirks. When I enabled the x-only_slurp_base and x-slurp_urls options and restarted Outlook I got several errors: - The Outlook reminder service did not start - POP3 email retrieval failed - When I opened the Spambayes manager the lists of folders to scan for spam and ham was corrupt (i.e. several folders said . I changed the options back to FALSE and restarted Outlook and the errors went away and the file folders looked fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-08 10:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The logs are called spambayesX.log, where X is a number from 1 (most recent) to 5. They are stored in the Windows temp directory (e.g., with XP, this is probably '/Documents and Settings/{username}/Local Settings/Temp'). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John (johnf3) Date: 2005-02-08 02:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1211752 What's the log file name? I'll take a look and see if I have it, or try and duplicate the issue again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 17:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you still have the log file for this time? If so, it would be great if you could attach it here. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115876&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 7 22:32:43 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 7 22:32:46 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1115876 ] Outlook problems with slurp experimental options enabled Message-ID: Bugs item #1115876, was opened at 2005-02-03 20:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by johnf3 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115876&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: John (johnf3) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Outlook problems with slurp experimental options enabled Initial Comment: I played around a bit with the experimental Spambayes options and ran into some quirks. When I enabled the x-only_slurp_base and x-slurp_urls options and restarted Outlook I got several errors: - The Outlook reminder service did not start - POP3 email retrieval failed - When I opened the Spambayes manager the lists of folders to scan for spam and ham was corrupt (i.e. several folders said . I changed the options back to FALSE and restarted Outlook and the errors went away and the file folders looked fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: John (johnf3) Date: 2005-02-07 16:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1211752 The logs that would have more details are gone...too old. I tried to recreate the errors and can't, so I guess just close this one and I'll be more diligent and save the logs next time (now that I know where they are). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 16:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The logs are called spambayesX.log, where X is a number from 1 (most recent) to 5. They are stored in the Windows temp directory (e.g., with XP, this is probably '/Documents and Settings/{username}/Local Settings/Temp'). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John (johnf3) Date: 2005-02-07 08:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1211752 What's the log file name? I'll take a look and see if I have it, or try and duplicate the issue again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-06 23:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you still have the log file for this time? If so, it would be great if you could attach it here. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115876&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 7 22:36:35 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 7 22:36:37 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1115876 ] Outlook problems with slurp experimental options enabled Message-ID: Bugs item #1115876, was opened at 2005-02-04 14:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115876&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Later Priority: 5 Submitted By: John (johnf3) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Outlook problems with slurp experimental options enabled Initial Comment: I played around a bit with the experimental Spambayes options and ran into some quirks. When I enabled the x-only_slurp_base and x-slurp_urls options and restarted Outlook I got several errors: - The Outlook reminder service did not start - POP3 email retrieval failed - When I opened the Spambayes manager the lists of folders to scan for spam and ham was corrupt (i.e. several folders said . I changed the options back to FALSE and restarted Outlook and the errors went away and the file folders looked fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-08 10:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ok, thanks for the update. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John (johnf3) Date: 2005-02-08 10:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1211752 The logs that would have more details are gone...too old. I tried to recreate the errors and can't, so I guess just close this one and I'll be more diligent and save the logs next time (now that I know where they are). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-08 10:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The logs are called spambayesX.log, where X is a number from 1 (most recent) to 5. They are stored in the Windows temp directory (e.g., with XP, this is probably '/Documents and Settings/{username}/Local Settings/Temp'). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John (johnf3) Date: 2005-02-08 02:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1211752 What's the log file name? I'll take a look and see if I have it, or try and duplicate the issue again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 17:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you still have the log file for this time? If so, it would be great if you could attach it here. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115876&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 7 23:56:10 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 7 23:56:12 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113863 ] sb_tray eats all cpu time Message-ID: Bugs item #1113863, was opened at 2005-02-01 23:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_tray eats all cpu time Initial Comment: After some time sb_tray.exe eats all cpu time. I tries 1.0.2 and 1.0.3. I have Celeron 2 GHz with 512 MB RAM, XP/SP2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-08 11:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ok, I've changed the behaviour for 1.1. If globals:verbose is set to True, then the behaviour is the same. Otherwise each distinct connection error is reported only once per hour. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-07 22:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 I agree, for me looks like connection is established, but later breaks - my email client reports about too long inactivity time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-07 22:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Tony, I did not know that my mailprovider was down and I'm not going to verify it each time I want to use my email program. I figured that out after sbtray was using all my cpu cycles and filling up my disk space. The error logging should not be turned off but repeating the same error line endlessly should be avoided...;-) Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-07 21:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Tony, I did not know that my mailprovider was down and I'm not going to verify it each time I want to use my email program. I figured that out after sbtray was using all my cpu cycles and filling up my disk space. The error logging should not be turned off but repeating the same error line endlessly should be avoided...;-) Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 14:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Why are you trying to check for mail when a network connection is unavailable? If you didn't try to check for new mail, then the error wouldn't occur and the log entry would not be created. I'm relucant to disable the printing of this error when it is a valid error and should be reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 14:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 1116710 ] BUG 1113863 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1116710&group_id=61702 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-04 01:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 In my log is nothing more, only "warning: unhandled exception" line repeated to 100 MB file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-03 21:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Unplug your PC from the Internet and triy to read the emails/connect to the pop3 server and it wil enter a loop. Here some details from the logfile: User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception ..and the unhandled exceptions goes on and on and on.. I think that writing these warnings is the I/O loop I already mentioned earlier. Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 14:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ah, the unhandled exception bits are very interesting! Could you please attach an example of such a log to the tracker? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-02 20:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 Yes, it's possible. Log file doesn't look very interesting: Service not available. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 8110 is proxying pop3.go2.pl:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception .... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-02 12:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Janusz, would this also be the case for you? (i.e. that the POP3 server was unavailable) I cannot duplicate this here, however. Attaching a log file for the period when this occured would really help. The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-02 00:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 I had a similar problem that last couple of days when my mail provider was down. It seems that, when it is not possible for sb_tray to access to the mailprovider, it enters a CPU and I/O write loop (many many millions of I/O writes...don't know where to but the number was really astonishing). I'm using Windows/XP PE SP1 and Spambayes 1.0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 8 11:07:20 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 8 11:07:22 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1118500 ] firends in contacts folder are marked as spam Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1118500, was opened at 2005-02-08 11:07 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1118500&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: DrKrabbe (drkrabbe) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: firends in contacts folder are marked as spam Initial Comment: I use spambayes with outlook integration. It would be very nice, if spambayes will have an option to disable spam filtering for any contact, that is listed in the contacts folder (so the contacts become a whitelist). That would definetly decrease the number of filter "good messages" without haveing any negative impact (in my case). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1118500&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 8 12:34:02 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 8 12:34:07 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113863 ] sb_tray eats all cpu time Message-ID: Bugs item #1113863, was opened at 2005-02-01 11:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jpiw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_tray eats all cpu time Initial Comment: After some time sb_tray.exe eats all cpu time. I tries 1.0.2 and 1.0.3. I have Celeron 2 GHz with 512 MB RAM, XP/SP2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-08 12:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 You can duplicate this error by setting remote host to any host without pop3 service (at 110 port) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 23:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ok, I've changed the behaviour for 1.1. If globals:verbose is set to True, then the behaviour is the same. Otherwise each distinct connection error is reported only once per hour. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-07 10:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 I agree, for me looks like connection is established, but later breaks - my email client reports about too long inactivity time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-07 10:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Tony, I did not know that my mailprovider was down and I'm not going to verify it each time I want to use my email program. I figured that out after sbtray was using all my cpu cycles and filling up my disk space. The error logging should not be turned off but repeating the same error line endlessly should be avoided...;-) Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-07 09:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Tony, I did not know that my mailprovider was down and I'm not going to verify it each time I want to use my email program. I figured that out after sbtray was using all my cpu cycles and filling up my disk space. The error logging should not be turned off but repeating the same error line endlessly should be avoided...;-) Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 02:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Why are you trying to check for mail when a network connection is unavailable? If you didn't try to check for new mail, then the error wouldn't occur and the log entry would not be created. I'm relucant to disable the printing of this error when it is a valid error and should be reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-07 02:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 1116710 ] BUG 1113863 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1116710&group_id=61702 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-03 13:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 In my log is nothing more, only "warning: unhandled exception" line repeated to 100 MB file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-03 09:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 Unplug your PC from the Internet and triy to read the emails/connect to the pop3 server and it wil enter a loop. Here some details from the logfile: User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to pop.unlimitedmail.org:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.bluebottle.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.prettel.nl:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') Can't connect to mail.runbox.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception ..and the unhandled exceptions goes on and on and on.. I think that writing these warnings is the I/O loop I already mentioned earlier. Regards, Dick ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 02:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ah, the unhandled exception bits are very interesting! Could you please attach an example of such a log to the tracker? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-02 08:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 Yes, it's possible. Log file doesn't look very interesting: Service not available. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 8110 is proxying pop3.go2.pl:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception warning: unhandled exception .... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-02 00:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Janusz, would this also be the case for you? (i.e. that the POP3 server was unavailable) I cannot duplicate this here, however. Attaching a log file for the period when this occured would really help. The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Cloggy (cloggy) Date: 2005-02-01 12:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1209514 I had a similar problem that last couple of days when my mail provider was down. It seems that, when it is not possible for sb_tray to access to the mailprovider, it enters a CPU and I/O write loop (many many millions of I/O writes...don't know where to but the number was really astonishing). I'm using Windows/XP PE SP1 and Spambayes 1.0.3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 8 22:46:01 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 8 22:46:05 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1118500 ] firends in contacts folder are marked as spam Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1118500, was opened at 2005-02-08 23:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1118500&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: DrKrabbe (drkrabbe) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: firends in contacts folder are marked as spam Initial Comment: I use spambayes with outlook integration. It would be very nice, if spambayes will have an option to disable spam filtering for any contact, that is listed in the contacts folder (so the contacts become a whitelist). That would definetly decrease the number of filter "good messages" without haveing any negative impact (in my case). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-09 10:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see FAQ 6.6: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1118500&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 9 04:06:27 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 9 04:06:30 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1119049 ] X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback Message-ID: Bugs item #1119049, was opened at 2005-02-08 22:06 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1119049&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul Harding (dj-kast) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback Initial Comment: SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0.3 (January 2005) Error on EVERY message: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 475, in onRetr . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 190, in chi2_spamprob . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 493, in _getclues . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 508, in _worddistanceget . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 308, in probability .AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1119049&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 9 04:11:03 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 9 04:11:06 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1119049 ] X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback Message-ID: Bugs item #1119049, was opened at 2005-02-09 16:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1119049&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul Harding (dj-kast) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback Initial Comment: SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0.3 (January 2005) Error on EVERY message: X-Spambayes-Exception: Traceback (most recent call last): . File "sb_server.pyc", line 475, in onRetr . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 190, in chi2_spamprob . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 493, in _getclues . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 508, in _worddistanceget . File "spambayes\classifier.pyc", line 308, in probability .AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-09 16:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This means that your database is corrupt - you will need to retrain from scratch (delete the database files, and restart training). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1119049&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 01:29:35 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 01:29:42 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113593 ] 100% SPAM messages pass through Message-ID: Bugs item #1113593, was opened at 2005-02-01 13:45 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113593&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Viktor Ferenczi (complex) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 100% SPAM messages pass through Initial Comment: I'm a happy user of spambayes since the 1.0.0 version. Currently I'm using spambayes 1.0.3 in concert with MS Outlook 2002 SP2. My filter is traned with about 1000 good and 1500 spam messages. SPAM score settings used: 0..15%: HAM 15..80%: Unsure 80..100%: SPAM I found an interesting behaviour of spambayes several months ago. Messages with 99.97% combined SPAM score are correctly categorized as SPAM, but others with 100% score are categorized as Unsure. These messages always appears to be SPAM for me, so I deleted them as SPAM using the spambayes toolbar. They should be categorized as SPAM. Is it a bug in spambayes? Most of my incoming mail is Hungarian, so nearly every non-Hungarian mail is spam. This trains the filter to separate languages rather than spam and no-spam. It yields very efficient SPAM detection and offten 100% SPAM scores. I think this can be the root of my problem. This behaviour can affect every and all non English speaking users. I've attached an example mail with 100% SPAM clue. SPAM clues reported by spambayes are included. The bug occours with increasing probability as time goes on. OS: WinXP Prof SP1 Office: MS Office XP SP2 - Hungarian version Virus and spyware protection is actively used and maintained. Thanks for your help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-01 13:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Any message with a score over your spam threshold (80%) should be moved to the spam folder. Could you please attach a log for a period when this isn't the case to the tracker? (SpamBayes->SpamBayes Manager->Advanced->Diagnostics->View Log) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113593&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 01:30:45 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 01:31:06 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809949 ] Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Message-ID: Bugs item #809949, was opened at 2003-09-21 10:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spambayes doesn't move spam messages Initial Comment: I trained spambayes over a lot of similar messages. I noticed it assigns 90%+ spam score to messages... but it doesn't move them to the spam folder I created! If I manually select the messages and click on "Delete as spam", the messages are correctly moved, nut it doesn't do that automatically, so it's completely unuseful! My OE is working perfectly, several different accounts and filter rules to move mail from inbox folder to specific folders for every account. I've got Norton Antivirus 2004 up and running, with email control ON. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-10 13:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Closed as per (very old!) comment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonardo Ruppenthal (wrongbutton) Date: 2004-02-28 21:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=871993 I found that my problem was resolved by upgrading to SpamBayes version 0.9. I have Outlook XP (SP2) running on Win XP Pro (SP1). SpamBayes was not moving most of the messages that were significantly flagged as spam. As per the 0.9 instructions, I uninstalled SpamBayes and then reinstalled the new version. Rather than continuing to use my existing database, I chose to retrain based on about 6 months of previously categorized email. It took almost an hour, but the results were highly worthwhile as all my messages are now being appropriately filtered. In conclusion: SpamBayes version 0.9 solved my problem. I hope it works for you too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Larry Finkel (lsp85) Date: 2003-12-21 08:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=935221 upgraded Outlook (MS Office) from 2000 to 2003, on a Win2k 5.00.2195 SP4 OS computer. I am using version .81 of SpamBayes SpanBayes worked fantastic on Outlook 2000, however it is not working very good at all on 2003. I retrained, deleted and retrained. No good. I disabled the Outlook junk e-mail option, still not good. I am getting scores of 100, 97 etc... but the e-mails will not forward to the suspected spam folders, they stay in the in box. I know my settings are correct. Any help with this would be greatly appreciated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ken (kenjin2) Date: 2003-10-28 05:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=895882 The SB Outlook plug-in (0081) fails to move messages that are classified as Spam or Spam-Maybe. An earlier version of the plug-in worked fine after some installation anomalies were resolved. Also, this plug-in worked when first installed 9-12-03. I'm not certain, but the failure seemed to occur when Office update to SP3 was applied along with a security rollup from Microsoft. I'm runing Windows XP/Professional SP1 with Outlook 2000 SP3. The log files seem nominal. Thanks for your efforts on this projevt. Ken ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 14:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is it possible that SpamBayes is configured to leave these messages "Untouched" in the Filter dialog? I'm adding some debug output to SpamBayes to help track this down in future versions, but the log certainly shows nothing going wrong when doing the move. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Ingenito (gates150) Date: 2003-10-17 04:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=888404 I am having this same problem also. Rebooting the computer does not fix the problem. I am using Outlook XP, Win XP SP2 and Spambayes .81. I have also set the delay to 4 seconds and this did not help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Greg Esterhai (esterhai) Date: 2003-10-04 06:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=879055 I am having the exact same problem and can't figure out a solution. Does anyone have a solution for us. Restarting the computer or Outlook doesn't solve my problem. I have been trying to make it work for 3 days now. Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonardo Ruppenthal (wrongbutton) Date: 2003-09-23 02:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=871993 I have a similar problem with SpamBayes 0.81, Outlook XP (SP2), and Win XP Pro (SP2 + all recent updates). Except rebooting does not solve my problem. Messages seem to be classified (with percentage certainty) but not moved. I have thought about completely reinstalling SpamBayes, but can find no documentation. Can anyone tell me how to do this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2003-09-22 06:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 It seems the problem is solved by rebooting the PC. Weird one... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patrick Grawehr (pgrawehr) Date: 2003-09-22 04:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=553846 I had a similar problem using Outlook 2000. The filtering seems to work after you restart the mail program for the first time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809949&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 02:22:00 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 02:22:03 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-898541 ] IMAP: Delete as Spam only deletes first marked message Message-ID: Bugs item #898541, was opened at 2004-02-17 21:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898541&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jens Vonderheide (vdh) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: IMAP: Delete as Spam only deletes first marked message Initial Comment: Using Outlook 2003 on an IMAP account, when I select multiple messages and then click "Delete as Spam", only the first message gets deleted. It seems to be connected with the download status of these messages, as all messages are deleted if they have been downloaded (mark message for download, process marked headers). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-10 14:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry for the very long period with no response. If you are still using SB, is this still a problem with 1.0.3? If so, could you please attach a log file for a period when this occured to this tracker? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898541&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 02:22:34 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 02:22:37 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-855835 ] cannot send mail shortly after downloading mail... Message-ID: Bugs item #855835, was opened at 2003-12-08 06:47 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=855835&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a7 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Matthew Fischer (mfischer2) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: cannot send mail shortly after downloading mail... Initial Comment: Running with 1.0a7 on Windows 98 with Eudora 6.x. Shortly after downloading my messages, if I try to send a message, it will fail. I get a "connection refused from localhost(0)" message. If I wait 5 or 10 seconds and try to resend the message it goes out fine. This leads me to believe that the pop3proxy is busy doing something else and cannot handle the outgoing message. On a similar note, if I start bouncing messages back to spambayes_xxx@localhost, which I do fairly often, Eudora will start sending one before the other is finished. pop3proxy cannot seem to handle this either. Perhaps this is related. Is the underlying pop3proxy single-threaded??? If you need them, I can try to get more detailed error logs from Eudora on my next round of spam downloading... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=855835&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 02:23:37 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 02:23:43 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-898834 ] Outlook crashes when toolbar is expanded Message-ID: Bugs item #898834, was opened at 2004-02-18 05:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898834&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathan Niesen (nniesen) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crashes when toolbar is expanded Initial Comment: Windows 2000 sp4 Outlook 2000 SpamBayes 0.8 and 0.9 (1.0a9) When I click the "More Buttons" arrow to expand the toolbar because not all the buttons are visible, Outlook crashes with a "Program Error OUTLOOK.exe has generated errors and will be closed by Windows." This seems to only occur when the "More Buttons" arrow has the ">>" symbol above it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-10 14:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does anyone know if this still occurs with 1.0.3? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hakero (hakero) Date: 2004-04-27 10:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1029828 I'm having the exact same problem. Always when hitting the 'more buttons' on the spambayes toolbar. I also have the same version of Windows, spambayes, and Outlook.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898834&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 02:24:53 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 02:25:20 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-806249 ] Outlook Hangs with currrent version Message-ID: Bugs item #806249, was opened at 2003-09-15 12:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806249&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Hangs with currrent version Initial Comment: I installed the v.8 downloaded on 9/12/2003. Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 messages. I turn off SpamBytes and same problem. Prior to the installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine. I have uninstalled SpamBytes and problem has been resolved. By the way, the uninstall did not remove the SpamBaytes buttons from the Outlook menu bar. Outlook is Outlook 2000 SR-1 Thanks, Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-10 14:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Is anyone that experienced this problem able to try 1.0.3 and see if the problem is still there? Anyone able to generate a log file for this happening? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-16 16:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The FAQ & Troubleshooting guide explain how to remove the toolbar, in case that's still a problem (this is a known bug). Noting dupe in [ 814859 ] Outlook hangs on opening ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806249&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 02:25:24 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 02:25:29 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961077 ] "Delete as Spam" deletes too many messages when multiclicked Message-ID: Bugs item #961077, was opened at 2004-05-27 07:57 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961077&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Drew (denimskater) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: "Delete as Spam" deletes too many messages when multiclicked Initial Comment: In "spam suspects" folder, double-clicking on the Delete As Spam deletes three messages. Clicking rapidly N times results in some number of messages >N being deleted. 100% repeatable on my system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961077&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 02:26:45 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 02:26:48 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833751 ] filter dies after a processing a few emails Message-ID: Bugs item #833751, was opened at 2003-11-01 05:58 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833751&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a6 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob s Youruncle (chumpmeister) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: filter dies after a processing a few emails Initial Comment: I'm running Spambayes-1.0a6 on RedHat 9 (with python 2.2.2) using the POP3 proxy. I have upgraded from v1.0a4. The filter works fine for about the first 15-20 of 100 emails, but seems to die at that point and then let everything through. I see the following message at the command prompt where I started Spambayes. ---- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 440, in onRetr msg.setId(state.getNewMessageName()) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 193, in setId msginfoDB._getState(self) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/message.py", line 131, in _getState (msg.c, msg.t) = self.db[msg.getId()] File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 70, in __getitem__ f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') ---- Spambayes-1.0a4 seemed to work OK, but needed restarting every now and then. thanks... PS. Non of the email that gets through when the filter dies, shows up in the review/classify screens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-10 14:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is so extremely old (apologies) that it's hard to know where to start. Can anyone that has this problem say whether it still occurs with 1.0.3? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833751&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 02:28:51 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 02:28:55 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-806249 ] Outlook Hangs with currrent version Message-ID: Bugs item #806249, was opened at 2003-09-14 17:11 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by leroypa You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806249&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Open >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Hangs with currrent version Initial Comment: I installed the v.8 downloaded on 9/12/2003. Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 messages. I turn off SpamBytes and same problem. Prior to the installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine. I have uninstalled SpamBytes and problem has been resolved. By the way, the uninstall did not remove the SpamBaytes buttons from the Outlook menu bar. Outlook is Outlook 2000 SR-1 Thanks, Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-09 17:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Is anyone that experienced this problem able to try 1.0.3 and see if the problem is still there? Anyone able to generate a log file for this happening? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-15 19:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The FAQ & Troubleshooting guide explain how to remove the toolbar, in case that's still a problem (this is a known bug). Noting dupe in [ 814859 ] Outlook hangs on opening ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806249&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 02:33:18 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 02:33:31 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during message download Message-ID: Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-13 16:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook hangs during message download Initial Comment: Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 messages. Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same problem at the same message count (31 of 50.) If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages download successfully. Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 100% sure of this.) Outlook has not previously experienced this problem prior to installing SpamBytes. I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes applied. Outlook is Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627) Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a chance to analyse them? SpamBytes does seem to lag a little behind the download by my casual observation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-10 14:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This tracker is very old now, and is full of conflicting reports. It seems that there are two solutions, which have worked for pretty much everyone (only filtering the inbox, using background filtering). Does anyone still have this problem (with 1.0.1 or 1.0.3)? If background filtering is the solution, then I think this can be closed. Only filtering the inbox isn't an ideal solution, so please say if that makes a difference to you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-10 13:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 This ONLY affects clients connecting to an exchange server ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-10 13:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Are you using SMTP and POP3 or are you connecting to an exchange server? When connecting to an exchange server (and, this COULD affect SMTP / POP3 as well - I have to confirm this) the RPC Binding Order dramatically affects the time it takes the Outlook client to process messages. The string in the reg key HKLM/Software/Microsoft/Exchange/RPC_Binding_Order comes, by default, as follows: ncalrpc,ncacn_ip_tcp,ncacn_spx,ncacn_np,netbios,ncacn_vns _spp All that is requitred for a standard TCP/IP connection is ncacn_ip_tcp RPC, SPX, NP (named pipes), netbios, and vns_spp (banyan vines) are rarely used. Outlook can take up to a minute attempting to establish communication using each individual protocol. Lets say that your server to server environment requires RPC. Outlook must first establish a TCP/IP connection before using RPC. So RPC will fail, then TCP/IP will establish, followed by SPX, NP, netbios, and vns_spp. Then it must go through the order again, establishing RPC, attempting to restablic TCP/IP, followed again by the rest. This can make it appear that the system is indeed hung. Modifying the binding order to reflect the required services, in the order they are used, reduces the time to perform tasks. If you want details, contact me and I will send them "offline" I will also determine if the RPC Binding order is used in the Internet Mail Only mode. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gilles Tessier (gillesmt) Date: 2003-12-07 07:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=925460 My XP pro does too except that it shut down completely as soon as it detect a message to DL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Jarrett (jjarrett) Date: 2003-12-03 09:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=899118 I tried leroypa's suggestion yesterday and Outlook has not yet hung again after receiving hundreds of messages and filtering them to dozens of folders through half a dozen email accounts. McAfee Virus Scan is running and I haven't seen a problem since I turned Spam Bayes back on yesterday. Again, all I did was tell Spam Bayes to ONLY filter the Inbox. I assume since Outlook puts the emails into the Inbox and then applies the Rules moving them to other folders, having Spam Bayes filter them in the Inbox then filter them again in sub-folders was somehow creating the problem. John ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Date: 2003-12-02 08:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=410520 I to have been having this problem (see previous posts). Like Basil, I to am running McAfee Virus Scan, but what I did was to filter only the 'Inbox' and not it's sub-folders as well as turning on 'background filtering'. Don't need to filter Inbox sub-folders as Outlook rules is setup to move messages I know I want to these folders. I also find that Spambytes does run slow and it does look like at times it is 'running into' Outlook processing. Thanks, PL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Basil Hussain (basil_hussain) Date: 2003-12-01 22:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=918906 I have been experiencing the same problem with Outlook hanging during download of messages. I tried setting SpamBayes to use background filtering, but that didn't help. I think it is definitely something to do with having McAfee VirusScan installed. I have VirusScan Enterprise 7.0.0 installed. I uninstalled the E-mail Scan feature (which integrates with Outlook) and all has been working well. This was with Outlook 2000 SP-3 9.0.0.6627. PGP Freeware 7.0.3 (with Outlook plug-in) is also installed, but seems to co- exist fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Jarrett (jjarrett) Date: 2003-11-01 07:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=899118 I am running McAfee (tried it with and without Hawk), Outlook 2000 SP-3, Win 2000 Pro and SpamBayes Outlook Addin binary 0.81. Sometimes it gets through a few dozen messages, sometimes just one. I've tried it with background processing on and off to no avail. If I deactivate SpamBayes, Outlook does not hang. I don't understand how the Timer would help... John T. Jarrett john@logontexas.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-23 13:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can the other people having trouble with this let me know how the "background processing" option works for them? The original reporter of this bug indicates that it fixed it for him. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf) Date: 2003-10-23 13:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=363795 I get exactly the same thing. It always happens on message number 31. I have to disable Spambayes, download my mail then reenable spambayes to get my mail. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-20 06:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I updated to 8.1. Still the same problem. However, if I remove all of the rules from the organize section, the problem goes away. I had some rule to refile emails as they came in to specific email addresses. Somehow, this causes the problem - but only on my WIN98 with Outlook 2000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-18 09:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I have now been running version 8.1 alsmost since it appeared. Not one instance of the problem has occured. I have set the timer options, initially at a couple of seconds but have been dropping it down gradually as it appears to be successful. I think at this stage the problem, for me at least, has been cured. I have not made any other changes to my system So looking good. The latest vestion does appear to miss a few spam messages that I would have thought were previously caught. That needs mor investigation however. Keep up the good work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Hood (john_hood) Date: 2003-09-18 06:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=834988 Same problem when the folder being monitored is large, or when the spam folder has a lot in it. Spambayes also hangs when remote users are accessing Exchange server over a modem. Left it for 1 hour 45 min, it never came back. Running "Outlook /a" and reducing the size of the folder, then re-enabling the Addin and restarting Outlook normally, will fix the problem for the LAN users but not the modem users. Running version 8 on Outlook 2002 on Win 2000 machines. 25 users testing it, only 6 problems, all the same as above. Users love it. If you did one for Outlook Express, man, you would be gods. Also, I checked the reference to the "Configuration Guide" and "Timer" There is no such reference in Configuration.htm, can find nothing called "Configuration Guide" in the install folder, in the site docs, or here. Ideas? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mike Churchward (mchurch) Date: 2003-09-16 09:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=311170 I am having the same problem using the latest version (8) on Outlook 2000 and WIN98. Outlook is SR-1, 9.0.0.5414. It seems to happen after Outlook has been running for a while (1-4 hours). When I unistalled Spambayes. It went away. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Date: 2003-09-15 12:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=410520 I also have the same problem with v.8 downloaded on 9/12/2003. Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 messages. I turn off SpamBytes and same problem. I've uninstalled SpamBytes and same problem. Prior to the installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine. Paul paleroy@pacbell.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-05 11:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Please enable the "timer" - see the "configuration guide". I suspect this will fix it. However, it is very strange, and still not reported by anyone else I can recall. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-09-04 20:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 I'm now up to version 7 and the problem persists. If I turn Spambayes off I never have any problem. With it on it frequently hanges part way through the downloading. I have obeserved that on several times the download hang at message 31 of xxx. THis occurs too frequently to be coincidental in my opinion. If I start/stop/start/stop the download I can retreive all the messages. If I download the messages with SpamBayes off and then filter them I again have no problems. HELP HELP HELP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonard Abbey (lba) Date: 2003-08-07 21:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820545 Having update thru version5 and now 6 the problem still occurs. Sam bypass applies. If I stp[ SpamBays the emails can be downloaded, if not evertime I try it will hang at the same email (ie cout of xx of yy) I have not been able to see what actual email causes the problem at this stage. Running the filter after a download works fine. The log does not seem to show anything conclusive. I do have McAfee running - current version. I will try disabling it next time I get a hang. Note, the incidence seems less frequent than originally reported. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-07 11:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-August/006564.html seems to blame McAfee. Is anyone else seeing this bug running McAfee? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hugh Brackett (hbrackett) Date: 2003-08-05 03:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=837287 I had this problem when I was running Outlook on a virtual desktop (vdesk.exe from the NT resource kit). As I recall it filtered and moved already downloaded messages properly. It might be relevant that the Office Assistant also does not work correctly on virtual desktops. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 02:34:17 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 02:34:18 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1095418 ] Invalid spam folder Message-ID: Bugs item #1095418, was opened at 2005-01-04 14:45 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1095418&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martin Amada (martinamada) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Invalid spam folder Initial Comment: Hello, I have been using Spambayes binary version .9 successfully for many months, running Outlook 2000 under Windows 98. I'm now getting the following error message consistently, even after uninstalling the program and installing version 1.01. I have been through the bug reports and troubleshooting guide and have not found an answer. ****** The spam folder is invalid. Not found exception:Exception0x8004010a (MAP_E_OBJECTDELETED):OLE error Ox8004010a Do you wish to reconfigure? Yes? No? ****** I have tried reconfiguring and resetting the configuration, and deleting the .ini file in the directory. I keep getting the same error message. The most recent log file is attached. I hope you can help. Martin Amada ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-04 15:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Are you trying to select a spam folder in the Deleted Items folder? That's not valid, so if so, please try selecting a different spam folder. Otherwise, try running scanpst (Inbox Repair Tool) over the pst file that the spam folder is in. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1095418&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 02:37:04 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 02:37:07 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-983487 ] Is/IsNot buttons do not work Message-ID: Bugs item #983487, was opened at 2004-07-02 03:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983487&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Claus (cb831) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: Is/IsNot buttons do not work Initial Comment: Setup Outlook 2003 / WinXP SP1 Outlook runs in cache mode against Exchange 2003 I have 3 mailboxes in Outlook (A, B and C) Spambayes scans A.Inbox, B.Inbox and C.Inbox Spambayes moves spam to C.Inbox.Spam Spambayes moves possible spam to C.Inbox.MaybeSpam A.Inbox is my real/primary inbox, B/C are additional. The automatic scanning works perfect in all Inboxes. [Delete As Spam] works in A.Inbox [Delete As Spam] does not work in B.Inbox [Delete As Spam] does not work in C.Inbox [Delete As Spam] does not work in C.Inbox.MaybeSpam [Recover From Spam] does not work in C.Inbox.MaybeSpam [Recover From Spam] does not work in C.Inbox.Spam When the buttons does not work the error presented is: "No filterable mail items are selected" no matter how many I select. As cached mode is partly offline (uses OST) this bug may be related to bug 982351. Regards Claus ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-10 14:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Apologies for the long delay. Are you still using SB? If so, is this still a problem with 1.0.1/1.0.3? Are the mailboxes pst files, IMAP, Hotmail, or Exchange? If local, have you tried running scanpst over them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Claus (cb831) Date: 2004-07-02 03:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1074982 Log Tail (mailbox names changed to match A/B/C): Message 'torpid Is it?' in 'C/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 283, in _Invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 288, in _invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 616, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 550, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 409, in OnItemAdd File "msgstore.pyc", line 365, in GetMessage msgstore.NotFoundException: NotFoundException: Exception 0x8004010f (MAPI_E_NOT_FOUND): OLE error 0x8004010f Message '$91823' in 'C/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 283, in _Invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 288, in _invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 616, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 550, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 409, in OnItemAdd File "msgstore.pyc", line 365, in GetMessage msgstore.NotFoundException: NotFoundException: Exception 0x8004010f (MAPI_E_NOT_FOUND): OLE error 0x8004010f Message 'Ebay Fraud Department (R)' in 'C/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 283, in _Invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 288, in _invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 616, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 550, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 409, in OnItemAdd File "msgstore.pyc", line 365, in GetMessage msgstore.NotFoundException: NotFoundException: Exception 0x8004010f (MAPI_E_NOT_FOUND): OLE error 0x8004010f Message 'ERNI online' in 'A/IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration' in 'C/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure' ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1024, in GetSelectedMessages File "msgstore.pyc", line 365, in GetMessage NotFoundException: NotFoundException: Exception 0x8004010f (MAPI_E_NOT_FOUND): OLE error 0x8004010f ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983487&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 02:48:27 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 02:49:13 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-855445 ] Outlook shuts down Message-ID: Bugs item #855445, was opened at 2003-12-07 07:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=855445&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0a6 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Gilles Tessier (gillesmt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook shuts down Initial Comment: I have XP Pro with all the updates installed and SP1 ronning Outlook 2000 9.0.0.2711 and Spambayes 08.1 and Norton 2003 Installation went well. Outlook opens and check for messages. If there are messages, Outlook automatically shuts down without downloading them. I have to use Outlook express to get my mail. Prior to installing SB I could send & receive mail without problems. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-10 14:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It seems to me there are three separate issues here: 1. With the OP, Outlook will not collect any mail. 2. With talonius, Outlook works, but will not work correctly if closed and reopened. 3. With ima_user, the Outlook.exe process isn't terminated on closed. #3 is covered in other bug reports, I believe. For #2, the log hints that there's something wrong with the store. Is is a pst, Exchange, Hotmail, IMAP? If a pst, then running scanpst would be a good idea. Check that the unsure and spam folders are valid, too. For #1, are there error messages when it shuts down? Does anything get put in the SB log? These are all rather old now, so I'm not sure if there will a response to any, but please let us know if there are still these problems (except #3, which is looked into elsewhere). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-06 12:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 This has been suggested as a resolution for Outlook continuing to run after exit. It pertains to having Outlook Backup Folders installed. Please see if Outlook.exe is listed under processes after closing Outlook. If it is, try the following: ---------------------------------------------------------- On the Tools menu, click Options, and then click the Other tab. Click the Advanced Options button, and then click COM Add- Ins. Click to uncheck Outlook Backup Add-in. Click OK until the Options dialog boxes are all closed, then exit Outlook, and restart your computer. Start Outlook, send a message to yourself, and then exit Outlook. Wait 30 seconds to allow the MAPI Spooler to finish its operation, and check in the Close Program list to see if Outlook is still running ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2003-12-31 08:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 I have sporadic problems with Outlook as well. After closing Outlook, check your task manager for running processes to see if Outlook is still running. If it is, select the process (Outlook.exe) and end task. I will look into how to resolve this Outlook related issue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Schkerke (talonius) Date: 2003-12-23 04:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=206805 Windows XP Professional SP1 (fully patched), Microsoft Outlook 2003 (fully patched through Office Update), Norton Antivirus Client 2003 Corporate Edition. After a fresh reboot I can load Outlook and SpamBayes and everything works wonderfully. If I shut Outlook down it will no longer load successfully. It only comes up, displays the first message, and then shuts itself back off. My log file looks like this (I do not see a way for me to attach files to this bug): Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\bmschkerke.DEVELOPMENT.001\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\bmschkerke.DEVELOPMENT.001\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 2197 spam and 7158 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk E-mail Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 0.34334ms Error finding the MAPI folders for a folder switch event Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1071, in OnFolderSwitch File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder NotFoundException: NotFoundException: Exception 0x8004010a (MAPI_E_OBJECT_DELETED): OLE error 0x8004010a Thank you! Brian Schkerke ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=855445&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 02:51:28 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 02:51:35 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-827100 ] Message stream from AOL Communicator appears truncated Message-ID: Bugs item #827100, was opened at 2003-10-21 09:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827100&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Blake (zebby58) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Message stream from AOL Communicator appears truncated Initial Comment: Spambayes is not scoring my messages correctly. I have attached a screenshot of my training configuration. Here is the info it has on a message that was moved to my inbox and should have been recognized as good. Spam Score: 100% (0.996519) word spamprob #ham #spam '*H*' 4.07836e-005 - - '*S*' 0.993078 - - 'to:no real name:2**0' 0.610067 397 79 'subject:(' 0.669051 3 1 'subject:subject' 0.776799 1 1 'subject:)' 0.822865 2 2 'header:Received:3' 0.834469 72 47 'from:addr:****' 0.908163 0 2 'from:name:****0.908163 0 2 'x-mailer:aol communicator (20030728.3 win)' 0.908163 0 2 'from:addr:aol.com' 0.92464 8 15 'message-id:@aol.com' 0.926397 4 9 Message Stream: Received: from imo-r02.mx.aol.com ([****]) by *****.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id 49XK1YSQ; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:03:00 - 0400 Received: from *****@aol.com by imo-r02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id v.cc.23bf465e (16112) for <***.com>; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:02:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from DELL.charter.net ****.com [24.216.55.96]) by air-id12.mx.aol.com (v96.8) with ESMTP id MAILINID124-3ef03f92fbdfce; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:02:23 -0400 Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:02:39 -0400 From: "***" <**@aol.com> Subject: (no subject) To: ***.com Message-ID: <3F92FBEF.3010602@aol.com> X-Mailer: AOL Communicator (20030728.3 Win) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY=79455383-41-1066597359-5020 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-AOL-IP: 24.216.55.96 <PRE><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <title></title> </head> <body> <font face="Arial,sans-serif"><font size="2">&nbsp;<span type="cite" >ne Message Tokens: 24 unique tokens 'cc:none' 'content-type:text/plain' 'from:addr:aol.com' 'from:addr:***' 'from:name:*** 'header:Date:1' 'header:From:1' 'header:MIME-Version:1' 'header:Message-ID:1' 'header:Received:3' 'header:Subject:1' 'header:To:1' 'message-id:@aol.com' 'reply-to:none' 'sender:none' 'subject: ' 'subject:(' 'subject:)' 'subject:subject' 'to:2**0' 'to:addr:*** 'to:addr:***.com' 'to:no real name:2**0' 'x-mailer:aol communicator (20030728.3 win)' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-10 14:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Can anyone say whether this is still a problem with 1.0.1/1.0.3? If it is, could someone attach a message for which this is a problem to a tracker (if it's not the OP or a developer, it'll have to be a new tracker with a link back here), so that I can play around with it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris Blake (zebby58) Date: 2003-10-28 11:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=891021 Even if the Message Stream is truncated, why does SpamBayes not change the score to 0% after I move the mail to my Inbox? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-10-27 16:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 It looks like we are not seeing the body of the message, hence only using clues from the headers. [ 819684 ] has a similar problem, but for Evolution MIME. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=827100&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 02:51:47 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 02:51:52 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-819684 ] Message stream from Evolution MIME message is truncated Message-ID: Bugs item #819684, was opened at 2003-10-08 13:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=819684&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: JD Brennan (jazzdevotee) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Message stream from Evolution MIME message is truncated Initial Comment: When a MIME message is received from the Evolution Mail client the SpamBayes Outlook plugin truncates the message stream after the headers and only tokenizers the headers. Message source looks like this: ... Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7FQBfj5xPKbUE94YalzJ" Organization: Message-Id: <1065568187.23375.8.camel@wookie> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 07 Oct 2003 16:09:47 -0700 Content-Length: 5759 --=-7FQBfj5xPKbUE94YalzJ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable message here ... --- Show spam clues indicates the message stream is only the headers. The message appears to get truncated after the Date header. My guess is that this is because Evolution puts two blanks lines after the headers instead of one. Other mail clients I tried only put one blank line after the headers before the first MIME boundary. Surprisingly this really doesn't seem to matter. SpamBayes quickly learned these messages were not spam. SpamBayes rocks! And so does the Outlook plugin! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-10 14:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-20 23:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Sorry for the delay here. The best thing you could do is install Python+SpamBayes source, and run the dump_props program against this message. Second best (but really just as good <wink>) is to wait for the next binary release, which will include dump_props as an executable ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: JD Brennan (jazzdevotee) Date: 2003-10-08 15:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=556412 A little Googling turned up a comment from Tim Peters a year ago: > The Outlook client right now "loses" all > attachments, and even loses the msg body if the msg has been > digitally signed (because it turns out Outlook does Yet > Another Entirely Different Thing for signed msgs, leaving the > two "normal" body properties empty and stuffing the body > *plus* the signature into Yet Another property). So if it's possible to figure out the name of this "Yet Another property", I could probably test and submit a patch (to msgstore.GetEmailPackageObject). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=819684&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 02:54:03 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 02:54:10 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-833346 ] winfax + spambayes causes error upon exiting Outlook Message-ID: Bugs item #833346, was opened at 2003-10-31 10:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833346&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott (secclest) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: winfax + spambayes causes error upon exiting Outlook Initial Comment: Every time I exit Outlook I am greeted with ?Microsoft Outlook has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience.? Error signature: AppName: outlook.exe AppVer: 10.0.4510.0 ModName: dccmsp32.dll ModVer: 10.0.2000.929 Offset: 00005346 I am running Windows XP Pro/Outlook XP both with the latest and greatest patches and updates. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-10 14:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-01-20 16:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm not sure if these are our specific issue, but: http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/faxprod.nsf/docid/2001110911391704 has information about a bug in WinFax 10.02 relating to Office XP, and information how to obtain an upgrade, or work around it. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;221201 has information about a bug in WinFax 9.02 relating to Office XP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DONNA P HAMMEL-DAVIS (dpdhamm) Date: 2004-01-15 10:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=932971 i was told by outlook and winfax folks that I need to completely uninstall ( they directed me to uninstallers on symantec and office websites) and remove all items for these programs from the registry, temp files, all folders,etc ( i did this with a microsoft technician..so best to call them) and then first install outlook and then winfax..the winfax tech said he was using the two programs without any difficulty. right now I have not reinstalled winfax..I am using Office 2003 alone to see if any error occur and after about 5 days there are none (the outlook error on exiting had been occurring 85- 100% of time).....I will rinstall winfax in the next day or so and see what happens and then will post...dpdhamm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-20 00:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 dccmsp32.dll is certainly a winfax DLL. I'm afraid I have no solution, but updating the summary accordingly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: DONNA P HAMMEL-DAVIS (dpdhamm) Date: 2003-12-17 23:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=932971 I have had this same problem and an told it is related to WINFAX integration with Outlook 2003 (never occurred before I upgraded to Outlook 2003;worked without problems in Outlook XP). Can disable dccmsp32.dll or stop Winfax but are ther any better solutions? Thanks. dpdhamm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 14:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you attach your spambayes log files? The troubleshooting guide has information about how to do this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=833346&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 02:58:00 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 02:58:02 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824632 ] sb_filter adds headers differently to other apps Message-ID: Bugs item #824632, was opened at 2003-10-16 20:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824632&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) >Summary: sb_filter adds headers differently to other apps Initial Comment: Headers:include_score does nothing in 1.0a6. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-10 14:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I think it would be worthwhile seeing how difficult it would be to have a command line switch for sb_filter in 1.1 that got it to use our spambayes.message class (and the header adding functions therein). It would consolidate code and if people found that it worked without problem, then maybe this could become the default way things work. I'll look into this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-17 10:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Whoops - I should have looked at the category you chose. You mean this for sb_filter, I presume? You're correct, this does not have any effect with sb_filter; the score should be included in the classification header, anyway. It does have an effect if you are using the pop3 proxy or imap filter. hammie.py needs to be updated to use message.py to add headers so that everything is consistent. There are some subtle differences in how things work, though, so this isn't straightforward. Since I also don't use sb_filter, I'm wary of doing this in case I break something (if you want to, feel free to submit a patch). I'm going to reopen this, but change the description. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-17 10:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This works for me. Are you sure you have it set right, that spambayes has found your config file, and that you haven't missed the header? It's called X-Spambayes-Spam- Probability by default. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824632&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 03:47:39 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 03:47:41 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1119791 ] message/partial misclassified Message-ID: Bugs item #1119791, was opened at 2005-02-09 18:47 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1119791&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: message/partial misclassified Initial Comment: Partial messages (usually split by SMTP limiters) can have base64 data without appropriate MIME header, therefore all data will be tokenized and will most likely result in numerous 'skip:q 70': 0.98; 'skip:g 70': 0.98; 'skip:j 70': 0.98; 'skip:o 70': 0.98; 'skip:v 70': 0.98; 'skip:k 70': 0.98; 'skip:s 70': 0.98; 'skip:t 70': 0.98; 'skip:a 70': 0.99; 'skip:n 70': 0.99; 'skip:p 70': 0.99; that will raise its spam score to the roof and cause the message to go to 'unsure' if the sender is well-trusted, or to 'spam' otherwise, where it can be lost. The classifier would do a better job by caching the classification of messages containing a header like Content-Type: message/partial; total=2; id="01C50EFC.CA6C2680@quake"; number=1 and applying it to the subsequent parts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1119791&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 04:06:19 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 04:06:21 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1119791 ] message/partial misclassified Message-ID: Bugs item #1119791, was opened at 2005-02-09 18:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by leobru You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1119791&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: message/partial misclassified Initial Comment: Partial messages (usually split by SMTP limiters) can have base64 data without appropriate MIME header, therefore all data will be tokenized and will most likely result in numerous 'skip:q 70': 0.98; 'skip:g 70': 0.98; 'skip:j 70': 0.98; 'skip:o 70': 0.98; 'skip:v 70': 0.98; 'skip:k 70': 0.98; 'skip:s 70': 0.98; 'skip:t 70': 0.98; 'skip:a 70': 0.99; 'skip:n 70': 0.99; 'skip:p 70': 0.99; that will raise its spam score to the roof and cause the message to go to 'unsure' if the sender is well-trusted, or to 'spam' otherwise, where it can be lost. The classifier would do a better job by caching the classification of messages containing a header like Content-Type: message/partial; total=2; id="01C50EFC.CA6C2680@quake"; number=1 and applying it to the subsequent parts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2005-02-09 19:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 Or, simpler, treat the body of continuation messages as "empty" . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1119791&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 16:19:57 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 16:20:03 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-898834 ] Outlook crashes when toolbar is expanded Message-ID: Bugs item #898834, was opened at 2004-02-17 10:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nniesen You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898834&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathan Niesen (nniesen) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crashes when toolbar is expanded Initial Comment: Windows 2000 sp4 Outlook 2000 SpamBayes 0.8 and 0.9 (1.0a9) When I click the "More Buttons" arrow to expand the toolbar because not all the buttons are visible, Outlook crashes with a "Program Error OUTLOOK.exe has generated errors and will be closed by Windows." This seems to only occur when the "More Buttons" arrow has the ">>" symbol above it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Nathan Niesen (nniesen) Date: 2005-02-10 09:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=142538 :( I'd try 1.0.3 to help verirfy but I'm now on Windows XP/Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-09 19:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does anyone know if this still occurs with 1.0.3? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hakero (hakero) Date: 2004-04-26 17:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1029828 I'm having the exact same problem. Always when hitting the 'more buttons' on the spambayes toolbar. I also have the same version of Windows, spambayes, and Outlook.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898834&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 19:14:18 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 20:07:35 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774978 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #774978, was opened at 2003-07-21 12:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kacolly You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: When during automatic receiving session only spam messages was received it is desired to remove envelope icon from tray. Probably this option should be switched off by default with the possibility to switch it on from the configuration file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: KeithC (kacolly) Date: 2005-02-10 18:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1216497 The envelope icon seems to be generated from Outlook's built- in "Unread Mail" search folder. By default, this is set to include all the unread mail in the mailbox and sub-folders. If you right- click on it and customize the search to show just the Inbox and other selected folders, the envelope (in brief tests I have tried here) goes away. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Kirchner (mkabcde) Date: 2004-12-05 09:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1171109 Hello everybody! I wrote my own vba-macro which checks ALL my Outlook folders under "Inbox". The macro "CountUnreadMessages" is called from Application_NewMail in ThisOutlookSession. It has also the possibility to skip certain folders. Just rename the folder and add "_" as last character of the name. I know this solution is not quite sophisticated however it works fine. The program triggers a beep but you could also open a messagebox or like I did invoke the assistant which does some funny stuff. I solved the problem with the normal Outlook notification by deactivating the "New Mail"-sound and always hiding the icon in the SysTray. HTH Martin If you have problems just ask. Here the code (Maybe you have to tune the waiting time according to the number of messages you get): Public Sub CountUnreadMessages() On Error GoTo ErrorHandler Wait.WaitTime (10) 'Wait 10 seconds to allow SpamBayes to do its work Dim Inbox As Outlook.MAPIFolder Dim Subfolders As Outlook.MAPIFolder Set Inbox = GetNamespace("MAPI"). GetDefaultFolder(olFolderInbox) Dim nUnreadMessages As Integer nUnreadMessages = CountUnreadMessagesInFolder(Inbox) Set Inbox = Nothing If nUnreadMessages > 0 Then 'do whatever you want MsgBow("You have " & nUnreadMessages & " messages") Beep End If Exit Sub ErrorHandler: MsgBox Err.Number & " :" & Error(Err.Number) Close #1 Set Inbox = Nothing End Sub Private Function CountUnreadMessagesInFolder(oFolder As Outlook.MAPIFolder) As Integer 'Folders which shall not be searched must end with "_". Their subfolders will not be searched If Right(oFolder.Name, 1) = "_" Then CountUnreadMessagesInFolder = 0 Exit Function End If 'count mails in subfolders Dim i As Integer Dim nUnreadMailsSubFolders As Integer For i = 1 To oFolder.Folders.count nUnreadMailsSubFolders = nUnreadMailsSubFolders + CountUnreadMessagesInFolder(oFolder.Folders(i)) Next i 'count mails in current folder Dim j As Integer Dim nUnreadMailsHere As Integer Dim oCurMailItem As MailItem For j = 1 To oFolder.Items.count If oFolder.Items(j).UnRead Then nUnreadMailsHere = nUnreadMailsHere + 1 Next j CountUnreadMessagesInFolder = nUnreadMailsSubFolders + nUnreadMailsHere End Function Public Sub WaitTime(sec As Integer) Dim Start, Ende, Gesamtdauer Start = Timer 'set starting time Do While Timer < Start + sec DoEvents 'process other events Loop End Sub ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-29 21:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 1075410 ] Mail notification if new ham detected https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1075410&group_id=61702&atid=498106 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-09-30 15:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Thanks for the input, but the real problem is not being able to clear the icon (I've already got Python code based on an earlier comment that will do that) but rather knowing *when* to clear the icon. The problem is that SpamBayes only knows about a small subset of the Outlook mail folders. A user can configure Outlook rules to move messages to other folders that SpamBayes doesn't know about, so it is difficult for SpamBayes to be certain when there are *no* other unread messages anywhere in Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf) Date: 2004-09-30 00:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=363795 Have you seen this: http://www.outlookcode.com/d/code/clearenvicon.htm It maybe able to help with this bloody annoying problem. :) Cheers, Gerard ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: JJJJust (jjjjust) Date: 2004-08-04 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1093702 A simpler workaround (Tested only in Outlook 2000) is to read all your non-spam e-mail first, then you can look at your spam e-mail, then you can right click on your Junk E-Mail folder and click Mark All as Read. That gets rid of the envelope for me. Tedious, yes... but it works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: edaly (edaly) Date: 2004-06-05 00:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057156 Any news on when we can expect this feature? I recently installed SpamBayes and it's a great program but the envelope icon is killing me. I like to answer email right away so I find myself constantly flipping to Outlook only to find no new messages there because it was spam. Interestingly, my old beta copy of Cloudmark SpamNet doesn't have this problem. It removes the envelope icon when the message is deleted and marked as read. Even if I had an option in SpamBayes to remove the envelope icon whenever SpamBayes detected spam (regardless of whether there was other new mail there or not), I would turn it on. Please please please get this feature in soon! thanks, Erin Daly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-02 15:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Notification sounds for SpamBayes have already been implemented, but not integrated into the release version yet. Sounds like we're getting enough requests for this that we might want to merge it, at least as a "config-file-only" experimental option. See Patch #858925: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? func=detail&aid=858925&group_id=61702&atid=498105 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2004-03-02 13:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 Just turn off the outlook notification (under advanced e-mail options). I don't use sound much so I didn't add that, but it's probably not too hard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2004-03-01 22:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Mark, I just downloaded your program and it seems to work fine. Unfortionately i still need the macro (see below) to get rid of the original outlook mail notification. This macro also eliminates all sounds of incoming mail/ham. Isn't it possible to do this all in your program? To have a audible notification on ham and silence on spam? No icon (not even a blue or black one) when spam is received and a mail notification when ham is received? I very much like that i can now see the number of emails i have received in contrast to "You have unread items" which is the normal outlook notification. Keep up the good work! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2004-03-01 20:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 I wrote a C# program to replace the outlook notify icon w/ my own. The code for this is at http://codeproject.com/csharp/gmcdoexmail.asp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2003-10-13 12:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Reacting on all before. Would'nt it be the best option to allow a rule or macro to be defined that can be runned after spam and ham is processed? In other words an extra option in the spambayes filtering dialog. [Move] spam to folder [...] [X] Mark spam as read [X] Process following rule or macro [...] Indeed the macro proposed by Ghuron does exactly that. It does not block the sounds though. More info on the macro on http://www.slipstick.com/dev/code/clearenvicon.htm#info ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-09 22:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark - what do you think of the idea of providing our own icon in the tray (and a sound) when we classify mail as [user- defined selection of ham/unsure/spam]? In your opinion, do you think that we could successfully determine when these messages were read so that we could clear the flag? Would you be opposed to this rather off-topic feature appearing in the plug-in? If your comments are positive, then I might try and write some code to do this at some point, if only to stop the incessant requests for this feature <wink>. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-09 22:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From the list: My outlook always plays a sound when new mails do arrive - also when new spam comes in. Since 90% of my mails are spam, this is really nerving. If spambayes could give out a sound when no-spam-mails arrive, then I could switch off the the standard-sound of outlook and only Spambayes reports "good" mails. Then we again have a true accustical message, when important mail arrive and are not irritated by spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Date: 2003-09-26 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=633868 I'm not a Visual Basic/Windows expert. But having used Outlook for a while, I *can* tell you that setting emails to "read" status stops the envelope icon coming up. This would probably be the easiest fix, and would also stop the spam folder coming up with bold text to draw your attention to it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 15:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 15:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 13:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Sorry, duplicated to #774908. Too bad that nothing can be done here ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 20:35:13 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 20:35:26 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-806249 ] Outlook Hangs with currrent version Message-ID: Bugs item #806249, was opened at 2003-09-14 17:11 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by leroypa You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806249&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul LeRoy (leroypa) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook Hangs with currrent version Initial Comment: I installed the v.8 downloaded on 9/12/2003. Outlook hangs after downloading approx 3 messages. I turn off SpamBytes and same problem. Prior to the installation of SpamBytes, outlook was working just fine. I have uninstalled SpamBytes and problem has been resolved. By the way, the uninstall did not remove the SpamBaytes buttons from the Outlook menu bar. Outlook is Outlook 2000 SR-1 Thanks, Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-09 17:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Is anyone that experienced this problem able to try 1.0.3 and see if the problem is still there? Anyone able to generate a log file for this happening? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-15 19:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The FAQ & Troubleshooting guide explain how to remove the toolbar, in case that's still a problem (this is a known bug). Noting dupe in [ 814859 ] Outlook hangs on opening ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=806249&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 20:39:36 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 20:40:11 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774978 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #774978, was opened at 2003-07-21 07:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by garrmark You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: When during automatic receiving session only spam messages was received it is desired to remove envelope icon from tray. Probably this option should be switched off by default with the possibility to switch it on from the configuration file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2005-02-10 14:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 kacolly's comment is valid for Outlook 2003, that feature doesn't exist in prior versions ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: KeithC (kacolly) Date: 2005-02-10 13:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1216497 The envelope icon seems to be generated from Outlook's built- in "Unread Mail" search folder. By default, this is set to include all the unread mail in the mailbox and sub-folders. If you right- click on it and customize the search to show just the Inbox and other selected folders, the envelope (in brief tests I have tried here) goes away. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Kirchner (mkabcde) Date: 2004-12-05 04:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1171109 Hello everybody! I wrote my own vba-macro which checks ALL my Outlook folders under "Inbox". The macro "CountUnreadMessages" is called from Application_NewMail in ThisOutlookSession. It has also the possibility to skip certain folders. Just rename the folder and add "_" as last character of the name. I know this solution is not quite sophisticated however it works fine. The program triggers a beep but you could also open a messagebox or like I did invoke the assistant which does some funny stuff. I solved the problem with the normal Outlook notification by deactivating the "New Mail"-sound and always hiding the icon in the SysTray. HTH Martin If you have problems just ask. Here the code (Maybe you have to tune the waiting time according to the number of messages you get): Public Sub CountUnreadMessages() On Error GoTo ErrorHandler Wait.WaitTime (10) 'Wait 10 seconds to allow SpamBayes to do its work Dim Inbox As Outlook.MAPIFolder Dim Subfolders As Outlook.MAPIFolder Set Inbox = GetNamespace("MAPI"). GetDefaultFolder(olFolderInbox) Dim nUnreadMessages As Integer nUnreadMessages = CountUnreadMessagesInFolder(Inbox) Set Inbox = Nothing If nUnreadMessages > 0 Then 'do whatever you want MsgBow("You have " & nUnreadMessages & " messages") Beep End If Exit Sub ErrorHandler: MsgBox Err.Number & " :" & Error(Err.Number) Close #1 Set Inbox = Nothing End Sub Private Function CountUnreadMessagesInFolder(oFolder As Outlook.MAPIFolder) As Integer 'Folders which shall not be searched must end with "_". Their subfolders will not be searched If Right(oFolder.Name, 1) = "_" Then CountUnreadMessagesInFolder = 0 Exit Function End If 'count mails in subfolders Dim i As Integer Dim nUnreadMailsSubFolders As Integer For i = 1 To oFolder.Folders.count nUnreadMailsSubFolders = nUnreadMailsSubFolders + CountUnreadMessagesInFolder(oFolder.Folders(i)) Next i 'count mails in current folder Dim j As Integer Dim nUnreadMailsHere As Integer Dim oCurMailItem As MailItem For j = 1 To oFolder.Items.count If oFolder.Items(j).UnRead Then nUnreadMailsHere = nUnreadMailsHere + 1 Next j CountUnreadMessagesInFolder = nUnreadMailsSubFolders + nUnreadMailsHere End Function Public Sub WaitTime(sec As Integer) Dim Start, Ende, Gesamtdauer Start = Timer 'set starting time Do While Timer < Start + sec DoEvents 'process other events Loop End Sub ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-29 16:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 1075410 ] Mail notification if new ham detected https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1075410&group_id=61702&atid=498106 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-09-30 10:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Thanks for the input, but the real problem is not being able to clear the icon (I've already got Python code based on an earlier comment that will do that) but rather knowing *when* to clear the icon. The problem is that SpamBayes only knows about a small subset of the Outlook mail folders. A user can configure Outlook rules to move messages to other folders that SpamBayes doesn't know about, so it is difficult for SpamBayes to be certain when there are *no* other unread messages anywhere in Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf) Date: 2004-09-29 19:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=363795 Have you seen this: http://www.outlookcode.com/d/code/clearenvicon.htm It maybe able to help with this bloody annoying problem. :) Cheers, Gerard ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: JJJJust (jjjjust) Date: 2004-08-04 07:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1093702 A simpler workaround (Tested only in Outlook 2000) is to read all your non-spam e-mail first, then you can look at your spam e-mail, then you can right click on your Junk E-Mail folder and click Mark All as Read. That gets rid of the envelope for me. Tedious, yes... but it works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: edaly (edaly) Date: 2004-06-04 19:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057156 Any news on when we can expect this feature? I recently installed SpamBayes and it's a great program but the envelope icon is killing me. I like to answer email right away so I find myself constantly flipping to Outlook only to find no new messages there because it was spam. Interestingly, my old beta copy of Cloudmark SpamNet doesn't have this problem. It removes the envelope icon when the message is deleted and marked as read. Even if I had an option in SpamBayes to remove the envelope icon whenever SpamBayes detected spam (regardless of whether there was other new mail there or not), I would turn it on. Please please please get this feature in soon! thanks, Erin Daly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-02 10:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Notification sounds for SpamBayes have already been implemented, but not integrated into the release version yet. Sounds like we're getting enough requests for this that we might want to merge it, at least as a "config-file-only" experimental option. See Patch #858925: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? func=detail&aid=858925&group_id=61702&atid=498105 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2004-03-02 08:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 Just turn off the outlook notification (under advanced e-mail options). I don't use sound much so I didn't add that, but it's probably not too hard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2004-03-01 17:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Mark, I just downloaded your program and it seems to work fine. Unfortionately i still need the macro (see below) to get rid of the original outlook mail notification. This macro also eliminates all sounds of incoming mail/ham. Isn't it possible to do this all in your program? To have a audible notification on ham and silence on spam? No icon (not even a blue or black one) when spam is received and a mail notification when ham is received? I very much like that i can now see the number of emails i have received in contrast to "You have unread items" which is the normal outlook notification. Keep up the good work! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2004-03-01 15:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 I wrote a C# program to replace the outlook notify icon w/ my own. The code for this is at http://codeproject.com/csharp/gmcdoexmail.asp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2003-10-13 07:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Reacting on all before. Would'nt it be the best option to allow a rule or macro to be defined that can be runned after spam and ham is processed? In other words an extra option in the spambayes filtering dialog. [Move] spam to folder [...] [X] Mark spam as read [X] Process following rule or macro [...] Indeed the macro proposed by Ghuron does exactly that. It does not block the sounds though. More info on the macro on http://www.slipstick.com/dev/code/clearenvicon.htm#info ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-09 17:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark - what do you think of the idea of providing our own icon in the tray (and a sound) when we classify mail as [user- defined selection of ham/unsure/spam]? In your opinion, do you think that we could successfully determine when these messages were read so that we could clear the flag? Would you be opposed to this rather off-topic feature appearing in the plug-in? If your comments are positive, then I might try and write some code to do this at some point, if only to stop the incessant requests for this feature <wink>. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-09 17:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From the list: My outlook always plays a sound when new mails do arrive - also when new spam comes in. Since 90% of my mails are spam, this is really nerving. If spambayes could give out a sound when no-spam-mails arrive, then I could switch off the the standard-sound of outlook and only Spambayes reports "good" mails. Then we again have a true accustical message, when important mail arrive and are not irritated by spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Date: 2003-09-26 12:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=633868 I'm not a Visual Basic/Windows expert. But having used Outlook for a while, I *can* tell you that setting emails to "read" status stops the envelope icon coming up. This would probably be the easiest fix, and would also stop the spam folder coming up with bold text to draw your attention to it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 10:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 10:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 08:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Sorry, duplicated to #774908. Too bad that nothing can be done here ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 22:29:37 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 22:29:40 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1119791 ] message/partial misclassified Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1119791, was opened at 2005-02-10 15:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1119791&group_id=61702 >Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Leonid (leobru) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: message/partial misclassified Initial Comment: Partial messages (usually split by SMTP limiters) can have base64 data without appropriate MIME header, therefore all data will be tokenized and will most likely result in numerous 'skip:q 70': 0.98; 'skip:g 70': 0.98; 'skip:j 70': 0.98; 'skip:o 70': 0.98; 'skip:v 70': 0.98; 'skip:k 70': 0.98; 'skip:s 70': 0.98; 'skip:t 70': 0.98; 'skip:a 70': 0.99; 'skip:n 70': 0.99; 'skip:p 70': 0.99; that will raise its spam score to the roof and cause the message to go to 'unsure' if the sender is well-trusted, or to 'spam' otherwise, where it can be lost. The classifier would do a better job by caching the classification of messages containing a header like Content-Type: message/partial; total=2; id="01C50EFC.CA6C2680@quake"; number=1 and applying it to the subsequent parts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-11 10:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sounds more like a feature request than a bug to me, so changing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Leonid (leobru) Date: 2005-02-10 16:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=790676 Or, simpler, treat the body of continuation messages as "empty" . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1119791&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 22:30:54 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 22:31:04 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-898834 ] Outlook crashes when toolbar is expanded Message-ID: Bugs item #898834, was opened at 2004-02-18 05:06 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898834&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathan Niesen (nniesen) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crashes when toolbar is expanded Initial Comment: Windows 2000 sp4 Outlook 2000 SpamBayes 0.8 and 0.9 (1.0a9) When I click the "More Buttons" arrow to expand the toolbar because not all the buttons are visible, Outlook crashes with a "Program Error OUTLOOK.exe has generated errors and will be closed by Windows." This seems to only occur when the "More Buttons" arrow has the ">>" symbol above it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nathan Niesen (nniesen) Date: 2005-02-11 04:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=142538 :( I'd try 1.0.3 to help verirfy but I'm now on Windows XP/Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-10 14:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does anyone know if this still occurs with 1.0.3? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hakero (hakero) Date: 2004-04-27 10:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1029828 I'm having the exact same problem. Always when hitting the 'more buttons' on the spambayes toolbar. I also have the same version of Windows, spambayes, and Outlook.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898834&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 22:53:59 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 22:54:03 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-819684 ] Message stream from Evolution MIME message is truncated Message-ID: Bugs item #819684, was opened at 2003-10-07 20:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=819684&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: JD Brennan (jazzdevotee) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Message stream from Evolution MIME message is truncated Initial Comment: When a MIME message is received from the Evolution Mail client the SpamBayes Outlook plugin truncates the message stream after the headers and only tokenizers the headers. Message source looks like this: ... Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7FQBfj5xPKbUE94YalzJ" Organization: Message-Id: <1065568187.23375.8.camel@wookie> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 07 Oct 2003 16:09:47 -0700 Content-Length: 5759 --=-7FQBfj5xPKbUE94YalzJ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable message here ... --- Show spam clues indicates the message stream is only the headers. The message appears to get truncated after the Date header. My guess is that this is because Evolution puts two blanks lines after the headers instead of one. Other mail clients I tried only put one blank line after the headers before the first MIME boundary. Surprisingly this really doesn't seem to matter. SpamBayes quickly learned these messages were not spam. SpamBayes rocks! And so does the Outlook plugin! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-02-10 16:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I just tried this sending from Evolution version 2.0 and accessing the message with Outlook 2003. I don't know if anything has changed in the Evolution mail format since 1.2.4 or if something has changed in how Outlook handles these messages, but it worked fine for me. I used Evolution 2.0 running on a Mandrake Linux system to send a PGP-signed plain-text message, a PGP-signed HTML message, an unsigned plain-text message, and an unsigned HTML message to my Exchange Server account. I then used Show Clues on each of the 4 received messages in Outlook 2003. In all 4 cases, the message stream in Clues included the entire message body. In the 2 HTML cases, it showed both the HTML message and the corresponding plain-text message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-09 20:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-20 05:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Sorry for the delay here. The best thing you could do is install Python+SpamBayes source, and run the dump_props program against this message. Second best (but really just as good <wink>) is to wait for the next binary release, which will include dump_props as an executable ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: JD Brennan (jazzdevotee) Date: 2003-10-07 22:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=556412 A little Googling turned up a comment from Tim Peters a year ago: > The Outlook client right now "loses" all > attachments, and even loses the msg body if the msg has been > digitally signed (because it turns out Outlook does Yet > Another Entirely Different Thing for signed msgs, leaving the > two "normal" body properties empty and stuffing the body > *plus* the signature into Yet Another property). So if it's possible to figure out the name of this "Yet Another property", I could probably test and submit a patch (to msgstore.GetEmailPackageObject). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=819684&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 22:57:05 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 22:57:10 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-819684 ] Message stream from Evolution MIME message is truncated Message-ID: Bugs item #819684, was opened at 2003-10-08 13:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=819684&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: JD Brennan (jazzdevotee) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Message stream from Evolution MIME message is truncated Initial Comment: When a MIME message is received from the Evolution Mail client the SpamBayes Outlook plugin truncates the message stream after the headers and only tokenizers the headers. Message source looks like this: ... Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7FQBfj5xPKbUE94YalzJ" Organization: Message-Id: <1065568187.23375.8.camel@wookie> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 07 Oct 2003 16:09:47 -0700 Content-Length: 5759 --=-7FQBfj5xPKbUE94YalzJ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable message here ... --- Show spam clues indicates the message stream is only the headers. The message appears to get truncated after the Date header. My guess is that this is because Evolution puts two blanks lines after the headers instead of one. Other mail clients I tried only put one blank line after the headers before the first MIME boundary. Surprisingly this really doesn't seem to matter. SpamBayes quickly learned these messages were not spam. SpamBayes rocks! And so does the Outlook plugin! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-11 10:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks! This is good enough for me, since there have been no other reports of problems about this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-02-11 10:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I just tried this sending from Evolution version 2.0 and accessing the message with Outlook 2003. I don't know if anything has changed in the Evolution mail format since 1.2.4 or if something has changed in how Outlook handles these messages, but it worked fine for me. I used Evolution 2.0 running on a Mandrake Linux system to send a PGP-signed plain-text message, a PGP-signed HTML message, an unsigned plain-text message, and an unsigned HTML message to my Exchange Server account. I then used Show Clues on each of the 4 received messages in Outlook 2003. In all 4 cases, the message stream in Clues included the entire message body. In the 2 HTML cases, it showed both the HTML message and the corresponding plain-text message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-10 14:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-20 23:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Sorry for the delay here. The best thing you could do is install Python+SpamBayes source, and run the dump_props program against this message. Second best (but really just as good <wink>) is to wait for the next binary release, which will include dump_props as an executable ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: JD Brennan (jazzdevotee) Date: 2003-10-08 15:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=556412 A little Googling turned up a comment from Tim Peters a year ago: > The Outlook client right now "loses" all > attachments, and even loses the msg body if the msg has been > digitally signed (because it turns out Outlook does Yet > Another Entirely Different Thing for signed msgs, leaving the > two "normal" body properties empty and stuffing the body > *plus* the signature into Yet Another property). So if it's possible to figure out the name of this "Yet Another property", I could probably test and submit a patch (to msgstore.GetEmailPackageObject). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=819684&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 10 23:00:50 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 10 23:00:54 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1115105 ] Binary will not work with NT Message-ID: Bugs item #1115105, was opened at 2005-02-03 12:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115105&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 8 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Binary will not work with NT Initial Comment: It appears that the binary (1.0.2 and 1.0.3, but not 1.0.1) will work work with NT. This is probably the result of a pywin32 change (although it might be the Python 2.4 change). It needs to be resolved for 1.1 (and maybe a 1.0.4, if it's worth doing that). Two confirmed cases are: Window NT 1.0 (Build 1381, Service Pack 6) and Outlook 2000 SR-1 (9.0.0.3821). WinNT 4.0 SP 6a plus hotfixes and Microsoft Outlook 2002 SP 3 plus hotfixes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-11 11:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm hoping that this is fixed by this pywin32 change: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=6544837&forum_id=32755 When I have a chance, I'll put together a version of 1.0.3 with this change and see if someone can try it out. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-03 12:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The first case above should be NT 4.0, not 1.0. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Taed Wynnell (taed) Date: 2005-02-03 12:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1025617 The buttons do appear in Outlook, however, they are non- functional and no filtering occurs. The log file contains only the following: Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1115105&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Feb 11 05:08:48 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Feb 11 05:08:49 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1120553 ] Error in Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1120553, was opened at 2005-02-11 04:08 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1120553&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric (paganil) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Error in Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: I hit the delete as spam button with a message in my inbox highlighted and I get the following error: Moving a message due to an Outlook Error. Exception 0x-7ffbf9f4 (OLE error 0x8004060c): OLE error 0x8004060c ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1120553&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Feb 11 15:00:03 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Feb 11 15:00:06 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1120780 ] no training with public folder postings or mails Message-ID: Bugs item #1120780, was opened at 2005-02-11 15:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1120780&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: marty K (martinkoeb) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: no training with public folder postings or mails Initial Comment: hi, I have full admin rights on the public folder,but the minute I focus on a mail in the folder,the 'delete as spam' button disappears. further when I start training with spam in a public folder (hr,jobs) in this case,I get :Checked 0 in folder HR - 0 new entries found. spambayes version:1.0.3 outlook 2003 Sp1 here's the log: ###################### Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\mak\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\mak\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 16 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0.3 (January 2005) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 2) using Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - Martin Koeb/Inbox' Folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/UNITS/Human Resources/HR' has no field named 'Spam' - creating Warning: failed to create the Outlook user-property in folder 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/UNITS/Human Resources/HR' (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (4096, 'Microsoft Office Outlook', "You don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation.", None, 0, -2147024891), None) WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/UNITS/Human Resources/HR, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField() SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Public Folders/IPM_SUBTREE/All Public Folders/UNITS/Human Resources/HR' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Mailbox - Martin Koeb/Junk E-mail' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'HR' took 24.4768ms Checked 377 in folder iit list - 371 new entries found. Checked 0 in folder HR - 0 new entries found. Checked 0 in folder jobs - 0 new entries found. Checked 0 in folder Junk E-mail - 0 new entries found. Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\mak\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\mak\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 371 good messages Ignoring OnCommand for IDC_START Ignoring OnCommand for IDC_START Ignoring OnCommand for IDC_START ########################### also:does anyone know:what's the difference between postings and mails in pub folders as far as spambayes goes? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1120780&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Feb 11 18:21:25 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Feb 11 18:21:27 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1120926 ] Character Replacements Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1120926, was opened at 2005-02-11 12:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1120926&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pete Davis (pdavis68) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Character Replacements Initial Comment: Spambayes should test character replacements to see if doing so would produce spam words. For example: v1c0d|n replace the '1' and '|' with 'i' and the '0' with 'o' and you get vicodin replace '3' with 'e' and '@' with 'a' and so forth. In addition, removing whitespace between individual letters or small letter groups to see if they form filtered words would also help. for example: v ! c 0 d1n Anyway, just a thought. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1120926&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 12 18:25:35 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 12 18:25:37 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1121419 ] Compile mboxtrain with windows setup program Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1121419, was opened at 2005-02-12 12:25 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1121419&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Robert Searle (robertsearle) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Compile mboxtrain with windows setup program Initial Comment: I would like the sb_mboxtrain to be precompiled with the next release. I would like to issue a command like the following in a windows command prompt / dos box. Notice that in windows, I must quote the dbx, not mbox, file name! sb_mboxtrain.exe -g "D:\Documents and Settings\blah\Local Settings\Application Data\Identities\{AD92E1BD-DE21-42DE-BDD4- 882321128522}\Microsoft\Outlook Express\ham.dbx" - s "D:\Documents and Settings\blah\Local Settings\Application Data\Identities\{AD92E1BD-DE21- 42DE-BDD4-882321128522}\Microsoft\Outlook Express\spam.dbx" Is this possible ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1121419&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 12 23:49:11 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 12 23:49:13 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1120926 ] Character Replacements Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1120926, was opened at 2005-02-12 06:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1120926&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pete Davis (pdavis68) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Character Replacements Initial Comment: Spambayes should test character replacements to see if doing so would produce spam words. For example: v1c0d|n replace the '1' and '|' with 'i' and the '0' with 'o' and you get vicodin replace '3' with 'e' and '@' with 'a' and so forth. In addition, removing whitespace between individual letters or small letter groups to see if they form filtered words would also help. for example: v ! c 0 d1n Anyway, just a thought. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-13 11:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a very time-consuming process. It's possible to calculate the 'edit distance' for words, and use that as clues (e.g. one recent paper at the 2005 MIT Spam Conference), but that is a lot of work. More to the point - the fact that there is a disguised word is itself a spam clue. The chances of getting a 'v1c0d|n' token in ham is much smaller than getting a 'vicodin' token. If the token hasn't been seen before, then it isn't used in the scoring, and all the rest of the message is used for the score. Until use of this technique actually causes any problems, it's not worth trying to work around it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1120926&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 12 23:52:30 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 12 23:52:33 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1121419 ] Compile mboxtrain with windows setup program Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1121419, was opened at 2005-02-13 06:25 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1121419&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Robert Searle (robertsearle) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Compile mboxtrain with windows setup program Initial Comment: I would like the sb_mboxtrain to be precompiled with the next release. I would like to issue a command like the following in a windows command prompt / dos box. Notice that in windows, I must quote the dbx, not mbox, file name! sb_mboxtrain.exe -g "D:\Documents and Settings\blah\Local Settings\Application Data\Identities\{AD92E1BD-DE21-42DE-BDD4- 882321128522}\Microsoft\Outlook Express\ham.dbx" - s "D:\Documents and Settings\blah\Local Settings\Application Data\Identities\{AD92E1BD-DE21- 42DE-BDD4-882321128522}\Microsoft\Outlook Express\spam.dbx" Is this possible ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-13 11:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't believe sb_mboxtrain works with dbx files, does it? So including a frozen sb_mboxtrain wouldn't actually do this. What is your use case for this? I'm not convinced that sb_mboxtrain would be widely used enough to make it worth including in the binary. It's not difficult to just install Python, after all, and run from source. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1121419&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 12 23:54:13 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 12 23:54:15 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1120553 ] 0x8004060c error in Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1120553, was opened at 2005-02-11 17:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1120553&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eric (paganil) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: 0x8004060c error in Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: I hit the delete as spam button with a message in my inbox highlighted and I get the following error: Moving a message due to an Outlook Error. Exception 0x-7ffbf9f4 (OLE error 0x8004060c): OLE error 0x8004060c ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-13 11:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Checking microsoft.com, the most common cause of this error is that the personal folders file is full. Please check whether that is the problem here. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1120553&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Feb 13 01:06:29 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Feb 13 01:06:34 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113593 ] 100% SPAM messages pass through Message-ID: Bugs item #1113593, was opened at 2005-02-01 01:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by complex You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113593&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Viktor Ferenczi (complex) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 100% SPAM messages pass through Initial Comment: I'm a happy user of spambayes since the 1.0.0 version. Currently I'm using spambayes 1.0.3 in concert with MS Outlook 2002 SP2. My filter is traned with about 1000 good and 1500 spam messages. SPAM score settings used: 0..15%: HAM 15..80%: Unsure 80..100%: SPAM I found an interesting behaviour of spambayes several months ago. Messages with 99.97% combined SPAM score are correctly categorized as SPAM, but others with 100% score are categorized as Unsure. These messages always appears to be SPAM for me, so I deleted them as SPAM using the spambayes toolbar. They should be categorized as SPAM. Is it a bug in spambayes? Most of my incoming mail is Hungarian, so nearly every non-Hungarian mail is spam. This trains the filter to separate languages rather than spam and no-spam. It yields very efficient SPAM detection and offten 100% SPAM scores. I think this can be the root of my problem. This behaviour can affect every and all non English speaking users. I've attached an example mail with 100% SPAM clue. SPAM clues reported by spambayes are included. The bug occours with increasing probability as time goes on. OS: WinXP Prof SP1 Office: MS Office XP SP2 - Hungarian version Virus and spyware protection is actively used and maintained. Thanks for your help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Viktor Ferenczi (complex) Date: 2005-02-13 01:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=142612 OK, I'm going to enable logging with higher verbosity level. I'll attach the log when I catch such a message again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-01 01:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Any message with a score over your spam threshold (80%) should be moved to the spam folder. Could you please attach a log for a period when this isn't the case to the tracker? (SpamBayes->SpamBayes Manager->Advanced->Diagnostics->View Log) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113593&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Feb 13 04:25:01 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Feb 13 04:25:14 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1121419 ] Compile mboxtrain with windows setup program Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1121419, was opened at 2005-02-12 12:25 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by robertsearle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1121419&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Robert Searle (robertsearle) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Compile mboxtrain with windows setup program Initial Comment: I would like the sb_mboxtrain to be precompiled with the next release. I would like to issue a command like the following in a windows command prompt / dos box. Notice that in windows, I must quote the dbx, not mbox, file name! sb_mboxtrain.exe -g "D:\Documents and Settings\blah\Local Settings\Application Data\Identities\{AD92E1BD-DE21-42DE-BDD4- 882321128522}\Microsoft\Outlook Express\ham.dbx" - s "D:\Documents and Settings\blah\Local Settings\Application Data\Identities\{AD92E1BD-DE21- 42DE-BDD4-882321128522}\Microsoft\Outlook Express\spam.dbx" Is this possible ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Robert Searle (robertsearle) Date: 2005-02-12 22:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=271524 I don't know, that part of my question. If it doesn't work with dbx files I am still up a creek---regardless. I am trying to automate the process. I find its easier to tell people to move spam into a spam folder than to use the web interface. I would like to setup a windows task to train it with all the messages in the spam folder. Something like every hour. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-12 17:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't believe sb_mboxtrain works with dbx files, does it? So including a frozen sb_mboxtrain wouldn't actually do this. What is your use case for this? I'm not convinced that sb_mboxtrain would be widely used enough to make it worth including in the binary. It's not difficult to just install Python, after all, and run from source. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1121419&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Feb 13 07:24:42 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Feb 13 07:24:44 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1121419 ] Compile mboxtrain with windows setup program Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1121419, was opened at 2005-02-13 06:25 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1121419&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Robert Searle (robertsearle) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Compile mboxtrain with windows setup program Initial Comment: I would like the sb_mboxtrain to be precompiled with the next release. I would like to issue a command like the following in a windows command prompt / dos box. Notice that in windows, I must quote the dbx, not mbox, file name! sb_mboxtrain.exe -g "D:\Documents and Settings\blah\Local Settings\Application Data\Identities\{AD92E1BD-DE21-42DE-BDD4- 882321128522}\Microsoft\Outlook Express\ham.dbx" - s "D:\Documents and Settings\blah\Local Settings\Application Data\Identities\{AD92E1BD-DE21- 42DE-BDD4-882321128522}\Microsoft\Outlook Express\spam.dbx" Is this possible ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-13 19:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You could try the sb_pop3dnd script in 1.1 (hopefully arriving soon) or in CVS. It hasn't had the extensive testing that the other scripts have (because it's newer) but allows drag-and-drop training from within mail clients. Perhaps using the SMTP proxy would be easier than the web interface? Otherwise, a new script (or modified mboxtrain) needs to be written that can handle dbx files. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Robert Searle (robertsearle) Date: 2005-02-13 16:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=271524 I don't know, that part of my question. If it doesn't work with dbx files I am still up a creek---regardless. I am trying to automate the process. I find its easier to tell people to move spam into a spam folder than to use the web interface. I would like to setup a windows task to train it with all the messages in the spam folder. Something like every hour. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-13 11:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't believe sb_mboxtrain works with dbx files, does it? So including a frozen sb_mboxtrain wouldn't actually do this. What is your use case for this? I'm not convinced that sb_mboxtrain would be widely used enough to make it worth including in the binary. It's not difficult to just install Python, after all, and run from source. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1121419&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 14 01:20:20 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 14 01:20:23 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1122067 ] Feature Request: Config sb_imapfilter for multiple accounts Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1122067, was opened at 2005-02-14 00:20 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122067&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Christopher M. Rasch (crasch) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Feature Request: Config sb_imapfilter for multiple accounts Initial Comment: [Per Tony Meyer's suggestion below, I'm adding this as a feature request.] I have three separate imap accounts (two work, one personal). Right now, to use SpamBayes, you have to run three separate processes, with three separate config files, and hammie.db and spambayes.messageinfo.db databases. It would be handy if a) each imap account could be filtered within a single process using a single config file b) all three could use and train on the same hammie.db and spambayes.messageinfo.db databases. ------------------- From: tameyer@ihug.co.nz Subject: RE: [Spambayes] How to configure for multiple IMAP accounts? Date: February 13, 2005 6:08:53 PM EST I have three separate IMAP accounts (two for work, one personal). I was wondering how I could set up separate SpamBayes configuration files for each account. [...] But I'm not sure how to tell each instance where to find the appropriate config file. The script (any SpamBayes script) will try and find configuration files that are in the BAYESCUSTOMIZE environment variable, or called .spambayesrc in your home directory, or bayescustomize.ini in the current working directory. So you can call the script from different directories, e.g.: account1/> python /path/to/spambayes/scripts/sb_imapfilter.py -c -t account2/> python /path/to/spambayes/scripts/sb_imapfilter.py -c -t Or setup the BAYESCUSTOMIZE environment variable for each one, e.g.: env BAYESCUSTOMIZE=/path/to/config/account1.ini python scripts/sb_imapfilter.py -c -t env BAYESCUSTOMIZE=/path/to/config/account2.ini python scripts/sb_imapfilter.py -c -t Or (and this is possibly the simplest) you can use the -o command line option to specify the options you wish to set, e.g.: python scripts/sb_imapfilter.py -c -t -o imap:username:user1 -o imap:password:pass1 -o imap:server:server1.example.com python scripts/sb_imapfilter.py -c -t -o imap:username:user2 -o imap:password:pass2 -o imap:server:server2.example.com I'm also wondering if each instance can use the same hammie.db and spambayes.messageinfo.db, or if each one needs a separate version of each. You shouldn't have any problems sharing if all the script is doing is classifying. However, if they are also going to be training, then that is a problem. Using a separate database for each would solve that, although that would seem a right PITA to me. The right way to solve this, I think, is to say that you'd like this solved (ideally, fill out a feature request on sourceforge: ) and I'll get to this for 1.1a1. =Tony.Meyer r ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122067&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 14 07:10:25 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 14 07:10:28 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1122067 ] Feature Request: Config sb_imapfilter for multiple accounts Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1122067, was opened at 2005-02-14 13:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122067&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Next Release (example) >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Christopher M. Rasch (crasch) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Feature Request: Config sb_imapfilter for multiple accounts Initial Comment: [Per Tony Meyer's suggestion below, I'm adding this as a feature request.] I have three separate imap accounts (two work, one personal). Right now, to use SpamBayes, you have to run three separate processes, with three separate config files, and hammie.db and spambayes.messageinfo.db databases. It would be handy if a) each imap account could be filtered within a single process using a single config file b) all three could use and train on the same hammie.db and spambayes.messageinfo.db databases. ------------------- From: tameyer@ihug.co.nz Subject: RE: [Spambayes] How to configure for multiple IMAP accounts? Date: February 13, 2005 6:08:53 PM EST I have three separate IMAP accounts (two for work, one personal). I was wondering how I could set up separate SpamBayes configuration files for each account. [...] But I'm not sure how to tell each instance where to find the appropriate config file. The script (any SpamBayes script) will try and find configuration files that are in the BAYESCUSTOMIZE environment variable, or called .spambayesrc in your home directory, or bayescustomize.ini in the current working directory. So you can call the script from different directories, e.g.: account1/> python /path/to/spambayes/scripts/sb_imapfilter.py -c -t account2/> python /path/to/spambayes/scripts/sb_imapfilter.py -c -t Or setup the BAYESCUSTOMIZE environment variable for each one, e.g.: env BAYESCUSTOMIZE=/path/to/config/account1.ini python scripts/sb_imapfilter.py -c -t env BAYESCUSTOMIZE=/path/to/config/account2.ini python scripts/sb_imapfilter.py -c -t Or (and this is possibly the simplest) you can use the -o command line option to specify the options you wish to set, e.g.: python scripts/sb_imapfilter.py -c -t -o imap:username:user1 -o imap:password:pass1 -o imap:server:server1.example.com python scripts/sb_imapfilter.py -c -t -o imap:username:user2 -o imap:password:pass2 -o imap:server:server2.example.com I'm also wondering if each instance can use the same hammie.db and spambayes.messageinfo.db, or if each one needs a separate version of each. You shouldn't have any problems sharing if all the script is doing is classifying. However, if they are also going to be training, then that is a problem. Using a separate database for each would solve that, although that would seem a right PITA to me. The right way to solve this, I think, is to say that you'd like this solved (ideally, fill out a feature request on sourceforge: ) and I'll get to this for 1.1a1. =Tony.Meyer r ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-14 19:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This should work with anon CVS now. If anyone interested in this is able, it would be great it they could try out CVS imapfilter when anon CVS catches up. Otherwise, 1.1a1 should be out soon, I hope. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122067&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 14 09:50:25 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 14 09:50:33 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-898541 ] IMAP: Delete as Spam only deletes first marked message Message-ID: Bugs item #898541, was opened at 2004-02-17 08:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by vdh You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898541&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jens Vonderheide (vdh) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: IMAP: Delete as Spam only deletes first marked message Initial Comment: Using Outlook 2003 on an IMAP account, when I select multiple messages and then click "Delete as Spam", only the first message gets deleted. It seems to be connected with the download status of these messages, as all messages are deleted if they have been downloaded (mark message for download, process marked headers). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jens Vonderheide (vdh) Date: 2005-02-14 08:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=239249 The behaviour has changed slightly, but the core problem is still there. Now when I try to execute "Delete As Spam" on a message that is not yet downloaded, this error message is displayed: "No filterable mail items are selected" The same error occurs regardless of the number of messages that I select before clicking the "Delete As Spam" button. To reproduce, make sure that the message is not downloaded automatically, i.e. - Disable the preview pane - Do not run "Filter messages..." from the SpamBayes menu - Disable background filtering A workaround is to run "Filter messages..." and enable background filtering as this forces a download of the messages. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-10 01:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry for the very long period with no response. If you are still using SB, is this still a problem with 1.0.3? If so, could you please attach a log file for a period when this occured to this tracker? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898541&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 14 10:02:03 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 14 10:02:06 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-898541 ] IMAP: Delete as Spam only deletes first marked message Message-ID: Bugs item #898541, was opened at 2004-02-17 21:11 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898541&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook >Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jens Vonderheide (vdh) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: IMAP: Delete as Spam only deletes first marked message Initial Comment: Using Outlook 2003 on an IMAP account, when I select multiple messages and then click "Delete as Spam", only the first message gets deleted. It seems to be connected with the download status of these messages, as all messages are deleted if they have been downloaded (mark message for download, process marked headers). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-14 22:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. What is the correct behaviour? Should SpamBayes be able to cause these messages to be downloaded, or should it wait until the messages are downloaded, and then work on them? Are these messages filtered before you click Delete As/Recover from? I would have thought that would have forced the download. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jens Vonderheide (vdh) Date: 2005-02-14 21:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=239249 The behaviour has changed slightly, but the core problem is still there. Now when I try to execute "Delete As Spam" on a message that is not yet downloaded, this error message is displayed: "No filterable mail items are selected" The same error occurs regardless of the number of messages that I select before clicking the "Delete As Spam" button. To reproduce, make sure that the message is not downloaded automatically, i.e. - Disable the preview pane - Do not run "Filter messages..." from the SpamBayes menu - Disable background filtering A workaround is to run "Filter messages..." and enable background filtering as this forces a download of the messages. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-10 14:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry for the very long period with no response. If you are still using SB, is this still a problem with 1.0.3? If so, could you please attach a log file for a period when this occured to this tracker? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=898541&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 14 18:02:09 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 14 18:02:12 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1122512 ] Install claim success, but no plugin visible Message-ID: Bugs item #1122512, was opened at 2005-02-14 12:02 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1122512&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: i_am_andy_k (i_am_andy_k) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Install claim success, but no plugin visible Initial Comment: I used SpamBayes for a few weeks at work on Win2000. No problems - I even enabled spam column per instructions. Great program. I used version 1.0.3.exe, but I don't see that on the Group pulldown. Got a new PC at work - now have no write permissions in Program Files (completely locked down). Maybe the Registry is similarly locked down. Here is the log file contents: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 1546, in ? File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 483, in UseCommandLine File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 413, in RegisterClasses File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 181, in RegisterServer File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 32, in _set_string pywintypes.error: (5, 'RegSetValue', 'Access is denied.') Any tips to work-around this issue appreciated ! I miss my SpamBayes filtering ! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1122512&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 14 23:50:31 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 14 23:50:33 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1122752 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1122752, was opened at 2005-02-14 22:50 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122752&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: edaly (edaly) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: kacolly's fix doesn't work for me. I'm using Outlook 2003 (11.6359.6360) SP1. Process used: - Rightclick on "Unread Mail" - Select "Customize this Search Folder" - Set "Mail from these folders will be included in this Search Folder" to Inbox - Click OK Any more info kacolly? edaly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122752&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 14 23:50:33 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 14 23:50:36 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1122753 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1122753, was opened at 2005-02-14 22:50 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122753&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: edaly (edaly) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: kacolly's fix doesn't work for me. I'm using Outlook 2003 (11.6359.6360) SP1. Process used: - Rightclick on "Unread Mail" - Select "Customize this Search Folder" - Set "Mail from these folders will be included in this Search Folder" to Inbox - Click OK Any more info kacolly? edaly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122753&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 14 23:50:35 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 14 23:50:38 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1122754 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1122754, was opened at 2005-02-14 22:50 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122754&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: edaly (edaly) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: kacolly's fix doesn't work for me. I'm using Outlook 2003 (11.6359.6360) SP1. Process used: - Rightclick on "Unread Mail" - Select "Customize this Search Folder" - Set "Mail from these folders will be included in this Search Folder" to Inbox - Click OK Any more info kacolly? edaly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122754&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 14 23:51:06 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 14 23:51:20 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774978 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #774978, was opened at 2003-07-21 12:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by edaly You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: When during automatic receiving session only spam messages was received it is desired to remove envelope icon from tray. Probably this option should be switched off by default with the possibility to switch it on from the configuration file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: edaly (edaly) Date: 2005-02-14 22:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057156 kacolly's fix doesn't work for me. I'm using Outlook 2003 (11. 6359.6360) SP1. Process used: - Rightclick on "Unread Mail" - Select "Customize this Search Folder" - Set "Mail from these folders will be included in this Search Folder" to Inbox - Click OK Any more info kacolly? edaly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2005-02-10 19:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 kacolly's comment is valid for Outlook 2003, that feature doesn't exist in prior versions ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: KeithC (kacolly) Date: 2005-02-10 18:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1216497 The envelope icon seems to be generated from Outlook's built- in "Unread Mail" search folder. By default, this is set to include all the unread mail in the mailbox and sub-folders. If you right- click on it and customize the search to show just the Inbox and other selected folders, the envelope (in brief tests I have tried here) goes away. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Kirchner (mkabcde) Date: 2004-12-05 09:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1171109 Hello everybody! I wrote my own vba-macro which checks ALL my Outlook folders under "Inbox". The macro "CountUnreadMessages" is called from Application_NewMail in ThisOutlookSession. It has also the possibility to skip certain folders. Just rename the folder and add "_" as last character of the name. I know this solution is not quite sophisticated however it works fine. The program triggers a beep but you could also open a messagebox or like I did invoke the assistant which does some funny stuff. I solved the problem with the normal Outlook notification by deactivating the "New Mail"-sound and always hiding the icon in the SysTray. HTH Martin If you have problems just ask. Here the code (Maybe you have to tune the waiting time according to the number of messages you get): Public Sub CountUnreadMessages() On Error GoTo ErrorHandler Wait.WaitTime (10) 'Wait 10 seconds to allow SpamBayes to do its work Dim Inbox As Outlook.MAPIFolder Dim Subfolders As Outlook.MAPIFolder Set Inbox = GetNamespace("MAPI"). GetDefaultFolder(olFolderInbox) Dim nUnreadMessages As Integer nUnreadMessages = CountUnreadMessagesInFolder(Inbox) Set Inbox = Nothing If nUnreadMessages > 0 Then 'do whatever you want MsgBow("You have " & nUnreadMessages & " messages") Beep End If Exit Sub ErrorHandler: MsgBox Err.Number & " :" & Error(Err.Number) Close #1 Set Inbox = Nothing End Sub Private Function CountUnreadMessagesInFolder(oFolder As Outlook.MAPIFolder) As Integer 'Folders which shall not be searched must end with "_". Their subfolders will not be searched If Right(oFolder.Name, 1) = "_" Then CountUnreadMessagesInFolder = 0 Exit Function End If 'count mails in subfolders Dim i As Integer Dim nUnreadMailsSubFolders As Integer For i = 1 To oFolder.Folders.count nUnreadMailsSubFolders = nUnreadMailsSubFolders + CountUnreadMessagesInFolder(oFolder.Folders(i)) Next i 'count mails in current folder Dim j As Integer Dim nUnreadMailsHere As Integer Dim oCurMailItem As MailItem For j = 1 To oFolder.Items.count If oFolder.Items(j).UnRead Then nUnreadMailsHere = nUnreadMailsHere + 1 Next j CountUnreadMessagesInFolder = nUnreadMailsSubFolders + nUnreadMailsHere End Function Public Sub WaitTime(sec As Integer) Dim Start, Ende, Gesamtdauer Start = Timer 'set starting time Do While Timer < Start + sec DoEvents 'process other events Loop End Sub ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-29 21:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 1075410 ] Mail notification if new ham detected https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1075410&group_id=61702&atid=498106 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-09-30 15:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Thanks for the input, but the real problem is not being able to clear the icon (I've already got Python code based on an earlier comment that will do that) but rather knowing *when* to clear the icon. The problem is that SpamBayes only knows about a small subset of the Outlook mail folders. A user can configure Outlook rules to move messages to other folders that SpamBayes doesn't know about, so it is difficult for SpamBayes to be certain when there are *no* other unread messages anywhere in Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf) Date: 2004-09-30 00:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=363795 Have you seen this: http://www.outlookcode.com/d/code/clearenvicon.htm It maybe able to help with this bloody annoying problem. :) Cheers, Gerard ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: JJJJust (jjjjust) Date: 2004-08-04 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1093702 A simpler workaround (Tested only in Outlook 2000) is to read all your non-spam e-mail first, then you can look at your spam e-mail, then you can right click on your Junk E-Mail folder and click Mark All as Read. That gets rid of the envelope for me. Tedious, yes... but it works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: edaly (edaly) Date: 2004-06-05 00:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057156 Any news on when we can expect this feature? I recently installed SpamBayes and it's a great program but the envelope icon is killing me. I like to answer email right away so I find myself constantly flipping to Outlook only to find no new messages there because it was spam. Interestingly, my old beta copy of Cloudmark SpamNet doesn't have this problem. It removes the envelope icon when the message is deleted and marked as read. Even if I had an option in SpamBayes to remove the envelope icon whenever SpamBayes detected spam (regardless of whether there was other new mail there or not), I would turn it on. Please please please get this feature in soon! thanks, Erin Daly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-02 15:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Notification sounds for SpamBayes have already been implemented, but not integrated into the release version yet. Sounds like we're getting enough requests for this that we might want to merge it, at least as a "config-file-only" experimental option. See Patch #858925: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? func=detail&aid=858925&group_id=61702&atid=498105 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2004-03-02 13:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 Just turn off the outlook notification (under advanced e-mail options). I don't use sound much so I didn't add that, but it's probably not too hard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2004-03-01 22:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Mark, I just downloaded your program and it seems to work fine. Unfortionately i still need the macro (see below) to get rid of the original outlook mail notification. This macro also eliminates all sounds of incoming mail/ham. Isn't it possible to do this all in your program? To have a audible notification on ham and silence on spam? No icon (not even a blue or black one) when spam is received and a mail notification when ham is received? I very much like that i can now see the number of emails i have received in contrast to "You have unread items" which is the normal outlook notification. Keep up the good work! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2004-03-01 20:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 I wrote a C# program to replace the outlook notify icon w/ my own. The code for this is at http://codeproject.com/csharp/gmcdoexmail.asp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2003-10-13 12:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Reacting on all before. Would'nt it be the best option to allow a rule or macro to be defined that can be runned after spam and ham is processed? In other words an extra option in the spambayes filtering dialog. [Move] spam to folder [...] [X] Mark spam as read [X] Process following rule or macro [...] Indeed the macro proposed by Ghuron does exactly that. It does not block the sounds though. More info on the macro on http://www.slipstick.com/dev/code/clearenvicon.htm#info ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-09 22:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark - what do you think of the idea of providing our own icon in the tray (and a sound) when we classify mail as [user- defined selection of ham/unsure/spam]? In your opinion, do you think that we could successfully determine when these messages were read so that we could clear the flag? Would you be opposed to this rather off-topic feature appearing in the plug-in? If your comments are positive, then I might try and write some code to do this at some point, if only to stop the incessant requests for this feature <wink>. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-09 22:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From the list: My outlook always plays a sound when new mails do arrive - also when new spam comes in. Since 90% of my mails are spam, this is really nerving. If spambayes could give out a sound when no-spam-mails arrive, then I could switch off the the standard-sound of outlook and only Spambayes reports "good" mails. Then we again have a true accustical message, when important mail arrive and are not irritated by spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Date: 2003-09-26 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=633868 I'm not a Visual Basic/Windows expert. But having used Outlook for a while, I *can* tell you that setting emails to "read" status stops the envelope icon coming up. This would probably be the easiest fix, and would also stop the spam folder coming up with bold text to draw your attention to it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 15:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 15:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 13:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Sorry, duplicated to #774908. Too bad that nothing can be done here ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 15 00:29:08 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 15 00:29:11 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1122752 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1122752, was opened at 2005-02-15 11:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122752&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: edaly (edaly) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: kacolly's fix doesn't work for me. I'm using Outlook 2003 (11.6359.6360) SP1. Process used: - Rightclick on "Unread Mail" - Select "Customize this Search Folder" - Set "Mail from these folders will be included in this Search Folder" to Inbox - Click OK Any more info kacolly? edaly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-15 12:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122752&group_id=61702 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122752&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 15 00:29:17 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 15 00:29:19 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1122753 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1122753, was opened at 2005-02-15 11:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122753&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: edaly (edaly) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: kacolly's fix doesn't work for me. I'm using Outlook 2003 (11.6359.6360) SP1. Process used: - Rightclick on "Unread Mail" - Select "Customize this Search Folder" - Set "Mail from these folders will be included in this Search Folder" to Inbox - Click OK Any more info kacolly? edaly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-15 12:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122752&group_id=61702 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122753&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 15 00:29:39 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 15 00:29:41 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1122754 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1122754, was opened at 2005-02-15 11:50 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122754&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: edaly (edaly) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: kacolly's fix doesn't work for me. I'm using Outlook 2003 (11.6359.6360) SP1. Process used: - Rightclick on "Unread Mail" - Select "Customize this Search Folder" - Set "Mail from these folders will be included in this Search Folder" to Inbox - Click OK Any more info kacolly? edaly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-15 12:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122752&group_id=61702 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1122754&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 15 00:45:25 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 15 00:45:30 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1122512 ] Install claim success, but no plugin visible Message-ID: Bugs item #1122512, was opened at 2005-02-15 06:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1122512&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: i_am_andy_k (i_am_andy_k) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Install claim success, but no plugin visible Initial Comment: I used SpamBayes for a few weeks at work on Win2000. No problems - I even enabled spam column per instructions. Great program. I used version 1.0.3.exe, but I don't see that on the Group pulldown. Got a new PC at work - now have no write permissions in Program Files (completely locked down). Maybe the Registry is similarly locked down. Here is the log file contents: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 1546, in ? File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 483, in UseCommandLine File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 413, in RegisterClasses File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 181, in RegisterServer File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 32, in _set_string pywintypes.error: (5, 'RegSetValue', 'Access is denied.') Any tips to work-around this issue appreciated ! I miss my SpamBayes filtering ! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-15 12:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It does look like you don't have access to the registry. Unfortunately, there's no way to let Outlook know about the plug-in without putting information in the registry, so unless you can get permission to do that, nothing can be done. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1122512&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 15 06:36:00 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 15 06:36:10 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1036970 ] Allow Outlook plugin to move ham to a designated folder Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1036970, was opened at 2004-09-29 05:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jdedrick You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1036970&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jesse Pelton (jessepelton) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Allow Outlook plugin to move ham to a designated folder Initial Comment: It would be nice to be able to move ham messages from wherever SpamBayes finds them to a user-specified folder. There are at least two scenarios where this would be useful: - When Exchange is configured to filter messages, it puts what it considers to be certain/possible junk in Junk/Junk candidates folders. Since its filtering isn't as good as SpamBayes (when well-trained), it's helpful to have SpamBayes filter the Junk folders and put real spam elsewhere. Without the ability to move ham, though, any ham remains in the Junk folders. - Guaranteeing the order of processing of Outlook rules and SpamBayes filtering. See http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2004-September/014781.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: jhd (jdedrick) Date: 2005-02-14 21:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1210159 Well, I take it back. Turns out Outlook can't redirect email without changing the "from" and "reply to" addresses, so even if Spambayes puts all the ham in one folder, there's no way to get it to the Blackberry web client account. Sigh.... Seems to me there's a huge unmet need here: There's no way to apply *any* client-side spam filtering technology to a blackberry account that doesn't have either blackberry enterprise server or exchange server + desktop redirector running, which in effect means private individuals have to live with the generic server side spam filters their ISP's provide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-01 20:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry - this hasn't been updated for a bit. The dialog has been remodelled and you can configure this from it now (which means this can be closed). There's an estimate for the timeline here: (also one here: ) As you can see, it's a little behind since 1.1 was hoped to be out at the end of January, and it's the start of Feb. If you push all the dates back a week, that would be a reasonable guess. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: jhd (jdedrick) Date: 2005-02-01 20:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1210159 Glad to hear this is going to make it. I don't think that this will be a rarely used feature, as it's the only reliable way to make Spambayes interact predictably with Outlook rules. This will enable a number of good things, for example reliable forwarding/synching of only filtered messages to a blackberry or PDA. Suggest you reconsider and put a button on the dialog, but either way I'm delighted to have the functionality. When will 1.1 be available? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-07 20:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I've added code to allow this (it will appear in 1.1). At the moment this can only be conifgured by manually editing the Outlook.ini (or {profilename}.ini) file, since there isn't really any room for another set of options in the Manager dialog at the moment. I don't want to resize the dialog just for this, since it's not likely to be used much and is really and advanced option. However, if it does get resized for something else, I'll see if this will then fit. Leaving open until then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1036970&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 15 06:44:01 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 15 06:44:04 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-786912 ] Delete spam from server but leave ham Message-ID: Feature Requests item #786912, was opened at 2003-08-11 11:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jdedrick You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=786912&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Arto Rantala (artranta) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Delete spam from server but leave ham Initial Comment: The pop3proxy should have the option to delete all spam from the pop3 server after download. This would allow the possibility of keeping only ham available on the server for downloads with other simple, secondary clients without spam filtering capability (mobile phones, PDAs). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: jhd (jdedrick) Date: 2005-02-14 21:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1210159 This *almost* works. The popboxer plugin to inboxer (a commercial tool built on top of SpamBayes) does this. Problem is, you can't ever guarantee whether SpamBayes or the other clients get to the POP account first, so half the time the spam gets through to them anyway. I think the only way to really solve this important problem is for SpamBayes to get the capability to redirect (not forward) ham to another mail account, while keeping the "from" and "reply to" addresses unmodified. Don't suppose there's any chance of this in 1.1? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2003-08-11 14:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 Nice idea. For those who read their email from multiple clients, it's a good compromise between automatically deleting spam (too dangerous IMHO) and having to wade through it every time you look at your email. This way, the messages are kept on your main client but don't clutter up the others. I don't think I'll have time to implement it, but if someone wants to have go I'll be glad to help. Shameless plug: Entrian wapmail (http://entrian.com/wapmail) has a feature whereby you can hide a message once you've seen it - it remains on the POP3 server, but wapmail doesn't show it to you any more. (And yes, I'd love to integrate Spambayes with wapmail, but I don't have the time.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=786912&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 15 15:00:46 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 15 15:00:48 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1122512 ] Install claim success, but no plugin visible Message-ID: Bugs item #1122512, was opened at 2005-02-14 12:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by i_am_andy_k You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1122512&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: i_am_andy_k (i_am_andy_k) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Install claim success, but no plugin visible Initial Comment: I used SpamBayes for a few weeks at work on Win2000. No problems - I even enabled spam column per instructions. Great program. I used version 1.0.3.exe, but I don't see that on the Group pulldown. Got a new PC at work - now have no write permissions in Program Files (completely locked down). Maybe the Registry is similarly locked down. Here is the log file contents: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 1546, in ? File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 483, in UseCommandLine File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 413, in RegisterClasses File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 181, in RegisterServer File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 32, in _set_string pywintypes.error: (5, 'RegSetValue', 'Access is denied.') Any tips to work-around this issue appreciated ! I miss my SpamBayes filtering ! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: i_am_andy_k (i_am_andy_k) Date: 2005-02-15 09:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1219094 I suggest 2 changes: 1) change installer to not claim success if this happens 2) mention write permissions to registry as a requirement Also - add 1.0.3 to SourceForge group list (but this registry issue likely applies to all versions) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: i_am_andy_k (i_am_andy_k) Date: 2005-02-15 09:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1219094 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-14 18:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It does look like you don't have access to the registry. Unfortunately, there's no way to let Outlook know about the plug-in without putting information in the registry, so unless you can get permission to do that, nothing can be done. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1122512&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Feb 15 21:31:26 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Feb 15 21:32:15 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774978 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #774978, was opened at 2003-07-21 12:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kacolly You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: When during automatic receiving session only spam messages was received it is desired to remove envelope icon from tray. Probably this option should be switched off by default with the possibility to switch it on from the configuration file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: KeithC (kacolly) Date: 2005-02-15 20:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1216497 edaly wrote: > Process used: > - Rightclick on "Unread Mail" > - Select "Customize this Search Folder" > - Set "Mail from these folders will be included in this Search Folder" to Inbox > - Click OK > Any more info kacolly? Yes, you need to uncheck "Search subfolders". If that doesn't work for you, I can't help, I am sorry. I'm not an Outlook guru, I just happened to notice this when I changed the Unread Mail search folder for other reasons. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: edaly (edaly) Date: 2005-02-14 22:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057156 kacolly's fix doesn't work for me. I'm using Outlook 2003 (11. 6359.6360) SP1. Process used: - Rightclick on "Unread Mail" - Select "Customize this Search Folder" - Set "Mail from these folders will be included in this Search Folder" to Inbox - Click OK Any more info kacolly? edaly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2005-02-10 19:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 kacolly's comment is valid for Outlook 2003, that feature doesn't exist in prior versions ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: KeithC (kacolly) Date: 2005-02-10 18:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1216497 The envelope icon seems to be generated from Outlook's built- in "Unread Mail" search folder. By default, this is set to include all the unread mail in the mailbox and sub-folders. If you right- click on it and customize the search to show just the Inbox and other selected folders, the envelope (in brief tests I have tried here) goes away. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Kirchner (mkabcde) Date: 2004-12-05 09:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1171109 Hello everybody! I wrote my own vba-macro which checks ALL my Outlook folders under "Inbox". The macro "CountUnreadMessages" is called from Application_NewMail in ThisOutlookSession. It has also the possibility to skip certain folders. Just rename the folder and add "_" as last character of the name. I know this solution is not quite sophisticated however it works fine. The program triggers a beep but you could also open a messagebox or like I did invoke the assistant which does some funny stuff. I solved the problem with the normal Outlook notification by deactivating the "New Mail"-sound and always hiding the icon in the SysTray. HTH Martin If you have problems just ask. Here the code (Maybe you have to tune the waiting time according to the number of messages you get): Public Sub CountUnreadMessages() On Error GoTo ErrorHandler Wait.WaitTime (10) 'Wait 10 seconds to allow SpamBayes to do its work Dim Inbox As Outlook.MAPIFolder Dim Subfolders As Outlook.MAPIFolder Set Inbox = GetNamespace("MAPI"). GetDefaultFolder(olFolderInbox) Dim nUnreadMessages As Integer nUnreadMessages = CountUnreadMessagesInFolder(Inbox) Set Inbox = Nothing If nUnreadMessages > 0 Then 'do whatever you want MsgBow("You have " & nUnreadMessages & " messages") Beep End If Exit Sub ErrorHandler: MsgBox Err.Number & " :" & Error(Err.Number) Close #1 Set Inbox = Nothing End Sub Private Function CountUnreadMessagesInFolder(oFolder As Outlook.MAPIFolder) As Integer 'Folders which shall not be searched must end with "_". Their subfolders will not be searched If Right(oFolder.Name, 1) = "_" Then CountUnreadMessagesInFolder = 0 Exit Function End If 'count mails in subfolders Dim i As Integer Dim nUnreadMailsSubFolders As Integer For i = 1 To oFolder.Folders.count nUnreadMailsSubFolders = nUnreadMailsSubFolders + CountUnreadMessagesInFolder(oFolder.Folders(i)) Next i 'count mails in current folder Dim j As Integer Dim nUnreadMailsHere As Integer Dim oCurMailItem As MailItem For j = 1 To oFolder.Items.count If oFolder.Items(j).UnRead Then nUnreadMailsHere = nUnreadMailsHere + 1 Next j CountUnreadMessagesInFolder = nUnreadMailsSubFolders + nUnreadMailsHere End Function Public Sub WaitTime(sec As Integer) Dim Start, Ende, Gesamtdauer Start = Timer 'set starting time Do While Timer < Start + sec DoEvents 'process other events Loop End Sub ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-29 21:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 1075410 ] Mail notification if new ham detected https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1075410&group_id=61702&atid=498106 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-09-30 15:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Thanks for the input, but the real problem is not being able to clear the icon (I've already got Python code based on an earlier comment that will do that) but rather knowing *when* to clear the icon. The problem is that SpamBayes only knows about a small subset of the Outlook mail folders. A user can configure Outlook rules to move messages to other folders that SpamBayes doesn't know about, so it is difficult for SpamBayes to be certain when there are *no* other unread messages anywhere in Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf) Date: 2004-09-30 00:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=363795 Have you seen this: http://www.outlookcode.com/d/code/clearenvicon.htm It maybe able to help with this bloody annoying problem. :) Cheers, Gerard ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: JJJJust (jjjjust) Date: 2004-08-04 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1093702 A simpler workaround (Tested only in Outlook 2000) is to read all your non-spam e-mail first, then you can look at your spam e-mail, then you can right click on your Junk E-Mail folder and click Mark All as Read. That gets rid of the envelope for me. Tedious, yes... but it works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: edaly (edaly) Date: 2004-06-05 00:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057156 Any news on when we can expect this feature? I recently installed SpamBayes and it's a great program but the envelope icon is killing me. I like to answer email right away so I find myself constantly flipping to Outlook only to find no new messages there because it was spam. Interestingly, my old beta copy of Cloudmark SpamNet doesn't have this problem. It removes the envelope icon when the message is deleted and marked as read. Even if I had an option in SpamBayes to remove the envelope icon whenever SpamBayes detected spam (regardless of whether there was other new mail there or not), I would turn it on. Please please please get this feature in soon! thanks, Erin Daly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-02 15:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Notification sounds for SpamBayes have already been implemented, but not integrated into the release version yet. Sounds like we're getting enough requests for this that we might want to merge it, at least as a "config-file-only" experimental option. See Patch #858925: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? func=detail&aid=858925&group_id=61702&atid=498105 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2004-03-02 13:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 Just turn off the outlook notification (under advanced e-mail options). I don't use sound much so I didn't add that, but it's probably not too hard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2004-03-01 22:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Mark, I just downloaded your program and it seems to work fine. Unfortionately i still need the macro (see below) to get rid of the original outlook mail notification. This macro also eliminates all sounds of incoming mail/ham. Isn't it possible to do this all in your program? To have a audible notification on ham and silence on spam? No icon (not even a blue or black one) when spam is received and a mail notification when ham is received? I very much like that i can now see the number of emails i have received in contrast to "You have unread items" which is the normal outlook notification. Keep up the good work! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2004-03-01 20:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 I wrote a C# program to replace the outlook notify icon w/ my own. The code for this is at http://codeproject.com/csharp/gmcdoexmail.asp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2003-10-13 12:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Reacting on all before. Would'nt it be the best option to allow a rule or macro to be defined that can be runned after spam and ham is processed? In other words an extra option in the spambayes filtering dialog. [Move] spam to folder [...] [X] Mark spam as read [X] Process following rule or macro [...] Indeed the macro proposed by Ghuron does exactly that. It does not block the sounds though. More info on the macro on http://www.slipstick.com/dev/code/clearenvicon.htm#info ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-09 22:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark - what do you think of the idea of providing our own icon in the tray (and a sound) when we classify mail as [user- defined selection of ham/unsure/spam]? In your opinion, do you think that we could successfully determine when these messages were read so that we could clear the flag? Would you be opposed to this rather off-topic feature appearing in the plug-in? If your comments are positive, then I might try and write some code to do this at some point, if only to stop the incessant requests for this feature <wink>. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-09 22:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From the list: My outlook always plays a sound when new mails do arrive - also when new spam comes in. Since 90% of my mails are spam, this is really nerving. If spambayes could give out a sound when no-spam-mails arrive, then I could switch off the the standard-sound of outlook and only Spambayes reports "good" mails. Then we again have a true accustical message, when important mail arrive and are not irritated by spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Date: 2003-09-26 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=633868 I'm not a Visual Basic/Windows expert. But having used Outlook for a while, I *can* tell you that setting emails to "read" status stops the envelope icon coming up. This would probably be the easiest fix, and would also stop the spam folder coming up with bold text to draw your attention to it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 15:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 15:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 13:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Sorry, duplicated to #774908. Too bad that nothing can be done here ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 17 01:14:41 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 17 01:14:44 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1124409 ] Remove admin registry write requirements for install Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1124409, was opened at 2005-02-17 13:14 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1124409&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Remove admin registry write requirements for install Initial Comment: Installing the plug-in currently requires write-access to parts of the registry that a 'regular' user does not have. We can probably register in other places to work around this, which would be good. I'll try to get this done for 1.1 (probably a2, but maybe a1). --- Tips from Ryan Malayter: The add-in itself appears to be registered with outlook in the USER portion of the registry: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\Outlook\Addins\SpamBayes.Out lookAddin However, the SpamBayes.OutlookAddin ProgID appears to be registered in a protected part of the registry: HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\AppID\{3556EDEE-FC91-4cf2-A0E4-7489747BAB10} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{3556EDEE-FC91-4cf2-A0E4-7489747BAB10} HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Instead, I would think you could put similar entries into the corresponding parts of the user's registry hive: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes\AppID HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes\CLSID HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes\SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Of course, the spambayes program files and DLLs themselves would have to go into the %USERPROFILE%\Application Data directory, which is the only place a "standard user" can write on the machine. --- In addition to these changes, I suppose that when doing a "for all users" registration, we should do what we currently do. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1124409&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 17 06:11:36 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 17 06:11:38 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-972359 ] some 100% SPAM sent to unsure Message-ID: Bugs item #972359, was opened at 2004-06-14 14:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972359&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dan Zenchelsky (dzenc) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: some 100% SPAM sent to unsure Initial Comment: (This is a continuation of Bugs item #923921. I am opening a new bug report so that I can upload related files.) About 5-10% of all 100%-spam gets shifted to the "Possible Spam" folder rather than the "Spam" folder. - I received a message which was sent to the "unsure" folder. I then ran "show spam clues" on it, which showed that it was 100% SPAM (see attached file). I then manually ran "filter messages..." on the unsure folder and it correctly detected the message as SPAM and moved it to the correct folder. *No* training was done between the time the message arrived and the time that I performed these steps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-17 18:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 1113593 ] 100% SPAM messages pass through http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1113593&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Derek Hofmann (traal42) Date: 2005-01-08 06:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=662400 I'm also getting 0% spam mails going to Unsure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 923921 ] 100% Spam moved only to ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 16:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. I wonder whether my one was a wierd fluke (I still have the clues message in my drafts folder...) since it doesn't have the content-type stuff, and these others do. Noting dupe in: [ 981750 ] 100% SPAM in possible SPAM folder https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=981750 (That tracker includes another example msg). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-29 17:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I have never seen this before, but did today (as in spambayes-dev message). Attached is the message that it happened with. Let me know if you need anything else (I saved the spam clues message so have that, but the log (ie. contents of the trace window in Pythonwin) are gone now, but I assure you it had nothing odd). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 19:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This will be an error in our 'content-type' magic. If I look at the headers for this message, as shown by Outlook's View->Options, I see: """ Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from mx56.dadoihag.us ([64.136.98.56]) by proxy.danz.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:39:09 -0700 From: "United Coalition" To: " " Subject: 1 Minute Mortgage Application Here Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 20:39:07 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A" Return-Path: SarahAllen@mx56.dadoihag.us X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jun 2004 01:39:10.0757 (UTC) FILETIME=[64083550:01C451B0] ------=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ------=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ------=_NextPart_000_0D33_D859C01A.71B0FC9A-- """ That doesn't look right (to me) for the headers, and I suspect is what is causing the tokenizer to not see all the tokens when filtered, but it *does* see them all for 'spam clues' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=972359&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 17 06:13:06 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 17 06:13:12 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1113593 ] 100% SPAM messages pass through Message-ID: Bugs item #1113593, was opened at 2005-02-01 13:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113593&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Viktor Ferenczi (complex) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: 100% SPAM messages pass through Initial Comment: I'm a happy user of spambayes since the 1.0.0 version. Currently I'm using spambayes 1.0.3 in concert with MS Outlook 2002 SP2. My filter is traned with about 1000 good and 1500 spam messages. SPAM score settings used: 0..15%: HAM 15..80%: Unsure 80..100%: SPAM I found an interesting behaviour of spambayes several months ago. Messages with 99.97% combined SPAM score are correctly categorized as SPAM, but others with 100% score are categorized as Unsure. These messages always appears to be SPAM for me, so I deleted them as SPAM using the spambayes toolbar. They should be categorized as SPAM. Is it a bug in spambayes? Most of my incoming mail is Hungarian, so nearly every non-Hungarian mail is spam. This trains the filter to separate languages rather than spam and no-spam. It yields very efficient SPAM detection and offten 100% SPAM scores. I think this can be the root of my problem. This behaviour can affect every and all non English speaking users. I've attached an example mail with 100% SPAM clue. SPAM clues reported by spambayes are included. The bug occours with increasing probability as time goes on. OS: WinXP Prof SP1 Office: MS Office XP SP2 - Hungarian version Virus and spyware protection is actively used and maintained. Thanks for your help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-17 18:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 972359 ] some 100% SPAM sent to unsure http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=972359&group_id=61702&atid=498103 (Any new comments should go in that tracker. Files can't be added to it except by a developer or the OP, though, so they can be added here (with a note in the other one). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Viktor Ferenczi (complex) Date: 2005-02-13 13:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=142612 OK, I'm going to enable logging with higher verbosity level. I'll attach the log when I catch such a message again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-01 13:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Any message with a score over your spam threshold (80%) should be moved to the spam folder. Could you please attach a log for a period when this isn't the case to the tracker? (SpamBayes->SpamBayes Manager->Advanced->Diagnostics->View Log) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1113593&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 17 20:29:37 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 17 20:29:43 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1126180 ] Remotely register Spambayes Exchange event Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1126180, was opened at 2005-02-17 13:29 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1126180&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: anomalyst (anomalyst) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Remotely register Spambayes Exchange event Initial Comment: We support a number of K-8 Educational customers in a Terminal Services environment, which does not allow spambayes to register its event. The book "Programming Microsoft Outlook and Microsoft Exchange 2003" on page 821 suggests "run your regsitration script script directly on the server, use Exchange Explorer from the SDK or use WebDAV" Basically we are looking for per user functionality in an Enterprise Terminal Server environment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1126180&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 17 23:00:12 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 17 23:00:15 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1126180 ] Remotely register Spambayes Exchange event Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1126180, was opened at 2005-02-18 08:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1126180&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: anomalyst (anomalyst) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Remotely register Spambayes Exchange event Initial Comment: We support a number of K-8 Educational customers in a Terminal Services environment, which does not allow spambayes to register its event. The book "Programming Microsoft Outlook and Microsoft Exchange 2003" on page 821 suggests "run your regsitration script script directly on the server, use Exchange Explorer from the SDK or use WebDAV" Basically we are looking for per user functionality in an Enterprise Terminal Server environment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-18 11:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't have access to Terminal Services myself, but mail on spambayes@python.org suggests that using it with SpamBayes does work. Have you tried the first of those suggestions? (i.e. running the regsitration utility on the server?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1126180&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Feb 20 07:03:44 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Feb 20 07:03:47 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1144670 ] SMTP slow on large files Message-ID: Bugs item #1144670, was opened at 2005-02-19 23:03 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1144670&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bruce Ramsay (bruceramsay) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SMTP slow on large files Initial Comment: Sending a large file through the SMTP proxy server can take a long time. This is because the contents of the file are concatenated one line at a time. Attached is a small patch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1144670&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Feb 20 18:51:02 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Feb 20 18:51:04 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1144906 ] Messages with high SPAM score moved into unsure folder Message-ID: Bugs item #1144906, was opened at 2005-02-20 18:50 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1144906&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Viktor Ferenczi (complex) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Messages with high SPAM score moved into unsure folder Initial Comment: Another bug report about moving surely SPAM messages into the unsure folder. I've created this report to include all files to help narrowing down this bug. Logfile is requested by anobind. Spam clue shows 97%, spam limit is set to 90%. The message is moved into my unsure folder: K?rd?ses The folder is named in Hungarian, but it seems not to affect the problem. Note: Mail delivery error messages shown in the logfile are NOT RELATED to this bug. They are because of a missing user account. SpamBayes version: 1.0.3 Integrated into Outlook 2002 SP2 Thanks, Complex ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1144906&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Feb 20 18:53:52 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Feb 20 18:54:07 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1144906 ] Messages with high score moved to unsure folder (NEW FILES) Message-ID: Bugs item #1144906, was opened at 2005-02-20 18:50 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by complex You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1144906&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Viktor Ferenczi (complex) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: Messages with high score moved to unsure folder (NEW FILES) Initial Comment: Another bug report about moving surely SPAM messages into the unsure folder. I've created this report to include all files to help narrowing down this bug. Logfile is requested by anobind. Spam clue shows 97%, spam limit is set to 90%. The message is moved into my unsure folder: K?rd?ses The folder is named in Hungarian, but it seems not to affect the problem. Note: Mail delivery error messages shown in the logfile are NOT RELATED to this bug. They are because of a missing user account. SpamBayes version: 1.0.3 Integrated into Outlook 2002 SP2 Thanks, Complex ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1144906&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Feb 20 23:09:30 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Feb 20 23:09:32 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1145057 ] SpamBayesServer log files grow limitless Message-ID: Bugs item #1145057, was opened at 2005-02-20 14:09 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1145057&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Valera F. (oxfv) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayesServer log files grow limitless Initial Comment: I'm using the Proxy version of SpamBayes, not an Outlook plugin. I have a POP3 mail account that (unfortunately) often throws an error, usualy this one: Can't connect to mail.sprintmail.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') The log file (SpamBayesServer2.log, or some other digit instead of 2) located in my Local Settings\Temp\ folder grows with these messages without limit. In half a year I use SpamBayes the log file have grown to 20 Gigabytes. I only noticed it because the OS started complaining about the lack of disk space. The SpamBayes application doesn't seem to provide a way to limit the size of log file or at least purge it once in a while (I had to exit the program, otherwise it locks the file). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1145057&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 21 02:37:49 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 21 02:37:52 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1145057 ] SpamBayesServer log files grow limitless Message-ID: Bugs item #1145057, was opened at 2005-02-21 11:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1145057&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Valera F. (oxfv) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: SpamBayesServer log files grow limitless Initial Comment: I'm using the Proxy version of SpamBayes, not an Outlook plugin. I have a POP3 mail account that (unfortunately) often throws an error, usualy this one: Can't connect to mail.sprintmail.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed') The log file (SpamBayesServer2.log, or some other digit instead of 2) located in my Local Settings\Temp\ folder grows with these messages without limit. In half a year I use SpamBayes the log file have grown to 20 Gigabytes. I only noticed it because the OS started complaining about the lack of disk space. The SpamBayes application doesn't seem to provide a way to limit the size of log file or at least purge it once in a while (I had to exit the program, otherwise it locks the file). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-21 14:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are always five log files, and each time SpamBayes is started up the oldest is deleted and a new one created. So to purge it, just restart SpamBayes (5 times, if you want them all gone). (Or there are various ways, including those provided by Windows itself, to clean the temp folder). Limiting the size would mean that errors would not be recorded, which would not be good. Changes have been made for 1.1 that limit the number of times identical errors are recorded, which will help those that continually get the same error (people that try to connect when the server is unavailable, for example). To get 20GB of logs, you must either run SpamBayes for exceptionally long periods of time or get a lot of errors! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1145057&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 21 09:23:22 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 21 09:23:24 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1145237 ] Find by SpambayesID doesn't work Message-ID: Bugs item #1145237, was opened at 2005-02-21 09:23 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1145237&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Find by SpambayesID doesn't work Initial Comment: Spambayes version 1.0.3 . I can find messages by subject, or body, but not by SpambayesID. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1145237&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 23 02:15:14 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 23 02:15:18 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1144670 ] SMTP slow on large files Message-ID: Bugs item #1144670, was opened at 2005-02-20 19:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1144670&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bruce Ramsay (bruceramsay) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: SMTP slow on large files Initial Comment: Sending a large file through the SMTP proxy server can take a long time. This is because the contents of the file are concatenated one line at a time. Attached is a small patch. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-23 14:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks. Checked in (r1.10). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1144670&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Feb 23 09:55:04 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Feb 23 09:55:06 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1149648 ] sb_filter doesn't work Message-ID: Bugs item #1149648, was opened at 2005-02-23 09:55 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1149648&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bartosz Feński (fenio) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_filter doesn't work Initial Comment: Hello. sb_filter crashes when it receives some lines. Here's my output: (fenio@domek)~/Mail/debian-security/cur$echo "Normal line which should work" | sb_filter.py X-Spambayes-Classification: unsure; 0.52 Normal line which should work (fenio@domek)~/Mail/debian-security/cur$head -1 1109110296.7674_3.on:2,S Return-Path: (fenio@domek)~/Mail/debian-security/cur$head -1 1109110296.7674_3.on:2,S | sb_filter.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 257, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 248, in main action(msg) File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 180, in filter return self.h.filter(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues tup = self._worddistanceget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 508, in _worddistanceget prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 311, in probability assert spamcount <= nspam AssertionError (fenio@domek)~/Mail/debian-security/cur$ Any hints what should I make with this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1149648&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 24 00:38:05 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 24 00:38:08 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1149648 ] sb_filter doesn't work Message-ID: Bugs item #1149648, was opened at 2005-02-23 21:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1149648&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bartosz Feński (fenio) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_filter doesn't work Initial Comment: Hello. sb_filter crashes when it receives some lines. Here's my output: (fenio@domek)~/Mail/debian-security/cur$echo "Normal line which should work" | sb_filter.py X-Spambayes-Classification: unsure; 0.52 Normal line which should work (fenio@domek)~/Mail/debian-security/cur$head -1 1109110296.7674_3.on:2,S Return-Path: (fenio@domek)~/Mail/debian-security/cur$head -1 1109110296.7674_3.on:2,S | sb_filter.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 257, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 248, in main action(msg) File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 180, in filter return self.h.filter(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues tup = self._worddistanceget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 508, in _worddistanceget prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 311, in probability assert spamcount <= nspam AssertionError (fenio@domek)~/Mail/debian-security/cur$ Any hints what should I make with this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-24 12:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It means that your database is corrupt (there is a token that has been seen in more spam than you have trained on, which is not possible). The solution is to retrain. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1149648&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 24 10:29:56 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 24 10:29:59 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1150863 ] Spambayes cuts subject of messages Message-ID: Bugs item #1150863, was opened at 2005-02-24 10:29 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1150863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes cuts subject of messages Initial Comment: I'm using OE so i've set spambayes to add predix to "unsure" and "spam" messages. But, when i search messages (via spambayes search), they have cutten subjects. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1150863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Feb 24 12:56:06 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Feb 24 12:56:10 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1149648 ] please provide some locking mechanism Message-ID: Bugs item #1149648, was opened at 2005-02-23 09:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fenio You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1149648&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Open Resolution: Invalid >Priority: 2 Submitted By: Bartosz Feński (fenio) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: please provide some locking mechanism Initial Comment: Hello. sb_filter crashes when it receives some lines. Here's my output: (fenio@domek)~/Mail/debian-security/cur$echo "Normal line which should work" | sb_filter.py X-Spambayes-Classification: unsure; 0.52 Normal line which should work (fenio@domek)~/Mail/debian-security/cur$head -1 1109110296.7674_3.on:2,S Return-Path: (fenio@domek)~/Mail/debian-security/cur$head -1 1109110296.7674_3.on:2,S | sb_filter.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 257, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 248, in main action(msg) File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 180, in filter return self.h.filter(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues tup = self._worddistanceget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 508, in _worddistanceget prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 311, in probability assert spamcount <= nspam AssertionError (fenio@domek)~/Mail/debian-security/cur$ Any hints what should I make with this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Bartosz Feński (fenio) Date: 2005-02-24 12:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=770596 Thanks. Rebuilding database from scratch did the trick. But in that case my database will get corrupted almost every week. So here's my wishlist. Is it possible to provide some locking mechanism? I know I can use procmail's locking, but if procmail is delivering my mails and in the same time I'm reading some mails and try to mark them as spam my database will get corrupted again. regards fEnIo ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-24 00:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It means that your database is corrupt (there is a token that has been seen in more spam than you have trained on, which is not possible). The solution is to retrain. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1149648&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Feb 25 02:51:08 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Feb 25 02:51:12 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1150863 ] Spambayes cuts subject of messages Message-ID: Bugs item #1150863, was opened at 2005-02-24 22:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1150863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Spambayes cuts subject of messages Initial Comment: I'm using OE so i've set spambayes to add predix to "unsure" and "spam" messages. But, when i search messages (via spambayes search), they have cutten subjects. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-25 14:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Can you give me an example of this? Does it happen with any message, or just some? (If just some, can you see any pattern?) Does it happen just when you search, or in the regular review pages as well? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1150863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Feb 25 02:52:07 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Feb 25 02:52:09 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1149648 ] please provide some locking mechanism Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1149648, was opened at 2005-02-23 21:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1149648&group_id=61702 >Category: None >Group: None Status: Open Priority: 2 Submitted By: Bartosz Feński (fenio) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: please provide some locking mechanism Initial Comment: Hello. sb_filter crashes when it receives some lines. Here's my output: (fenio@domek)~/Mail/debian-security/cur$echo "Normal line which should work" | sb_filter.py X-Spambayes-Classification: unsure; 0.52 Normal line which should work (fenio@domek)~/Mail/debian-security/cur$head -1 1109110296.7674_3.on:2,S Return-Path: (fenio@domek)~/Mail/debian-security/cur$head -1 1109110296.7674_3.on:2,S | sb_filter.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 257, in ? main() File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 248, in main action(msg) File "/usr/bin/sb_filter.py", line 180, in filter return self.h.filter(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 109, in filter prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues tup = self._worddistanceget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 508, in _worddistanceget prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 311, in probability assert spamcount <= nspam AssertionError (fenio@domek)~/Mail/debian-security/cur$ Any hints what should I make with this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-25 14:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (Changing to RFE) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bartosz Feński (fenio) Date: 2005-02-25 00:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=770596 Thanks. Rebuilding database from scratch did the trick. But in that case my database will get corrupted almost every week. So here's my wishlist. Is it possible to provide some locking mechanism? I know I can use procmail's locking, but if procmail is delivering my mails and in the same time I'm reading some mails and try to mark them as spam my database will get corrupted again. regards fEnIo ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-24 12:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It means that your database is corrupt (there is a token that has been seen in more spam than you have trained on, which is not possible). The solution is to retrain. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1149648&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Feb 25 08:48:22 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Feb 25 08:48:26 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1150863 ] Spambayes cuts subject of messages Message-ID: Bugs item #1150863, was opened at 2005-02-24 10:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jpiw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1150863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Spambayes cuts subject of messages Initial Comment: I'm using OE so i've set spambayes to add predix to "unsure" and "spam" messages. But, when i search messages (via spambayes search), they have cutten subjects. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-25 08:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 It happens for any message with added prefix, when i search. I'm attaching example header of message before and after training. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-25 02:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Can you give me an example of this? Does it happen with any message, or just some? (If just some, can you see any pattern?) Does it happen just when you search, or in the regular review pages as well? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1150863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Feb 25 23:00:13 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Feb 25 23:00:17 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1103976 ] Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Message-ID: Bugs item #1103976, was opened at 2005-01-17 10:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fsnyder You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: robert (elitemrp) Assigned to: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Summary: Outlook.exe will not terminate when launched via mailto Initial Comment: I first ran into this problem a few months ago at work. But at the time I thought it was related to a custom program we run here. But now I noticed I can easily reproduce the problem on any computer running SpamBayes+Outlook 2003 on Windows XP. Basically, I will open Outlook via the icon to read mail. I will then close Outlook, and if I have Task Manager open, I will see that Outlook.exe closes correctly. Now if I launch a mailto: link (or use a program that launches a new mail), where the Compose Mail window opens, but not the actual outlook program, the problem occurs. If I close the compose mail window, by either clicking Send, or closing it without sending, the OUTLOOK.EXE task will not exit. If I launch Outlook again, I'll now have multiple instances of OUTLOOK.EXE in task manager. Now the multiple instances is what caused the problem with our custom software at work, but that has nothing to do with the fact that Outlook does not exit correctly when running Spambayes and having a program/mailto link open the Compose Mail window. Yes I realize there have been 2 previous tickets about OUTLOOK.EXE closing, but none came to the conclusion that it's caused by a Compose Mail window. And both are closed without a solution. I have tested this on several computers and have tried multiple things to try to fix it (such as renaming extend.dat and other files) and nothing seems to work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: fsnyder (fsnyder) Date: 2005-02-25 17:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1227716 This behavior of the Outlook.exe not being stopped properly can be duplicated using the following VBScript code. OPTION EXPLICIT On error Resume Next err.clear Dim oOutlookApp, oOutlookNS Set oOutlookApp = GetObject(,"Outlook.Application") if Err <> 0 then MsgBox "Outlook not currently running." & VbCrLf & "Creating New Outlook Application. I'll kill it when I'm done" set oOutlookApp = CreateObject ("Outlook.Application") else MsgBox "Outlook was running. I'll kill it anyway when I'm done." End If MsgBox oOutlookApp.name & " version# " & oOutlookApp.version MsgBox "Now I'll kill the Outlook.exe process the clean way" oOutlookApp.Quit set oOutlookNS = Nothing set oOutlookApp = Nothing MsgBox "END" Run it and watch the TaskManager for when the Outlook.exe process gets created, and killed (as long as the SpamBayes Add-In is NOT activated in Outlook) This should normally kill the process unless some other add- in or anti-virus code is not allowing Outlook to exit cleanly. Hope this Helps -fsnyder ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2005-02-03 13:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 One other source of hanging OL up, with or without Spambayes is ActiveSync for your PDA, celll phone or whatever. AS does tend to work behind your back, a little bit. One of the reasons I love Process Explorer from System Internals... -h ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gil (spambayes411) Date: 2005-02-02 05:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1210353 I've discovered this is not limited to the mailto function. I use a program called SynchPST to keep outlook sychronized between my home computer and my laptop. When SynchPST opens, I see it in the task manager and it opens Outlook as well. After I synch my PST files, I close SynchPST. It closes but Outlook remains in the task manager. If the Spambayes add-in is not loaded, then both SynchPST and Outlook quit as they should. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-24 18:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks Kenny :) I don't really know what might be causing this, but I guess you could start by checking to see if the spambayes log gets to the "addin terminating" part. Let me know if I can help at all (though I don't have OL2003 anywhere). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2005-01-24 11:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Yep, I was able to confirm this problem on Outlook 2003. If I activate a mailto link with SpamBayes loaded and enabled, OUTLOOK.EXE will not exit when I close the compose window. If I disable SpamBayes filtering from SpamBayes Manager, OUTLOOK.EXE still doesn't exit. If I completely disable loading of SpamBayes from the COM Add-ins dialog then OUTLOOK.EXE closes properly when I close the compose window. I'll look into this further when I get a chance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-24 00:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Maybe this is specific to Outlook 2003 then? Kenny: you've got 2003, right? Can you try and replicate this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: robert (elitemrp) Date: 2005-01-21 06:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1198932 Yes, it only happens with SpamBayes installed. I install SpamBayes, set up the toolbar, etc Close Outlook, type mailto:blah@blah.com in a browser or click a mail link and it opens the Compose Mail window. Once I close this window, Outlook.exe ramains in the task list. If I click another mailto link I'll have 2 stuck open, then 3, etc If I have only 1 process loaded and it's the main Outlook window, when I click a mailto link it will work fine since it doesn't load a separate outlook.exe process. It only does this when the main outlook program isn't loaded. Once I uninstall SpamBayes or uncheck it in the COM Add-Ins area in Outlook, this problem goes away. As soon as I close a Compose Mail window, OUTLOOK.EXE terminates correctly. I've tried this on several PCs, some with fresh installs of XP/ Outlook, some with several months old installs and other applications, it's the same on each. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-01-20 22:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Have you tried this without SpamBayes installed? I get the same behaviour without SpamBayes, which says to me it's an Outlook problem, not a SpamBayes one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1103976&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 26 00:22:55 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 26 00:22:58 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1150863 ] Spambayes cuts subject of messages Message-ID: Bugs item #1150863, was opened at 2005-02-24 22:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1150863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Spambayes cuts subject of messages Initial Comment: I'm using OE so i've set spambayes to add predix to "unsure" and "spam" messages. But, when i search messages (via spambayes search), they have cutten subjects. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-26 12:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What version of spambayes is this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-25 20:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 It happens for any message with added prefix, when i search. I'm attaching example header of message before and after training. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-25 14:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Can you give me an example of this? Does it happen with any message, or just some? (If just some, can you see any pattern?) Does it happen just when you search, or in the regular review pages as well? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1150863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Feb 26 09:56:57 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Feb 26 09:56:59 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1152264 ] SpamBayesServer1.log filled w/"warning: unhandled exception" Message-ID: Bugs item #1152264, was opened at 2005-02-26 00:56 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1152264&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Valera F. (oxfv) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayesServer1.log filled w/"warning: unhandled exception" Initial Comment: This is a follow-up to bug #1145057 which I explained incorrectly, as I discovered later. The behavior only occurs on v.1.0.3. to which I recently upgraded from whatever was the current version half a year ago; the older version didn't do that. My POP3 email account glitches sometimes, returning the error message "Can't connect to mail.sprintmail.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed')". When this happens (not sure each time or sometimes) SpamBayes starts stuffing the log file with lines "warning: unhandled exception" like crazy, hogging the CPU and eating up all 20GB of available disk space in a matter of minutes. Stopping SpamBayes doesn't help, it keeps adding this line to the log. I'm going to look for older version now and downgrade: this misbehavior is not tolerable. Thanks, Valera. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1152264&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Feb 27 19:35:44 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Feb 27 19:35:46 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1152981 ] Internal Rules & Alerts OL2003 don't work Message-ID: Bugs item #1152981, was opened at 2005-02-27 10:35 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1152981&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: superba (superba) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Internal Rules & Alerts OL2003 don't work Initial Comment: HI, I love Spambayes better than about 10 other AS that I've tried. However, there is a problem, which may also occur with other addins. I use Rules and Alerts to move email from my inbox to a large number of folders within OL2003. Rules and Alerts apparently stops working when 1) SB or another email filter is installed, or 2) when a certain number(upper limit) of Rules and Alerts are written. My WAG is that somehow the SB hooks interfere or shut down the internal filtering of OL2003. I reported this same situation with OL2000.... Any ideas? Thanks for a good product. Cheers! Jim Jordan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1152981&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Feb 27 19:37:47 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Feb 27 19:37:51 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1150863 ] Spambayes cuts subject of messages Message-ID: Bugs item #1150863, was opened at 2005-02-24 10:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jpiw You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1150863&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Spambayes cuts subject of messages Initial Comment: I'm using OE so i've set spambayes to add predix to "unsure" and "spam" messages. But, when i search messages (via spambayes search), they have cutten subjects. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-27 19:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 It's 1.0.3 version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-26 00:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What version of spambayes is this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Janusz Piwowarski (jpiw) Date: 2005-02-25 08:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=436042 It happens for any message with added prefix, when i search. I'm attaching example header of message before and after training. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-25 02:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Can you give me an example of this? Does it happen with any message, or just some? (If just some, can you see any pattern?) Does it happen just when you search, or in the regular review pages as well? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1150863&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Feb 28 01:14:03 2005 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Feb 28 01:14:06 2005 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1152264 ] SpamBayesServer1.log filled w/"warning: unhandled exception" Message-ID: Bugs item #1152264, was opened at 2005-02-26 21:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1152264&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Valera F. (oxfv) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayesServer1.log filled w/"warning: unhandled exception" Initial Comment: This is a follow-up to bug #1145057 which I explained incorrectly, as I discovered later. The behavior only occurs on v.1.0.3. to which I recently upgraded from whatever was the current version half a year ago; the older version didn't do that. My POP3 email account glitches sometimes, returning the error message "Can't connect to mail.sprintmail.com:110: (11001, 'getaddrinfo failed')". When this happens (not sure each time or sometimes) SpamBayes starts stuffing the log file with lines "warning: unhandled exception" like crazy, hogging the CPU and eating up all 20GB of available disk space in a matter of minutes. Stopping SpamBayes doesn't help, it keeps adding this line to the log. I'm going to look for older version now and downgrade: this misbehavior is not tolerable. Thanks, Valera. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-02-28 13:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 1145057 ] SpamBayesServer log files grow limitless ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1152264&group_id=61702