[SciPy-user] Building 64bit scipy with ATLAS/LAPACK/UMFPACK in Fedora core 8
Antonino Ingargiola
tritemio at gmail.com
Fri Jul 24 06:09:45 EDT 2009
Hi David,
2009/7/24 David Cournapeau <david at ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp>:
[cut]
>> I can I check if this scipy is correctly using the fast
>> atlas/lapack/umfpack libraries?
>>
>
> You can check as follows:
> >>> import scipy
> >>> scipy.show_config()
> >>> import scipy.linalg.atlas_version
>
> To check the speed, you can just use numpy.dot. Basic blas vs. optimized
> ATLAS can be one order of magnitude different for large matrices (say
> 1000x1000, for example).
I get this:
import numpy, scipy
a=numpy.random.rand(1000,1000)
b=numpy.random.rand(1000,1000)
time c = numpy.dot(a,b)
CPU times: user 0.55 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 0.56 s
Wall time: 0.56 s
so it seems is using the fast lapack? (On an Ubuntu machine in which
sfepy is very fast I get the same in 0.6 s)
Furthermore scipy.show_config() gives:
amd_info:
libraries = ['amd']
library_dirs = ['/usr/lib64']
umfpack_info:
libraries = ['umfpack', 'amd']
library_dirs = ['/usr/lib64']
define_macros = [('SCIPY_UMFPACK_H', None)]
swig_opts = ['-I/usr/include/suitesparse']
include_dirs = ['/usr/include/suitesparse']
atlas_threads_info:
NOT AVAILABLE
blas_opt_info:
libraries = ['f77blas', 'cblas', 'atlas']
library_dirs = ['/usr/lib64/atlas']
define_macros = [('ATLAS_INFO', '"\\"3.6.0\\""')]
language = c
include_dirs = ['/usr/include/atlas']
atlas_blas_threads_info:
NOT AVAILABLE
lapack_opt_info:
libraries = ['lapack', 'f77blas', 'cblas', 'atlas']
library_dirs = ['/usr/lib64/atlas']
define_macros = [('ATLAS_INFO', '"\\"3.6.0\\""')]
language = f77
include_dirs = ['/usr/include/atlas']
atlas_info:
libraries = ['lapack', 'f77blas', 'cblas', 'atlas']
library_dirs = ['/usr/lib64/atlas']
language = f77
include_dirs = ['/usr/include/atlas']
lapack_mkl_info:
NOT AVAILABLE
blas_mkl_info:
NOT AVAILABLE
atlas_blas_info:
libraries = ['f77blas', 'cblas', 'atlas']
library_dirs = ['/usr/lib64/atlas']
language = c
include_dirs = ['/usr/include/atlas']
mkl_info:
NOT AVAILABLE
is it ok?
>> Are there any pitfalls on fedora core 8 regarding the numerical
>> libraries? I've read that some libraries are broken...
>>
>
> Generally, problems are with the packaged versions - ATLAS in particular
> is very hard to package correctly. If you build them by yourself
> correctly, there should be no problem. Just make sure you use the last
> released ATLAS (3.8.3 I believe at this time), and avoid LAPACK 3.2.0
> (i.e. use 3.1.1).
Given the above results the packages version of ATLAS/LAPACK should work fine.
How about testing if UMFPACK is used... maybe I should test a dot
product between sparse matrices but I don't know how to do it.
> cheers,
>
> David
Thanks,
Antonio
More information about the SciPy-User
mailing list