[spambayes-bugs] [ spambayes-Bugs-793844 ] pop3proxy gives
different results for TOP and RETR
SourceForge.net
noreply at sourceforge.net
Sun Aug 24 19:31:03 EDT 2003
Bugs item #793844, was opened at 2003-08-24 05:52
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793844&group_id=61702
Category: pop3proxy
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Eric Ball (ericball)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pop3proxy gives different results for TOP and RETR
Initial Comment:
output (editted) from _pop3proxy.log:
TOP 1 0
+OK Message follows
Return-Path: <user at concentric.net>
Received: from lmtprelay.echo-on.net
(lmtprelay.internal.echo-on.net
[192.168.1.8])
by mail.internal.echo-on.net (Cyrus v2.1.14)
with LMTP;
Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:34:32 -0400
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from localhost (lmtprelay.echo-on.net
[127.0.0.1])
by lmtprelay.echo-on.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id B26E71F5E6F
for <user at lmtprelay.echo-on.net>;
Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lmtprelay.echo-on.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (lmtprelay.echo-on.net
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024)
with ESMTP id 05672-02 for
<w9726 at lmtprelay.echo-on.net>;
Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5mx37.postini.com
[12.158.34.194])
by lmtprelay.echo-on.net (Postfix) with SMTP
id B08241F5ED3
for <user at arvotek.net>; Sat, 23 Aug 2003
09:22:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from source ([210.92.92.211]) by
exprod5mx37.postini.com
([12.158.34.245]) with SMTP; Sat, 23 Aug
2003 06:22:36 PDT
Message-ID:
<NLNFBPIOOFBCJBBAGPCBEDKNDEAB.user at concentric.
net>
From: "User" <user at concentric.net>
To: user at arvotek.net
Subject: Technological advances
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:22:40 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416
(9.0.2910.0)
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spambayes-Classification: unsure
.
RETR 1
+OK Message follows
Return-Path: <user at concentric.net>
Received: from lmtprelay.echo-on.net
(lmtprelay.internal.echo-on.net
[192.168.1.8])
by mail.internal.echo-on.net (Cyrus v2.1.14)
with LMTP;
Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:34:32 -0400
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from localhost (lmtprelay.echo-on.net
[127.0.0.1])
by lmtprelay.echo-on.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id B26E71F5E6F
for <user at lmtprelay.echo-on.net>;
Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lmtprelay.echo-on.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (lmtprelay.echo-on.net
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024)
with ESMTP id 05672-02 for
<w9726 at lmtprelay.echo-on.net>;
Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:22:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5mx37.postini.com
[12.158.34.194])
by lmtprelay.echo-on.net (Postfix) with SMTP
id B08241F5ED3
for <user at arvotek.net>; Sat, 23 Aug 2003
09:22:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from source ([210.92.92.211]) by
exprod5mx37.postini.com
([12.158.34.245]) with SMTP; Sat, 23 Aug
2003 06:22:36 PDT
Message-ID:
<NLNFBPIOOFBCJBBAGPCBEDKNDEAB.user at concentric.
net>
From: "User" <user at concentric.net>
To: spam,user at arvotek.net
Subject: Technological advances
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:22:40 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416
(9.0.2910.0)
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spambayes-Classification: spam
using version 1.0a4
SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Beta1, version 0.1 (May 2003),
using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Web Interface Alpha2,
version 0.02
and engine SpamBayes Beta2, version 0.2 (July 2003).
[globals]
verbose:True
[pop3proxy]
add_mailid_to:body
listen_ports:1101,1102
remote_servers:pop.arvotek.net,mail.eol.ca
notate_to:True
[smtpproxy]
ham_address:good at localhost
spam_address:junk at localhost
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Date: 2003-08-25 13:31
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=552329
There is a warning about this in the pop3proxy code.
It is impossible for TOP and RETR to guarentee the same
classification unless TOP also retrieves the whole message or
RETR only classifies on headers (I'm sure you see why).
This shouldn't be a problem in general use cases, if it's a
specific problem, then you'll have to figure out a way around
it (feel free to ask for advice).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=793844&group_id=61702
More information about the Spambayes-bugs
mailing list