[SciPy-User] SciPy-User Digest, Vol 165, Issue 1

Mon May 1 03:51:40 EDT 2017

I want to unscribe please.

On 1 May 2017 9:47 a.m., <scipy-user-request at python.org> wrote:

> Send SciPy-User mailing list submissions to
>         scipy-user at python.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         scipy-user-request at python.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         scipy-user-owner at python.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SciPy-User digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Install Scipy with Anaconda's MKL libraries (David Hagen)
>    2. Re: Install Scipy with Anaconda's MKL libraries (Matthieu Brucher)
>    3. Re: Install Scipy with Anaconda's MKL libraries (Denis Akhiyarov)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 17:41:05 -0400
> From: David Hagen <david at drhagen.com>
> To: scipy-user at python.org
> Subject: Re: [SciPy-User] Install Scipy with Anaconda's MKL libraries
> Message-ID:
>         <CALO6Ft55X=Q9hhPUNwn-pZ1JRS+FnGLxdubLph9qtN4WkQUtnw at mail.
> gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> > Welcome to the world of pain with building scientific packages from
> source on Windows!
>
> I am beginning to feel it.
>
> > You need Fortran and C/C++ compilers on Windows to build scipy from
> source
>
> I have MinGW-w64 installed, which seems to be the recommended method.
>
> > I?m pretty sure that anaconda does not come with the development files
> for MKL, only the runtime files.
>
> I understand now. It looks like MKL is not the way to go unless I want to
> pay Intel.
>
> > If you don't need mkl and lapack/blas is good enough, then
> m2w64-toolchain from conda should have all necessary dependencies for
> building scipy.
>
> My only goal is to install and use Scipy master somewhere where it won't
> break my stable installation. I thought Anaconda would be a good place to
> start because once I activate an Anaconda environment, I should be able to
> treat like a normal Python installation and follow the normal
> install-from-source instructions. I went ahead and installed that
> m2w64-toolchain package, but it still doesn't find any BLAS/LAPACK. Maybe I
> should change my question to: how do I install Scipy on Windows from
> source? Though when I search for this specifically on the web, the answer
> seems to be "Don't.". It seems that MinGW-w64 and ATLAS are recommended by
> Scipy. Do you know of a conda/pip package that provides ATLAS for building
> Scipy or another more suitable BLAS/LAPACK?
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-user/
> attachments/20170430/3a767c3a/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 23:22:03 +0100
> From: Matthieu Brucher <matthieu.brucher at gmail.com>
> To: SciPy Users List <scipy-user at python.org>
> Subject: Re: [SciPy-User] Install Scipy with Anaconda's MKL libraries
> Message-ID:
>         <CAHCaCk+tYbh8AXuhWkTAtnjfCTqFjt4rFT9_
> XOP++bArRmsepQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Why do you want to pay Intel? You can install the MKL and develop with it,
> no sweat.
>
> 2017-04-30 22:41 GMT+01:00 David Hagen <david at drhagen.com>:
>
> > > Welcome to the world of pain with building scientific packages from
> > source on Windows!
> >
> > I am beginning to feel it.
> >
> > > You need Fortran and C/C++ compilers on Windows to build scipy from
> > source
> >
> > I have MinGW-w64 installed, which seems to be the recommended method.
> >
> > > I?m pretty sure that anaconda does not come with the development files
> > for MKL, only the runtime files.
> >
> > I understand now. It looks like MKL is not the way to go unless I want to
> > pay Intel.
> >
> > > If you don't need mkl and lapack/blas is good enough, then
> > m2w64-toolchain from conda should have all necessary dependencies for
> > building scipy.
> >
> > My only goal is to install and use Scipy master somewhere where it won't
> > break my stable installation. I thought Anaconda would be a good place to
> > start because once I activate an Anaconda environment, I should be able
> to
> > treat like a normal Python installation and follow the normal
> > install-from-source instructions. I went ahead and installed that
> > m2w64-toolchain package, but it still doesn't find any BLAS/LAPACK.
> Maybe I
> > should change my question to: how do I install Scipy on Windows from
> > source? Though when I search for this specifically on the web, the answer
> > seems to be "Don't.". It seems that MinGW-w64 and ATLAS are recommended
> by
> > Scipy. Do you know of a conda/pip package that provides ATLAS for
> building
> > Scipy or another more suitable BLAS/LAPACK?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SciPy-User mailing list
> > SciPy-User at python.org
> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Information System Engineer, Ph.D.
> Blog: http://blog.audio-tk.com/
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-user/
> attachments/20170430/30c78312/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 07:44:57 +0000
> From: Denis Akhiyarov <denis.akhiyarov at gmail.com>
> To: SciPy Users List <scipy-user at python.org>
> Subject: Re: [SciPy-User] Install Scipy with Anaconda's MKL libraries
> Message-ID:
>         <CALxxJLTUAjOupyKROxaYPAr+7VOTFm5kj70mEZApZUpAzgE=pA@
> mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I still suggest Intel+MSVC compilers, since you can use trial version or
> request license for open-source projects from Intel. This is what Anaconda
> team is using. Also this is what Christoph Gohlke wheels are based on:
>
> http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#scipy
>
> If you end up with m2w64, here is lapack for conda, you may still have to
> modify paths:
>
> https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/lapack
>
> And blas:
>
> https://anaconda.org/search?q=Blas
>
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017, 5:22 PM Matthieu Brucher <matthieu.brucher at gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Why do you want to pay Intel? You can install the MKL and develop with
> it,
> > no sweat.
> >
> > 2017-04-30 22:41 GMT+01:00 David Hagen <david at drhagen.com>:
> >
> >> > Welcome to the world of pain with building scientific packages from
> >> source on Windows!
> >>
> >> I am beginning to feel it.
> >>
> >> > You need Fortran and C/C++ compilers on Windows to build scipy from
> >> source
> >>
> >> I have MinGW-w64 installed, which seems to be the recommended method.
> >>
> >> > I?m pretty sure that anaconda does not come with the development files
> >> for MKL, only the runtime files.
> >>
> >> I understand now. It looks like MKL is not the way to go unless I want
> to
> >> pay Intel.
> >>
> >> > If you don't need mkl and lapack/blas is good enough, then
> >> m2w64-toolchain from conda should have all necessary dependencies for
> >> building scipy.
> >>
> >> My only goal is to install and use Scipy master somewhere where it won't
> >> break my stable installation. I thought Anaconda would be a good place
> to
> >> start because once I activate an Anaconda environment, I should be able
> to
> >> treat like a normal Python installation and follow the normal
> >> install-from-source instructions. I went ahead and installed that
> >> m2w64-toolchain package, but it still doesn't find any BLAS/LAPACK.
> Maybe I
> >> should change my question to: how do I install Scipy on Windows from
> >> source? Though when I search for this specifically on the web, the
> answer
> >> seems to be "Don't.". It seems that MinGW-w64 and ATLAS are recommended
> by
> >> Scipy. Do you know of a conda/pip package that provides ATLAS for
> building
> >> Scipy or another more suitable BLAS/LAPACK?
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> SciPy-User mailing list
> >> SciPy-User at python.org
> >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Information System Engineer, Ph.D.
> > Blog: http://blog.audio-tk.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher
> > _______________________________________________
> > SciPy-User mailing list
> > SciPy-User at python.org
> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-user/
> attachments/20170501/f5de028e/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-User mailing list
> SciPy-User at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of SciPy-User Digest, Vol 165, Issue 1
> ******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-user/attachments/20170501/4eefa3ab/attachment.html>