[SciPy-User] Wrapping a lapack function (attempt results seg fault)
Skipper Seabold
jsseabold at gmail.com
Sat Feb 6 18:02:14 EST 2010
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:45 PM, <josef.pktd at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Skipper Seabold <jsseabold at gmail.com> wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I'm trying to wrap the lapack function dtgsen for the ordered generalized
>> Schur decomposition given real valued arrays
>> <http://linux.die.net/man/l/dtgsen>. However, I'm getting a segmentation
>> fault, and I have no idea why. I was hoping someone might look at my work
>> and see where I've gone wrong, as this is my first attempt at trying to do
>> something like this. One specific thing I wasn't sure about is when the
>> lapack function calls for a LOGICAL type can this just be
>>
>> from ctypes import c_bool
>> logical_true = c_bool(True)
>>
>> ?
>>
>> I've attached my functions and arrays that make a self-contained example.
>> Just put the two files in a directory and run. When I do a gdb backtrace I
>> receive the following output.
>>
>> (gdb) run ordqztest.py
>>
>> Starting program: /usr/bin/python ordqztest.py
>>
>> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
>>
>>
>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>> 0x00007ffff5015d7d in dtgsen_ () from /usr/lib/liblapack.so
>> (gdb) backtrace
>> #0 0x00007ffff5015d7d in dtgsen_ () from /usr/lib/liblapack.so
>> #1 0x00007ffff6da8bec in ffi_call_unix64 ()
>> at
>> /build/buildd/python2.6-2.6.4/Modules/_ctypes/libffi/src/x86/unix64.S:75
>> #2 0x00007ffff6da82d3 in ffi_call (cif=0x7fffffffd810, fn=<value optimized
>> out>,
>> rvalue=<value optimized out>, avalue=<value optimized out>)
>>
>> at
>> /build/buildd/python2.6-2.6.4/Modules/_ctypes/libffi/src/x86/ffi64.c:430
>> #3 0x00007ffff6da2d64 in _call_function_pointer (pProc=<value optimized
>> out>,
>> argtuple=<value optimized out>, flags=<value optimized out>,
>> argtypes=<value optimized out>,
>> restype=<value optimized out>, checker=<value optimized out>)
>>
>> at /build/buildd/python2.6-2.6.4/Modules/_ctypes/callproc.c:816
>>
>> #4 _CallProc (pProc=<value optimized out>, argtuple=<value optimized out>,
>>
>> flags=<value optimized out>, argtypes=<value optimized out>,
>> restype=<value optimized out>,
>> checker=<value optimized out>) at
>> /build/buildd/python2.6-2.6.4/Modules/_ctypes/callproc.c:1163
>> #5 0x00007ffff6d9abf7 in CFuncPtr_call (self=0xc2c2c0, inargs=0x18,
>> kwds=<value optimized out>)
>> at /build/buildd/python2.6-2.6.4/Modules/_ctypes/_ctypes.c:3860
>>
>> #6 0x000000000041d6e7 in PyObject_Call (func=0xc2c2c0, arg=0xcb8360,
>> kw=0xc63520)
>> at ../Objects/abstract.c:2492
>>
>> #7 0x00000000004a199c in do_call (f=0xcb98c0, throwflag=<value optimized
>> out>)
>> at ../Python/ceval.c:3924
>>
>> #8 call_function (f=0xcb98c0, throwflag=<value optimized out>) at
>> ../Python/ceval.c:3729
>> #9 PyEval_EvalFrameEx (f=0xcb98c0, throwflag=<value optimized out>) at
>> ../Python/ceval.c:2389
>> #10 0x00000000004a40e0 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx (co=0x7ffff7f01f30,
>> globals=<value optimized out>,
>> locals=<value optimized out>, args=0x9, argcount=<value optimized out>,
>> kws=<value optimized out>,
>> kwcount=2, defs=0x7ffff7f0a7f8, defcount=4, closure=0x0) at
>> ../Python/ceval.c:2968
>> #11 0x00000000004a245f in fast_function (f=0xcb9660, throwflag=<value
>> optimized out>)
>> at ../Python/ceval.c:3802
>>
>> #12 call_function (f=0xcb9660, throwflag=<value optimized out>) at
>> ../Python/ceval.c:3727
>> ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
>>
>> #13 PyEval_EvalFrameEx (f=0xcb9660, throwflag=<value optimized out>) at
>> ../Python/ceval.c:2389
>> #14 0x00000000004a40e0 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx (co=0x7ffff7f026c0,
>> globals=<value optimized out>,
>> locals=<value optimized out>, args=0x8, argcount=<value optimized out>,
>> kws=<value optimized out>,
>> kwcount=2, defs=0x7ffff3ea9e78, defcount=3, closure=0x0) at
>> ../Python/ceval.c:2968
>> #15 0x00000000004a245f in fast_function (f=0x928e00, throwflag=<value
>> optimized out>)
>> at ../Python/ceval.c:3802
>> #16 call_function (f=0x928e00, throwflag=<value optimized out>) at
>> ../Python/ceval.c:3727
>> #17 PyEval_EvalFrameEx (f=0x928e00, throwflag=<value optimized out>) at
>> ../Python/ceval.c:2389
>> #18 0x00000000004a40e0 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx (co=0x7ffff7f02378,
>> globals=<value optimized out>,
>> locals=<value optimized out>, args=0x0, argcount=<value optimized out>,
>> kws=<value optimized out>,
>> kwcount=0, defs=0x0, defcount=0, closure=0x0) at ../Python/ceval.c:2968
>> #19 0x00000000004a41b2 in PyEval_EvalCode (co=0x0, globals=0xcb8360,
>> locals=0xc63520)
>> at ../Python/ceval.c:522
>> #20 0x00000000004c33a0 in run_mod (fp=0x919900, filename=<value optimized
>> out>,
>> start=<value optimized out>, globals=<value optimized out>,
>> locals=0x8b9270, closeit=1,
>> flags=0x7fffffffe100) at ../Python/pythonrun.c:1335
>> #21 PyRun_FileExFlags (fp=0x919900, filename=<value optimized out>,
>> start=<value optimized out>,
>> globals=<value optimized out>, locals=0x8b9270, closeit=1,
>> flags=0x7fffffffe100)
>> at ../Python/pythonrun.c:1321
>> #22 0x00000000004c3564 in PyRun_SimpleFileExFlags (fp=<value optimized out>,
>> filename=0x7fffffffe518 "ordqztest.py", closeit=1, flags=0x7fffffffe100)
>> at ../Python/pythonrun.c:931
>> #23 0x0000000000418ab7 in Py_Main (argc=-135384960, argv=<value optimized
>> out>) at ../Modules/main.c:599
>> #24 0x00007ffff6fd0abd in __libc_start_main (main=<value optimized out>,
>> argc=<value optimized out>,
>> ubp_av=<value optimized out>, init=<value optimized out>, fini=<value
>> optimized out>,
>> rtld_fini=<value optimized out>, stack_end=0x7fffffffe218) at
>> libc-start.c:220
>> #25 0x0000000000417ca9 in _start () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/elf/start.S:113
>>
>> Any help or pointers would be appreciated, as I am a bit out of my depth.
>>
>> -Skipper
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SciPy-User mailing list
>> SciPy-User at scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-user
>>
>>
>
> according to http://www.netlib.org/lapack/double/dtgsen.f you are
> missing alphai in the argument list.
>
Ah, that is true. I wonder why it didn't complain about my arguments
list. I originally tried to do the complex version, but then realized
I didn't need it as of yet. Still seg faults though.
> I don't have (or find) c_bool in python 2.5, so my tries are also unsuccessful.
>
This is where I think it might be tripping up, but I don't know if
LOGICAL type can just be a c_int.
> Maybe wrapping with f2py like the routines in scipy.linalg might be a
> better choice than ctypes? However, I haven't seen a recipe how to do
> it.
>
I guess I do have the fortran source file. I will try this. I think
I should just have to add the f2py directives for the inputs/outputs
and (fingers-crossed) it will work.
Skipper
More information about the SciPy-User
mailing list