[Scipy-organizers] Tutorial reviews

[Andy Ray Terrel]

Feel free to ignore the google doc.  Sorry that is hit all the
reviews, that was unintentional.

One thing that is a tad bit different with tutorials, is we would like
to have at least one on core libraries and a full track of easy,
medium, and advanced.  Sometimes you just can't fill it with the
proposed and we ask folks to do them.

Let me know if you have any other questions.

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Kristen Thyng <kthyng at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been loosely following along the program committee review emails that
> have been actively going around, and now just looked at the Tutorials
> situation to start thinking about those reviews. When I check them out in
> my dashboard, I see the same setup as I do for reviewing abstracts as part
> of the program committee. The vote/comment part on the main page for a
> proposal is generic enough to work, but the google doc is clearly specific
> to the abstracts.
>
> What is the intention for what to do for the tutorials? We could just use
> the vote/comment section and ignore the google docs. Or make another
> document in order to standardize the reviewing, like in the program
> committee setup.
>
> I looked at the tutorials notes but it isn't clear to me how this has
> worked in the past.
>
> Thanks,
> Kristen
>
> --
> Kristen M. Thyng
> Postdoctoral Research Associate
> Department of Oceanography
> Texas A&M University
> http://kristenthyng.com
> _______________________________________________
> Scipy-organizers mailing list
> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers