From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jul 1 11:36:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jul 1 11:36:26 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-983487 ] Is/IsNot buttons does not work Message-ID: Bugs item #983487, was opened at 2004-07-01 17:36 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983487&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Claus (cb831) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Is/IsNot buttons does not work Initial Comment: Setup Outlook 2003 / WinXP SP1 Outlook runs in cache mode against Exchange 2003 I have 3 mailboxes in Outlook (A, B and C) Spambayes scans A.Inbox, B.Inbox and C.Inbox Spambayes moves spam to C.Inbox.Spam Spambayes moves possible spam to C.Inbox.MaybeSpam A.Inbox is my real/primary inbox, B/C are additional. The automatic scanning works perfect in all Inboxes. [Delete As Spam] works in A.Inbox [Delete As Spam] does not work in B.Inbox [Delete As Spam] does not work in C.Inbox [Delete As Spam] does not work in C.Inbox.MaybeSpam [Recover From Spam] does not work in C.Inbox.MaybeSpam [Recover From Spam] does not work in C.Inbox.Spam When the buttons does not work the error presented is: "No filterable mail items are selected" no matter how many I select. As cached mode is partly offline (uses OST) this bug may be related to bug 982351. Regards Claus ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983487&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jul 1 11:44:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jul 1 11:44:39 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-983487 ] Is/IsNot buttons does not work Message-ID: Bugs item #983487, was opened at 2004-07-01 17:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cb831 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983487&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Claus (cb831) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Is/IsNot buttons does not work Initial Comment: Setup Outlook 2003 / WinXP SP1 Outlook runs in cache mode against Exchange 2003 I have 3 mailboxes in Outlook (A, B and C) Spambayes scans A.Inbox, B.Inbox and C.Inbox Spambayes moves spam to C.Inbox.Spam Spambayes moves possible spam to C.Inbox.MaybeSpam A.Inbox is my real/primary inbox, B/C are additional. The automatic scanning works perfect in all Inboxes. [Delete As Spam] works in A.Inbox [Delete As Spam] does not work in B.Inbox [Delete As Spam] does not work in C.Inbox [Delete As Spam] does not work in C.Inbox.MaybeSpam [Recover From Spam] does not work in C.Inbox.MaybeSpam [Recover From Spam] does not work in C.Inbox.Spam When the buttons does not work the error presented is: "No filterable mail items are selected" no matter how many I select. As cached mode is partly offline (uses OST) this bug may be related to bug 982351. Regards Claus ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Claus (cb831) Date: 2004-07-01 17:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1074982 Log Tail (mailbox names changed to match A/B/C): Message 'torpid Is it?' in 'C/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 283, in _Invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 288, in _invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 616, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 550, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 409, in OnItemAdd File "msgstore.pyc", line 365, in GetMessage msgstore.NotFoundException: NotFoundException: Exception 0x8004010f (MAPI_E_NOT_FOUND): OLE error 0x8004010f Message '$91823' in 'C/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 283, in _Invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 288, in _invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 616, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 550, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 409, in OnItemAdd File "msgstore.pyc", line 365, in GetMessage msgstore.NotFoundException: NotFoundException: Exception 0x8004010f (MAPI_E_NOT_FOUND): OLE error 0x8004010f Message 'Ebay Fraud Department (R)' in 'C/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method. Traceback (most recent call last): File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 283, in _Invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 288, in _invoke_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 616, in _invokeex_ File "win32com\server\policy.pyc", line 550, in _invokeex_ File "addin.pyc", line 409, in OnItemAdd File "msgstore.pyc", line 365, in GetMessage msgstore.NotFoundException: NotFoundException: Exception 0x8004010f (MAPI_E_NOT_FOUND): OLE error 0x8004010f Message 'ERNI online' in 'A/IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'SourceForge.net Account Registration' in 'C/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure' ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.pyc", line 1024, in GetSelectedMessages File "msgstore.pyc", line 365, in GetMessage NotFoundException: NotFoundException: Exception 0x8004010f (MAPI_E_NOT_FOUND): OLE error 0x8004010f ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983487&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jul 1 13:04:39 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jul 1 13:04:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-983539 ] Install error on Outlook 2002 Message-ID: Bugs item #983539, was opened at 2004-07-01 10:04 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983539&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Taed Wynnell (taed) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Install error on Outlook 2002 Initial Comment: When I installed 1.0 RC 2, I got an installation error. When I then loaded Outlook, SpamBayes seemed to load and displayed the buttons, but the SpamBayes menu was non-functional (ignored click). I'm running Outlook 2002 (with all updates) on my Windows NT 4.0 Server (with all updates). I've tried installing it multiple times (and rebooting and so on), but no luck. Re-installing 1.0 RC 1 will then work fine. Here's the outlook_addin_register.exe.log file contents: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 40, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 40, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983539&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jul 1 15:54:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jul 1 16:21:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-982167 ] Different scores between Outlook plugin and SB source Message-ID: Support Requests item #982167, was opened at 2004-06-29 13:57 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by peteshack You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=982167&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Deleted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pete Shack (peteshack) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Different scores between Outlook plugin and SB source Initial Comment: Any help with this is greatly appreciated. I know this may not be the best place to post this: I've got the outlook plugin installed - works great. I'm also trying Andrew Dalkes SpamBayesCuller: http://www.entrian.com/sbwiki/SpamBayesCuller using the same training database. Outlook scores emails more accurately than the culler script. I've checked the scores on identical messages - the culler script scored 0.477 where the plugin scored it 0.999 Any ideas why or where I should start to look? THANKS! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=982167&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jul 1 19:44:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jul 1 19:44:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-982167 ] Different scores between Outlook plugin and SB source Message-ID: Support Requests item #982167, was opened at 2004-06-29 14:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=982167&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Pete Shack (peteshack) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Different scores between Outlook plugin and SB source Initial Comment: Any help with this is greatly appreciated. I know this may not be the best place to post this: I've got the outlook plugin installed - works great. I'm also trying Andrew Dalkes SpamBayesCuller: http://www.entrian.com/sbwiki/SpamBayesCuller using the same training database. Outlook scores emails more accurately than the culler script. I've checked the scores on identical messages - the culler script scored 0.477 where the plugin scored it 0.999 Any ideas why or where I should start to look? THANKS! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-07-01 19:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Take a specific email and generate clue lists from both ways of scoring it. That's the only way to start. I don't expect the scores to be identical, because Outlook destroys the MIME structure of incoming email, so the proxy literally sees a different message than the Outlook addin sees. That should be a minor difference, though. Differences in option settings probably account for it -- but no way to tell without those clue lists. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=982167&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 2 19:27:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 2 19:27:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-984398 ] Can you drag messages to classify? Message-ID: Support Requests item #984398, was opened at 2004-07-02 19:27 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=984398&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve (vamp07) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can you drag messages to classify? Initial Comment: With the outlook plug-in, can you drag messages between folders to train or must you use the buttons? Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=984398&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 2 23:59:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 2 23:59:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-984398 ] Can you drag messages to classify? Message-ID: Support Requests item #984398, was opened at 2004-07-03 11:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=984398&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: v1.0 (example) >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve (vamp07) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can you drag messages to classify? Initial Comment: With the outlook plug-in, can you drag messages between folders to train or must you use the buttons? Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-03 15:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are options (in the "Training" tab of the SpamBayes Manager dialog) to control this, so it's up to you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=984398&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jul 4 02:20:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jul 4 02:20:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-933473 ] Unnecessary spam folder hook Message-ID: Bugs item #933473, was opened at 2004-04-12 13:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=933473&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 1 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Unnecessary spam folder hook Initial Comment: [From discussion on spambayes-dev] The spam folder gets hooked for incremental training, even if the train_manual_spam option is False. In the hooked event, it checks for the train_manual_spam option and quits if it's False. I asked: """ Would it not be better to only add the hook if the train_manual_spam option is True? Or is there some other reason that the spam folder has to be hooked? """ Mark replied: """I think you are correct - we could avoid the hook alltogether. However, I'm still reluctant to change this, as it does risk breakage. We can fix it post 1.0. """ Opening this so that I remember that this needs to be done. Attaching a patch that does the job, and I'll run with this in my own day-to-day plug-in so there's some limited testing at least before it gets checked in. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-04 18:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Checked into the HEAD. Checking in Outlook2000/addin.py; new revision: 1.129; previous revision: 1.128 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=933473&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jul 6 14:04:04 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jul 6 14:04:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-985921 ] Have Spambyes look at posts as well as mail items for spam Message-ID: Feature Requests item #985921, was opened at 2004-07-06 06:04 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=985921&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: GoRoar (goroar) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Have Spambyes look at posts as well as mail items for spam Initial Comment: We have just upgraded to a new mail server and now a lot of emails are showing up as posts in the mail folder. This should be a simple check to see if the item that is being looked at is a post or a mail item and take the appropriate steps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=985921&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jul 6 18:45:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jul 6 18:45:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-986079 ] Multilanguage Message-ID: Feature Requests item #986079, was opened at 2004-07-06 18:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: seppli (seppli) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multilanguage Initial Comment: what do you think about a multilingual-programming- interface to easy translate the Strings in spam-bayes ? - For example a single file which holds all user-dialog- strings? Translating such a file in german could be my tribute spam-bayes - my favorite spamfilter. And could anybody tell my why the Outlook after 0.81 downloads first all mail bofore classifying them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 From geoffrey at nwlink.com Wed Jul 7 04:56:40 2004 From: geoffrey at nwlink.com (Geoffrey Swenson) Date: Wed Jul 7 04:55:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] SpamBayes outlook addin incompatible with ZipMagic Message-ID: <001e01c463ce$0716bd00$0200a8c0@geewhizbang> If I turn zipmagic folders on, spambayes is broken with the following log message: Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. Geoffrey J. Swenson geoffrey@nwlink.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/attachments/20040706/caa22f44/attachment.htm From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 7 05:45:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 7 05:45:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-986353 ] Outlook/ZipMagic Incompatibility Message-ID: Bugs item #986353, was opened at 2004-07-06 20:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=986353&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook/ZipMagic Incompatibility Initial Comment: I use ZipMagic to handle Zip files under Win2K. If I turn zipmagic on, it permanently crashes SpamBayes with the following logfile message: Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=986353&group_id=61702 From rjl at biosci.umtri.umich.edu Wed Jul 7 15:53:55 2004 From: rjl at biosci.umtri.umich.edu (Richard Jeff Lehman) Date: Wed Jul 7 15:54:11 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] SpamBayes will not stay loaded Message-ID: <40EBC832.31693.4E0052@biosci.umtri.umich.edu> After several months running alphas, betas and RC1, SB suddenly unloaded itself and now refuses to stay loaded. (I get an envelope icon with a red triangle that lasts a few seconds or until I try to move the mouse over it.) WinXP, all current MS updates (through 7/7/04), McAfee VirusScan Enterprise 7.0, engine 4.3.20, 4373 defs. I have rebooted the system, run virus and spyware scanners, uninstalled and reinstalled SB, also python and the Win-py extensions. I do not recall installing anything at the time SB unloaded. -- ========================================================== = Richard Jeff Lehman Voice: 734-763-3463 = = UMTRI FAX: 734-647-3330 = = 2901 Baxter Rd. email: rjlehman AT umich DOT edu = = Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2150 = ========================================================== From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 7 16:16:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 7 16:16:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-986353 ] Outlook/ZipMagic Incompatibility Message-ID: Bugs item #986353, was opened at 2004-07-06 23:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=986353&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook/ZipMagic Incompatibility Initial Comment: I use ZipMagic to handle Zip files under Win2K. If I turn zipmagic on, it permanently crashes SpamBayes with the following logfile message: Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-07 10:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The logfile message you show is a normal message that is written to the logfile whenever you exit Outlook, so it's difficult to guess where the problem is. Are there any tracebacks or other error messages earlier in the logfile? It would be helpful if you could attach your complete logfile to this bug report. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=986353&group_id=61702 From kennypitt at hotmail.com Wed Jul 7 16:34:24 2004 From: kennypitt at hotmail.com (Kenny Pitt) Date: Wed Jul 7 16:34:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] SpamBayes will not stay loaded In-Reply-To: <40EBC832.31693.4E0052@biosci.umtri.umich.edu> Message-ID: Richard Jeff Lehman wrote: > After several months running alphas, betas and RC1, SB suddenly > unloaded itself and now refuses to stay loaded. (I get an envelope > icon with a red triangle that lasts a few seconds or until I try to > move the mouse over it.) Since you appear to be using Pegasus as your mail client, I assume you are using the sb_server proxy application, yes? Did the problem start immediately after you installed an updated version of SpamBayes (current version is RC2), or did it just suddenly start happening with the same version that you had been running successfully? Are you running the binary version from the installer, or are you running from source? Are there any error messages in your logfile? Except for the "red triangle", does the envelope icon that you see look the same as the normal SpamBayes icon with the green triangle that indicates SpamBayes is running? If so, look closely and see if it is actually a red square. SpamBayes does not include an icon with a red triangle, but it does have icons with a green triangle to indicate running and a red square to indicate stopped. -- Kenny Pitt From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 7 16:41:45 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 7 16:41:50 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-986353 ] Outlook/ZipMagic Incompatibility Message-ID: Bugs item #986353, was opened at 2004-07-06 20:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by geewhizbang You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=986353&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook/ZipMagic Incompatibility Initial Comment: I use ZipMagic to handle Zip files under Win2K. If I turn zipmagic on, it permanently crashes SpamBayes with the following logfile message: Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Date: 2004-07-07 07:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078371 I have attached the logfile, but the message I posted is the only thing that looks like an error The most likely reason for the crash is that the zip file "spambayes.zip" (or any other zip file used by spambayes) becomes a folder when zipmagic is activated. A similar feature is actually included with windows XP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-07 07:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The logfile message you show is a normal message that is written to the logfile whenever you exit Outlook, so it's difficult to guess where the problem is. Are there any tracebacks or other error messages earlier in the logfile? It would be helpful if you could attach your complete logfile to this bug report. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=986353&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 7 17:48:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 7 17:49:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-986353 ] Outlook/ZipMagic Incompatibility Message-ID: Bugs item #986353, was opened at 2004-07-06 23:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=986353&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook/ZipMagic Incompatibility Initial Comment: I use ZipMagic to handle Zip files under Win2K. If I turn zipmagic on, it permanently crashes SpamBayes with the following logfile message: Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-07 11:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The attached logfile shows a perfectly normal execution of SpamBayes, ending with a normal exit from SpamBayes when Outlook is closed. What is the error that you are seeing? Does it happen when you first start Outlook with ZipMagic's ZipFolders enabled? What happens if you disable ZipFolders before loading Outlook, and then reenable after Outlook and SpamBayes are loaded and running? The logfile you uploaded is "spambayes4.log". There should be 3 more recent logfiles named "spambayes1.log", "spambayes2.log", and "spambayes3.log". Can you find those? Please refer to bug #941639. It sounds like you are getting further than the user who submitted that bug, but maybe the logfile you uploaded was generated when ZipFolders was disabled? Do any of the symptons there sound at all familiar? Windows XP has a shell extension that will allow you to see the contents of a zip file in a "folder-like" view, but unlike ZipMagic it does not make the zip file look like a normal folder to other programs that directly access the file system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Date: 2004-07-07 10:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078371 I have attached the logfile, but the message I posted is the only thing that looks like an error The most likely reason for the crash is that the zip file "spambayes.zip" (or any other zip file used by spambayes) becomes a folder when zipmagic is activated. A similar feature is actually included with windows XP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-07 10:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The logfile message you show is a normal message that is written to the logfile whenever you exit Outlook, so it's difficult to guess where the problem is. Are there any tracebacks or other error messages earlier in the logfile? It would be helpful if you could attach your complete logfile to this bug report. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=986353&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 7 20:54:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 7 20:54:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-986793 ] Changing data_directory location Message-ID: Support Requests item #986793, was opened at 2004-07-07 13:54 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=986793&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jennifer Giannini (jcgiannini) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Changing data_directory location Initial Comment: Has anyone moved their data_directory to another location (e.g. a network server) by modifying the Default Outlook Profile.ini file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=986793&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 7 22:12:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 7 22:12:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-986793 ] Changing data_directory location Message-ID: Support Requests item #986793, was opened at 2004-07-07 14:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=986793&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jennifer Giannini (jcgiannini) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Changing data_directory location Initial Comment: Has anyone moved their data_directory to another location (e.g. a network server) by modifying the Default Outlook Profile.ini file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-07 16:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Not by modifying "Default Outlook Profile.ini", but you can do it by creating a "default_configuration.ini" file in the same directory. See FAQ #3.14: http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#how-can-i- change-the-directory-that-spambayes-stores-my-data-in ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=986793&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 7 22:13:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 7 22:14:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-986793 ] Changing data_directory location Message-ID: Support Requests item #986793, was opened at 2004-07-07 14:54 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=986793&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jennifer Giannini (jcgiannini) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Changing data_directory location Initial Comment: Has anyone moved their data_directory to another location (e.g. a network server) by modifying the Default Outlook Profile.ini file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-07 16:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Not by modifying "Default Outlook Profile.ini", but you can do it by creating a "default_configuration.ini" file in the same directory. See FAQ #3.14: http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#how-can-i- change-the-directory-that-spambayes-stores-my-data-in ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=986793&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jul 8 11:33:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jul 8 11:33:54 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970359 ] XP freezes when training SpamBays via web interface Message-ID: Bugs item #970359, was opened at 2004-06-10 08:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kmccoy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970359&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Bartram (stevebartram) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: XP freezes when training SpamBays via web interface Initial Comment: First, thank you for SpamBayes. It marks my spam very well indeed. However, when training SpamBayes via the web inteface (which is very nice) it frequently freezes my computer so even ctrl-alt-delete won't work. I've checked the Spambayes mailing lists and haven't seen any other report of this problem. Environment: I am using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) (binary), with version 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] of Python; my operating system is Windows 5.1.2600.2 (). I have trained 360 ham and 412 spam. (although the "Check for latest version" reports version "0.6") It's the Windows binary version. Some mail retrieved by Pegasus email and some by a custom perl script. These work without any problems. FireFox 0.8 AVG anti-virus up-to-date and ZoneAlarm correctly configured. SpamBayes trained via web interface, I haven't tried the smtp proxy method. SpamBayes is almost in it's default setup. It is using dbm for storage. Here is my bayescustomize.ini ================ [Headers] header_score_logarithm:True include_evidence:True include_score:True include_thermostat:True [html_ui] display_score:True [pop3proxy] listen_ports:8110,8111,8112,8113 remote_servers:..... [smtpproxy] use_cached_message:True ================ SpamBayesServer1.log: ================ Service not availible. Using thread. Loading database... SMTP Listener on port 8225 is proxying 127.0.01:25 Listener on port 8110 is proxying mail.zetnet.co.uk:110 Listener on port 8111 is proxying mail.tesco.net:110 Listener on port 8112 is proxying pop3.connectfree.co.uk:110 Listener on port 8113 is proxying mail.onetel.net.uk:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ ================ Symptoms: Quite frequently (but NOT consistently!) my computer will freeze when training SpamBayes via the web interface. This starts as a page not finishing loading. Sometimes this is the review page, but more often it is a page displaying a specific email. But, as I was writing this email and checking my configuration it did it on the page displaying which storage option was being used. When this happens I can still click a few times. The "back" button in the browser often seems to work. But after a few clicks the system starts to lock up. First all application windows fail to refresh their contents, although their frames redraw. This is rapidly followed by no response at all, even to ctrl-alt-delete. At which point only a hard reset will work. After rebooting SpamBayes may successfully train on the same set of emails. Or, it may freeze again. I usually avoid trying to examine the email that I was trying to view when the last freeze occurred. Instead, I find it in my email client and check it there. These freezes only happen on the spambayes pages. I haven't changed/installed anything else recently. I have tried closing Pegasus and stopping the perl script (which runs periodically) before trying to train. But this didn't prevent the freeze. I also tried IE 6 instead of FireFox, but that froze too. Any help will be greatly appreciated. TIA, Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: kmccoy (kmccoy) Date: 2004-07-08 04:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079301 Hello, I've encountered exactly the same problem. It originally happened with 1.0RC1 and it has continued happening with 1.0RC2 -- both the windows binary install file. It happened on versions of Firefox from 0.8 through 0.9.1 and IE6. I don't know how to find out the versions of python and XP, but it's XP SP1 in the system control panel. I use Eudora 6.1 for my email downloading. My settings are slightly altered, but I don't have a .ini file listing the changes. I'll detail them: -pop3 proxy settings pop.mail.yahoo.com 110 -smtp proxy options smtp.mail.yahoo.com 25 ham@localhost spam@localhost yes -header options none selected -storage options hammie.db spambayes.messageinfo.db yes no 0 -statistics options 0.2 0.85 -- advanced -statistics options 150 0.1 0.5 0.45 -header options yes 2 yes yes no 0.2 -storage options dbm 7 no pop3proxy-ham-cache pop3proxy-spam-cache pop3proxy-unknown-cache -tokenising options no no no no -training options no -interface options Subject From no yes no ham spam spam 0.0 100.0 localhost none myusername mypassword (both of those are obviously not that. :P) localhost localhost -- experimental -experimental options no no no no yes url-cache 7 no no ---- end ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 01:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 The symptoms sound similar to what happens when windows runs out of GUI resources. If that is indeed true, it maybe your browser rather than spambayes, particularly if you are using other than IE. If you are using IE, then this sounds very strange, and certainly the frist report I have heard. Being able to hang the OS is a bug in the OS even if we *are* being really naughty (which we aren't trying to be ) Another very interesting test would be to run from Python sources - the binary version of the proxy programs are used far less than their source-code versions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970359&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jul 8 14:07:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jul 8 14:07:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-987243 ] Spam won't filter Message-ID: Bugs item #987243, was opened at 2004-07-08 12:07 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=987243&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spam won't filter Initial Comment: I have used SPAMBAYES successfully for some months. Recently upgraded my machine to an IBM Thinkpad T41p running Win 2000 (previous was Compaq M700 with Win 2000). Running 1.0rc1, the system seemed to train OK and was allocating "sensible" scores to SPAM mails after training. However, they were'n't being moved to the Junk E-Mail folder. I upgraded to 1.0rc2 and tried again. Retrained, on the same mails, checked the scores and it was unchanged. Latest mail in was scored at 100% but not moved. Checked the Filter Action was set to filter all (I had noted that it seemed to have reset itself to Score but don't filter in the past). Log file attached Any suggestions? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=987243&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jul 8 15:53:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jul 8 15:54:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-986353 ] Outlook/ZipMagic Incompatibility Message-ID: Bugs item #986353, was opened at 2004-07-06 20:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by geewhizbang You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=986353&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook/ZipMagic Incompatibility Initial Comment: I use ZipMagic to handle Zip files under Win2K. If I turn zipmagic on, it permanently crashes SpamBayes with the following logfile message: Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Date: 2004-07-08 06:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078371 Yes, I have seen the same message as in bug #941639, but in the previous version. I did not see this message anywhere this time. What may be the difference is that I usually leave ZipMagic off, and turn it on only to create a .ZIP file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-07 08:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The attached logfile shows a perfectly normal execution of SpamBayes, ending with a normal exit from SpamBayes when Outlook is closed. What is the error that you are seeing? Does it happen when you first start Outlook with ZipMagic's ZipFolders enabled? What happens if you disable ZipFolders before loading Outlook, and then reenable after Outlook and SpamBayes are loaded and running? The logfile you uploaded is "spambayes4.log". There should be 3 more recent logfiles named "spambayes1.log", "spambayes2.log", and "spambayes3.log". Can you find those? Please refer to bug #941639. It sounds like you are getting further than the user who submitted that bug, but maybe the logfile you uploaded was generated when ZipFolders was disabled? Do any of the symptons there sound at all familiar? Windows XP has a shell extension that will allow you to see the contents of a zip file in a "folder-like" view, but unlike ZipMagic it does not make the zip file look like a normal folder to other programs that directly access the file system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Date: 2004-07-07 07:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078371 I have attached the logfile, but the message I posted is the only thing that looks like an error The most likely reason for the crash is that the zip file "spambayes.zip" (or any other zip file used by spambayes) becomes a folder when zipmagic is activated. A similar feature is actually included with windows XP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-07 07:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The logfile message you show is a normal message that is written to the logfile whenever you exit Outlook, so it's difficult to guess where the problem is. Are there any tracebacks or other error messages earlier in the logfile? It would be helpful if you could attach your complete logfile to this bug report. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=986353&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jul 8 19:21:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jul 8 19:21:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-987440 ] SB plug-in affects Outlook's AutoArchive behavior Message-ID: Bugs item #987440, was opened at 2004-07-08 10:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=987440&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Jansen (jsjansen) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SB plug-in affects Outlook's AutoArchive behavior Initial Comment: When SB is installed it apparently changes the modification date of all existing messages in the Outlook database to the date-time it scans them for "learning." The mod date is the date Outlook uses to AutoArchive Outlook items. So this has the adverse effect of delaying the AutoArchiving of any email messages that were received before SB was installed. For example, I noticed that one of my Outlook folders contained many items older than 12 months, even though that folder was configured to AutoArchive items when they are 12 months old. Even though the Received Date for an item was, say, 7/1/03 and that item should have been AutoArchived on 7/1/04 (12 months later), because I installed SB on 1/11/04 the mod date was changed to 1/11/04 so now it won't get AutoArchived until 1/11/05. This means I have to open each of my several Outlook archive files and then go through every one of my Outlook folders and manually move items into its archive file. This is a royal pain, to say the least. If possible, I would like the SB plugin to be changed so that it does not change the mod date of Outlook items it scans during learning. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=987440&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jul 8 20:06:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jul 8 20:06:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961019 ] Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Message-ID: Bugs item #961019, was opened at 2004-05-26 11:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by andyneil You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 4 Submitted By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Initial Comment: New Inbox messages get a spam rating of 100% but are not moved to "__Spam" folder as expected Key symptom from log (attached) seems to be "Eeek - only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS" and then "WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Mailbox - Andy Neil/IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField()" Config details: WinXPSP1, user account has local administrator privileges. Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5703) (with full Office 2003 Pro install). NewsGator 2.0. All Outlook rules have been turned off. Outlook "Junk E-mail Filtering" set to "No automatic filtering". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Date: 2004-07-08 11:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1050507 After the program did nothing useful for several weeks, I uninstalled. Won't have time to follow up per your suggestions. I understand how all-volunteer projects work in terms of prioritization/response time, sorry I won't be able to help out. Good luck. AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 18:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 That error is is very interesting, but I don't believe it is related to spam not being moved. That error relates to our attempt at determining if the 'Spam' field exists in the folder, but should not affect the normal filtering. You will see this message once each time SpamBayes starts, and each time the config dialog is closed. Your log indicates everything is going normally. Can you please go to the SB manager, Advanced->Diagnostics, and set the log level to "2". Then restart spambayes, and wait for the next spam correctly classified, but not moved. Could you then please create a *new* bug for that specific issue, and attach the log. I want to take over this bug for that error message you see - but as I mentioned, I'm not convinced they are related. I'm lowering the priority on this, as I also don't believe it will affect normal operation. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jul 8 20:32:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jul 8 20:35:24 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-986793 ] Changing data_directory location Message-ID: Support Requests item #986793, was opened at 2004-07-07 13:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jcgiannini You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=986793&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jennifer Giannini (jcgiannini) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Changing data_directory location Initial Comment: Has anyone moved their data_directory to another location (e.g. a network server) by modifying the Default Outlook Profile.ini file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jennifer Giannini (jcgiannini) Date: 2004-07-08 13:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=834086 Thank you very much! That did the trick. Do you know if you can use a UNC address instead of a drive letter to specify the data_directory location? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-07 15:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Not by modifying "Default Outlook Profile.ini", but you can do it by creating a "default_configuration.ini" file in the same directory. See FAQ #3.14: http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#how-can-i- change-the-directory-that-spambayes-stores-my-data-in ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=986793&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 9 05:08:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 9 05:08:15 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-986793 ] Changing data_directory location Message-ID: Support Requests item #986793, was opened at 2004-07-08 06:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=986793&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jennifer Giannini (jcgiannini) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Changing data_directory location Initial Comment: Has anyone moved their data_directory to another location (e.g. a network server) by modifying the Default Outlook Profile.ini file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 15:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 That should be fine - although from memory there is an issue if it's the top level of the share (like //server/ rather than //server/folder/). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jennifer Giannini (jcgiannini) Date: 2004-07-09 06:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=834086 Thank you very much! That did the trick. Do you know if you can use a UNC address instead of a drive letter to specify the data_directory location? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-08 08:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Not by modifying "Default Outlook Profile.ini", but you can do it by creating a "default_configuration.ini" file in the same directory. See FAQ #3.14: http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#how-can-i- change-the-directory-that-spambayes-stores-my-data-in ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=986793&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 9 05:14:45 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 9 05:14:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-987440 ] SB plug-in affects Outlook's AutoArchive behavior Message-ID: Bugs item #987440, was opened at 2004-07-09 05:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=987440&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Jansen (jsjansen) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SB plug-in affects Outlook's AutoArchive behavior Initial Comment: When SB is installed it apparently changes the modification date of all existing messages in the Outlook database to the date-time it scans them for "learning." The mod date is the date Outlook uses to AutoArchive Outlook items. So this has the adverse effect of delaying the AutoArchiving of any email messages that were received before SB was installed. For example, I noticed that one of my Outlook folders contained many items older than 12 months, even though that folder was configured to AutoArchive items when they are 12 months old. Even though the Received Date for an item was, say, 7/1/03 and that item should have been AutoArchived on 7/1/04 (12 months later), because I installed SB on 1/11/04 the mod date was changed to 1/11/04 so now it won't get AutoArchived until 1/11/05. This means I have to open each of my several Outlook archive files and then go through every one of my Outlook folders and manually move items into its archive file. This is a royal pain, to say the least. If possible, I would like the SB plugin to be changed so that it does not change the mod date of Outlook items it scans during learning. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 15:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This should only be happening during filtering/scoring, not training (but you were probably scoring messages after training, as this is typically something you want to do). This is because the spam score is saved to the message. You can turn this off if you really want to - you need to add Filter save_spam_info:False To the {profilename}.ini or Outlook.ini file in your data directory. Note that this does have consequences - SpamBayes does want to use this information at times, and will need to regenerate it each time. You also won't be able to display the spam score in Outlook. However, it would be simpler to just not score the messages after training (i.e. untick that box). That way training will not change the messages - filtering still will, but that shouldn't matter, right? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=987440&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 9 05:18:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 9 05:18:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-987243 ] Spam won't filter Message-ID: Bugs item #987243, was opened at 2004-07-09 00:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=987243&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spam won't filter Initial Comment: I have used SPAMBAYES successfully for some months. Recently upgraded my machine to an IBM Thinkpad T41p running Win 2000 (previous was Compaq M700 with Win 2000). Running 1.0rc1, the system seemed to train OK and was allocating "sensible" scores to SPAM mails after training. However, they were'n't being moved to the Junk E-Mail folder. I upgraded to 1.0rc2 and tried again. Retrained, on the same mails, checked the scores and it was unchanged. Latest mail in was scored at 100% but not moved. Checked the Filter Action was set to filter all (I had noted that it seemed to have reset itself to Score but don't filter in the past). Log file attached Any suggestions? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 15:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Duplicate of [ 961019 ] Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Please use that tracker to follow this bug. If you could read Mark's initial comments and try his request, that would be great. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=987243&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 9 05:18:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 9 05:18:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961019 ] Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Message-ID: Bugs item #961019, was opened at 2004-05-27 06:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 4 Submitted By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Initial Comment: New Inbox messages get a spam rating of 100% but are not moved to "__Spam" folder as expected Key symptom from log (attached) seems to be "Eeek - only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS" and then "WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Mailbox - Andy Neil/IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField()" Config details: WinXPSP1, user account has local administrator privileges. Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5703) (with full Office 2003 Pro install). NewsGator 2.0. All Outlook rules have been turned off. Outlook "Junk E-mail Filtering" set to "No automatic filtering". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 15:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting duplicate in [ 987243 ] Spam won't filter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Date: 2004-07-09 06:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1050507 After the program did nothing useful for several weeks, I uninstalled. Won't have time to follow up per your suggestions. I understand how all-volunteer projects work in terms of prioritization/response time, sorry I won't be able to help out. Good luck. AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 13:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 That error is is very interesting, but I don't believe it is related to spam not being moved. That error relates to our attempt at determining if the 'Spam' field exists in the folder, but should not affect the normal filtering. You will see this message once each time SpamBayes starts, and each time the config dialog is closed. Your log indicates everything is going normally. Can you please go to the SB manager, Advanced->Diagnostics, and set the log level to "2". Then restart spambayes, and wait for the next spam correctly classified, but not moved. Could you then please create a *new* bug for that specific issue, and attach the log. I want to take over this bug for that error message you see - but as I mentioned, I'm not convinced they are related. I'm lowering the priority on this, as I also don't believe it will affect normal operation. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 9 05:36:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 9 05:38:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-981970 ] tests failing Message-ID: Bugs item #981970, was opened at 2004-06-30 02:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981970&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: tests failing Initial Comment: Assigning to Tony for initial triage since he seems to know the most about these apps... There are some test scripts in spambayes/test. I tried running them just now and got this: * test_sb-server.py -z - when starting: User interface url is http://localhost:8881/ Listener on port 8111 is proxying localhost:8110 error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel (exceptions.TypeError:object does not support item assignment [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|read|69] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|handle_read_event|358] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py|handle_accept|284] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|374] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|199] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|145] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|create_socket|234] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|add_channel|218]) when connecting via lynx: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", li ne 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) TypeError: onHome() got an unexpected keyword argument '' * test_storage.py: ...E. ====================================================================== ERROR: testNoDBMAvailable (__main__.DBStorageTestCase) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_storage.py", line 154, in testNoDBMAvailable open_storage(db_name, True) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 676, in open_storage raise NoSuchClassifierError(db_type) NoSuchClassifierError: True ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 5 tests in 0.210s FAILED (errors=1) * test_smtpproxy.py: Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_smtpproxy.py", line 93, in ? from sb_server import state, _recreateState ImportError: No module named sb_server * test_programs.py: SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ FSpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 961, in ? run() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 955, in run start() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 892, in start main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort, state.launchUI) File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 869, in main httpServer = UserInterfaceServer(uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 113, in __init__ Dibbler.HTTPServer.__init__(self, uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 304, in __init__ (self, context), context._map) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 271, in __init__ self.bind(port) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line 277, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (48, 'Address already in use') FSpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 961, in ? run() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 955, in run start() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 892, in start main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort, state.launchUI) File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 869, in main httpServer = UserInterfaceServer(uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 113, in __init__ Dibbler.HTTPServer.__init__(self, uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 304, in __init__ (self, context), context._map) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 271, in __init__ self.bind(port) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line 277, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (48, 'Address already in use') F ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_default (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 166, in test_sb_server_default self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_restore (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 180, in test_sb_server_restore self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_ui_port (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 172, in test_sb_server_ui_port self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 3 tests in 15.811s FAILED (failures=3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 15:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed test_storage. With test_sb-server.py I get this: """ C:\spambayes\spambayes\test>test_sb-server.py -z Loading database...Loading state from _pop3proxy_test.pickle pickle _pop3proxy_test.pickle is a new pickle Running self-test... User interface url is http://localhost:8881/ Listener on port 8111 is proxying localhost:8110 Self-test passed. """ I'm using Python 2.3 - could this be a 2.3 -> 2.4 change? Or a platform depend problem? (me Windows, you not) I'll look into the other two shortly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981970&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 9 06:24:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 9 06:24:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-987440 ] SB plug-in affects Outlook's AutoArchive behavior Message-ID: Bugs item #987440, was opened at 2004-07-08 13:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=987440&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Jansen (jsjansen) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SB plug-in affects Outlook's AutoArchive behavior Initial Comment: When SB is installed it apparently changes the modification date of all existing messages in the Outlook database to the date-time it scans them for "learning." The mod date is the date Outlook uses to AutoArchive Outlook items. So this has the adverse effect of delaying the AutoArchiving of any email messages that were received before SB was installed. For example, I noticed that one of my Outlook folders contained many items older than 12 months, even though that folder was configured to AutoArchive items when they are 12 months old. Even though the Received Date for an item was, say, 7/1/03 and that item should have been AutoArchived on 7/1/04 (12 months later), because I installed SB on 1/11/04 the mod date was changed to 1/11/04 so now it won't get AutoArchived until 1/11/05. This means I have to open each of my several Outlook archive files and then go through every one of my Outlook folders and manually move items into its archive file. This is a royal pain, to say the least. If possible, I would like the SB plugin to be changed so that it does not change the mod date of Outlook items it scans during learning. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-07-09 00:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Note that there's a checkbox you can deselect if you want to stop saving spam scores, in the Advanced tab of the SpamBayes Manager: click the Diagnostics... button there to get at it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-08 23:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This should only be happening during filtering/scoring, not training (but you were probably scoring messages after training, as this is typically something you want to do). This is because the spam score is saved to the message. You can turn this off if you really want to - you need to add Filter save_spam_info:False To the {profilename}.ini or Outlook.ini file in your data directory. Note that this does have consequences - SpamBayes does want to use this information at times, and will need to regenerate it each time. You also won't be able to display the spam score in Outlook. However, it would be simpler to just not score the messages after training (i.e. untick that box). That way training will not change the messages - filtering still will, but that shouldn't matter, right? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=987440&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 9 06:54:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 9 06:54:12 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-987440 ] SB plug-in affects Outlook's AutoArchive behavior Message-ID: Bugs item #987440, was opened at 2004-07-09 05:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=987440&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Jansen (jsjansen) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SB plug-in affects Outlook's AutoArchive behavior Initial Comment: When SB is installed it apparently changes the modification date of all existing messages in the Outlook database to the date-time it scans them for "learning." The mod date is the date Outlook uses to AutoArchive Outlook items. So this has the adverse effect of delaying the AutoArchiving of any email messages that were received before SB was installed. For example, I noticed that one of my Outlook folders contained many items older than 12 months, even though that folder was configured to AutoArchive items when they are 12 months old. Even though the Received Date for an item was, say, 7/1/03 and that item should have been AutoArchived on 7/1/04 (12 months later), because I installed SB on 1/11/04 the mod date was changed to 1/11/04 so now it won't get AutoArchived until 1/11/05. This means I have to open each of my several Outlook archive files and then go through every one of my Outlook folders and manually move items into its archive file. This is a royal pain, to say the least. If possible, I would like the SB plugin to be changed so that it does not change the mod date of Outlook items it scans during learning. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 16:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks Tim - I didn't realise that we exposed that option :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-07-09 16:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Note that there's a checkbox you can deselect if you want to stop saving spam scores, in the Advanced tab of the SpamBayes Manager: click the Diagnostics... button there to get at it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 15:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This should only be happening during filtering/scoring, not training (but you were probably scoring messages after training, as this is typically something you want to do). This is because the spam score is saved to the message. You can turn this off if you really want to - you need to add Filter save_spam_info:False To the {profilename}.ini or Outlook.ini file in your data directory. Note that this does have consequences - SpamBayes does want to use this information at times, and will need to regenerate it each time. You also won't be able to display the spam score in Outlook. However, it would be simpler to just not score the messages after training (i.e. untick that box). That way training will not change the messages - filtering still will, but that shouldn't matter, right? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=987440&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 9 07:11:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 9 07:12:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-981970 ] tests failing Message-ID: Bugs item #981970, was opened at 2004-06-30 02:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981970&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) >Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: tests failing Initial Comment: Assigning to Tony for initial triage since he seems to know the most about these apps... There are some test scripts in spambayes/test. I tried running them just now and got this: * test_sb-server.py -z - when starting: User interface url is http://localhost:8881/ Listener on port 8111 is proxying localhost:8110 error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel (exceptions.TypeError:object does not support item assignment [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|read|69] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|handle_read_event|358] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py|handle_accept|284] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|374] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|199] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|145] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|create_socket|234] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|add_channel|218]) when connecting via lynx: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", li ne 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) TypeError: onHome() got an unexpected keyword argument '' * test_storage.py: ...E. ====================================================================== ERROR: testNoDBMAvailable (__main__.DBStorageTestCase) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_storage.py", line 154, in testNoDBMAvailable open_storage(db_name, True) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 676, in open_storage raise NoSuchClassifierError(db_type) NoSuchClassifierError: True ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 5 tests in 0.210s FAILED (errors=1) * test_smtpproxy.py: Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_smtpproxy.py", line 93, in ? from sb_server import state, _recreateState ImportError: No module named sb_server * test_programs.py: SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ FSpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 961, in ? run() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 955, in run start() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 892, in start main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort, state.launchUI) File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 869, in main httpServer = UserInterfaceServer(uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 113, in __init__ Dibbler.HTTPServer.__init__(self, uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 304, in __init__ (self, context), context._map) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 271, in __init__ self.bind(port) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line 277, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (48, 'Address already in use') FSpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 961, in ? run() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 955, in run start() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 892, in start main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort, state.launchUI) File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 869, in main httpServer = UserInterfaceServer(uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 113, in __init__ Dibbler.HTTPServer.__init__(self, uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 304, in __init__ (self, context), context._map) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 271, in __init__ self.bind(port) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line 277, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (48, 'Address already in use') F ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_default (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 166, in test_sb_server_default self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_restore (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 180, in test_sb_server_restore self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_ui_port (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 172, in test_sb_server_ui_port self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 3 tests in 15.811s FAILED (failures=3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 17:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 test_smtpproxy doesn't look like it was ever finished, I think. (If true, this is my fault). I'll try and find time to finish it off over the next week. I don't know enough about the mutex stuff to figure out test_programs, so I'm reassigning to Mark :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 15:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed test_storage. With test_sb-server.py I get this: """ C:\spambayes\spambayes\test>test_sb-server.py -z Loading database...Loading state from _pop3proxy_test.pickle pickle _pop3proxy_test.pickle is a new pickle Running self-test... User interface url is http://localhost:8881/ Listener on port 8111 is proxying localhost:8110 Self-test passed. """ I'm using Python 2.3 - could this be a 2.3 -> 2.4 change? Or a platform depend problem? (me Windows, you not) I'll look into the other two shortly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981970&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 9 07:12:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 9 07:12:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-987440 ] SB plug-in affects Outlook's AutoArchive behavior Message-ID: Bugs item #987440, was opened at 2004-07-08 13:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=987440&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Jansen (jsjansen) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SB plug-in affects Outlook's AutoArchive behavior Initial Comment: When SB is installed it apparently changes the modification date of all existing messages in the Outlook database to the date-time it scans them for "learning." The mod date is the date Outlook uses to AutoArchive Outlook items. So this has the adverse effect of delaying the AutoArchiving of any email messages that were received before SB was installed. For example, I noticed that one of my Outlook folders contained many items older than 12 months, even though that folder was configured to AutoArchive items when they are 12 months old. Even though the Received Date for an item was, say, 7/1/03 and that item should have been AutoArchived on 7/1/04 (12 months later), because I installed SB on 1/11/04 the mod date was changed to 1/11/04 so now it won't get AutoArchived until 1/11/05. This means I have to open each of my several Outlook archive files and then go through every one of my Outlook folders and manually move items into its archive file. This is a royal pain, to say the least. If possible, I would like the SB plugin to be changed so that it does not change the mod date of Outlook items it scans during learning. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-07-09 01:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Ya, although "exposed" is a strong characterization . Mark introduced it to see whether saving the spam score was having a surprising effect on something other than what this report was talking about. That's why it's so deeply hidden. I wouldn't be surprised if it went away! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 00:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks Tim - I didn't realise that we exposed that option :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-07-09 00:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Note that there's a checkbox you can deselect if you want to stop saving spam scores, in the Advanced tab of the SpamBayes Manager: click the Diagnostics... button there to get at it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-08 23:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This should only be happening during filtering/scoring, not training (but you were probably scoring messages after training, as this is typically something you want to do). This is because the spam score is saved to the message. You can turn this off if you really want to - you need to add Filter save_spam_info:False To the {profilename}.ini or Outlook.ini file in your data directory. Note that this does have consequences - SpamBayes does want to use this information at times, and will need to regenerate it each time. You also won't be able to display the spam score in Outlook. However, it would be simpler to just not score the messages after training (i.e. untick that box). That way training will not change the messages - filtering still will, but that shouldn't matter, right? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=987440&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 9 08:13:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 9 08:14:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-981970 ] tests failing Message-ID: Bugs item #981970, was opened at 2004-06-30 00:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981970&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: tests failing Initial Comment: Assigning to Tony for initial triage since he seems to know the most about these apps... There are some test scripts in spambayes/test. I tried running them just now and got this: * test_sb-server.py -z - when starting: User interface url is http://localhost:8881/ Listener on port 8111 is proxying localhost:8110 error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel (exceptions.TypeError:object does not support item assignment [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|read|69] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|handle_read_event|358] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py|handle_accept|284] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|374] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|199] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|145] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|create_socket|234] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|add_channel|218]) when connecting via lynx: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", li ne 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) TypeError: onHome() got an unexpected keyword argument '' * test_storage.py: ...E. ====================================================================== ERROR: testNoDBMAvailable (__main__.DBStorageTestCase) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_storage.py", line 154, in testNoDBMAvailable open_storage(db_name, True) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 676, in open_storage raise NoSuchClassifierError(db_type) NoSuchClassifierError: True ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 5 tests in 0.210s FAILED (errors=1) * test_smtpproxy.py: Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_smtpproxy.py", line 93, in ? from sb_server import state, _recreateState ImportError: No module named sb_server * test_programs.py: SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ FSpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 961, in ? run() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 955, in run start() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 892, in start main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort, state.launchUI) File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 869, in main httpServer = UserInterfaceServer(uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 113, in __init__ Dibbler.HTTPServer.__init__(self, uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 304, in __init__ (self, context), context._map) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 271, in __init__ self.bind(port) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line 277, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (48, 'Address already in use') FSpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 961, in ? run() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 955, in run start() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 892, in start main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort, state.launchUI) File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 869, in main httpServer = UserInterfaceServer(uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 113, in __init__ Dibbler.HTTPServer.__init__(self, uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 304, in __init__ (self, context), context._map) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 271, in __init__ self.bind(port) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line 277, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (48, 'Address already in use') F ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_default (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 166, in test_sb_server_default self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_restore (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 180, in test_sb_server_restore self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_ui_port (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 172, in test_sb_server_ui_port self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 3 tests in 15.811s FAILED (failures=3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-07-09 16:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Best I can tell, the "-u" option to sb_server is broken: % sb_server.py -u 8899 ... User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ I believe that last line should read "8899". This is causing our attempt to stop the server to fail (as it is trying to connect to port 8899), and then future tests fail as the sb_server on port 8880 is still running. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 15:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 test_smtpproxy doesn't look like it was ever finished, I think. (If true, this is my fault). I'll try and find time to finish it off over the next week. I don't know enough about the mutex stuff to figure out test_programs, so I'm reassigning to Mark :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 13:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed test_storage. With test_sb-server.py I get this: """ C:\spambayes\spambayes\test>test_sb-server.py -z Loading database...Loading state from _pop3proxy_test.pickle pickle _pop3proxy_test.pickle is a new pickle Running self-test... User interface url is http://localhost:8881/ Listener on port 8111 is proxying localhost:8110 Self-test passed. """ I'm using Python 2.3 - could this be a 2.3 -> 2.4 change? Or a platform depend problem? (me Windows, you not) I'll look into the other two shortly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981970&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 9 10:05:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 9 10:06:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961019 ] Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Message-ID: Bugs item #961019, was opened at 2004-05-26 18:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richarddeubert You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 4 Submitted By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Initial Comment: New Inbox messages get a spam rating of 100% but are not moved to "__Spam" folder as expected Key symptom from log (attached) seems to be "Eeek - only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS" and then "WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Mailbox - Andy Neil/IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField()" Config details: WinXPSP1, user account has local administrator privileges. Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5703) (with full Office 2003 Pro install). NewsGator 2.0. All Outlook rules have been turned off. Outlook "Junk E-mail Filtering" set to "No automatic filtering". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Date: 2004-07-09 08:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079441 If this really is linked to my bug report (987243) - which I question - then it most certainly does affect normal operation. In my case Spambayes is not working at all. It simply doesn't move any mails - mails that score 100%. Perhaps the priority should be reconsidered? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 03:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting duplicate in [ 987243 ] Spam won't filter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Date: 2004-07-08 18:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1050507 After the program did nothing useful for several weeks, I uninstalled. Won't have time to follow up per your suggestions. I understand how all-volunteer projects work in terms of prioritization/response time, sorry I won't be able to help out. Good luck. AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 01:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 That error is is very interesting, but I don't believe it is related to spam not being moved. That error relates to our attempt at determining if the 'Spam' field exists in the folder, but should not affect the normal filtering. You will see this message once each time SpamBayes starts, and each time the config dialog is closed. Your log indicates everything is going normally. Can you please go to the SB manager, Advanced->Diagnostics, and set the log level to "2". Then restart spambayes, and wait for the next spam correctly classified, but not moved. Could you then please create a *new* bug for that specific issue, and attach the log. I want to take over this bug for that error message you see - but as I mentioned, I'm not convinced they are related. I'm lowering the priority on this, as I also don't believe it will affect normal operation. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 9 11:10:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 9 11:11:15 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961019 ] Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Message-ID: Bugs item #961019, was opened at 2004-05-27 06:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 4 Submitted By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Initial Comment: New Inbox messages get a spam rating of 100% but are not moved to "__Spam" folder as expected Key symptom from log (attached) seems to be "Eeek - only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS" and then "WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Mailbox - Andy Neil/IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField()" Config details: WinXPSP1, user account has local administrator privileges. Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5703) (with full Office 2003 Pro install). NewsGator 2.0. All Outlook rules have been turned off. Outlook "Junk E-mail Filtering" set to "No automatic filtering". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 21:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's pretty certain that they are the same problems - the log files are practically identical (same "expecting one row" then "spam field missing" entries). The symptoms are also identical (scored but not moved). Why do you think that it's not the same? Given the two reports, it's possible that the two problems are related. In any case, the higher level report that Mark requested would probably be the most useful thing to get now (more than that will have to come from him). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Date: 2004-07-09 20:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079441 If this really is linked to my bug report (987243) - which I question - then it most certainly does affect normal operation. In my case Spambayes is not working at all. It simply doesn't move any mails - mails that score 100%. Perhaps the priority should be reconsidered? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 15:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting duplicate in [ 987243 ] Spam won't filter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Date: 2004-07-09 06:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1050507 After the program did nothing useful for several weeks, I uninstalled. Won't have time to follow up per your suggestions. I understand how all-volunteer projects work in terms of prioritization/response time, sorry I won't be able to help out. Good luck. AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 13:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 That error is is very interesting, but I don't believe it is related to spam not being moved. That error relates to our attempt at determining if the 'Spam' field exists in the folder, but should not affect the normal filtering. You will see this message once each time SpamBayes starts, and each time the config dialog is closed. Your log indicates everything is going normally. Can you please go to the SB manager, Advanced->Diagnostics, and set the log level to "2". Then restart spambayes, and wait for the next spam correctly classified, but not moved. Could you then please create a *new* bug for that specific issue, and attach the log. I want to take over this bug for that error message you see - but as I mentioned, I'm not convinced they are related. I'm lowering the priority on this, as I also don't believe it will affect normal operation. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 9 11:20:29 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 9 11:20:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-981970 ] tests failing Message-ID: Bugs item #981970, was opened at 2004-06-30 02:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981970&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: tests failing Initial Comment: Assigning to Tony for initial triage since he seems to know the most about these apps... There are some test scripts in spambayes/test. I tried running them just now and got this: * test_sb-server.py -z - when starting: User interface url is http://localhost:8881/ Listener on port 8111 is proxying localhost:8110 error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel (exceptions.TypeError:object does not support item assignment [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|read|69] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|handle_read_event|358] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py|handle_accept|284] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|374] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|199] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|145] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|create_socket|234] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|add_channel|218]) when connecting via lynx: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", li ne 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) TypeError: onHome() got an unexpected keyword argument '' * test_storage.py: ...E. ====================================================================== ERROR: testNoDBMAvailable (__main__.DBStorageTestCase) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_storage.py", line 154, in testNoDBMAvailable open_storage(db_name, True) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 676, in open_storage raise NoSuchClassifierError(db_type) NoSuchClassifierError: True ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 5 tests in 0.210s FAILED (errors=1) * test_smtpproxy.py: Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_smtpproxy.py", line 93, in ? from sb_server import state, _recreateState ImportError: No module named sb_server * test_programs.py: SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ FSpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 961, in ? run() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 955, in run start() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 892, in start main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort, state.launchUI) File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 869, in main httpServer = UserInterfaceServer(uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 113, in __init__ Dibbler.HTTPServer.__init__(self, uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 304, in __init__ (self, context), context._map) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 271, in __init__ self.bind(port) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line 277, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (48, 'Address already in use') FSpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 961, in ? run() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 955, in run start() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 892, in start main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort, state.launchUI) File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 869, in main httpServer = UserInterfaceServer(uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 113, in __init__ Dibbler.HTTPServer.__init__(self, uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 304, in __init__ (self, context), context._map) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 271, in __init__ self.bind(port) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line 277, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (48, 'Address already in use') F ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_default (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 166, in test_sb_server_default self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_restore (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 180, in test_sb_server_restore self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_ui_port (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 172, in test_sb_server_ui_port self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 3 tests in 15.811s FAILED (failures=3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 21:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Drat. This has been a bug for a while now, I believe (I guess not many people are using the command line to specify a different port!). I'll check in a fix for sb_server. The test_program tests now pass for me (well, I haven't tried the service ones). So reassigning to me for the remaining smtpproxy one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-07-09 18:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Best I can tell, the "-u" option to sb_server is broken: % sb_server.py -u 8899 ... User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ I believe that last line should read "8899". This is causing our attempt to stop the server to fail (as it is trying to connect to port 8899), and then future tests fail as the sb_server on port 8880 is still running. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 17:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 test_smtpproxy doesn't look like it was ever finished, I think. (If true, this is my fault). I'll try and find time to finish it off over the next week. I don't know enough about the mutex stuff to figure out test_programs, so I'm reassigning to Mark :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 15:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed test_storage. With test_sb-server.py I get this: """ C:\spambayes\spambayes\test>test_sb-server.py -z Loading database...Loading state from _pop3proxy_test.pickle pickle _pop3proxy_test.pickle is a new pickle Running self-test... User interface url is http://localhost:8881/ Listener on port 8111 is proxying localhost:8110 Self-test passed. """ I'm using Python 2.3 - could this be a 2.3 -> 2.4 change? Or a platform depend problem? (me Windows, you not) I'll look into the other two shortly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981970&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 9 14:52:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 9 14:53:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961019 ] Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Message-ID: Bugs item #961019, was opened at 2004-05-26 18:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richarddeubert You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 4 Submitted By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Initial Comment: New Inbox messages get a spam rating of 100% but are not moved to "__Spam" folder as expected Key symptom from log (attached) seems to be "Eeek - only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS" and then "WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Mailbox - Andy Neil/IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField()" Config details: WinXPSP1, user account has local administrator privileges. Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5703) (with full Office 2003 Pro install). NewsGator 2.0. All Outlook rules have been turned off. Outlook "Junk E-mail Filtering" set to "No automatic filtering". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Date: 2004-07-09 12:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079441 I accept your expert view that they are the same. I have upped the logging level to 5 as sugggested and will submit a new bug report with the new log file attached once I have a couple of new "spam" mails ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 09:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's pretty certain that they are the same problems - the log files are practically identical (same "expecting one row" then "spam field missing" entries). The symptoms are also identical (scored but not moved). Why do you think that it's not the same? Given the two reports, it's possible that the two problems are related. In any case, the higher level report that Mark requested would probably be the most useful thing to get now (more than that will have to come from him). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Date: 2004-07-09 08:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079441 If this really is linked to my bug report (987243) - which I question - then it most certainly does affect normal operation. In my case Spambayes is not working at all. It simply doesn't move any mails - mails that score 100%. Perhaps the priority should be reconsidered? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 03:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting duplicate in [ 987243 ] Spam won't filter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Date: 2004-07-08 18:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1050507 After the program did nothing useful for several weeks, I uninstalled. Won't have time to follow up per your suggestions. I understand how all-volunteer projects work in terms of prioritization/response time, sorry I won't be able to help out. Good luck. AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 01:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 That error is is very interesting, but I don't believe it is related to spam not being moved. That error relates to our attempt at determining if the 'Spam' field exists in the folder, but should not affect the normal filtering. You will see this message once each time SpamBayes starts, and each time the config dialog is closed. Your log indicates everything is going normally. Can you please go to the SB manager, Advanced->Diagnostics, and set the log level to "2". Then restart spambayes, and wait for the next spam correctly classified, but not moved. Could you then please create a *new* bug for that specific issue, and attach the log. I want to take over this bug for that error message you see - but as I mentioned, I'm not convinced they are related. I'm lowering the priority on this, as I also don't believe it will affect normal operation. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 9 19:00:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 9 19:00:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-988095 ] Athlon64, SP2, NX (no execute)=no workee Message-ID: Bugs item #988095, was opened at 2004-07-09 12:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988095&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: mlarma (mlarma) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Athlon64, SP2, NX (no execute)=no workee Initial Comment: When enabling the NX function underneath WinXP with SP2 RC2 (32 bit edition, not 64 bit windows), I was unable to start Outlook with the SpamBayes plug-in. After disabling and only disabling NX (remove /noexecute from boot.ini), it worked. Funny thing is that the owner of the company I work for developed a Bayesian spam filter as well and it had the same issue with the NX. Not sure what the problem is, but the NX feature would be nice to turn on. Does anyone know if NX can be disabled at the application level so that the other processes were protected with NX? Mark ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988095&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 9 19:35:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 9 19:35:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-988095 ] Athlon64, SP2, NX (no execute)=no workee Message-ID: Bugs item #988095, was opened at 2004-07-09 13:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988095&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: mlarma (mlarma) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Athlon64, SP2, NX (no execute)=no workee Initial Comment: When enabling the NX function underneath WinXP with SP2 RC2 (32 bit edition, not 64 bit windows), I was unable to start Outlook with the SpamBayes plug-in. After disabling and only disabling NX (remove /noexecute from boot.ini), it worked. Funny thing is that the owner of the company I work for developed a Bayesian spam filter as well and it had the same issue with the NX. Not sure what the problem is, but the NX feature would be nice to turn on. Does anyone know if NX can be disabled at the application level so that the other processes were protected with NX? Mark ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-07-09 13:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 You'll really have to ask about NX gimmicks on an Athlon list. SpamBayes is written entirely in the Python programming language, and that never, ever tries to execute code from a data region (I'm very familiar with Python's implementation) My only guess is that Outlook itself, or MAPI, try to do this when interfacing with extensions. Or Mark Hammond is playing disgusting games (the only kind he knows, really ) in the win32all Python extensions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988095&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 9 22:11:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 9 22:11:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-983539 ] Install error on Outlook 2002 Message-ID: Bugs item #983539, was opened at 2004-07-01 10:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pbarbour You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983539&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Taed Wynnell (taed) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Install error on Outlook 2002 Initial Comment: When I installed 1.0 RC 2, I got an installation error. When I then loaded Outlook, SpamBayes seemed to load and displayed the buttons, but the SpamBayes menu was non-functional (ignored click). I'm running Outlook 2002 (with all updates) on my Windows NT 4.0 Server (with all updates). I've tried installing it multiple times (and rebooting and so on), but no luck. Re-installing 1.0 RC 1 will then work fine. Here's the outlook_addin_register.exe.log file contents: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 40, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 40, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: pbarbour (pbarbour) Date: 2004-07-09 13:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1080518 likely due a call to the FlashWindowEx() function which is not supported in NT4. This error occured on my NT4 workstation also. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983539&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Jul 10 22:24:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Jul 10 22:24:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-988624 ] More of Bug no 961019 Message-ID: Bugs item #988624, was opened at 2004-07-10 20:24 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988624&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: More of Bug no 961019 Initial Comment: This is a follow on to bug no 961019 I have uped the log level to 5 and have had some 9 or 10 that should heve been moved to Junk Mail folder by SPAMBAYES but weren't. Hopefully the attached log file will help diagnosis. R ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988624&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jul 11 05:27:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jul 11 05:27:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-988763 ] Changing data folder by default_configuration.ini is ignored Message-ID: Bugs item #988763, was opened at 2004-07-11 03:27 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988763&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Greg Lorriman (lorriman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Changing data folder by default_configuration.ini is ignored Initial Comment: I've tried putting the default_configuration.ini file in many different locations since the instructions in the faq are not clear enough. The logfiles are empty (first time install) apart from one or two innocuous messages such as : "Loading database... User interface url is http://localhost:8880/" I've tried adding an extra backslash to the end of the folder path (for each copy of the ini file). I've watched for the recreation of the data folder; which only happens in the default location. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988763&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jul 11 08:21:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jul 11 08:21:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-988763 ] Changing data folder by default_configuration.ini is ignored Message-ID: Bugs item #988763, was opened at 2004-07-11 15:27 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988763&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Greg Lorriman (lorriman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Changing data folder by default_configuration.ini is ignored Initial Comment: I've tried putting the default_configuration.ini file in many different locations since the instructions in the faq are not clear enough. The logfiles are empty (first time install) apart from one or two innocuous messages such as : "Loading database... User interface url is http://localhost:8880/" I've tried adding an extra backslash to the end of the folder path (for each copy of the ini file). I've watched for the recreation of the data folder; which only happens in the default location. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-11 18:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You're reading a question in the FAQ that only applies to the Outlook plugin (it's in the Outlook plug-in section). None of it applies to the proxy, and no "default_configuration.ini" file will be used at any point. You have two options if you want to change where the data is stored: 1. just go into the configuration page on the web interface (some of the options are on the advanced page) and change the ones you want. 2. if the paths to the various items (the two databases and the cache directories) are relative ("folder/folder", not "drive:/folder/folder") then they will be relative to the location of the configuration file (the bayescustomize.ini file, probably). So you can move this and they'll move too. To get SpamBayes to recognise the location of the moved bayescustomize.ini file, set the environment variable "BAYESCUSTOMIZE" to the location of the file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988763&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 12 09:41:39 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 12 09:41:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961019 ] Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Message-ID: Bugs item #961019, was opened at 2004-05-27 06:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 4 Submitted By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Initial Comment: New Inbox messages get a spam rating of 100% but are not moved to "__Spam" folder as expected Key symptom from log (attached) seems to be "Eeek - only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS" and then "WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Mailbox - Andy Neil/IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField()" Config details: WinXPSP1, user account has local administrator privileges. Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5703) (with full Office 2003 Pro install). NewsGator 2.0. All Outlook rules have been turned off. Outlook "Junk E-mail Filtering" set to "No automatic filtering". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 19:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that Richard has done this: the new tracker is: [ 988624 ] More of Bug no 961019 If you could take a look at it Mark, that would be great. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Date: 2004-07-10 00:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079441 I accept your expert view that they are the same. I have upped the logging level to 5 as sugggested and will submit a new bug report with the new log file attached once I have a couple of new "spam" mails ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 21:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's pretty certain that they are the same problems - the log files are practically identical (same "expecting one row" then "spam field missing" entries). The symptoms are also identical (scored but not moved). Why do you think that it's not the same? Given the two reports, it's possible that the two problems are related. In any case, the higher level report that Mark requested would probably be the most useful thing to get now (more than that will have to come from him). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Date: 2004-07-09 20:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079441 If this really is linked to my bug report (987243) - which I question - then it most certainly does affect normal operation. In my case Spambayes is not working at all. It simply doesn't move any mails - mails that score 100%. Perhaps the priority should be reconsidered? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 15:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting duplicate in [ 987243 ] Spam won't filter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Date: 2004-07-09 06:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1050507 After the program did nothing useful for several weeks, I uninstalled. Won't have time to follow up per your suggestions. I understand how all-volunteer projects work in terms of prioritization/response time, sorry I won't be able to help out. Good luck. AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 13:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 That error is is very interesting, but I don't believe it is related to spam not being moved. That error relates to our attempt at determining if the 'Spam' field exists in the folder, but should not affect the normal filtering. You will see this message once each time SpamBayes starts, and each time the config dialog is closed. Your log indicates everything is going normally. Can you please go to the SB manager, Advanced->Diagnostics, and set the log level to "2". Then restart spambayes, and wait for the next spam correctly classified, but not moved. Could you then please create a *new* bug for that specific issue, and attach the log. I want to take over this bug for that error message you see - but as I mentioned, I'm not convinced they are related. I'm lowering the priority on this, as I also don't believe it will affect normal operation. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 12 09:41:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 12 09:41:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-988624 ] More of Bug no 961019 Message-ID: Bugs item #988624, was opened at 2004-07-11 08:24 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988624&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) >Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: More of Bug no 961019 Initial Comment: This is a follow on to bug no 961019 I have uped the log level to 5 and have had some 9 or 10 that should heve been moved to Junk Mail folder by SPAMBAYES but weren't. Hopefully the attached log file will help diagnosis. R ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988624&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 12 09:44:21 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 12 09:44:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-986079 ] Multilanguage Message-ID: Feature Requests item #986079, was opened at 2004-07-07 04:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: seppli (seppli) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multilanguage Initial Comment: what do you think about a multilingual-programming- interface to easy translate the Strings in spam-bayes ? - For example a single file which holds all user-dialog- strings? Translating such a file in german could be my tribute spam-bayes - my favorite spamfilter. And could anybody tell my why the Outlook after 0.81 downloads first all mail bofore classifying them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 19:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are some people who are interested in doing the translation, and the developers are certainly willing to help out as much as possible. Hopefully work will start on this post-1.0 (soonish). What it really needs at the moment is a 'champion' - someone who will do the work of organising everyone involved, and making sure that things happen. Most of us are pretty busy at the moment. As for the question - how else can SpamBayes do the classification? It needs to 'read' the mail to be able to see whether it's good or bad, and in order to 'read' it, it needs to download it first. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 12 19:00:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 12 19:00:23 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-986079 ] Multilanguage Message-ID: Feature Requests item #986079, was opened at 2004-07-06 18:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by seppli You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: seppli (seppli) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Multilanguage Initial Comment: what do you think about a multilingual-programming- interface to easy translate the Strings in spam-bayes ? - For example a single file which holds all user-dialog- strings? Translating such a file in german could be my tribute spam-bayes - my favorite spamfilter. And could anybody tell my why the Outlook after 0.81 downloads first all mail bofore classifying them? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: seppli (seppli) Date: 2004-07-12 19:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078049 Mmh - OK i like SpamBayes and i dont know how to live in this WORLD OF SPAM without it - but i think that i am not that "super-spiderman-mega-champion" - My english is not so Oxford-likely and i thougt that phyton is some kind of a snake... Just have a look on the translation-interface of an other sf- project - for example pdfcreator (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/) IMHO SpamBayes 0.81 downloads ONE single message and classifies that before downloading the next message - my 1.0rc2 now downloads ALL mails and classifies them after - some times it seams that SpamBayes forget to classifies some mails - that never happen with the version 0.81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 09:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 There are some people who are interested in doing the translation, and the developers are certainly willing to help out as much as possible. Hopefully work will start on this post-1.0 (soonish). What it really needs at the moment is a 'champion' - someone who will do the work of organising everyone involved, and making sure that things happen. Most of us are pretty busy at the moment. As for the question - how else can SpamBayes do the classification? It needs to 'read' the mail to be able to see whether it's good or bad, and in order to 'read' it, it needs to download it first. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=986079&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jul 13 01:23:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jul 13 01:23:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-989817 ] Filter Messages performed filter actions in spite of option Message-ID: Bugs item #989817, was opened at 2004-07-12 18:23 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=989817&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Price (sandyprice) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Filter Messages performed filter actions in spite of option Initial Comment: Did filter messages on a folder the plugin does not normally monitor using filter messages... from Spambayes plugin menu. In spite of the fact that "Score messages but don't perform filter options" was checked, the filter options were performed anyway--messages were moved out. Note, if it makes any difference, the inbox, Junk suspects and Junk E-Mail folders were also selected at the same time. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=989817&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jul 13 22:41:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jul 13 22:41:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-844796 ] SpamBayes as mail manager? Message-ID: Feature Requests item #844796, was opened at 2003-11-18 19:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by roguenovember You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=844796&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Klein (cadey) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: SpamBayes as mail manager? Initial Comment: Hello, I'm using the Outlook Addin and it's great, saves me a lot of time ! Will it be possible to use SpamBayes as a mail management system? Our helpdesk team is receiving hundreds of mails a day. It could be really usefull to teach a spambayes base to forward each mail to the right person regarding the words they contain? Of course, to do that, the learning database should be shared by all the support team, I don't know if already possible? That's two requests in one ;-) Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jamie Richard Wilson (roguenovember) Date: 2004-07-13 16:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=870522 There is another SourceForge project dedicated to Bayesian email classification for the kind of use you are requesting: https://sourceforge.net/projects/popfile/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=844796&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 08:08:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 08:08:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-990685 ] Change in cgi.parse_qs breaks sb_server in Python 2.4 Message-ID: Bugs item #990685, was opened at 2004-07-14 18:08 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=990685&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: Change in cgi.parse_qs breaks sb_server in Python 2.4 Initial Comment: cgi.parse_qs has changed behaviour between 2.3.4 and 2.4a1. Python 2.3.4 (#53, May 25 2004, 21:17:02) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import cgi >>> cgi.parse_qs("") {} >>> cgi.parse_qs("", 1) {} Python 2.4a1 (#54, Jul 8 2004, 11:30:13) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import cgi >>> cgi.parse_qs("") {} >>> cgi.parse_qs("", 1) {'': ['']} This breaks the sb_server web interface, because we get a {'': ['']} dict passed as kwparams to the onX functions, and they aren't expecting that. Adding "if query == '': cgiParams = {} else" to Dibbler.py at line 391 fixes this, but I'd like to check with you that that's a valid fix before checking it in. (You use Dibbler elsewhere, right?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=990685&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 08:10:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 08:11:03 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-981970 ] tests failing Message-ID: Bugs item #981970, was opened at 2004-06-30 02:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981970&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: tests failing Initial Comment: Assigning to Tony for initial triage since he seems to know the most about these apps... There are some test scripts in spambayes/test. I tried running them just now and got this: * test_sb-server.py -z - when starting: User interface url is http://localhost:8881/ Listener on port 8111 is proxying localhost:8110 error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel (exceptions.TypeError:object does not support item assignment [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|read|69] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|handle_read_event|358] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py|handle_accept|284] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|374] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|199] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|145] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|create_socket|234] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|add_channel|218]) when connecting via lynx: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", li ne 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) TypeError: onHome() got an unexpected keyword argument '' * test_storage.py: ...E. ====================================================================== ERROR: testNoDBMAvailable (__main__.DBStorageTestCase) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_storage.py", line 154, in testNoDBMAvailable open_storage(db_name, True) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 676, in open_storage raise NoSuchClassifierError(db_type) NoSuchClassifierError: True ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 5 tests in 0.210s FAILED (errors=1) * test_smtpproxy.py: Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_smtpproxy.py", line 93, in ? from sb_server import state, _recreateState ImportError: No module named sb_server * test_programs.py: SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ FSpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 961, in ? run() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 955, in run start() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 892, in start main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort, state.launchUI) File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 869, in main httpServer = UserInterfaceServer(uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 113, in __init__ Dibbler.HTTPServer.__init__(self, uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 304, in __init__ (self, context), context._map) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 271, in __init__ self.bind(port) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line 277, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (48, 'Address already in use') FSpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 961, in ? run() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 955, in run start() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 892, in start main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort, state.launchUI) File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 869, in main httpServer = UserInterfaceServer(uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 113, in __init__ Dibbler.HTTPServer.__init__(self, uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 304, in __init__ (self, context), context._map) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 271, in __init__ self.bind(port) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line 277, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (48, 'Address already in use') F ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_default (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 166, in test_sb_server_default self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_restore (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 180, in test_sb_server_restore self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_ui_port (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 172, in test_sb_server_ui_port self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 3 tests in 15.811s FAILED (failures=3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 18:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The 'unexpected argument' problem is a Python 2.4 change that breaks Dibbler.py (and so all our web interfaces). I've split this off into: [ 990685 ] Change in cgi.parse_qs breaks sb_server in Python 2.4 And assigned it to Richie to decide whether my proposed patch is ok or not. Until then I expect that you'll find that test_programs still fails for you (as would launching sb_server and then opening the web interface). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 21:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Drat. This has been a bug for a while now, I believe (I guess not many people are using the command line to specify a different port!). I'll check in a fix for sb_server. The test_program tests now pass for me (well, I haven't tried the service ones). So reassigning to me for the remaining smtpproxy one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-07-09 18:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Best I can tell, the "-u" option to sb_server is broken: % sb_server.py -u 8899 ... User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ I believe that last line should read "8899". This is causing our attempt to stop the server to fail (as it is trying to connect to port 8899), and then future tests fail as the sb_server on port 8880 is still running. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 17:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 test_smtpproxy doesn't look like it was ever finished, I think. (If true, this is my fault). I'll try and find time to finish it off over the next week. I don't know enough about the mutex stuff to figure out test_programs, so I'm reassigning to Mark :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 15:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed test_storage. With test_sb-server.py I get this: """ C:\spambayes\spambayes\test>test_sb-server.py -z Loading database...Loading state from _pop3proxy_test.pickle pickle _pop3proxy_test.pickle is a new pickle Running self-test... User interface url is http://localhost:8881/ Listener on port 8111 is proxying localhost:8110 Self-test passed. """ I'm using Python 2.3 - could this be a 2.3 -> 2.4 change? Or a platform depend problem? (me Windows, you not) I'll look into the other two shortly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981970&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 09:01:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 09:02:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-990700 ] Changes to asyncore in Python 2.4 break ServerLineReader Message-ID: Bugs item #990700, was opened at 2004-07-14 19:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=990700&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: Changes to asyncore in Python 2.4 break ServerLineReader Initial Comment: Another Python 2.3.4 -> Python 2.4a1 problem. Python 2.3.4 has this in asyncore: """ def add_channel(self, map=None): #self.log_info('adding channel %s' % self) if map is None: map = socket_map map[self._fileno] = self """ The Python 2.4a1 version is this: """ def add_channel(self, map=None): #self.log_info('adding channel %s' % self) if map is None: map = self._map map[self._fileno] = self """ ServerLineReader defaults to having self._map be None, so the map[self._fileno] line crashes with a TypeError. Putting "if map is not None:" before line 191 of Dibbler.py (and indenting the "self._map = map" line) fixes this, but again I'd like to check with you that this is correct before checking it in. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=990700&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 10:46:26 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 10:46:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-989817 ] Filter Messages performed filter actions in spite of option Message-ID: Bugs item #989817, was opened at 2004-07-13 11:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=989817&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Price (sandyprice) >Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Filter Messages performed filter actions in spite of option Initial Comment: Did filter messages on a folder the plugin does not normally monitor using filter messages... from Spambayes plugin menu. In spite of the fact that "Score messages but don't perform filter options" was checked, the filter options were performed anyway--messages were moved out. Note, if it makes any difference, the inbox, Junk suspects and Junk E-Mail folders were also selected at the same time. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 20:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can't duplicate this. If you try it again, does it still happen? If so, please attach a copy of your most recent log file to this tracker (the troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=989817&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 10:47:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 10:47:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-988095 ] Athlon64, SP2, NX (no execute)=no workee Message-ID: Bugs item #988095, was opened at 2004-07-10 05:00 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988095&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: mlarma (mlarma) >Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Athlon64, SP2, NX (no execute)=no workee Initial Comment: When enabling the NX function underneath WinXP with SP2 RC2 (32 bit edition, not 64 bit windows), I was unable to start Outlook with the SpamBayes plug-in. After disabling and only disabling NX (remove /noexecute from boot.ini), it worked. Funny thing is that the owner of the company I work for developed a Bayesian spam filter as well and it had the same issue with the NX. Not sure what the problem is, but the NX feature would be nice to turn on. Does anyone know if NX can be disabled at the application level so that the other processes were protected with NX? Mark ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-07-10 05:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 You'll really have to ask about NX gimmicks on an Athlon list. SpamBayes is written entirely in the Python programming language, and that never, ever tries to execute code from a data region (I'm very familiar with Python's implementation) My only guess is that Outlook itself, or MAPI, try to do this when interfacing with extensions. Or Mark Hammond is playing disgusting games (the only kind he knows, really ) in the win32all Python extensions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988095&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 10:52:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 10:52:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-976802 ] multiple POP server setting causes Python error Message-ID: Bugs item #976802, was opened at 2004-06-22 03:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=976802&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Asaf Bartov (amoose) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: multiple POP server setting causes Python error Initial Comment: Adding a POP server to my setup, using the configuration page of the SpamBayes pop3proxy, I encounter the following error: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 461, in found_terminator File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 770, in onChangeopts File "spambayes\ProxyUI.pyc", line 731, in verifyInput File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 862, in verifyInput File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 585, in convert File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 266, in convert AttributeError: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'split' The string I've put in the "Remote Servers" field (the very first one in the config page) was: "pop3.actcom.net.il,benyehuda.org" Help appreciated. Thanks, Asaf Bartov ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 20:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a known bug with 1.0rc1 that should be fixed with 1.0rc2. Please try 1.0rc2 and reopen if the problem persists. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=976802&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 10:59:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 10:59:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-959937 ] "Invalid server" message not always correct Message-ID: Bugs item #959937, was opened at 2004-05-25 19:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=959937&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: "Invalid server" message not always correct Initial Comment: sb_imapfilter prints out an "invalid server" message if anything (i.e. "except:") goes wrong with IMAP initialisation. More care should be taken to print out an accurate message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 20:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed in sb_imapfilter.py v1.33 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=959937&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 11:02:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 11:02:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-969328 ] Traceback from sb_imapfilter.py Message-ID: Bugs item #969328, was opened at 2004-06-09 13:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=969328&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Jones (cwhj) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Traceback from sb_imapfilter.py Initial Comment: Python 2.3.4 Red Hat EL 3.0 WS Update 2 Failure seems messsage dependent. Any Python meister care to suggest what this means ? Tue Jun 8 18:55:00 MDT 2004 Loading state from /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db is an existing database, with 1501 spam and 716 ham SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.4 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db... Done. Classifying ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ...................................****.Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 928, in ? run() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 918, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 789, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 703, in Filter for msg in self: File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 594, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 626, in __getitem__ data = _extract_fetch_data(response[1][0]) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 172, in _extract_fetch_data mo = FETCH_RESPONSE_RE.match(response) TypeError: expected string or buffer This failure seems to occur when there are several (5+) messages to classify The next classification then does this :- Loading state from /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db is an existing database, with 1501 spam and 716 ham SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.4 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db... Done. Classifying ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ....................................*. Classified 0 ham, 1 spam, and 0 unsure. Classifying took 6.5131 seconds. Which seems to complete the task that the first call barf'd on so this does not seem high priority just messy :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 21:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you could generate this problem again, but using also having '-i4' on the command line, that would be great. That will spit out a copy of the IMAP conversation, and let me figure out what it is that FETCH is returning that is causing the trouble. Note that the conversation will include your username and password, so please edit those out before you attach it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=969328&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 11:22:52 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 11:22:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-944109 ] notate_to/subject option valid values should be dynamic Message-ID: Bugs item #944109, was opened at 2004-04-29 12:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=944109&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 1 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: notate_to/subject option valid values should be dynamic Initial Comment: The notate_to/notate_subject options are currently hard-coded to accept "ham", "spam" or "unsure" as valid values. This is always the case unless the user has changed the header_ham_string/header_spam_string/header_unsure_string options, in which case the values should be the same as those. This means that you can't use the notate_to/notate_subject option if you have changed those values. This isn't a big deal, because changing those values is almost always unnecessary. Even for Outlook Express users - how many times do they get actual mail that has "spam," in the recipient list? Even the simpler "spam," in the subject (note the comma) should be rare. As such, I don't want to check this in before 1.0, because it might break something. After that, though, there should be code in Options.py that dynmically sets (when it's loaded) the appropriate bits of notate_to/notate_subject to whatever the header_X_strings are. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 21:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed in Options.py v1.108 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=944109&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 11:32:03 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 11:32:12 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-939130 ] HTML problem on Relnotes page Message-ID: Bugs item #939130, was opened at 2004-04-21 20:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=939130&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ken Robertson (kenrob) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: HTML problem on Relnotes page Initial Comment: A very minor matter, but the release notes on the page: http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php? release_id=230697 have bad markup somewhere corrupting the display. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 21:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As best I can tell, this is a deliberate change by sf. As such, we'll simply no longer use html in the release notes or changelog (this is more annoying for us, but never mind). Closing, since the only active release notes do this now, anyway. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-04-22 13:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Interesting. This appears to be a sf-wide change. Not only the page above, but all other release notes on sourceforge no longer work with html tags. I wonder if this was them fixing a bug that allowed it, or introducing a bug doing something else. I'll look into this some more and if necessary change the SpamBayes 1.0a9 and 1.0b1 notes to plain text. For the moment, the release notes are more-or-less the same as the message posted to spambayes-announce (so in the archives for that list) and the changelog is in the archive or in CVS (accessible via the web). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=939130&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 11:38:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 11:38:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-722672 ] MANIFEST.in -- sdist cannot reproduce itself Message-ID: Bugs item #722672, was opened at 2003-04-17 07:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=722672&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Terrel Shumway (terrelshumway) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: MANIFEST.in -- sdist cannot reproduce itself Initial Comment: minor packaging nit. to reproduce: --- cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/spambayes login cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous@cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/spambayes co spambayes cd spambayes python setup.py sdist cd .. tar xzf spambayes/dist/spambayes-1.0a2.tar.gz tar tzf spambayes/dist/spambayes-1.0a2.tar.gz >cvs cd spambayes-1.0a2/ python setup.py sdist cd .. mv spambayes-1.0a2 spambayes-sdist tar tzf spambayes-sdist/dist/spambayes-1.0a2.tar.gz >sdist diff cvs sdist --- result: some files are missing from the second sdist: notably MANIFEST.in --- expected behavior: the file lists should be identical --- Also if you diff -r spambayes spambayes-sdist you will notice that spambayes_addin.iss spambayes_addin.spec runtests.sh dotest.sh are missing from the first sdist ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 21:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I believe that this has been fixed at some point. I just ran the instructions above, but I get empty output from the two diff commands (i.e. the created files are identical). Anyone feel free to reopen if this is not the case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=722672&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 11:41:03 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 11:42:54 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-753215 ] binascii.Error decoding message Message-ID: Bugs item #753215, was opened at 2003-06-12 23:35 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=753215&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Raphael Manfredi (rmanfredi) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: binascii.Error decoding message Initial Comment: I've got the following stack trace, probably due to a badly encoded MIME extension. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/ram/bin/spambayes/hammiefilter.py", line 178, in ? main() File "/home/ram/bin/spambayes/hammiefilter.py", line 174, in main action(msg) File "/home/ram/bin/spambayes/hammiefilter.py", line 112, in filter return h.filter(msg) File "/home/ram/bin/spambayes/hammie.py", line 108, in filter spambayes.hammiebulk.main() File "/home/ram/bin/spambayes/hammie.py", line 38, in _scoremsg spambayes.hammiebulk.main() File "./spambayes/classifier.py", line 217, in chi2_spamprob File "./spambayes/classifier.py", line 436, in _getclues File "./spambayes/compatsets.py", line 374, in __init__ File "./spambayes/compatsets.py", line 333, in _update File "./spambayes/tokenizer.py", line 1052, in tokenize File "./spambayes/tokenizer.py", line 1106, in tokenize_headers File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/Header.py", line 92, in decode_header dec = email.base64MIME.decode(encoded) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/email/base64MIME.py", line 179, in decode dec = a2b_base64(s) binascii.Error: Incorrect padding ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 21:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Since this is obviously reasonably rare (no other reports in over a year), I'm going to close this. Moving to Python 2.4 or the latest email package should fix this (with the new Feedparser), and I think that SpamBayes will end up relying more on that than trying to duplicate their efforts in patching up malformed messages. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=753215&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 11:48:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 11:49:03 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-824631 ] Documentation of Options, persistent_storage_file Message-ID: Bugs item #824631, was opened at 2003-10-16 20:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824631&group_id=61702 Category: hammie Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Janne Sinkkonen (janne) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Documentation of Options, persistent_storage_file Initial Comment: The documentation in Options.py gives hammie.db as the default without mentioning the trick at the beginning of sb_filter.HammieFilter. This is a bit confusing for a new user. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 21:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Things are slightly different now, but the problem still exists. The '~/' is no longer necessary, because a plain '.hammie.db' will be taken relative to the config file, which defaults to the home directory. However, there's still a difference between "hammie.db" and ".hammiedb". This should be resolved one way or the other for 1.1a1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-17 10:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 [Why would a new user be reading the source code?] The best fix here would be to get rid of the hackish trick in sb_filter (and also one of the other scripts from memory - mboxtrain, maybe?). This could be done from 1.1.a1, since a lot of other things will be changing then, and people could use 1.0 if they need a stable release. I think the correct fix is to change the default to "~//hammie.db" - this will end up in the Application Data directory for Windows users, which is ok (and most will have been caught earlier anyway, and be moved into application data/spambayes/proxy). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=824631&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 12:04:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 12:04:11 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-790757 ] signal handler created with wrong # of args Message-ID: Bugs item #790757, was opened at 2003-08-19 07:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790757&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 5 Submitted By: Real Name (assworth) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: signal handler created with wrong # of args Initial Comment: Line 102 of mailsort.py reads: signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, lambda s: sys.exit(1)) but should read: signal.signal(signal.SIGALRM, lambda s, f: sys.exit(1)) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 22:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is very old, but appears correct to me, so checking this in. Thanks - belatedly! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=790757&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 12:13:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 12:14:02 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-856753 ] malformed message stop pop download Message-ID: Bugs item #856753, was opened at 2003-12-09 22:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856753&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a7 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Giovanni Coi (coig) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: malformed message stop pop download Initial Comment: Some kind of malformed messages, in my experience whitout blank line between e-mail headers and body, and without Subject:, From: header stop pop3 download. If I have 100 messages and, for example, 40th message is malformed I download 39 messages, the my e-mail client raise a timeout error and all 100 messages remain on the server. So the next time I download (again) previous 39 messages and the stop again, .... No error message. Platform: WinXp Python 2.3.2 (#49, Oct 2 2003, 20:02:00) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 e-mail client: Pegasus mail 4.12a msg sample1: ------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: <jwbushbeer@yahoo.com> Delivered-To: my@adress.org Received: (qmail 45538 invoked by uid 85); 6 Dec 2003 10:14:26 -0000 Delivered-To: mydomain-myreal@address.org Received: (qmail 45529 invoked by uid 85); 6 Dec 2003 10:14:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.address.org) (192.168.100.11) by 0 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2003 10:14:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 64262 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2003 10:08:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO highway) (211.147.227.238) by 0 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2003 10:08:06 -0000 ------------------------------------------------------- sample2: ------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: <Hcounterfeitinge@EXCITE.COM> Delivered-To: my@adress.org Received: (qmail 62208 invoked by uid 85); 6 Dec 2003 23:34:37 -0000 Delivered-To: mydomain-myreal@address.org Received: (qmail 62197 invoked by uid 85); 6 Dec 2003 23:34:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.address.org) (192.168.100.11) by 0 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2003 23:34:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 66944 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2003 23:28:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailsport.mailserver) (203.149.7.153) by 0 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2003 23:28:21 -0000 Received: from melody (SERVER [218.18.84.213]) by mailsport.mailserver with SMTP (Microsof t Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id YJ2MGCQZ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 05:57:12 +0700 <html><body bgcolor=#FFFFFF text=#000000><b><font color=#000099><a href=http://saleinlin3d d.com/dr/>L0SE<font color=#ffffff>argentina</font> WE1GHT <font color=#ffffff>acceptors</f ont>WHl1E<font color=#ffffff>screenplay</font> Y0U <font color=#ffffff>science</font>S1EEP .</a></font></b><a href=http://saleinlin3dd.com/dr/></body></html> --------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 22:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry that this has been left here so long. This has been addressed some time ago, and should no longer be a problem (any messages causing errors have a "X-SpamBayes-Exception" header added and things keep going). In the longer term, using Python 2.4's email package will allow us to be even more robust than this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=856753&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 12:22:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 12:22:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-868742 ] sb_mboxtrain.py fails on cygwin Message-ID: Bugs item #868742, was opened at 2004-01-01 23:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=868742&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Miki Tebeka (tebeka) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_mboxtrain.py fails on cygwin Initial Comment: Trying to run sb_mboxtrain.py on cygwin fails. The cause of the problem is line 165 which has seek(0), this does not work on cygwin. I've commented this like and looks like it's working. A patch would be: if sys.platform != cygwin: outf.seek(0) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 22:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Python 2.3.4 on Cygwin does indeed have seek, and both lines in sb_mboxtrain.py work. sb_mboxtrain.py appears to work, although I don't use it, so that's only from limited testing. Closing as out of date. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=868742&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 12:26:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 12:26:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-795257 ] mboxtrain.py & cyrus Message-ID: Patches item #795257, was opened at 2003-08-26 22:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=795257&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alon (arohter) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: mboxtrain.py & cyrus Initial Comment: Attached is a patched 1.0a4 mboxtrain.py to work with the Cyrus IMAPd. Taken from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003- August/006544.html "I believe that all you should have to do is modify one line in mboxtrain - the regex in line 185 - to include '.' as well as 0-9 (change it from "[0-9]*" to "[0-9\.]*"), and it should work just as normal." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 22:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Closing based on comment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alon (arohter) Date: 2003-08-28 19:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=36549 UPDATE: I would suggest NOT using mboxtrain.py on cyrus mail systems. Seems to mess up the mail headers when training (afaik it strips out carriage returns). Use imapfilter.py to train instead. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=795257&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 12:26:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 12:26:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-618932 ] fpfn.py: add interactivity on unix Message-ID: Patches item #618932, was opened at 2002-10-06 01:52 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=618932&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rob W.W. Hooft (hooft) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: fpfn.py: add interactivity on unix Initial Comment: * Add "-i" option to show all falses using "less", and ask the user what to do with them. I used this a lot to clean up my spam/ham corpuses. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=618932&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 23:45:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 23:45:39 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-969328 ] Traceback from sb_imapfilter.py Message-ID: Bugs item #969328, was opened at 2004-06-08 19:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cwhj You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=969328&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter >Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Jones (cwhj) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Traceback from sb_imapfilter.py Initial Comment: Python 2.3.4 Red Hat EL 3.0 WS Update 2 Failure seems messsage dependent. Any Python meister care to suggest what this means ? Tue Jun 8 18:55:00 MDT 2004 Loading state from /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db is an existing database, with 1501 spam and 716 ham SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.4 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db... Done. Classifying ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ...................................****.Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 928, in ? run() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 918, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 789, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 703, in Filter for msg in self: File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 594, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 626, in __getitem__ data = _extract_fetch_data(response[1][0]) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 172, in _extract_fetch_data mo = FETCH_RESPONSE_RE.match(response) TypeError: expected string or buffer This failure seems to occur when there are several (5+) messages to classify The next classification then does this :- Loading state from /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db is an existing database, with 1501 spam and 716 ham SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.4 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db... Done. Classifying ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ....................................*. Classified 0 ham, 1 spam, and 0 unsure. Classifying took 6.5131 seconds. Which seems to complete the task that the first call barf'd on so this does not seem high priority just messy :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Chris Jones (cwhj) Date: 2004-07-14 15:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=37202 I have not been able to reproduce the exact failure as shown above I moved up to RC 2 which might make a difference. However here is a training problem (in RC 2) that seems to have a similar flavor in that it seems msg specific. I have attached two files. The first 'crap.res' contains the result of running :- sb_imapfilter.py -i4 -t -v -e y On a Spam folder containing a single message that was moved there following an 'unsure' classification. The message itself is included in a second attached file 'crap.msg ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 03:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you could generate this problem again, but using also having '-i4' on the command line, that would be great. That will spit out a copy of the IMAP conversation, and let me figure out what it is that FETCH is returning that is causing the trouble. Note that the conversation will include your username and password, so please edit those out before you attach it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=969328&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 14 23:54:34 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 14 23:54:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-969328 ] Traceback from sb_imapfilter.py Message-ID: Bugs item #969328, was opened at 2004-06-08 19:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by cwhj You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=969328&group_id=61702 Category: imapfilter Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Jones (cwhj) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Traceback from sb_imapfilter.py Initial Comment: Python 2.3.4 Red Hat EL 3.0 WS Update 2 Failure seems messsage dependent. Any Python meister care to suggest what this means ? Tue Jun 8 18:55:00 MDT 2004 Loading state from /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db is an existing database, with 1501 spam and 716 ham SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.4 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db... Done. Classifying ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ...................................****.Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 928, in ? run() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 918, in run imap_filter.Filter() File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 789, in Filter self.unsure_folder) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 703, in Filter for msg in self: File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 594, in __iter__ yield self[key] File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 626, in __getitem__ data = _extract_fetch_data(response[1][0]) File "/usr/local/bin/sb_imapfilter.py", line 172, in _extract_fetch_data mo = FETCH_RESPONSE_RE.match(response) TypeError: expected string or buffer This failure seems to occur when there are several (5+) messages to classify The next classification then does this :- Loading state from /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db is an existing database, with 1501 spam and 716 ham SpamBayes IMAP Filter Version 0.4 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database /home/crs/spambayes-1.0rc1/hammie.db... Done. Classifying ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ................................................................................ ....................................*. Classified 0 ham, 1 spam, and 0 unsure. Classifying took 6.5131 seconds. Which seems to complete the task that the first call barf'd on so this does not seem high priority just messy :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Chris Jones (cwhj) Date: 2004-07-14 15:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=37202 The message that I included and causes the training failure is not unique. And unlike the initital classification problem does not 'go away' on subsequent calls. I'm currently having to delete about one third of the messages assigned to the Spam folder becasue they generate this failure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris Jones (cwhj) Date: 2004-07-14 15:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=37202 I have not been able to reproduce the exact failure as shown above I moved up to RC 2 which might make a difference. However here is a training problem (in RC 2) that seems to have a similar flavor in that it seems msg specific. I have attached two files. The first 'crap.res' contains the result of running :- sb_imapfilter.py -i4 -t -v -e y On a Spam folder containing a single message that was moved there following an 'unsure' classification. The message itself is included in a second attached file 'crap.msg ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 03:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you could generate this problem again, but using also having '-i4' on the command line, that would be great. That will spit out a copy of the IMAP conversation, and let me figure out what it is that FETCH is returning that is causing the trouble. Note that the conversation will include your username and password, so please edit those out before you attach it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=969328&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jul 15 08:00:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jul 15 08:00:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-860599 ] Outlook database corruption Message-ID: Bugs item #860599, was opened at 2003-12-16 10:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860599&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Owen Mathias (jesse_custer) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook database corruption Initial Comment: I have the well documented problem ("Toolbar items appear, but fail to work") with a SpamBayes install on my boss' system. He has Outlook 2000 SP3 installed in Windows 2000. Please before responding to this read the first sentence of my post. I know this is a known issue and that there are fixes already posted on the FAQ pages and in the Troubleshooting guide. I have gone to great lengths to follow those tips to the letter in trying to solve this problem. My problem isn't that I can't read or follow instructions. I wouldn't be posting on here if that was who I am. That said. The problem I have (and many others, though they are happily running again with the fixes) is that the button "delete as spam" appears but then does nothing. I am able to "fix" this by either: renaming the outcmd.dat file to outcmd.bak or deleting my spambayes toolbar and restarting outlook or uninstalling/reinstalling spambayes (with antivirus disabled) Unfortunatly, none of these actually "fixes" the problem for long. After deleting 2 or 3 spam messages, the "delete as spam" button goes dead. I can click it, an hourglass will even show up indicating that it WANTs to move this message to the New Spam folder, but nothing happens. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-15 18:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This hasn't found any more comments, so it might as well be closed, since it's dealt with in [ 807217 ] fatal region error detected; run recovery (It's not entirely clear whether Outlook and sb_server have the same cause of the problem, but the symptoms are certainly the same.) If anyone really feels that we need two open reports about this, then you know what to do . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Owen Mathias (jesse_custer) Date: 2004-01-01 06:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=931849 !!!!UPDATE!!!! Thanks! Clearing the Old .DB fixed this. I actually went and deleted all the spambayes related directories before reinstalling and retraining. I hope the log file I sent has helped you guys with this project. You obviously care enough to monitor and participate in the troubleshooting and support of SpamBayes. I look forward to more of these kind of Open software experiences. By the way. The system this was on has a HUGE Outlook database (.pst file): 1.5 GB. Maybe none of you have tried to get SpamBayes corrupted with such a large Outlook file. The other thing I can think of is AntiVirus. Though I reinstalled SpamBayes several times with AntiVirus unloaded to try and fix the problem before deleting the .db, I'm not 100% sure it was off the first time it was installed. Do you think that would have corrupted the SpamBayes program? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2003-12-30 12:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 When this occurs, if you close Outlook, then view running tasks, is Outlook.exe still listed under processes? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-20 16:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This makes it a dupe, but leaving it open in case it coaxes interesting facts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-19 06:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Wow! I've been trying to provoke database corruption on 3 different Outlooks for 3 months without success! jesse_custer, you're one lucky fellow <wink>. Did something very unusual happen while you've been fiddling with this ... like forced reboots, power outages, or killing Outlook manually from Task Manager while Outlook was in active use? Do you have other Outlook addins installed? A virus scanner? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-19 06:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The logfile indicates a known database corruption issue, although this may be the first report of it happening in the Outlook plug-in. For now, there is no fix, only a workaround. You will need to delete *.db in your data directory and then retrain. This is mentioned in the FAQ (#5.3), but not in the Outlook section. I apologize if this is one of the workarounds you've already tried, but it wasn't mentioned in your description. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=860599&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jul 15 08:05:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jul 15 08:05:34 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943852 ] Incorrect sort order for Score column Message-ID: Bugs item #943852, was opened at 2004-04-29 05:36 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943852&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 2 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Incorrect sort order for Score column Initial Comment: In the Review Messages page, clicking the Score column header appears to sort by the alphabetical order of the percentage text rather than the numeric value. The scores for ham messages sorted as follows: 1, 10, 11, ..., 19, 2, etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943852&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jul 15 22:24:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jul 15 22:24:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-983539 ] Install error on Outlook 2002 Message-ID: Bugs item #983539, was opened at 2004-07-01 13:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983539&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Taed Wynnell (taed) >Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Install error on Outlook 2002 Initial Comment: When I installed 1.0 RC 2, I got an installation error. When I then loaded Outlook, SpamBayes seemed to load and displayed the buttons, but the SpamBayes menu was non-functional (ignored click). I'm running Outlook 2002 (with all updates) on my Windows NT 4.0 Server (with all updates). I've tried installing it multiple times (and rebooting and so on), but no luck. Re-installing 1.0 RC 1 will then work fine. Here's the outlook_addin_register.exe.log file contents: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 40, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 40, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-15 16:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It seems that the problem is not a *call* to FlashWindowEx, but rather simply that FlashWindowEx appears in the import table of the win32gui.pyd DLL file and the import cannot be resolved on NT4. This is an issue in the pywin32 extensions, and appears to have been introduced in build 202. Revision 1.42 of win32gui.i added the PyFlashWindowEx function that generates the offending import. I'm assigning this to Mark to see if he can find a way to implement the FlashWindow function without generating a static import reference to the FlashWindowEx function (maybe LoadLibrary/GetProcAddress after an OS version check?). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: pbarbour (pbarbour) Date: 2004-07-09 16:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1080518 likely due a call to the FlashWindowEx() function which is not supported in NT4. This error occured on my NT4 workstation also. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983539&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 03:04:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 03:04:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943852 ] Incorrect sort order for Score column Message-ID: Bugs item #943852, was opened at 2004-04-29 05:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943852&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 2 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Incorrect sort order for Score column Initial Comment: In the Review Messages page, clicking the Score column header appears to sort by the alphabetical order of the percentage text rather than the numeric value. The scores for ham messages sorted as follows: 1, 10, 11, ..., 19, 2, etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 13:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed, along with a related problem where the ham messages were always sorted in the opposite order to spam/unsure. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943852&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 03:08:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 03:08:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970374 ] Score column disappears from review page Message-ID: Bugs item #970374, was opened at 2004-06-11 01:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970374&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Bartram (stevebartram) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Score column disappears from review page Initial Comment: I am using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) (binary), with version 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] of Python; my operating system is Windows 5.1.2600.2 (). I have trained 360 ham and 412 spam. The score column disappears from the review page if I change any of the options on any of the config pages. Exiting and restarting SpamBayes restores the score. Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 13:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This definitely occurs with 1.0, but is fixed in CVS. I presume I fixed it when I fixed the sorting problems although I haven't investigated fully (who cares, as long as the problem is gone ). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970374&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 03:26:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 03:26:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-970359 ] XP freezes when training SpamBays via web interface Message-ID: Bugs item #970359, was opened at 2004-06-11 01:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970359&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steve Bartram (stevebartram) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: XP freezes when training SpamBays via web interface Initial Comment: First, thank you for SpamBayes. It marks my spam very well indeed. However, when training SpamBayes via the web inteface (which is very nice) it frequently freezes my computer so even ctrl-alt-delete won't work. I've checked the Spambayes mailing lists and haven't seen any other report of this problem. Environment: I am using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) (binary), with version 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] of Python; my operating system is Windows 5.1.2600.2 (). I have trained 360 ham and 412 spam. (although the "Check for latest version" reports version "0.6") It's the Windows binary version. Some mail retrieved by Pegasus email and some by a custom perl script. These work without any problems. FireFox 0.8 AVG anti-virus up-to-date and ZoneAlarm correctly configured. SpamBayes trained via web interface, I haven't tried the smtp proxy method. SpamBayes is almost in it's default setup. It is using dbm for storage. Here is my bayescustomize.ini ================ [Headers] header_score_logarithm:True include_evidence:True include_score:True include_thermostat:True [html_ui] display_score:True [pop3proxy] listen_ports:8110,8111,8112,8113 remote_servers:..... [smtpproxy] use_cached_message:True ================ SpamBayesServer1.log: ================ Service not availible. Using thread. Loading database... SMTP Listener on port 8225 is proxying 127.0.01:25 Listener on port 8110 is proxying mail.zetnet.co.uk:110 Listener on port 8111 is proxying mail.tesco.net:110 Listener on port 8112 is proxying pop3.connectfree.co.uk:110 Listener on port 8113 is proxying mail.onetel.net.uk:110 User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ ================ Symptoms: Quite frequently (but NOT consistently!) my computer will freeze when training SpamBayes via the web interface. This starts as a page not finishing loading. Sometimes this is the review page, but more often it is a page displaying a specific email. But, as I was writing this email and checking my configuration it did it on the page displaying which storage option was being used. When this happens I can still click a few times. The "back" button in the browser often seems to work. But after a few clicks the system starts to lock up. First all application windows fail to refresh their contents, although their frames redraw. This is rapidly followed by no response at all, even to ctrl-alt-delete. At which point only a hard reset will work. After rebooting SpamBayes may successfully train on the same set of emails. Or, it may freeze again. I usually avoid trying to examine the email that I was trying to view when the last freeze occurred. Instead, I find it in my email client and check it there. These freezes only happen on the spambayes pages. I haven't changed/installed anything else recently. I have tried closing Pegasus and stopping the perl script (which runs periodically) before trying to train. But this didn't prevent the freeze. I also tried IE 6 instead of FireFox, but that froze too. Any help will be greatly appreciated. TIA, Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 13:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 For the OP, this is almost certainly a ZoneAlarm problem. Details can be found here: kmccoy - are you also using ZoneAlarm? It seems to be the likely cause. If you're not, then please open a new report with the details as below. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: kmccoy (kmccoy) Date: 2004-07-08 21:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079301 Hello, I've encountered exactly the same problem. It originally happened with 1.0RC1 and it has continued happening with 1.0RC2 -- both the windows binary install file. It happened on versions of Firefox from 0.8 through 0.9.1 and IE6. I don't know how to find out the versions of python and XP, but it's XP SP1 in the system control panel. I use Eudora 6.1 for my email downloading. My settings are slightly altered, but I don't have a .ini file listing the changes. I'll detail them: -pop3 proxy settings pop.mail.yahoo.com 110 -smtp proxy options smtp.mail.yahoo.com 25 ham@localhost spam@localhost yes -header options none selected -storage options hammie.db spambayes.messageinfo.db yes no 0 -statistics options 0.2 0.85 -- advanced -statistics options 150 0.1 0.5 0.45 -header options yes 2 yes yes no 0.2 -storage options dbm 7 no pop3proxy-ham-cache pop3proxy-spam-cache pop3proxy-unknown-cache -tokenising options no no no no -training options no -interface options Subject From no yes no ham spam spam 0.0 100.0 localhost none myusername mypassword (both of those are obviously not that. :P) localhost localhost -- experimental -experimental options no no no no yes url-cache 7 no no ---- end ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 18:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 The symptoms sound similar to what happens when windows runs out of GUI resources. If that is indeed true, it maybe your browser rather than spambayes, particularly if you are using other than IE. If you are using IE, then this sounds very strange, and certainly the frist report I have heard. Being able to hang the OS is a bug in the OS even if we *are* being really naughty (which we aren't trying to be ) Another very interesting test would be to run from Python sources - the binary version of the proxy programs are used far less than their source-code versions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=970359&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 03:28:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 03:28:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962291 ] WinXP / Server connexion refused Message-ID: Bugs item #962291, was opened at 2004-05-29 03:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: WinXP / Server connexion refused Initial Comment: Used 9 version since today, installed the 1.0 release candidate, with same settings. Now when I try to connect to the spambayes server ( local ) , it returns me a "connexion refused" message, for any of the pop account proxies I have setted ( nothing changes on the client computers ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 13:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 11:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you open the configuration page, does it still have the server values there? Could you attach your log file to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 03:29:38 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 03:29:45 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-970859 ] Transparent proxying support? Message-ID: Feature Requests item #970859, was opened at 2004-06-11 15:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=970859&group_id=61702 >Category: None >Group: None Status: Open Priority: 3 Submitted By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Transparent proxying support? Initial Comment: Hi, how about adding support for transparent proxying? e.g. perl equiv from a perl pop3proxy I wrote #$daddr:$dport = where the proxy will actually make connections to #$FORCEDEFSVR is whether to force usage of the configured default server #$USE_SO_ORIGINAL_DST is whether to do Linux-style transparent proxying or FreeBSD style # $SO_ORIGINAL_DST = 80 if linux headers not available #$client holds the inbound socket object # $BOUNDPORT and $BOUNDADDRESS = actual addr and port proxy is listening on #should probably do more checks to stop loops #e.g. enforce bound addr:port != default addr:port if ($FORCEDEFSVR) { $daddr=$DEFADDRESS; $dport=$DEFPORT; } else { if ($USE_SO_ORIGINAL_DST) { my $p= getsockopt $client, $SOL_IP, $SO_ORIGINAL_DST; $daddr=inet_ntoa(substr ($p,4,4)); $dport=unpack('n',substr ($p,2,2)); } else { #FreeBSD style $daddr=$client->sockhost; $dport=$client->sockport; } #dolog('DEBUG', "dest: $daddr:$dport"); if (($dport==$BOUNDPORT) and ($daddr eq $BOUNDADDRESS)) { # If seem to be connecting to self connect to default server instead $daddr=$DEFADDRESS; $dport=$DEFPORT; } } -- I don't know python, but I might see if I can figure out spambayes+ python. Feature may be harder to add than I think ;). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 13:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I suspect that this is something that will only get added if lots of people ask for it or if someone supplies a patch. In any case, this is certainly a feature request and not a bug, so I'm changing the type. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Date: 2004-06-12 04:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1060689 OK, the support for CAPA, APOP etc is a valid reason to not support the proxy chaining with USER. Back to transparent proxying. With transparent proxying the mail clients can retain their mail settings as it is. What typically happens is the network is set up so that pop3 requests pass through a server (e.g. firewall) and are intercepted by the firewall rules and forwarded to a proxy listening on a local address:port - e.g. 127.0.0.3:10110 or something. The proxy figures out the original intended destination, makes the connections and proxies between the client and the destination. The client thinks it is talking directly to the destination (connection end point = dest IP:port), and in most setups the destination thinks it's talking to the proxy. If the proxy is down, the firewall rules could be changed to pass through the connections. Figuring out the original intended destination can be platform dependent. Apparently earlier versions of Linux were like FreeBSD. Newer versions of Linux require you to use the socket/IP options thing to get it. I'm not sure about Windows. Other issues: is it important for spambayes to distinguish one user-popserver pair from another? Transparent proxying could either complicate that, or the proxy admin will have to train and configure spambayes based on all messages passing through the proxy for all users and servers. It is in theory possible to set things up so that say a hundred different users use the same transparent proxy, but still get to administer and train their own "proxy". This could be done by creating spambayes accounts based on a successful pop3 login (perhaps only if automatic creation is enabled). If there's no spambayes account (either manually/automatically created), then the proxy goes to a "pass through" mode - no filtering or parsing. Alternatively an admin could administer on behalf of all users. Spambayes for the masses. That said, there may be performance and memory issues. Well there'd be another use for those multiGHz 64 bit CPUs eh? BTW spambayes takes 40MB of mem in peak usage on my Win2K machine. Is that shared amongst multiple connections or is that per connection? Fortunately I'm not using WinXP - based on some personal/anecdotal evidence it seems to have a memory handling algorithm that fails more disgracefully than W2K. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-06-11 19:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 [Tony] > SpamBayes chose to not use the USER method of electing > which server to connect to The main reason for this is that the client can send requests before the USER request. For instance, it can issue a CAPA to ask the server which POP3 extensions it supports. If you don't know which real server to connect to until the USER request, you can't serve the CAPA request (or any others that are made before USER). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-11 15:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm not familiar with transparent proxying, so forgive me if these are obvious questions: 1. Can this be done with Windows as well as Linux? There's a minimum of platform specific code in sb_server at the moment, and it's probably good to stay that way. 2. Does this offer any significant benefit over simply reconfiguring the client (either manually as at the moment, or automatically)? Python likes explicit over implicit, and this doesn't seem very explicit. SpamBayes chose to not use the USER method of electing which server to connect to, and has one proxy port for each server instead. (Although the pspam code that's in the source dist does use this method). This was decided a long time back, and is highly unlikely to change now. You'd have to put forth some pretty compelling arguments to do so. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: lyeoh (lyeoh) Date: 2004-06-11 15:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1060689 Transparent proxying will require configuration of Linux iptables or FreeBSD IPFW to redirect desired TCP connections to the proxy. The proxy will then figure out the actual intended destination addr and port as per the code above, make the connections and do stuff - spamfiltering, protocol enforcement. NOTE: if it is possible to tell spambayes to connect to a particular popserver by using the following USER command then the need for a transparent proxy may be less, and one could also more easily chain proxies. e.g. USER user@name:popserver1 If the feature is active that should tell spambayes to connect to popserver1 and send USER user@name The delimiter ":" should be configurable. Not sure what would be best - maybe looking at the wrong RFC. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-11 15:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 My Perl is extremely rusty. Exactly what do you mean by transparent proxying? i.e. what changes do you want from the current proxying? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=970859&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 03:31:12 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 03:31:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-958500 ] Error when modifying configuration Message-ID: Bugs item #958500, was opened at 2004-05-23 01:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958500&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: RAWright (rawright) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Error when modifying configuration Initial Comment: While trying to change the configuration to enable tagging headers with Spam or Ham annotations, the following error is returned: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "spambayes\Dibbler.pyc", line 461, in found_terminator File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 770, in onChangeopts File "spambayes\ProxyUI.pyc", line 731, in verifyInput File "spambayes\UserInterface.pyc", line 862, in verifyInput File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 585, in convert File "spambayes\OptionsClass.pyc", line 266, in convert AttributeError: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'split' This function was working perfectly until this morning. Last night I spent considerable time installing the latest security patches for Outlook Express 6 and Internet Explorer 6 (among other patches), and I suspect that something in these updates is interfering with the operation of SpamBayes. My OS is Win2K Server, SP4, in case that matters. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 13:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This should be fixed in 1.0rc2 and 1.0. Please reopen if it is not. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 12:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This has been reported by a few people, but I doubt it has anything to do with any of those updates. Annoyingly, I can't duplicate this - I suspect that it's the result of an old option value in the config file, which is no longer in the correct format, but I can't figure which one. Would you mind attaching your configuration file to this tracker? You can remove or XXX the server values. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958500&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 03:33:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 03:33:23 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-896366 ] Crashes in the web interface Message-ID: Bugs item #896366, was opened at 2004-02-13 22:20 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code 1.0a9 (0.9) >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Crashes in the web interface Initial Comment: I am using the last (1.0a9) version of spambayes, and I am having some problems with teh web interface. 1) If I click on the "more statistics" link in the home page I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 1016, in onStats s = Stats.Stats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 42, in __init__ self.CalculateStats() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Stats.py", line 58, in CalculateStats for msg in msginfoDB.db: File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 70, in __getitem__ f = StringIO(self.dict[key]) TypeError: key type must be string ===================================== 2) If I try to train even a single message I get ===================================== 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 386, in onReview targetCorpus.takeMessage(id, sourceCorpus) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 187, in takeMessage self.addMessage(msg) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/FileCorpus.py", line 140, in addMessage Corpus.Corpus.addMessage(self, message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Corpus.py", line 133, in addMessage obs.onAddMessage(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 581, in onAddMessage self.train(message) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 589, in train self.bayes.learn(message.tokenize(), self.is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 273, in learn self._add_msg(wordstream, is_spam) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 375, in _add_msg record = self._wordinfoget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 261, in _wordinfoget r = self.db.get(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 65, in get if self.dict.has_key(key): error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') ===================================== Hint yesterday I reported a bug that was solved very quickly: it has domething to do with my version of python (2.2) Could also this bug a python version incompatability ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 13:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-19 14:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Cool - thanks for keeping us informed. You can use the sb_dbexpimp.py script in the source dist to convert between pickle & dbm. Running it without any arguments gives example usage. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Date: 2004-02-19 05:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=224613 I started yesterday a new proxy on the same machine (using a differerent configuration) and it ran for a whole day without problems, both in web training and SMTP training. I am using pickle as database type. When enough mail are collected I will try to use the new db files on the 'production' installation, and let you know the results. BTW, which is the procedure to convert the db file from one format to another (pickle <=> dbm)? Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 In the other bug report (the SMTP proxy one), you noted that you could train a problem message with the "train message/dbx/mbox" form on the front page of the web interface. Can you also do this with ones that don't work via the review page? (It's very strange). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 16:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 897895 ] training via SMTP is not possible ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 12:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you have it set to dbm (and haven't manually specified which type of dbm in the config file - it's not exposed via the web interface), then it'll be whatever it thinks is best for your platform, probably bsddb or gdbm. The whichdb.py file in the contrib directory should be able to figure out which one it is. Sorry, I should have been more explicit about using a pickle. At the moment changing is a bit of a headache if you've got an existing database. Basically you have to change the option, convert the db (or start from fresh), and then start it up again. This will be fixed at some point. I'll leave this for now (lots of 'real' work to do anyway!) until I hear back about using fresh db's. I'm reasonably confident that this is a case of the db being corrupt for some reason, or an existing db not being opened correctly (there were changes in the way that the db type is determined for opening), so a fresh db would fix all of that (although it's not ideal). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Massimo Ferrario (maxferrario) Date: 2004-02-16 22:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=224613 > Were you using a version of sb before 1.0a9? > If so, which version? Yes, version 1.0a7 >What sort of database are you using? > pickle? bsddb? gdbm? dbm is set in the advancedconfig page: i do not see neither bsddd nor gdbm. >If you swap to a different >one, does the problem still occur? I tried to change to pickle and got ================ 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 793, in onChangeopts self.reReadOptions() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py", line 711, in reReadOptions state = self.state_recreator() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 833, in _recreateState state.close() File "/usr/bin/sb_server.py", line 667, in close state.bayes.store() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site- packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 225, in store self.db[key] = val.__getstate__() File "/usr/lib/python2.2/shelve.py", line 77, in __setitem__ self.dict[key] = f.getvalue() error: (-30981, 'Unknown error 4294936315') =================== I had to manually change the bayescustomize.ini file (removing the 'pickle' line) to have it started again. >What happens if you move your dbs > aside and use fresh ones? > Does the error reoccur immediately, > after a while, or not at all? I will try this later PS the changes in Stats.pm are working perfectly. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 17:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can't duplicate (2), even with Python 2.2, and it's a dupe of: [ 833751 ] filter dies after a processing a few emails Unfortunately, this was submitted Nov 1 last year and hasn't been fixed yet. Were you using a version of sb before 1.0a9? If so, which version? What sort of database are you using? pickle? bsddb? gdbm? If you swap to a different one, does the problem still occur? (Sorry for all the questions, but I'm not at all sure what could be causing this, although it certainly looks like a db problem, and "unknown error" isn't the most helpful description :) What happens if you move your dbs aside and use fresh ones? Does the error reoccur immediately, after a while, or not at all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-15 15:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Drat. Yes, it is. It seems that iterating through a shelve object doesn't work in Python 2.2, which is the problem with (1). I'll look into (2) in an hour or so. When Stats.py v1.6 makes it into anon CVS you can grab that and drop into into your Lib/site-packages/spambayes folder and it'll fix (1). (it's a 4 character change, anyway). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=896366&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 03:39:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 03:39:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-831941 ] Empty Spam Folder menu item Message-ID: Patches item #831941, was opened at 2003-10-29 10:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Empty Spam Folder menu item Initial Comment: RFE 788755 asks for a menu item to empty the spam folder, and I have seen this requested several times on the lists. I've come up with an initial patch to implement this as a menu item on the SpamBayes dropdown. It works very much like the Empty "Deleted Items" Folder context menu item, which means it prompts with a Yes/No message box before deleting, and just does nothing if the spam folder is already empty. This seems to work well on my Outlook 2003 setup, but probably needs more wide-spread testing before being considered entirely stable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 13:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It seems that all the concerns have been addressed, and since the code is somewhat safe in the 1.0 branch, I figure this might as well be committed, yes? Unless someone disagrees, I say Kenny should just committ this to the HEAD now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-23 03:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Oops, the _GetParent() function is module-level in 'manager', not class-level in 'BayesManager', so do 'import manager' to get access to it. Also added an information message box when the spam folder is already empty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-20 02:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 If you turn off the "Warn before deleting items permanently" option then Outlook will always empty Deleted Items without any confirmation prompt. Regardless of the warn setting, Outlook will silently ignore your request to empty Deleted Items if it is already empty. I like the idea of adding an OK-only message box to inform the user that the folder is already empty. It makes it obvious to the user what is going on, and requires no more clicks than the confirmation prompt would have required if there had been messages to remove. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-19 13:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 What "Empty Deleted Items" does actually depends on how the user sets an option (something like "warn before deleting items permanently", true by default). So if you want to match Outlook's behavior seamlessly, we can add another 15 modules to try to figure out how that option is set <wink>). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-19 12:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 > Is this how Outlook's "Empty Deleted Items" > works? Either asks for confirmation, or silently > does nothing? (Mine is too full to check :) Surprisingly, yes. So if matching Outlook's behaviour is the way to go, then no prompt if empty. OTOH, if we're going to track folders by name at some point in the future, rather than via ID, then we're perhaps moving away from what Outlook does. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 12:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 'print' statements predate LogDebug - the latter is generally preferred with a debug level that reflects how likely it is anyone *really* needs to see it - 0==always, etc This is looking good, but I still have a query re the confirmation (I don't think I explained myself well last time - I agree we *never* want to silently remove items). Currently, if there are zero items in the folder, then selecting the menu item will silently do *nothing*. I am concerned that some users will assume it to be broken, as selecting that menu has no effect in some cases. Other cases, it prompts you. Some users may not make the distinction between "this time is is empty, last time it wasn't" Is this how Outlook's "Empty Deleted Items" works? Either asks for confirmation, or silently does nothing? (Mine is too full to check :) I would think it better to either say: * "Are you sure you wish to remove the 0 items" - dumb, but obvious what is going on and one less branch/dialog. * A message box saying "already empty - nothing deleted" What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 05:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I knew there had to be a way to generate a combined patch file, but didn't know the syntax. Thanks. I made the AskQuestion/_GetParent changes, and uploaded a partially updated patch pending the following questions/comments. This is now diff'ed against latest CVS updates from anonymous. I didn't want to do anything "silently" that could irretrievably remove messages, but I also didn't want to display a removal confirmation question when there was nothing to remove. I added the check for items to avoid the unnecessary confirmation, which matches Outlook's Deleted Items behavior. I'd rather not call EmptyFolder silently, but I'll be glad to add a message box indicating that there are no items to remove if you think it's needed. I would have preferred to just disable the menu item if the folder is empty, but it seemed like it would be a lot of trouble to track it properly and keep the menu state updated. I added the print statements for logging so that I could check for any problems, and also so that we could diagnose future user problems such as, "I used Empty Spam Folder, but the spam messages didn't get deleted." I noticed that there is a mixture in addin.py of print and LogDebug. What are the current guidelines for which to use? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 20:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This looks like a good start. manager.py has _GetParent and AskQuestion - can you update the patch to use these. Also, if no items are in the folder, we should display a message to the user rather than a simple 'print'. In fact, I see no real good reason to have the check for items - even with no items, still silently call EmptyFolder, and if there are no items, then big deal - the folder is still empty after the event, so we can consider that it worked Ok. If possible, attach a patch as a single file - just "cvs -z5 diff -u file1.py file2.py > whatever.patch", then just upload the .patch (or .diff) Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 03:40:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 03:40:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-859339 ] Add sqlite support for the dbmstorage.py Message-ID: Feature Requests item #859339, was opened at 2003-12-13 17:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=859339&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Vladimir Ulogov (vulogov) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add sqlite support for the dbmstorage.py Initial Comment: In addition to the BerkleyDB, I'd like to use sqlite as well ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 13:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a feature request, not a patch, so changing type. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-05 21:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that you can use mysql or postgresql. Are either of those good enough? If not, then you could maybe write your own SQLiteClassifier class, based on the other SQL ones in storage.py. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=859339&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 04:03:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 04:03:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-887984 ] Remove "Save and Shutdown" button when running as service Message-ID: Feature Requests item #887984, was opened at 2004-01-31 15:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=887984&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Remove "Save and Shutdown" button when running as service Initial Comment: Robert Neuschul on spambayes@python.org: """ I have a /small/ query/comment about the web UI and functionality when it's used in conjunction with the pop3proxy_service.py on a Windows Server: there's a "Save & Shutdown" button on most pages. If one does use it then the service stops. This button therefore seems to me to be doing something slightly illogical in this context - in most instances when running as a service one does NOT want to shutdown after saving any changes or after training etc - that's the whole point of running as a service. This button seems to be of more use when SpamBayes is working in pure application mode - perhaps on a workstation or personal PC - rather than as a service on a server. """ This makes sense to me. Robert makes various suggestions, but it seems to me that the most sensible option is to simply remove the button if we are running as a service (all the saving is done elsewhere, anyway, so it's really just doing a shutdown). Of course, we need to therefore detect that we are running as a service, which I'm pretty sure we don't have any way of doing at the moment. Something that would be good to fix at some point, anyway. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 14:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Added in sb_server 1.24, ProxyUI.py 1.48, pop3proxy_service 1.18 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=887984&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:04:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:04:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-751348 ] Problem registering DLL/OCX Message-ID: Support Requests item #751348, was opened at 2003-06-10 02:22 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=751348&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kathy Gauvin (kmgauvin) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problem registering DLL/OCX Initial Comment: I got the follwoing error: Unable to register the DLL/OCX: DllRegisterServer failed. Abort Retry Ignore Ignore to proceed anyway(not recommended). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 These problems may be fixed with the 1.0a9 (0.9) release (see http://spambayes.org/windows.html). Leaving open since it's got various tips and might be read by people about to leave a bug report. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 756965 ] I sent in the OCX/DLL problem ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Coote (timcoote) Date: 2003-11-18 22:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=574600 I get this with no anti virus s/w on the machine: xp pro sp1, ol 2002 sp2 + salesforce.com add-in clearly this is a bit of a blocker ;-) also, the rollback doesn't work: it doesn't rollback the creation of the install directory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeff Sohrt (jsohrt) Date: 2003-09-03 06:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=857533 I got the same problem. If anyone can tell me what to do to fix it, would appreciate it. I have XP Pro with Outlook 2000. I turn off ZoneAlarm and Norton Antivirus (autoprotect = off). I'm thinking maybe I need to try the V006 version -- don't know where to download from. Otherwise on my other XP machine, this plugin is awsome! That one is Outlook 2002 (from Office XP). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sebastien Groulx (sgroulx) Date: 2003-08-12 03:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842228 just desable your Anti-virus and the instalation works well ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Graybill (graystarr) Date: 2003-06-12 04:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=340885 I get this same error. And I c annot get it to install! Please help? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mike dee (miked_187) Date: 2003-06-10 02:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=797254 i had this one too, outlook 2k. had cloudmark spam program installed as an active plugin. had to go to tools|options etc to get to the plugin screen and then uncheck the cloudmark program. exit and close outlook, reinstall went fine. mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=751348&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:20:27 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:20:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-785089 ] Can't move items from Advanced Find Message-ID: Bugs item #785089, was opened at 2003-08-08 11:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785089&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Curt Finley (cmfinley) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: Can't move items from Advanced Find Initial Comment: I'm not positive that this behavior was caused by spambayes but I just installed it this morning and noticed the following. I did a search for a message using the advanced search tool. It brought up a list of messages matching the search. I tried to drag the message from the search folder to a different folder and got a message "Can't move the items." I can however move the message as long as it isn't in the search window. I'm using Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2, Windows XP Pro SP1, and the latest version of the Outlook spambayes plugin. Sorry, I can't seem to find the spambayes version number anywhere. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I get this problem too, and if I uninstall SpamBayes it goes away, so it presumably is our fault. I'm not sure where to look for the cause of this, though. It occurs even when moving to & from folders that we are not hooking. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=785089&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:21:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:22:00 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-798318 ] Blackberry redirector e-mails identified as (maybe-)SPAM Message-ID: Support Requests item #798318, was opened at 2003-09-01 12:09 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=798318&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Blackberry redirector e-mails identified as (maybe-)SPAM Initial Comment: Hi!. I installed SpamBayes 0.7 on my Windows XP Pro SP1 system late Thursday evening 8/28. Here it is Sunday 8/31, and SB is working very nicely! BUT, it doesn't seem to have learned that RIM / Blackberry Redirector e-mails or non-spam. It pretty regularly puts them in the "maybe spam" folder. I've included the detailed "spam report" on one such message below. Otherwise, SB is working great with my Blackberry -- if it identifies an inbox message as Spam it moves it out of the inbox before the Blackberry Redirector has a chance to send it to my Blackberry! Please let me know if I can provide more information. Thank you! --Ben Slivka Ben [at] Slivka [dot] com Clyde Hill, WA (near Seattle) Spam Score: 0.207205 word spamprob #ham #spam '*H*' 0.663497 - - '*S*' 0.0779066 - - 'between' 0.0221876 2566 0 'blackberry' 0.0815819 3592 1 'processed' 0.249116 120 0 'move' 0.264701 1577 2 'data' 0.270535 1529 2 'header:Message-Id:1' 0.302488 5573 9 'used' 0.318698 2332 4 'not' 0.37607 14097 32 'reply-to:none' 0.390848 27683 67 'to:addr:ben' 0.60174 18381 105 'header:MIME-Version:1' 0.614831 13414 81 'to:addr:slivka.com' 0.616083 17303 105 'from:no real name:2**0' 0.669564 2714 21 'to:no real name:2**0' 0.687821 12466 104 'header:Return-Path:1' 0.744835 9939 110 'carry' 0.779405 332 5 Message Stream: X-MS-Mail-Gibberish: Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from BlackBerry.NET ([206.51.26.40]) by janus.slivka.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 31 Aug 2003 16:06:27 -0700 Received: from smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry (smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry [172.16.147.240]) by BlackBerry.NET (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7VN6hvs008489 for <ben@slivka.com>; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:06:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from etp02.etp.prod.on.blackberry (etp02.etp.prod.on.blackberry [172.16.147.237]) by smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7VMxtAg013832 for <ben@slivka.com>; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:02:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:02:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200308312302.h7VMxtAg013832@smtprelay01.etp.prod. on.blackberry> From: etp@etp02.etp.na.blackberry.net Subject: RIM_bca28a80-e9c0-11d1-87fe-00600811c6a2 To: ben@slivka.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/mixed; BOUNDARY="- 1824071167-23478-1062370948=:1404" Return-Path: etp@etp02.etp.na.blackberry.net X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Aug 2003 23:06:28.0062 (UTC) FILETIME=[8215A7E0:01C37014] <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.0.6249.1"> <TITLE>RIM_bca28a80-e9c0-11d1-87fe- 00600811c6a2</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <!-- Converted from text/plain format --> <P><FONT SIZE=2>This message is used to carry data between the BlackBerry Redirector and BlackBerry Handheld. Please do not delete, move or respond to this message - it will be processed by the BlackBerry Redirector.</FONT></P> </BODY> </HTML> This message is used to carry data between the BlackBerry Redirector and BlackBerry Handheld. Please do not delete, move or respond to this message - it will be processed by the BlackBerry Redirector. Message Tokens: 47 unique tokens 'and' 'between' 'blackberry' 'carry' 'cc:none' 'content-type:text/plain' 'data' 'delete,' 'from:addr:etp' 'from:addr:etp02.etp.na.blackberry.net' 'from:no real name:2**0' 'handheld.' 'header:Date:1' 'header:From:1' 'header:MIME-Version:1' 'header:Message-Id:1' 'header:Received:3' 'header:Return-Path:1' 'header:Subject:1' 'header:To:1' 'message' 'message-id:@smtprelay01.etp.prod.on.blackberry' 'move' 'not' 'please' 'processed' 'redirector' 'redirector.' 'reply-to:none' 'respond' 'sender:none' 'skip:r 40' 'subject:-' 'subject:00600811c6a2' 'subject:11d1' 'subject:87fe' 'subject:RIM_bca28a80' 'subject:e9c0' 'the' 'this' 'to:2**0' 'to:addr:ben' 'to:addr:slivka.com' 'to:no real name:2**0' 'used' 'will' 'x-mailer:none' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As per comment, this seems to be fixed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka) Date: 2003-09-04 11:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=856287 Dear Tim_One: I set "experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment: False" and that immediately curred the problem -- the Blackberry e- mails are staying in the inbox and being processed by the Blackberry Redirector. I don't notice any significant increase in spam-as-ham, either! Thank you and keep up the great work! ben@slivka.com www.slivka.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-09-02 12:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 It's much simpler for you to keep your training data balanced than it is for me to add entirely new subsystems to the code <wink>. Try it! People with balanced training sets don't have problems like this. If I had time to throw at making improvements, I'd be much more interested in finding a better way to deal with unbalanced training data than fiddling with brittle rule-based subsystems (they're always brittle, unless backed by complex learning algorithms to adjust weights based on feedback). It would help if you at least tried setting experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment: False and reported back on what happened. You don't have to retrain after doing that. Your original complaint should go away then. More interesting is what new problems would arise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Benjamin W. Slivka (benslivka) Date: 2003-09-01 15:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=856287 Dear Tim_One, I have tons of ham (29,000+) and barely any spam (now up to 189 from 80 when I first trained SpamBayes). Have you considered having some additional filter rules that would allow me to indicate that mail from certain domains and/or with certain reg_exp subject lines was SPAM/NOT- SPAM? I understand this would violate the "pure" Bayesian approach, but might be a simple, practical solution? Thanks! --ben@slivka.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-09-01 13:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Looks like you trained on a great many more ham msgs than spam msgs. If so, try training on an approximately equal number of each. The code was designed, tested, and tuned by people who trained on approximately equal numbers of each, and we don't have yet have a good approach to dealing with wildly unbalanced training sets. You can find your default_bayes_customize.ini file and change the line experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment: True to experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment: False and then these msgs will almost certainly be scored as solid ham. However, you'll probably get a much higher false negative rate (spam erroneously classified as ham) then too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=798318&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:24:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:24:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-801751 ] Cannot install the program Message-ID: Support Requests item #801751, was opened at 2003-09-07 07:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=801751&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Erik Thorsen (passage) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Cannot install the program Initial Comment: After reading through almost every reported bug on this web site and also looking through the documentation html page I am most confident I can't find the reason for my error in any other way than reporting it here. The problem is as follows... I first tried to install the addin for outlook. I had to cancel because it told me to close all outlook tasks and so forth. Then it adviced me to turn of any antivirus programs running. I felt it would be safest to restart my computer, so I choose the cancel button. After restarting and making sure I am not connected with anything like internet explorer, outlook, outlook express, yahoo, msn or anything else that should cause any problems, I get the following error message: You must close Outlook before spambayes can be installed. Please close all outlook windows (using File->Exit and log off" if available) and click retry, or cancel to exit the installation. If the message persists after closing all outlook windows, you may need to log off from windows and try again. I have tried everything now but I can't seem to get the program ready for installing, even though I have disabled my antivirus program and closed all open windows. As the program is not installed I have no log file or anything else to attach. I am running a windows system, xp pro, with office pro installed on it. If you need any additional information about my system, please do not hesitate to contact me! If anyone can help me with this matter I would appreciate it very much!!! Thank you ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Open up the task manager and check to see if Outlook.exe is still there. If it's not, then a list of the processes that *are* running when Outlook is closed would be helpful, if you can provide that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adamscpas (adamscpas) Date: 2004-04-02 07:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1011391 I have a similar problem when running the install program. Even though I have closed Outlook, it still insists that my Outlook Mail Delivery Agent is still running and won't go any further. I've rebooted without Outlook in my Start-up menu and checked to see if any apps are running in the background... nothing. Any suggestions? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-10 10:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Are you running ActiveSync, Palm software, or any other software for synchronizing an electronic organizer with Outlook? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 801756 ] Problems installing the addin on win xp pro ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=801751&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:26:20 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:26:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-813151 ] Have Outlook remove specific messages from server Message-ID: Support Requests item #813151, was opened at 2003-09-27 04:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=813151&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Marty Rabens (martoon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Have Outlook remove specific messages from server Initial Comment: Does anyone know of a way to get Outlook to remove specific messages from the server without deleting them from your mail folders? I run the SpamBayes plugin at work, and I'd like to keep all my spam (in case I need to retrain SpamBayes or to experiment with other spam filters), but I'd like to remove all the spam from the server so I don't have to retrieve it over dialup at home. My apologies that this isn't actually a support request for SpamBayes, but it does relate to the Outlook plugin (and I thought other users may have the same question). Thanks, Marty ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's been a long time, and no-one has any more ideas, and this isn't really a SpamBayes question (as the OP said), so closing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marty Rabens (martoon) Date: 2003-10-02 08:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=483884 Thanks for the suggestions, guys. Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to work for me. I'm running Outlook 2002. I created a new .pst file, created a spam folder in it, and told the SpamBayes plugin to put spam there. I have the "Remove from server when deleted from 'Deleted Items'" option checked. When I retrieve my mail, SpamBayes puts the spam in the folder in the other .pst file, but it still gets left on the server. Maybe this was a bug in Outlook 2000 that's been fixed in Outlook 2002. Oh well. Guess I'll need to start deleting the spam. I just wish Outlook had some kind of "remove the selected items from server" feature. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-09-27 05:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Purely by accident, I stumbled into something that works great, at least in Outlook 2000: On my POP3 accounts, I have the "Remove from server when deleted from 'Deleted Items'" Outlook option checked. God only knows exactly what that option truly means, but it turns out it means something surprising: I have separate .pst file into which I store my training ham and training spam. The Outlook addin is configured to move Spam directly into the training spam folder in this other .pst file. And that's all it takes! The spam messages (and only the spam messages) are automatically removed from my POP3 server. I have no idea why this works; I guess Outlook sees that the messages have vanished from the .pst file containing ny Inbox, and erroneously concludes that I must have deleted them from the Deleted Items folder. Whatever the reason, it works for me on Outlook 2K, for 3 unrelated POP3 accounts, and across 3 different OL2K installations on 3 different computers. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist) Date: 2003-09-27 05:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=583713 In Outlook, go to file->Data File Management. Use that dialog to create a pst file. Now create a new folder in the pst file (should be attached as "Personal Folders" or something). Set you spam folder to be the new folder. That should do what you want but, I can't test it because I don't use exchange currently. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=813151&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:29:00 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:29:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-841147 ] install problem Message-ID: Support Requests item #841147, was opened at 2003-11-13 16:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=841147&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: robert betz (bbxrider) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: install problem Initial Comment: this is for win2k, outlook2k tried to run the .exe option but windows didn't recognize it, so -installed python 2.3.2 -installed the win32all extensions, -ran the 'setup.py install', lots of copy messages, looked good, ended with, copying build\scripts-2.3\pop3proxy_tray.py -> C:\Program Files\pythonInstaller\Scripts - ran addin.py, got this output # This window will display output from any programs that import win32traceutil # win32com servers registered with '--debug' are in this category. Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin Registration complete. but.... no spambays tool bar in my outlook2k and its not listed in the outlook addin area any ideas what might be missing? i would really like to have this running, i'm drowning in spam ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I don't know what I was thinking when I wrote that. The OP comments are describing installing sb_server (well, the tray app). What is needed is running addin.py, as described in the documentation. IAC, hopefully the 1.0 release installs properly. If not, then read the instructions in the README in the Outlook2000 directory, and that explains how to install from source. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you try the 1.0a9 (0.9) release? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=841147&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:31:08 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:31:12 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-852387 ] Spambayes stops working Message-ID: Support Requests item #852387, was opened at 2003-12-02 13:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=852387&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Moss (mossesq) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes stops working Initial Comment: I do not know what happened, but Spambayes was working great, then stopped! I tried uninstall and redownloading and reinstall, but it made no difference. Even after uninstall and before the reinstall, the "Delete as Spam" Icon and the "Spambayes" drop down box were there, but clicking on "Delete as Spam" did nothing, and there was no drop down on the spambayes key. I used to get a drop down box re: the manager. What happened? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If any of you are still experiencing problems please attach a copy of your most recent log file to this tracker, and change the status to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Alfson (balfson) Date: 2004-01-22 11:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=820772 I have just experienced the same phenomenon with the latest version of Spambayes running with Outlook 2002 SP2 on Win2K SP3. I tried a similar fix, even going so far as to uninstall from Add/Remove Programs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-04 11:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 POPFile is another 'bayesian' spam filter - it also does n-way classification. There's a link on the spambayes website to lots of related packages, including popfile - http://popfile.sf.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jeff Moss (mossesq) Date: 2003-12-04 05:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=921777 Sorry for my ignarance, but what si PopFile and where do I get it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nick (jaxjaguar) Date: 2003-12-02 19:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=892819 I was running the service and it stopped working on me a few last weekend. It had some strange coding errors and was not allowing complete email downloads. Since I am not a coder and did not know how to de-bug, I installed PopFile. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=852387&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:32:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:32:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-861014 ] Install Error Message-ID: Support Requests item #861014, was opened at 2003-12-17 03:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=861014&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: Melissa Phillips (mrphillips) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Install Error Initial Comment: I'm getting an error after installing saying the software cannot be initialized. Your troubleshooting pages says to send you a copy of the log file in this case............ Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\melissa.phillips\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\melissa.phillips\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] ERROR enumerating a receive folder - (- 2147221246, 'Invalid window handle', None, None) Error connecting to Outlook! Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1177, in OnConnection File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in CreateWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in InitWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in YieldReceiveFolders File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 1177, in OnConnection File "out1.pyz/dialogs", line 64, in ShowWizard File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 142, in CreateWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/config_wizard", line 49, in InitWizardConfig File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 372, in YieldReceiveFolders File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 337, in GetFolder MsgStoreException: MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80004005 (Unspecified error): Unspecified error FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No response from OP for a long time. If you are still having problems, please try the latest release, and if that doesn't work, set the status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-10 10:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Could you try reinstalling with the latest 1.0a9 (0.9) version? There are some changes in the new release that might possibly affect this. It would also be best if you could delete your "Documents and Setings\...\Application Data\SpamBayes" directory before reinstalling. If you have never been able to get SpamBayes running successfully then there won't be any useful info in this directory, but it could interfere with the Configuration Wizard when reinstalling. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=861014&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:30:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:33:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-848313 ] Scores, but doesnt move Message-ID: Support Requests item #848313, was opened at 2003-11-25 03:27 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=848313&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Drew Boillot (sicwan) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Scores, but doesnt move Initial Comment: Hello, I have noticed that sometimes SpamBayes will score, and mark the message as read, but fails to move it to the spam folder. This uesally happens after the weekend when i havn't checked this account. I've Increased the deley in wich SpamBayes starts to scan messages, but that still didn't help. I didn't have this problem untill my boss tried to uninstall SpamBayes because he didn't know what it was. (In the process, he some how corrupted my settings file and i had to start over) If anyone has and suggestions, or a fix for this. Please let me know. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Haven't heard from OP in a long time, and it's likely that this has been fixed since (as there have been similar problems fixed), so closing. Please re-open if that is not the case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does this still happen with 1.0a9 (0.9)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=848313&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:33:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:33:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-867177 ] Problem reinstalling SpamBayes Message-ID: Support Requests item #867177, was opened at 2003-12-30 05:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=867177&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: John Lee (jlee418) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Problem reinstalling SpamBayes Initial Comment: Spambayes has been working fine for me when I first installed it. Just today, it stopped working. Trying to access the SpamBayes Manager or clicking the Delete as Spam button did nothing. At first, I thought a reboot would fix the problem, but it didn't. So I was left with the usual uninstall/reinstall approach to see if that fixed the problem, but it didn't. Upon uninstall, I noticed that the SpamBayes toolbar was still there in Outlook, so I removed that as according to one of your FAQs. After the removal of the SpamBayes toolbar, I then went ahead and downloaded the latest version of SpamBayes and installed that. The installation went through smoothly with no errors of any kind. However, upon loading Outlook, the SpamBayes toolbar is not there?! Here are the specifications of the environment SpamBayes was installed in: Windows 2000 SP4 Outlook XP Norton Antivirus (Completely disabled during this whole process) After this failed reinstalled, I have done numerous uninstalls and reinstalls including rebooting after an uninstall and rebooting after an install, to see if that fixed the problem, but it persists. I have also even tried removing the registry keys that SpamBayes still left behind by doing a search for spambayes. However after a reboot and then another install of SpamBayes with no success. I have also removed the Spambayes directory that's located in the C:\Documents and Settings\<user> directory as indicated in your FAQ where SpamBayes keeps it "trained" database. Is there a way for me to completely remove all the SpamBayes information from the system as though SpamBayes was never installed before? It seems as though there are still some reminiscent information left behind, maybe some dlls that needs to be removed that was not removed by the uninstall program? Please any insight or suggestions would be helpful, I'm being bombarded with tons of spam again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No response from OP in a long time. If this is still a problem with the latest release, please say so and set the status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-30 13:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you attach your log files? They should indicate what is going wrong. The 008.1 version can leave some stuff behind on uninstall - the next release will fix that. However, there shouldn't be anything left if you've done all the above. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=867177&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:34:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:35:00 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-893036 ] Installed but quits after 1 cycle Message-ID: Support Requests item #893036, was opened at 2004-02-09 10:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=893036&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: allen hutton (ahutton) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Installed but quits after 1 cycle Initial Comment: I use Goldmine contact manager which takes in email via pop3. I got spambayes all configured and can get a group of messages into the Goldmine program with Ham in the subject line. all this is fine but then when I retreive mail again all the pop3 activity on my XP pro unit is stopped. I get no server found for email thru Spambayes and thru my other setups. Logging off does not help but a full reboot does. I can again start spambayes retreive a few messages and then all email gets hung. If no mail is present it does not lock when I retrive an email "Subject : ham,[Norton AntiSpam] test" its Ok as soon as I've retrieved an email and go back to check it sits and sits "connected to localhost" and times out without retreiving.. after a few minutes it gives up. at this point outlook will not work either. it seems liek a port is in limbo!!! it also will not send email at this point either ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Sorry no-one has got to this before (must have missed it). It seems likely that you've either got it to work or given up on it by now, but if you still have the problem and want to get it sorted, then please attach a copy of your most recent log file (the troubleshooting guide explains where to find this) using the most recent release to this tracker and set the status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=893036&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:36:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:36:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-900252 ] Assertion Error in Classifier Message-ID: Support Requests item #900252, was opened at 2004-02-20 01:36 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=900252&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Kjellquist (oldcyberdude) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Assertion Error in Classifier Initial Comment: Spambayes suddenly stops classifying. Traceback shows the following error: System is Rh 9, Evolution and running spambayes 1.0a9 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/spambayes-1.0a6/scripts/sb_server.py", line 442, in onRetr evidence=True) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 190, in chi2_spamprob clues = self._getclues(wordstream) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 493, in _getclues tup = self._worddistanceget(word) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 508, in _worddistanceget prob = self.probability(record) File "/usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py", line 308, in probability assert hamcount <= nham AssertionError I am not a python coder but I can certainly go in and make any recommended changes. Any ideas. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is rather late, but if necessary please see FAQ 5.3: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=900252&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:37:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:37:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-909218 ] Training Question Message-ID: Support Requests item #909218, was opened at 2004-03-04 06:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=909218&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Hall (hallktm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Training Question Initial Comment: Stupid Question: I get a *lot* of spam - Some of which shows up as questionable. I the ham I get is about 1/4 the questionable items. This leaves an inbalance in training materials - even if I move all ham back to questionable and train on it (a PITA by the way). Is there a suggested workaround, other than directly deleting questionable items and not training on them? *Very* happy with the program btw. Jim Hall ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is rather late, but: The wiki has a lot of information about training techniques: . Otherwise adjusting the thresholds (as asphunck said) may work best. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Aslak (asphunck) Date: 2004-04-22 23:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1026777 So because of your imbalance in training material you supposedly get a biased spam score. E.g. the spam score would be too high. Couldn't you just adjust the triggering levels that marks "questionable" and "sure spam". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=909218&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:38:21 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:38:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-913460 ] Reliability? Message-ID: Support Requests item #913460, was opened at 2004-03-11 01:56 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=913460&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Prosser (rprosser) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Reliability? Initial Comment: I notice that much of the code appears to be in Alpha state. I want to use this software (or the like) for a commercial project, so can I rely on it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-11 10:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Well, if you're going to sell it to people, then IMO you really have an obligation to test it yourself, thoroughly, whatever we tell you about the code. That said - it really depends what part of the code you're planning on using. If it's the core classifier and tokenizer, without any x- options, then it's very stable. The Outlook plug-in is just about as stable, as is sb_server, and I think the sb_filter/sb_mboxtrain scripts as well. sb_imapfilter is a few steps behind, and sb_notesfilter and sb_pop3dnd are not at all there. Since SpamBayes is used by a few people now, bugs do tend to show up reasonably quickly - if it hasn't been reported, then it's probably not going to effect many people, or there isn't a bug at all. Take a look at the open bug reports and see what you think. That would also tell you what you need to fix before you use it. Note that there's no obligation, but we would be very happy to accept back any patches that you create if you do end up using it. Good luck! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=913460&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:40:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:40:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-917027 ] sb_imapfilter wiped out my inbox Message-ID: Support Requests item #917027, was opened at 2004-03-16 14:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=917027&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: James Bland (birdra) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_imapfilter wiped out my inbox Initial Comment: Configuration: Suse pro 9.0 Python 2.3 Spambayes 1.09a with sb_imapfilter v1.27 and message.py vv1.48 from CVS I had loaded the sb_imapfilter.py and message.py from CVS to try to correct the issue of getting duplicate emails in my inbox. After I added the files and fired up my script all but 6 of my emails in my inbox disappeared. They are nowhere to be found. not in spam, possiblespam, or trash folders. Also, still getting duplicate emails after sb_imapfilter runs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is very late now (we seem to have missed most of the support requests), but FWIW: It's possible that this has been since fixed, since there have been many imapfilter fixes. Certainly we make every attempt we can to make sure that the mail is still there. Even before, though, the mail would still have been there, just maybe marked /Deleted. Your mail client ought to have been able to show it somewhere. Presumably this is so out-of-date it's irrelevant now (sorry!). Please reopen if that is not the case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=917027&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:42:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:42:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-928081 ] add in reg fail help Message-ID: Support Requests item #928081, was opened at 2004-04-02 19:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=928081&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: russf2001 (russf2001) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: add in reg fail help Initial Comment: using windows xp pro with office 2003 pro system has roaming profiles with restricted group policies. i log on as admin. adjust permissions on spambayes folder. spam bayes works on this profile than i regsvr32 as instructions state and i get this errot -- c:\program files\spambayes\bin\outlook_addin.dill was loaded, but the dllInstall entry point was not found. This file cannot be registered. help. Can I just add a key if so please detail TIA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm not sure what version this was, but if you use 1.0rc2 or 1.0 you can run the outlook_addin_register.exe program that gets installed in the "bin" directory and that should work. The instructions have been updated to reflect this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=928081&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:43:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:43:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-932471 ] Spambayes will not install on NT Message-ID: Bugs item #932471, was opened at 2004-04-10 07:12 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=932471&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: jonw (jondavidsmith) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes will not install on NT Initial Comment: Hello, I am trying to install spambayes on an NT system. The install gets to the finish page and then jumps to the welcome to spambayes page--as expected. The toolbar does not appear on outlook and the install is not compleat. I'm running nt4.0 with service pack 6. Using Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.3821 Spambayes 1.0a9 I beleive I have the correct comcat.dll. In that both the good and bad ones are version 5.0, Ican't be sure, but IE is 6.0 2800 and the bad dll comes from IE4.0. This is per this link: spambayes1.log : Unregistered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin spambayes2.log: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 1546, in ? File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 477, in UseCommandLine File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 407, in RegisterClasses File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 261, in RegisterServer File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 85, in _cat_registrar pywintypes.com_error: (-2147467262, 'No such interface supported', None, None) The only pyton file that showes up is: pythoncom23.dll in winnt\system32. No "com addins" are shown in outlook tools. Tony Meyer has been helping me, but has run out of ideas. Thanks, Jon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=932471&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:44:02 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:44:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-939947 ] suggestion: give link to a spam pst file. Message-ID: Feature Requests item #939947, was opened at 2004-04-22 22:57 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=939947&group_id=61702 Category: None >Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Aslak (asphunck) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: suggestion: give link to a spam pst file. Initial Comment: A suggestion: Giving a download link to an outlook pst file containing ~100 spam messages for fast training. It would be entirely optional to use it ofcourse. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=939947&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:47:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:47:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-955347 ] SpamBayes stop working after installing new version. Message-ID: Support Requests item #955347, was opened at 2004-05-18 04:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=955347&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Doug (djpratt) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SpamBayes stop working after installing new version. Initial Comment: I don't know if this is a bug or if I screwed something up. Windows XP with all the updates, Outlook 2002, SpamBayes 1.0b1, two users/accounts that use email on this machine. Log information is at the bottom of this email. Here is my problem; I originally started with an older version of SpamBayes (don?t recall the version but I downloaded 6-8 months ago) and it worked like a charm for me and my wife. I saw that there was a newer version so I uninstalled the old version and installed the new one. It still work fine for me but when my wife logs in and goes to Outlook, the two SpamBayes button are there but they are not functional. It doesn?t do anything when you click on them. I tried to use the troubleshooting guide but it?s over my head. I did note on my wife side, COM add-ins is empty (no files listed or checked). I would appreciate it if you can help me solve this problem. Best Regards, Doug Pratt Warning: option experimental_ham_spam_imbalance_adjustment in section Classifier is deprecated Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Douglas J. Pratt\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Douglas J. Pratt\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 281 spam and 1314 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0b1 (April 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/Spam' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Douglas J. Pratt\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/Spam' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\Douglas J. Pratt\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/Spam' Message 'Auto-response for your message to the "Spambayes" mailing list' in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No word back from OP, so assume that this worked. Please set the status back to "Open" if that is not the case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-18 09:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Perhaps what has happened here is that SpamBayes isn't installed for your wife's account. The old versions of SB installed for all users, but there were problems with this, so new ones just install for the user running the installer. There are two ways around this - either run the installer when logged in with your wife's account, or install for all users manually - see the online version of the troubleshooting guide for details about how to do that. If SB is installed for all users, then it won't appear in the COM addins list for either of you. If this the case, then are you sure that the log you've attached is for your wife's account and not yours? The username looks male, and there aren't any errors in it. It's possible that Outlook has disabled the plug-in on your wife's account - try doing Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items and seeing if SpamBayes is listed there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=955347&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:51:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:51:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-975529 ] Can't train on items in "Deleted Items" folder? Message-ID: Support Requests item #975529, was opened at 2004-06-19 06:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=975529&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Adam (rumblies) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't train on items in "Deleted Items" folder? Initial Comment: Hello, I've looked through documentation and haven't seen anything about this, apologies if I missed it. I keep about half of my archived mail in the Outlook "Deleted Items" folder (and subfolders). The SpamBayes Manager doesn't let me select those folders to train on. Is this by design? Is it a limitation of Outlook? Is there a workaround? My scoring isn't going to be nearly as good as it could be until I get that fixed, and I'm reluctant to shuffle the organization of my stuff because I've got 7 years of archived mail in other PST files that follow the same pattern. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is deliberate, sort of. You might want to read FAQ 3.11: Although you're talking about training, not filtering, it's the same code that presents the folders (AFAIK). However, the best thing to do would be to simply adopt a 'train on mistakes' regime. This is typically one of the best methods anyway. So you don't need to train on any mail that you've already got, just anything that lands in the unsure folder, or any ham in the spam folder and vice versa. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=975529&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:52:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:52:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-976529 ] Hotkeys for training Message-ID: Feature Requests item #976529, was opened at 2004-06-21 17:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=976529&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Baram (mbaram) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Hotkeys for training Initial Comment: Are there hotkeys for Delete and Recover from Spam butons? it would be nice to have that not to press the buttons all the time. Also can I add these antries to right-mouse menu in Outlook? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No, but there could be, I suppose. Changing this to a feature request. I think there is already a request/patch for the right-click/context menu. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=976529&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:54:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:54:55 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-979183 ] Slow scoring for active mailboxes Message-ID: Support Requests item #979183, was opened at 2004-06-25 07:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=979183&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Rith (rpeou) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Slow scoring for active mailboxes Initial Comment: I've installed SpamBayes to work on an Exchange mailbox that is very active at certain times, i.e. the box receives about 3000 emails per hour during parts of the day. At first I thought that SpamBayes was skipping the scoring for large numbers of emails as it's coming into the Inbox (the Spam column in Outlook is blank). But if I wait until there is a slow period (which may be as much as 8-10 hours after an email arrived), the email does eventually get scored and possibly moved. My question is whether this is an expected behavior or is this a bug? Is there any setting that can be changed to score the emails more efficiently and quickly? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes scores the message after Outlook tells it that the message has arrived, so if it's that that's taking a long time, then there's nothing that can be done about it, as it's out of our hands. However, if "background filtering" is enabled, we also wait for a set period before scoring (after being told about the new mail) and that might be causing the problem. The reason for doing this is to ensure that all Outlook rules run before SpamBayes (otherwise it could be before, during or after, depending on any number of things). If all your rules run on Exchange, then you don't need this (as they will definitely run first), so can disabled it (it's on the Advanced Tab of the SpamBayes Manager dialog). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=979183&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 05:58:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 05:58:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-940630 ] SMTP proxy doesnt work Message-ID: Bugs item #940630, was opened at 2004-04-23 22:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=940630&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Binary 1.0b1 >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: BlackCat (cmelv) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: SMTP proxy doesnt work Initial Comment: I just changed my local server to send through SpamBayes' SMTP proxy rather than directly to my ISP (extmail.bigpond.com), so that SpamBayes can be sent learning messages. However my ISP wont accept mail from SpamBytes - every attempt fails with the SMTP error: "501 space seperator provided without argument" It doesnt matter what the message is, or what client originally sent it (whether Outlook 2003 or a simple command line SMTP mailer). If SpamBayes is removed from the loop again, it does back to working perfectly. I have a feeling that someone will tell me that the ISP is not implementing some RFC or other correctly, but that won't help - it's Telstra (Australia's main Telco), who are absolutely NOT going to change anything so that it's users can use SpamBayes!! :-( Is there any chance of a workaround - I don't know SMTP/RFCs or Python well enough to have a go at it myself :-( ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 15:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-03 14:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You mention trying a command-line mailer - what SMTP command is it failing on? We only change two (RCPT TO and DATA) and just pass the rest on unchanged, and I'm not sure I see how either could be causing this 501. The other possibility is that it's some non-standard command which is getting changed by the proxying - it would be easy enough to put in a workaround for this, but I'd need to know exactly what command it was (including whatever arguments get passed). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=940630&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 06:03:26 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 06:03:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-990700 ] Changes to asyncore in Python 2.4 break ServerLineReader Message-ID: Bugs item #990700, was opened at 2004-07-14 19:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=990700&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: Changes to asyncore in Python 2.4 break ServerLineReader Initial Comment: Another Python 2.3.4 -> Python 2.4a1 problem. Python 2.3.4 has this in asyncore: """ def add_channel(self, map=None): #self.log_info('adding channel %s' % self) if map is None: map = socket_map map[self._fileno] = self """ The Python 2.4a1 version is this: """ def add_channel(self, map=None): #self.log_info('adding channel %s' % self) if map is None: map = self._map map[self._fileno] = self """ ServerLineReader defaults to having self._map be None, so the map[self._fileno] line crashes with a TypeError. Putting "if map is not None:" before line 191 of Dibbler.py (and indenting the "self._map = map" line) fixes this, but again I'd like to check with you that this is correct before checking it in. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 16:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 That fix *does not* work. It just delays the problem until later on. I'm really not sure what the correct fix is, so I'll leave this for now since it's possible that you (Richie) will instantly know the solution. If it's something that needs digging about, then just give me a clue and reassign to me if you like. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=990700&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 07:46:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 07:46:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962291 ] WinXP / Server connexion refused Message-ID: Bugs item #962291, was opened at 2004-05-28 17:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by leshaussebons You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: WinXP / Server connexion refused Initial Comment: Used 9 version since today, installed the 1.0 release candidate, with same settings. Now when I try to connect to the spambayes server ( local ) , it returns me a "connexion refused" message, for any of the pop account proxies I have setted ( nothing changes on the client computers ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 07:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 still aware or this problem but haven't the courage to re-install the jamming version on my computer, as I use the anti-spam functions actively. I set back the older version that remained working fine for me . .. Answer to previous post : yeah the settings were the same, and were kept. I also tryied to re-enter them. Will try to install the newer version soon, I swear, as I really want to help you with fixing this odd bug ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 03:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 01:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you open the configuration page, does it still have the server values there? Could you attach your log file to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 08:12:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 08:13:03 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962291 ] WinXP / Server connexion refused Message-ID: Bugs item #962291, was opened at 2004-05-28 17:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by leshaussebons You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy >Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: WinXP / Server connexion refused Initial Comment: Used 9 version since today, installed the 1.0 release candidate, with same settings. Now when I try to connect to the spambayes server ( local ) , it returns me a "connexion refused" message, for any of the pop account proxies I have setted ( nothing changes on the client computers ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 08:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 here is the log Service not availible. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 4700 is proxying pop. laposte.net:110 Listener on port 4701 is proxying pop.free.fr:110 Listener on port 4702 is proxying pop.lost-oasis nothing special, I noticed I had the same log while working. I can't download any mail, as the messenger ( thunderbird, and I had the same stuff with another one ) tells me : unable to connect to server, the server returned an error : ( blank ) On any account, any port. ( I installed the rc2 ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 07:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 still aware or this problem but haven't the courage to re-install the jamming version on my computer, as I use the anti-spam functions actively. I set back the older version that remained working fine for me . .. Answer to previous post : yeah the settings were the same, and were kept. I also tryied to re-enter them. Will try to install the newer version soon, I swear, as I really want to help you with fixing this odd bug ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 03:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 01:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you open the configuration page, does it still have the server values there? Could you attach your log file to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 08:18:45 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 08:18:49 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962291 ] WinXP / Server connexion refused Message-ID: Bugs item #962291, was opened at 2004-05-29 03:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: WinXP / Server connexion refused Initial Comment: Used 9 version since today, installed the 1.0 release candidate, with same settings. Now when I try to connect to the spambayes server ( local ) , it returns me a "connexion refused" message, for any of the pop account proxies I have setted ( nothing changes on the client computers ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 18:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I will look at this on Monday, but am away this weekend (and it's late on Friday here right now, so can't do it now). So feel free to drop back to the old version until then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 18:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 here is the log Service not availible. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 4700 is proxying pop. laposte.net:110 Listener on port 4701 is proxying pop.free.fr:110 Listener on port 4702 is proxying pop.lost-oasis nothing special, I noticed I had the same log while working. I can't download any mail, as the messenger ( thunderbird, and I had the same stuff with another one ) tells me : unable to connect to server, the server returned an error : ( blank ) On any account, any port. ( I installed the rc2 ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 17:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 still aware or this problem but haven't the courage to re-install the jamming version on my computer, as I use the anti-spam functions actively. I set back the older version that remained working fine for me . .. Answer to previous post : yeah the settings were the same, and were kept. I also tryied to re-enter them. Will try to install the newer version soon, I swear, as I really want to help you with fixing this odd bug ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 13:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 11:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you open the configuration page, does it still have the server values there? Could you attach your log file to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 13:26:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 13:26:29 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-932471 ] Spambayes will not install on NT Message-ID: Bugs item #932471, was opened at 2004-04-09 15:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jondavidsmith You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=932471&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: jonw (jondavidsmith) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spambayes will not install on NT Initial Comment: Hello, I am trying to install spambayes on an NT system. The install gets to the finish page and then jumps to the welcome to spambayes page--as expected. The toolbar does not appear on outlook and the install is not compleat. I'm running nt4.0 with service pack 6. Using Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.3821 Spambayes 1.0a9 I beleive I have the correct comcat.dll. In that both the good and bad ones are version 5.0, Ican't be sure, but IE is 6.0 2800 and the bad dll comes from IE4.0. This is per this link: spambayes1.log : Unregistered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin spambayes2.log: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 1546, in ? File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 477, in UseCommandLine File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 407, in RegisterClasses File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 261, in RegisterServer File "win32com\server\register.pyc", line 85, in _cat_registrar pywintypes.com_error: (-2147467262, 'No such interface supported', None, None) The only pyton file that showes up is: pythoncom23.dll in winnt\system32. No "com addins" are shown in outlook tools. Tony Meyer has been helping me, but has run out of ideas. Thanks, Jon ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: jonw (jondavidsmith) Date: 2004-07-16 07:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1017921 After having no luck with spambayes, I ended up buying Junk- out for $20. It is slow, but it does catch the spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=932471&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 16:11:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:11:39 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-986353 ] Outlook/ZipMagic Incompatibility Message-ID: Bugs item #986353, was opened at 2004-07-06 23:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=986353&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook/ZipMagic Incompatibility Initial Comment: I use ZipMagic to handle Zip files under Win2K. If I turn zipmagic on, it permanently crashes SpamBayes with the following logfile message: Addin terminating: 2 COM client and 2 COM servers exist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-16 10:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This has been fixed in latest CVS. Changes will probably not appear in the binary installer until the first 1.1 alpha release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Date: 2004-07-08 09:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078371 Yes, I have seen the same message as in bug #941639, but in the previous version. I did not see this message anywhere this time. What may be the difference is that I usually leave ZipMagic off, and turn it on only to create a .ZIP file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-07 11:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The attached logfile shows a perfectly normal execution of SpamBayes, ending with a normal exit from SpamBayes when Outlook is closed. What is the error that you are seeing? Does it happen when you first start Outlook with ZipMagic's ZipFolders enabled? What happens if you disable ZipFolders before loading Outlook, and then reenable after Outlook and SpamBayes are loaded and running? The logfile you uploaded is "spambayes4.log". There should be 3 more recent logfiles named "spambayes1.log", "spambayes2.log", and "spambayes3.log". Can you find those? Please refer to bug #941639. It sounds like you are getting further than the user who submitted that bug, but maybe the logfile you uploaded was generated when ZipFolders was disabled? Do any of the symptons there sound at all familiar? Windows XP has a shell extension that will allow you to see the contents of a zip file in a "folder-like" view, but unlike ZipMagic it does not make the zip file look like a normal folder to other programs that directly access the file system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Geoffrey J. Swenson (geewhizbang) Date: 2004-07-07 10:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1078371 I have attached the logfile, but the message I posted is the only thing that looks like an error The most likely reason for the crash is that the zip file "spambayes.zip" (or any other zip file used by spambayes) becomes a folder when zipmagic is activated. A similar feature is actually included with windows XP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-07 10:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The logfile message you show is a normal message that is written to the logfile whenever you exit Outlook, so it's difficult to guess where the problem is. Are there any tracebacks or other error messages earlier in the logfile? It would be helpful if you could attach your complete logfile to this bug report. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=986353&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 16:14:59 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 16:15:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-941639 ] Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Message-ID: Bugs item #941639, was opened at 2004-04-25 01:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0b1 Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 9 Submitted By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Initial Comment: Unable to register addin in Outlook 2000 SR1 9.0.0.5414 / Microsoft Windows 98 4.10.2222 A. I uninstalled the Spambayes-outlook-0081 because I could never get it to register as an addin. (consistent error) and tried the latest release 1.0b1 and it failed also. I ran regsvr32.exe outlook_addin.dll as described in the trouble shooting guide and the windows error was that it could not locate a file to execute. This is the same error I get every time I try to install. I purged all references to spambayes from the registry before trying the latest fresh install. This is the log from the latest two failed attempts with 1.0.b1: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories my paths: C:\Program Files\SpamBayes D:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Outlook.exe C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook C:\WINDOWS\Profiles\Marc Powell\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook What is a 'pywintypes' module and where is it located? Which of my sys.path directories do I have to stick in the freezer before I can copy the 'pywintypes' module into it? Any help will be greatly appreciated as this has become a personal challenge. Marc Powell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-16 10:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 A later bug [986353] seems to indicate that this is, in fact, caused by a zip folder utility such as ZipMagic. This has been fixed in latest CVS. Changes will probably not appear in the binary installer until the first 1.1 alpha release. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-06-29 09:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It would definately be interesting to know if the OP is still having a problem with this. I had forgotten about this bug until I got the tracker e-mail from Mark's update. I took a second look and there is something very interesting in the directory listing file. It contains file listings for folders such as the following that look no different than the real folders that we install: c:\Program Files\SpamBayes\lib\spambayes.zipc:\Program Files\SpamBayes\lib\spambayes.zip\bsddbc:\Program Files\SpamBayes\lib\spambayes.zip\dialogsc:\Program Files\SpamBayes\lib\spambayes.zip\dialogs\resources If the user was running some sort of Windows extension that transparently makes ZIP files look like normal folders, would it possibly result in the behavior we were seeing? I've never tried it myself, but the ZipMagic program (http://www.aladdinsys.com/win/zipmagic/) claims to do something like this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-28 21:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Is this still a problem with the most recent versions? If so, please reset the bug status to "Open". Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 09:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 No, I did not extract c:\Program Files\SpamBayes\lib\spambayes.zip\. The directory listing [c program files spambayes.txt] of c:\Program Files\SpamBayes\ reflects a totally default install of spambayes-1.0b1.exe with no other programs open. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 03:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 If I make a local hack to simulate this error (and change the error text ;), I see: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? File "pywintypes.pyc", line 69, in ? File "pywintypes.pyc", line 45, in __import_pywin32_system_module__ ImportError: Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories ['E:\src\spambayes\windows\py2exe\dist\lib\spambayes.zip'] Note there is no source-line shown, and that none of the files reference the .zip file. However, if I replace create a *directory* spambayes.zip, and unzip the contents of the real .zip file into it, here is the exception I get: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "E:\src\spambayes\windows\py2exe\dist\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c ... ie, just like in this bug!! mypowell - did you unzip this .zip file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 03:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log 5/4/04. I wiill try "running from source" if it will help to put this one to bed. speaking of bed... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-05-04 03:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Here is something I find strange. From OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log ... File "addin.py", line 33, in ? File "win32com\__init__.pyc", line 6, in ? File "C:\PROGRAM FILES\SPAMBAYES\lib\spambayes.zip\pythoncom.pyc", line 2, in ? #@c Note 2 things: * addin.py and win32com\__init__ do not reference the .zip file. * pythoncom.pyc references the .zip file, and has garbage for the source line. I would expect no source-lines at all. Is almost looks as though the .zip file has been expanded!? I might follow this as a clue... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-04 03:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Either something really weird is going on or sys.path has somehow ended up not being what it should by the time pywintypes.py is imported. Either way, I can't think of anything to resolve this apart from building a diagnostic version of the binary (with various debugging statements in pywintypes.py). Kenny/Mark - can you think of anything? By "running from source", I mean running the plug-in from source code rather than from the binary version that the installer installs. You do this by installing Python & pywin32 and using the source distibution of SpamBayes. The website has details. It could certainly make it easier to diagnose (unless the problem didn't exist, which is possible), but is more hassle for you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-04 02:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 I performed another clean install of a fresh download of 1.0b1 which resulted in the exact exception as before (Module 'pywintypes' isn't in frozen sys.path directories). The file, pywintypes23.dll. is in the "lib" subdirectory. See the attached file, "c program files SpamBayes.txt"; a printout of the c program files SpamBayes directory. Also attached is the only OUTLOOK_ADDIN_REGISTER.EXE.log for this install. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-03 13:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The problem is not a corrupted pywintypes.pyc. The pywintypes.pyc must be running correctly for you to get the "isn't in frozen sys.path" exception. The purpose of the .pyc file is to locate and load a related DLL file, which in the case of the SpamBayes install should be named pywintypes23.dll. This file should be installed in the "lib" subdirectory of your SpamBayes installation. Could you attach a directory listing of the files in the SpamBayes "lib" directory? If possible, also attach any SpamBayes log files you can find as describe in the Troubleshooting Guide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: mrpowell (mrpowell) Date: 2004-05-02 23:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1028635 Thank you anadelonbrin for responding. I do not have Python installed. Why would the pywintypes.pyc file cause a problem on each and every install from a number of different (fresh) downloads from different mirrors, especially with a total registry crawl to remove all traces of the previous install? "You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works" what do you mean "from source"? Can I replace the pywintypes.pyc file with a known good file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-02 23:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The pywintypes module is a file that should be in the spambayes.zip file in the lib directory where spambayes was installed. It's not necessarily a path issue, because the file that's raising the error is the pywintypes.pyc file itself. Do you have Python installed by any chance? If so, is it the build from python.org or the ActiveState one (or another one)? You could try running the plug-in from source and seeing if that works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=941639&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 17:25:29 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 17:25:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-788755 ] Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Message-ID: Feature Requests item #788755, was opened at 2003-08-14 11:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Easy-empty Spam, Potential Spam folders Initial Comment: I have my spam (Outlook 2K, Windows XP Pro, by the way) going into a folder titled 'Spam' and potential spam going into 'Potential Spam' (original, eh?). Any way your plugin could add 'Empty XXX Folder' to the menu list which pops up when I right-click on these two folders, as occurs now with the Deleted Items folder? That would save me the added steps of selecting all the messages in Spam, moving them to Deleted Items and then emptying THAT folder. I've got Spam set to 7-day message retention, and after that time deletion, but I try to keep my Outlook tidier than that when I have time....... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-16 11:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 An "Empty Spam Folder" menu item has been added to the SpamBayes menu in latest CVS. This feature should appear in the first alpha release of SpamBayes 1.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-19 15:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 We're in a feature freeze right now until we get the final 1.0 release out. Once we begin work on new features for 1.1, we will consider including this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: govnah (krowell) Date: 2004-05-19 15:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1045513 I want to officially request that the "delete spam" feature be added to the official release. I would really like that feature as well... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 18:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Thanks, but I'm actually set (and I have NO clue why my last reply showed up four separate times!!!). After posting the last reply, I browsed through the message log and found the Visual Basic script that someone else posted earlier this year. It works great; I've also turned off the preview pane in Potential Spam and Spam folders (didn't realize before now that this was per-folder selectable, not a global setting). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 17:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 First you'll need to be running the plugin from source instead of the binary. If you're not already running from source then the steps involved are: * uninstall binary plug-in * install Python 2.3.2+ (http://www.python.org/2.3.2/) * install the win32all Python extensions (http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/win32/Downloads .html) * get a copy of the source from CVS or download it from here (http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/spambayes/spambayes- 1.0a7.zip?download) and extract it * register the source version of the plugin by running "addin.py --register" in the Outlook2000 subdirectory of the source Once you have the plugin up and running from source, get a copy of Larry Wall's patch utility (http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/patch.htm) and download the latest copy of the patch file from the referenced patch number. Put the empty_spam.patch file in the Outlook2000 subdirectory and run the following command: patch -i empty_spam.patch Hopefully this will apply the patch to the correct locations in your version of the source. Then restart Outlook and you should have it. Note that the Empty Spam Folder command is on the SpamBayes menu, not the right-click menu. If you do undertake this and get it running, please let me know how it works for you and if it solves your problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 17:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 16:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 16:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Brian Dipert (bdipert) Date: 2003-12-18 16:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=838657 Kenny, How do I roll your patch into my existing v0.81? I'd desperately love to be able to do this, as simply previewing some of these spam messages (which happens automatically when I select them to move them to Deleted Messages) indicates to the server that's sent the junk that my email address is alive (via GIF image load, etc). Regards, Brian ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-20 09:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This actually isn't that difficult to do, and I've already submitted a patch (#831941) to do it for the Spam folder. No decision yet on whether or not it will be included in a future release. It probably isn't a good idea to do this for the Potential Spam folder. These messages are, by definition, ones that SpamBayes is unsure about and need to be looked at individually by the user. If you are getting a lot of messages in Potential Spam that you don't care to review, you might want to consider lowering your spam threshold so that more of these messages go directly into the Spam folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 04:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 I don't know if you can add the menu item, but Outlook 2003 does provide a SPAM folder with this feature. (not for potential spam though) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=788755&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 16 17:27:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 16 17:28:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-831941 ] Empty Spam Folder menu item Message-ID: Patches item #831941, was opened at 2003-10-28 16:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Empty Spam Folder menu item Initial Comment: RFE 788755 asks for a menu item to empty the spam folder, and I have seen this requested several times on the lists. I've come up with an initial patch to implement this as a menu item on the SpamBayes dropdown. It works very much like the Empty "Deleted Items" Folder context menu item, which means it prompts with a Yes/No message box before deleting, and just does nothing if the spam folder is already empty. This seems to work well on my Outlook 2003 setup, but probably needs more wide-spread testing before being considered entirely stable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-16 11:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I added the Empty Spam Folder option on cvs head, and updated RFE 788755 to indicate that the feature will be available in version 1.1. For an extra margin of safety, I added menu separators above and below the Empty Spam Folder item to make it a little more difficult to select it accidentally. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-15 21:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It seems that all the concerns have been addressed, and since the code is somewhat safe in the 1.0 branch, I figure this might as well be committed, yes? Unless someone disagrees, I say Kenny should just committ this to the HEAD now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-22 09:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Oops, the _GetParent() function is module-level in 'manager', not class-level in 'BayesManager', so do 'import manager' to get access to it. Also added an information message box when the spam folder is already empty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-19 08:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 If you turn off the "Warn before deleting items permanently" option then Outlook will always empty Deleted Items without any confirmation prompt. Regardless of the warn setting, Outlook will silently ignore your request to empty Deleted Items if it is already empty. I like the idea of adding an OK-only message box to inform the user that the folder is already empty. It makes it obvious to the user what is going on, and requires no more clicks than the confirmation prompt would have required if there had been messages to remove. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-18 19:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 What "Empty Deleted Items" does actually depends on how the user sets an option (something like "warn before deleting items permanently", true by default). So if you want to match Outlook's behavior seamlessly, we can add another 15 modules to try to figure out how that option is set <wink>). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-18 18:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 > Is this how Outlook's "Empty Deleted Items" > works? Either asks for confirmation, or silently > does nothing? (Mine is too full to check :) Surprisingly, yes. So if matching Outlook's behaviour is the way to go, then no prompt if empty. OTOH, if we're going to track folders by name at some point in the future, rather than via ID, then we're perhaps moving away from what Outlook does. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-18 18:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 'print' statements predate LogDebug - the latter is generally preferred with a debug level that reflects how likely it is anyone *really* needs to see it - 0==always, etc This is looking good, but I still have a query re the confirmation (I don't think I explained myself well last time - I agree we *never* want to silently remove items). Currently, if there are zero items in the folder, then selecting the menu item will silently do *nothing*. I am concerned that some users will assume it to be broken, as selecting that menu has no effect in some cases. Other cases, it prompts you. Some users may not make the distinction between "this time is is empty, last time it wasn't" Is this how Outlook's "Empty Deleted Items" works? Either asks for confirmation, or silently does nothing? (Mine is too full to check :) I would think it better to either say: * "Are you sure you wish to remove the 0 items" - dumb, but obvious what is going on and one less branch/dialog. * A message box saying "already empty - nothing deleted" What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-17 11:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I knew there had to be a way to generate a combined patch file, but didn't know the syntax. Thanks. I made the AskQuestion/_GetParent changes, and uploaded a partially updated patch pending the following questions/comments. This is now diff'ed against latest CVS updates from anonymous. I didn't want to do anything "silently" that could irretrievably remove messages, but I also didn't want to display a removal confirmation question when there was nothing to remove. I added the check for items to avoid the unnecessary confirmation, which matches Outlook's Deleted Items behavior. I'd rather not call EmptyFolder silently, but I'll be glad to add a message box indicating that there are no items to remove if you think it's needed. I would have preferred to just disable the menu item if the folder is empty, but it seemed like it would be a lot of trouble to track it properly and keep the menu state updated. I added the print statements for logging so that I could check for any problems, and also so that we could diagnose future user problems such as, "I used Empty Spam Folder, but the spam messages didn't get deleted." I noticed that there is a mixture in addin.py of print and LogDebug. What are the current guidelines for which to use? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 02:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This looks like a good start. manager.py has _GetParent and AskQuestion - can you update the patch to use these. Also, if no items are in the folder, we should display a message to the user rather than a simple 'print'. In fact, I see no real good reason to have the check for items - even with no items, still silently call EmptyFolder, and if there are no items, then big deal - the folder is still empty after the event, so we can consider that it worked Ok. If possible, attach a patch as a single file - just "cvs -z5 diff -u file1.py file2.py > whatever.patch", then just upload the .patch (or .diff) Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Jul 17 19:51:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Jul 17 19:51:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-992948 ] wont run with XP SP2 RC2 Message-ID: Bugs item #992948, was opened at 2004-07-17 13:51 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=992948&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: craig (computermagic) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: wont run with XP SP2 RC2 Initial Comment: Since installing Windows XP SP2 (RC2-- almost finaql code) with Outlook 2003, Spambayes won't load with Outlook. If one goes to Tools| Options| Other | Advance Options| Com Add-In... the Spambayes block to load at start-up is unchecked... checking it deosn't help, as when you restart Outlook it is again unchecked. Had been running v 0.9 before loading XP SP2, and it was fine for a day or so. Then Outlook crashed and later said it had recovered from a serios error, and from then one Spambayes wasn't running (wasn't showing up on task bar in OUtlook)... uninstalling, even removing Spambayes directory, and reinstalling newer version (tried all versions 1) and same result. craig@computermagic.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=992948&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jul 18 00:51:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jul 18 00:51:24 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-990700 ] Changes to asyncore in Python 2.4 break ServerLineReader Message-ID: Bugs item #990700, was opened at 2004-07-14 07:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=990700&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: Changes to asyncore in Python 2.4 break ServerLineReader Initial Comment: Another Python 2.3.4 -> Python 2.4a1 problem. Python 2.3.4 has this in asyncore: """ def add_channel(self, map=None): #self.log_info('adding channel %s' % self) if map is None: map = socket_map map[self._fileno] = self """ The Python 2.4a1 version is this: """ def add_channel(self, map=None): #self.log_info('adding channel %s' % self) if map is None: map = self._map map[self._fileno] = self """ ServerLineReader defaults to having self._map be None, so the map[self._fileno] line crashes with a TypeError. Putting "if map is not None:" before line 191 of Dibbler.py (and indenting the "self._map = map" line) fixes this, but again I'd like to check with you that this is correct before checking it in. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-07-17 22:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 I've tried and failed to get a working Python 2.4 / Spambayes setup this evening so I can't test this, but I'm pretty sure I know what the problem is, and what the fix is. BrighterAsyncChat in Dibbler.py shouldn't have a member called _map - that's an unintentional clash with one of asyncore's members. Renaming it to __map should fix the bug (that's a two-line edit, just to BrighterAsyncChat - other uses of _map in Dibbler.py are OK). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 04:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 That fix *does not* work. It just delays the problem until later on. I'm really not sure what the correct fix is, so I'll leave this for now since it's possible that you (Richie) will instantly know the solution. If it's something that needs digging about, then just give me a clue and reassign to me if you like. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=990700&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jul 18 01:08:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jul 18 01:08:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-990685 ] Change in cgi.parse_qs breaks sb_server in Python 2.4 Message-ID: Bugs item #990685, was opened at 2004-07-14 06:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=990685&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: Change in cgi.parse_qs breaks sb_server in Python 2.4 Initial Comment: cgi.parse_qs has changed behaviour between 2.3.4 and 2.4a1. Python 2.3.4 (#53, May 25 2004, 21:17:02) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import cgi >>> cgi.parse_qs("") {} >>> cgi.parse_qs("", 1) {} Python 2.4a1 (#54, Jul 8 2004, 11:30:13) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import cgi >>> cgi.parse_qs("") {} >>> cgi.parse_qs("", 1) {'': ['']} This breaks the sb_server web interface, because we get a {'': ['']} dict passed as kwparams to the onX functions, and they aren't expecting that. Adding "if query == '': cgiParams = {} else" to Dibbler.py at line 391 fixes this, but I'd like to check with you that that's a valid fix before checking it in. (You use Dibbler elsewhere, right?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-07-17 23:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 I believe this is a bug in Python 2.4, and I've submitted a patch to fix it, number 993062. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=990685&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jul 18 01:10:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jul 18 01:12:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-981970 ] tests failing Message-ID: Bugs item #981970, was opened at 2004-06-29 14:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981970&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: tests failing Initial Comment: Assigning to Tony for initial triage since he seems to know the most about these apps... There are some test scripts in spambayes/test. I tried running them just now and got this: * test_sb-server.py -z - when starting: User interface url is http://localhost:8881/ Listener on port 8111 is proxying localhost:8110 error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel (exceptions.TypeError:object does not support item assignment [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|read|69] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|handle_read_event|358] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py|handle_accept|284] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|374] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|199] [/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py|__init__|145] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|create_socket|234] [/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py|add_channel|218]) when connecting via lynx: 500 Server error Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", li ne 461, in found_terminator getattr(plugin, name)(**params) TypeError: onHome() got an unexpected keyword argument '' * test_storage.py: ...E. ====================================================================== ERROR: testNoDBMAvailable (__main__.DBStorageTestCase) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_storage.py", line 154, in testNoDBMAvailable open_storage(db_name, True) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py", line 676, in open_storage raise NoSuchClassifierError(db_type) NoSuchClassifierError: True ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 5 tests in 0.210s FAILED (errors=1) * test_smtpproxy.py: Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_smtpproxy.py", line 93, in ? from sb_server import state, _recreateState ImportError: No module named sb_server * test_programs.py: SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ FSpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 961, in ? run() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 955, in run start() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 892, in start main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort, state.launchUI) File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 869, in main httpServer = UserInterfaceServer(uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 113, in __init__ Dibbler.HTTPServer.__init__(self, uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 304, in __init__ (self, context), context._map) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 271, in __init__ self.bind(port) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line 277, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (48, 'Address already in use') FSpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) and engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004). Loading database... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 961, in ? run() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 955, in run start() File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 892, in start main(state.servers, state.proxyPorts, state.uiPort, state.launchUI) File "/Users/skip/tmp/spambayes/scripts/sb_server.py", line 869, in main httpServer = UserInterfaceServer(uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py", line 113, in __init__ Dibbler.HTTPServer.__init__(self, uiPort) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 304, in __init__ (self, context), context._map) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py", line 271, in __init__ self.bind(port) File "/Users/skip/local/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line 277, in bind return self.socket.bind(addr) File "", line 1, in bind socket.error: (48, 'Address already in use') F ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_default (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 166, in test_sb_server_default self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_restore (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 180, in test_sb_server_restore self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ====================================================================== FAIL: test_sb_server_ui_port (__main__.TestServer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_programs.py", line 172, in test_sb_server_ui_port self._start_spawner(s) File "test_programs.py", line 148, in _start_spawner spawner.start() File "test_programs.py", line 103, in start if self.is_running() and is_any_sb_server_running(): File "test_programs.py", line 78, in is_running "My server stopped, but global server mutex held") AssertionError: My server stopped, but global server mutex held ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 3 tests in 15.811s FAILED (failures=3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-07-17 23:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 I've submitted patch 993062 to Python to fix what I believe is a bug in the 2.4 cgi module. I can't get a working Python 2.4 / Spambayes environment together to check that it fixes this specific problem, but I believe it will. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 06:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The 'unexpected argument' problem is a Python 2.4 change that breaks Dibbler.py (and so all our web interfaces). I've split this off into: [ 990685 ] Change in cgi.parse_qs breaks sb_server in Python 2.4 And assigned it to Richie to decide whether my proposed patch is ok or not. Until then I expect that you'll find that test_programs still fails for you (as would launching sb_server and then opening the web interface). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 09:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Drat. This has been a bug for a while now, I believe (I guess not many people are using the command line to specify a different port!). I'll check in a fix for sb_server. The test_program tests now pass for me (well, I haven't tried the service ones). So reassigning to me for the remaining smtpproxy one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-07-09 06:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Best I can tell, the "-u" option to sb_server is broken: % sb_server.py -u 8899 ... User interface url is http://localhost:8880/ I believe that last line should read "8899". This is causing our attempt to stop the server to fail (as it is trying to connect to port 8899), and then future tests fail as the sb_server on port 8880 is still running. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 05:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 test_smtpproxy doesn't look like it was ever finished, I think. (If true, this is my fault). I'll try and find time to finish it off over the next week. I don't know enough about the mutex stuff to figure out test_programs, so I'm reassigning to Mark :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 03:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed test_storage. With test_sb-server.py I get this: """ C:\spambayes\spambayes\test>test_sb-server.py -z Loading database...Loading state from _pop3proxy_test.pickle pickle _pop3proxy_test.pickle is a new pickle Running self-test... User interface url is http://localhost:8881/ Listener on port 8111 is proxying localhost:8110 Self-test passed. """ I'm using Python 2.3 - could this be a 2.3 -> 2.4 change? Or a platform depend problem? (me Windows, you not) I'll look into the other two shortly. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=981970&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 19 00:51:38 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 19 00:51:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-993472 ] Outlook 2000 & SMTP auth problems Message-ID: Bugs item #993472, was opened at 2004-07-18 22:51 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=993472&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard (pcsupport) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2000 & SMTP auth problems Initial Comment: This is exactly the same problem as bug # 887256 Install Outlook 2000 - Sends & recieves fine Install SpamBayes 1.0rc2 - Can receive, cannot send. The same error as bug # 887256 occurs. Open task manager and Mapisp32.exe and Outlook.exe are running. Mapisp32.exe runs with high cpu usage. Remove and reinstall office makes no difference. Have to download and install MS Office 2003 Resource Kit to completely remove Office then do a fresh install. Outlook then sends and receives fine. Reinstall SpamBayes 1.0rc2 and all the problems start again. I have repeated this 3 times now just to be sure... The previous version of spambayes does not cause this problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=993472&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 19 03:57:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 19 03:58:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-815233 ] Empty Spam folder button Message-ID: Feature Requests item #815233, was opened at 2003-10-01 04:21 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=815233&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bill Barth (wbarth1) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Empty Spam folder button Initial Comment: Unsophisticated users end up deleting spam folder. I've added a "empty spam" button on the toolbar but it should be part of the product. See below: (loop may look inefficient but necessary to sync object with macro vars) Sub emptyspam() Set myOlApp = CreateObject("Outlook.Application") Set myNamespace = myOlApp.GetNamespace("MAPI") Set objFolders = myNamespace.Folders() Set objPF = objFolders.Item("Personal Folders") Set objSpamFolder = objPF.Folders.Item("SPAM") Set SpamItems = objSpamFolder.Items mycount = SpamItems.Count Do Set SpamItems = objSpamFolder.Items If SpamItems.Count > 0 Then SpamItems.Remove (1) Else: Exit Do End If Loop MsgBox (mycount & " Spam messages deleted") End Sub The "trash can" makes a nice icon for this macro. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-19 13:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The first 1.1 release will include an "Empty Spam Folder" item in the SpamBayes drop-down menu, which is about as close to this as we'll get (trying to avoid the number of items on the toolbar is worthwhile). (This is in CVS now, if you run from source). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=815233&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 19 04:03:04 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 19 04:03:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-831941 ] Empty Spam Folder menu item Message-ID: Patches item #831941, was opened at 2003-10-29 10:18 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Empty Spam Folder menu item Initial Comment: RFE 788755 asks for a menu item to empty the spam folder, and I have seen this requested several times on the lists. I've come up with an initial patch to implement this as a menu item on the SpamBayes dropdown. It works very much like the Empty "Deleted Items" Folder context menu item, which means it prompts with a Yes/No message box before deleting, and just does nothing if the spam folder is already empty. This seems to work well on my Outlook 2003 setup, but probably needs more wide-spread testing before being considered entirely stable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-17 03:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I added the Empty Spam Folder option on cvs head, and updated RFE 788755 to indicate that the feature will be available in version 1.1. For an extra margin of safety, I added menu separators above and below the Empty Spam Folder item to make it a little more difficult to select it accidentally. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 13:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It seems that all the concerns have been addressed, and since the code is somewhat safe in the 1.0 branch, I figure this might as well be committed, yes? Unless someone disagrees, I say Kenny should just committ this to the HEAD now. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-23 03:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Oops, the _GetParent() function is module-level in 'manager', not class-level in 'BayesManager', so do 'import manager' to get access to it. Also added an information message box when the spam folder is already empty. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-20 02:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 If you turn off the "Warn before deleting items permanently" option then Outlook will always empty Deleted Items without any confirmation prompt. Regardless of the warn setting, Outlook will silently ignore your request to empty Deleted Items if it is already empty. I like the idea of adding an OK-only message box to inform the user that the folder is already empty. It makes it obvious to the user what is going on, and requires no more clicks than the confirmation prompt would have required if there had been messages to remove. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2003-12-19 13:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 What "Empty Deleted Items" does actually depends on how the user sets an option (something like "warn before deleting items permanently", true by default). So if you want to match Outlook's behavior seamlessly, we can add another 15 modules to try to figure out how that option is set <wink>). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-19 12:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 > Is this how Outlook's "Empty Deleted Items" > works? Either asks for confirmation, or silently > does nothing? (Mine is too full to check :) Surprisingly, yes. So if matching Outlook's behaviour is the way to go, then no prompt if empty. OTOH, if we're going to track folders by name at some point in the future, rather than via ID, then we're perhaps moving away from what Outlook does. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-19 12:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 'print' statements predate LogDebug - the latter is generally preferred with a debug level that reflects how likely it is anyone *really* needs to see it - 0==always, etc This is looking good, but I still have a query re the confirmation (I don't think I explained myself well last time - I agree we *never* want to silently remove items). Currently, if there are zero items in the folder, then selecting the menu item will silently do *nothing*. I am concerned that some users will assume it to be broken, as selecting that menu has no effect in some cases. Other cases, it prompts you. Some users may not make the distinction between "this time is is empty, last time it wasn't" Is this how Outlook's "Empty Deleted Items" works? Either asks for confirmation, or silently does nothing? (Mine is too full to check :) I would think it better to either say: * "Are you sure you wish to remove the 0 items" - dumb, but obvious what is going on and one less branch/dialog. * A message box saying "already empty - nothing deleted" What do you think? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 05:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I knew there had to be a way to generate a combined patch file, but didn't know the syntax. Thanks. I made the AskQuestion/_GetParent changes, and uploaded a partially updated patch pending the following questions/comments. This is now diff'ed against latest CVS updates from anonymous. I didn't want to do anything "silently" that could irretrievably remove messages, but I also didn't want to display a removal confirmation question when there was nothing to remove. I added the check for items to avoid the unnecessary confirmation, which matches Outlook's Deleted Items behavior. I'd rather not call EmptyFolder silently, but I'll be glad to add a message box indicating that there are no items to remove if you think it's needed. I would have preferred to just disable the menu item if the folder is empty, but it seemed like it would be a lot of trouble to track it properly and keep the menu state updated. I added the print statements for logging so that I could check for any problems, and also so that we could diagnose future user problems such as, "I used Empty Spam Folder, but the spam messages didn't get deleted." I noticed that there is a mixture in addin.py of print and LogDebug. What are the current guidelines for which to use? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 20:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 This looks like a good start. manager.py has _GetParent and AskQuestion - can you update the patch to use these. Also, if no items are in the folder, we should display a message to the user rather than a simple 'print'. In fact, I see no real good reason to have the check for items - even with no items, still silently call EmptyFolder, and if there are no items, then big deal - the folder is still empty after the event, so we can consider that it worked Ok. If possible, attach a patch as a single file - just "cvs -z5 diff -u file1.py file2.py > whatever.patch", then just upload the .patch (or .diff) Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=831941&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 19 04:10:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 19 04:10:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-990700 ] Changes to asyncore in Python 2.4 break ServerLineReader Message-ID: Bugs item #990700, was opened at 2004-07-14 19:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=990700&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: Changes to asyncore in Python 2.4 break ServerLineReader Initial Comment: Another Python 2.3.4 -> Python 2.4a1 problem. Python 2.3.4 has this in asyncore: """ def add_channel(self, map=None): #self.log_info('adding channel %s' % self) if map is None: map = socket_map map[self._fileno] = self """ The Python 2.4a1 version is this: """ def add_channel(self, map=None): #self.log_info('adding channel %s' % self) if map is None: map = self._map map[self._fileno] = self """ ServerLineReader defaults to having self._map be None, so the map[self._fileno] line crashes with a TypeError. Putting "if map is not None:" before line 191 of Dibbler.py (and indenting the "self._map = map" line) fixes this, but again I'd like to check with you that this is correct before checking it in. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-19 14:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Making that change works for me, so checking it in and closing this. Thanks Richie! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-07-18 10:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 I've tried and failed to get a working Python 2.4 / Spambayes setup this evening so I can't test this, but I'm pretty sure I know what the problem is, and what the fix is. BrighterAsyncChat in Dibbler.py shouldn't have a member called _map - that's an unintentional clash with one of asyncore's members. Renaming it to __map should fix the bug (that's a two-line edit, just to BrighterAsyncChat - other uses of _map in Dibbler.py are OK). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 16:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 That fix *does not* work. It just delays the problem until later on. I'm really not sure what the correct fix is, so I'll leave this for now since it's possible that you (Richie) will instantly know the solution. If it's something that needs digging about, then just give me a clue and reassign to me if you like. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=990700&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 19 04:15:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 19 04:15:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-990685 ] Change in cgi.parse_qs breaks sb_server in Python 2.4 Message-ID: Bugs item #990685, was opened at 2004-07-14 18:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=990685&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: Change in cgi.parse_qs breaks sb_server in Python 2.4 Initial Comment: cgi.parse_qs has changed behaviour between 2.3.4 and 2.4a1. Python 2.3.4 (#53, May 25 2004, 21:17:02) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import cgi >>> cgi.parse_qs("") {} >>> cgi.parse_qs("", 1) {} Python 2.4a1 (#54, Jul 8 2004, 11:30:13) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import cgi >>> cgi.parse_qs("") {} >>> cgi.parse_qs("", 1) {'': ['']} This breaks the sb_server web interface, because we get a {'': ['']} dict passed as kwparams to the onX functions, and they aren't expecting that. Adding "if query == '': cgiParams = {} else" to Dibbler.py at line 391 fixes this, but I'd like to check with you that that's a valid fix before checking it in. (You use Dibbler elsewhere, right?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-19 14:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 FWIW, after applying the cgi.py patch sb_server seems to work with Python 2.4a1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-07-18 11:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 I believe this is a bug in Python 2.4, and I've submitted a patch to fix it, number 993062. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=990685&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 19 04:19:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 19 04:19:53 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-993472 ] Outlook 2000 & SMTP auth problems Message-ID: Bugs item #993472, was opened at 2004-07-19 10:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=993472&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard (pcsupport) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook 2000 & SMTP auth problems Initial Comment: This is exactly the same problem as bug # 887256 Install Outlook 2000 - Sends & recieves fine Install SpamBayes 1.0rc2 - Can receive, cannot send. The same error as bug # 887256 occurs. Open task manager and Mapisp32.exe and Outlook.exe are running. Mapisp32.exe runs with high cpu usage. Remove and reinstall office makes no difference. Have to download and install MS Office 2003 Resource Kit to completely remove Office then do a fresh install. Outlook then sends and receives fine. Reinstall SpamBayes 1.0rc2 and all the problems start again. I have repeated this 3 times now just to be sure... The previous version of spambayes does not cause this problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-19 14:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Duplicate (as noted in original comment) of: [ 887256 ] Outlook 2002 SP2 & SMTP Auth issue Please use that tracker to comment on this problem. It would be worth noting (there) whether you have tried the suggested fix, and what the result was. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=993472&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 19 04:19:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 19 04:19:57 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-887256 ] Outlook 2002 SP2 & SMTP Auth issue Message-ID: Bugs item #887256, was opened at 2004-01-30 09:56 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887256&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Martin Siefert (msiefert) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2002 SP2 & SMTP Auth issue Initial Comment: To all the SpamBayes gurus. I recently installed XP and the MS Office suite 2002. Updated the OS and Office with all the latest and greatest patches without problem. Finally I was able to install SpamBayes for Outlook, also without problems and in its latest version 0.81. So I went on to create my POP3 account for my domain. Just like I do for about 20 other clients (They run Office 2000). I try to send an email to an outside domain and now I get the following bounces. Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: test Sent: 1/29/2004 1:45 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: recpient@othercompany.com on 1/29/2004 1:45 PM 501 5.7.1 This system is not configured to relay mail from to for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx I contacted my ISP and verified my settings in Outlook which are 100% correct. I use SMTP Auth to authorize any emails I send. The username and password are correct as well. I know this is a long shot, but is anyone aware of any incompatibility / issue with SpamBayes and Outlook 2002 using SMTP Auth? Please let me know.... this is driving me crazy. Martin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-19 14:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 993472 ] Outlook 2000 & SMTP auth problems ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-03-07 11:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Select "My Outgoing (SMTP) server requires Authentication" and set the username and password here. If you have already done so, delete the information and re-enter it - perhaps there is a typo in the password field. You may also attempt selecting and deselecting the "log into incoming server before sending mail" checkbox to see if this makes a difference on your server. These are MS Outlook issues, however. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-03-07 06:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 Select "My Outgoing (SMTP) server requires Authentication" and set the username and password here. If you have already done so, delete the information and re-enter it - perhaps there is a typo in the password field. You may also attempt selecting and deselecting the "log into incoming server before sending mail" checkbox to see if this makes a difference on your server. These are MS Outlook issues, however. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-01-30 11:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Suggest you uninstall the SpamBayes addin and try again. I expect you'll find it makes no difference. The addin isn't involved in sending email (or even in receiving email -- it just sits there until Outlook tells it an item has been added to one of the folders you told it to watch; the addin plays no part in Outlook's POP3 or SMTP dialogs). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=887256&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 19 05:46:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 19 05:46:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-992948 ] wont run with XP SP2 RC2 Message-ID: Bugs item #992948, was opened at 2004-07-18 05:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=992948&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: craig (computermagic) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: wont run with XP SP2 RC2 Initial Comment: Since installing Windows XP SP2 (RC2-- almost finaql code) with Outlook 2003, Spambayes won't load with Outlook. If one goes to Tools| Options| Other | Advance Options| Com Add-In... the Spambayes block to load at start-up is unchecked... checking it deosn't help, as when you restart Outlook it is again unchecked. Had been running v 0.9 before loading XP SP2, and it was fine for a day or so. Then Outlook crashed and later said it had recovered from a serios error, and from then one Spambayes wasn't running (wasn't showing up on task bar in OUtlook)... uninstalling, even removing Spambayes directory, and reinstalling newer version (tried all versions 1) and same result. craig@computermagic.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-19 15:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What about Outlook's Disabled Items list? Is it there? (Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=992948&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 19 05:49:43 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 19 05:49:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962291 ] WinXP / Server connexion refused Message-ID: Bugs item #962291, was opened at 2004-05-29 03:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: WinXP / Server connexion refused Initial Comment: Used 9 version since today, installed the 1.0 release candidate, with same settings. Now when I try to connect to the spambayes server ( local ) , it returns me a "connexion refused" message, for any of the pop account proxies I have setted ( nothing changes on the client computers ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-19 15:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What happens if you telnet to localhost:4700? Do you manage to connect, or does it also fail? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 18:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I will look at this on Monday, but am away this weekend (and it's late on Friday here right now, so can't do it now). So feel free to drop back to the old version until then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 18:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 here is the log Service not availible. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 4700 is proxying pop. laposte.net:110 Listener on port 4701 is proxying pop.free.fr:110 Listener on port 4702 is proxying pop.lost-oasis nothing special, I noticed I had the same log while working. I can't download any mail, as the messenger ( thunderbird, and I had the same stuff with another one ) tells me : unable to connect to server, the server returned an error : ( blank ) On any account, any port. ( I installed the rc2 ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 17:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 still aware or this problem but haven't the courage to re-install the jamming version on my computer, as I use the anti-spam functions actively. I set back the older version that remained working fine for me . .. Answer to previous post : yeah the settings were the same, and were kept. I also tryied to re-enter them. Will try to install the newer version soon, I swear, as I really want to help you with fixing this odd bug ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 13:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 11:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you open the configuration page, does it still have the server values there? Could you attach your log file to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 19 10:18:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 19 10:19:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-955758 ] Blocks Folder with ':' in the name Message-ID: Bugs item #955758, was opened at 2004-05-18 11:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by preisl You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955758&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Works For Me >Priority: 3 Submitted By: Martin Preishuber (preisl) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Blocks Folder with ':' in the name Initial Comment: I have one mailbox named ':Lastprognose VPL' (Note the colon at the beginning). After adding the Folder I get the message "Spam Bayes configuration broken" ... If I start outlook for the 2nd time, I don't get any error, but I can't access this mailbox. My own mailbox and a second mailbox work fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Martin Preishuber (preisl) Date: 2004-07-19 10:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=29575 Hmm ok, it was definitely not the colon in the name. actually I have no idea what has happened, but it works fine now ... it just started to work after a couple of days. I know that this is definitely NOT the information you want to have on a bug report, but I don't know any more details on that :( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 04:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Martin - can you please confirm the colon in the name is not the problem, and also confirm exactly what you mean by "mailbox" - I assume you mean creating a new mailbox on an exchange server. If so, I suspect this may be the same underlying issue as bug 959560 (which is an "access denied" error hitting other mailboxes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 02:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Is this an Exchange mailbox? If so, what sort of permissions do you have for the mailbox? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Preishuber (preisl) Date: 2004-05-21 11:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=29575 My mistake, the first message is 'There appears to be a problem with the SpamBayes configuration\r\n\r\nPlease select the SpamBayes manager, and run the\r\nConfiguration Wizard to reconfigure the filter.' as seen in the log file ... I can access the mailbox after adding it. If I restart outlook, I can't access it any more. spambayes2.log is the log file which has been created during adding the mailbox, spambayes1.log is the one, when I tried to access it the second time. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-19 00:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's highly unlikely to be the same, because SpamBayes doesn't use the name at all - it uses Outlook's "entry id" and "store id" (big long numbers that uniquely identify the folder, basically). Certainly I can have a folder called ":Lastprognose VPL" and SpamBayes works fine filtering it (just checked). Could you attach your log file? It should have more information about what is going wrong. It's probably some trouble accessing that folder, for some other reason. The exact error message (nothing in spambayes prints out the word "broken") would help, too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=955758&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 19 11:40:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 19 11:41:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-993679 ] Remember place on review page when viewing message Message-ID: Feature Requests item #993679, was opened at 2004-07-19 21:40 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=993679&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Remember place on review page when viewing message Initial Comment: >From spambayes@python.org > 2 - Here is an item maybe you or someone could fix: > > Remember, my lists of untrained messages are very long. If I > am on the Review screen and click on the message and look at > it in the View Message screen, your program doesn't register > a placeholder. So, rather than returning to that > message in the list, so that I can keep scanning subject > lines, when I return from the View Message screen to the Review > page, I am sent back to the top of the list. I agree that fixing this would be nice. We could just add a unique identifier to the "view message" link, which gets built into the "view message" page, that when clicked would move us to the appropriate message. Or this might be more complicated than that :) But fixing it would be good. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=993679&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 19 14:13:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 19 14:13:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-992948 ] wont run with XP SP2 RC2 Message-ID: Bugs item #992948, was opened at 2004-07-17 13:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by computermagic You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=992948&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: craig (computermagic) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: wont run with XP SP2 RC2 Initial Comment: Since installing Windows XP SP2 (RC2-- almost finaql code) with Outlook 2003, Spambayes won't load with Outlook. If one goes to Tools| Options| Other | Advance Options| Com Add-In... the Spambayes block to load at start-up is unchecked... checking it deosn't help, as when you restart Outlook it is again unchecked. Had been running v 0.9 before loading XP SP2, and it was fine for a day or so. Then Outlook crashed and later said it had recovered from a serios error, and from then one Spambayes wasn't running (wasn't showing up on task bar in OUtlook)... uninstalling, even removing Spambayes directory, and reinstalling newer version (tried all versions 1) and same result. craig@computermagic.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: craig (computermagic) Date: 2004-07-19 08:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1067670 You are right... it WAS in disabled list and that fixed it! sorry for mssing that one regards ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-18 23:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What about Outlook's Disabled Items list? Is it there? (Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=992948&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 19 15:40:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 19 15:41:08 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793830 ] Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting Message-ID: Bugs item #793830, was opened at 2003-08-23 17:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kremp You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Last message arrived on Server not filtered when starting Initial Comment: Hi, I use Outlook Plugin Version 007. It is used in an Environment of a central Microsoft Exchange 2000 Server to which I connect with an Outlook 2000 client. I observe that when starting the client, all messages in the Inbox that arrived during the time period where the Client was unavailable are filtered by SpamBayes, ***except*** the last one that arrived. It is unfiltered and shown with 0% rate. When manually rating (Show spam clues...), the rate indicates that it is clearly Spam. Also performing a complete rating/filtering (Filter now) rates the message correctly and moves it accordingly. If Outlook is permamently running, I do not observe such effect. It seems to be related to the code initially examining the Inbox when starting Outlook. Juergen Kremp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Date: 2004-07-19 13:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=850764 I got new hardware with changed operating system (Microsoft Windows XP Professional) and installed 1.0rc1. In this configuration, the problem does not occur. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-02-09 14:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I believe this is the same as bug #876281. As far as I can tell, having only started looking at Python and the SpamBayes Windows code yesterday, here is why this happens: 1. When SB starts, it (eventually) invokes BayesManager.EnsureOutlookFieldsForFolder() for each folder. This method finds the first MalItem in the specified folder and looks for the "Spam" UserProperty attached to that MailItem. If the MailItem does not have the "Spam" UserProperty, SB adds the UserProperty to the MailItem, causing the MailItem to have a Spam score of 0. 2. In trying to process missed messages, SB invokes MAPIMsgStoreFolder.GetNewUnscoredMessageGenerator(), which excludes any MailItem that already has the "Spam" UserProperty from processing. Voila. The item most recently received in a folder while SB was not running is automatically assigned a score of 0 and not filtered. Apparently, there isn't a clean way to detect if a folder has a particular user defined field. So, the only way to check for the presence of the user defined field in the folder is to check the items in the folder. SB (correctly) assumes that adding the UserProperty to the first MailItem will force the creation of the user defined field in the folder. However, this is not a benign act. Possible solutions: * Don't force the creation of the user defined field until SB has an actual score to store. However, I fear there may be a great number of places in the code that assume the Spam field already exists. For example, GetNewUnscoredMessageGenerator() certainly makes this assumption. The error resulting from the lack of the Spam field could be trapped, but I don't know the code well enough to find all the places where the absence of the field might be a problem. Nonetheless, this seems to be the correct solution to me. * EnsureOutlookFieldsForFolder() could check more than just the first MailItem in the folder. However, this doesn't avoid the problem if every message in the folder is a missed message. * If SB is going to force the creation of the Spam field, go ahead and filter the message. Aside from not being terribly clean, its not clear to me that enough of the code has been initialized by this point to filter a message. * If SB is going to force the creation of the Spam field, initialize it to a value that is easily detected as unscored, for example -1. However, I'm not confident that the code doesn't depend on 0 <= Spam <= 100. In addition, I don't know how many places in the code would have to be changed to recognize this value. * Change the minimum score to 0.0001, or the like, and detect a score of 0 as an unscored message. Kludgey and one would still have to find all of the places where something with a ham-like score (or any score) is excluded from further filtering (e.g., addin.ProcessMessage()). * Since OutlookAddin.ProcessMissedMessages() only _seems_ effectively to be invoked at startup, it could be modified to always process the first MailItem if the item is unread and has a score of exactly zero. Again, kludgey, but at least the kludge is confined to a single place. On the other hand, it looks to me like SB has already hooked into the folders it is watching at this point. if SB is filtering in the background, I suspect that any mail received before the "processing start delay" expires would bump the improperly flagged message out of the first position. Hmmm. * One could treat anything with a score of 0 as an unscored message, but it isn't really desirable to rescore all of those messages, since the majority of them have presumably already been filtered correctly. Any feedback from someone who actually knows the code? ---Jim ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-30 05:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-30 04:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-30 04:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jim Brown (brown2611) Date: 2004-01-30 04:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=963745 I can confirm this problem with Plugin 0.81 on Outlook 2002 SP-2 and XP Pro with Exchange 2000. I'm running SpamBayes in background mode with a 1.0 sec start delay and a 0.5 sec delay between messages. It appears that SpamBayes fails to find and filter the most recently received email message when Outlook is started. Example: I started Outlook at about 11:40 PM. The most recent email in my inbox was received at 10:57 PM, when Outlook was not running. Here's the log from SpamBayes with verbosity 1. It clearly shows that SpamBayes did not find the message upon startup: --- System verbosity set to 1 No old pickle file to migrate Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\brown\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 25710 spam and 22311 good messages Loaded databases in 11.4339ms SpamBayes Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3+ (#46, Aug 6 2003, 16:39:24) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Inbox SpamBayes: Watching for new messages in folder Junk (pending) Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer New message timer started - id=25680, delay=1000 FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, - 2147467259), None) Deleted the dead popup control - re-creating The timer with id=25680 fired The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping --- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Pete Marion (ima_user) Date: 2004-01-09 11:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=923210 I have confirmed this running Windows XP Home and Outlook 2002 sonnecting to a POP / SMTP server. Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: John Marrett (jmarrett) Date: 2003-10-23 12:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=642463 I am experiencing the same problem with SpamBayes version 0.81 (September 9, 2003) connected to Microsoft Exchange server 5.5. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Juergen Kremp (kremp) Date: 2003-10-10 12:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=850764 I installed Outlook Addin, Binary version 0.81 (September 9, 2003). It shows the same effect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793830&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 19 22:32:53 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 19 22:33:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-943702 ] sb hangs outlook (except when offline) Message-ID: Bugs item #943702, was opened at 2004-04-28 15:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by src_be You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943702&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: sb hangs outlook (except when offline) Initial Comment: I can start Outlook in "connect" mode or "offline". When SpamBayes is enabled, Outlook hangs when it is started in "connect" mode. All other combination works well : is SB is disabled or Outlook is started "offline", everything works well. In "connect" mode, when starting with SB disabled, I have no problem when I later enable SB. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2004-07-19 22:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 Problem is not reproducable since installation of Office 2003. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2004-06-29 07:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 Unfortunately, same behaviour after installation of rc2. I did simply install over previous version, I did not deinstall. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 04:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please try rc2 - there was a change in our packaging tools that may explain this error. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Yves Gaffarel (src_be) Date: 2004-05-24 09:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545313 Problem was initially reported against 1.0b1. It is still occuring after installation of 1.0rc1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=943702&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jul 20 01:32:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jul 20 01:32:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-990685 ] Change in cgi.parse_qs breaks sb_server in Python 2.4 Message-ID: Bugs item #990685, was opened at 2004-07-14 18:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=990685&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Source code - CVS >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Summary: Change in cgi.parse_qs breaks sb_server in Python 2.4 Initial Comment: cgi.parse_qs has changed behaviour between 2.3.4 and 2.4a1. Python 2.3.4 (#53, May 25 2004, 21:17:02) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import cgi >>> cgi.parse_qs("") {} >>> cgi.parse_qs("", 1) {} Python 2.4a1 (#54, Jul 8 2004, 11:30:13) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import cgi >>> cgi.parse_qs("") {} >>> cgi.parse_qs("", 1) {'': ['']} This breaks the sb_server web interface, because we get a {'': ['']} dict passed as kwparams to the onX functions, and they aren't expecting that. Adding "if query == '': cgiParams = {} else" to Dibbler.py at line 391 fixes this, but I'd like to check with you that that's a valid fix before checking it in. (You use Dibbler elsewhere, right?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-20 11:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The Python bug has been corrected, so this shouldn't be a problem with Python 2.4a2 and beyond, so closing. Thanks Richie! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-19 14:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 FWIW, after applying the cgi.py patch sb_server seems to work with Python 2.4a1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle) Date: 2004-07-18 11:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=85414 I believe this is a bug in Python 2.4, and I've submitted a patch to fix it, number 993062. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=990685&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jul 20 01:57:40 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jul 20 01:57:46 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-992948 ] wont run with XP SP2 RC2 Message-ID: Bugs item #992948, was opened at 2004-07-18 05:51 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=992948&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: craig (computermagic) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: wont run with XP SP2 RC2 Initial Comment: Since installing Windows XP SP2 (RC2-- almost finaql code) with Outlook 2003, Spambayes won't load with Outlook. If one goes to Tools| Options| Other | Advance Options| Com Add-In... the Spambayes block to load at start-up is unchecked... checking it deosn't help, as when you restart Outlook it is again unchecked. Had been running v 0.9 before loading XP SP2, and it was fine for a day or so. Then Outlook crashed and later said it had recovered from a serios error, and from then one Spambayes wasn't running (wasn't showing up on task bar in OUtlook)... uninstalling, even removing Spambayes directory, and reinstalling newer version (tried all versions 1) and same result. craig@computermagic.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: craig (computermagic) Date: 2004-07-20 00:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1067670 You are right... it WAS in disabled list and that fixed it! sorry for mssing that one regards ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-19 15:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What about Outlook's Disabled Items list? Is it there? (Help->About Microsoft Outlook->Disabled Items). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=992948&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jul 20 04:17:06 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jul 20 04:17:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-989817 ] Filter Messages performed filter actions in spite of option Message-ID: Bugs item #989817, was opened at 2004-07-12 18:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sandyprice You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=989817&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Price (sandyprice) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Filter Messages performed filter actions in spite of option Initial Comment: Did filter messages on a folder the plugin does not normally monitor using filter messages... from Spambayes plugin menu. In spite of the fact that "Score messages but don't perform filter options" was checked, the filter options were performed anyway--messages were moved out. Note, if it makes any difference, the inbox, Junk suspects and Junk E-Mail folders were also selected at the same time. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Bob Price (sandyprice) Date: 2004-07-19 21:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1082288 Sigh. I can't get it to happen again. I was very careful the first time, so I know it CAN happen--but I can't make it happen again. So I guess you can do whatever you do with problems that can't be reproduced. Bob P. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 03:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can't duplicate this. If you try it again, does it still happen? If so, please attach a copy of your most recent log file to this tracker (the troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=989817&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jul 20 04:39:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jul 20 04:39:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-989817 ] Filter Messages performed filter actions in spite of option Message-ID: Bugs item #989817, was opened at 2004-07-13 11:23 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=989817&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bob Price (sandyprice) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Filter Messages performed filter actions in spite of option Initial Comment: Did filter messages on a folder the plugin does not normally monitor using filter messages... from Spambayes plugin menu. In spite of the fact that "Score messages but don't perform filter options" was checked, the filter options were performed anyway--messages were moved out. Note, if it makes any difference, the inbox, Junk suspects and Junk E-Mail folders were also selected at the same time. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Price (sandyprice) Date: 2004-07-20 14:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1082288 Sigh. I can't get it to happen again. I was very careful the first time, so I know it CAN happen--but I can't make it happen again. So I guess you can do whatever you do with problems that can't be reproduced. Bob P. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-14 20:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can't duplicate this. If you try it again, does it still happen? If so, please attach a copy of your most recent log file to this tracker (the troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=989817&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jul 20 13:06:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jul 20 13:07:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-988624 ] More of Bug no 961019 Message-ID: Bugs item #988624, was opened at 2004-07-10 20:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richarddeubert You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988624&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Source code 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: More of Bug no 961019 Initial Comment: This is a follow on to bug no 961019 I have uped the log level to 5 and have had some 9 or 10 that should heve been moved to Junk Mail folder by SPAMBAYES but weren't. Hopefully the attached log file will help diagnosis. R ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Date: 2004-07-20 11:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079441 An update. The situation now seems to be fairly stable. The filtering works, but only when manually triggered from the Spambayes menu - Filtering - Start Filtering. It seems that just the filtering activation, on arrival of new messages or start up seems to have got lost. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988624&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jul 20 17:04:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jul 20 17:04:44 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-988095 ] Athlon64, SP2, NX (no execute)=no workee Message-ID: Bugs item #988095, was opened at 2004-07-09 17:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by paulquinn You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988095&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: mlarma (mlarma) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Athlon64, SP2, NX (no execute)=no workee Initial Comment: When enabling the NX function underneath WinXP with SP2 RC2 (32 bit edition, not 64 bit windows), I was unable to start Outlook with the SpamBayes plug-in. After disabling and only disabling NX (remove /noexecute from boot.ini), it worked. Funny thing is that the owner of the company I work for developed a Bayesian spam filter as well and it had the same issue with the NX. Not sure what the problem is, but the NX feature would be nice to turn on. Does anyone know if NX can be disabled at the application level so that the other processes were protected with NX? Mark ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul Quinn (paulquinn) Date: 2004-07-20 15:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=815032 This is a problem with NX protection...this is how I got it to work: There are ways to disable NX at application level: a) Through the UI... i) "Control Panel" > "System" ii) Click on the "Advanced" tab iii) Under "Performance" section, click "Settings" iv) Click on the "Data Execution Prevention" tab v) Click "Add" and select the appication you want to disable NX for b) Registry... Under "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\AppCompatFlags\Layers" (there are equivalent HKEY_CURRENT_USER keys), create a new string key, its name being the full path to the executable file you want to disable NX for, the value being "DisableNXShowUI" ...you'll notice that in the UI, only executable files can be added. This means that I had to select the "Outlook.exe" file to get Spambayes to work again. I tried adding the spambayes_addin.dll and the python23.dll paths to the registry as a workaround, but this didn't work... Also, if you are using Outlook 2003, you may need to re-enable the plug-in by deleting its resilliency key (the COM Add-in Manager won't remember the re-enable setting no matter how many times you try): http://groups.google.co.uk/groups? hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=uZ%24FJzyFEHA.3984% 40TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl FYI, the same techniques work with Inboxer etc. I'm guessing, as tim_one said, it's to do with the Python libraries. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-07-09 17:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 You'll really have to ask about NX gimmicks on an Athlon list. SpamBayes is written entirely in the Python programming language, and that never, ever tries to execute code from a data region (I'm very familiar with Python's implementation) My only guess is that Outlook itself, or MAPI, try to do this when interfacing with extensions. Or Mark Hammond is playing disgusting games (the only kind he knows, really ) in the win32all Python extensions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988095&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 21 17:30:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 21 17:52:11 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962291 ] WinXP / Server connexion refused Message-ID: Bugs item #962291, was opened at 2004-05-28 17:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by leshaussebons You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: WinXP / Server connexion refused Initial Comment: Used 9 version since today, installed the 1.0 release candidate, with same settings. Now when I try to connect to the spambayes server ( local ) , it returns me a "connexion refused" message, for any of the pop account proxies I have setted ( nothing changes on the client computers ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-21 17:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 tryied to connect via telnet , on localhost : 4700 did nothing ( looks like timed out ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-19 05:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What happens if you telnet to localhost:4700? Do you manage to connect, or does it also fail? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 08:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I will look at this on Monday, but am away this weekend (and it's late on Friday here right now, so can't do it now). So feel free to drop back to the old version until then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 08:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 here is the log Service not availible. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 4700 is proxying pop. laposte.net:110 Listener on port 4701 is proxying pop.free.fr:110 Listener on port 4702 is proxying pop.lost-oasis nothing special, I noticed I had the same log while working. I can't download any mail, as the messenger ( thunderbird, and I had the same stuff with another one ) tells me : unable to connect to server, the server returned an error : ( blank ) On any account, any port. ( I installed the rc2 ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 07:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 still aware or this problem but haven't the courage to re-install the jamming version on my computer, as I use the anti-spam functions actively. I set back the older version that remained working fine for me . .. Answer to previous post : yeah the settings were the same, and were kept. I also tryied to re-enter them. Will try to install the newer version soon, I swear, as I really want to help you with fixing this odd bug ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 03:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 01:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you open the configuration page, does it still have the server values there? Could you attach your log file to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 21 19:28:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 21 19:29:52 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962291 ] WinXP / Server connexion refused Message-ID: Bugs item #962291, was opened at 2004-05-28 11:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: WinXP / Server connexion refused Initial Comment: Used 9 version since today, installed the 1.0 release candidate, with same settings. Now when I try to connect to the spambayes server ( local ) , it returns me a "connexion refused" message, for any of the pop account proxies I have setted ( nothing changes on the client computers ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-21 13:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Sounds like SpamBayes is not running. Check in Windows Task Manager and see if the sb_tray process is running. You can also go to a Windows Command Prompt and enter the command "netstat -a", and look to see if anyone is listening on port 4700. One other possibility is that you have a personal firewall of some sort (such as XP's Internet Connection Firewal) that is blocking access to the port. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-21 11:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 tryied to connect via telnet , on localhost : 4700 did nothing ( looks like timed out ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-18 23:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What happens if you telnet to localhost:4700? Do you manage to connect, or does it also fail? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 02:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I will look at this on Monday, but am away this weekend (and it's late on Friday here right now, so can't do it now). So feel free to drop back to the old version until then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 02:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 here is the log Service not availible. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 4700 is proxying pop. laposte.net:110 Listener on port 4701 is proxying pop.free.fr:110 Listener on port 4702 is proxying pop.lost-oasis nothing special, I noticed I had the same log while working. I can't download any mail, as the messenger ( thunderbird, and I had the same stuff with another one ) tells me : unable to connect to server, the server returned an error : ( blank ) On any account, any port. ( I installed the rc2 ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 01:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 still aware or this problem but haven't the courage to re-install the jamming version on my computer, as I use the anti-spam functions actively. I set back the older version that remained working fine for me . .. Answer to previous post : yeah the settings were the same, and were kept. I also tryied to re-enter them. Will try to install the newer version soon, I swear, as I really want to help you with fixing this odd bug ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-15 21:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-31 19:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you open the configuration page, does it still have the server values there? Could you attach your log file to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 21 20:08:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 21 20:10:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962291 ] WinXP / Server connexion refused Message-ID: Bugs item #962291, was opened at 2004-05-28 17:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by leshaussebons You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 6 Submitted By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: WinXP / Server connexion refused Initial Comment: Used 9 version since today, installed the 1.0 release candidate, with same settings. Now when I try to connect to the spambayes server ( local ) , it returns me a "connexion refused" message, for any of the pop account proxies I have setted ( nothing changes on the client computers ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-21 20:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 C:\Documents and Settings\Gateway>netstat -a Connexions actives Proto Adresse locale Adresse distante Etat (...) TCP p4:4700 p4:0 LISTENING TCP p4:4701 p4:0 LISTENING TCP p4:4702 p4:0 LISTENING (...) TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.3:1047 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.3:1055 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1232 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1233 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1234 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1235 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4701 192.168.0.3:1046 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4701 192.168.0.3:1054 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4701 192.168.0.206:1236 TIME_WAIT ***************************** What is the TIME_WAIT statement ? Local Ips are from my other computers ( 3 & 206 ) Netstat and the task list show that spamB is up and listening. I tryied a telnet localhost 4700 ***************************** +OK POP3 server ready (7.0.028) <3E9BBACFAB(...sessioninfo.. .)44FDD764761EE@mx.laposte.net> Working ! Then I try a telnet 192.168.0.1 4700 from any computer on the lan I get **************************** -ERR Connection not allowed Perte de la connexion ? l'h?te. Appuyez sur une touche pour continuer... ****************************************** ( connection to host lost, press a key to go on ... ) I tryied to turn my firewall off, does the same. The 0.9 version is still working fine, same ports, same config. Is there some configuration to do in spambayes to grant access from LAN machines ? It works fine with the 0.9 and still hangs - for me - with the newer versions. Have something changed in the way it uses network ? maybe windows doesn't like it much. Well, I hope I am not the only one with this soucy ... I try to help you finding the cure :) , Anyway I plan to set a w2000 server instead of my old xp pro, so the bug may won't exist in some weeks ... Hope we could fix it before. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-21 19:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Sounds like SpamBayes is not running. Check in Windows Task Manager and see if the sb_tray process is running. You can also go to a Windows Command Prompt and enter the command "netstat -a", and look to see if anyone is listening on port 4700. One other possibility is that you have a personal firewall of some sort (such as XP's Internet Connection Firewal) that is blocking access to the port. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-21 17:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 tryied to connect via telnet , on localhost : 4700 did nothing ( looks like timed out ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-19 05:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What happens if you telnet to localhost:4700? Do you manage to connect, or does it also fail? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 08:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I will look at this on Monday, but am away this weekend (and it's late on Friday here right now, so can't do it now). So feel free to drop back to the old version until then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 08:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 here is the log Service not availible. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 4700 is proxying pop. laposte.net:110 Listener on port 4701 is proxying pop.free.fr:110 Listener on port 4702 is proxying pop.lost-oasis nothing special, I noticed I had the same log while working. I can't download any mail, as the messenger ( thunderbird, and I had the same stuff with another one ) tells me : unable to connect to server, the server returned an error : ( blank ) On any account, any port. ( I installed the rc2 ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 07:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 still aware or this problem but haven't the courage to re-install the jamming version on my computer, as I use the anti-spam functions actively. I set back the older version that remained working fine for me . .. Answer to previous post : yeah the settings were the same, and were kept. I also tryied to re-enter them. Will try to install the newer version soon, I swear, as I really want to help you with fixing this odd bug ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 03:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 01:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you open the configuration page, does it still have the server values there? Could you attach your log file to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 21 20:18:45 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 21 20:27:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962291 ] WinXP / Server connexion refused Message-ID: Bugs item #962291, was opened at 2004-05-28 17:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by leshaussebons You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 6 Submitted By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: WinXP / Server connexion refused Initial Comment: Used 9 version since today, installed the 1.0 release candidate, with same settings. Now when I try to connect to the spambayes server ( local ) , it returns me a "connexion refused" message, for any of the pop account proxies I have setted ( nothing changes on the client computers ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-21 20:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 Tested localy ( outlook express on the gateway ) param : localhost:4700, downloaded and rated mail ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-21 20:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 C:\Documents and Settings\Gateway>netstat -a Connexions actives Proto Adresse locale Adresse distante Etat (...) TCP p4:4700 p4:0 LISTENING TCP p4:4701 p4:0 LISTENING TCP p4:4702 p4:0 LISTENING (...) TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.3:1047 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.3:1055 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1232 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1233 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1234 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1235 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4701 192.168.0.3:1046 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4701 192.168.0.3:1054 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4701 192.168.0.206:1236 TIME_WAIT ***************************** What is the TIME_WAIT statement ? Local Ips are from my other computers ( 3 & 206 ) Netstat and the task list show that spamB is up and listening. I tryied a telnet localhost 4700 ***************************** +OK POP3 server ready (7.0.028) <3E9BBACFAB(...sessioninfo.. .)44FDD764761EE@mx.laposte.net> Working ! Then I try a telnet 192.168.0.1 4700 from any computer on the lan I get **************************** -ERR Connection not allowed Perte de la connexion ? l'h?te. Appuyez sur une touche pour continuer... ****************************************** ( connection to host lost, press a key to go on ... ) I tryied to turn my firewall off, does the same. The 0.9 version is still working fine, same ports, same config. Is there some configuration to do in spambayes to grant access from LAN machines ? It works fine with the 0.9 and still hangs - for me - with the newer versions. Have something changed in the way it uses network ? maybe windows doesn't like it much. Well, I hope I am not the only one with this soucy ... I try to help you finding the cure :) , Anyway I plan to set a w2000 server instead of my old xp pro, so the bug may won't exist in some weeks ... Hope we could fix it before. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-21 19:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Sounds like SpamBayes is not running. Check in Windows Task Manager and see if the sb_tray process is running. You can also go to a Windows Command Prompt and enter the command "netstat -a", and look to see if anyone is listening on port 4700. One other possibility is that you have a personal firewall of some sort (such as XP's Internet Connection Firewal) that is blocking access to the port. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-21 17:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 tryied to connect via telnet , on localhost : 4700 did nothing ( looks like timed out ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-19 05:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What happens if you telnet to localhost:4700? Do you manage to connect, or does it also fail? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 08:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I will look at this on Monday, but am away this weekend (and it's late on Friday here right now, so can't do it now). So feel free to drop back to the old version until then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 08:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 here is the log Service not availible. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 4700 is proxying pop. laposte.net:110 Listener on port 4701 is proxying pop.free.fr:110 Listener on port 4702 is proxying pop.lost-oasis nothing special, I noticed I had the same log while working. I can't download any mail, as the messenger ( thunderbird, and I had the same stuff with another one ) tells me : unable to connect to server, the server returned an error : ( blank ) On any account, any port. ( I installed the rc2 ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 07:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 still aware or this problem but haven't the courage to re-install the jamming version on my computer, as I use the anti-spam functions actively. I set back the older version that remained working fine for me . .. Answer to previous post : yeah the settings were the same, and were kept. I also tryied to re-enter them. Will try to install the newer version soon, I swear, as I really want to help you with fixing this odd bug ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 03:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 01:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you open the configuration page, does it still have the server values there? Could you attach your log file to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 21 20:52:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 21 20:52:12 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962291 ] WinXP / Server connexion refused Message-ID: Bugs item #962291, was opened at 2004-05-28 11:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 6 Submitted By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: WinXP / Server connexion refused Initial Comment: Used 9 version since today, installed the 1.0 release candidate, with same settings. Now when I try to connect to the spambayes server ( local ) , it returns me a "connexion refused" message, for any of the pop account proxies I have setted ( nothing changes on the client computers ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-21 14:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 By default, SpamBayes does not allow connections except from the local machine. If you want to allow connections from other machines on your network, do right-click "Configure...", scroll to the bottom of the page, and click the "Advanced Configuration" button. Near the bottom of the advanced page you will find a total of 3 boxes labeled "Allowed remote connections". The first is a little ways up from the bottom of the page, followed by several other options, followed by 2 at the very bottom of the page. The help text for the first box refers simply to "Remote connections", and you should set this to the machines that you want to have access to the Web UI. The help text for the second box refers to "Remote POP connections", and you should set it to the machines that you want to be able to connect through the POP3 proxy for retrieving mail. Unless you are proxying SMTP traffic for training, you will not need to change the third one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-21 14:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 Tested localy ( outlook express on the gateway ) param : localhost:4700, downloaded and rated mail ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-21 14:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 C:\Documents and Settings\Gateway>netstat -a Connexions actives Proto Adresse locale Adresse distante Etat (...) TCP p4:4700 p4:0 LISTENING TCP p4:4701 p4:0 LISTENING TCP p4:4702 p4:0 LISTENING (...) TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.3:1047 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.3:1055 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1232 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1233 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1234 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1235 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4701 192.168.0.3:1046 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4701 192.168.0.3:1054 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4701 192.168.0.206:1236 TIME_WAIT ***************************** What is the TIME_WAIT statement ? Local Ips are from my other computers ( 3 & 206 ) Netstat and the task list show that spamB is up and listening. I tryied a telnet localhost 4700 ***************************** +OK POP3 server ready (7.0.028) <3E9BBACFAB(...sessioninfo.. .)44FDD764761EE@mx.laposte.net> Working ! Then I try a telnet 192.168.0.1 4700 from any computer on the lan I get **************************** -ERR Connection not allowed Perte de la connexion ? l'h?te. Appuyez sur une touche pour continuer... ****************************************** ( connection to host lost, press a key to go on ... ) I tryied to turn my firewall off, does the same. The 0.9 version is still working fine, same ports, same config. Is there some configuration to do in spambayes to grant access from LAN machines ? It works fine with the 0.9 and still hangs - for me - with the newer versions. Have something changed in the way it uses network ? maybe windows doesn't like it much. Well, I hope I am not the only one with this soucy ... I try to help you finding the cure :) , Anyway I plan to set a w2000 server instead of my old xp pro, so the bug may won't exist in some weeks ... Hope we could fix it before. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-21 13:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Sounds like SpamBayes is not running. Check in Windows Task Manager and see if the sb_tray process is running. You can also go to a Windows Command Prompt and enter the command "netstat -a", and look to see if anyone is listening on port 4700. One other possibility is that you have a personal firewall of some sort (such as XP's Internet Connection Firewal) that is blocking access to the port. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-21 11:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 tryied to connect via telnet , on localhost : 4700 did nothing ( looks like timed out ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-18 23:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What happens if you telnet to localhost:4700? Do you manage to connect, or does it also fail? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 02:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I will look at this on Monday, but am away this weekend (and it's late on Friday here right now, so can't do it now). So feel free to drop back to the old version until then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 02:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 here is the log Service not availible. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 4700 is proxying pop. laposte.net:110 Listener on port 4701 is proxying pop.free.fr:110 Listener on port 4702 is proxying pop.lost-oasis nothing special, I noticed I had the same log while working. I can't download any mail, as the messenger ( thunderbird, and I had the same stuff with another one ) tells me : unable to connect to server, the server returned an error : ( blank ) On any account, any port. ( I installed the rc2 ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 01:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 still aware or this problem but haven't the courage to re-install the jamming version on my computer, as I use the anti-spam functions actively. I set back the older version that remained working fine for me . .. Answer to previous post : yeah the settings were the same, and were kept. I also tryied to re-enter them. Will try to install the newer version soon, I swear, as I really want to help you with fixing this odd bug ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-15 21:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-31 19:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you open the configuration page, does it still have the server values there? Could you attach your log file to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 21 23:04:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 21 23:04:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962291 ] WinXP / Server connexion refused Message-ID: Bugs item #962291, was opened at 2004-05-28 17:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by leshaussebons You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Closed >Resolution: Accepted Priority: 6 Submitted By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: WinXP / Server connexion refused Initial Comment: Used 9 version since today, installed the 1.0 release candidate, with same settings. Now when I try to connect to the spambayes server ( local ) , it returns me a "connexion refused" message, for any of the pop account proxies I have setted ( nothing changes on the client computers ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-21 23:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 Sorry that I didnt figure this configuration tip, as it wasnt required in the beta version. I feel dumb :) works great now ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-21 20:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 By default, SpamBayes does not allow connections except from the local machine. If you want to allow connections from other machines on your network, do right-click "Configure...", scroll to the bottom of the page, and click the "Advanced Configuration" button. Near the bottom of the advanced page you will find a total of 3 boxes labeled "Allowed remote connections". The first is a little ways up from the bottom of the page, followed by several other options, followed by 2 at the very bottom of the page. The help text for the first box refers simply to "Remote connections", and you should set this to the machines that you want to have access to the Web UI. The help text for the second box refers to "Remote POP connections", and you should set it to the machines that you want to be able to connect through the POP3 proxy for retrieving mail. Unless you are proxying SMTP traffic for training, you will not need to change the third one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-21 20:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 Tested localy ( outlook express on the gateway ) param : localhost:4700, downloaded and rated mail ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-21 20:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 C:\Documents and Settings\Gateway>netstat -a Connexions actives Proto Adresse locale Adresse distante Etat (...) TCP p4:4700 p4:0 LISTENING TCP p4:4701 p4:0 LISTENING TCP p4:4702 p4:0 LISTENING (...) TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.3:1047 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.3:1055 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1232 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1233 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1234 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1235 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4701 192.168.0.3:1046 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4701 192.168.0.3:1054 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4701 192.168.0.206:1236 TIME_WAIT ***************************** What is the TIME_WAIT statement ? Local Ips are from my other computers ( 3 & 206 ) Netstat and the task list show that spamB is up and listening. I tryied a telnet localhost 4700 ***************************** +OK POP3 server ready (7.0.028) <3E9BBACFAB(...sessioninfo.. .)44FDD764761EE@mx.laposte.net> Working ! Then I try a telnet 192.168.0.1 4700 from any computer on the lan I get **************************** -ERR Connection not allowed Perte de la connexion ? l'h?te. Appuyez sur une touche pour continuer... ****************************************** ( connection to host lost, press a key to go on ... ) I tryied to turn my firewall off, does the same. The 0.9 version is still working fine, same ports, same config. Is there some configuration to do in spambayes to grant access from LAN machines ? It works fine with the 0.9 and still hangs - for me - with the newer versions. Have something changed in the way it uses network ? maybe windows doesn't like it much. Well, I hope I am not the only one with this soucy ... I try to help you finding the cure :) , Anyway I plan to set a w2000 server instead of my old xp pro, so the bug may won't exist in some weeks ... Hope we could fix it before. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-21 19:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Sounds like SpamBayes is not running. Check in Windows Task Manager and see if the sb_tray process is running. You can also go to a Windows Command Prompt and enter the command "netstat -a", and look to see if anyone is listening on port 4700. One other possibility is that you have a personal firewall of some sort (such as XP's Internet Connection Firewal) that is blocking access to the port. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-21 17:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 tryied to connect via telnet , on localhost : 4700 did nothing ( looks like timed out ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-19 05:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What happens if you telnet to localhost:4700? Do you manage to connect, or does it also fail? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 08:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I will look at this on Monday, but am away this weekend (and it's late on Friday here right now, so can't do it now). So feel free to drop back to the old version until then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 08:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 here is the log Service not availible. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 4700 is proxying pop. laposte.net:110 Listener on port 4701 is proxying pop.free.fr:110 Listener on port 4702 is proxying pop.lost-oasis nothing special, I noticed I had the same log while working. I can't download any mail, as the messenger ( thunderbird, and I had the same stuff with another one ) tells me : unable to connect to server, the server returned an error : ( blank ) On any account, any port. ( I installed the rc2 ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 07:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 still aware or this problem but haven't the courage to re-install the jamming version on my computer, as I use the anti-spam functions actively. I set back the older version that remained working fine for me . .. Answer to previous post : yeah the settings were the same, and were kept. I also tryied to re-enter them. Will try to install the newer version soon, I swear, as I really want to help you with fixing this odd bug ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 03:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 01:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you open the configuration page, does it still have the server values there? Could you attach your log file to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 21 23:45:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 21 23:45:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-995553 ] IMAP 'Recover from Spam' goes to wrong folder Message-ID: Bugs item #995553, was opened at 2004-07-22 09:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=995553&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Data Bitz (databitz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: IMAP 'Recover from Spam' goes to wrong folder Initial Comment: Outlook 2000 SP-3 Windows 2000 Pro SP-4 New messages are delivered to IMAP folder 'Inbox' then moved to IMAP folder 'Junk E-Mail' when are found to be spam. If I select a message from the IMAP folder 'Junk E-Mail' then select 'Recover from Spam', the message is moved to the Personal folder 'Inbox', instead of the original IMAP folder 'Inbox' that it was removed from. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=995553&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 21 23:48:52 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 21 23:48:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-995553 ] IMAP 'Recover from Spam' goes to wrong folder Message-ID: Bugs item #995553, was opened at 2004-07-22 09:45 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by databitz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=995553&group_id=61702 >Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Data Bitz (databitz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: IMAP 'Recover from Spam' goes to wrong folder Initial Comment: Outlook 2000 SP-3 Windows 2000 Pro SP-4 New messages are delivered to IMAP folder 'Inbox' then moved to IMAP folder 'Junk E-Mail' when are found to be spam. If I select a message from the IMAP folder 'Junk E-Mail' then select 'Recover from Spam', the message is moved to the Personal folder 'Inbox', instead of the original IMAP folder 'Inbox' that it was removed from. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=995553&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jul 22 17:42:13 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jul 22 17:42:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-962291 ] WinXP / Server connexion refused Message-ID: Bugs item #962291, was opened at 2004-05-28 11:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Closed Resolution: Accepted Priority: 6 Submitted By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: WinXP / Server connexion refused Initial Comment: Used 9 version since today, installed the 1.0 release candidate, with same settings. Now when I try to connect to the spambayes server ( local ) , it returns me a "connexion refused" message, for any of the pop account proxies I have setted ( nothing changes on the client computers ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-22 11:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Great, glad to hear it is working for you! The additional restriction was added after someone pointed out that we were not preventing remote connections to the proxy ports, and that the SMTP proxy in particular could then be used as an open relay. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-21 17:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 Sorry that I didnt figure this configuration tip, as it wasnt required in the beta version. I feel dumb :) works great now ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-21 14:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 By default, SpamBayes does not allow connections except from the local machine. If you want to allow connections from other machines on your network, do right-click "Configure...", scroll to the bottom of the page, and click the "Advanced Configuration" button. Near the bottom of the advanced page you will find a total of 3 boxes labeled "Allowed remote connections". The first is a little ways up from the bottom of the page, followed by several other options, followed by 2 at the very bottom of the page. The help text for the first box refers simply to "Remote connections", and you should set this to the machines that you want to have access to the Web UI. The help text for the second box refers to "Remote POP connections", and you should set it to the machines that you want to be able to connect through the POP3 proxy for retrieving mail. Unless you are proxying SMTP traffic for training, you will not need to change the third one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-21 14:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 Tested localy ( outlook express on the gateway ) param : localhost:4700, downloaded and rated mail ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-21 14:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 C:\Documents and Settings\Gateway>netstat -a Connexions actives Proto Adresse locale Adresse distante Etat (...) TCP p4:4700 p4:0 LISTENING TCP p4:4701 p4:0 LISTENING TCP p4:4702 p4:0 LISTENING (...) TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.3:1047 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.3:1055 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1232 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1233 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1234 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4700 192.168.0.206:1235 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4701 192.168.0.3:1046 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4701 192.168.0.3:1054 TIME_WAIT TCP p4:4701 192.168.0.206:1236 TIME_WAIT ***************************** What is the TIME_WAIT statement ? Local Ips are from my other computers ( 3 & 206 ) Netstat and the task list show that spamB is up and listening. I tryied a telnet localhost 4700 ***************************** +OK POP3 server ready (7.0.028) <3E9BBACFAB(...sessioninfo.. .)44FDD764761EE@mx.laposte.net> Working ! Then I try a telnet 192.168.0.1 4700 from any computer on the lan I get **************************** -ERR Connection not allowed Perte de la connexion ? l'h?te. Appuyez sur une touche pour continuer... ****************************************** ( connection to host lost, press a key to go on ... ) I tryied to turn my firewall off, does the same. The 0.9 version is still working fine, same ports, same config. Is there some configuration to do in spambayes to grant access from LAN machines ? It works fine with the 0.9 and still hangs - for me - with the newer versions. Have something changed in the way it uses network ? maybe windows doesn't like it much. Well, I hope I am not the only one with this soucy ... I try to help you finding the cure :) , Anyway I plan to set a w2000 server instead of my old xp pro, so the bug may won't exist in some weeks ... Hope we could fix it before. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-21 13:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Sounds like SpamBayes is not running. Check in Windows Task Manager and see if the sb_tray process is running. You can also go to a Windows Command Prompt and enter the command "netstat -a", and look to see if anyone is listening on port 4700. One other possibility is that you have a personal firewall of some sort (such as XP's Internet Connection Firewal) that is blocking access to the port. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-21 11:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 tryied to connect via telnet , on localhost : 4700 did nothing ( looks like timed out ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-18 23:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 What happens if you telnet to localhost:4700? Do you manage to connect, or does it also fail? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-16 02:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I will look at this on Monday, but am away this weekend (and it's late on Friday here right now, so can't do it now). So feel free to drop back to the old version until then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 02:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 here is the log Service not availible. Using thread. Loading database... Listener on port 4700 is proxying pop. laposte.net:110 Listener on port 4701 is proxying pop.free.fr:110 Listener on port 4702 is proxying pop.lost-oasis nothing special, I noticed I had the same log while working. I can't download any mail, as the messenger ( thunderbird, and I had the same stuff with another one ) tells me : unable to connect to server, the server returned an error : ( blank ) On any account, any port. ( I installed the rc2 ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: LesHauSsebons (leshaussebons) Date: 2004-07-16 01:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=887049 still aware or this problem but haven't the courage to re-install the jamming version on my computer, as I use the anti-spam functions actively. I set back the older version that remained working fine for me . .. Answer to previous post : yeah the settings were the same, and were kept. I also tryied to re-enter them. Will try to install the newer version soon, I swear, as I really want to help you with fixing this odd bug ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-15 21:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 We haven't heard from the original reporter of the bug for some time. Without the requested information, there really isn't much we can do. If anyone does provide further information, please also change the bug status back to "Open". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-31 19:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 If you open the configuration page, does it still have the server values there? Could you attach your log file to this tracker? The troubleshooting guide explains where to find that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=962291&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 23 02:33:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 23 02:33:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-995553 ] IMAP 'Recover from Spam' goes to wrong folder Message-ID: Bugs item #995553, was opened at 2004-07-21 16:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kstaker You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=995553&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Data Bitz (databitz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: IMAP 'Recover from Spam' goes to wrong folder Initial Comment: Outlook 2000 SP-3 Windows 2000 Pro SP-4 New messages are delivered to IMAP folder 'Inbox' then moved to IMAP folder 'Junk E-Mail' when are found to be spam. If I select a message from the IMAP folder 'Junk E-Mail' then select 'Recover from Spam', the message is moved to the Personal folder 'Inbox', instead of the original IMAP folder 'Inbox' that it was removed from. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Keegan Staker (kstaker) Date: 2004-07-22 19:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1051943 I have complaints of this problem as well and would love to have this addressed in the final release. I understand that the message may not be marked to know where to return to, but even if you could specify the folder for Recovery, that would be a big help. They can easily get lost in the Personal Folders/Inbox. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=995553&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 23 02:45:00 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 23 02:45:16 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786212 ] Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Message-ID: Bugs item #786212, was opened at 2003-08-10 23:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Initial Comment: Hi In my OutlookXP the function "Recover from Spam" from within my Unsure Imap-Folder moves the mail back to the wrong Inbox(POP3) Folder. I have 2 mail accounts in Outlook. One Imap Inbox Folder and one Pop3 Inbox Folder under Personal Folders. Spambayes runs only for the imap-account. Filter is configured only for the imap-Inbox. Unsure and Spam Folders are on the Imap. The "Recover from Spam" should move the mails back to the Imap-Inbox but instead it moves them to the Pop3-Inbox under Personal Folders. Spambayes Version is Outlook Addin Binary version 0.7 Regards ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-23 12:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting duplicate in [ 995553 ] IMAP 'Recover from Spam' goes to wrong folder ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Keegan Staker (kstaker) Date: 2004-05-29 02:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1051943 Until now i was unaware that this really is not functional for non-technical users with IMAP boxes. I've pushed this program to everyone I know, but am now realizing that if a user is using an IMAP box, and clicks on "recover from spam" in his suspects folder, that message will not return to its normal inbox. This is very troublesome and I'd love to see progress on this. I am only watching one inbox. it would be nice if messages returned to that particular inbox when "Recover from Spam" was clicked instead of his Personal Folders inbox. Thanks, Keegan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jose Gutirrez (image57) Date: 2003-10-30 08:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=686578 i think the key here is the following line in my log: Unable to determine source folder for message 'comments...' - restoring to Inbox Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training message 'comments...' - Training on message 'comments...' - trained as good ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Opps. Think, Tony, think! I recovered a message that hadn't been scored before it was 'deleted as spam', so I presume that is why. Still, it would probably be a good idea to save the info for messages that don't have it, when deleting as spam. (I think maybe another tracker has this request). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can repro this with my spam folder in a pst and the other folders on Exchange. Never noticed before, since I usually only filter the Inbox. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 14:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I can't repro this, for either hotmail, imap or pop test accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-26 11:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks, but unfortunately the log doesn't have what I thought it did. However, I am guessing the problem is that we can't save properties on the IMAP message. I have just opened another bug https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=794992&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which when fixed should also solve this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Date: 2003-08-26 01:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=841583 This is a commonly reported bug that unfortunately we don't know how to fix at this stage. If you follow the "troubleshooting guide" - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html. You will find instructions for resetting the toolbars, which generally fixes all toolbar related issues. If it doesn't, please reopen this bug giving further details. We hope to have this working better in future versions, so if it continues to give you trouble, please subscribe to the spambayes-announce list - http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-25 18:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please attach a log for a session where you tried this (and set the status back to Open)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 23 02:47:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 23 02:47:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-995553 ] IMAP 'Recover from Spam' goes to wrong folder Message-ID: Bugs item #995553, was opened at 2004-07-22 09:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=995553&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: Data Bitz (databitz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: IMAP 'Recover from Spam' goes to wrong folder Initial Comment: Outlook 2000 SP-3 Windows 2000 Pro SP-4 New messages are delivered to IMAP folder 'Inbox' then moved to IMAP folder 'Junk E-Mail' when are found to be spam. If I select a message from the IMAP folder 'Junk E-Mail' then select 'Recover from Spam', the message is moved to the Personal folder 'Inbox', instead of the original IMAP folder 'Inbox' that it was removed from. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-23 12:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of [ 786212 ] Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Please use that tracker for any comments regarding this bug. (Note, too, that the 1.0 release will not have any changes from 1.0rc2 (that's the aim of a release candidate). A fix for this may appear in 1.0.1 or 1.1a1, if we can figure out the cause). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Keegan Staker (kstaker) Date: 2004-07-23 12:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1051943 I have complaints of this problem as well and would love to have this addressed in the final release. I understand that the message may not be marked to know where to return to, but even if you could specify the folder for Recovery, that would be a big help. They can easily get lost in the Personal Folders/Inbox. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=995553&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 23 03:03:06 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 23 03:03:17 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786212 ] Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Message-ID: Bugs item #786212, was opened at 2003-08-10 23:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Initial Comment: Hi In my OutlookXP the function "Recover from Spam" from within my Unsure Imap-Folder moves the mail back to the wrong Inbox(POP3) Folder. I have 2 mail accounts in Outlook. One Imap Inbox Folder and one Pop3 Inbox Folder under Personal Folders. Spambayes runs only for the imap-account. Filter is configured only for the imap-Inbox. Unsure and Spam Folders are on the Imap. The "Recover from Spam" should move the mails back to the Imap-Inbox but instead it moves them to the Pop3-Inbox under Personal Folders. Spambayes Version is Outlook Addin Binary version 0.7 Regards ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-23 13:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 FWIW, I can't repro this either. My IMAP server is Courier (not sure of version). I imagine this is a quirk of the particular IMAP servers, and to really debug we would need the IMAP conversation (I believe Outlook can store this) as well as the SpamBayes log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-23 12:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting duplicate in [ 995553 ] IMAP 'Recover from Spam' goes to wrong folder ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Keegan Staker (kstaker) Date: 2004-05-29 02:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1051943 Until now i was unaware that this really is not functional for non-technical users with IMAP boxes. I've pushed this program to everyone I know, but am now realizing that if a user is using an IMAP box, and clicks on "recover from spam" in his suspects folder, that message will not return to its normal inbox. This is very troublesome and I'd love to see progress on this. I am only watching one inbox. it would be nice if messages returned to that particular inbox when "Recover from Spam" was clicked instead of his Personal Folders inbox. Thanks, Keegan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jose Gutirrez (image57) Date: 2003-10-30 08:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=686578 i think the key here is the following line in my log: Unable to determine source folder for message 'comments...' - restoring to Inbox Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training message 'comments...' - Training on message 'comments...' - trained as good ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Opps. Think, Tony, think! I recovered a message that hadn't been scored before it was 'deleted as spam', so I presume that is why. Still, it would probably be a good idea to save the info for messages that don't have it, when deleting as spam. (I think maybe another tracker has this request). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can repro this with my spam folder in a pst and the other folders on Exchange. Never noticed before, since I usually only filter the Inbox. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 14:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I can't repro this, for either hotmail, imap or pop test accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-26 11:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks, but unfortunately the log doesn't have what I thought it did. However, I am guessing the problem is that we can't save properties on the IMAP message. I have just opened another bug https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=794992&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which when fixed should also solve this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Date: 2003-08-26 01:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=841583 This is a commonly reported bug that unfortunately we don't know how to fix at this stage. If you follow the "troubleshooting guide" - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html. You will find instructions for resetting the toolbars, which generally fixes all toolbar related issues. If it doesn't, please reopen this bug giving further details. We hope to have this working better in future versions, so if it continues to give you trouble, please subscribe to the spambayes-announce list - http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-25 18:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please attach a log for a session where you tried this (and set the status back to Open)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 23 03:55:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 23 03:55:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786212 ] Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Message-ID: Bugs item #786212, was opened at 2003-08-10 23:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by databitz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Initial Comment: Hi In my OutlookXP the function "Recover from Spam" from within my Unsure Imap-Folder moves the mail back to the wrong Inbox(POP3) Folder. I have 2 mail accounts in Outlook. One Imap Inbox Folder and one Pop3 Inbox Folder under Personal Folders. Spambayes runs only for the imap-account. Filter is configured only for the imap-Inbox. Unsure and Spam Folders are on the Imap. The "Recover from Spam" should move the mails back to the Imap-Inbox but instead it moves them to the Pop3-Inbox under Personal Folders. Spambayes Version is Outlook Addin Binary version 0.7 Regards ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Data Bitz (databitz) Date: 2004-07-23 13:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=702593 I can duplicate this problem. My IMAP server is IBM Lotus Domino. My Outlook 2000 client is running in 'Internet Only Mode'. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-23 13:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 FWIW, I can't repro this either. My IMAP server is Courier (not sure of version). I imagine this is a quirk of the particular IMAP servers, and to really debug we would need the IMAP conversation (I believe Outlook can store this) as well as the SpamBayes log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-23 12:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting duplicate in [ 995553 ] IMAP 'Recover from Spam' goes to wrong folder ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Keegan Staker (kstaker) Date: 2004-05-29 02:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1051943 Until now i was unaware that this really is not functional for non-technical users with IMAP boxes. I've pushed this program to everyone I know, but am now realizing that if a user is using an IMAP box, and clicks on "recover from spam" in his suspects folder, that message will not return to its normal inbox. This is very troublesome and I'd love to see progress on this. I am only watching one inbox. it would be nice if messages returned to that particular inbox when "Recover from Spam" was clicked instead of his Personal Folders inbox. Thanks, Keegan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jose Gutirrez (image57) Date: 2003-10-30 08:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=686578 i think the key here is the following line in my log: Unable to determine source folder for message 'comments...' - restoring to Inbox Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training message 'comments...' - Training on message 'comments...' - trained as good ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Opps. Think, Tony, think! I recovered a message that hadn't been scored before it was 'deleted as spam', so I presume that is why. Still, it would probably be a good idea to save the info for messages that don't have it, when deleting as spam. (I think maybe another tracker has this request). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can repro this with my spam folder in a pst and the other folders on Exchange. Never noticed before, since I usually only filter the Inbox. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 14:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I can't repro this, for either hotmail, imap or pop test accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-26 11:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks, but unfortunately the log doesn't have what I thought it did. However, I am guessing the problem is that we can't save properties on the IMAP message. I have just opened another bug https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=794992&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which when fixed should also solve this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Date: 2003-08-26 01:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=841583 This is a commonly reported bug that unfortunately we don't know how to fix at this stage. If you follow the "troubleshooting guide" - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html. You will find instructions for resetting the toolbars, which generally fixes all toolbar related issues. If it doesn't, please reopen this bug giving further details. We hope to have this working better in future versions, so if it continues to give you trouble, please subscribe to the spambayes-announce list - http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-25 18:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please attach a log for a session where you tried this (and set the status back to Open)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 23 04:04:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 23 04:05:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786212 ] Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Message-ID: Bugs item #786212, was opened at 2003-08-10 23:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by databitz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Initial Comment: Hi In my OutlookXP the function "Recover from Spam" from within my Unsure Imap-Folder moves the mail back to the wrong Inbox(POP3) Folder. I have 2 mail accounts in Outlook. One Imap Inbox Folder and one Pop3 Inbox Folder under Personal Folders. Spambayes runs only for the imap-account. Filter is configured only for the imap-Inbox. Unsure and Spam Folders are on the Imap. The "Recover from Spam" should move the mails back to the Imap-Inbox but instead it moves them to the Pop3-Inbox under Personal Folders. Spambayes Version is Outlook Addin Binary version 0.7 Regards ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Data Bitz (databitz) Date: 2004-07-23 14:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=702593 Couldn't find a way of capturing the imap conversation? There is a spambayes log attached to the bug report 995553. Should I run spambayes log with more details? My log verbosity is set to 0 at the moment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Data Bitz (databitz) Date: 2004-07-23 13:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=702593 I can duplicate this problem. My IMAP server is IBM Lotus Domino. My Outlook 2000 client is running in 'Internet Only Mode'. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-23 13:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 FWIW, I can't repro this either. My IMAP server is Courier (not sure of version). I imagine this is a quirk of the particular IMAP servers, and to really debug we would need the IMAP conversation (I believe Outlook can store this) as well as the SpamBayes log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-23 12:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting duplicate in [ 995553 ] IMAP 'Recover from Spam' goes to wrong folder ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Keegan Staker (kstaker) Date: 2004-05-29 02:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1051943 Until now i was unaware that this really is not functional for non-technical users with IMAP boxes. I've pushed this program to everyone I know, but am now realizing that if a user is using an IMAP box, and clicks on "recover from spam" in his suspects folder, that message will not return to its normal inbox. This is very troublesome and I'd love to see progress on this. I am only watching one inbox. it would be nice if messages returned to that particular inbox when "Recover from Spam" was clicked instead of his Personal Folders inbox. Thanks, Keegan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jose Gutirrez (image57) Date: 2003-10-30 08:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=686578 i think the key here is the following line in my log: Unable to determine source folder for message 'comments...' - restoring to Inbox Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training message 'comments...' - Training on message 'comments...' - trained as good ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Opps. Think, Tony, think! I recovered a message that hadn't been scored before it was 'deleted as spam', so I presume that is why. Still, it would probably be a good idea to save the info for messages that don't have it, when deleting as spam. (I think maybe another tracker has this request). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can repro this with my spam folder in a pst and the other folders on Exchange. Never noticed before, since I usually only filter the Inbox. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 14:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I can't repro this, for either hotmail, imap or pop test accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-26 11:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks, but unfortunately the log doesn't have what I thought it did. However, I am guessing the problem is that we can't save properties on the IMAP message. I have just opened another bug https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=794992&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which when fixed should also solve this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Date: 2003-08-26 01:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=841583 This is a commonly reported bug that unfortunately we don't know how to fix at this stage. If you follow the "troubleshooting guide" - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html. You will find instructions for resetting the toolbars, which generally fixes all toolbar related issues. If it doesn't, please reopen this bug giving further details. We hope to have this working better in future versions, so if it continues to give you trouble, please subscribe to the spambayes-announce list - http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-25 18:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please attach a log for a session where you tried this (and set the status back to Open)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 23 04:12:21 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 23 04:12:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-786212 ] Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Message-ID: Bugs item #786212, was opened at 2003-08-10 23:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Recover from Spam moves email back to wrong inbox folder Initial Comment: Hi In my OutlookXP the function "Recover from Spam" from within my Unsure Imap-Folder moves the mail back to the wrong Inbox(POP3) Folder. I have 2 mail accounts in Outlook. One Imap Inbox Folder and one Pop3 Inbox Folder under Personal Folders. Spambayes runs only for the imap-account. Filter is configured only for the imap-Inbox. Unsure and Spam Folders are on the Imap. The "Recover from Spam" should move the mails back to the Imap-Inbox but instead it moves them to the Pop3-Inbox under Personal Folders. Spambayes Version is Outlook Addin Binary version 0.7 Regards ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-23 14:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This MS support article explains how to turn logging on: (Basically Tools->Options->Advanced Options and tick the box). It also explains where the logs are (XP is the same as Win2k). Remember to turn logging off afterwards, otherwise you'll end up with *lots* of logs :) Only the OP and admins can attach logs to any trackers, so you'll have to open a new report and attach it there (and then put a note here). Yes, you might as well raise the SpamBayes log level to 5 for this. Thanks for the help! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Data Bitz (databitz) Date: 2004-07-23 14:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=702593 Couldn't find a way of capturing the imap conversation? There is a spambayes log attached to the bug report 995553. Should I run spambayes log with more details? My log verbosity is set to 0 at the moment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Data Bitz (databitz) Date: 2004-07-23 13:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=702593 I can duplicate this problem. My IMAP server is IBM Lotus Domino. My Outlook 2000 client is running in 'Internet Only Mode'. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-23 13:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 FWIW, I can't repro this either. My IMAP server is Courier (not sure of version). I imagine this is a quirk of the particular IMAP servers, and to really debug we would need the IMAP conversation (I believe Outlook can store this) as well as the SpamBayes log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-23 12:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting duplicate in [ 995553 ] IMAP 'Recover from Spam' goes to wrong folder ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Keegan Staker (kstaker) Date: 2004-05-29 02:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1051943 Until now i was unaware that this really is not functional for non-technical users with IMAP boxes. I've pushed this program to everyone I know, but am now realizing that if a user is using an IMAP box, and clicks on "recover from spam" in his suspects folder, that message will not return to its normal inbox. This is very troublesome and I'd love to see progress on this. I am only watching one inbox. it would be nice if messages returned to that particular inbox when "Recover from Spam" was clicked instead of his Personal Folders inbox. Thanks, Keegan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jose Gutirrez (image57) Date: 2003-10-30 08:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=686578 i think the key here is the following line in my log: Unable to determine source folder for message 'comments...' - restoring to Inbox Recovering to folder 'Inbox' and ham training message 'comments...' - Training on message 'comments...' - trained as good ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Opps. Think, Tony, think! I recovered a message that hadn't been scored before it was 'deleted as spam', so I presume that is why. Still, it would probably be a good idea to save the info for messages that don't have it, when deleting as spam. (I think maybe another tracker has this request). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-16 17:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I can repro this with my spam folder in a pst and the other folders on Exchange. Never noticed before, since I usually only filter the Inbox. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-09-08 14:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I can't repro this, for either hotmail, imap or pop test accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-26 11:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Thanks, but unfortunately the log doesn't have what I thought it did. However, I am guessing the problem is that we can't save properties on the IMAP message. I have just opened another bug https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=794992&group_id=61702&atid=498103, which when fixed should also solve this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Philipp Gruenig (otomi) Date: 2003-08-26 01:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=841583 This is a commonly reported bug that unfortunately we don't know how to fix at this stage. If you follow the "troubleshooting guide" - installed with SpamBayes, but also online at http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html. You will find instructions for resetting the toolbars, which generally fixes all toolbar related issues. If it doesn't, please reopen this bug giving further details. We hope to have this working better in future versions, so if it continues to give you trouble, please subscribe to the spambayes-announce list - http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-announce. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-08-25 18:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 Could you please attach a log for a session where you tried this (and set the status back to Open)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=786212&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Jul 25 17:40:42 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Jul 25 17:40:45 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-997576 ] Improve methods for initial training! Message-ID: Feature Requests item #997576, was opened at 2004-07-25 17:40 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=997576&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom M?ller (zakmcrofl) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Improve methods for initial training! Initial Comment: I would love to have more options for training the POP3Proxy under win32. For example: -use a command line tool to add existing mail files (*.txt) to ham/spam training? -(better) make it possible to forward _any_ message to spambayes_ham@localhost, not just ones that already got spambayes-classied. This would be a great one step solutions for everyone who has an email program that can bounce. All in all there does not seem to be a proper way right now to do initial training. But since it is vital to a good spambayes experience, you should really consider adding this feature. Regards, Zak ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=997576&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Jul 26 00:53:03 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Jul 26 00:53:08 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-997576 ] Improve methods for initial training! Message-ID: Feature Requests item #997576, was opened at 2004-07-26 03:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=997576&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tom M?ller (zakmcrofl) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Improve methods for initial training! Initial Comment: I would love to have more options for training the POP3Proxy under win32. For example: -use a command line tool to add existing mail files (*.txt) to ham/spam training? -(better) make it possible to forward _any_ message to spambayes_ham@localhost, not just ones that already got spambayes-classied. This would be a great one step solutions for everyone who has an email program that can bounce. All in all there does not seem to be a proper way right now to do initial training. But since it is vital to a good spambayes experience, you should really consider adding this feature. Regards, Zak ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-26 10:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1/ sb_mboxtrain or sb_filter or sb_upload should suffice, depending on exactly what the requirements are. 2/ You can do this if you set the [smtpproxy] 'Lookup message in cache' option to false. *However*, you really ought to make sure that you're forwarding the message exactly how it appeared (i.e. headers and all), otherwise you'll end up training SpamBayes that (eg) messages from you are spam. BTW, initial training isn't particularly useful IMO. Start out with train-on-mistakes, and after a dozen or so messages classification will be pretty good, and you won't have cluttered the database with unnecessary information. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=997576&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jul 27 01:43:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jul 27 01:43:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-956834 ] Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions Message-ID: Bugs item #956834, was opened at 2004-05-20 04:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=956834&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hans Otten (haotten) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions Initial Comment: I have been using Spambayes for a while and when I upgraded to the 0.8 release everything worked fine until I highlighted an email that spambayes had not caught and clicked on the "Delete as Spam" button. Outlook crashed and I had to restart. Then I discovered if I try to access any SpamBayes function Outlook immediatly crashes. I just upgraded to rc1 and the same thing still occurs. Please note that the SpamBayes is still properly removing the spam. I have attached the log file, where I noticed several Eeek statements and the following error : only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-27 11:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also: [ 961019 ] Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field I suspect that these are duplicates, but although they both have the "only expecting one row" problem, the other problems seem qutie different. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hans Otten (haotten) Date: 2004-06-08 02:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=229205 Here is the attached Log file... Sorry about that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Benjamin Curtis (bcurtis) Date: 2004-06-03 03:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11944 I couldn't find a log file -- do I have to enable that? If so, how? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 12:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No log file attached. Could either of you attach the log file? (Don't forget to tick the wee box!). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Benjamin Curtis (bcurtis) Date: 2004-05-28 07:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11944 I am also experiencing this problem. 1.0rc1 binary with Outlook 2003 using Exchange. It sorts out spam just fine, but if I click on the SpamBayes drop-down menu button from the toolbar Outlook crashes (every time). Great product otherwise! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=956834&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Jul 27 01:43:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Jul 27 01:43:32 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-961019 ] Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Message-ID: Bugs item #961019, was opened at 2004-05-27 06:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 4 Submitted By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Initial Comment: New Inbox messages get a spam rating of 100% but are not moved to "__Spam" folder as expected Key symptom from log (attached) seems to be "Eeek - only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS" and then "WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Mailbox - Andy Neil/IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField()" Config details: WinXPSP1, user account has local administrator privileges. Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5703) (with full Office 2003 Pro install). NewsGator 2.0. All Outlook rules have been turned off. Outlook "Junk E-mail Filtering" set to "No automatic filtering". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-27 11:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also: [ 956834 ] Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions I suspect that these are duplicates, but although they both have the "only expecting one row" problem, the other problems seem qutie different. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 19:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that Richard has done this: the new tracker is: [ 988624 ] More of Bug no 961019 If you could take a look at it Mark, that would be great. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Date: 2004-07-10 00:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079441 I accept your expert view that they are the same. I have upped the logging level to 5 as sugggested and will submit a new bug report with the new log file attached once I have a couple of new "spam" mails ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 21:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's pretty certain that they are the same problems - the log files are practically identical (same "expecting one row" then "spam field missing" entries). The symptoms are also identical (scored but not moved). Why do you think that it's not the same? Given the two reports, it's possible that the two problems are related. In any case, the higher level report that Mark requested would probably be the most useful thing to get now (more than that will have to come from him). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Date: 2004-07-09 20:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079441 If this really is linked to my bug report (987243) - which I question - then it most certainly does affect normal operation. In my case Spambayes is not working at all. It simply doesn't move any mails - mails that score 100%. Perhaps the priority should be reconsidered? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 15:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting duplicate in [ 987243 ] Spam won't filter ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Date: 2004-07-09 06:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1050507 After the program did nothing useful for several weeks, I uninstalled. Won't have time to follow up per your suggestions. I understand how all-volunteer projects work in terms of prioritization/response time, sorry I won't be able to help out. Good luck. AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 13:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 That error is is very interesting, but I don't believe it is related to spam not being moved. That error relates to our attempt at determining if the 'Spam' field exists in the folder, but should not affect the normal filtering. You will see this message once each time SpamBayes starts, and each time the config dialog is closed. Your log indicates everything is going normally. Can you please go to the SB manager, Advanced->Diagnostics, and set the log level to "2". Then restart spambayes, and wait for the next spam correctly classified, but not moved. Could you then please create a *new* bug for that specific issue, and attach the log. I want to take over this bug for that error message you see - but as I mentioned, I'm not convinced they are related. I'm lowering the priority on this, as I also don't believe it will affect normal operation. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 28 15:19:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 28 15:19:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-999411 ] SPAM folder disappears Message-ID: Support Requests item #999411, was opened at 2004-07-28 08:19 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=999411&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Syndi (synlupri) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SPAM folder disappears Initial Comment: Hi there! I have a friend (not really pc literate) who calls every so often and says his SPAM folder for his Spambayes has disappeared. This in turn causes the SB program to have to be reconfigured and trained all over again. Have you heard of the SPAM folder just disappearing? Or is it a user malfunction (aka: the nut behind the keyboard)? I tend to think its the later. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=999411&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Jul 28 17:04:54 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Jul 28 17:04:58 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-999411 ] SPAM folder disappears Message-ID: Support Requests item #999411, was opened at 2004-07-28 09:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=999411&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Syndi (synlupri) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SPAM folder disappears Initial Comment: Hi there! I have a friend (not really pc literate) who calls every so often and says his SPAM folder for his Spambayes has disappeared. This in turn causes the SB program to have to be reconfigured and trained all over again. Have you heard of the SPAM folder just disappearing? Or is it a user malfunction (aka: the nut behind the keyboard)? I tend to think its the later. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-07-28 11:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Encourage your friend to look in Deleted Items. The spam folder is almost always found there, as a subfolder. This comes from the user deleting the Spam folder themself, although users typically refuse to believe this at first . See the SB FAQ for more info on this (it is a FAQ!). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=999411&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jul 29 00:52:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jul 29 00:52:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-999411 ] SPAM folder disappears Message-ID: Support Requests item #999411, was opened at 2004-07-29 01:19 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=999411&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Syndi (synlupri) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SPAM folder disappears Initial Comment: Hi there! I have a friend (not really pc literate) who calls every so often and says his SPAM folder for his Spambayes has disappeared. This in turn causes the SB program to have to be reconfigured and trained all over again. Have you heard of the SPAM folder just disappearing? Or is it a user malfunction (aka: the nut behind the keyboard)? I tend to think its the later. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-07-29 03:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Encourage your friend to look in Deleted Items. The spam folder is almost always found there, as a subfolder. This comes from the user deleting the Spam folder themself, although users typically refuse to believe this at first . See the SB FAQ for more info on this (it is a FAQ!). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=999411&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jul 29 15:10:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jul 29 15:10:27 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-999411 ] SPAM folder disappears Message-ID: Support Requests item #999411, was opened at 2004-07-28 08:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by synlupri You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=999411&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Syndi (synlupri) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: SPAM folder disappears Initial Comment: Hi there! I have a friend (not really pc literate) who calls every so often and says his SPAM folder for his Spambayes has disappeared. This in turn causes the SB program to have to be reconfigured and trained all over again. Have you heard of the SPAM folder just disappearing? Or is it a user malfunction (aka: the nut behind the keyboard)? I tend to think its the later. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Syndi (synlupri) Date: 2004-07-29 08:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1055190 Lol. That's pretty much what I figured. Thanks for the quick response. Again...LOVE the app! Happy Thursday! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one) Date: 2004-07-28 10:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=31435 Encourage your friend to look in Deleted Items. The spam folder is almost always found there, as a subfolder. This comes from the user deleting the Spam folder themself, although users typically refuse to believe this at first . See the SB FAQ for more info on this (it is a FAQ!). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=999411&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Jul 29 18:21:27 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Jul 29 18:21:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1000192 ] Weird Userfield errors in log every day Message-ID: Bugs item #1000192, was opened at 2004-07-29 10:21 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1000192&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Lambert (ranbato) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Weird Userfield errors in log every day Initial Comment: This has no visible effect on Spambayes, but it is odd. See the attached log ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1000192&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 30 02:07:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 30 02:07:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1000427 ] non-English spam; localized filters Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1000427, was opened at 2004-07-30 00:07 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1000427&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Engel (mkengel) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: non-English spam; localized filters Initial Comment: How to deal with spam in a mixture of English/non-English mails* - it seems that they pass easily the filters * in my case English/German/French and Japanese Solution idea: localized filters, one after the other; should be possible to choose upon installation ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1000427&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Jul 30 15:00:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Jul 30 15:00:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1000687 ] Toolbar use crashes Outlook 2003 Message-ID: Bugs item #1000687, was opened at 2004-07-30 09:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1000687&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Buzz Hamilton (hamilb) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Toolbar use crashes Outlook 2003 Initial Comment: Since updating to SP1 of Outlook 2003, any use of the SpamBayes toolbar items causes a Outlook crash and restart with exception 5. The addin is filtering emails and some toolbar activities (i.e. Recover from Spam) is accomplished before the crash. This was happening in 1.0b1 and still happens after updating to 1.0rc2. I did disable through Outlook's customize menu and deleted outcmd.dat. spambayes1.log is 'attached'. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1000687&group_id=61702