From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 1 03:00:03 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 1 03:00:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1067658 ] log file for error message. Message-ID: Support Requests item #1067658, was opened at 2004-11-17 10:56 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1067658&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: v1.0 (example) >Status: Pending Priority: 5 Submitted By: Syndi (synlupri) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: log file for error message. Initial Comment: The following is the latest log file for SB. I've tried installing and uninstalling several times and continue to get "no filterable mail items selected". I am running XPPro, SP1, P4, 512MB Ram, Office 2003, SB ver1.0rc1. Any ideas? Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0rc1 (May 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1) using Python 2.3.3 (#51, Feb 13 2004, 14:39:56) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Personal Folders/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Personal Folders/SPAM' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... ERROR: 'No filterable mail items are selected' SpamBayes - Dis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-22 17:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Any (filterable) message can be filtered. This doesn't mean only new mail - the criteria are in my earlier comment. What do you mean a lot of filtering on every message? (I don't understand the comment at all). We do not recommend pretraining spambayes with a lot of mail. See the wiki: http://entrian.com/sbwiki/TrainingIdeas for extensive discussion. That should work, however, as long as the messages are filterable. Did the folder of messages arrive normally in Outlook? If, for example, they were imported from OE, then the import process may have mangled them (a common problem is Outlook stripping all the headers). To be clear - if you click "Delete as spam" or "Recover from spam" on a message that is regularly recieved by Outlook, do you get the error? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Syndi (synlupri) Date: 2004-11-18 09:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1055190 It is for every message that I was attempting training on. However, today I realized a brand new email came into the junk suspects folder and was able to be recovered from SPAM. So this means that only new messages can be filtered? Yikes that's a whole lot of filtering on every message. Usually I make a folder called SPAM and fill it with all the junk mail before I download SB. Then I train the application program on all those as SPAM and all those presently in the inbox as Good. It just will not let me do this. That error message "no filterable mail items selected" comes up every time I highlight a new message and hit the "delete as spam" button. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-17 13:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does this happen with all messages, or just one in particular? Not every message can be filtered - it has to be mail that has been received (i.e. not sent items or drafts), and has to be messages (i.e. not calendar items, tasks, etc). Some other items (special Outlook messages like anti-virus warnings etc) are also not filterable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1067658&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 1 03:03:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 1 03:03:23 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1072734 ] outlook_addin_register.exe crash Message-ID: Bugs item #1072734, was opened at 2004-11-25 08:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1072734&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jay Thompson (jaythompson) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: outlook_addin_register.exe crash Initial Comment: Had been using SpamBayes for a year, new HDD, reinstalling system all over again. Trying to install in Outlook 2000, with the new SP3 Office update. outlook_addin_register.exe crashes, the installer reports it's finished. Nothing (buttons, etc) shows up in Outlook. The spambayes.log file is empty (zero bytes). The M$ error reporting system txt file contains this: Event viewer, application error says: Faulting application outlook_addin_register.exe, version 0.0.0.0, faulting module msvcrt.dll, version 7.0.2600.2180, fault address 0x0003809e. I've tried this several times, with same result, also after restarting. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-01 15:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Did the Office update fix the Office crashes? If not, perhaps this is a symptom of a larger issue? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jay Thompson (jaythompson) Date: 2004-11-30 07:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1165628 I just tried the fix suggested: [ 1059170 ] SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash http://sourceforge.net/tracker/? group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=d etail&aid=1059170 But got the identical crash. The version number of the replacement msvcrt.dll that I have is 7.0.2600.0 I don't know if I have any other problems with the .dll, I don't know how to check. But generally, my system is running well, with only the typical amount of XP instabilities. I had been experiencing some random Office crashes, which is why Windows suggested I update Office 2000 to the lastest set of patches/service packs. Since these were relatively new updates I thought that might be why I couldn't get it to install. Unless you have some other tricks to share, I guess I'll have to find some other spam manager, which is a drag as SpamBayes had worked well for me for some time. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-26 15:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a dupe of [ 1059170 ] SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=1059170 Which is strange - our best guess for this is that you have a bad msvcrt.dll. Do you have any other problems with it? The fix suggested in the above tracker might work - it would be worth trying. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1072734&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 1 03:16:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 1 03:17:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-809665 ] Installation and automated Update problems Message-ID: Bugs item #809665, was opened at 2003-09-20 20:07 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809665&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Outlook 008 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Out of Date Priority: 5 Submitted By: Christoph Obernd?rfer (baloons) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Installation and automated Update problems Initial Comment: Hello forum, there are two issues I want to tell you: First one is a problem with the installation on WindowsXP with OutlookXP. At the end of the installation process, there is the error-message, that the spambayes_addin.dll couldn't be initialized. Then I tried to initialize it manually as plugin into OutlookXP but that did nothing. At last, I copied the file into the MSOutlook Addin-folder and initialized it as Outlook-plugin... voilla Seccond one is the automated update feature. When running it, the following message comes up: There was an error checking for the latest version. Fot specific errors on the error, please see the SpamBayes log. Please check your internet connection, or try again later. In the log, there is the following entry: ERROR: 'There was an error checking for the latest version\r\nFor specific details on the error, please see the SpamBayes log\r\n\r\nPlease check your internet connection, or try again later' Traceback (most recent call last): File "out1.pyz/addin", line 530, in CheckLatestVersion File "out1.pyz/spambayes.Version", line 145, in fetch_latest_dict File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 136, in urlopen File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 843, in do_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 353, in error File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 479, in http_error_302 File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 333, in open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 849, in http_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 843, in do_open File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 359, in error File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 313, in _call_chain File "out1.pyz/urllib2", line 419, in http_error_default HTTPError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found I have a permanent on connection via a DSL-Router. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-01 15:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I suspect that these both no longer apply (apologies for the lack of response). If anyone is experiencing these with 1.0.1, please re-open. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Douglas A. Seifert (seifertd) Date: 2003-10-04 05:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=591390 I experience this as well during install on Windows XP ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=809665&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 1 10:03:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 1 10:03:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1076595 ] Feature request: Windows dll/.net to use in other program Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1076595, was opened at 2004-12-01 10:03 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1076595&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patric (likit) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Windows dll/.net to use in other program Initial Comment: Hi, I have plan to build an messagefilter for our companys exchange-server for spam-classified. I use spambayers on clientside but i will have it on serverside so the webaccess will process and filter spam/ham to right folder. I think that the dll/.net-class shuld have (3) functions like classifieMessage, processAsSpam, processAsHam Best regards Patric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1076595&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 1 20:07:50 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 1 20:07:54 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1072734 ] outlook_addin_register.exe crash Message-ID: Bugs item #1072734, was opened at 2004-11-24 11:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jaythompson You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1072734&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jay Thompson (jaythompson) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: outlook_addin_register.exe crash Initial Comment: Had been using SpamBayes for a year, new HDD, reinstalling system all over again. Trying to install in Outlook 2000, with the new SP3 Office update. outlook_addin_register.exe crashes, the installer reports it's finished. Nothing (buttons, etc) shows up in Outlook. The spambayes.log file is empty (zero bytes). The M$ error reporting system txt file contains this: Event viewer, application error says: Faulting application outlook_addin_register.exe, version 0.0.0.0, faulting module msvcrt.dll, version 7.0.2600.2180, fault address 0x0003809e. I've tried this several times, with same result, also after restarting. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jay Thompson (jaythompson) Date: 2004-12-01 11:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1165628 Yes, it did. (knock on wood.) I suspect there is some other issue complicating this. I sent the bug report to see if anyone else had experieced any installation errors with the Office SP3 updates. It sounds like there haven't been any, so it's likely some other conflict. I had a recent install of Plone/Zope on the same box, which I just removed to see if that was doing it. (I was also getting pythonw crashes.) Too early to say, but so far, things seem stable again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-30 18:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Did the Office update fix the Office crashes? If not, perhaps this is a symptom of a larger issue? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jay Thompson (jaythompson) Date: 2004-11-29 10:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1165628 I just tried the fix suggested: [ 1059170 ] SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash http://sourceforge.net/tracker/? group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=d etail&aid=1059170 But got the identical crash. The version number of the replacement msvcrt.dll that I have is 7.0.2600.0 I don't know if I have any other problems with the .dll, I don't know how to check. But generally, my system is running well, with only the typical amount of XP instabilities. I had been experiencing some random Office crashes, which is why Windows suggested I update Office 2000 to the lastest set of patches/service packs. Since these were relatively new updates I thought that might be why I couldn't get it to install. Unless you have some other tricks to share, I guess I'll have to find some other spam manager, which is a drag as SpamBayes had worked well for me for some time. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-25 18:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a dupe of [ 1059170 ] SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=1059170 Which is strange - our best guess for this is that you have a bad msvcrt.dll. Do you have any other problems with it? The fix suggested in the above tracker might work - it would be worth trying. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1072734&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 1 23:22:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 1 23:22:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1076595 ] Feature request: Windows dll/.net to use in other program Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1076595, was opened at 2004-12-01 22:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1076595&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patric (likit) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Windows dll/.net to use in other program Initial Comment: Hi, I have plan to build an messagefilter for our companys exchange-server for spam-classified. I use spambayers on clientside but i will have it on serverside so the webaccess will process and filter spam/ham to right folder. I think that the dll/.net-class shuld have (3) functions like classifieMessage, processAsSpam, processAsHam Best regards Patric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-02 11:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This thing about this is that SpamBayes is open-source, so it's really trivial to just get the source and use it to build what you want. The code is all well documented and should be simple to understand - but the people on spambayes-dev would probably be willing to help out anyway. You probably want to start with the tokenizer.py and classifier.py modules. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1076595&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 2 00:53:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 2 00:53:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1076595 ] Feature request: Windows dll/.net to use in other program Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1076595, was opened at 2004-12-01 10:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by likit You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1076595&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patric (likit) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Windows dll/.net to use in other program Initial Comment: Hi, I have plan to build an messagefilter for our companys exchange-server for spam-classified. I use spambayers on clientside but i will have it on serverside so the webaccess will process and filter spam/ham to right folder. I think that the dll/.net-class shuld have (3) functions like classifieMessage, processAsSpam, processAsHam Best regards Patric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Patric (likit) Date: 2004-12-02 00:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=671964 My big problem to build the dll in python is that I can't the python-language that I must learn me before I start... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-01 23:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This thing about this is that SpamBayes is open-source, so it's really trivial to just get the source and use it to build what you want. The code is all well documented and should be simple to understand - but the people on spambayes-dev would probably be willing to help out anyway. You probably want to start with the tokenizer.py and classifier.py modules. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1076595&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 2 01:09:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 2 01:09:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1076595 ] Feature request: Windows dll/.net to use in other program Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1076595, was opened at 2004-12-01 22:03 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1076595&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Patric (likit) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Feature request: Windows dll/.net to use in other program Initial Comment: Hi, I have plan to build an messagefilter for our companys exchange-server for spam-classified. I use spambayers on clientside but i will have it on serverside so the webaccess will process and filter spam/ham to right folder. I think that the dll/.net-class shuld have (3) functions like classifieMessage, processAsSpam, processAsHam Best regards Patric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-02 13:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Python is *extremely* easy to learn, especially if you already know another language. The existing scripts probably have all the functions you need, anyway, so you'd just have to pick the ones you want and then write the appropriate py2exe script to create the dll. Have you considered just running sb_xmlrpcserver.py and then just sending messages to/from that? It would certainly be simple, and has the advantage of using existing scripts and keeping the SpamBayes state separate and alive across filtering sessions (for speed). The sb_bnfilter/sb_bnserver scripts (sb_bnserver is also implemented in C) do this sort of thing, but without the XML RPC, but are *nix only. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Patric (likit) Date: 2004-12-02 12:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=671964 My big problem to build the dll in python is that I can't the python-language that I must learn me before I start... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-02 11:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This thing about this is that SpamBayes is open-source, so it's really trivial to just get the source and use it to build what you want. The code is all well documented and should be simple to understand - but the people on spambayes-dev would probably be willing to help out anyway. You probably want to start with the tokenizer.py and classifier.py modules. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1076595&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 2 16:00:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 2 16:00:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1077626 ] lost attachments in inbox Message-ID: Bugs item #1077626, was opened at 2004-12-02 15:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1077626&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: nobody (acspam) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: lost attachments in inbox Initial Comment: Hi, Just installed program on outlook 2002. All working ok with excellent filtering but when downloading email with large 4mb attachments the attachment disappears ? or changes into a blank text file.? What is happening? I see the attachement being picked up but I cannot access them through the message. AC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1077626&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 3 00:46:45 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 3 00:46:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-858925 ] Add notification sound to Outlook addin Message-ID: Patches item #858925, was opened at 2003-12-13 03:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=858925&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) >Assigned to: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Summary: Add notification sound to Outlook addin Initial Comment: This patch adds support for playing notification sounds when messages are processed by SpamBayes. The attached ZIP file contains 3 diff files to patch files in the Outlook2000 directory, and a notification_sound_patch.txt file that describes the notification sound feature and how to configure it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-03 12:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Kenny - how would you feel about committing this to CVS Head at some point? We still get regular requests for it, and I don't see that it could hurt going into 1.1a1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-18 12:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. There are a *lot* of experimental/new features that will be present in the next release that weren't in 1.0a7 as a result of dumping the 1_0_release branch and the current popularity of 'x-' options. I suppose these don't effect the plug-in in any obvious way, but they are still there in the background (apart from the web interface changes). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-18 03:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I agree that we shouldn't be adding any new features, especially experimental ones, to the 1.0 release. A branch sounds like a good idea, and fits with the branching strategy discussed earlier on spambayes-dev. Either a single branch for all new features or a separate branch per feature is fine with me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 19:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm reluctant to include this in the trunk at this stage. How would you feel about it going on a branch, and after 1.0 we integrate it? If we are really keen, we could build "experimental" binaries for people as we go (but these would not be official) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=858925&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 3 00:51:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 3 00:51:13 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1077626 ] lost attachments in inbox Message-ID: Bugs item #1077626, was opened at 2004-12-03 04:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1077626&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: nobody (acspam) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: lost attachments in inbox Initial Comment: Hi, Just installed program on outlook 2002. All working ok with excellent filtering but when downloading email with large 4mb attachments the attachment disappears ? or changes into a blank text file.? What is happening? I see the attachement being picked up but I cannot access them through the message. AC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-03 12:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes doesn't alter the message content at all (apart from entering a value in an Outlook field), so it's hard to see how this could be SpamBayes. The most likely situation is that your mail provider is doing this, possibly as some sort of anti-virus protection. If you uninstall SpamBayes, does the problem go away? (You can uninstall and reinstall without losing any configuration or training data). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1077626&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 3 22:46:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 3 22:46:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-858925 ] Add notification sound to Outlook addin Message-ID: Patches item #858925, was opened at 2003-12-12 09:22 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=858925&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Assigned to: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Summary: Add notification sound to Outlook addin Initial Comment: This patch adds support for playing notification sounds when messages are processed by SpamBayes. The attached ZIP file contains 3 diff files to patch files in the Outlook2000 directory, and a notification_sound_patch.txt file that describes the notification sound feature and how to configure it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-03 16:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I've checked the changes into latest CVS. The next step will be to provide a Notifications tab in SpamBayes Manager for configuring the sounds. Until then, you can configure it according to the original instructions in this patch. The only difference is that I placed the settings in a separate section called "Notification" instead of in the "Experimental" section. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-02 18:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Kenny - how would you feel about committing this to CVS Head at some point? We still get regular requests for it, and I don't see that it could hurt going into 1.1a1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-12-17 18:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. There are a *lot* of experimental/new features that will be present in the next release that weren't in 1.0a7 as a result of dumping the 1_0_release branch and the current popularity of 'x-' options. I suppose these don't effect the plug-in in any obvious way, but they are still there in the background (apart from the web interface changes). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-12-17 09:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I agree that we shouldn't be adding any new features, especially experimental ones, to the 1.0 release. A branch sounds like a good idea, and fits with the branching strategy discussed earlier on spambayes-dev. Either a single branch for all new features or a separate branch per feature is fine with me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2003-12-17 01:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 I'm reluctant to include this in the trunk at this stage. How would you feel about it going on a branch, and after 1.0 we integrate it? If we are really keen, we could build "experimental" binaries for people as we go (but these would not be official) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=858925&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 3 22:53:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 3 22:54:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-793478 ] Plugin for Mozilla Mail Message-ID: Feature Requests item #793478, was opened at 2003-08-22 16:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=793478&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Tim Urberg (tim273) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Plugin for Mozilla Mail Initial Comment: Create a plugin for Mozilla Mail/Mozilla Thunderbird that is similar to the Outlook plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-03 16:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Noted dupe in [ 895290 ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Matt Gerrans (mattgerrans) Date: 2004-09-22 15:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=481624 One additional thing the Outlook plugin does is add a Spam percentage column to your folder view, allowing you to sort a folder by likelihood of being spam. This makes training new spam (and ham) a lot easier, in contrast with Thunderbirds binary spam or not icon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Isaac Arias (ikester) Date: 2004-02-11 18:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=570853 The Mozilla/Thunderbird community is interested in improving the junk mail filter functionality of Thunderbird using the SpamBayes approach. The current implementation is apparently not working well for many users and they are looking at SpamBayes as a better solution. You can view the current discussion about it at: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181534 In my opinion, building the SpamBayes algorithms directly into Thunderbird's junk mail handling would be even better than developing a plug-in/extension as proposed here. It would be sad to see talent wasted by having two different teams work on the same feature when they could work together. Specially since it seems neither sub-project has taken off yet in a significant way. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-08-25 19:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The plugin provides a toolbar with three buttons: "delete as spam" moves the currently selected message to the spam folder and does the appropriate training (this is not visible in the spam folder). "recover from spam" does the opposite, basically. The third button opens up a dialog that lets the user configure the plugin, train, and filter one or more folders. Once setup, the plug-in also filters all incoming mail in the folders it is set to watch. Let me know if you need any more details. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Romain Guy (gfx) Date: 2003-08-25 11:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=6845 Can somebody describe me exactly what does the Outlook plugin do ? I'm volunteer to create a Mozilla Mail plugin. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=793478&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 3 22:54:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 3 22:54:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-895290 ] Integrate into Mozilla Thunderbird Message-ID: Feature Requests item #895290, was opened at 2004-02-11 18:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=895290&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Isaac Arias (ikester) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Integrate into Mozilla Thunderbird Initial Comment: Some users of Mozilla Thunderbird are very interested in improving the junk mail filter functionality of Thunderbird using the SpamBayes approach. The current implementation is apparently not working well for many users and they are looking at SpamBayes as a better solution. You can view the current discussion about it at: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181534 In my opinion, building the SpamBayes algorithms directly into Thunderbird's junk mail handling would be even better than developing a plug-in/extension as proposed below in [ 793478 ] Plugin for Mozilla Mail although there may be a complelling reason for not doing so that I'm not currently aware of. It would be sad to see talent wasted by having two different teams work on the same feature when they could work together. Specially since it seems neither sub-project has taken off yet in a significant way. I see that the Outlook plugin and the pop3proxy are managed as different applications. Perhaps this could be handled in a similar fashion. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-03 16:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Dupe of RFE [ 793478 ] Plugin for Mozilla Mail ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-04 20:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Tim gets a lot of email and doesn't have time for it all. You shouldn't ever need to email any of the developers privately - use one of the mailing lists, or this sourceforge system. http://spambayes.org/contact.html You're welcome to develop a plug-in, although the general consensus among the existing developers is that since the Thunderbird developers are integrating spambayes ideas into their filter, it's not worth duplicating their work. If you need any help, you can ask on spambayes-dev (see link above). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alex Grigoriev (ratter) Date: 2004-10-02 03:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=314177 I want to develop mozilla mail/thunderbird plugin to integrate it with SpamBayes. I've written a letter to tim_one some days ago, there was no reply. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=895290&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 3 22:58:59 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 3 22:59:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-800487 ] Don't count classified spam as new mail Message-ID: Feature Requests item #800487, was opened at 2003-09-04 10:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=800487&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Russell Leake (leaker) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Don't count classified spam as new mail Initial Comment: I found what "turns me on" and "off" to spam filters is their ability NOT to falsely indicate the arrival of new mail. If a message is classified as spam, it would be nice if SpamBayes would not indicate it as new mail (sounds/tray icon envelope). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-03 16:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 I just checked in a notification sound mechanism to latest CVS. There isn't any UI for configuring it yet, so for now you'll need to configure it manually as per the instructions in patch [ 858925]. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=858925&group_id=61702&atid=498105 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Paul Turpie (turpie) Date: 2004-11-04 19:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=374613 What might be a simple solution/work-around would be hto ave SpamBayes play a sound when it classifies a message as ham. I could then disable Outlooks builtin notification feature which plays a sound whenever any message is received even if its junk. You could also do the reverse and play a sound when spam is detected, I'm sure some people would enjoy hearing their spam going through the shredder. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dale W. Freck (dwfreck) Date: 2003-10-06 12:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=881319 Greetings. With respect to FAQ 3.9, it says, "Until someone comes up with a clever solution for all of this...". It looks like someone has: the author of Spammunition, a free bayesian Outlook add-in. Spammunition is similar to SpamBayes (I like SpamBayes better; it's more effective), but Spammunition includes an option to turn off the "new mail" icon if it moves spam out of your Inbox and there are no unread mesages remaining there. Outlook will still play a sound/open a pop-up when something arrives, if you have Outlook configured that way. With Outlook configured to play a sound, and Spammunition configured to turn off the icon when appropriate, you know spam has arrived because you'll hear the sound, but the icon doesn't show up. Spammunition hasn't been updated in quite a while, but the author posted a news item on his web site saying he was trying to make it an open source project, so perhaps you could recruit him... See http://www.upserve.com for information. I've sent him an e-mail referencing this project. Sincerely, Dale Freck ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-04 18:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. That is an interesting idea. I'll change this back to open and see what Mark thinks of it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Russell Leake (leaker) Date: 2003-09-04 18:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=676711 All too clear now. Thank you for your prompt response. An alternative solution would be to create a spambayes icon and update it upon success or filter. An example that I have seen is JunkOut (which uses a Bayesian filter also). Just a suggestion. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-04 18:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please read FAQ 3.9. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=800487&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sat Dec 4 16:53:36 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sat Dec 4 16:53:39 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1078923 ] Unicode support incomplete Message-ID: Bugs item #1078923, was opened at 2004-12-04 10:53 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1078923&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Bjornsson (mbjornsson) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unicode support incomplete Initial Comment: When selecting the "Show Data Folder" in the Advanced tab a dialog pops up, complaining that: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\fxa' in position 30: ordinal not in range (128). And in my case here is indeed a non-ascii symbol in the path. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1078923&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Dec 5 10:38:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Dec 5 10:38:50 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774978 ] Hide envelope icon when only spam received Message-ID: Feature Requests item #774978, was opened at 2003-07-21 14:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mkabcde You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received Initial Comment: When during automatic receiving session only spam messages was received it is desired to remove envelope icon from tray. Probably this option should be switched off by default with the possibility to switch it on from the configuration file. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martin Kirchner (mkabcde) Date: 2004-12-05 10:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1171109 Hello everybody! I wrote my own vba-macro which checks ALL my Outlook folders under "Inbox". The macro "CountUnreadMessages" is called from Application_NewMail in ThisOutlookSession. It has also the possibility to skip certain folders. Just rename the folder and add "_" as last character of the name. I know this solution is not quite sophisticated however it works fine. The program triggers a beep but you could also open a messagebox or like I did invoke the assistant which does some funny stuff. I solved the problem with the normal Outlook notification by deactivating the "New Mail"-sound and always hiding the icon in the SysTray. HTH Martin If you have problems just ask. Here the code (Maybe you have to tune the waiting time according to the number of messages you get): Public Sub CountUnreadMessages() On Error GoTo ErrorHandler Wait.WaitTime (10) 'Wait 10 seconds to allow SpamBayes to do its work Dim Inbox As Outlook.MAPIFolder Dim Subfolders As Outlook.MAPIFolder Set Inbox = GetNamespace("MAPI"). GetDefaultFolder(olFolderInbox) Dim nUnreadMessages As Integer nUnreadMessages = CountUnreadMessagesInFolder(Inbox) Set Inbox = Nothing If nUnreadMessages > 0 Then 'do whatever you want MsgBow("You have " & nUnreadMessages & " messages") Beep End If Exit Sub ErrorHandler: MsgBox Err.Number & " :" & Error(Err.Number) Close #1 Set Inbox = Nothing End Sub Private Function CountUnreadMessagesInFolder(oFolder As Outlook.MAPIFolder) As Integer 'Folders which shall not be searched must end with "_". Their subfolders will not be searched If Right(oFolder.Name, 1) = "_" Then CountUnreadMessagesInFolder = 0 Exit Function End If 'count mails in subfolders Dim i As Integer Dim nUnreadMailsSubFolders As Integer For i = 1 To oFolder.Folders.count nUnreadMailsSubFolders = nUnreadMailsSubFolders + CountUnreadMessagesInFolder(oFolder.Folders(i)) Next i 'count mails in current folder Dim j As Integer Dim nUnreadMailsHere As Integer Dim oCurMailItem As MailItem For j = 1 To oFolder.Items.count If oFolder.Items(j).UnRead Then nUnreadMailsHere = nUnreadMailsHere + 1 Next j CountUnreadMessagesInFolder = nUnreadMailsSubFolders + nUnreadMailsHere End Function Public Sub WaitTime(sec As Integer) Dim Start, Ende, Gesamtdauer Start = Timer 'set starting time Do While Timer < Start + sec DoEvents 'process other events Loop End Sub ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-29 22:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in: [ 1075410 ] Mail notification if new ham detected https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1075410&group_id=61702&atid=498106 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-09-30 17:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Thanks for the input, but the real problem is not being able to clear the icon (I've already got Python code based on an earlier comment that will do that) but rather knowing *when* to clear the icon. The problem is that SpamBayes only knows about a small subset of the Outlook mail folders. A user can configure Outlook rules to move messages to other folders that SpamBayes doesn't know about, so it is difficult for SpamBayes to be certain when there are *no* other unread messages anywhere in Outlook. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Gerard Roche (balfbalf) Date: 2004-09-30 02:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=363795 Have you seen this: http://www.outlookcode.com/d/code/clearenvicon.htm It maybe able to help with this bloody annoying problem. :) Cheers, Gerard ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: JJJJust (jjjjust) Date: 2004-08-04 14:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1093702 A simpler workaround (Tested only in Outlook 2000) is to read all your non-spam e-mail first, then you can look at your spam e-mail, then you can right click on your Junk E-Mail folder and click Mark All as Read. That gets rid of the envelope for me. Tedious, yes... but it works. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: edaly (edaly) Date: 2004-06-05 02:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1057156 Any news on when we can expect this feature? I recently installed SpamBayes and it's a great program but the envelope icon is killing me. I like to answer email right away so I find myself constantly flipping to Outlook only to find no new messages there because it was spam. Interestingly, my old beta copy of Cloudmark SpamNet doesn't have this problem. It removes the envelope icon when the message is deleted and marked as read. Even if I had an option in SpamBayes to remove the envelope icon whenever SpamBayes detected spam (regardless of whether there was other new mail there or not), I would turn it on. Please please please get this feature in soon! thanks, Erin Daly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-03-02 16:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Notification sounds for SpamBayes have already been implemented, but not integrated into the release version yet. Sounds like we're getting enough requests for this that we might want to merge it, at least as a "config-file-only" experimental option. See Patch #858925: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? func=detail&aid=858925&group_id=61702&atid=498105 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2004-03-02 14:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 Just turn off the outlook notification (under advanced e-mail options). I don't use sound much so I didn't add that, but it's probably not too hard. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2004-03-01 23:46 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Mark, I just downloaded your program and it seems to work fine. Unfortionately i still need the macro (see below) to get rid of the original outlook mail notification. This macro also eliminates all sounds of incoming mail/ham. Isn't it possible to do this all in your program? To have a audible notification on ham and silence on spam? No icon (not even a blue or black one) when spam is received and a mail notification when ham is received? I very much like that i can now see the number of emails i have received in contrast to "You have unread items" which is the normal outlook notification. Keep up the good work! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark F Garrison (garrmark) Date: 2004-03-01 21:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=726010 I wrote a C# program to replace the outlook notify icon w/ my own. The code for this is at http://codeproject.com/csharp/gmcdoexmail.asp ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Bob Hamans (bchamans) Date: 2003-10-13 14:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=866934 Reacting on all before. Would'nt it be the best option to allow a rule or macro to be defined that can be runned after spam and ham is processed? In other words an extra option in the spambayes filtering dialog. [Move] spam to folder [...] [X] Mark spam as read [X] Process following rule or macro [...] Indeed the macro proposed by Ghuron does exactly that. It does not block the sounds though. More info on the macro on http://www.slipstick.com/dev/code/clearenvicon.htm#info ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-10 00:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Mark - what do you think of the idea of providing our own icon in the tray (and a sound) when we classify mail as [user- defined selection of ham/unsure/spam]? In your opinion, do you think that we could successfully determine when these messages were read so that we could clear the flag? Would you be opposed to this rather off-topic feature appearing in the plug-in? If your comments are positive, then I might try and write some code to do this at some point, if only to stop the incessant requests for this feature <wink>. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-10-10 00:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 >From the list: My outlook always plays a sound when new mails do arrive - also when new spam comes in. Since 90% of my mails are spam, this is really nerving. If spambayes could give out a sound when no-spam-mails arrive, then I could switch off the the standard-sound of outlook and only Spambayes reports "good" mails. Then we again have a true accustical message, when important mail arrive and are not irritated by spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Graham Bartlett (grab_rat) Date: 2003-09-26 19:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=633868 I'm not a Visual Basic/Windows expert. But having used Outlook for a while, I *can* tell you that setting emails to "read" status stops the envelope icon coming up. This would probably be the easiest fix, and would also stop the spam folder coming up with bold text to draw your attention to it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 17:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 17:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron) Date: 2003-07-21 15:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=824558 Sorry, duplicated to #774908. Too bad that nothing can be done here ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Dec 5 17:49:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Dec 5 17:49:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-958506 ] Fetching mail not always happens Message-ID: Bugs item #958506, was opened at 2004-05-22 15:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by be037446 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jos (be037446) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fetching mail not always happens Initial Comment: I'm using the Opera 7.50 mail client in combination with the Spambayes proxy. I notice that Opera is not always fetching e-mails although there are e-mails waiting at my ISP. I have 4 account divided over 2 ISP and it happens with all 4 of them but never together. It's a very irregular pattern. When I change the e-mail configuration to fetch e-mails directly from the ISP instead of passing the proxy, there is no problem at all. So, I assume there is a problem with the Spambayes proxy. I also tried the Mozilla e-mail client Thunderbird and I have the same problems there. So, it isn't related to Opera alone. Before that, I always used the Outlook plug-in and never had a problem. Any ideas ? Kind regards, Jos. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-12-05 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 I tried the latest version op Spambayes (1.01) and I still have the same problem. I'm using the latest version of Mozilla Thunderbird. It seems I will have go back to MS Outlook because Spambayes worked well under these circumstances. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-06-06 10:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 Sorry guys but it seems I overlooked something. Added another log (found in the command line window) with clearly some errors. I hope this can clearify something. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-06-06 10:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 New log added. This time only one account activated for spamfiltering. The other accounts retrieve their mail directly with no problem. So, even with one account the problem persists. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-06-06 09:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 No errors in Opera nor Thunderbird nor anywhere else. I will set only one account to pass through the filter and send another log. Perhaps it's more clear to read then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 01:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Yes, it is hard to read with the two accounts (three at the top) intermixed. It definately does see that there are 14/3 messages, and gets the uidl for each. Then the log ends with two "REPR 1" commands (I presume one for each account). The log should then have the REPR responses (the whole body of the message, but the octet count), which it doesn't. I'm not sure why the log stops, though - I can't see how it would stop without some error occuring. Do you get any error in the log? Or any error in Opera? (like a timeout, or something?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-05-29 09:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 No, as I want to use Opera to be my primary mail client, I don't leave the messages on the server. But I have the same problem with the Mozilla e-mail client which is configured to leave the messages on the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-27 21:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Do you have Opera configured to leave messages on the server? I'm only so-so at reading POP3 logs, especially with the two accounts intermixed, but this is what it looks like to me: 1. successful log in to acct be35926 2. stat command reports 14 total messages 3. mail client downloads the list of identifiers for the 14 messages 4. client assumedly determines that all of the listed identifiers have been previously downloaded so it doesn't download them again ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-05-27 19:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 See the attach file. There are indeed messages waiting but they aren't fetched. It's funny but it always happens with the same accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 01:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It would be very odd if this was the proxy - all it does is proxy (i.e. directly pass the commands through), unless it's doing a RETR (or sometimes TOP) command, when it classifies the message. To not fetch the messages, I presume that the mail client is getting back a 0 response from the LIST, which is just proxied. If you set the [globals]verbose option to True ('-o globals:verbose:True' on the command line should do, or in your bayescustomise), then you should get a _pop3proxy.log file created that logs the POP3 conversation. Could you do that and attach a copy here that covers a time when this happens? (Check the log for any confidential data; I can't remember what it does with username/passwords). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 6 00:29:32 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 6 00:29:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1078923 ] Unicode support incomplete Message-ID: Bugs item #1078923, was opened at 2004-12-05 04:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1078923&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Bjornsson (mbjornsson) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Unicode support incomplete Initial Comment: When selecting the "Show Data Folder" in the Advanced tab a dialog pops up, complaining that: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\fxa' in position 30: ordinal not in range (128). And in my case here is indeed a non-ascii symbol in the path. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-06 12:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Thanks. Fixed in CVS and will backport, so this will be fixed in 1.0.2 and 1.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1078923&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 6 21:01:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 6 21:01:54 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1072734 ] outlook_addin_register.exe crash Message-ID: Bugs item #1072734, was opened at 2004-11-24 11:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jaythompson You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1072734&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jay Thompson (jaythompson) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: outlook_addin_register.exe crash Initial Comment: Had been using SpamBayes for a year, new HDD, reinstalling system all over again. Trying to install in Outlook 2000, with the new SP3 Office update. outlook_addin_register.exe crashes, the installer reports it's finished. Nothing (buttons, etc) shows up in Outlook. The spambayes.log file is empty (zero bytes). The M$ error reporting system txt file contains this: Event viewer, application error says: Faulting application outlook_addin_register.exe, version 0.0.0.0, faulting module msvcrt.dll, version 7.0.2600.2180, fault address 0x0003809e. I've tried this several times, with same result, also after restarting. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jay Thompson (jaythompson) Date: 2004-12-06 12:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1165628 Final resolution: I de-installed SpamBayes via the Windows control panel add/delete programs (it was showing up there, even though it wasn't showing up in Outlook) and then the plugin installed normally when I tried it again. I've got no idea why it worked, and was surprised to see it show up in the list of installed programs. Thanks for the offered suggestions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jay Thompson (jaythompson) Date: 2004-12-01 11:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1165628 Yes, it did. (knock on wood.) I suspect there is some other issue complicating this. I sent the bug report to see if anyone else had experieced any installation errors with the Office SP3 updates. It sounds like there haven't been any, so it's likely some other conflict. I had a recent install of Plone/Zope on the same box, which I just removed to see if that was doing it. (I was also getting pythonw crashes.) Too early to say, but so far, things seem stable again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-30 18:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Did the Office update fix the Office crashes? If not, perhaps this is a symptom of a larger issue? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jay Thompson (jaythompson) Date: 2004-11-29 10:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1165628 I just tried the fix suggested: [ 1059170 ] SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash http://sourceforge.net/tracker/? group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=d etail&aid=1059170 But got the identical crash. The version number of the replacement msvcrt.dll that I have is 7.0.2600.0 I don't know if I have any other problems with the .dll, I don't know how to check. But generally, my system is running well, with only the typical amount of XP instabilities. I had been experiencing some random Office crashes, which is why Windows suggested I update Office 2000 to the lastest set of patches/service packs. Since these were relatively new updates I thought that might be why I couldn't get it to install. Unless you have some other tricks to share, I guess I'll have to find some other spam manager, which is a drag as SpamBayes had worked well for me for some time. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-25 18:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a dupe of [ 1059170 ] SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=1059170 Which is strange - our best guess for this is that you have a bad msvcrt.dll. Do you have any other problems with it? The fix suggested in the above tracker might work - it would be worth trying. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1072734&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 7 01:37:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 7 01:37:27 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1072734 ] outlook_addin_register.exe crash Message-ID: Bugs item #1072734, was opened at 2004-11-25 08:59 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1072734&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jay Thompson (jaythompson) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: outlook_addin_register.exe crash Initial Comment: Had been using SpamBayes for a year, new HDD, reinstalling system all over again. Trying to install in Outlook 2000, with the new SP3 Office update. outlook_addin_register.exe crashes, the installer reports it's finished. Nothing (buttons, etc) shows up in Outlook. The spambayes.log file is empty (zero bytes). The M$ error reporting system txt file contains this: Event viewer, application error says: Faulting application outlook_addin_register.exe, version 0.0.0.0, faulting module msvcrt.dll, version 7.0.2600.2180, fault address 0x0003809e. I've tried this several times, with same result, also after restarting. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-07 13:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Hmm. I don't really know whether to close this or not, but I guess I will, and write it off to some one-off combination of variables. We can always re-open if it reoccurs, and there isn't any way I can see of investigating this further. Thanks for the update. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jay Thompson (jaythompson) Date: 2004-12-07 09:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1165628 Final resolution: I de-installed SpamBayes via the Windows control panel add/delete programs (it was showing up there, even though it wasn't showing up in Outlook) and then the plugin installed normally when I tried it again. I've got no idea why it worked, and was surprised to see it show up in the list of installed programs. Thanks for the offered suggestions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jay Thompson (jaythompson) Date: 2004-12-02 08:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1165628 Yes, it did. (knock on wood.) I suspect there is some other issue complicating this. I sent the bug report to see if anyone else had experieced any installation errors with the Office SP3 updates. It sounds like there haven't been any, so it's likely some other conflict. I had a recent install of Plone/Zope on the same box, which I just removed to see if that was doing it. (I was also getting pythonw crashes.) Too early to say, but so far, things seem stable again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-01 15:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Did the Office update fix the Office crashes? If not, perhaps this is a symptom of a larger issue? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jay Thompson (jaythompson) Date: 2004-11-30 07:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1165628 I just tried the fix suggested: [ 1059170 ] SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash http://sourceforge.net/tracker/? group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=d etail&aid=1059170 But got the identical crash. The version number of the replacement msvcrt.dll that I have is 7.0.2600.0 I don't know if I have any other problems with the .dll, I don't know how to check. But generally, my system is running well, with only the typical amount of XP instabilities. I had been experiencing some random Office crashes, which is why Windows suggested I update Office 2000 to the lastest set of patches/service packs. Since these were relatively new updates I thought that might be why I couldn't get it to install. Unless you have some other tricks to share, I guess I'll have to find some other spam manager, which is a drag as SpamBayes had worked well for me for some time. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-26 15:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is a dupe of [ 1059170 ] SpamBayes-1.0 msvcrt.dll install crash http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=1059170 Which is strange - our best guess for this is that you have a bad msvcrt.dll. Do you have any other problems with it? The fix suggested in the above tracker might work - it would be worth trying. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1072734&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 7 10:36:46 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 7 10:36:50 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1077626 ] lost attachments in inbox Message-ID: Bugs item #1077626, was opened at 2004-12-02 15:00 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by acspam You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1077626&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: nobody (acspam) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: lost attachments in inbox Initial Comment: Hi, Just installed program on outlook 2002. All working ok with excellent filtering but when downloading email with large 4mb attachments the attachment disappears ? or changes into a blank text file.? What is happening? I see the attachement being picked up but I cannot access them through the message. AC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: nobody (acspam) Date: 2004-12-07 09:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1170448 Hi there, Uninstalled program and tested attachements, all ok as you suggested. Re-installed SpamBayes picked up the same attachment and the problem no longer exists. I have no idea what went wrong. Thanks for the help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-02 23:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 SpamBayes doesn't alter the message content at all (apart from entering a value in an Outlook field), so it's hard to see how this could be SpamBayes. The most likely situation is that your mail provider is doing this, possibly as some sort of anti-virus protection. If you uninstall SpamBayes, does the problem go away? (You can uninstall and reinstall without losing any configuration or training data). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1077626&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 7 19:44:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 7 19:44:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-958506 ] Fetching mail not always happens Message-ID: Bugs item #958506, was opened at 2004-05-22 15:47 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by be037446 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 Category: pop3proxy Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jos (be037446) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Fetching mail not always happens Initial Comment: I'm using the Opera 7.50 mail client in combination with the Spambayes proxy. I notice that Opera is not always fetching e-mails although there are e-mails waiting at my ISP. I have 4 account divided over 2 ISP and it happens with all 4 of them but never together. It's a very irregular pattern. When I change the e-mail configuration to fetch e-mails directly from the ISP instead of passing the proxy, there is no problem at all. So, I assume there is a problem with the Spambayes proxy. I also tried the Mozilla e-mail client Thunderbird and I have the same problems there. So, it isn't related to Opera alone. Before that, I always used the Outlook plug-in and never had a problem. Any ideas ? Kind regards, Jos. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-12-07 19:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 New developments. When I configure my mailaccount to only fetch the mail headers, then there is no problem. But some message can't be displayed. So basicly, the problem stays but at least I got a bit further. Isn't there anyone with the same problem ? I can't believe you guys all use MS Outlook. Regards, Jos. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-12-05 17:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 I tried the latest version op Spambayes (1.01) and I still have the same problem. I'm using the latest version of Mozilla Thunderbird. It seems I will have go back to MS Outlook because Spambayes worked well under these circumstances. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-06-06 10:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 Sorry guys but it seems I overlooked something. Added another log (found in the command line window) with clearly some errors. I hope this can clearify something. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-06-06 10:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 New log added. This time only one account activated for spamfiltering. The other accounts retrieve their mail directly with no problem. So, even with one account the problem persists. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-06-06 09:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 No errors in Opera nor Thunderbird nor anywhere else. I will set only one account to pass through the filter and send another log. Perhaps it's more clear to read then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-06-01 01:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Yes, it is hard to read with the two accounts (three at the top) intermixed. It definately does see that there are 14/3 messages, and gets the uidl for each. Then the log ends with two "REPR 1" commands (I presume one for each account). The log should then have the REPR responses (the whole body of the message, but the octet count), which it doesn't. I'm not sure why the log stops, though - I can't see how it would stop without some error occuring. Do you get any error in the log? Or any error in Opera? (like a timeout, or something?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-05-29 09:14 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 No, as I want to use Opera to be my primary mail client, I don't leave the messages on the server. But I have the same problem with the Mozilla e-mail client which is configured to leave the messages on the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-05-27 21:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Do you have Opera configured to leave messages on the server? I'm only so-so at reading POP3 logs, especially with the two accounts intermixed, but this is what it looks like to me: 1. successful log in to acct be35926 2. stat command reports 14 total messages 3. mail client downloads the list of identifiers for the 14 messages 4. client assumedly determines that all of the listed identifiers have been previously downloaded so it doesn't download them again ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jos (be037446) Date: 2004-05-27 19:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1047380 See the attach file. There are indeed messages waiting but they aren't fetched. It's funny but it always happens with the same accounts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-05-26 01:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It would be very odd if this was the proxy - all it does is proxy (i.e. directly pass the commands through), unless it's doing a RETR (or sometimes TOP) command, when it classifies the message. To not fetch the messages, I presume that the mail client is getting back a 0 response from the LIST, which is just proxied. If you set the [globals]verbose option to True ('-o globals:verbose:True' on the command line should do, or in your bayescustomise), then you should get a _pop3proxy.log file created that logs the POP3 conversation. Could you do that and attach a copy here that covers a time when this happens? (Check the log for any confidential data; I can't remember what it does with username/passwords). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=958506&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 8 04:29:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 8 04:29:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-848365 ] Remove subject annotations from message review page Message-ID: Feature Requests item #848365, was opened at 2003-11-25 04:37 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=848365&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dave Brueck (dbrueck) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Remove subject annotations from message review page Initial Comment: On the message review page in the web interface (Home -> Review), the subject line for messages shows annotations that SB added if such annotations are turned on in the configuration (Home -> Configuration Page -> Header Options -> Classify in subject header). This causes a problem if you leave the raidio boxes to their default values and click Train because the annotation tokens are used as training input (on my system the "subject:spam" token now has a value of 0.997). In addition to removing SB's own annotations from the subject lines, it might be a good idea to change that page so that messages that are classified as spam/ham have their Discard/Defer/Ham/Spam radio button default to Discard or Defer, so that the common task of just reviewing unsure messages does not require the user to also look over those that were classified and decide whether or not they should be included in the training. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-08 16:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fixed the review page to remove notations before display. Fixed training to remove notations before training. These are more an improvement than a bugfix, per se, so will appear in 1.1 rather than 1.0.2, unless someone yells loudly enough. Regarding the last point (and this should have been commented ages ago, sorry!), you can set the default actions to whatever you like - use the advanced configuration page. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=848365&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 8 04:38:39 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 8 04:38:46 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-765924 ] Spam / ham statistics Message-ID: Feature Requests item #765924, was opened at 2003-07-05 00:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=765924&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Magnus Aycox (mbip) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Spam / ham statistics Initial Comment: Possibility to get statistics on how many mails were received per hour / day and how many of these were spam messages. It would be great if it could be presented both as numbers and graphically (impresses CEO's...). The means to print it as a hard copy would be just swell... ;o) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-08 16:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Another update: there is now a separate "Statistics" tab in the SpamBayes Manager, which makes way for more stats. The stats are now mostly the ones that the web interface offers, plus ones that can be used for JGC's batting average calculations. Thanks to Kenny Pitt! To summarise the rest of this tracker: there is still no graphical display, stats about the database itself, or stats about mail received per hour/day. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-15 12:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 As an update: I've checked in a change to CVS that makes the Outlook plug-in's statistics persistent across sessions, so it's now basically the same as sb_server/sb_imapfilter's stats. Graphics or more stats will have to wait for another day... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Josh Wand (joshwa) Date: 2004-06-27 12:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=7937 Have a look at the popfile statistics page for good ideas on how to present spam statistics. Totals and percentages for spam, non-spam, false-pos, false-neg, and summary and detail statistics on the corpus itself (which words are likliest to be in spam, ham, etc). Lovely html graphics, too. I'd love to see these features in spambayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Murilo Pinto (mulpinsf) Date: 2004-05-28 01:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=378491 I'd like to have a tiny button in the Outlook toolbar showing how many spams(red)/ham(blue) SB processed in that session. Hovering the mouse at it would give % in the "pop- up" comment. If clicked, it could open a "page" with more detailed stats, as per hour/day/month/hour of the day/day of the week/accounts/year. Outstanding antispam, btw. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-13 20:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe in [ 915260 ] Statistics ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2003-11-21 03:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 The latest CVS plugin actually does include false positives and negatives in the statistics. The definition is this. If a message was classified as Ham and then reclassified by the user as Spam, it is a false negative. If a message was classified as Spam and then reclassified by the user as Ham, it is a false positive. A message that was originally classified as Unsure is never considered a false positive or negative. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Erik Sargent (esargent) Date: 2003-11-20 22:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586922 Quick note on the "impossibility" of tracking false pos/neg. Actually, since an incorrectly classified message already has a header inserted, then you would only flag a "false" if that header existed and was changed. This means you'd have to check for the existence of the header before you processed the Delete/Recover buttons, but it can be done. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-09-30 16:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that the plug-in has basic stats information (cvs version) now, although it's still only on a per session basis (this will no doubt improve at some point). The web interface (for non-plugin users) also now (cvs head) has basic stats, which are persisted between sessions. Any opinions on which statistics would be best to add? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2003-07-11 16:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's not exactly what you have asked for, but as a start, are you aware that in the logs, each time you shut Outlook down it prints a message like: "SpamBayes processed 555 messages, finding 34 spam and 11 unsure" (So you could shut Outlook down each hour/day, to generate this message). It's unlikely that a graphical version would ever be made, but it would be easy enough to throw numbers like this into Excel and get pretty graphs. The number of false positives/negatives is more difficult because SpamBayes doesn't really have any way to know that mail is a fp/fn. It could print the number of times the "delete as spam" and "recover from spam" buttons are used, I guess, but this would include all unsure mail, which aren't exactly fp/fn's. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Jeays (dze27) Date: 2003-07-11 16:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=302748 I'm just another user but I think this would be a great addition. I'd also be interested in: number of false positives (along with percentage of total), number of false negatives (along with percentage of total) and percentage of mail received that is spam. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=765924&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 8 05:29:25 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 8 05:29:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1036970 ] Allow Outlook plugin to move ham to a designated folder Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1036970, was opened at 2004-09-30 00:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1036970&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jesse Pelton (jessepelton) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Allow Outlook plugin to move ham to a designated folder Initial Comment: It would be nice to be able to move ham messages from wherever SpamBayes finds them to a user-specified folder. There are at least two scenarios where this would be useful: - When Exchange is configured to filter messages, it puts what it considers to be certain/possible junk in Junk/Junk candidates folders. Since its filtering isn't as good as SpamBayes (when well-trained), it's helpful to have SpamBayes filter the Junk folders and put real spam elsewhere. Without the ability to move ham, though, any ham remains in the Junk folders. - Guaranteeing the order of processing of Outlook rules and SpamBayes filtering. See http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2004-September/014781.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-08 17:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I've added code to allow this (it will appear in 1.1). At the moment this can only be conifgured by manually editing the Outlook.ini (or {profilename}.ini) file, since there isn't really any room for another set of options in the Manager dialog at the moment. I don't want to resize the dialog just for this, since it's not likely to be used much and is really and advanced option. However, if it does get resized for something else, I'll see if this will then fit. Leaving open until then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1036970&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 8 11:45:27 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 8 11:45:30 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1081261 ] STLS patch for POP3 missing from 1.0.1 Message-ID: Patches item #1081261, was opened at 2004-12-08 11:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1081261&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eirik Aavitsland (aavit) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: STLS patch for POP3 missing from 1.0.1 Initial Comment: First, thanks for creating Spambayes! It seems the patch that was suggested by Wummel in this earlier bug report: [ 909088 ] remove STLS pop3 capability https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=909088&group_id=61702 ...didn't make it into 1.0.1. I hope it will be added to future releases, because sb_server hangs for me too without it. Regards, - Eirik Aa. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1081261&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 8 23:34:05 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 8 23:34:10 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1081261 ] STLS patch for POP3 missing from 1.0.1 Message-ID: Patches item #1081261, was opened at 2004-12-08 23:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1081261&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eirik Aavitsland (aavit) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: STLS patch for POP3 missing from 1.0.1 Initial Comment: First, thanks for creating Spambayes! It seems the patch that was suggested by Wummel in this earlier bug report: [ 909088 ] remove STLS pop3 capability https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=909088&group_id=61702 ...didn't make it into 1.0.1. I hope it will be added to future releases, because sb_server hangs for me too without it. Regards, - Eirik Aa. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-09 11:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Convince me that it's a bug rather than an enhancement and it'll make it into 1.0.2. For the moment, it's in CVS (so you could run from source and it would work) and will appear in 1.1 (where non bugfix changes are fine). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1081261&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 9 02:10:18 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 9 02:10:21 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1081787 ] Adding the version only to sb_filter.py Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1081787, was opened at 2004-12-09 12:10 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1081787&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Matthew Vickers (matthew_vickers) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Adding the version only to sb_filter.py Initial Comment: Hi Folks, Doing some integeration of Spambayes into our network email gateway and I needed the version only to be printed to the console i.e sb_filter -v. I have modified the source of sb_filter.py to include the version commandline option. Mabey someone else out there needs this small functionality or it could be placed into the CVS tree. def version(): print >> sys.stderr, get_version_string("sb_filter"), "with engine %s" % get_version_string() sys.exit(1) and in the main() function Added a "v" to the getopt arguments opts, args = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:], 'hxd:p:nfvgstGSo:', ['help', 'examples', 'option=']) Added the following into the else if statements elif opt == '-v': version(); Regards all. Matt. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1081787&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 9 16:53:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 9 16:53:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1081261 ] STLS patch for POP3 missing from 1.0.1 Message-ID: Patches item #1081261, was opened at 2004-12-08 11:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by aavit You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1081261&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eirik Aavitsland (aavit) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: STLS patch for POP3 missing from 1.0.1 Initial Comment: First, thanks for creating Spambayes! It seems the patch that was suggested by Wummel in this earlier bug report: [ 909088 ] remove STLS pop3 capability https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=909088&group_id=61702 ...didn't make it into 1.0.1. I hope it will be added to future releases, because sb_server hangs for me too without it. Regards, - Eirik Aa. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Eirik Aavitsland (aavit) Date: 2004-12-09 16:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1174128 Thanks; glad to see it's not forgotten; I can certainly live with applying the patch myself until 1.1 comes out :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-08 23:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Convince me that it's a bug rather than an enhancement and it'll make it into 1.0.2. For the moment, it's in CVS (so you could run from source and it would work) and will appear in 1.1 (where non bugfix changes are fine). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1081261&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 9 19:15:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 9 19:15:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1082344 ] sb_imapfilter.py -- training header fallback Message-ID: Patches item #1082344, was opened at 2004-12-09 13:15 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1082344&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Todd Mokros (tmokros) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_imapfilter.py -- training header fallback Initial Comment: This patch allows sb_imapfilter.py to use the training header added by sb_filter, which allows sb_imapfilter to retrain messages that were initially trained by sb_filter.py. It also fixes a small bug where the spambayes headers would be lost if a message was untrained, and moved to another folder. -- Todd Mokros ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1082344&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 9 19:23:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 9 19:23:18 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1082344 ] sb_imapfilter.py -- training header fallback Message-ID: Patches item #1082344, was opened at 2004-12-09 13:15 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tmokros You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1082344&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Todd Mokros (tmokros) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_imapfilter.py -- training header fallback Initial Comment: This patch allows sb_imapfilter.py to use the training header added by sb_filter, which allows sb_imapfilter to retrain messages that were initially trained by sb_filter.py. It also fixes a small bug where the spambayes headers would be lost if a message was untrained, and moved to another folder. -- Todd Mokros ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Todd Mokros (tmokros) Date: 2004-12-09 13:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11699 Forgot to mention, this patch was against the current cvs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1082344&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Dec 12 22:35:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Dec 12 22:35:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1081261 ] STLS patch for POP3 missing from 1.0.1 Message-ID: Patches item #1081261, was opened at 2004-12-08 23:45 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1081261&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eirik Aavitsland (aavit) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: STLS patch for POP3 missing from 1.0.1 Initial Comment: First, thanks for creating Spambayes! It seems the patch that was suggested by Wummel in this earlier bug report: [ 909088 ] remove STLS pop3 capability https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=909088&group_id=61702 ...didn't make it into 1.0.1. I hope it will be added to future releases, because sb_server hangs for me too without it. Regards, - Eirik Aa. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eirik Aavitsland (aavit) Date: 2004-12-10 04:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1174128 Thanks; glad to see it's not forgotten; I can certainly live with applying the patch myself until 1.1 comes out :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-09 11:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Convince me that it's a bug rather than an enhancement and it'll make it into 1.0.2. For the moment, it's in CVS (so you could run from source and it would work) and will appear in 1.1 (where non bugfix changes are fine). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1081261&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Dec 12 22:35:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Dec 12 22:36:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1081787 ] Adding the version only to sb_filter.py Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1081787, was opened at 2004-12-09 14:10 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1081787&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Matthew Vickers (matthew_vickers) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Adding the version only to sb_filter.py Initial Comment: Hi Folks, Doing some integeration of Spambayes into our network email gateway and I needed the version only to be printed to the console i.e sb_filter -v. I have modified the source of sb_filter.py to include the version commandline option. Mabey someone else out there needs this small functionality or it could be placed into the CVS tree. def version(): print >> sys.stderr, get_version_string("sb_filter"), "with engine %s" % get_version_string() sys.exit(1) and in the main() function Added a "v" to the getopt arguments opts, args = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:], 'hxd:p:nfvgstGSo:', ['help', 'examples', 'option=']) Added the following into the else if statements elif opt == '-v': version(); Regards all. Matt. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1081787&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Sun Dec 12 22:36:23 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Sun Dec 12 22:36:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-1082344 ] sb_imapfilter.py -- training header fallback Message-ID: Patches item #1082344, was opened at 2004-12-10 07:15 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1082344&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Todd Mokros (tmokros) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_imapfilter.py -- training header fallback Initial Comment: This patch allows sb_imapfilter.py to use the training header added by sb_filter, which allows sb_imapfilter to retrain messages that were initially trained by sb_filter.py. It also fixes a small bug where the spambayes headers would be lost if a message was untrained, and moved to another folder. -- Todd Mokros ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd Mokros (tmokros) Date: 2004-12-10 07:23 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=11699 Forgot to mention, this patch was against the current cvs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=1082344&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 14 05:02:39 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 14 05:02:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1084889 ] installation error Message-ID: Bugs item #1084889, was opened at 2004-12-13 22:02 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1084889&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: Binary 1.0rc1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: cadbunny (cadbunny) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: installation error Initial Comment: Basically, I installed SpamBayes in the spring and it worked like a charm until I got a switched to the whole pickle thing and then it stopped working altogether. I've uninstalled and reinstalled the binary several times, including a go at installing it as a service, and I always get the same error. I get the successful installation screens, but it will not open. I've installed 1.0rc1, 1.0rc2 and 1.0.1 all with the same error... This is what the log says: Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy_tray.py", line 100, in ? File "sb_server.pyc", line 104, in ? File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 214, in ? File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 148, in __init__ File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 160, in load File "pickle.pyc", line 1390, in load File "pickle.pyc", line 872, in load KeyError: '\x00' I absolutely loved it when it worked and I'd really love to use it again. Any help would be greatly appreciated... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1084889&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 14 07:20:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 14 07:20:19 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1084889 ] installation error Message-ID: Support Requests item #1084889, was opened at 2004-12-14 17:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1084889&group_id=61702 Category: None >Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: cadbunny (cadbunny) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: installation error Initial Comment: Basically, I installed SpamBayes in the spring and it worked like a charm until I got a switched to the whole pickle thing and then it stopped working altogether. I've uninstalled and reinstalled the binary several times, including a go at installing it as a service, and I always get the same error. I get the successful installation screens, but it will not open. I've installed 1.0rc1, 1.0rc2 and 1.0.1 all with the same error... This is what the log says: Traceback (most recent call last): File "pop3proxy_tray.py", line 100, in ? File "sb_server.pyc", line 104, in ? File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 214, in ? File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 148, in __init__ File "spambayes\message.pyc", line 160, in load File "pickle.pyc", line 1390, in load File "pickle.pyc", line 872, in load KeyError: '\x00' I absolutely loved it when it worked and I'd really love to use it again. Any help would be greatly appreciated... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-14 19:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The messageinfo pickle (called spambayes.messageinfo.pik, most probably) is corrupted and must be deleted. This file is in your spambayes data directory - the troubleshooting guide explains how to find that (and the path is on the main configuration page of the web interface). Simply delete that file and all should work again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1084889&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 14 14:36:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 14 14:36:24 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1061119 ] Provide verification and/or security measures for downloads Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1061119, was opened at 2004-11-05 13:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jessepelton You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1061119&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jesse Pelton (jessepelton) Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: Provide verification and/or security measures for downloads Initial Comment: It would be a good idea (and not terribly difficult) to provide MD5 checksums for the various downloads so users can verify the integrity of their downloaded files. In the best of all possible worlds, there'd also be a way to check that the downloaded file was created by who its purported author, presumably by some sort of digital signature. I don't know if there are standardized ways to do this that are not burdensome, however. (Authenticode might be an option for the Outlook plugin.) If not, I'd recommend just providing MD5 sums. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jesse Pelton (jessepelton) Date: 2004-12-14 08:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1130248 For the record: it looks like MD5 sums may not be good enough in the long term. See http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/12/07/2019244&tid=93&tid=172&tid=8 and http://www.doxpara.com/md5_someday.pdf. SHA1 seems to be the preferred alternative. I don't think any immediate action is necessary. (It might not even be desireable, since MD5 is much more widely recognized.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-30 01:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 After suggestions from Anthony, the page is a little modified, but I'm willing to believe it's all correct now, so closing. (The instructions for putting out a release include this process now, so future releases should also have all of this done). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jesse Pelton (jessepelton) Date: 2004-11-29 15:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1130248 I checked spambayes-1.0.1.exe. The MD5 sum and file size match my results. The signature also looked OK, but I'm not an expert. The GnuPG documentation warns that "secure usage requires that YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING." Maybe you should post a request for expert opinion on the SpamBayes list. Heaven knows you give enough help to have earned a little assistance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-25 02:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please see http://spambayes.org/download.html Is this correct? I've not done this before, so it may not be... there are PGP sigs, sizes, and MD5 checksums for each of the files. I would greatly appreciate feedback about whether this has been done correctly! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1061119&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 14 18:49:02 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 14 18:49:08 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1002273 ] inbox not filtered on startup and excessive startup time Message-ID: Bugs item #1002273, was opened at 2004-08-02 17:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ostroffjh You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1002273&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: peter (pmaxwell121) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: inbox not filtered on startup and excessive startup time Initial Comment: If I start Outlook (I have Outlook 2000 on Win2K) with spambayes enabled, it takes a huge amount of time before I can access my inbox, and no message filtering is done. All the unread items remain just as they are and incoming messages aren't filtered either. If I then open spambayes manager, to verify the enabled flag is set (which it is) and then close it, inbox now becomes filtered. If I start Outlook with spambayes disabled, the startup time is fine (this aspect sounds a bit similar to 943702). This behavior did not happen with the previous version, which I think was 1.0b. I've attached two log files, one immediately after startup, and the other immediately after having opened and closed spambayes manager. The two files are merged because there doesn't seem a method to attach more than one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: ostroffjh (ostroffjh) Date: 2004-12-14 12:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1165726 This is resolved for me with 1.0.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: ostroffjh (ostroffjh) Date: 2004-11-24 17:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1165726 I have the same problem, currently with SpamBayes 1.0, but also with 1.0rc2. Outlook takes almost two mintes to start up (before I can actually do anything) but less than twenty seconds with SpamBayes disabled, or "work offline" (but the junk and unsure folders are not synchronized for offline use). I'm running Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627) under Windows 2000. 1.0rc2 used to work without this problem. I'm not absolutely certain, but I strongly suspect that the problem started when I was migrated from Exchange Server 2000 to Exchange Server 2003. My log looks very similar to the one posted - with the four unavailable messages and the toolbar error message, so I'll only post it at specific request. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: peter (pmaxwell121) Date: 2004-08-03 13:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1096199 The only folder that's supposed to be watched is "Mailbox - MAXWELL,PETER (A-Americas,ex1)/Inbox". This is on an Exchange server. I don't know why there are four skipping messages (does it try four times?). Outlook can connect to the server because the folder list appears very quickly, and it displays correctly the number of unread items in all the folders. It's strange that spambayes can't access them. This behavior did not occur with the older version, although I have no idea if there have been configuration changes with the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-08-03 02:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The logs have a "skipping because temporarily available" message which indicates that SpamBayes can't connect to the folders it's trying to watch. (This would explain the delay (trying and failing to get hold of them), and the failure to filter). What sort of store are these folders in? IMAP, Hotmail, Exchange, local pst? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1002273&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 14 19:44:56 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 14 19:45:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1068458 ] Scores but wont move Message-ID: Bugs item #1068458, was opened at 2004-11-18 00:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by h07r0d You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Columbo (columbo1492) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Scores but wont move Initial Comment: I have several folders that outlook move to folders. SpanBayes scores the messages but wont move them unless I manually run filter results. I upgrade from outlook 2000 to 2003 I'm runing SB 1.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-14 13:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 I'm also having this problem. Have tried using v0.9, 1.0 and 1.0.1 with the same results. I've captures a level 4 log and have attached it. I'm seeing this on multiple systems. All XP Pro SP2, w/ Outlook 2000. Two machines are vanilla and one is SP3 for Outlook, all with the same issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-21 23:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please attach your most recent log file (the troubleshooting guide explains where to find this) to this tracker. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 14 19:49:38 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 14 19:49:43 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1002273 ] inbox not filtered on startup and excessive startup time Message-ID: Bugs item #1002273, was opened at 2004-08-02 17:17 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1002273&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: peter (pmaxwell121) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: inbox not filtered on startup and excessive startup time Initial Comment: If I start Outlook (I have Outlook 2000 on Win2K) with spambayes enabled, it takes a huge amount of time before I can access my inbox, and no message filtering is done. All the unread items remain just as they are and incoming messages aren't filtered either. If I then open spambayes manager, to verify the enabled flag is set (which it is) and then close it, inbox now becomes filtered. If I start Outlook with spambayes disabled, the startup time is fine (this aspect sounds a bit similar to 943702). This behavior did not happen with the previous version, which I think was 1.0b. I've attached two log files, one immediately after startup, and the other immediately after having opened and closed spambayes manager. The two files are merged because there doesn't seem a method to attach more than one. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: ostroffjh (ostroffjh) Date: 2004-12-14 12:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1165726 This is resolved for me with 1.0.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: ostroffjh (ostroffjh) Date: 2004-11-24 17:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1165726 I have the same problem, currently with SpamBayes 1.0, but also with 1.0rc2. Outlook takes almost two mintes to start up (before I can actually do anything) but less than twenty seconds with SpamBayes disabled, or "work offline" (but the junk and unsure folders are not synchronized for offline use). I'm running Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627) under Windows 2000. 1.0rc2 used to work without this problem. I'm not absolutely certain, but I strongly suspect that the problem started when I was migrated from Exchange Server 2000 to Exchange Server 2003. My log looks very similar to the one posted - with the four unavailable messages and the toolbar error message, so I'll only post it at specific request. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: peter (pmaxwell121) Date: 2004-08-03 13:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1096199 The only folder that's supposed to be watched is "Mailbox - MAXWELL,PETER (A-Americas,ex1)/Inbox". This is on an Exchange server. I don't know why there are four skipping messages (does it try four times?). Outlook can connect to the server because the folder list appears very quickly, and it displays correctly the number of unread items in all the folders. It's strange that spambayes can't access them. This behavior did not occur with the older version, although I have no idea if there have been configuration changes with the server. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-08-03 02:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 The logs have a "skipping because temporarily available" message which indicates that SpamBayes can't connect to the folders it's trying to watch. (This would explain the delay (trying and failing to get hold of them), and the failure to filter). What sort of store are these folders in? IMAP, Hotmail, Exchange, local pst? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1002273&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 14 22:02:16 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 14 22:02:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1068458 ] Scores but wont move Message-ID: Bugs item #1068458, was opened at 2004-11-18 18:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Columbo (columbo1492) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Scores but wont move Initial Comment: I have several folders that outlook move to folders. SpanBayes scores the messages but wont move them unless I manually run filter results. I upgrade from outlook 2000 to 2003 I'm runing SB 1.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-15 10:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No log is attached. As you are not the original submitter of this tracker, you'll need to open a new tracker to attach files to it - be sure to tick the box. If you could put a link in this one to the new one, that would also help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-15 07:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 I'm also having this problem. Have tried using v0.9, 1.0 and 1.0.1 with the same results. I've captures a level 4 log and have attached it. I'm seeing this on multiple systems. All XP Pro SP2, w/ Outlook 2000. Two machines are vanilla and one is SP3 for Outlook, all with the same issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-22 17:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please attach your most recent log file (the troubleshooting guide explains where to find this) to this tracker. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 15 16:00:39 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 15 16:02:51 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1068458 ] Scores but wont move Message-ID: Bugs item #1068458, was opened at 2004-11-18 00:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by h07r0d You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Columbo (columbo1492) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Scores but wont move Initial Comment: I have several folders that outlook move to folders. SpanBayes scores the messages but wont move them unless I manually run filter results. I upgrade from outlook 2000 to 2003 I'm runing SB 1.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-15 10:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 I've uploaded a log file to my server. You can find it here: http://www.emeraldsandtwilight.com/spambayes1.log Hope that helps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-14 16:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No log is attached. As you are not the original submitter of this tracker, you'll need to open a new tracker to attach files to it - be sure to tick the box. If you could put a link in this one to the new one, that would also help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-14 13:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 I'm also having this problem. Have tried using v0.9, 1.0 and 1.0.1 with the same results. I've captures a level 4 log and have attached it. I'm seeing this on multiple systems. All XP Pro SP2, w/ Outlook 2000. Two machines are vanilla and one is SP3 for Outlook, all with the same issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-21 23:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please attach your most recent log file (the troubleshooting guide explains where to find this) to this tracker. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 15 17:28:34 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 15 17:29:28 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1068458 ] Scores but wont move Message-ID: Bugs item #1068458, was opened at 2004-11-18 00:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Columbo (columbo1492) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Scores but wont move Initial Comment: I have several folders that outlook move to folders. SpanBayes scores the messages but wont move them unless I manually run filter results. I upgrade from outlook 2000 to 2003 I'm runing SB 1.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-15 11:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Maybe you can explain what actions you took that were captured in this log file. Here's my best guess based on what I see in the log: 1. Started Outlook 2. SpamBayes loaded and started its delay timer. 3. You switched to a different folder, possibly from Outlook Today to Inbox but I can't tell from the log. 4. The delay timer expired, but no unread messages were found. 5. You opened SpamBayes Manager or performed a Filter Now (unfortunately, Filter Now doesn't log much unless it fails so I can't tell) 6. You switched to your Unsure or Spam folder, selected the message "MMS Seasonal Gathering Tickets...", and clicked the Recover from Spam button. 7. SpamBayes moved the message back to your Inbox and trained it as ham. 8. SpamBayes saw the message again as Outlook added it to the Inbox, but properly detected that the message was already trained as ham. 9. You switched back to the Inbox folder, selected the "Seasonal Gathering" message again, and clicked the Delete as Spam button. 10. SpamBayes moved the message to the Spam folder and trained it as spam. If this is what actually took place then I'm afraid I don't see anything here that indicates a problem unless there were, in fact, unread messages in the Inbox that SpamBayes didn't detect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-15 10:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 I've uploaded a log file to my server. You can find it here: http://www.emeraldsandtwilight.com/spambayes1.log Hope that helps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-14 16:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No log is attached. As you are not the original submitter of this tracker, you'll need to open a new tracker to attach files to it - be sure to tick the box. If you could put a link in this one to the new one, that would also help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-14 13:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 I'm also having this problem. Have tried using v0.9, 1.0 and 1.0.1 with the same results. I've captures a level 4 log and have attached it. I'm seeing this on multiple systems. All XP Pro SP2, w/ Outlook 2000. Two machines are vanilla and one is SP3 for Outlook, all with the same issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-21 23:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please attach your most recent log file (the troubleshooting guide explains where to find this) to this tracker. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 15 17:44:02 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 15 17:44:07 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1068458 ] Scores but wont move Message-ID: Bugs item #1068458, was opened at 2004-11-18 00:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by h07r0d You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Columbo (columbo1492) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Scores but wont move Initial Comment: I have several folders that outlook move to folders. SpanBayes scores the messages but wont move them unless I manually run filter results. I upgrade from outlook 2000 to 2003 I'm runing SB 1.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-15 11:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 That's basically it. However, the move's don't actually occur until you change your focus in Outlook. I had no new messages available at the time, so I just moved some spam back and forth to generate the log. After (6): Clicked Recover from spam. The message stayed where it was in the Spam folder and was still highlighted. I also could still read it in the preview pane. When I selected a different message, THEN the spam moved back to the Inbox. Or, when I moved to the Inbox from the Spam folder, the "untrained" message was there. I selected the same message again, and "Delete as Spam". Once again, the message did NOT move in the current view until my focus changed. Hope that helps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-15 11:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Maybe you can explain what actions you took that were captured in this log file. Here's my best guess based on what I see in the log: 1. Started Outlook 2. SpamBayes loaded and started its delay timer. 3. You switched to a different folder, possibly from Outlook Today to Inbox but I can't tell from the log. 4. The delay timer expired, but no unread messages were found. 5. You opened SpamBayes Manager or performed a Filter Now (unfortunately, Filter Now doesn't log much unless it fails so I can't tell) 6. You switched to your Unsure or Spam folder, selected the message "MMS Seasonal Gathering Tickets...", and clicked the Recover from Spam button. 7. SpamBayes moved the message back to your Inbox and trained it as ham. 8. SpamBayes saw the message again as Outlook added it to the Inbox, but properly detected that the message was already trained as ham. 9. You switched back to the Inbox folder, selected the "Seasonal Gathering" message again, and clicked the Delete as Spam button. 10. SpamBayes moved the message to the Spam folder and trained it as spam. If this is what actually took place then I'm afraid I don't see anything here that indicates a problem unless there were, in fact, unread messages in the Inbox that SpamBayes didn't detect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-15 10:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 I've uploaded a log file to my server. You can find it here: http://www.emeraldsandtwilight.com/spambayes1.log Hope that helps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-14 16:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No log is attached. As you are not the original submitter of this tracker, you'll need to open a new tracker to attach files to it - be sure to tick the box. If you could put a link in this one to the new one, that would also help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-14 13:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 I'm also having this problem. Have tried using v0.9, 1.0 and 1.0.1 with the same results. I've captures a level 4 log and have attached it. I'm seeing this on multiple systems. All XP Pro SP2, w/ Outlook 2000. Two machines are vanilla and one is SP3 for Outlook, all with the same issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-21 23:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please attach your most recent log file (the troubleshooting guide explains where to find this) to this tracker. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 15 18:04:28 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 15 18:05:03 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-899839 ] Outlook 2003 UI Does Not Refresh after "Delete As Spam" Message-ID: Bugs item #899839, was opened at 2004-02-18 14:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899839&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Furka (jfurka) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 UI Does Not Refresh after "Delete As Spam" Initial Comment: When you select an email and hit the "Delete As Spam" button while in the Inbox, the UI is not refreshed after the delete. Selecting the message again gives the error "No filterable mail items are selected". The UI is finally refreshed after another user action, such as going to another mail folder and coming back, or deleting a second message as Spam. This behavior can also be seen in the "Junk Suspects" folder. If you select all of the emails and hit "Delete as Spam", the Outlook UI still contains all of the emails. If you then go to the Spam folder, it is also not refreshed properly with the "Junk Suspects" email that should now be in the Spam folder. Another user action is needed to refresh the UI. I'm running Outlook 2003 in non-cached mode. I don't see the problem is cached mode. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-15 12:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This seems like the same issue as [ 1007472 ], which was closed as being an Outlook issue and not a SpamBayes issue. Should this bug also be closed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-15 23:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is not limited to SP2, or to Outlook 2003. I very occasionally see this with Outlook 2002 and XP SP1. I believe it's when the Exchange server is particularly busy, although I couldn't say for sure. It's hard to know what SpamBayes can do about it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: callowjg (callowjg) Date: 2004-09-02 09:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1115159 I have also noticed this problem with two machines. The issue started right after I installed WinXP SP2 on both of them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899839&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 15 18:10:48 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 15 18:12:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1068458 ] Scores but wont move Message-ID: Bugs item #1068458, was opened at 2004-11-18 00:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Columbo (columbo1492) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Scores but wont move Initial Comment: I have several folders that outlook move to folders. SpanBayes scores the messages but wont move them unless I manually run filter results. I upgrade from outlook 2000 to 2003 I'm runing SB 1.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-15 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This sounds like the same Outlook refresh problem that was reported in [ 899839 ] and [ 1007472 ], and has been discussed several times on the mailing list. Here is a list (probably not exhaustive) of some links to threads in the mailing list archive that provide more information. Please let us know if this sounds like the problem you are having. http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2004-October/014837.html http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2004-October/015051.html http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2004-December/015510.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-15 11:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 That's basically it. However, the move's don't actually occur until you change your focus in Outlook. I had no new messages available at the time, so I just moved some spam back and forth to generate the log. After (6): Clicked Recover from spam. The message stayed where it was in the Spam folder and was still highlighted. I also could still read it in the preview pane. When I selected a different message, THEN the spam moved back to the Inbox. Or, when I moved to the Inbox from the Spam folder, the "untrained" message was there. I selected the same message again, and "Delete as Spam". Once again, the message did NOT move in the current view until my focus changed. Hope that helps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-15 11:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Maybe you can explain what actions you took that were captured in this log file. Here's my best guess based on what I see in the log: 1. Started Outlook 2. SpamBayes loaded and started its delay timer. 3. You switched to a different folder, possibly from Outlook Today to Inbox but I can't tell from the log. 4. The delay timer expired, but no unread messages were found. 5. You opened SpamBayes Manager or performed a Filter Now (unfortunately, Filter Now doesn't log much unless it fails so I can't tell) 6. You switched to your Unsure or Spam folder, selected the message "MMS Seasonal Gathering Tickets...", and clicked the Recover from Spam button. 7. SpamBayes moved the message back to your Inbox and trained it as ham. 8. SpamBayes saw the message again as Outlook added it to the Inbox, but properly detected that the message was already trained as ham. 9. You switched back to the Inbox folder, selected the "Seasonal Gathering" message again, and clicked the Delete as Spam button. 10. SpamBayes moved the message to the Spam folder and trained it as spam. If this is what actually took place then I'm afraid I don't see anything here that indicates a problem unless there were, in fact, unread messages in the Inbox that SpamBayes didn't detect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-15 10:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 I've uploaded a log file to my server. You can find it here: http://www.emeraldsandtwilight.com/spambayes1.log Hope that helps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-14 16:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No log is attached. As you are not the original submitter of this tracker, you'll need to open a new tracker to attach files to it - be sure to tick the box. If you could put a link in this one to the new one, that would also help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-14 13:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 I'm also having this problem. Have tried using v0.9, 1.0 and 1.0.1 with the same results. I've captures a level 4 log and have attached it. I'm seeing this on multiple systems. All XP Pro SP2, w/ Outlook 2000. Two machines are vanilla and one is SP3 for Outlook, all with the same issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-21 23:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please attach your most recent log file (the troubleshooting guide explains where to find this) to this tracker. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 15 19:41:33 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 15 19:41:39 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1068458 ] Scores but wont move Message-ID: Bugs item #1068458, was opened at 2004-11-18 00:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by h07r0d You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Columbo (columbo1492) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Scores but wont move Initial Comment: I have several folders that outlook move to folders. SpanBayes scores the messages but wont move them unless I manually run filter results. I upgrade from outlook 2000 to 2003 I'm runing SB 1.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-15 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 Yes, this does seem to be the issue. My appologies for not browsing the previous threads that were closed, it never occured to me to check those. Thank you for your help. I will try some of the solutions posted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-15 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This sounds like the same Outlook refresh problem that was reported in [ 899839 ] and [ 1007472 ], and has been discussed several times on the mailing list. Here is a list (probably not exhaustive) of some links to threads in the mailing list archive that provide more information. Please let us know if this sounds like the problem you are having. http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2004-October/014837.html http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2004-October/015051.html http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2004-December/015510.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-15 11:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 That's basically it. However, the move's don't actually occur until you change your focus in Outlook. I had no new messages available at the time, so I just moved some spam back and forth to generate the log. After (6): Clicked Recover from spam. The message stayed where it was in the Spam folder and was still highlighted. I also could still read it in the preview pane. When I selected a different message, THEN the spam moved back to the Inbox. Or, when I moved to the Inbox from the Spam folder, the "untrained" message was there. I selected the same message again, and "Delete as Spam". Once again, the message did NOT move in the current view until my focus changed. Hope that helps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-15 11:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Maybe you can explain what actions you took that were captured in this log file. Here's my best guess based on what I see in the log: 1. Started Outlook 2. SpamBayes loaded and started its delay timer. 3. You switched to a different folder, possibly from Outlook Today to Inbox but I can't tell from the log. 4. The delay timer expired, but no unread messages were found. 5. You opened SpamBayes Manager or performed a Filter Now (unfortunately, Filter Now doesn't log much unless it fails so I can't tell) 6. You switched to your Unsure or Spam folder, selected the message "MMS Seasonal Gathering Tickets...", and clicked the Recover from Spam button. 7. SpamBayes moved the message back to your Inbox and trained it as ham. 8. SpamBayes saw the message again as Outlook added it to the Inbox, but properly detected that the message was already trained as ham. 9. You switched back to the Inbox folder, selected the "Seasonal Gathering" message again, and clicked the Delete as Spam button. 10. SpamBayes moved the message to the Spam folder and trained it as spam. If this is what actually took place then I'm afraid I don't see anything here that indicates a problem unless there were, in fact, unread messages in the Inbox that SpamBayes didn't detect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-15 10:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 I've uploaded a log file to my server. You can find it here: http://www.emeraldsandtwilight.com/spambayes1.log Hope that helps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-14 16:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No log is attached. As you are not the original submitter of this tracker, you'll need to open a new tracker to attach files to it - be sure to tick the box. If you could put a link in this one to the new one, that would also help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-14 13:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 I'm also having this problem. Have tried using v0.9, 1.0 and 1.0.1 with the same results. I've captures a level 4 log and have attached it. I'm seeing this on multiple systems. All XP Pro SP2, w/ Outlook 2000. Two machines are vanilla and one is SP3 for Outlook, all with the same issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-21 23:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please attach your most recent log file (the troubleshooting guide explains where to find this) to this tracker. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 15 20:04:27 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 15 20:04:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1068458 ] Scores but wont move Message-ID: Bugs item #1068458, was opened at 2004-11-18 00:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kpitt You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Columbo (columbo1492) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Scores but wont move Initial Comment: I have several folders that outlook move to folders. SpanBayes scores the messages but wont move them unless I manually run filter results. I upgrade from outlook 2000 to 2003 I'm runing SB 1.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-15 14:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Closing as dupe of [ 899839] and [ 1007472 ]. Thanks for the update. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-15 13:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 Yes, this does seem to be the issue. My appologies for not browsing the previous threads that were closed, it never occured to me to check those. Thank you for your help. I will try some of the solutions posted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-15 12:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This sounds like the same Outlook refresh problem that was reported in [ 899839 ] and [ 1007472 ], and has been discussed several times on the mailing list. Here is a list (probably not exhaustive) of some links to threads in the mailing list archive that provide more information. Please let us know if this sounds like the problem you are having. http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2004-October/014837.html http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2004-October/015051.html http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2004-December/015510.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-15 11:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 That's basically it. However, the move's don't actually occur until you change your focus in Outlook. I had no new messages available at the time, so I just moved some spam back and forth to generate the log. After (6): Clicked Recover from spam. The message stayed where it was in the Spam folder and was still highlighted. I also could still read it in the preview pane. When I selected a different message, THEN the spam moved back to the Inbox. Or, when I moved to the Inbox from the Spam folder, the "untrained" message was there. I selected the same message again, and "Delete as Spam". Once again, the message did NOT move in the current view until my focus changed. Hope that helps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-15 11:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Maybe you can explain what actions you took that were captured in this log file. Here's my best guess based on what I see in the log: 1. Started Outlook 2. SpamBayes loaded and started its delay timer. 3. You switched to a different folder, possibly from Outlook Today to Inbox but I can't tell from the log. 4. The delay timer expired, but no unread messages were found. 5. You opened SpamBayes Manager or performed a Filter Now (unfortunately, Filter Now doesn't log much unless it fails so I can't tell) 6. You switched to your Unsure or Spam folder, selected the message "MMS Seasonal Gathering Tickets...", and clicked the Recover from Spam button. 7. SpamBayes moved the message back to your Inbox and trained it as ham. 8. SpamBayes saw the message again as Outlook added it to the Inbox, but properly detected that the message was already trained as ham. 9. You switched back to the Inbox folder, selected the "Seasonal Gathering" message again, and clicked the Delete as Spam button. 10. SpamBayes moved the message to the Spam folder and trained it as spam. If this is what actually took place then I'm afraid I don't see anything here that indicates a problem unless there were, in fact, unread messages in the Inbox that SpamBayes didn't detect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-15 10:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 I've uploaded a log file to my server. You can find it here: http://www.emeraldsandtwilight.com/spambayes1.log Hope that helps. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-14 16:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No log is attached. As you are not the original submitter of this tracker, you'll need to open a new tracker to attach files to it - be sure to tick the box. If you could put a link in this one to the new one, that would also help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Todd (h07r0d) Date: 2004-12-14 13:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1178213 I'm also having this problem. Have tried using v0.9, 1.0 and 1.0.1 with the same results. I've captures a level 4 log and have attached it. I'm seeing this on multiple systems. All XP Pro SP2, w/ Outlook 2000. Two machines are vanilla and one is SP3 for Outlook, all with the same issues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-21 23:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please attach your most recent log file (the troubleshooting guide explains where to find this) to this tracker. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1068458&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 15 23:30:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 15 23:30:25 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-899839 ] Outlook 2003 UI Does Not Refresh after "Delete As Spam" Message-ID: Bugs item #899839, was opened at 2004-02-19 08:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899839&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Furka (jfurka) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 UI Does Not Refresh after "Delete As Spam" Initial Comment: When you select an email and hit the "Delete As Spam" button while in the Inbox, the UI is not refreshed after the delete. Selecting the message again gives the error "No filterable mail items are selected". The UI is finally refreshed after another user action, such as going to another mail folder and coming back, or deleting a second message as Spam. This behavior can also be seen in the "Junk Suspects" folder. If you select all of the emails and hit "Delete as Spam", the Outlook UI still contains all of the emails. If you then go to the Spam folder, it is also not refreshed properly with the "Junk Suspects" email that should now be in the Spam folder. Another user action is needed to refresh the UI. I'm running Outlook 2003 in non-cached mode. I don't see the problem is cached mode. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-16 11:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm not sure. This effects a lot of people (including me), and it is suspicious that it happens much more with spambayes actions than it does with manual actions. Maybe there is something we can do to encourage a refresh? Unfortunately, it seems to be the sort of thing that will take lots of trawling through msdn.microsoft.com and testing all sorts of things to figure out, and I just don't have the time for that at the moment, particularly for something that is more a annoyance than a problem. I'm happy to leave it open until we can confirm that there's nothing we can do about it, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-16 06:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This seems like the same issue as [ 1007472 ], which was closed as being an Outlook issue and not a SpamBayes issue. Should this bug also be closed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is not limited to SP2, or to Outlook 2003. I very occasionally see this with Outlook 2002 and XP SP1. I believe it's when the Exchange server is particularly busy, although I couldn't say for sure. It's hard to know what SpamBayes can do about it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: callowjg (callowjg) Date: 2004-09-03 01:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1115159 I have also noticed this problem with two machines. The issue started right after I installed WinXP SP2 on both of them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899839&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 16 00:12:15 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 16 00:12:35 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-983539 ] Install error on Outlook 2002 Message-ID: Bugs item #983539, was opened at 2004-07-02 05:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983539&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Taed Wynnell (taed) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Install error on Outlook 2002 Initial Comment: When I installed 1.0 RC 2, I got an installation error. When I then loaded Outlook, SpamBayes seemed to load and displayed the buttons, but the SpamBayes menu was non-functional (ignored click). I'm running Outlook 2002 (with all updates) on my Windows NT 4.0 Server (with all updates). I've tried installing it multiple times (and rebooting and so on), but no luck. Re-installing 1.0 RC 1 will then work fine. Here's the outlook_addin_register.exe.log file contents: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 40, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 40, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-16 12:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm 99.9% sure that I used build 203 to create 1.0.1, so if that was all it took, it ought to be fixed. However, a message to spambayes@python.org today indicated that maybe it is not. Possibly something else needs to be done? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-10-13 04:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It appears that build 203 of pywin32/win32all has split out the XP-specific functions into a separate extension to restore NT compatibility. We will upgrade to build 203 for the next SpamBayes build (probably either 1.1a1 alpha release or 1.0.1 maintenance release), so hopefully that will fix this problem. Here are a couple bullets snipped from Mark's release announcement: * The win32gui, win32security, and win32service modules all again work on Windows NT. * New 'winxpgui' module - almost identical to win32gui, but has a Windows XP manifest included, and a couple of extra functions not supported by Windows NT (AnimateWindow, FlashWindowEx, etc) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-09-29 09:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Noting dupe in [ 1036551 ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-16 08:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It seems that the problem is not a *call* to FlashWindowEx, but rather simply that FlashWindowEx appears in the import table of the win32gui.pyd DLL file and the import cannot be resolved on NT4. This is an issue in the pywin32 extensions, and appears to have been introduced in build 202. Revision 1.42 of win32gui.i added the PyFlashWindowEx function that generates the offending import. I'm assigning this to Mark to see if he can find a way to implement the FlashWindow function without generating a static import reference to the FlashWindowEx function (maybe LoadLibrary/GetProcAddress after an OS version check?). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: pbarbour (pbarbour) Date: 2004-07-10 08:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1080518 likely due a call to the FlashWindowEx() function which is not supported in NT4. This error occured on my NT4 workstation also. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983539&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 16 00:15:00 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 16 00:15:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-983539 ] Install error on Outlook 2002 Message-ID: Bugs item #983539, was opened at 2004-07-01 10:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by taed You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983539&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Taed Wynnell (taed) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Install error on Outlook 2002 Initial Comment: When I installed 1.0 RC 2, I got an installation error. When I then loaded Outlook, SpamBayes seemed to load and displayed the buttons, but the SpamBayes menu was non-functional (ignored click). I'm running Outlook 2002 (with all updates) on my Windows NT 4.0 Server (with all updates). I've tried installing it multiple times (and rebooting and so on), but no luck. Re-installing 1.0 RC 1 will then work fine. Here's the outlook_addin_register.exe.log file contents: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 40, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 40, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Taed Wynnell (taed) Date: 2004-12-15 15:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1025617 I'm the original submitter, and 1.0.1 did fix this problem for me on Windows NT, so as far as I'm concerned, this has been fixed. (Thanks!) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-15 15:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm 99.9% sure that I used build 203 to create 1.0.1, so if that was all it took, it ought to be fixed. However, a message to spambayes@python.org today indicated that maybe it is not. Possibly something else needs to be done? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-10-12 08:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It appears that build 203 of pywin32/win32all has split out the XP-specific functions into a separate extension to restore NT compatibility. We will upgrade to build 203 for the next SpamBayes build (probably either 1.1a1 alpha release or 1.0.1 maintenance release), so hopefully that will fix this problem. Here are a couple bullets snipped from Mark's release announcement: * The win32gui, win32security, and win32service modules all again work on Windows NT. * New 'winxpgui' module - almost identical to win32gui, but has a Windows XP manifest included, and a couple of extra functions not supported by Windows NT (AnimateWindow, FlashWindowEx, etc) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-09-28 14:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Noting dupe in [ 1036551 ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-15 13:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It seems that the problem is not a *call* to FlashWindowEx, but rather simply that FlashWindowEx appears in the import table of the win32gui.pyd DLL file and the import cannot be resolved on NT4. This is an issue in the pywin32 extensions, and appears to have been introduced in build 202. Revision 1.42 of win32gui.i added the PyFlashWindowEx function that generates the offending import. I'm assigning this to Mark to see if he can find a way to implement the FlashWindow function without generating a static import reference to the FlashWindowEx function (maybe LoadLibrary/GetProcAddress after an OS version check?). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: pbarbour (pbarbour) Date: 2004-07-09 13:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1080518 likely due a call to the FlashWindowEx() function which is not supported in NT4. This error occured on my NT4 workstation also. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983539&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 16 00:29:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 16 00:29:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-983539 ] Install error on Outlook 2002 Message-ID: Bugs item #983539, was opened at 2004-07-02 05:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983539&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0rc2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Taed Wynnell (taed) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Install error on Outlook 2002 Initial Comment: When I installed 1.0 RC 2, I got an installation error. When I then loaded Outlook, SpamBayes seemed to load and displayed the buttons, but the SpamBayes menu was non-functional (ignored click). I'm running Outlook 2002 (with all updates) on my Windows NT 4.0 Server (with all updates). I've tried installing it multiple times (and rebooting and so on), but no luck. Re-installing 1.0 RC 1 will then work fine. Here's the outlook_addin_register.exe.log file contents: Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 40, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. Traceback (most recent call last): File "addin.py", line 40, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 9, in ? File "win32gui.pyc", line 7, in __load ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified procedure could not be found. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-16 12:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Fantastic :) The poster today probably has 1.0, then. I'll close this as fixed, then. Thanks for the update! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Taed Wynnell (taed) Date: 2004-12-16 12:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1025617 I'm the original submitter, and 1.0.1 did fix this problem for me on Windows NT, so as far as I'm concerned, this has been fixed. (Thanks!) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-16 12:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm 99.9% sure that I used build 203 to create 1.0.1, so if that was all it took, it ought to be fixed. However, a message to spambayes@python.org today indicated that maybe it is not. Possibly something else needs to be done? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-10-13 04:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It appears that build 203 of pywin32/win32all has split out the XP-specific functions into a separate extension to restore NT compatibility. We will upgrade to build 203 for the next SpamBayes build (probably either 1.1a1 alpha release or 1.0.1 maintenance release), so hopefully that will fix this problem. Here are a couple bullets snipped from Mark's release announcement: * The win32gui, win32security, and win32service modules all again work on Windows NT. * New 'winxpgui' module - almost identical to win32gui, but has a Windows XP manifest included, and a couple of extra functions not supported by Windows NT (AnimateWindow, FlashWindowEx, etc) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-09-29 09:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 Noting dupe in [ 1036551 ] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-07-16 08:24 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 It seems that the problem is not a *call* to FlashWindowEx, but rather simply that FlashWindowEx appears in the import table of the win32gui.pyd DLL file and the import cannot be resolved on NT4. This is an issue in the pywin32 extensions, and appears to have been introduced in build 202. Revision 1.42 of win32gui.i added the PyFlashWindowEx function that generates the offending import. I'm assigning this to Mark to see if he can find a way to implement the FlashWindow function without generating a static import reference to the FlashWindowEx function (maybe LoadLibrary/GetProcAddress after an OS version check?). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: pbarbour (pbarbour) Date: 2004-07-10 08:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1080518 likely due a call to the FlashWindowEx() function which is not supported in NT4. This error occured on my NT4 workstation also. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=983539&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 16 03:34:38 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 16 03:34:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1086194 ] sb_server.py error Message-ID: Bugs item #1086194, was opened at 2004-12-15 18:34 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1086194&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Squirrel FuzzyNutz (sqwerl) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: sb_server.py error Initial Comment: Here is the traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_server.py", line 471, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/message. py", line 249, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) AttributeError: Parser instance has no attribute '_parseheaders' My machine is running FreeBSD 5.2 if that helps. This error renders emails not to be classified. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1086194&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 16 03:53:35 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 16 03:53:37 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1086194 ] sb_server.py error Message-ID: Bugs item #1086194, was opened at 2004-12-16 15:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1086194&group_id=61702 >Category: pop3proxy Group: 1.0.1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Squirrel FuzzyNutz (sqwerl) >Assigned to: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Summary: sb_server.py error Initial Comment: Here is the traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/sb_server.py", line 471, in onRetr msg.setPayload(messageText) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/spambayes/message. py", line 249, in setPayload prs._parseheaders(self, fp) AttributeError: Parser instance has no attribute '_parseheaders' My machine is running FreeBSD 5.2 if that helps. This error renders emails not to be classified. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-16 15:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 1.0.1 is not compatible with Python 2.4, unfortunately. Both 1.0.2 and 1.1 will be, but for the moment you'll have to either use source from CVS or an earlier version of Python. (A fix for this has been checked into CVS). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1086194&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 16 07:06:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 16 07:06:14 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-741250 ] mboxtrain can truncate your mailbox Message-ID: Bugs item #741250, was opened at 2003-05-21 13:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jmvalin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741250&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: mboxtrain can truncate your mailbox Initial Comment: There is code in mboxtrain to rewrite the mailbox which looks like try: os.ftruncate(f.fileno(), 0) f.seek(0) except: # If anything goes wrong, don't try to write print "Problem truncating mbox--nothing written" raise If the ftruncate() call succeeds but the seek() call fails, the user would be left with an empty mailbox. I think the code should write a temporary mailbox then rename it only if the complete write operation is successful. Furthermore, bare except clauses should be avoided unless you really can't anticipate all the exceptions which might be raised. No patch yet. I'll try to come up with something. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jean-Marc Valin (jmvalin) Date: 2004-12-16 01:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1494 I'm not sure whether my problem is related to that bug, but it seems close. When I train with mboxtrain, my spam folder gets truncated too. From the more than 10,000 emails in the folder, only 433 are trained and at the end, the mbox file is shortened from 147 MB to about 3 MB. Only the spam folder seems to be affected. I tried using -g instead of -s (to see if it's with the file or the flag) and the problem is still there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741250&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 16 07:45:52 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 16 07:45:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-741250 ] mboxtrain can truncate your mailbox Message-ID: Bugs item #741250, was opened at 2003-05-21 13:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jmvalin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741250&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro) Summary: mboxtrain can truncate your mailbox Initial Comment: There is code in mboxtrain to rewrite the mailbox which looks like try: os.ftruncate(f.fileno(), 0) f.seek(0) except: # If anything goes wrong, don't try to write print "Problem truncating mbox--nothing written" raise If the ftruncate() call succeeds but the seek() call fails, the user would be left with an empty mailbox. I think the code should write a temporary mailbox then rename it only if the complete write operation is successful. Furthermore, bare except clauses should be avoided unless you really can't anticipate all the exceptions which might be raised. No patch yet. I'll try to come up with something. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jean-Marc Valin (jmvalin) Date: 2004-12-16 01:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1494 I tried to pin down the problem. I came up with this small file: http://people.xiph.org/~jm/spam.mbox When doing: sb_mboxtrain.py -f -d spam.db -s spam.mbox I get: Training spam (spam.mbox): Reading as Unix mbox Trained 0 out of 0 messages and the file gets truncated to (in this case) zero bytes. There seem to be several emails in my spam folder that trigger that bug. In the end, spambayes becomes completely unusable for me since I have to way to train a database without spending hours to remove each email that triggers the bug. In case it matters, I'm running debian unstable and spambayes 1.0.1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jean-Marc Valin (jmvalin) Date: 2004-12-16 01:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1494 I'm not sure whether my problem is related to that bug, but it seems close. When I train with mboxtrain, my spam folder gets truncated too. From the more than 10,000 emails in the folder, only 433 are trained and at the end, the mbox file is shortened from 147 MB to about 3 MB. Only the spam folder seems to be affected. I tried using -g instead of -s (to see if it's with the file or the flag) and the problem is still there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741250&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 16 23:35:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 16 23:35:16 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1036868 ] can not filter more than one inbox-folder Message-ID: Bugs item #1036868, was opened at 2004-09-29 03:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dprainc You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036868&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eggi (eggidd) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: can not filter more than one inbox-folder Initial Comment: I use SpamBayes Version 1. on W2k with OL2003. I have two exchange-boxes enabled. My own box and the folder named "contact". I am the owner of the box "Contact". In SpamBayes Manager i can't enable to filter the subfolder "inbox" of the "contact"-box. I don't know why? SpamBayes works with my own folder very good. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Harold Vandeventer (dprainc) Date: 2004-12-16 16:35 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=971973 I'm also seeing the cannot filter on another Exchange server account problem. On the Filtering Tab, Browse button I can see the other Exchange accounts. Pressing the "+" to expand does not expand. An error is not displayed to the monitor. THe log reports: C:\Program Files\Spambayes\lib\spambayes.modules\msgstore.py:126: FutureWarning: %u/%o/%x/%x of negative int will return a signed string in Python 2.4 and up. MsgStoreException: Exception 0x80040107 (MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID): OLE error 0x80040107 One attempt to open one other account produces 8 of the MsgStoreException lines in the log. I am attempting to monitor 6 other accounts. The PC is WinXP/SP2, Outlook 2003 with the 1.0.1 SB Plugin installed. At an earlier point in time (pre-SP2, pre-Outlook 2003, earlier SB version) I was able to filter on other accounts. I'm not sure when the problem developed. I've uninstalled SB, renamed the folder containing previous training data and re-installed. Still unable to filter on other accounts. I can read and delete mail in those accounts to my hearts content, SB can't drill down on them to let me specify the lower level folders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-26 16:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Dupe of: [ 844824 ] MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID when filtering secondary accounts ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-10-04 19:44 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Does the description in this article fit your situation? SpamBayes is receiving a MAPI_E_INVALID_ENTRYID error from Outlook when it tries to access those folders, so it ignores them. There probably isn't anything we can do to avoid that error, however. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eggi (eggidd) Date: 2004-10-01 02:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1130124 The postbox is on an exchange-server. I found the log file and I attach the file. I hope the upload will be successful. Thank you for your support. Greetings ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-30 18:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 That sounds like there is a problem accessing the subfolders (is this a pst file, on Exchange, Hotmail, IMAP, ...?), but the log would have the details. As I said, the troubleshooting guide explains where to find the log files. SpamBayes->Help->Troubleshooting Guide, or there's a copy online via http://spambayes.org/docs.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eggi (eggidd) Date: 2004-09-30 04:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1130124 No, I don't get an error message from spambayes, the folder is in the list but it is not possible to open the subfolders. How do I get the log file? I did not find the log file in the program-folder of spambayes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-29 20:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you get an error message from spambayes when you try to, or is the folder simply not in the list to choose? Could you please try this again (to get the log entries) then attach you most recent log file (the troubleshooting guide explains where they are) to this tracker, please? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1036868&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 21 13:49:01 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 21 13:49:06 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1088998 ] Annotate mails that were manually trained Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1088998, was opened at 2004-12-21 12:49 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1088998&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Amir J. Katz (amirkatz) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Annotate mails that were manually trained Initial Comment: When SB categorizes an e-mail incorrectly as ham, it would be nice if the 'Delete as spam' button would annotate the mail so that later it is easy to search for those failures. For example, add a new header, "X-SpamBayes Original Score: N%". Having this header with a value will annotate the mail as one that was trained manually, overriding the original score. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1088998&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 21 13:50:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 21 13:50:47 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-886903 ] Add button to show raw mail message Message-ID: Feature Requests item #886903, was opened at 2004-01-29 11:50 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by amirkatz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=886903&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Amir J. Katz (amirkatz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Summary: Add button to show raw mail message Initial Comment: This is regarding the Outlook plug-in. In a competing product, Spammunition (also free), there is a button called 'show analysis', which shows the statistics, like SpamBayes' 'show spam clues for current message'. However, Spammunition's feature is better because: a) It does not create a new mail message that has to be manually discarded b) It opens a pop up window with the three sections: - the mail headers - the raw message - the Bayesian statistics I think the SB should adopt this method. But hey, this is a great piece of software. Amir ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 04:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (Changing the summary to reflect what this is actually after). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=886903&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 21 13:53:17 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 21 13:53:20 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-886903 ] Add button to show raw mail message Message-ID: Feature Requests item #886903, was opened at 2004-01-29 11:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by amirkatz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=886903&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Amir J. Katz (amirkatz) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add button to show raw mail message Initial Comment: This is regarding the Outlook plug-in. In a competing product, Spammunition (also free), there is a button called 'show analysis', which shows the statistics, like SpamBayes' 'show spam clues for current message'. However, Spammunition's feature is better because: a) It does not create a new mail message that has to be manually discarded b) It opens a pop up window with the three sections: - the mail headers - the raw message - the Bayesian statistics I think the SB should adopt this method. But hey, this is a great piece of software. Amir ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Amir J. Katz (amirkatz) Date: 2004-12-21 12:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=15627 FWIW, another free tool, Pocketknife Peek (also an Outlook add-in) has the requested functionality. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 04:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (Changing the summary to reflect what this is actually after). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=886903&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 21 21:49:58 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 21 21:50:04 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1060206 ] Taking too much processor time Message-ID: Bugs item #1060206, was opened at 2004-11-04 13:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dleftley You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1060206&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: shiphen (shiphen) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Taking too much processor time Initial Comment: ms Outlook (Office 2002) / Win2000 Pro Hi How do I stop Spambayes from taking up too much processor time?! When I am downloading emails, my entire PC becomes so slow that it is more or less unusable! This is a disaster because I need to see my new emails regularly thoughout the day & I get huge amounts of spam! With thanks Ship Shiperton Henethe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Leftley (dleftley) Date: 2004-12-21 20:49 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=891846 Has Spambayes always run slowly for you, or has it recently slowed down? I ask because I find my copy fairly often gets into this state, which I think is because the database gets slightly corrupted. If so, you should find that if you delete all your training data and retrain from scratch it will run at an acceptable speed again. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: shiphen (shiphen) Date: 2004-11-04 13:32 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1152455 P.S. I am using the Add-in Binary Version 1.0 - (July 2004)... Ship ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1060206&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 21 22:51:30 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 21 22:51:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-1088998 ] Annotate mails that were manually trained Message-ID: Feature Requests item #1088998, was opened at 2004-12-22 01:49 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1088998&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Amir J. Katz (amirkatz) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Annotate mails that were manually trained Initial Comment: When SB categorizes an e-mail incorrectly as ham, it would be nice if the 'Delete as spam' button would annotate the mail so that later it is easy to search for those failures. For example, add a new header, "X-SpamBayes Original Score: N%". Having this header with a value will annotate the mail as one that was trained manually, overriding the original score. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-22 10:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Can I ask what the intended use is? We can probably do this (or something close enough) in 1.1 with the messageinfo database changes that we've made, but it's hard to be sure without knowing how the information will be used. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=1088998&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 21 22:54:19 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 21 22:55:31 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-886903 ] Add button to show raw mail message Message-ID: Feature Requests item #886903, was opened at 2004-01-30 00:50 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=886903&group_id=61702 Category: Interface Improvements (example) Group: Next Release (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Amir J. Katz (amirkatz) >Assigned to: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Summary: Add button to show raw mail message Initial Comment: This is regarding the Outlook plug-in. In a competing product, Spammunition (also free), there is a button called 'show analysis', which shows the statistics, like SpamBayes' 'show spam clues for current message'. However, Spammunition's feature is better because: a) It does not create a new mail message that has to be manually discarded b) It opens a pop up window with the three sections: - the mail headers - the raw message - the Bayesian statistics I think the SB should adopt this method. But hey, this is a great piece of software. Amir ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-22 10:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 One thing (and possibly the original reason for it) that using a message has over (eg) a dialog is that it's then easy to send it to the list to ask for help figuring it out. However, I suppose we could have a "Create email" button on such a dialog that created what we have now. I'll assign to Kenny, since he has shown an ability to muck about wth the dialogs, which is not something I intend to do. I guess we'd need a whole new (fairly large) one, with three tabs. He can decide if he wants to try and do this ;) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Amir J. Katz (amirkatz) Date: 2004-12-22 01:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=15627 FWIW, another free tool, Pocketknife Peek (also an Outlook add-in) has the requested functionality. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-17 17:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 (Changing the summary to reflect what this is actually after). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=886903&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 21 23:16:24 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 21 23:16:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-905648 ] Option to whitelist Outlook Contacts / Address Book Message-ID: Feature Requests item #905648, was opened at 2004-02-27 06:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by garyuthegreat You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=905648&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dave Rinell (kitchenboy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Option to whitelist Outlook Contacts / Address Book Initial Comment: It would be great if there was an option to "Whitelist" mail from e-mail addresses attached to Outlook Contacts and/or Address Book. Before using SpamBayes, I was using PopFile with an Outlook plugin and this feature was very helpful - except for a few annoyances (the whitelist was not dynamic - you had to load the list from contacts periodically because it was a static list). This could even be extended to allow right-click -- > "Add Sender to WhiteList" functionality. The messages from whitelist members could still be scanned, ... if they looked like spam, they could go into Possible - just not directly into SPAM. SpamBayes is GREAT - this would make it that much better. Great Work ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Garyu (garyuthegreat) Date: 2004-12-21 22:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1003063 I'd also like a whitelist function. From a few people, I get/send mails in another language than default. Because it's just such a few, they all get marked as spam or possible spam. A right-click "add sender to whitelist" would solve the problem. My guess it's not that hard to implement (just a guess, sorry), and it would prevent most of my "Possible Spam" classifications, making Spambayes much better! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-29 04:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No. Unforunately it's not possible to implement SpamBayes' filtering using the Outlook Rules system, so SpamBayes works independantly of it, and so the "Stop processing" won't have any effect. I would recommend that the best solution would be to create a new folder, and move either all 'whitelisted' mail to it, or everything *except* 'whitelisted' mail to it. Ensure that 'background filtering' is enabled (Advanced tab) and get SpamBayes to filter *only* the folder that doesn't include the 'whitelisted' mail. You'll now have an inbox with mail SpamBayes thinks is ham, and an inbox with mail that your 'whitelist' thinks is ham, and SpamBayes hasn't touched. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dave Rinell (kitchenboy) Date: 2004-02-27 06:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985524 If I specify the rule as "If Sender is in Contacts, then Stop processing more rules" will this stop it from being moved into the SPAM or possible folder? Or do I need to have the filter on the SPAM / possible folder to move the message back to the Inbox? I don't want to move it to another folder if at all possible... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-27 06:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please read FAQ 6.6: Basically, you should just turn on background filtering, and do any whitelisting via Outlook's pretty good rules system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=905648&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 21 23:33:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 21 23:34:09 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-905648 ] Option to whitelist Outlook Contacts / Address Book Message-ID: Feature Requests item #905648, was opened at 2004-02-27 19:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=905648&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dave Rinell (kitchenboy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Option to whitelist Outlook Contacts / Address Book Initial Comment: It would be great if there was an option to "Whitelist" mail from e-mail addresses attached to Outlook Contacts and/or Address Book. Before using SpamBayes, I was using PopFile with an Outlook plugin and this feature was very helpful - except for a few annoyances (the whitelist was not dynamic - you had to load the list from contacts periodically because it was a static list). This could even be extended to allow right-click -- > "Add Sender to WhiteList" functionality. The messages from whitelist members could still be scanned, ... if they looked like spam, they could go into Possible - just not directly into SPAM. SpamBayes is GREAT - this would make it that much better. Great Work ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-22 11:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Unfortunately implementation is tricky. FAQ 6.6 has a comments (and a link to comments about implementation) that explain why: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Garyu (garyuthegreat) Date: 2004-12-22 11:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1003063 I'd also like a whitelist function. From a few people, I get/send mails in another language than default. Because it's just such a few, they all get marked as spam or possible spam. A right-click "add sender to whitelist" would solve the problem. My guess it's not that hard to implement (just a guess, sorry), and it would prevent most of my "Possible Spam" classifications, making Spambayes much better! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-29 17:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No. Unforunately it's not possible to implement SpamBayes' filtering using the Outlook Rules system, so SpamBayes works independantly of it, and so the "Stop processing" won't have any effect. I would recommend that the best solution would be to create a new folder, and move either all 'whitelisted' mail to it, or everything *except* 'whitelisted' mail to it. Ensure that 'background filtering' is enabled (Advanced tab) and get SpamBayes to filter *only* the folder that doesn't include the 'whitelisted' mail. You'll now have an inbox with mail SpamBayes thinks is ham, and an inbox with mail that your 'whitelist' thinks is ham, and SpamBayes hasn't touched. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dave Rinell (kitchenboy) Date: 2004-02-27 19:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985524 If I specify the rule as "If Sender is in Contacts, then Stop processing more rules" will this stop it from being moved into the SPAM or possible folder? Or do I need to have the filter on the SPAM / possible folder to move the message back to the Inbox? I don't want to move it to another folder if at all possible... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-27 19:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please read FAQ 6.6: Basically, you should just turn on background filtering, and do any whitelisting via Outlook's pretty good rules system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=905648&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 22 00:08:31 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 22 00:08:42 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-905648 ] Option to whitelist Outlook Contacts / Address Book Message-ID: Feature Requests item #905648, was opened at 2004-02-27 06:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by garyuthegreat You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=905648&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Dave Rinell (kitchenboy) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Option to whitelist Outlook Contacts / Address Book Initial Comment: It would be great if there was an option to "Whitelist" mail from e-mail addresses attached to Outlook Contacts and/or Address Book. Before using SpamBayes, I was using PopFile with an Outlook plugin and this feature was very helpful - except for a few annoyances (the whitelist was not dynamic - you had to load the list from contacts periodically because it was a static list). This could even be extended to allow right-click -- > "Add Sender to WhiteList" functionality. The messages from whitelist members could still be scanned, ... if they looked like spam, they could go into Possible - just not directly into SPAM. SpamBayes is GREAT - this would make it that much better. Great Work ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Garyu (garyuthegreat) Date: 2004-12-21 23:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1003063 Yeah, I just read the text in the FAQ & comments (couldn't find it at first, that's why I looked in the feature requests). It's true that not everybody would be happy with a whitelist, but it's good for some people, like me! :-). I guess it's more a feature that isn't that necessary so it will not be implemented until someone finds the time and motivation to write it. Perhaps once I learn some more Python I'll dive into it myself. The way I see it is a whitelist separate from the Contacts. I don't want to mess up my contacts by adding every person that's allowed to send me e-mail to my contacts. Perhaps a one-time-importing function (I understand this is quite hard, but it would be nice anyway ;-)). I'd need just some basic whitelisting rules. This means a GUI page with checkboxes, buttons for Add/Modify/Delete and a simple rules checker, setting Spam-score at 0% (or some other value). Just a thought. Not a necessary feature right now, but a reminder for the future (perhaps even for myself!). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-21 22:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Unfortunately implementation is tricky. FAQ 6.6 has a comments (and a link to comments about implementation) that explain why: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Garyu (garyuthegreat) Date: 2004-12-21 22:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1003063 I'd also like a whitelist function. From a few people, I get/send mails in another language than default. Because it's just such a few, they all get marked as spam or possible spam. A right-click "add sender to whitelist" would solve the problem. My guess it's not that hard to implement (just a guess, sorry), and it would prevent most of my "Possible Spam" classifications, making Spambayes much better! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-29 04:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 No. Unforunately it's not possible to implement SpamBayes' filtering using the Outlook Rules system, so SpamBayes works independantly of it, and so the "Stop processing" won't have any effect. I would recommend that the best solution would be to create a new folder, and move either all 'whitelisted' mail to it, or everything *except* 'whitelisted' mail to it. Ensure that 'background filtering' is enabled (Advanced tab) and get SpamBayes to filter *only* the folder that doesn't include the 'whitelisted' mail. You'll now have an inbox with mail SpamBayes thinks is ham, and an inbox with mail that your 'whitelist' thinks is ham, and SpamBayes hasn't touched. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Dave Rinell (kitchenboy) Date: 2004-02-27 06:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=985524 If I specify the rule as "If Sender is in Contacts, then Stop processing more rules" will this stop it from being moved into the SPAM or possible folder? Or do I need to have the filter on the SPAM / possible folder to move the message back to the Inbox? I don't want to move it to another folder if at all possible... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-27 06:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please read FAQ 6.6: Basically, you should just turn on background filtering, and do any whitelisting via Outlook's pretty good rules system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=905648&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 22 08:22:11 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 22 08:22:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-899839 ] Outlook 2003 UI Does Not Refresh after "Delete As Spam" Message-ID: Bugs item #899839, was opened at 2004-02-18 20:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sfbasti You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899839&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Furka (jfurka) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 UI Does Not Refresh after "Delete As Spam" Initial Comment: When you select an email and hit the "Delete As Spam" button while in the Inbox, the UI is not refreshed after the delete. Selecting the message again gives the error "No filterable mail items are selected". The UI is finally refreshed after another user action, such as going to another mail folder and coming back, or deleting a second message as Spam. This behavior can also be seen in the "Junk Suspects" folder. If you select all of the emails and hit "Delete as Spam", the Outlook UI still contains all of the emails. If you then go to the Spam folder, it is also not refreshed properly with the "Junk Suspects" email that should now be in the Spam folder. Another user action is needed to refresh the UI. I'm running Outlook 2003 in non-cached mode. I don't see the problem is cached mode. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sebastian Klebba (sfbasti) Date: 2004-12-22 08:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1170218 >I have also noticed this problem with two machines. The >issue started right after I installed WinXP SP2 on both of them. If your are working with an Exchange-Server you must allow some UDP-Packages to pass yout firewall. If they are blocked Outlook seems not to refresh after some actions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-15 23:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm not sure. This effects a lot of people (including me), and it is suspicious that it happens much more with spambayes actions than it does with manual actions. Maybe there is something we can do to encourage a refresh? Unfortunately, it seems to be the sort of thing that will take lots of trawling through msdn.microsoft.com and testing all sorts of things to figure out, and I just don't have the time for that at the moment, particularly for something that is more a annoyance than a problem. I'm happy to leave it open until we can confirm that there's nothing we can do about it, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-15 18:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This seems like the same issue as [ 1007472 ], which was closed as being an Outlook issue and not a SpamBayes issue. Should this bug also be closed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 05:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is not limited to SP2, or to Outlook 2003. I very occasionally see this with Outlook 2002 and XP SP1. I believe it's when the Exchange server is particularly busy, although I couldn't say for sure. It's hard to know what SpamBayes can do about it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: callowjg (callowjg) Date: 2004-09-02 15:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1115159 I have also noticed this problem with two machines. The issue started right after I installed WinXP SP2 on both of them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899839&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 23 00:28:49 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 23 00:28:56 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-899839 ] Outlook 2003 UI Does Not Refresh after "Delete As Spam" Message-ID: Bugs item #899839, was opened at 2004-02-19 08:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899839&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Furka (jfurka) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 UI Does Not Refresh after "Delete As Spam" Initial Comment: When you select an email and hit the "Delete As Spam" button while in the Inbox, the UI is not refreshed after the delete. Selecting the message again gives the error "No filterable mail items are selected". The UI is finally refreshed after another user action, such as going to another mail folder and coming back, or deleting a second message as Spam. This behavior can also be seen in the "Junk Suspects" folder. If you select all of the emails and hit "Delete as Spam", the Outlook UI still contains all of the emails. If you then go to the Spam folder, it is also not refreshed properly with the "Junk Suspects" email that should now be in the Spam folder. Another user action is needed to refresh the UI. I'm running Outlook 2003 in non-cached mode. I don't see the problem is cached mode. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-23 12:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you have any more specifics about what needs to be unblocked? It would be great to resolve this issue! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sebastian Klebba (sfbasti) Date: 2004-12-22 20:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1170218 >I have also noticed this problem with two machines. The >issue started right after I installed WinXP SP2 on both of them. If your are working with an Exchange-Server you must allow some UDP-Packages to pass yout firewall. If they are blocked Outlook seems not to refresh after some actions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-16 11:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm not sure. This effects a lot of people (including me), and it is suspicious that it happens much more with spambayes actions than it does with manual actions. Maybe there is something we can do to encourage a refresh? Unfortunately, it seems to be the sort of thing that will take lots of trawling through msdn.microsoft.com and testing all sorts of things to figure out, and I just don't have the time for that at the moment, particularly for something that is more a annoyance than a problem. I'm happy to leave it open until we can confirm that there's nothing we can do about it, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-16 06:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This seems like the same issue as [ 1007472 ], which was closed as being an Outlook issue and not a SpamBayes issue. Should this bug also be closed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 15:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is not limited to SP2, or to Outlook 2003. I very occasionally see this with Outlook 2002 and XP SP1. I believe it's when the Exchange server is particularly busy, although I couldn't say for sure. It's hard to know what SpamBayes can do about it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: callowjg (callowjg) Date: 2004-09-03 01:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1115159 I have also noticed this problem with two machines. The issue started right after I installed WinXP SP2 on both of them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899839&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 23 07:57:07 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 23 07:57:36 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-899839 ] Outlook 2003 UI Does Not Refresh after "Delete As Spam" Message-ID: Bugs item #899839, was opened at 2004-02-18 20:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sfbasti You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899839&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Furka (jfurka) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 UI Does Not Refresh after "Delete As Spam" Initial Comment: When you select an email and hit the "Delete As Spam" button while in the Inbox, the UI is not refreshed after the delete. Selecting the message again gives the error "No filterable mail items are selected". The UI is finally refreshed after another user action, such as going to another mail folder and coming back, or deleting a second message as Spam. This behavior can also be seen in the "Junk Suspects" folder. If you select all of the emails and hit "Delete as Spam", the Outlook UI still contains all of the emails. If you then go to the Spam folder, it is also not refreshed properly with the "Junk Suspects" email that should now be in the Spam folder. Another user action is needed to refresh the UI. I'm running Outlook 2003 in non-cached mode. I don't see the problem is cached mode. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sebastian Klebba (sfbasti) Date: 2004-12-23 07:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1170218 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en- us;264035 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-23 00:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you have any more specifics about what needs to be unblocked? It would be great to resolve this issue! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sebastian Klebba (sfbasti) Date: 2004-12-22 08:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1170218 >I have also noticed this problem with two machines. The >issue started right after I installed WinXP SP2 on both of them. If your are working with an Exchange-Server you must allow some UDP-Packages to pass yout firewall. If they are blocked Outlook seems not to refresh after some actions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-15 23:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm not sure. This effects a lot of people (including me), and it is suspicious that it happens much more with spambayes actions than it does with manual actions. Maybe there is something we can do to encourage a refresh? Unfortunately, it seems to be the sort of thing that will take lots of trawling through msdn.microsoft.com and testing all sorts of things to figure out, and I just don't have the time for that at the moment, particularly for something that is more a annoyance than a problem. I'm happy to leave it open until we can confirm that there's nothing we can do about it, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-15 18:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This seems like the same issue as [ 1007472 ], which was closed as being an Outlook issue and not a SpamBayes issue. Should this bug also be closed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-16 05:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is not limited to SP2, or to Outlook 2003. I very occasionally see this with Outlook 2002 and XP SP1. I believe it's when the Exchange server is particularly busy, although I couldn't say for sure. It's hard to know what SpamBayes can do about it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: callowjg (callowjg) Date: 2004-09-02 15:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1115159 I have also noticed this problem with two machines. The issue started right after I installed WinXP SP2 on both of them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899839&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Thu Dec 23 14:55:41 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Thu Dec 23 14:55:50 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-899839 ] Outlook 2003 UI Does Not Refresh after "Delete As Spam" Message-ID: Bugs item #899839, was opened at 2004-02-18 14:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by callowjg You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899839&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: Binary 1.0a9 (0.9) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jim Furka (jfurka) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook 2003 UI Does Not Refresh after "Delete As Spam" Initial Comment: When you select an email and hit the "Delete As Spam" button while in the Inbox, the UI is not refreshed after the delete. Selecting the message again gives the error "No filterable mail items are selected". The UI is finally refreshed after another user action, such as going to another mail folder and coming back, or deleting a second message as Spam. This behavior can also be seen in the "Junk Suspects" folder. If you select all of the emails and hit "Delete as Spam", the Outlook UI still contains all of the emails. If you then go to the Spam folder, it is also not refreshed properly with the "Junk Suspects" email that should now be in the Spam folder. Another user action is needed to refresh the UI. I'm running Outlook 2003 in non-cached mode. I don't see the problem is cached mode. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: callowjg (callowjg) Date: 2004-12-23 08:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1115159 Since first viewing this posting I have changed to cached mode and that has proved to effectively solve the problem for me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sebastian Klebba (sfbasti) Date: 2004-12-23 01:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1170218 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en- us;264035 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-22 18:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Do you have any more specifics about what needs to be unblocked? It would be great to resolve this issue! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sebastian Klebba (sfbasti) Date: 2004-12-22 02:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1170218 >I have also noticed this problem with two machines. The >issue started right after I installed WinXP SP2 on both of them. If your are working with an Exchange-Server you must allow some UDP-Packages to pass yout firewall. If they are blocked Outlook seems not to refresh after some actions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-15 17:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 I'm not sure. This effects a lot of people (including me), and it is suspicious that it happens much more with spambayes actions than it does with manual actions. Maybe there is something we can do to encourage a refresh? Unfortunately, it seems to be the sort of thing that will take lots of trawling through msdn.microsoft.com and testing all sorts of things to figure out, and I just don't have the time for that at the moment, particularly for something that is more a annoyance than a problem. I'm happy to leave it open until we can confirm that there's nothing we can do about it, though. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Kenny Pitt (kpitt) Date: 2004-12-15 12:04 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=859086 This seems like the same issue as [ 1007472 ], which was closed as being an Outlook issue and not a SpamBayes issue. Should this bug also be closed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-09-15 22:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 This is not limited to SP2, or to Outlook 2003. I very occasionally see this with Outlook 2002 and XP SP1. I believe it's when the Exchange server is particularly busy, although I couldn't say for sure. It's hard to know what SpamBayes can do about it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: callowjg (callowjg) Date: 2004-09-02 08:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1115159 I have also noticed this problem with two machines. The issue started right after I installed WinXP SP2 on both of them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=899839&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Mon Dec 27 23:19:20 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Mon Dec 27 23:19:22 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1091912 ] cna't see files in Junk Suspects Message-ID: Bugs item #1091912, was opened at 2004-12-27 17:19 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1091912&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: dcav (dcav) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: cna't see files in Junk Suspects Initial Comment: Files will be directed to Junk suspects, but i can not see a list of files or access that folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1091912&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 28 14:42:09 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 28 14:42:11 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1092172 ] Outlook Sapmbayes Can't see Junk Suspect files Message-ID: Support Requests item #1092172, was opened at 2004-12-28 08:42 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1092172&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: dcav (dcav) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook Sapmbayes Can't see Junk Suspect files Initial Comment: Files are directed to the junk suspect folder, however i can not access them or "train" spambayes on how to disposition them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1092172&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 28 23:45:14 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 28 23:45:48 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1092440 ] can not see junk suspect files Message-ID: Bugs item #1092440, was opened at 2004-12-28 17:45 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1092440&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: dcav (dcav) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: can not see junk suspect files Initial Comment: Files are directed to junk suspect folder but i can not see any files when i click on the button. It says there are no items to show in this folder. I have the latest version and i am using Outlook 2003. here is a copy of my log. Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\dcavanaugh\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\dcavanaugh\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 54 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0.1 (November 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 2) using Python 2.3.4 (#53, May 25 2004, 21:17:02) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - d cavanaugh/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Mailbox - d cavanaugh/Junk E-Mail' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... Message 'confirm 24b47a79ffc99276fcc2a39de02a0b8f5a77657b' in 'Mailbox - d cavanaugh/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Welcome to the "Spambayes" mailing list' in 'Mailbox - d cavanaugh/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\dcavanaugh\Application Data\SpamBayes\dcavanaugh.ini SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - d cavanaugh/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Mailbox - d cavanaugh/Junk E-Mail' Message 'Auto-response for your message to the "Spambayes" mailing list' in 'Mailbox - d cavanaugh/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message '[Spambayes] Can not view files in the Junk Suspects folder...Help!!' in 'Mailbox - d cavanaugh/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message '[Spambayes] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient file blockingsettings matched and action taken.' in 'Mailbox - d cavanaugh/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1092440&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 28 23:53:22 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 28 23:53:41 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1092172 ] Outlook Sapmbayes Can't see Junk Suspect files Message-ID: Support Requests item #1092172, was opened at 2004-12-29 02:42 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1092172&group_id=61702 Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: dcav (dcav) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Outlook Sapmbayes Can't see Junk Suspect files Initial Comment: Files are directed to the junk suspect folder, however i can not access them or "train" spambayes on how to disposition them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-29 11:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 You probably have an Outlook "view filter" set up for that folder. The Outlook documentation has more information about those, but what you probably want to know is: 1. Select the folder. 2. Choose View->Current View->Customize Current View 3. Click Filter. 4. Change the filter so that it will show the messages you want. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1092172&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 28 23:54:10 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 28 23:54:27 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1091912 ] cna't see files in Junk Suspects Message-ID: Bugs item #1091912, was opened at 2004-12-28 11:19 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1091912&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: dcav (dcav) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: cna't see files in Junk Suspects Initial Comment: Files will be directed to Junk suspects, but i can not see a list of files or access that folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-29 11:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please submit only one request per problem! You probably have an Outlook "view filter" set up for that folder. The Outlook documentation has more information about those, but what you probably want to know is: 1. Select the folder. 2. Choose View->Current View->Customize Current View 3. Click Filter. 4. Change the filter so that it will show the messages you want. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1091912&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Tue Dec 28 23:54:44 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Tue Dec 28 23:55:01 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1092440 ] can not see junk suspect files Message-ID: Bugs item #1092440, was opened at 2004-12-29 11:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1092440&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 5 Submitted By: dcav (dcav) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: can not see junk suspect files Initial Comment: Files are directed to junk suspect folder but i can not see any files when i click on the button. It says there are no items to show in this folder. I have the latest version and i am using Outlook 2003. here is a copy of my log. Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\dcavanaugh\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\dcavanaugh\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 54 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0.1 (November 2004) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 2) using Python 2.3.4 (#53, May 25 2004, 21:17:02) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - d cavanaugh/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Mailbox - d cavanaugh/Junk E-Mail' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (- 2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... Message 'confirm 24b47a79ffc99276fcc2a39de02a0b8f5a77657b' in 'Mailbox - d cavanaugh/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Welcome to the "Spambayes" mailing list' in 'Mailbox - d cavanaugh/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and Settings\dcavanaugh\Application Data\SpamBayes\dcavanaugh.ini SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Mailbox - d cavanaugh/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Mailbox - d cavanaugh/Junk E-Mail' Message 'Auto-response for your message to the "Spambayes" mailing list' in 'Mailbox - d cavanaugh/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message '[Spambayes] Can not view files in the Junk Suspects folder...Help!!' in 'Mailbox - d cavanaugh/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message '[Spambayes] [MailServer Notification]To Recipient file blockingsettings matched and action taken.' in 'Mailbox - d cavanaugh/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-12-29 11:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Please submit only one request per problem! You probably have an Outlook "view filter" set up for that folder. The Outlook documentation has more information about those, but what you probably want to know is: 1. Select the folder. 2. Choose View->Current View->Customize Current View 3. Click Filter. 4. Change the filter so that it will show the messages you want. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1092440&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 29 17:27:51 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 29 17:28:33 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-892634 ] Outlook plugin won't score/filter msgs in 2nd PST file Message-ID: Bugs item #892634, was opened at 2004-02-07 16:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bpu_webguy You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=892634&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Stanley (dbstanley) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook plugin won't score/filter msgs in 2nd PST file Initial Comment: Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5606) Windows XP Pro, all updates installed SpamBayes Outlook plugin v0.81 The SpamBayes plugin seems to score and automatically filter only messages in one PST file, if multiple PST files are used with Outlook. My main PST files ("Personal Folders") has only the standard folders (Inbox, Outbox, Sent Items, Junk E-Mail, Junk Suspects, Drafts, Deleted Items). I have another PST file (okay, actually I have 3 more) with several folders. I have Outlook rules set up to move messages into a few of these folders "after they arrive." I have set up SpamBayes to filter 3 of these folders (in the 2nd PST), as well as the Inbox folder in the main PST file. Although messages that end up in my Inbox folder are being scored and automatically filtered, messages in the second PST files are not. The "Spam" field shows nothing (blank) for messages in filtered folders in the second PST file. However, the "Show Spam clues for current message" option shows high scores (100% in some cases) for Spam messages in these folders. If I force filter-these messages using the "Filter Messages..." option, the Spam messages are filtered and moved to the Junk E- mail folder. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hal Smith (bpu_webguy) Date: 2004-12-29 10:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=842378 Hmm, in RFE [ 829602 ] Multiple Inboxes seem to be mishandled, I noted that all of the exchange inboxes get processed and sent to the primary Inbox, Bayes_Spam or Bayes_NotSure folder depending, of course, on the score. The secondary mailboxes do not get items in their inboxes if SpamBayes is active, and do get their mail if it is not, as I remember. I am not currently running SpamBayes on my new locked down corporate workstation, still trying to get it on the "approved list". Security is sooooo much fun. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-03-15 18:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 In addition, are you using background filtering? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-02-07 19:21 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Could you please attach a log file that covers a period where mail arrives in a folder that should be filtered, but isn't? The plug-in will find the latest log for you via the "Diagnostics" button on the Advanced tab of the Manager, or the FAQ and troubleshooting guide explain where to find it manually. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=892634&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Wed Dec 29 20:51:57 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Wed Dec 29 20:51:59 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-1092896 ] Can't Reinstall SpamBayes Message-ID: Support Requests item #1092896, was opened at 2004-12-29 13:51 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1092896&group_id=61702 Category: Install Problem (example) Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: markinkc (markinkc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't Reinstall SpamBayes Initial Comment: Here's a tricky one. I had both Outlook 2002 and Outlook 2003 installed on my system. I had SpamBayes installed on Outlook 2002. It appeared installed on Outlook 2003 too, but didn't work. I uninstalled Outlook 2002 (actually all of Office 2002). SpamBayes appeared to be installed in Outlook 2003, but didn't work, so I tried (in the following order): 1 - Reinstalling SpamBayes. 2 - Uninstalling and Reinstalling SpamBayes 3 - Repairing Outlook2003, then uninstalling & reinstalling SpamBayes 4 - Uninstalling both SpamBayes and Outlook 2003, then reinstalling both. 5 - Deleting the SpamBayes data folder and reinstalling SpamBayes. Nothing seems to work. The SpamBayes installer runs and says it has completed successfully, but the SpamBayes manager does not appear when Outlook launches and it is not in the Outlook toolbar. I'm thinking there's a bad registry entry left over from Outlook 2002, but have no clue what to look for. Any suggestions? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=1092896&group_id=61702 From noreply at sourceforge.net Fri Dec 31 22:18:37 2004 From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net) Date: Fri Dec 31 22:18:40 2004 Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-1093901 ] autopreview pane now turned on Message-ID: Bugs item #1093901, was opened at 2004-12-31 16:18 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1093901&group_id=61702 Category: Outlook Group: 1.0.1 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Mark Urban-Lurain (urban-lurain) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: autopreview pane now turned on Initial Comment: Win XP Pro, SP2. Outlook 2002. SB 1.0.1 IMAP client. After installing this version to watch my Inbox, outlook keeps enabling the autopreview on this folder. I turn it off, switch folders, and when I come back to this folder, it is turned on again. It does not do this on any other folders. It did not do this before in installed this. I had been running version 0.8 for well over a year an never had this problem. I run this account as a limited user. However, the installation documentation was vague. It said that it would only work on the account from which it was installed, but did not specify that one needed admin privs to install. So, I granted this account admin privs, installed and configured spambayes, then logged out and changed the account back to a limited user. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=1093901&group_id=61702