From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul  4 19:56:51 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Jul  5 00:44:39 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-740198 ] Installation fails with
	regsvr error
Message-ID: <E19YcIF-0005WC-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #740198, was opened at 2003-05-19 21:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rdesantos
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Installation fails with regsvr error

Initial Comment:
I'm trying to install SpamBayes into Outlook XP on 
Win98SE.  The install fails with a regsvr error.  
Attempts at manually registering the file also fail.  
Here's the log:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 274, in 
importHook
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 353, in doimport
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", 
line 59, in ?
  
File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\client\genca
che.py", line 368, in EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error 
loading type library/DLL.', None, None)
SystemError: PyErr_NormalizeException() called 
without exception
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 11, in ?
AttributeError: 'module' object has no 
attribute 'OutlookAddin'

Any help?

Cheers,

Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-04 21:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ken Walker (kwalker411)
Date: 2003-05-23 12:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=785557

Hi Fellas.  As per Tony Meyer's request, I'm appending my
version information here.  The plugin wouldn't install on my
platform due to a regsvr error.

System:

     Microsoft Windows 2000
     5.00.2195
     Service Pack 3

Mail Client:

     Microsoft Outlook 2002
     10.4219.5025
     Service Pack 2

Thanks,
K

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-22 22:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:
"I have a win2000 running outlook 2000 sr1 and I get the 
following message  
<<error.jpeg>> and the logs are as follows the first two time 
the log was empty but the next two time I got the following 
logs.  <<spambayes3.log>>  
<<spambayes4.log>> 
David"

The jpeg was just a screenshot of the regsvr error.  Log3 is:
"Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 15, in DllRegisterServer
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\register.py", 
line 388, in RegisterClasses
IndexError: list index out of range"
and log4 is:
"warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
Unregistered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 22, in DllUnregisterServer
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 791, in 
UnregisterAddin
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 296, in importHook
ImportError: No module named _winreg"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-22 19:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Noting a dupe in
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741914&group_id=61702

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul  4 19:57:34 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Jul  5 00:44:40 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-740198 ] Installation fails with
	regsvr error
Message-ID: <E19YcIw-0005Wx-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #740198, was opened at 2003-05-19 21:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rdesantos
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Installation fails with regsvr error

Initial Comment:
I'm trying to install SpamBayes into Outlook XP on 
Win98SE.  The install fails with a regsvr error.  
Attempts at manually registering the file also fail.  
Here's the log:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 274, in 
importHook
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 353, in doimport
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", 
line 59, in ?
  
File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\client\genca
che.py", line 368, in EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error 
loading type library/DLL.', None, None)
SystemError: PyErr_NormalizeException() called 
without exception
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 11, in ?
AttributeError: 'module' object has no 
attribute 'OutlookAddin'

Any help?

Cheers,

Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-04 21:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-04 21:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ken Walker (kwalker411)
Date: 2003-05-23 12:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=785557

Hi Fellas.  As per Tony Meyer's request, I'm appending my
version information here.  The plugin wouldn't install on my
platform due to a regsvr error.

System:

     Microsoft Windows 2000
     5.00.2195
     Service Pack 3

Mail Client:

     Microsoft Outlook 2002
     10.4219.5025
     Service Pack 2

Thanks,
K

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-22 22:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:
"I have a win2000 running outlook 2000 sr1 and I get the 
following message  
<<error.jpeg>> and the logs are as follows the first two time 
the log was empty but the next two time I got the following 
logs.  <<spambayes3.log>>  
<<spambayes4.log>> 
David"

The jpeg was just a screenshot of the regsvr error.  Log3 is:
"Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 15, in DllRegisterServer
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\register.py", 
line 388, in RegisterClasses
IndexError: list index out of range"
and log4 is:
"warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
Unregistered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 22, in DllUnregisterServer
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 791, in 
UnregisterAddin
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 296, in importHook
ImportError: No module named _winreg"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-22 19:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Noting a dupe in
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741914&group_id=61702

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul  4 21:48:28 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Jul  5 00:44:41 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-740198 ] Installation fails with
	regsvr error
Message-ID: <E19Ye2G-0007lv-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #740198, was opened at 2003-05-19 21:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rdesantos
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Installation fails with regsvr error

Initial Comment:
I'm trying to install SpamBayes into Outlook XP on 
Win98SE.  The install fails with a regsvr error.  
Attempts at manually registering the file also fail.  
Here's the log:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 274, in 
importHook
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 353, in doimport
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", 
line 59, in ?
  
File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\client\genca
che.py", line 368, in EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error 
loading type library/DLL.', None, None)
SystemError: PyErr_NormalizeException() called 
without exception
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 11, in ?
AttributeError: 'module' object has no 
attribute 'OutlookAddin'

Any help?

Cheers,

Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-04 23:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

Addendum:  following my earlier post today I discovered 
release 3 of the code had been made.  I retested install with 
the binary and it failed again with an error in the regsvr:

DllRegisterServer ... failed Return Code was 0x80040201

with this in the log file:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 71, in ?
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 368, in 
EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error loading type 
library/DLL.', None, None)

I also tried the Python/open source install and it also fails 
with an error that "Outlook 2000 is not installed on this 
machine"... well, no isn't.  Outlook 2002 (XP) is!  

I'd love to try out this program but if I can't get it to install I 
guess I'll never find out.  

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-04 21:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-04 21:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ken Walker (kwalker411)
Date: 2003-05-23 12:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=785557

Hi Fellas.  As per Tony Meyer's request, I'm appending my
version information here.  The plugin wouldn't install on my
platform due to a regsvr error.

System:

     Microsoft Windows 2000
     5.00.2195
     Service Pack 3

Mail Client:

     Microsoft Outlook 2002
     10.4219.5025
     Service Pack 2

Thanks,
K

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-22 22:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:
"I have a win2000 running outlook 2000 sr1 and I get the 
following message  
<<error.jpeg>> and the logs are as follows the first two time 
the log was empty but the next two time I got the following 
logs.  <<spambayes3.log>>  
<<spambayes4.log>> 
David"

The jpeg was just a screenshot of the regsvr error.  Log3 is:
"Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 15, in DllRegisterServer
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\register.py", 
line 388, in RegisterClasses
IndexError: list index out of range"
and log4 is:
"warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
Unregistered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 22, in DllUnregisterServer
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 791, in 
UnregisterAddin
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 296, in importHook
ImportError: No module named _winreg"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-22 19:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Noting a dupe in
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741914&group_id=61702

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul  6 09:29:26 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul  6 20:05:00 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows
	2000
Message-ID: <E19ZBSA-0005EH-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-01 20:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hallstevenson
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000

Initial Comment:
When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs 
until the registering dll's section and then stops with an 
alert.  An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is

"Unable to register the DLL/OCX. 

DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201.

<Abort> <Retry> <Ignore>"

I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just 
repeat the error and Abort would unwind the 
installation.  I never tried Ignore.

I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, 
but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them.  
Abort worked the second time.  I finally tried Ignore, 
which completes okay.  When I ran Outlook, though, the 
add-in wasn't there.

This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron 
notebook.  It has Outlook 2002 SP2.  Both are up to 
date with recent patches.  I believe this combination is 
not known to work, but thought this information might 
help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 11:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :)

--Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error.
--Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to 
Spambayes Outlook plug-in
--Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using 
both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB 
article. No difference.
--Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in 
case:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;207132

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;249873

The 2nd one mentions this:

DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. 
Return code was: string
*Search Winerror.h for string. 

You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to 
get this working again. 

Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes 
working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her 
to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, 
her missing "spam thingy".

I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I 
upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. 
Just so happened that 003 became available and 
troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, 
so I did. Didn't help me.... :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-04 00:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 
did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ 
SP2 installed.

The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. 
Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up 
and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running 
the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does 
NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-02 13:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on 
Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could 
not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) 
And still could not install the Binary version 003.
I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then 
tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I 
uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul  6 10:39:50 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul  6 20:05:00 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-766750 ] Source install fails on
	Office XP
Message-ID: <E19ZCYI-0007g2-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #766750, was opened at 2003-07-06 12:39
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=766750&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Source install fails on Office XP

Initial Comment:
I've been trying and trying to get the binary install to 
work since upgrading from Outlook 2000 to Outlook XP 
with no success. So, I tried the source version.... 
Downloaded and installed Python, the Win32 extensions, 
and the zip file for Spambayes.

Running "addin.py" opens a DOS console that quickly 
(too quickly) flashes an error message. It took me about 
six runs to read part of the message. I then located it in 
the 'addin.py' source file. It's this one:

"This Addin requires that Outlook 2000 be installed on 
this machine."
"This appears to not be installed due to the following 
error:"

Apparently it's failing 'cause of not finding something 
related to this:

universal.RegisterInterfaces('{AC0714F2-3D04-11D1-
AE7D-00A0C90F26F4})

Part of that is a registry key, I assume. I *do* have 
that registry key and it has quite a few sub-keys... 
here's one of the values in a sub-key:

MSAddnDr.AddInDesigner.1

My next attempt will be uninstalling Office XP and then 
using some Office clean-up tools I've read about from 
Microsoft's website. Will report back...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=766750&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul  6 12:10:44 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul  6 20:05:01 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-766750 ] Source install fails on
	Office XP
Message-ID: <E19ZDyG-0004TU-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #766750, was opened at 2003-07-06 12:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hallstevenson
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=766750&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Source install fails on Office XP

Initial Comment:
I've been trying and trying to get the binary install to 
work since upgrading from Outlook 2000 to Outlook XP 
with no success. So, I tried the source version.... 
Downloaded and installed Python, the Win32 extensions, 
and the zip file for Spambayes.

Running "addin.py" opens a DOS console that quickly 
(too quickly) flashes an error message. It took me about 
six runs to read part of the message. I then located it in 
the 'addin.py' source file. It's this one:

"This Addin requires that Outlook 2000 be installed on 
this machine."
"This appears to not be installed due to the following 
error:"

Apparently it's failing 'cause of not finding something 
related to this:

universal.RegisterInterfaces('{AC0714F2-3D04-11D1-
AE7D-00A0C90F26F4})

Part of that is a registry key, I assume. I *do* have 
that registry key and it has quite a few sub-keys... 
here's one of the values in a sub-key:

MSAddnDr.AddInDesigner.1

My next attempt will be uninstalling Office XP and then 
using some Office clean-up tools I've read about from 
Microsoft's website. Will report back...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 14:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from "addin.py" 
regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=766750&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul  6 12:11:47 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul  6 20:05:02 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows
	2000
Message-ID: <E19ZDzH-0000W0-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-01 20:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hallstevenson
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000

Initial Comment:
When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs 
until the registering dll's section and then stops with an 
alert.  An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is

"Unable to register the DLL/OCX. 

DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201.

<Abort> <Retry> <Ignore>"

I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just 
repeat the error and Abort would unwind the 
installation.  I never tried Ignore.

I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, 
but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them.  
Abort worked the second time.  I finally tried Ignore, 
which completes okay.  When I ran Outlook, though, the 
add-in wasn't there.

This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron 
notebook.  It has Outlook 2002 SP2.  Both are up to 
date with recent patches.  I believe this combination is 
not known to work, but thought this information might 
help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 14:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Copy-n-pasted from another bug report:

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from
"addin.py" regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 11:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :)

--Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error.
--Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to 
Spambayes Outlook plug-in
--Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using 
both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB 
article. No difference.
--Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in 
case:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;207132

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;249873

The 2nd one mentions this:

DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. 
Return code was: string
*Search Winerror.h for string. 

You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to 
get this working again. 

Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes 
working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her 
to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, 
her missing "spam thingy".

I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I 
upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. 
Just so happened that 003 became available and 
troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, 
so I did. Didn't help me.... :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-04 00:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 
did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ 
SP2 installed.

The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. 
Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up 
and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running 
the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does 
NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-02 13:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on 
Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could 
not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) 
And still could not install the Binary version 003.
I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then 
tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I 
uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul  6 16:59:56 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul  6 20:05:03 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-747107 ] SpamBayes leaves
	duplicate messages
Message-ID: <E19ZIU8-0004Hp-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #747107, was opened at 2003-06-02 06:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747107&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Eric Brown (ericbr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: SpamBayes leaves duplicate messages

Initial Comment:
I am subscribed to a number of different mailing lists, 
and I have a number of Outlook rules (set up via Rules 
Wizard) to route the different mailing lists into different 
folders.

When the rules are of the form:
Apply this rule after the message arrives
with <words> in the subject
move it to the <specified> folder

and a matching message comes in, SpamBayes 
seems to leave multiple copies of that message in the 
inbox.

This is very frustrating.

If the rule is of the form:
Apply this rule after the message arrives
sent to <email address>
move it to the <specified> folder

and a matching message comes in, duplicate 
messages do not occur.

So it seems to be some sort of odd interaction with 
Outlook Rules.

I'm running Outlook 2002 SP 2 on Windows XP SP 1a 
(with current hotfixes).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-07 10:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

No, installing 003 over the top of 002 should work fine.

I don't have any more answers, sorry, but no doubt Mark will 
look into this when he gets a chance.  Stay tuned!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Brown (ericbr)
Date: 2003-07-05 09:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=783913

Anadelon:  Outlook junk mail rules are turned off; spam is 
Moved to Junk Mail.

I just ran the release 003 of the plugin, and I'm still seeing 
the problem.

(I didn't bother uninstalling release 002 - is that a problem?)

Eric


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Brent Rockwood (dnaguy)
Date: 2003-07-05 03:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=18879

It appears the problem lies between the keyboard and 
chair. :)  I seem to have overlooked the option to move 
messages instead of copying.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 15:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

In addition, the log file seems to indicate that you are using 
release 002 of the plugin.  If you haven't already, could you 
try release 003 and let us know if the problem still occurs?

Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 15:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Eric, do you have the Outlook junk mail rules turned on?  If 
you do, would both of you be able to try turning them off 
(they aren't all that much use if you are using spambayes 
anyway), and seeing if this resolves the problem?

In addition, forgive me if you've checked this, but in the 
spambayes filter setup, do you have "move" selected rather 
than "copy"?

(It's an odd problem that IIRC we have heard before, but I'm 
using the same version of Windows and Outlook, and have 
rules of that form, and don't notice this problem).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Brent Rockwood (dnaguy)
Date: 2003-07-04 03:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=18879

I am also having this problem.  I have not tested it with 
various rule types, but I believe it is occurring in conjunction 
with the Outlook "Junk E-mail" feature.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747107&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul  7 10:09:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul  7 12:10:04 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765256 ] train does not work
Message-ID: <E19ZYYj-0004rY-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765256, was opened at 2003-07-03 11:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ganssauge
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765256&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: hans mueller (modifier)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: train does not work

Initial Comment:
hi,
after choosing the right directories in the "train now" 
form, an pressing the train button nothing happens... 
german outlook xp!
modi

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gottfried Gan?auge (ganssauge)
Date: 2003-07-07 16:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=792746

I could verify the behaviour which indeed is quite strange.
When starting the training session the progress bar is set up 
by calling Progress.set_stages in dialogs/AsyncDialog.py.
There the assertion in the last line fires because start_pos - 
1.0 is not less than 0.001.
After a fair bit of trying I came to the conclusion that floating 
point literals within the python source text are not correctly 
parsed.
It was possible to verify that by asserting 1.0 == float(1).
VERY STRANGE INDEED.
Changing the locale didn't help at all.
I could avoid that particular error by generating floating point 
constants using the float() builtin.
For example I defined 0.001 as (float(1) / float(1000)).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Cloutier (chealer)
Date: 2003-07-04 22:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738765

Topic similar to 765912.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 03:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

There are some issues with Outlook with non-English locales.  
We have made some movement towards fixing these, but a 
definitive fix has eluded us so far.

If you could attach your log file to this tracker, that would 
certainly help.  Instructions about how to find it are in the 
troubleshooting.html file (which you can get to via 
the "about.html" file from the main manager dialog).

Also - are you using the 003 or 002 binary, or source?  If you 
are using the 002 binary, please check to see if this still 
happens with the 003 release, and attach the log file from 
that execution if it does.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765256&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul  7 14:00:47 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul  7 16:01:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765256 ] train does not work
Message-ID: <E19ZcAJ-0001tM-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765256, was opened at 2003-07-03 13:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tvrs
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765256&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: hans mueller (modifier)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: train does not work

Initial Comment:
hi,
after choosing the right directories in the "train now" 
form, an pressing the train button nothing happens... 
german outlook xp!
modi

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Thomas Verschuren (tvrs)
Date: 2003-07-07 22:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=810345

Same problem here, dutch outlook XP...

Logfile show the following:

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and
Settings\ThomasV\Application
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and
Settings\ThomasV\Application
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003)
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May
2003))...
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and
Settings\ThomasV\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID
1100, Code 0

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gottfried Gan?auge (ganssauge)
Date: 2003-07-07 18:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=792746

I could verify the behaviour which indeed is quite strange.
When starting the training session the progress bar is set up 
by calling Progress.set_stages in dialogs/AsyncDialog.py.
There the assertion in the last line fires because start_pos - 
1.0 is not less than 0.001.
After a fair bit of trying I came to the conclusion that floating 
point literals within the python source text are not correctly 
parsed.
It was possible to verify that by asserting 1.0 == float(1).
VERY STRANGE INDEED.
Changing the locale didn't help at all.
I could avoid that particular error by generating floating point 
constants using the float() builtin.
For example I defined 0.001 as (float(1) / float(1000)).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Cloutier (chealer)
Date: 2003-07-05 00:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738765

Topic similar to 765912.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 05:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

There are some issues with Outlook with non-English locales.  
We have made some movement towards fixing these, but a 
definitive fix has eluded us so far.

If you could attach your log file to this tracker, that would 
certainly help.  Instructions about how to find it are in the 
troubleshooting.html file (which you can get to via 
the "about.html" file from the main manager dialog).

Also - are you using the 003 or 002 binary, or source?  If you 
are using the 002 binary, please check to see if this still 
happens with the 003 release, and attach the log file from 
that execution if it does.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765256&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul  7 15:52:12 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul  7 17:52:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-716684 ] Filtering marks message
	as unread
Message-ID: <E19Zdu8-0007WM-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #716684, was opened at 2003-04-07 04:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gokubi
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filtering marks message as unread

Initial Comment:
Reported too many times :)  Exchange server users only.

As spambayes startsit starts processing missed
messages.  In the meantime, the user reads some
messages, thereby marking them as read.  As smapbayes
writes the spam field, these messages spring back to a
read status.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Andersen (gokubi)
Date: 2003-07-07 14:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=558027

I find that if I get a new message and hit reply before I read 
it (I'm in Autopreview) after sending the message it is still 
unread.

More troubling is that Outlook does not show that I have 
replied to the message by changing the envelope icon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-03 22:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:  a user had the same problem, but also noted 
this:

> If an attachment is included, the first time I open the 
> message, I cannot open the attachement, or save it. If I 
> close the message, and reopen it, I can both open and 
save 
> the attachment.

Odd!  I don't get this problem very often at all anymore; I 
don't know why.  If I did, I'd test the attachment theory, but 
as it is, I can't, so I leave it for others ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-10 05:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I just had this happen to me again. I'm using the CVS version 
from a day or two ago.

So the version in current CVS isn't (completely) fixed.

Anythong else I could try? I see part of a thread about 
USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS here, but I can't find the original. 
My code has USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS in it. If you can tell 
me what (if anything) else needs changing, I can try taking it 
out.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-08 08:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

Just as an FYI, I agree with tobermory's comments in that 
spambayes is in fact classifying the message immediately, 
but it's the update to the server and/or client that appears to 
be delayed until the next Outlook event.  See the first of my 
two spambayes list mail messages referenced in my note 
Mark included in this bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-08 08:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

> Would it be possible to try another change for me instead?  
Revert
> filter.py, and in msgstore.py's Save method, find the line:
> 
>             self.mapi_object.SaveChanges
(mapi.KEEP_OPEN_READWRITE |
> USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS)

I'm pretty sure I had tried that first, while experimenting, 
before I
ended up with the extra Save as a final "flush all" attempt.  
There
was no change, nor did the function return an error.  I think I 
also
tried setting it to 0 (after reading the internal comment) to no
apparent effect, although I may be misremembering since the 
same
comment may have caused me to hesitate to make that 
change :-)

But I'll double check this when I get a chance today.  If I recall
when testing, my review of the code seemed to indicate that 
everything
should work fine, and that the spambayes code was 
managing the read
flag reasonably well, and in fact, was issuing a Save() back in
filter.py.  I ended up inserting test Save()s at the lowermost 
level
(which worked) and then bubbling them up to see how high I 
could leave
the extra call so it was called as infrequently as possible.

In the end, the issue seemed related to the processing that 
goes on
when all_actions is enabled.  If the Save() occurred after the 
field
status was updated, but before 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() was
called, all was fine.  But if the 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() got
called first, then the following Save() - as already in filter.py -
didn't seem to "take."

> I'm a little unsure why one of the Save calls is indented too.

Ah, that was just to minimize change from the existing code 
path.

I wanted to move the Save() to happen before
RememberMessageCurrentFolder(), but then the second Save
() became
completely superfluous in the main branch case - but I didn't 
want to
lose the Save() following RememberMessageCurrentFolder() if 
it was
called just in case that was critical to existing behavior, so I 
moved
it to only occur in that same block.

-- David

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Leftley (tobermory)
Date: 2003-04-08 02:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=626601

Just to try and clarify one point: earlier msgs in this thread 
suggest that spambayes doesn't attempt to classify a 
message until certain events (reading a msg, etc.) occur.

In fact from watching the trace output, the message is 
classified as soon as it arrives (the trace 
shows "Message 'xxx' had a Spam classification of 'yyy'") but 
Outlook doesn't reflect this change until the next event occurs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-08 01:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

My version of filter.py looks different. I haven't updated from 
CVS in a while, maybe that's why. But my version looks like 
it has msg.Save() called unconditionally.

    try:
        # Save the score
        msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
        # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
        msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
        msg.Save()

I've tried moving msg.Save() to before msg.Remember...(), but 
I'll have to wait to see results. Will report back.

(Better might be to cvs update and apply your change, but I 
may not get a chance to do that for a couple of days...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-04-07 19:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From David Bolen:
"Moore, Paul" <Paul.Moore@atosorigin.com> writes:

> As far as I know, no-one has been able to track down the 
> problem to fix it yet.

I have, however, implemented a local workaround that's
working really well for me.  This was based on my prior
messages in:

   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004086.html
   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004088.html

Since I can't quantify what if any penalty it imposes in the
general
case by syncing changes back to the server an additional
time, and
since the problem may be limited to Exchange servers, I haven't
proposed it be made to the main source yet - although I
certainly
haven't noticed much of a penalty in my local testing.

But if anyone else wants to try a local change, it's fairly
trivial,
adding an additional call to msg.Save() in filter.py:

    *** filter.py   18 Mar 2003 03:09:03 -0000      1.20
    --- filter.py   7 Apr 2003 22:18:58 -0000
    ***************
    *** 27,39 ****
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !         msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")
    --- 26,39 ----
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
    +         msg.Save()
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !             msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")


After making this change, what went from virtually _every_
message staying unread, became the extreme rare case, such
that I'm no longer certain any remaining case may even be
spambayes related.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-04-07 04:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

A bit of investigation (I am using Outlook 2002 & Exchange 
2000).

A new message arriving in my Inbox does not get analysed by 
SpamBayes until:
- You switch to another folder and back again.
- You read the message (then analysed, but remains 'unread')
- Another email arrives, when the first message is then rated 
(second one not rated though)
- Another email in Inbox is saved after editing
In other words, it seems some other action eventually triggers 
the analysis - not the arrival event itself.

An email that is read before it has been analysed by 
SpamBayes will always be 'unread' afterwards. This is 
independent of type (plain, rich text or HTML)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul  7 17:37:46 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul  7 19:37:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765256 ] train does not work
Message-ID: <E19ZfYI-0003rr-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765256, was opened at 2003-07-03 23:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765256&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: hans mueller (modifier)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: train does not work

Initial Comment:
hi,
after choosing the right directories in the "train now" 
form, an pressing the train button nothing happens... 
german outlook xp!
modi

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-08 11:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

This does sound like (another) locale problem.  The problem is 
that float literals in the code are written like "3.14159", but 
some locales expect them to be written like "3,14159", and so 
the wrong number is read.

The way around this that was used was that the locale was 
set to English quite early on.  One problem, though, is that 
calling certain Outlook functions switches the locale back 
(sigh).  I'll look into this again when I get a chance.

Note that this is more-or-less the same as the "Include a 
proper locale fix in Options.py" bug tracker.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Thomas Verschuren (tvrs)
Date: 2003-07-08 08:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=810345

Same problem here, dutch outlook XP...

Logfile show the following:

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and
Settings\ThomasV\Application
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and
Settings\ThomasV\Application
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003)
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May
2003))...
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and
Settings\ThomasV\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID
1100, Code 0

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gottfried Gan?auge (ganssauge)
Date: 2003-07-08 04:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=792746

I could verify the behaviour which indeed is quite strange.
When starting the training session the progress bar is set up 
by calling Progress.set_stages in dialogs/AsyncDialog.py.
There the assertion in the last line fires because start_pos - 
1.0 is not less than 0.001.
After a fair bit of trying I came to the conclusion that floating 
point literals within the python source text are not correctly 
parsed.
It was possible to verify that by asserting 1.0 == float(1).
VERY STRANGE INDEED.
Changing the locale didn't help at all.
I could avoid that particular error by generating floating point 
constants using the float() builtin.
For example I defined 0.001 as (float(1) / float(1000)).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Cloutier (chealer)
Date: 2003-07-05 10:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738765

Topic similar to 765912.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 15:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

There are some issues with Outlook with non-English locales.  
We have made some movement towards fixing these, but a 
definitive fix has eluded us so far.

If you could attach your log file to this tracker, that would 
certainly help.  Instructions about how to find it are in the 
troubleshooting.html file (which you can get to via 
the "about.html" file from the main manager dialog).

Also - are you using the 003 or 002 binary, or source?  If you 
are using the 002 binary, please check to see if this still 
happens with the 003 release, and attach the log file from 
that execution if it does.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765256&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 01:52:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 03:52:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-767595 ] Outlook/Imap Badness.
Message-ID: <E19ZnGb-0000yT-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #767595, was opened at 2003-07-08 07:52
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=767595&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook/Imap Badness.

Initial Comment:
Similar to report #765042, using XP with Outlook 2002 
SP2 and IMAP via SSL . Also recently set up another 
account using IMAP without SSL

New mail is ignored when I first log in.
ie log shows
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
102.157ms

Once logged in Mail that has Spam classification of 'No' 
is not scored. Mail that has Spam classification 
of 'Unsure' is not scored.
Mail that has a Spam classification of 'Yes' is scored but 
not moved. Filters are set to move only Spam and leave 
Unsure (ham).
Manual Filtering scores read messages but also fails to 
move them (yes Perform All Actions is marked). Unread
messages are not scored (generally.. )

Manual filtering on the non SSL IMAP account seems to 
generate multiple copies of the same spam email 
in the Spam Folder (the moves work on this account)
probably due to my not purging the inbox folder after 
the initial move (ie the message is marked for deletion 
but not deleted) so every manual filter moves the same
spam again. Unread Mail is Not Scored or Filtered on the 
Non SSL account either .

Interestingly 'Delete As Spam' works perfectly, it scores 
and moves the mail (For both SSL and non).

Logfile attached ( when I first opened the non SSL IMAP 
account Spambayes seemed to process all the 
messages correctly up until a point, this is shown in the 
log) perhaps this is a database issue??




----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=767595&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 05:06:13 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 07:06:26 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-725466 ] Include a proper locale
	fix in Options.py
Message-ID: <E19ZqIX-0006PA-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #725466, was opened at 2003-04-22 16:07
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=725466&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 6
Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Include a proper locale fix in Options.py

Initial Comment:
When reading the options, the float() call fails when the 
locale is a language that uses a ',' for a separator 
instead of '.'.  This is hack-fixed in Outlook, but needs to 
be fixed in general.

I imagine that there must be some sort of locale call that 
will convert between the current locale and English, and 
that this should be called as the option is set.

Anyway, I'll get to this when I can.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Still alive :(
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=765256&group_id=61702&atid=498103


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-13 09:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I've checked in a partial fix, where I just set the locale back to 
(US) English after that call (to work it needs this one, and the 
one in addin.py, it seems).  It all seems to work ok now, but 
this is hardly a nice solution.

I had one problem.  (I changed my locale by using the XP 
control panel).
*  If I used locale.getlocale I received "de_DE".  If I tried to set 
the locale to this, I get a "locale setting not supported" error.

This meant that I couldn't try a nice solution that set the 
locale back to the local one.

My testing setup is pretty much gone now, but if I find time I'll 
play around with this again, unless you manage to.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-11 04:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Damn.  IIRC, MAPI also changes the cwd.  I guess the
solution may be the same - check the locale before setting,
and reset explicitly afterwards.  It would be great if you
can check this while you are still setup to test, but
otherwise it can stay on my todo list :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-09 13:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Ok, I did more digging.  The locale set in addin.py isn't 
enough.  This line in msgstore.py screws up the locale:
        self.session = mapi.MAPILogonEx(0, None, None, 
logonFlags)
(it's in the __init__ of MAPIMsgStore; my line numbers are all 
screwed up).

(by 'screws up the locale', I mean that math.log(2) returns a 
number with a '.' decimal separator before it, and a ',' decimal 
separator afterwards).

I'll leave it to Mark to figure out what should be done.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-09 13:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Ok, forget that, I've found a way I can reproduce a similar 
error.

This is definately Outlook specific, and definately cannot be 
fixed in the spambayes code, except by changing the locale 
to 'en' or 'c', or something similar.

Ignoring spambayes completely, and using the demo outlook 
plugin that comes with the win32com extensions, I printed 
out the results of math.log(2).  This should be "0.69314718056
" and not "0,69314718056".  I made this print statement 
pretty much every second line.  When adding, it always gives 
the correct answer.  As soon as Outlook is started up, it 
gives the wrong answer.

It's beyond me whether this is something that the win32com 
stuff does (although importing the extensions doesn't cause 
it), or if it's something that Outlook does, somehow.  No 
doubt you can answer that, Mark?  ;)

Anyway, unless a change to the win32com stuff occurs, this 
will have to remain in the spambayes Outlook code.  (The 
options stuff is a separate problem, and my fix for that should 
work).  It doesn't need to be outside the Outlook code though.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-09 12:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

What I don't understand is why I can't reproduce this error. If I 
make the same addition to manager.py, but use 'german'[1] 
as the locale, everything still works.  (It also still works if I 
make the change in addin.py where the other locale set is, 
and also if I change the locale to german in the windows 
control panel).

In addition, why does the import from PythonWin work?  
Surely this means (as mentioned) that something else that is 
imported is screwing up the locale setting before random gets 
imported - but then, shouldn't it do this on my machine, too?

Googling on this (NV_MAGICCONST) brings up lots of 
instances of the problem, but nothing in the way of a solution 
apart from setting the locale to 'en' or 'c' before the random 
import.  This really doesn't seem like the correct solution.

I really am tempted to try my luck with c.l.p for a solution, if 
there aren't any more ideas here.

[1] I can't set to "de_DE", I get a locale not supported 
error.  "german" does use ',' as the decimal separator, so it 
should be the same, though.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Stefan Gr?ndel (sgruendel)
Date: 2003-05-09 03:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=671479

Ok, I've got it working by setting the locale in the constructor 
of class BayesManager (manager.py):

[...]
        self.config_filename = config_base 
+ "_configuration.pck"

        print "locale: ", locale.getlocale()
        print "default locale: ", locale.getdefaultlocale()
        locale.setlocale(locale.LC_NUMERIC, "en")

        # First read the configuration file.
[...]


Locale/default locale are both de_DE for me.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Stefan Gr?ndel (sgruendel)
Date: 2003-05-09 03:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=671479

>>> import locale
>>> locale.setlocale(locale.LC_NUMERIC, "en")

'English_United States.1252'
>>> import random
>>> 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-07 20:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

What happens if you go into Pythonwin/IDLE, execute the
locale call mentioned, then import that module?

>>> import locale
>>> locale.setlocale(locale.LC_NUMERIC, "en")


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Stefan Gr?ndel (sgruendel)
Date: 2003-05-07 19:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=671479

The import works fine both in IDLE and PythonWin. I suspect 
the handling of floats is somehow broken by something 
loaded by Outlook or Python Windows Extensions. But then I 
don't really know enough about the architecture to make 
educated guesses ...

Anyway I wonder why float handling at this low level seems to 
be locale dependent? Parsing text and converting to float is 
ok to be locale depedent, but doing calculations?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-07 09:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

This makes me wonder if the locale just needs to be set, but 
that seems too heavy-handed and ugly, really.

What happens if you just execute
>>> import random
from the interpreter (e.g. in PythonWin or IDLE)?

I suspect that you'll get the same trace, in which case this 
really should be fixed in random.py, not in Spambayes 
(although it would be easy enough to throw together a hack 
for it).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Stefan Gr?ndel (sgruendel)
Date: 2003-05-07 00:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=671479

It seems like it's not enough to fix Options.py only. I did this 
and then got the following error:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\dev\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\universal.py", line 170, in dispatch
    retVal = ob._InvokeEx_(meth.dispid, 0, meth.invkind, args, 
None, None)
  File "D:\dev\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 322, in _InvokeEx_
    return self._invokeex_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args, kwargs, 
serviceProvider)
  File "D:\dev\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 601, in _invokeex_
    return DesignatedWrapPolicy._invokeex_( self, dispid, lcid, 
wFlags, args, kwArgs, serviceProvider)
  File "D:\dev\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in _invokeex_
    return apply(func, args)
  File "D:\util\spambayes-1.0a2\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 
611, in OnConnection
    self.manager = manager.GetManager(application)
  File "D:\util\spambayes-1.0a2\Outlook2000\manager.py", 
line 335, in GetManager
    _mgr = BayesManager(outlook=outlook, verbose=verbose)
  File "D:\util\spambayes-1.0a2\Outlook2000\manager.py", 
line 79, in __init__
    import_core_spambayes_stuff(self.ini_filename)
  File "D:\util\spambayes-1.0a2\Outlook2000\manager.py", 
line 53, in import_core_spambayes_stuff
    from spambayes.tokenizer import tokenize
  File "D:\util\spambayes-1.0a2\spambayes\tokenizer.py", 
line 7, in ?
    import email.Message
  File "D:\dev\Python22\Lib\email\Message.py", line 14, in ?
    from email import Utils
  File "D:\dev\Python22\Lib\email\Utils.py", line 10, in ?
    import random
  File "D:\dev\Python22\Lib\random.py", line 93, in ?
    _verify('NV_MAGICCONST', NV_MAGICCONST, 
1.71552776992141)
  File "D:\dev\Python22\Lib\random.py", line 88, in _verify
    raise ValueError(
exceptions.ValueError: computed value for 
NV_MAGICCONST deviates too much (computed 2,82843, 
expected 1)



Obviously random.py uses ',' too!  I'm using german 
Windows/Outlook, if I can be of any help in testing, just drop 
me a mail.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-04-24 16:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Options.py now uses locale.atoi and locale.atof to convert 
options.  I *think* this will solve this problem, but I'm not 
100%.

If someone could do some testing, that would be great.  I'm 
leaving open until I'm sure it's done.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=725466&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 05:07:36 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 07:07:45 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765256 ] train does not work
Message-ID: <E19ZqJs-0001a5-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765256, was opened at 2003-07-03 21:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765256&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: hans mueller (modifier)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: train does not work

Initial Comment:
hi,
after choosing the right directories in the "train now" 
form, an pressing the train button nothing happens... 
german outlook xp!
modi

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yep - closing as a dupe, but made a reference to this in
[725466] Include a proper locale fix in Options.py

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-08 09:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

This does sound like (another) locale problem.  The problem is 
that float literals in the code are written like "3.14159", but 
some locales expect them to be written like "3,14159", and so 
the wrong number is read.

The way around this that was used was that the locale was 
set to English quite early on.  One problem, though, is that 
calling certain Outlook functions switches the locale back 
(sigh).  I'll look into this again when I get a chance.

Note that this is more-or-less the same as the "Include a 
proper locale fix in Options.py" bug tracker.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Thomas Verschuren (tvrs)
Date: 2003-07-08 06:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=810345

Same problem here, dutch outlook XP...

Logfile show the following:

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and
Settings\ThomasV\Application
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and
Settings\ThomasV\Application
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003)
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May
2003))...
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and
Settings\ThomasV\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID
1100, Code 0

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gottfried Gan?auge (ganssauge)
Date: 2003-07-08 02:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=792746

I could verify the behaviour which indeed is quite strange.
When starting the training session the progress bar is set up 
by calling Progress.set_stages in dialogs/AsyncDialog.py.
There the assertion in the last line fires because start_pos - 
1.0 is not less than 0.001.
After a fair bit of trying I came to the conclusion that floating 
point literals within the python source text are not correctly 
parsed.
It was possible to verify that by asserting 1.0 == float(1).
VERY STRANGE INDEED.
Changing the locale didn't help at all.
I could avoid that particular error by generating floating point 
constants using the float() builtin.
For example I defined 0.001 as (float(1) / float(1000)).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Cloutier (chealer)
Date: 2003-07-05 08:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738765

Topic similar to 765912.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 13:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

There are some issues with Outlook with non-English locales.  
We have made some movement towards fixing these, but a 
definitive fix has eluded us so far.

If you could attach your log file to this tracker, that would 
certainly help.  Instructions about how to find it are in the 
troubleshooting.html file (which you can get to via 
the "about.html" file from the main manager dialog).

Also - are you using the 003 or 002 binary, or source?  If you 
are using the 002 binary, please check to see if this still 
happens with the 003 release, and attach the log file from 
that execution if it does.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765256&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 05:09:49 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 07:09:52 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764806 ] Filtering Halted
Message-ID: <E19ZqM1-0003FN-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764806, was opened at 2003-07-03 05:03
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764806&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott Solmonson (scosol)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filtering Halted

Initial Comment:
Outlook2k on Win2k -> Ive had an occasional problem 
where certain messages would not be caught as spam.
(where they very obviously were spam)
For these messages, "view spam clues" did nothing.  Also, 
"delete as spam" did nothing.
For a long time this was just an occasional thing, but now 
it's become locked this way.  It is no longer filtering 
anything at all, and I can't view spam clues for any 
message anywhere.  2 maybe-signifigant things: I have 
been using the AVG antivirus Outlook plugin for a while 
now; today it uptaded itself (I believe the first update 
since my installation of Spambayes).  I'll play with things 
and see if I can fix it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'm glad I added this error :)  I just wish we could find
the cause :(

Thanks!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Scott Solmonson (scosol)
Date: 2003-07-03 05:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=254856

Well- I saw that the new version of the outlook plugin was 
released today. so I installed it and it complained about a 
corrupt database, I retrained and everything seems to be 
working :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764806&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 05:13:29 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 07:13:34 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764241 ] Most recent message
	unopened
Message-ID: <E19ZqPZ-0001oT-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764241, was opened at 2003-07-02 07:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764241&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Landry (dlandry99)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Most recent message unopened

Initial Comment:
After uninstalling the prior version and installing 
SpamBayes Outlook Beta 1, Binary Version 3 from 
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/spambayes
/
on July 1, 2003, I still encountered the same error I 
encountered on the previous version (but I can report it 
with more precision).  This error occurs under Outlook 
2002 SP2, running on a client with Windows 2000 via 
Exchange 5.5.

When I open the most recent message and close it the 
message envelop icon indicates the message is still 
unopened.  It is only after I open the message a second 
time that the message bolding turns off and the icon 
shows an open rather than closed envelop.  This 
happens for every single most recent message.  But 
unopened messages underneath the most recent one 
will correctly show their opened status after they are 
opened.  This bug only effects the message that is the 
most recent.  


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Dupe of [ 716684 ] Filtering marks message as unread

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764241&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 05:14:00 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 07:14:21 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-716684 ] Filtering marks message
	as unread
Message-ID: <E19ZqQ4-0003Jd-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #716684, was opened at 2003-04-07 21:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filtering marks message as unread

Initial Comment:
Reported too many times :)  Exchange server users only.

As spambayes startsit starts processing missed
messages.  In the meantime, the user reads some
messages, thereby marking them as read.  As smapbayes
writes the spam field, these messages spring back to a
read status.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Closing
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=764241&group_id=61702&atid=498103
as a dupe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Andersen (gokubi)
Date: 2003-07-08 07:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=558027

I find that if I get a new message and hit reply before I read 
it (I'm in Autopreview) after sending the message it is still 
unread.

More troubling is that Outlook does not show that I have 
replied to the message by changing the envelope icon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 15:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:  a user had the same problem, but also noted 
this:

> If an attachment is included, the first time I open the 
> message, I cannot open the attachement, or save it. If I 
> close the message, and reopen it, I can both open and 
save 
> the attachment.

Odd!  I don't get this problem very often at all anymore; I 
don't know why.  If I did, I'd test the attachment theory, but 
as it is, I can't, so I leave it for others ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-10 22:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I just had this happen to me again. I'm using the CVS version 
from a day or two ago.

So the version in current CVS isn't (completely) fixed.

Anythong else I could try? I see part of a thread about 
USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS here, but I can't find the original. 
My code has USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS in it. If you can tell 
me what (if anything) else needs changing, I can try taking it 
out.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-09 01:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

Just as an FYI, I agree with tobermory's comments in that 
spambayes is in fact classifying the message immediately, 
but it's the update to the server and/or client that appears to 
be delayed until the next Outlook event.  See the first of my 
two spambayes list mail messages referenced in my note 
Mark included in this bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-09 01:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

> Would it be possible to try another change for me instead?  
Revert
> filter.py, and in msgstore.py's Save method, find the line:
> 
>             self.mapi_object.SaveChanges
(mapi.KEEP_OPEN_READWRITE |
> USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS)

I'm pretty sure I had tried that first, while experimenting, 
before I
ended up with the extra Save as a final "flush all" attempt.  
There
was no change, nor did the function return an error.  I think I 
also
tried setting it to 0 (after reading the internal comment) to no
apparent effect, although I may be misremembering since the 
same
comment may have caused me to hesitate to make that 
change :-)

But I'll double check this when I get a chance today.  If I recall
when testing, my review of the code seemed to indicate that 
everything
should work fine, and that the spambayes code was 
managing the read
flag reasonably well, and in fact, was issuing a Save() back in
filter.py.  I ended up inserting test Save()s at the lowermost 
level
(which worked) and then bubbling them up to see how high I 
could leave
the extra call so it was called as infrequently as possible.

In the end, the issue seemed related to the processing that 
goes on
when all_actions is enabled.  If the Save() occurred after the 
field
status was updated, but before 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() was
called, all was fine.  But if the 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() got
called first, then the following Save() - as already in filter.py -
didn't seem to "take."

> I'm a little unsure why one of the Save calls is indented too.

Ah, that was just to minimize change from the existing code 
path.

I wanted to move the Save() to happen before
RememberMessageCurrentFolder(), but then the second Save
() became
completely superfluous in the main branch case - but I didn't 
want to
lose the Save() following RememberMessageCurrentFolder() if 
it was
called just in case that was critical to existing behavior, so I 
moved
it to only occur in that same block.

-- David

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Leftley (tobermory)
Date: 2003-04-08 19:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=626601

Just to try and clarify one point: earlier msgs in this thread 
suggest that spambayes doesn't attempt to classify a 
message until certain events (reading a msg, etc.) occur.

In fact from watching the trace output, the message is 
classified as soon as it arrives (the trace 
shows "Message 'xxx' had a Spam classification of 'yyy'") but 
Outlook doesn't reflect this change until the next event occurs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-08 18:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

My version of filter.py looks different. I haven't updated from 
CVS in a while, maybe that's why. But my version looks like 
it has msg.Save() called unconditionally.

    try:
        # Save the score
        msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
        # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
        msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
        msg.Save()

I've tried moving msg.Save() to before msg.Remember...(), but 
I'll have to wait to see results. Will report back.

(Better might be to cvs update and apply your change, but I 
may not get a chance to do that for a couple of days...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-04-08 12:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From David Bolen:
"Moore, Paul" <Paul.Moore@atosorigin.com> writes:

> As far as I know, no-one has been able to track down the 
> problem to fix it yet.

I have, however, implemented a local workaround that's
working really well for me.  This was based on my prior
messages in:

   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004086.html
   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004088.html

Since I can't quantify what if any penalty it imposes in the
general
case by syncing changes back to the server an additional
time, and
since the problem may be limited to Exchange servers, I haven't
proposed it be made to the main source yet - although I
certainly
haven't noticed much of a penalty in my local testing.

But if anyone else wants to try a local change, it's fairly
trivial,
adding an additional call to msg.Save() in filter.py:

    *** filter.py   18 Mar 2003 03:09:03 -0000      1.20
    --- filter.py   7 Apr 2003 22:18:58 -0000
    ***************
    *** 27,39 ****
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !         msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")
    --- 26,39 ----
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
    +         msg.Save()
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !             msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")


After making this change, what went from virtually _every_
message staying unread, became the extreme rare case, such
that I'm no longer certain any remaining case may even be
spambayes related.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-04-07 21:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

A bit of investigation (I am using Outlook 2002 & Exchange 
2000).

A new message arriving in my Inbox does not get analysed by 
SpamBayes until:
- You switch to another folder and back again.
- You read the message (then analysed, but remains 'unread')
- Another email arrives, when the first message is then rated 
(second one not rated though)
- Another email in Inbox is saved after editing
In other words, it seems some other action eventually triggers 
the analysis - not the arrival event itself.

An email that is read before it has been analysed by 
SpamBayes will always be 'unread' afterwards. This is 
independent of type (plain, rich text or HTML)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 05:18:17 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 07:18:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-767595 ] Outlook/Imap Badness.
Message-ID: <E19ZqUD-0006tk-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #767595, was opened at 2003-07-08 17:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=767595&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook/Imap Badness.

Initial Comment:
Similar to report #765042, using XP with Outlook 2002 
SP2 and IMAP via SSL . Also recently set up another 
account using IMAP without SSL

New mail is ignored when I first log in.
ie log shows
Processing 0 missed spam in folder 'Inbox' took 
102.157ms

Once logged in Mail that has Spam classification of 'No' 
is not scored. Mail that has Spam classification 
of 'Unsure' is not scored.
Mail that has a Spam classification of 'Yes' is scored but 
not moved. Filters are set to move only Spam and leave 
Unsure (ham).
Manual Filtering scores read messages but also fails to 
move them (yes Perform All Actions is marked). Unread
messages are not scored (generally.. )

Manual filtering on the non SSL IMAP account seems to 
generate multiple copies of the same spam email 
in the Spam Folder (the moves work on this account)
probably due to my not purging the inbox folder after 
the initial move (ie the message is marked for deletion 
but not deleted) so every manual filter moves the same
spam again. Unread Mail is Not Scored or Filtered on the 
Non SSL account either .

Interestingly 'Delete As Spam' works perfectly, it scores 
and moves the mail (For both SSL and non).

Logfile attached ( when I first opened the non SSL IMAP 
account Spambayes seemed to process all the 
messages correctly up until a point, this is shown in the 
log) perhaps this is a database issue??




----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yeah - identical bug - will track it there.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=767595&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 05:15:56 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 07:19:34 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-742440 ] Outlook 2003 doesn't
	display toolbar
Message-ID: <E19ZqRw-0006ml-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #742440, was opened at 2003-05-24 02:21
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=742440&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kenneth Haynes (kh4yn3s)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook 2003 doesn't display toolbar

Initial Comment:
I am running Windows XP, SP1. I have the Beta 2 
version of Office that includes Outlook 2003.  When I 
tried to install using the windows installer, I got no error 
messages, but neither did I get the configuration buttons 
on the menu.
spambayes1.log:
SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
Created new configuration file 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\ken\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_configuration.pck'
Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\ken\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\ken\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
Loaded databases in 4.68803ms
SpamAddin - Disconnecting from Outlook

spambayes2.log and spambayes3.log all look the same 
as spambayes1.log.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Apparently, the latest version of SpamBayes + the latest
Outlook 2003 update work well together :)  Please let me
know if this isn't true.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-06-18 23:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'm hoping this is fixed in CVS - will know soon :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Cort Schaefer (corts)
Date: 2003-05-26 14:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=541173

This looks exactly like what I am getting running the same 
configuration.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=742440&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 05:35:36 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 07:35:43 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-755738 ] Toolbar items aren't
	created.
Message-ID: <E19Zqky-0001hQ-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #755738, was opened at 2003-06-17 16:57
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=755738&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Summary: Toolbar items aren't created.

Initial Comment:
I have been using spambayes for some months.  The 
latest cvs-version fails with the following traceback:

pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 275, in 
_Invoke_
    return self._invoke_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 280, in 
_invoke_
    return S_OK, -1, self._invokeex_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, 
args, None, None)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 601, in 
_invokeex_
    return DesignatedWrapPolicy._invokeex_( self, dispid, 
lcid, wFlags, args, kwArgs, serviceProvider)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in 
_invokeex_
    return apply(func, args)
  
File "c:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O
utlook2000\addin.py", line 609, in OnSelectionChange
    self.SetupUI()
  
File "c:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O
utlook2000\addin.py", line 500, in SetupUI
    Tag = "SpamBayesCommand.Manager")
  
File "c:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O
utlook2000\addin.py", line 564, in _AddControl
    item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, 
Temporary=False)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\client\__init__.py", line 451, in 
__getattr__
    return apply(self._ApplyTypes_, args)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\client\__init__.py", line 445, in 
_ApplyTypes_
    return self._get_good_object_(apply
(self._oleobj_.InvokeTypes, (dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, 
argTypes) + args), user, resultCLSID)
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147352567, 'Det oppstod et 
unntak.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None)
Message 'Kunder med utest?ende hos Stocknet.' had a 
Spam classification of 'No'

The traceback is repeated each time a message is 
selected.

I tried the the cvs-version ca a week ago as well with 
the same result.  I unregistered the plugin before 
installing it, and also tried this multiple times.

The new toolbar doen not seem to work.  When clicking 
the "Anti-Spam"-button nothing happens.  When 
selecting the spam-folder, the "Delete as spam"-button 
does not change to "recover-from-spam", the latter 
does not show up at all.

OS: win XP home
outllook 2000

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a fix that will still attempt to create
all toolbar items, even if a previous one fails.  This may
means that at least *some* of our toolbar items work.

I'm afraid I am a little stumped here.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-07-03 16:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

the "new" traceback is:

pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 275, in _Invoke_
    return self._invoke_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 280, in _invoke_
    return S_OK, -1, self._invokeex_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args, 
None, None)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 601, in _invokeex_
    return DesignatedWrapPolicy._invokeex_( self, dispid, lcid, 
wFlags, args, kwArgs, serviceProvider)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in _invokeex_
    return apply(func, args)
  
File "c:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\Outlook
2000\addin.py", line 674, in OnSelectionChange
    self.SetupUI()
  
File "c:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\Outlook
2000\addin.py", line 548, in SetupUI
    Tag = "SpamBayesCommand.Manager")
  
File "c:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\Outlook
2000\addin.py", line 623, in _AddControl
    item = parent.Controls.Add(Type=control_type, 
Temporary=False)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\client\__init__.py", line 451, in 
__getattr__
    return apply(self._ApplyTypes_, args)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\_DEV\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\client\__init__.py", line 445, in 
_ApplyTypes_
    return self._get_good_object_(apply
(self._oleobj_.InvokeTypes, (dispid, 0, wFlags, retType, 
argTypes) + args), user, resultCLSID)
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147352567, 'Det oppstod et 
unntak.', (0, None, 'Medlemmet ble ikke funnet.', None, 0, -
2147467259), None)


translation of the last messages:
oppstod et unntak.: An exception occured
Medlemmet ble ikke funnet: The memeber was not found

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-07-02 21:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

I see the same _behaviour_.  I'll repost a (new) traceback the 
next time this problem occurs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-02 21:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Are you sure this is current CVS?  I see:

File "c:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O
utlook2000\addin.py", line 609, in OnSelectionChange
self.SetupUI() 

File "c:\Programfiler\_UTIL\spambayes_cvs\spambayes\O
utlook2000\addin.py", line 500, in SetupUI
Tag = "SpamBayesCommand.Manager") 

And these are both out by a fair way.  Current CVS is rev 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fredrik Rodland (fmmr)
Date: 2003-07-02 17:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=724871

yes.  it seems to happen each morning when I start outllok 
after having shut down my pc.

you tipped me to delete \Documents and Settings\{username}
\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\outcmd.dat

this solves the problem, but it reappears after a while 
(reboot, new day, shutdown?)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-02 09:20

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Does this still happen?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=755738&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 05:39:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 07:39:48 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-760062 ] Traceback untraining a
	single message
Message-ID: <E19Zqoz-0001sU-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #760062, was opened at 2003-06-25 06:48
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=760062&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Greg Ward (gward)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Traceback untraining a single message

Initial Comment:
If I use hammie.py to untrain on a single message, it
crashes with NameError:

$ hammie.py -d -p 10.db -U -s msg 
Untraining spam (msg):
     1
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/bin/hammie.py", line 6, in ?
    spambayes.hammiebulk.main()
  File "/home/greg/lib/python/spambayes/hammiebulk.py",
line 204, in main
    h.store()
  File "/home/greg/lib/python/spambayes/hammie.py",
line 246, in store
    self.bayes.store()
  File "/home/greg/lib/python/spambayes/storage.py",
line 192, in store
    assert word not in self.wordinfo, \
NameError: global name 'word' is not defined

('msg' is a Maildir containing exactly one message;
it's a subset of the spam folder used to create this
training database)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Oops - sorry - my obvious error.  Fixed in 1.15 of storage.py

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Greg Ward (gward)
Date: 2003-06-25 06:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14422

It looks like the assert in store() could never have worked,
since
'word' is never defined in that method.  Reassigning to
mhammond, since he wrote that code (rev 1.7-1.8, late May 2003).


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=760062&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 05:44:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 07:44:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-740198 ] Installation fails with
	regsvr error
Message-ID: <E19Zqt7-00024T-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #740198, was opened at 2003-05-20 11:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Installation fails with regsvr error

Initial Comment:
I'm trying to install SpamBayes into Outlook XP on 
Win98SE.  The install fails with a regsvr error.  
Attempts at manually registering the file also fail.  
Here's the log:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 274, in 
importHook
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 353, in doimport
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", 
line 59, in ?
  
File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\client\genca
che.py", line 368, in EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error 
loading type library/DLL.', None, None)
SystemError: PyErr_NormalizeException() called 
without exception
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 11, in ?
AttributeError: 'module' object has no 
attribute 'OutlookAddin'

Any help?

Cheers,

Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Seeing as you have Python installed, can you please try the
following:

* Go to a command prompt, and change to the
\Python\lib\site-packages\com\win32com\client directory
* Execute "python makepy.py -i"
* Select any "Outlook XP" related entries (if necessary,
repeat for each one).
* You should get a coupld of lines of Python code generated.

Mail me these lines, and I will send you a new version to test.

I wish I had that combination to test here, but as I don't,
this is my best hope :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-05 13:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

Addendum:  following my earlier post today I discovered 
release 3 of the code had been made.  I retested install with 
the binary and it failed again with an error in the regsvr:

DllRegisterServer ... failed Return Code was 0x80040201

with this in the log file:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 71, in ?
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 368, in 
EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error loading type 
library/DLL.', None, None)

I also tried the Python/open source install and it also fails 
with an error that "Outlook 2000 is not installed on this 
machine"... well, no isn't.  Outlook 2002 (XP) is!  

I'd love to try out this program but if I can't get it to install I 
guess I'll never find out.  

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-05 11:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-05 11:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ken Walker (kwalker411)
Date: 2003-05-24 02:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=785557

Hi Fellas.  As per Tony Meyer's request, I'm appending my
version information here.  The plugin wouldn't install on my
platform due to a regsvr error.

System:

     Microsoft Windows 2000
     5.00.2195
     Service Pack 3

Mail Client:

     Microsoft Outlook 2002
     10.4219.5025
     Service Pack 2

Thanks,
K

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-23 12:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:
"I have a win2000 running outlook 2000 sr1 and I get the 
following message  
<<error.jpeg>> and the logs are as follows the first two time 
the log was empty but the next two time I got the following 
logs.  <<spambayes3.log>>  
<<spambayes4.log>> 
David"

The jpeg was just a screenshot of the regsvr error.  Log3 is:
"Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 15, in DllRegisterServer
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\register.py", 
line 388, in RegisterClasses
IndexError: list index out of range"
and log4 is:
"warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
Unregistered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 22, in DllUnregisterServer
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 791, in 
UnregisterAddin
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 296, in importHook
ImportError: No module named _winreg"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-23 09:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Noting a dupe in
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741914&group_id=61702

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 10:03:00 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 12:03:04 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-767871 ] failed to load Bayes
	database
Message-ID: <E19Zuvk-0001zL-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #767871, was opened at 2003-07-08 16:02
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=767871&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joseph Beaulieu (jbc123)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: failed to load Bayes database

Initial Comment:

Uninstalled version 2, installed version 3. When I fired up 
Outlook2000, this log file was generated.

ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam 
plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled.  Please 
re-configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError 
details:\r\nFailed to load bayes database'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 419, in LoadBayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 159, in open_bayes
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 147, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 155, in load
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 59, in open
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 41, in 
open_best
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 18, in 
open_dbhash
  File "out1.pyz/bsddb", line 162, in hashopen
DBFileExistsError: (17, 'File exists')
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jbeauli\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Either bayes database or message database is missing - 
creating new
Error connecting to Outlook!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 800, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 682, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 238, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 434, in LoadBayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 557, in InitNewBayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 133, in new_bayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 159, in open_bayes
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 147, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 155, in load
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 59, in open
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 41, in 
open_best
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 18, in 
open_dbhash
  File "out1.pyz/bsddb", line 162, in hashopen
DBFileExistsError: (17, 'File exists')
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 800, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 682, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 238, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 434, in LoadBayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 557, in InitNewBayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 133, in new_bayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 159, in open_bayes
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 147, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 155, in load
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 59, in open
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 41, in 
open_best
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 18, in 
open_dbhash
  File "out1.pyz/bsddb", line 162, in hashopen
DBFileExistsError: (17, 'File exists')


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=767871&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 10:15:24 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 12:15:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764806 ] Filtering Halted
Message-ID: <E19Zv7k-00047k-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764806, was opened at 2003-07-02 12:03
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by scosol
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764806&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott Solmonson (scosol)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filtering Halted

Initial Comment:
Outlook2k on Win2k -> Ive had an occasional problem 
where certain messages would not be caught as spam.
(where they very obviously were spam)
For these messages, "view spam clues" did nothing.  Also, 
"delete as spam" did nothing.
For a long time this was just an occasional thing, but now 
it's become locked this way.  It is no longer filtering 
anything at all, and I can't view spam clues for any 
message anywhere.  2 maybe-signifigant things: I have 
been using the AVG antivirus Outlook plugin for a while 
now; today it uptaded itself (I believe the first update 
since my installation of Spambayes).  I'll play with things 
and see if I can fix it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Scott Solmonson (scosol)
Date: 2003-07-08 09:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=254856

Haha- just so it's clear, it still has the problem of some messages just 
being unable to be filtered. (but its an occasional thing so not a big deal)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 04:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'm glad I added this error :)  I just wish we could find
the cause :(

Thanks!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Scott Solmonson (scosol)
Date: 2003-07-02 12:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=254856

Well- I saw that the new version of the outlook plugin was 
released today. so I installed it and it complained about a 
corrupt database, I retrained and everything seems to be 
working :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764806&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 15:18:18 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 17:18:31 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765912 ] SB will not train or
	filter with O XP swedish
Message-ID: <E19Zzqs-00086T-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765912, was opened at 2003-07-04 14:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gmarziou
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: SB will not train or filter with O XP swedish

Initial Comment:
I upgraded my (working) outlook 2000 + spambayes 
installation to Outlook XP and the newest version of 
Spambayes. Spambayes would not perform any action 
when I had defined "spam" and "ham" folders and chosen 
"Train". It wouldn't matter if I had "rebuild entire 
database" checked or unchecked.

Actions: 
1. Start Outlook.
2. Go to SpamBayes config menu.
3. Click on "Train now"
4. Select "spam" folder.
5. Click on "Train now"

After that, "nothing happens". Clicking on "stop training" 
does not work, but I can close the window by clicking on 
the "[x] in the upper right corner and get back to the 
"main" menu.

I have tried all possible combinations of checkboxes. I 
have also ran "scanpst.exe" on my mailbox file. OS is XP 
Pro (English) 


Here's the log file:




Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in 
set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command 
ID 1100, Code 0

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gael Marziou (gmarziou)
Date: 2003-07-08 23:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=203211

I ahve exactly the same symptoms on US outlook 2000 on 
windows 2000 pro sp3.

My log file:

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons
ERROR: 'You must enable SpamBayes before you can delete 
as spam'
None
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Cloutier (chealer)
Date: 2003-07-05 00:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738765

GOD!
I had the exact same problem with French version. 
Repeating "Train now" after closing the window with X only 
made the above lines to repeat in the log file. log files closes 
by

Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\Chealer\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 0 messages, finding 0 spam and 0 
unsure
Addin terminating: 1 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


And now, just as I was writing the bug report, I open Outlook 
and it's gone! SB is now trained, and I made no reboot, no 
update of anything...
So what to say? Well, be patient. I think I tried the function 
about 10 times and closed Outlook around 5 times in the 
meantime... hope it's gonna be as simple as that to fix the 
bug too.
By the way, this bug succeeded to the max size error with 
binary 002 which had been perfectly fixed by 003.

OS is Windows XP Pro SP1 French, I have Outlook XP SP2 
French and didn't change this since months.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 16:16:41 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 18:18:56 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-740198 ] Installation fails with
	regsvr error
Message-ID: <E19a0lN-0002LL-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #740198, was opened at 2003-05-19 21:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hallstevenson
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Installation fails with regsvr error

Initial Comment:
I'm trying to install SpamBayes into Outlook XP on 
Win98SE.  The install fails with a regsvr error.  
Attempts at manually registering the file also fail.  
Here's the log:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 274, in 
importHook
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 353, in doimport
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", 
line 59, in ?
  
File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\client\genca
che.py", line 368, in EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error 
loading type library/DLL.', None, None)
SystemError: PyErr_NormalizeException() called 
without exception
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 11, in ?
AttributeError: 'module' object has no 
attribute 'OutlookAddin'

Any help?

Cheers,

Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-08 18:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

mhammond:

you said

>> * Go to a command prompt, and change to the
>> \Python\lib\site-packages\com\win32com\client 
>> directory 
>> * Execute "python makepy.py -i"
>> * Select any "Outlook XP" related entries (if
>> necessary, repeat for each one).
>> * You should get a coupld of lines of Python 
>> code generated.
>> 
>> Mail me these lines, and I will send you a new 
>> version to test.

Here's what I get:

Microsoft Outlook View Control
 {0006F062-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}, lcid=0, 
major=1, minor=0
 >>> # Use these commands in Python code to auto 
generate .py support
 >>> from win32com.client import gencache
 >>> gencache.EnsureModule('{0006F062-0000-0000-C000-
000000000046}', 0, 1, 0)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 07:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Seeing as you have Python installed, can you please try the
following:

* Go to a command prompt, and change to the
\Python\lib\site-packages\com\win32com\client directory
* Execute "python makepy.py -i"
* Select any "Outlook XP" related entries (if necessary,
repeat for each one).
* You should get a coupld of lines of Python code generated.

Mail me these lines, and I will send you a new version to test.

I wish I had that combination to test here, but as I don't,
this is my best hope :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-04 23:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

Addendum:  following my earlier post today I discovered 
release 3 of the code had been made.  I retested install with 
the binary and it failed again with an error in the regsvr:

DllRegisterServer ... failed Return Code was 0x80040201

with this in the log file:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 71, in ?
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 368, in 
EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error loading type 
library/DLL.', None, None)

I also tried the Python/open source install and it also fails 
with an error that "Outlook 2000 is not installed on this 
machine"... well, no isn't.  Outlook 2002 (XP) is!  

I'd love to try out this program but if I can't get it to install I 
guess I'll never find out.  

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-04 21:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-04 21:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ken Walker (kwalker411)
Date: 2003-05-23 12:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=785557

Hi Fellas.  As per Tony Meyer's request, I'm appending my
version information here.  The plugin wouldn't install on my
platform due to a regsvr error.

System:

     Microsoft Windows 2000
     5.00.2195
     Service Pack 3

Mail Client:

     Microsoft Outlook 2002
     10.4219.5025
     Service Pack 2

Thanks,
K

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-22 22:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:
"I have a win2000 running outlook 2000 sr1 and I get the 
following message  
<<error.jpeg>> and the logs are as follows the first two time 
the log was empty but the next two time I got the following 
logs.  <<spambayes3.log>>  
<<spambayes4.log>> 
David"

The jpeg was just a screenshot of the regsvr error.  Log3 is:
"Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 15, in DllRegisterServer
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\register.py", 
line 388, in RegisterClasses
IndexError: list index out of range"
and log4 is:
"warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
Unregistered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 22, in DllUnregisterServer
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 791, in 
UnregisterAddin
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 296, in importHook
ImportError: No module named _winreg"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-22 19:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Noting a dupe in
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741914&group_id=61702

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 18:44:49 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 20:44:53 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-767871 ] failed to load Bayes
	database
Message-ID: <E19a34j-0007E6-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #767871, was opened at 2003-07-09 04:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=767871&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joseph Beaulieu (jbc123)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: failed to load Bayes database

Initial Comment:

Uninstalled version 2, installed version 3. When I fired up 
Outlook2000, this log file was generated.

ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam 
plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled.  Please 
re-configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError 
details:\r\nFailed to load bayes database'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 419, in LoadBayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 159, in open_bayes
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 147, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 155, in load
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 59, in open
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 41, in 
open_best
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 18, in 
open_dbhash
  File "out1.pyz/bsddb", line 162, in hashopen
DBFileExistsError: (17, 'File exists')
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jbeauli\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Either bayes database or message database is missing - 
creating new
Error connecting to Outlook!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 800, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 682, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 238, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 434, in LoadBayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 557, in InitNewBayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 133, in new_bayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 159, in open_bayes
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 147, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 155, in load
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 59, in open
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 41, in 
open_best
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 18, in 
open_dbhash
  File "out1.pyz/bsddb", line 162, in hashopen
DBFileExistsError: (17, 'File exists')
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 800, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 682, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 238, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 434, in LoadBayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 557, in InitNewBayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 133, in new_bayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 159, in open_bayes
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 147, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 155, in load
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 59, in open
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 41, in 
open_best
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 18, in 
open_dbhash
  File "out1.pyz/bsddb", line 162, in hashopen
DBFileExistsError: (17, 'File exists')


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-09 12:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Try deleting whatever files are in your data directory 
(SpamBayes will recreate them).  Note that you'll lose your 
configuration and training, but this might be the case already 
(you could try simply moving them and then moving them 
back instead).

The FAQ explains where to find these files.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=767871&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 19:13:16 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 22:01:45 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-768162 ] UNC path for
	data_directory?
Message-ID: <E19a3WG-00080Y-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #768162, was opened at 2003-07-09 01:13
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=768162&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: UNC path for data_directory?

Initial Comment:
I'd like to keep one SpamBayes database, but I use 
several PCs threough out the day.

I can mount a shared resource, and specify in my 
default_configuration.ini:
  data_directory:M:\data\Mail\SpamBayes

However, I'd like to be able to specify a UNC path, like:
  data_directory:\myhost\c$\data\Mail\SpamBayes

so that I do not have to keep a drive-letter mounted or 
rely on it being there...

I realize that, for laptops, this might cause issues when 
offline; however, if that folder were marked for 
synchronization, it should work, right?

Thanks,
Bobby Wilkins


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=768162&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 21:33:23 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 23:33:26 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-768221 ] v1.0a4 dies whan
	training on Maildir
Message-ID: <E19a5hr-0001uX-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #768221, was opened at 2003-07-08 20:33
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768221&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Leonid (leobru)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: v1.0a4 dies whan training on Maildir

Initial Comment:
If Maildir/cur contains an untrained message,
mboxtrain.py dies with

Traceback (most recent call last):       
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 294, in ?
    main()
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 281, in main
    train(h, g, False, force, trainnew)
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 216, in train
    maildir_train(h, os.path.join(path, "cur"),
is_spam, force)
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 113, in maildir_train
    f = file(tfn, "wb")
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'.../Maildir/cur/tmp/1057721381.20217_25.domain.com

What's with /cur/tmp/ ?



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768221&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 21:34:14 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 23:34:16 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-768221 ] v1.0a4 dies when
	training on Maildir
Message-ID: <E19a5ig-0001wG-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #768221, was opened at 2003-07-08 20:33
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by leobru
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768221&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 8
Submitted By: Leonid (leobru)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
>Summary: v1.0a4 dies when training on Maildir

Initial Comment:
If Maildir/cur contains an untrained message,
mboxtrain.py dies with

Traceback (most recent call last):       
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 294, in ?
    main()
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 281, in main
    train(h, g, False, force, trainnew)
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 216, in train
    maildir_train(h, os.path.join(path, "cur"),
is_spam, force)
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 113, in maildir_train
    f = file(tfn, "wb")
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'.../Maildir/cur/tmp/1057721381.20217_25.domain.com

What's with /cur/tmp/ ?



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768221&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 21:44:10 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul  8 23:44:13 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-768221 ] v1.0a4 dies when
	training on Maildir
Message-ID: <E19a5sI-0004Fp-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #768221, was opened at 2003-07-09 15:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768221&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Leonid (leobru)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: v1.0a4 dies when training on Maildir

Initial Comment:
If Maildir/cur contains an untrained message,
mboxtrain.py dies with

Traceback (most recent call last):       
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 294, in ?
    main()
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 281, in main
    train(h, g, False, force, trainnew)
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 216, in train
    maildir_train(h, os.path.join(path, "cur"),
is_spam, force)
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 113, in maildir_train
    f = file(tfn, "wb")
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'.../Maildir/cur/tmp/1057721381.20217_25.domain.com

What's with /cur/tmp/ ?



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-09 15:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

/cur/tmp/ is where a temporary copy of the message is stored 
until it is renamed to the /cur/ name.

If you create the /cur/tmp/ directory, this should work.  I 
suppose mboxtrain should check that this directory exists, 
and create it if it doesn't (like pop3proxy does for it's 
directories).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768221&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 22:08:52 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul  9 00:09:01 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-768162 ] UNC path for
	data_directory?
Message-ID: <E19a6GC-0004sN-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #768162, was opened at 2003-07-09 01:13
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hwilkins
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=768162&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: UNC path for data_directory?

Initial Comment:
I'd like to keep one SpamBayes database, but I use 
several PCs threough out the day.

I can mount a shared resource, and specify in my 
default_configuration.ini:
  data_directory:M:\data\Mail\SpamBayes

However, I'd like to be able to specify a UNC path, like:
  data_directory:\myhost\c$\data\Mail\SpamBayes

so that I do not have to keep a drive-letter mounted or 
rely on it being there...

I realize that, for laptops, this might cause issues when 
offline; however, if that folder were marked for 
synchronization, it should work, right?

Thanks,
Bobby Wilkins


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Date: 2003-07-09 04:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=145585

Note: on discussion with Tony Meyer, it was identified to me 
that SpamBayes is doing an os.path.isdir() on the value of 
data_directory.

My personal testing of this function indicates that it 
successfully identifies UNC paths; directiries return ture, and 
other items do not.

Therefore, I suggest that this might be a "bug", not 
a "feature request". 

Should I re-submit in the "bugs" area?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=768162&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 22:10:09 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul  9 00:10:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-768162 ] UNC path for
	data_directory?
Message-ID: <E19a6HR-0002vI-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #768162, was opened at 2003-07-09 01:13
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hwilkins
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=768162&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: UNC path for data_directory?

Initial Comment:
I'd like to keep one SpamBayes database, but I use 
several PCs threough out the day.

I can mount a shared resource, and specify in my 
default_configuration.ini:
  data_directory:M:\data\Mail\SpamBayes

However, I'd like to be able to specify a UNC path, like:
  data_directory:\myhost\c$\data\Mail\SpamBayes

so that I do not have to keep a drive-letter mounted or 
rely on it being there...

I realize that, for laptops, this might cause issues when 
offline; however, if that folder were marked for 
synchronization, it should work, right?

Thanks,
Bobby Wilkins


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Date: 2003-07-09 04:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=145585

(... and one should check one's typography when submitting 
late at night...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Date: 2003-07-09 04:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=145585

Note: on discussion with Tony Meyer, it was identified to me 
that SpamBayes is doing an os.path.isdir() on the value of 
data_directory.

My personal testing of this function indicates that it 
successfully identifies UNC paths; directiries return ture, and 
other items do not.

Therefore, I suggest that this might be a "bug", not 
a "feature request". 

Should I re-submit in the "bugs" area?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=768162&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 22:21:28 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul  9 00:22:51 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-768221 ] v1.0a4 dies when
	training on Maildir
Message-ID: <E19a6SO-0003GZ-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #768221, was opened at 2003-07-08 20:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by leobru
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768221&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Leonid (leobru)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: v1.0a4 dies when training on Maildir

Initial Comment:
If Maildir/cur contains an untrained message,
mboxtrain.py dies with

Traceback (most recent call last):       
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 294, in ?
    main()
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 281, in main
    train(h, g, False, force, trainnew)
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 216, in train
    maildir_train(h, os.path.join(path, "cur"),
is_spam, force)
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 113, in maildir_train
    f = file(tfn, "wb")
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'.../Maildir/cur/tmp/1057721381.20217_25.domain.com

What's with /cur/tmp/ ?



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Leonid (leobru)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=790676

The temporary directory is Maildir/tmp, not Maildir/cur/tmp.
The observed behavior is a regression wrt v1.0a2;
creating a new directory is a hacky workaround.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-08 20:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

/cur/tmp/ is where a temporary copy of the message is stored 
until it is renamed to the /cur/ name.

If you create the /cur/tmp/ directory, this should work.  I 
suppose mboxtrain should check that this directory exists, 
and create it if it doesn't (like pop3proxy does for it's 
directories).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768221&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 22:30:48 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul  9 00:32:11 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-768221 ] v1.0a4 dies when
	training on Maildir
Message-ID: <E19a6bQ-0003Td-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #768221, was opened at 2003-07-09 15:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768221&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: v1.0 (example)
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Leonid (leobru)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: v1.0a4 dies when training on Maildir

Initial Comment:
If Maildir/cur contains an untrained message,
mboxtrain.py dies with

Traceback (most recent call last):       
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 294, in ?
    main()
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 281, in main
    train(h, g, False, force, trainnew)
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 216, in train
    maildir_train(h, os.path.join(path, "cur"),
is_spam, force)
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 113, in maildir_train
    f = file(tfn, "wb")
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'.../Maildir/cur/tmp/1057721381.20217_25.domain.com

What's with /cur/tmp/ ?



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-09 16:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Ah, I see.  This was introduced in v1.6.

Fixed in v1.10.  You should be able to get this version of 
mboxtrain and drop it into the a4 release.  (note that sf 
pserver cvs is crappy at the moment, so it might take a while 
for v1.10 to be visible).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Leonid (leobru)
Date: 2003-07-09 16:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=790676

The temporary directory is Maildir/tmp, not Maildir/cur/tmp.
The observed behavior is a regression wrt v1.0a2;
creating a new directory is a hacky workaround.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-09 15:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

/cur/tmp/ is where a temporary copy of the message is stored 
until it is renamed to the /cur/ name.

If you create the /cur/tmp/ directory, this should work.  I 
suppose mboxtrain should check that this directory exists, 
and create it if it doesn't (like pop3proxy does for it's 
directories).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768221&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 22:30:59 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul  9 00:32:22 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-768221 ] v1.0a4 dies when
	training on Maildir
Message-ID: <E19a6bb-0003Tz-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #768221, was opened at 2003-07-08 20:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by leobru
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768221&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: v1.0 (example)
>Status: Open
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Leonid (leobru)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: v1.0a4 dies when training on Maildir

Initial Comment:
If Maildir/cur contains an untrained message,
mboxtrain.py dies with

Traceback (most recent call last):       
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 294, in ?
    main()
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 281, in main
    train(h, g, False, force, trainnew)
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 216, in train
    maildir_train(h, os.path.join(path, "cur"),
is_spam, force)
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 113, in maildir_train
    f = file(tfn, "wb")
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'.../Maildir/cur/tmp/1057721381.20217_25.domain.com

What's with /cur/tmp/ ?



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Leonid (leobru)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=790676

And, worse yet, this "workaround" does not work for obvious
reasons:

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./mboxtrain.py", line 294, in ? main()
File "./mboxtrain.py", line 281, in main train(h, g, False,
force, trainnew)
File "./mboxtrain.py", line 216, in train maildir_train(h,
os.path.join(path, "cur"), is_spam, force)
File "./mboxtrain.py", line 118, in maildir_train
os.rename(tfn, cfn)
OSError: [Errno} 21] Is a directory

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Ah, I see.  This was introduced in v1.6.

Fixed in v1.10.  You should be able to get this version of 
mboxtrain and drop it into the a4 release.  (note that sf 
pserver cvs is crappy at the moment, so it might take a while 
for v1.10 to be visible).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Leonid (leobru)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=790676

The temporary directory is Maildir/tmp, not Maildir/cur/tmp.
The observed behavior is a regression wrt v1.0a2;
creating a new directory is a hacky workaround.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-08 20:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

/cur/tmp/ is where a temporary copy of the message is stored 
until it is renamed to the /cur/ name.

If you create the /cur/tmp/ directory, this should work.  I 
suppose mboxtrain should check that this directory exists, 
and create it if it doesn't (like pop3proxy does for it's 
directories).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768221&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 22:40:50 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul  9 00:42:12 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-768221 ] v1.0a4 dies when
	training on Maildir
Message-ID: <E19a6l8-0006ZC-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #768221, was opened at 2003-07-09 15:33
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768221&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: v1.0 (example)
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Leonid (leobru)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: v1.0a4 dies when training on Maildir

Initial Comment:
If Maildir/cur contains an untrained message,
mboxtrain.py dies with

Traceback (most recent call last):       
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 294, in ?
    main()
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 281, in main
    train(h, g, False, force, trainnew)
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 216, in train
    maildir_train(h, os.path.join(path, "cur"),
is_spam, force)
  File "./mboxtrain.py", line 113, in maildir_train
    f = file(tfn, "wb")
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'.../Maildir/cur/tmp/1057721381.20217_25.domain.com

What's with /cur/tmp/ ?



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-09 16:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Sorry, I missed that maildir_train would then try to pick it up 
as a file.  In any case, the v1.10 fix should still work.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Leonid (leobru)
Date: 2003-07-09 16:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=790676

And, worse yet, this "workaround" does not work for obvious
reasons:

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./mboxtrain.py", line 294, in ? main()
File "./mboxtrain.py", line 281, in main train(h, g, False,
force, trainnew)
File "./mboxtrain.py", line 216, in train maildir_train(h,
os.path.join(path, "cur"), is_spam, force)
File "./mboxtrain.py", line 118, in maildir_train
os.rename(tfn, cfn)
OSError: [Errno} 21] Is a directory

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-09 16:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Ah, I see.  This was introduced in v1.6.

Fixed in v1.10.  You should be able to get this version of 
mboxtrain and drop it into the a4 release.  (note that sf 
pserver cvs is crappy at the moment, so it might take a while 
for v1.10 to be visible).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Leonid (leobru)
Date: 2003-07-09 16:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=790676

The temporary directory is Maildir/tmp, not Maildir/cur/tmp.
The observed behavior is a regression wrt v1.0a2;
creating a new directory is a hacky workaround.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-09 15:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

/cur/tmp/ is where a temporary copy of the message is stored 
until it is renamed to the /cur/ name.

If you create the /cur/tmp/ directory, this should work.  I 
suppose mboxtrain should check that this directory exists, 
and create it if it doesn't (like pop3proxy does for it's 
directories).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768221&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 22:54:17 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul  9 00:56:54 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765912 ] AssertionError:
	Proportions must add to 1.0 ...
Message-ID: <E19a6y9-00068P-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765912, was opened at 2003-07-04 22:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Summary: AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 ...

Initial Comment:
I upgraded my (working) outlook 2000 + spambayes 
installation to Outlook XP and the newest version of 
Spambayes. Spambayes would not perform any action 
when I had defined "spam" and "ham" folders and chosen 
"Train". It wouldn't matter if I had "rebuild entire 
database" checked or unchecked.

Actions: 
1. Start Outlook.
2. Go to SpamBayes config menu.
3. Click on "Train now"
4. Select "spam" folder.
5. Click on "Train now"

After that, "nothing happens". Clicking on "stop training" 
does not work, but I can close the window by clicking on 
the "[x] in the upper right corner and get back to the 
"main" menu.

I have tried all possible combinations of checkboxes. I 
have also ran "scanpst.exe" on my mailbox file. OS is XP 
Pro (English) 


Here's the log file:




Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in 
set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command 
ID 1100, Code 0

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 14:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Good to know English versions also show it.  Anyone able to
 run the source code version?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gael Marziou (gmarziou)
Date: 2003-07-09 07:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=203211

I ahve exactly the same symptoms on US outlook 2000 on 
windows 2000 pro sp3.

My log file:

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons
ERROR: 'You must enable SpamBayes before you can delete 
as spam'
None
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Cloutier (chealer)
Date: 2003-07-05 08:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738765

GOD!
I had the exact same problem with French version. 
Repeating "Train now" after closing the window with X only 
made the above lines to repeat in the log file. log files closes 
by

Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\Chealer\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 0 messages, finding 0 spam and 0 
unsure
Addin terminating: 1 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


And now, just as I was writing the bug report, I open Outlook 
and it's gone! SB is now trained, and I made no reboot, no 
update of anything...
So what to say? Well, be patient. I think I tried the function 
about 10 times and closed Outlook around 5 times in the 
meantime... hope it's gonna be as simple as that to fix the 
bug too.
By the way, this bug succeeded to the max size error with 
binary 002 which had been perfectly fixed by 003.

OS is Windows XP Pro SP1 French, I have Outlook XP SP2 
French and didn't change this since months.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 23:01:39 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul  9 01:03:26 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-740198 ] Installation fails with
	regsvr error
Message-ID: <E19a75H-0007NO-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #740198, was opened at 2003-05-20 11:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Installation fails with regsvr error

Initial Comment:
I'm trying to install SpamBayes into Outlook XP on 
Win98SE.  The install fails with a regsvr error.  
Attempts at manually registering the file also fail.  
Here's the log:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 274, in 
importHook
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 353, in doimport
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", 
line 59, in ?
  
File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\client\genca
che.py", line 368, in EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error 
loading type library/DLL.', None, None)
SystemError: PyErr_NormalizeException() called 
without exception
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 11, in ?
AttributeError: 'module' object has no 
attribute 'OutlookAddin'

Any help?

Cheers,

Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 15:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

What version are you running?  It looks like binary 002 - if
so, please try version 003.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-09 08:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

mhammond:

you said

>> * Go to a command prompt, and change to the
>> \Python\lib\site-packages\com\win32com\client 
>> directory 
>> * Execute "python makepy.py -i"
>> * Select any "Outlook XP" related entries (if
>> necessary, repeat for each one).
>> * You should get a coupld of lines of Python 
>> code generated.
>> 
>> Mail me these lines, and I will send you a new 
>> version to test.

Here's what I get:

Microsoft Outlook View Control
 {0006F062-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}, lcid=0, 
major=1, minor=0
 >>> # Use these commands in Python code to auto 
generate .py support
 >>> from win32com.client import gencache
 >>> gencache.EnsureModule('{0006F062-0000-0000-C000-
000000000046}', 0, 1, 0)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Seeing as you have Python installed, can you please try the
following:

* Go to a command prompt, and change to the
\Python\lib\site-packages\com\win32com\client directory
* Execute "python makepy.py -i"
* Select any "Outlook XP" related entries (if necessary,
repeat for each one).
* You should get a coupld of lines of Python code generated.

Mail me these lines, and I will send you a new version to test.

I wish I had that combination to test here, but as I don't,
this is my best hope :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-05 13:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

Addendum:  following my earlier post today I discovered 
release 3 of the code had been made.  I retested install with 
the binary and it failed again with an error in the regsvr:

DllRegisterServer ... failed Return Code was 0x80040201

with this in the log file:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 71, in ?
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 368, in 
EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error loading type 
library/DLL.', None, None)

I also tried the Python/open source install and it also fails 
with an error that "Outlook 2000 is not installed on this 
machine"... well, no isn't.  Outlook 2002 (XP) is!  

I'd love to try out this program but if I can't get it to install I 
guess I'll never find out.  

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-05 11:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-05 11:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ken Walker (kwalker411)
Date: 2003-05-24 02:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=785557

Hi Fellas.  As per Tony Meyer's request, I'm appending my
version information here.  The plugin wouldn't install on my
platform due to a regsvr error.

System:

     Microsoft Windows 2000
     5.00.2195
     Service Pack 3

Mail Client:

     Microsoft Outlook 2002
     10.4219.5025
     Service Pack 2

Thanks,
K

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-23 12:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:
"I have a win2000 running outlook 2000 sr1 and I get the 
following message  
<<error.jpeg>> and the logs are as follows the first two time 
the log was empty but the next two time I got the following 
logs.  <<spambayes3.log>>  
<<spambayes4.log>> 
David"

The jpeg was just a screenshot of the regsvr error.  Log3 is:
"Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 15, in DllRegisterServer
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\register.py", 
line 388, in RegisterClasses
IndexError: list index out of range"
and log4 is:
"warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
Unregistered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 22, in DllUnregisterServer
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 791, in 
UnregisterAddin
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 296, in importHook
ImportError: No module named _winreg"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-23 09:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Noting a dupe in
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741914&group_id=61702

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 23:10:22 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul  9 01:11:49 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-768162 ] UNC path for
	data_directory?
Message-ID: <E19a7Di-0006aY-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #768162, was opened at 2003-07-09 01:13
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hwilkins
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=768162&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: UNC path for data_directory?

Initial Comment:
I'd like to keep one SpamBayes database, but I use 
several PCs threough out the day.

I can mount a shared resource, and specify in my 
default_configuration.ini:
  data_directory:M:\data\Mail\SpamBayes

However, I'd like to be able to specify a UNC path, like:
  data_directory:\myhost\c$\data\Mail\SpamBayes

so that I do not have to keep a drive-letter mounted or 
rely on it being there...

I realize that, for laptops, this might cause issues when 
offline; however, if that folder were marked for 
synchronization, it should work, right?

Thanks,
Bobby Wilkins


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Date: 2003-07-09 05:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=145585

Continuing to work with Tony, we believe we've isolated this 
to an "omission" bug -- the PATH was not allowing '$' to be 
included, which is a necessity for any hidden-share UNC 
paths...

I think we can close this, and I believe Tony said he'd get the 
change rolled into the distribution (if I'm speaking for you, 
Tony, please step in).

Now, off to try out the manual install... ;^)

Thanks,
Bobby

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Date: 2003-07-09 04:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=145585

(... and one should check one's typography when submitting 
late at night...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Date: 2003-07-09 04:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=145585

Note: on discussion with Tony Meyer, it was identified to me 
that SpamBayes is doing an os.path.isdir() on the value of 
data_directory.

My personal testing of this function indicates that it 
successfully identifies UNC paths; directiries return ture, and 
other items do not.

Therefore, I suggest that this might be a "bug", not 
a "feature request". 

Should I re-submit in the "bugs" area?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=768162&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul  8 23:18:05 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul  9 01:18:12 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-768162 ] UNC path for
	data_directory?
Message-ID: <E19a7LB-0006o9-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #768162, was opened at 2003-07-09 13:13
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=768162&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: UNC path for data_directory?

Initial Comment:
I'd like to keep one SpamBayes database, but I use 
several PCs threough out the day.

I can mount a shared resource, and specify in my 
default_configuration.ini:
  data_directory:M:\data\Mail\SpamBayes

However, I'd like to be able to specify a UNC path, like:
  data_directory:\myhost\c$\data\Mail\SpamBayes

so that I do not have to keep a drive-letter mounted or 
rely on it being there...

I realize that, for laptops, this might cause issues when 
offline; however, if that folder were marked for 
synchronization, it should work, right?

Thanks,
Bobby Wilkins


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-09 17:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I've checked in that change (to OptionsClass.py).

I believe this should work now as long as os.path.isdir() works 
for the UNC directory on the user's system.  This works for 
Bobby, but does not work on my system.

I presume this is a Python thing and not a SpamBayes thing 
and so there's not much that can be done here.  (Unless 
there is a different function that can be used to check if a 
directory exists that reliably works with UNC).

Mark, you can close this if you think that it's not worth doing 
anything else.  Otherwise, do want you want :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Date: 2003-07-09 17:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=145585

Continuing to work with Tony, we believe we've isolated this 
to an "omission" bug -- the PATH was not allowing '$' to be 
included, which is a necessity for any hidden-share UNC 
paths...

I think we can close this, and I believe Tony said he'd get the 
change rolled into the distribution (if I'm speaking for you, 
Tony, please step in).

Now, off to try out the manual install... ;^)

Thanks,
Bobby

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Date: 2003-07-09 16:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=145585

(... and one should check one's typography when submitting 
late at night...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Date: 2003-07-09 16:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=145585

Note: on discussion with Tony Meyer, it was identified to me 
that SpamBayes is doing an os.path.isdir() on the value of 
data_directory.

My personal testing of this function indicates that it 
successfully identifies UNC paths; directiries return ture, and 
other items do not.

Therefore, I suggest that this might be a "bug", not 
a "feature request". 

Should I re-submit in the "bugs" area?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=768162&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul  9 01:01:56 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul  9 03:02:00 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-768162 ] UNC path for
	data_directory?
Message-ID: <E19a8xg-0002gx-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #768162, was opened at 2003-07-09 11:13
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=768162&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: UNC path for data_directory?

Initial Comment:
I'd like to keep one SpamBayes database, but I use 
several PCs threough out the day.

I can mount a shared resource, and specify in my 
default_configuration.ini:
  data_directory:M:\data\Mail\SpamBayes

However, I'd like to be able to specify a UNC path, like:
  data_directory:\myhost\c$\data\Mail\SpamBayes

so that I do not have to keep a drive-letter mounted or 
rely on it being there...

I realize that, for laptops, this might cause issues when 
offline; however, if that folder were marked for 
synchronization, it should work, right?

Thanks,
Bobby Wilkins


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 17:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I am sure this is fixed.  There is a "bug" where the root of
a UNC path is not considered a directory.  ie, for me, "e"
is the root of my e:

>>> os.path.isdir(r"\eden\e\temp")
True
>>> os.path.isdir(r"\eden\e")
False

So this means that no one will be able to store in the
*root* of a UNC path - which I think is fine.  There is an
existing Python bug on that, so when that is fixed, this
will too.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-09 15:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I've checked in that change (to OptionsClass.py).

I believe this should work now as long as os.path.isdir() works 
for the UNC directory on the user's system.  This works for 
Bobby, but does not work on my system.

I presume this is a Python thing and not a SpamBayes thing 
and so there's not much that can be done here.  (Unless 
there is a different function that can be used to check if a 
directory exists that reliably works with UNC).

Mark, you can close this if you think that it's not worth doing 
anything else.  Otherwise, do want you want :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Date: 2003-07-09 15:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=145585

Continuing to work with Tony, we believe we've isolated this 
to an "omission" bug -- the PATH was not allowing '$' to be 
included, which is a necessity for any hidden-share UNC 
paths...

I think we can close this, and I believe Tony said he'd get the 
change rolled into the distribution (if I'm speaking for you, 
Tony, please step in).

Now, off to try out the manual install... ;^)

Thanks,
Bobby

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Date: 2003-07-09 14:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=145585

(... and one should check one's typography when submitting 
late at night...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Date: 2003-07-09 14:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=145585

Note: on discussion with Tony Meyer, it was identified to me 
that SpamBayes is doing an os.path.isdir() on the value of 
data_directory.

My personal testing of this function indicates that it 
successfully identifies UNC paths; directiries return ture, and 
other items do not.

Therefore, I suggest that this might be a "bug", not 
a "feature request". 

Should I re-submit in the "bugs" area?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=768162&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul  9 01:53:20 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul  9 03:53:23 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765042 ] IMAP mail fails to filter
Message-ID: <E19a9lQ-0001G0-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765042, was opened at 2003-07-03 12:21
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765042&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Josh Goodman (jogoodma)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: IMAP mail fails to filter

Initial Comment:
Incoming mail from IMAP server fails to get filtered and 
scored.  I can manually filter mail but only after the 
messages have been marked read no matter what filter 
option I specify in the "Filter now" dialog box.  

The filter fails if junk mail is supposed to be moved to a 
local Outlook folder or another IMAP folder.

This is happening with Outlook 2000 SP-1 on Win XP.  
The IMAP server is also using SSL for server connections.

I have attached the logfile.


Josh

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 17:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Fixed in CVS.

Checking in filter.py;
new revision: 1.26; previous revision: 1.25
Checking in msgstore.py;
new revision: 1.48; previous revision: 1.47

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765042&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul  9 06:32:40 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul  9 08:32:54 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-740198 ] Installation fails with
	regsvr error
Message-ID: <E19aE7k-0007QL-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #740198, was opened at 2003-05-19 21:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hallstevenson
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Installation fails with regsvr error

Initial Comment:
I'm trying to install SpamBayes into Outlook XP on 
Win98SE.  The install fails with a regsvr error.  
Attempts at manually registering the file also fail.  
Here's the log:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 274, in 
importHook
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 353, in doimport
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", 
line 59, in ?
  
File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\client\genca
che.py", line 368, in EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error 
loading type library/DLL.', None, None)
SystemError: PyErr_NormalizeException() called 
without exception
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 11, in ?
AttributeError: 'module' object has no 
attribute 'OutlookAddin'

Any help?

Cheers,

Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-09 08:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

I've had both 002 and 003 installed, but either both have 
been uninstalled or 003 is still left on the machine.

I also have Python installed and that's why I tried what you 
suggested to another user.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 01:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

What version are you running?  It looks like binary 002 - if
so, please try version 003.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-08 18:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

mhammond:

you said

>> * Go to a command prompt, and change to the
>> \Python\lib\site-packages\com\win32com\client 
>> directory 
>> * Execute "python makepy.py -i"
>> * Select any "Outlook XP" related entries (if
>> necessary, repeat for each one).
>> * You should get a coupld of lines of Python 
>> code generated.
>> 
>> Mail me these lines, and I will send you a new 
>> version to test.

Here's what I get:

Microsoft Outlook View Control
 {0006F062-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}, lcid=0, 
major=1, minor=0
 >>> # Use these commands in Python code to auto 
generate .py support
 >>> from win32com.client import gencache
 >>> gencache.EnsureModule('{0006F062-0000-0000-C000-
000000000046}', 0, 1, 0)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 07:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Seeing as you have Python installed, can you please try the
following:

* Go to a command prompt, and change to the
\Python\lib\site-packages\com\win32com\client directory
* Execute "python makepy.py -i"
* Select any "Outlook XP" related entries (if necessary,
repeat for each one).
* You should get a coupld of lines of Python code generated.

Mail me these lines, and I will send you a new version to test.

I wish I had that combination to test here, but as I don't,
this is my best hope :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-04 23:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

Addendum:  following my earlier post today I discovered 
release 3 of the code had been made.  I retested install with 
the binary and it failed again with an error in the regsvr:

DllRegisterServer ... failed Return Code was 0x80040201

with this in the log file:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 71, in ?
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.client.gencache", line 368, in 
EnsureModule
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error loading type 
library/DLL.', None, None)

I also tried the Python/open source install and it also fails 
with an error that "Outlook 2000 is not installed on this 
machine"... well, no isn't.  Outlook 2002 (XP) is!  

I'd love to try out this program but if I can't get it to install I 
guess I'll never find out.  

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-04 21:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Rob de Santos (rdesantos)
Date: 2003-07-04 21:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782486

OK, I'm new to this... any idea when we can expect a fix to 
this issue?  Is it being worked on?

Cheers,

-Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ken Walker (kwalker411)
Date: 2003-05-23 12:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=785557

Hi Fellas.  As per Tony Meyer's request, I'm appending my
version information here.  The plugin wouldn't install on my
platform due to a regsvr error.

System:

     Microsoft Windows 2000
     5.00.2195
     Service Pack 3

Mail Client:

     Microsoft Outlook 2002
     10.4219.5025
     Service Pack 2

Thanks,
K

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-22 22:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:
"I have a win2000 running outlook 2000 sr1 and I get the 
following message  
<<error.jpeg>> and the logs are as follows the first two time 
the log was empty but the next two time I got the following 
logs.  <<spambayes3.log>>  
<<spambayes4.log>> 
David"

The jpeg was just a screenshot of the regsvr error.  Log3 is:
"Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 15, in DllRegisterServer
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\register.py", 
line 388, in RegisterClasses
IndexError: list index out of range"
and log4 is:
"warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
Unregistered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 22, in DllUnregisterServer
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 791, in 
UnregisterAddin
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 296, in importHook
ImportError: No module named _winreg"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-22 19:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Noting a dupe in
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=741914&group_id=61702

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=740198&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul  9 13:28:29 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul  9 15:28:38 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-768682 ] Appointment filtered but
	can't be recovered
Message-ID: <E19aKc9-000880-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #768682, was opened at 2003-07-09 13:28
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768682&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Grunwald (pgrunwald)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Appointment filtered but can't be recovered

Initial Comment:
Outlook Plugin Beta 3
Outlook 2002 SP1

I received an calender request that was filtered into 
unsure.  When I try to recover it, I get the dialog "no 
message selected"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768682&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul  9 15:10:14 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul  9 17:10:18 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-768732 ] "Failed to save the Spam
	score for message" error
Message-ID: <E19aMCc-0004oe-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #768732, was opened at 2003-07-09 16:10
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768732&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Roger B. Dannenberg (rbd)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: "Failed to save the Spam score for message" error

Initial Comment:
Spam-bayes seems to have installed and set up 
everything properly, but nothing actually receives a spam 
score and no filtering takes place. The log file contains 
error messages including "Failed to save the Spam score 
for message ..." and "Failed filtering message! ..." and 
some stack trace info. I will append the log file.




I'm running SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta 1, Binary 
version 3 (July 2003) with Outlook on WinXP.




----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768732&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul  9 16:48:35 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul  9 18:48:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-768162 ] UNC path for
	data_directory?
Message-ID: <E19aNjn-0001tl-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #768162, was opened at 2003-07-09 13:13
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=768162&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: UNC path for data_directory?

Initial Comment:
I'd like to keep one SpamBayes database, but I use 
several PCs threough out the day.

I can mount a shared resource, and specify in my 
default_configuration.ini:
  data_directory:M:\data\Mail\SpamBayes

However, I'd like to be able to specify a UNC path, like:
  data_directory:\myhost\c$\data\Mail\SpamBayes

so that I do not have to keep a drive-letter mounted or 
rely on it being there...

I realize that, for laptops, this might cause issues when 
offline; however, if that folder were marked for 
synchronization, it should work, right?

Thanks,
Bobby Wilkins


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-10 10:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

:)  Didn't think to check a folder past the root.  This does 
indeed work for me, too, and explains why it worked for Bobby 
and not me.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 19:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I am sure this is fixed.  There is a "bug" where the root of
a UNC path is not considered a directory.  ie, for me, "e"
is the root of my e:

>>> os.path.isdir(r"\eden\e\temp")
True
>>> os.path.isdir(r"\eden\e")
False

So this means that no one will be able to store in the
*root* of a UNC path - which I think is fine.  There is an
existing Python bug on that, so when that is fixed, this
will too.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-09 17:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I've checked in that change (to OptionsClass.py).

I believe this should work now as long as os.path.isdir() works 
for the UNC directory on the user's system.  This works for 
Bobby, but does not work on my system.

I presume this is a Python thing and not a SpamBayes thing 
and so there's not much that can be done here.  (Unless 
there is a different function that can be used to check if a 
directory exists that reliably works with UNC).

Mark, you can close this if you think that it's not worth doing 
anything else.  Otherwise, do want you want :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Date: 2003-07-09 17:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=145585

Continuing to work with Tony, we believe we've isolated this 
to an "omission" bug -- the PATH was not allowing '$' to be 
included, which is a necessity for any hidden-share UNC 
paths...

I think we can close this, and I believe Tony said he'd get the 
change rolled into the distribution (if I'm speaking for you, 
Tony, please step in).

Now, off to try out the manual install... ;^)

Thanks,
Bobby

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Date: 2003-07-09 16:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=145585

(... and one should check one's typography when submitting 
late at night...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bobby Wilkins (hwilkins)
Date: 2003-07-09 16:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=145585

Note: on discussion with Tony Meyer, it was identified to me 
that SpamBayes is doing an os.path.isdir() on the value of 
data_directory.

My personal testing of this function indicates that it 
successfully identifies UNC paths; directiries return ture, and 
other items do not.

Therefore, I suggest that this might be a "bug", not 
a "feature request". 

Should I re-submit in the "bugs" area?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=768162&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul  9 16:51:07 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul  9 18:51:12 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-690418 ] Non mail items filtered
	by Outlook
Message-ID: <E19aNmF-000209-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #690418, was opened at 2003-02-21 14:11
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=690418&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Non mail items filtered by Outlook

Initial Comment:
DeliveryReports are filtered by SpamBayes.  We should
check that we are only filtering mail items.  I added a
check for this in the "Recover from Spam" buttons, so
we can copy that.  Indeed, we *must* copy that, as the
filter may move such a message, but then our "Delete
as/Recover from" buttons won't let us get it back

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-10 10:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Noting duplicate in 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768682&group_id=61702

([ 768682 ] Appointment filtered but can't be recovered)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-02 11:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Also happens for meeting requests (which apparently also
often end up as unsure)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=690418&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul  9 16:51:14 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul  9 18:51:30 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-768682 ] Appointment filtered but
	can't be recovered
Message-ID: <E19aNmM-00020K-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #768682, was opened at 2003-07-10 07:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768682&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Grunwald (pgrunwald)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Appointment filtered but can't be recovered

Initial Comment:
Outlook Plugin Beta 3
Outlook 2002 SP1

I received an calender request that was filtered into 
unsure.  When I try to recover it, I get the dialog "no 
message selected"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-10 10:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Dupe of 690418.

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=690418&group_id=61702&atid=498103

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768682&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 10 07:52:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 10 09:52:33 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-769132 ] Cannot set
	the Certain Spam folder
Message-ID: <E19abqY-0000xO-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #769132, was opened at 2003-07-10 08:52
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=769132&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: scot alexander (fluzwup)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Cannot set the Certain Spam folder

Initial Comment:
I installed SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-003.exe on Win2k running Outlook2k, and everything worked 
fine for about a week.  Then my spam folder went away--I don't know whether I accidentally 
deleted the folder rather than its contents, or if the spam filter killed it--and now I cannot set the 
folder.  If I go to the "Filter Rules" dialog, it will let me browse for a folder, and it will place it in the 
edit box, but when I click OK and go back to the "SpamBayes" dialog, I get "Watching 'Inbox'. Spam 
managed in '<unknown folder>', unsure managed in" (at which point the content is clipped).

I originally had the spam go to "Spam, spam, eggs and spam" and the usure go to "Bloody Vikings"; 
I've tried creating different folders for spam, with the same name as the original and with different 
names (including the reccommended "Spam"), but with no luck.  I've uninstalled and reinstalled 
SpamBayes several times, shut down and restarted Outlook several times, searched the registry 
and the SpamBayes folder for "Bloody Vikings" to see if I could manually edit the configuration, but 
found nothing, and I've run out of ideas.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=769132&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 10 08:08:51 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 10 10:08:54 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-769132 ] Cannot set
	the Certain Spam folder
Message-ID: <E19ac6N-0003Y8-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #769132, was opened at 2003-07-10 13:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=769132&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: scot alexander (fluzwup)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Cannot set the Certain Spam folder

Initial Comment:
I installed SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-003.exe on Win2k running Outlook2k, and everything worked 
fine for about a week.  Then my spam folder went away--I don't know whether I accidentally 
deleted the folder rather than its contents, or if the spam filter killed it--and now I cannot set the 
folder.  If I go to the "Filter Rules" dialog, it will let me browse for a folder, and it will place it in the 
edit box, but when I click OK and go back to the "SpamBayes" dialog, I get "Watching 'Inbox'. Spam 
managed in '<unknown folder>', unsure managed in" (at which point the content is clipped).

I originally had the spam go to "Spam, spam, eggs and spam" and the usure go to "Bloody Vikings"; 
I've tried creating different folders for spam, with the same name as the original and with different 
names (including the reccommended "Spam"), but with no luck.  I've uninstalled and reinstalled 
SpamBayes several times, shut down and restarted Outlook several times, searched the registry 
and the SpamBayes folder for "Bloody Vikings" to see if I could manually edit the configuration, but 
found nothing, and I've run out of ideas.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-10 14:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

As a workaround:
With outlook and spambayes closed (check the processes in 
the task manager to be sure). Edit the C:\Documents and 
Settings\<userid>\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini file
removed the lines that start with "spam_folder_id" or just 
delete the file. Restart outlook and reconfig Spambayes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=769132&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 10 10:35:10 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 10 12:35:21 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-769215 ] Failed to Load Upon
	Microsoft Updates
Message-ID: <E19aeNy-0003UF-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #769215, was opened at 2003-07-10 16:35
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769215&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Love (jtlove)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Failed to Load Upon Microsoft Updates

Initial Comment:
Upon installing the most recent Microsofts Updates for 
Windows XP that are automatically retrieved, the 
Spambayes plugin no longer loads.  I reinstalled v2 and 
looked at the options--> com-addins and found the 
plugin to be unchecked, I then checked it and found 
Outlook to uncheck it upon coming back into the form 
reporting that errors were encountered during the load.  
I then tried installing v3, only to encounter the same 
problem.  I have no idea what the Microsoft patch did 
but it has effectively disabled the plugin.  Any ideas?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769215&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 10 12:36:23 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 10 14:36:43 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-769132 ] Cannot set
	the Certain Spam folder
Message-ID: <E19agHH-0005vh-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #769132, was opened at 2003-07-10 08:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fluzwup
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=769132&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Priority: 1
Submitted By: scot alexander (fluzwup)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Cannot set the Certain Spam folder

Initial Comment:
I installed SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-003.exe on Win2k running Outlook2k, and everything worked 
fine for about a week.  Then my spam folder went away--I don't know whether I accidentally 
deleted the folder rather than its contents, or if the spam filter killed it--and now I cannot set the 
folder.  If I go to the "Filter Rules" dialog, it will let me browse for a folder, and it will place it in the 
edit box, but when I click OK and go back to the "SpamBayes" dialog, I get "Watching 'Inbox'. Spam 
managed in '<unknown folder>', unsure managed in" (at which point the content is clipped).

I originally had the spam go to "Spam, spam, eggs and spam" and the usure go to "Bloody Vikings"; 
I've tried creating different folders for spam, with the same name as the original and with different 
names (including the reccommended "Spam"), but with no luck.  I've uninstalled and reinstalled 
SpamBayes several times, shut down and restarted Outlook several times, searched the registry 
and the SpamBayes folder for "Bloody Vikings" to see if I could manually edit the configuration, but 
found nothing, and I've run out of ideas.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: scot alexander (fluzwup)
Date: 2003-07-10 13:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=819950

There was no "Outlook.ini", but there was a "Scot
Alexander.ini" that had "spam_folder_id" fields.  Just to be
on the safe side, I deleted the whole SpamBayes folder and
re-trained.  That appears to have solved the problem.  Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-10 09:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

As a workaround:
With outlook and spambayes closed (check the processes in 
the task manager to be sure). Edit the C:\Documents and 
Settings\<userid>\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini file
removed the lines that start with "spam_folder_id" or just 
delete the file. Restart outlook and reconfig Spambayes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=769132&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 10 13:44:27 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 10 15:44:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-761318 ] Moved mail is unfiltered
Message-ID: <E19ahL9-0000ss-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #761318, was opened at 2003-06-26 13:22
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dginsburg
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761318&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Welsh (markw_x)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Moved mail is unfiltered

Initial Comment:
When I use Outlook's rules wizard to move my emails to 
a different folder, they aren't filtered by the add-in.

Both the inbox, where the message arrives for a second 
before the rule is used, and the destination folder, 
where the message is moved by the rule, are listed as 
folders that should be filtered by the add-in.

The spam that arrives is given a spam score but not 
filtered accordingly.

This is an excerpt from the log for a piece of spam that 
was given a rating of 100%:
Message 'Get Your NEW Car ASAP' had a Spam 
classification of 'Yes'
Training on message 'Get Your NEW Car ASAP' -  trained 
as good
Training on message 'Get Your NEW Car ASAP' -  trained 
as spam

It was trained as spam because I clicked the "Delete as 
Spam" button, not because of the filtering.

I have Outlook 2002 SP-2.  I'm using the latest binary of 
the add-in (SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-002.exe).  The 
spam filtering works fine for all other mail that's left in 
the inbox and not moved by a rule.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dylan Ginsburg (dginsburg)
Date: 2003-07-10 15:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=820134

I have the same problem. I was able to get the filtering to 
work by only watching the sub-folder to which I move certain 
emails. When I watch both the master and sub-folder the 
filtering doesn't work (though the spam % is correct).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Welsh (markw_x)
Date: 2003-07-01 21:12

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=809756

I just got the latest binary (SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-
003.exe) and the bug still exists.

I set SpamBayes to mark all spam as read.  Although the 
spam doesn't get moved to the spam directory, it does get 
marked as read automatically.  Unfortunately, it's still trained 
as good until I delete it manually.

I thought maybe that observation would help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761318&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 10 16:05:35 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 10 18:05:49 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-769346 ] Problems after deleting
	certain spam folder
Message-ID: <E19ajXj-0007CM-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #769346, was opened at 2003-07-10 22:05
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769346&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Emile van Sebille (evansebille)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Problems after deleting certain spam folder

Initial Comment:
I have a customer running ol2000sr1 on winxp and I'd 
installed spambayes from cvs about three weeks ago.

On Monday, my customer deleted the target folder of 
the certain spam rule, fouling things up, and could not 
simply restore the folder to get things working again.  
nothing I tried would cause the filter rules target folder 
to remained changed.  Other changes would take, just 
not this one.

Today, nothing I tried would cause the filter rules target 
folder to remained changed.  Other changes would take, 
just not this one.

After a few simple attempts, I tried to force a clean 
install by scrubbing everything which included:
  --exit and logoff from outlook
  --uninstalling (unregistering) spambayes
  --uninstalling outlook
  --deleting outlook related info from disk & registry
  --deleting spambayes related files from disk & registry
  --deleting mail profiles
  --reinstalling outlook
  --download and install v.3 from exe installer

Even this did not work. 

I did get my customer going again by changing the 
certain spam filter to do nothing at 100% likelyhood of 
being spam, and redefining possible spam filter to move 
the spam to _junk at 85%.  Kludge, but it works.

So, one question...
How do you make outlook forget about spambayes 
entirely to do a clean install?

...and one bug?
Why couldn't I change the certain spam target folder?

Thanks,

Emile


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769346&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 10 18:10:04 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 10 20:10:13 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-769215 ] Failed to Load Upon
	Microsoft Updates
Message-ID: <E19alUC-0004Lc-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #769215, was opened at 2003-07-11 04:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769215&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Love (jtlove)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Failed to Load Upon Microsoft Updates

Initial Comment:
Upon installing the most recent Microsofts Updates for 
Windows XP that are automatically retrieved, the 
Spambayes plugin no longer loads.  I reinstalled v2 and 
looked at the options--> com-addins and found the 
plugin to be unchecked, I then checked it and found 
Outlook to uncheck it upon coming back into the form 
reporting that errors were encountered during the load.  
I then tried installing v3, only to encounter the same 
problem.  I have no idea what the Microsoft patch did 
but it has effectively disabled the plugin.  Any ideas?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-11 12:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

What version of Windows/Outlook are you now using?  Could 
you also go through the steps in the troubleshooting.html file 
and attach your log file?

Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769215&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 10 18:13:35 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 10 20:13:52 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-769346 ] Problems after deleting
	certain spam folder
Message-ID: <E19alXb-0004Rm-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #769346, was opened at 2003-07-11 10:05
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769346&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Emile van Sebille (evansebille)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Problems after deleting certain spam folder

Initial Comment:
I have a customer running ol2000sr1 on winxp and I'd 
installed spambayes from cvs about three weeks ago.

On Monday, my customer deleted the target folder of 
the certain spam rule, fouling things up, and could not 
simply restore the folder to get things working again.  
nothing I tried would cause the filter rules target folder 
to remained changed.  Other changes would take, just 
not this one.

Today, nothing I tried would cause the filter rules target 
folder to remained changed.  Other changes would take, 
just not this one.

After a few simple attempts, I tried to force a clean 
install by scrubbing everything which included:
  --exit and logoff from outlook
  --uninstalling (unregistering) spambayes
  --uninstalling outlook
  --deleting outlook related info from disk & registry
  --deleting spambayes related files from disk & registry
  --deleting mail profiles
  --reinstalling outlook
  --download and install v.3 from exe installer

Even this did not work. 

I did get my customer going again by changing the 
certain spam filter to do nothing at 100% likelyhood of 
being spam, and redefining possible spam filter to move 
the spam to _junk at 85%.  Kludge, but it works.

So, one question...
How do you make outlook forget about spambayes 
entirely to do a clean install?

...and one bug?
Why couldn't I change the certain spam target folder?

Thanks,

Emile


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-11 12:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

It does look like this may be a bug (certainly many people 
have had this trouble).  I'll leave that for Mark ;)

Regarding the question - all you need to do is delete all the 
*.ini files in your spambayes data directory.  When you next 
start Outlook you will then be able to reconfigure the plugin.  
See faq 3.6 for details about where this folder is.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769346&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 10 22:16:34 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 11 00:16:52 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-765924 ] Spam / ham
	statistics
Message-ID: <E19apKk-0002Jg-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #765924, was opened at 2003-07-04 08:51
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dze27
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=765924&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Magnus Aycox (mbip)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spam / ham statistics

Initial Comment:
Possibility to get statistics on how many mails were 
received per hour / day and how many of these were 
spam messages.
It would be great if it could be presented both as 
numbers and graphically (impresses CEO's...). The 
means to print it as a hard copy would be just 
swell... ;o)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Jeays (dze27)
Date: 2003-07-11 00:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=302748

I'm just another user but I think this would be a great
addition. I'd also be interested in: number of false
positives (along with percentage of total), number of false
negatives (along with percentage of total) and percentage of
mail received that is spam.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=765924&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 10 22:25:55 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 11 00:26:05 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-765924 ] Spam / ham
	statistics
Message-ID: <E19apTn-0003Ou-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #765924, was opened at 2003-07-05 00:51
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=765924&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Magnus Aycox (mbip)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spam / ham statistics

Initial Comment:
Possibility to get statistics on how many mails were 
received per hour / day and how many of these were 
spam messages.
It would be great if it could be presented both as 
numbers and graphically (impresses CEO's...). The 
means to print it as a hard copy would be just 
swell... ;o)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-11 16:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

It's not exactly what you have asked for, but as a start, are 
you aware that in the logs, each time you shut Outlook down 
it prints a message like:
"SpamBayes processed 555 messages, finding 34 spam and 11 
unsure"

(So you could shut Outlook down each hour/day, to generate 
this message).  It's unlikely that a graphical version would 
ever be made, but it would be easy enough to throw numbers 
like this into Excel and get pretty graphs.

The number of false positives/negatives is more difficult 
because SpamBayes doesn't really have any way to know 
that mail is a fp/fn.  It could print the number of times 
the "delete as spam" and "recover from spam" buttons are 
used, I guess, but this would include all unsure mail, which 
aren't exactly fp/fn's.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Jeays (dze27)
Date: 2003-07-11 16:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=302748

I'm just another user but I think this would be a great
addition. I'd also be interested in: number of false
positives (along with percentage of total), number of false
negatives (along with percentage of total) and percentage of
mail received that is spam.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=765924&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 11 05:21:59 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 11 07:22:04 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-769588 ] data_directory doesn't
	work
Message-ID: <E19avyR-000862-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #769588, was opened at 2003-07-11 13:21
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769588&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edwin (eddepet_33)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: data_directory doesn't work

Initial Comment:
I am using the outlook plugin (version 0.3) and I have 
two users on Windows XP/Outlook XP. I've tried to use 
the data_directory option to only have one database. 
The plugin doesn't load the data_directory. I've used all 
possible ways to name the directory (no quotes, single 
and double quotes, single backslash, double backslash, 
forward slash). Here are the messages in the logfile.

Attempted to set [General] data_directory with invalid 
value 'C:\Documents and Settings\Edwin\Application 
Data\SpamBayes' (<type 'str'>)
Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Agnes\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Agnes\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 
(May 2003))...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769588&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 11 06:56:53 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 11 08:56:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-769619 ] message time shifts when
	moved from possible to ham folder
Message-ID: <E19axSH-0002L4-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #769619, was opened at 2003-07-11 08:56
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769619&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joe Copley (jcopley)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: message time shifts when moved from possible to ham folder

Initial Comment:
When a message is placed in my possible SPAM folder, 
and I use the recover button to move it back to my 
inbox, the message time is moved  earlier by 8 hours.

I have Outlook XP and am in the Eastern time zone.

My Inbox is an IMAP account. The SPAM and Possible 
SPAM folders are local Outlook Accounts.

I use Rockliffe Mailsite as my mail server.

I have detected quirky behavior in Outlook before 
installing SpamBayes. For example, sometimes the rules 
simply stop working for no discernable reason. These 
problems migrated from Outlook 2000 on Win 98 to 
Outlook 2002 on XP.

On XP only, whenever I start Outlook after boot, the 
rules simply don't get invoked and I have to run them 
manually.

I am using Beta 1, Binary Version 3.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769619&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 11 09:40:41 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 11 11:40:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-769215 ] Failed to Load Upon
	Microsoft Updates
Message-ID: <E19b00n-0002SL-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #769215, was opened at 2003-07-10 16:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jtlove
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769215&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Love (jtlove)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Failed to Load Upon Microsoft Updates

Initial Comment:
Upon installing the most recent Microsofts Updates for 
Windows XP that are automatically retrieved, the 
Spambayes plugin no longer loads.  I reinstalled v2 and 
looked at the options--> com-addins and found the 
plugin to be unchecked, I then checked it and found 
Outlook to uncheck it upon coming back into the form 
reporting that errors were encountered during the load.  
I then tried installing v3, only to encounter the same 
problem.  I have no idea what the Microsoft patch did 
but it has effectively disabled the plugin.  Any ideas?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Jason Love (jtlove)
Date: 2003-07-11 15:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=667319

I am using Outlook 2002 with XP Profesional.  Working through 
the troubleshooting.html, I found that the plugin failed to load 
but was checked under the com-addins and not shown as a 
disabled item under the Help - About Outlook.  I have 
attached the log file.  Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-11 00:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

What version of Windows/Outlook are you now using?  Could 
you also go through the steps in the troubleshooting.html file 
and attach your log file?

Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769215&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 11 14:28:49 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 11 16:37:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-761250 ] .dll doesn't stay
	checked in COM Add-Ins window
Message-ID: <E19b4Vd-0006uz-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #761250, was opened at 2003-06-26 15:40
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by byjiminy
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761250&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: James Noser (byjiminy)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: .dll doesn't stay checked in COM Add-Ins window

Initial Comment:
I downloaded some Windows security patches yesterday 
and SpamBayes no longer appeared in the toolbar.  

I uninstalled and reinstalled both SpamBayes and 
Outlook.  I tried to instal Spambayes using the binary 
and the addin.py source.  

The COM add-in appeared in the Outlook menu, I 
checked it, and chose OK.  Then when I opened the 
COM add-in window again, the Spam Bayes add-in 
wasn't checked.  The attached log file documents three 
tries.

I removed the .dll from the COM add-in window, and 
then added it in again.  Sometimes this caused Outlook 
to Crash.  

Strangely enough, the log file shows the application 
trying to access files on the E: drive.  Both Outlook and 
Spambayes are installed on my C: drive.  

As a note, I've passed this program to several 
associates who love the software.  They worry though, 
that my problems may come their way.  Let me know if I 
can offer any other information.  

Thanks

PS - Windows 2000 Professional, Office 2000 
Proffessional

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: James Noser (byjiminy)
Date: 2003-07-11 20:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=810155

Here are the updates I installed the day SpamBayes gave up.

Successful Wednesday, June 25, 2003 814078: Security 
Update (Microsoft Jscript version 5.6, Windows 2000, 
Windows XP) Automatic update 
Successful Wednesday, June 25, 2003 330994: April 2003, 
Security Update for Outlook Express 6 SP1 Automatic update 
Successful Wednesday, June 25, 2003 818529: June 2003, 
Cumulative Patch for Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1 
Automatic update 


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: James Noser (byjiminy)
Date: 2003-06-30 15:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=810155

I've added the log file from an installation attempt.  I ran 
addin.py.  Here is the log.  

Thanks again

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Hihn (jhihn1)
Date: 2003-06-28 01:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=142836

PLEASE PEOPLE, BE ADVISED:
That it is not actually looking for a E: drive. When the
python code was compiled, it stored the path information of
the source files. It is telling the developers what function
in what file had the problem, along with how it got there.
It is not actually looking for a file.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Behring (jbehring20)
Date: 2003-06-27 17:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=811023

I am also running into the same problems on Windows 98 with Outllok 
2000. removed the .dll and tried to add it again manually and this is the 
error I got: 
 
OUTLOOK caused an invalid page fault in 
module PYTHON23.DLL at 0187:1e03ff78. 
Registers: 
EAX=505c3a43 CS=0187 EIP=1e03ff78 EFLGS=00010246 
EBX=005a3b70 SS=018f ESP=0056b834 EBP=1e0b8ec0 
ECX=005fdc70 DS=018f ESI=005fdc70 FS=4daf 
EDX=00705130 ES=018f EDI=1e03ff70 GS=0000 
Bytes at CS:EIP: 
8b 48 54 f6 c5 40 74 1f 8b 80 a4 00 00 00 85 c0 
Stack dump: 
00000000 1e0352fd 005fdc70 00000000 1e0b8ea8 005a3b60 00000002 
005f4da0 
00000020 1e03ff5d 005fdc70 1e03ff70 00000000 1e0b8ea8 00000001 
1e03fd38 
 
This is my first post and I don't see where to upload the log file, so I'll 
just add it here. 
 
SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook 
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher 
Traceback (most recent call last): 
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py", line 170, in 
dispatch 
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 322, in 
_InvokeEx_ 
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 601, in 
_invokeex_ 
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in 
_invokeex_ 
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 655, in 
OnConnection 
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 475, in 
GetManager 
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 141, in 
__init__ 
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 182, in 
LocateDataDirectory 
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\ntpath.py", line 269, in isdir 
exceptions.LookupError: no codec search functions registered: can't 
find encoding 
SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook 
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher 
Traceback (most recent call last): 
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py", line 170, in 
dispatch 
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 322, in 
_InvokeEx_ 
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 601, in 
_invokeex_ 
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in 
_invokeex_ 
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 655, in 
OnConnection 
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 475, in 
GetManager 
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 141, in 
__init__ 
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 182, in 
LocateDataDirectory 
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\ntpath.py", line 269, in isdir 
exceptions.LookupError: no codec search functions registered: can't 
find encoding 
 
 
 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Johan Nilsson (gnistan)
Date: 2003-06-27 07:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=810664

I ran it on Outlook 2002 Swedish, this result did I get:
SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
Created new configuration file 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\bheljoni\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_configuration.pck'
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py", line 170, 
in dispatch
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
322, in _InvokeEx_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
601, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
541, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 655, in 
OnConnection
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 475, 
in GetManager
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 156, 
in __init__
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 71, in 
import_core_spambayes_stuff
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 274, in importHook
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 353, in doimport
  File "E:\src\spambayes\spambayes\tokenizer.py", line 659, 
in ?
exceptions.AttributeError: 'OptionsClass' object has no 
attribute 'skip_max_word_size'

Removed it from COM addins and added it again:

Registered: SpamBayes.OutlookAddin 
SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
Created new configuration file 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\bheljoni\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_configuration.pck'
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py", line 170, 
in dispatch
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
322, in _InvokeEx_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
601, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
541, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 655, in 
OnConnection
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 475, 
in GetManager
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 156, 
in __init__
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 71, in 
import_core_spambayes_stuff
exceptions.ImportError: cannot import name tokenize


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Hihn (jhihn1)
Date: 2003-06-26 19:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=142836

I have the same problem. here's my log:

SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py", line
170, in dispatch
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line
322, in _InvokeEx_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line
601, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line
541, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 655, in
OnConnection
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 475,
in GetManager
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 141,
in __init__
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 182,
in LocateDataDirectory
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\ntpath.py", line 269, in isdir
exceptions.LookupError: no codec search functions
registered: can't find encoding
SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py", line
170, in dispatch
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line
322, in _InvokeEx_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line
601, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line
541, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 655, in
OnConnection
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 475,
in GetManager
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 141,
in __init__
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 182,
in LocateDataDirectory
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\ntpath.py", line 269, in isdir
exceptions.LookupError: no codec search functions
registered: can't find encoding


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761250&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 11 20:48:42 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 11 22:48:49 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-769981 ] Outlook plugin: allow
	user to change spam and unsure
Message-ID: <E19bARG-0007fx-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #769981, was opened at 2003-07-12 02:48
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=769981&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook plugin: allow user to change spam and unsure

Initial Comment:
The config.py module does not allow a user to change 
the spam and/or unsure folders after changing them 
from the default of "None". The bug usually shows up 
after someone has deleted the spam folder by accident 
and requires the user to delete the ini file from the 
spambayes data folder as a workaround. However, the 
bug affects changing the values from existing folders as 
well.

The patch changes the is_valid_single method to test 
the "self.value" field which is a tuple in the case of spam 
and unsure folders instead of the "value" parameter 
which is a string in those cases. It will also return true 
in the case of a list so that the list of "good email" 
folders can be set.

The command used to create the attached diff was:
cvs diff -c config.py > config.diff

If I should do something differently, let me know.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=769981&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 11 20:54:18 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 11 22:54:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-762577 ] Outlook 2003
	Workarounds
Message-ID: <E19bAWg-0007mz-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #762577, was opened at 2003-06-29 04:56
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=762577&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook 2003 Workarounds

Initial Comment:
This patch makes the toolbar display in OL 2003 and 
adds a option to run a timer to look for new mail 
because outlook 2003 doesn't fire the events properly.

A diff -u is attached.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-02 17:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

No longer needed after install the techinal refresh for outlook 
2003.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=762577&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Jul 12 06:17:29 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Jul 12 08:17:32 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-770111 ] "Could not
	extract ID" (Win98/OE) 
Message-ID: <E19bJJh-0006QJ-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #770111, was opened at 2003-07-12 12:17
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=770111&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Chris Caston (caston)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: "Could not extract ID" (Win98/OE) 

Initial Comment:
Hello,

I'm testing this on Win98/ Outlook Express and must 
have have an option set incorrectly.

I'm using spambayes 1.0a4 and Python 2.2.3.
In my command prompt window for the smtp proxy every 
time I try forwarding an e-mail I get the message:

"Could not extract ID"

Any idea how to fix this?

Please find my config file attached:

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=770111&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Jul 12 09:36:06 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Jul 12 11:36:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770175 ] resources/ui_html.py as
	plain ASCII
Message-ID: <E19bMPu-0002VW-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #770175, was opened at 2003-07-12 10:36
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770175&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Summary: resources/ui_html.py as plain ASCII

Initial Comment:
Python 2.3 emits a warning about non-ASCII data in
resources/ui_html.py:

/Users/skip/src/spambayes/spambayes/
UserInterface.py:193: DeprecationWarning: Non-ASCII 
character '\xda' in file /Users/skip/src/spambayes/
spambayes/resources/ui_html.py on line 7, but no encoding 
declared; see http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0263.html 
for details

I could add a coding comment but have no idea what to
add since that's not any Unicode encoding.  Instead, the
attached patch further encodes the compressed data as
base64 so the file only contains ASCII data.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770175&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Jul 12 22:27:40 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 13 00:27:50 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook Not Responding
Message-ID: <E19bYSa-0007lK-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-13 14:27
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook Not Responding

Initial Comment:
Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with 
SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way 
through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 
messages.

Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same 
problem at the same message count (31 of 50.)

If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages 
download successfully.

Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these 
downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves 
them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 
100% sure of this.)

Outlook has not previously experienced this problem 
prior to installing SpamBytes.

I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes 
applied.

Outlook is  Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627)



Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook 
Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a 
chance to analyse them?  SpamBytes does seem to lag 
a little behind the download by my casual observation.






----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 13 04:04:41 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 13 06:04:46 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770175 ] resources/ui_html.py as
	plain ASCII
Message-ID: <E19bdij-0005Yx-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #770175, was opened at 2003-07-12 15:36
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770175&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Summary: resources/ui_html.py as plain ASCII

Initial Comment:
Python 2.3 emits a warning about non-ASCII data in
resources/ui_html.py:

/Users/skip/src/spambayes/spambayes/
UserInterface.py:193: DeprecationWarning: Non-ASCII 
character '\xda' in file /Users/skip/src/spambayes/
spambayes/resources/ui_html.py on line 7, but no encoding 
declared; see http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0263.html 
for details

I could add a coding comment but have no idea what to
add since that's not any Unicode encoding.  Instead, the
attached patch further encodes the compressed data as
base64 so the file only contains ASCII data.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-07-13 10:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

The .py files in the reources directory are created
automatically from the html/gif/etc files by Mike Fletcher's
Resource Package, so patching them won't help in the long
run.  Tony has already raised the issue with Mike, but not
to anyone's real satisfaction judging by the comments in
the RFE:

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=732511&group_id=71287&atid=530785

I know nothing about Unicode or character encodings, so
I don't really know what to add.  Your scheme of base64
encoding sounds like it should work, but Mike may have
some reason for not doing that.  I've asked about it in his
RFE.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770175&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 13 10:14:46 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 13 12:14:51 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770175 ] resources/ui_html.py as
	plain ASCII
Message-ID: <E19bjUs-0001Mv-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #770175, was opened at 2003-07-12 15:36
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770175&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Summary: resources/ui_html.py as plain ASCII

Initial Comment:
Python 2.3 emits a warning about non-ASCII data in
resources/ui_html.py:

/Users/skip/src/spambayes/spambayes/
UserInterface.py:193: DeprecationWarning: Non-ASCII 
character '\xda' in file /Users/skip/src/spambayes/
spambayes/resources/ui_html.py on line 7, but no encoding 
declared; see http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0263.html 
for details

I could add a coding comment but have no idea what to
add since that's not any Unicode encoding.  Instead, the
attached patch further encodes the compressed data as
base64 so the file only contains ASCII data.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-07-13 16:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Mike has released a new version (1.0.0b1) of Resource
Package which resolves this.  I've regenerated our resource
modules with it.  However, I didn't seem to get the warnings
even before I did that.  Skip, could you check that this fix
works for you?  Ta.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-07-13 10:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

The .py files in the reources directory are created
automatically from the html/gif/etc files by Mike Fletcher's
Resource Package, so patching them won't help in the long
run.  Tony has already raised the issue with Mike, but not
to anyone's real satisfaction judging by the comments in
the RFE:

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=732511&group_id=71287&atid=530785

I know nothing about Unicode or character encodings, so
I don't really know what to add.  Your scheme of base64
encoding sounds like it should work, but Mike may have
some reason for not doing that.  I've asked about it in his
RFE.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770175&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 13 11:05:48 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 13 13:05:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-769981 ] Outlook plugin: allow
	user to change spam and unsure
Message-ID: <E19bkIG-0002ww-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #769981, was opened at 2003-07-12 02:48
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=769981&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
>Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook plugin: allow user to change spam and unsure

Initial Comment:
The config.py module does not allow a user to change 
the spam and/or unsure folders after changing them 
from the default of "None". The bug usually shows up 
after someone has deleted the spam folder by accident 
and requires the user to delete the ini file from the 
spambayes data folder as a workaround. However, the 
bug affects changing the values from existing folders as 
well.

The patch changes the is_valid_single method to test 
the "self.value" field which is a tuple in the case of spam 
and unsure folders instead of the "value" parameter 
which is a string in those cases. It will also return true 
in the case of a list so that the list of "good email" 
folders can be set.

The command used to create the attached diff was:
cvs diff -c config.py > config.diff

If I should do something differently, let me know.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=769981&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 13 12:41:50 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 13 14:41:55 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770175 ] resources/ui_html.py as
	plain ASCII
Message-ID: <E19blnC-00068g-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #770175, was opened at 2003-07-12 10:36
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770175&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Summary: resources/ui_html.py as plain ASCII

Initial Comment:
Python 2.3 emits a warning about non-ASCII data in
resources/ui_html.py:

/Users/skip/src/spambayes/spambayes/
UserInterface.py:193: DeprecationWarning: Non-ASCII 
character '\xda' in file /Users/skip/src/spambayes/
spambayes/resources/ui_html.py on line 7, but no encoding 
declared; see http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0263.html 
for details

I could add a coding comment but have no idea what to
add since that's not any Unicode encoding.  Instead, the
attached patch further encodes the compressed data as
base64 so the file only contains ASCII data.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-13 13:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

Seems to, yes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-07-13 11:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Mike has released a new version (1.0.0b1) of Resource
Package which resolves this.  I've regenerated our resource
modules with it.  However, I didn't seem to get the warnings
even before I did that.  Skip, could you check that this fix
works for you?  Ta.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-07-13 05:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

The .py files in the reources directory are created
automatically from the html/gif/etc files by Mike Fletcher's
Resource Package, so patching them won't help in the long
run.  Tony has already raised the issue with Mike, but not
to anyone's real satisfaction judging by the comments in
the RFE:

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=732511&group_id=71287&atid=530785

I know nothing about Unicode or character encodings, so
I don't really know what to add.  Your scheme of base64
encoding sounds like it should work, but Mike may have
some reason for not doing that.  I've asked about it in his
RFE.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770175&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 13 16:54:57 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 13 18:55:07 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-769588 ] data_directory doesn't
	work
Message-ID: <E19bpk9-0002qd-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #769588, was opened at 2003-07-11 23:21
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769588&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edwin (eddepet_33)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: data_directory doesn't work

Initial Comment:
I am using the outlook plugin (version 0.3) and I have 
two users on Windows XP/Outlook XP. I've tried to use 
the data_directory option to only have one database. 
The plugin doesn't load the data_directory. I've used all 
possible ways to name the directory (no quotes, single 
and double quotes, single backslash, double backslash, 
forward slash). Here are the messages in the logfile.

Attempted to set [General] data_directory with invalid 
value 'C:\Documents and Settings\Edwin\Application 
Data\SpamBayes' (<type 'str'>)
Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Agnes\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Agnes\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 
(May 2003))...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-14 10:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

What is the path that you are trying to give it?  The error 
message is basically saying that it's an invalid path, but this 
could easily be because the regex testing it is wrong.  (If it 
includes a '$', for example, this is fixed in CVS, but not in a 
release, yet).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769588&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 13 17:01:47 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 13 19:02:01 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Support Requests-770111 ] "Could not
	extract ID" (Win98/OE) 
Message-ID: <E19bpql-0004tn-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Support Requests item #770111, was opened at 2003-07-13 00:17
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=770111&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Chris Caston (caston)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: "Could not extract ID" (Win98/OE) 

Initial Comment:
Hello,

I'm testing this on Win98/ Outlook Express and must 
have have an option set incorrectly.

I'm using spambayes 1.0a4 and Python 2.2.3.
In my command prompt window for the smtp proxy every 
time I try forwarding an e-mail I get the message:

"Could not extract ID"

Any idea how to fix this?

Please find my config file attached:

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-14 11:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Sorry, this is our fault for not updating the documentation.

The option to put the id in the body of the message doesn't 
work in a3/a4 (a long and complicated story).  There is still 
discussion about whether it will be added, or the option will 
be removed.

Since OE is one of the mailers that doesn't work with the id in 
the headers, you'll have to use the web interface to train 
messages, sorry.

There are other improvements arriving soon that will help this, 
though, including:
 * a new SMTP proxy that can be set to train on forwarded 
messages, rather than finding the right message in the cache.
 * a new application similar to pop3proxy that lets you train 
by moving mail from one folder to another.

The option to put the id in the body *may* also make it back.

Again, apologies for this.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498104&aid=770111&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 13 23:12:05 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 14 01:12:10 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] 
	[ spambayes-Bugs-770793 ] Win98, database corrupts?
Message-ID: <E19bvd7-0006BO-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #770793, was opened at 2003-07-14 08:12
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770793&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Lauri Harpf (theranger54)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Win98, database corrupts?

Initial Comment:
Gives:

---
Loading database...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", 
line 777, in ?
    run()
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", 
line 752, in run
    state.createWorkers()
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", 
line 594, in createWorkers
    self.bayes = storage.DBDictClassifier(filename)
  
File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\spambayes\storage.
py", line 147, in __init
__
    self.load()
  
File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\spambayes\storage.
py", line 159, in load
    t = self.db[self.statekey]
  File "C:\OHJELMATIEDOSTOT\PYTHON22\lib\shelve.py", 
line 71, in __getitem__
    return Unpickler(f).load()
EOFError
Exception exceptions.AttributeError: "'NoneType' object 
has no attribute 'error'
" in <bound method _Database.__del__ of 
<dumbdbm._Database instance at 0x00ED936
0>> ignored
---

on startup. Worked fine, then I rebooted the machine 
(shut down Spambayes through the Web interface) and 
then it simply refused to boot up with the above 
message. Error seems permanent, unless user does 
something drastic (ie. destroys the database). I'm 
running Win98 Se, using pop3proxy with Outlook 6 SP1, 
starting the program with

c:\ohjelmatiedostot\python22\python.exe 
c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\pop3proxy.
py -b

Hard drive is a 80GB model, partitioned into one single 
partition using FAT32, 45,7GB still free. Spambayes 
version is 1.0 A4.

The same problem also occurred with Alpha 3, it refuses 
to start up with the message

---
Loading database...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayesbak\pop3proxy.py", 
line 730, in ?
    run()
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayesbak\pop3proxy.py", 
line 705, in run
    state.createWorkers()
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayesbak\pop3proxy.py", 
line 547, in createWorke
rs
    self.bayes = storage.DBDictClassifier(filename)
  
File "C:\Ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\spambayes\storage.
py", line 147, in __init
__
    self.load()
  
File "C:\Ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\spambayes\storage.
py", line 159, in load
    t = self.db[self.statekey]
  File "C:\OHJELMATIEDOSTOT\PYTHON22\lib\shelve.py", 
line 71, in __getitem__
    return Unpickler(f).load()
EOFError
Exception exceptions.AttributeError: "'NoneType' object 
has no attribute 'error'
" in <bound method _Database.__del__ of 
<dumbdbm._Database instance at 0x00ED1D7
0>> ignored
---

After a fresh install, the program usually works fine for a 
while. Every reboot does not appear to mix things up, it 
only seems to go bad after it has been running for a 
while and the user has classified enough messages. I run 
my comp mostly 24/7, so reboots are rare and 
Spambayes is usually running unless I need to boot.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770793&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 14 00:44:52 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 14 02:45:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-769588 ] data_directory doesn't
	work
Message-ID: <E19bx4u-0000XV-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #769588, was opened at 2003-07-11 13:21
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by eddepet_33
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769588&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edwin (eddepet_33)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: data_directory doesn't work

Initial Comment:
I am using the outlook plugin (version 0.3) and I have 
two users on Windows XP/Outlook XP. I've tried to use 
the data_directory option to only have one database. 
The plugin doesn't load the data_directory. I've used all 
possible ways to name the directory (no quotes, single 
and double quotes, single backslash, double backslash, 
forward slash). Here are the messages in the logfile.

Attempted to set [General] data_directory with invalid 
value 'C:\Documents and Settings\Edwin\Application 
Data\SpamBayes' (<type 'str'>)
Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Agnes\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Agnes\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 
(May 2003))...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Edwin (eddepet_33)
Date: 2003-07-14 08:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=820567

The path is exactly as in the log-segment. There are spaces 
but no other strange characters. It doesn't load the path 
which contains 'Edwin' but it does use the path which 
contains 'Agnes'. The paths are basically the same. Could the 
spaces be a problem? I will give it a go tonight.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-14 00:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

What is the path that you are trying to give it?  The error 
message is basically saying that it's an invalid path, but this 
could easily be because the regex testing it is wrong.  (If it 
includes a '$', for example, this is fixed in CVS, but not in a 
release, yet).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769588&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 14 03:13:42 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 14 05:13:51 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770847 ] Training not possible on
	Outlook XP / WinXP
Message-ID: <E19bzOw-00015c-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #770847, was opened at 2003-07-14 11:13
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770847&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Markus L. Noga (mlnoga)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Training not possible on Outlook XP / WinXP

Initial Comment:
The train spam button does not work. This breaks the 
entire plugin.

Specifically, the logfile shows a warning "raising a string 
exception is deprecated" when I set the training folders, 
and it shows an assertion error that "Proportions must 
add to 1.0" when I press the training button. See 
attached logfile.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770847&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 14 04:45:32 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 14 06:45:44 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770847 ] Training not possible on
	Outlook XP / WinXP
Message-ID: <E19c0po-0000m7-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #770847, was opened at 2003-07-14 11:13
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by eddepet_33
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770847&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Markus L. Noga (mlnoga)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Training not possible on Outlook XP / WinXP

Initial Comment:
The train spam button does not work. This breaks the 
entire plugin.

Specifically, the logfile shows a warning "raising a string 
exception is deprecated" when I set the training folders, 
and it shows an assertion error that "Proportions must 
add to 1.0" when I press the training button. See 
attached logfile.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Edwin (eddepet_33)
Date: 2003-07-14 12:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=820567

This problem has been mentioned before on this list. One 
comment there suggested to keep trying. I had the same 
problem on Outlook XP and WinXP but after a couple of 
restarts of Outlook it suddenly worked. I don't have any 
problems now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770847&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 14 13:45:37 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 14 15:45:39 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-771192 ] Spam "Moved" but
	Original Left in Inbox as Read
Message-ID: <E19c9GT-000226-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #771192, was opened at 2003-07-14 14:45
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771192&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heath Stewart (clubstew)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Spam "Moved" but Original Left in Inbox as Read

Initial Comment:
Lately (and for no apparently reason I can think of, i.e. 
no new plugins, etc.) my SPAM filter isn't working as it 
should. I have SPAM setup to be *moved* to a subdir of 
the Inbox but the message is really only being copied. 
The original is left in the inbox although it is marked as 
read. Also, for these messages (it's not all, but most and 
I can't see the pattern) the Spam score column doesn't 
display at all.

Also, the "Delete as Spam" button has stopped working 
(I'm guessing it's just a general problem, but the usual 
stuff (restarting, etc.) doesn't fix it). I have to move to 
the next message item, then back, and click the button. 
I can delete two messages before I have to repeat this 
process. This process, too, does not display a SPAM 
score in the Spam field.

My setup is on XP using Exchange Server in Outlook.

Sorry if this is a dup, but I couldn't really find another 
one like this.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771192&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 14 16:10:13 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 14 18:10:21 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-771256 ] Not scoring Spam
Message-ID: <E19cBWP-0005Iq-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #771256, was opened at 2003-07-14 22:10
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771256&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott Hagie (shagie)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Not scoring Spam

Initial Comment:
For the most part the Outlook version works pretty well, 
but in two cases so far Spambayes will refuse to give it 
a score on the main page or sort it. One of the e-mails 
was spam, the other was not. The e-mails do not appear 
at all in the log. I can view the spam clues and it will 
give me accurate information of what score it should 
have given it though. For instance, the Spam got:

'*H*'                               3.14121e-008        -      -
'*S*'                               0.999976            -      -

and the good e-mail got:

'*H*'                               0.999994            -      -
'*S*'                               7.60678e-010        -      -

The good e-mail was unusual in that it had no subject 
line, the bad is pretty typical html spam. I won't bother 
adding the log since it does not show anything.

I really like this program, I can not wait until you get all 
the bugs out.

Scott

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771256&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 15 05:52:14 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 15 07:52:23 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-771541 ] "Recover from" button
	not present in "Unsure" folder
Message-ID: <E19cOLu-0001mP-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #771541, was opened at 2003-07-15 07:52
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771541&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jim Drash (jdrash)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Recover from" button not present in "Unsure" folder

Initial Comment:
In the 003 release of the Outlook Add-in, the "Recover 
from" button does not display in the Unsure folder. Onlt 
the "Delete As Spam" displays.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771541&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 15 05:52:36 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 15 07:52:41 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-771542 ] "Recover from" button
	not present in "Unsure" folder
Message-ID: <E19cOMG-0004D2-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #771542, was opened at 2003-07-15 07:52
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771542&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jim Drash (jdrash)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Recover from" button not present in "Unsure" folder

Initial Comment:
In the 003 release of the Outlook Add-in, the "Recover 
from" button does not display in the Unsure folder. Onlt 
the "Delete As Spam" displays.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771542&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 16 02:25:00 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 16 04:25:07 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-771542 ] "Recover from" button
	not present in "Unsure" folder
Message-ID: <E19chau-00043S-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #771542, was opened at 2003-07-15 21:52
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771542&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jim Drash (jdrash)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Recover from" button not present in "Unsure" folder

Initial Comment:
In the 003 release of the Outlook Add-in, the "Recover 
from" button does not display in the Unsure folder. Onlt 
the "Delete As Spam" displays.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771542&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 16 02:27:13 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 16 04:27:18 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770847 ] Training not possible on
	Outlook XP / WinXP
Message-ID: <E19chd3-0006wL-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #770847, was opened at 2003-07-14 19:13
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770847&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Markus L. Noga (mlnoga)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Training not possible on Outlook XP / WinXP

Initial Comment:
The train spam button does not work. This breaks the 
entire plugin.

Specifically, the logfile shows a warning "raising a string 
exception is deprecated" when I set the training folders, 
and it shows an assertion error that "Proportions must 
add to 1.0" when I press the training button. See 
attached logfile.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-16 18:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Thanks - dupe of 765912

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Edwin (eddepet_33)
Date: 2003-07-14 20:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=820567

This problem has been mentioned before on this list. One 
comment there suggested to keep trying. I had the same 
problem on Outlook XP and WinXP but after a couple of 
restarts of Outlook it suddenly worked. I don't have any 
problems now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770847&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 16 02:47:40 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 16 04:47:44 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-772155 ] Meeting requests
Message-ID: <E19chwq-0005h6-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #772155, was opened at 2003-07-16 08:47
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=772155&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kevin Smith (ksmith42)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Meeting requests

Initial Comment:
If a meeting request is identified as spam or possible 
spam then the recover from spam button does not work 
correctly, the message "No Items Selected" is displayed.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=772155&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 16 08:04:50 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 16 10:04:55 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] 
	[ spambayes-Bugs-770793 ] Win98, database corrupts?
Message-ID: <E19cmtm-0004pV-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #770793, was opened at 2003-07-14 01:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770793&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Lauri Harpf (theranger54)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Win98, database corrupts?

Initial Comment:
Gives:

---
Loading database...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", 
line 777, in ?
    run()
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", 
line 752, in run
    state.createWorkers()
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", 
line 594, in createWorkers
    self.bayes = storage.DBDictClassifier(filename)
  
File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\spambayes\storage.
py", line 147, in __init
__
    self.load()
  
File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\spambayes\storage.
py", line 159, in load
    t = self.db[self.statekey]
  File "C:\OHJELMATIEDOSTOT\PYTHON22\lib\shelve.py", 
line 71, in __getitem__
    return Unpickler(f).load()
EOFError
Exception exceptions.AttributeError: "'NoneType' object 
has no attribute 'error'
" in <bound method _Database.__del__ of 
<dumbdbm._Database instance at 0x00ED936
0>> ignored
---

on startup. Worked fine, then I rebooted the machine 
(shut down Spambayes through the Web interface) and 
then it simply refused to boot up with the above 
message. Error seems permanent, unless user does 
something drastic (ie. destroys the database). I'm 
running Win98 Se, using pop3proxy with Outlook 6 SP1, 
starting the program with

c:\ohjelmatiedostot\python22\python.exe 
c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\pop3proxy.
py -b

Hard drive is a 80GB model, partitioned into one single 
partition using FAT32, 45,7GB still free. Spambayes 
version is 1.0 A4.

The same problem also occurred with Alpha 3, it refuses 
to start up with the message

---
Loading database...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayesbak\pop3proxy.py", 
line 730, in ?
    run()
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayesbak\pop3proxy.py", 
line 705, in run
    state.createWorkers()
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayesbak\pop3proxy.py", 
line 547, in createWorke
rs
    self.bayes = storage.DBDictClassifier(filename)
  
File "C:\Ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\spambayes\storage.
py", line 147, in __init
__
    self.load()
  
File "C:\Ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\spambayes\storage.
py", line 159, in load
    t = self.db[self.statekey]
  File "C:\OHJELMATIEDOSTOT\PYTHON22\lib\shelve.py", 
line 71, in __getitem__
    return Unpickler(f).load()
EOFError
Exception exceptions.AttributeError: "'NoneType' object 
has no attribute 'error'
" in <bound method _Database.__del__ of 
<dumbdbm._Database instance at 0x00ED1D7
0>> ignored
---

After a fresh install, the program usually works fine for a 
while. Every reboot does not appear to mix things up, it 
only seems to go bad after it has been running for a 
while and the user has classified enough messages. I run 
my comp mostly 24/7, so reboots are rare and 
Spambayes is usually running unless I need to boot.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-16 10:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

The "dumbdbm._Database instance" in the traceback is a sure 
sign of a recently-diagnosed critical problem.  Since you're 
using Outlook, using the Outlook addin instead of pop3proxy 
will cure it.  If for some reason you want to use pop3proxy 
with Outlook (I woudn't -- the Outlook addin is a joy), you'll 
need to install "a real" database.  Python 2.3 will ship with a 
current version of Sleepycat's Berkeley bsddb database.  For 
Python 2.2.3, that can be obtained separately from the 
SourceForge PyBSDDB project:

http://pybsddb.sf.net/

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770793&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 16 08:50:29 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 16 10:50:44 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-761797 ] "Failed to call the
	universal dispatcher"
Message-ID: <E19cnbx-0001SI-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #761797, was opened at 2003-06-27 06:45
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kwladyka
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761797&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Simon Caddy (simoncaddy)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Failed to call the universal dispatcher"

Initial Comment:
My Spambayes log shows this error:

SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py",
line 170, in dispatch
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py",
line 322, in _InvokeEx_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py",
line 601, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py",
line 541, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line
655, in OnConnection
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line
475, in GetManager
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line
141, in __init__
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line
182, in LocateDataDirectory
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\ntpath.py", line 269, in
isdir
exceptions.LookupError: no codec search functions
registered: can't find encoding
SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py",
line 170, in dispatch
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py",
line 322, in _InvokeEx_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py",
line 601, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py",
line 541, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line
655, in OnConnection
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line
475, in GetManager
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line
141, in __init__
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line
182, in LocateDataDirectory
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\ntpath.py", line 269, in
isdir
exceptions.LookupError: no codec search functions
registered: can't find encoding


Any ideas...?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Kevin Wladyka (kwladyka)
Date: 2003-07-16 08:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=823907

I assume the latest download (1.0a4) is the 0.3 binary or 
later?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-01 17:12

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Fixed in the 0.3 binary.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Simon Caddy (simoncaddy)
Date: 2003-07-01 03:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=810828

Outlook 2002 also then, sorry, misread your earlier post

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bengt Bergholm (borgsquirrel)
Date: 2003-07-01 03:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=813286

Yes and no. I don't know about how close code relationship
there is between Outlook 2000 and 2002 (2k2) which I am running.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Simon Caddy (simoncaddy)
Date: 2003-07-01 03:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=810828

Vaguely reassurring to know it's not just a 98/Me problem
then... common factor so far is Outlook 2K.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bengt Bergholm (borgsquirrel)
Date: 2003-07-01 02:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=813286

I have this exact problem under Windows XP w/ Outlook 2k2
sp2, english.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Simon Caddy (simoncaddy)
Date: 2003-06-30 02:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=810828

Yeah, thanks... I have now seem at the top of the docs page
"current binary installer will not work with Windows 98"...
but no solution!?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Cloutier (chealer)
Date: 2003-06-28 23:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738765

It seems you have the same problem as the one reported in 
761316.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761797&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 16 16:15:13 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 16 18:15:31 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-761797 ] "Failed to call the
	universal dispatcher"
Message-ID: <E19cuYL-0006Zl-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #761797, was opened at 2003-06-28 00:45
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761797&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Simon Caddy (simoncaddy)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Failed to call the universal dispatcher"

Initial Comment:
My Spambayes log shows this error:

SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py",
line 170, in dispatch
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py",
line 322, in _InvokeEx_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py",
line 601, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py",
line 541, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line
655, in OnConnection
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line
475, in GetManager
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line
141, in __init__
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line
182, in LocateDataDirectory
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\ntpath.py", line 269, in
isdir
exceptions.LookupError: no codec search functions
registered: can't find encoding
SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py",
line 170, in dispatch
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py",
line 322, in _InvokeEx_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py",
line 601, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py",
line 541, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line
655, in OnConnection
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line
475, in GetManager
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line
141, in __init__
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line
182, in LocateDataDirectory
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\ntpath.py", line 269, in
isdir
exceptions.LookupError: no codec search functions
registered: can't find encoding


Any ideas...?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-17 10:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Kinda.  The spambayes_1.0a4 download is *source only*.  
This does include the source for the latest binary Outlook 
plug-in, but if you want the binary installer, then you must 
get this from Mark's webpage.  The downloads page has 
details/links.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Kevin Wladyka (kwladyka)
Date: 2003-07-17 02:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=823907

I assume the latest download (1.0a4) is the 0.3 binary or 
later?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-02 11:12

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Fixed in the 0.3 binary.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Simon Caddy (simoncaddy)
Date: 2003-07-01 21:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=810828

Outlook 2002 also then, sorry, misread your earlier post

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bengt Bergholm (borgsquirrel)
Date: 2003-07-01 21:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=813286

Yes and no. I don't know about how close code relationship
there is between Outlook 2000 and 2002 (2k2) which I am running.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Simon Caddy (simoncaddy)
Date: 2003-07-01 21:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=810828

Vaguely reassurring to know it's not just a 98/Me problem
then... common factor so far is Outlook 2K.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bengt Bergholm (borgsquirrel)
Date: 2003-07-01 20:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=813286

I have this exact problem under Windows XP w/ Outlook 2k2
sp2, english.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Simon Caddy (simoncaddy)
Date: 2003-06-30 20:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=810828

Yeah, thanks... I have now seem at the top of the docs page
"current binary installer will not work with Windows 98"...
but no solution!?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Cloutier (chealer)
Date: 2003-06-29 17:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738765

It seems you have the same problem as the one reported in 
761316.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761797&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 17 18:49:35 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 17 20:49:43 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-773364 ] "Delete From Server"
	doesn't work on filtered mail
Message-ID: <E19dJRH-0007Qb-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #773364, was opened at 2003-07-18 12:49
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail

Initial Comment:
In Outlook's account properties, you can choose to 
leave a copy of retrieved mail on the server, and to 
remove that copy when the mail is deleted from 
the "Deleted Items" folder. However, this does not seem 
to be working with mail that has been checked by 
SpamBayes. When I delete a mail from the "Certain 
Spam" folder, it is moved to "Deleted Items" as 
expected, but when the "Deleted Items" folder is 
emptied, the copy remains on the server. I've tried the 
same thing with mail that has not been checked by 
SpamBayes, and it gets deleted from the server as 
expected.
It seems that Outlook cannot tell that the filtered mail is 
the same as the one on the server. Perhaps this is 
because of the addition of the spam score to the local 
copy?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 17 19:27:26 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 17 21:27:29 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-773382 ] Add training
	on outgoing messages
Message-ID: <E19dK1u-0002MC-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #773382, was opened at 2003-07-17 18:27
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=773382&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Leonid (leobru)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Add training on outgoing messages

Initial Comment:
So far SpamBayes only worked in a "reactive" mode, when
a message is first classified, then used for training.
I am proposing to use a "proactive" mode as well:
training on outgoing messages that are ham by
definition. Such training will provide for increased
"hamminess" of letters from your new correspondents
even before you have received  a single letter from them!
Obviously, training on outgoing mail must differ from
training on good incoming mail: the
From/Cc/To/Reply-To/Bcc headers must be handled
appropriately, the absence of Received and other
headers that are only likely to be present in incoming
messages must be ignored, and the Message-Id can be
kept as well to be matched with In-Reply-To. 


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=773382&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 18 00:05:21 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 18 02:05:31 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-773452 ] Unable to use fractional
	number as spam_threshold
Message-ID: <E19dOMr-0001nh-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #773452, was opened at 2003-07-18 10:05
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773452&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Unable to use fractional number as spam_threshold

Initial Comment:
Assumes that I want to use 99.5% as a threshold for 
considering message as spam. I can open "Filter rules 
window" and try to put here "99,5" (because decimal 
separator in my regional settings is comma) - it 
said "please enter a number". Ok, I put there "99.5". 
Open it again - you will see "99". Press "OK" button - 
you will get "spam_threshold:99.0" in outlook.ini

After some action I have even seen "995.0" value in .ini 
file, but unfortunatly I was not able to figure out steps 
to reproduce.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773452&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 18 00:26:42 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 18 02:26:55 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-773452 ] Unable to use fractional
	number as spam_threshold
Message-ID: <E19dOhW-0000oB-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #773452, was opened at 2003-07-18 18:05
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773452&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Unable to use fractional number as spam_threshold

Initial Comment:
Assumes that I want to use 99.5% as a threshold for 
considering message as spam. I can open "Filter rules 
window" and try to put here "99,5" (because decimal 
separator in my regional settings is comma) - it 
said "please enter a number". Ok, I put there "99.5". 
Open it again - you will see "99". Press "OK" button - 
you will get "spam_threshold:99.0" in outlook.ini

After some action I have even seen "995.0" value in .ini 
file, but unfortunatly I was not able to figure out steps 
to reproduce.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-18 18:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Using a comma is problematic - once the locale fix bug (in 
other tracker) is fixed, this might be too.

However, I'm able to set 99.5 and have it appear in my ini 
file.  However, it does print it as an integer, and if you go 
back and look at it and then click ok again, it will save the int.

I've checked in a change that fixes this (v1.19 of 
FilterDialog.py).  We'll see if Mark likes it :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773452&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 18 09:02:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 18 11:02:49 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-761507 ] Outlook Express reports
	pop3proxy not responding.
Message-ID: <E19dWkv-0007Va-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #761507, was opened at 2003-06-26 22:26
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by the_onceler
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761507&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Foster (the_onceler)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook Express reports pop3proxy not responding.

Initial Comment:
I am running v 1.0a3 and it, along with v1.0a2 for some 
reason now likes to break connection with Outlook 
Express.  Outlook Express states the POP3 server is not 
responding and no matter how many times you tell it to 
wait, it never finishes getting the messages.  If you tell 
Outlook Express to get messages again, it will start 
downloading the messages from the beginning again with 
no problem.  pop3proxy is not generating any error 
messages and it doesn't crash.

I thought this could be a problem with a message, but if 
I delete all the messages out of my mailbox on the pop3 
server to the message it stoped downloading on, it has 
no problem getting the rest of them all.

I don't think it's a corrupt database because I have just 
recreated the problem on a new machine that I started 
with a fresh install.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Jason Foster (the_onceler)
Date: 2003-07-18 15:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=55450

I installed 1.0a4 as soon as it came out on both machines 
and I am not experiencing the problem any longer, so I am 
assuming that the problem has been corrected in the source 
code somewhere.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-07-02 20:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Could you add the following to your bayescustomize.ini:

[globals]
verbose=True

and try again?  This should create a file called
_pop3proxy.log in the working directory, which will
contain a dump of the entire POP3 conversation.  At
the point the thing hangs, break into it using Ctrl+C
or Ctrl+Break.  Then please attach _pop3proxy.log
to this bug report (censor anything you don't want
public - it contains your POP3 password, plus all the
emails you download... if you'd rather not publish it
on sourceforge, send it to me by private email instead,
to richie@entrian.com).  Thanks.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761507&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 18 11:58:35 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 18 13:58:39 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-761507 ] Outlook Express reports
	pop3proxy not responding.
Message-ID: <E19dZV5-0004aS-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #761507, was opened at 2003-06-26 22:26
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761507&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Foster (the_onceler)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook Express reports pop3proxy not responding.

Initial Comment:
I am running v 1.0a3 and it, along with v1.0a2 for some 
reason now likes to break connection with Outlook 
Express.  Outlook Express states the POP3 server is not 
responding and no matter how many times you tell it to 
wait, it never finishes getting the messages.  If you tell 
Outlook Express to get messages again, it will start 
downloading the messages from the beginning again with 
no problem.  pop3proxy is not generating any error 
messages and it doesn't crash.

I thought this could be a problem with a message, but if 
I delete all the messages out of my mailbox on the pop3 
server to the message it stoped downloading on, it has 
no problem getting the rest of them all.

I don't think it's a corrupt database because I have just 
recreated the problem on a new machine that I started 
with a fresh install.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-07-18 17:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Glad to hear it's working for you.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Foster (the_onceler)
Date: 2003-07-18 15:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=55450

I installed 1.0a4 as soon as it came out on both machines 
and I am not experiencing the problem any longer, so I am 
assuming that the problem has been corrected in the source 
code somewhere.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-07-02 20:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Could you add the following to your bayescustomize.ini:

[globals]
verbose=True

and try again?  This should create a file called
_pop3proxy.log in the working directory, which will
contain a dump of the entire POP3 conversation.  At
the point the thing hangs, break into it using Ctrl+C
or Ctrl+Break.  Then please attach _pop3proxy.log
to this bug report (censor anything you don't want
public - it contains your POP3 password, plus all the
emails you download... if you'd rather not publish it
on sourceforge, send it to me by private email instead,
to richie@entrian.com).  Thanks.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761507&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Jul 19 21:30:29 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Jul 19 23:30:39 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-769346 ] Problems after deleting
	certain spam folder
Message-ID: <E19e4u5-00015s-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #769346, was opened at 2003-07-10 22:05
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769346&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Emile van Sebille (evansebille)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Problems after deleting certain spam folder

Initial Comment:
I have a customer running ol2000sr1 on winxp and I'd 
installed spambayes from cvs about three weeks ago.

On Monday, my customer deleted the target folder of 
the certain spam rule, fouling things up, and could not 
simply restore the folder to get things working again.  
nothing I tried would cause the filter rules target folder 
to remained changed.  Other changes would take, just 
not this one.

Today, nothing I tried would cause the filter rules target 
folder to remained changed.  Other changes would take, 
just not this one.

After a few simple attempts, I tried to force a clean 
install by scrubbing everything which included:
  --exit and logoff from outlook
  --uninstalling (unregistering) spambayes
  --uninstalling outlook
  --deleting outlook related info from disk & registry
  --deleting spambayes related files from disk & registry
  --deleting mail profiles
  --reinstalling outlook
  --download and install v.3 from exe installer

Even this did not work. 

I did get my customer going again by changing the 
certain spam filter to do nothing at 100% likelyhood of 
being spam, and redefining possible spam filter to move 
the spam to _junk at 85%.  Kludge, but it works.

So, one question...
How do you make outlook forget about spambayes 
entirely to do a clean install?

...and one bug?
Why couldn't I change the certain spam target folder?

Thanks,

Emile


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 03:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Patch #769981 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=769981&group_id=61702&atid=498105 should 
fix this.

When you say "deleting spambayes related file from disk & 
registry" did you also delete the ini files from the 
C:\Documents and Settings\<user>\Application 
Data\SpamBayes directory and reconfigure as this would 
return all settings to defaults?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-11 00:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

It does look like this may be a bug (certainly many people 
have had this trouble).  I'll leave that for Mark ;)

Regarding the question - all you need to do is delete all the 
*.ini files in your spambayes data directory.  When you next 
start Outlook you will then be able to reconfigure the plugin.  
See faq 3.6 for details about where this folder is.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769346&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Jul 19 21:32:58 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Jul 19 23:33:07 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-769981 ] Outlook plugin: allow
	user to change spam and unsure
Message-ID: <E19e4wU-0006be-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #769981, was opened at 2003-07-12 02:48
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=769981&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook plugin: allow user to change spam and unsure

Initial Comment:
The config.py module does not allow a user to change 
the spam and/or unsure folders after changing them 
from the default of "None". The bug usually shows up 
after someone has deleted the spam folder by accident 
and requires the user to delete the ini file from the 
spambayes data folder as a workaround. However, the 
bug affects changing the values from existing folders as 
well.

The patch changes the is_valid_single method to test 
the "self.value" field which is a tuple in the case of spam 
and unsure folders instead of the "value" parameter 
which is a string in those cases. It will also return true 
in the case of a list so that the list of "good email" 
folders can be set.

The command used to create the attached diff was:
cvs diff -c config.py > config.diff

If I should do something differently, let me know.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 03:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

see the bug 761507 as an example of one that this patch 
may fix.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=769981&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Jul 19 21:53:22 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Jul 19 23:53:29 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-768732 ] "Failed to save the Spam
	score for message" error
Message-ID: <E19e5GE-0001VD-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #768732, was opened at 2003-07-09 21:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768732&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Roger B. Dannenberg (rbd)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: "Failed to save the Spam score for message" error

Initial Comment:
Spam-bayes seems to have installed and set up 
everything properly, but nothing actually receives a spam 
score and no filtering takes place. The log file contains 
error messages including "Failed to save the Spam score 
for message ..." and "Failed filtering message! ..." and 
some stack trace info. I will append the log file.




I'm running SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta 1, Binary 
version 3 (July 2003) with Outlook on WinXP.




----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 03:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Related emails in the mailing list archive: 
http://mail.python.org/pipermail-21/spambayes/2003-
June/005574.html
http://mail.python.org/pipermail-21/spambayes/2003-
June/005580.html

The basic error is a bad response from you imap server. Could 
you confirm that you are using an imap server?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768732&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Jul 19 22:06:11 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 00:06:26 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-772155 ] Meeting requests
Message-ID: <E19e5Sd-0001m0-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #772155, was opened at 2003-07-16 08:47
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=772155&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kevin Smith (ksmith42)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Meeting requests

Initial Comment:
If a meeting request is identified as spam or possible 
spam then the recover from spam button does not work 
correctly, the message "No Items Selected" is displayed.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 04:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Please track/monitor under bug #690418 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=690418&group_id=61702&atid=498103

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=772155&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Jul 19 22:06:51 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 00:06:57 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-690418 ] Non mail items filtered
	by Outlook
Message-ID: <E19e5TH-0008Aw-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #690418, was opened at 2003-02-21 01:11
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=690418&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Non mail items filtered by Outlook

Initial Comment:
DeliveryReports are filtered by SpamBayes.  We should
check that we are only filtering mail items.  I added a
check for this in the "Recover from Spam" buttons, so
we can copy that.  Indeed, we *must* copy that, as the
filter may move such a message, but then our "Delete
as/Recover from" buttons won't let us get it back

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 04:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

[ 772155 ] Meeting requests
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=772155&group_id=61702&atid=498103
is a dupe of this.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-09 22:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Noting duplicate in 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768682&group_id=61702

([ 768682 ] Appointment filtered but can't be recovered)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-01 23:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Also happens for meeting requests (which apparently also
often end up as unsure)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=690418&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Jul 19 22:11:38 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 00:11:45 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-772155 ] Meeting requests
Message-ID: <E19e5Xu-0001Lj-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #772155, was opened at 2003-07-16 20:47
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=772155&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Kevin Smith (ksmith42)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Meeting requests

Initial Comment:
If a meeting request is identified as spam or possible 
spam then the recover from spam button does not work 
correctly, the message "No Items Selected" is displayed.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 16:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Please track/monitor under bug #690418 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=690418&group_id=61702&atid=498103

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=772155&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Jul 19 22:24:38 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 00:24:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-769981 ] Outlook plugin: allow
	user to change spam and unsure
Message-ID: <E19e5kU-0007qb-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #769981, was opened at 2003-07-12 12:48
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=769981&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook plugin: allow user to change spam and unsure

Initial Comment:
The config.py module does not allow a user to change 
the spam and/or unsure folders after changing them 
from the default of "None". The bug usually shows up 
after someone has deleted the spam folder by accident 
and requires the user to delete the ini file from the 
spambayes data folder as a workaround. However, the 
bug affects changing the values from existing folders as 
well.

The patch changes the is_valid_single method to test 
the "self.value" field which is a tuple in the case of spam 
and unsure folders instead of the "value" parameter 
which is a string in those cases. It will also return true 
in the case of a list so that the list of "good email" 
folders can be set.

The command used to create the attached diff was:
cvs diff -c config.py > config.diff

If I should do something differently, let me know.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 14:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I don't think the patch is correct.  The most obvious
problem is that if self.value is None, any value is accepted.

The problem is that the base class is messing us up here. 
Consider the following execution order:

* Default options initialized with None
* Program attempts to set first value - tuple of (string,string)
* Base class is_valid called (OptionsClass.py).  This checks
if self.value is a list or tuple to determine if a
multi-valued option or not.  self.value currently None, so
not-multi.  Base class calls our is_valid_single.  This
passes, so option correctly set.

Now we attempt to set another folder - the process repeats.
* Base is_valid called.  self.value is now a tuple. 
is_valid incorrectly thinks this is now a multi-valued
option.  It therefore unpacks the existing value (ie, each
of the 2 strings in the ID) and passes this to
is_valid_single.  Hence, we get called with a string.

Note that in the "normal" multi-valued case, we expect a
list of these tuples.  Thus, as the list is unpacked, each
tuple is still correctly passed to is_valid_single, and
goodness prevails.

This is all my fault, and my bending of the options system
to my pre-existing "config" system.  The best fix I can some
up with is to a new "is_valid" method to the FolderIDOption
class, which is basically a clone of the parent method -
except that instead of checking:
        if type(self.value) in MultiContainerTypes:
you check:
        if type(self.default_value)==type([]):

I hope this makes sense.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 13:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

see the bug 761507 as an example of one that this patch 
may fix.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=769981&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Jul 19 23:22:10 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 01:22:19 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-769981 ] Outlook plugin: allow
	user to change spam and unsure
Message-ID: <E19e6eA-0000kB-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #769981, was opened at 2003-07-12 02:48
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=769981&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook plugin: allow user to change spam and unsure

Initial Comment:
The config.py module does not allow a user to change 
the spam and/or unsure folders after changing them 
from the default of "None". The bug usually shows up 
after someone has deleted the spam folder by accident 
and requires the user to delete the ini file from the 
spambayes data folder as a workaround. However, the 
bug affects changing the values from existing folders as 
well.

The patch changes the is_valid_single method to test 
the "self.value" field which is a tuple in the case of spam 
and unsure folders instead of the "value" parameter 
which is a string in those cases. It will also return true 
in the case of a list so that the list of "good email" 
folders can be set.

The command used to create the attached diff was:
cvs diff -c config.py > config.diff

If I should do something differently, let me know.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 05:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I agree with your summary of the OptionClass execute and 
that the first patch was flawed (I didn't have that case come 
up in testing). But I disagree with your suggested fix. I'm not 
a fan of dupicate code b/c it leads to maintaince problems. 
I'm attaching a new patch that leaves the is_valid_single 
method untoched but adds the "is_valid_multiple" method to 
the FolderIDOption class. This "is_valid_multiple" will not 
unpack tuples with a length of 2, but instead, pass the value 
to "is_valid_single". Any tuples whose length is not 2 or any 
value whose type is not a tuple will be processed by the 
Option.is_valid_multiple method.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 04:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I don't think the patch is correct.  The most obvious
problem is that if self.value is None, any value is accepted.

The problem is that the base class is messing us up here. 
Consider the following execution order:

* Default options initialized with None
* Program attempts to set first value - tuple of (string,string)
* Base class is_valid called (OptionsClass.py).  This checks
if self.value is a list or tuple to determine if a
multi-valued option or not.  self.value currently None, so
not-multi.  Base class calls our is_valid_single.  This
passes, so option correctly set.

Now we attempt to set another folder - the process repeats.
* Base is_valid called.  self.value is now a tuple. 
is_valid incorrectly thinks this is now a multi-valued
option.  It therefore unpacks the existing value (ie, each
of the 2 strings in the ID) and passes this to
is_valid_single.  Hence, we get called with a string.

Note that in the "normal" multi-valued case, we expect a
list of these tuples.  Thus, as the list is unpacked, each
tuple is still correctly passed to is_valid_single, and
goodness prevails.

This is all my fault, and my bending of the options system
to my pre-existing "config" system.  The best fix I can some
up with is to a new "is_valid" method to the FolderIDOption
class, which is basically a clone of the parent method -
except that instead of checking:
        if type(self.value) in MultiContainerTypes:
you check:
        if type(self.default_value)==type([]):

I hope this makes sense.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 03:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

see the bug 761507 as an example of one that this patch 
may fix.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=769981&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 00:11:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 02:11:22 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-769981 ] Outlook plugin: allow
	user to change spam and unsure
Message-ID: <E19e7Pj-0002se-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #769981, was opened at 2003-07-12 12:48
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=769981&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook plugin: allow user to change spam and unsure

Initial Comment:
The config.py module does not allow a user to change 
the spam and/or unsure folders after changing them 
from the default of "None". The bug usually shows up 
after someone has deleted the spam folder by accident 
and requires the user to delete the ini file from the 
spambayes data folder as a workaround. However, the 
bug affects changing the values from existing folders as 
well.

The patch changes the is_valid_single method to test 
the "self.value" field which is a tuple in the case of spam 
and unsure folders instead of the "value" parameter 
which is a string in those cases. It will also return true 
in the case of a list so that the list of "good email" 
folders can be set.

The command used to create the attached diff was:
cvs diff -c config.py > config.diff

If I should do something differently, let me know.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 16:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'm sorry, but I disagree.  The code is still taking the
incorrect path - the parent class still believes a
single-valued value is actually a multi-valued value.  Your
patch would indeed make it work, but is simply covering the
symptom of the bug rather than fixing it.

OK - how about this for an even better idea:
* Modify OptionsClass is_valid's if test to 'if
self.multiple_values_allowed():'
* Overide this single method in our class

That smells like the right fix to me!


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 15:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I agree with your summary of the OptionClass execute and 
that the first patch was flawed (I didn't have that case come 
up in testing). But I disagree with your suggested fix. I'm not 
a fan of dupicate code b/c it leads to maintaince problems. 
I'm attaching a new patch that leaves the is_valid_single 
method untoched but adds the "is_valid_multiple" method to 
the FolderIDOption class. This "is_valid_multiple" will not 
unpack tuples with a length of 2, but instead, pass the value 
to "is_valid_single". Any tuples whose length is not 2 or any 
value whose type is not a tuple will be processed by the 
Option.is_valid_multiple method.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 14:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I don't think the patch is correct.  The most obvious
problem is that if self.value is None, any value is accepted.

The problem is that the base class is messing us up here. 
Consider the following execution order:

* Default options initialized with None
* Program attempts to set first value - tuple of (string,string)
* Base class is_valid called (OptionsClass.py).  This checks
if self.value is a list or tuple to determine if a
multi-valued option or not.  self.value currently None, so
not-multi.  Base class calls our is_valid_single.  This
passes, so option correctly set.

Now we attempt to set another folder - the process repeats.
* Base is_valid called.  self.value is now a tuple. 
is_valid incorrectly thinks this is now a multi-valued
option.  It therefore unpacks the existing value (ie, each
of the 2 strings in the ID) and passes this to
is_valid_single.  Hence, we get called with a string.

Note that in the "normal" multi-valued case, we expect a
list of these tuples.  Thus, as the list is unpacked, each
tuple is still correctly passed to is_valid_single, and
goodness prevails.

This is all my fault, and my bending of the options system
to my pre-existing "config" system.  The best fix I can some
up with is to a new "is_valid" method to the FolderIDOption
class, which is basically a clone of the parent method -
except that instead of checking:
        if type(self.value) in MultiContainerTypes:
you check:
        if type(self.default_value)==type([]):

I hope this makes sense.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 13:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

see the bug 761507 as an example of one that this patch 
may fix.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=769981&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 00:51:54 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 02:51:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-769981 ] Outlook plugin: allow
	user to change spam and unsure
Message-ID: <E19e830-0003pT-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #769981, was opened at 2003-07-12 02:48
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=769981&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook plugin: allow user to change spam and unsure

Initial Comment:
The config.py module does not allow a user to change 
the spam and/or unsure folders after changing them 
from the default of "None". The bug usually shows up 
after someone has deleted the spam folder by accident 
and requires the user to delete the ini file from the 
spambayes data folder as a workaround. However, the 
bug affects changing the values from existing folders as 
well.

The patch changes the is_valid_single method to test 
the "self.value" field which is a tuple in the case of spam 
and unsure folders instead of the "value" parameter 
which is a string in those cases. It will also return true 
in the case of a list so that the list of "good email" 
folders can be set.

The command used to create the attached diff was:
cvs diff -c config.py > config.diff

If I should do something differently, let me know.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 06:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Sorry, didn't realize the "multiple_values_allowed" method 
existed. Attached is a patch our mothers should be proud of ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 06:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'm sorry, but I disagree.  The code is still taking the
incorrect path - the parent class still believes a
single-valued value is actually a multi-valued value.  Your
patch would indeed make it work, but is simply covering the
symptom of the bug rather than fixing it.

OK - how about this for an even better idea:
* Modify OptionsClass is_valid's if test to 'if
self.multiple_values_allowed():'
* Overide this single method in our class

That smells like the right fix to me!


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 05:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I agree with your summary of the OptionClass execute and 
that the first patch was flawed (I didn't have that case come 
up in testing). But I disagree with your suggested fix. I'm not 
a fan of dupicate code b/c it leads to maintaince problems. 
I'm attaching a new patch that leaves the is_valid_single 
method untoched but adds the "is_valid_multiple" method to 
the FolderIDOption class. This "is_valid_multiple" will not 
unpack tuples with a length of 2, but instead, pass the value 
to "is_valid_single". Any tuples whose length is not 2 or any 
value whose type is not a tuple will be processed by the 
Option.is_valid_multiple method.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 04:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I don't think the patch is correct.  The most obvious
problem is that if self.value is None, any value is accepted.

The problem is that the base class is messing us up here. 
Consider the following execution order:

* Default options initialized with None
* Program attempts to set first value - tuple of (string,string)
* Base class is_valid called (OptionsClass.py).  This checks
if self.value is a list or tuple to determine if a
multi-valued option or not.  self.value currently None, so
not-multi.  Base class calls our is_valid_single.  This
passes, so option correctly set.

Now we attempt to set another folder - the process repeats.
* Base is_valid called.  self.value is now a tuple. 
is_valid incorrectly thinks this is now a multi-valued
option.  It therefore unpacks the existing value (ie, each
of the 2 strings in the ID) and passes this to
is_valid_single.  Hence, we get called with a string.

Note that in the "normal" multi-valued case, we expect a
list of these tuples.  Thus, as the list is unpacked, each
tuple is still correctly passed to is_valid_single, and
goodness prevails.

This is all my fault, and my bending of the options system
to my pre-existing "config" system.  The best fix I can some
up with is to a new "is_valid" method to the FolderIDOption
class, which is basically a clone of the parent method -
except that instead of checking:
        if type(self.value) in MultiContainerTypes:
you check:
        if type(self.default_value)==type([]):

I hope this makes sense.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 03:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

see the bug 761507 as an example of one that this patch 
may fix.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=769981&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 01:15:51 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 03:15:56 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-769981 ] Outlook plugin: allow
	user to change spam and unsure
Message-ID: <E19e8QB-0003Sd-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #769981, was opened at 2003-07-12 12:48
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=769981&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook plugin: allow user to change spam and unsure

Initial Comment:
The config.py module does not allow a user to change 
the spam and/or unsure folders after changing them 
from the default of "None". The bug usually shows up 
after someone has deleted the spam folder by accident 
and requires the user to delete the ini file from the 
spambayes data folder as a workaround. However, the 
bug affects changing the values from existing folders as 
well.

The patch changes the is_valid_single method to test 
the "self.value" field which is a tuple in the case of spam 
and unsure folders instead of the "value" parameter 
which is a string in those cases. It will also return true 
in the case of a list so that the list of "good email" 
folders can be set.

The command used to create the attached diff was:
cvs diff -c config.py > config.diff

If I should do something differently, let me know.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 17:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Thanks!

Checking in Outlook2000/config.py;
new revision: 1.14; previous revision: 1.13
Checking in spambayes/OptionsClass.py;
new revision: 1.4; previous revision: 1.3


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 16:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Sorry, didn't realize the "multiple_values_allowed" method 
existed. Attached is a patch our mothers should be proud of ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 16:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'm sorry, but I disagree.  The code is still taking the
incorrect path - the parent class still believes a
single-valued value is actually a multi-valued value.  Your
patch would indeed make it work, but is simply covering the
symptom of the bug rather than fixing it.

OK - how about this for an even better idea:
* Modify OptionsClass is_valid's if test to 'if
self.multiple_values_allowed():'
* Overide this single method in our class

That smells like the right fix to me!


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 15:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I agree with your summary of the OptionClass execute and 
that the first patch was flawed (I didn't have that case come 
up in testing). But I disagree with your suggested fix. I'm not 
a fan of dupicate code b/c it leads to maintaince problems. 
I'm attaching a new patch that leaves the is_valid_single 
method untoched but adds the "is_valid_multiple" method to 
the FolderIDOption class. This "is_valid_multiple" will not 
unpack tuples with a length of 2, but instead, pass the value 
to "is_valid_single". Any tuples whose length is not 2 or any 
value whose type is not a tuple will be processed by the 
Option.is_valid_multiple method.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 14:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I don't think the patch is correct.  The most obvious
problem is that if self.value is None, any value is accepted.

The problem is that the base class is messing us up here. 
Consider the following execution order:

* Default options initialized with None
* Program attempts to set first value - tuple of (string,string)
* Base class is_valid called (OptionsClass.py).  This checks
if self.value is a list or tuple to determine if a
multi-valued option or not.  self.value currently None, so
not-multi.  Base class calls our is_valid_single.  This
passes, so option correctly set.

Now we attempt to set another folder - the process repeats.
* Base is_valid called.  self.value is now a tuple. 
is_valid incorrectly thinks this is now a multi-valued
option.  It therefore unpacks the existing value (ie, each
of the 2 strings in the ID) and passes this to
is_valid_single.  Hence, we get called with a string.

Note that in the "normal" multi-valued case, we expect a
list of these tuples.  Thus, as the list is unpacked, each
tuple is still correctly passed to is_valid_single, and
goodness prevails.

This is all my fault, and my bending of the options system
to my pre-existing "config" system.  The best fix I can some
up with is to a new "is_valid" method to the FolderIDOption
class, which is basically a clone of the parent method -
except that instead of checking:
        if type(self.value) in MultiContainerTypes:
you check:
        if type(self.default_value)==type([]):

I hope this makes sense.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 13:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

see the bug 761507 as an example of one that this patch 
may fix.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=769981&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 01:16:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 03:16:34 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-769346 ] Problems after deleting
	certain spam folder
Message-ID: <E19e8Qo-0003Ui-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #769346, was opened at 2003-07-11 08:05
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769346&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Emile van Sebille (evansebille)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Problems after deleting certain spam folder

Initial Comment:
I have a customer running ol2000sr1 on winxp and I'd 
installed spambayes from cvs about three weeks ago.

On Monday, my customer deleted the target folder of 
the certain spam rule, fouling things up, and could not 
simply restore the folder to get things working again.  
nothing I tried would cause the filter rules target folder 
to remained changed.  Other changes would take, just 
not this one.

Today, nothing I tried would cause the filter rules target 
folder to remained changed.  Other changes would take, 
just not this one.

After a few simple attempts, I tried to force a clean 
install by scrubbing everything which included:
  --exit and logoff from outlook
  --uninstalling (unregistering) spambayes
  --uninstalling outlook
  --deleting outlook related info from disk & registry
  --deleting spambayes related files from disk & registry
  --deleting mail profiles
  --reinstalling outlook
  --download and install v.3 from exe installer

Even this did not work. 

I did get my customer going again by changing the 
certain spam filter to do nothing at 100% likelyhood of 
being spam, and redefining possible spam filter to move 
the spam to _junk at 85%.  Kludge, but it works.

So, one question...
How do you make outlook forget about spambayes 
entirely to do a clean install?

...and one bug?
Why couldn't I change the certain spam target folder?

Thanks,

Emile


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 17:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Fixed in the source tree.  I will try and do a new binary
fairly soon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 13:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Patch #769981 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=769981&group_id=61702&atid=498105 should 
fix this.

When you say "deleting spambayes related file from disk & 
registry" did you also delete the ini files from the 
C:\Documents and Settings\<user>\Application 
Data\SpamBayes directory and reconfigure as this would 
return all settings to defaults?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-11 10:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

It does look like this may be a bug (certainly many people 
have had this trouble).  I'll leave that for Mark ;)

Regarding the question - all you need to do is delete all the 
*.ini files in your spambayes data directory.  When you next 
start Outlook you will then be able to reconfigure the plugin.  
See faq 3.6 for details about where this folder is.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769346&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 01:23:20 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 03:23:31 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-768732 ] "Failed to save the Spam
	score for message" error
Message-ID: <E19e8XQ-0004aI-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #768732, was opened at 2003-07-10 07:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768732&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Roger B. Dannenberg (rbd)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: "Failed to save the Spam score for message" error

Initial Comment:
Spam-bayes seems to have installed and set up 
everything properly, but nothing actually receives a spam 
score and no filtering takes place. The log file contains 
error messages including "Failed to save the Spam score 
for message ..." and "Failed filtering message! ..." and 
some stack trace info. I will append the log file.




I'm running SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta 1, Binary 
version 3 (July 2003) with Outlook on WinXP.




----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 17:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Thanks for your report.  This bug has previously been reported,
and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect
to see the fix in the next binary release.  

You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see
when each version is released - details at
http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce

If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS
version of the source-code, and you should find the fix
immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 13:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Related emails in the mailing list archive: 
http://mail.python.org/pipermail-21/spambayes/2003-
June/005574.html
http://mail.python.org/pipermail-21/spambayes/2003-
June/005580.html

The basic error is a bad response from you imap server. Could 
you confirm that you are using an imap server?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768732&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 01:24:27 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 03:24:38 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-771192 ] Spam "Moved" but
	Original Left in Inbox as Read
Message-ID: <E19e8YV-0004br-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #771192, was opened at 2003-07-15 05:45
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771192&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heath Stewart (clubstew)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Spam "Moved" but Original Left in Inbox as Read

Initial Comment:
Lately (and for no apparently reason I can think of, i.e. 
no new plugins, etc.) my SPAM filter isn't working as it 
should. I have SPAM setup to be *moved* to a subdir of 
the Inbox but the message is really only being copied. 
The original is left in the inbox although it is marked as 
read. Also, for these messages (it's not all, but most and 
I can't see the pattern) the Spam score column doesn't 
display at all.

Also, the "Delete as Spam" button has stopped working 
(I'm guessing it's just a general problem, but the usual 
stuff (restarting, etc.) doesn't fix it). I have to move to 
the next message item, then back, and click the button. 
I can delete two messages before I have to repeat this 
process. This process, too, does not display a SPAM 
score in the Spam field.

My setup is on XP using Exchange Server in Outlook.

Sorry if this is a dup, but I couldn't really find another 
one like this.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 17:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

dupe of 747107

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771192&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 01:26:47 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 03:26:52 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] 
	[ spambayes-Bugs-770793 ] Win98, database corrupts?
Message-ID: <E19e8al-0004ei-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #770793, was opened at 2003-07-14 15:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770793&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Lauri Harpf (theranger54)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Win98, database corrupts?

Initial Comment:
Gives:

---
Loading database...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", 
line 777, in ?
    run()
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", 
line 752, in run
    state.createWorkers()
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", 
line 594, in createWorkers
    self.bayes = storage.DBDictClassifier(filename)
  
File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\spambayes\storage.
py", line 147, in __init
__
    self.load()
  
File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\spambayes\storage.
py", line 159, in load
    t = self.db[self.statekey]
  File "C:\OHJELMATIEDOSTOT\PYTHON22\lib\shelve.py", 
line 71, in __getitem__
    return Unpickler(f).load()
EOFError
Exception exceptions.AttributeError: "'NoneType' object 
has no attribute 'error'
" in <bound method _Database.__del__ of 
<dumbdbm._Database instance at 0x00ED936
0>> ignored
---

on startup. Worked fine, then I rebooted the machine 
(shut down Spambayes through the Web interface) and 
then it simply refused to boot up with the above 
message. Error seems permanent, unless user does 
something drastic (ie. destroys the database). I'm 
running Win98 Se, using pop3proxy with Outlook 6 SP1, 
starting the program with

c:\ohjelmatiedostot\python22\python.exe 
c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\pop3proxy.
py -b

Hard drive is a 80GB model, partitioned into one single 
partition using FAT32, 45,7GB still free. Spambayes 
version is 1.0 A4.

The same problem also occurred with Alpha 3, it refuses 
to start up with the message

---
Loading database...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayesbak\pop3proxy.py", 
line 730, in ?
    run()
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayesbak\pop3proxy.py", 
line 705, in run
    state.createWorkers()
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayesbak\pop3proxy.py", 
line 547, in createWorke
rs
    self.bayes = storage.DBDictClassifier(filename)
  
File "C:\Ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\spambayes\storage.
py", line 147, in __init
__
    self.load()
  
File "C:\Ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\spambayes\storage.
py", line 159, in load
    t = self.db[self.statekey]
  File "C:\OHJELMATIEDOSTOT\PYTHON22\lib\shelve.py", 
line 71, in __getitem__
    return Unpickler(f).load()
EOFError
Exception exceptions.AttributeError: "'NoneType' object 
has no attribute 'error'
" in <bound method _Database.__del__ of 
<dumbdbm._Database instance at 0x00ED1D7
0>> ignored
---

After a fresh install, the program usually works fine for a 
while. Every reboot does not appear to mix things up, it 
only seems to go bad after it has been running for a 
while and the user has classified enough messages. I run 
my comp mostly 24/7, so reboots are rare and 
Spambayes is usually running unless I need to boot.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 17:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Well, fixed in Python anyway.  If you still care, add a
feature request that Outlook fail to register unless we have
a bsddb database

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-17 00:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

The "dumbdbm._Database instance" in the traceback is a sure 
sign of a recently-diagnosed critical problem.  Since you're 
using Outlook, using the Outlook addin instead of pop3proxy 
will cure it.  If for some reason you want to use pop3proxy 
with Outlook (I woudn't -- the Outlook addin is a joy), you'll 
need to install "a real" database.  Python 2.3 will ship with a 
current version of Sleepycat's Berkeley bsddb database.  For 
Python 2.2.3, that can be obtained separately from the 
SourceForge PyBSDDB project:

http://pybsddb.sf.net/

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770793&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 01:28:21 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 03:28:25 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-767871 ] "file exists" error
	upgrading binary
Message-ID: <E19e8cH-0004i5-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #767871, was opened at 2003-07-09 02:02
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=767871&group_id=61702

>Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joseph Beaulieu (jbc123)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
>Summary: "file exists" error upgrading binary

Initial Comment:

Uninstalled version 2, installed version 3. When I fired up 
Outlook2000, this log file was generated.

ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the Spam 
plugin.\r\n\r\nSpam filtering has been disabled.  Please 
re-configure\r\nand re-enable this plugin\r\n\r\nError 
details:\r\nFailed to load bayes database'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 419, in LoadBayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 159, in open_bayes
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 147, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 155, in load
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 59, in open
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 41, in 
open_best
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 18, in 
open_dbhash
  File "out1.pyz/bsddb", line 162, in hashopen
DBFileExistsError: (17, 'File exists')
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jbeauli\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Either bayes database or message database is missing - 
creating new
Error connecting to Outlook!
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 800, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 682, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 238, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 434, in LoadBayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 557, in InitNewBayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 133, in new_bayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 159, in open_bayes
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 147, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 155, in load
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 59, in open
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 41, in 
open_best
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 18, in 
open_dbhash
  File "out1.pyz/bsddb", line 162, in hashopen
DBFileExistsError: (17, 'File exists')
ERROR: 'There was an error initializing the SpamBayes 
addin\r\n\r\nPlease re-start Outlook and try again.'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 800, in OnConnection
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 682, in GetManager
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 238, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 434, in LoadBayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 557, in InitNewBayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 133, in new_bayes
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 159, in open_bayes
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 147, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.storage", line 155, in load
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 59, in open
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 41, in 
open_best
  File "out1.pyz/spambayes.dbmstorage", line 18, in 
open_dbhash
  File "out1.pyz/bsddb", line 162, in hashopen
DBFileExistsError: (17, 'File exists')


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-09 10:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Try deleting whatever files are in your data directory 
(SpamBayes will recreate them).  Note that you'll lose your 
configuration and training, but this might be the case already 
(you could try simply moving them and then moving them 
back instead).

The FAQ explains where to find these files.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=767871&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 01:54:32 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 03:54:36 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-761499 ] pop3proxy_service
	doesn't stop when shutdown from browser
Message-ID: <E19e91c-0005Lx-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #761499, was opened at 2003-06-27 08:17
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761499&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Foster (the_onceler)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy_service doesn't stop when shutdown from browser

Initial Comment:
If you click "save and shutdown" in your broswer, 
pop3proxy shuts down, but in services the 
pop3proxy_service still lists as started.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 17:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I actually noticed this the other day :)  I've checked in a
version that works, and also logs errors should the server
quit unexpectedly.

Checking in pop3proxy_service.py;
new revision: 1.6; previous revision: 1.5


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761499&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 02:01:55 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 04:02:00 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-757131 ] "Bad file descriptor"
	starting pop3proxy_service
Message-ID: <E19e98l-00076F-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #757131, was opened at 2003-06-19 20:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=757131&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Tregidgo (smst)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: "Bad file descriptor" starting pop3proxy_service

Initial Comment:
(Running SpamBayes alpha2 release under Python 2.2.3
(Win2k) with the additional module pop3proxy_service.py.)

I tried to diagnose a 'hdrtxt' AttributeError (which
has now disappeared, so I have no traceback -- I
remember only that it was raised explicitly by
Message.__getattr__ for a FileMessage instance) while
reviewing messages through the pop3proxy interface. I
stopped the pop3proxy service (using Win2k's "Services"
panel), enabled the verbose option in
bayescustomize.ini and started the service again.

The service silently failed to start; in the Event
Viewer was the following traceback:

The instance's SvcRun() method failed 
  File
"C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-packages\win32\lib\win32serviceutil.py",
line 635, in SvcRun
    self.SvcDoRun()
  File "C:\Program
Files\spambayes-1.0a2\windows\pop3proxy_service.py",
line 68, in SvcDoRun
    pop3proxy.state.createWorkers()
  File "C:\Program Files\spambayes-1.0a2\pop3proxy.py",
line 1198, in createWorkers
    self.hamCorpus.removeExpiredMessages()
  File "C:\Program
Files\spambayes-1.0a2\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 264,
in removeExpiredMessages
    for msg in self:
  File "C:\Program
Files\spambayes-1.0a2\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 230,
in __iter__
    yield self[key]
  File "C:\Program
Files\spambayes-1.0a2\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 216,
in __getitem__
    self.cacheMessage(amsg)
  File "C:\Program
Files\spambayes-1.0a2\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 173,
in cacheMessage
    self.unCacheMessage(keyToFlush)
  File "C:\Program
Files\spambayes-1.0a2\spambayes\Corpus.py", line 180,
in unCacheMessage
    print 'Flushing %s from corpus cache' % (key) 
exceptions.IOError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor

Starting pop3proxy from a command prompt worked fine,
with the print statement being executed properly. I
suspected that the running of pop3proxy as a service was 
causing sys.stdout to be broken somehow, but restarting
through "Services" again, catching the IOError and
raising information about stdout gives the following,
which seems reasonable:
 <open file '<stdout>', mode 'w' at 0x008D7708> 

I can continue to run the service with 'verbose' set to
False of course, but it would be handy to be able to
switch that flag back on in case my 'hdrtxt' error returns.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 18:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This has been fixed in CVS - now print statements go to
win32traceutil.py

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=757131&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 07:45:47 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 09:46:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-773364 ] "Delete From Server"
	doesn't work on filtered mail
Message-ID: <E19eEVX-0001Ee-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #773364, was opened at 2003-07-18 10:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail

Initial Comment:
In Outlook's account properties, you can choose to 
leave a copy of retrieved mail on the server, and to 
remove that copy when the mail is deleted from 
the "Deleted Items" folder. However, this does not seem 
to be working with mail that has been checked by 
SpamBayes. When I delete a mail from the "Certain 
Spam" folder, it is moved to "Deleted Items" as 
expected, but when the "Deleted Items" folder is 
emptied, the copy remains on the server. I've tried the 
same thing with mail that has not been checked by 
SpamBayes, and it gets deleted from the server as 
expected.
It seems that Outlook cannot tell that the filtered mail is 
the same as the one on the server. Perhaps this is 
because of the addition of the spam score to the local 
copy?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 23:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 07:47:12 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 09:47:16 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-747107 ] SpamBayes leaves
	duplicate messages
Message-ID: <E19eEWu-0001Gq-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #747107, was opened at 2003-06-02 04:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747107&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Eric Brown (ericbr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: SpamBayes leaves duplicate messages

Initial Comment:
I am subscribed to a number of different mailing lists, 
and I have a number of Outlook rules (set up via Rules 
Wizard) to route the different mailing lists into different 
folders.

When the rules are of the form:
Apply this rule after the message arrives
with <words> in the subject
move it to the <specified> folder

and a matching message comes in, SpamBayes 
seems to leave multiple copies of that message in the 
inbox.

This is very frustrating.

If the rule is of the form:
Apply this rule after the message arrives
sent to <email address>
move it to the <specified> folder

and a matching message comes in, duplicate 
messages do not occur.

So it seems to be some sort of odd interaction with 
Outlook Rules.

I'm running Outlook 2002 SP 2 on Windows XP SP 1a 
(with current hotfixes).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 23:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-07 08:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

No, installing 003 over the top of 002 should work fine.

I don't have any more answers, sorry, but no doubt Mark will 
look into this when he gets a chance.  Stay tuned!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Brown (ericbr)
Date: 2003-07-05 07:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=783913

Anadelon:  Outlook junk mail rules are turned off; spam is 
Moved to Junk Mail.

I just ran the release 003 of the plugin, and I'm still seeing 
the problem.

(I didn't bother uninstalling release 002 - is that a problem?)

Eric


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Brent Rockwood (dnaguy)
Date: 2003-07-05 01:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=18879

It appears the problem lies between the keyboard and 
chair. :)  I seem to have overlooked the option to move 
messages instead of copying.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 13:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

In addition, the log file seems to indicate that you are using 
release 002 of the plugin.  If you haven't already, could you 
try release 003 and let us know if the problem still occurs?

Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 13:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Eric, do you have the Outlook junk mail rules turned on?  If 
you do, would both of you be able to try turning them off 
(they aren't all that much use if you are using spambayes 
anyway), and seeing if this resolves the problem?

In addition, forgive me if you've checked this, but in the 
spambayes filter setup, do you have "move" selected rather 
than "copy"?

(It's an odd problem that IIRC we have heard before, but I'm 
using the same version of Windows and Outlook, and have 
rules of that form, and don't notice this problem).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Brent Rockwood (dnaguy)
Date: 2003-07-04 01:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=18879

I am also having this problem.  I have not tested it with 
various rule types, but I believe it is occurring in conjunction 
with the Outlook "Junk E-mail" feature.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747107&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 07:47:59 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 09:48:12 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-716684 ] Filtering marks message
	as unread
Message-ID: <E19eEXf-0001H2-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #716684, was opened at 2003-04-07 21:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filtering marks message as unread

Initial Comment:
Reported too many times :)  Exchange server users only.

As spambayes startsit starts processing missed
messages.  In the meantime, the user reads some
messages, thereby marking them as read.  As smapbayes
writes the spam field, these messages spring back to a
read status.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 23:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Closing
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=764241&group_id=61702&atid=498103
as a dupe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Andersen (gokubi)
Date: 2003-07-08 07:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=558027

I find that if I get a new message and hit reply before I read 
it (I'm in Autopreview) after sending the message it is still 
unread.

More troubling is that Outlook does not show that I have 
replied to the message by changing the envelope icon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 15:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:  a user had the same problem, but also noted 
this:

> If an attachment is included, the first time I open the 
> message, I cannot open the attachement, or save it. If I 
> close the message, and reopen it, I can both open and 
save 
> the attachment.

Odd!  I don't get this problem very often at all anymore; I 
don't know why.  If I did, I'd test the attachment theory, but 
as it is, I can't, so I leave it for others ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-10 22:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I just had this happen to me again. I'm using the CVS version 
from a day or two ago.

So the version in current CVS isn't (completely) fixed.

Anythong else I could try? I see part of a thread about 
USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS here, but I can't find the original. 
My code has USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS in it. If you can tell 
me what (if anything) else needs changing, I can try taking it 
out.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-09 01:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

Just as an FYI, I agree with tobermory's comments in that 
spambayes is in fact classifying the message immediately, 
but it's the update to the server and/or client that appears to 
be delayed until the next Outlook event.  See the first of my 
two spambayes list mail messages referenced in my note 
Mark included in this bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-09 01:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

> Would it be possible to try another change for me instead?  
Revert
> filter.py, and in msgstore.py's Save method, find the line:
> 
>             self.mapi_object.SaveChanges
(mapi.KEEP_OPEN_READWRITE |
> USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS)

I'm pretty sure I had tried that first, while experimenting, 
before I
ended up with the extra Save as a final "flush all" attempt.  
There
was no change, nor did the function return an error.  I think I 
also
tried setting it to 0 (after reading the internal comment) to no
apparent effect, although I may be misremembering since the 
same
comment may have caused me to hesitate to make that 
change :-)

But I'll double check this when I get a chance today.  If I recall
when testing, my review of the code seemed to indicate that 
everything
should work fine, and that the spambayes code was 
managing the read
flag reasonably well, and in fact, was issuing a Save() back in
filter.py.  I ended up inserting test Save()s at the lowermost 
level
(which worked) and then bubbling them up to see how high I 
could leave
the extra call so it was called as infrequently as possible.

In the end, the issue seemed related to the processing that 
goes on
when all_actions is enabled.  If the Save() occurred after the 
field
status was updated, but before 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() was
called, all was fine.  But if the 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() got
called first, then the following Save() - as already in filter.py -
didn't seem to "take."

> I'm a little unsure why one of the Save calls is indented too.

Ah, that was just to minimize change from the existing code 
path.

I wanted to move the Save() to happen before
RememberMessageCurrentFolder(), but then the second Save
() became
completely superfluous in the main branch case - but I didn't 
want to
lose the Save() following RememberMessageCurrentFolder() if 
it was
called just in case that was critical to existing behavior, so I 
moved
it to only occur in that same block.

-- David

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Leftley (tobermory)
Date: 2003-04-08 19:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=626601

Just to try and clarify one point: earlier msgs in this thread 
suggest that spambayes doesn't attempt to classify a 
message until certain events (reading a msg, etc.) occur.

In fact from watching the trace output, the message is 
classified as soon as it arrives (the trace 
shows "Message 'xxx' had a Spam classification of 'yyy'") but 
Outlook doesn't reflect this change until the next event occurs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-08 18:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

My version of filter.py looks different. I haven't updated from 
CVS in a while, maybe that's why. But my version looks like 
it has msg.Save() called unconditionally.

    try:
        # Save the score
        msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
        # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
        msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
        msg.Save()

I've tried moving msg.Save() to before msg.Remember...(), but 
I'll have to wait to see results. Will report back.

(Better might be to cvs update and apply your change, but I 
may not get a chance to do that for a couple of days...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-04-08 12:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From David Bolen:
"Moore, Paul" <Paul.Moore@atosorigin.com> writes:

> As far as I know, no-one has been able to track down the 
> problem to fix it yet.

I have, however, implemented a local workaround that's
working really well for me.  This was based on my prior
messages in:

   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004086.html
   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004088.html

Since I can't quantify what if any penalty it imposes in the
general
case by syncing changes back to the server an additional
time, and
since the problem may be limited to Exchange servers, I haven't
proposed it be made to the main source yet - although I
certainly
haven't noticed much of a penalty in my local testing.

But if anyone else wants to try a local change, it's fairly
trivial,
adding an additional call to msg.Save() in filter.py:

    *** filter.py   18 Mar 2003 03:09:03 -0000      1.20
    --- filter.py   7 Apr 2003 22:18:58 -0000
    ***************
    *** 27,39 ****
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !         msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")
    --- 26,39 ----
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
    +         msg.Save()
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !             msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")


After making this change, what went from virtually _every_
message staying unread, became the extreme rare case, such
that I'm no longer certain any remaining case may even be
spambayes related.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-04-07 21:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

A bit of investigation (I am using Outlook 2002 & Exchange 
2000).

A new message arriving in my Inbox does not get analysed by 
SpamBayes until:
- You switch to another folder and back again.
- You read the message (then analysed, but remains 'unread')
- Another email arrives, when the first message is then rated 
(second one not rated though)
- Another email in Inbox is saved after editing
In other words, it seems some other action eventually triggers 
the analysis - not the arrival event itself.

An email that is read before it has been analysed by 
SpamBayes will always be 'unread' afterwards. This is 
independent of type (plain, rich text or HTML)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 07:57:18 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 09:57:57 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-712480 ] Install error: bizarre
	import errors
Message-ID: <E19eEgg-0001Zk-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #712480, was opened at 2003-03-31 15:47
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=712480&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Marrero (pmarrero)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Install error: bizarre import errors

Initial Comment:
I use office XP with the Outlook client.  It appears that 
the registration was successfull but I cannnot find any 
menu buttons.  XP clipboard does appear to have the 
Icons.  The command line train works.  Not sure where 
to go from here.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 23:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Pretty sure I fixed this in the 003 release.  re-open if not.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-06-05 13:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Ah - here's the tracer I was looking for!

I posted this in another trace, but it belonged here.  In the 
aims of testing the SP2 theory, I made no other changes, 
upgraded to SP2 (same version as below) and tried to install 
the binary.  I have progressed ;) to the 'no disk' error.  I can't 
really be bothered (at the moment) trying to get further since 
CVS still works :)

In case this is of use...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-25 21:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Failes with Outlook XP ver.10.4712.4219 sp-2

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-23 09:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

*sob* - so it certainly fails with Outlook SP2 here?  

ecvogel - is your traceback identical to this one?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric C. Vogel (ecvogel)
Date: 2003-05-23 05:20

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=784818

Same here. Outlook XP all SP and patches, WIn XP Pro SP1 
all patches. The file is registered and in the COM and has the 
check. Exchange Server 2000 all SP and patches on SBS 
2kSP-1 all patches. 002 install

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve McCullough (sm5669)
Date: 2003-05-20 08:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=782446

Same here.  Outlook 2002 on Win2000 with all the latest SPs 
and patches applied.  Log file...

warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
warning: use func(*args, **kwargs) instead of apply(func, 
args, kwargs)
SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON32\lib\site-
packages\win32com\universal.py", line 170, in dispatch
    retVal = ob._InvokeEx_(meth.dispid, 0, meth.invkind, args, 
None, None)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON32\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 322, in _InvokeEx_
    return self._invokeex_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args, kwargs, 
serviceProvider)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON32\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 601, in _invokeex_
    return DesignatedWrapPolicy._invokeex_( self, dispid, lcid, 
wFlags, args, kwArgs, serviceProvider)
  File "C:\PROGRA~1\PYTHON32\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in _invokeex_
    return apply(func, args)
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 654, in 
OnConnection
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 274, in importHook
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 353, in doimport
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 15, 
in ?
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 274, in importHook
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 353, in doimport
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\msgstore.py", line 86, 
in ?
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 296, in importHook
exceptions.ImportError: No module named win32com.mapi


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tormod Hystad (thystad)
Date: 2003-05-16 17:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=780089

Exactly same as Nick here. Win2003 RC2, Outlook XP 
(Norwegian, version 10.2627.4219 SP2, configured with one 
Exchange (Standard) email acount) and the 002 install 
package.

Thanks,
Tormod

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Nick Trautmann (nicktrautmann)
Date: 2003-05-12 18:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=776857

Similar here:

pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py", line 170, 
in dispatch
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
322, in _InvokeEx_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
601, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
541, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 655, in 
OnConnection
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 475, 
in GetManager
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 156, 
in __init__
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 71, 
in import_core_spambayes_stuff
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 274, in importHook
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 353, in doimport
  File "E:\src\spambayes\spambayes\tokenizer.py", line 659, 
in ?
exceptions.AttributeError: 'OptionsClass' object has no 
attribute 'skip_max_word_size'
SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
Created new configuration file 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Nick\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_configuration.pck'
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py", line 170, 
in dispatch
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
322, in _InvokeEx_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
601, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
541, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 655, in 
OnConnection
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 475, 
in GetManager
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 156, 
in __init__
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 71, 
in import_core_spambayes_stuff
exceptions.ImportError: cannot import name tokenize

Thanks
Nick


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-04-01 12:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Actually, I get this too.  I've just switched to Outlook XP, so 
I'm not sure if this is the reason, or just that I'm doing a fresh 
install.  The log includes the following traces:

SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
Failed to load bayes database
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 310, 
in LoadBayes
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 118, 
in open_bayes
AttributeError: 'module' object has no 
attribute 'DBDictClassifier'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\tameyer\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Either bayes database or message database is missing - 
creating new
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py", line 170, 
in dispatch
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
322, in _InvokeEx_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
601, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
541, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 655, in 
OnConnection
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 475, 
in GetManager
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 165, 
in __init__
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 329, 
in LoadBayes
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 378, 
in InitNewBayes
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 94, 
in new_bayes
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 118, 
in open_bayes
exceptions.AttributeError: 'module' object has no 
attribute 'DBDictClassifier'
SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
Failed to load bayes database
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 310, 
in LoadBayes
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 118, 
in open_bayes
AttributeError: 'module' object has no 
attribute 'DBDictClassifier'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\tameyer\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Either bayes database or message database is missing - 
creating new
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py", line 170, 
in dispatch
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
322, in _InvokeEx_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
601, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py", line 
541, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 655, in 
OnConnection
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 475, 
in GetManager
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 165, 
in __init__
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 329, 
in LoadBayes
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 378, 
in InitNewBayes
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 94, 
in new_bayes
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 118, 
in open_bayes
exceptions.AttributeError: 'module' object has no 
attribute 'DBDictClassifier'


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-03-31 16:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Which version of the Outlook plugin are you using?  (a) the 
latest CVS, (b) the 001 stand-alone installer, or (c) the 002 
stand-alone installer?  I know that the 001 installer has been 
known to have this problem (although it appeared to be fixed 
in 002).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=712480&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 08:29:16 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 10:29:25 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-769588 ] data_directory doesn't
	work
Message-ID: <E19eFBc-0000cJ-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #769588, was opened at 2003-07-11 21:21
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769588&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edwin (eddepet_33)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: data_directory doesn't work

Initial Comment:
I am using the outlook plugin (version 0.3) and I have 
two users on Windows XP/Outlook XP. I've tried to use 
the data_directory option to only have one database. 
The plugin doesn't load the data_directory. I've used all 
possible ways to name the directory (no quotes, single 
and double quotes, single backslash, double backslash, 
forward slash). Here are the messages in the logfile.

Attempted to set [General] data_directory with invalid 
value 'C:\Documents and Settings\Edwin\Application 
Data\SpamBayes' (<type 'str'>)
Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Agnes\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Agnes\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 
(May 2003))...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 00:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The problem was spaces in the filename.  I have fixed this
in CVS, or in the meantime, you can use the "short name" of
the directory - use "dir /x" to see these names.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Edwin (eddepet_33)
Date: 2003-07-14 16:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=820567

The path is exactly as in the log-segment. There are spaces 
but no other strange characters. It doesn't load the path 
which contains 'Edwin' but it does use the path which 
contains 'Agnes'. The paths are basically the same. Could the 
spaces be a problem? I will give it a go tonight.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-14 08:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

What is the path that you are trying to give it?  The error 
message is basically saying that it's an invalid path, but this 
could easily be because the regex testing it is wrong.  (If it 
includes a '$', for example, this is fixed in CVS, but not in a 
release, yet).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769588&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 08:31:46 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 10:31:53 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-766750 ] Source install fails on
	Office XP
Message-ID: <E19eFE2-0000iN-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #766750, was opened at 2003-07-07 02:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=766750&group_id=61702

>Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
>Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Source install fails on Office XP

Initial Comment:
I've been trying and trying to get the binary install to 
work since upgrading from Outlook 2000 to Outlook XP 
with no success. So, I tried the source version.... 
Downloaded and installed Python, the Win32 extensions, 
and the zip file for Spambayes.

Running "addin.py" opens a DOS console that quickly 
(too quickly) flashes an error message. It took me about 
six runs to read part of the message. I then located it in 
the 'addin.py' source file. It's this one:

"This Addin requires that Outlook 2000 be installed on 
this machine."
"This appears to not be installed due to the following 
error:"

Apparently it's failing 'cause of not finding something 
related to this:

universal.RegisterInterfaces('{AC0714F2-3D04-11D1-
AE7D-00A0C90F26F4})

Part of that is a registry key, I assume. I *do* have 
that registry key and it has quite a few sub-keys... 
here's one of the values in a sub-key:

MSAddnDr.AddInDesigner.1

My next attempt will be uninstalling Office XP and then 
using some Office clean-up tools I've read about from 
Microsoft's website. Will report back...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 00:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please post the complete traceback (the one with the
universal.RegisterInterfaces error?)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-07 04:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from "addin.py" 
regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=766750&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 08:33:50 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 10:33:57 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows
	2000
Message-ID: <E19eFG2-0000nd-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-02 10:44
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

>Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola)
>Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000

Initial Comment:
When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs 
until the registering dll's section and then stops with an 
alert.  An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is

"Unable to register the DLL/OCX. 

DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201.

<Abort> <Retry> <Ignore>"

I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just 
repeat the error and Abort would unwind the 
installation.  I never tried Ignore.

I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, 
but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them.  
Abort worked the second time.  I finally tried Ignore, 
which completes okay.  When I ran Outlook, though, the 
add-in wasn't there.

This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron 
notebook.  It has Outlook 2002 SP2.  Both are up to 
date with recent patches.  I believe this combination is 
not known to work, but thought this information might 
help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-07 04:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Copy-n-pasted from another bug report:

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from
"addin.py" regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-07 01:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :)

--Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error.
--Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to 
Spambayes Outlook plug-in
--Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using 
both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB 
article. No difference.
--Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in 
case:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;207132

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;249873

The 2nd one mentions this:

DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. 
Return code was: string
*Search Winerror.h for string. 

You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to 
get this working again. 

Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes 
working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her 
to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, 
her missing "spam thingy".

I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I 
upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. 
Just so happened that 003 became available and 
troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, 
so I did. Didn't help me.... :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-04 14:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 
did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ 
SP2 installed.

The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. 
Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up 
and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running 
the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does 
NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-03 03:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on 
Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could 
not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) 
And still could not install the Binary version 003.
I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then 
tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I 
uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 08:58:35 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 10:58:48 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-766750 ] Source install fails on
	Office XP
Message-ID: <E19eFdz-0001yX-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #766750, was opened at 2003-07-06 12:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hallstevenson
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=766750&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Source install fails on Office XP

Initial Comment:
I've been trying and trying to get the binary install to 
work since upgrading from Outlook 2000 to Outlook XP 
with no success. So, I tried the source version.... 
Downloaded and installed Python, the Win32 extensions, 
and the zip file for Spambayes.

Running "addin.py" opens a DOS console that quickly 
(too quickly) flashes an error message. It took me about 
six runs to read part of the message. I then located it in 
the 'addin.py' source file. It's this one:

"This Addin requires that Outlook 2000 be installed on 
this machine."
"This appears to not be installed due to the following 
error:"

Apparently it's failing 'cause of not finding something 
related to this:

universal.RegisterInterfaces('{AC0714F2-3D04-11D1-
AE7D-00A0C90F26F4})

Part of that is a registry key, I assume. I *do* have 
that registry key and it has quite a few sub-keys... 
here's one of the values in a sub-key:

MSAddnDr.AddInDesigner.1

My next attempt will be uninstalling Office XP and then 
using some Office clean-up tools I've read about from 
Microsoft's website. Will report back...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-20 10:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

> Can you please post the complete 
> traceback (the one with the
> universal.RegisterInterfaces error?)

Can you please clarify what you mean by that ?? Thanks :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 10:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please post the complete traceback (the one with the
universal.RegisterInterfaces error?)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 14:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from "addin.py" 
regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=766750&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 12:44:09 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 14:44:16 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774650 ] Additional
	post-filtering options
Message-ID: <E19eJAH-0001pt-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #774650, was opened at 2003-07-20 18:44
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774650&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Next Release (example)
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John D. Zanette (vbpf0jsb0a30kc)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Additional post-filtering options

Initial Comment:
1.  Option to "Permanently Delete" certain spam rather 
than just moving it.

2.  Better than that, the option to do anything with a 
post-filtered message that I can do with an Outlook rule 
filtered message (forward, flag, etc.)

3.  User configurable number of filtering levels - i.e., 
more than two.

4.  A way to view/modify/tweak the database directly 
(maybe this already exists and I don't know it?)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774650&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 13:37:20 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 15:37:30 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764164 ] Error: No mail items are
	selected.
Message-ID: <E19eJzk-0006va-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764164, was opened at 2003-07-01 13:40
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kwladyka
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764164&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Superfly (sakaplan)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Error: No mail items are selected.

Initial Comment:
Howdy!  Noticed a bug when using it in MS Outlook.  
Perhaps you'd like to correct? Basically, if you get an 
Outlook meeting request that gets deemed as spam 
(and for whatever reason, most of my Outlook meeting 
requests are deemed as such), the bug in the software 
is that you cannot "recover from spam". 
 
While the message is in your spam folder, when you click 
the "recover from spam" button to train SpamBayes that 
this message is not spam and subsequently move the 
message back to your inbox or wherever, SpamBayes 
replies to your click, saying, "No Selection: No mail items 
are selected." 
 
Bug #2 is that you have the exact same problem as 
above with send/read mail receipts returned back to you 
from messages where you requested the receipts in the 
first place.  What this means is that if I request read 
receipts, I have to trudge through my spam folder to 
locate them and when I do, there's no way for me to 
train the software that these receipts aren't spam 
because when I click the "recover from spam" button, 
the software tells me I didn't select any e-mail to 
recover from. 
 
Anyhoo, hopefully the fix is a simple one which is to 
treat these messages in Outlook like any other mail.   I 
suspect the software nearly does, because it filters 
them in the first place.  Now, if only I could get 
SpamBayes to allow me to recover them out of spam 
folder, it be perfect...
 
Screen shots attached.  
 
Thanks.
 
-- Superfly

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Kevin Wladyka (kwladyka)
Date: 2003-07-20 13:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=823907

I have the same problem.  Outlook 2002/Windows 2000.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-01 17:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Thanks - we are tracking this in [ 690418 ] Non mail items
filtered by Outlook

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764164&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 14:02:48 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 16:03:29 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774650 ] Additional
	post-filtering options
Message-ID: <E19eKOO-0003h1-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #774650, was opened at 2003-07-20 18:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774650&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Next Release (example)
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John D. Zanette (vbpf0jsb0a30kc)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Additional post-filtering options

Initial Comment:
1.  Option to "Permanently Delete" certain spam rather 
than just moving it.

2.  Better than that, the option to do anything with a 
post-filtered message that I can do with an Outlook rule 
filtered message (forward, flag, etc.)

3.  User configurable number of filtering levels - i.e., 
more than two.

4.  A way to view/modify/tweak the database directly 
(maybe this already exists and I don't know it?)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 20:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

For #1, you can right click the spam folder and set the auto 
archive options to delete messages in that folder after a 
certain time (1 day is smallest amount) or move them to 
another pst file for retraining.

For #2, convince a developer that it is useful. I would think 
either header or subject line modication would be easier and 
then build your rules using outlook.

For #3, Do you mean more than filtering on different ranges 
of the the spam score or trying to do spam/ham and 
work/personal  (etc.) type of thing?

For #4, Looking at the spam clues for a message is filtered 
snapshot of the db. I think viewing would kinda neat, but 
modify/tweak could have some bad results.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774650&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 15:31:32 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 17:31:52 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-761797 ] "Failed to call the
	universal dispatcher"
Message-ID: <E19eLmG-0006Pz-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #761797, was opened at 2003-06-27 06:45
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kwladyka
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761797&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Simon Caddy (simoncaddy)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Failed to call the universal dispatcher"

Initial Comment:
My Spambayes log shows this error:

SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py",
line 170, in dispatch
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py",
line 322, in _InvokeEx_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py",
line 601, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py",
line 541, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line
655, in OnConnection
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line
475, in GetManager
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line
141, in __init__
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line
182, in LocateDataDirectory
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\ntpath.py", line 269, in
isdir
exceptions.LookupError: no codec search functions
registered: can't find encoding
SpamAddin - Connecting to Outlook
pythoncom error: Failed to call the universal dispatcher
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\universal.py",
line 170, in dispatch
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py",
line 322, in _InvokeEx_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py",
line 601, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\policy.py",
line 541, in _invokeex_
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line
655, in OnConnection
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line
475, in GetManager
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line
141, in __init__
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line
182, in LocateDataDirectory
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\ntpath.py", line 269, in
isdir
exceptions.LookupError: no codec search functions
registered: can't find encoding


Any ideas...?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Kevin Wladyka (kwladyka)
Date: 2003-07-20 15:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=823907

Thanks anadelonbrin

Yes the installer is a much easier way to go.  I assume the fix 
is in SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-003.exe which appears to be 
the lastest.  I'll give it a try.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-16 16:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Kinda.  The spambayes_1.0a4 download is *source only*.  
This does include the source for the latest binary Outlook 
plug-in, but if you want the binary installer, then you must 
get this from Mark's webpage.  The downloads page has 
details/links.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Kevin Wladyka (kwladyka)
Date: 2003-07-16 08:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=823907

I assume the latest download (1.0a4) is the 0.3 binary or 
later?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-01 17:12

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Fixed in the 0.3 binary.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Simon Caddy (simoncaddy)
Date: 2003-07-01 03:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=810828

Outlook 2002 also then, sorry, misread your earlier post

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bengt Bergholm (borgsquirrel)
Date: 2003-07-01 03:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=813286

Yes and no. I don't know about how close code relationship
there is between Outlook 2000 and 2002 (2k2) which I am running.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Simon Caddy (simoncaddy)
Date: 2003-07-01 03:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=810828

Vaguely reassurring to know it's not just a 98/Me problem
then... common factor so far is Outlook 2K.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Bengt Bergholm (borgsquirrel)
Date: 2003-07-01 02:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=813286

I have this exact problem under Windows XP w/ Outlook 2k2
sp2, english.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Simon Caddy (simoncaddy)
Date: 2003-06-30 02:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=810828

Yeah, thanks... I have now seem at the top of the docs page
"current binary installer will not work with Windows 98"...
but no solution!?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Cloutier (chealer)
Date: 2003-06-28 23:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738765

It seems you have the same problem as the one reported in 
761316.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=761797&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 15:47:12 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 17:47:16 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-774708 ] Folder Definition
Message-ID: <E19eM1Q-0007gG-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #774708, was opened at 2003-07-20 16:47
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774708&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Henrichs (markhenrichs)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Folder Definition

Initial Comment:
Great program!  However, if I try to redefine the folders 
for filtering, they simply revert to unknown folder.  An 
attempt to redefine them appears at first to work.  
When I close the filter dialogue and reopen it, the folder 
names have been reset to unknown.  I have only been 
able to cure the problem by removing Spoambayes, then 
Outlook and reloading both.  As a result, I don't have a 
reliable log file documenting the problem.   Most people 
will not notice the bug because they will never try to 
redeinf the folders.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774708&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 16:07:04 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 18:07:11 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] 
	[ spambayes-Bugs-770793 ] Win98, database corrupts?
Message-ID: <E19eMKe-0007TJ-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #770793, was opened at 2003-07-14 01:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770793&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Lauri Harpf (theranger54)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Win98, database corrupts?

Initial Comment:
Gives:

---
Loading database...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", 
line 777, in ?
    run()
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", 
line 752, in run
    state.createWorkers()
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\pop3proxy.py", 
line 594, in createWorkers
    self.bayes = storage.DBDictClassifier(filename)
  
File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\spambayes\storage.
py", line 147, in __init
__
    self.load()
  
File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\spambayes\storage.
py", line 159, in load
    t = self.db[self.statekey]
  File "C:\OHJELMATIEDOSTOT\PYTHON22\lib\shelve.py", 
line 71, in __getitem__
    return Unpickler(f).load()
EOFError
Exception exceptions.AttributeError: "'NoneType' object 
has no attribute 'error'
" in <bound method _Database.__del__ of 
<dumbdbm._Database instance at 0x00ED936
0>> ignored
---

on startup. Worked fine, then I rebooted the machine 
(shut down Spambayes through the Web interface) and 
then it simply refused to boot up with the above 
message. Error seems permanent, unless user does 
something drastic (ie. destroys the database). I'm 
running Win98 Se, using pop3proxy with Outlook 6 SP1, 
starting the program with

c:\ohjelmatiedostot\python22\python.exe 
c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\pop3proxy.
py -b

Hard drive is a 80GB model, partitioned into one single 
partition using FAT32, 45,7GB still free. Spambayes 
version is 1.0 A4.

The same problem also occurred with Alpha 3, it refuses 
to start up with the message

---
Loading database...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayesbak\pop3proxy.py", 
line 730, in ?
    run()
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayesbak\pop3proxy.py", 
line 705, in run
    state.createWorkers()
  File "c:\ohjelmatiedostot\spambayesbak\pop3proxy.py", 
line 547, in createWorke
rs
    self.bayes = storage.DBDictClassifier(filename)
  
File "C:\Ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\spambayes\storage.
py", line 147, in __init
__
    self.load()
  
File "C:\Ohjelmatiedostot\spambayes\spambayes\storage.
py", line 159, in load
    t = self.db[self.statekey]
  File "C:\OHJELMATIEDOSTOT\PYTHON22\lib\shelve.py", 
line 71, in __getitem__
    return Unpickler(f).load()
EOFError
Exception exceptions.AttributeError: "'NoneType' object 
has no attribute 'error'
" in <bound method _Database.__del__ of 
<dumbdbm._Database instance at 0x00ED1D7
0>> ignored
---

After a fresh install, the program usually works fine for a 
while. Every reboot does not appear to mix things up, it 
only seems to go bad after it has been running for a 
while and the user has classified enough messages. I run 
my comp mostly 24/7, so reboots are rare and 
Spambayes is usually running unless I need to boot.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-20 18:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Mark, the Outlook addin never uses dumbdbm, does it?  Looks 
like manager.py looks for bsddb3, and, if it fails to find one, 
uses a PickleStorageManager.  I don't want to give up the 
option of using a PickleStorageManager, since no bugs are 
ever reported against that (low tech == low risk <0.2 wink>).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 03:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Well, fixed in Python anyway.  If you still care, add a
feature request that Outlook fail to register unless we have
a bsddb database

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-16 10:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

The "dumbdbm._Database instance" in the traceback is a sure 
sign of a recently-diagnosed critical problem.  Since you're 
using Outlook, using the Outlook addin instead of pop3proxy 
will cure it.  If for some reason you want to use pop3proxy 
with Outlook (I woudn't -- the Outlook addin is a joy), you'll 
need to install "a real" database.  Python 2.3 will ship with a 
current version of Sleepycat's Berkeley bsddb database.  For 
Python 2.2.3, that can be obtained separately from the 
SourceForge PyBSDDB project:

http://pybsddb.sf.net/

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770793&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 16:08:08 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 18:08:16 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774650 ] Additional
	post-filtering options
Message-ID: <E19eMLg-0005r5-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #774650, was opened at 2003-07-20 18:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by vbpf0jsb0a30kc
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774650&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: Next Release (example)
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: John D. Zanette (vbpf0jsb0a30kc)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Additional post-filtering options

Initial Comment:
1.  Option to "Permanently Delete" certain spam rather 
than just moving it.

2.  Better than that, the option to do anything with a 
post-filtered message that I can do with an Outlook rule 
filtered message (forward, flag, etc.)

3.  User configurable number of filtering levels - i.e., 
more than two.

4.  A way to view/modify/tweak the database directly 
(maybe this already exists and I don't know it?)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: John D. Zanette (vbpf0jsb0a30kc)
Date: 2003-07-20 22:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=826656

#1 - That had already been suggested by Mr. Meyer when I 
posted to the SpamBayes list (he also suggested that I [re]
post it here)

#2 - Header or subject line modification would work for this (I 
have used that technique successfully with the K9 filter 
(http://kier.net) and Outlook's rules.  Unfortunately K9 does 
not support Outlook/Exchange directly (only through POP3), 
which is why I now use SpamBayes since I needed support for 
multiple simultaneous Exchange and POP3 mailboxes.

#3 - What I mean is more spam score filters.  Since it is 
CRITICAL for me to NEVER lose a "ham" message, I would like 
to have at least three levels of filtering.  For example:

  70% - 100% Immediate Delete (via SpamBayes
  as in #2 or using the AutoArchive method in #1)

  30% - 69% Move to Spam folder with autodelete
  after 3 days

  10%-29% Move to Suspect folder for manual review

I have had such great success in less than a month of using 
SpamBayes (over 99.9%) that I am actually considering how I 
can "trust" it to autodelete.  I have tried many alternatives 
including commercial products and none (with the exception 
of K9, noted above) has come close to SpamBayes.

#4 - Agreed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 20:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

For #1, you can right click the spam folder and set the auto 
archive options to delete messages in that folder after a 
certain time (1 day is smallest amount) or move them to 
another pst file for retraining.

For #2, convince a developer that it is useful. I would think 
either header or subject line modication would be easier and 
then build your rules using outlook.

For #3, Do you mean more than filtering on different ranges 
of the the spam score or trying to do spam/ham and 
work/personal  (etc.) type of thing?

For #4, Looking at the spam clues for a message is filtered 
snapshot of the db. I think viewing would kinda neat, but 
modify/tweak could have some bad results.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774650&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 16:53:23 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 18:53:28 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-774708 ] Folder Definition
Message-ID: <E19eN3T-0003bt-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #774708, was opened at 2003-07-21 07:47
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774708&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Henrichs (markhenrichs)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Folder Definition

Initial Comment:
Great program!  However, if I try to redefine the folders 
for filtering, they simply revert to unknown folder.  An 
attempt to redefine them appears at first to work.  
When I close the filter dialogue and reopen it, the folder 
names have been reset to unknown.  I have only been 
able to cure the problem by removing Spoambayes, then 
Outlook and reloading both.  As a result, I don't have a 
reliable log file documenting the problem.   Most people 
will not notice the bug because they will never try to 
redeinf the folders.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 08:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Thanks for your report.  This bug has previously been reported,
and has already been fixed in the source-code - so you can expect
to see the fix in the next binary release.  

You may wish to subscribe to the spambayes-announce list to see
when each version is released - details at
http://mail.python.org/mailman-21/listinfo/spambayes-announce

If you are technically minded, you may like to run from the CVS
version of the source-code, and you should find the fix
immediately - see the main SpamBayes pages for details.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774708&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 17:09:12 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 19:09:22 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-737619 ] Message spam score is
	displayed (and filtered) wrongly
Message-ID: <E19eNIm-0001h5-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #737619, was opened at 2003-05-14 20:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=737619&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Message spam score is displayed (and filtered) wrongly

Initial Comment:
Exchange, Outlook 2000, plugin from CVS around 9th 
April. Occasionally (it seems to be mostly when the plugin 
is doing a "catchup" when I start up in the morning, but I 
don't think it's *always* then) a spam is left in my inbox 
with a score of 0% displayed. Clicking the "show spam 
clues" button shows a correct score of 99.xxx%.

I *think* that the message isn't showing in the log of 
messages being filtered (so why does it get a score at 
all?) but it's hard to be sure I didn't miss the note about 
a message with subject "??????????????????????" in a list 
of 200+ such messages :-)

This has been discussed on the list in the past, but I 
could find no bug specifically about it. If I missed one, I 
apologise - feel free to close this in that case.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 09:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This is very similar to
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=771256&group_id=61702&atid=498103
- except in that bug, there is no score displayed (ie, in
that one, the message appears "completely missed".  It is
alot easier to see how the "no score" behaviour could
happen, but this stumps me!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=737619&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 17:10:31 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 19:10:45 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-771256 ] Filter misses messages
Message-ID: <E19eNK3-0001j0-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #771256, was opened at 2003-07-15 08:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771256&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott Hagie (shagie)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Summary: Filter misses messages

Initial Comment:
For the most part the Outlook version works pretty well, 
but in two cases so far Spambayes will refuse to give it 
a score on the main page or sort it. One of the e-mails 
was spam, the other was not. The e-mails do not appear 
at all in the log. I can view the spam clues and it will 
give me accurate information of what score it should 
have given it though. For instance, the Spam got:

'*H*'                               3.14121e-008        -      -
'*S*'                               0.999976            -      -

and the good e-mail got:

'*H*'                               0.999994            -      -
'*S*'                               7.60678e-010        -      -

The good e-mail was unusual in that it had no subject 
line, the bad is pretty typical html spam. I won't bother 
adding the log since it does not show anything.

I really like this program, I can not wait until you get all 
the bugs out.

Scott

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 09:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Similar to
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=737619&group_id=61702&atid=498103,
except that report indicates that an invalid spam score
*did* end up on the message.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771256&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 17:14:04 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 19:14:08 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-770397 ] Outlook hangs during
	message download
Message-ID: <E19eNNU-00013e-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #770397, was opened at 2003-07-13 14:27
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Leonard Abbey (lba)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Summary: Outlook hangs during message download

Initial Comment:
Approx 1 on 8 to 10 times that I start Outlook with 
SpamBytes filtering enabled Outlook Hangs part way 
through the download of messages. Say at 31 of 50 
messages.

Cancelling and restarting Outlook results in the same 
problem at the same message count (31 of 50.)

If I turn off the filtering of SpamBytes the messages 
download successfully.

Filtering the downloaded messages works fine on these 
downloaded messages (although I don;t think it Moves 
them to the designated folders - need to recheck to be 
100% sure of this.)

Outlook has not previously experienced this problem 
prior to installing SpamBytes.

I am running Windows XP Home edition - with most fixes 
applied.

Outlook is  Outlook 2000 SP-3 (9.0.0.6627)



Just looking at the Log file, is it possible that my Outlook 
Filtering is moving messages before SpamBytes gets a 
chance to analyse them?  SpamBytes does seem to lag 
a little behind the download by my casual observation.






----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=770397&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 17:53:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 19:53:25 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765912 ] AssertionError:
	Proportions must add to 1.0 ...
Message-ID: <E19eNzB-0000je-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765912, was opened at 2003-07-04 22:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 ...

Initial Comment:
I upgraded my (working) outlook 2000 + spambayes 
installation to Outlook XP and the newest version of 
Spambayes. Spambayes would not perform any action 
when I had defined "spam" and "ham" folders and chosen 
"Train". It wouldn't matter if I had "rebuild entire 
database" checked or unchecked.

Actions: 
1. Start Outlook.
2. Go to SpamBayes config menu.
3. Click on "Train now"
4. Select "spam" folder.
5. Click on "Train now"

After that, "nothing happens". Clicking on "stop training" 
does not work, but I can close the window by clicking on 
the "[x] in the upper right corner and get back to the 
"main" menu.

I have tried all possible combinations of checkboxes. I 
have also ran "scanpst.exe" on my mailbox file. OS is XP 
Pro (English) 


Here's the log file:




Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in 
set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command 
ID 1100, Code 0

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 09:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in code to help diagnose this - the assertion
prints the items and the sum

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 14:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Good to know English versions also show it.  Anyone able to
 run the source code version?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gael Marziou (gmarziou)
Date: 2003-07-09 07:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=203211

I ahve exactly the same symptoms on US outlook 2000 on 
windows 2000 pro sp3.

My log file:

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons
ERROR: 'You must enable SpamBayes before you can delete 
as spam'
None
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Cloutier (chealer)
Date: 2003-07-05 08:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738765

GOD!
I had the exact same problem with French version. 
Repeating "Train now" after closing the window with X only 
made the above lines to repeat in the log file. log files closes 
by

Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\Chealer\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 0 messages, finding 0 spam and 0 
unsure
Addin terminating: 1 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


And now, just as I was writing the bug report, I open Outlook 
and it's gone! SB is now trained, and I made no reboot, no 
update of anything...
So what to say? Well, be patient. I think I tried the function 
about 10 times and closed Outlook around 5 times in the 
meantime... hope it's gonna be as simple as that to fix the 
bug too.
By the way, this bug succeeded to the max size error with 
binary 002 which had been perfectly fixed by 003.

OS is Windows XP Pro SP1 French, I have Outlook XP SP2 
French and didn't change this since months.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 17:54:11 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 19:54:24 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-771541 ] "Recover from" button
	not present in "Unsure" folder
Message-ID: <E19eO0J-0000lM-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #771541, was opened at 2003-07-15 21:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771541&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jim Drash (jdrash)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Recover from" button not present in "Unsure" folder

Initial Comment:
In the 003 release of the Outlook Add-in, the "Recover 
from" button does not display in the Unsure folder. Onlt 
the "Delete As Spam" displays.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 09:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please try doing a reset of your toolbars, as per
the troubleshooting guide.  Go the brutal "delete
outcmd.dat" route.  Let me know if that fixes it

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771541&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 18:46:55 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 20:47:00 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765242 ] UnicodeEncodeError:
	'ascii' codec can't encode character '\u
Message-ID: <E19eOpL-00024V-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765242, was opened at 2003-07-03 07:09
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mbjornsson
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765242&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bj?rn Toft Madsen (sunbeam60)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character '\u

Initial Comment:
After installation, Outlook XP reports the following
error when started up:

There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin.

Please re-start Outlook and try again.

Machine is running Danish locale, but English
installation of Office.

Log file attached.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Magnus Bjornsson (mbjornsson)
Date: 2003-07-20 20:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=826804


For me it was enough to change the default encoding to
iso-8859-1, rebuild and voil?!

For instructions how, see:
http://diveintopython.org/kgp_unicode.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765242&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 19:19:15 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 21:19:21 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765242 ] UnicodeEncodeError:
	'ascii' codec can't encode character '\u
Message-ID: <E19ePKd-0004lZ-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765242, was opened at 2003-07-03 21:09
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765242&group_id=61702

>Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bj?rn Toft Madsen (sunbeam60)
>Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character '\u

Initial Comment:
After installation, Outlook XP reports the following
error when started up:

There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin.

Please re-start Outlook and try again.

Machine is running Danish locale, but English
installation of Office.

Log file attached.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 11:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Interesting - that exception is:

    os.environ["BAYESCUSTOMIZE"] = ini_filename

ini_filename will be a Unicode string, and in the case of
tha bug, contain non-ASCII characters.  If anyone is running
from source code, I would be very interested to know if
changing to:

 os.environ["BAYESCUSTOMIZE"] = ini_filename.encode("mbcs")

Also fixes it.  I think I will make that change here anyway
- it wont hurt pure ascii filenames, and os.environ is known
to not be unicode aware at this stage.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Magnus Bjornsson (mbjornsson)
Date: 2003-07-21 10:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=826804


For me it was enough to change the default encoding to
iso-8859-1, rebuild and voil?!

For instructions how, see:
http://diveintopython.org/kgp_unicode.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765242&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 20:07:22 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 22:07:27 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-774781 ] No progress while
	training
Message-ID: <E19eQ5C-0004IZ-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #774781, was opened at 2003-07-20 22:07
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774781&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Magnus Bjornsson (mbjornsson)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: No progress while training

Initial Comment:

After setting the spam and good folders, and pressing
the Train Now button in the training dialog nothing
happens!
I started to look around some and it seemed that it was
complaining about the line
 assert(abs(start_pos-1.0)) < 0.001, "Proportions must
add to 1.0" (line 45 in AsyncDialog.py)
For some reason this assertion was failing.

Simply removing this assertion (ugh!) managed to get me
to finish training the db but without the nice progress
bar though.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774781&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 20:14:50 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 22:15:49 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765912 ] AssertionError:
	Proportions must add to 1.0 ...
Message-ID: <E19eQCQ-0006Mu-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765912, was opened at 2003-07-04 12:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 ...

Initial Comment:
I upgraded my (working) outlook 2000 + spambayes 
installation to Outlook XP and the newest version of 
Spambayes. Spambayes would not perform any action 
when I had defined "spam" and "ham" folders and chosen 
"Train". It wouldn't matter if I had "rebuild entire 
database" checked or unchecked.

Actions: 
1. Start Outlook.
2. Go to SpamBayes config menu.
3. Click on "Train now"
4. Select "spam" folder.
5. Click on "Train now"

After that, "nothing happens". Clicking on "stop training" 
does not work, but I can close the window by clicking on 
the "[x] in the upper right corner and get back to the 
"main" menu.

I have tried all possible combinations of checkboxes. I 
have also ran "scanpst.exe" on my mailbox file. OS is XP 
Pro (English) 


Here's the log file:




Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in 
set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command 
ID 1100, Code 0

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-21 02:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

noting dupicate in #774781

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 23:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in code to help diagnose this - the assertion
prints the items and the sum

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 04:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Good to know English versions also show it.  Anyone able to
 run the source code version?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gael Marziou (gmarziou)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=203211

I ahve exactly the same symptoms on US outlook 2000 on 
windows 2000 pro sp3.

My log file:

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons
ERROR: 'You must enable SpamBayes before you can delete 
as spam'
None
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Cloutier (chealer)
Date: 2003-07-04 22:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738765

GOD!
I had the exact same problem with French version. 
Repeating "Train now" after closing the window with X only 
made the above lines to repeat in the log file. log files closes 
by

Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\Chealer\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 0 messages, finding 0 spam and 0 
unsure
Addin terminating: 1 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


And now, just as I was writing the bug report, I open Outlook 
and it's gone! SB is now trained, and I made no reboot, no 
update of anything...
So what to say? Well, be patient. I think I tried the function 
about 10 times and closed Outlook around 5 times in the 
meantime... hope it's gonna be as simple as that to fix the 
bug too.
By the way, this bug succeeded to the max size error with 
binary 002 which had been perfectly fixed by 003.

OS is Windows XP Pro SP1 French, I have Outlook XP SP2 
French and didn't change this since months.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 20:24:05 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 22:24:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-774781 ] No progress while
	training
Message-ID: <E19eQLN-0006en-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #774781, was opened at 2003-07-21 02:07
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774781&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Magnus Bjornsson (mbjornsson)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: No progress while training

Initial Comment:

After setting the spam and good folders, and pressing
the Train Now button in the training dialog nothing
happens!
I started to look around some and it seemed that it was
complaining about the line
 assert(abs(start_pos-1.0)) < 0.001, "Proportions must
add to 1.0" (line 45 in AsyncDialog.py)
For some reason this assertion was failing.

Simply removing this assertion (ugh!) managed to get me
to finish training the db but without the nice progress
bar though.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-21 02:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Thanks for the report.
Please track under [ 765912 ] AssertionError: Proportions 
must add to 1.0 ...
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=765912&group_id=61702&atid=498103

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774781&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 20:32:48 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 22:32:54 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-690418 ] Non mail items filtered
	by Outlook
Message-ID: <E19eQTo-0006w8-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #690418, was opened at 2003-02-21 01:11
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=690418&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Non mail items filtered by Outlook

Initial Comment:
DeliveryReports are filtered by SpamBayes.  We should
check that we are only filtering mail items.  I added a
check for this in the "Recover from Spam" buttons, so
we can copy that.  Indeed, we *must* copy that, as the
filter may move such a message, but then our "Delete
as/Recover from" buttons won't let us get it back

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-21 02:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Mark, Please review the patch I've attached. It checks for a 
message class beginning with "IPM.Note" in the 
ProcessMessage method, which seems to the common entry 
point with the exception of the buttons (which you already 
fixed).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 04:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

[ 772155 ] Meeting requests
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=772155&group_id=61702&atid=498103
is a dupe of this.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-09 22:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Noting duplicate in 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768682&group_id=61702

([ 768682 ] Appointment filtered but can't be recovered)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-01 23:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Also happens for meeting requests (which apparently also
often end up as unsure)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=690418&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 20:43:49 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 22:43:55 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-690418 ] Non mail items filtered
	by Outlook
Message-ID: <E19eQeT-0007H7-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #690418, was opened at 2003-02-21 12:11
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=690418&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Non mail items filtered by Outlook

Initial Comment:
DeliveryReports are filtered by SpamBayes.  We should
check that we are only filtering mail items.  I added a
check for this in the "Recover from Spam" buttons, so
we can copy that.  Indeed, we *must* copy that, as the
filter may move such a message, but then our "Delete
as/Recover from" buttons won't let us get it back

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 12:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Thanks!  That is certainly a step in the right direction. 
The fact it isn't that simple is the reason why this bug has
sat here for so long.  Other things:
* The GetMessageGenerator etc should have the same logic, so
that "bult training" of folders doesn't pick up these items.
 This code does *not* use the Outlook object model, and
opening an Outlook object per mail is way too slow.
* This should be rolled into one function, so *everything*
knows to skip (or not) a message.  Later, this will include
checks like "has this ever been sent" (see the other bug)

But - the great news is that I am actually working on that
as we speak, and very nearly have it done.  Will probably be
my next checkins.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-21 12:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Mark, Please review the patch I've attached. It checks for a 
message class beginning with "IPM.Note" in the 
ProcessMessage method, which seems to the common entry 
point with the exception of the buttons (which you already 
fixed).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 14:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

[ 772155 ] Meeting requests
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=772155&group_id=61702&atid=498103
is a dupe of this.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-10 08:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Noting duplicate in 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768682&group_id=61702

([ 768682 ] Appointment filtered but can't be recovered)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-02 09:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Also happens for meeting requests (which apparently also
often end up as unsure)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=690418&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 21:13:04 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 23:13:10 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-719586 ] Cannot View Spam Cues
	for Undeliverable Reports
Message-ID: <E19eR6m-00005T-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #719586, was opened at 2003-04-11 10:20
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=719586&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Martin Worger (worger)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Cannot View Spam Cues for Undeliverable Reports

Initial Comment:
The SpamBayes Outlook add-in marked an undeliverable 
notice as spam. I moved it back into my Inbox, but it still 
shows a 90% rating. When I try to view the spam cues 
for it says that no message is selected.

The email is using a different message class i.e. it is 
a 'report' not a 'message' (when you look at the 
message properties).

BTW: Sorry if I have trampled on any protocols by 
posting this - I'm not a developer, merely testing (and it 
is doing a pretty good job of filtering, this is my first FP 
since filtering was enabled - I'm impressed!)

Martin Worger

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-21 03:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Closing b/c submitter noted the previous bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-04-11 10:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

Sorry - I didn't see bug 690418!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-04-11 10:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

Sorry - I didn't see bug 690418!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=719586&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 21:35:18 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 20 23:35:26 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-750069 ] Spambayes Enabled,
	No Decimal Values Reported
Message-ID: <E19eRSI-0006py-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #750069, was opened at 2003-06-06 13:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=750069&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: George Bertoli (gbertoli)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spambayes Enabled, No Decimal Values Reported

Initial Comment:
Running Windows 2000 professional, Outlook 2000 SP3

Log files attached.

Think this might be result of Ad-Aware or Spybot 
removing or disabling Python?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-21 03:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

This appears to be the same bug as [ 706520 ] assert fails in 
classifier
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=706520&group_id=61702&atid=498103

You can try deleting the databases and retraining. See the 
FAQ for infomation on locating the databases. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: George Bertoli (gbertoli)
Date: 2003-06-08 02:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=795444

Further notes,
Spambayes was installed and working fine for two weeks 
before it stopped working (stopped reporting decimal values 
and resultant no filtering).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=750069&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 22:34:42 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 00:34:49 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-690418 ] Non mail items filtered
	by Outlook
Message-ID: <E19eSNm-0001k3-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #690418, was opened at 2003-02-21 12:11
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=690418&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Non mail items filtered by Outlook

Initial Comment:
DeliveryReports are filtered by SpamBayes.  We should
check that we are only filtering mail items.  I added a
check for this in the "Recover from Spam" buttons, so
we can copy that.  Indeed, we *must* copy that, as the
filter may move such a message, but then our "Delete
as/Recover from" buttons won't let us get it back

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 14:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Fix checked in.  Only mail items are filtered.  Only items
that can be filtered can show spamclues.  Note that
user-composed messages are still filtered, as per that other
bug!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 12:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Thanks!  That is certainly a step in the right direction. 
The fact it isn't that simple is the reason why this bug has
sat here for so long.  Other things:
* The GetMessageGenerator etc should have the same logic, so
that "bult training" of folders doesn't pick up these items.
 This code does *not* use the Outlook object model, and
opening an Outlook object per mail is way too slow.
* This should be rolled into one function, so *everything*
knows to skip (or not) a message.  Later, this will include
checks like "has this ever been sent" (see the other bug)

But - the great news is that I am actually working on that
as we speak, and very nearly have it done.  Will probably be
my next checkins.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-21 12:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Mark, Please review the patch I've attached. It checks for a 
message class beginning with "IPM.Note" in the 
ProcessMessage method, which seems to the common entry 
point with the exception of the buttons (which you already 
fixed).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-20 14:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

[ 772155 ] Meeting requests
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=772155&group_id=61702&atid=498103
is a dupe of this.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-10 08:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Noting duplicate in 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detail&atid=498103&aid=768682&group_id=61702

([ 768682 ] Appointment filtered but can't be recovered)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-02 09:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Also happens for meeting requests (which apparently also
often end up as unsure)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=690418&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 22:36:37 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 00:36:44 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765242 ] UnicodeEncodeError:
	'ascii' codec can't encode character '\u
Message-ID: <E19eSPd-0001mG-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765242, was opened at 2003-07-03 21:09
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765242&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bj?rn Toft Madsen (sunbeam60)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character '\u

Initial Comment:
After installation, Outlook XP reports the following
error when started up:

There was an error initializing the SpamBayes addin.

Please re-start Outlook and try again.

Machine is running Danish locale, but English
installation of Office.

Log file attached.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 14:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

OK, I managed to test this by setting my data directory to a
local directory with an extended character.  This caused a
number of failures beyond this.  I checked in fixes - all
should now work in CVS.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 11:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Interesting - that exception is:

    os.environ["BAYESCUSTOMIZE"] = ini_filename

ini_filename will be a Unicode string, and in the case of
tha bug, contain non-ASCII characters.  If anyone is running
from source code, I would be very interested to know if
changing to:

 os.environ["BAYESCUSTOMIZE"] = ini_filename.encode("mbcs")

Also fixes it.  I think I will make that change here anyway
- it wont hurt pure ascii filenames, and os.environ is known
to not be unicode aware at this stage.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Magnus Bjornsson (mbjornsson)
Date: 2003-07-21 10:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=826804


For me it was enough to change the default encoding to
iso-8859-1, rebuild and voil?!

For instructions how, see:
http://diveintopython.org/kgp_unicode.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765242&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 22:37:34 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 00:37:39 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-680010 ] train on
	messages replied to
Message-ID: <E19eSQY-0001oh-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #680010, was opened at 2003-02-04 15:00
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=680010&group_id=61702

>Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: train on messages replied to

Initial Comment:
Tim's idea, in the thread "RE: [Spambayes] Outlook
plugin notes".  Automatically train as ham any messages
which are replied to.

Probably needs a checkbox for this behaviour.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=680010&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 20 22:41:05 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 00:41:08 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-769619 ] message time shifts when
	moved from possible to ham folder
Message-ID: <E19eSTx-00008K-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #769619, was opened at 2003-07-11 22:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769619&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joe Copley (jcopley)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: message time shifts when moved from possible to ham folder

Initial Comment:
When a message is placed in my possible SPAM folder, 
and I use the recover button to move it back to my 
inbox, the message time is moved  earlier by 8 hours.

I have Outlook XP and am in the Eastern time zone.

My Inbox is an IMAP account. The SPAM and Possible 
SPAM folders are local Outlook Accounts.

I use Rockliffe Mailsite as my mail server.

I have detected quirky behavior in Outlook before 
installing SpamBayes. For example, sometimes the rules 
simply stop working for no discernable reason. These 
problems migrated from Outlook 2000 on Win 98 to 
Outlook 2002 on XP.

On XP only, whenever I start Outlook after boot, the 
rules simply don't get invoked and I have to run them 
manually.

I am using Beta 1, Binary Version 3.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 14:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you account for the 8 hours?  Is that the time
difference between you and your server?

Can you also confirm that the original moving of the message
to the "unsure" folder did not change the time - only the
recovery process?

Can you also please test what happens if you drag-and-drop
the message back to the inbox - is the time also shifted?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769619&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 21 04:14:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 06:14:39 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-774908 ] New mail icon stays
	visible
Message-ID: <E19eXgc-0004qO-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #774908, was opened at 2003-07-21 12:14
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774908&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edwin (eddepet_33)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: New mail icon stays visible

Initial Comment:
When new e-mail arrives and is moved to the spam-
folder, the new mail icon remains visible in de system-
tray. I have the option 
delete_as_spam_message_state:Read in my ini file. The 
e-mail itself is correctly set as read.

Spambayes version: outlook beta 1, binary version 3.
Outlook: office 2000 on W2K

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774908&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 21 04:30:26 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 06:30:29 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-774908 ] New mail icon stays
	visible
Message-ID: <E19eXw2-0005L1-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #774908, was opened at 2003-07-21 20:14
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774908&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: v1.0 (example)
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edwin (eddepet_33)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: New mail icon stays visible

Initial Comment:
When new e-mail arrives and is moved to the spam-
folder, the new mail icon remains visible in de system-
tray. I have the option 
delete_as_spam_message_state:Read in my ini file. The 
e-mail itself is correctly set as read.

Spambayes version: outlook beta 1, binary version 3.
Outlook: office 2000 on W2K

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 20:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Sorry, but there is nothing we can do here.  We make no
claim to clear the icon, just to change the message flag.

Outlook doesn't expose a way to change this flag.  I will
update the docs to indicate that this doesn't change the
read state.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774908&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 21 04:36:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 06:36:08 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-773364 ] "Delete From Server"
	doesn't work on filtered mail
Message-ID: <E19eY1T-000656-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #773364, was opened at 2003-07-18 10:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail

Initial Comment:
In Outlook's account properties, you can choose to 
leave a copy of retrieved mail on the server, and to 
remove that copy when the mail is deleted from 
the "Deleted Items" folder. However, this does not seem 
to be working with mail that has been checked by 
SpamBayes. When I delete a mail from the "Certain 
Spam" folder, it is moved to "Deleted Items" as 
expected, but when the "Deleted Items" folder is 
emptied, the copy remains on the server. I've tried the 
same thing with mail that has not been checked by 
SpamBayes, and it gets deleted from the server as 
expected.
It seems that Outlook cannot tell that the filtered mail is 
the same as the one on the server. Perhaps this is 
because of the addition of the spam score to the local 
copy?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 20:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 23:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 21 04:36:59 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 06:37:23 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765912 ] AssertionError:
	Proportions must add to 1.0 ...
Message-ID: <E19eY2N-000679-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765912, was opened at 2003-07-04 22:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 ...

Initial Comment:
I upgraded my (working) outlook 2000 + spambayes 
installation to Outlook XP and the newest version of 
Spambayes. Spambayes would not perform any action 
when I had defined "spam" and "ham" folders and chosen 
"Train". It wouldn't matter if I had "rebuild entire 
database" checked or unchecked.

Actions: 
1. Start Outlook.
2. Go to SpamBayes config menu.
3. Click on "Train now"
4. Select "spam" folder.
5. Click on "Train now"

After that, "nothing happens". Clicking on "stop training" 
does not work, but I can close the window by clicking on 
the "[x] in the upper right corner and get back to the 
"main" menu.

I have tried all possible combinations of checkboxes. I 
have also ran "scanpst.exe" on my mailbox file. OS is XP 
Pro (English) 


Here's the log file:




Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in 
set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command 
ID 1100, Code 0

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 20:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Please try version 004 of the binary - I expect the same
behavior, but more information in the log!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-21 12:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

noting dupicate in #774781

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 09:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in code to help diagnose this - the assertion
prints the items and the sum

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 14:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Good to know English versions also show it.  Anyone able to
 run the source code version?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gael Marziou (gmarziou)
Date: 2003-07-09 07:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=203211

I ahve exactly the same symptoms on US outlook 2000 on 
windows 2000 pro sp3.

My log file:

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons
ERROR: 'You must enable SpamBayes before you can delete 
as spam'
None
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Cloutier (chealer)
Date: 2003-07-05 08:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738765

GOD!
I had the exact same problem with French version. 
Repeating "Train now" after closing the window with X only 
made the above lines to repeat in the log file. log files closes 
by

Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\Chealer\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 0 messages, finding 0 spam and 0 
unsure
Addin terminating: 1 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


And now, just as I was writing the bug report, I open Outlook 
and it's gone! SB is now trained, and I made no reboot, no 
update of anything...
So what to say? Well, be patient. I think I tried the function 
about 10 times and closed Outlook around 5 times in the 
meantime... hope it's gonna be as simple as that to fix the 
bug too.
By the way, this bug succeeded to the max size error with 
binary 002 which had been perfectly fixed by 003.

OS is Windows XP Pro SP1 French, I have Outlook XP SP2 
French and didn't change this since months.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 21 04:37:56 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 06:37:59 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-747107 ] SpamBayes leaves
	duplicate messages
Message-ID: <E19eY3I-00069t-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #747107, was opened at 2003-06-02 04:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747107&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Eric Brown (ericbr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: SpamBayes leaves duplicate messages

Initial Comment:
I am subscribed to a number of different mailing lists, 
and I have a number of Outlook rules (set up via Rules 
Wizard) to route the different mailing lists into different 
folders.

When the rules are of the form:
Apply this rule after the message arrives
with <words> in the subject
move it to the <specified> folder

and a matching message comes in, SpamBayes 
seems to leave multiple copies of that message in the 
inbox.

This is very frustrating.

If the rule is of the form:
Apply this rule after the message arrives
sent to <email address>
move it to the <specified> folder

and a matching message comes in, duplicate 
messages do not occur.

So it seems to be some sort of odd interaction with 
Outlook Rules.

I'm running Outlook 2002 SP 2 on Windows XP SP 1a 
(with current hotfixes).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 20:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 23:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-07 08:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

No, installing 003 over the top of 002 should work fine.

I don't have any more answers, sorry, but no doubt Mark will 
look into this when he gets a chance.  Stay tuned!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Brown (ericbr)
Date: 2003-07-05 07:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=783913

Anadelon:  Outlook junk mail rules are turned off; spam is 
Moved to Junk Mail.

I just ran the release 003 of the plugin, and I'm still seeing 
the problem.

(I didn't bother uninstalling release 002 - is that a problem?)

Eric


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Brent Rockwood (dnaguy)
Date: 2003-07-05 01:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=18879

It appears the problem lies between the keyboard and 
chair. :)  I seem to have overlooked the option to move 
messages instead of copying.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 13:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

In addition, the log file seems to indicate that you are using 
release 002 of the plugin.  If you haven't already, could you 
try release 003 and let us know if the problem still occurs?

Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 13:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Eric, do you have the Outlook junk mail rules turned on?  If 
you do, would both of you be able to try turning them off 
(they aren't all that much use if you are using spambayes 
anyway), and seeing if this resolves the problem?

In addition, forgive me if you've checked this, but in the 
spambayes filter setup, do you have "move" selected rather 
than "copy"?

(It's an odd problem that IIRC we have heard before, but I'm 
using the same version of Windows and Outlook, and have 
rules of that form, and don't notice this problem).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Brent Rockwood (dnaguy)
Date: 2003-07-04 01:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=18879

I am also having this problem.  I have not tested it with 
various rule types, but I believe it is occurring in conjunction 
with the Outlook "Junk E-mail" feature.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747107&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 21 04:38:29 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 06:38:43 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-716684 ] Filtering marks message
	as unread
Message-ID: <E19eY3p-0006BV-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #716684, was opened at 2003-04-07 21:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filtering marks message as unread

Initial Comment:
Reported too many times :)  Exchange server users only.

As spambayes startsit starts processing missed
messages.  In the meantime, the user reads some
messages, thereby marking them as read.  As smapbayes
writes the spam field, these messages spring back to a
read status.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 20:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 23:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Closing
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=764241&group_id=61702&atid=498103
as a dupe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Andersen (gokubi)
Date: 2003-07-08 07:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=558027

I find that if I get a new message and hit reply before I read 
it (I'm in Autopreview) after sending the message it is still 
unread.

More troubling is that Outlook does not show that I have 
replied to the message by changing the envelope icon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 15:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:  a user had the same problem, but also noted 
this:

> If an attachment is included, the first time I open the 
> message, I cannot open the attachement, or save it. If I 
> close the message, and reopen it, I can both open and 
save 
> the attachment.

Odd!  I don't get this problem very often at all anymore; I 
don't know why.  If I did, I'd test the attachment theory, but 
as it is, I can't, so I leave it for others ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-10 22:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I just had this happen to me again. I'm using the CVS version 
from a day or two ago.

So the version in current CVS isn't (completely) fixed.

Anythong else I could try? I see part of a thread about 
USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS here, but I can't find the original. 
My code has USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS in it. If you can tell 
me what (if anything) else needs changing, I can try taking it 
out.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-09 01:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

Just as an FYI, I agree with tobermory's comments in that 
spambayes is in fact classifying the message immediately, 
but it's the update to the server and/or client that appears to 
be delayed until the next Outlook event.  See the first of my 
two spambayes list mail messages referenced in my note 
Mark included in this bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-09 01:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

> Would it be possible to try another change for me instead?  
Revert
> filter.py, and in msgstore.py's Save method, find the line:
> 
>             self.mapi_object.SaveChanges
(mapi.KEEP_OPEN_READWRITE |
> USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS)

I'm pretty sure I had tried that first, while experimenting, 
before I
ended up with the extra Save as a final "flush all" attempt.  
There
was no change, nor did the function return an error.  I think I 
also
tried setting it to 0 (after reading the internal comment) to no
apparent effect, although I may be misremembering since the 
same
comment may have caused me to hesitate to make that 
change :-)

But I'll double check this when I get a chance today.  If I recall
when testing, my review of the code seemed to indicate that 
everything
should work fine, and that the spambayes code was 
managing the read
flag reasonably well, and in fact, was issuing a Save() back in
filter.py.  I ended up inserting test Save()s at the lowermost 
level
(which worked) and then bubbling them up to see how high I 
could leave
the extra call so it was called as infrequently as possible.

In the end, the issue seemed related to the processing that 
goes on
when all_actions is enabled.  If the Save() occurred after the 
field
status was updated, but before 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() was
called, all was fine.  But if the 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() got
called first, then the following Save() - as already in filter.py -
didn't seem to "take."

> I'm a little unsure why one of the Save calls is indented too.

Ah, that was just to minimize change from the existing code 
path.

I wanted to move the Save() to happen before
RememberMessageCurrentFolder(), but then the second Save
() became
completely superfluous in the main branch case - but I didn't 
want to
lose the Save() following RememberMessageCurrentFolder() if 
it was
called just in case that was critical to existing behavior, so I 
moved
it to only occur in that same block.

-- David

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Leftley (tobermory)
Date: 2003-04-08 19:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=626601

Just to try and clarify one point: earlier msgs in this thread 
suggest that spambayes doesn't attempt to classify a 
message until certain events (reading a msg, etc.) occur.

In fact from watching the trace output, the message is 
classified as soon as it arrives (the trace 
shows "Message 'xxx' had a Spam classification of 'yyy'") but 
Outlook doesn't reflect this change until the next event occurs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-08 18:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

My version of filter.py looks different. I haven't updated from 
CVS in a while, maybe that's why. But my version looks like 
it has msg.Save() called unconditionally.

    try:
        # Save the score
        msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
        # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
        msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
        msg.Save()

I've tried moving msg.Save() to before msg.Remember...(), but 
I'll have to wait to see results. Will report back.

(Better might be to cvs update and apply your change, but I 
may not get a chance to do that for a couple of days...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-04-08 12:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From David Bolen:
"Moore, Paul" <Paul.Moore@atosorigin.com> writes:

> As far as I know, no-one has been able to track down the 
> problem to fix it yet.

I have, however, implemented a local workaround that's
working really well for me.  This was based on my prior
messages in:

   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004086.html
   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004088.html

Since I can't quantify what if any penalty it imposes in the
general
case by syncing changes back to the server an additional
time, and
since the problem may be limited to Exchange servers, I haven't
proposed it be made to the main source yet - although I
certainly
haven't noticed much of a penalty in my local testing.

But if anyone else wants to try a local change, it's fairly
trivial,
adding an additional call to msg.Save() in filter.py:

    *** filter.py   18 Mar 2003 03:09:03 -0000      1.20
    --- filter.py   7 Apr 2003 22:18:58 -0000
    ***************
    *** 27,39 ****
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !         msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")
    --- 26,39 ----
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
    +         msg.Save()
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !             msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")


After making this change, what went from virtually _every_
message staying unread, became the extreme rare case, such
that I'm no longer certain any remaining case may even be
spambayes related.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-04-07 21:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

A bit of investigation (I am using Outlook 2002 & Exchange 
2000).

A new message arriving in my Inbox does not get analysed by 
SpamBayes until:
- You switch to another folder and back again.
- You read the message (then analysed, but remains 'unread')
- Another email arrives, when the first message is then rated 
(second one not rated though)
- Another email in Inbox is saved after editing
In other words, it seems some other action eventually triggers 
the analysis - not the arrival event itself.

An email that is read before it has been analysed by 
SpamBayes will always be 'unread' afterwards. This is 
independent of type (plain, rich text or HTML)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 21 06:08:28 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 08:08:36 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-774960 ] application won't install
Message-ID: <E19eZSu-0001S5-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #774960, was opened at 2003-07-21 07:08
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774960&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Stuart (s_stuart)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: application won't install

Initial Comment:
I am running Outlook 2000 under Windows XP, and the 
application, upon installation, tells me that I am not 
running Outlook.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774960&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 21 06:42:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 08:42:04 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774978 ] Hide
	envelope icon when only spam received
Message-ID: <E19eZzN-0002yx-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #774978, was opened at 2003-07-21 16:42
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received

Initial Comment:
When during automatic receiving session only spam 
messages was received it is desired to remove envelope 
icon from tray. Probably this option should be switched 
off by default with the possibility to switch it on from 
the configuration file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 21 06:46:39 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 08:46:43 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774980 ] Items in
	context menu desired
Message-ID: <E19ea3r-0007kK-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #774980, was opened at 2003-07-21 16:46
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774980&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Items in context menu desired

Initial Comment:
It is desired to have "Delete as spam" and "Recoved 
from spam" in context menu (right click) for one or group 
of mail messages

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774980&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 21 07:06:09 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 09:06:19 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774978 ] Hide
	envelope icon when only spam received
Message-ID: <E19eaMj-0004d3-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #774978, was opened at 2003-07-21 16:42
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ghuron
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
>Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received

Initial Comment:
When during automatic receiving session only spam 
messages was received it is desired to remove envelope 
icon from tray. Probably this option should be switched 
off by default with the possibility to switch it on from 
the configuration file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-21 17:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Sorry, duplicated to #774908. Too bad that nothing can be 
done here

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 21 09:13:20 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 11:13:30 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-774908 ] New mail icon stays
	visible
Message-ID: <E19ecLo-0007pK-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #774908, was opened at 2003-07-21 14:14
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ghuron
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774908&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edwin (eddepet_33)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: New mail icon stays visible

Initial Comment:
When new e-mail arrives and is moved to the spam-
folder, the new mail icon remains visible in de system-
tray. I have the option 
delete_as_spam_message_state:Read in my ini file. The 
e-mail itself is correctly set as read.

Spambayes version: outlook beta 1, binary version 3.
Outlook: office 2000 on W2K

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-21 19:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Although you could not do anything from outlook API you still 
can switch off icon using Windows API. The exact description 
together with the example is described in http://beta.experts-
exchange.com/Applications/MS_Office/Q_20149311.html
Basically the idea is that you should find an Outlook window 
called "rctrl_renwnd32" and send a NIM_DELETE message to 
the icon using Shell_Notify

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 14:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Sorry, but there is nothing we can do here.  We make no
claim to clear the icon, just to change the message flag.

Outlook doesn't expose a way to change this flag.  I will
update the docs to indicate that this doesn't change the
read state.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774908&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 21 09:17:12 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 11:17:19 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774978 ] Hide
	envelope icon when only spam received
Message-ID: <E19ecPY-00083H-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #774978, was opened at 2003-07-21 16:42
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ghuron
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
>Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received

Initial Comment:
When during automatic receiving session only spam 
messages was received it is desired to remove envelope 
icon from tray. Probably this option should be switched 
off by default with the possibility to switch it on from 
the configuration file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-21 19:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) 
This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-21 17:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Sorry, duplicated to #774908. Too bad that nothing can be 
done here

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 21 09:17:37 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 11:17:45 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-774978 ] Hide
	envelope icon when only spam received
Message-ID: <E19ecPx-0003Xw-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #774978, was opened at 2003-07-21 16:42
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ghuron
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Hide envelope icon when only spam received

Initial Comment:
When during automatic receiving session only spam 
messages was received it is desired to remove envelope 
icon from tray. Probably this option should be switched 
off by default with the possibility to switch it on from 
the configuration file.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-21 19:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) 
This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-21 19:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Since I could not attach files to #774908 I'm doing it here :) 
This is an example of how to hide envelope icon in tray.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-21 17:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Sorry, duplicated to #774908. Too bad that nothing can be 
done here

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=774978&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 21 10:53:55 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 12:54:05 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-769619 ] message time shifts when
	moved from possible to ham folder
Message-ID: <E19edv9-0000GF-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #769619, was opened at 2003-07-11 08:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jcopley
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769619&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Joe Copley (jcopley)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: message time shifts when moved from possible to ham folder

Initial Comment:
When a message is placed in my possible SPAM folder, 
and I use the recover button to move it back to my 
inbox, the message time is moved  earlier by 8 hours.

I have Outlook XP and am in the Eastern time zone.

My Inbox is an IMAP account. The SPAM and Possible 
SPAM folders are local Outlook Accounts.

I use Rockliffe Mailsite as my mail server.

I have detected quirky behavior in Outlook before 
installing SpamBayes. For example, sometimes the rules 
simply stop working for no discernable reason. These 
problems migrated from Outlook 2000 on Win 98 to 
Outlook 2002 on XP.

On XP only, whenever I start Outlook after boot, the 
rules simply don't get invoked and I have to run them 
manually.

I am using Beta 1, Binary Version 3.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Joe Copley (jcopley)
Date: 2003-07-21 12:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=820625

As messages appear in possible spam, they have what 
appears to be the correct time.

The time is shifted whether I use the recover button or drag-
and-drop.

However, if I open the message, the original time is shown. 
The incorrect date appears only in the Outlook message list 
window.

If I move a time-shifted message back to possible spam, the 
listed message time does not shift back. If I again move the 
message back to Inbox, it is shifted another eight hours.

I cannot acount for the eight hours. GMT is +4 from Eastern 
Daylight. My server and I are in the same time zone.

The time is not shifted if I move from possible spam to spam.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 00:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you account for the 8 hours?  Is that the time
difference between you and your server?

Can you also confirm that the original moving of the message
to the "unsure" folder did not change the time - only the
recovery process?

Can you also please test what happens if you drag-and-drop
the message back to the inbox - is the time also shifted?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769619&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 21 12:31:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 14:31:12 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-775181 ] Pythoncom error - Saving
	configuration
Message-ID: <E19efR9-00050G-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #775181, was opened at 2003-07-21 14:31
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775181&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jon Schaeffer (jmschaeffer)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Pythoncom error - Saving configuration

Initial Comment:
Just installed v.04 this morning and have never had this 
problem in recent versions.  Every time I start Outlook I 
have to enable filtering.  When I close Outlook and Start 
it again, I have to enable it again.  Checking the 
attached log, I found an error saving the configuration 
which probably has something to do with the problem, 
but I've not idea how to fix it.  This is on a clean install 
of Outlook and Windows XP installed 2 days ago.  I 
originally loaded it with v.03 and had not enabled 
filtering because of the lack of good messages.  After 
upgrading to v.04 this morning, I finally did have enough 
messages to enable filtering.  Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775181&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 21 13:29:15 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 21 15:29:23 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows
	2000
Message-ID: <E19egLT-0003cl-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-01 17:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by portola
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000

Initial Comment:
When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs 
until the registering dll's section and then stops with an 
alert.  An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is

"Unable to register the DLL/OCX. 

DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201.

<Abort> <Retry> <Ignore>"

I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just 
repeat the error and Abort would unwind the 
installation.  I never tried Ignore.

I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, 
but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them.  
Abort worked the second time.  I finally tried Ignore, 
which completes okay.  When I ran Outlook, though, the 
add-in wasn't there.

This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron 
notebook.  It has Outlook 2002 SP2.  Both are up to 
date with recent patches.  I believe this combination is 
not known to work, but thought this information might 
help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-21 12:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Although this is not yet claimed to be fixed, I tested it in the 
new version 004 installer.  As expected, it fails in the same 
way it did in the 002 and 003 installers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 11:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Copy-n-pasted from another bug report:

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from
"addin.py" regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 08:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :)

--Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error.
--Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to 
Spambayes Outlook plug-in
--Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using 
both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB 
article. No difference.
--Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in 
case:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;207132

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;249873

The 2nd one mentions this:

DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. 
Return code was: string
*Search Winerror.h for string. 

You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to 
get this working again. 

Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes 
working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her 
to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, 
her missing "spam thingy".

I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I 
upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. 
Just so happened that 003 became available and 
troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, 
so I did. Didn't help me.... :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-03 21:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 
did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ 
SP2 installed.

The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. 
Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up 
and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running 
the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does 
NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-02 10:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on 
Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could 
not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) 
And still could not install the Binary version 003.
I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then 
tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I 
uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 00:35:43 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 02:35:46 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-774960 ] application won't install
Message-ID: <E19eqkR-0007bS-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #774960, was opened at 2003-07-21 22:08
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774960&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Stuart (s_stuart)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: application won't install

Initial Comment:
I am running Outlook 2000 under Windows XP, and the 
application, upon installation, tells me that I am not 
running Outlook.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 16:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Version 005 will give the same message, but allow you to
continue.  Please let me know if this does actually work for
you!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774960&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 00:36:22 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 02:36:25 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-775181 ] Pythoncom error - Saving
	configuration
Message-ID: <E19eql4-0007dF-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #775181, was opened at 2003-07-22 04:31
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775181&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jon Schaeffer (jmschaeffer)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Pythoncom error - Saving configuration

Initial Comment:
Just installed v.04 this morning and have never had this 
problem in recent versions.  Every time I start Outlook I 
have to enable filtering.  When I close Outlook and Start 
it again, I have to enable it again.  Checking the 
attached log, I found an error saving the configuration 
which probably has something to do with the problem, 
but I've not idea how to fix it.  This is on a clean install 
of Outlook and Windows XP installed 2 days ago.  I 
originally loaded it with v.03 and had not enabled 
filtering because of the lack of good messages.  After 
upgrading to v.04 this morning, I finally did have enough 
messages to enable filtering.  Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 16:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Please try the hot-off-the-presses 005 build.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775181&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 00:36:40 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 02:36:43 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-774960 ] application won't install
Message-ID: <E19eqlM-0007e1-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #774960, was opened at 2003-07-21 22:08
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774960&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: v1.0 (example)
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Stuart (s_stuart)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: application won't install

Initial Comment:
I am running Outlook 2000 under Windows XP, and the 
application, upon installation, tells me that I am not 
running Outlook.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 16:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Version 005 will give the same message, but allow you to
continue.  Please let me know if this does actually work for
you!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=774960&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 03:03:18 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 05:03:27 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-775533 ] Filtering only happens
	at startup in Outlook 2003
Message-ID: <E19et3G-0005VF-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #775533, was opened at 2003-07-22 09:03
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775533&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Keith Garland (cagier)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filtering only happens at startup in Outlook 2003

Initial Comment:
When I was setting this up I got filtering to work great 
but as I customised things more my Outlook 2003 Beta 
starting crashing every time I changed something.  Now, 
the spam is filtered correctly whenever I start up 
Outlook but even though I have "Enable Filtering" 
switched on, it does not score messages or filter them 
at all.  Manual "Delete as spam" and spam-scoring still 
work fine though...    It is very frustrating because 
SpamBayes is so effective when it works properly!



One other relevant point, I did have a problem with my 
folders as I deleted the Spam folder accidentally but I 
read the solution to a similar problem and deleted my .ini 
file to reconfigure things and this seemed to worked OK -
 but my problems did seem to start around this time.  
Since I installed the plug-in I cannot exit Outlook 2003 
Beta without it crashing - hopefully the Outlook Beta 
update will fix this maybe.

Many thanks.

Keith

(Current log file enclosed.)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775533&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 04:40:18 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 06:40:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-716684 ] Filtering marks message
	as unread
Message-ID: <E19euZ8-0007wj-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #716684, was opened at 2003-04-07 12:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pmoore
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filtering marks message as unread

Initial Comment:
Reported too many times :)  Exchange server users only.

As spambayes startsit starts processing missed
messages.  In the meantime, the user reads some
messages, thereby marking them as read.  As smapbayes
writes the spam field, these messages spring back to a
read status.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-22 11:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

Initial impressions are that this fixes the problem of messages 
going back to unread, but the "Spam" score is not being set 
on the messages any more (they are still being filtered OK, it's 
just that the score isn't shown).

Not sure whether this counts as an improvement or not...

I'll leave the setting as "False" for a while in case the problem 
reappears.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 11:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 14:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 12:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Closing
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=764241&group_id=61702&atid=498103
as a dupe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Andersen (gokubi)
Date: 2003-07-07 22:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=558027

I find that if I get a new message and hit reply before I read 
it (I'm in Autopreview) after sending the message it is still 
unread.

More troubling is that Outlook does not show that I have 
replied to the message by changing the envelope icon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 06:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:  a user had the same problem, but also noted 
this:

> If an attachment is included, the first time I open the 
> message, I cannot open the attachement, or save it. If I 
> close the message, and reopen it, I can both open and 
save 
> the attachment.

Odd!  I don't get this problem very often at all anymore; I 
don't know why.  If I did, I'd test the attachment theory, but 
as it is, I can't, so I leave it for others ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-10 13:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I just had this happen to me again. I'm using the CVS version 
from a day or two ago.

So the version in current CVS isn't (completely) fixed.

Anythong else I could try? I see part of a thread about 
USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS here, but I can't find the original. 
My code has USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS in it. If you can tell 
me what (if anything) else needs changing, I can try taking it 
out.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-08 16:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

Just as an FYI, I agree with tobermory's comments in that 
spambayes is in fact classifying the message immediately, 
but it's the update to the server and/or client that appears to 
be delayed until the next Outlook event.  See the first of my 
two spambayes list mail messages referenced in my note 
Mark included in this bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-08 16:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

> Would it be possible to try another change for me instead?  
Revert
> filter.py, and in msgstore.py's Save method, find the line:
> 
>             self.mapi_object.SaveChanges
(mapi.KEEP_OPEN_READWRITE |
> USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS)

I'm pretty sure I had tried that first, while experimenting, 
before I
ended up with the extra Save as a final "flush all" attempt.  
There
was no change, nor did the function return an error.  I think I 
also
tried setting it to 0 (after reading the internal comment) to no
apparent effect, although I may be misremembering since the 
same
comment may have caused me to hesitate to make that 
change :-)

But I'll double check this when I get a chance today.  If I recall
when testing, my review of the code seemed to indicate that 
everything
should work fine, and that the spambayes code was 
managing the read
flag reasonably well, and in fact, was issuing a Save() back in
filter.py.  I ended up inserting test Save()s at the lowermost 
level
(which worked) and then bubbling them up to see how high I 
could leave
the extra call so it was called as infrequently as possible.

In the end, the issue seemed related to the processing that 
goes on
when all_actions is enabled.  If the Save() occurred after the 
field
status was updated, but before 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() was
called, all was fine.  But if the 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() got
called first, then the following Save() - as already in filter.py -
didn't seem to "take."

> I'm a little unsure why one of the Save calls is indented too.

Ah, that was just to minimize change from the existing code 
path.

I wanted to move the Save() to happen before
RememberMessageCurrentFolder(), but then the second Save
() became
completely superfluous in the main branch case - but I didn't 
want to
lose the Save() following RememberMessageCurrentFolder() if 
it was
called just in case that was critical to existing behavior, so I 
moved
it to only occur in that same block.

-- David

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Leftley (tobermory)
Date: 2003-04-08 10:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=626601

Just to try and clarify one point: earlier msgs in this thread 
suggest that spambayes doesn't attempt to classify a 
message until certain events (reading a msg, etc.) occur.

In fact from watching the trace output, the message is 
classified as soon as it arrives (the trace 
shows "Message 'xxx' had a Spam classification of 'yyy'") but 
Outlook doesn't reflect this change until the next event occurs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-08 09:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

My version of filter.py looks different. I haven't updated from 
CVS in a while, maybe that's why. But my version looks like 
it has msg.Save() called unconditionally.

    try:
        # Save the score
        msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
        # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
        msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
        msg.Save()

I've tried moving msg.Save() to before msg.Remember...(), but 
I'll have to wait to see results. Will report back.

(Better might be to cvs update and apply your change, but I 
may not get a chance to do that for a couple of days...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-04-08 03:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From David Bolen:
"Moore, Paul" <Paul.Moore@atosorigin.com> writes:

> As far as I know, no-one has been able to track down the 
> problem to fix it yet.

I have, however, implemented a local workaround that's
working really well for me.  This was based on my prior
messages in:

   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004086.html
   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004088.html

Since I can't quantify what if any penalty it imposes in the
general
case by syncing changes back to the server an additional
time, and
since the problem may be limited to Exchange servers, I haven't
proposed it be made to the main source yet - although I
certainly
haven't noticed much of a penalty in my local testing.

But if anyone else wants to try a local change, it's fairly
trivial,
adding an additional call to msg.Save() in filter.py:

    *** filter.py   18 Mar 2003 03:09:03 -0000      1.20
    --- filter.py   7 Apr 2003 22:18:58 -0000
    ***************
    *** 27,39 ****
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !         msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")
    --- 26,39 ----
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
    +         msg.Save()
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !             msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")


After making this change, what went from virtually _every_
message staying unread, became the extreme rare case, such
that I'm no longer certain any remaining case may even be
spambayes related.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-04-07 12:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

A bit of investigation (I am using Outlook 2002 & Exchange 
2000).

A new message arriving in my Inbox does not get analysed by 
SpamBayes until:
- You switch to another folder and back again.
- You read the message (then analysed, but remains 'unread')
- Another email arrives, when the first message is then rated 
(second one not rated though)
- Another email in Inbox is saved after editing
In other words, it seems some other action eventually triggers 
the analysis - not the arrival event itself.

An email that is read before it has been analysed by 
SpamBayes will always be 'unread' afterwards. This is 
independent of type (plain, rich text or HTML)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 04:47:29 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 06:47:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-775571 ] "Spambayes" menu in
	Outlook dead
Message-ID: <E19eug5-0001ex-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #775571, was opened at 2003-07-22 12:47
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775571&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Magnus Aycox (mbip)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Spambayes" menu in Outlook dead

Initial Comment:
I use WinXP Pro sp1, Outlook 2002 sp1.

I used Spambayes outlook plugin v.003 when all of a 
sudden (no program crash) the "Spambayes" menu 
button (next to "Delete as spam") froze (it highlites 
when mouse hovers but I can't click it) and "Recover" 
button never appeared (funny enough then "Delete as 
spam" button still worked).

I uninstalled and installed v.005. Now the "Recover" 
button appears and works. However the "Spambayes" 
button(menu) still doesn't work.

The log file includes messages (in Swedish) 
about "incorrect variable type" for the menu buttons.
I have performed the View->Toolbars->Customize - 
Reset and Options->COM Add-ins - Remove 
operations. "Spambayes" button still dead in the water...

Anybody know what to do????????


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775571&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 05:22:25 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 07:22:41 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-716684 ] Filtering marks message
	as unread
Message-ID: <E19evDt-00018q-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #716684, was opened at 2003-04-07 21:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filtering marks message as unread

Initial Comment:
Reported too many times :)  Exchange server users only.

As spambayes startsit starts processing missed
messages.  In the meantime, the user reads some
messages, thereby marking them as read.  As smapbayes
writes the spam field, these messages spring back to a
read status.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 21:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Well, it does tell me that the "Save" is indeed the issue,
which is a good start.

Someone running from the source code would still be best :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-22 20:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

Initial impressions are that this fixes the problem of messages 
going back to unread, but the "Spam" score is not being set 
on the messages any more (they are still being filtered OK, it's 
just that the score isn't shown).

Not sure whether this counts as an improvement or not...

I'll leave the setting as "False" for a while in case the problem 
reappears.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 20:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 23:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Closing
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=764241&group_id=61702&atid=498103
as a dupe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Andersen (gokubi)
Date: 2003-07-08 07:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=558027

I find that if I get a new message and hit reply before I read 
it (I'm in Autopreview) after sending the message it is still 
unread.

More troubling is that Outlook does not show that I have 
replied to the message by changing the envelope icon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 15:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:  a user had the same problem, but also noted 
this:

> If an attachment is included, the first time I open the 
> message, I cannot open the attachement, or save it. If I 
> close the message, and reopen it, I can both open and 
save 
> the attachment.

Odd!  I don't get this problem very often at all anymore; I 
don't know why.  If I did, I'd test the attachment theory, but 
as it is, I can't, so I leave it for others ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-10 22:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I just had this happen to me again. I'm using the CVS version 
from a day or two ago.

So the version in current CVS isn't (completely) fixed.

Anythong else I could try? I see part of a thread about 
USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS here, but I can't find the original. 
My code has USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS in it. If you can tell 
me what (if anything) else needs changing, I can try taking it 
out.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-09 01:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

Just as an FYI, I agree with tobermory's comments in that 
spambayes is in fact classifying the message immediately, 
but it's the update to the server and/or client that appears to 
be delayed until the next Outlook event.  See the first of my 
two spambayes list mail messages referenced in my note 
Mark included in this bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-09 01:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

> Would it be possible to try another change for me instead?  
Revert
> filter.py, and in msgstore.py's Save method, find the line:
> 
>             self.mapi_object.SaveChanges
(mapi.KEEP_OPEN_READWRITE |
> USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS)

I'm pretty sure I had tried that first, while experimenting, 
before I
ended up with the extra Save as a final "flush all" attempt.  
There
was no change, nor did the function return an error.  I think I 
also
tried setting it to 0 (after reading the internal comment) to no
apparent effect, although I may be misremembering since the 
same
comment may have caused me to hesitate to make that 
change :-)

But I'll double check this when I get a chance today.  If I recall
when testing, my review of the code seemed to indicate that 
everything
should work fine, and that the spambayes code was 
managing the read
flag reasonably well, and in fact, was issuing a Save() back in
filter.py.  I ended up inserting test Save()s at the lowermost 
level
(which worked) and then bubbling them up to see how high I 
could leave
the extra call so it was called as infrequently as possible.

In the end, the issue seemed related to the processing that 
goes on
when all_actions is enabled.  If the Save() occurred after the 
field
status was updated, but before 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() was
called, all was fine.  But if the 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() got
called first, then the following Save() - as already in filter.py -
didn't seem to "take."

> I'm a little unsure why one of the Save calls is indented too.

Ah, that was just to minimize change from the existing code 
path.

I wanted to move the Save() to happen before
RememberMessageCurrentFolder(), but then the second Save
() became
completely superfluous in the main branch case - but I didn't 
want to
lose the Save() following RememberMessageCurrentFolder() if 
it was
called just in case that was critical to existing behavior, so I 
moved
it to only occur in that same block.

-- David

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Leftley (tobermory)
Date: 2003-04-08 19:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=626601

Just to try and clarify one point: earlier msgs in this thread 
suggest that spambayes doesn't attempt to classify a 
message until certain events (reading a msg, etc.) occur.

In fact from watching the trace output, the message is 
classified as soon as it arrives (the trace 
shows "Message 'xxx' had a Spam classification of 'yyy'") but 
Outlook doesn't reflect this change until the next event occurs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-08 18:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

My version of filter.py looks different. I haven't updated from 
CVS in a while, maybe that's why. But my version looks like 
it has msg.Save() called unconditionally.

    try:
        # Save the score
        msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
        # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
        msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
        msg.Save()

I've tried moving msg.Save() to before msg.Remember...(), but 
I'll have to wait to see results. Will report back.

(Better might be to cvs update and apply your change, but I 
may not get a chance to do that for a couple of days...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-04-08 12:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From David Bolen:
"Moore, Paul" <Paul.Moore@atosorigin.com> writes:

> As far as I know, no-one has been able to track down the 
> problem to fix it yet.

I have, however, implemented a local workaround that's
working really well for me.  This was based on my prior
messages in:

   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004086.html
   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004088.html

Since I can't quantify what if any penalty it imposes in the
general
case by syncing changes back to the server an additional
time, and
since the problem may be limited to Exchange servers, I haven't
proposed it be made to the main source yet - although I
certainly
haven't noticed much of a penalty in my local testing.

But if anyone else wants to try a local change, it's fairly
trivial,
adding an additional call to msg.Save() in filter.py:

    *** filter.py   18 Mar 2003 03:09:03 -0000      1.20
    --- filter.py   7 Apr 2003 22:18:58 -0000
    ***************
    *** 27,39 ****
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !         msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")
    --- 26,39 ----
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
    +         msg.Save()
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !             msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")


After making this change, what went from virtually _every_
message staying unread, became the extreme rare case, such
that I'm no longer certain any remaining case may even be
spambayes related.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-04-07 21:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

A bit of investigation (I am using Outlook 2002 & Exchange 
2000).

A new message arriving in my Inbox does not get analysed by 
SpamBayes until:
- You switch to another folder and back again.
- You read the message (then analysed, but remains 'unread')
- Another email arrives, when the first message is then rated 
(second one not rated though)
- Another email in Inbox is saved after editing
In other words, it seems some other action eventually triggers 
the analysis - not the arrival event itself.

An email that is read before it has been analysed by 
SpamBayes will always be 'unread' afterwards. This is 
independent of type (plain, rich text or HTML)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 05:30:38 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 07:30:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-775571 ] "Spambayes" menu in
	Outlook dead
Message-ID: <E19evLq-0008LL-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #775571, was opened at 2003-07-22 20:47
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775571&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Magnus Aycox (mbip)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Spambayes" menu in Outlook dead

Initial Comment:
I use WinXP Pro sp1, Outlook 2002 sp1.

I used Spambayes outlook plugin v.003 when all of a 
sudden (no program crash) the "Spambayes" menu 
button (next to "Delete as spam") froze (it highlites 
when mouse hovers but I can't click it) and "Recover" 
button never appeared (funny enough then "Delete as 
spam" button still worked).

I uninstalled and installed v.005. Now the "Recover" 
button appears and works. However the "Spambayes" 
button(menu) still doesn't work.

The log file includes messages (in Swedish) 
about "incorrect variable type" for the menu buttons.
I have performed the View->Toolbars->Customize - 
Reset and Options->COM Add-ins - Remove 
operations. "Spambayes" button still dead in the water...

Anybody know what to do????????


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 21:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Please see the troubleshooting guide (via "about.html" in
the SpamBayes program directory) and see the tips for
restoring the toolbar.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775571&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 05:37:54 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 07:38:17 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-716684 ] Filtering marks message
	as unread
Message-ID: <E19evSs-00047F-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #716684, was opened at 2003-04-07 12:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pmoore
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filtering marks message as unread

Initial Comment:
Reported too many times :)  Exchange server users only.

As spambayes startsit starts processing missed
messages.  In the meantime, the user reads some
messages, thereby marking them as read.  As smapbayes
writes the spam field, these messages spring back to a
read status.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-22 12:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I'm happy to switch to the source version from CVS, if you 
can tell me what you want me to try. My time is limited (and 
I'm unavailable for the next 3 days) but I'm happy to do what 
I can.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 12:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Well, it does tell me that the "Save" is indeed the issue,
which is a good start.

Someone running from the source code would still be best :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-22 11:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

Initial impressions are that this fixes the problem of messages 
going back to unread, but the "Spam" score is not being set 
on the messages any more (they are still being filtered OK, it's 
just that the score isn't shown).

Not sure whether this counts as an improvement or not...

I'll leave the setting as "False" for a while in case the problem 
reappears.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 11:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 14:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 12:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Closing
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=764241&group_id=61702&atid=498103
as a dupe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Andersen (gokubi)
Date: 2003-07-07 22:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=558027

I find that if I get a new message and hit reply before I read 
it (I'm in Autopreview) after sending the message it is still 
unread.

More troubling is that Outlook does not show that I have 
replied to the message by changing the envelope icon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 06:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:  a user had the same problem, but also noted 
this:

> If an attachment is included, the first time I open the 
> message, I cannot open the attachement, or save it. If I 
> close the message, and reopen it, I can both open and 
save 
> the attachment.

Odd!  I don't get this problem very often at all anymore; I 
don't know why.  If I did, I'd test the attachment theory, but 
as it is, I can't, so I leave it for others ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-10 13:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I just had this happen to me again. I'm using the CVS version 
from a day or two ago.

So the version in current CVS isn't (completely) fixed.

Anythong else I could try? I see part of a thread about 
USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS here, but I can't find the original. 
My code has USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS in it. If you can tell 
me what (if anything) else needs changing, I can try taking it 
out.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-08 16:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

Just as an FYI, I agree with tobermory's comments in that 
spambayes is in fact classifying the message immediately, 
but it's the update to the server and/or client that appears to 
be delayed until the next Outlook event.  See the first of my 
two spambayes list mail messages referenced in my note 
Mark included in this bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-08 16:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

> Would it be possible to try another change for me instead?  
Revert
> filter.py, and in msgstore.py's Save method, find the line:
> 
>             self.mapi_object.SaveChanges
(mapi.KEEP_OPEN_READWRITE |
> USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS)

I'm pretty sure I had tried that first, while experimenting, 
before I
ended up with the extra Save as a final "flush all" attempt.  
There
was no change, nor did the function return an error.  I think I 
also
tried setting it to 0 (after reading the internal comment) to no
apparent effect, although I may be misremembering since the 
same
comment may have caused me to hesitate to make that 
change :-)

But I'll double check this when I get a chance today.  If I recall
when testing, my review of the code seemed to indicate that 
everything
should work fine, and that the spambayes code was 
managing the read
flag reasonably well, and in fact, was issuing a Save() back in
filter.py.  I ended up inserting test Save()s at the lowermost 
level
(which worked) and then bubbling them up to see how high I 
could leave
the extra call so it was called as infrequently as possible.

In the end, the issue seemed related to the processing that 
goes on
when all_actions is enabled.  If the Save() occurred after the 
field
status was updated, but before 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() was
called, all was fine.  But if the 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() got
called first, then the following Save() - as already in filter.py -
didn't seem to "take."

> I'm a little unsure why one of the Save calls is indented too.

Ah, that was just to minimize change from the existing code 
path.

I wanted to move the Save() to happen before
RememberMessageCurrentFolder(), but then the second Save
() became
completely superfluous in the main branch case - but I didn't 
want to
lose the Save() following RememberMessageCurrentFolder() if 
it was
called just in case that was critical to existing behavior, so I 
moved
it to only occur in that same block.

-- David

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Leftley (tobermory)
Date: 2003-04-08 10:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=626601

Just to try and clarify one point: earlier msgs in this thread 
suggest that spambayes doesn't attempt to classify a 
message until certain events (reading a msg, etc.) occur.

In fact from watching the trace output, the message is 
classified as soon as it arrives (the trace 
shows "Message 'xxx' had a Spam classification of 'yyy'") but 
Outlook doesn't reflect this change until the next event occurs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-08 09:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

My version of filter.py looks different. I haven't updated from 
CVS in a while, maybe that's why. But my version looks like 
it has msg.Save() called unconditionally.

    try:
        # Save the score
        msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
        # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
        msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
        msg.Save()

I've tried moving msg.Save() to before msg.Remember...(), but 
I'll have to wait to see results. Will report back.

(Better might be to cvs update and apply your change, but I 
may not get a chance to do that for a couple of days...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-04-08 03:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From David Bolen:
"Moore, Paul" <Paul.Moore@atosorigin.com> writes:

> As far as I know, no-one has been able to track down the 
> problem to fix it yet.

I have, however, implemented a local workaround that's
working really well for me.  This was based on my prior
messages in:

   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004086.html
   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004088.html

Since I can't quantify what if any penalty it imposes in the
general
case by syncing changes back to the server an additional
time, and
since the problem may be limited to Exchange servers, I haven't
proposed it be made to the main source yet - although I
certainly
haven't noticed much of a penalty in my local testing.

But if anyone else wants to try a local change, it's fairly
trivial,
adding an additional call to msg.Save() in filter.py:

    *** filter.py   18 Mar 2003 03:09:03 -0000      1.20
    --- filter.py   7 Apr 2003 22:18:58 -0000
    ***************
    *** 27,39 ****
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !         msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")
    --- 26,39 ----
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
    +         msg.Save()
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !             msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")


After making this change, what went from virtually _every_
message staying unread, became the extreme rare case, such
that I'm no longer certain any remaining case may even be
spambayes related.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-04-07 12:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

A bit of investigation (I am using Outlook 2002 & Exchange 
2000).

A new message arriving in my Inbox does not get analysed by 
SpamBayes until:
- You switch to another folder and back again.
- You read the message (then analysed, but remains 'unread')
- Another email arrives, when the first message is then rated 
(second one not rated though)
- Another email in Inbox is saved after editing
In other words, it seems some other action eventually triggers 
the analysis - not the arrival event itself.

An email that is read before it has been analysed by 
SpamBayes will always be 'unread' afterwards. This is 
independent of type (plain, rich text or HTML)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 05:43:55 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 07:44:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-716684 ] Filtering marks message
	as unread
Message-ID: <E19evYh-0007fC-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #716684, was opened at 2003-04-07 21:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filtering marks message as unread

Initial Comment:
Reported too many times :)  Exchange server users only.

As spambayes startsit starts processing missed
messages.  In the meantime, the user reads some
messages, thereby marking them as read.  As smapbayes
writes the spam field, these messages spring back to a
read status.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 21:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Give me a yell in mail once you have this setup.  Once you
do, I will send you a patch or 2 with a couple of
experiments to the way we save the score

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-22 21:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I'm happy to switch to the source version from CVS, if you 
can tell me what you want me to try. My time is limited (and 
I'm unavailable for the next 3 days) but I'm happy to do what 
I can.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 21:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Well, it does tell me that the "Save" is indeed the issue,
which is a good start.

Someone running from the source code would still be best :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-22 20:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

Initial impressions are that this fixes the problem of messages 
going back to unread, but the "Spam" score is not being set 
on the messages any more (they are still being filtered OK, it's 
just that the score isn't shown).

Not sure whether this counts as an improvement or not...

I'll leave the setting as "False" for a while in case the problem 
reappears.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 20:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 23:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Closing
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=764241&group_id=61702&atid=498103
as a dupe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Andersen (gokubi)
Date: 2003-07-08 07:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=558027

I find that if I get a new message and hit reply before I read 
it (I'm in Autopreview) after sending the message it is still 
unread.

More troubling is that Outlook does not show that I have 
replied to the message by changing the envelope icon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 15:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:  a user had the same problem, but also noted 
this:

> If an attachment is included, the first time I open the 
> message, I cannot open the attachement, or save it. If I 
> close the message, and reopen it, I can both open and 
save 
> the attachment.

Odd!  I don't get this problem very often at all anymore; I 
don't know why.  If I did, I'd test the attachment theory, but 
as it is, I can't, so I leave it for others ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-10 22:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I just had this happen to me again. I'm using the CVS version 
from a day or two ago.

So the version in current CVS isn't (completely) fixed.

Anythong else I could try? I see part of a thread about 
USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS here, but I can't find the original. 
My code has USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS in it. If you can tell 
me what (if anything) else needs changing, I can try taking it 
out.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-09 01:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

Just as an FYI, I agree with tobermory's comments in that 
spambayes is in fact classifying the message immediately, 
but it's the update to the server and/or client that appears to 
be delayed until the next Outlook event.  See the first of my 
two spambayes list mail messages referenced in my note 
Mark included in this bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-09 01:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

> Would it be possible to try another change for me instead?  
Revert
> filter.py, and in msgstore.py's Save method, find the line:
> 
>             self.mapi_object.SaveChanges
(mapi.KEEP_OPEN_READWRITE |
> USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS)

I'm pretty sure I had tried that first, while experimenting, 
before I
ended up with the extra Save as a final "flush all" attempt.  
There
was no change, nor did the function return an error.  I think I 
also
tried setting it to 0 (after reading the internal comment) to no
apparent effect, although I may be misremembering since the 
same
comment may have caused me to hesitate to make that 
change :-)

But I'll double check this when I get a chance today.  If I recall
when testing, my review of the code seemed to indicate that 
everything
should work fine, and that the spambayes code was 
managing the read
flag reasonably well, and in fact, was issuing a Save() back in
filter.py.  I ended up inserting test Save()s at the lowermost 
level
(which worked) and then bubbling them up to see how high I 
could leave
the extra call so it was called as infrequently as possible.

In the end, the issue seemed related to the processing that 
goes on
when all_actions is enabled.  If the Save() occurred after the 
field
status was updated, but before 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() was
called, all was fine.  But if the 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() got
called first, then the following Save() - as already in filter.py -
didn't seem to "take."

> I'm a little unsure why one of the Save calls is indented too.

Ah, that was just to minimize change from the existing code 
path.

I wanted to move the Save() to happen before
RememberMessageCurrentFolder(), but then the second Save
() became
completely superfluous in the main branch case - but I didn't 
want to
lose the Save() following RememberMessageCurrentFolder() if 
it was
called just in case that was critical to existing behavior, so I 
moved
it to only occur in that same block.

-- David

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Leftley (tobermory)
Date: 2003-04-08 19:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=626601

Just to try and clarify one point: earlier msgs in this thread 
suggest that spambayes doesn't attempt to classify a 
message until certain events (reading a msg, etc.) occur.

In fact from watching the trace output, the message is 
classified as soon as it arrives (the trace 
shows "Message 'xxx' had a Spam classification of 'yyy'") but 
Outlook doesn't reflect this change until the next event occurs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-08 18:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

My version of filter.py looks different. I haven't updated from 
CVS in a while, maybe that's why. But my version looks like 
it has msg.Save() called unconditionally.

    try:
        # Save the score
        msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
        # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
        msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
        msg.Save()

I've tried moving msg.Save() to before msg.Remember...(), but 
I'll have to wait to see results. Will report back.

(Better might be to cvs update and apply your change, but I 
may not get a chance to do that for a couple of days...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-04-08 12:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From David Bolen:
"Moore, Paul" <Paul.Moore@atosorigin.com> writes:

> As far as I know, no-one has been able to track down the 
> problem to fix it yet.

I have, however, implemented a local workaround that's
working really well for me.  This was based on my prior
messages in:

   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004086.html
   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004088.html

Since I can't quantify what if any penalty it imposes in the
general
case by syncing changes back to the server an additional
time, and
since the problem may be limited to Exchange servers, I haven't
proposed it be made to the main source yet - although I
certainly
haven't noticed much of a penalty in my local testing.

But if anyone else wants to try a local change, it's fairly
trivial,
adding an additional call to msg.Save() in filter.py:

    *** filter.py   18 Mar 2003 03:09:03 -0000      1.20
    --- filter.py   7 Apr 2003 22:18:58 -0000
    ***************
    *** 27,39 ****
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !         msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")
    --- 26,39 ----
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
    +         msg.Save()
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !             msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")


After making this change, what went from virtually _every_
message staying unread, became the extreme rare case, such
that I'm no longer certain any remaining case may even be
spambayes related.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-04-07 21:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

A bit of investigation (I am using Outlook 2002 & Exchange 
2000).

A new message arriving in my Inbox does not get analysed by 
SpamBayes until:
- You switch to another folder and back again.
- You read the message (then analysed, but remains 'unread')
- Another email arrives, when the first message is then rated 
(second one not rated though)
- Another email in Inbox is saved after editing
In other words, it seems some other action eventually triggers 
the analysis - not the arrival event itself.

An email that is read before it has been analysed by 
SpamBayes will always be 'unread' afterwards. This is 
independent of type (plain, rich text or HTML)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 06:23:21 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 08:23:27 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-775601 ] latest message not
	checked on outlook startup
Message-ID: <E19ewAr-0003vR-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #775601, was opened at 2003-07-22 07:23
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775601&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: matt tagliaferri (mtagliaf)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: latest message not checked on outlook startup

Initial Comment:
When I first turn on Outlook and the filter begins 
slogging through all the messages I've received 
overnight, it always skips the latest message (the one 
at the top if the listview is sorted by date received).

It would also be useful to add something in the loop that 
would allow other Windows task to get some time - the 
loop pretty much takes over the PC while it's running. 
Don't know how this is done in Python, in VB6 it's 
Application.DoEvents. 

matt tag

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775601&group_id=61702

From srengasamy at firstam.com  Mon Jul 21 19:05:16 2003
From: srengasamy at firstam.com (srengasamy@firstam.com)
Date: Tue Jul 22 08:33:07 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] SpamBayes Outlook Addin under CodeWeaver's
	Crossover
Message-ID: <AB30A2AC2E6C1849AC6C2148C9030BF6557B62@fada1sxc05.firstam-reis.com>

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: spambayes1.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1299 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/attachments/20030721/a76ba538/spambayes1.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: spambayes2.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-bugs/attachments/20030721/a76ba538/spambayes2.obj
From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 07:07:25 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 09:09:48 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765912 ] AssertionError:
	Proportions must add to 1.0 ...
Message-ID: <E19ewrV-0004EQ-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765912, was opened at 2003-07-04 12:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by somogyia
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 ...

Initial Comment:
I upgraded my (working) outlook 2000 + spambayes 
installation to Outlook XP and the newest version of 
Spambayes. Spambayes would not perform any action 
when I had defined "spam" and "ham" folders and chosen 
"Train". It wouldn't matter if I had "rebuild entire 
database" checked or unchecked.

Actions: 
1. Start Outlook.
2. Go to SpamBayes config menu.
3. Click on "Train now"
4. Select "spam" folder.
5. Click on "Train now"

After that, "nothing happens". Clicking on "stop training" 
does not work, but I can close the window by clicking on 
the "[x] in the upper right corner and get back to the 
"main" menu.

I have tried all possible combinations of checkboxes. I 
have also ran "scanpst.exe" on my mailbox file. OS is XP 
Pro (English) 


Here's the log file:




Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in 
set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command 
ID 1100, Code 0

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Date: 2003-07-22 13:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=815848

I installed the latest version of the plugin. Here's the logfile. 
Actions taken: 
1. started outlook
2. Opened "spambayes manager" 
3. clicked "train now"
4. selected "rebuild entire database"
5. selected a "spam" folder (the field was empty)
6. clicked on "train now"
(nothing happened)
7. clicked on the "close window" button.
8. clicked on "train now"
9. deselected "rebuild entire database"
10. clicked "train now" again
(nothing happened)
11. closed the window

Here's the logfile:

Loaded bayes database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin (beta), version 0.4 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 
2003))...
On Windows version 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


// Andreas

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 10:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Please try version 004 of the binary - I expect the same
behavior, but more information in the log!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-21 02:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

noting dupicate in #774781

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 23:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in code to help diagnose this - the assertion
prints the items and the sum

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 04:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Good to know English versions also show it.  Anyone able to
 run the source code version?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gael Marziou (gmarziou)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=203211

I ahve exactly the same symptoms on US outlook 2000 on 
windows 2000 pro sp3.

My log file:

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons
ERROR: 'You must enable SpamBayes before you can delete 
as spam'
None
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Cloutier (chealer)
Date: 2003-07-04 22:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738765

GOD!
I had the exact same problem with French version. 
Repeating "Train now" after closing the window with X only 
made the above lines to repeat in the log file. log files closes 
by

Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\Chealer\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 0 messages, finding 0 spam and 0 
unsure
Addin terminating: 1 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


And now, just as I was writing the bug report, I open Outlook 
and it's gone! SB is now trained, and I made no reboot, no 
update of anything...
So what to say? Well, be patient. I think I tried the function 
about 10 times and closed Outlook around 5 times in the 
meantime... hope it's gonna be as simple as that to fix the 
bug too.
By the way, this bug succeeded to the max size error with 
binary 002 which had been perfectly fixed by 003.

OS is Windows XP Pro SP1 French, I have Outlook XP SP2 
French and didn't change this since months.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 07:29:42 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 09:44:29 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765912 ] AssertionError:
	Proportions must add to 1.0 ...
Message-ID: <E19exD4-0006I8-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765912, was opened at 2003-07-04 12:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by somogyia
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 ...

Initial Comment:
I upgraded my (working) outlook 2000 + spambayes 
installation to Outlook XP and the newest version of 
Spambayes. Spambayes would not perform any action 
when I had defined "spam" and "ham" folders and chosen 
"Train". It wouldn't matter if I had "rebuild entire 
database" checked or unchecked.

Actions: 
1. Start Outlook.
2. Go to SpamBayes config menu.
3. Click on "Train now"
4. Select "spam" folder.
5. Click on "Train now"

After that, "nothing happens". Clicking on "stop training" 
does not work, but I can close the window by clicking on 
the "[x] in the upper right corner and get back to the 
"main" menu.

I have tried all possible combinations of checkboxes. I 
have also ran "scanpst.exe" on my mailbox file. OS is XP 
Pro (English) 


Here's the log file:




Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in 
set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command 
ID 1100, Code 0

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Date: 2003-07-22 13:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=815848

I installed the latest version of the plugin. Here's the logfile. 
Actions taken: 
1. started outlook
2. Opened "spambayes manager" 
3. clicked "train now"
4. selected "rebuild entire database"
5. selected a "spam" folder (the field was empty)
6. clicked on "train now"
(nothing happened)
7. clicked on the "close window" button.
8. clicked on "train now"
9. deselected "rebuild entire database"
10. clicked "train now" again
(nothing happened)
11. closed the window

Here's the logfile:

Loaded bayes database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin (beta), version 0.4 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 
2003))...
On Windows version 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


// Andreas

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Date: 2003-07-22 13:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=815848

I installed the latest version of the plugin. Here's the logfile. 
Actions taken: 
1. started outlook
2. Opened "spambayes manager" 
3. clicked "train now"
4. selected "rebuild entire database"
5. selected a "spam" folder (the field was empty)
6. clicked on "train now"
(nothing happened)
7. clicked on the "close window" button.
8. clicked on "train now"
9. deselected "rebuild entire database"
10. clicked "train now" again
(nothing happened)
11. closed the window

Here's the logfile:

Loaded bayes database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin (beta), version 0.4 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 
2003))...
On Windows version 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


// Andreas

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 10:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Please try version 004 of the binary - I expect the same
behavior, but more information in the log!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-21 02:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

noting dupicate in #774781

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 23:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in code to help diagnose this - the assertion
prints the items and the sum

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 04:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Good to know English versions also show it.  Anyone able to
 run the source code version?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gael Marziou (gmarziou)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=203211

I ahve exactly the same symptoms on US outlook 2000 on 
windows 2000 pro sp3.

My log file:

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons
ERROR: 'You must enable SpamBayes before you can delete 
as spam'
None
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Cloutier (chealer)
Date: 2003-07-04 22:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738765

GOD!
I had the exact same problem with French version. 
Repeating "Train now" after closing the window with X only 
made the above lines to repeat in the log file. log files closes 
by

Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\Chealer\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 0 messages, finding 0 spam and 0 
unsure
Addin terminating: 1 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


And now, just as I was writing the bug report, I open Outlook 
and it's gone! SB is now trained, and I made no reboot, no 
update of anything...
So what to say? Well, be patient. I think I tried the function 
about 10 times and closed Outlook around 5 times in the 
meantime... hope it's gonna be as simple as that to fix the 
bug too.
By the way, this bug succeeded to the max size error with 
binary 002 which had been perfectly fixed by 003.

OS is Windows XP Pro SP1 French, I have Outlook XP SP2 
French and didn't change this since months.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 08:02:16 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 10:02:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-693387 ] user-composed messages
	are filtered
Message-ID: <E19exia-0000cf-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #693387, was opened at 2003-02-26 14:27
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=693387&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: user-composed messages are filtered

Initial Comment:
Messages composed by the user (eg, dragged back from
"Drafts") or otherwise ending up there via external
programs (I actually saw this with a Quicken generated
mail) get filtered.  They usually end up as "maybe",
but should be ignored.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-23 00:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Checking in msgstore.py;
new revision: 1.53; previous revision: 1.52


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=693387&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 08:32:31 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 10:32:46 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-747107 ] SpamBayes leaves
	duplicate messages
Message-ID: <E19eyBr-0002F6-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #747107, was opened at 2003-06-01 11:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ericbr
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747107&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Eric Brown (ericbr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: SpamBayes leaves duplicate messages

Initial Comment:
I am subscribed to a number of different mailing lists, 
and I have a number of Outlook rules (set up via Rules 
Wizard) to route the different mailing lists into different 
folders.

When the rules are of the form:
Apply this rule after the message arrives
with <words> in the subject
move it to the <specified> folder

and a matching message comes in, SpamBayes 
seems to leave multiple copies of that message in the 
inbox.

This is very frustrating.

If the rule is of the form:
Apply this rule after the message arrives
sent to <email address>
move it to the <specified> folder

and a matching message comes in, duplicate 
messages do not occur.

So it seems to be some sort of odd interaction with 
Outlook Rules.

I'm running Outlook 2002 SP 2 on Windows XP SP 1a 
(with current hotfixes).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Eric Brown (ericbr)
Date: 2003-07-22 07:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=783913

I installed both versions 4 and 5 of the binary, and set the 
save_spam_info to False.  So far, it seems to have fixed the 
problem, although I'd like to give it a full day of email to verify 
(because it doesn't always happen).  

However:  for some reason, the SpamBayes configuration 
dialog doesn't pop up when I click the spambayes button.  
This happens on Outlook XP on Windows XP.  

I'll put a new bug in on this; just thought you should know.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 03:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 06:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-06 15:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

No, installing 003 over the top of 002 should work fine.

I don't have any more answers, sorry, but no doubt Mark will 
look into this when he gets a chance.  Stay tuned!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Brown (ericbr)
Date: 2003-07-04 14:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=783913

Anadelon:  Outlook junk mail rules are turned off; spam is 
Moved to Junk Mail.

I just ran the release 003 of the plugin, and I'm still seeing 
the problem.

(I didn't bother uninstalling release 002 - is that a problem?)

Eric


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Brent Rockwood (dnaguy)
Date: 2003-07-04 08:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=18879

It appears the problem lies between the keyboard and 
chair. :)  I seem to have overlooked the option to move 
messages instead of copying.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-03 20:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

In addition, the log file seems to indicate that you are using 
release 002 of the plugin.  If you haven't already, could you 
try release 003 and let us know if the problem still occurs?

Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-03 20:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Eric, do you have the Outlook junk mail rules turned on?  If 
you do, would both of you be able to try turning them off 
(they aren't all that much use if you are using spambayes 
anyway), and seeing if this resolves the problem?

In addition, forgive me if you've checked this, but in the 
spambayes filter setup, do you have "move" selected rather 
than "copy"?

(It's an odd problem that IIRC we have heard before, but I'm 
using the same version of Windows and Outlook, and have 
rules of that form, and don't notice this problem).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Brent Rockwood (dnaguy)
Date: 2003-07-03 08:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=18879

I am also having this problem.  I have not tested it with 
various rule types, but I believe it is occurring in conjunction 
with the Outlook "Junk E-mail" feature.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747107&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 11:39:23 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 13:39:40 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows
	2000
Message-ID: <E19f16h-0001HE-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-01 17:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by portola
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000

Initial Comment:
When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs 
until the registering dll's section and then stops with an 
alert.  An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is

"Unable to register the DLL/OCX. 

DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201.

<Abort> <Retry> <Ignore>"

I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just 
repeat the error and Abort would unwind the 
installation.  I never tried Ignore.

I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, 
but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them.  
Abort worked the second time.  I finally tried Ignore, 
which completes okay.  When I ran Outlook, though, the 
add-in wasn't there.

This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron 
notebook.  It has Outlook 2002 SP2.  Both are up to 
date with recent patches.  I believe this combination is 
not known to work, but thought this information might 
help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-22 10:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Just to keep up to date--the 005 version of the binary 
installer still has this problem on Win 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-21 12:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Although this is not yet claimed to be fixed, I tested it in the 
new version 004 installer.  As expected, it fails in the same 
way it did in the 002 and 003 installers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 11:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Copy-n-pasted from another bug report:

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from
"addin.py" regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 08:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :)

--Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error.
--Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to 
Spambayes Outlook plug-in
--Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using 
both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB 
article. No difference.
--Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in 
case:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;207132

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;249873

The 2nd one mentions this:

DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. 
Return code was: string
*Search Winerror.h for string. 

You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to 
get this working again. 

Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes 
working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her 
to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, 
her missing "spam thingy".

I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I 
upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. 
Just so happened that 003 became available and 
troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, 
so I did. Didn't help me.... :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-03 21:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 
did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ 
SP2 installed.

The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. 
Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up 
and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running 
the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does 
NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-02 10:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on 
Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could 
not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) 
And still could not install the Binary version 003.
I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then 
tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I 
uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 17:49:31 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 19:49:37 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-775977 ] pop3proxy reports an
	exception in shelve.py
Message-ID: <E19f6st-0004D3-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #775977, was opened at 2003-07-22 23:49
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775977&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Gary Herron (herron)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy reports an exception in shelve.py

Initial Comment:
Using pop3proxy  
  from spambayes-1.0a4 
  with Python 2.3b1 
  on Linux, 
 
the attached email comes throught pop3proxy with the following 
exception reported in the headers: 
 
X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.EOFError() in __getitem__() 
at 
        /usr/local/lib/python2.3/shelve.py line 119: value = 
        Unpickler(f).load() 
 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775977&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 17:55:07 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 19:55:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows
	2000
Message-ID: <E19f6yJ-0004PH-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-02 10:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000

Initial Comment:
When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs 
until the registering dll's section and then stops with an 
alert.  An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is

"Unable to register the DLL/OCX. 

DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201.

<Abort> <Retry> <Ignore>"

I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just 
repeat the error and Abort would unwind the 
installation.  I never tried Ignore.

I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, 
but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them.  
Abort worked the second time.  I finally tried Ignore, 
which completes okay.  When I ran Outlook, though, the 
add-in wasn't there.

This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron 
notebook.  It has Outlook 2002 SP2.  Both are up to 
date with recent patches.  I believe this combination is 
not known to work, but thought this information might 
help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-23 09:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

That error code generally means the Python code doing the
registration failed.  Can you please look for a log file to
attach - see
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html
for info on finding the log

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-23 03:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Just to keep up to date--the 005 version of the binary 
installer still has this problem on Win 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-22 05:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Although this is not yet claimed to be fixed, I tested it in the 
new version 004 installer.  As expected, it fails in the same 
way it did in the 002 and 003 installers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-07 04:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Copy-n-pasted from another bug report:

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from
"addin.py" regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-07 01:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :)

--Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error.
--Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to 
Spambayes Outlook plug-in
--Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using 
both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB 
article. No difference.
--Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in 
case:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;207132

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;249873

The 2nd one mentions this:

DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. 
Return code was: string
*Search Winerror.h for string. 

You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to 
get this working again. 

Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes 
working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her 
to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, 
her missing "spam thingy".

I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I 
upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. 
Just so happened that 003 became available and 
troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, 
so I did. Didn't help me.... :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-04 14:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 
did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ 
SP2 installed.

The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. 
Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up 
and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running 
the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does 
NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-03 03:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on 
Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could 
not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) 
And still could not install the Binary version 003.
I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then 
tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I 
uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 22 20:51:05 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 22 22:51:27 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-776022 ] Spambayes configuration
	menu doesn't drop.
Message-ID: <E19f9ib-0006gs-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #776022, was opened at 2003-07-22 19:51
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776022&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Eric Brown (ericbr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spambayes configuration menu doesn't drop.

Initial Comment:
The toolbar set up in Build 004 (and 005) of the 
spambayes outlook installer has an 
inoperable 'spambayes' button.  This makes it difficult to 
get to the configuration UI.  Luckily, I've already 
configured spambayes....

Outlook XP SP-2, Windows XP SP 1 with all current 
hotfixes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776022&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 23 08:58:25 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 23 10:58:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-776297 ] Add version check to
	plugin
Message-ID: <E19fL4T-0007iu-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #776297, was opened at 2003-07-23 09:58
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Add version check to plugin

Initial Comment:
Many questions on the spambayes mailing list are 
answered with "first, make sure you are using the 
latest version of the Outlook plugin".  This patch
allows people to check to see if they are up-to-date.

Before incorporating this, please change the URL
of the page which contains the version number! :-)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 23 09:30:55 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 23 11:31:02 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-776297 ] Add version check to
	plugin
Message-ID: <E19fLZv-0000YL-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #776297, was opened at 2003-07-23 14:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xenogeist
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Add version check to plugin

Initial Comment:
Many questions on the spambayes mailing list are 
answered with "first, make sure you are using the 
latest version of the Outlook plugin".  This patch
allows people to check to see if they are up-to-date.

Before incorporating this, please change the URL
of the page which contains the version number! :-)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-23 15:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Maybe checking the version at startup in a seperate thread 
(along with an option to disable the check) and only show 
the message if a new version is availible could be added. ...Or 
maybe that would just hammer the website too much ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 23 09:37:44 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 23 11:37:56 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-776297 ] Add version check to
	plugin
Message-ID: <E19fLgW-0001a6-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #776297, was opened at 2003-07-23 09:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Add version check to plugin

Initial Comment:
Many questions on the spambayes mailing list are 
answered with "first, make sure you are using the 
latest version of the Outlook plugin".  This patch
allows people to check to see if they are up-to-date.

Before incorporating this, please change the URL
of the page which contains the version number! :-)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-23 10:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

> ...Or maybe that would just hammer the website too much ;)

Plus 'twould have been beyond my nascent Windows programming
skills...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-23 10:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Maybe checking the version at startup in a seperate thread 
(along with an option to disable the check) and only show 
the message if a new version is availible could be added. ...Or 
maybe that would just hammer the website too much ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 23 16:39:25 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 23 18:39:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-769215 ] Failed to Load Upon
	Microsoft Updates
Message-ID: <E19fSGb-0008Jf-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #769215, was opened at 2003-07-10 16:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jtlove
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769215&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Love (jtlove)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Failed to Load Upon Microsoft Updates

Initial Comment:
Upon installing the most recent Microsofts Updates for 
Windows XP that are automatically retrieved, the 
Spambayes plugin no longer loads.  I reinstalled v2 and 
looked at the options--> com-addins and found the 
plugin to be unchecked, I then checked it and found 
Outlook to uncheck it upon coming back into the form 
reporting that errors were encountered during the load.  
I then tried installing v3, only to encounter the same 
problem.  I have no idea what the Microsoft patch did 
but it has effectively disabled the plugin.  Any ideas?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Jason Love (jtlove)
Date: 2003-07-23 22:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=667319

Release 005 has fixed the problem

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Love (jtlove)
Date: 2003-07-11 15:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=667319

I am using Outlook 2002 with XP Profesional.  Working through 
the troubleshooting.html, I found that the plugin failed to load 
but was checked under the com-addins and not shown as a 
disabled item under the Help - About Outlook.  I have 
attached the log file.  Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-11 00:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

What version of Windows/Outlook are you now using?  Could 
you also go through the steps in the troubleshooting.html file 
and attach your log file?

Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769215&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 23 16:39:59 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 23 18:40:05 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-769215 ] Failed to Load Upon
	Microsoft Updates
Message-ID: <E19fSH9-0008Kr-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #769215, was opened at 2003-07-10 16:35
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by jtlove
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769215&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Love (jtlove)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Failed to Load Upon Microsoft Updates

Initial Comment:
Upon installing the most recent Microsofts Updates for 
Windows XP that are automatically retrieved, the 
Spambayes plugin no longer loads.  I reinstalled v2 and 
looked at the options--> com-addins and found the 
plugin to be unchecked, I then checked it and found 
Outlook to uncheck it upon coming back into the form 
reporting that errors were encountered during the load.  
I then tried installing v3, only to encounter the same 
problem.  I have no idea what the Microsoft patch did 
but it has effectively disabled the plugin.  Any ideas?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Love (jtlove)
Date: 2003-07-23 22:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=667319

Release 005 has fixed the problem

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Love (jtlove)
Date: 2003-07-11 15:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=667319

I am using Outlook 2002 with XP Profesional.  Working through 
the troubleshooting.html, I found that the plugin failed to load 
but was checked under the com-addins and not shown as a 
disabled item under the Help - About Outlook.  I have 
attached the log file.  Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-11 00:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

What version of Windows/Outlook are you now using?  Could 
you also go through the steps in the troubleshooting.html file 
and attach your log file?

Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769215&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 23 16:56:38 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 23 18:56:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-769215 ] Failed to Load Upon
	Microsoft Updates
Message-ID: <E19fSXG-0000eO-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #769215, was opened at 2003-07-11 02:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769215&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Love (jtlove)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Failed to Load Upon Microsoft Updates

Initial Comment:
Upon installing the most recent Microsofts Updates for 
Windows XP that are automatically retrieved, the 
Spambayes plugin no longer loads.  I reinstalled v2 and 
looked at the options--> com-addins and found the 
plugin to be unchecked, I then checked it and found 
Outlook to uncheck it upon coming back into the form 
reporting that errors were encountered during the load.  
I then tried installing v3, only to encounter the same 
problem.  I have no idea what the Microsoft patch did 
but it has effectively disabled the plugin.  Any ideas?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-24 08:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

woo hoo!  Thanks for following up

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Love (jtlove)
Date: 2003-07-24 08:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=667319

Release 005 has fixed the problem

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Love (jtlove)
Date: 2003-07-12 01:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=667319

I am using Outlook 2002 with XP Profesional.  Working through 
the troubleshooting.html, I found that the plugin failed to load 
but was checked under the com-addins and not shown as a 
disabled item under the Help - About Outlook.  I have 
attached the log file.  Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-11 10:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

What version of Windows/Outlook are you now using?  Could 
you also go through the steps in the troubleshooting.html file 
and attach your log file?

Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=769215&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 23 17:22:14 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 23 19:22:19 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-776297 ] Add version check to
	plugin
Message-ID: <E19fSw2-0002kz-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #776297, was opened at 2003-07-24 00:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Add version check to plugin

Initial Comment:
Many questions on the spambayes mailing list are 
answered with "first, make sure you are using the 
latest version of the Outlook plugin".  This patch
allows people to check to see if they are up-to-date.

Before incorporating this, please change the URL
of the page which contains the version number! :-)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-24 09:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

How about we put on the web server the latest version of
"spambayes\Version.py" - we could then parse it locally and
extra more metadata (such as the new release date etc).  The
code could also be generally useful for all spambayes apps.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-24 01:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

> ...Or maybe that would just hammer the website too much ;)

Plus 'twould have been beyond my nascent Windows programming
skills...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-24 01:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Maybe checking the version at startup in a seperate thread 
(along with an option to disable the check) and only show 
the message if a new version is availible could be added. ...Or 
maybe that would just hammer the website too much ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 23 19:06:56 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 23 21:07:10 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-776297 ] Add version check to
	plugin
Message-ID: <E19fUZM-0004Ut-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #776297, was opened at 2003-07-23 09:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Add version check to plugin

Initial Comment:
Many questions on the spambayes mailing list are 
answered with "first, make sure you are using the 
latest version of the Outlook plugin".  This patch
allows people to check to see if they are up-to-date.

Before incorporating this, please change the URL
of the page which contains the version number! :-)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-23 20:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

That sounds fine to me.  Is the BinaryVersion element (currently
0.5) the item to compare with?  I was looking through the
Outlook2000 directory for "005".

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-23 18:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

How about we put on the web server the latest version of
"spambayes\Version.py" - we could then parse it locally and
extra more metadata (such as the new release date etc).  The
code could also be generally useful for all spambayes apps.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-23 10:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

> ...Or maybe that would just hammer the website too much ;)

Plus 'twould have been beyond my nascent Windows programming
skills...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-23 10:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Maybe checking the version at startup in a seperate thread 
(along with an option to disable the check) and only show 
the message if a new version is availible could be added. ...Or 
maybe that would just hammer the website too much ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 23 22:48:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 00:52:06 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-716684 ] Filtering marks message
	as unread
Message-ID: <E19fY1b-0005Qx-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #716684, was opened at 2003-04-07 11:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by db3l
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filtering marks message as unread

Initial Comment:
Reported too many times :)  Exchange server users only.

As spambayes startsit starts processing missed
messages.  In the meantime, the user reads some
messages, thereby marking them as read.  As smapbayes
writes the spam field, these messages spring back to a
read status.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-07-24 04:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

For what it's worth, I've continued to run from source with my 
multiple save modification (as detailed earlier in the ticket) 
quite successfully (e.g., the problem doesn't happen for me).  
I'm positive it's still just a sledgehammer approach to the 
problem, and have found one slow laptop in the office (out of 
a number running a modified binary I produced with that 
change) that still can hit the problem even with the change, 
so it has a feeling of a race condition.  But sledgehammer or 
no, I'm embarrassed to say that it worked so well for me that 
I settled for it as a solution :-)

But I'd be happy to experiment with any other changes you 
might want to try out.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 11:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Give me a yell in mail once you have this setup.  Once you
do, I will send you a patch or 2 with a couple of
experiments to the way we save the score

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-22 11:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I'm happy to switch to the source version from CVS, if you 
can tell me what you want me to try. My time is limited (and 
I'm unavailable for the next 3 days) but I'm happy to do what 
I can.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 11:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Well, it does tell me that the "Save" is indeed the issue,
which is a good start.

Someone running from the source code would still be best :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-22 10:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

Initial impressions are that this fixes the problem of messages 
going back to unread, but the "Spam" score is not being set 
on the messages any more (they are still being filtered OK, it's 
just that the score isn't shown).

Not sure whether this counts as an improvement or not...

I'll leave the setting as "False" for a while in case the problem 
reappears.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 10:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 13:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 11:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Closing
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=764241&group_id=61702&atid=498103
as a dupe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Andersen (gokubi)
Date: 2003-07-07 21:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=558027

I find that if I get a new message and hit reply before I read 
it (I'm in Autopreview) after sending the message it is still 
unread.

More troubling is that Outlook does not show that I have 
replied to the message by changing the envelope icon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 05:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:  a user had the same problem, but also noted 
this:

> If an attachment is included, the first time I open the 
> message, I cannot open the attachement, or save it. If I 
> close the message, and reopen it, I can both open and 
save 
> the attachment.

Odd!  I don't get this problem very often at all anymore; I 
don't know why.  If I did, I'd test the attachment theory, but 
as it is, I can't, so I leave it for others ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-10 12:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I just had this happen to me again. I'm using the CVS version 
from a day or two ago.

So the version in current CVS isn't (completely) fixed.

Anythong else I could try? I see part of a thread about 
USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS here, but I can't find the original. 
My code has USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS in it. If you can tell 
me what (if anything) else needs changing, I can try taking it 
out.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-08 15:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

Just as an FYI, I agree with tobermory's comments in that 
spambayes is in fact classifying the message immediately, 
but it's the update to the server and/or client that appears to 
be delayed until the next Outlook event.  See the first of my 
two spambayes list mail messages referenced in my note 
Mark included in this bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-08 15:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

> Would it be possible to try another change for me instead?  
Revert
> filter.py, and in msgstore.py's Save method, find the line:
> 
>             self.mapi_object.SaveChanges
(mapi.KEEP_OPEN_READWRITE |
> USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS)

I'm pretty sure I had tried that first, while experimenting, 
before I
ended up with the extra Save as a final "flush all" attempt.  
There
was no change, nor did the function return an error.  I think I 
also
tried setting it to 0 (after reading the internal comment) to no
apparent effect, although I may be misremembering since the 
same
comment may have caused me to hesitate to make that 
change :-)

But I'll double check this when I get a chance today.  If I recall
when testing, my review of the code seemed to indicate that 
everything
should work fine, and that the spambayes code was 
managing the read
flag reasonably well, and in fact, was issuing a Save() back in
filter.py.  I ended up inserting test Save()s at the lowermost 
level
(which worked) and then bubbling them up to see how high I 
could leave
the extra call so it was called as infrequently as possible.

In the end, the issue seemed related to the processing that 
goes on
when all_actions is enabled.  If the Save() occurred after the 
field
status was updated, but before 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() was
called, all was fine.  But if the 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() got
called first, then the following Save() - as already in filter.py -
didn't seem to "take."

> I'm a little unsure why one of the Save calls is indented too.

Ah, that was just to minimize change from the existing code 
path.

I wanted to move the Save() to happen before
RememberMessageCurrentFolder(), but then the second Save
() became
completely superfluous in the main branch case - but I didn't 
want to
lose the Save() following RememberMessageCurrentFolder() if 
it was
called just in case that was critical to existing behavior, so I 
moved
it to only occur in that same block.

-- David

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Leftley (tobermory)
Date: 2003-04-08 09:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=626601

Just to try and clarify one point: earlier msgs in this thread 
suggest that spambayes doesn't attempt to classify a 
message until certain events (reading a msg, etc.) occur.

In fact from watching the trace output, the message is 
classified as soon as it arrives (the trace 
shows "Message 'xxx' had a Spam classification of 'yyy'") but 
Outlook doesn't reflect this change until the next event occurs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-08 08:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

My version of filter.py looks different. I haven't updated from 
CVS in a while, maybe that's why. But my version looks like 
it has msg.Save() called unconditionally.

    try:
        # Save the score
        msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
        # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
        msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
        msg.Save()

I've tried moving msg.Save() to before msg.Remember...(), but 
I'll have to wait to see results. Will report back.

(Better might be to cvs update and apply your change, but I 
may not get a chance to do that for a couple of days...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-04-08 02:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From David Bolen:
"Moore, Paul" <Paul.Moore@atosorigin.com> writes:

> As far as I know, no-one has been able to track down the 
> problem to fix it yet.

I have, however, implemented a local workaround that's
working really well for me.  This was based on my prior
messages in:

   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004086.html
   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004088.html

Since I can't quantify what if any penalty it imposes in the
general
case by syncing changes back to the server an additional
time, and
since the problem may be limited to Exchange servers, I haven't
proposed it be made to the main source yet - although I
certainly
haven't noticed much of a penalty in my local testing.

But if anyone else wants to try a local change, it's fairly
trivial,
adding an additional call to msg.Save() in filter.py:

    *** filter.py   18 Mar 2003 03:09:03 -0000      1.20
    --- filter.py   7 Apr 2003 22:18:58 -0000
    ***************
    *** 27,39 ****
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !         msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")
    --- 26,39 ----
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
    +         msg.Save()
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !             msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")


After making this change, what went from virtually _every_
message staying unread, became the extreme rare case, such
that I'm no longer certain any remaining case may even be
spambayes related.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-04-07 11:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

A bit of investigation (I am using Outlook 2002 & Exchange 
2000).

A new message arriving in my Inbox does not get analysed by 
SpamBayes until:
- You switch to another folder and back again.
- You read the message (then analysed, but remains 'unread')
- Another email arrives, when the first message is then rated 
(second one not rated though)
- Another email in Inbox is saved after editing
In other words, it seems some other action eventually triggers 
the analysis - not the arrival event itself.

An email that is read before it has been analysed by 
SpamBayes will always be 'unread' afterwards. This is 
independent of type (plain, rich text or HTML)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 02:10:24 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 04:10:40 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-776808 ] Expanding toolbar
	crashes outlook
Message-ID: <E19fbBA-0008Mh-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #776808, was opened at 2003-07-24 10:10
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776808&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edwin (eddepet_33)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Expanding toolbar crashes outlook

Initial Comment:
If the spambayes toolbar is not completely visible in 
Outlook you can open/expand it using the '>>' button at 
the end of the toolbar. Clicking on this button crashes 
outlook completely with the following message:

"Program Error: Outlook.exe has generated errors and will 
be closed by Windows. You will need to restart the 
program."

Outlook's own toolbars don't have this problem.

Versions:
Outlook 2000 on W2K
Spambayes Outlook Addin (beta), Binary version 0.5 (july 
2003)





----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776808&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 04:30:07 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 06:30:13 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-776866 ] Doesn't filter IMAP
	folders
Message-ID: <E19fdMN-0003o8-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #776866, was opened at 2003-07-24 11:30
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776866&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: James Aylett (tartarus)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Doesn't filter IMAP folders

Initial Comment:
IMAP folders added to a filter seem to fail scanning
completely. Asking for spam clues, however, always works.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776866&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 04:44:52 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 06:44:55 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-776874 ] Exception when saving
	options from pop3proxy
Message-ID: <E19fdae-0006H0-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #776874, was opened at 2003-07-24 03:44
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776874&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David R. Handy (davidhandy)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Exception when saving options from pop3proxy

Initial Comment:
Since I upgraded from spambayes 1.0a2 to 1.0a4
recently, I have been unable to change options from the
pop3proxy web interface. When I hit the same button on
the Configure page I get the following exception:

-----------------------------

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py",
line 398,
in found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py",
line
 525, in onChangeopts
    self.reReadOptions()

  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py",
line 484,
in reReadOptions
    state = self.state_recreator()

  File "/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 693, in
_recreateState
    state.createWorkers()

  File "/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 595, in
createWorkers
    self.bayes = storage.DBDictClassifier(filename)

  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py",
line 147,
in __init__
    self.load()

  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py",
line 155,
in load
    self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode)

  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py",
line 59
, in open
    return f(*args)
  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py",
line 23
, in open_gdbm
    return gdbm.open(*args)

error: (11, 'Resource temporarily unavailable')

-------------------------

The line numbers pop3proxy.py may be high by two or
three because I added some print statements trying to
debug this. The print statements show that the file
that it is attempting to open is hammie.db, the
classfier database.

I am running pop3proxy on RedHat 8.0. as my user. The
file permissions show that hammie.db is writable by me,
etc. I explicity configured spambayes to use the gdbm
database instead of the default - is that part of the
problem?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776874&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 05:00:49 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 07:00:54 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-776874 ] Exception when saving
	options from pop3proxy
Message-ID: <E19fdq5-0004Iq-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #776874, was opened at 2003-07-24 03:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by davidhandy
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776874&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David R. Handy (davidhandy)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Exception when saving options from pop3proxy

Initial Comment:
Since I upgraded from spambayes 1.0a2 to 1.0a4
recently, I have been unable to change options from the
pop3proxy web interface. When I hit the same button on
the Configure page I get the following exception:

-----------------------------

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py",
line 398,
in found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py",
line
 525, in onChangeopts
    self.reReadOptions()

  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py",
line 484,
in reReadOptions
    state = self.state_recreator()

  File "/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 693, in
_recreateState
    state.createWorkers()

  File "/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 595, in
createWorkers
    self.bayes = storage.DBDictClassifier(filename)

  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py",
line 147,
in __init__
    self.load()

  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py",
line 155,
in load
    self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode)

  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py",
line 59
, in open
    return f(*args)
  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py",
line 23
, in open_gdbm
    return gdbm.open(*args)

error: (11, 'Resource temporarily unavailable')

-------------------------

The line numbers pop3proxy.py may be high by two or
three because I added some print statements trying to
debug this. The print statements show that the file
that it is attempting to open is hammie.db, the
classfier database.

I am running pop3proxy on RedHat 8.0. as my user. The
file permissions show that hammie.db is writable by me,
etc. I explicity configured spambayes to use the gdbm
database instead of the default - is that part of the
problem?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: David R. Handy (davidhandy)
Date: 2003-07-24 04:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=171902

I checked and it turns out that when I set dbm_type:best
that it naturally chooses gdbm anyway - I apparently don't
have bsddb3 or bsddb available to me as storage types.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776874&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 07:18:15 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 09:21:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-716684 ] Filtering marks message
	as unread
Message-ID: <E19ffz5-0008Tq-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #716684, was opened at 2003-04-07 21:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filtering marks message as unread

Initial Comment:
Reported too many times :)  Exchange server users only.

As spambayes startsit starts processing missed
messages.  In the meantime, the user reads some
messages, thereby marking them as read.  As smapbayes
writes the spam field, these messages spring back to a
read status.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-24 23:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

If you could try the current CVS sources it would be great -
this version saves in a slightly different way, and there
has been one report of a similar bug being fixed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-07-24 14:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

For what it's worth, I've continued to run from source with my 
multiple save modification (as detailed earlier in the ticket) 
quite successfully (e.g., the problem doesn't happen for me).  
I'm positive it's still just a sledgehammer approach to the 
problem, and have found one slow laptop in the office (out of 
a number running a modified binary I produced with that 
change) that still can hit the problem even with the change, 
so it has a feeling of a race condition.  But sledgehammer or 
no, I'm embarrassed to say that it worked so well for me that 
I settled for it as a solution :-)

But I'd be happy to experiment with any other changes you 
might want to try out.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 21:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Give me a yell in mail once you have this setup.  Once you
do, I will send you a patch or 2 with a couple of
experiments to the way we save the score

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-22 21:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I'm happy to switch to the source version from CVS, if you 
can tell me what you want me to try. My time is limited (and 
I'm unavailable for the next 3 days) but I'm happy to do what 
I can.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 21:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Well, it does tell me that the "Save" is indeed the issue,
which is a good start.

Someone running from the source code would still be best :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-22 20:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

Initial impressions are that this fixes the problem of messages 
going back to unread, but the "Spam" score is not being set 
on the messages any more (they are still being filtered OK, it's 
just that the score isn't shown).

Not sure whether this counts as an improvement or not...

I'll leave the setting as "False" for a while in case the problem 
reappears.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 20:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 23:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Closing
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=764241&group_id=61702&atid=498103
as a dupe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Andersen (gokubi)
Date: 2003-07-08 07:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=558027

I find that if I get a new message and hit reply before I read 
it (I'm in Autopreview) after sending the message it is still 
unread.

More troubling is that Outlook does not show that I have 
replied to the message by changing the envelope icon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 15:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:  a user had the same problem, but also noted 
this:

> If an attachment is included, the first time I open the 
> message, I cannot open the attachement, or save it. If I 
> close the message, and reopen it, I can both open and 
save 
> the attachment.

Odd!  I don't get this problem very often at all anymore; I 
don't know why.  If I did, I'd test the attachment theory, but 
as it is, I can't, so I leave it for others ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-10 22:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I just had this happen to me again. I'm using the CVS version 
from a day or two ago.

So the version in current CVS isn't (completely) fixed.

Anythong else I could try? I see part of a thread about 
USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS here, but I can't find the original. 
My code has USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS in it. If you can tell 
me what (if anything) else needs changing, I can try taking it 
out.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-09 01:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

Just as an FYI, I agree with tobermory's comments in that 
spambayes is in fact classifying the message immediately, 
but it's the update to the server and/or client that appears to 
be delayed until the next Outlook event.  See the first of my 
two spambayes list mail messages referenced in my note 
Mark included in this bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-09 01:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

> Would it be possible to try another change for me instead?  
Revert
> filter.py, and in msgstore.py's Save method, find the line:
> 
>             self.mapi_object.SaveChanges
(mapi.KEEP_OPEN_READWRITE |
> USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS)

I'm pretty sure I had tried that first, while experimenting, 
before I
ended up with the extra Save as a final "flush all" attempt.  
There
was no change, nor did the function return an error.  I think I 
also
tried setting it to 0 (after reading the internal comment) to no
apparent effect, although I may be misremembering since the 
same
comment may have caused me to hesitate to make that 
change :-)

But I'll double check this when I get a chance today.  If I recall
when testing, my review of the code seemed to indicate that 
everything
should work fine, and that the spambayes code was 
managing the read
flag reasonably well, and in fact, was issuing a Save() back in
filter.py.  I ended up inserting test Save()s at the lowermost 
level
(which worked) and then bubbling them up to see how high I 
could leave
the extra call so it was called as infrequently as possible.

In the end, the issue seemed related to the processing that 
goes on
when all_actions is enabled.  If the Save() occurred after the 
field
status was updated, but before 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() was
called, all was fine.  But if the 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() got
called first, then the following Save() - as already in filter.py -
didn't seem to "take."

> I'm a little unsure why one of the Save calls is indented too.

Ah, that was just to minimize change from the existing code 
path.

I wanted to move the Save() to happen before
RememberMessageCurrentFolder(), but then the second Save
() became
completely superfluous in the main branch case - but I didn't 
want to
lose the Save() following RememberMessageCurrentFolder() if 
it was
called just in case that was critical to existing behavior, so I 
moved
it to only occur in that same block.

-- David

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Leftley (tobermory)
Date: 2003-04-08 19:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=626601

Just to try and clarify one point: earlier msgs in this thread 
suggest that spambayes doesn't attempt to classify a 
message until certain events (reading a msg, etc.) occur.

In fact from watching the trace output, the message is 
classified as soon as it arrives (the trace 
shows "Message 'xxx' had a Spam classification of 'yyy'") but 
Outlook doesn't reflect this change until the next event occurs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-08 18:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

My version of filter.py looks different. I haven't updated from 
CVS in a while, maybe that's why. But my version looks like 
it has msg.Save() called unconditionally.

    try:
        # Save the score
        msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
        # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
        msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
        msg.Save()

I've tried moving msg.Save() to before msg.Remember...(), but 
I'll have to wait to see results. Will report back.

(Better might be to cvs update and apply your change, but I 
may not get a chance to do that for a couple of days...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-04-08 12:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From David Bolen:
"Moore, Paul" <Paul.Moore@atosorigin.com> writes:

> As far as I know, no-one has been able to track down the 
> problem to fix it yet.

I have, however, implemented a local workaround that's
working really well for me.  This was based on my prior
messages in:

   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004086.html
   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004088.html

Since I can't quantify what if any penalty it imposes in the
general
case by syncing changes back to the server an additional
time, and
since the problem may be limited to Exchange servers, I haven't
proposed it be made to the main source yet - although I
certainly
haven't noticed much of a penalty in my local testing.

But if anyone else wants to try a local change, it's fairly
trivial,
adding an additional call to msg.Save() in filter.py:

    *** filter.py   18 Mar 2003 03:09:03 -0000      1.20
    --- filter.py   7 Apr 2003 22:18:58 -0000
    ***************
    *** 27,39 ****
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !         msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")
    --- 26,39 ----
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
    +         msg.Save()
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !             msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")


After making this change, what went from virtually _every_
message staying unread, became the extreme rare case, such
that I'm no longer certain any remaining case may even be
spambayes related.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-04-07 21:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

A bit of investigation (I am using Outlook 2002 & Exchange 
2000).

A new message arriving in my Inbox does not get analysed by 
SpamBayes until:
- You switch to another folder and back again.
- You read the message (then analysed, but remains 'unread')
- Another email arrives, when the first message is then rated 
(second one not rated though)
- Another email in Inbox is saved after editing
In other words, it seems some other action eventually triggers 
the analysis - not the arrival event itself.

An email that is read before it has been analysed by 
SpamBayes will always be 'unread' afterwards. This is 
independent of type (plain, rich text or HTML)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 07:34:44 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 09:34:57 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-776866 ] Doesn't filter IMAP
	folders
Message-ID: <E19fgF2-0000z8-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #776866, was opened at 2003-07-24 20:30
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776866&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: James Aylett (tartarus)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Doesn't filter IMAP folders

Initial Comment:
IMAP folders added to a filter seem to fail scanning
completely. Asking for spam clues, however, always works.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-24 23:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

You have an old version of the plugin.  Please try binary
verion 005.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776866&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 07:31:33 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 09:36:43 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765912 ] AssertionError:
	Proportions must add to 1.0 ...
Message-ID: <E19fgBx-0005bI-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765912, was opened at 2003-07-04 22:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 ...

Initial Comment:
I upgraded my (working) outlook 2000 + spambayes 
installation to Outlook XP and the newest version of 
Spambayes. Spambayes would not perform any action 
when I had defined "spam" and "ham" folders and chosen 
"Train". It wouldn't matter if I had "rebuild entire 
database" checked or unchecked.

Actions: 
1. Start Outlook.
2. Go to SpamBayes config menu.
3. Click on "Train now"
4. Select "spam" folder.
5. Click on "Train now"

After that, "nothing happens". Clicking on "stop training" 
does not work, but I can close the window by clicking on 
the "[x] in the upper right corner and get back to the 
"main" menu.

I have tried all possible combinations of checkboxes. I 
have also ran "scanpst.exe" on my mailbox file. OS is XP 
Pro (English) 


Here's the log file:




Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in 
set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command 
ID 1100, Code 0

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-24 23:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This has us stumped.  I have an instrumented version of the
plugin at
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/downloads/SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-BugCatcher.exe
- if you are seeing this assertion error, please try this
version and attach a log.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Date: 2003-07-22 23:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=815848

I installed the latest version of the plugin. Here's the logfile. 
Actions taken: 
1. started outlook
2. Opened "spambayes manager" 
3. clicked "train now"
4. selected "rebuild entire database"
5. selected a "spam" folder (the field was empty)
6. clicked on "train now"
(nothing happened)
7. clicked on the "close window" button.
8. clicked on "train now"
9. deselected "rebuild entire database"
10. clicked "train now" again
(nothing happened)
11. closed the window

Here's the logfile:

Loaded bayes database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin (beta), version 0.4 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 
2003))...
On Windows version 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


// Andreas

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Date: 2003-07-22 23:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=815848

I installed the latest version of the plugin. Here's the logfile. 
Actions taken: 
1. started outlook
2. Opened "spambayes manager" 
3. clicked "train now"
4. selected "rebuild entire database"
5. selected a "spam" folder (the field was empty)
6. clicked on "train now"
(nothing happened)
7. clicked on the "close window" button.
8. clicked on "train now"
9. deselected "rebuild entire database"
10. clicked "train now" again
(nothing happened)
11. closed the window

Here's the logfile:

Loaded bayes database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin (beta), version 0.4 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 
2003))...
On Windows version 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


// Andreas

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 20:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Please try version 004 of the binary - I expect the same
behavior, but more information in the log!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-21 12:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

noting dupicate in #774781

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 09:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in code to help diagnose this - the assertion
prints the items and the sum

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 14:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Good to know English versions also show it.  Anyone able to
 run the source code version?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gael Marziou (gmarziou)
Date: 2003-07-09 07:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=203211

I ahve exactly the same symptoms on US outlook 2000 on 
windows 2000 pro sp3.

My log file:

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons
ERROR: 'You must enable SpamBayes before you can delete 
as spam'
None
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Cloutier (chealer)
Date: 2003-07-05 08:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738765

GOD!
I had the exact same problem with French version. 
Repeating "Train now" after closing the window with X only 
made the above lines to repeat in the log file. log files closes 
by

Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\Chealer\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 0 messages, finding 0 spam and 0 
unsure
Addin terminating: 1 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


And now, just as I was writing the bug report, I open Outlook 
and it's gone! SB is now trained, and I made no reboot, no 
update of anything...
So what to say? Well, be patient. I think I tried the function 
about 10 times and closed Outlook around 5 times in the 
meantime... hope it's gonna be as simple as that to fix the 
bug too.
By the way, this bug succeeded to the max size error with 
binary 002 which had been perfectly fixed by 003.

OS is Windows XP Pro SP1 French, I have Outlook XP SP2 
French and didn't change this since months.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 08:22:59 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 10:23:08 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows
	2000
Message-ID: <E19fgzj-0001MY-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-02 04:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ghuron
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000

Initial Comment:
When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs 
until the registering dll's section and then stops with an 
alert.  An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is

"Unable to register the DLL/OCX. 

DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201.

<Abort> <Retry> <Ignore>"

I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just 
repeat the error and Abort would unwind the 
installation.  I never tried Ignore.

I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, 
but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them.  
Abort worked the second time.  I finally tried Ignore, 
which completes okay.  When I ran Outlook, though, the 
add-in wasn't there.

This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron 
notebook.  It has Outlook 2002 SP2.  Both are up to 
date with recent patches.  I believe this combination is 
not known to work, but thought this information might 
help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-24 18:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "<string>", line 10, in ?

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport

  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 75, in ?

  File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 21, in 
RegisterInterfaces
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147319779, 'Library not 
registered.', None, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-23 03:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

That error code generally means the Python code doing the
registration failed.  Can you please look for a log file to
attach - see
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html
for info on finding the log

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-22 21:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Just to keep up to date--the 005 version of the binary 
installer still has this problem on Win 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-21 23:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Although this is not yet claimed to be fixed, I tested it in the 
new version 004 installer.  As expected, it fails in the same 
way it did in the 002 and 003 installers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 22:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Copy-n-pasted from another bug report:

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from
"addin.py" regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 19:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :)

--Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error.
--Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to 
Spambayes Outlook plug-in
--Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using 
both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB 
article. No difference.
--Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in 
case:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;207132

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;249873

The 2nd one mentions this:

DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. 
Return code was: string
*Search Winerror.h for string. 

You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to 
get this working again. 

Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes 
working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her 
to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, 
her missing "spam thingy".

I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I 
upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. 
Just so happened that 003 became available and 
troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, 
so I did. Didn't help me.... :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-04 08:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 
did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ 
SP2 installed.

The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. 
Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up 
and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running 
the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does 
NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-02 21:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on 
Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could 
not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) 
And still could not install the Binary version 003.
I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then 
tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I 
uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 10:17:11 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 12:17:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777026 ] Possible cause for db
	corruption in storage.py/DBDictClassif
Message-ID: <E19fimF-0003Pl-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777026, was opened at 2003-07-24 16:17
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777026&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fionn Behrens (fionn)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Possible cause for db corruption in storage.py/DBDictClassif

Initial Comment:

DBDistClassifier uses a neat trick to save some memory:

    def _wordinfoset:
        if record and (record.spamcount+record.hamcount
<= 1):
            self.db[word] = record.__getstate__()
            # Remove this word from the changed list
(not that it should be
            # there, but strange things can happen :)
            try:
                del self.changed_words[word]
            except KeyError:
                pass

Unfortunately the programmer seems to have overlooked
that there might already be a self.wordinfo[word] entry
if (record.spamcount+record.hamcount) have been > 1
previously and some message has been untrained.
So, if some record is e.g. untrained from a count of 2
to a count of 1, then wordinfo[word] will still be 2
while the db[word] entry will be 1. This can lead to
minor miscounts in the spam/ham.

To circumvent the problem, the following should be
added to storage.py at line 239 (referring to version
1.0a3, right below the code part you see above):

            try:
              del self.wordinfo[word]
            except KeyError:
              pass

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777026&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 13:45:11 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 15:45:13 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777165 ] Typo in Options.py
	causes bogus warning on reading config
Message-ID: <E19fm1X-0008Oe-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777165, was opened at 2003-07-24 12:45
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777165&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David R. Handy (davidhandy)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Typo in Options.py causes bogus warning on reading config

Initial Comment:
In the Alpha 4 release, in Options.py, line 912, there
is a string literal "bd3hash" which should instead be
"db3hash", in the tuple of valid values for the
dbm_type setting.

The effect is that when you start up i.e. pop3proxy.py
you could get a bogus message:

Attempted to set [globals] dbm_type with invalid value
db3hash (<type 'str'>)

Changing the string in Options.py from "bd3hash" to
"db3hash" causes this bogus message to go away. This
should be fixed in the main distribution.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777165&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 14:00:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 16:00:07 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-776874 ] Exception when saving
	options from pop3proxy
Message-ID: <E19fmFv-0005nN-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #776874, was opened at 2003-07-24 03:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by davidhandy
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776874&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David R. Handy (davidhandy)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Exception when saving options from pop3proxy

Initial Comment:
Since I upgraded from spambayes 1.0a2 to 1.0a4
recently, I have been unable to change options from the
pop3proxy web interface. When I hit the same button on
the Configure page I get the following exception:

-----------------------------

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/Dibbler.py",
line 398,
in found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/UserInterface.py",
line
 525, in onChangeopts
    self.reReadOptions()

  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/ProxyUI.py",
line 484,
in reReadOptions
    state = self.state_recreator()

  File "/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 693, in
_recreateState
    state.createWorkers()

  File "/usr/local/bin/pop3proxy.py", line 595, in
createWorkers
    self.bayes = storage.DBDictClassifier(filename)

  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py",
line 147,
in __init__
    self.load()

  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/storage.py",
line 155,
in load
    self.dbm = dbmstorage.open(self.db_name, self.mode)

  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py",
line 59
, in open
    return f(*args)
  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/dbmstorage.py",
line 23
, in open_gdbm
    return gdbm.open(*args)

error: (11, 'Resource temporarily unavailable')

-------------------------

The line numbers pop3proxy.py may be high by two or
three because I added some print statements trying to
debug this. The print statements show that the file
that it is attempting to open is hammie.db, the
classfier database.

I am running pop3proxy on RedHat 8.0. as my user. The
file permissions show that hammie.db is writable by me,
etc. I explicity configured spambayes to use the gdbm
database instead of the default - is that part of the
problem?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: David R. Handy (davidhandy)
Date: 2003-07-24 13:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=171902

Workaround:

I downloaded, compiled, and installed the bsddb3 module so
that I could use the db3hash storage type. After switching
my storage type to db3hash this problem went away.

This might indicate a problem with gdbm. I won't use it any
more if I can avoid it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David R. Handy (davidhandy)
Date: 2003-07-24 04:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=171902

I checked and it turns out that when I set dbm_type:best
that it naturally chooses gdbm anyway - I apparently don't
have bsddb3 or bsddb available to me as storage types.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776874&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 15:22:33 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 17:22:48 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-776808 ] Expanding toolbar
	crashes outlook
Message-ID: <E19fnXl-0002Pi-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #776808, was opened at 2003-07-24 20:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776808&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edwin (eddepet_33)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Expanding toolbar crashes outlook

Initial Comment:
If the spambayes toolbar is not completely visible in 
Outlook you can open/expand it using the '>>' button at 
the end of the toolbar. Clicking on this button crashes 
outlook completely with the following message:

"Program Error: Outlook.exe has generated errors and will 
be closed by Windows. You will need to restart the 
program."

Outlook's own toolbars don't have this problem.

Versions:
Outlook 2000 on W2K
Spambayes Outlook Addin (beta), Binary version 0.5 (july 
2003)





----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-25 09:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Just for reference, I do not experience this with current CVS 
and Outlook 2k2 sp2 with WinXP SP1.  (I never have enough 
room in my possible spam folder, because both buttons are 
present, so I use this every now and then).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776808&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 15:28:37 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 17:28:43 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777026 ] Possible cause for db
	corruption in storage.py/DBDictClassif
Message-ID: <E19fndd-0002eC-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777026, was opened at 2003-07-25 04:17
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777026&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fionn Behrens (fionn)
>Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Possible cause for db corruption in storage.py/DBDictClassif

Initial Comment:

DBDistClassifier uses a neat trick to save some memory:

    def _wordinfoset:
        if record and (record.spamcount+record.hamcount
<= 1):
            self.db[word] = record.__getstate__()
            # Remove this word from the changed list
(not that it should be
            # there, but strange things can happen :)
            try:
                del self.changed_words[word]
            except KeyError:
                pass

Unfortunately the programmer seems to have overlooked
that there might already be a self.wordinfo[word] entry
if (record.spamcount+record.hamcount) have been > 1
previously and some message has been untrained.
So, if some record is e.g. untrained from a count of 2
to a count of 1, then wordinfo[word] will still be 2
while the db[word] entry will be 1. This can lead to
minor miscounts in the spam/ham.

To circumvent the problem, the following should be
added to storage.py at line 239 (referring to version
1.0a3, right below the code part you see above):

            try:
              del self.wordinfo[word]
            except KeyError:
              pass

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777026&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 15:32:11 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 17:32:23 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777165 ] Typo in Options.py
	causes bogus warning on reading config
Message-ID: <E19fnh5-0002p0-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777165, was opened at 2003-07-25 07:45
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777165&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David R. Handy (davidhandy)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Typo in Options.py causes bogus warning on reading config

Initial Comment:
In the Alpha 4 release, in Options.py, line 912, there
is a string literal "bd3hash" which should instead be
"db3hash", in the tuple of valid values for the
dbm_type setting.

The effect is that when you start up i.e. pop3proxy.py
you could get a bogus message:

Attempted to set [globals] dbm_type with invalid value
db3hash (<type 'str'>)

Changing the string in Options.py from "bd3hash" to
"db3hash" causes this bogus message to go away. This
should be fixed in the main distribution.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-25 09:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Thanks.  Fixed in Options.py v1.59

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777165&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 15:44:00 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 17:44:08 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-776808 ] Expanding toolbar
	crashes outlook
Message-ID: <E19fnsW-0001sZ-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #776808, was opened at 2003-07-24 04:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776808&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edwin (eddepet_33)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Expanding toolbar crashes outlook

Initial Comment:
If the spambayes toolbar is not completely visible in 
Outlook you can open/expand it using the '>>' button at 
the end of the toolbar. Clicking on this button crashes 
outlook completely with the following message:

"Program Error: Outlook.exe has generated errors and will 
be closed by Windows. You will need to restart the 
program."

Outlook's own toolbars don't have this problem.

Versions:
Outlook 2000 on W2K
Spambayes Outlook Addin (beta), Binary version 0.5 (july 
2003)





----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-24 17:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

FYI, I've seen this too, on Win2K and Win98SE, using Outlook 
2000, and CVS spambayes, Python 2.2.3.  Just reproduced it 
after a CVS up.  This happens when I'm in my Unsure folder, 
which tries to display both buttons, and often my Outlook 
window is too small.  I first saw it shortly after we switched 
to building our own toolbar.  It doesn't bother me, especially 
since I can't imagine we're at fault <0.5 wink>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-24 17:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Just for reference, I do not experience this with current CVS 
and Outlook 2k2 sp2 with WinXP SP1.  (I never have enough 
room in my possible spam folder, because both buttons are 
present, so I use this every now and then).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776808&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 19:39:17 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 21:39:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777314 ] Outlook keeps
	downloading same spam
Message-ID: <E19frYD-0001Tw-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777314, was opened at 2003-07-24 21:39
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777314&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook keeps downloading same spam

Initial Comment:
>From the spambayes mailing list:

"""
Someone please tell me why I keep downloading the 
same email from my POP mailbox when SPAM Bayes 
Filtering is enabled. The email comes down and
is immediately moved to the correct SPAM folder.  
However, the same email is downloaded every time 
I "Send/Receive".

version of Windows - Windows 2000 Pro, Office's Outlook 
XP

the version of SpamBayes - SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-
005.exe (lastest try), and SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-
003.exe (earlier attempt)
"""

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777314&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 21:25:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 23:25:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777026 ] Possible cause for db
	corruption in storage.py/DBDictClassif
Message-ID: <E19ftD0-0006b0-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777026, was opened at 2003-07-25 02:17
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777026&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fionn Behrens (fionn)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Possible cause for db corruption in storage.py/DBDictClassif

Initial Comment:

DBDistClassifier uses a neat trick to save some memory:

    def _wordinfoset:
        if record and (record.spamcount+record.hamcount
<= 1):
            self.db[word] = record.__getstate__()
            # Remove this word from the changed list
(not that it should be
            # there, but strange things can happen :)
            try:
                del self.changed_words[word]
            except KeyError:
                pass

Unfortunately the programmer seems to have overlooked
that there might already be a self.wordinfo[word] entry
if (record.spamcount+record.hamcount) have been > 1
previously and some message has been untrained.
So, if some record is e.g. untrained from a count of 2
to a count of 1, then wordinfo[word] will still be 2
while the db[word] entry will be 1. This can lead to
minor miscounts in the spam/ham.

To circumvent the problem, the following should be
added to storage.py at line 239 (referring to version
1.0a3, right below the code part you see above):

            try:
              del self.wordinfo[word]
            except KeyError:
              pass

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 13:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The code currently works, as in the case you describe
self.wordinfo[key] is still correctly set to 1.  Thus, the
_wordinfoget() gets the correct value.

1.3 is quite out of date - other bugs have been fixed since
then. However, I added a test\test_storage.py file that
tries to exercise these edge cases - if you believe there is
still a bug, please provoke that into failing.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777026&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 22:39:34 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 25 00:39:38 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777026 ] Possible cause for db
	corruption in storage.py/DBDictClassif
Message-ID: <E19fuMg-0006t0-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777026, was opened at 2003-07-24 12:17
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777026&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Open
>Resolution: Later
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fionn Behrens (fionn)
>Assigned to: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Summary: Possible cause for db corruption in storage.py/DBDictClassif

Initial Comment:

DBDistClassifier uses a neat trick to save some memory:

    def _wordinfoset:
        if record and (record.spamcount+record.hamcount
<= 1):
            self.db[word] = record.__getstate__()
            # Remove this word from the changed list
(not that it should be
            # there, but strange things can happen :)
            try:
                del self.changed_words[word]
            except KeyError:
                pass

Unfortunately the programmer seems to have overlooked
that there might already be a self.wordinfo[word] entry
if (record.spamcount+record.hamcount) have been > 1
previously and some message has been untrained.
So, if some record is e.g. untrained from a count of 2
to a count of 1, then wordinfo[word] will still be 2
while the db[word] entry will be 1. This can lead to
minor miscounts in the spam/ham.

To circumvent the problem, the following should be
added to storage.py at line 239 (referring to version
1.0a3, right below the code part you see above):

            try:
              del self.wordinfo[word]
            except KeyError:
              pass

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-25 00:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Well, the reason this works is really quite subtle:  the 
classifier's _remove_msg and _add_msg methods *mutate* 
the WordInfo record in the wordinfo dict, and pass the 
mutated version on to _wordinfoset.  That's why they never 
get out of synch.

In fact, you can add this line to the start of _wordinfoset's 
outermost else clause:

            assert self.wordinfo[word] is record

and it won't fail.  The assignment

            self.wordinfo[word] = record

isn't actually needed in _wordinfoset!  It always rebinds 
self.wordinfo[word] to the object it was already bound to.

But this isn't apparent from the guts of _wordinfoset, it's a 
property that follows from what holds at the only two places 
_wordinfoset is called from the classifier, and that 
_wordinfoget fills in wordinfo[word] too.

This is really too delicate to bear.  Reopening and assigning to 
me.  While calls of _wordinfoset from the classifier happen 
always to pass the same record on to _wordinfoset as they 
got from the wordinfo dict, I'm not sure all calls everywhere 
do this.  Better to make it bulletproof than to rely on this.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-24 23:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The code currently works, as in the case you describe
self.wordinfo[key] is still correctly set to 1.  Thus, the
_wordinfoget() gets the correct value.

1.3 is quite out of date - other bugs have been fixed since
then. However, I added a test\test_storage.py file that
tries to exercise these edge cases - if you believe there is
still a bug, please provoke that into failing.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777026&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 24 23:24:15 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 25 01:24:31 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777026 ] Possible cause for db
	corruption in storage.py/DBDictClassif
Message-ID: <E19fv3v-0008Gf-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777026, was opened at 2003-07-24 12:17
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777026&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fionn Behrens (fionn)
Assigned to: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Summary: Possible cause for db corruption in storage.py/DBDictClassif

Initial Comment:

DBDistClassifier uses a neat trick to save some memory:

    def _wordinfoset:
        if record and (record.spamcount+record.hamcount
<= 1):
            self.db[word] = record.__getstate__()
            # Remove this word from the changed list
(not that it should be
            # there, but strange things can happen :)
            try:
                del self.changed_words[word]
            except KeyError:
                pass

Unfortunately the programmer seems to have overlooked
that there might already be a self.wordinfo[word] entry
if (record.spamcount+record.hamcount) have been > 1
previously and some message has been untrained.
So, if some record is e.g. untrained from a count of 2
to a count of 1, then wordinfo[word] will still be 2
while the db[word] entry will be 1. This can lead to
minor miscounts in the spam/ham.

To circumvent the problem, the following should be
added to storage.py at line 239 (referring to version
1.0a3, right below the code part you see above):

            try:
              del self.wordinfo[word]
            except KeyError:
              pass

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-25 01:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Fixed, in

spambayes/storage.py; new revision: 1.16
spambayes/test/test_storage.py; new revision: 1.2

Writing a failing test case was necessarily ugly, since there 
was in fact no actual failure possible here when sticking to 
the ways the _wordinfo{set,get,del} methods get called from 
a classifier.

Mark, many thanks for writing the test driver!  That made this 
a whole lot easier.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-25 00:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Well, the reason this works is really quite subtle:  the 
classifier's _remove_msg and _add_msg methods *mutate* 
the WordInfo record in the wordinfo dict, and pass the 
mutated version on to _wordinfoset.  That's why they never 
get out of synch.

In fact, you can add this line to the start of _wordinfoset's 
outermost else clause:

            assert self.wordinfo[word] is record

and it won't fail.  The assignment

            self.wordinfo[word] = record

isn't actually needed in _wordinfoset!  It always rebinds 
self.wordinfo[word] to the object it was already bound to.

But this isn't apparent from the guts of _wordinfoset, it's a 
property that follows from what holds at the only two places 
_wordinfoset is called from the classifier, and that 
_wordinfoget fills in wordinfo[word] too.

This is really too delicate to bear.  Reopening and assigning to 
me.  While calls of _wordinfoset from the classifier happen 
always to pass the same record on to _wordinfoset as they 
got from the wordinfo dict, I'm not sure all calls everywhere 
do this.  Better to make it bulletproof than to rely on this.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-24 23:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The code currently works, as in the case you describe
self.wordinfo[key] is still correctly set to 1.  Thus, the
_wordinfoget() gets the correct value.

1.3 is quite out of date - other bugs have been fixed since
then. However, I added a test\test_storage.py file that
tries to exercise these edge cases - if you believe there is
still a bug, please provoke that into failing.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777026&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 25 04:02:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 25 06:02:39 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows
	2000
Message-ID: <E19fzPC-0003U1-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-02 04:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ghuron
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000

Initial Comment:
When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs 
until the registering dll's section and then stops with an 
alert.  An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is

"Unable to register the DLL/OCX. 

DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201.

<Abort> <Retry> <Ignore>"

I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just 
repeat the error and Abort would unwind the 
installation.  I never tried Ignore.

I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, 
but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them.  
Abort worked the second time.  I finally tried Ignore, 
which completes okay.  When I ran Outlook, though, the 
add-in wasn't there.

This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron 
notebook.  It has Outlook 2002 SP2.  Both are up to 
date with recent patches.  I believe this combination is 
not known to work, but thought this information might 
help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-25 14:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Using regmon and filemon I finally found what was the source 
of that problem: somebody unregister file %Program Files%
\Common Files\Designer\MSADDNDR.DLL 
When I register it manually, I was able to register 
spambayes_addin.dll 
I have no idea what is this module for and why 
spambayes_addin.dll is trying to access it in DLLRegisterServer
()

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-24 18:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "<string>", line 10, in ?

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport

  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 75, in ?

  File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 21, in 
RegisterInterfaces
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147319779, 'Library not 
registered.', None, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-23 03:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

That error code generally means the Python code doing the
registration failed.  Can you please look for a log file to
attach - see
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html
for info on finding the log

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-22 21:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Just to keep up to date--the 005 version of the binary 
installer still has this problem on Win 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-21 23:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Although this is not yet claimed to be fixed, I tested it in the 
new version 004 installer.  As expected, it fails in the same 
way it did in the 002 and 003 installers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 22:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Copy-n-pasted from another bug report:

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from
"addin.py" regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 19:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :)

--Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error.
--Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to 
Spambayes Outlook plug-in
--Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using 
both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB 
article. No difference.
--Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in 
case:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;207132

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;249873

The 2nd one mentions this:

DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. 
Return code was: string
*Search Winerror.h for string. 

You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to 
get this working again. 

Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes 
working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her 
to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, 
her missing "spam thingy".

I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I 
upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. 
Just so happened that 003 became available and 
troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, 
so I did. Didn't help me.... :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-04 08:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 
did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ 
SP2 installed.

The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. 
Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up 
and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running 
the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does 
NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-02 21:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on 
Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could 
not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) 
And still could not install the Binary version 003.
I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then 
tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I 
uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 25 04:35:56 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 25 06:35:59 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-777453 ] Mark spam as
	read automatically
Message-ID: <E19fzvY-0002Zr-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #777453, was opened at 2003-07-25 12:35
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=777453&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Torsten Martinsen (bullestock)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Mark spam as read automatically

Initial Comment:
Just installed the SpamBayes Outlook yesterday, and it 
already works great. Thanks guys.

However, any spam moved to the Spam folder is still 
marked as Unread, which means that Outlook displays its 
cute little envelope indicator in the tray, causing me to 
open it to check my new mail.

I would prefer that Spam items (not the Unsure ones of 
course) were automatically marked as Read, so that I 
could just periodically review the contents of the Spam 
folder.

(Of course, Mozilla already does this, which is why I have 
grown used to it).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=777453&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 25 05:19:10 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 25 07:19:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765912 ] AssertionError:
	Proportions must add to 1.0 ...
Message-ID: <E19g0bO-0000as-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765912, was opened at 2003-07-04 22:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 ...

Initial Comment:
I upgraded my (working) outlook 2000 + spambayes 
installation to Outlook XP and the newest version of 
Spambayes. Spambayes would not perform any action 
when I had defined "spam" and "ham" folders and chosen 
"Train". It wouldn't matter if I had "rebuild entire 
database" checked or unchecked.

Actions: 
1. Start Outlook.
2. Go to SpamBayes config menu.
3. Click on "Train now"
4. Select "spam" folder.
5. Click on "Train now"

After that, "nothing happens". Clicking on "stop training" 
does not work, but I can close the window by clicking on 
the "[x] in the upper right corner and get back to the 
"main" menu.

I have tried all possible combinations of checkboxes. I 
have also ran "scanpst.exe" on my mailbox file. OS is XP 
Pro (English) 


Here's the log file:




Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in 
set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command 
ID 1100, Code 0

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 21:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Success confirmed :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-24 23:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This has us stumped.  I have an instrumented version of the
plugin at
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/downloads/SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-BugCatcher.exe
- if you are seeing this assertion error, please try this
version and attach a log.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Date: 2003-07-22 23:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=815848

I installed the latest version of the plugin. Here's the logfile. 
Actions taken: 
1. started outlook
2. Opened "spambayes manager" 
3. clicked "train now"
4. selected "rebuild entire database"
5. selected a "spam" folder (the field was empty)
6. clicked on "train now"
(nothing happened)
7. clicked on the "close window" button.
8. clicked on "train now"
9. deselected "rebuild entire database"
10. clicked "train now" again
(nothing happened)
11. closed the window

Here's the logfile:

Loaded bayes database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin (beta), version 0.4 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 
2003))...
On Windows version 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


// Andreas

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Date: 2003-07-22 23:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=815848

I installed the latest version of the plugin. Here's the logfile. 
Actions taken: 
1. started outlook
2. Opened "spambayes manager" 
3. clicked "train now"
4. selected "rebuild entire database"
5. selected a "spam" folder (the field was empty)
6. clicked on "train now"
(nothing happened)
7. clicked on the "close window" button.
8. clicked on "train now"
9. deselected "rebuild entire database"
10. clicked "train now" again
(nothing happened)
11. closed the window

Here's the logfile:

Loaded bayes database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin (beta), version 0.4 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 
2003))...
On Windows version 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


// Andreas

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 20:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Please try version 004 of the binary - I expect the same
behavior, but more information in the log!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-21 12:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

noting dupicate in #774781

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 09:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in code to help diagnose this - the assertion
prints the items and the sum

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 14:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Good to know English versions also show it.  Anyone able to
 run the source code version?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gael Marziou (gmarziou)
Date: 2003-07-09 07:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=203211

I ahve exactly the same symptoms on US outlook 2000 on 
windows 2000 pro sp3.

My log file:

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons
ERROR: 'You must enable SpamBayes before you can delete 
as spam'
None
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Cloutier (chealer)
Date: 2003-07-05 08:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738765

GOD!
I had the exact same problem with French version. 
Repeating "Train now" after closing the window with X only 
made the above lines to repeat in the log file. log files closes 
by

Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\Chealer\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 0 messages, finding 0 spam and 0 
unsure
Addin terminating: 1 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


And now, just as I was writing the bug report, I open Outlook 
and it's gone! SB is now trained, and I made no reboot, no 
update of anything...
So what to say? Well, be patient. I think I tried the function 
about 10 times and closed Outlook around 5 times in the 
meantime... hope it's gonna be as simple as that to fix the 
bug too.
By the way, this bug succeeded to the max size error with 
binary 002 which had been perfectly fixed by 003.

OS is Windows XP Pro SP1 French, I have Outlook XP SP2 
French and didn't change this since months.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 25 05:30:37 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 25 07:30:41 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Feature Requests-777453 ] Mark spam as
	read automatically
Message-ID: <E19g0mT-00018Y-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Feature Requests item #777453, was opened at 2003-07-25 20:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=777453&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Torsten Martinsen (bullestock)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Mark spam as read automatically

Initial Comment:
Just installed the SpamBayes Outlook yesterday, and it 
already works great. Thanks guys.

However, any spam moved to the Spam folder is still 
marked as Unread, which means that Outlook displays its 
cute little envelope indicator in the tray, causing me to 
open it to check my new mail.

I would prefer that Spam items (not the Unsure ones of 
course) were automatically marked as Read, so that I 
could just periodically review the contents of the Spam 
folder.

(Of course, Mozilla already does this, which is why I have 
grown used to it).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 21:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Please see
http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#can-mail-marked-as-spam-automatically-be-marked-as-read

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498106&aid=777453&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 25 08:37:55 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 25 10:38:00 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows
	2000
Message-ID: <E19g3hj-0006rv-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-02 10:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000

Initial Comment:
When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs 
until the registering dll's section and then stops with an 
alert.  An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is

"Unable to register the DLL/OCX. 

DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201.

<Abort> <Retry> <Ignore>"

I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just 
repeat the error and Abort would unwind the 
installation.  I never tried Ignore.

I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, 
but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them.  
Abort worked the second time.  I finally tried Ignore, 
which completes okay.  When I ran Outlook, though, the 
add-in wasn't there.

This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron 
notebook.  It has Outlook 2002 SP2.  Both are up to 
date with recent patches.  I believe this combination is 
not known to work, but thought this information might 
help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-26 00:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I've put a new interim version at
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/downloads/SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-BugCatcher.exe.
 This version is specifically for testing this "Unable to
Register" error, so please try it as soon as you can, and
let me know how it goes.  (Note that speficically, it should
work even when that dll is not registered/installed)



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-25 20:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Using regmon and filemon I finally found what was the source 
of that problem: somebody unregister file %Program Files%
\Common Files\Designer\MSADDNDR.DLL 
When I register it manually, I was able to register 
spambayes_addin.dll 
I have no idea what is this module for and why 
spambayes_addin.dll is trying to access it in DLLRegisterServer
()

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-25 00:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "<string>", line 10, in ?

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport

  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 75, in ?

  File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 21, in 
RegisterInterfaces
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147319779, 'Library not 
registered.', None, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-23 09:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

That error code generally means the Python code doing the
registration failed.  Can you please look for a log file to
attach - see
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html
for info on finding the log

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-23 03:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Just to keep up to date--the 005 version of the binary 
installer still has this problem on Win 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-22 05:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Although this is not yet claimed to be fixed, I tested it in the 
new version 004 installer.  As expected, it fails in the same 
way it did in the 002 and 003 installers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-07 04:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Copy-n-pasted from another bug report:

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from
"addin.py" regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-07 01:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :)

--Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error.
--Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to 
Spambayes Outlook plug-in
--Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using 
both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB 
article. No difference.
--Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in 
case:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;207132

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;249873

The 2nd one mentions this:

DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. 
Return code was: string
*Search Winerror.h for string. 

You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to 
get this working again. 

Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes 
working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her 
to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, 
her missing "spam thingy".

I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I 
upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. 
Just so happened that 003 became available and 
troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, 
so I did. Didn't help me.... :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-04 14:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 
did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ 
SP2 installed.

The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. 
Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up 
and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running 
the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does 
NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-03 03:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on 
Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could 
not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) 
And still could not install the Binary version 003.
I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then 
tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I 
uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 25 08:54:31 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 25 10:56:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777540 ] DLL Registration Error
	on Reinstall
Message-ID: <E19g3xn-0001u1-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777540, was opened at 2003-07-25 23:30
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777540&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Kantor (akantor)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: DLL Registration Error on Reinstall

Initial Comment:
[Copy of this sent to mailing list]

During reinstall of plugin (v005), I got the following
error: "Unable to register the DLL/OCX:
DllRegisterServer failed; code 0x80040201."

I retried, then decided to ignore. Naturally, the
plugin didn't work. I tried everything in the
Troubleshooting Guide (re-enabling, etc.) to no avail.
Any help you can offer would be appreciated!
 
Here's the system:
Windows 98 with Outlook XP
SpamBayes Outlook plugin 005
 
Log files 1 and 2 are identical:
 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 75, in ?
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 21, in
RegisterInterfaces
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error loading type
library/DLL.', None, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777540&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 25 07:31:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 25 11:01:50 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777540 ] DLL Registration Error
	on Reinstall
Message-ID: <E19g2ez-0002Q0-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777540, was opened at 2003-07-25 09:30
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777540&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Kantor (akantor)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: DLL Registration Error on Reinstall

Initial Comment:
[Copy of this sent to mailing list]

During reinstall of plugin (v005), I got the following
error: "Unable to register the DLL/OCX:
DllRegisterServer failed; code 0x80040201."

I retried, then decided to ignore. Naturally, the
plugin didn't work. I tried everything in the
Troubleshooting Guide (re-enabling, etc.) to no avail.
Any help you can offer would be appreciated!
 
Here's the system:
Windows 98 with Outlook XP
SpamBayes Outlook plugin 005
 
Log files 1 and 2 are identical:
 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook
  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 75, in ?
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 21, in
RegisterInterfaces
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147312566, 'Error loading type
library/DLL.', None, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777540&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 25 08:56:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 25 11:01:57 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-750069 ] Spambayes Enabled,
	No Decimal Values Reported
Message-ID: <E19g3zX-0004Kp-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #750069, was opened at 2003-06-06 23:10
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=750069&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: George Bertoli (gbertoli)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spambayes Enabled, No Decimal Values Reported

Initial Comment:
Running Windows 2000 professional, Outlook 2000 SP3

Log files attached.

Think this might be result of Ad-Aware or Spybot 
removing or disabling Python?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-21 13:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

This appears to be the same bug as [ 706520 ] assert fails in 
classifier
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=706520&group_id=61702&atid=498103

You can try deleting the databases and retraining. See the 
FAQ for infomation on locating the databases. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: George Bertoli (gbertoli)
Date: 2003-06-08 12:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=795444

Further notes,
Spambayes was installed and working fine for two weeks 
before it stopped working (stopped reporting decimal values 
and resultant no filtering).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=750069&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 25 09:41:26 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 25 11:41:40 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows
	2000
Message-ID: <E19g4hC-0005ys-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-02 04:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ghuron
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000

Initial Comment:
When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs 
until the registering dll's section and then stops with an 
alert.  An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is

"Unable to register the DLL/OCX. 

DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201.

<Abort> <Retry> <Ignore>"

I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just 
repeat the error and Abort would unwind the 
installation.  I never tried Ignore.

I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, 
but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them.  
Abort worked the second time.  I finally tried Ignore, 
which completes okay.  When I ran Outlook, though, the 
add-in wasn't there.

This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron 
notebook.  It has Outlook 2002 SP2.  Both are up to 
date with recent patches.  I believe this combination is 
not known to work, but thought this information might 
help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-25 19:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Works fine here: Win2003EE+OutlookXPSP2. In the same 
enviroment ver 005 doesn't won't to install with 0x80040201

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 18:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I've put a new interim version at
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/downloads/SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-BugCatcher.exe.
 This version is specifically for testing this "Unable to
Register" error, so please try it as soon as you can, and
let me know how it goes.  (Note that speficically, it should
work even when that dll is not registered/installed)



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-25 14:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Using regmon and filemon I finally found what was the source 
of that problem: somebody unregister file %Program Files%
\Common Files\Designer\MSADDNDR.DLL 
When I register it manually, I was able to register 
spambayes_addin.dll 
I have no idea what is this module for and why 
spambayes_addin.dll is trying to access it in DLLRegisterServer
()

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-24 18:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "<string>", line 10, in ?

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport

  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 75, in ?

  File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 21, in 
RegisterInterfaces
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147319779, 'Library not 
registered.', None, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-23 03:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

That error code generally means the Python code doing the
registration failed.  Can you please look for a log file to
attach - see
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html
for info on finding the log

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-22 21:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Just to keep up to date--the 005 version of the binary 
installer still has this problem on Win 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-21 23:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Although this is not yet claimed to be fixed, I tested it in the 
new version 004 installer.  As expected, it fails in the same 
way it did in the 002 and 003 installers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 22:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Copy-n-pasted from another bug report:

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from
"addin.py" regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 19:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :)

--Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error.
--Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to 
Spambayes Outlook plug-in
--Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using 
both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB 
article. No difference.
--Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in 
case:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;207132

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;249873

The 2nd one mentions this:

DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. 
Return code was: string
*Search Winerror.h for string. 

You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to 
get this working again. 

Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes 
working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her 
to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, 
her missing "spam thingy".

I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I 
upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. 
Just so happened that 003 became available and 
troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, 
so I did. Didn't help me.... :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-04 08:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 
did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ 
SP2 installed.

The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. 
Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up 
and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running 
the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does 
NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-02 21:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on 
Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could 
not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) 
And still could not install the Binary version 003.
I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then 
tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I 
uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 25 09:50:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 25 11:50:10 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows
	2000
Message-ID: <E19g4pX-0006ax-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-02 10:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000

Initial Comment:
When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs 
until the registering dll's section and then stops with an 
alert.  An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is

"Unable to register the DLL/OCX. 

DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201.

<Abort> <Retry> <Ignore>"

I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just 
repeat the error and Abort would unwind the 
installation.  I never tried Ignore.

I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, 
but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them.  
Abort worked the second time.  I finally tried Ignore, 
which completes okay.  When I ran Outlook, though, the 
add-in wasn't there.

This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron 
notebook.  It has Outlook 2002 SP2.  Both are up to 
date with recent patches.  I believe this combination is 
not known to work, but thought this information might 
help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-26 01:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yay - I'm convinced this specific error, with
"win32com.universal" showing up, is fixed :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-26 01:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Works fine here: Win2003EE+OutlookXPSP2. In the same 
enviroment ver 005 doesn't won't to install with 0x80040201

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-26 00:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I've put a new interim version at
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/downloads/SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-BugCatcher.exe.
 This version is specifically for testing this "Unable to
Register" error, so please try it as soon as you can, and
let me know how it goes.  (Note that speficically, it should
work even when that dll is not registered/installed)



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-25 20:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Using regmon and filemon I finally found what was the source 
of that problem: somebody unregister file %Program Files%
\Common Files\Designer\MSADDNDR.DLL 
When I register it manually, I was able to register 
spambayes_addin.dll 
I have no idea what is this module for and why 
spambayes_addin.dll is trying to access it in DLLRegisterServer
()

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-25 00:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "<string>", line 10, in ?

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport

  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 75, in ?

  File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 21, in 
RegisterInterfaces
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147319779, 'Library not 
registered.', None, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-23 09:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

That error code generally means the Python code doing the
registration failed.  Can you please look for a log file to
attach - see
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html
for info on finding the log

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-23 03:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Just to keep up to date--the 005 version of the binary 
installer still has this problem on Win 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-22 05:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Although this is not yet claimed to be fixed, I tested it in the 
new version 004 installer.  As expected, it fails in the same 
way it did in the 002 and 003 installers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-07 04:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Copy-n-pasted from another bug report:

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from
"addin.py" regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-07 01:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :)

--Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error.
--Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to 
Spambayes Outlook plug-in
--Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using 
both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB 
article. No difference.
--Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in 
case:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;207132

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;249873

The 2nd one mentions this:

DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. 
Return code was: string
*Search Winerror.h for string. 

You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to 
get this working again. 

Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes 
working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her 
to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, 
her missing "spam thingy".

I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I 
upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. 
Just so happened that 003 became available and 
troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, 
so I did. Didn't help me.... :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-04 14:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 
did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ 
SP2 installed.

The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. 
Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up 
and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running 
the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does 
NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-03 03:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on 
Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could 
not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) 
And still could not install the Binary version 003.
I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then 
tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I 
uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 25 17:06:09 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 25 19:06:31 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777856 ] SpamBayes now crashes
	Outlook
Message-ID: <E19gBdZ-0003st-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777856, was opened at 2003-07-25 16:06
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777856&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Geoffrey Linnell (glinnell)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: SpamBayes now crashes Outlook

Initial Comment:
I installed V .2, and it worked fine.  I uninstalled, and 
installed V .3, and since then when I go into Manager, 
select Train Now, and click on browse, Outlook 2000 
freezes...I have to kill the process to end it.  I've since 
tried V .5...the same.  I've uninstalled Office, Re-
installed, patched to SP3...nothing.  Any SpamBayes 
dialog that has a Browse button still halts Outlook.  
Office is 9.0.6926 SP3, Outlook is SP3, 9.0.0.6627.  All 
running on Windows 2000 Build 2195 SP3.

-Geoff 
ilx@cypress.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777856&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 25 19:05:44 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 25 21:05:57 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777891 ] CVS Outlook addin dead
	on Win98SE
Message-ID: <E19gDVI-0007GM-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777891, was opened at 2003-07-25 21:00
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777891&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: CVS Outlook addin dead on Win98SE

Initial Comment:
Updated to current CVS a little while ago.  Using Python 
2.2.3 w/o bsddb3 (so have a pickled dict) ... win32all 
build 150 ... Outlook 2K IMO SR1 ... Win98SE (w/ all 
relevant service packs).

Opened Outlook and the toolbar was there, but no msgs 
getting scored.  Opened the PythonWin trace collector 
window, and it was blank.  That's a new one.

Closed Outlook, ran Outlook2000 addin.py, which 
appeared to work.  Opened Outlook again, and got just 
this in the trace collector:

"""
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 144, in 
CreateInstance
    return retObj._CreateInstance_(clsid, reqIID)
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 201, in 
_CreateInstance_
    self._wrap_(myob)
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 447, in _wrap_
    MappedWrapPolicy._wrap_(self, ob)
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 393, in _wrap_
    BasicWrapPolicy._wrap_(self, object)
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 239, in _wrap_
    i = pythoncom.InterfaceNames[i]
exceptions.KeyError: _IDTExtensibility2
pythoncom error: CPyFactory::CreateInstance failed to 
create instance. (80004005)
"""

This sequence of actions and results is repeatable in all 
respects.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-25 21:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Huge <wink> clue:  I did a CVS update with "-D yesterday", 
ran addin.py again, and everything works great again.

cvsup said these files were reverted to yesterday's state:

P Outlook2000/addin.py
P Outlook2000/manager.py
P Outlook2000/msgstore.py
P Outlook2000/installer/spambayes_addin.spec
P spambayes/storage.py
cvs server: spambayes/test/README.txt is no longer in the 
repository
cvs server: spambayes/test/test_storage.py is no longer in 
the repository

I checked in changes to storage.py and test_storage.py last 
night, and ran Outlook without problems after that, so they're 
not it (which stands to reason, since the changes were to 
DBDictClassifier, which my home spambayes installation isn't 
using).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777891&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 25 19:36:27 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 25 21:36:52 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777891 ] CVS Outlook addin dead
	on Win98SE
Message-ID: <E19gDz1-0006wU-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777891, was opened at 2003-07-26 11:00
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777891&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: CVS Outlook addin dead on Win98SE

Initial Comment:
Updated to current CVS a little while ago.  Using Python 
2.2.3 w/o bsddb3 (so have a pickled dict) ... win32all 
build 150 ... Outlook 2K IMO SR1 ... Win98SE (w/ all 
relevant service packs).

Opened Outlook and the toolbar was there, but no msgs 
getting scored.  Opened the PythonWin trace collector 
window, and it was blank.  That's a new one.

Closed Outlook, ran Outlook2000 addin.py, which 
appeared to work.  Opened Outlook again, and got just 
this in the trace collector:

"""
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 144, in 
CreateInstance
    return retObj._CreateInstance_(clsid, reqIID)
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 201, in 
_CreateInstance_
    self._wrap_(myob)
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 447, in _wrap_
    MappedWrapPolicy._wrap_(self, ob)
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 393, in _wrap_
    BasicWrapPolicy._wrap_(self, object)
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 239, in _wrap_
    i = pythoncom.InterfaceNames[i]
exceptions.KeyError: _IDTExtensibility2
pythoncom error: CPyFactory::CreateInstance failed to 
create instance. (80004005)
"""

This sequence of actions and results is repeatable in all 
respects.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-26 11:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Sorry about that.  I actually remembered I broke things
befor I saw this bug :)  1.78 of addin.py should have it
fixed (or reopen it if not)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-26 11:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Huge <wink> clue:  I did a CVS update with "-D yesterday", 
ran addin.py again, and everything works great again.

cvsup said these files were reverted to yesterday's state:

P Outlook2000/addin.py
P Outlook2000/manager.py
P Outlook2000/msgstore.py
P Outlook2000/installer/spambayes_addin.spec
P spambayes/storage.py
cvs server: spambayes/test/README.txt is no longer in the 
repository
cvs server: spambayes/test/test_storage.py is no longer in 
the repository

I checked in changes to storage.py and test_storage.py last 
night, and ran Outlook without problems after that, so they're 
not it (which stands to reason, since the changes were to 
DBDictClassifier, which my home spambayes installation isn't 
using).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777891&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 25 20:15:43 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 25 22:15:46 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777908 ] Spam allowed when 8th
	bit set on character in subject
Message-ID: <E19gEb1-0001Hg-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777908, was opened at 2003-07-25 19:15
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777908&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David R. Handy (davidhandy)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Spam allowed when 8th bit set on character in subject

Initial Comment:
I have been getting about 1 message a day leaked
through because pop3proxy can't handle messages with
subject header lines that contain characters out of the
US ASCII range.

The symptom is that I get an email with a header line
that looks like this:

X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeError(ASCII
decoding error: ordinal
        not in range(128)) in append() at
        /usr/local/lib/python2.2/email/Header.py line 230:
        ustr = unicode(s, incodec)

And there is no X-Spambayes-Classification header.

And then I look and I find that there is some weird
character in the subject line.

Spammers often put random garbage at the end of subject
lines. In some cases however this looked deliberate -
using o with an umlaut, for example, in place of a
regular o in an English word.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777908&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 25 20:25:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Fri Jul 25 22:25:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777891 ] CVS Outlook addin dead
	on Win98SE
Message-ID: <E19gEkU-0008HT-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777891, was opened at 2003-07-25 21:00
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777891&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: CVS Outlook addin dead on Win98SE

Initial Comment:
Updated to current CVS a little while ago.  Using Python 
2.2.3 w/o bsddb3 (so have a pickled dict) ... win32all 
build 150 ... Outlook 2K IMO SR1 ... Win98SE (w/ all 
relevant service packs).

Opened Outlook and the toolbar was there, but no msgs 
getting scored.  Opened the PythonWin trace collector 
window, and it was blank.  That's a new one.

Closed Outlook, ran Outlook2000 addin.py, which 
appeared to work.  Opened Outlook again, and got just 
this in the trace collector:

"""
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 144, in 
CreateInstance
    return retObj._CreateInstance_(clsid, reqIID)
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 201, in 
_CreateInstance_
    self._wrap_(myob)
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 447, in _wrap_
    MappedWrapPolicy._wrap_(self, ob)
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 393, in _wrap_
    BasicWrapPolicy._wrap_(self, object)
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 239, in _wrap_
    i = pythoncom.InterfaceNames[i]
exceptions.KeyError: _IDTExtensibility2
pythoncom error: CPyFactory::CreateInstance failed to 
create instance. (80004005)
"""

This sequence of actions and results is repeatable in all 
respects.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-25 22:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Don't apologize, I owe you many indulgences by now <wink>.  
It is indeed fixed in current CVS.  Thanks!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 21:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Sorry about that.  I actually remembered I broke things
befor I saw this bug :)  1.78 of addin.py should have it
fixed (or reopen it if not)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-25 21:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Huge <wink> clue:  I did a CVS update with "-D yesterday", 
ran addin.py again, and everything works great again.

cvsup said these files were reverted to yesterday's state:

P Outlook2000/addin.py
P Outlook2000/manager.py
P Outlook2000/msgstore.py
P Outlook2000/installer/spambayes_addin.spec
P spambayes/storage.py
cvs server: spambayes/test/README.txt is no longer in the 
repository
cvs server: spambayes/test/test_storage.py is no longer in 
the repository

I checked in changes to storage.py and test_storage.py last 
night, and ran Outlook without problems after that, so they're 
not it (which stands to reason, since the changes were to 
DBDictClassifier, which my home spambayes installation isn't 
using).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777891&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 25 19:03:10 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Jul 26 01:03:27 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-776297 ] Add version check to
	plugin
Message-ID: <E19gDSo-00065k-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #776297, was opened at 2003-07-24 00:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
>Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Summary: Add version check to plugin

Initial Comment:
Many questions on the spambayes mailing list are 
answered with "first, make sure you are using the 
latest version of the Outlook plugin".  This patch
allows people to check to see if they are up-to-date.

Before incorporating this, please change the URL
of the page which contains the version number! :-)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-26 11:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yep, binary version would be what you should compare against

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-24 11:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

That sounds fine to me.  Is the BinaryVersion element (currently
0.5) the item to compare with?  I was looking through the
Outlook2000 directory for "005".

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-24 09:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

How about we put on the web server the latest version of
"spambayes\Version.py" - we could then parse it locally and
extra more metadata (such as the new release date etc).  The
code could also be generally useful for all spambayes apps.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-24 01:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

> ...Or maybe that would just hammer the website too much ;)

Plus 'twould have been beyond my nascent Windows programming
skills...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-24 01:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Maybe checking the version at startup in a seperate thread 
(along with an option to disable the check) and only show 
the message if a new version is availible could be added. ...Or 
maybe that would just hammer the website too much ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Jul 26 00:35:18 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Jul 26 02:35:25 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777908 ] Spam allowed when 8th
	bit set on character in subject
Message-ID: <E19gIeE-0005RM-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777908, was opened at 2003-07-26 02:15
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by richiehindle
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777908&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David R. Handy (davidhandy)
>Assigned to: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Summary: Spam allowed when 8th bit set on character in subject

Initial Comment:
I have been getting about 1 message a day leaked
through because pop3proxy can't handle messages with
subject header lines that contain characters out of the
US ASCII range.

The symptom is that I get an email with a header line
that looks like this:

X-Spambayes-Exception: exceptions.UnicodeError(ASCII
decoding error: ordinal
        not in range(128)) in append() at
        /usr/local/lib/python2.2/email/Header.py line 230:
        ustr = unicode(s, incodec)

And there is no X-Spambayes-Classification header.

And then I look and I find that there is some weird
character in the subject line.

Spammers often put random garbage at the end of subject
lines. In some cases however this looked deliberate -
using o with an umlaut, for example, in place of a
regular o in an English word.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Richie Hindle (richiehindle)
Date: 2003-07-26 06:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85414

Already fixed in CVS:

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-checkins/2003-
July/001441.html
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes-checkins/2003-
July/001440.html


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777908&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Fri Jul 25 19:00:34 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Jul 26 06:11:54 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777891 ] CVS Outlook addin dead
	on Win98SE
Message-ID: <E19gDQI-000733-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777891, was opened at 2003-07-25 21:00
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777891&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: CVS Outlook addin dead on Win98SE

Initial Comment:
Updated to current CVS a little while ago.  Using Python 
2.2.3 w/o bsddb3 (so have a pickled dict) ... win32all 
build 150 ... Outlook 2K IMO SR1 ... Win98SE (w/ all 
relevant service packs).

Opened Outlook and the toolbar was there, but no msgs 
getting scored.  Opened the PythonWin trace collector 
window, and it was blank.  That's a new one.

Closed Outlook, ran Outlook2000 addin.py, which 
appeared to work.  Opened Outlook again, and got just 
this in the trace collector:

"""
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 144, in 
CreateInstance
    return retObj._CreateInstance_(clsid, reqIID)
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 201, in 
_CreateInstance_
    self._wrap_(myob)
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 447, in _wrap_
    MappedWrapPolicy._wrap_(self, ob)
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 393, in _wrap_
    BasicWrapPolicy._wrap_(self, object)
  File "C:\PYTHON22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 239, in _wrap_
    i = pythoncom.InterfaceNames[i]
exceptions.KeyError: _IDTExtensibility2
pythoncom error: CPyFactory::CreateInstance failed to 
create instance. (80004005)
"""

This sequence of actions and results is repeatable in all 
respects.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777891&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sat Jul 26 18:37:05 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sat Jul 26 20:37:10 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-776297 ] Add version check to
	plugin
Message-ID: <E19gZX7-0003ZO-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #776297, was opened at 2003-07-23 09:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
>Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Add version check to plugin

Initial Comment:
Many questions on the spambayes mailing list are 
answered with "first, make sure you are using the 
latest version of the Outlook plugin".  This patch
allows people to check to see if they are up-to-date.

Before incorporating this, please change the URL
of the page which contains the version number! :-)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-26 19:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

Here's an updated version of just checkversion.py which
assumes the remote file is the latest version of Version.py.
I haven't tried this on Windows (I'm at home).  I'll leave it
for Mark to pronounce on.  Mark, if you want me to check
it in, let me know what URL you want it to fetch.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 20:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yep, binary version would be what you should compare against

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-23 20:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

That sounds fine to me.  Is the BinaryVersion element (currently
0.5) the item to compare with?  I was looking through the
Outlook2000 directory for "005".

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-23 18:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

How about we put on the web server the latest version of
"spambayes\Version.py" - we could then parse it locally and
extra more metadata (such as the new release date etc).  The
code could also be generally useful for all spambayes apps.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-23 10:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

> ...Or maybe that would just hammer the website too much ;)

Plus 'twould have been beyond my nascent Windows programming
skills...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-23 10:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Maybe checking the version at startup in a seperate thread 
(along with an option to disable the check) and only show 
the message if a new version is availible could be added. ...Or 
maybe that would just hammer the website too much ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 01:26:53 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 03:28:16 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765912 ] AssertionError:
	Proportions must add to 1.0 ...
Message-ID: <E19gfvh-0003BI-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765912, was opened at 2003-07-04 12:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by somogyia
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 ...

Initial Comment:
I upgraded my (working) outlook 2000 + spambayes 
installation to Outlook XP and the newest version of 
Spambayes. Spambayes would not perform any action 
when I had defined "spam" and "ham" folders and chosen 
"Train". It wouldn't matter if I had "rebuild entire 
database" checked or unchecked.

Actions: 
1. Start Outlook.
2. Go to SpamBayes config menu.
3. Click on "Train now"
4. Select "spam" folder.
5. Click on "Train now"

After that, "nothing happens". Clicking on "stop training" 
does not work, but I can close the window by clicking on 
the "[x] in the upper right corner and get back to the 
"main" menu.

I have tried all possible combinations of checkboxes. I 
have also ran "scanpst.exe" on my mailbox file. OS is XP 
Pro (English) 


Here's the log file:




Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in 
set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command 
ID 1100, Code 0

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Date: 2003-07-27 07:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=815848

Yes, with the bugcatcher installer, it works fine here. Wanna 
see the logfile?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 11:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Success confirmed :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-24 13:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This has us stumped.  I have an instrumented version of the
plugin at
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/downloads/SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-BugCatcher.exe
- if you are seeing this assertion error, please try this
version and attach a log.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Date: 2003-07-22 13:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=815848

I installed the latest version of the plugin. Here's the logfile. 
Actions taken: 
1. started outlook
2. Opened "spambayes manager" 
3. clicked "train now"
4. selected "rebuild entire database"
5. selected a "spam" folder (the field was empty)
6. clicked on "train now"
(nothing happened)
7. clicked on the "close window" button.
8. clicked on "train now"
9. deselected "rebuild entire database"
10. clicked "train now" again
(nothing happened)
11. closed the window

Here's the logfile:

Loaded bayes database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin (beta), version 0.4 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 
2003))...
On Windows version 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


// Andreas

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Date: 2003-07-22 13:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=815848

I installed the latest version of the plugin. Here's the logfile. 
Actions taken: 
1. started outlook
2. Opened "spambayes manager" 
3. clicked "train now"
4. selected "rebuild entire database"
5. selected a "spam" folder (the field was empty)
6. clicked on "train now"
(nothing happened)
7. clicked on the "close window" button.
8. clicked on "train now"
9. deselected "rebuild entire database"
10. clicked "train now" again
(nothing happened)
11. closed the window

Here's the logfile:

Loaded bayes database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin (beta), version 0.4 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 
2003))...
On Windows version 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


// Andreas

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 10:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Please try version 004 of the binary - I expect the same
behavior, but more information in the log!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-21 02:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

noting dupicate in #774781

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 23:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in code to help diagnose this - the assertion
prints the items and the sum

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 04:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Good to know English versions also show it.  Anyone able to
 run the source code version?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gael Marziou (gmarziou)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=203211

I ahve exactly the same symptoms on US outlook 2000 on 
windows 2000 pro sp3.

My log file:

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons
ERROR: 'You must enable SpamBayes before you can delete 
as spam'
None
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Cloutier (chealer)
Date: 2003-07-04 22:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738765

GOD!
I had the exact same problem with French version. 
Repeating "Train now" after closing the window with X only 
made the above lines to repeat in the log file. log files closes 
by

Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\Chealer\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 0 messages, finding 0 spam and 0 
unsure
Addin terminating: 1 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


And now, just as I was writing the bug report, I open Outlook 
and it's gone! SB is now trained, and I made no reboot, no 
update of anything...
So what to say? Well, be patient. I think I tried the function 
about 10 times and closed Outlook around 5 times in the 
meantime... hope it's gonna be as simple as that to fix the 
bug too.
By the way, this bug succeeded to the max size error with 
binary 002 which had been perfectly fixed by 003.

OS is Windows XP Pro SP1 French, I have Outlook XP SP2 
French and didn't change this since months.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 01:26:53 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 03:33:56 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-765912 ] AssertionError:
	Proportions must add to 1.0 ...
Message-ID: <E19gfvh-0003BM-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #765912, was opened at 2003-07-04 12:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by somogyia
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 ...

Initial Comment:
I upgraded my (working) outlook 2000 + spambayes 
installation to Outlook XP and the newest version of 
Spambayes. Spambayes would not perform any action 
when I had defined "spam" and "ham" folders and chosen 
"Train". It wouldn't matter if I had "rebuild entire 
database" checked or unchecked.

Actions: 
1. Start Outlook.
2. Go to SpamBayes config menu.
3. Click on "Train now"
4. Select "spam" folder.
5. Click on "Train now"

After that, "nothing happens". Clicking on "stop training" 
does not work, but I can close the window by clicking on 
the "[x] in the upper right corner and get back to the 
"main" menu.

I have tried all possible combinations of checkboxes. I 
have also ran "scanpst.exe" on my mailbox file. OS is XP 
Pro (English) 


Here's the log file:




Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in 
set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command 
ID 1100, Code 0

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Date: 2003-07-27 07:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=815848

Yes, with the bugcatcher installer, it works fine here. Wanna 
see the logfile?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Date: 2003-07-27 07:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=815848

Yes, with the bugcatcher installer, it works fine here. Wanna 
see the logfile?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 11:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Success confirmed :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-24 13:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This has us stumped.  I have an instrumented version of the
plugin at
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/downloads/SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-BugCatcher.exe
- if you are seeing this assertion error, please try this
version and attach a log.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Date: 2003-07-22 13:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=815848

I installed the latest version of the plugin. Here's the logfile. 
Actions taken: 
1. started outlook
2. Opened "spambayes manager" 
3. clicked "train now"
4. selected "rebuild entire database"
5. selected a "spam" folder (the field was empty)
6. clicked on "train now"
(nothing happened)
7. clicked on the "close window" button.
8. clicked on "train now"
9. deselected "rebuild entire database"
10. clicked "train now" again
(nothing happened)
11. closed the window

Here's the logfile:

Loaded bayes database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin (beta), version 0.4 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 
2003))...
On Windows version 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


// Andreas

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andreas Somogyi (somogyia)
Date: 2003-07-22 13:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=815848

I installed the latest version of the plugin. Here's the logfile. 
Actions taken: 
1. started outlook
2. Opened "spambayes manager" 
3. clicked "train now"
4. selected "rebuild entire database"
5. selected a "spam" folder (the field was empty)
6. clicked on "train now"
(nothing happened)
7. clicked on the "close window" button.
8. clicked on "train now"
9. deselected "rebuild entire database"
10. clicked "train now" again
(nothing happened)
11. closed the window

Here's the logfile:

Loaded bayes database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'D:\Documents and 
Settings\Andreas.INSOMNIAC\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin (beta), version 0.4 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 
2003))...
On Windows version 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 145, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 175, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0 (1,(('', 1.0),))
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


// Andreas

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 10:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Please try version 004 of the binary - I expect the same
behavior, but more information in the log!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-21 02:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

noting dupicate in #774781

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 23:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in code to help diagnose this - the assertion
prints the items and the sum

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-09 04:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Good to know English versions also show it.  Anyone able to
 run the source code version?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Gael Marziou (gmarziou)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=203211

I ahve exactly the same symptoms on US outlook 2000 on 
windows 2000 pro sp3.

My log file:

Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\marziou\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 0 spam and 0 good messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin Beta1, version 0.3 (July 2003) 
starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta1, version 0.1 (May 
2003))...
Creating new SpamBayes toolbar to host our buttons
ERROR: 'You must enable SpamBayes before you can delete 
as spam'
None
warning: raising a string exception is deprecated
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 144, in OnStart
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.TrainingDialog", line 127, in 
StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 174, in StartProcess
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 36, in __init__
  File "out1.pyz/dialogs.AsyncDialog", line 45, in set_stages
AssertionError: Proportions must add to 1.0
win32ui: Error in Command Message handler for command ID 
1100, Code 0


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Cloutier (chealer)
Date: 2003-07-04 22:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=738765

GOD!
I had the exact same problem with French version. 
Repeating "Train now" after closing the window with X only 
made the above lines to repeat in the log file. log files closes 
by

Saving configuration -> C:\Documents and 
Settings\Chealer\Application Data\SpamBayes\Outlook.ini
SpamBayes - Disconnecting from Outlook
Bayes database is not dirty - not writing
SpamBayes processed 0 messages, finding 0 spam and 0 
unsure
Addin terminating: 1 COM client and 2 COM servers exist.


And now, just as I was writing the bug report, I open Outlook 
and it's gone! SB is now trained, and I made no reboot, no 
update of anything...
So what to say? Well, be patient. I think I tried the function 
about 10 times and closed Outlook around 5 times in the 
meantime... hope it's gonna be as simple as that to fix the 
bug too.
By the way, this bug succeeded to the max size error with 
binary 002 which had been perfectly fixed by 003.

OS is Windows XP Pro SP1 French, I have Outlook XP SP2 
French and didn't change this since months.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=765912&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 07:17:58 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 09:18:05 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-776297 ] Add version check to
	plugin
Message-ID: <E19glPS-0001NH-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #776297, was opened at 2003-07-23 09:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Add version check to plugin

Initial Comment:
Many questions on the spambayes mailing list are 
answered with "first, make sure you are using the 
latest version of the Outlook plugin".  This patch
allows people to check to see if they are up-to-date.

Before incorporating this, please change the URL
of the page which contains the version number! :-)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-27 08:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

Okay, idiot that I am, I have it simply importing the file I
downloaded.  That obviously has some serious security
risks, so I will change it so that it simply pulls the version 
information from the file as if it was pure data.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-26 19:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

Here's an updated version of just checkversion.py which
assumes the remote file is the latest version of Version.py.
I haven't tried this on Windows (I'm at home).  I'll leave it
for Mark to pronounce on.  Mark, if you want me to check
it in, let me know what URL you want it to fetch.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 20:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yep, binary version would be what you should compare against

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-23 20:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

That sounds fine to me.  Is the BinaryVersion element (currently
0.5) the item to compare with?  I was looking through the
Outlook2000 directory for "005".

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-23 18:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

How about we put on the web server the latest version of
"spambayes\Version.py" - we could then parse it locally and
extra more metadata (such as the new release date etc).  The
code could also be generally useful for all spambayes apps.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-23 10:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

> ...Or maybe that would just hammer the website too much ;)

Plus 'twould have been beyond my nascent Windows programming
skills...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-23 10:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Maybe checking the version at startup in a seperate thread 
(along with an option to disable the check) and only show 
the message if a new version is availible could be added. ...Or 
maybe that would just hammer the website too much ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 07:30:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 09:30:38 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-776297 ] Add version check to
	plugin
Message-ID: <E19glba-0002i8-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #776297, was opened at 2003-07-23 09:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Add version check to plugin

Initial Comment:
Many questions on the spambayes mailing list are 
answered with "first, make sure you are using the 
latest version of the Outlook plugin".  This patch
allows people to check to see if they are up-to-date.

Before incorporating this, please change the URL
of the page which contains the version number! :-)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-27 08:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

Here's another version.  This uses re.search to extract
the BinaryVersion value from the remote copy of
Version.py and compares it with the local value.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-27 08:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

Okay, idiot that I am, I have it simply importing the file I
downloaded.  That obviously has some serious security
risks, so I will change it so that it simply pulls the version 
information from the file as if it was pure data.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-26 19:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

Here's an updated version of just checkversion.py which
assumes the remote file is the latest version of Version.py.
I haven't tried this on Windows (I'm at home).  I'll leave it
for Mark to pronounce on.  Mark, if you want me to check
it in, let me know what URL you want it to fetch.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 20:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yep, binary version would be what you should compare against

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-23 20:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

That sounds fine to me.  Is the BinaryVersion element (currently
0.5) the item to compare with?  I was looking through the
Outlook2000 directory for "005".

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-23 18:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

How about we put on the web server the latest version of
"spambayes\Version.py" - we could then parse it locally and
extra more metadata (such as the new release date etc).  The
code could also be generally useful for all spambayes apps.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-23 10:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

> ...Or maybe that would just hammer the website too much ;)

Plus 'twould have been beyond my nascent Windows programming
skills...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-23 10:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Maybe checking the version at startup in a seperate thread 
(along with an option to disable the check) and only show 
the message if a new version is availible could be added. ...Or 
maybe that would just hammer the website too much ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 10:30:55 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 12:30:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777314 ] Outlook keeps
	downloading same spam
Message-ID: <E19goQB-0001H1-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777314, was opened at 2003-07-24 21:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777314&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook keeps downloading same spam

Initial Comment:
>From the spambayes mailing list:

"""
Someone please tell me why I keep downloading the 
same email from my POP mailbox when SPAM Bayes 
Filtering is enabled. The email comes down and
is immediately moved to the correct SPAM folder.  
However, the same email is downloaded every time 
I "Send/Receive".

version of Windows - Windows 2000 Pro, Office's Outlook 
XP

the version of SpamBayes - SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-
005.exe (lastest try), and SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-
003.exe (earlier attempt)
"""

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-27 12:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Another report from the spambayes list:

"""
I got Spambayes working on my computer that uses Outlook 
2000, but when I installed it on my laptop which has Outlook 
2002, it gets a funny error.  This error consists of 
downloading the same messages every time 
it "sends/receives".  I now have multiple copies of the same 
emails, whether they are SPAM, HAM, or MaybeSpam. I have 
checked to make sure I am not leaving copies of message on 
my POP server. If anyone has any ideas or suggestions, I 
would like to hear them before I revert back to Outlook 2000. 

...

Both my machines are using Window 2000 Professional and 
the version of SpamBayes is SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-
005.exe.  I have also tried version 003.
"""

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777314&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 17:45:22 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 19:45:29 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-778660 ] cannot install on
	outlook2000
Message-ID: <E19gvCc-0002Iv-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #778660, was opened at 2003-07-27 23:45
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=778660&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Marsyas Sherman (she328)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: cannot install on outlook2000

Initial Comment:
During two installations of the spambayes plugin the 
following error message appeared;

"Unable to register the
DLL/OCX: DllRegisterServer failed; code 0x00000000.  
Click Retry...".

Note 1: The these client's copy of Outlook 2000 has 
other plugins for Trim (Tower s/w) etc.

Having no expertise in the python language I am unable 
to decypher the cryptic messages in the error logs to 
ascertain the casue for this plugin to flai to 'plugin'.

Note 2: Spambayes has been installed on numerous W2K 
& W2K PCs without any hitches.

error logs:

1st attempt install by client

spambayes1.log

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 15, in DllRegisterServer
  
File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\register.py", 
line 388, in RegisterClasses
IndexError: list index out of range

==========================================
=================================

spambayes2.log

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 15, in DllRegisterServer
  
File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\server\register.py", 
line 388, in RegisterClasses
IndexError: list index out of range

==========================================
=================================
2nd attempt install - with no apps running

spambayes3.log

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in ?
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 274, in importHook
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 353, in doimport
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 59, 
in ?
  
File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\client\gencache.py"
, line 341, in EnsureModule
  
File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\client\gencache.py"
, line 213, in GetModuleForTypelib
  
File "E:\src\pythonex\com\win32com\client\gencache.py"
, line 473, in _GetModule
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 274, in importHook
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 335, in doimport
  File "E:\src\Installer\iu.py", line 181, in getmod
  File "E:\src\Installer\archive.py", line 375, in getmod
TypeError: unbound method getmod() must be called 
with DirOwner instance as first argument (got 
ExtInPkgImporter instance instead)



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=778660&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 18:47:42 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 20:47:50 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-778674 ] Training does not persist
Message-ID: <E19gwAw-000720-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #778674, was opened at 2003-07-28 10:47
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=778674&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Cusack (peterc_555)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Training does not persist

Initial Comment:
After installing and taining Spambayes, it works fine. 
When the computer is restarted next day, Spambayes 
comes up in its default configuration, reporting no 
database, and with filtering disabled. These may be set 
properly, but the settings don't stick.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=778674&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 18:58:58 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 20:59:04 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-778674 ] Training does not persist
Message-ID: <E19gwLq-0005A8-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #778674, was opened at 2003-07-28 10:47
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=778674&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Cusack (peterc_555)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Training does not persist

Initial Comment:
After installing and taining Spambayes, it works fine. 
When the computer is restarted next day, Spambayes 
comes up in its default configuration, reporting no 
database, and with filtering disabled. These may be set 
properly, but the settings don't stick.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-28 10:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

You need to perform a complete re-train of your database -
unfortunately, we don't know why this happens.  Also note
you are using a fairly old version - after you re-train,
please consider upgrading.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=778674&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 20:05:31 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 22:05:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-778674 ] Training does not persist
Message-ID: <E19gxOF-0007NW-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #778674, was opened at 2003-07-28 10:47
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by peterc_555
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=778674&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Cusack (peterc_555)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Training does not persist

Initial Comment:
After installing and taining Spambayes, it works fine. 
When the computer is restarted next day, Spambayes 
comes up in its default configuration, reporting no 
database, and with filtering disabled. These may be set 
properly, but the settings don't stick.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Peter Cusack (peterc_555)
Date: 2003-07-28 12:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=831815

I have retrained the database. several times. It doesn't stick. 
As for using a later version, I'd love to, but I thiught that I 
already had the latest. Unfortunately there is no version 
number in the about page so that I can confirm trhis. Lastly, 
the download page presents me with a python project, and all 
I want is a working plug in. Where can I get the latest 
version?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-28 10:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

You need to perform a complete re-train of your database -
unfortunately, we don't know why this happens.  Also note
you are using a fairly old version - after you re-train,
please consider upgrading.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=778674&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 20:07:28 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 22:07:35 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777314 ] Outlook keeps
	downloading same spam
Message-ID: <E19gxQ8-00057K-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777314, was opened at 2003-07-25 13:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777314&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook keeps downloading same spam

Initial Comment:
>From the spambayes mailing list:

"""
Someone please tell me why I keep downloading the 
same email from my POP mailbox when SPAM Bayes 
Filtering is enabled. The email comes down and
is immediately moved to the correct SPAM folder.  
However, the same email is downloaded every time 
I "Send/Receive".

version of Windows - Windows 2000 Pro, Office's Outlook 
XP

the version of SpamBayes - SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-
005.exe (lastest try), and SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-
003.exe (earlier attempt)
"""

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-28 14:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

FWIW, I think this happens to me, too, but only one one of 
the accounts that I check, which happens to be the one that 
is set to leave the mail on the server (although I note that 
the second poster here doesn't have that set).

Basically, every now and then Outlook fails to successfully 
download all the mail from that account.  If I restart Outlook, 
all is ok, but it downloads everything that is on the account.  
I'm too lazy to figure if this is an Outlook problem or a 
spambayes one.

Anyway, if you need someone running cvs code to test 
anything to fix this, then I'm happy to figure out if this is 
spambayes related or not, and if it is, be a guinea pig.  Just 
let me know.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-28 04:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Another report from the spambayes list:

"""
I got Spambayes working on my computer that uses Outlook 
2000, but when I installed it on my laptop which has Outlook 
2002, it gets a funny error.  This error consists of 
downloading the same messages every time 
it "sends/receives".  I now have multiple copies of the same 
emails, whether they are SPAM, HAM, or MaybeSpam. I have 
checked to make sure I am not leaving copies of message on 
my POP server. If anyone has any ideas or suggestions, I 
would like to hear them before I revert back to Outlook 2000. 

...

Both my machines are using Window 2000 Professional and 
the version of SpamBayes is SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-
005.exe.  I have also tried version 003.
"""

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777314&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 20:15:55 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 22:16:05 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777314 ] Outlook keeps
	downloading same spam
Message-ID: <E19gxYJ-0007dz-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777314, was opened at 2003-07-24 20:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by davidj411
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777314&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook keeps downloading same spam

Initial Comment:
>From the spambayes mailing list:

"""
Someone please tell me why I keep downloading the 
same email from my POP mailbox when SPAM Bayes 
Filtering is enabled. The email comes down and
is immediately moved to the correct SPAM folder.  
However, the same email is downloaded every time 
I "Send/Receive".

version of Windows - Windows 2000 Pro, Office's Outlook 
XP

the version of SpamBayes - SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-
005.exe (lastest try), and SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-
003.exe (earlier attempt)
"""

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Jackson (davidj411)
Date: 2003-07-27 21:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=831618

This is not something that sometiems happens.
I begins happening right after SpamBayes is installed (even 
after rebooting).
Also it stops happening when SpamBayes is uninstalled.
This leads me to believe it is not an Outlook problem, but is a 
SpamBayes one.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-27 21:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

FWIW, I think this happens to me, too, but only one one of 
the accounts that I check, which happens to be the one that 
is set to leave the mail on the server (although I note that 
the second poster here doesn't have that set).

Basically, every now and then Outlook fails to successfully 
download all the mail from that account.  If I restart Outlook, 
all is ok, but it downloads everything that is on the account.  
I'm too lazy to figure if this is an Outlook problem or a 
spambayes one.

Anyway, if you need someone running cvs code to test 
anything to fix this, then I'm happy to figure out if this is 
spambayes related or not, and if it is, be a guinea pig.  Just 
let me know.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-27 11:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Another report from the spambayes list:

"""
I got Spambayes working on my computer that uses Outlook 
2000, but when I installed it on my laptop which has Outlook 
2002, it gets a funny error.  This error consists of 
downloading the same messages every time 
it "sends/receives".  I now have multiple copies of the same 
emails, whether they are SPAM, HAM, or MaybeSpam. I have 
checked to make sure I am not leaving copies of message on 
my POP server. If anyone has any ideas or suggestions, I 
would like to hear them before I revert back to Outlook 2000. 

...

Both my machines are using Window 2000 Professional and 
the version of SpamBayes is SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-
005.exe.  I have also tried version 003.
"""

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777314&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 20:15:55 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 22:16:14 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-778674 ] Training does not persist
Message-ID: <E19gxYJ-0007dw-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #778674, was opened at 2003-07-28 12:47
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=778674&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Cusack (peterc_555)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Training does not persist

Initial Comment:
After installing and taining Spambayes, it works fine. 
When the computer is restarted next day, Spambayes 
comes up in its default configuration, reporting no 
database, and with filtering disabled. These may be set 
properly, but the settings don't stick.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-28 14:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The dialog box that pops up when you select "SpamBayes 
Manager" from the toolbar has the version number at the 
top.  The logs also have it, also at the top.  The latest 
version is 005.

The download page has a link to Mark's page, and directly to 
the installer.  It's about two-thirds down under "binary 
releases".

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Peter Cusack (peterc_555)
Date: 2003-07-28 14:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=831815

I have retrained the database. several times. It doesn't stick. 
As for using a later version, I'd love to, but I thiught that I 
already had the latest. Unfortunately there is no version 
number in the about page so that I can confirm trhis. Lastly, 
the download page presents me with a python project, and all 
I want is a working plug in. Where can I get the latest 
version?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-28 12:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

You need to perform a complete re-train of your database -
unfortunately, we don't know why this happens.  Also note
you are using a fairly old version - after you re-train,
please consider upgrading.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=778674&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 20:24:54 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 22:25:04 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-725466 ] Include a proper locale
	fix in Options.py
Message-ID: <E19gxh0-0007tj-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #725466, was opened at 2003-04-22 18:07
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=725466&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 6
Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Include a proper locale fix in Options.py

Initial Comment:
When reading the options, the float() call fails when the 
locale is a language that uses a ',' for a separator 
instead of '.'.  This is hack-fixed in Outlook, but needs to 
be fixed in general.

I imagine that there must be some sort of locale call that 
will convert between the current locale and English, and 
that this should be called as the option is set.

Anyway, I'll get to this when I can.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-28 14:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I think that we think that this is fixed now.  It long ago 
moved past Options.py, anyway.

Note that we do currently require config files to be in "C"-
locale style, which means '.' as a decimal point.  This may 
change, but would be better as a new tracker, and probably a 
feature request, not a bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 23:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Still alive :(
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=765256&group_id=61702&atid=498103


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-13 11:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I've checked in a partial fix, where I just set the locale back to 
(US) English after that call (to work it needs this one, and the 
one in addin.py, it seems).  It all seems to work ok now, but 
this is hardly a nice solution.

I had one problem.  (I changed my locale by using the XP 
control panel).
*  If I used locale.getlocale I received "de_DE".  If I tried to set 
the locale to this, I get a "locale setting not supported" error.

This meant that I couldn't try a nice solution that set the 
locale back to the local one.

My testing setup is pretty much gone now, but if I find time I'll 
play around with this again, unless you manage to.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-11 06:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Damn.  IIRC, MAPI also changes the cwd.  I guess the
solution may be the same - check the locale before setting,
and reset explicitly afterwards.  It would be great if you
can check this while you are still setup to test, but
otherwise it can stay on my todo list :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-09 15:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Ok, I did more digging.  The locale set in addin.py isn't 
enough.  This line in msgstore.py screws up the locale:
        self.session = mapi.MAPILogonEx(0, None, None, 
logonFlags)
(it's in the __init__ of MAPIMsgStore; my line numbers are all 
screwed up).

(by 'screws up the locale', I mean that math.log(2) returns a 
number with a '.' decimal separator before it, and a ',' decimal 
separator afterwards).

I'll leave it to Mark to figure out what should be done.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-09 15:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Ok, forget that, I've found a way I can reproduce a similar 
error.

This is definately Outlook specific, and definately cannot be 
fixed in the spambayes code, except by changing the locale 
to 'en' or 'c', or something similar.

Ignoring spambayes completely, and using the demo outlook 
plugin that comes with the win32com extensions, I printed 
out the results of math.log(2).  This should be "0.69314718056
" and not "0,69314718056".  I made this print statement 
pretty much every second line.  When adding, it always gives 
the correct answer.  As soon as Outlook is started up, it 
gives the wrong answer.

It's beyond me whether this is something that the win32com 
stuff does (although importing the extensions doesn't cause 
it), or if it's something that Outlook does, somehow.  No 
doubt you can answer that, Mark?  ;)

Anyway, unless a change to the win32com stuff occurs, this 
will have to remain in the spambayes Outlook code.  (The 
options stuff is a separate problem, and my fix for that should 
work).  It doesn't need to be outside the Outlook code though.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-09 14:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

What I don't understand is why I can't reproduce this error. If I 
make the same addition to manager.py, but use 'german'[1] 
as the locale, everything still works.  (It also still works if I 
make the change in addin.py where the other locale set is, 
and also if I change the locale to german in the windows 
control panel).

In addition, why does the import from PythonWin work?  
Surely this means (as mentioned) that something else that is 
imported is screwing up the locale setting before random gets 
imported - but then, shouldn't it do this on my machine, too?

Googling on this (NV_MAGICCONST) brings up lots of 
instances of the problem, but nothing in the way of a solution 
apart from setting the locale to 'en' or 'c' before the random 
import.  This really doesn't seem like the correct solution.

I really am tempted to try my luck with c.l.p for a solution, if 
there aren't any more ideas here.

[1] I can't set to "de_DE", I get a locale not supported 
error.  "german" does use ',' as the decimal separator, so it 
should be the same, though.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Stefan Gr?ndel (sgruendel)
Date: 2003-05-09 05:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=671479

Ok, I've got it working by setting the locale in the constructor 
of class BayesManager (manager.py):

[...]
        self.config_filename = config_base 
+ "_configuration.pck"

        print "locale: ", locale.getlocale()
        print "default locale: ", locale.getdefaultlocale()
        locale.setlocale(locale.LC_NUMERIC, "en")

        # First read the configuration file.
[...]


Locale/default locale are both de_DE for me.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Stefan Gr?ndel (sgruendel)
Date: 2003-05-09 05:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=671479

>>> import locale
>>> locale.setlocale(locale.LC_NUMERIC, "en")

'English_United States.1252'
>>> import random
>>> 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-05-07 22:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

What happens if you go into Pythonwin/IDLE, execute the
locale call mentioned, then import that module?

>>> import locale
>>> locale.setlocale(locale.LC_NUMERIC, "en")


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Stefan Gr?ndel (sgruendel)
Date: 2003-05-07 21:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=671479

The import works fine both in IDLE and PythonWin. I suspect 
the handling of floats is somehow broken by something 
loaded by Outlook or Python Windows Extensions. But then I 
don't really know enough about the architecture to make 
educated guesses ...

Anyway I wonder why float handling at this low level seems to 
be locale dependent? Parsing text and converting to float is 
ok to be locale depedent, but doing calculations?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-05-07 11:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

This makes me wonder if the locale just needs to be set, but 
that seems too heavy-handed and ugly, really.

What happens if you just execute
>>> import random
from the interpreter (e.g. in PythonWin or IDLE)?

I suspect that you'll get the same trace, in which case this 
really should be fixed in random.py, not in Spambayes 
(although it would be easy enough to throw together a hack 
for it).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Stefan Gr?ndel (sgruendel)
Date: 2003-05-07 02:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=671479

It seems like it's not enough to fix Options.py only. I did this 
and then got the following error:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\dev\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\universal.py", line 170, in dispatch
    retVal = ob._InvokeEx_(meth.dispid, 0, meth.invkind, args, 
None, None)
  File "D:\dev\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 322, in _InvokeEx_
    return self._invokeex_(dispid, lcid, wFlags, args, kwargs, 
serviceProvider)
  File "D:\dev\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 601, in _invokeex_
    return DesignatedWrapPolicy._invokeex_( self, dispid, lcid, 
wFlags, args, kwArgs, serviceProvider)
  File "D:\dev\Python22\lib\site-
packages\win32com\server\policy.py", line 541, in _invokeex_
    return apply(func, args)
  File "D:\util\spambayes-1.0a2\Outlook2000\addin.py", line 
611, in OnConnection
    self.manager = manager.GetManager(application)
  File "D:\util\spambayes-1.0a2\Outlook2000\manager.py", 
line 335, in GetManager
    _mgr = BayesManager(outlook=outlook, verbose=verbose)
  File "D:\util\spambayes-1.0a2\Outlook2000\manager.py", 
line 79, in __init__
    import_core_spambayes_stuff(self.ini_filename)
  File "D:\util\spambayes-1.0a2\Outlook2000\manager.py", 
line 53, in import_core_spambayes_stuff
    from spambayes.tokenizer import tokenize
  File "D:\util\spambayes-1.0a2\spambayes\tokenizer.py", 
line 7, in ?
    import email.Message
  File "D:\dev\Python22\Lib\email\Message.py", line 14, in ?
    from email import Utils
  File "D:\dev\Python22\Lib\email\Utils.py", line 10, in ?
    import random
  File "D:\dev\Python22\Lib\random.py", line 93, in ?
    _verify('NV_MAGICCONST', NV_MAGICCONST, 
1.71552776992141)
  File "D:\dev\Python22\Lib\random.py", line 88, in _verify
    raise ValueError(
exceptions.ValueError: computed value for 
NV_MAGICCONST deviates too much (computed 2,82843, 
expected 1)



Obviously random.py uses ',' too!  I'm using german 
Windows/Outlook, if I can be of any help in testing, just drop 
me a mail.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-04-24 18:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Options.py now uses locale.atoi and locale.atof to convert 
options.  I *think* this will solve this problem, but I'm not 
100%.

If someone could do some testing, that would be great.  I'm 
leaving open until I'm sure it's done.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=725466&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 20:27:29 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 22:27:32 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-706520 ] assert fails in
	classifier
Message-ID: <E19gxjV-0007x9-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #706520, was opened at 2003-03-20 08:46
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=706520&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Glass (adamglass)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: assert fails in classifier

Initial Comment:
This morning, I noticed that my emails no longer had a
X-Spambayes-Classification header, so I looked through
my procmail logs, and sure enough, hammiefilter.py is
giving a traceback when an assertion fails.  This
happens on all messages now; it is not specific to a
single message, or intermittent.  Therefore, I suspect
my .hammiedb is corrupted... I can supply it to anyone
who would like to investigate it for debugging purposes.

I am using Spambayes 1.0a2, installed on a system with
Python 2.2.1, with the new version of the email library
(as per the install docs.)

Please contact me if you require any further details.

Example of how to generate the error follows, along
with traceback:

adam$ /usr/local/bin/hammiefilter.py -f -d
$HOME/.hammiedb < example
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/bin/hammiefilter.py", line 179, in ?
    main()
  File "/usr/local/bin/hammiefilter.py", line 175, in main
    action(msg)
  File "/usr/local/bin/hammiefilter.py", line 113, in
filter
    return h.filter(msg)
  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py",
line 108, in filter
    prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True)
  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py",
line 38, in _scoremsg
    return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence)
  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py",
line 217, in chi2_spamprob
    clues = self._getclues(wordstream)
  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py",
line 441, in _getclues
    prob = self.probability(record)
  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py",
line 304, in probability
    assert spamcount <= nspam
AssertionError


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-28 14:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

If this is still happening to anyone, could you let us know?  
This may have been caused by training at a bad time in 
Outlook, and using dumbdbm in other apps.  There may still be 
a third cause, of course...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-06-04 20:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Outlook again: [ 730151 ] Outlook fails to classify

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-06-04 20:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Another Outlook report in [ 745292 ] Logs Show COM error

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-06-04 20:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Noting we have an Outlook user with this now too:
[ 747458 ] messages not processed
(which I closed as a dupe)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Leonid (leobru)
Date: 2003-05-31 12:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=790676

This happens, e.g., if a forced re-training was performed on
a non-empty database, thus screwing up the message counts -
this is for sure, I was bitten by it myself;

or, potentially, if hammiefilter.py -t and mboxtrain.py were
running at the same time ???

To avoid: do not do it (I do not use hammiefilter.py -t to
be on the safe side).

To fix, once it happens: start from scratch.

Good to have in the next version: a database validator and
corrector. 



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=706520&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 20:29:25 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 22:29:28 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-738501 ] AttributeError second
	time around with pop3proxy
Message-ID: <E19gxlN-00081G-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #738501, was opened at 2003-05-16 09:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=738501&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Bengtsson (peterbe)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: AttributeError second time around with pop3proxy

Initial Comment:
Yesterday (14/05) I downloaded the latest CVS version
and starting it; worked fine. Then I turned that off
when I went to bed and tried to start it again today.
This time I get the following error::


C:\Python22\spambayes>C:\python22\python.exe pop3proxy.py
Loading database...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "pop3proxy.py", line 738, in ?
    run()
  File "pop3proxy.py", line 713, in run
    state.createWorkers()
  File "pop3proxy.py", line 559, in createWorkers
    self.bayes = storage.DBDictClassifier(filename)
  File "spambayes\storage.py", line 139, in __init__
    self.load()
  File "spambayes\storage.py", line 151, in load
    t = self.db[self.statekey]
  File "C:\Python22\lib\shelve.py", line 71, in __getitem__
    return Unpickler(f).load()
EOFError
Exception exceptions.AttributeError: "'NoneType' object
has no attribute 'error'
" in <bound method _Database.__del__ of
<dumbdbm._Database instance at 0x00A208A
0>> ignored



Any ideas what this might be? Is it a bug?
Solutions?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-28 14:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

There are known issues with using dumbdbm.  Please try using 
a pickle or installing pybsddb (bsddb3) and using that 
instead.  Note that you will need to do a full retrain.

Please re-open if this does reoccur.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Remi Ricard (papadoc)
Date: 2003-05-28 00:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=145206

Hi,

I'm getting the same error message.

This is what happened.
I was training pop3proxy with the web interface. Classifying
a unsure to be spam.

I got this error message in the web interface
raceback (most recent call last):

  File
"C:\Devtools\SPAMBA~1\SPAMBA~1.21\spambayes\Dibbler.py",
line 398, in found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  File
"C:\Devtools\SPAMBA~1\SPAMBA~1.21\spambayes\ProxyUI.py",
line 359, in onReview
    message =
spambayes.mboxutils.get_message(cachedMessage.getSubstance())

  File
"C:\Devtools\SPAMBA~1\SPAMBA~1.21\spambayes\Corpus.py", line
349, in getSubstance
    return self.hdrtxt + self.payload

  File
"C:\Devtools\SPAMBA~1\SPAMBA~1.21\spambayes\Corpus.py", line
296, in __getattr__
    raise AttributeError, attributeName

AttributeError: hdrtxt


Then I stop pop3proxy.py because I wanted to enable the logging
with
[globals]
verbose = True

Then I restarted the pop3proxy and I got the same error
message as in bug 738501

Remi
(papaDoc@videotron.ca)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=738501&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 20:30:11 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 22:30:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-738501 ] AttributeError second
	time around with pop3proxy
Message-ID: <E19gxm7-00083F-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #738501, was opened at 2003-05-16 09:27
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=738501&group_id=61702

Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Bengtsson (peterbe)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: AttributeError second time around with pop3proxy

Initial Comment:
Yesterday (14/05) I downloaded the latest CVS version
and starting it; worked fine. Then I turned that off
when I went to bed and tried to start it again today.
This time I get the following error::


C:\Python22\spambayes>C:\python22\python.exe pop3proxy.py
Loading database...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "pop3proxy.py", line 738, in ?
    run()
  File "pop3proxy.py", line 713, in run
    state.createWorkers()
  File "pop3proxy.py", line 559, in createWorkers
    self.bayes = storage.DBDictClassifier(filename)
  File "spambayes\storage.py", line 139, in __init__
    self.load()
  File "spambayes\storage.py", line 151, in load
    t = self.db[self.statekey]
  File "C:\Python22\lib\shelve.py", line 71, in __getitem__
    return Unpickler(f).load()
EOFError
Exception exceptions.AttributeError: "'NoneType' object
has no attribute 'error'
" in <bound method _Database.__del__ of
<dumbdbm._Database instance at 0x00A208A
0>> ignored



Any ideas what this might be? Is it a bug?
Solutions?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-28 14:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

There are known issues with using dumbdbm.  Please try using 
a pickle or installing pybsddb (bsddb3) and using that 
instead.  Note that you will need to do a full retrain.

Please re-open if this does reoccur.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-28 14:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

There are known issues with using dumbdbm.  Please try using 
a pickle or installing pybsddb (bsddb3) and using that 
instead.  Note that you will need to do a full retrain.

Please re-open if this does reoccur.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Remi Ricard (papadoc)
Date: 2003-05-28 00:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=145206

Hi,

I'm getting the same error message.

This is what happened.
I was training pop3proxy with the web interface. Classifying
a unsure to be spam.

I got this error message in the web interface
raceback (most recent call last):

  File
"C:\Devtools\SPAMBA~1\SPAMBA~1.21\spambayes\Dibbler.py",
line 398, in found_terminator
    getattr(plugin, name)(**params)

  File
"C:\Devtools\SPAMBA~1\SPAMBA~1.21\spambayes\ProxyUI.py",
line 359, in onReview
    message =
spambayes.mboxutils.get_message(cachedMessage.getSubstance())

  File
"C:\Devtools\SPAMBA~1\SPAMBA~1.21\spambayes\Corpus.py", line
349, in getSubstance
    return self.hdrtxt + self.payload

  File
"C:\Devtools\SPAMBA~1\SPAMBA~1.21\spambayes\Corpus.py", line
296, in __getattr__
    raise AttributeError, attributeName

AttributeError: hdrtxt


Then I stop pop3proxy.py because I wanted to enable the logging
with
[globals]
verbose = True

Then I restarted the pop3proxy and I got the same error
message as in bug 738501

Remi
(papaDoc@videotron.ca)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=738501&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 20:30:38 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 22:30:46 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777314 ] Outlook keeps
	downloading same spam
Message-ID: <E19gxmY-00060U-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777314, was opened at 2003-07-24 21:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777314&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Outlook keeps downloading same spam

Initial Comment:
>From the spambayes mailing list:

"""
Someone please tell me why I keep downloading the 
same email from my POP mailbox when SPAM Bayes 
Filtering is enabled. The email comes down and
is immediately moved to the correct SPAM folder.  
However, the same email is downloaded every time 
I "Send/Receive".

version of Windows - Windows 2000 Pro, Office's Outlook 
XP

the version of SpamBayes - SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-
005.exe (lastest try), and SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-
003.exe (earlier attempt)
"""

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-27 22:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

davidj411, what kind of accounts are you accessing?  POP3, 
IMAP, Exchange server?

I run 3 Outlook+spambayes installations myself (on 3 different 
machines), each sucks down email from 4 distinct accounts, 
all are POP3 accounts, and "leave a copy of the msg on the 
server" is enabled for all my accounts in all my Outlooks, 
plus "remove msg from server when item is deleted from 
Delete Items", plus "remove from server when 8 days old".

Much like Tony, *almost* the only time I ever see duplicates 
downloaded is when I lose my connection midway thru 
downloading.  Given the way the POP3 protocol works, that 
makes sense.  Sometimes I also get massive duplicates on 
one specific account, where I happen to know it's due to 
server crashes (and subsequent insanity) on *their* end.

spambayes doesn't participate in fetching or sending email, so 
it's hard to imagine how it's possible for spambayes to cause 
a problem here.  Outlook tells us when a message arrives, and 
we add a custom score property to it, and that's about it.

If you're using Outlook 2002, be sure you have the very latest 
service pack for it (it seems they're calling some 
these "technical refreshes" <wink/snort> these days).  Since 
only Outlook plays any part in POP3/SMTP/IMAP 
communications, it's almost certainly the case that, at worst, 
spambayes is tickling an Outlook 2002 bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Jackson (davidj411)
Date: 2003-07-27 22:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=831618

This is not something that sometiems happens.
I begins happening right after SpamBayes is installed (even 
after rebooting).
Also it stops happening when SpamBayes is uninstalled.
This leads me to believe it is not an Outlook problem, but is a 
SpamBayes one.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-27 22:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

FWIW, I think this happens to me, too, but only one one of 
the accounts that I check, which happens to be the one that 
is set to leave the mail on the server (although I note that 
the second poster here doesn't have that set).

Basically, every now and then Outlook fails to successfully 
download all the mail from that account.  If I restart Outlook, 
all is ok, but it downloads everything that is on the account.  
I'm too lazy to figure if this is an Outlook problem or a 
spambayes one.

Anyway, if you need someone running cvs code to test 
anything to fix this, then I'm happy to figure out if this is 
spambayes related or not, and if it is, be a guinea pig.  Just 
let me know.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-27 12:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Another report from the spambayes list:

"""
I got Spambayes working on my computer that uses Outlook 
2000, but when I installed it on my laptop which has Outlook 
2002, it gets a funny error.  This error consists of 
downloading the same messages every time 
it "sends/receives".  I now have multiple copies of the same 
emails, whether they are SPAM, HAM, or MaybeSpam. I have 
checked to make sure I am not leaving copies of message on 
my POP server. If anyone has any ideas or suggestions, I 
would like to hear them before I revert back to Outlook 2000. 

...

Both my machines are using Window 2000 Professional and 
the version of SpamBayes is SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-
005.exe.  I have also tried version 003.
"""

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777314&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 20:31:53 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 22:31:59 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-747945 ] apparent corruption of
	Received lines
Message-ID: <E19gxnl-00085h-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #747945, was opened at 2003-06-03 18:09
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747945&group_id=61702

Category: hammie
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Raphael Manfredi (rmanfredi)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: apparent corruption of Received lines

Initial Comment:
It looks like the message header is corrupted by
hammiefilter.py.  Here's my evidence:

I'm running the 1.0a2 release.

I use "mailagent" to filter my mail, which is like
procmail (with a much cleaner code base and readable
rules) and I've set up the rules like that:

### Begin SPAM filtering section ###
       
{
    FEED ~/bin/spambayes/hammiefilter.py;
    RESYNC;
    REJECT;
};
         
X-Spambayes-Classification:
    /^spam/     { REJECT SPAM }
    /^ham/      { REJECT INITIAL }
    /^unsure/   { REJECT LOST };
       
# Dispatch to spam/lost, keep going if ham...
<LOST,SPAM>     { VACATION off; BIFF off; REJECT };   
<LOST>          { SAVE lost };
<SPAM>          { SAVE spam };
         
### End of SPAM filtering section ###

The "FEED" command pipes the message to the specified
scripts and gets the output back as the new message.
The RESYNC command reparses the headers, since they
might have been changed by the command (and indeed,
they are since X-Spambayes-Classification is added!).

However, here are the logs I see:

------------------------------
03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: FROM
<tvd_documentation@nai.com>
03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: RELAYED
hbs43-138.hbs.edu, orb.pobox.com, pop.free.fr, lyon.ram.loc
03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: ABOUT Approved
03/06/03 07:44:37 mailagent[277851]: MATCH on rule #68
in mode INITIAL
03/06/03 07:44:39 mailagent[277851]: FED [qm16938]
through '~/bin/spambayes/hammiefilter.py'
03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: WARNING no by in
first Received: line 'from localhost (mail@localhost
[127.0.0.1])h535iTik016935 for <ram@localhost>; Tue, 3
Jun 2003 07:44:30 +0200'
03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: weird Received:
line 'from localhost (mail@localhost
[127.0.0.1])h535iTik016935 for <ram@localhost>; Tue, 3
Jun 2003 07:44:30 +0200'
03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: RESYNCED [qm16938]
03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: REJECTED [qm16938]
in state INITIAL
03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: MATCH on rule #69
in mode INITIAL
03/06/03 07:44:40 mailagent[277851]: entering new state
SPAM
---------------------------------

Look at the WARNING about the absence of "by" in
Received.  The problem is that no such warning is
originally emitted, but it appears during RESYNC when
the headers are reparsed after the message went through
hammiefilter.py.

This indicates a corruption problem, since mailagent
uses the same code to reparse the headers during RESYNC
as it used originally, and no warning were emitted
before FEED was run.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-28 14:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Could you try this with alpha4 and let us know if it still occurs?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747945&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Sun Jul 27 20:58:07 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Sun Jul 27 22:58:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-778674 ] Training does not persist
Message-ID: <E19gyD9-0006x0-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #778674, was opened at 2003-07-28 10:47
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by peterc_555
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=778674&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Cusack (peterc_555)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Training does not persist

Initial Comment:
After installing and taining Spambayes, it works fine. 
When the computer is restarted next day, Spambayes 
comes up in its default configuration, reporting no 
database, and with filtering disabled. These may be set 
properly, but the settings don't stick.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Peter Cusack (peterc_555)
Date: 2003-07-28 12:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=831815

Thanks Mark. I found the latest version on your page, 
downloaded and installed it. It picked up the old database, 
and after initially not knowing which folder to filter, it seems 
to be running fine.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-28 12:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

The dialog box that pops up when you select "SpamBayes 
Manager" from the toolbar has the version number at the 
top.  The logs also have it, also at the top.  The latest 
version is 005.

The download page has a link to Mark's page, and directly to 
the installer.  It's about two-thirds down under "binary 
releases".

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Peter Cusack (peterc_555)
Date: 2003-07-28 12:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=831815

I have retrained the database. several times. It doesn't stick. 
As for using a later version, I'd love to, but I thiught that I 
already had the latest. Unfortunately there is no version 
number in the about page so that I can confirm trhis. Lastly, 
the download page presents me with a python project, and all 
I want is a working plug in. Where can I get the latest 
version?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-28 10:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

You need to perform a complete re-train of your database -
unfortunately, we don't know why this happens.  Also note
you are using a fairly old version - after you re-train,
please consider upgrading.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=778674&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 28 06:15:08 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 28 08:15:19 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-775601 ] latest message not
	checked on outlook startup
Message-ID: <E19h6uC-0006Bv-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #775601, was opened at 2003-07-22 12:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by hankster2000
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775601&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: matt tagliaferri (mtagliaf)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: latest message not checked on outlook startup

Initial Comment:
When I first turn on Outlook and the filter begins 
slogging through all the messages I've received 
overnight, it always skips the latest message (the one 
at the top if the listview is sorted by date received).

It would also be useful to add something in the loop that 
would allow other Windows task to get some time - the 
loop pretty much takes over the PC while it's running. 
Don't know how this is done in Python, in VB6 it's 
Application.DoEvents. 

matt tag

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Henry Happ (hankster2000)
Date: 2003-07-28 12:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832150

I have version 0.5 installed and have seen the same thing.  
This is the only issue I have come across.  
The spam catch rate has been 99+%!!!  Outstanding!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775601&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 28 11:04:04 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 28 13:04:18 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows
	2000
Message-ID: <E19hBPo-0003np-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-01 17:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by portola
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000

Initial Comment:
When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs 
until the registering dll's section and then stops with an 
alert.  An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is

"Unable to register the DLL/OCX. 

DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201.

<Abort> <Retry> <Ignore>"

I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just 
repeat the error and Abort would unwind the 
installation.  I never tried Ignore.

I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, 
but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them.  
Abort worked the second time.  I finally tried Ignore, 
which completes okay.  When I ran Outlook, though, the 
add-in wasn't there.

This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron 
notebook.  It has Outlook 2002 SP2.  Both are up to 
date with recent patches.  I believe this combination is 
not known to work, but thought this information might 
help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-28 10:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Sorry to be late to the celebration--I was out of town and 
unable to test on my Win 2000 machine.  This morning, 
however, I confirmed that it installs and works correctly 
there.  Thanks!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 08:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yay - I'm convinced this specific error, with
"win32com.universal" showing up, is fixed :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-25 08:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Works fine here: Win2003EE+OutlookXPSP2. In the same 
enviroment ver 005 doesn't won't to install with 0x80040201

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 07:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I've put a new interim version at
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/downloads/SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-BugCatcher.exe.
 This version is specifically for testing this "Unable to
Register" error, so please try it as soon as you can, and
let me know how it goes.  (Note that speficically, it should
work even when that dll is not registered/installed)



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-25 03:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Using regmon and filemon I finally found what was the source 
of that problem: somebody unregister file %Program Files%
\Common Files\Designer\MSADDNDR.DLL 
When I register it manually, I was able to register 
spambayes_addin.dll 
I have no idea what is this module for and why 
spambayes_addin.dll is trying to access it in DLLRegisterServer
()

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-24 07:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "<string>", line 10, in ?

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport

  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 75, in ?

  File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 21, in 
RegisterInterfaces
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147319779, 'Library not 
registered.', None, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 16:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

That error code generally means the Python code doing the
registration failed.  Can you please look for a log file to
attach - see
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html
for info on finding the log

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-22 10:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Just to keep up to date--the 005 version of the binary 
installer still has this problem on Win 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-21 12:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Although this is not yet claimed to be fixed, I tested it in the 
new version 004 installer.  As expected, it fails in the same 
way it did in the 002 and 003 installers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 11:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Copy-n-pasted from another bug report:

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from
"addin.py" regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 08:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :)

--Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error.
--Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to 
Spambayes Outlook plug-in
--Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using 
both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB 
article. No difference.
--Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in 
case:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;207132

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;249873

The 2nd one mentions this:

DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. 
Return code was: string
*Search Winerror.h for string. 

You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to 
get this working again. 

Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes 
working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her 
to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, 
her missing "spam thingy".

I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I 
upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. 
Just so happened that 003 became available and 
troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, 
so I did. Didn't help me.... :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-03 21:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 
did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ 
SP2 installed.

The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. 
Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up 
and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running 
the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does 
NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-02 10:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on 
Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could 
not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) 
And still could not install the Binary version 003.
I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then 
tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I 
uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 28 11:29:34 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 28 13:29:37 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-779049 ] No score, no response
Message-ID: <E19hBoU-0001jd-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #779049, was opened at 2003-07-28 12:29
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779049&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul R. Brown (paulrbrown)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: No score, no response

Initial Comment:
I have some messages that SPAMBayes will neither score
nor filter.  Accessing the drop-down to view the
current message scores results in nothing -- no error,
no scores, just silence.

My guess is that it's because of bad MIME?  (I'll have
to dust off an RFC or two and find out...)  The
following appears in each message:

--= Multipart Boundary 1722809
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--= Multipart Boundary 1722809
Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

[... content here ...]

--= Multipart Boundary 1722809-- 

The offending message (in Outlook format) is attached.

Environment is Outlook 2003 (w/updates), WinXP,
Exchange 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779049&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 28 11:32:07 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 28 13:32:13 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-779049 ] No score, no response
Message-ID: <E19hBqx-0001pv-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #779049, was opened at 2003-07-28 12:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by paulrbrown
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779049&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul R. Brown (paulrbrown)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: No score, no response

Initial Comment:
I have some messages that SPAMBayes will neither score
nor filter.  Accessing the drop-down to view the
current message scores results in nothing -- no error,
no scores, just silence.

My guess is that it's because of bad MIME?  (I'll have
to dust off an RFC or two and find out...)  The
following appears in each message:

--= Multipart Boundary 1722809
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--= Multipart Boundary 1722809
Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

[... content here ...]

--= Multipart Boundary 1722809-- 

The offending message (in Outlook format) is attached.

Environment is Outlook 2003 (w/updates), WinXP,
Exchange 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Paul R. Brown (paulrbrown)
Date: 2003-07-28 12:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=532486

Another take on the same message.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779049&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 28 12:11:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 28 14:11:38 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows
	2000
Message-ID: <E19hCSt-0005bR-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-02 02:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by elmar71
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000

Initial Comment:
When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs 
until the registering dll's section and then stops with an 
alert.  An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is

"Unable to register the DLL/OCX. 

DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201.

<Abort> <Retry> <Ignore>"

I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just 
repeat the error and Abort would unwind the 
installation.  I never tried Ignore.

I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, 
but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them.  
Abort worked the second time.  I finally tried Ignore, 
which completes okay.  When I ran Outlook, though, the 
add-in wasn't there.

This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron 
notebook.  It has Outlook 2002 SP2.  Both are up to 
date with recent patches.  I believe this combination is 
not known to work, but thought this information might 
help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Elmar Bransch (elmar71)
Date: 2003-07-28 20:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832399

After digging in the Mailing List and the bug base I found the 
interim version posted on 25-07 in this thread.
I was very lucky having SpamBayes 002 installed on Win2000 
Prof. with Outlook 2000 SR-1. Since upgrading to 003 it had 
the DLL-Register-0x80040201-problem, still remaining with the 
binary 005 installer. Finally the interim bug catcher release did 
the trick for me and installed fine - there has been even no 
errors in the spambayes1.log on startup so far :-)

Thanks! Keep on ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-28 19:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Sorry to be late to the celebration--I was out of town and 
unable to test on my Win 2000 machine.  This morning, 
however, I confirmed that it installs and works correctly 
there.  Thanks!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 17:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yay - I'm convinced this specific error, with
"win32com.universal" showing up, is fixed :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-25 17:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Works fine here: Win2003EE+OutlookXPSP2. In the same 
enviroment ver 005 doesn't won't to install with 0x80040201

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 16:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I've put a new interim version at
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/downloads/SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-BugCatcher.exe.
 This version is specifically for testing this "Unable to
Register" error, so please try it as soon as you can, and
let me know how it goes.  (Note that speficically, it should
work even when that dll is not registered/installed)



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-25 12:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Using regmon and filemon I finally found what was the source 
of that problem: somebody unregister file %Program Files%
\Common Files\Designer\MSADDNDR.DLL 
When I register it manually, I was able to register 
spambayes_addin.dll 
I have no idea what is this module for and why 
spambayes_addin.dll is trying to access it in DLLRegisterServer
()

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-24 16:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "<string>", line 10, in ?

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport

  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 75, in ?

  File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 21, in 
RegisterInterfaces
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147319779, 'Library not 
registered.', None, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-23 01:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

That error code generally means the Python code doing the
registration failed.  Can you please look for a log file to
attach - see
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html
for info on finding the log

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-22 19:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Just to keep up to date--the 005 version of the binary 
installer still has this problem on Win 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-21 21:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Although this is not yet claimed to be fixed, I tested it in the 
new version 004 installer.  As expected, it fails in the same 
way it did in the 002 and 003 installers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 20:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Copy-n-pasted from another bug report:

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from
"addin.py" regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 17:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :)

--Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error.
--Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to 
Spambayes Outlook plug-in
--Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using 
both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB 
article. No difference.
--Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in 
case:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;207132

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;249873

The 2nd one mentions this:

DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. 
Return code was: string
*Search Winerror.h for string. 

You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to 
get this working again. 

Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes 
working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her 
to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, 
her missing "spam thingy".

I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I 
upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. 
Just so happened that 003 became available and 
troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, 
so I did. Didn't help me.... :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-04 06:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 
did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ 
SP2 installed.

The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. 
Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up 
and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running 
the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does 
NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-02 19:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on 
Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could 
not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) 
And still could not install the Binary version 003.
I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then 
tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I 
uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 28 19:54:02 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 28 21:54:12 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-779319 ] 0.5 does not install on
	French version of Outlook 2002
Message-ID: <E19hJgg-0002Ix-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #779319, was opened at 2003-07-28 18:53
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: 0.5 does not install on French version of Outlook 2002

Initial Comment:
Running Windows 2000 SP-4 Server in Terminal 
Server mode and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 
both in french. When I install the latest 0.5 
SpamBayes version, it does not show up in Outlook. 
When I check the toolbar menu, I do not see the 
SpamBayes toolbar.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 28 20:44:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 28 22:44:24 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-779319 ] 0.5 does not install on
	French version of Outlook 2002
Message-ID: <E19hKTL-0002wo-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #779319, was opened at 2003-07-29 11:53
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: 0.5 does not install on French version of Outlook 2002

Initial Comment:
Running Windows 2000 SP-4 Server in Terminal 
Server mode and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 
both in french. When I install the latest 0.5 
SpamBayes version, it does not show up in Outlook. 
When I check the toolbar menu, I do not see the 
SpamBayes toolbar.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 12:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please try version 006 (brand new!), and if that
fails, attach a log (see the troubleshooting guide)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 28 23:02:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 01:02:11 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777856 ] SpamBayes now crashes
	Outlook
Message-ID: <E19hMcd-0000FB-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777856, was opened at 2003-07-26 09:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777856&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Geoffrey Linnell (glinnell)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: SpamBayes now crashes Outlook

Initial Comment:
I installed V .2, and it worked fine.  I uninstalled, and 
installed V .3, and since then when I go into Manager, 
select Train Now, and click on browse, Outlook 2000 
freezes...I have to kill the process to end it.  I've since 
tried V .5...the same.  I've uninstalled Office, Re-
installed, patched to SP3...nothing.  Any SpamBayes 
dialog that has a Browse button still halts Outlook.  
Office is 9.0.6926 SP3, Outlook is SP3, 9.0.0.6627.  All 
running on Windows 2000 Build 2195 SP3.

-Geoff 
ilx@cypress.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 15:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please check for a log file, and attach it here -
see the "troubleshooting guide" for details.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777856&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 28 23:04:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 01:04:06 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-776022 ] Spambayes configuration
	menu doesn't drop.
Message-ID: <E19hMeZ-0000IF-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #776022, was opened at 2003-07-23 12:51
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776022&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Eric Brown (ericbr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Spambayes configuration menu doesn't drop.

Initial Comment:
The toolbar set up in Build 004 (and 005) of the 
spambayes outlook installer has an 
inoperable 'spambayes' button.  This makes it difficult to 
get to the configuration UI.  Luckily, I've already 
configured spambayes....

Outlook XP SP-2, Windows XP SP 1 with all current 
hotfixes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 15:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'm afraid I have no idea why this happens, but the
"troubleshooting" guide has info on how to reset the toolbars.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776022&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 28 23:05:15 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 01:05:26 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-775533 ] Filtering only happens
	at startup in Outlook 2003
Message-ID: <E19hMfj-0000KJ-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #775533, was opened at 2003-07-22 19:03
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775533&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Keith Garland (cagier)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filtering only happens at startup in Outlook 2003

Initial Comment:
When I was setting this up I got filtering to work great 
but as I customised things more my Outlook 2003 Beta 
starting crashing every time I changed something.  Now, 
the spam is filtered correctly whenever I start up 
Outlook but even though I have "Enable Filtering" 
switched on, it does not score messages or filter them 
at all.  Manual "Delete as spam" and spam-scoring still 
work fine though...    It is very frustrating because 
SpamBayes is so effective when it works properly!



One other relevant point, I did have a problem with my 
folders as I deleted the Spam folder accidentally but I 
read the solution to a similar problem and deleted my .ini 
file to reconfigure things and this seemed to worked OK -
 but my problems did seem to start around this time.  
Since I installed the plug-in I cannot exit Outlook 2003 
Beta without it crashing - hopefully the Outlook Beta 
update will fix this maybe.

Many thanks.

Keith

(Current log file enclosed.)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 15:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I've heard the Outlook beta update does solve a whole load
of problems.  You may also like to try version 006.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775533&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 28 23:05:29 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 01:05:43 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-779319 ] 0.5 does not install on
	French version of Outlook 2002
Message-ID: <E19hMfx-0007ks-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #779319, was opened at 2003-07-28 18:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by emoret
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: 0.5 does not install on French version of Outlook 2002

Initial Comment:
Running Windows 2000 SP-4 Server in Terminal 
Server mode and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 
both in french. When I install the latest 0.5 
SpamBayes version, it does not show up in Outlook. 
When I check the toolbar menu, I do not see the 
SpamBayes toolbar.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Date: 2003-07-28 22:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832650

Just installed 006, still not fixed. Find attached the log file as 
requested

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-28 19:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please try version 006 (brand new!), and if that
fails, attach a log (see the troubleshooting guide)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 28 23:06:06 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 01:06:09 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-775601 ] latest message not
	checked on outlook startup
Message-ID: <E19hMgY-0000MN-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #775601, was opened at 2003-07-22 22:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775601&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: matt tagliaferri (mtagliaf)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: latest message not checked on outlook startup

Initial Comment:
When I first turn on Outlook and the filter begins 
slogging through all the messages I've received 
overnight, it always skips the latest message (the one 
at the top if the listview is sorted by date received).

It would also be useful to add something in the loop that 
would allow other Windows task to get some time - the 
loop pretty much takes over the PC while it's running. 
Don't know how this is done in Python, in VB6 it's 
Application.DoEvents. 

matt tag

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 15:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

You may like to try version 006, and enable the new
experimental "timer"

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Henry Happ (hankster2000)
Date: 2003-07-28 22:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832150

I have version 0.5 installed and have seen the same thing.  
This is the only issue I have come across.  
The spam catch rate has been 99+%!!!  Outstanding!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=775601&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 28 23:29:57 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 01:30:04 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-779049 ]
	email.Errors.HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen ...
Message-ID: <E19hN3d-0008UD-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #779049, was opened at 2003-07-29 03:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779049&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul R. Brown (paulrbrown)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Summary: email.Errors.HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen ...

Initial Comment:
I have some messages that SPAMBayes will neither score
nor filter.  Accessing the drop-down to view the
current message scores results in nothing -- no error,
no scores, just silence.

My guess is that it's because of bad MIME?  (I'll have
to dust off an RFC or two and find out...)  The
following appears in each message:

--= Multipart Boundary 1722809
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--= Multipart Boundary 1722809
Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

[... content here ...]

--= Multipart Boundary 1722809-- 

The offending message (in Outlook format) is attached.

Environment is Outlook 2003 (w/updates), WinXP,
Exchange 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 15:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

FAILED to create email.message from:  'X-MS-Mail-Gibberish:
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0\r\nReceived:
from shfex02.hosting.innerhost.com ([192.168.29.8]) by
shbex01.hosting.innerhost.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);\r\n\t Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:01:08
-0400\r\nReceived: from mail7.savingscourier.com
([64.253.204.179]) by shfex02.hosting.innerhost.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);\r\n\t Thu, 24 Jul 2003
15:01:08 -0400\r\nReceived: from savingscourier.com
(192.168.1.8)\r\n  by mail7.savingscourier.com with SMTP; 24
Jul 2003 15:01:05 -0400\r\nFrom: Mark and
Bob<723-1722809-unsubscribe@savingscourier.com>\r\nTo:
prb@fivesight.com \r\nSubject: Are These Guys Nuts?\r\nDate:
Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:20:05 -0400\r\nContent-Type:
multipart/alternative;\r\n        boundary="= Multipart
Boundary 1722809" \r\nX-Priority: 3 \r\nX-MSMail-Priority:
Normal \r\nX-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416
(9.0.2911.0)  \r\nX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
V6.00.2800.1106  \r\nMime-Version: 1.0 \r\nReturn-Path:
723-1722809-unsubscribe@savingscourier.com\r\nMessage-ID:
<SHFEX02stgr3SU0hXCR00000274@shfex02.hosting.innerhost.com>\r\nX-OriginalArrivalTime:
24 Jul 2003 19:01:08.0236 (UTC)
FILETIME=[F0AFF4C0:01C35215]\r\n\n<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
"-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transitional//EN">\r\n<html>\r\n<head>\r\n<META
HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;
charset=windows-1251">\r\n\r\n\t<title>Are These Guys
Nuts?</title>\r\n</head>\r\n<body bgcolor="#ffffff"
marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" leftmargin="0"
topmargin="0">\r\n<div align="center"><a
href="http://www.savingscourier.com/c/c723c.php?ea=cHJiQGZpdmVzaWdodC5jb20="><img
src="http://freeimagehosting.sendmebargains.com/onemin/franklincreative.jpg"
alt="" width="433" height="370"
border="0"></a></div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<img
src="http://www.savingscourier.com/o/o723o.php?ea=cHJiQGZpdmVzaWdodC5jb20="
width="1" height="1" alt=""
border="0">\r\n&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br><center><table
bgcolor="#c0c0c0" width=433 border=0 cellpadding="1"
cellspacing="2"><tr><td bgcolor="#efefef" align=center><font
face=verdana size=1 color=black>To stop receiving offers <a
href="http://www.savingscourier.com/unsubscribe/?ea=prb@fivesight.com"><font
face=verdana size=1 color=black>Go Here</font></a><font
face=verdana size=1 color=black> or send mail
to:<br>Unsubscribe Department<br>1730 S. Federal Hwy, Suite
116<br>Delray Beach, FL
33483</font></td></tr></table></center>\r\n</body>\r\n</html>\r\n\r\n--=
Multipart Boundary 1722809-- \r\n\r\n\n
<http://www.savingscourier.com/c/c723c.php?ea=cHJiQGZpdmVzaWdodC5jb20=>
\r\n 
<http://www.savingscourier.com/o/o723o.php?ea=cHJiQGZpdmVzaWdodC5jb20=>
 \r\n \r\n\r\nTo stop receiving offers 
<http://www.savingscourier.com/unsubscribe/?ea=prb@fivesight.com>
Go Here or send mail to:\r\nUnsubscribe Department\r\n1730
S. Federal Hwy, Suite 116\r\nDelray Beach, FL 33483\t\r\n--=
Multipart Boundary 1722809-- \r\n'

...

Traceback is:
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 677,
in score
    email = msg.GetEmailPackageObject()
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\msgstore.py", line 734,
in GetEmailPackageObject
    msg = email.message_from_string(text)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\__init__.py", line 52,
in message_from_string
    return Parser(_class, strict=strict).parsestr(s)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\Parser.py", line 75, in
parsestr
    return self.parse(StringIO(text), headersonly=headersonly)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\Parser.py", line 64, in
parse
    self._parsebody(root, fp, firstbodyline)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\Parser.py", line 239, in
_parsebody
    msgobj = self.parsestr(part)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\Parser.py", line 75, in
parsestr
    return self.parse(StringIO(text), headersonly=headersonly)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\Parser.py", line 62, in
parse
    firstbodyline = self._parseheaders(root, fp)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\Parser.py", line 111, in
_parseheaders
    raise Errors.HeaderParseError(
email.Errors.HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen before
first header


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul R. Brown (paulrbrown)
Date: 2003-07-29 03:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=532486

Another take on the same message.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779049&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 28 23:32:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 01:32:05 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-779319 ] ntpath Unicode error
Message-ID: <E19hN5d-00006B-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #779319, was opened at 2003-07-29 11:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 6
Submitted By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Summary: ntpath Unicode error

Initial Comment:
Running Windows 2000 SP-4 Server in Terminal 
Server mode and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 
both in french. When I install the latest 0.5 
SpamBayes version, it does not show up in Outlook. 
When I check the toolbar menu, I do not see the 
SpamBayes toolbar.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 15:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

You may like to check out the "configuration guide", and set
a data directory to somewhere without any non-ascii
characters, and try that.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Date: 2003-07-29 15:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832650

Just installed 006, still not fixed. Find attached the log file as 
requested

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 12:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please try version 006 (brand new!), and if that
fails, attach a log (see the troubleshooting guide)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 28 23:34:04 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 01:34:12 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777856 ] Outlook freezes on
	folder "browse" dialogs
Message-ID: <E19hN7c-0000BB-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777856, was opened at 2003-07-26 09:06
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777856&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Geoffrey Linnell (glinnell)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
>Summary: Outlook freezes on folder "browse" dialogs

Initial Comment:
I installed V .2, and it worked fine.  I uninstalled, and 
installed V .3, and since then when I go into Manager, 
select Train Now, and click on browse, Outlook 2000 
freezes...I have to kill the process to end it.  I've since 
tried V .5...the same.  I've uninstalled Office, Re-
installed, patched to SP3...nothing.  Any SpamBayes 
dialog that has a Browse button still halts Outlook.  
Office is 9.0.6926 SP3, Outlook is SP3, 9.0.0.6627.  All 
running on Windows 2000 Build 2195 SP3.

-Geoff 
ilx@cypress.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 15:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please check for a log file, and attach it here -
see the "troubleshooting guide" for details.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777856&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 28 23:34:59 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 01:35:04 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-773364 ] "Delete From Server"
	doesn't work on filtered mail
Message-ID: <E19hN8V-0000Ch-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #773364, was opened at 2003-07-18 10:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail

Initial Comment:
In Outlook's account properties, you can choose to 
leave a copy of retrieved mail on the server, and to 
remove that copy when the mail is deleted from 
the "Deleted Items" folder. However, this does not seem 
to be working with mail that has been checked by 
SpamBayes. When I delete a mail from the "Certain 
Spam" folder, it is moved to "Deleted Items" as 
expected, but when the "Deleted Items" folder is 
emptied, the copy remains on the server. I've tried the 
same thing with mail that has not been checked by 
SpamBayes, and it gets deleted from the server as 
expected.
It seems that Outlook cannot tell that the filtered mail is 
the same as the one on the server. Perhaps this is 
because of the addition of the spam score to the local 
copy?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 15:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The latest binary version has the ability to disable saving
the spam score with each message.  Can you try this version
and see if the behaviour changes?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 20:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 23:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 28 23:35:33 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 01:35:38 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-771541 ] "Recover from" button
	not present in "Unsure" folder
Message-ID: <E19hN93-0000EE-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #771541, was opened at 2003-07-15 21:52
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771541&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jim Drash (jdrash)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Recover from" button not present in "Unsure" folder

Initial Comment:
In the 003 release of the Outlook Add-in, the "Recover 
from" button does not display in the Unsure folder. Onlt 
the "Delete As Spam" displays.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 09:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please try doing a reset of your toolbars, as per
the troubleshooting guide.  Go the brutal "delete
outcmd.dat" route.  Let me know if that fixes it

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771541&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Mon Jul 28 23:39:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 01:39:23 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-766750 ] Source install fails on
	Office XP
Message-ID: <E19hNCh-0003ZH-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #766750, was opened at 2003-07-07 02:39
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=766750&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Source install fails on Office XP

Initial Comment:
I've been trying and trying to get the binary install to 
work since upgrading from Outlook 2000 to Outlook XP 
with no success. So, I tried the source version.... 
Downloaded and installed Python, the Win32 extensions, 
and the zip file for Spambayes.

Running "addin.py" opens a DOS console that quickly 
(too quickly) flashes an error message. It took me about 
six runs to read part of the message. I then located it in 
the 'addin.py' source file. It's this one:

"This Addin requires that Outlook 2000 be installed on 
this machine."
"This appears to not be installed due to the following 
error:"

Apparently it's failing 'cause of not finding something 
related to this:

universal.RegisterInterfaces('{AC0714F2-3D04-11D1-
AE7D-00A0C90F26F4})

Part of that is a registry key, I assume. I *do* have 
that registry key and it has quite a few sub-keys... 
here's one of the values in a sub-key:

MSAddnDr.AddInDesigner.1

My next attempt will be uninstalling Office XP and then 
using some Office clean-up tools I've read about from 
Microsoft's website. Will report back...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 15:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

This error appears to happen due to registration errors of
that component, MSAddnDr.AddInDesigner.1.  This is the most
common cause of registration errors in the binary too.  I
have heard from a few people that "repairing" the
installation works OK.

Note that the most recent binary version *will* work even
without this library being correctly registered.

Let me know if you are still having problems.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-21 00:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

> Can you please post the complete 
> traceback (the one with the
> universal.RegisterInterfaces error?)

Can you please clarify what you mean by that ?? Thanks :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 00:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please post the complete traceback (the one with the
universal.RegisterInterfaces error?)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-07 04:10

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from "addin.py" 
regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=766750&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 29 00:34:44 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 02:34:51 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-779319 ] ntpath Unicode error
Message-ID: <E19hO4K-0003d5-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #779319, was opened at 2003-07-28 18:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by emoret
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 6
Submitted By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: ntpath Unicode error

Initial Comment:
Running Windows 2000 SP-4 Server in Terminal 
Server mode and Outlook 2002 (10.4712.4219) SP-2 
both in french. When I install the latest 0.5 
SpamBayes version, it does not show up in Outlook. 
When I check the toolbar menu, I do not see the 
SpamBayes toolbar.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Date: 2003-07-28 23:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832650

I added the following two lines to my configuration file but I 
still get the same error message:
[general]
data_directory: c:\temp

Also my default data directory does not seem to have non 
ascii chars:
D:\Documents and Settings\hmoret\Application 
Data\SpamBayes

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-28 22:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

You may like to check out the "configuration guide", and set
a data directory to somewhere without any non-ascii
characters, and try that.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Moret (emoret)
Date: 2003-07-28 22:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832650

Just installed 006, still not fixed. Find attached the log file as 
requested

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-28 19:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please try version 006 (brand new!), and if that
fails, attach a log (see the troubleshooting guide)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779319&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 29 02:03:36 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 04:03:44 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-706520 ] assert fails in
	classifier
Message-ID: <E19hPSK-0000sS-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #706520, was opened at 2003-03-20 08:46
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=706520&group_id=61702

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adam Glass (adamglass)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: assert fails in classifier

Initial Comment:
This morning, I noticed that my emails no longer had a
X-Spambayes-Classification header, so I looked through
my procmail logs, and sure enough, hammiefilter.py is
giving a traceback when an assertion fails.  This
happens on all messages now; it is not specific to a
single message, or intermittent.  Therefore, I suspect
my .hammiedb is corrupted... I can supply it to anyone
who would like to investigate it for debugging purposes.

I am using Spambayes 1.0a2, installed on a system with
Python 2.2.1, with the new version of the email library
(as per the install docs.)

Please contact me if you require any further details.

Example of how to generate the error follows, along
with traceback:

adam$ /usr/local/bin/hammiefilter.py -f -d
$HOME/.hammiedb < example
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/bin/hammiefilter.py", line 179, in ?
    main()
  File "/usr/local/bin/hammiefilter.py", line 175, in main
    action(msg)
  File "/usr/local/bin/hammiefilter.py", line 113, in
filter
    return h.filter(msg)
  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py",
line 108, in filter
    prob, clues = self._scoremsg(msg, True)
  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/hammie.py",
line 38, in _scoremsg
    return self.bayes.spamprob(tokenize(msg), evidence)
  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py",
line 217, in chi2_spamprob
    clues = self._getclues(wordstream)
  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py",
line 441, in _getclues
    prob = self.probability(record)
  File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.2/site-packages/spambayes/classifier.py",
line 304, in probability
    assert spamcount <= nspam
AssertionError


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-29 20:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

If this happening to anyone, please reopen.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-28 14:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

If this is still happening to anyone, could you let us know?  
This may have been caused by training at a bad time in 
Outlook, and using dumbdbm in other apps.  There may still be 
a third cause, of course...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-06-04 20:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Outlook again: [ 730151 ] Outlook fails to classify

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-06-04 20:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Another Outlook report in [ 745292 ] Logs Show COM error

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-06-04 20:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Noting we have an Outlook user with this now too:
[ 747458 ] messages not processed
(which I closed as a dupe)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Leonid (leobru)
Date: 2003-05-31 12:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=790676

This happens, e.g., if a forced re-training was performed on
a non-empty database, thus screwing up the message counts -
this is for sure, I was bitten by it myself;

or, potentially, if hammiefilter.py -t and mboxtrain.py were
running at the same time ???

To avoid: do not do it (I do not use hammiefilter.py -t to
be on the safe side).

To fix, once it happens: start from scratch.

Good to have in the next version: a database validator and
corrector. 



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=706520&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 29 04:23:13 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 06:23:25 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-779049 ]
	email.Errors.HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen ...
Message-ID: <E19hRdR-0000XS-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #779049, was opened at 2003-07-28 17:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jamesoff
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779049&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul R. Brown (paulrbrown)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: email.Errors.HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen ...

Initial Comment:
I have some messages that SPAMBayes will neither score
nor filter.  Accessing the drop-down to view the
current message scores results in nothing -- no error,
no scores, just silence.

My guess is that it's because of bad MIME?  (I'll have
to dust off an RFC or two and find out...)  The
following appears in each message:

--= Multipart Boundary 1722809
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--= Multipart Boundary 1722809
Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

[... content here ...]

--= Multipart Boundary 1722809-- 

The offending message (in Outlook format) is attached.

Environment is Outlook 2003 (w/updates), WinXP,
Exchange 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: James Seward (jamesoff)
Date: 2003-07-29 10:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=582117

Another example in case it helps. This is Outlook 2002 SP-1 
on WinXP SP-1 talking to Exchange 2000 (although I had this 
problem with the previous version of Exchange too).

This problems occurs with roughly 20% of my emails which I 
class as spam.

--- begin logfile snippet ---
Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jamess\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jamess\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 59 spam and 1753 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin (beta), Binary version 0.6 (July 29, 
2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 
(July 2003))
on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
using Python 2.3c1 (#44, Jul 21 2003, 09:21:38) [MSC 
v.1200 32 bit (Intel)]

...

FAILED to create email.message from:  'X-MS-Mail-Gibberish: 
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0\r\nReceived: from 
lfallback0.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net ([62.189.34.25]) by 
mailhost.greymatter.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC
(5.0.2195.5329);\r\n\t Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:42:55 +0100
\r\nReceived: from mail3.sendmeoffers.com 
([64.253.204.241])\r\n\tby lfallback0.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net with 
esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1)\r\n\tid 19gpGb-0006ll-00\r\n\tfor 
jamess@greymatter.com; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 17:25:06 +0000
\r\nReceived: from sendmeoffers.com (192.168.1.8)\r\n  by 
mail3.sendmeoffers.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 2003 13:25:03 -
0400\r\nFrom: Gourmet Coffee Direct<749-2211081-
unsubscribe@sendmeoffers.com>\r\nTo: 
jamess@greymatter.com \r\nSubject: Gevalia\'s summer sale! 
A limited-time offer for the uncommon coffee drinker\r\nDate: 
Sun, 27 Jul 2003 11:32:44 -0400\r\nContent-Type: 
multipart/alternative;\r\n        boundary="= Multipart 
Boundary 2211081" \r\nX-Priority: 3 \r\nX-MSMail-Priority: 
Normal \r\nX-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 
(9.0.2911.0)  \r\nX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft 
MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106  \r\nMime-Version: 1.0 
\r\nMessage-Id: <E19gpGb-0006ll-
00@lfallback0.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net>\r\nReturn-Path: 749-
2211081-unsubscribe@sendmeoffers.com\r\nX-
OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2003 09:42:56.0002 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[C9D35E20:01C355B5]
\r\n\n<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Gevalia 
Iced.</TITLE>\r\n</HEAD>\r\n<BODY 
bgColor=#ffffff>\r\n<CENTER>\r\n<TABLE cellSpacing=0 
cellPadding=0 width=600 border=0>\r\n  <TBODY>\r\n  
<TR>\r\n    <TD colSpan=3><IMG height=5 \r\n      
src="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_disclaimer_01.
gif" width=600></TD></TR>\r\n  <TR>\r\n    <TD 
background="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_disclai
mer_02.gif"><IMG height=6 \r\n      
src="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_disclaimer_02.
gif" width=5></TD>\r\n    <TD width=590 height=6><FONT 
face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" \r\n      color=#142e76 
size=1>This email and offer have not been sent to you by 
\r\n      Gevalia Kaffe, but by a 3rd party where you may 
have opted in to receive \r\n      updates. To opt-out or 
unsubscribe, please follow instructions as provided \r\n      by 
the sender.</FONT></TD>\r\n    <TD 
background=http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_disclai
mer_04.jpg><IMG height=6 \r\n      
src="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_disclaimer_04.j
pg" width=5></TD></TR>\r\n  <TR>\r\n    <TD 
colSpan=3><IMG height=5 \r\n      
src="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_disclaimer_05.
gif" 
\r\nwidth=600></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>\r\n<TABLE 
cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=600 border=0>\r\n  
<TBODY>\r\n  <TR>\r\n    <TD colSpan=2><IMG height=19 
\r\n      
src="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_iced_01.gif" 
width=268></TD>\r\n    <TD rowSpan=3><IMG height=400 
\r\n      
src="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_iced_02.jpg" 
width=332></TD></TR>\r\n  <TR>\r\n    <TD><IMG 
height=334 
src="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_iced_03.gif" 
\r\n      width=15></TD>\r\n    <TD vAlign=top width=253 
height=334>\r\n      <P><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-
serif" color=#142e76 \r\n      size=3><STRONG>Experience a 
pleasure that\'s uniquely yours - and purely \r\n      Gevalia 
Kaffe.</STRONG></FONT><BR><FONT \r\n      face="Arial, 
Helvetica, sans-serif" size=2>An uncommon offer for an 
\r\n      uncommon coffee drinker. Just place your order 
today and receive, for \r\n      <FONT 
color=#142e76><STRONG>only $12.95</STRONG></FONT>, 
including \r\n      shipping & 
handling:</FONT><BR><BR><FONT \r\n      face="Arial, 
Helvetica, sans-serif" size=2><IMG height=135 \r\n      
alt="Gevalia Coffee" 
src="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/coffee_makers_sm.jpg"
 \r\n      width=120 align=left>- Two boxes of our 
extraordinary coffee<BR>- A 12-cup \r\n      Programmable 
Coffeemaker <STRONG><FONT \r\n      
color=#142e76>FREE</FONT></STRONG><BR>- Two Gevalia 
Ceramic Mugs \r\n      <STRONG><FONT 
color=#142e76>FREE</FONT></STRONG></FONT></P>\r\n    
  <P><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" color=#142e76 
\r\n      size=2><EM><BR>(Approximate retail value $75)
</EM><br>\r\n\t  <font face="arial,helvetica,san-serif" 
size="1">\r\n This offer expires August 15, 
2003<br></FONT></P></TD></TR>\r\n  <TR>\r\n    <TD 
colSpan=2><A 
href="http://www.sendmeoffers.com/c/c749c.php?
ea=amFtZXNzQGdyZXltYXR0ZXIuY29t"><IMG height=47 
\r\n      
src="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_iced_05.jpg" 
width=268 \r\n  
border=0></A></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>\r\n
\r\n\r\n<img 
src="http://www.sendmeoffers.com/o/o749o.php?
ea=amFtZXNzQGdyZXltYXR0ZXIuY29t" width="1" height="1" 
alt="" border="0">\r\n&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br><center><table 
bgcolor="#c0c0c0" width=600 border=0 cellpadding="1" 
cellspacing="2"><tr><td bgcolor="#efefef" align=center><font 
face=verdana size=1 color=black>To stop receiving offers <a 
href="http://www.sendmeoffers.com/unsubscribe/?
ea=jamess@greymatter.com"><font face=verdana size=1 
color=black>Go Here</font></a><font face=verdana size=1 
color=black> or send mail to:<br>Unsubscribe 
Department<br>1730 S. Federal Hwy, Suite 116<br>Delray 
Beach, FL 
33483</font></td></tr></table></center>\r\n</body>\r\n</h
tml>\r\n\r\n--= Multipart Boundary 2211081-- \r\n\r\n\nHere 
Is Our Offering:\r\n\r\nExperience a pleasure that\'s uniquely 
yours and purely Gevalia Kaffe.  \r\nJust place your order 
today and receive, for only $12.95, including shipping & 
handling:\r\n\r\n-Two boxes of our extraordinary coffee\r\n-A 
12-cup Programmable Automatic Drip Coffeemaker\r\n-Two 
matching Gevalia Ceramic Mugs Free\r\n(Approximate retail 
value $ 85)\r\n\r\nYou can cancel at any time with no further 
obligation.\r\n\r\nhttp://www.sendmeoffers.com/c/c749c.php?
ea=amFtZXNzQGdyZXltYXR0ZXIuY29t\r\n\r\nOrder Right 
Now.\r\n\r\nThis order expires July 28, 2003.\r\n\r\n\r\nStop 
receiving 
offers:\r\nhttp://www.sendmeoffers.com/unsubscribe/?
ea=jamess@greymatter.com\r\n\r\n'
pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 275, in _Invoke_
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 280, in _invoke_
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 541, in 
_invokeex_
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 228, in OnClick
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 424, in ShowClues
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 677, in score
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 734, in GetEmailPackageObject
  File "out1.pyz/email", line 52, in message_from_string
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 75, in parsestr
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 64, in parse
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 239, in _parsebody
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 75, in parsestr
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 62, in parse
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 111, in _parseheaders
email.Errors.HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen before 
first header
--- EOF ---

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 05:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

FAILED to create email.message from:  'X-MS-Mail-Gibberish:
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0\r\nReceived:
from shfex02.hosting.innerhost.com ([192.168.29.8]) by
shbex01.hosting.innerhost.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);\r\n\t Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:01:08
-0400\r\nReceived: from mail7.savingscourier.com
([64.253.204.179]) by shfex02.hosting.innerhost.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);\r\n\t Thu, 24 Jul 2003
15:01:08 -0400\r\nReceived: from savingscourier.com
(192.168.1.8)\r\n  by mail7.savingscourier.com with SMTP; 24
Jul 2003 15:01:05 -0400\r\nFrom: Mark and
Bob<723-1722809-unsubscribe@savingscourier.com>\r\nTo:
prb@fivesight.com \r\nSubject: Are These Guys Nuts?\r\nDate:
Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:20:05 -0400\r\nContent-Type:
multipart/alternative;\r\n        boundary="= Multipart
Boundary 1722809" \r\nX-Priority: 3 \r\nX-MSMail-Priority:
Normal \r\nX-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416
(9.0.2911.0)  \r\nX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
V6.00.2800.1106  \r\nMime-Version: 1.0 \r\nReturn-Path:
723-1722809-unsubscribe@savingscourier.com\r\nMessage-ID:
<SHFEX02stgr3SU0hXCR00000274@shfex02.hosting.innerhost.com>\r\nX-OriginalArrivalTime:
24 Jul 2003 19:01:08.0236 (UTC)
FILETIME=[F0AFF4C0:01C35215]\r\n\n<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
"-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transitional//EN">\r\n<html>\r\n<head>\r\n<META
HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;
charset=windows-1251">\r\n\r\n\t<title>Are These Guys
Nuts?</title>\r\n</head>\r\n<body bgcolor="#ffffff"
marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" leftmargin="0"
topmargin="0">\r\n<div align="center"><a
href="http://www.savingscourier.com/c/c723c.php?ea=cHJiQGZpdmVzaWdodC5jb20="><img
src="http://freeimagehosting.sendmebargains.com/onemin/franklincreative.jpg"
alt="" width="433" height="370"
border="0"></a></div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<img
src="http://www.savingscourier.com/o/o723o.php?ea=cHJiQGZpdmVzaWdodC5jb20="
width="1" height="1" alt=""
border="0">\r\n&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br><center><table
bgcolor="#c0c0c0" width=433 border=0 cellpadding="1"
cellspacing="2"><tr><td bgcolor="#efefef" align=center><font
face=verdana size=1 color=black>To stop receiving offers <a
href="http://www.savingscourier.com/unsubscribe/?ea=prb@fivesight.com"><font
face=verdana size=1 color=black>Go Here</font></a><font
face=verdana size=1 color=black> or send mail
to:<br>Unsubscribe Department<br>1730 S. Federal Hwy, Suite
116<br>Delray Beach, FL
33483</font></td></tr></table></center>\r\n</body>\r\n</html>\r\n\r\n--=
Multipart Boundary 1722809-- \r\n\r\n\n
<http://www.savingscourier.com/c/c723c.php?ea=cHJiQGZpdmVzaWdodC5jb20=>
\r\n 
<http://www.savingscourier.com/o/o723o.php?ea=cHJiQGZpdmVzaWdodC5jb20=>
 \r\n \r\n\r\nTo stop receiving offers 
<http://www.savingscourier.com/unsubscribe/?ea=prb@fivesight.com>
Go Here or send mail to:\r\nUnsubscribe Department\r\n1730
S. Federal Hwy, Suite 116\r\nDelray Beach, FL 33483\t\r\n--=
Multipart Boundary 1722809-- \r\n'

...

Traceback is:
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 677,
in score
    email = msg.GetEmailPackageObject()
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\msgstore.py", line 734,
in GetEmailPackageObject
    msg = email.message_from_string(text)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\__init__.py", line 52,
in message_from_string
    return Parser(_class, strict=strict).parsestr(s)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\Parser.py", line 75, in
parsestr
    return self.parse(StringIO(text), headersonly=headersonly)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\Parser.py", line 64, in
parse
    self._parsebody(root, fp, firstbodyline)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\Parser.py", line 239, in
_parsebody
    msgobj = self.parsestr(part)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\Parser.py", line 75, in
parsestr
    return self.parse(StringIO(text), headersonly=headersonly)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\Parser.py", line 62, in
parse
    firstbodyline = self._parseheaders(root, fp)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\Parser.py", line 111, in
_parseheaders
    raise Errors.HeaderParseError(
email.Errors.HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen before
first header


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul R. Brown (paulrbrown)
Date: 2003-07-28 17:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=532486

Another take on the same message.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779049&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 29 05:09:10 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 07:09:21 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-779049 ]
	email.Errors.HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen ...
Message-ID: <E19hSLu-0008Te-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #779049, was opened at 2003-07-29 03:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779049&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul R. Brown (paulrbrown)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: email.Errors.HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen ...

Initial Comment:
I have some messages that SPAMBayes will neither score
nor filter.  Accessing the drop-down to view the
current message scores results in nothing -- no error,
no scores, just silence.

My guess is that it's because of bad MIME?  (I'll have
to dust off an RFC or two and find out...)  The
following appears in each message:

--= Multipart Boundary 1722809
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--= Multipart Boundary 1722809
Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

[... content here ...]

--= Multipart Boundary 1722809-- 

The offending message (in Outlook format) is attached.

Environment is Outlook 2003 (w/updates), WinXP,
Exchange 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 21:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Checking in msgstore.py;
new revision: 1.59; previous revision: 1.58


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: James Seward (jamesoff)
Date: 2003-07-29 20:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=582117

Another example in case it helps. This is Outlook 2002 SP-1 
on WinXP SP-1 talking to Exchange 2000 (although I had this 
problem with the previous version of Exchange too).

This problems occurs with roughly 20% of my emails which I 
class as spam.

--- begin logfile snippet ---
Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jamess\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db'
Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and 
Settings\jamess\Application 
Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db'
Bayes database initialized with 59 spam and 1753 good 
messages
SpamBayes Outlook Addin (beta), Binary version 0.6 (July 29, 
2003) starting (with engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 
(July 2003))
on Windows 5.1.2600 (Service Pack 1)
using Python 2.3c1 (#44, Jul 21 2003, 09:21:38) [MSC 
v.1200 32 bit (Intel)]

...

FAILED to create email.message from:  'X-MS-Mail-Gibberish: 
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0\r\nReceived: from 
lfallback0.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net ([62.189.34.25]) by 
mailhost.greymatter.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC
(5.0.2195.5329);\r\n\t Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:42:55 +0100
\r\nReceived: from mail3.sendmeoffers.com 
([64.253.204.241])\r\n\tby lfallback0.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net with 
esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1)\r\n\tid 19gpGb-0006ll-00\r\n\tfor 
jamess@greymatter.com; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 17:25:06 +0000
\r\nReceived: from sendmeoffers.com (192.168.1.8)\r\n  by 
mail3.sendmeoffers.com with SMTP; 27 Jul 2003 13:25:03 -
0400\r\nFrom: Gourmet Coffee Direct<749-2211081-
unsubscribe@sendmeoffers.com>\r\nTo: 
jamess@greymatter.com \r\nSubject: Gevalia\'s summer sale! 
A limited-time offer for the uncommon coffee drinker\r\nDate: 
Sun, 27 Jul 2003 11:32:44 -0400\r\nContent-Type: 
multipart/alternative;\r\n        boundary="= Multipart 
Boundary 2211081" \r\nX-Priority: 3 \r\nX-MSMail-Priority: 
Normal \r\nX-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 
(9.0.2911.0)  \r\nX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft 
MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106  \r\nMime-Version: 1.0 
\r\nMessage-Id: <E19gpGb-0006ll-
00@lfallback0.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net>\r\nReturn-Path: 749-
2211081-unsubscribe@sendmeoffers.com\r\nX-
OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2003 09:42:56.0002 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[C9D35E20:01C355B5]
\r\n\n<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Gevalia 
Iced.</TITLE>\r\n</HEAD>\r\n<BODY 
bgColor=#ffffff>\r\n<CENTER>\r\n<TABLE cellSpacing=0 
cellPadding=0 width=600 border=0>\r\n  <TBODY>\r\n  
<TR>\r\n    <TD colSpan=3><IMG height=5 \r\n      
src="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_disclaimer_01.
gif" width=600></TD></TR>\r\n  <TR>\r\n    <TD 
background="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_disclai
mer_02.gif"><IMG height=6 \r\n      
src="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_disclaimer_02.
gif" width=5></TD>\r\n    <TD width=590 height=6><FONT 
face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" \r\n      color=#142e76 
size=1>This email and offer have not been sent to you by 
\r\n      Gevalia Kaffe, but by a 3rd party where you may 
have opted in to receive \r\n      updates. To opt-out or 
unsubscribe, please follow instructions as provided \r\n      by 
the sender.</FONT></TD>\r\n    <TD 
background=http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_disclai
mer_04.jpg><IMG height=6 \r\n      
src="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_disclaimer_04.j
pg" width=5></TD></TR>\r\n  <TR>\r\n    <TD 
colSpan=3><IMG height=5 \r\n      
src="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_disclaimer_05.
gif" 
\r\nwidth=600></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>\r\n<TABLE 
cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=600 border=0>\r\n  
<TBODY>\r\n  <TR>\r\n    <TD colSpan=2><IMG height=19 
\r\n      
src="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_iced_01.gif" 
width=268></TD>\r\n    <TD rowSpan=3><IMG height=400 
\r\n      
src="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_iced_02.jpg" 
width=332></TD></TR>\r\n  <TR>\r\n    <TD><IMG 
height=334 
src="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_iced_03.gif" 
\r\n      width=15></TD>\r\n    <TD vAlign=top width=253 
height=334>\r\n      <P><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-
serif" color=#142e76 \r\n      size=3><STRONG>Experience a 
pleasure that\'s uniquely yours - and purely \r\n      Gevalia 
Kaffe.</STRONG></FONT><BR><FONT \r\n      face="Arial, 
Helvetica, sans-serif" size=2>An uncommon offer for an 
\r\n      uncommon coffee drinker. Just place your order 
today and receive, for \r\n      <FONT 
color=#142e76><STRONG>only $12.95</STRONG></FONT>, 
including \r\n      shipping & 
handling:</FONT><BR><BR><FONT \r\n      face="Arial, 
Helvetica, sans-serif" size=2><IMG height=135 \r\n      
alt="Gevalia Coffee" 
src="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/coffee_makers_sm.jpg"
 \r\n      width=120 align=left>- Two boxes of our 
extraordinary coffee<BR>- A 12-cup \r\n      Programmable 
Coffeemaker <STRONG><FONT \r\n      
color=#142e76>FREE</FONT></STRONG><BR>- Two Gevalia 
Ceramic Mugs \r\n      <STRONG><FONT 
color=#142e76>FREE</FONT></STRONG></FONT></P>\r\n    
  <P><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" color=#142e76 
\r\n      size=2><EM><BR>(Approximate retail value $75)
</EM><br>\r\n\t  <font face="arial,helvetica,san-serif" 
size="1">\r\n This offer expires August 15, 
2003<br></FONT></P></TD></TR>\r\n  <TR>\r\n    <TD 
colSpan=2><A 
href="http://www.sendmeoffers.com/c/c749c.php?
ea=amFtZXNzQGdyZXltYXR0ZXIuY29t"><IMG height=47 
\r\n      
src="http://img.2prove.com/geval/iced/gevalia_iced_05.jpg" 
width=268 \r\n  
border=0></A></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>\r\n
\r\n\r\n<img 
src="http://www.sendmeoffers.com/o/o749o.php?
ea=amFtZXNzQGdyZXltYXR0ZXIuY29t" width="1" height="1" 
alt="" border="0">\r\n&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br><center><table 
bgcolor="#c0c0c0" width=600 border=0 cellpadding="1" 
cellspacing="2"><tr><td bgcolor="#efefef" align=center><font 
face=verdana size=1 color=black>To stop receiving offers <a 
href="http://www.sendmeoffers.com/unsubscribe/?
ea=jamess@greymatter.com"><font face=verdana size=1 
color=black>Go Here</font></a><font face=verdana size=1 
color=black> or send mail to:<br>Unsubscribe 
Department<br>1730 S. Federal Hwy, Suite 116<br>Delray 
Beach, FL 
33483</font></td></tr></table></center>\r\n</body>\r\n</h
tml>\r\n\r\n--= Multipart Boundary 2211081-- \r\n\r\n\nHere 
Is Our Offering:\r\n\r\nExperience a pleasure that\'s uniquely 
yours and purely Gevalia Kaffe.  \r\nJust place your order 
today and receive, for only $12.95, including shipping & 
handling:\r\n\r\n-Two boxes of our extraordinary coffee\r\n-A 
12-cup Programmable Automatic Drip Coffeemaker\r\n-Two 
matching Gevalia Ceramic Mugs Free\r\n(Approximate retail 
value $ 85)\r\n\r\nYou can cancel at any time with no further 
obligation.\r\n\r\nhttp://www.sendmeoffers.com/c/c749c.php?
ea=amFtZXNzQGdyZXltYXR0ZXIuY29t\r\n\r\nOrder Right 
Now.\r\n\r\nThis order expires July 28, 2003.\r\n\r\n\r\nStop 
receiving 
offers:\r\nhttp://www.sendmeoffers.com/unsubscribe/?
ea=jamess@greymatter.com\r\n\r\n'
pythoncom error: Python error invoking COM method.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 275, in _Invoke_
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 280, in _invoke_
  File "out1.pyz/win32com.server.policy", line 541, in 
_invokeex_
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 228, in OnClick
  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 424, in ShowClues
  File "out1.pyz/manager", line 677, in score
  File "out1.pyz/msgstore", line 734, in GetEmailPackageObject
  File "out1.pyz/email", line 52, in message_from_string
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 75, in parsestr
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 64, in parse
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 239, in _parsebody
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 75, in parsestr
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 62, in parse
  File "out1.pyz/email.Parser", line 111, in _parseheaders
email.Errors.HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen before 
first header
--- EOF ---

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 15:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

FAILED to create email.message from:  'X-MS-Mail-Gibberish:
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0\r\nReceived:
from shfex02.hosting.innerhost.com ([192.168.29.8]) by
shbex01.hosting.innerhost.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);\r\n\t Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:01:08
-0400\r\nReceived: from mail7.savingscourier.com
([64.253.204.179]) by shfex02.hosting.innerhost.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);\r\n\t Thu, 24 Jul 2003
15:01:08 -0400\r\nReceived: from savingscourier.com
(192.168.1.8)\r\n  by mail7.savingscourier.com with SMTP; 24
Jul 2003 15:01:05 -0400\r\nFrom: Mark and
Bob<723-1722809-unsubscribe@savingscourier.com>\r\nTo:
prb@fivesight.com \r\nSubject: Are These Guys Nuts?\r\nDate:
Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:20:05 -0400\r\nContent-Type:
multipart/alternative;\r\n        boundary="= Multipart
Boundary 1722809" \r\nX-Priority: 3 \r\nX-MSMail-Priority:
Normal \r\nX-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416
(9.0.2911.0)  \r\nX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
V6.00.2800.1106  \r\nMime-Version: 1.0 \r\nReturn-Path:
723-1722809-unsubscribe@savingscourier.com\r\nMessage-ID:
<SHFEX02stgr3SU0hXCR00000274@shfex02.hosting.innerhost.com>\r\nX-OriginalArrivalTime:
24 Jul 2003 19:01:08.0236 (UTC)
FILETIME=[F0AFF4C0:01C35215]\r\n\n<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC
"-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transitional//EN">\r\n<html>\r\n<head>\r\n<META
HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html;
charset=windows-1251">\r\n\r\n\t<title>Are These Guys
Nuts?</title>\r\n</head>\r\n<body bgcolor="#ffffff"
marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" leftmargin="0"
topmargin="0">\r\n<div align="center"><a
href="http://www.savingscourier.com/c/c723c.php?ea=cHJiQGZpdmVzaWdodC5jb20="><img
src="http://freeimagehosting.sendmebargains.com/onemin/franklincreative.jpg"
alt="" width="433" height="370"
border="0"></a></div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<img
src="http://www.savingscourier.com/o/o723o.php?ea=cHJiQGZpdmVzaWdodC5jb20="
width="1" height="1" alt=""
border="0">\r\n&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br><center><table
bgcolor="#c0c0c0" width=433 border=0 cellpadding="1"
cellspacing="2"><tr><td bgcolor="#efefef" align=center><font
face=verdana size=1 color=black>To stop receiving offers <a
href="http://www.savingscourier.com/unsubscribe/?ea=prb@fivesight.com"><font
face=verdana size=1 color=black>Go Here</font></a><font
face=verdana size=1 color=black> or send mail
to:<br>Unsubscribe Department<br>1730 S. Federal Hwy, Suite
116<br>Delray Beach, FL
33483</font></td></tr></table></center>\r\n</body>\r\n</html>\r\n\r\n--=
Multipart Boundary 1722809-- \r\n\r\n\n
<http://www.savingscourier.com/c/c723c.php?ea=cHJiQGZpdmVzaWdodC5jb20=>
\r\n 
<http://www.savingscourier.com/o/o723o.php?ea=cHJiQGZpdmVzaWdodC5jb20=>
 \r\n \r\n\r\nTo stop receiving offers 
<http://www.savingscourier.com/unsubscribe/?ea=prb@fivesight.com>
Go Here or send mail to:\r\nUnsubscribe Department\r\n1730
S. Federal Hwy, Suite 116\r\nDelray Beach, FL 33483\t\r\n--=
Multipart Boundary 1722809-- \r\n'

...

Traceback is:
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\manager.py", line 677,
in score
    email = msg.GetEmailPackageObject()
  File "E:\src\spambayes\Outlook2000\msgstore.py", line 734,
in GetEmailPackageObject
    msg = email.message_from_string(text)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\__init__.py", line 52,
in message_from_string
    return Parser(_class, strict=strict).parsestr(s)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\Parser.py", line 75, in
parsestr
    return self.parse(StringIO(text), headersonly=headersonly)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\Parser.py", line 64, in
parse
    self._parsebody(root, fp, firstbodyline)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\Parser.py", line 239, in
_parsebody
    msgobj = self.parsestr(part)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\Parser.py", line 75, in
parsestr
    return self.parse(StringIO(text), headersonly=headersonly)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\Parser.py", line 62, in
parse
    firstbodyline = self._parseheaders(root, fp)
  File "E:\src\python-cvs\lib\email\Parser.py", line 111, in
_parseheaders
    raise Errors.HeaderParseError(
email.Errors.HeaderParseError: Continuation line seen before
first header


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul R. Brown (paulrbrown)
Date: 2003-07-29 03:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=532486

Another take on the same message.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=779049&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 29 06:13:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 08:13:42 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-771541 ] "Recover from" button
	not present in "Unsure" folder
Message-ID: <E19hTMA-0002zq-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #771541, was opened at 2003-07-15 07:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jdrash
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771541&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jim Drash (jdrash)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Recover from" button not present in "Unsure" folder

Initial Comment:
In the 003 release of the Outlook Add-in, the "Recover 
from" button does not display in the Unsure folder. Onlt 
the "Delete As Spam" displays.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Jim Drash (jdrash)
Date: 2003-07-29 08:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53269

Your suggestion fixes the problem. Thank you.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 19:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please try doing a reset of your toolbars, as per
the troubleshooting guide.  Go the brutal "delete
outcmd.dat" route.  Let me know if that fixes it

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=771541&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 29 10:25:53 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 12:26:11 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-777856 ] Outlook freezes on
	folder "browse" dialogs
Message-ID: <E19hXIP-0008V2-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #777856, was opened at 2003-07-25 16:06
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by glinnell
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777856&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Geoffrey Linnell (glinnell)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook freezes on folder "browse" dialogs

Initial Comment:
I installed V .2, and it worked fine.  I uninstalled, and 
installed V .3, and since then when I go into Manager, 
select Train Now, and click on browse, Outlook 2000 
freezes...I have to kill the process to end it.  I've since 
tried V .5...the same.  I've uninstalled Office, Re-
installed, patched to SP3...nothing.  Any SpamBayes 
dialog that has a Browse button still halts Outlook.  
Office is 9.0.6926 SP3, Outlook is SP3, 9.0.0.6627.  All 
running on Windows 2000 Build 2195 SP3.

-Geoff 
ilx@cypress.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Geoffrey Linnell (glinnell)
Date: 2003-07-29 09:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=830627

Hmmm...now it works.  I installed W2K-SP4 and MS03-026 
RPC patch yesterday.  I hadn't tried SpamBayes in about a 
week, and in an effort to record a recent log to send you, 
tried SpamBayes again...this time it worked properly.  All of 
the old logfiles have been overwriten, but I'm attaching the 
current one if it's of any use.  Thanks for the quick response!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-28 22:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Can you please check for a log file, and attach it here -
see the "troubleshooting guide" for details.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=777856&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 29 12:36:09 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 14:36:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-716684 ] Filtering marks message
	as unread
Message-ID: <E19hZKT-0007id-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #716684, was opened at 2003-04-07 11:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by db3l
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filtering marks message as unread

Initial Comment:
Reported too many times :)  Exchange server users only.

As spambayes startsit starts processing missed
messages.  In the meantime, the user reads some
messages, thereby marking them as read.  As smapbayes
writes the spam field, these messages spring back to a
read status.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-07-29 18:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

Ok, I've been running with the latest CVS from 7/25 (or 
whatever was there in the SF CVS backup server on 7/25) for 
a few days now and it seems to be working properly.  They 
key behavior change is that new messages get their Spam 
field set right away and the change is immediately visible.  
The only uncertainty I have is that since reproducing it 
previously involved getting the message open before the 
Spam field updated visibly, I can't be absolutely sure that a 
slower machine might not still have the problem.  I want to 
check it out on the slower machine having problems even with 
my prior workaround, but have to plan that out (it's the 
CEO :-)).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-24 13:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

If you could try the current CVS sources it would be great -
this version saves in a slightly different way, and there
has been one report of a similar bug being fixed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-07-24 04:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

For what it's worth, I've continued to run from source with my 
multiple save modification (as detailed earlier in the ticket) 
quite successfully (e.g., the problem doesn't happen for me).  
I'm positive it's still just a sledgehammer approach to the 
problem, and have found one slow laptop in the office (out of 
a number running a modified binary I produced with that 
change) that still can hit the problem even with the change, 
so it has a feeling of a race condition.  But sledgehammer or 
no, I'm embarrassed to say that it worked so well for me that 
I settled for it as a solution :-)

But I'd be happy to experiment with any other changes you 
might want to try out.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 11:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Give me a yell in mail once you have this setup.  Once you
do, I will send you a patch or 2 with a couple of
experiments to the way we save the score

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-22 11:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I'm happy to switch to the source version from CVS, if you 
can tell me what you want me to try. My time is limited (and 
I'm unavailable for the next 3 days) but I'm happy to do what 
I can.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 11:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Well, it does tell me that the "Save" is indeed the issue,
which is a good start.

Someone running from the source code would still be best :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-22 10:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

Initial impressions are that this fixes the problem of messages 
going back to unread, but the "Spam" score is not being set 
on the messages any more (they are still being filtered OK, it's 
just that the score isn't shown).

Not sure whether this counts as an improvement or not...

I'll leave the setting as "False" for a while in case the problem 
reappears.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 10:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 13:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 11:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Closing
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=764241&group_id=61702&atid=498103
as a dupe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Andersen (gokubi)
Date: 2003-07-07 21:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=558027

I find that if I get a new message and hit reply before I read 
it (I'm in Autopreview) after sending the message it is still 
unread.

More troubling is that Outlook does not show that I have 
replied to the message by changing the envelope icon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 05:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:  a user had the same problem, but also noted 
this:

> If an attachment is included, the first time I open the 
> message, I cannot open the attachement, or save it. If I 
> close the message, and reopen it, I can both open and 
save 
> the attachment.

Odd!  I don't get this problem very often at all anymore; I 
don't know why.  If I did, I'd test the attachment theory, but 
as it is, I can't, so I leave it for others ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-10 12:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I just had this happen to me again. I'm using the CVS version 
from a day or two ago.

So the version in current CVS isn't (completely) fixed.

Anythong else I could try? I see part of a thread about 
USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS here, but I can't find the original. 
My code has USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS in it. If you can tell 
me what (if anything) else needs changing, I can try taking it 
out.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-08 15:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

Just as an FYI, I agree with tobermory's comments in that 
spambayes is in fact classifying the message immediately, 
but it's the update to the server and/or client that appears to 
be delayed until the next Outlook event.  See the first of my 
two spambayes list mail messages referenced in my note 
Mark included in this bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-08 15:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

> Would it be possible to try another change for me instead?  
Revert
> filter.py, and in msgstore.py's Save method, find the line:
> 
>             self.mapi_object.SaveChanges
(mapi.KEEP_OPEN_READWRITE |
> USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS)

I'm pretty sure I had tried that first, while experimenting, 
before I
ended up with the extra Save as a final "flush all" attempt.  
There
was no change, nor did the function return an error.  I think I 
also
tried setting it to 0 (after reading the internal comment) to no
apparent effect, although I may be misremembering since the 
same
comment may have caused me to hesitate to make that 
change :-)

But I'll double check this when I get a chance today.  If I recall
when testing, my review of the code seemed to indicate that 
everything
should work fine, and that the spambayes code was 
managing the read
flag reasonably well, and in fact, was issuing a Save() back in
filter.py.  I ended up inserting test Save()s at the lowermost 
level
(which worked) and then bubbling them up to see how high I 
could leave
the extra call so it was called as infrequently as possible.

In the end, the issue seemed related to the processing that 
goes on
when all_actions is enabled.  If the Save() occurred after the 
field
status was updated, but before 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() was
called, all was fine.  But if the 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() got
called first, then the following Save() - as already in filter.py -
didn't seem to "take."

> I'm a little unsure why one of the Save calls is indented too.

Ah, that was just to minimize change from the existing code 
path.

I wanted to move the Save() to happen before
RememberMessageCurrentFolder(), but then the second Save
() became
completely superfluous in the main branch case - but I didn't 
want to
lose the Save() following RememberMessageCurrentFolder() if 
it was
called just in case that was critical to existing behavior, so I 
moved
it to only occur in that same block.

-- David

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Leftley (tobermory)
Date: 2003-04-08 09:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=626601

Just to try and clarify one point: earlier msgs in this thread 
suggest that spambayes doesn't attempt to classify a 
message until certain events (reading a msg, etc.) occur.

In fact from watching the trace output, the message is 
classified as soon as it arrives (the trace 
shows "Message 'xxx' had a Spam classification of 'yyy'") but 
Outlook doesn't reflect this change until the next event occurs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-08 08:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

My version of filter.py looks different. I haven't updated from 
CVS in a while, maybe that's why. But my version looks like 
it has msg.Save() called unconditionally.

    try:
        # Save the score
        msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
        # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
        msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
        msg.Save()

I've tried moving msg.Save() to before msg.Remember...(), but 
I'll have to wait to see results. Will report back.

(Better might be to cvs update and apply your change, but I 
may not get a chance to do that for a couple of days...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-04-08 02:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From David Bolen:
"Moore, Paul" <Paul.Moore@atosorigin.com> writes:

> As far as I know, no-one has been able to track down the 
> problem to fix it yet.

I have, however, implemented a local workaround that's
working really well for me.  This was based on my prior
messages in:

   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004086.html
   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004088.html

Since I can't quantify what if any penalty it imposes in the
general
case by syncing changes back to the server an additional
time, and
since the problem may be limited to Exchange servers, I haven't
proposed it be made to the main source yet - although I
certainly
haven't noticed much of a penalty in my local testing.

But if anyone else wants to try a local change, it's fairly
trivial,
adding an additional call to msg.Save() in filter.py:

    *** filter.py   18 Mar 2003 03:09:03 -0000      1.20
    --- filter.py   7 Apr 2003 22:18:58 -0000
    ***************
    *** 27,39 ****
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !         msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")
    --- 26,39 ----
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
    +         msg.Save()
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !             msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")


After making this change, what went from virtually _every_
message staying unread, became the extreme rare case, such
that I'm no longer certain any remaining case may even be
spambayes related.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-04-07 11:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

A bit of investigation (I am using Outlook 2002 & Exchange 
2000).

A new message arriving in my Inbox does not get analysed by 
SpamBayes until:
- You switch to another folder and back again.
- You read the message (then analysed, but remains 'unread')
- Another email arrives, when the first message is then rated 
(second one not rated though)
- Another email in Inbox is saved after editing
In other words, it seems some other action eventually triggers 
the analysis - not the arrival event itself.

An email that is read before it has been analysed by 
SpamBayes will always be 'unread' afterwards. This is 
independent of type (plain, rich text or HTML)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 29 15:28:34 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 17:28:45 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-773364 ] "Delete From Server"
	doesn't work on filtered mail
Message-ID: <E19hc1K-0002Gs-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #773364, was opened at 2003-07-18 12:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by plasmadog
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail

Initial Comment:
In Outlook's account properties, you can choose to 
leave a copy of retrieved mail on the server, and to 
remove that copy when the mail is deleted from 
the "Deleted Items" folder. However, this does not seem 
to be working with mail that has been checked by 
SpamBayes. When I delete a mail from the "Certain 
Spam" folder, it is moved to "Deleted Items" as 
expected, but when the "Deleted Items" folder is 
emptied, the copy remains on the server. I've tried the 
same thing with mail that has not been checked by 
SpamBayes, and it gets deleted from the server as 
expected.
It seems that Outlook cannot tell that the filtered mail is 
the same as the one on the server. Perhaps this is 
because of the addition of the spam score to the local 
copy?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog)
Date: 2003-07-30 09:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=231995

OK, I've tried it, but it has not solved the problem. I've added 
the save_spam_info:False to the ini file, but I'm not sure that 
it's doing what it's meant to. The spam score column is still 
working as it did before; I would have thought that this would 
stop working with that option set. Anyway, it still isn't 
deleting from the server.
On the other hand, I'm not certain I have the right version 
running. I tried uninstalling the plugin, and rebuilding it from 
the pre-release 4 files, but the SpamBayes Manager dialog 
still says version 0.3. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 17:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The latest binary version has the ability to disable saving
the spam score with each message.  Can you try this version
and see if the behaviour changes?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 22:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 01:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 29 15:33:07 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 17:33:16 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-773364 ] "Delete From Server"
	doesn't work on filtered mail
Message-ID: <E19hc5j-0002Tm-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #773364, was opened at 2003-07-18 12:49
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by plasmadog
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail

Initial Comment:
In Outlook's account properties, you can choose to 
leave a copy of retrieved mail on the server, and to 
remove that copy when the mail is deleted from 
the "Deleted Items" folder. However, this does not seem 
to be working with mail that has been checked by 
SpamBayes. When I delete a mail from the "Certain 
Spam" folder, it is moved to "Deleted Items" as 
expected, but when the "Deleted Items" folder is 
emptied, the copy remains on the server. I've tried the 
same thing with mail that has not been checked by 
SpamBayes, and it gets deleted from the server as 
expected.
It seems that Outlook cannot tell that the filtered mail is 
the same as the one on the server. Perhaps this is 
because of the addition of the spam score to the local 
copy?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog)
Date: 2003-07-30 09:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=231995

OK, I've tried it, but it has not solved the problem. I've added 
the save_spam_info:False to the ini file, but I'm not sure that 
it's doing what it's meant to. The spam score column is still 
working as it did before; I would have thought that this would 
stop working with that option set. Anyway, it still isn't 
deleting from the server.
On the other hand, I'm not certain I have the right version 
running. I tried uninstalling the plugin, and rebuilding it from 
the pre-release 4 files, but the SpamBayes Manager dialog 
still says version 0.3. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 17:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The latest binary version has the ability to disable saving
the spam score with each message.  Can you try this version
and see if the behaviour changes?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 22:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 01:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 29 16:43:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 18:43:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-773364 ] "Delete From Server"
	doesn't work on filtered mail
Message-ID: <E19hdC5-00075W-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #773364, was opened at 2003-07-18 12:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail

Initial Comment:
In Outlook's account properties, you can choose to 
leave a copy of retrieved mail on the server, and to 
remove that copy when the mail is deleted from 
the "Deleted Items" folder. However, this does not seem 
to be working with mail that has been checked by 
SpamBayes. When I delete a mail from the "Certain 
Spam" folder, it is moved to "Deleted Items" as 
expected, but when the "Deleted Items" folder is 
emptied, the copy remains on the server. I've tried the 
same thing with mail that has not been checked by 
SpamBayes, and it gets deleted from the server as 
expected.
It seems that Outlook cannot tell that the filtered mail is 
the same as the one on the server. Perhaps this is 
because of the addition of the spam score to the local 
copy?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-30 10:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Are you running the plugin from source?  (and in particular, 
the 1.0a4 release?)

If you are: this doesn't include the most recent changes to 
the Outlook plugin.  The only way to get them is to get hold 
of the cvs source or the binary installer from Mark's website.

(Although there have been a great number of improvements 
to the Outlook plugin since 1.0a4, there hasn't been much 
changed elsewhere, so it's not really worth releasing a 1.0a5 
since most Outlook people use the binary or CVS).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog)
Date: 2003-07-30 09:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=231995

OK, I've tried it, but it has not solved the problem. I've added 
the save_spam_info:False to the ini file, but I'm not sure that 
it's doing what it's meant to. The spam score column is still 
working as it did before; I would have thought that this would 
stop working with that option set. Anyway, it still isn't 
deleting from the server.
On the other hand, I'm not certain I have the right version 
running. I tried uninstalling the plugin, and rebuilding it from 
the pre-release 4 files, but the SpamBayes Manager dialog 
still says version 0.3. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 17:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The latest binary version has the ability to disable saving
the spam score with each message.  Can you try this version
and see if the behaviour changes?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 22:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 01:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Tue Jul 29 16:55:05 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 18:55:13 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-773364 ] "Delete From Server"
	doesn't work on filtered mail
Message-ID: <E19hdN3-00067i-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #773364, was opened at 2003-07-18 12:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by plasmadog
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail

Initial Comment:
In Outlook's account properties, you can choose to 
leave a copy of retrieved mail on the server, and to 
remove that copy when the mail is deleted from 
the "Deleted Items" folder. However, this does not seem 
to be working with mail that has been checked by 
SpamBayes. When I delete a mail from the "Certain 
Spam" folder, it is moved to "Deleted Items" as 
expected, but when the "Deleted Items" folder is 
emptied, the copy remains on the server. I've tried the 
same thing with mail that has not been checked by 
SpamBayes, and it gets deleted from the server as 
expected.
It seems that Outlook cannot tell that the filtered mail is 
the same as the one on the server. Perhaps this is 
because of the addition of the spam score to the local 
copy?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog)
Date: 2003-07-30 10:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=231995

Ah, OK. I didn't know about that website. I've now got v0.6 
installed. I'll report back when I've seen some spam (shouldn't 
be too long).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-30 10:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Are you running the plugin from source?  (and in particular, 
the 1.0a4 release?)

If you are: this doesn't include the most recent changes to 
the Outlook plugin.  The only way to get them is to get hold 
of the cvs source or the binary installer from Mark's website.

(Although there have been a great number of improvements 
to the Outlook plugin since 1.0a4, there hasn't been much 
changed elsewhere, so it's not really worth releasing a 1.0a5 
since most Outlook people use the binary or CVS).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog)
Date: 2003-07-30 09:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=231995

OK, I've tried it, but it has not solved the problem. I've added 
the save_spam_info:False to the ini file, but I'm not sure that 
it's doing what it's meant to. The spam score column is still 
working as it did before; I would have thought that this would 
stop working with that option set. Anyway, it still isn't 
deleting from the server.
On the other hand, I'm not certain I have the right version 
running. I tried uninstalling the plugin, and rebuilding it from 
the pre-release 4 files, but the SpamBayes Manager dialog 
still says version 0.3. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 17:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The latest binary version has the ability to disable saving
the spam score with each message.  Can you try this version
and see if the behaviour changes?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 22:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 01:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 30 17:40:46 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 30 19:40:59 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-773364 ] "Delete From Server"
	doesn't work on filtered mail
Message-ID: <E19i0Yo-0001z9-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #773364, was opened at 2003-07-18 12:49
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by plasmadog
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: "Delete From Server" doesn't work on filtered mail

Initial Comment:
In Outlook's account properties, you can choose to 
leave a copy of retrieved mail on the server, and to 
remove that copy when the mail is deleted from 
the "Deleted Items" folder. However, this does not seem 
to be working with mail that has been checked by 
SpamBayes. When I delete a mail from the "Certain 
Spam" folder, it is moved to "Deleted Items" as 
expected, but when the "Deleted Items" folder is 
emptied, the copy remains on the server. I've tried the 
same thing with mail that has not been checked by 
SpamBayes, and it gets deleted from the server as 
expected.
It seems that Outlook cannot tell that the filtered mail is 
the same as the one on the server. Perhaps this is 
because of the addition of the spam score to the local 
copy?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog)
Date: 2003-07-31 11:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=231995

OK, the save_spam_info option now appears to be doing what 
it is meant to do, but it hasn't solved the "delete from server" 
problem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog)
Date: 2003-07-30 10:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=231995

Ah, OK. I didn't know about that website. I've now got v0.6 
installed. I'll report back when I've seen some spam (shouldn't 
be too long).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-30 10:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Are you running the plugin from source?  (and in particular, 
the 1.0a4 release?)

If you are: this doesn't include the most recent changes to 
the Outlook plugin.  The only way to get them is to get hold 
of the cvs source or the binary installer from Mark's website.

(Although there have been a great number of improvements 
to the Outlook plugin since 1.0a4, there hasn't been much 
changed elsewhere, so it's not really worth releasing a 1.0a5 
since most Outlook people use the binary or CVS).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Peguero (plasmadog)
Date: 2003-07-30 09:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=231995

OK, I've tried it, but it has not solved the problem. I've added 
the save_spam_info:False to the ini file, but I'm not sure that 
it's doing what it's meant to. The spam score column is still 
working as it did before; I would have thought that this would 
stop working with that option set. Anyway, it still isn't 
deleting from the server.
On the other hand, I'm not certain I have the right version 
running. I tried uninstalling the plugin, and rebuilding it from 
the pre-release 4 files, but the SpamBayes Manager dialog 
still says version 0.3. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-29 17:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

The latest binary version has the ability to disable saving
the spam score with each message.  Can you try this version
and see if the behaviour changes?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 22:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 01:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=773364&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 30 17:43:27 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 30 19:43:36 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows
	2000
Message-ID: <E19i0bP-00025N-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-01 13:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by xaviorm
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000

Initial Comment:
When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs 
until the registering dll's section and then stops with an 
alert.  An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is

"Unable to register the DLL/OCX. 

DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201.

<Abort> <Retry> <Ignore>"

I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just 
repeat the error and Abort would unwind the 
installation.  I never tried Ignore.

I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, 
but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them.  
Abort worked the second time.  I finally tried Ignore, 
which completes okay.  When I ran Outlook, though, the 
add-in wasn't there.

This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron 
notebook.  It has Outlook 2002 SP2.  Both are up to 
date with recent patches.  I believe this combination is 
not known to work, but thought this information might 
help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Xavior Mosswart (xaviorm)
Date: 2003-07-30 12:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=564609

I am having this problem on an NT 4 sp6a box with the 06 
version. Using Outlook 2000. any clues what is causing this? 
so far it just seems to be fixing it's self for people.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Elmar Bransch (elmar71)
Date: 2003-07-28 07:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832399

After digging in the Mailing List and the bug base I found the 
interim version posted on 25-07 in this thread.
I was very lucky having SpamBayes 002 installed on Win2000 
Prof. with Outlook 2000 SR-1. Since upgrading to 003 it had 
the DLL-Register-0x80040201-problem, still remaining with the 
binary 005 installer. Finally the interim bug catcher release did 
the trick for me and installed fine - there has been even no 
errors in the spambayes1.log on startup so far :-)

Thanks! Keep on ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-28 06:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Sorry to be late to the celebration--I was out of town and 
unable to test on my Win 2000 machine.  This morning, 
however, I confirmed that it installs and works correctly 
there.  Thanks!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 04:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yay - I'm convinced this specific error, with
"win32com.universal" showing up, is fixed :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-25 04:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Works fine here: Win2003EE+OutlookXPSP2. In the same 
enviroment ver 005 doesn't won't to install with 0x80040201

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-25 03:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I've put a new interim version at
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/downloads/SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-BugCatcher.exe.
 This version is specifically for testing this "Unable to
Register" error, so please try it as soon as you can, and
let me know how it goes.  (Note that speficically, it should
work even when that dll is not registered/installed)



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-24 23:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Using regmon and filemon I finally found what was the source 
of that problem: somebody unregister file %Program Files%
\Common Files\Designer\MSADDNDR.DLL 
When I register it manually, I was able to register 
spambayes_addin.dll 
I have no idea what is this module for and why 
spambayes_addin.dll is trying to access it in DLLRegisterServer
()

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-24 03:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "<string>", line 10, in ?

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport

  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 75, in ?

  File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 21, in 
RegisterInterfaces
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147319779, 'Library not 
registered.', None, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 12:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

That error code generally means the Python code doing the
registration failed.  Can you please look for a log file to
attach - see
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html
for info on finding the log

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-22 06:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Just to keep up to date--the 005 version of the binary 
installer still has this problem on Win 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-21 08:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Although this is not yet claimed to be fixed, I tested it in the 
new version 004 installer.  As expected, it fails in the same 
way it did in the 002 and 003 installers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 07:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Copy-n-pasted from another bug report:

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from
"addin.py" regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-06 04:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :)

--Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error.
--Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to 
Spambayes Outlook plug-in
--Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using 
both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB 
article. No difference.
--Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in 
case:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;207132

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;249873

The 2nd one mentions this:

DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. 
Return code was: string
*Search Winerror.h for string. 

You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to 
get this working again. 

Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes 
working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her 
to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, 
her missing "spam thingy".

I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I 
upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. 
Just so happened that 003 became available and 
troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, 
so I did. Didn't help me.... :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-03 17:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 
did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ 
SP2 installed.

The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. 
Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up 
and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running 
the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does 
NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-02 06:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on 
Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could 
not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) 
And still could not install the Binary version 003.
I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then 
tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I 
uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 30 18:40:48 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 30 20:40:51 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-780612 ] Outlook incorrectly
	trains on moves messages
Message-ID: <E19i1Uu-0002WL-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #780612, was opened at 2003-07-31 10:40
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780612&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook incorrectly trains on moves messages

Initial Comment:
Consider:

* SpamBayes set to filter "inbox" and "my folder".
* Item arrives in "inbox".  SpamBayes scores as 'ham'
* Outlook rule kicks in - message moved to "My Folder"
* SpamBayes sees this message, notices we have scored
it, and assumes it is a "recover" operation - trains as
Ham.

Not sure how to tackle this!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780612&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 30 18:43:30 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 30 20:44:24 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-764325 ] Can't install on Windows
	2000
Message-ID: <E19i1XW-0003vl-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #764325, was opened at 2003-07-02 10:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Can't install on Windows 2000

Initial Comment:
When I run the binary installer on Windows 2000, it runs 
until the registering dll's section and then stops with an 
alert.  An image of the alert is attached, but the gist is

"Unable to register the DLL/OCX. 

DllREgisterServer failed; code 0x80040201.

<Abort> <Retry> <Ignore>"

I got this error on version 0.3 where Retry would just 
repeat the error and Abort would unwind the 
installation.  I never tried Ignore.

I have now tried version 0.3 and it gives the same error, 
but Abort and Retry hung the first time I tried them.  
Abort worked the second time.  I finally tried Ignore, 
which completes okay.  When I ran Outlook, though, the 
add-in wasn't there.

This is Windows 2000 SP3 on an elderly Dell Inspiron 
notebook.  It has Outlook 2002 SP2.  Both are up to 
date with recent patches.  I believe this combination is 
not known to work, but thought this information might 
help.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-31 10:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

For most people, the problem is the MS "Designer" object
spontaneously unregistering.  The 006 binary attempts to fix
this by not requiring the object to be installed at all!

This particular error code generally means a Python failure
that will be written to a log.  Please see the
troubleshooting guide and attach the log.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Xavior Mosswart (xaviorm)
Date: 2003-07-31 09:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=564609

I am having this problem on an NT 4 sp6a box with the 06 
version. Using Outlook 2000. any clues what is causing this? 
so far it just seems to be fixing it's self for people.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Elmar Bransch (elmar71)
Date: 2003-07-29 04:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=832399

After digging in the Mailing List and the bug base I found the 
interim version posted on 25-07 in this thread.
I was very lucky having SpamBayes 002 installed on Win2000 
Prof. with Outlook 2000 SR-1. Since upgrading to 003 it had 
the DLL-Register-0x80040201-problem, still remaining with the 
binary 005 installer. Finally the interim bug catcher release did 
the trick for me and installed fine - there has been even no 
errors in the spambayes1.log on startup so far :-)

Thanks! Keep on ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-29 03:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Sorry to be late to the celebration--I was out of town and 
unable to test on my Win 2000 machine.  This morning, 
however, I confirmed that it installs and works correctly 
there.  Thanks!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-26 01:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yay - I'm convinced this specific error, with
"win32com.universal" showing up, is fixed :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-26 01:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Works fine here: Win2003EE+OutlookXPSP2. In the same 
enviroment ver 005 doesn't won't to install with 0x80040201

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-26 00:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I've put a new interim version at
http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/downloads/SpamBayes-Outlook-Setup-BugCatcher.exe.
 This version is specifically for testing this "Unable to
Register" error, so please try it as soon as you can, and
let me know how it goes.  (Note that speficically, it should
work even when that dll is not registered/installed)



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-25 20:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Using regmon and filemon I finally found what was the source 
of that problem: somebody unregister file %Program Files%
\Common Files\Designer\MSADDNDR.DLL 
When I register it manually, I was able to register 
spambayes_addin.dll 
I have no idea what is this module for and why 
spambayes_addin.dll is trying to access it in DLLRegisterServer
()

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew Zaikin (ghuron)
Date: 2003-07-25 00:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=824558

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "<string>", line 10, in ?

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 277, in importHook

  File "out3.pkg/iu.pyc", line 362, in doimport

  File "out1.pyz/addin", line 75, in ?

  File "out1.pyz/win32com.universal", line 21, in 
RegisterInterfaces
pywintypes.com_error: (-2147319779, 'Library not 
registered.', None, None)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-23 09:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

That error code generally means the Python code doing the
registration failed.  Can you please look for a log file to
attach - see
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/spambayes/spambayes/Outlook2000/docs/troubleshooting.html
for info on finding the log

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-23 03:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Just to keep up to date--the 005 version of the binary 
installer still has this problem on Win 2000.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dennis Austin (portola)
Date: 2003-07-22 05:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=787905

Although this is not yet claimed to be fixed, I tested it in the 
new version 004 installer.  As expected, it fails in the same 
way it did in the 002 and 003 installers.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-07 04:11

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Copy-n-pasted from another bug report:

Uninstalled Office XP, cleaned up any remnants per another 
MS KB article, and reinstalled. NO Service Packs installed yet.

Tried binary instalers 002 and 003. Both fail with 
same "Unable to register DLL/OCX" error.

Tried source install again and still get error from
"addin.py" regarding Outlook 2000 not being installed or found.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-07 01:29

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

More information. May be worthwhile or may be useless... :)

--Tried reinstalling the 002 installer and get the same error.
--Cleaned the Windows Registry of *all* entries related to 
Spambayes Outlook plug-in
--Ran 'regsvr32.exe' in app's directory, using 
both "spambayes_addin.dll" and "spamba~1.dll", per MS KB 
article. No difference.
--Found two MS KB articles that *may* be helpful, just in 
case:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;207132

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-
us;249873

The 2nd one mentions this:

DllRegisterServer (or DllUnregisterServer)in Dllname failed. 
Return code was: string
*Search Winerror.h for string. 

You guys are smarter than me though.... :0 I'm just trying to 
get this working again. 

Important note: I had Office/Outlook 2000 and Spambayes 
working fine ** on my wife's PC **. I decided to upgrade her 
to Office XP thinking she wouldn't notice, but she did. Mainly, 
her missing "spam thingy".

I'm not sure how up-to-date I had her Office 2000 install. I 
upgraded to Office XP and the SpamBayes plug-in was gone. 
Just so happened that 003 became available and 
troubleshooting info also said to install all SPs for Office XP, 
so I did. Didn't help me.... :(

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hall Stevenson (hallstevenson)
Date: 2003-07-04 14:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=120676

Same problem here... acting exactly like installer version 002 
did, actually. My OS is XP Pro w/ all updates and Office XP w/ 
SP2 installed.

The install fails on the spambayes_addin.dll registration. 
Telling the install to "Retry" causes the installer to hang up 
and has to be killed ("End Now"). Running 
the "regsvr32.exe..." command from the Spambayes dir does 
NOT work. Gives a similar (probably the same) error.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-03 03:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

I got the same thing with Outlook 2003 (with tech refresh) on 
Windows XP. I tried uninstalling Python and win32all. (could 
not install from source after installing the tech refresh either) 
And still could not install the Binary version 003.
I installed "Spamunition" which registered it's dll fine. Then 
tried to install spambayes again. This time it worked. so I 
uninstalled spamunition. Spambayes is working fine again now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=764325&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 30 19:12:38 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 30 21:12:58 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-716684 ] Filtering marks message
	as unread
Message-ID: <E19i1zi-0003i0-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #716684, was opened at 2003-04-07 21:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filtering marks message as unread

Initial Comment:
Reported too many times :)  Exchange server users only.

As spambayes startsit starts processing missed
messages.  In the meantime, the user reads some
messages, thereby marking them as read.  As smapbayes
writes the spam field, these messages spring back to a
read status.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-31 11:12

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Fixed in 006 :)  Let me know if not fixed for you.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-07-30 04:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

Ok, I've been running with the latest CVS from 7/25 (or 
whatever was there in the SF CVS backup server on 7/25) for 
a few days now and it seems to be working properly.  They 
key behavior change is that new messages get their Spam 
field set right away and the change is immediately visible.  
The only uncertainty I have is that since reproducing it 
previously involved getting the message open before the 
Spam field updated visibly, I can't be absolutely sure that a 
slower machine might not still have the problem.  I want to 
check it out on the slower machine having problems even with 
my prior workaround, but have to plan that out (it's the 
CEO :-)).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-24 23:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

If you could try the current CVS sources it would be great -
this version saves in a slightly different way, and there
has been one report of a similar bug being fixed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-07-24 14:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

For what it's worth, I've continued to run from source with my 
multiple save modification (as detailed earlier in the ticket) 
quite successfully (e.g., the problem doesn't happen for me).  
I'm positive it's still just a sledgehammer approach to the 
problem, and have found one slow laptop in the office (out of 
a number running a modified binary I produced with that 
change) that still can hit the problem even with the change, 
so it has a feeling of a race condition.  But sledgehammer or 
no, I'm embarrassed to say that it worked so well for me that 
I settled for it as a solution :-)

But I'd be happy to experiment with any other changes you 
might want to try out.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 21:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Give me a yell in mail once you have this setup.  Once you
do, I will send you a patch or 2 with a couple of
experiments to the way we save the score

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-22 21:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I'm happy to switch to the source version from CVS, if you 
can tell me what you want me to try. My time is limited (and 
I'm unavailable for the next 3 days) but I'm happy to do what 
I can.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 21:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Well, it does tell me that the "Save" is indeed the issue,
which is a good start.

Someone running from the source code would still be best :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-22 20:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

Initial impressions are that this fixes the problem of messages 
going back to unread, but the "Spam" score is not being set 
on the messages any more (they are still being filtered OK, it's 
just that the score isn't shown).

Not sure whether this counts as an improvement or not...

I'll leave the setting as "False" for a while in case the problem 
reappears.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 20:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 23:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 21:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Closing
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=764241&group_id=61702&atid=498103
as a dupe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Andersen (gokubi)
Date: 2003-07-08 07:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=558027

I find that if I get a new message and hit reply before I read 
it (I'm in Autopreview) after sending the message it is still 
unread.

More troubling is that Outlook does not show that I have 
replied to the message by changing the envelope icon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 15:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:  a user had the same problem, but also noted 
this:

> If an attachment is included, the first time I open the 
> message, I cannot open the attachement, or save it. If I 
> close the message, and reopen it, I can both open and 
save 
> the attachment.

Odd!  I don't get this problem very often at all anymore; I 
don't know why.  If I did, I'd test the attachment theory, but 
as it is, I can't, so I leave it for others ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-10 22:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I just had this happen to me again. I'm using the CVS version 
from a day or two ago.

So the version in current CVS isn't (completely) fixed.

Anythong else I could try? I see part of a thread about 
USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS here, but I can't find the original. 
My code has USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS in it. If you can tell 
me what (if anything) else needs changing, I can try taking it 
out.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-09 01:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

Just as an FYI, I agree with tobermory's comments in that 
spambayes is in fact classifying the message immediately, 
but it's the update to the server and/or client that appears to 
be delayed until the next Outlook event.  See the first of my 
two spambayes list mail messages referenced in my note 
Mark included in this bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-09 01:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

> Would it be possible to try another change for me instead?  
Revert
> filter.py, and in msgstore.py's Save method, find the line:
> 
>             self.mapi_object.SaveChanges
(mapi.KEEP_OPEN_READWRITE |
> USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS)

I'm pretty sure I had tried that first, while experimenting, 
before I
ended up with the extra Save as a final "flush all" attempt.  
There
was no change, nor did the function return an error.  I think I 
also
tried setting it to 0 (after reading the internal comment) to no
apparent effect, although I may be misremembering since the 
same
comment may have caused me to hesitate to make that 
change :-)

But I'll double check this when I get a chance today.  If I recall
when testing, my review of the code seemed to indicate that 
everything
should work fine, and that the spambayes code was 
managing the read
flag reasonably well, and in fact, was issuing a Save() back in
filter.py.  I ended up inserting test Save()s at the lowermost 
level
(which worked) and then bubbling them up to see how high I 
could leave
the extra call so it was called as infrequently as possible.

In the end, the issue seemed related to the processing that 
goes on
when all_actions is enabled.  If the Save() occurred after the 
field
status was updated, but before 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() was
called, all was fine.  But if the 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() got
called first, then the following Save() - as already in filter.py -
didn't seem to "take."

> I'm a little unsure why one of the Save calls is indented too.

Ah, that was just to minimize change from the existing code 
path.

I wanted to move the Save() to happen before
RememberMessageCurrentFolder(), but then the second Save
() became
completely superfluous in the main branch case - but I didn't 
want to
lose the Save() following RememberMessageCurrentFolder() if 
it was
called just in case that was critical to existing behavior, so I 
moved
it to only occur in that same block.

-- David

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Leftley (tobermory)
Date: 2003-04-08 19:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=626601

Just to try and clarify one point: earlier msgs in this thread 
suggest that spambayes doesn't attempt to classify a 
message until certain events (reading a msg, etc.) occur.

In fact from watching the trace output, the message is 
classified as soon as it arrives (the trace 
shows "Message 'xxx' had a Spam classification of 'yyy'") but 
Outlook doesn't reflect this change until the next event occurs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-08 18:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

My version of filter.py looks different. I haven't updated from 
CVS in a while, maybe that's why. But my version looks like 
it has msg.Save() called unconditionally.

    try:
        # Save the score
        msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
        # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
        msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
        msg.Save()

I've tried moving msg.Save() to before msg.Remember...(), but 
I'll have to wait to see results. Will report back.

(Better might be to cvs update and apply your change, but I 
may not get a chance to do that for a couple of days...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-04-08 12:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From David Bolen:
"Moore, Paul" <Paul.Moore@atosorigin.com> writes:

> As far as I know, no-one has been able to track down the 
> problem to fix it yet.

I have, however, implemented a local workaround that's
working really well for me.  This was based on my prior
messages in:

   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004086.html
   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004088.html

Since I can't quantify what if any penalty it imposes in the
general
case by syncing changes back to the server an additional
time, and
since the problem may be limited to Exchange servers, I haven't
proposed it be made to the main source yet - although I
certainly
haven't noticed much of a penalty in my local testing.

But if anyone else wants to try a local change, it's fairly
trivial,
adding an additional call to msg.Save() in filter.py:

    *** filter.py   18 Mar 2003 03:09:03 -0000      1.20
    --- filter.py   7 Apr 2003 22:18:58 -0000
    ***************
    *** 27,39 ****
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !         msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")
    --- 26,39 ----
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
    +         msg.Save()
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !             msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")


After making this change, what went from virtually _every_
message staying unread, became the extreme rare case, such
that I'm no longer certain any remaining case may even be
spambayes related.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-04-07 21:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

A bit of investigation (I am using Outlook 2002 & Exchange 
2000).

A new message arriving in my Inbox does not get analysed by 
SpamBayes until:
- You switch to another folder and back again.
- You read the message (then analysed, but remains 'unread')
- Another email arrives, when the first message is then rated 
(second one not rated though)
- Another email in Inbox is saved after editing
In other words, it seems some other action eventually triggers 
the analysis - not the arrival event itself.

An email that is read before it has been analysed by 
SpamBayes will always be 'unread' afterwards. This is 
independent of type (plain, rich text or HTML)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 30 19:14:19 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 30 21:14:22 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-747107 ] SpamBayes leaves
	duplicate messages
Message-ID: <E19i21L-0003mL-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #747107, was opened at 2003-06-02 04:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747107&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Eric Brown (ericbr)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: SpamBayes leaves duplicate messages

Initial Comment:
I am subscribed to a number of different mailing lists, 
and I have a number of Outlook rules (set up via Rules 
Wizard) to route the different mailing lists into different 
folders.

When the rules are of the form:
Apply this rule after the message arrives
with <words> in the subject
move it to the <specified> folder

and a matching message comes in, SpamBayes 
seems to leave multiple copies of that message in the 
inbox.

This is very frustrating.

If the rule is of the form:
Apply this rule after the message arrives
sent to <email address>
move it to the <specified> folder

and a matching message comes in, duplicate 
messages do not occur.

So it seems to be some sort of odd interaction with 
Outlook Rules.

I'm running Outlook 2002 SP 2 on Windows XP SP 1a 
(with current hotfixes).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-31 11:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I would be very interested to know if version 006 works with
save_spam_info = True - it very well might.  It would be
great if you could let me know.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Brown (ericbr)
Date: 2003-07-23 00:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=783913

I installed both versions 4 and 5 of the binary, and set the 
save_spam_info to False.  So far, it seems to have fixed the 
problem, although I'd like to give it a full day of email to verify 
(because it doesn't always happen).  

However:  for some reason, the SpamBayes configuration 
dialog doesn't pop up when I click the spambayes button.  
This happens on Outlook XP on Windows XP.  

I'll put a new bug in on this; just thought you should know.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 20:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 23:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-07 08:59

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

No, installing 003 over the top of 002 should work fine.

I don't have any more answers, sorry, but no doubt Mark will 
look into this when he gets a chance.  Stay tuned!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Eric Brown (ericbr)
Date: 2003-07-05 07:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=783913

Anadelon:  Outlook junk mail rules are turned off; spam is 
Moved to Junk Mail.

I just ran the release 003 of the plugin, and I'm still seeing 
the problem.

(I didn't bother uninstalling release 002 - is that a problem?)

Eric


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Brent Rockwood (dnaguy)
Date: 2003-07-05 01:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=18879

It appears the problem lies between the keyboard and 
chair. :)  I seem to have overlooked the option to move 
messages instead of copying.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 13:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

In addition, the log file seems to indicate that you are using 
release 002 of the plugin.  If you haven't already, could you 
try release 003 and let us know if the problem still occurs?

Thanks.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 13:46

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Eric, do you have the Outlook junk mail rules turned on?  If 
you do, would both of you be able to try turning them off 
(they aren't all that much use if you are using spambayes 
anyway), and seeing if this resolves the problem?

In addition, forgive me if you've checked this, but in the 
spambayes filter setup, do you have "move" selected rather 
than "copy"?

(It's an odd problem that IIRC we have heard before, but I'm 
using the same version of Windows and Outlook, and have 
rules of that form, and don't notice this problem).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Brent Rockwood (dnaguy)
Date: 2003-07-04 01:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=18879

I am also having this problem.  I have not tested it with 
various rule types, but I believe it is occurring in conjunction 
with the Outlook "Junk E-mail" feature.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=747107&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 30 19:15:05 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 30 21:15:08 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Patches-776297 ] Add version check to
	plugin
Message-ID: <E19i225-0003np-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Patches item #776297, was opened at 2003-07-24 00:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Add version check to plugin

Initial Comment:
Many questions on the spambayes mailing list are 
answered with "first, make sure you are using the 
latest version of the Outlook plugin".  This patch
allows people to check to see if they are up-to-date.

Before incorporating this, please change the URL
of the page which contains the version number! :-)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-31 11:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Done - thanks Skip!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-27 23:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

Here's another version.  This uses re.search to extract
the BinaryVersion value from the remote copy of
Version.py and compares it with the local value.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-27 23:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

Okay, idiot that I am, I have it simply importing the file I
downloaded.  That obviously has some serious security
risks, so I will change it so that it simply pulls the version 
information from the file as if it was pure data.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-27 10:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

Here's an updated version of just checkversion.py which
assumes the remote file is the latest version of Version.py.
I haven't tried this on Windows (I'm at home).  I'll leave it
for Mark to pronounce on.  Mark, if you want me to check
it in, let me know what URL you want it to fetch.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-26 11:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Yep, binary version would be what you should compare against

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-24 11:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

That sounds fine to me.  Is the BinaryVersion element (currently
0.5) the item to compare with?  I was looking through the
Outlook2000 directory for "005".

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-24 09:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

How about we put on the web server the latest version of
"spambayes\Version.py" - we could then parse it locally and
extra more metadata (such as the new release date etc).  The
code could also be generally useful for all spambayes apps.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-07-24 01:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

> ...Or maybe that would just hammer the website too much ;)

Plus 'twould have been beyond my nascent Windows programming
skills...


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Adam Walker (xenogeist)
Date: 2003-07-24 01:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=583713

Maybe checking the version at startup in a seperate thread 
(along with an option to disable the check) and only show 
the message if a new version is availible could be added. ...Or 
maybe that would just hammer the website too much ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498105&aid=776297&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 30 21:01:53 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 30 23:02:00 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-780612 ] Outlook incorrectly
	trains on moves messages
Message-ID: <E19i3hR-00020v-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #780612, was opened at 2003-07-31 12:40
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780612&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook incorrectly trains on moves messages

Initial Comment:
Consider:

* SpamBayes set to filter "inbox" and "my folder".
* Item arrives in "inbox".  SpamBayes scores as 'ham'
* Outlook rule kicks in - message moved to "My Folder"
* SpamBayes sees this message, notices we have scored
it, and assumes it is a "recover" operation - trains as
Ham.

Not sure how to tackle this!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-31 15:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Couldn't you remember the classification for each message?  

This is what pop3proxy et al do - the message class provides 
the necessary information.  (This could be your chance to 
switch to using that and finish the rather uncomplete "master 
db" thing in there!) <wink>

What exactly is stored in the default_message_database 
anyway?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780612&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 30 21:18:13 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 30 23:18:17 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-780648 ] Plugin version 0.6
	reports version 0.5 from dropdown
Message-ID: <E19i3xF-0003hi-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #780648, was opened at 2003-07-30 22:18
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780648&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul R. Brown (paulrbrown)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Plugin version 0.6 reports version 0.5 from dropdown

Initial Comment:
The option from the toolbar dropdown to check for the
latest version displays a dialog that reports that the
current version is 0.5 and that the plugin is up to
date.  However, the installer was version 006 and the
version listed on the website is 0.6.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780648&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 30 21:25:23 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 30 23:25:30 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-780648 ] Plugin version 0.6
	reports version 0.5 from dropdown
Message-ID: <E19i44B-0007nk-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #780648, was opened at 2003-07-31 15:18
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780648&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Pending
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul R. Brown (paulrbrown)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Plugin version 0.6 reports version 0.5 from dropdown

Initial Comment:
The option from the toolbar dropdown to check for the
latest version displays a dialog that reports that the
current version is 0.5 and that the plugin is up to
date.  However, the installer was version 006 and the
version listed on the website is 0.6.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-31 15:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I was going to say that this was me because I only checked 
that the website directory was up-to-date before I pushed to 
the website.  However my version.py has 003 for the Outlook 
plugin.... ;)

I'll push a new version as soon as sf cvs starts working again.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780648&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 30 21:33:33 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 30 23:33:41 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-780612 ] Outlook incorrectly
	trains on moves messages
Message-ID: <E19i4C5-00084X-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #780612, was opened at 2003-07-31 10:40
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780612&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook incorrectly trains on moves messages

Initial Comment:
Consider:

* SpamBayes set to filter "inbox" and "my folder".
* Item arrives in "inbox".  SpamBayes scores as 'ham'
* Outlook rule kicks in - message moved to "My Folder"
* SpamBayes sees this message, notices we have scored
it, and assumes it is a "recover" operation - trains as
Ham.

Not sure how to tackle this!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-31 13:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

We do remember the classification - that is how the training
is triggered.  It is *because* we remember that we do the train.

What we could do is also remember the folder we origianlly
filtered it in.  Then, when it is moved we would be able to
determine if it is being "moved back" (ie, should be
trained) or simply moved by the user (and should be ignored
- other than probably updating the name of the folder we
"trained" it in)

I should get the test case failing first.

The message database is simply a dictionary of msgid:
trained_as_spam.  No entry means "never trained", otherwise
we know how it was trained.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-31 13:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Couldn't you remember the classification for each message?  

This is what pop3proxy et al do - the message class provides 
the necessary information.  (This could be your chance to 
switch to using that and finish the rather uncomplete "master 
db" thing in there!) <wink>

What exactly is stored in the default_message_database 
anyway?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780612&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 30 21:36:47 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 30 23:36:51 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-780648 ] Plugin version 0.6
	reports version 0.5 from dropdown
Message-ID: <E19i4FD-0002qx-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #780648, was opened at 2003-07-31 15:18
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780648&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul R. Brown (paulrbrown)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Plugin version 0.6 reports version 0.5 from dropdown

Initial Comment:
The option from the toolbar dropdown to check for the
latest version displays a dialog that reports that the
current version is 0.5 and that the plugin is up to
date.  However, the installer was version 006 and the
version listed on the website is 0.6.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-31 15:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Then again, maybe it wasn't - I was looking at the wrong file, 
and I did appear to have 0.6.  Anyway, the right file should 
be there now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-31 15:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I was going to say that this was me because I only checked 
that the website directory was up-to-date before I pushed to 
the website.  However my version.py has 003 for the Outlook 
plugin.... ;)

I'll push a new version as soon as sf cvs starts working again.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780648&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 30 21:41:36 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Wed Jul 30 23:41:44 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-780612 ] Outlook incorrectly
	trains on moves messages
Message-ID: <E19i4Js-0002zc-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #780612, was opened at 2003-07-31 12:40
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780612&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook incorrectly trains on moves messages

Initial Comment:
Consider:

* SpamBayes set to filter "inbox" and "my folder".
* Item arrives in "inbox".  SpamBayes scores as 'ham'
* Outlook rule kicks in - message moved to "My Folder"
* SpamBayes sees this message, notices we have scored
it, and assumes it is a "recover" operation - trains as
Ham.

Not sure how to tackle this!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-31 15:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

If you remember the classification, can't the rule simply be:

If I am being moved into a ham folder, and I was trained as 
spam, then I am being reclassified.
If I am being moved into a spam folder, and I was not trained 
as spam, then I am being reclassified.
Otherwise, I am just being moved.

(Where 'reclassified' checks to see if it already is the correct 
classification).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-31 15:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

We do remember the classification - that is how the training
is triggered.  It is *because* we remember that we do the train.

What we could do is also remember the folder we origianlly
filtered it in.  Then, when it is moved we would be able to
determine if it is being "moved back" (ie, should be
trained) or simply moved by the user (and should be ignored
- other than probably updating the name of the folder we
"trained" it in)

I should get the test case failing first.

The message database is simply a dictionary of msgid:
trained_as_spam.  No entry means "never trained", otherwise
we know how it was trained.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-31 15:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Couldn't you remember the classification for each message?  

This is what pop3proxy et al do - the message class provides 
the necessary information.  (This could be your chance to 
switch to using that and finish the rather uncomplete "master 
db" thing in there!) <wink>

What exactly is stored in the default_message_database 
anyway?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780612&group_id=61702

From paul at amazon.com  Wed Jul 30 20:32:35 2003
From: paul at amazon.com (Nordstrom, Paul)
Date: Thu Jul 31 01:24:59 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] RE: [Spambayes] problems with 1.0 alpha 4 outlook
	addin
Message-ID: <8F19180141484340B53B2593AD61B4430437588C@ex-mail-02.ant.amazon.com>

See thread below for an audit trail for this problem

My setup:

Outlook 2002 SP2
Windows 2000 Pro.

SpamBayes 1.0 alpha 4 (binary installer)

2 Outlook profiles, one MS Exchange Server-based, the other POP3-based.

When I had only one profile, everything worked fine.  After I added the second profile, every time I stop and start Outlook (whether I switch profiles or reopen the same one) all the settings in the "Define filters" dialogue are lost.

please query me for any other details I can provide.

paul

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Hammond [mailto:mhammond@skippinet.com.au] 
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 6:28 PM
>> To: Nordstrom, Paul; spambayes@python.org
>> Subject: RE: [Spambayes] problems with 1.0 alpha 4 outlook addin
>> 
>> 
>> Sorry, this message got lost.  Are you will having this 
>> problem?  Given the subject line, it appears you are running 
>> the source-code version - if so, please update your win32all 
>> - that will fix the problem.
>> 
>> Otherwise, the best thing is to open a bug report, as the 
>> bug wont get lost - however, I am reluctant to do this 
>> myself, as then there will be no-one in the bug to verify 
>> the fix (as I can't reproduce the problem).
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Mark.
>> 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Nordstrom, Paul [mailto:paul@amazon.com]
>> > Sent: Thursday, 24 July 2003 1:37 AM
>> > To: Mark Hammond; spambayes@python.org
>> > Subject: RE: [Spambayes] problems with 1.0 alpha 4 outlook addin
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> From: Mark Hammond [mailto:mhammond@skippinet.com.au] 
>> > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 5:55 PM
>> > >> To: Nordstrom, Paul; spambayes@python.org
>> > >> Subject: RE: [Spambayes] problems with 1.0 alpha 4 outlook addin
>> > >> 
>> > >> 
>> > >> > when I switch from one profile to the other, the folder 
>> > >> > settings get lost ... both filterable folders and target 
>> > >> > folders.  This happens even if all the message stores 
>> > >> > involved are visible in both profiles.  It is as if they had 
>> > >> > never been set.  The keyword association data seems to 
>> > >> > survive the transitions.
>> > >> 
>> > >> This is by design.  You must configure each profile 
>> > >> seperately, but the training information is shared.  It 
>> > >> seems that even if I wanted to share folder settings between 
>> > >> profiles I would have a hard time - the IDs used for these 
>> > >> folders appear to change across profiles.
>> > >> 
>> > 
>> > perhaps I wasn't clear ... any time I come back to a profile 
>> > (after having switched to the other one) ALL its 
>> > configuration is gone (except for the training info) and must 
>> > be reentered.  I wasn't expecting them to share 
>> > configuration, I just tried that as a workaround.
>> > 
>> > >> But assuming there are no technical problems, I'm not 
>> > >> convinced we should share any configuration.  For users that 
>> > >> share only a few information stores (or indeed none at all) 
>> > >> between profiles, this may appear strange, and could have 
>> > >> confusing semantics - eg, if 2 out of 3 profiles share an 
>> > >> information store, should changing the spam folders in one 
>> > >> of these 2 profiles change the other one?
>> > >> 
>> > 
>> > I certainly agree with this.
>> > 
>> > >> If there are any issues other than the fact that each 
>> > >> profile needs to be configured seperately, then please open 
>> > >> a bug, being as specific as you can.  If what you want is a 
>> > >> feature request, please open one of them instead (as I find 
>> > >> it easier to ignore them <wink>)
>> > >> 
>> > >> > Donation complete ... (now if you only accepted Amazon Honor 
>> > >> > system donations :-)
>> > >> > http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/browse/-/542032/qid%3D105
>> > >> 8919474/sr%3D1-1
>> > >> 
>> > >> Excellent - thanks!  It would be nice if somehow the PSA 
>> > >> could track how much was given by SpamBayes users.  I think 
>> > >> that once the mail SpamBayes dev crew agrees, we should add 
>> > >> a few PayPal donate buttons on a few of the pages.
>> > >> 
>> > >> Mark.
>> > >> 
>> 

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 31 00:19:03 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 31 02:19:34 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-716684 ] Filtering marks message
	as unread
Message-ID: <E19i6mF-0000rq-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #716684, was opened at 2003-04-07 11:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by db3l
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Filtering marks message as unread

Initial Comment:
Reported too many times :)  Exchange server users only.

As spambayes startsit starts processing missed
messages.  In the meantime, the user reads some
messages, thereby marking them as read.  As smapbayes
writes the spam field, these messages spring back to a
read status.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-07-31 06:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

Yeah, I had just built my own binary installer for the CVS 
version to test when I saw you publish 006 :-)  006 also 
seems to work fine for me.  I'll let you know when I get 
feedback from the problem laptop case.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-31 01:12

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Fixed in 006 :)  Let me know if not fixed for you.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-07-29 18:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

Ok, I've been running with the latest CVS from 7/25 (or 
whatever was there in the SF CVS backup server on 7/25) for 
a few days now and it seems to be working properly.  They 
key behavior change is that new messages get their Spam 
field set right away and the change is immediately visible.  
The only uncertainty I have is that since reproducing it 
previously involved getting the message open before the 
Spam field updated visibly, I can't be absolutely sure that a 
slower machine might not still have the problem.  I want to 
check it out on the slower machine having problems even with 
my prior workaround, but have to plan that out (it's the 
CEO :-)).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-24 13:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

If you could try the current CVS sources it would be great -
this version saves in a slightly different way, and there
has been one report of a similar bug being fixed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-07-24 04:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

For what it's worth, I've continued to run from source with my 
multiple save modification (as detailed earlier in the ticket) 
quite successfully (e.g., the problem doesn't happen for me).  
I'm positive it's still just a sledgehammer approach to the 
problem, and have found one slow laptop in the office (out of 
a number running a modified binary I produced with that 
change) that still can hit the problem even with the change, 
so it has a feeling of a race condition.  But sledgehammer or 
no, I'm embarrassed to say that it worked so well for me that 
I settled for it as a solution :-)

But I'd be happy to experiment with any other changes you 
might want to try out.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 11:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Give me a yell in mail once you have this setup.  Once you
do, I will send you a patch or 2 with a couple of
experiments to the way we save the score

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-22 11:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I'm happy to switch to the source version from CVS, if you 
can tell me what you want me to try. My time is limited (and 
I'm unavailable for the next 3 days) but I'm happy to do what 
I can.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-22 11:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Well, it does tell me that the "Save" is indeed the issue,
which is a good start.

Someone running from the source code would still be best :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-22 10:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

Initial impressions are that this fixes the problem of messages 
going back to unread, but the "Spam" score is not being set 
on the messages any more (they are still being filtered OK, it's 
just that the score isn't shown).

Not sure whether this counts as an improvement or not...

I'll leave the setting as "False" for a while in case the problem 
reappears.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-21 10:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I have released version 4 of the binary.  There is a new
option save_spam_info. as documented in the 'configuration'
guide.  If you set this option to False, SpamBayes will no
longer attempt to save anything back into the message. 
Please try this new version with this option set to False,
and see if the behavior of this bug changes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-20 13:47

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I just checked in a new option that can be set -
filter.save_spam_info - see the configuration documentation
for more details.

If this option is set to False, then spambayes will not
attempt to save the spam score or other information as it
filters.  You may like to try this option when you can, to
see if it has any effect on this bug.  You can try it
immediately if you use CVS, or as soon as the next release
is made.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-08 11:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Closing
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=764241&group_id=61702&atid=498103
as a dupe

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Steve Andersen (gokubi)
Date: 2003-07-07 21:52

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=558027

I find that if I get a new message and hit reply before I read 
it (I'm in Autopreview) after sending the message it is still 
unread.

More troubling is that Outlook does not show that I have 
replied to the message by changing the envelope icon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-04 05:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

>From the list:  a user had the same problem, but also noted 
this:

> If an attachment is included, the first time I open the 
> message, I cannot open the attachement, or save it. If I 
> close the message, and reopen it, I can both open and 
save 
> the attachment.

Odd!  I don't get this problem very often at all anymore; I 
don't know why.  If I did, I'd test the attachment theory, but 
as it is, I can't, so I leave it for others ;)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-10 12:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I just had this happen to me again. I'm using the CVS version 
from a day or two ago.

So the version in current CVS isn't (completely) fixed.

Anythong else I could try? I see part of a thread about 
USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS here, but I can't find the original. 
My code has USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS in it. If you can tell 
me what (if anything) else needs changing, I can try taking it 
out.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-08 15:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

Just as an FYI, I agree with tobermory's comments in that 
spambayes is in fact classifying the message immediately, 
but it's the update to the server and/or client that appears to 
be delayed until the next Outlook event.  See the first of my 
two spambayes list mail messages referenced in my note 
Mark included in this bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Bolen (db3l)
Date: 2003-04-08 15:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=53196

> Would it be possible to try another change for me instead?  
Revert
> filter.py, and in msgstore.py's Save method, find the line:
> 
>             self.mapi_object.SaveChanges
(mapi.KEEP_OPEN_READWRITE |
> USE_DEFERRED_ERRORS)

I'm pretty sure I had tried that first, while experimenting, 
before I
ended up with the extra Save as a final "flush all" attempt.  
There
was no change, nor did the function return an error.  I think I 
also
tried setting it to 0 (after reading the internal comment) to no
apparent effect, although I may be misremembering since the 
same
comment may have caused me to hesitate to make that 
change :-)

But I'll double check this when I get a chance today.  If I recall
when testing, my review of the code seemed to indicate that 
everything
should work fine, and that the spambayes code was 
managing the read
flag reasonably well, and in fact, was issuing a Save() back in
filter.py.  I ended up inserting test Save()s at the lowermost 
level
(which worked) and then bubbling them up to see how high I 
could leave
the extra call so it was called as infrequently as possible.

In the end, the issue seemed related to the processing that 
goes on
when all_actions is enabled.  If the Save() occurred after the 
field
status was updated, but before 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() was
called, all was fine.  But if the 
RememberMessageCurrentFolder() got
called first, then the following Save() - as already in filter.py -
didn't seem to "take."

> I'm a little unsure why one of the Save calls is indented too.

Ah, that was just to minimize change from the existing code 
path.

I wanted to move the Save() to happen before
RememberMessageCurrentFolder(), but then the second Save
() became
completely superfluous in the main branch case - but I didn't 
want to
lose the Save() following RememberMessageCurrentFolder() if 
it was
called just in case that was critical to existing behavior, so I 
moved
it to only occur in that same block.

-- David

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: David Leftley (tobermory)
Date: 2003-04-08 09:08

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=626601

Just to try and clarify one point: earlier msgs in this thread 
suggest that spambayes doesn't attempt to classify a 
message until certain events (reading a msg, etc.) occur.

In fact from watching the trace output, the message is 
classified as soon as it arrives (the trace 
shows "Message 'xxx' had a Spam classification of 'yyy'") but 
Outlook doesn't reflect this change until the next event occurs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-04-08 08:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

My version of filter.py looks different. I haven't updated from 
CVS in a while, maybe that's why. But my version looks like 
it has msg.Save() called unconditionally.

    try:
        # Save the score
        msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
        # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
        msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
        msg.Save()

I've tried moving msg.Save() to before msg.Remember...(), but 
I'll have to wait to see results. Will report back.

(Better might be to cvs update and apply your change, but I 
may not get a chance to do that for a couple of days...)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-04-08 02:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

>From David Bolen:
"Moore, Paul" <Paul.Moore@atosorigin.com> writes:

> As far as I know, no-one has been able to track down the 
> problem to fix it yet.

I have, however, implemented a local workaround that's
working really well for me.  This was based on my prior
messages in:

   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004086.html
   
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/2003-March/004088.html

Since I can't quantify what if any penalty it imposes in the
general
case by syncing changes back to the server an additional
time, and
since the problem may be limited to Exchange servers, I haven't
proposed it be made to the main source yet - although I
certainly
haven't noticed much of a penalty in my local testing.

But if anyone else wants to try a local change, it's fairly
trivial,
adding an additional call to msg.Save() in filter.py:

    *** filter.py   18 Mar 2003 03:09:03 -0000      1.20
    --- filter.py   7 Apr 2003 22:18:58 -0000
    ***************
    *** 27,39 ****
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !         msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")
    --- 26,39 ----
          try:
              # Save the score
              msg.SetField(mgr.config.field_score_name, prob)
    +         msg.Save()
              # and the ID of the folder we were in when scored.
              # (but only if we want to perform all actions)
              # Note we must do this, and the Save, before the
              # filter, else the save will fail.
              if all_actions:
                  msg.RememberMessageCurrentFolder()
    !             msg.Save()

              if all_actions and attr_prefix is not None:
                  folder_id = getattr(config, attr_prefix +
"_folder_id")


After making this change, what went from virtually _every_
message staying unread, became the extreme rare case, such
that I'm no longer certain any remaining case may even be
spambayes related.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin Worger (worger)
Date: 2003-04-07 11:58

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=751487

A bit of investigation (I am using Outlook 2002 & Exchange 
2000).

A new message arriving in my Inbox does not get analysed by 
SpamBayes until:
- You switch to another folder and back again.
- You read the message (then analysed, but remains 'unread')
- Another email arrives, when the first message is then rated 
(second one not rated though)
- Another email in Inbox is saved after editing
In other words, it seems some other action eventually triggers 
the analysis - not the arrival event itself.

An email that is read before it has been analysed by 
SpamBayes will always be 'unread' afterwards. This is 
independent of type (plain, rich text or HTML)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=716684&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 31 02:09:02 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 31 04:09:11 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-780648 ] Plugin version 0.6
	reports version 0.5 from dropdown
Message-ID: <E19i8Ug-0000uG-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #780648, was opened at 2003-07-31 13:18
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780648&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul R. Brown (paulrbrown)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Plugin version 0.6 reports version 0.5 from dropdown

Initial Comment:
The option from the toolbar dropdown to check for the
latest version displays a dialog that reports that the
current version is 0.5 and that the plugin is up to
date.  However, the installer was version 006 and the
version listed on the website is 0.6.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-31 18:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I'm so confused :)  This *did work for a while, then
stopped.  I assume it stopped as someone re-ran the makefile
without doing a "cvs up" on the main source tree.  We should
add this to the makefile.

I pushed this out hours ago, and have confirmed that the sf
htdocs folder has the correct version.  I think Tony did the
same since - but still the web page has the old version.  

I think we are just waiting for the cron job? 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-31 13:36

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Then again, maybe it wasn't - I was looking at the wrong file, 
and I did appear to have 0.6.  Anyway, the right file should 
be there now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-31 13:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

I was going to say that this was me because I only checked 
that the website directory was up-to-date before I pushed to 
the website.  However my version.py has 003 for the Outlook 
plugin.... ;)

I'll push a new version as soon as sf cvs starts working again.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780648&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 31 02:38:42 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 31 04:38:47 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-780612 ] Outlook incorrectly
	trains on moves messages
Message-ID: <E19i8xO-00022w-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #780612, was opened at 2003-07-31 10:40
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780612&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Outlook incorrectly trains on moves messages

Initial Comment:
Consider:

* SpamBayes set to filter "inbox" and "my folder".
* Item arrives in "inbox".  SpamBayes scores as 'ham'
* Outlook rule kicks in - message moved to "My Folder"
* SpamBayes sees this message, notices we have scored
it, and assumes it is a "recover" operation - trains as
Ham.

Not sure how to tackle this!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-31 18:38

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Except that "classification" does not imply "trained".  Eg,
a spam comes in, so we filter it.  User drags it back.  We
notice spam classification, so we train as good.  If we look
for "was previously trained", it will fail.

But yeah, I you are basically correct - we should only train
as good on a drag if the existing score did not put it in
the "good" range already.  In fact, we do already do that
for Spam - "Delete as Spam" only trains if it would not
already fall in the spam range.

In fact, we
"If I am being moved into a ham folder, and I was trained as 
spam, then I am being reclassified."


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-31 13:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

If you remember the classification, can't the rule simply be:

If I am being moved into a ham folder, and I was trained as 
spam, then I am being reclassified.
If I am being moved into a spam folder, and I was not trained 
as spam, then I am being reclassified.
Otherwise, I am just being moved.

(Where 'reclassified' checks to see if it already is the correct 
classification).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-31 13:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

We do remember the classification - that is how the training
is triggered.  It is *because* we remember that we do the train.

What we could do is also remember the folder we origianlly
filtered it in.  Then, when it is moved we would be able to
determine if it is being "moved back" (ie, should be
trained) or simply moved by the user (and should be ignored
- other than probably updating the name of the folder we
"trained" it in)

I should get the test case failing first.

The message database is simply a dictionary of msgid:
trained_as_spam.  No entry means "never trained", otherwise
we know how it was trained.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-31 13:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Couldn't you remember the classification for each message?  

This is what pop3proxy et al do - the message class provides 
the necessary information.  (This could be your chance to 
switch to using that and finish the rather uncomplete "master 
db" thing in there!) <wink>

What exactly is stored in the default_message_database 
anyway?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780612&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 31 03:28:43 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 31 05:28:51 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-776808 ] Expanding toolbar
	crashes outlook
Message-ID: <E19i9jn-0006Dz-00@sc8-sf-web2.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #776808, was opened at 2003-07-24 09:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pmoore
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776808&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edwin (eddepet_33)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Expanding toolbar crashes outlook

Initial Comment:
If the spambayes toolbar is not completely visible in 
Outlook you can open/expand it using the '>>' button at 
the end of the toolbar. Clicking on this button crashes 
outlook completely with the following message:

"Program Error: Outlook.exe has generated errors and will 
be closed by Windows. You will need to restart the 
program."

Outlook's own toolbars don't have this problem.

Versions:
Outlook 2000 on W2K
Spambayes Outlook Addin (beta), Binary version 0.5 (july 
2003)





----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-31 10:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I get this on Outlook 2000 SP1, with the Spambayes addin 
binary installer 006.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-24 22:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

FYI, I've seen this too, on Win2K and Win98SE, using Outlook 
2000, and CVS spambayes, Python 2.2.3.  Just reproduced it 
after a CVS up.  This happens when I'm in my Unsure folder, 
which tries to display both buttons, and often my Outlook 
window is too small.  I first saw it shortly after we switched 
to building our own toolbar.  It doesn't bother me, especially 
since I can't imagine we're at fault <0.5 wink>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-24 22:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Just for reference, I do not experience this with current CVS 
and Outlook 2k2 sp2 with WinXP SP1.  (I never have enough 
room in my possible spam folder, because both buttons are 
present, so I use this every now and then).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776808&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 31 03:41:12 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 31 05:41:15 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-776808 ] Expanding toolbar
	crashes outlook
Message-ID: <E19i9vs-00053d-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #776808, was opened at 2003-07-24 18:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776808&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Edwin (eddepet_33)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Expanding toolbar crashes outlook

Initial Comment:
If the spambayes toolbar is not completely visible in 
Outlook you can open/expand it using the '>>' button at 
the end of the toolbar. Clicking on this button crashes 
outlook completely with the following message:

"Program Error: Outlook.exe has generated errors and will 
be closed by Windows. You will need to restart the 
program."

Outlook's own toolbars don't have this problem.

Versions:
Outlook 2000 on W2K
Spambayes Outlook Addin (beta), Binary version 0.5 (july 
2003)





----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-31 19:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

I get this too.  I'm at a loss though

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul Moore (pmoore)
Date: 2003-07-31 19:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=113328

I get this on Outlook 2000 SP1, with the Spambayes addin 
binary installer 006.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-07-25 07:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

FYI, I've seen this too, on Win2K and Win98SE, using Outlook 
2000, and CVS spambayes, Python 2.2.3.  Just reproduced it 
after a CVS up.  This happens when I'm in my Unsure folder, 
which tries to display both buttons, and often my Outlook 
window is too small.  I first saw it shortly after we switched 
to building our own toolbar.  It doesn't bother me, especially 
since I can't imagine we're at fault <0.5 wink>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-07-25 07:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=552329

Just for reference, I do not experience this with current CVS 
and Outlook 2k2 sp2 with WinXP SP1.  (I never have enough 
room in my possible spam folder, because both buttons are 
present, so I use this every now and then).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=776808&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 31 06:04:20 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 31 08:04:26 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-780801 ] IMAP Still Failing
Message-ID: <E19iCAO-0007ir-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #780801, was opened at 2003-07-31 12:04
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780801&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: IMAP Still Failing

Initial Comment:
back to #765042 / 767595

Not sure what happened cause it looked like it 
was working there at one stage.
Currently failing to filter anything Spam/Ham/Good.
Doesnt score anything either.
Manual Filtering works.
Log  Attached.

Back on the CVS version with Verbose=1 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780801&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 31 06:30:45 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 31 08:30:49 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-780801 ] IMAP Still Failing
Message-ID: <E19iCZx-0000h3-00@sc8-sf-web3.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #780801, was opened at 2003-07-31 22:04
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mhammond
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780801&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shaun Broadbent (shaunbroadbent)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: IMAP Still Failing

Initial Comment:
back to #765042 / 767595

Not sure what happened cause it looked like it 
was working there at one stage.
Currently failing to filter anything Spam/Ham/Good.
Doesnt score anything either.
Manual Filtering works.
Log  Attached.

Back on the CVS version with Verbose=1 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Date: 2003-07-31 22:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=14198

Shit - sorry about that!

Checking in msgstore.py;
new revision: 1.61; previous revision: 1.60
Checking in filter.py;
new revision: 1.28; previous revision: 1.27


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780801&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 31 06:46:01 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 31 08:46:07 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-780819 ] Images pasted to
	clipboard each startup
Message-ID: <E19iCoj-0005F1-00@sc8-sf-web4.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #780819, was opened at 2003-07-31 22:46
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780819&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: Images pasted to clipboard each startup

Initial Comment:
There is no need to load the bitmaps and set toolbar
button images each time we start, but only when we we
actually need to create the button as we can't find it

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=780819&group_id=61702

From noreply at sourceforge.net  Thu Jul 31 13:32:12 2003
From: noreply at sourceforge.net (SourceForge.net)
Date: Thu Jul 31 15:32:20 2003
Subject: [spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-781061 ] SpamBayes Addin quit
	working
Message-ID: <E19iJ9o-0001tv-00@sc8-sf-web1.sourceforge.net>

Bugs item #781061, was opened at 2003-07-31 19:32
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=781061&group_id=61702

Category: Outlook
Group: v1.0 (example)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sherry (slbergh)
Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond)
Summary: SpamBayes Addin quit working

Initial Comment:
The SpamBayes configuration button suddenly quit 
working in Outlook. Clicking Delete as Spam brings up a 
message to configure the spam folder, which is 
impossible to do since the button appears dead. Any 
ideas?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=781061&group_id=61702