From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 1 01:37:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 1 01:37:39 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1036868 ] can not filter more than one inbox-folder Message-ID: Bugs item #1036868, was opened at 2004-09-29 20:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036868&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eggi (eggidd) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: can not filter more than one inbox-folder Initial Comment: I use SpamBayes Version 1. on W2k with OL2003. I have two exchange-boxes enabled. My own box and the folder named "contact". I am the owner of the box "Contact". In SpamBayes Manager i can't enable to filter the subfolder "inbox" of the "contact"-box. I don't know why? SpamBayes works with my own folder very good. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-01 11:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 That sounds like there is a problem accessing the subfolders (is this a pst file, on Exchange, Hotmail, IMAP, ...?), but the log would have the details. As I said, the troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. SpamBayes->Help->Troubleshooting Guide, or there's a copy online via http://spambayes.org/docs.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eggi (eggidd) Date: 2004-09-30 21:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1130124 No, I don't get an error message from spambayes, the folder is in the list but it is not possible to open the subfolders. How do I get the log file? I did not find the log file in the program-folder of spambayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-30 13:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you get an error message from spambayes when you try to, or is the folder simply not in the list to choose? Could you please try this again (to get the log entries) then attach you most recent log file (the troubleshooting guide explains where they are) to this tracker, please? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036868&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 1 01:40:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 1 01:40:16 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-986079 ] Multilanguage Message-ID: Feature Requests item #986079, was opened at 2004-07-07 04:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: seppli (seppli) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multilanguage Initial Comment: what do you think about a multilingual-programming- interface to easy translate the Strings in spam-bayes ? - For example a single file which holds all user-dialog- strings? Translating such a file in german could be my tribute spam-bayes - my favorite spamfilter. And could anybody tell my why the Outlook after 0.81 downloads first all mail bofore classifying them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-01 11:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No, there are no time requirements other than the ones you impose on yourself. You won't need any stats knowledge for this sort of work. I'm happy to subchampion this (helping out wherever necessary), but I can't really help in any actual translating (apart from Maori, or maybe a little bit of German) and I haven't done any work like this before, which would help. I am very familiar with SpamBayes itself, though. Probably the best move would be for someone to post a list of "things to do" to spambayes-dev and ask for volunteers/help. Creating that "things to do" list would be the first step :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-17 03:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I know Python, that's no problem for me. Unless the dev group impose high requirements on time and Bayesian stats knowledge I can volunteer for that work. I'll feel more confident if a subchampion, or is it vicechampion? ;-), volunteers too. I don't have any problem to take the second place either instead. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-09-16 21:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 I am willing to translate to Czech and Slovak. Maybe I could be that person to organize, but what do U understand under that term? I am not working in Python, only in vbscript, so if it includes programming abilities, we need to find out someone else. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dup in: [ 958015 ] German language ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes-dev would be the best place. It really just needs a champion at the moment - someone who is willing to organise the work getting done for one language, and then the rest should be reasonably simple. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-09 03:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I volunteer for a spanish translation version. My main target is the Outlook plugin. Where should the discussion take place? In the spambayes- dev mailing list? A wiki? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seppli (seppli) Date: 2004-07-13 05:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078049 Mmh - OK i like SpamBayes and i dont know how to live in this WORLD OF SPAM without it - but i think that i am not that "super-spiderman-mega-champion" - My english is not so Oxford-likely and i thougt that phyton is some kind of a snake... Just have a look on the translation-interface of an other sf- project - for example pdfcreator (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/) IMHO SpamBayes 0.81 downloads ONE single message and classifies that before downloading the next message - my 1.0rc2 now downloads ALL mails and classifies them after - some times it seams that SpamBayes forget to classifies some mails - that never happen with the version 0.81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 19:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are some people who are interested in doing the translation, and the developers are certainly willing to help out as much as possible. Hopefully work will start on this post-1.0 (soonish). What it really needs at the moment is a 'champion' - someone who will do the work of organising everyone involved, and making sure that things happen. Most of us are pretty busy at the moment. As for the question - how else can SpamBayes do the classification? It needs to 'read' the mail to be able to see whether it's good or bad, and in order to 'read' it, it needs to download it first. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 1 09:08:52 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 1 09:08:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1036868 ] can not filter more than one inbox-folder Message-ID: Bugs item #1036868, was opened at 2004-09-29 10:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by eggidd You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036868&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eggi (eggidd) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: can not filter more than one inbox-folder Initial Comment: I use SpamBayes Version 1. on W2k with OL2003. I have two exchange-boxes enabled. My own box and the folder named "contact". I am the owner of the box "Contact". In SpamBayes Manager i can't enable to filter the subfolder "inbox" of the "contact"-box. I don't know why? SpamBayes works with my own folder very good. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Eggi (eggidd) Date: 2004-10-01 09:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1130124 The postbox is on an exchange-server. I found the log file and I attach the file. I hope the upload will be successful. Thank you for your support. Greetings ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-01 01:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 That sounds like there is a problem accessing the subfolders (is this a pst file, on Exchange, Hotmail, IMAP, ...?), but the log would have the details. As I said, the troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. SpamBayes->Help->Troubleshooting Guide, or there's a copy online via http://spambayes.org/docs.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eggi (eggidd) Date: 2004-09-30 11:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1130124 No, I don't get an error message from spambayes, the folder is in the list but it is not possible to open the subfolders. How do I get the log file? I did not find the log file in the program-folder of spambayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-30 03:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you get an error message from spambayes when you try to, or is the folder simply not in the list to choose? Could you please try this again (to get the log entries) then attach you most recent log file (the troubleshooting guide explains where they are) to this tracker, please? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036868&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 1 14:23:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 1 14:24:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-986079 ] Multilanguage Message-ID: Feature Requests item #986079, was opened at 2004-07-06 18:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hfoffani You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: seppli (seppli) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multilanguage Initial Comment: what do you think about a multilingual-programming- interface to easy translate the Strings in spam-bayes ? - For example a single file which holds all user-dialog- strings? Translating such a file in german could be my tribute spam-bayes - my favorite spamfilter. And could anybody tell my why the Outlook after 0.81 downloads first all mail bofore classifying them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-01 14:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Ok, then. I'm on. Let's go for it. I've already subscribe to spambayes-dev list so expect an introductory message from myself any time soon. The only thing I don't like too much is the word "champion". That implies too much credit to me beforehand when I haven't seen a single line of Spambayes' code. ;-) See you in the dev list. -Hernan. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-01 01:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No, there are no time requirements other than the ones you impose on yourself. You won't need any stats knowledge for this sort of work. I'm happy to subchampion this (helping out wherever necessary), but I can't really help in any actual translating (apart from Maori, or maybe a little bit of German) and I haven't done any work like this before, which would help. I am very familiar with SpamBayes itself, though. Probably the best move would be for someone to post a list of "things to do" to spambayes-dev and ask for volunteers/help. Creating that "things to do" list would be the first step :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-16 17:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I know Python, that's no problem for me. Unless the dev group impose high requirements on time and Bayesian stats knowledge I can volunteer for that work. I'll feel more confident if a subchampion, or is it vicechampion? ;-), volunteers too. I don't have any problem to take the second place either instead. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-09-16 11:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 I am willing to translate to Czech and Slovak. Maybe I could be that person to organize, but what do U understand under that term? I am not working in Python, only in vbscript, so if it includes programming abilities, we need to find out someone else. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 05:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dup in: [ 958015 ] German language ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 05:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes-dev would be the best place. It really just needs a champion at the moment - someone who is willing to organise the work getting done for one language, and then the rest should be reasonably simple. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-08 17:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I volunteer for a spanish translation version. My main target is the Outlook plugin. Where should the discussion take place? In the spambayes- dev mailing list? A wiki? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seppli (seppli) Date: 2004-07-12 19:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078049 Mmh - OK i like SpamBayes and i dont know how to live in this WORLD OF SPAM without it - but i think that i am not that "super-spiderman-mega-champion" - My english is not so Oxford-likely and i thougt that phyton is some kind of a snake... Just have a look on the translation-interface of an other sf- project - for example pdfcreator (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/) IMHO SpamBayes 0.81 downloads ONE single message and classifies that before downloading the next message - my 1.0rc2 now downloads ALL mails and classifies them after - some times it seams that SpamBayes forget to classifies some mails - that never happen with the version 0.81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 09:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are some people who are interested in doing the translation, and the developers are certainly willing to help out as much as possible. Hopefully work will start on this post-1.0 (soonish). What it really needs at the moment is a 'champion' - someone who will do the work of organising everyone involved, and making sure that things happen. Most of us are pretty busy at the moment. As for the question - how else can SpamBayes do the classification? It needs to 'read' the mail to be able to see whether it's good or bad, and in order to 'read' it, it needs to download it first. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Oct 2 09:42:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Oct 2 09:43:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-895290 ] Integrate into Mozilla Thunderbird Message-ID: Feature Requests item #895290, was opened at 2004-02-12 02:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ratter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=895290&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Isaac Arias (ikester) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Integrate into Mozilla Thunderbird Initial Comment: Some users of Mozilla Thunderbird are very interested in improving the junk mail filter functionality of Thunderbird using the SpamBayes approach. The current implementation is apparently not working well for many users and they are looking at SpamBayes as a better solution. You can view the current discussion about it at: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181534 In my opinion, building the SpamBayes algorithms directly into Thunderbird's junk mail handling would be even better than developing a plug-in/extension as proposed below in [ 793478 ] Plugin for Mozilla Mail although there may be a complelling reason for not doing so that I'm not currently aware of. It would be sad to see talent wasted by having two different teams work on the same feature when they could work together. Specially since it seems neither sub-project has taken off yet in a significant way. I see that the Outlook plugin and the pop3proxy are managed as different applications. Perhaps this could be handled in a similar fashion. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alex Grigoriev (ratter) Date: 2004-10-02 11:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=314177 I want to develop mozilla mail/thunderbird plugin to integrate it with SpamBayes. I've written a letter to tim_one some days ago, there was no reply. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=895290&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Oct 2 17:03:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Oct 2 17:03:26 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1039032 ] "allow access for" issue Message-ID: Bugs item #1039032, was opened at 2004-10-02 10:03 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1039032&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeremy (jerm74) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: "allow access for" issue Initial Comment: I know this is an MS problem, but thoght maybe someone here would know how to get 'round it. I got it installed on XPsp2 with Outlook 2003, but I can only let it access my email for 10 minutes at a time. It installed ok (when I installed it with outlook closed) and it analyzes words ok, and it will show analysis ok. It also can move messages that are spam out of my inbox, if the 10 minutes haven't run out. Strangley, it doesn't ask for permission after 10 minutes (silently denying?) but I can click on "Show Analysis" and it will ask again, and I'll get another 10 minutes. Any help welcome, Jeremy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1039032&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Oct 2 17:05:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Oct 2 17:05:46 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1039032 ] "allow access for" issue OL2k3 XPsp2 (install was fine) Message-ID: Bugs item #1039032, was opened at 2004-10-02 10:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jerm74 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1039032&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeremy (jerm74) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: "allow access for" issue OL2k3 XPsp2 (install was fine) Initial Comment: I know this is an MS problem, but thoght maybe someone here would know how to get 'round it. I got it installed on XPsp2 with Outlook 2003, but I can only let it access my email for 10 minutes at a time. It installed ok (when I installed it with outlook closed) and it analyzes words ok, and it will show analysis ok. It also can move messages that are spam out of my inbox, if the 10 minutes haven't run out. Strangley, it doesn't ask for permission after 10 minutes (silently denying?) but I can click on "Show Analysis" and it will ask again, and I'll get another 10 minutes. Any help welcome, Jeremy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jeremy (jerm74) Date: 2004-10-02 10:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1131962 version 0.64 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1039032&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Oct 2 17:07:03 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Oct 2 17:07:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1039032 ] "allow access for" issue OL2k3 XPsp2 (install was fine) Message-ID: Bugs item #1039032, was opened at 2004-10-02 10:03 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by jerm74 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1039032&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Deleted Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeremy (jerm74) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: "allow access for" issue OL2k3 XPsp2 (install was fine) Initial Comment: I know this is an MS problem, but thoght maybe someone here would know how to get 'round it. I got it installed on XPsp2 with Outlook 2003, but I can only let it access my email for 10 minutes at a time. It installed ok (when I installed it with outlook closed) and it analyzes words ok, and it will show analysis ok. It also can move messages that are spam out of my inbox, if the 10 minutes haven't run out. Strangley, it doesn't ask for permission after 10 minutes (silently denying?) but I can click on "Show Analysis" and it will ask again, and I'll get another 10 minutes. Any help welcome, Jeremy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeremy (jerm74) Date: 2004-10-02 10:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1131962 version 0.64 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1039032&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Oct 2 18:10:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Oct 2 18:10:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1039057 ] Diffs for IMAP login problems... Message-ID: Patches item #1039057, was opened at 2004-10-02 12:10 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1039057&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: pcm (michali) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Diffs for IMAP login problems... Initial Comment: These are quick diffs for a change that, if the IMAP login fails, it will just skip and wait for the next poll and try again. It solves transient problems with accessing the IMAP server that I am seeing. Note: I strip out changes that I also made to create a HAM folder. Hopefully I got all the info. I think I'm using 1.0rc1 version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1039057&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 4 23:01:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 4 23:01:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1023797 ] Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Message-ID: Bugs item #1023797, was opened at 2004-09-07 11:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jmgilligan You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023797&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Initial Comment: sb_imapfilter.py fails intermittently, but frequently, with the error: __main__.BadIMAPResponseError: The command 'Cannot find saved message' failed to give an OK response. Rerunning the filter produces this error, but different amounts of processing occur before I get the error. For what it's worth, my email client (mulberry) reports that it frequently spends as much as 90 seconds waiting for a response from the server, so perhaps this is a timeout problem. I'm running the latest spambayes checked out from CVS using python 2.3.4 under Windows 2000 (Python 2.3.4 (#53, Aug 23 2004, 16:24:32) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32). The server welcome is: '* OK imap1 Cyrus IMAP4 v2.0.16 server ready' The server capabilties is: ('IMAP4', 'IMAP4REV1', 'ACL', 'QUOTA', 'LITERAL+', 'NA MESPACE', 'UIDPLUS', 'ID', 'NO_ATOMIC_RENAME', 'UNSELECT', 'MULTIAPPEND', 'S ORT', 'THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT', 'THREAD=REFERENCES', 'IDLE', 'STARTTLS', 'AUTH=PL AIN', 'X-NETSCAPE') Attached is the output from sb_imapfilter -v -t -c -i 4 where the exception occurs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Date: 2004-10-04 16:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11595 Revision 1.40 (by sjoerd) to manage illegal values in the Message-Id, seems to fix this. I am currently testing and will report back on whether this really solves the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Date: 2004-09-30 10:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11595 I have increased the range in line 548 to 10000 or even 100000, and it doesn't solve the problem. I even inserted an increasing time.sleep(): for i in xrange(11): .... time.sleep(1 << i) and I still get crashes, so just increasing the number of noops or waiting longer doesn't seem to solve the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-29 22:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (Apologies for not getting to this yesterday) Could you try making a change to your copy of sb_imapfitler.py for me? Line 548 is " for i in xrange(100):". Could you try increasing the 100 to 10000 and seeing if that solves the problem? (It may run for a long time before it finally quits, if it doesn't fix it - but it's just no-op'ing, so it doesn't hurt). I suspect it is related to a timeout sort of problem - maybe the server is slow and so it's taking a long time to register that the new message is there. I guessed that 100 no-ops would be enough, but perhaps it isn't. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-27 02:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Apologies for the delay in getting to this (I've been overseas). This code is quite significantly changed (for the better, in theory) than the 1.0 sb_imapfilter, so hasn't been as widely tested. Your server isn't giving up the EXISTS response that's expected or in the expected way, so something's falling apart. I'll try and find time to have a proper look at this tomorrow. Note that you ought to be able to fall back to the 1.0 imapfilter if necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023797&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 5 02:44:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 5 02:44:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1036868 ] can not filter more than one inbox-folder Message-ID: Bugs item #1036868, was opened at 2004-09-29 20:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036868&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eggi (eggidd) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: can not filter more than one inbox-folder Initial Comment: I use SpamBayes Version 1. on W2k with OL2003. I have two exchange-boxes enabled. My own box and the folder named "contact". I am the owner of the box "Contact". In SpamBayes Manager i can't enable to filter the subfolder "inbox" of the "contact"-box. I don't know why? SpamBayes works with my own folder very good. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-05 13:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does the description in this article fit your situation? SpamBayes is receiving a MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID error from Outlook when it tries to access those folders, so it ignores them. There probably isn't anything we can do to avoid that error, however. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eggi (eggidd) Date: 2004-10-01 19:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1130124 The postbox is on an exchange-server. I found the log file and I attach the file. I hope the upload will be successful. Thank you for your support. Greetings ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-01 11:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 That sounds like there is a problem accessing the subfolders (is this a pst file, on Exchange, Hotmail, IMAP, ...?), but the log would have the details. As I said, the troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. SpamBayes->Help->Troubleshooting Guide, or there's a copy online via http://spambayes.org/docs.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eggi (eggidd) Date: 2004-09-30 21:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1130124 No, I don't get an error message from spambayes, the folder is in the list but it is not possible to open the subfolders. How do I get the log file? I did not find the log file in the program-folder of spambayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-30 13:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you get an error message from spambayes when you try to, or is the folder simply not in the list to choose? Could you please try this again (to get the log entries) then attach you most recent log file (the troubleshooting guide explains where they are) to this tracker, please? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036868&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 5 02:46:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 5 02:46:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-895290 ] Integrate into Mozilla Thunderbird Message-ID: Feature Requests item #895290, was opened at 2004-02-12 12:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=895290&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Isaac Arias (ikester) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Integrate into Mozilla Thunderbird Initial Comment: Some users of Mozilla Thunderbird are very interested in improving the junk mail filter functionality of Thunderbird using the SpamBayes approach. The current implementation is apparently not working well for many users and they are looking at SpamBayes as a better solution. You can view the current discussion about it at: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181534 In my opinion, building the SpamBayes algorithms directly into Thunderbird's junk mail handling would be even better than developing a plug-in/extension as proposed below in [ 793478 ] Plugin for Mozilla Mail although there may be a complelling reason for not doing so that I'm not currently aware of. It would be sad to see talent wasted by having two different teams work on the same feature when they could work together. Specially since it seems neither sub-project has taken off yet in a significant way. I see that the Outlook plugin and the pop3proxy are managed as different applications. Perhaps this could be handled in a similar fashion. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-05 13:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Tim gets a lot of email and doesn't have time for it all. You shouldn't ever need to email any of the developers privately - use one of the mailing lists, or this sourceforge system. http://spambayes.org/contact.html You're welcome to develop a plug-in, although the general consensus among the existing developers is that since the Thunderbird developers are integrating spambayes ideas into their filter, it's not worth duplicating their work. If you need any help, you can ask on spambayes-dev (see link above). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alex Grigoriev (ratter) Date: 2004-10-02 19:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=314177 I want to develop mozilla mail/thunderbird plugin to integrate it with SpamBayes. I've written a letter to tim_one some days ago, there was no reply. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=895290&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 5 02:47:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 5 02:47:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1039057 ] Diffs for IMAP login problems... Message-ID: Patches item #1039057, was opened at 2004-10-03 05:10 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1039057&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: pcm (michali) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Diffs for IMAP login problems... Initial Comment: These are quick diffs for a change that, if the IMAP login fails, it will just skip and wait for the next poll and try again. It solves transient problems with accessing the IMAP server that I am seeing. Note: I strip out changes that I also made to create a HAM folder. Hopefully I got all the info. I think I'm using 1.0rc1 version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1039057&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 5 05:52:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 5 05:52:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1040390 ] Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1040390, was opened at 2004-10-04 20:52 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: James (jzchang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Toolbars items crash Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: Toolbar items "Delete as Spam" and "Recover from Spam" seem to function. However, it crashes Outlook 2003 afterwards (a dialog came up asking whether to send a bug report to Microsoft). Then Outlook 2003 restarts itself (if the restart checkbox is check otherwise it will quit) and the toolbar came up again after Outlook relaunches. I noticed the action (delete or recover) was taken after Outlook relaunched. The SpamBayes pull-down menu will cause the crash immediately without showing the sub-menu items. The Spam filtering seems to work fine. I tried the toolbar fixes in the Troubleshooting Guide, but it didn't solve the problem. I am using Widows XP Professional SP2. I didn't have problem with Outlook 2000. The problem appeared right after I upgraded to Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1040390&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 5 09:32:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 5 09:32:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1036135 ] detect faxes as spam Message-ID: Bugs item #1036135, was opened at 2004-09-28 14:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zimcad You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036135&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: zimcad (zimcad) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: detect faxes as spam Initial Comment: the outlook plugin detects incoming faxes in outlook as suspected spam. Combined Score: 29% (0.288208) Internal ham score (*H*): 0.85227 Internal spam score (*S*): 0.428687 # ham trained on: 327 # spam trained on: 573 3 Significant Tokens token spamprob #ham #spam 'from:none' 0.0180723 12 0 'x-mailer:none' 0.665707 120 419 'to:none' 0.721932 12 55 Message Stream Seiten: 1 Seiten: 1 Die Mitteilung hat folgenden Anhang: All Message Tokens 8 unique tokens 'cc:none' 'content-type:text/plain' 'from:none' 'message-id:invalid' 'reply-to:none' 'sender:none' 'to:none' 'x-mailer:none' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: zimcad (zimcad) Date: 2004-10-05 09:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1055336 sure, it only takes a time to train spambayes (i was too impatient) after i had 5 faxes in the inbox the score is at 24% - so i think we can erase my message ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-09-28 23:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The following tokens look like they would probably be pretty consistent for incoming faxes, and the fact that none of them appear in the "significant tokens" list seems to indicate that you haven't trained any incoming fax messages. 'cc:none' 'content-type:text/plain' 'message-id:invalid' 'reply-to:none' 'sender:none' 29% isn't that high a score, and I don't think it would take much training to drive that into the good message range. I don't have the ability to receive faxes in my Inbox, so I've never tried training one. Is SpamBayes preventing you from training on these? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036135&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 5 15:35:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 5 15:35:45 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-824651 ] Multibyte (CJK etc.) message support Message-ID: Patches item #824651, was opened at 2003-10-16 17:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hatukanezumi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: Multibyte (CJK etc.) message support Initial Comment: Maybe this also applicable to other East-Asian languages. o Unicode'ify text: For example by Japanese message, RFC1468 recommends that ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and multibyte character set both designated to GL, should be used. Original tokenizer generates only bogus meaningless text fragments for Japanese messages. o Concatinate C/J lines. In Japanese (and maybe Chinese) messages, line folding often breaks 'words'. o Bigram of C/J characters. In Japanese (and often Chinese) messages, 'words' are not separated by character such as whitespace. Tokenization to grammatical 'words' will require heuristic algorithms using large corpus. Instead of expensive human-language parser, generate bigram from run of kanji (ideograph for C/J/K) or run of hiragana & katakana (syllabic letters for J). N.B.: - I believe number of database items is roughly O(n^2) for bigram, O(n^3) for trigram,... and O(n^i) for i-gram, where n is size of used character set. On katakana & hiragana n is approximately 100. On kanzi it is approx. 5000 (KS X 1001), 7000 (JIS X 0208), or more (Chinese standards). By C/J messages, 3-or-more-gram will generate very sparse and large database. - Words of single kanzi should not be discarded by tokenizer. Since most of basic kanzi words are of 1 or 2 characters. Words of single hiragana/katakana may be discarded. - As far as I know, in Korean message, phrase (not 'word' but similar) is often separated by whitespace. As run of hangul (syllabic character for K) may not splitted to n-gram. o Punctuation --- what is 'punctuation'? A lot of punctuations, spaces, signs and symbols registered with Unicode Standard are added to punctuation_run_re (for compatibility, some of them are overlapped with subject_words_re). Since many of them are also registered as punctuations or symbols with C/J/K character set standards. Problems: o sb_dbexpimp.py become incompatible. o Only BMP range is supported. Surrogates are not recognized. o Tested by Japanese messages only, not by other East-Asian messages. o No batch tests. This only aims at Japanese support. Configuration: o To support unicode, .spambayesrc must be set: [Tokenizer] replace_nonascii_chars: False ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2004-10-05 22:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 Update for 1.0-final. - Normalize Unicode'ified texts by Normalization Form KC (NFKC). - HTTP charset is fixed to UTF-8. Option [html_ui] http_charset was removed. - Some bug fixes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-12-08 12:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 patch 1.0. Per-language corpus. Ham/spam ratio are different by language of message. This affects performance. NOTE: Format of corpus has been changed. It now contains per-language nham/nspam info and wordinfo. PICKLE_VERSION is 6. New configuration option: [Tokenizer] per_language_corpus ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-29 17:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 o hammie.py / sb_filter.py / sb_xmlrpcserver.py: - clues in X-Spambayes-Evidence: header will be MIME header encoded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-26 17:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 server patch 1.0a7-0.6 o Dibbler performs HTTP charset conversion (to/from internal UTF-8). o New configuration option: [html_ui] http_charset ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-11-26 09:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Added the sb_dbexpimp.py patch (v1.3). Will look at the rest, shortly - thanks for your patience! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-11-11 21:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 o db_expimp.py is imcompatible again. It exports / imports data as UTF-8. o Unicode'ifyed sb_server.py. - HTTP charset is UTF-8. - clues in X-Spambayes-Evidences will be MIME header encoded. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-29 19:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 OK. I'll test the code untill addition. minor fix: 'replace_nonascii_chars' option works correctly, etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-21 12:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Just a wee note to say thanks for this, and that someone will get to looking at adding this in, but everyone's pretty busy with other stuff at the moment! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-19 19:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 fix for Korean message. Hangul phrases/words can be of 1 or 2 chars. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-17 18:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 minor fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2003-10-16 21:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 > ISO/EIC 2022 encoding scheme, with ASCII and > multibyte character set both designated to GL, Not 'designate'. 'Invoke' is correct. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=824651&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 5 16:12:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 5 16:12:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1036135 ] detect faxes as spam Message-ID: Bugs item #1036135, was opened at 2004-09-28 08:32 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036135&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: zimcad (zimcad) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: detect faxes as spam Initial Comment: the outlook plugin detects incoming faxes in outlook as suspected spam. Combined Score: 29% (0.288208) Internal ham score (*H*): 0.85227 Internal spam score (*S*): 0.428687 # ham trained on: 327 # spam trained on: 573 3 Significant Tokens token spamprob #ham #spam 'from:none' 0.0180723 12 0 'x-mailer:none' 0.665707 120 419 'to:none' 0.721932 12 55 Message Stream Seiten: 1 Seiten: 1 Die Mitteilung hat folgenden Anhang: All Message Tokens 8 unique tokens 'cc:none' 'content-type:text/plain' 'from:none' 'message-id:invalid' 'reply-to:none' 'sender:none' 'to:none' 'x-mailer:none' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-10-05 10:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Because these messages have so few tokens, it probably will take a little more training on these than it might for normal e-mail messages. Also, you may be able to adjust the Possible Spam cutoff on the Filtering tab of SpamBayes Manager to help out a little. It will depend on how your other unsure messages are scoring, but there's a good chance you could raise the cutoff from 15 to 20 without increasing your false negatives (spam in your Inbox). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: zimcad (zimcad) Date: 2004-10-05 03:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1055336 sure, it only takes a time to train spambayes (i was too impatient) after i had 5 faxes in the inbox the score is at 24% - so i think we can erase my message ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-09-28 17:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The following tokens look like they would probably be pretty consistent for incoming faxes, and the fact that none of them appear in the "significant tokens" list seems to indicate that you haven't trained any incoming fax messages. 'cc:none' 'content-type:text/plain' 'message-id:invalid' 'reply-to:none' 'sender:none' 29% isn't that high a score, and I don't think it would take much training to drive that into the good message range. I don't have the ability to receive faxes in my Inbox, so I've never tried training one. Is SpamBayes preventing you from training on these? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036135&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 5 16:13:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 5 16:13:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1000427 ] non-English spam; localized filters Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1000427, was opened at 2004-07-30 09:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hatukanezumi You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1000427&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Engel (mkengel) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: non-English spam; localized filters Initial Comment: How to deal with spam in a mixture of English/non-English mails* - it seems that they pass easily the filters * in my case English/German/French and Japanese Solution idea: localized filters, one after the other; should be possible to choose upon installation ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hatuka*nezumi (hatukanezumi) Date: 2004-10-05 23:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=529503 I'm working on non-English / multi-lingual tokenizer. See patch #824651. * This isn't compatible with original spambayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Engel (mkengel) Date: 2004-08-09 16:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=780774 Thank you for the comments. I have waited a little bit to see if the training on German spam had an effect. It did, after a total of 4 weeks, SpamBayes now discovers these messages as spam (0.44 - my cutoff line is 0.35). Probably, there were not enough messages in German and French that SpamBayes could see the difference. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-08-03 15:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Is your ham also mixed language? With English/German/French, SpamBayes doesn't care about the language and will just learn each word as good/bad, so should work fine (with appropriate training). Have you trained on these sorts of spam? Attaching the clues for a misclassified message would give more insight into this. The Japanese is more difficult, because SpamBayes creates tokens by (mostly) splitting on whitespace, and this isn't how Asian languages work (we would get sentence tokens, I think). It's unlikely that we will ever handle this well, and the best solution would be to have someone (willing to do all the work) create a forked project that has a different tokeniser, customised for Asian langauges. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1000427&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 6 16:33:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 6 16:33:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1041503 ] Outlook 2000 Crashes after SP2 Upgrade Message-ID: Bugs item #1041503, was opened at 2004-10-06 07:33 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1041503&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rob Shirra (rshirra) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2000 Crashes after SP2 Upgrade Initial Comment: I upgraded my XP system to SP2 yesterday and ever since the Outlook client crashes as soon as messages begin to download. Difficult to tell whether spambayes is the culprit but it seems to crash when I would expect the spam messages to start to be identified. I tried re-starting XP and then downloaded spambayes 1.0 and re-installed. Same problem. I do not know how to uninstall spambayes, so I cannot access my e-mail. Can anyone help me? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1041503&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 7 00:08:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 7 00:09:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1041503 ] Outlook 2000 Crashes after SP2 Upgrade Message-ID: Bugs item #1041503, was opened at 2004-10-07 03:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1041503&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rob Shirra (rshirra) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2000 Crashes after SP2 Upgrade Initial Comment: I upgraded my XP system to SP2 yesterday and ever since the Outlook client crashes as soon as messages begin to download. Difficult to tell whether spambayes is the culprit but it seems to crash when I would expect the spam messages to start to be identified. I tried re-starting XP and then downloaded spambayes 1.0 and re-installed. Same problem. I do not know how to uninstall spambayes, so I cannot access my e-mail. Can anyone help me? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-07 11:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Other users are successfully using XP SP2, so it seems unlikely that it is SpamBayes. However, uninstalling is the correct way to test that. Please see FAQ 3.16 for uninstall instructions: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1041503&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 7 08:26:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 7 08:26:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-973376 ] Make "Delete as Spam" *really* Delete the email Message-ID: Feature Requests item #973376, was opened at 2004-06-16 04:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=973376&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open >Priority: 5 Submitted By: Lance (lancevictor) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Make "Delete as Spam" *really* Delete the email Initial Comment: Proposed change in functionality: If SpamBayes automatically detects spam, it moves it to the Spam folder (where I can go to verify that it really was spam). On the other hand if *I* select a message and click "Delete As Spam" I'd like the message to be moved to my deleted folder (ie: a human has already verified that it really is spam and it can safely be deleted completely, not moved to "spam"). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-07 19:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It looks like from 1.1 the buttons will be called "Spam" and "Not Spam". However, I presume that you'd still like this functionality - and it would fit more nicely with that change, IMO. I suppose we could add a "move to Deleted Items" option where the "mark as read" options are. My main question is whether there is a need for this given that you are presumably clearing out (somehow) the spam folder anyway, does it matter if there are a few extra emails as well? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-09-22 03:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 I must agree, in fact I actually wanted to post same thread :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=973376&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 7 18:14:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 7 18:14:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-986353 ] Outlook/ZipMagic Incompatibility Message-ID: Bugs item #986353, was opened at 2004-07-06 20:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by geewhizbang You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=986353&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Open >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook/ZipMagic Incompatibility Initial Comment: I use ZipMagic to handle Zip files under Win2K. If I turn zipmagic on, it permanently crashes SpamBayes with the following logfile message: Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Date: 2004-10-07 09:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078371 It still doesn't work on version 1.0. If zipfolders are turned on while Outlook is running, spambayes has to be uninstalled/ reinstalled to get it to work again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-16 07:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This has been fixed in latest CVS. Changes will probably not appear in the binary installer until the first 1.1 alpha release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Date: 2004-07-08 06:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078371 Yes, I have seen the same message as in bug #941639, but in the previous version. I did not see this message anywhere this time. What may be the difference is that I usually leave ZipMagic off, and turn it on only to create a .ZIP file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-07 08:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The attached logfile shows a perfectly normal execution of SpamBayes, ending with a normal exit from SpamBayes when Outlook is closed. What is the error that you are seeing? Does it happen when you first start Outlook with ZipMagic's ZipFolders enabled? What happens if you disable ZipFolders before loading Outlook, and then reenable after Outlook and SpamBayes are loaded and running? The logfile you uploaded is "spambayes4.log". There should be 3 more recent logfiles named "spambayes1.log", "spambayes2.log", and "spambayes3.log". Can you find those? Please refer to bug #941639. It sounds like you are getting further than the user who submitted that bug, but maybe the logfile you uploaded was generated when ZipFolders was disabled? Do any of the symptons there sound at all familiar? Windows XP has a shell extension that will allow you to see the contents of a zip file in a "folder-like" view, but unlike ZipMagic it does not make the zip file look like a normal folder to other programs that directly access the file system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Date: 2004-07-07 07:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078371 I have attached the logfile, but the message I posted is the only thing that looks like an error The most likely reason for the crash is that the zip file "spambayes.zip" (or any other zip file used by spambayes) becomes a folder when zipmagic is activated. A similar feature is actually included with windows XP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-07 07:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The logfile message you show is a normal message that is written to the logfile whenever you exit Outlook, so it's difficult to guess where the problem is. Are there any tracebacks or other error messages earlier in the logfile? It would be helpful if you could attach your complete logfile to this bug report. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=986353&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 7 18:23:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 7 18:24:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-986353 ] Outlook/ZipMagic Incompatibility Message-ID: Bugs item #986353, was opened at 2004-07-06 20:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by geewhizbang You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=986353&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook/ZipMagic Incompatibility Initial Comment: I use ZipMagic to handle Zip files under Win2K. If I turn zipmagic on, it permanently crashes SpamBayes with the following logfile message: Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Date: 2004-10-07 09:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078371 Verision 1.0 still has this issue. Spam Bayes fails completely, and must be uninstalled/reinstalled to work again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Date: 2004-10-07 09:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078371 It still doesn't work on version 1.0. If zipfolders are turned on while Outlook is running, spambayes has to be uninstalled/ reinstalled to get it to work again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-16 07:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This has been fixed in latest CVS. Changes will probably not appear in the binary installer until the first 1.1 alpha release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Date: 2004-07-08 06:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078371 Yes, I have seen the same message as in bug #941639, but in the previous version. I did not see this message anywhere this time. What may be the difference is that I usually leave ZipMagic off, and turn it on only to create a .ZIP file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-07 08:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The attached logfile shows a perfectly normal execution of SpamBayes, ending with a normal exit from SpamBayes when Outlook is closed. What is the error that you are seeing? Does it happen when you first start Outlook with ZipMagic's ZipFolders enabled? What happens if you disable ZipFolders before loading Outlook, and then reenable after Outlook and SpamBayes are loaded and running? The logfile you uploaded is "spambayes4.log". There should be 3 more recent logfiles named "spambayes1.log", "spambayes2.log", and "spambayes3.log". Can you find those? Please refer to bug #941639. It sounds like you are getting further than the user who submitted that bug, but maybe the logfile you uploaded was generated when ZipFolders was disabled? Do any of the symptons there sound at all familiar? Windows XP has a shell extension that will allow you to see the contents of a zip file in a "folder-like" view, but unlike ZipMagic it does not make the zip file look like a normal folder to other programs that directly access the file system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Date: 2004-07-07 07:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078371 I have attached the logfile, but the message I posted is the only thing that looks like an error The most likely reason for the crash is that the zip file "spambayes.zip" (or any other zip file used by spambayes) becomes a folder when zipmagic is activated. A similar feature is actually included with windows XP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-07 07:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The logfile message you show is a normal message that is written to the logfile whenever you exit Outlook, so it's difficult to guess where the problem is. Are there any tracebacks or other error messages earlier in the logfile? It would be helpful if you could attach your complete logfile to this bug report. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=986353&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 7 19:38:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 7 19:38:45 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-986353 ] Outlook/ZipMagic Incompatibility Message-ID: Bugs item #986353, was opened at 2004-07-06 23:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=986353&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook/ZipMagic Incompatibility Initial Comment: I use ZipMagic to handle Zip files under Win2K. If I turn zipmagic on, it permanently crashes SpamBayes with the following logfile message: Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-10-07 13:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Please read the comments more closely. The fix has been made for inclusion in the *1.1 version* of SpamBayes. There are no immediate plans to backport this fix to the 1.0 version. However, we do intend to put out a maintenance release of 1.0 at some point and we will make a determination on which changes from the 1.1 version should be included in that maintenance release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Date: 2004-10-07 12:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078371 Verision 1.0 still has this issue. Spam Bayes fails completely, and must be uninstalled/reinstalled to work again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Date: 2004-10-07 12:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078371 It still doesn't work on version 1.0. If zipfolders are turned on while Outlook is running, spambayes has to be uninstalled/ reinstalled to get it to work again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-16 10:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This has been fixed in latest CVS. Changes will probably not appear in the binary installer until the first 1.1 alpha release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Date: 2004-07-08 09:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078371 Yes, I have seen the same message as in bug #941639, but in the previous version. I did not see this message anywhere this time. What may be the difference is that I usually leave ZipMagic off, and turn it on only to create a .ZIP file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-07 11:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The attached logfile shows a perfectly normal execution of SpamBayes, ending with a normal exit from SpamBayes when Outlook is closed. What is the error that you are seeing? Does it happen when you first start Outlook with ZipMagic's ZipFolders enabled? What happens if you disable ZipFolders before loading Outlook, and then reenable after Outlook and SpamBayes are loaded and running? The logfile you uploaded is "spambayes4.log". There should be 3 more recent logfiles named "spambayes1.log", "spambayes2.log", and "spambayes3.log". Can you find those? Please refer to bug #941639. It sounds like you are getting further than the user who submitted that bug, but maybe the logfile you uploaded was generated when ZipFolders was disabled? Do any of the symptons there sound at all familiar? Windows XP has a shell extension that will allow you to see the contents of a zip file in a "folder-like" view, but unlike ZipMagic it does not make the zip file look like a normal folder to other programs that directly access the file system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Date: 2004-07-07 10:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078371 I have attached the logfile, but the message I posted is the only thing that looks like an error The most likely reason for the crash is that the zip file "spambayes.zip" (or any other zip file used by spambayes) becomes a folder when zipmagic is activated. A similar feature is actually included with windows XP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-07 10:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The logfile message you show is a normal message that is written to the logfile whenever you exit Outlook, so it's difficult to guess where the problem is. Are there any tracebacks or other error messages earlier in the logfile? It would be helpful if you could attach your complete logfile to this bug report. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=986353&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 7 21:30:59 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 7 21:31:08 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-744558 ] Add " Delete As Spam" button to Outlook inspector window Message-ID: Feature Requests item #744558, was opened at 2003-05-27 16:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by arkitekt1 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=744558&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Raabe (mraabe) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Add "Delete As Spam" button to Outlook inspector window Initial Comment: The "Delete As Spam" button that the addin adds to the toolbar in Outlook's main explorer window should also be added to the toolbar in each email inspector window as well. I.e., when you double-click on an email and are viewing it in its own window, you should have the option right there to delete it as spam, instead of having to return to the explorer window to do so. It's of lesser importance, but it may make sense to add the "Anti-Spam" dropdown button to the inspector window as well. I tried adding the buttons myself, which caused me to discover bug #744550 (where Outlook's Tools/Customize dialog is broken). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: arkitekt1 (arkitekt1) Date: 2004-10-07 14:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1135013 I believe this would be a valuable added feature - especially for those of us using Outlook add-ons such as Neo Email Organizer (http://www.caelo.com/a/rl.php3?i=A963D) - this is a great program but I end up losing the benefit of SpamBayes because when I double click the messages to open them the Delete As Spam button isn't available ... I have to go back to Outlook and find the email and designate it as spam. NEO itself does have some spam type features that help - I can drag the email to a folder designated as spam (junk email folder that I set with SpamBayes) and it ignores that folder. But it would be even better to have the Delete As Spam feature built right into each email interface. I don't know how difficult this would be, but it would be a great addition in functionality for people like myself using an add-on interface. Thanks for your consideration ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=744558&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 8 15:39:03 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 8 18:03:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-829602 ] Multiple Inboxes seem to be mishandled Message-ID: Feature Requests item #829602, was opened at 2003-10-24 09:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bpu_webguy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=829602&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Multiple Inboxes seem to be mishandled Initial Comment: I have a primary exchange account for my Outlook 2K. I also monitor a varying number of other mailboxes when folks are gone or I'm working in a project area that has an application outlook mailbox. (e.g. SQL Mail and the outlook mailbox assigned to our Intranet). I have an Outlook profile for my main mailbox as the default and a secondary one for the Intranet mail account. Here is what happens; When someone with global enterprise send capabilities sends that global message, The Outlook plug-in for SpamBayes handles all of them and they appear as only one message in my Inbox or one of the SpamBayes classification folders. Anyone else seen this happen? Also, it appears, but I have not completely confirmed that any inbound mail to the intranet account shows up as above, MY inbox or Spambayes classification folders. So, do we have a bug, a "feature" or do I have a wonky system because it is a developer machine?? bpu_webguy, a.k.a. Hal ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2004-10-08 08:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 Going back over my posts, I noticed this. One update: Multiple mailboxes with OL2003 and POP3 servers still hit the same inbox, spam or unsure folders, no matter what the destination account is. One semi work-around is to set an OL rule up to shake and bake the destination folders and move the messages based on the recipient. -hal ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=829602&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 8 15:25:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 8 18:03:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-963136 ] Outlook.exe process not terminated Message-ID: Bugs item #963136, was opened at 2004-05-30 09:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bpu_webguy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook.exe process not terminated Initial Comment: After installing Spambayes 1.0rc1, I noticed I couldn't delete some Spambayes log files in my temp folder. I opened the task manager and saw 4 (four) "Outlook.exe" processes idling (but reserving memory) in the list. Terminating those processes freed the log files and allowed me to delete them safely. It seems I can open Oulook 2003 infinite times, everything works perfectly and Spamnayes IS doing its work, but when I close Outlook, the process still remains active and uses up my RAM. Eventually, after an afternoon of work, WinXP told me I had not enough memory to continue working (1 Gb RAM installed...). Please solve this one, or I have to leave the project for something less memory-hungry!!! :((( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2004-10-08 08:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 Running W2K Pro, I have found that this occurs in OL2000 / Exchange 5.5 at the office, and also at home with OL2000 WG/Inet then later upgraded to OL2003 WG/Inet, that when I have ActiveSync 3.71 running with my WinCE 2002 PDA docked. If I kill the ASync process and get OL to shutdown cleanly, then I don't wind up with the multiple instances. -Hal ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: superba (superba) Date: 2004-06-16 11:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1064841 Hi, I just added a comment without listing my OS; it's Win XP Pro, SP1+. Cheers! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: superba (superba) Date: 2004-06-16 11:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1064841 Hi, Outlook 2k SR3 process remains loaded after closing Outlook. I don't THINK this happened before loading Spambayes 1.0rc1. Otherwise, I think SP is working okay. Cheers! Jim J ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 20:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 I wouldn't believe it unless you tried it 20 times in a row with the same outcomes each time. I've been puzzling over Outlook shutdown hangs for (literally) years, and as I said before, I still can't predict them. We never write to Outlook's .dat files, neither at installation time nor any other time. Outlook writes those itself. Alas, because the source code for Outlook is secret, we don't know what's in those files, or why, or how Outlook manages to corrupt them. Well, I know what's in extend.dat: it's a copy of registry entries related to Outlook. Why Outlook writes them into a little file instead of looking up values in the registry is beyond me, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-30 19:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 It seems Outlook was to be blamed for this strange behaviour, you were right! After following the first step in the page you linked, the problem disappeared... Weird, but If I uninstall then reinstall Spambayes, the problem is back... renaming those .dat files eliminates the problem again. Maybe Spambayes modifies some of those files incorrectly when installed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 18:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Well, you wouldn't know it unless you *looked* for it. Depending on how much training you've done and msgs you've scored, Outlook may require a lot more memory when SpamBayes is installed. So you can leave a lot more wedged non-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around than you can leave wedged with-SpamBayes stale Outlooks around. Just for fun, uninstall SpamBayes and pay attention to Task Manager for a week. If you never see Outlook sticking around then, that would indeed implicate SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Steve Shultz (shultz) Date: 2004-05-30 17:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=706922 I'm sorry Tim, but I never experienced this strange behaviour in Outlook 2003 before installing Spambayes, so you must be wrong: it's Spambayes related. ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-05-30 14:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Sorry, I doubt this has anything to do with SpamBayes. All installations of Outlook I've used, on all flavors of Windows, have a habit of not shutting down completely from time to time, and regardless of whether SpamBayes is installed. Many people have reported the same. In fact, do some googling and you'll find lots of reports of this, along with superstitious advice; e.g., http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/tips/outlook_trouble.ht ml My brand new OL2003 on my brand new WinXP Pro SP1 box failed to shut down the first time I brought it up, and that happened many additional times in the week before I installed SpamBayes on this box. It still doesn't shut down sometimes, but I can't predict when it will or won't, and it doesn't seem to be any more or less frequent than before I installed SB. Likewise for Outlook crashes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=963136&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 8 23:57:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 8 23:57:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1043358 ] OL 2K internal filters stop working Message-ID: Bugs item #1043358, was opened at 2004-10-08 14:57 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1043358&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: superba (superba) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: OL 2K internal filters stop working Initial Comment: Hi, It's OL 2K with SR3, latest version of SB, Win XP Pro w/SP2+. After loading the released version 1.0 of SB, some if not all of my internal filters stopped working and I could find no way to reactivate them. I use them to file email into different folders based on their subject/and or origin. I searched for a reported bug but found none. BTW, OL 2K remains open sometimes with and without SB installed. Any ideas? Cheers! Jim Jordan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1043358&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 11 09:15:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 11 09:15:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1028194 ] Feature request: Training on root folders Message-ID: Bugs item #1028194, was opened at 2004-09-14 23:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by magnusholm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1028194&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Training on root folders Initial Comment: SpamBayes should support training on root folders. This is especially useful when you have PSTs consisting only of ham (or spam for that sake) with lots of folders on the root level. (Friends.pst, Colleagues.pst, Spam.pst) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Date: 2004-10-11 09:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=738321 1: Yes.. For instance i have a .PST-file with friends and acquaintances containing about 400 sub folders at root level. Of course one could go crazy with the keypad arrows and space, but I'd rather just check the root folder. 2: Training in bulk for me means training on five to ten different PST files ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 05:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Two things: 1. Is it really that hard to just tick the boxes? 2. We recommend training in bulk, so this should almost never be necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1028194&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 12 02:09:21 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 12 02:09:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1028194 ] Feature request: Training on root folders Message-ID: Bugs item #1028194, was opened at 2004-09-15 09:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1028194&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Training on root folders Initial Comment: SpamBayes should support training on root folders. This is especially useful when you have PSTs consisting only of ham (or spam for that sake) with lots of folders on the root level. (Friends.pst, Colleagues.pst, Spam.pst) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-12 13:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ack. Sorry, there's a missing "against" in my second comment. It should read: 2. We recommend AGAINST training in bulk, so this should almost never be necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Date: 2004-10-11 20:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=738321 1: Yes.. For instance i have a .PST-file with friends and acquaintances containing about 400 sub folders at root level. Of course one could go crazy with the keypad arrows and space, but I'd rather just check the root folder. 2: Training in bulk for me means training on five to ten different PST files ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Two things: 1. Is it really that hard to just tick the boxes? 2. We recommend training in bulk, so this should almost never be necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1028194&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 12 09:02:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 12 09:02:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1028194 ] Feature request: Training on root folders Message-ID: Bugs item #1028194, was opened at 2004-09-14 23:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by magnusholm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1028194&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Training on root folders Initial Comment: SpamBayes should support training on root folders. This is especially useful when you have PSTs consisting only of ham (or spam for that sake) with lots of folders on the root level. (Friends.pst, Colleagues.pst, Spam.pst) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Date: 2004-10-12 09:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=738321 Hehe... ok... The problem is that with my setup, SpamBayes gets pretty biased training, because a lot of my "good" mail is moved to different folders in Outlook before SpamBayes gets to them. What I'm trying to achieve is to tell SpamBayes that those mails are "good", keeping Spambayes from guessing. ..and that raises another question... I have not looked at the source, but would it be easy to invoke SpamBayes from another Outlook plugin? eg: sbObj.FilterMailItem(myMailItem)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-12 02:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ack. Sorry, there's a missing "against" in my second comment. It should read: 2. We recommend AGAINST training in bulk, so this should almost never be necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Date: 2004-10-11 09:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=738321 1: Yes.. For instance i have a .PST-file with friends and acquaintances containing about 400 sub folders at root level. Of course one could go crazy with the keypad arrows and space, but I'd rather just check the root folder. 2: Training in bulk for me means training on five to ten different PST files ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 05:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Two things: 1. Is it really that hard to just tick the boxes? 2. We recommend training in bulk, so this should almost never be necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1028194&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 12 09:12:03 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 12 09:12:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1045098 ] Unable to filter multiple mailboxes in Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1045098, was opened at 2004-10-12 02:12 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1045098&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to filter multiple mailboxes in Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: I have been enjoying the benefits of SpamBayes since version Outlook-002 to monitor multiple Exchange Mailbox folders using Outlook 2002 on XP Pro. I have found it to be better than competing, often commercial, products and it saves me much time. In my configuration, starting Outlook opens the primary Exchange mailbox which in turn opens several other Exchange Mailboxes and SpamBayes monitors all the Inboxes of all accounts simultaneously. I have never had any issues (other than performance, and the occasional disappearing toolbar) with this setup in my 16 months of using the product. I just upgraded to Outlook 2003 and now the Filtering has stopped for all of the folders except the InBox of the primary email account. Here's what I see: 1. Under SpamBayes Manager's Filtering Tab, the three folders I want to monitor are correctly displayed under "Filter the following folders as messages arrive". 2. Clicking "Browse" displays the "Select folder(s)" window with "Public Folders", "Mailbox - PrimaryUser", "Mailbox - User2", "Mailbox - User3", etc. 3. Mailbox - Primary User is expanded with the "Inbox" checked. Nothing else is checked and the bottom of the window now says "Selected 1 folder" and displays "Inbox". It used to say "Selected 3 folders". 4. When I click the "+" to expand "Mailbox - User2" or "Mailbox - User3", nothing happens. So I am unable to re-select the User2-Inbox or the User3-Inbox. 5. I can try to place a check in the un-expanded box to the left of "Mailbox - User2" but this just leads to the "Please select a child folder - top-level folders cannot be used" message. Any assistance is appreciated. And thank you for an extremely useful product. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1045098&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 12 15:32:34 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 12 15:32:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-982351 ] SpamBayes doesn't move spam mail when in offline mode Message-ID: Bugs item #982351, was opened at 2004-06-30 02:56 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by efish4 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=982351&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook >Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: fx (efish4) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayes doesn't move spam mail when in offline mode Initial Comment: Outlook 2000 w/ SP-3 in corporate mode (Exchange server) SpamBayes 1.0rc2 If outlook is launched in offline mode (OST file for the Exchange Server service), then SpamBayes pops up a MAPI error when trying to move some mail to the spam directory. The MAPI error is: 'Moving a message failed due to an unexpected Outlook error.\r\n Exception 0x80040119 (MAPI_E_EXTENDED_ERROR): OLE error 0x80040119\r\n \r\nIt is recommended you restart Outlook at the earliest opportunity\r\n\r\n This message will not be reported again until SpamBayes\r\nis restarted. Could it be possible to have SpamBayes working in offline mode ? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=982351&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 12 17:21:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 12 17:22:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-983539 ] Install error on Outlook 2002 Message-ID: Bugs item #983539, was opened at 2004-07-01 13:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983539&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Taed Wynnell (taed) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Install error on Outlook 2002 Initial Comment: When I installed 1.0 RC 2, I got an installation error. When I then loaded Outlook, SpamBayes seemed to load and displayed the buttons, but the SpamBayes menu was non-functional (ignored click). I'm running Outlook 2002 (with all updates) on my Windows NT 4.0 Server (with all updates). I've tried installing it multiple times (and rebooting and so on), but no luck. Re-installing 1.0 RC 1 will then work fine. Here's the outlook_addin_register.exe.log file contents: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 40, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 40, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-10-12 11:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It appears that build 203 of pywin32/win32all has split out the XP-specific functions into a separate extension to restore NT compatibility. We will upgrade to build 203 for the next SpamBayes build (probably either 1.1a1 alpha release or 1.0.1 maintenance release), so hopefully that will fix this problem. Here are a couple bullets snipped from Mark's release announcement: * The win32gui, win32security, and win32service modules all again work on Windows NT. * New 'winxpgui' module - almost identical to win32gui, but has a Windows XP manifest included, and a couple of extra functions not supported by Windows NT (AnimateWindow, FlashWindowEx, etc) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-09-28 17:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Noting dupe in [ 1036551 ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-15 16:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It seems that the problem is not a *call* to FlashWindowEx, but rather simply that FlashWindowEx appears in the import table of the win32gui.pyd DLL file and the import cannot be resolved on NT4. This is an issue in the pywin32 extensions, and appears to have been introduced in build 202. Revision 1.42 of win32gui.i added the PyFlashWindowEx function that generates the offending import. I'm assigning this to Mark to see if he can find a way to implement the FlashWindow function without generating a static import reference to the FlashWindowEx function (maybe LoadLibrary/GetProcAddress after an OS version check?). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: pbarbour (pbarbour) Date: 2004-07-09 16:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1080518 likely due a call to the FlashWindowEx() function which is not supported in NT4. This error occured on my NT4 workstation also. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983539&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 12 17:24:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 12 17:24:15 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1045504 ] Same problem ver 1.0 Outlook 2k Message-ID: Bugs item #1045504, was opened at 2004-10-12 08:24 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1045504&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: paul j barrett (firebalrog) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Same problem ver 1.0 Outlook 2k Initial Comment: I also forgot to uninstall 0.8 before installing 1.0 and Outlook hangs on exit. If Spambayes is disabled then outlook exits normally. I have uninstalled all versions and reinstalled ver 1.0 but problem persists. I had also recently opened a personal folder that had been previously opened in Outlook 2003 however closing this personal folder didn't resolve the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1045504&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 12 17:27:26 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 12 17:27:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1045504 ] Same problem ver 1.0 Outlook 2k Message-ID: Bugs item #1045504, was opened at 2004-10-12 08:24 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by firebalrog You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1045504&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Deleted Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: paul j barrett (firebalrog) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Same problem ver 1.0 Outlook 2k Initial Comment: I also forgot to uninstall 0.8 before installing 1.0 and Outlook hangs on exit. If Spambayes is disabled then outlook exits normally. I have uninstalled all versions and reinstalled ver 1.0 but problem persists. I had also recently opened a personal folder that had been previously opened in Outlook 2003 however closing this personal folder didn't resolve the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1045504&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 12 17:28:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 12 17:28:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943702 ] sb hangs outlook (except when offline) Message-ID: Bugs item #943702, was opened at 2004-04-28 06:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by firebalrog You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943702&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: sb hangs outlook (except when offline) Initial Comment: I can start Outlook in "connect" mode or "offline". When SpamBayes is enabled, Outlook hangs when it is started in "connect" mode. All other combination works well : is SB is disabled or Outlook is started "offline", everything works well. In "connect" mode, when starting with SB disabled, I have no problem when I later enable SB. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: paul j barrett (firebalrog) Date: 2004-10-12 08:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=844598 I also forgot to uninstall 0.8 before installing 1.0 and Outlook 2k hangs on exit. If Spambayes is disabled then outlook exits normally. I have uninstalled all versions and reinstalled ver 1.0 but problem persists. I had also recently opened a personal folder that had been previously opened in Outlook 2003 however closing this personal folder didn't resolve the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2004-07-19 13:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 Problem is not reproducable since installation of Office 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2004-06-28 22:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 Unfortunately, same behaviour after installation of rc2. I did simply install over previous version, I did not deinstall. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please try rc2 - there was a change in our packaging tools that may explain this error. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2004-05-24 00:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 Problem was initially reported against 1.0b1. It is still occuring after installation of 1.0rc1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943702&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 01:05:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 01:05:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1045098 ] Unable to filter multiple mailboxes in Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1045098, was opened at 2004-10-12 20:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1045098&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to filter multiple mailboxes in Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: I have been enjoying the benefits of SpamBayes since version Outlook-002 to monitor multiple Exchange Mailbox folders using Outlook 2002 on XP Pro. I have found it to be better than competing, often commercial, products and it saves me much time. In my configuration, starting Outlook opens the primary Exchange mailbox which in turn opens several other Exchange Mailboxes and SpamBayes monitors all the Inboxes of all accounts simultaneously. I have never had any issues (other than performance, and the occasional disappearing toolbar) with this setup in my 16 months of using the product. I just upgraded to Outlook 2003 and now the Filtering has stopped for all of the folders except the InBox of the primary email account. Here's what I see: 1. Under SpamBayes Manager's Filtering Tab, the three folders I want to monitor are correctly displayed under "Filter the following folders as messages arrive". 2. Clicking "Browse" displays the "Select folder(s)" window with "Public Folders", "Mailbox - PrimaryUser", "Mailbox - User2", "Mailbox - User3", etc. 3. Mailbox - Primary User is expanded with the "Inbox" checked. Nothing else is checked and the bottom of the window now says "Selected 1 folder" and displays "Inbox". It used to say "Selected 3 folders". 4. When I click the "+" to expand "Mailbox - User2" or "Mailbox - User3", nothing happens. So I am unable to re-select the User2-Inbox or the User3-Inbox. 5. I can try to place a check in the un-expanded box to the left of "Mailbox - User2" but this just leads to the "Please select a child folder - top-level folders cannot be used" message. Any assistance is appreciated. And thank you for an extremely useful product. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 12:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem is in step 4, but to figure out exactly what is going wrong, we need to see your log file. Could you please try this again (to generate the log entries) and then attach your most recent log file to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the logs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1045098&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 04:42:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 04:45:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1039057 ] Diffs for IMAP login problems... Message-ID: Patches item #1039057, was opened at 2004-10-03 05:10 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1039057&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: pcm (michali) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Diffs for IMAP login problems... Initial Comment: These are quick diffs for a change that, if the IMAP login fails, it will just skip and wait for the next poll and try again. It solves transient problems with accessing the IMAP server that I am seeing. Note: I strip out changes that I also made to create a HAM folder. Hopefully I got all the info. I think I'm using 1.0rc1 version. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 15:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I've checked a change into CVS that implements this, in a slightly different way. It'll appear in 1.1a1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1039057&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 04:52:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 04:52:27 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-711845 ] mboxtrain.py in mh mode: trivial fix Message-ID: Patches item #711845, was opened at 2003-03-30 04:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=711845&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jay Berkenbilt (jay_berkenbilt) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: mboxtrain.py in mh mode: trivial fix Initial Comment: This patch relative to mboxtrain.py in the 2003-01-17 snapshot fixes two trivial problems in mhdir_train: files are overwritten needlessly, and the count of trained messages is not properly updated. I just took the logic from the maildir_train function and duplicated it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 15:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 At some point since this the count has been corrected. I'm not sure whether the other change is correct or not. It means that if the include_trained header option is True the message won't be in the new version of the mbox (i.e. it will vanish). This doesn't seem like the desired behaviour. If I'm wrong, please re-open. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jay Berkenbilt (jay_berkenbilt) Date: 2003-04-13 04:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=523210 I'm attaching a new patch relative to the current CVS. Sorry for not doing that to begin with. The only difference actually between this patch and the previous one is the line numbers. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=711845&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 04:57:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 04:57:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-836922 ] sb_mboxtrain include_trained mbox fix Message-ID: Patches item #836922, was opened at 2003-11-06 13:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=836922&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Hazen (jhazen) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain include_trained mbox fix Initial Comment: Version: SB 1.0a6 When dealing with mbox files, it looks like the processing for the 'include_trained' option is incorrect. I found this when training repeatedly on the same ham and spam files, and seeing that all messages were being added to the database repeatedly. Then I saw that the 'X-Spambayes-Trained:' header had not been added to the files. After looking at Options.options, I believe the correct solution is to change the processing of mbox files, as 'include_trained' defaults to true, and I have not unset it. The patch below fixed the problem for me. Let me know if you need any further information. This is my first patch on SF, so I'm not sure it will send me email. You can reach me directly at (john at hazendotnet). (In case this context isn't clear, the two "not"s are removed in mbox_train.) gate2:scripts$ diff -c sb_mboxtrain.py sb_mboxtrain.jsh.py *** sb_mboxtrain.py Thu Sep 18 08:36:30 2003 --- sb_mboxtrain.jsh.py Wed Nov 5 16:03:01 2003 *************** *** 157,167 **** sys.stdout.flush() if msg_train(h, msg, is_spam, force): trained += 1 ! if not options["Headers", "include_trained"]: # Write it out with the Unix "From " line outf.write(msg.as_string(True)) ! if not options["Headers", "include_trained"]: outf.seek(0) try: os.ftruncate(f.fileno(), 0) --- 157,167 ---- sys.stdout.flush() if msg_train(h, msg, is_spam, force): trained += 1 ! if options["Headers", "include_trained"]: # Write it out with the Unix "From " line outf.write(msg.as_string(True)) ! if options["Headers", "include_trained"]: outf.seek(0) try: os.ftruncate(f.fileno(), 0) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 15:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This was fixed in revision 1.6 of sb_mboxtrain. Apologies for not indicating this here before now! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=836922&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 04:59:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 04:59:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-932463 ] Installs but will not run Inbox Problem Message-ID: Support Requests item #932463, was opened at 2004-04-10 07:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=932463&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rich (richg56) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Installs but will not run Inbox Problem Initial Comment: I have a similar problem to [ 861014 ] Install Error http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? func=detail&aid=861014&group_id=61702&atid=498104 Submitted By: Melissa Phillips - mrphillips Date Submitted: 2003-12-16 09:18 Last Updated By: kpitt - Comment added Date Last Updated: 2004-03-09 16:20 Loading spambayes-1.0a9.exe . 4/9/04 I load it and it turns off filtering automatically. I can get to the manager and under the filtering tab first browse button I get no folder tree the existing information is install;install;install The other 2 browse buttons provide folder trees. My first install I did a lot of training I uninstalled and removed the directory mentioned in the follow-up and restarted then reloaded without training, without all unsure directory. Same problem. Potential conflicts: + Outlook ->Tools->Email accounts->2 accounts forwarded to 1 local pst file in 2003 format (not compatible with 2002 and previous) + Tivoli + McAfee on demain virus scanner ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 15:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If this is still relevant, please reset status to "open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-08-03 18:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is really out of date - sorry about that (support request items tend to get missed, as compared to bug reports or traffic on the mailing list). The log has a lot of "access denied" errors. Are the folders that should be displayed all in the local pst file? What is Tivoli? Might it be denying access? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=932463&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 05:01:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 05:01:16 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1018225 ] Junk email folder deleted repeatedly Message-ID: Support Requests item #1018225, was opened at 2004-08-29 04:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1018225&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael (spambayes) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Junk email folder deleted repeatedly Initial Comment: I watched my junk email folder get deleted in fron of my eyes. I created it again and the next day it was gone again I created a different named folder and set it to work on that one and it has stayed put. Is there a bug or spyware program that is targeting that folder for deletion? It is suspicious as it happened right in front of me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 16:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No-one has mentioned anything like this before on the spambayes mailing lists or in the trackers here, so it's unlikely. If this does occur again, let us know, but I assume it was some sort of Outlook foible. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1018225&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 04:59:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 05:02:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-824326 ] Does not train on messages in public folders Message-ID: Support Requests item #824326, was opened at 2003-10-16 08:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=824326&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Anthony D\'Agostino (lokeswari) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Does not train on messages in public folders Initial Comment: Hi - When I attempted to train spambayes, I checked off three personal folders and three Public Folders on our Exchange server for spam training. When done, the training database only reports 55 messages (the number in my personal folders). It seems to be ignoring the 263 messages in the public folder that were checked. Log is attached. Versions: Outlook 2002 Exchange 2000 OS: XP Professional SpamBayes Outlook add-in: 0.81 Questions: Should this work? Why doesn't it? Is there another way to train the db on these messages? Can you configure spambayes to filter mail being sent to a public folder? Thank! dad ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 15:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If there still is a problem here, please reset status to "open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-08-03 18:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Apologies for the glacial delay. Support requests often get missed as people concentrate on the bug reports and mailing list traffice. Not sure if this is still relevant, but in case it is: 1. We deliberately don't filter any "non-mail" items. This includes what Outlook calls IPM.Notes and IPM.Anti-Virus (the former are often called 'posts', I think). Messages in public folders may be for the former type, which would explain this. If you want this changed, then you'll have to convince Mark it's a good idea (which might not be hard). 2. The log has a variety of access denied errors. I'm not sure whether this is related to training or not. In the advanced options of the Manager dialog there is the option to turn off saving the spam info, which might make a difference. Things related to access have also been fixed since 0.81, so that might also help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=824326&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 05:02:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 05:02:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-982167 ] Different scores between Outlook plugin and SB source Message-ID: Support Requests item #982167, was opened at 2004-06-30 06:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=982167&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pete Shack (peteshack) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Different scores between Outlook plugin and SB source Initial Comment: Any help with this is greatly appreciated. I know this may not be the best place to post this: I've got the outlook plugin installed - works great. I'm also trying Andrew Dalkes SpamBayesCuller: http://www.entrian.com/sbwiki/SpamBayesCuller using the same training database. Outlook scores emails more accurately than the culler script. I've checked the scores on identical messages - the culler script scored 0.477 where the plugin scored it 0.999 Any ideas why or where I should start to look? THANKS! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 16:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you'd still like help with this, please attach the clues that Tim described to the tracker (or do it via spambayes@python.org) and we'll go over them with you. If you do, then please reset the status of this tracker back to "open". (I'm closing given the time that has passed since Tim's answer, without any futher comment). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-07-02 11:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Take a specific email and generate clue lists from both ways of scoring it. That's the only way to start. I don't expect the scores to be identical, because Outlook destroys the MIME structure of incoming email, so the proxy literally sees a different message than the Outlook addin sees. That should be a minor difference, though. Differences in option settings probably account for it -- but no way to tell without those clue lists. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=982167&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 05:04:04 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 05:04:08 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1028194 ] Feature request: Training on root folders Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1028194, was opened at 2004-09-15 09:00 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1028194&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook >Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Training on root folders Initial Comment: SpamBayes should support training on root folders. This is especially useful when you have PSTs consisting only of ham (or spam for that sake) with lots of folders on the root level. (Friends.pst, Colleagues.pst, Spam.pst) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Date: 2004-10-12 20:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=738321 Hehe... ok... The problem is that with my setup, SpamBayes gets pretty biased training, because a lot of my "good" mail is moved to different folders in Outlook before SpamBayes gets to them. What I'm trying to achieve is to tell SpamBayes that those mails are "good", keeping Spambayes from guessing. ..and that raises another question... I have not looked at the source, but would it be easy to invoke SpamBayes from another Outlook plugin? eg: sbObj.FilterMailItem(myMailItem)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-12 13:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ack. Sorry, there's a missing "against" in my second comment. It should read: 2. We recommend AGAINST training in bulk, so this should almost never be necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Date: 2004-10-11 20:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=738321 1: Yes.. For instance i have a .PST-file with friends and acquaintances containing about 400 sub folders at root level. Of course one could go crazy with the keypad arrows and space, but I'd rather just check the root folder. 2: Training in bulk for me means training on five to ten different PST files ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Two things: 1. Is it really that hard to just tick the boxes? 2. We recommend training in bulk, so this should almost never be necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1028194&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 05:04:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 05:04:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1028198 ] Feature request: Classify as ham Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1028198, was opened at 2004-09-15 09:02 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1028198&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook >Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Classify as ham Initial Comment: When a mail is classified as "not spam", there should be a function to reclassify it as ham (set spam score to 0% and include words in "good words"-list) Now you have to first delete the mail as spam, then recover it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1028198&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 05:04:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 05:04:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1032383 ] Feature Request: Extend maximum wait time for filter timer Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1032383, was opened at 2004-09-22 18:41 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1032383&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook >Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature Request: Extend maximum wait time for filter timer Initial Comment: Today the maximum filter processing start delay is ten seconds. This is too short. I want to be able to increase it to 30 or 60 seconds. It is ok for me that the slider goes from 0 to 10 seconds, but SpamBayes should accept higher values. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1032383&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 05:07:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 05:07:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1032744 ] Outlook 2003: does not "mark as read" in folder list Message-ID: Bugs item #1032744, was opened at 2004-09-23 03:43 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032744&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ducem Barr (ducembarr) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003: does not "mark as read" in folder list Initial Comment: I recently switched to Outlook 2003 SP1 and re-run the SpamBayes configuration wizard. Everything works fine, but I noticed that Spambayes has stopped marking spam messages as read, although the option is set. To be more specific: messages are marked as not read in the folder list (i.e. folder name is set bold and number of unread mails is shown), but the message appears as read inside of the folder. This applies to messages filtered automatically in the Inbox. On the other hand, "Junk suspects" stay unread on both accounts even when classified manually as spam via "Delete as Spam". I searched the help files, FAQs and bug messages and have found nothing so far. Has anyone got a solution for this weird behavior ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 16:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This sounds like something Outlook is doing, rather than SpamBayes. Essentially the problem is that the message is marked as read, but the folder list isn't updated, right? (To mark as read with the "Delete as Spam" button, you have to turn a separate option on, in the Training tab of the SpamBayes Manager). Do you ever see the folder list lagging behind when you manually mark messages as read? Is this a local pst, IMAP server, Exchange, hotmail...? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032744&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 05:07:29 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 05:07:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1036970 ] Allow Outlook plugin to move ham to a designated folder Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1036970, was opened at 2004-09-30 00:30 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1036970&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook >Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jesse Pelton (jessepelton) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Allow Outlook plugin to move ham to a designated folder Initial Comment: It would be nice to be able to move ham messages from wherever SpamBayes finds them to a user-specified folder. There are at least two scenarios where this would be useful: - When Exchange is configured to filter messages, it puts what it considers to be certain/possible junk in Junk/Junk candidates folders. Since its filtering isn't as good as SpamBayes (when well-trained), it's helpful to have SpamBayes filter the Junk folders and put real spam elsewhere. Without the ability to move ham, though, any ham remains in the Junk folders. - Guaranteeing the order of processing of Outlook rules and SpamBayes filtering. See http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2004-September/014781.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1036970&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 05:10:04 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 05:10:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1043358 ] OL 2K internal filters stop working Message-ID: Bugs item #1043358, was opened at 2004-10-09 10:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1043358&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: superba (superba) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: OL 2K internal filters stop working Initial Comment: Hi, It's OL 2K with SR3, latest version of SB, Win XP Pro w/SP2+. After loading the released version 1.0 of SB, some if not all of my internal filters stopped working and I could find no way to reactivate them. I use them to file email into different folders based on their subject/and or origin. I searched for a reported bug but found none. BTW, OL 2K remains open sometimes with and without SB installed. Any ideas? Cheers! Jim Jordan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 16:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes doesn't interact with the Outlook rules at all, so it's unlikely that SpamBayes is doing this. If you uninstall SpamBayes, does the problem go away (when you reinstall you won't have lost any configuration/training data). If you go into the Outlook Rules Wizard, are the rules still enabled there? What do you mean by "remains open"? After you quit it, you can still see it in the Task Manager, you mean? This is reasonably common for Outlook, with or without SpamBayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1043358&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 05:22:03 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 05:22:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1031959 ] Silent mode Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1031959, was opened at 2004-09-22 03:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1031959&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Soulin (soulin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Silent mode Initial Comment: I think ability to create unattended/silent installation could be really great. Define what you want install (Outlook plugin only), where you want to install it, what will be the names of Spam and Suspected spam mail directories etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 16:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You could do some of this yourself. If you install it once, you'll have the necessary files, which you can copy to the appropriate place with a script. To register the addin, you can get the script to run the outlook_addin_register.exe file, which will do the registration. That should be all you need to do the install. Configuring SpamBayes is a bit trickier. You can easily manually create the configuration file (the *.ini file in the data directory), and it's easy to enter in any of the options except for folders. Folders are difficult because they are not specified by name, but by Outlook's store & entry ids (open up a *.ini file and take a look). Given that you'd have to specify these anyway, I'm not sure what the benefit of doing this outside of the Wizard would be. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1031959&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 05:25:38 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 05:25:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1028194 ] Feature request: Training on root folders Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1028194, was opened at 2004-09-15 09:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1028194&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Training on root folders Initial Comment: SpamBayes should support training on root folders. This is especially useful when you have PSTs consisting only of ham (or spam for that sake) with lots of folders on the root level. (Friends.pst, Colleagues.pst, Spam.pst) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 16:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If SpamBayes doesn't get to them, then you don't need to be training them. You should only train on mail that's like the stuff you're going to classify. At the moment, do you get false positives (i.e. good mail classified as bad), many false negatives (bad mail classified as good), or more than about 3% of your mail classified as unsure? I don't know about invoking SpamBayes from another plug-in. It gets registered as a COM client, so I guess that it's possible, but I have no idea how easy it would be. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Date: 2004-10-12 20:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=738321 Hehe... ok... The problem is that with my setup, SpamBayes gets pretty biased training, because a lot of my "good" mail is moved to different folders in Outlook before SpamBayes gets to them. What I'm trying to achieve is to tell SpamBayes that those mails are "good", keeping Spambayes from guessing. ..and that raises another question... I have not looked at the source, but would it be easy to invoke SpamBayes from another Outlook plugin? eg: sbObj.FilterMailItem(myMailItem)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-12 13:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Ack. Sorry, there's a missing "against" in my second comment. It should read: 2. We recommend AGAINST training in bulk, so this should almost never be necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Date: 2004-10-11 20:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=738321 1: Yes.. For instance i have a .PST-file with friends and acquaintances containing about 400 sub folders at root level. Of course one could go crazy with the keypad arrows and space, but I'd rather just check the root folder. 2: Training in bulk for me means training on five to ten different PST files ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Two things: 1. Is it really that hard to just tick the boxes? 2. We recommend training in bulk, so this should almost never be necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1028194&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 06:51:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 06:51:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-977928 ] Installer should detect non-admin install for Outlook Message-ID: Bugs item #977928, was opened at 2004-06-23 13:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=977928&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael (madkayaker) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Installer should detect non-admin install for Outlook Initial Comment: I can't get Spam Bayes to show in the COM ad-ins section, even though i reinstalled it again. I am running windows XP, with Outlook from Office XP. here is the log file also. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 17:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I presume that this worked, since there was no further comment. Please re-open if I'm wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael (madkayaker) Date: 2004-06-29 11:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1068932 ok can do. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-06-25 04:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It looks like you are trying to install SpamBayes from a non- administrator account that does not have access rights to modify the registry. Try installing the software from the Administrator account. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=977928&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 11:41:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 11:43:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1045098 ] Unable to filter multiple mailboxes in Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1045098, was opened at 2004-10-12 02:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ultgha5qndvhpzj You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1045098&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to filter multiple mailboxes in Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: I have been enjoying the benefits of SpamBayes since version Outlook-002 to monitor multiple Exchange Mailbox folders using Outlook 2002 on XP Pro. I have found it to be better than competing, often commercial, products and it saves me much time. In my configuration, starting Outlook opens the primary Exchange mailbox which in turn opens several other Exchange Mailboxes and SpamBayes monitors all the Inboxes of all accounts simultaneously. I have never had any issues (other than performance, and the occasional disappearing toolbar) with this setup in my 16 months of using the product. I just upgraded to Outlook 2003 and now the Filtering has stopped for all of the folders except the InBox of the primary email account. Here's what I see: 1. Under SpamBayes Manager's Filtering Tab, the three folders I want to monitor are correctly displayed under "Filter the following folders as messages arrive". 2. Clicking "Browse" displays the "Select folder(s)" window with "Public Folders", "Mailbox - PrimaryUser", "Mailbox - User2", "Mailbox - User3", etc. 3. Mailbox - Primary User is expanded with the "Inbox" checked. Nothing else is checked and the bottom of the window now says "Selected 1 folder" and displays "Inbox". It used to say "Selected 3 folders". 4. When I click the "+" to expand "Mailbox - User2" or "Mailbox - User3", nothing happens. So I am unable to re-select the User2-Inbox or the User3-Inbox. 5. I can try to place a check in the un-expanded box to the left of "Mailbox - User2" but this just leads to the "Please select a child folder - top-level folders cannot be used" message. Any assistance is appreciated. And thank you for an extremely useful product. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Date: 2004-10-13 04:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1137526 As requested, spambayes1.log is attached. This is a clean load where there was no mail to process. Outlook was started, actions #1 thru #4 were performed, and Outlook was closed. For security purposes, the actual user/mailbox names were changed in the log but all else is intact. The problem appears to be the recurring message: ** Unable to open child folder - ignoring MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040107 (MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID): OLE error 0x80040107 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-12 18:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem is in step 4, but to figure out exactly what is going wrong, we need to see your log file. Could you please try this again (to generate the log entries) and then attach your most recent log file to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the logs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1045098&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 11:49:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 11:49:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1045098 ] Unable to filter multiple mailboxes in Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1045098, was opened at 2004-10-12 02:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ultgha5qndvhpzj You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1045098&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to filter multiple mailboxes in Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: I have been enjoying the benefits of SpamBayes since version Outlook-002 to monitor multiple Exchange Mailbox folders using Outlook 2002 on XP Pro. I have found it to be better than competing, often commercial, products and it saves me much time. In my configuration, starting Outlook opens the primary Exchange mailbox which in turn opens several other Exchange Mailboxes and SpamBayes monitors all the Inboxes of all accounts simultaneously. I have never had any issues (other than performance, and the occasional disappearing toolbar) with this setup in my 16 months of using the product. I just upgraded to Outlook 2003 and now the Filtering has stopped for all of the folders except the InBox of the primary email account. Here's what I see: 1. Under SpamBayes Manager's Filtering Tab, the three folders I want to monitor are correctly displayed under "Filter the following folders as messages arrive". 2. Clicking "Browse" displays the "Select folder(s)" window with "Public Folders", "Mailbox - PrimaryUser", "Mailbox - User2", "Mailbox - User3", etc. 3. Mailbox - Primary User is expanded with the "Inbox" checked. Nothing else is checked and the bottom of the window now says "Selected 1 folder" and displays "Inbox". It used to say "Selected 3 folders". 4. When I click the "+" to expand "Mailbox - User2" or "Mailbox - User3", nothing happens. So I am unable to re-select the User2-Inbox or the User3-Inbox. 5. I can try to place a check in the un-expanded box to the left of "Mailbox - User2" but this just leads to the "Please select a child folder - top-level folders cannot be used" message. Any assistance is appreciated. And thank you for an extremely useful product. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Date: 2004-10-13 04:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1137526 My problem looks like a recurrence of Bug 844824. But my system was working properly with Spambayes Binary 1.0/Outlook 2002/WinXP before I upgraded to Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Date: 2004-10-13 04:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1137526 As requested, spambayes1.log is attached. This is a clean load where there was no mail to process. Outlook was started, actions #1 thru #4 were performed, and Outlook was closed. For security purposes, the actual user/mailbox names were changed in the log but all else is intact. The problem appears to be the recurring message: ** Unable to open child folder - ignoring MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040107 (MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID): OLE error 0x80040107 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-12 18:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem is in step 4, but to figure out exactly what is going wrong, we need to see your log file. Could you please try this again (to generate the log entries) and then attach your most recent log file to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the logs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1045098&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 13 23:16:45 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 13 23:16:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1023797 ] Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Message-ID: Bugs item #1023797, was opened at 2004-09-07 11:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jmgilligan You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023797&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 2 Submitted By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Initial Comment: sb_imapfilter.py fails intermittently, but frequently, with the error: __main__.BadIMAPResponseError: The command 'Cannot find saved message' failed to give an OK response. Rerunning the filter produces this error, but different amounts of processing occur before I get the error. For what it's worth, my email client (mulberry) reports that it frequently spends as much as 90 seconds waiting for a response from the server, so perhaps this is a timeout problem. I'm running the latest spambayes checked out from CVS using python 2.3.4 under Windows 2000 (Python 2.3.4 (#53, Aug 23 2004, 16:24:32) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32). The server welcome is: '* OK imap1 Cyrus IMAP4 v2.0.16 server ready' The server capabilties is: ('IMAP4', 'IMAP4REV1', 'ACL', 'QUOTA', 'LITERAL+', 'NA MESPACE', 'UIDPLUS', 'ID', 'NO_ATOMIC_RENAME', 'UNSELECT', 'MULTIAPPEND', 'S ORT', 'THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT', 'THREAD=REFERENCES', 'IDLE', 'STARTTLS', 'AUTH=PL AIN', 'X-NETSCAPE') Attached is the output from sb_imapfilter -v -t -c -i 4 where the exception occurs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Date: 2004-10-13 16:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11595 I have been testing this for over a week with very few problems. I have gone from several failures per hour to less than one failure per day on average. sjoerd's fix (rev. 1.40) seems to have made a lot of difference. Things are currently stable enough for me to be happy downgrading the severity of the bug. It's not quite perfectly fixed, but it's good enough for me to use regularly on my production system. I'll leave it up to Tony to decide whether this is sufficient to declare the bug closed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Date: 2004-10-04 16:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11595 Revision 1.40 (by sjoerd) to manage illegal values in the Message-Id, seems to fix this. I am currently testing and will report back on whether this really solves the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Date: 2004-09-30 10:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11595 I have increased the range in line 548 to 10000 or even 100000, and it doesn't solve the problem. I even inserted an increasing time.sleep(): for i in xrange(11): .... time.sleep(1 << i) and I still get crashes, so just increasing the number of noops or waiting longer doesn't seem to solve the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-29 22:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (Apologies for not getting to this yesterday) Could you try making a change to your copy of sb_imapfitler.py for me? Line 548 is " for i in xrange(100):". Could you try increasing the 100 to 10000 and seeing if that solves the problem? (It may run for a long time before it finally quits, if it doesn't fix it - but it's just no-op'ing, so it doesn't hurt). I suspect it is related to a timeout sort of problem - maybe the server is slow and so it's taking a long time to register that the new message is there. I guessed that 100 no-ops would be enough, but perhaps it isn't. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-27 02:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Apologies for the delay in getting to this (I've been overseas). This code is quite significantly changed (for the better, in theory) than the 1.0 sb_imapfilter, so hasn't been as widely tested. Your server isn't giving up the EXISTS response that's expected or in the expected way, so something's falling apart. I'll try and find time to have a proper look at this tomorrow. Note that you ought to be able to fall back to the 1.0 imapfilter if necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023797&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 14 08:47:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 14 08:48:03 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1031959 ] Silent mode Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1031959, was opened at 2004-09-21 15:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by soulin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1031959&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Soulin (soulin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Silent mode Initial Comment: I think ability to create unattended/silent installation could be really great. Define what you want install (Outlook plugin only), where you want to install it, what will be the names of Spam and Suspected spam mail directories etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-10-14 06:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 Hi anadelonbrin! The main point is to make SpamBayes useful for organizations. With need of manual install it is almost useless for mass deployment :( I will try to create .msi file if U dont mind ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 03:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You could do some of this yourself. If you install it once, you'll have the necessary files, which you can copy to the appropriate place with a script. To register the addin, you can get the script to run the outlook_addin_register.exe file, which will do the registration. That should be all you need to do the install. Configuring SpamBayes is a bit trickier. You can easily manually create the configuration file (the *.ini file in the data directory), and it's easy to enter in any of the options except for folders. Folders are difficult because they are not specified by name, but by Outlook's store & entry ids (open up a *.ini file and take a look). Given that you'd have to specify these anyway, I'm not sure what the benefit of doing this outside of the Wizard would be. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1031959&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 14 09:04:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 14 09:04:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1031959 ] Silent mode Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1031959, was opened at 2004-09-22 03:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1031959&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Soulin (soulin) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Silent mode Initial Comment: I think ability to create unattended/silent installation could be really great. Define what you want install (Outlook plugin only), where you want to install it, what will be the names of Spam and Suspected spam mail directories etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-14 20:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You're most welcome to do so, of course! If you're willing to, then submitting any created script back to the project as a patch would be gratefully received. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-10-14 19:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 Hi anadelonbrin! The main point is to make SpamBayes useful for organizations. With need of manual install it is almost useless for mass deployment :( I will try to create .msi file if U dont mind ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 16:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You could do some of this yourself. If you install it once, you'll have the necessary files, which you can copy to the appropriate place with a script. To register the addin, you can get the script to run the outlook_addin_register.exe file, which will do the registration. That should be all you need to do the install. Configuring SpamBayes is a bit trickier. You can easily manually create the configuration file (the *.ini file in the data directory), and it's easy to enter in any of the options except for folders. Folders are difficult because they are not specified by name, but by Outlook's store & entry ids (open up a *.ini file and take a look). Given that you'd have to specify these anyway, I'm not sure what the benefit of doing this outside of the Wizard would be. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1031959&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 14 09:08:52 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 14 09:09:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-986079 ] Multilanguage Message-ID: Feature Requests item #986079, was opened at 2004-07-06 16:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by soulin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: seppli (seppli) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multilanguage Initial Comment: what do you think about a multilingual-programming- interface to easy translate the Strings in spam-bayes ? - For example a single file which holds all user-dialog- strings? Translating such a file in german could be my tribute spam-bayes - my favorite spamfilter. And could anybody tell my why the Outlook after 0.81 downloads first all mail bofore classifying them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-10-14 07:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 So whats the situation now? I wanted to use SpamBayes as 2nd level antispam protection in my company, but people here dont speak english :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-01 12:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Ok, then. I'm on. Let's go for it. I've already subscribe to spambayes-dev list so expect an introductory message from myself any time soon. The only thing I don't like too much is the word "champion". That implies too much credit to me beforehand when I haven't seen a single line of Spambayes' code. ;-) See you in the dev list. -Hernan. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-30 23:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No, there are no time requirements other than the ones you impose on yourself. You won't need any stats knowledge for this sort of work. I'm happy to subchampion this (helping out wherever necessary), but I can't really help in any actual translating (apart from Maori, or maybe a little bit of German) and I haven't done any work like this before, which would help. I am very familiar with SpamBayes itself, though. Probably the best move would be for someone to post a list of "things to do" to spambayes-dev and ask for volunteers/help. Creating that "things to do" list would be the first step :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-16 15:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I know Python, that's no problem for me. Unless the dev group impose high requirements on time and Bayesian stats knowledge I can volunteer for that work. I'll feel more confident if a subchampion, or is it vicechampion? ;-), volunteers too. I don't have any problem to take the second place either instead. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-09-16 09:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 I am willing to translate to Czech and Slovak. Maybe I could be that person to organize, but what do U understand under that term? I am not working in Python, only in vbscript, so if it includes programming abilities, we need to find out someone else. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 03:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dup in: [ 958015 ] German language ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 03:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes-dev would be the best place. It really just needs a champion at the moment - someone who is willing to organise the work getting done for one language, and then the rest should be reasonably simple. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-08 15:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I volunteer for a spanish translation version. My main target is the Outlook plugin. Where should the discussion take place? In the spambayes- dev mailing list? A wiki? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seppli (seppli) Date: 2004-07-12 17:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078049 Mmh - OK i like SpamBayes and i dont know how to live in this WORLD OF SPAM without it - but i think that i am not that "super-spiderman-mega-champion" - My english is not so Oxford-likely and i thougt that phyton is some kind of a snake... Just have a look on the translation-interface of an other sf- project - for example pdfcreator (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/) IMHO SpamBayes 0.81 downloads ONE single message and classifies that before downloading the next message - my 1.0rc2 now downloads ALL mails and classifies them after - some times it seams that SpamBayes forget to classifies some mails - that never happen with the version 0.81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 07:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are some people who are interested in doing the translation, and the developers are certainly willing to help out as much as possible. Hopefully work will start on this post-1.0 (soonish). What it really needs at the moment is a 'champion' - someone who will do the work of organising everyone involved, and making sure that things happen. Most of us are pretty busy at the moment. As for the question - how else can SpamBayes do the classification? It needs to 'read' the mail to be able to see whether it's good or bad, and in order to 'read' it, it needs to download it first. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 14 09:24:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 14 09:24:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-986079 ] Multilanguage Message-ID: Feature Requests item #986079, was opened at 2004-07-07 04:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: seppli (seppli) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multilanguage Initial Comment: what do you think about a multilingual-programming- interface to easy translate the Strings in spam-bayes ? - For example a single file which holds all user-dialog- strings? Translating such a file in german could be my tribute spam-bayes - my favorite spamfilter. And could anybody tell my why the Outlook after 0.81 downloads first all mail bofore classifying them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-14 20:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Work is beginning right now for this. See the recent discussion on spambayes-dev for more information. http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-dev ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-10-14 20:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 So whats the situation now? I wanted to use SpamBayes as 2nd level antispam protection in my company, but people here dont speak english :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-02 00:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Ok, then. I'm on. Let's go for it. I've already subscribe to spambayes-dev list so expect an introductory message from myself any time soon. The only thing I don't like too much is the word "champion". That implies too much credit to me beforehand when I haven't seen a single line of Spambayes' code. ;-) See you in the dev list. -Hernan. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-01 11:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No, there are no time requirements other than the ones you impose on yourself. You won't need any stats knowledge for this sort of work. I'm happy to subchampion this (helping out wherever necessary), but I can't really help in any actual translating (apart from Maori, or maybe a little bit of German) and I haven't done any work like this before, which would help. I am very familiar with SpamBayes itself, though. Probably the best move would be for someone to post a list of "things to do" to spambayes-dev and ask for volunteers/help. Creating that "things to do" list would be the first step :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-17 03:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I know Python, that's no problem for me. Unless the dev group impose high requirements on time and Bayesian stats knowledge I can volunteer for that work. I'll feel more confident if a subchampion, or is it vicechampion? ;-), volunteers too. I don't have any problem to take the second place either instead. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Soulin (soulin) Date: 2004-09-16 21:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1121435 I am willing to translate to Czech and Slovak. Maybe I could be that person to organize, but what do U understand under that term? I am not working in Python, only in vbscript, so if it includes programming abilities, we need to find out someone else. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dup in: [ 958015 ] German language ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes-dev would be the best place. It really just needs a champion at the moment - someone who is willing to organise the work getting done for one language, and then the rest should be reasonably simple. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-09-09 03:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 I volunteer for a spanish translation version. My main target is the Outlook plugin. Where should the discussion take place? In the spambayes- dev mailing list? A wiki? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: seppli (seppli) Date: 2004-07-13 05:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078049 Mmh - OK i like SpamBayes and i dont know how to live in this WORLD OF SPAM without it - but i think that i am not that "super-spiderman-mega-champion" - My english is not so Oxford-likely and i thougt that phyton is some kind of a snake... Just have a look on the translation-interface of an other sf- project - for example pdfcreator (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/) IMHO SpamBayes 0.81 downloads ONE single message and classifies that before downloading the next message - my 1.0rc2 now downloads ALL mails and classifies them after - some times it seams that SpamBayes forget to classifies some mails - that never happen with the version 0.81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 19:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are some people who are interested in doing the translation, and the developers are certainly willing to help out as much as possible. Hopefully work will start on this post-1.0 (soonish). What it really needs at the moment is a 'champion' - someone who will do the work of organising everyone involved, and making sure that things happen. Most of us are pretty busy at the moment. As for the question - how else can SpamBayes do the classification? It needs to 'read' the mail to be able to see whether it's good or bad, and in order to 'read' it, it needs to download it first. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 15 00:52:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 15 00:52:16 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-711845 ] mboxtrain.py in mh mode: trivial fix Message-ID: Patches item #711845, was opened at 2003-03-29 11:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jay_berkenbilt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=711845&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jay Berkenbilt (jay_berkenbilt) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: mboxtrain.py in mh mode: trivial fix Initial Comment: This patch relative to mboxtrain.py in the 2003-01-17 snapshot fixes two trivial problems in mhdir_train: files are overwritten needlessly, and the count of trained messages is not properly updated. I just took the logic from the maildir_train function and duplicated it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jay Berkenbilt (jay_berkenbilt) Date: 2004-10-14 18:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=523210 Thanks for responding to this. I am no longer using spambayes (I've been using bayesian filtering in spamassassin instead) so I won't be retesting this. I'm just mentioning that in case anyone else is following progress on this bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-12 22:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 At some point since this the count has been corrected. I'm not sure whether the other change is correct or not. It means that if the include_trained header option is True the message won't be in the new version of the mbox (i.e. it will vanish). This doesn't seem like the desired behaviour. If I'm wrong, please re-open. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jay Berkenbilt (jay_berkenbilt) Date: 2003-04-12 12:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=523210 I'm attaching a new patch relative to the current CVS. Sorry for not doing that to begin with. The only difference actually between this patch and the previous one is the line numbers. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=711845&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 15 01:47:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 15 01:47:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-765924 ] Spam / ham statistics Message-ID: Feature Requests item #765924, was opened at 2003-07-05 00:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=765924&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Aycox (mbip) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spam / ham statistics Initial Comment: Possibility to get statistics on how many mails were received per hour / day and how many of these were spam messages. It would be great if it could be presented both as numbers and graphically (impresses CEO's...). The means to print it as a hard copy would be just swell... ;o) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-15 12:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As an update: I've checked in a change to CVS that makes the Outlook plug-in's statistics persistent across sessions, so it's now basically the same as sb_server/sb_imapfilter's stats. Graphics or more stats will have to wait for another day... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Josh Wand (joshwa) Date: 2004-06-27 12:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=7937 Have a look at the popfile statistics page for good ideas on how to present spam statistics. Totals and percentages for spam, non-spam, false-pos, false-neg, and summary and detail statistics on the corpus itself (which words are likliest to be in spam, ham, etc). Lovely html graphics, too. I'd love to see these features in spambayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Murilo Pinto (mulpinsf) Date: 2004-05-28 01:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=378491 I'd like to have a tiny button in the Outlook toolbar showing how many spams(red)/ham(blue) SB processed in that session. Hovering the mouse at it would give % in the "pop- up" comment. If clicked, it could open a "page" with more detailed stats, as per hour/day/month/hour of the day/day of the week/accounts/year. Outstanding antispam, btw. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-13 20:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 915260 ] Statistics ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-21 03:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The latest CVS plugin actually does include false positives and negatives in the statistics. The definition is this. If a message was classified as Ham and then reclassified by the user as Spam, it is a false negative. If a message was classified as Spam and then reclassified by the user as Ham, it is a false positive. A message that was originally classified as Unsure is never considered a false positive or negative. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 22:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 Quick note on the "impossibility" of tracking false pos/neg. Actually, since an incorrectly classified message already has a header inserted, then you would only flag a "false" if that header existed and was changed. This means you'd have to check for the existence of the header before you processed the Delete/Recover buttons, but it can be done. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-30 16:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that the plug-in has basic stats information (cvs version) now, although it's still only on a per session basis (this will no doubt improve at some point). The web interface (for non-plugin users) also now (cvs head) has basic stats, which are persisted between sessions. Any opinions on which statistics would be best to add? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-11 16:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's not exactly what you have asked for, but as a start, are you aware that in the logs, each time you shut Outlook down it prints a message like: "SpamBayes processed 555 messages, finding 34 spam and 11 unsure" (So you could shut Outlook down each hour/day, to generate this message). It's unlikely that a graphical version would ever be made, but it would be easy enough to throw numbers like this into Excel and get pretty graphs. The number of false positives/negatives is more difficult because SpamBayes doesn't really have any way to know that mail is a fp/fn. It could print the number of times the "delete as spam" and "recover from spam" buttons are used, I guess, but this would include all unsure mail, which aren't exactly fp/fn's. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Jeays (dze27) Date: 2003-07-11 16:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=302748 I'm just another user but I think this would be a great addition. I'd also be interested in: number of false positives (along with percentage of total), number of false negatives (along with percentage of total) and percentage of mail received that is spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=765924&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 15 10:54:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 15 10:54:26 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1032744 ] Outlook 2003: does not "mark as read" in folder list Message-ID: Bugs item #1032744, was opened at 2004-09-22 15:43 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ducembarr You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032744&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ducem Barr (ducembarr) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2003: does not "mark as read" in folder list Initial Comment: I recently switched to Outlook 2003 SP1 and re-run the SpamBayes configuration wizard. Everything works fine, but I noticed that Spambayes has stopped marking spam messages as read, although the option is set. To be more specific: messages are marked as not read in the folder list (i.e. folder name is set bold and number of unread mails is shown), but the message appears as read inside of the folder. This applies to messages filtered automatically in the Inbox. On the other hand, "Junk suspects" stay unread on both accounts even when classified manually as spam via "Delete as Spam". I searched the help files, FAQs and bug messages and have found nothing so far. Has anyone got a solution for this weird behavior ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Ducem Barr (ducembarr) Date: 2004-10-15 08:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=880328 Thanks, anadelonbrin, for the enquiry. No, the Outlook folder list does not lag behind in anything else but SpamBayes. And yes, it is a local pst, pulling emails from a pop3 server. Background filtering is on (2 & 1 secs), only for folders that receive new mail. Spambayes has produced zero error messages. I use 1.0 rc2. Any ideas what causes the bug ? Ducem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 03:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This sounds like something Outlook is doing, rather than SpamBayes. Essentially the problem is that the message is marked as read, but the folder list isn't updated, right? (To mark as read with the "Delete as Spam" button, you have to turn a separate option on, in the Training tab of the SpamBayes Manager). Do you ever see the folder list lagging behind when you manually mark messages as read? Is this a local pst, IMAP server, Exchange, hotmail...? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1032744&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 20 23:49:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 20 23:49:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1051081 ] uncaught socket timeout exception slurping URLs Message-ID: Bugs item #1051081, was opened at 2004-10-20 16:49 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1051081&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: uncaught socket timeout exception slurping URLs Initial Comment: I occasionally get the following failure when spambayes tries to slurp an URL while classifying and the URL times out. It would be better to catch the exception and fail gracefully to slurp the URL rather than bailing out of the whole script. Slurping bestsellingreplicas.info Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1020, in ? run() File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1010, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 879, in Filter self.unsure_folder, self.ham_folder) File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 767, in Filter evidence=True) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 246, in slu rping_spamprob slurp_tokens = list(self._generate_slurp()) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 559, in _ge nerate_slurp tokens = self.slurp(*slurp_wordstream) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 725, in slu rp page = f.read() File "C:\Python23\lib\socket.py", line 283, in read data = self._sock.recv(recv_size) socket.timeout: timed out Running CVS version under python 2.3.4 (#53) under Win2K. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1051081&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 21 00:10:29 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 21 00:10:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1051081 ] uncaught socket timeout exception slurping URLs Message-ID: Bugs item #1051081, was opened at 2004-10-21 10:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1051081&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: uncaught socket timeout exception slurping URLs Initial Comment: I occasionally get the following failure when spambayes tries to slurp an URL while classifying and the URL times out. It would be better to catch the exception and fail gracefully to slurp the URL rather than bailing out of the whole script. Slurping bestsellingreplicas.info Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1020, in ? run() File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1010, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 879, in Filter self.unsure_folder, self.ham_folder) File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 767, in Filter evidence=True) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 246, in slu rping_spamprob slurp_tokens = list(self._generate_slurp()) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 559, in _ge nerate_slurp tokens = self.slurp(*slurp_wordstream) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 725, in slu rp page = f.read() File "C:\Python23\lib\socket.py", line 283, in read data = self._sock.recv(recv_size) socket.timeout: timed out Running CVS version under python 2.3.4 (#53) under Win2K. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-21 11:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This should be fixed in classifier.py 1.27. If you could CVS up once anon-CVS catches up and try it out, that would be great. BTW, do you find that the slurping helps? It's still an experimental option for a number of reasons, but one of those is that we don't really know whether it really helps anyone. Feedback would be great! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1051081&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 22 15:10:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 22 15:10:27 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1052180 ] Message not classified as SPAM Message-ID: Bugs item #1052180, was opened at 2004-10-22 08:10 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1052180&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: MCCOMM (mccomm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Message not classified as SPAM Initial Comment: Although I've only been using the product for 2 days, I feel that the message I had to train this morning is blatant SPAM. So far the filter has tagged 4 messages as SPAM or unsure. 3 of them I'd consider false positives. So along with this false negative the filter is batting .200. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1052180&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 22 15:14:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 22 15:14:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1052183 ] spambayes on terminal server Message-ID: Support Requests item #1052183, was opened at 2004-10-22 15:14 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1052183&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martijn Saly (thany) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spambayes on terminal server Initial Comment: We have got a terminal server (Windows 2003) with Outlook 2003 for each user. Is it possible to install spambayes on such a server safely, and perhaps install it for every user at once? Also, would it possible to put in some default configuration for all users in one go? I ask this, because it would be a pain to login as each and every user manually and install spambayes. Not to mention the fact that such a user needs permissions on the server to install software... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1052183&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Oct 23 18:44:38 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Oct 23 18:44:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1052816 ] I18N Message-ID: Patches item #1052816, was opened at 2004-10-23 18:44 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: I18N Initial Comment: Here goes my first patches for the Outlook addin I18N. The patches in Outlook2000\dialogs\resources change the parser to output gettexted captions and labels. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Oct 23 18:58:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Oct 23 18:58:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1052816 ] I18N Message-ID: Patches item #1052816, was opened at 2004-10-23 18:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hfoffani You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: I18N Initial Comment: Here goes my first patches for the Outlook addin I18N. The patches in Outlook2000\dialogs\resources change the parser to output gettexted captions and labels. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-23 18:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 The patch for Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py lets SB import a foreign language i18n_dialogs.py file. To better distinguish with the default dialogs.py in the official distribution, the new transalated dialogs will be prefixed by "i18n_". __init__.py assumes that SB already has a modified sys.path that points to the correct language resources. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Oct 23 19:20:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Oct 23 19:20:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1052816 ] I18N Message-ID: Patches item #1052816, was opened at 2004-10-23 18:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hfoffani You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: I18N Initial Comment: Here goes my first patches for the Outlook addin I18N. The patches in Outlook2000\dialogs\resources change the parser to output gettexted captions and labels. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-23 19:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 i18n.py contains the class that I use to initialize the internationalization environment. That is: gettext and sys.path. i18n.py should be in the Outlook2000 directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-23 18:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 The patch for Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py lets SB import a foreign language i18n_dialogs.py file. To better distinguish with the default dialogs.py in the official distribution, the new transalated dialogs will be prefixed by "i18n_". __init__.py assumes that SB already has a modified sys.path that points to the correct language resources. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Oct 23 19:26:34 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Oct 23 19:26:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1052816 ] I18N Message-ID: Patches item #1052816, was opened at 2004-10-23 18:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hfoffani You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: I18N Initial Comment: Here goes my first patches for the Outlook addin I18N. The patches in Outlook2000\dialogs\resources change the parser to output gettexted captions and labels. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-23 19:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Outlook2000.txt patch file modifies config.py to add a "language" user var and modifies manager.py adding calls to the LanguageManager class. The first calls set the language to the default system one. The second call set the language to the one that is configured in the SB config file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-23 19:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 i18n.py contains the class that I use to initialize the internationalization environment. That is: gettext and sys.path. i18n.py should be in the Outlook2000 directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-23 18:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 The patch for Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py lets SB import a foreign language i18n_dialogs.py file. To better distinguish with the default dialogs.py in the official distribution, the new transalated dialogs will be prefixed by "i18n_". __init__.py assumes that SB already has a modified sys.path that points to the correct language resources. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Oct 24 17:06:27 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Oct 24 17:06:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1053223 ] Blackberry faster than SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #1053223, was opened at 2004-10-24 08:06 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1053223&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Blackberry faster than SpamBayes Initial Comment: I've been running SpamBayes for over a year on Outlook (now XP SP3). I've also had a BlackBerry for three years (have had a 7780 since the summer). Over time, I've noticed ever more Spam hitting my BlackBerry, even though when I get home and check my Outlook Inbox it is not there, but (correctly) in the Spam folder. And recently I've noticed that when I select an email in the "maybe SPAM" folder and click the "Delete as Spam" button, it takes several seconds to move it to the SPAM folder. So I'm guessing SpamBayes has a linear (or worse than linear) time algorithm for updating the spam database. SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0 (July 2004) reports that this training database status: Database has 30326 good and 16916 spam. I assume one solution is for me to delete the databases and retrain. Have you also considered some kind of automatic pruning to keep the databases manageable? Here are the SB DB file sizes: 1,316 default_bayes_customize.ini 42,049,536 default_bayes_database.db 2,506,752 default_message_database.db 3,521 MS Exchange Settings.ini Of course the other possibility is to modify your DB algorithms so their running time is O(LogN) or faster... Thank you! --Ben Slivka ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1053223&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 25 13:25:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 25 13:26:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1053658 ] OLE Errors with Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1053658, was opened at 2004-10-25 11:25 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1053658&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mario Menti (mmenti) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: OLE Errors with Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: I can't seem to get Spambayes to work with Outlook 2003. It installs OK and looks like it works, but does no filtering. Also, trying to train it on the Inbox doesn't work, it stops without displaying an error message after a second or two. Looking at the logs, there are lots of OLE errors. Logfile is attached. Any pointers appreciated.. (have un- and reinstalled both Outlook and SpamBayes without success). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1053658&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 25 18:26:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 25 18:26:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1051081 ] uncaught socket timeout exception slurping URLs Message-ID: Bugs item #1051081, was opened at 2004-10-20 16:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jmgilligan You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1051081&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code - CVS Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: uncaught socket timeout exception slurping URLs Initial Comment: I occasionally get the following failure when spambayes tries to slurp an URL while classifying and the URL times out. It would be better to catch the exception and fail gracefully to slurp the URL rather than bailing out of the whole script. Slurping bestsellingreplicas.info Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1020, in ? run() File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1010, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 879, in Filter self.unsure_folder, self.ham_folder) File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 767, in Filter evidence=True) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 246, in slu rping_spamprob slurp_tokens = list(self._generate_slurp()) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 559, in _ge nerate_slurp tokens = self.slurp(*slurp_wordstream) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 725, in slu rp page = f.read() File "C:\Python23\lib\socket.py", line 283, in read data = self._sock.recv(recv_size) socket.timeout: timed out Running CVS version under python 2.3.4 (#53) under Win2K. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Date: 2004-10-25 11:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11595 You're right. The latest CVS version does not experience this problem. I'm not sure how much slurping helps. I'm getting very good discrimination using it, but I haven't compared to working without the slurping, so I don't have any good measure of how much difference it makes. My false-negative rate (SPAM misclassified as HAM) is a few messages per week and my false positive rate (HAM misclassified as SPAM) is much smaller---maybe a few per month, with traffic of one to two hundred messages per day, with consisting of about 50 SPAM and 50-150 HAM. Importantly, the false positives are almost entirely opt-in bulk email advertising that I want to receive. I have yet to see a personal email misclassified as SPAM in over six months of SpamBayes use. This is quite acceptable to me. The only significant problems I'm seeing are various things that make the scripts crash. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-20 17:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This should be fixed in classifier.py 1.27. If you could CVS up once anon-CVS catches up and try it out, that would be great. BTW, do you find that the slurping helps? It's still an experimental option for a number of reasons, but one of those is that we don't really know whether it really helps anyone. Feedback would be great! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1051081&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Oct 25 18:29:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Oct 25 18:29:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1023797 ] Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Message-ID: Bugs item #1023797, was opened at 2004-09-07 11:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jmgilligan You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023797&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 2 Submitted By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Imapfilter fails: 'Cannot find saved message' Initial Comment: sb_imapfilter.py fails intermittently, but frequently, with the error: __main__.BadIMAPResponseError: The command 'Cannot find saved message' failed to give an OK response. Rerunning the filter produces this error, but different amounts of processing occur before I get the error. For what it's worth, my email client (mulberry) reports that it frequently spends as much as 90 seconds waiting for a response from the server, so perhaps this is a timeout problem. I'm running the latest spambayes checked out from CVS using python 2.3.4 under Windows 2000 (Python 2.3.4 (#53, Aug 23 2004, 16:24:32) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32). The server welcome is: '* OK imap1 Cyrus IMAP4 v2.0.16 server ready' The server capabilties is: ('IMAP4', 'IMAP4REV1', 'ACL', 'QUOTA', 'LITERAL+', 'NA MESPACE', 'UIDPLUS', 'ID', 'NO_ATOMIC_RENAME', 'UNSELECT', 'MULTIAPPEND', 'S ORT', 'THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT', 'THREAD=REFERENCES', 'IDLE', 'STARTTLS', 'AUTH=PL AIN', 'X-NETSCAPE') Attached is the output from sb_imapfilter -v -t -c -i 4 where the exception occurs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Date: 2004-10-25 11:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11595 Following up after a few weeks of the latest version: I'm still getting occasional failures---probably some peculiarity of the Cyrus IMAP server I'm using. The failures are about once every day or two with about 8-10 hours of continual running "sb_imapfilter -v -t -c -l 10". This is acceptable, and is a huge improvement over the state when I submitted this bug, where sb_imapfilter would crash several times per hour, but it would be nice if it were possible to fix it completely. Definitely a low-priority item, though, since it only affects the usability of the IMAP filter slightly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Date: 2004-10-13 16:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11595 I have been testing this for over a week with very few problems. I have gone from several failures per hour to less than one failure per day on average. sjoerd's fix (rev. 1.40) seems to have made a lot of difference. Things are currently stable enough for me to be happy downgrading the severity of the bug. It's not quite perfectly fixed, but it's good enough for me to use regularly on my production system. I'll leave it up to Tony to decide whether this is sufficient to declare the bug closed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Date: 2004-10-04 16:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11595 Revision 1.40 (by sjoerd) to manage illegal values in the Message-Id, seems to fix this. I am currently testing and will report back on whether this really solves the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Date: 2004-09-30 10:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11595 I have increased the range in line 548 to 10000 or even 100000, and it doesn't solve the problem. I even inserted an increasing time.sleep(): for i in xrange(11): .... time.sleep(1 << i) and I still get crashes, so just increasing the number of noops or waiting longer doesn't seem to solve the problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-29 22:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (Apologies for not getting to this yesterday) Could you try making a change to your copy of sb_imapfitler.py for me? Line 548 is " for i in xrange(100):". Could you try increasing the 100 to 10000 and seeing if that solves the problem? (It may run for a long time before it finally quits, if it doesn't fix it - but it's just no-op'ing, so it doesn't hurt). I suspect it is related to a timeout sort of problem - maybe the server is slow and so it's taking a long time to register that the new message is there. I guessed that 100 no-ops would be enough, but perhaps it isn't. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-27 02:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Apologies for the delay in getting to this (I've been overseas). This code is quite significantly changed (for the better, in theory) than the 1.0 sb_imapfilter, so hasn't been as widely tested. Your server isn't giving up the EXISTS response that's expected or in the expected way, so something's falling apart. I'll try and find time to have a proper look at this tomorrow. Note that you ought to be able to fall back to the 1.0 imapfilter if necessary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023797&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 26 02:33:26 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 26 02:33:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1052180 ] Message not classified as SPAM Message-ID: Bugs item #1052180, was opened at 2004-10-23 02:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1052180&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: MCCOMM (mccomm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Message not classified as SPAM Initial Comment: Although I've only been using the product for 2 days, I feel that the message I had to train this morning is blatant SPAM. So far the filter has tagged 4 messages as SPAM or unsure. 3 of them I'd consider false positives. So along with this false negative the filter is batting .200. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-26 13:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't understand your batting reference (not everyone is American!), but I presume you mean it isn't good. SpamBayes works based on the training that *you* do. It doesn't come with any existing knowledge. So if you haven't trained it on messages like that one, then it wouldn't know what it was, irregardless of what you yourself know. FAQ 4.7 might help: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1052180&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 26 02:34:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 26 02:34:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1051081 ] uncaught socket timeout exception slurping URLs Message-ID: Bugs item #1051081, was opened at 2004-10-21 10:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1051081&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Source code - CVS Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: uncaught socket timeout exception slurping URLs Initial Comment: I occasionally get the following failure when spambayes tries to slurp an URL while classifying and the URL times out. It would be better to catch the exception and fail gracefully to slurp the URL rather than bailing out of the whole script. Slurping bestsellingreplicas.info Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1020, in ? run() File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 1010, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 879, in Filter self.unsure_folder, self.ham_folder) File "C:\Python23\Scripts\sb_imapfilter.py", line 767, in Filter evidence=True) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 246, in slu rping_spamprob slurp_tokens = list(self._generate_slurp()) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 559, in _ge nerate_slurp tokens = self.slurp(*slurp_wordstream) File "C:\Python23\Lib\site- packages\spambayes\classifier.py", line 725, in slu rp page = f.read() File "C:\Python23\lib\socket.py", line 283, in read data = self._sock.recv(recv_size) socket.timeout: timed out Running CVS version under python 2.3.4 (#53) under Win2K. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-26 13:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for the comments. If there are other things that are causing crashes, please be sure to open bug reports about them if you haven't already. We will get to them as we can! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jonathan M. Gilligan (jmgilligan) Date: 2004-10-26 05:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11595 You're right. The latest CVS version does not experience this problem. I'm not sure how much slurping helps. I'm getting very good discrimination using it, but I haven't compared to working without the slurping, so I don't have any good measure of how much difference it makes. My false-negative rate (SPAM misclassified as HAM) is a few messages per week and my false positive rate (HAM misclassified as SPAM) is much smaller---maybe a few per month, with traffic of one to two hundred messages per day, with consisting of about 50 SPAM and 50-150 HAM. Importantly, the false positives are almost entirely opt-in bulk email advertising that I want to receive. I have yet to see a personal email misclassified as SPAM in over six months of SpamBayes use. This is quite acceptable to me. The only significant problems I'm seeing are various things that make the scripts crash. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-21 11:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This should be fixed in classifier.py 1.27. If you could CVS up once anon-CVS catches up and try it out, that would be great. BTW, do you find that the slurping helps? It's still an experimental option for a number of reasons, but one of those is that we don't really know whether it really helps anyone. Feedback would be great! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1051081&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 26 03:03:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 26 03:03:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1053223 ] Blackberry faster than SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #1053223, was opened at 2004-10-25 04:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1053223&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Blackberry faster than SpamBayes Initial Comment: I've been running SpamBayes for over a year on Outlook (now XP SP3). I've also had a BlackBerry for three years (have had a 7780 since the summer). Over time, I've noticed ever more Spam hitting my BlackBerry, even though when I get home and check my Outlook Inbox it is not there, but (correctly) in the Spam folder. And recently I've noticed that when I select an email in the "maybe SPAM" folder and click the "Delete as Spam" button, it takes several seconds to move it to the SPAM folder. So I'm guessing SpamBayes has a linear (or worse than linear) time algorithm for updating the spam database. SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0 (July 2004) reports that this training database status: Database has 30326 good and 16916 spam. I assume one solution is for me to delete the databases and retrain. Have you also considered some kind of automatic pruning to keep the databases manageable? Here are the SB DB file sizes: 1,316 default_bayes_customize.ini 42,049,536 default_bayes_database.db 2,506,752 default_message_database.db 3,521 MS Exchange Settings.ini Of course the other possibility is to modify your DB algorithms so their running time is O(LogN) or faster... Thank you! --Ben Slivka ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-26 14:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1. ~47000 messages is a very large database. Generally, it seems that the best results can be obtained from quite small (under 1000) databases, which would remove this problem. The wiki has a lot of stuff about training strategies. 2. Classification time shouldn't be particularly related to the db size (training certainly is). I don't know what the system is that sends mail to the BlackBerry, but perhaps adjusting the background filtering options could help with this problem? 3. There has been a little investigation into expiring messages, but the research hasn't shown that it's particularly helpful. One major problem is that SpamBayes relies on bags of tokens being added/removed as a set. This means that if we were to prune the database we would want to remove whole messages, not individual tokens. At the moment we don't store this information, so it would mean a whole new database/table. 4. Alternate training regimes, which keep the database size small, like 'train to exhaustion', are likely to be the best solution for this sort of problem. The 1.1 release of SpamBayes will almost certainly have some sort of support for (more easily) trying out different training regimes with the Outlook plug-in/sb_server. 5. The database is user-selected. By default bsddb is used (I have no idea what the access times for bsddb are meant to be, but I'm google could pull up something). You can, however, use a pickle, MySQL, or Postgres SQL. Any of these might help, depending on your exact requirements. A pickle takes a lot more memory, and will be slow to load/save, but very fast otherwise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1053223&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 26 03:09:04 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 26 03:09:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1045098 ] Unable to filter multiple mailboxes in Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1045098, was opened at 2004-10-12 20:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1045098&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to filter multiple mailboxes in Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: I have been enjoying the benefits of SpamBayes since version Outlook-002 to monitor multiple Exchange Mailbox folders using Outlook 2002 on XP Pro. I have found it to be better than competing, often commercial, products and it saves me much time. In my configuration, starting Outlook opens the primary Exchange mailbox which in turn opens several other Exchange Mailboxes and SpamBayes monitors all the Inboxes of all accounts simultaneously. I have never had any issues (other than performance, and the occasional disappearing toolbar) with this setup in my 16 months of using the product. I just upgraded to Outlook 2003 and now the Filtering has stopped for all of the folders except the InBox of the primary email account. Here's what I see: 1. Under SpamBayes Manager's Filtering Tab, the three folders I want to monitor are correctly displayed under "Filter the following folders as messages arrive". 2. Clicking "Browse" displays the "Select folder(s)" window with "Public Folders", "Mailbox - PrimaryUser", "Mailbox - User2", "Mailbox - User3", etc. 3. Mailbox - Primary User is expanded with the "Inbox" checked. Nothing else is checked and the bottom of the window now says "Selected 1 folder" and displays "Inbox". It used to say "Selected 3 folders". 4. When I click the "+" to expand "Mailbox - User2" or "Mailbox - User3", nothing happens. So I am unable to re-select the User2-Inbox or the User3-Inbox. 5. I can try to place a check in the un-expanded box to the left of "Mailbox - User2" but this just leads to the "Please select a child folder - top-level folders cannot be used" message. Any assistance is appreciated. And thank you for an extremely useful product. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-26 14:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I agree that this is a dupe (therefore closing, and will track there) of 844824: [ 844824 ] MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID when filtering secondary accounts Unfortunately that doesn't really help at all since we haven't made any progress with that. Everything I can find about MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID at Microsoft is to do with LDAP. Can you confirm that that's definately not involved here? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Date: 2004-10-13 22:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1137526 My problem looks like a recurrence of Bug 844824. But my system was working properly with Spambayes Binary 1.0/Outlook 2002/WinXP before I upgraded to Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Date: 2004-10-13 22:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1137526 As requested, spambayes1.log is attached. This is a clean load where there was no mail to process. Outlook was started, actions #1 thru #4 were performed, and Outlook was closed. For security purposes, the actual user/mailbox names were changed in the log but all else is intact. The problem appears to be the recurring message: ** Unable to open child folder - ignoring MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040107 (MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID): OLE error 0x80040107 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-13 12:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem is in step 4, but to figure out exactly what is going wrong, we need to see your log file. Could you please try this again (to generate the log entries) and then attach your most recent log file to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the logs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1045098&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 26 03:06:04 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 26 03:09:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-844824 ] MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID when filtering secondary accounts Message-ID: Bugs item #844824, was opened at 2003-11-19 14:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=844824&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook >Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Vottero (jvottero) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID when filtering secondary accounts Initial Comment: I upgraded to V0.81 and email to my secondary accounts isn't being filtered. I have three, Exchange server based accounts, the main one filters fine but, it looks like SpamBayes can't open messages that arrive in the other two Inboxes. The log file shows: Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 346, in _TimerFunc File "out1.pyz/addin", line 118, in HaveSeenMessage File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 985, in GetField File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 861, in _EnsureObject msgstore.MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040107 (MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID): OLE error 0x80040107 Also, if I pick "SpamBayes->Filter Messages...", then click the "Browse" button, the only folder I can expand is the first one, if I click any of the others, I get a similar error in the spambayes.log file: ** Unable to open child folder - ignoring MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040107 (MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID): OLE error 0x80040107 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-26 14:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 1045098 ] Unable to filter multiple mailboxes in Outlook 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=844824&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 26 03:14:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 26 03:14:38 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1053223 ] Blackberry faster than SpamBayes Message-ID: Bugs item #1053223, was opened at 2004-10-24 08:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by benslivka You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1053223&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Blackberry faster than SpamBayes Initial Comment: I've been running SpamBayes for over a year on Outlook (now XP SP3). I've also had a BlackBerry for three years (have had a 7780 since the summer). Over time, I've noticed ever more Spam hitting my BlackBerry, even though when I get home and check my Outlook Inbox it is not there, but (correctly) in the Spam folder. And recently I've noticed that when I select an email in the "maybe SPAM" folder and click the "Delete as Spam" button, it takes several seconds to move it to the SPAM folder. So I'm guessing SpamBayes has a linear (or worse than linear) time algorithm for updating the spam database. SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0 (July 2004) reports that this training database status: Database has 30326 good and 16916 spam. I assume one solution is for me to delete the databases and retrain. Have you also considered some kind of automatic pruning to keep the databases manageable? Here are the SB DB file sizes: 1,316 default_bayes_customize.ini 42,049,536 default_bayes_database.db 2,506,752 default_message_database.db 3,521 MS Exchange Settings.ini Of course the other possibility is to modify your DB algorithms so their running time is O(LogN) or faster... Thank you! --Ben Slivka ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka) Date: 2004-10-25 18:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=856287 Dear Tony, Thank you for the thorough response. 1) I didn't create the database -- that is happening "under the covers". I assume SpamBayes built up that database all on its own? I'm just an "end user" and I get a lot of email (and, unfortunately, a lot of spam -- ben **at** slivka **dot** com is too easy to figure out, I guess). And there is no obvious way in the user interface for me to shrink or prune the database. 2) I deleted the database files -- it didn't change the classification speed at all -- it's still noticeably slower than it was when I first installed SpamBayes (in 2003). Are their some other files or registry settings I should reset/delete? 3) So you would have to redesign your database schema -- I get that. But what advice to you have for users when the DB gets "too large"? 4) I'm all for you all experimenting with new techniques and training regimines! 5) I installed the Windows binary -- I'm not looking to experiment with other database choices! Thank you! --Ben ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-25 18:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1. ~47000 messages is a very large database. Generally, it seems that the best results can be obtained from quite small (under 1000) databases, which would remove this problem. The wiki has a lot of stuff about training strategies. 2. Classification time shouldn't be particularly related to the db size (training certainly is). I don't know what the system is that sends mail to the BlackBerry, but perhaps adjusting the background filtering options could help with this problem? 3. There has been a little investigation into expiring messages, but the research hasn't shown that it's particularly helpful. One major problem is that SpamBayes relies on bags of tokens being added/removed as a set. This means that if we were to prune the database we would want to remove whole messages, not individual tokens. At the moment we don't store this information, so it would mean a whole new database/table. 4. Alternate training regimes, which keep the database size small, like 'train to exhaustion', are likely to be the best solution for this sort of problem. The 1.1 release of SpamBayes will almost certainly have some sort of support for (more easily) trying out different training regimes with the Outlook plug-in/sb_server. 5. The database is user-selected. By default bsddb is used (I have no idea what the access times for bsddb are meant to be, but I'm google could pull up something). You can, however, use a pickle, MySQL, or Postgres SQL. Any of these might help, depending on your exact requirements. A pickle takes a lot more memory, and will be slow to load/save, but very fast otherwise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1053223&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 26 09:33:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 26 09:33:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1045098 ] Unable to filter multiple mailboxes in Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1045098, was opened at 2004-10-12 02:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ultgha5qndvhpzj You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1045098&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Closed Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unable to filter multiple mailboxes in Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: I have been enjoying the benefits of SpamBayes since version Outlook-002 to monitor multiple Exchange Mailbox folders using Outlook 2002 on XP Pro. I have found it to be better than competing, often commercial, products and it saves me much time. In my configuration, starting Outlook opens the primary Exchange mailbox which in turn opens several other Exchange Mailboxes and SpamBayes monitors all the Inboxes of all accounts simultaneously. I have never had any issues (other than performance, and the occasional disappearing toolbar) with this setup in my 16 months of using the product. I just upgraded to Outlook 2003 and now the Filtering has stopped for all of the folders except the InBox of the primary email account. Here's what I see: 1. Under SpamBayes Manager's Filtering Tab, the three folders I want to monitor are correctly displayed under "Filter the following folders as messages arrive". 2. Clicking "Browse" displays the "Select folder(s)" window with "Public Folders", "Mailbox - PrimaryUser", "Mailbox - User2", "Mailbox - User3", etc. 3. Mailbox - Primary User is expanded with the "Inbox" checked. Nothing else is checked and the bottom of the window now says "Selected 1 folder" and displays "Inbox". It used to say "Selected 3 folders". 4. When I click the "+" to expand "Mailbox - User2" or "Mailbox - User3", nothing happens. So I am unable to re-select the User2-Inbox or the User3-Inbox. 5. I can try to place a check in the un-expanded box to the left of "Mailbox - User2" but this just leads to the "Please select a child folder - top-level folders cannot be used" message. Any assistance is appreciated. And thank you for an extremely useful product. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Date: 2004-10-26 02:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1137526 As far as I can tell I am NOT using LDAP. This is OL2003 accessing multiple Exch 5.5 Servers and POP3 mailboxes. Also, this issue appears to be the same as 1036868. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-25 20:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I agree that this is a dupe (therefore closing, and will track there) of 844824: [ 844824 ] MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID when filtering secondary accounts Unfortunately that doesn't really help at all since we haven't made any progress with that. Everything I can find about MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID at Microsoft is to do with LDAP. Can you confirm that that's definately not involved here? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Date: 2004-10-13 04:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1137526 My problem looks like a recurrence of Bug 844824. But my system was working properly with Spambayes Binary 1.0/Outlook 2002/WinXP before I upgraded to Outlook 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Date: 2004-10-13 04:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1137526 As requested, spambayes1.log is attached. This is a clean load where there was no mail to process. Outlook was started, actions #1 thru #4 were performed, and Outlook was closed. For security purposes, the actual user/mailbox names were changed in the log but all else is intact. The problem appears to be the recurring message: ** Unable to open child folder - ignoring MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040107 (MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID): OLE error 0x80040107 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-12 18:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The problem is in step 4, but to figure out exactly what is going wrong, we need to see your log file. Could you please try this again (to generate the log entries) and then attach your most recent log file to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find the logs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1045098&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 26 09:58:03 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 26 09:58:05 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1054425 ] Additional filtering options Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1054425, was opened at 2004-10-26 02:58 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1054425&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Additional filtering options Initial Comment: Spambayes is working so well for me that I now feel I can trust it enough to auto-delete messages that score 99% or above. But I need more than the two builting filtering levels of Certain Spam and Possible Spam. In essence, I would like to add a third filtering level called Possible Spam as well as an option to immediately delete "Certain Spam", bypassing the "Deleted Items" folder. It could work like this: Certain Spam is immediately deleted and purged Probable Spam is moved to the Spam Folder Possible Spam is moved to the Suspect Folder A whitelist feature that bypasses SpamBayes completely would also be very helpful. Thank you for your efforts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1054425&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 26 11:22:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 26 11:23:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1054425 ] Additional filtering options Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1054425, was opened at 2004-10-26 02:58 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ultgha5qndvhpzj You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1054425&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Additional filtering options Initial Comment: Spambayes is working so well for me that I now feel I can trust it enough to auto-delete messages that score 99% or above. But I need more than the two builting filtering levels of Certain Spam and Possible Spam. In essence, I would like to add a third filtering level called Possible Spam as well as an option to immediately delete "Certain Spam", bypassing the "Deleted Items" folder. It could work like this: Certain Spam is immediately deleted and purged Probable Spam is moved to the Spam Folder Possible Spam is moved to the Suspect Folder A whitelist feature that bypasses SpamBayes completely would also be very helpful. Thank you for your efforts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Date: 2004-10-26 04:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1137526 Correction: Make that a new feature called Probable Spam to add in between Certain Spam and Possible Spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1054425&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 26 23:38:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 26 23:38:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1036868 ] can not filter more than one inbox-folder Message-ID: Bugs item #1036868, was opened at 2004-09-29 20:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036868&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eggi (eggidd) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: can not filter more than one inbox-folder Initial Comment: I use SpamBayes Version 1. on W2k with OL2003. I have two exchange-boxes enabled. My own box and the folder named "contact". I am the owner of the box "Contact". In SpamBayes Manager i can't enable to filter the subfolder "inbox" of the "contact"-box. I don't know why? SpamBayes works with my own folder very good. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-27 10:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of: [ 844824 ] MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID when filtering secondary accounts ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-05 13:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does the description in this article fit your situation? SpamBayes is receiving a MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID error from Outlook when it tries to access those folders, so it ignores them. There probably isn't anything we can do to avoid that error, however. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eggi (eggidd) Date: 2004-10-01 19:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1130124 The postbox is on an exchange-server. I found the log file and I attach the file. I hope the upload will be successful. Thank you for your support. Greetings ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-01 11:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 That sounds like there is a problem accessing the subfolders (is this a pst file, on Exchange, Hotmail, IMAP, ...?), but the log would have the details. As I said, the troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. SpamBayes->Help->Troubleshooting Guide, or there's a copy online via http://spambayes.org/docs.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eggi (eggidd) Date: 2004-09-30 21:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1130124 No, I don't get an error message from spambayes, the folder is in the list but it is not possible to open the subfolders. How do I get the log file? I did not find the log file in the program-folder of spambayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-30 13:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you get an error message from spambayes when you try to, or is the folder simply not in the list to choose? Could you please try this again (to get the log entries) then attach you most recent log file (the troubleshooting guide explains where they are) to this tracker, please? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036868&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 26 23:38:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 26 23:39:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-844824 ] MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID when filtering secondary accounts Message-ID: Bugs item #844824, was opened at 2003-11-19 14:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=844824&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Vottero (jvottero) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID when filtering secondary accounts Initial Comment: I upgraded to V0.81 and email to my secondary accounts isn't being filtered. I have three, Exchange server based accounts, the main one filters fine but, it looks like SpamBayes can't open messages that arrive in the other two Inboxes. The log file shows: Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 346, in _TimerFunc File "out1.pyz/addin", line 118, in HaveSeenMessage File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 985, in GetField File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 861, in _EnsureObject msgstore.MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040107 (MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID): OLE error 0x80040107 Also, if I pick "SpamBayes->Filter Messages...", then click the "Browse" button, the only folder I can expand is the first one, if I click any of the others, I get a similar error in the spambayes.log file: ** Unable to open child folder - ignoring MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040107 (MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID): OLE error 0x80040107 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-27 10:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 1036868 ] can not filter more than one inbox-folder ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-26 14:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 1045098 ] Unable to filter multiple mailboxes in Outlook 2003 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=844824&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 26 23:53:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 26 23:53:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1054425 ] Additional filtering options Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1054425, was opened at 2004-10-26 20:58 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1054425&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: Next Release (example) >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Additional filtering options Initial Comment: Spambayes is working so well for me that I now feel I can trust it enough to auto-delete messages that score 99% or above. But I need more than the two builting filtering levels of Certain Spam and Possible Spam. In essence, I would like to add a third filtering level called Possible Spam as well as an option to immediately delete "Certain Spam", bypassing the "Deleted Items" folder. It could work like this: Certain Spam is immediately deleted and purged Probable Spam is moved to the Spam Folder Possible Spam is moved to the Suspect Folder A whitelist feature that bypasses SpamBayes completely would also be very helpful. Thank you for your efforts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-27 10:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of: [ 774650 ] Additional post-filtering options Re: whitelisting, please see FAQ 6.6: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: ULTGHA5qNdvhPzJ (ultgha5qndvhpzj) Date: 2004-10-26 22:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1137526 Correction: Make that a new feature called Probable Spam to add in between Certain Spam and Possible Spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1054425&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Oct 26 23:53:21 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Oct 26 23:53:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774650 ] Additional post-filtering options Message-ID: Feature Requests item #774650, was opened at 2003-07-21 06:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774650&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: John D. Zanette (vbpf0jsb0a30kc) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Additional post-filtering options Initial Comment: 1. Option to "Permanently Delete" certain spam rather than just moving it. 2. Better than that, the option to do anything with a post-filtered message that I can do with an Outlook rule filtered message (forward, flag, etc.) 3. User configurable number of filtering levels - i.e., more than two. 4. A way to view/modify/tweak the database directly (maybe this already exists and I don't know it?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-27 10:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 1054425 ] Additional filtering options ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: B?nz Ledin (banz) Date: 2004-01-22 07:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=956857 I have a similar request: Spam makes it virtually impossible for me to use my mobile phone to download my mail (too many messages for low bandwith, too small a screen to sort out Spam). This could be solved by Spam Bayes removing all messages that are moved to the _SPAM folder from the mailserver: my computer would be always on, Spam messages would go into my _SPAM folder and ham would be left on the mail server for e.g. 5 days, according to Outlook settings. Therefore when accessing the server from outside with the mobile phone I would get only the ham from the last 5 days. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John D. Zanette (vbpf0jsb0a30kc) Date: 2003-07-21 10:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=826656 #1 - That had already been suggested by Mr. Meyer when I posted to the SpamBayes list (he also suggested that I [re] post it here) #2 - Header or subject line modification would work for this (I have used that technique successfully with the K9 filter (http://kier.net) and Outlook's rules. Unfortunately K9 does not support Outlook/Exchange directly (only through POP3), which is why I now use SpamBayes since I needed support for multiple simultaneous Exchange and POP3 mailboxes. #3 - What I mean is more spam score filters. Since it is CRITICAL for me to NEVER lose a "ham" message, I would like to have at least three levels of filtering. For example: 70% - 100% Immediate Delete (via SpamBayes as in #2 or using the AutoArchive method in #1) 30% - 69% Move to Spam folder with autodelete after 3 days 10%-29% Move to Suspect folder for manual review I have had such great success in less than a month of using SpamBayes (over 99.9%) that I am actually considering how I can "trust" it to autodelete. I have tried many alternatives including commercial products and none (with the exception of K9, noted above) has come close to SpamBayes. #4 - Agreed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-07-21 08:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 For #1, you can right click the spam folder and set the auto archive options to delete messages in that folder after a certain time (1 day is smallest amount) or move them to another pst file for retraining. For #2, convince a developer that it is useful. I would think either header or subject line modication would be easier and then build your rules using outlook. For #3, Do you mean more than filtering on different ranges of the the spam score or trying to do spam/ham and work/personal (etc.) type of thing? For #4, Looking at the spam clues for a message is filtered snapshot of the db. I think viewing would kinda neat, but modify/tweak could have some bad results. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774650&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 27 12:53:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 27 12:53:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1053658 ] OLE Errors with Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1053658, was opened at 2004-10-25 11:25 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mmenti You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1053658&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Rejected Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mario Menti (mmenti) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: OLE Errors with Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: I can't seem to get Spambayes to work with Outlook 2003. It installs OK and looks like it works, but does no filtering. Also, trying to train it on the Inbox doesn't work, it stops without displaying an error message after a second or two. Looking at the logs, there are lots of OLE errors. Logfile is attached. Any pointers appreciated.. (have un- and reinstalled both Outlook and SpamBayes without success). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mario Menti (mmenti) Date: 2004-10-27 10:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1077763 Problem solved, my OST file was corrupted. Running SCANPST.EXE on the ost file fixed it.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1053658&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Oct 27 16:10:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Oct 27 16:10:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1055309 ] Recurring Problem Message-ID: Bugs item #1055309, was opened at 2004-10-27 09:10 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1055309&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jason Silver (jasonsilver) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Recurring Problem Initial Comment: I think I've tracked down at least one possible reason for the hammie database to get corrupted. Concerning the file: spambayes.messageinfo.db For some reason, I had two copies of the tray application (SpamBayes for pop servers) in my start up registry. Until now, when I repaired the problem, everytime I closed one of these extra copies of the application, the hammie database became corrupted. I haven't double tested this possibility, but noticed that there is still very little information available in the FAQs about why the database becomes corrupted. Mine has been corrupted a total of four times (I get hundreds of spam a day). Three of those times was in the last week. I have the latest version. Thanks, Jason Silver ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1055309&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 28 01:32:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 28 01:32:26 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1055309 ] Recurring Problem Message-ID: Bugs item #1055309, was opened at 2004-10-28 03:10 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1055309&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jason Silver (jasonsilver) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Recurring Problem Initial Comment: I think I've tracked down at least one possible reason for the hammie database to get corrupted. Concerning the file: spambayes.messageinfo.db For some reason, I had two copies of the tray application (SpamBayes for pop servers) in my start up registry. Until now, when I repaired the problem, everytime I closed one of these extra copies of the application, the hammie database became corrupted. I haven't double tested this possibility, but noticed that there is still very little information available in the FAQs about why the database becomes corrupted. Mine has been corrupted a total of four times (I get hundreds of spam a day). Three of those times was in the last week. I have the latest version. Thanks, Jason Silver ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-28 12:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Concurrently accessing the database from two separate processes is a known way to corrupt the database, yes. You're right that the FAQ is out of date - I'll try and update that later today. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1055309&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 28 04:45:47 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 28 04:45:54 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-807234 ] Active Sync Problem Message-ID: Support Requests item #807234, was opened at 2003-09-17 04:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=807234&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nathaniel Gildersleeve (natgild) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Active Sync Problem Initial Comment: I am using the Outlook 2002 addin version .08 on a machine with Windows XP. After installing Spambayes, I am unable to sync my Ipaq Pocket PC using Activesync Version 3.7 and Windows Mobile 2003 on the Ipaq. My computer will no longer connect to the Ipaq. I recall I had a similar problem with Outlook Spam Filter Version 1.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-28 15:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Assuming that this is therefore an Outlook problem (and we obviously have no idea, or we would have said something by now), so closing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alec Clews (alecclews) Date: 2004-02-20 16:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=202472 After upgrading to Outlook 2003 Spambayes and Activesync now seem to work together nicely ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alec Clews (alecclews) Date: 2003-12-25 23:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=202472 I have a similiar problem. Spambayes 0.8.1, activesync 3.7.1, Windows XP SP1 and Outlook 2002 SP-2. I installed Spambayes and had it working. I then installed Activesync and spampayes has just died. Spambayes produces no long files :-(. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=807234&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 28 04:49:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 28 04:49:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1052183 ] spambayes on terminal server Message-ID: Support Requests item #1052183, was opened at 2004-10-23 02:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1052183&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martijn Saly (thany) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: spambayes on terminal server Initial Comment: We have got a terminal server (Windows 2003) with Outlook 2003 for each user. Is it possible to install spambayes on such a server safely, and perhaps install it for every user at once? Also, would it possible to put in some default configuration for all users in one go? I ask this, because it would be a pain to login as each and every user manually and install spambayes. Not to mention the fact that such a user needs permissions on the server to install software... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-28 15:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This message indicates that if you install it on the server it will be installed for everyone, with separate databases: I believe (but do not know) that each user would have the configuration wizard pop up - if they just click through that it will do the default configuration for them. The configuration that's needed is to select the watch/unsure/spam folders, and unless you know the Outlook ids for those (and they exist), then you can't do that automatically with any scripts we currently have. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1052183&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 28 05:46:04 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 28 05:46:12 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1052816 ] I18N Message-ID: Patches item #1052816, was opened at 2004-10-24 05:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: I18N Initial Comment: Here goes my first patches for the Outlook addin I18N. The patches in Outlook2000\dialogs\resources change the parser to output gettexted captions and labels. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-28 16:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 These look good to me. Do you have any translations done/partly done, so I could see how it all goes? BTW, could you confirm that you're fine donating this code to the SpamBayes project, to be licensed under the PSF licence? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-24 06:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Outlook2000.txt patch file modifies config.py to add a "language" user var and modifies manager.py adding calls to the LanguageManager class. The first calls set the language to the default system one. The second call set the language to the one that is configured in the SB config file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-24 06:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 i18n.py contains the class that I use to initialize the internationalization environment. That is: gettext and sys.path. i18n.py should be in the Outlook2000 directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-24 05:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 The patch for Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py lets SB import a foreign language i18n_dialogs.py file. To better distinguish with the default dialogs.py in the official distribution, the new transalated dialogs will be prefixed by "i18n_". __init__.py assumes that SB already has a modified sys.path that points to the correct language resources. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 28 05:58:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 28 05:59:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-938992 ] Allow longer background filtering delays. Message-ID: Feature Requests item #938992, was opened at 2004-04-21 12:47 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=938992&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook >Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Taed Wynnell (taed) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Allow longer background filtering delays. Initial Comment: I use two different anti-spam programs, SpamNet and SpamBayes. They both do well at different types of messages, so the they do very well when used together. I give SpamNet the first crack at it, and then use SpamBayes background filtering with both delays set to 10 seconds. However, SpamNet sometimes hits heavy load on their servers (especially Monday mornings), and it can take it more than 10 seconds per message. This sometimes causes the two anti-spam programs to step on each other a bit and then messages can end up in the wrong folders. I'd like the ability to set the values to whatever I want, or at least up to 60 seconds. (Thanks!) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 11:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'll do this post 1.0 - note that if you open the config file with a text editor, you will be able to set values up to 30 seconds (greater than that, and they will not be accepted). The slight complication is that by extending the range to 60 seconds, the slider control loses "resolution" - ie, the typical user will still want values of 1/1.5/2 seconds, but selecting these on the slider will be much harder when the range is 60 seconds. I see no reason why the slider couldn't still go only to 10 seconds, but the edit box allow you to enter a larger number. This is more intrusive though, so will have to wait until post 1.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=938992&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 28 06:29:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 28 06:30:00 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-938992 ] Allow longer background filtering delays. Message-ID: Feature Requests item #938992, was opened at 2004-04-21 12:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=938992&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Taed Wynnell (taed) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Allow longer background filtering delays. Initial Comment: I use two different anti-spam programs, SpamNet and SpamBayes. They both do well at different types of messages, so the they do very well when used together. I give SpamNet the first crack at it, and then use SpamBayes background filtering with both delays set to 10 seconds. However, SpamNet sometimes hits heavy load on their servers (especially Monday mornings), and it can take it more than 10 seconds per message. This sometimes causes the two anti-spam programs to step on each other a bit and then messages can end up in the wrong folders. I'd like the ability to set the values to whatever I want, or at least up to 60 seconds. (Thanks!) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-28 17:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Added to CVS head. This will appear in the first 1.1 release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 11:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'll do this post 1.0 - note that if you open the config file with a text editor, you will be able to set values up to 30 seconds (greater than that, and they will not be accepted). The slight complication is that by extending the range to 60 seconds, the slider control loses "resolution" - ie, the typical user will still want values of 1/1.5/2 seconds, but selecting these on the slider will be much harder when the range is 60 seconds. I see no reason why the slider couldn't still go only to 10 seconds, but the edit box allow you to enter a larger number. This is more intrusive though, so will have to wait until post 1.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=938992&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 28 06:31:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 28 06:31:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1032383 ] Feature Request: Extend maximum wait time for filter timer Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1032383, was opened at 2004-09-22 18:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1032383&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Holm (magnusholm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature Request: Extend maximum wait time for filter timer Initial Comment: Today the maximum filter processing start delay is ten seconds. This is too short. I want to be able to increase it to 30 or 60 seconds. It is ok for me that the slider goes from 0 to 10 seconds, but SpamBayes should accept higher values. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-28 17:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is in CVS HEAD. It will appear in the first 1.1 release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1032383&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 28 06:44:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 28 06:44:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-748199 ] Spam score now shows as decimal Message-ID: Bugs item #748199, was opened at 2003-06-04 02:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=748199&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peter Zalinski (pezalinski) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Spam score now shows as decimal Initial Comment: When I created a "Spam" column in Outlook 2000, and scored the folder using your product, everything was grand -- the scores showed up as percentages. Then I moved the "Spam" column by dragging it over a few columns, and the scores converted to decimals, and I can't seem to get them to convert back to a percentage, no matter what I try. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-28 17:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 These suggestions should work, and there hasn't been a response in almost a year, so closing. Note that the field was once an "integer", but then was "percentage". If the field is already "integer", then you can't change it to "percentage" without recreating it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2003-12-30 12:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Have you right clicked on the SPAM column header and selected Format Columns? This will bring up a configuration screen. Change the field labeled "Format" to "ROUNDED" by selecting the dropdown to the right side, and click the "OK" button at the bottom of the configuration box. This should eliminate the decimals for you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Rottenberg (halr9000) Date: 2003-08-27 05:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=93952 Have you tried removing and re-adding the field? This worked for me on OL2K3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=748199&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 28 06:46:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 28 06:46:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-769619 ] message time shifts when moved from possible to ham folder Message-ID: Bugs item #769619, was opened at 2003-07-12 00:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769619&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Joe Copley (jcopley) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: message time shifts when moved from possible to ham folder Initial Comment: When a message is placed in my possible SPAM folder, and I use the recover button to move it back to my inbox, the message time is moved earlier by 8 hours. I have Outlook XP and am in the Eastern time zone. My Inbox is an IMAP account. The SPAM and Possible SPAM folders are local Outlook Accounts. I use Rockliffe Mailsite as my mail server. I have detected quirky behavior in Outlook before installing SpamBayes. For example, sometimes the rules simply stop working for no discernable reason. These problems migrated from Outlook 2000 on Win 98 to Outlook 2002 on XP. On XP only, whenever I start Outlook after boot, the rules simply don't get invoked and I have to run them manually. I am using Beta 1, Binary Version 3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-28 17:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is very out of date (sorry!). Please reset the status of this bug to "open" if it is still relevant with 1.0, and we will take another look at it. It sounds to me like an IMAP/Outlook quirk, but I couldn't say for sure. You could try setting the save_spam_info to False, and seeing if that helped, too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Joe Copley (jcopley) Date: 2003-07-22 04:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820625 As messages appear in possible spam, they have what appears to be the correct time. The time is shifted whether I use the recover button or drag- and-drop. However, if I open the message, the original time is shown. The incorrect date appears only in the Outlook message list window. If I move a time-shifted message back to possible spam, the listed message time does not shift back. If I again move the message back to Inbox, it is shifted another eight hours. I cannot acount for the eight hours. GMT is +4 from Eastern Daylight. My server and I are in the same time zone. The time is not shifted if I move from possible spam to spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-07-21 16:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Can you account for the 8 hours? Is that the time difference between you and your server? Can you also confirm that the original moving of the message to the "unsure" folder did not change the time - only the recovery process? Can you also please test what happens if you drag-and-drop the message back to the inbox - is the time also shifted? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769619&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 28 06:48:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 28 06:49:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-796298 ] Outlook plugin: 0.7 Check for new version doesn't use proxy Message-ID: Feature Requests item #796298, was opened at 2003-08-28 09:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796298&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Clark (clach04) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Outlook plugin: 0.7 Check for new version doesn't use proxy Initial Comment: Very low priority, the "Check for new version" option fails after a few seconds. I'm behind a http proxy (IE is configured for proxy access so the plugin could lookup IE's proxy settings and use that). Fragment of spambayes.log: Error checking the latest version Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 522, in CheckLatestVersion File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 136, in fetch_latest_dict File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 834, in do_open URLError: <urlopen error (10060, 'Operation timed out')> ERROR: 'There was an error checking for the latest version\r\nFor specific details on the error, please see the SpamBayes log\r\n\r\nPlease check your internet connection, or try again later' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 522, in CheckLatestVersion File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 136, in fetch_latest_dict File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 834, in do_open URLError: <urlopen error (10060, 'Operation timed out')> SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook Bayes database is not dirty - not writing SpamBayes processed 0 messages, finding 0 spam and 0 unsure Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-28 17:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No-one else has asked for this, so it's obviously not a big deal. I don't want to spend time on it, since it's such an unimportant issue, and so many other programs don't support autoconfigure scripts (e.g. iTunes) that I've given up using them for the most part. If anyone really cares about this, set the status back to open and someone will look at it at some point. Or, better, attach a patch to it, and we'll add it :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-30 16:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I started looking into this, but if anyone else would rather do it... >From what I have been able to tell, autoconfigure scripts are in javascript. But not just any javascript - there are some 'helper' functions predefined, but not for regular javascript. So, either we write those ourselves (or steal them from someone), and then parse the javascript, or we do it some other way. I think that the best solution might be to do the work at the server end (if sf lets us do this). We could open a page like "http://spambayes.org/latest_version.html? my_version=008", and it could display a "You are using version %s, the latest is 008.1" message. We already go to the browser for help, so that's not so bad - and it could have a link to the latest version, if there is a newer one. Of course it's not as elegant as the current method, and it's only for those people with autoconfigure scripts...What do you think, Mark? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris Clark (clach04) Date: 2003-08-29 05:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=379468 My PC has some imposed login scripts that set the proxy method to autodetect so you where spot on there. I usually manually specify the proxy (I'd just rebooted to ensure a "clean" bug report). I just set it manually and re-tried and the log now complains about getting an authentication error. Log attached at end. For MS products I usually don't have to provide authentication information as the machine is logged into a domain server (i.e. my current OS user is DOMAINNAME\username) for non MS products I usually have to feed it the id/pw, e.g. Mozzilla, lynx, wget, my own python scripts, etc. I've not figured out what makes MS apps "special" in not needing to manually specify the auth. info). Error checking the latest version Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 522, in CheckLatestVersion File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 136, in fetch_latest_dict File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 843, in do_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 359, in error File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 419, in http_error_default HTTPError: HTTP Error 407: Proxy Authentication Required ERROR: 'There was an error checking for the latest version\r\nFor specific details on the error, please see the SpamBayes log\r\n\r\nPlease check your internet connection, or try again later' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 522, in CheckLatestVersion File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 136, in fetch_latest_dict File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 843, in do_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 359, in error File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 419, in http_error_default HTTPError: HTTP Error 407: Proxy Authentication Required ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-28 12:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 We do try and use the IE proxy configuration, but currently can't use the "auto configuration" option - we need to have the proxy explicitly specified. How is your IE proxy configured? If configured for auto, then Tony Meyer is looking at that too, but we aren't even sure yet if it is practical. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=796298&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 28 07:12:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 28 07:12:15 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-715248 ] Pickle classifier should save to a temp file first Message-ID: Bugs item #715248, was opened at 2003-04-05 00:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=715248&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Pickle classifier should save to a temp file first Initial Comment: A number of "EOF Error"s could be avoided if the pickle classifier saved to a temp file first, then renamed to the real file. Otherwise, failure during save can lose the database. This came up in https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=709051&group_id=61702 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-28 18:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Tim never did add this, for some reason. I've added this now, so it will appear in the first 1.1 release. The code is similar, although not the same (os.link isn't available on win32). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simone Piunno (pioppo) Date: 2003-04-05 09:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=227443 sorry, typo... the 3rd "try" is "except OSError, e", like the 2nd one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Stone (timstone4) Date: 2003-04-05 09:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=645698 I agree. This was how it did its thing to start with... <sigh>. I'll put it back in. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Simone Piunno (pioppo) Date: 2003-04-05 08:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=227443 --- spambayes/storage.py.orig 2003-04-03 23:35:47.000000000 +0200 +++ spambayes/storage.py 2003-04-04 21:51:25.000000000 +0200 @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ import cPickle as pickle import errno import shelve +import sys +import os +import random from spambayes import dbmstorage # Make shelve use binary pickles by default. @@ -121,10 +124,31 @@ if options.verbose: print 'Persisting',self.db_name,'as a pickle' - fp = open(self.db_name, 'wb') - pickle.dump(self, fp, PICKLE_TYPE) - fp.close() - + # Be as defensive as possible, keep always a safe copy. + rand = random.randrange(0, sys.maxint) + tmp = self.db_name + '.%d.%d.tmp' % (rand, os.getpid()) + last = self.db_name + '.bak' + fp = None + try: + fp = open(tmp, 'wb') + pickle.dump(self, fp, PICKLE_TYPE) + fp.close() + except IOError, e: + if options.verbose: + print 'Failed update: ' + e + if fp is not None: + os.unlink(tmp) + raise + try: + os.unlink(last) + except OSError, e: + if e.errno <> errno.ENOENT: raise + try: + os.link(self.db_name, last) + except: + if e.errno <> errno.ENOENT: raise + os.rename(tmp, self.db_name) + class DBDictClassifier(classifier.Classifier): '''Classifier object persisted in a caching database''' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=715248&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 28 07:13:21 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 28 07:13:23 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1023274 ] sb_server.py -u problem Message-ID: Bugs item #1023274, was opened at 2004-09-07 08:04 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023274&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_server.py -u problem Initial Comment: The sb_server.py's -u option (set the port for the web interface) doesn't seem to work, though I know it used to. 1.0b1 and 1.0rc1 both use the default port instead of the specified port. It would also be nice if the port could be set in the configuration file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 14:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks for your report. This bug has previously been reported, and has already been fixed in the source-code (i.e. in CVS) - so you can expect to see the fix in the next release. You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see when each version is released - details at http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS version of the source-code, and you should find the fix immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake) Date: 2004-09-07 08:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=3066 Ah, from reading the source I see the html_ui port setting; that solves my immediate problem, since it works. The -u option should still be made to work, or be removed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1023274&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 28 07:14:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 28 07:14:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1005866 ] Saving options Message-ID: Bugs item #1005866, was opened at 2004-08-09 21:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1005866&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: SShort (sabrewings) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Saving options Initial Comment: After I acquire a good amount of trained messages, whenever I try to save any options (like to stop caching messages) I get this: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 461, in found_terminator File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 770, in onChangeopts File "spambayes\ProxyUI.pyc", line 731, in verifyInput File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 862, in verifyInput File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 585, in convert File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 266, in convert AttributeError: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'split' I searched through the previous bugs, but was unable to find this exact bug on this version nor a way to fix it. I would really like to stop sucking up my hard drive. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-28 18:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe this was fixed before 1.0 final. If that is not the case, please reset the status of this tracker to "open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1005866&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 28 09:31:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 28 09:31:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-981970 ] tests failing Message-ID: Bugs item #981970, was opened at 2004-06-30 02:21 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981970&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: tests failing Initial Comment: Assigning to Tony for initial triage since he seems to know the most about these apps... There are some test scripts in spambayes/test. I tried running them just now and got this: * test_sb-server.py -z - when starting: User interface url is http://localhost:8881/ Listener on port 8111 is proxying localhost:8110 error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel (exceptions.TypeError:object does not support item assignment [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|read|69] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|handle_read_event|358] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py|handle_accept|284] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|374] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|199] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|145] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|create_socket|234] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|add_channel|218]) when connecting via lynx: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", li ne 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) TypeError: onHome() got an unexpected keyword argument '' * test_storage.py: ...E. ====================================================================== ERROR: testNoDBMAvailable (__main__.DBStorageTestCase) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_storage.py", line 154, in testNoDBMAvailable open_storage(db_name, True) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 676, in open_storage raise NoSuchClassifierError(db_type) NoSuchClassifierError: True ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 5 tests in 0.210s FAILED (errors=1) * test_smtpproxy.py: Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_smtpproxy.py", line 93, in ? from sb_server import state, _recreateState ImportError: No module named sb_server * test_programs.py: SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ FSpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 961, in ? run() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 955, in run start() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 892, in start main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort, state.launchUI) File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 869, in main httpServer = UserInterfaceServer(uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 113, in __init__ Dibbler.HTTPServer.__init__(self, uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 304, in __init__ (self, context), context._map) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 271, in __init__ self.bind(port) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line 277, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (48, 'Address already in use') FSpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 961, in ? run() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 955, in run start() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 892, in start main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort, state.launchUI) File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 869, in main httpServer = UserInterfaceServer(uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 113, in __init__ Dibbler.HTTPServer.__init__(self, uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 304, in __init__ (self, context), context._map) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 271, in __init__ self.bind(port) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line 277, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (48, 'Address already in use') F ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_default (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 166, in test_sb_server_default self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_restore (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 180, in test_sb_server_restore self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_ui_port (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 172, in test_sb_server_ui_port self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 3 tests in 15.811s FAILED (failures=3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-28 20:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I've finally got around to fixing test_smtpproxy.py, so these all work now. Richie's fix is in Python 2.4b1, I believe, and all the tests appear to work with Python 2.2*, 2.3 and 2.4. * Except test_programs, which needs os.waitpid, which 2.2 doesn't have. This is a problem with the test only, though, AFAICT. Also except test_sb_imapfilter, which I'll look into (I'm still finishing that off). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-07-18 11:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 I've submitted patch 993062 to Python to fix what I believe is a bug in the 2.4 cgi module. I can't get a working Python 2.4 / Spambayes environment together to check that it fixes this specific problem, but I believe it will. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 18:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The 'unexpected argument' problem is a Python 2.4 change that breaks Dibbler.py (and so all our web interfaces). I've split this off into: [ 990685 ] Change in cgi.parse_qs breaks sb_server in Python 2.4 And assigned it to Richie to decide whether my proposed patch is ok or not. Until then I expect that you'll find that test_programs still fails for you (as would launching sb_server and then opening the web interface). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 21:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Drat. This has been a bug for a while now, I believe (I guess not many people are using the command line to specify a different port!). I'll check in a fix for sb_server. The test_program tests now pass for me (well, I haven't tried the service ones). So reassigning to me for the remaining smtpproxy one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-07-09 18:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Best I can tell, the "-u" option to sb_server is broken: % sb_server.py -u 8899 ... User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ I believe that last line should read "8899". This is causing our attempt to stop the server to fail (as it is trying to connect to port 8899), and then future tests fail as the sb_server on port 8880 is still running. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 17:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 test_smtpproxy doesn't look like it was ever finished, I think. (If true, this is my fault). I'll try and find time to finish it off over the next week. I don't know enough about the mutex stuff to figure out test_programs, so I'm reassigning to Mark :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 15:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed test_storage. With test_sb-server.py I get this: """ C:\spambayes\spambayes\test>test_sb-server.py -z Loading database...Loading state from _pop3proxy_test.pickle pickle _pop3proxy_test.pickle is a new pickle Running self-test... User interface url is http://localhost:8881/ Listener on port 8111 is proxying localhost:8110 Self-test passed. """ I'm using Python 2.3 - could this be a 2.3 -> 2.4 change? Or a platform depend problem? (me Windows, you not) I'll look into the other two shortly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981970&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 28 10:03:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 28 10:03:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1055924 ] What about classifying non-spam instead Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1055924, was opened at 2004-10-28 08:03 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1055924&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Engel (mkengel) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: What about classifying non-spam instead Initial Comment: Hello, Before training your database, every mail is passing as HAM. With training, your filter can decide if SPAM or HAM. Have you ever thought starting from the other extreme: starting with everything classified as SPAM and with training of ONLY good messages as HAM. Could that make it easier ? Regards Michael Engel ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1055924&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 28 12:27:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 28 12:27:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1052816 ] I18N Message-ID: Patches item #1052816, was opened at 2004-10-23 18:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hfoffani You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: I18N Initial Comment: Here goes my first patches for the Outlook addin I18N. The patches in Outlook2000\dialogs\resources change the parser to output gettexted captions and labels. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-28 12:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Sure. I upload "es" and "es_AR". I translated the "Help" menu and submenus and the first tab of the manager dialog window. If you set your "International Settings" for Spanish-Argentina (Espa?ol-Argentina) you'll see that "Help" is translated as "Ashuda". If you set your "International Settings" for Spanish-Spain (Espa?ol-Espa?a) you'll see that "Help" is now spelled as "Ayuda" (the y-sh difference was a local pun.) Given that there is no "es_ES" directory yet, Spanish-Spain fallbacks to "es". You can also try to set to, for instance, French-France which will fallback to the embedded english. Besides configuring through "International Settings", you can also set the language in SB's outlook .ini. Do it in General section, language variable like: [General] language: fr_FR Regarding "license" well.. that's a strong word for my code. Do whatever you like with it. Consider it in public domain. ah... unzip the file under the spambayes directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-28 05:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 These look good to me. Do you have any translations done/partly done, so I could see how it all goes? BTW, could you confirm that you're fine donating this code to the SpamBayes project, to be licensed under the PSF licence? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-23 19:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Outlook2000.txt patch file modifies config.py to add a "language" user var and modifies manager.py adding calls to the LanguageManager class. The first calls set the language to the default system one. The second call set the language to the one that is configured in the SB config file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-23 19:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 i18n.py contains the class that I use to initialize the internationalization environment. That is: gettext and sys.path. i18n.py should be in the Outlook2000 directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-23 18:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 The patch for Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py lets SB import a foreign language i18n_dialogs.py file. To better distinguish with the default dialogs.py in the official distribution, the new transalated dialogs will be prefixed by "i18n_". __init__.py assumes that SB already has a modified sys.path that points to the correct language resources. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Oct 28 23:35:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Oct 28 23:35:50 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1055924 ] What about classifying non-spam instead Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1055924, was opened at 2004-10-28 21:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1055924&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Engel (mkengel) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: What about classifying non-spam instead Initial Comment: Hello, Before training your database, every mail is passing as HAM. With training, your filter can decide if SPAM or HAM. Have you ever thought starting from the other extreme: starting with everything classified as SPAM and with training of ONLY good messages as HAM. Could that make it easier ? Regards Michael Engel ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-29 10:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You've misunderstood. Before you train, everything is 'unsure' (it scores exactly 0.5), because SpamBayes knows nothing, and so is unsure about everything, as you would expect. Given the way the math works, this is really the only way to go, and it seems to make sense, IMO. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1055924&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 29 04:02:04 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 29 04:02:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1052816 ] I18N Message-ID: Patches item #1052816, was opened at 2004-10-24 05:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: I18N Initial Comment: Here goes my first patches for the Outlook addin I18N. The patches in Outlook2000\dialogs\resources change the parser to output gettexted captions and labels. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-29 15:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The "Help" menu & submenus need addin.py to be converted to use '_()', too, right? (It didn't work before then, but did afterwards). Apart from that, looks great. I would like the option to be in the main options file - otherwise there will be one there and one for Outlook, and there are too many options like that already. Attached are revised patches that do that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-28 23:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Sure. I upload "es" and "es_AR". I translated the "Help" menu and submenus and the first tab of the manager dialog window. If you set your "International Settings" for Spanish-Argentina (Espa?ol-Argentina) you'll see that "Help" is translated as "Ashuda". If you set your "International Settings" for Spanish-Spain (Espa?ol-Espa?a) you'll see that "Help" is now spelled as "Ayuda" (the y-sh difference was a local pun.) Given that there is no "es_ES" directory yet, Spanish-Spain fallbacks to "es". You can also try to set to, for instance, French-France which will fallback to the embedded english. Besides configuring through "International Settings", you can also set the language in SB's outlook .ini. Do it in General section, language variable like: [General] language: fr_FR Regarding "license" well.. that's a strong word for my code. Do whatever you like with it. Consider it in public domain. ah... unzip the file under the spambayes directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-28 16:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 These look good to me. Do you have any translations done/partly done, so I could see how it all goes? BTW, could you confirm that you're fine donating this code to the SpamBayes project, to be licensed under the PSF licence? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-24 06:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Outlook2000.txt patch file modifies config.py to add a "language" user var and modifies manager.py adding calls to the LanguageManager class. The first calls set the language to the default system one. The second call set the language to the one that is configured in the SB config file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-24 06:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 i18n.py contains the class that I use to initialize the internationalization environment. That is: gettext and sys.path. i18n.py should be in the Outlook2000 directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-24 05:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 The patch for Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py lets SB import a foreign language i18n_dialogs.py file. To better distinguish with the default dialogs.py in the official distribution, the new transalated dialogs will be prefixed by "i18n_". __init__.py assumes that SB already has a modified sys.path that points to the correct language resources. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 29 04:06:02 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 29 04:06:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1052816 ] I18N Message-ID: Patches item #1052816, was opened at 2004-10-24 05:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: I18N Initial Comment: Here goes my first patches for the Outlook addin I18N. The patches in Outlook2000\dialogs\resources change the parser to output gettexted captions and labels. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-29 15:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm happy to check in what's done so far, if you are. That way it's easy for the other developers (most are using CVS HEAD, I think) to try it out too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-29 15:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The "Help" menu & submenus need addin.py to be converted to use '_()', too, right? (It didn't work before then, but did afterwards). Apart from that, looks great. I would like the option to be in the main options file - otherwise there will be one there and one for Outlook, and there are too many options like that already. Attached are revised patches that do that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-28 23:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Sure. I upload "es" and "es_AR". I translated the "Help" menu and submenus and the first tab of the manager dialog window. If you set your "International Settings" for Spanish-Argentina (Espa?ol-Argentina) you'll see that "Help" is translated as "Ashuda". If you set your "International Settings" for Spanish-Spain (Espa?ol-Espa?a) you'll see that "Help" is now spelled as "Ayuda" (the y-sh difference was a local pun.) Given that there is no "es_ES" directory yet, Spanish-Spain fallbacks to "es". You can also try to set to, for instance, French-France which will fallback to the embedded english. Besides configuring through "International Settings", you can also set the language in SB's outlook .ini. Do it in General section, language variable like: [General] language: fr_FR Regarding "license" well.. that's a strong word for my code. Do whatever you like with it. Consider it in public domain. ah... unzip the file under the spambayes directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-28 16:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 These look good to me. Do you have any translations done/partly done, so I could see how it all goes? BTW, could you confirm that you're fine donating this code to the SpamBayes project, to be licensed under the PSF licence? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-24 06:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Outlook2000.txt patch file modifies config.py to add a "language" user var and modifies manager.py adding calls to the LanguageManager class. The first calls set the language to the default system one. The second call set the language to the one that is configured in the SB config file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-24 06:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 i18n.py contains the class that I use to initialize the internationalization environment. That is: gettext and sys.path. i18n.py should be in the Outlook2000 directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-24 05:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 The patch for Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py lets SB import a foreign language i18n_dialogs.py file. To better distinguish with the default dialogs.py in the official distribution, the new transalated dialogs will be prefixed by "i18n_". __init__.py assumes that SB already has a modified sys.path that points to the correct language resources. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Oct 29 20:43:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Oct 29 20:43:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1052816 ] I18N Message-ID: Patches item #1052816, was opened at 2004-10-23 18:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hfoffani You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: I18N Initial Comment: Here goes my first patches for the Outlook addin I18N. The patches in Outlook2000\dialogs\resources change the parser to output gettexted captions and labels. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-29 20:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Yes, you need the _() around "Help". I knew I've forgotten something... My current addin.py and manager.py have many messages gettexted but the code is far from complete so I reverted those to the minimun. Configuring the language in the main options is better, yes. Thanks. Don't check the patches in yet. I'm going to test sb_server very soon to double check if there are problems with the designed framework on other SB programs besides the Outlook addin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-29 04:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm happy to check in what's done so far, if you are. That way it's easy for the other developers (most are using CVS HEAD, I think) to try it out too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-29 04:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The "Help" menu & submenus need addin.py to be converted to use '_()', too, right? (It didn't work before then, but did afterwards). Apart from that, looks great. I would like the option to be in the main options file - otherwise there will be one there and one for Outlook, and there are too many options like that already. Attached are revised patches that do that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-28 12:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Sure. I upload "es" and "es_AR". I translated the "Help" menu and submenus and the first tab of the manager dialog window. If you set your "International Settings" for Spanish-Argentina (Espa?ol-Argentina) you'll see that "Help" is translated as "Ashuda". If you set your "International Settings" for Spanish-Spain (Espa?ol-Espa?a) you'll see that "Help" is now spelled as "Ayuda" (the y-sh difference was a local pun.) Given that there is no "es_ES" directory yet, Spanish-Spain fallbacks to "es". You can also try to set to, for instance, French-France which will fallback to the embedded english. Besides configuring through "International Settings", you can also set the language in SB's outlook .ini. Do it in General section, language variable like: [General] language: fr_FR Regarding "license" well.. that's a strong word for my code. Do whatever you like with it. Consider it in public domain. ah... unzip the file under the spambayes directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-28 05:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 These look good to me. Do you have any translations done/partly done, so I could see how it all goes? BTW, could you confirm that you're fine donating this code to the SpamBayes project, to be licensed under the PSF licence? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-23 19:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 Outlook2000.txt patch file modifies config.py to add a "language" user var and modifies manager.py adding calls to the LanguageManager class. The first calls set the language to the default system one. The second call set the language to the one that is configured in the SB config file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-23 19:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 i18n.py contains the class that I use to initialize the internationalization environment. That is: gettext and sys.path. i18n.py should be in the Outlook2000 directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hernan Martinez Foffani (hfoffani) Date: 2004-10-23 18:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112690 The patch for Outlook2000\dialogs\__init__.py lets SB import a foreign language i18n_dialogs.py file. To better distinguish with the default dialogs.py in the official distribution, the new transalated dialogs will be prefixed by "i18n_". __init__.py assumes that SB already has a modified sys.path that points to the correct language resources. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1052816&group_id=61702