[SciPy-User] [SciPy-user] ATLAS install has no effect

[Ian Goodfellow]

Sure, that's a good call to know about. It looks like it's not using the same setting for library_dirs as what's in my LD_LIBRARY_PATH.

>>> numpy.show_config()
blas_info:
    libraries = ['blas']
    library_dirs = ['/usr/lib']
    language = f77

lapack_info:
    libraries = ['lapack']
    library_dirs = ['/usr/lib']
    language = f77

atlas_threads_info:
  NOT AVAILABLE

blas_opt_info:
    libraries = ['blas']
    library_dirs = ['/usr/lib']
    language = f77
    define_macros = [('NO_ATLAS_INFO', 1)]

atlas_blas_threads_info:
  NOT AVAILABLE

lapack_opt_info:
    libraries = ['lapack', 'blas']
    library_dirs = ['/usr/lib']
    language = f77
    define_macros = [('NO_ATLAS_INFO', 1)]

atlas_info:
  NOT AVAILABLE

lapack_mkl_info:
  NOT AVAILABLE

blas_mkl_info:
  NOT AVAILABLE

atlas_blas_info:
  NOT AVAILABLE

mkl_info:
  NOT AVAILABLE

>>> 
ia3n at gaussian:~/theano/2_atlas% echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
/usr/lib/atlas/sse2

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Warde-Farley" <dwf at cs.toronto.edu>
To: "SciPy Users List" <scipy-user at scipy.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 1:06:46 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: [SciPy-User] [SciPy-user] ATLAS install has no effect


On 11-Mar-10, at 3:21 PM, stair314 wrote:

> However, the instructions recommend squaring a 1000x1000 matrix with  
> and
> without LD_LIBRARY_PATH set to use ATLAS to test whether the  
> installation
> worked. I get no difference when setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to use  
> ATLAS. Also,
> this task takes less than a second in Matlab but is taking 10.3  
> seconds in
> numpy. Any ideas how to diagnose whether numpy is using ATLAS or if my
> installation of ATLAS is just slow?


Can you give us the output of numpy.show_config()?

David

_______________________________________________
SciPy-User mailing list
SciPy-User at scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user