From scopatz at gmail.com Wed Apr 2 13:44:41 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 10:44:41 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Total submission count? Message-ID: Hello All, I'd like to put the total number of submissions that we received this year in the next mailing (also how many slots we think we'll have). Could someone with access run the numbers please? Thanks! Be Well Anthony From srey at asu.edu Wed Apr 2 13:51:33 2014 From: srey at asu.edu (Serge Rey) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 10:51:33 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Total submission count? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 133 talks/poster submissions On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > Hello All, > > I'd like to put the total number of submissions that we received this year > in the next mailing (also how many slots we think we'll have). Could > someone with access run the numbers please? Thanks! > > Be Well > Anthony > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > -- Sergio (Serge) Rey Professor, School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation Arizona State University http://geoplan.asu.edu/rey Editor, International Regional Science Review http://irx.sagepub.com From katyhuff at gmail.com Wed Apr 2 14:24:44 2014 From: katyhuff at gmail.com (Katy Huff) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 11:24:44 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Total submission count? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Talk slots, about 24 per day, for three days. So 72. You have access to this part : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AiP1TmlNKprrdGE1aWV0dGNDMnlCSl9KSTFSX2Nib2c&usp=sharing On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Serge Rey wrote: > 133 talks/poster submissions > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Anthony Scopatz > wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > I'd like to put the total number of submissions that we received this > year > > in the next mailing (also how many slots we think we'll have). Could > > someone with access run the numbers please? Thanks! > > > > Be Well > > Anthony > > _______________________________________________ > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > > > > > -- > Sergio (Serge) Rey > Professor, School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning > GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation > Arizona State University > http://geoplan.asu.edu/rey > > Editor, International Regional Science Review > http://irx.sagepub.com > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > -- http://katyhuff.github.com From katyhuff at gmail.com Wed Apr 2 14:28:25 2014 From: katyhuff at gmail.com (Katy Huff) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 11:28:25 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Total submission count? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: btw, that allows 30 mins per talk (including questions). So, 72 is a minimum number. That talk length may be potentially flexible (though, I like 30 mins), and the mini-symposia may have more talks/hour. On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Katy Huff wrote: > Talk slots, about 24 per day, for three days. So 72. > You have access to this part : > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AiP1TmlNKprrdGE1aWV0dGNDMnlCSl9KSTFSX2Nib2c&usp=sharing > > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Serge Rey wrote: > >> 133 talks/poster submissions >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Anthony Scopatz >> wrote: >> >> > Hello All, >> > >> > I'd like to put the total number of submissions that we received this >> year >> > in the next mailing (also how many slots we think we'll have). Could >> > someone with access run the numbers please? Thanks! >> > >> > Be Well >> > Anthony >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Sergio (Serge) Rey >> Professor, School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning >> GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation >> Arizona State University >> http://geoplan.asu.edu/rey >> >> Editor, International Regional Science Review >> http://irx.sagepub.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > > > > -- > http://katyhuff.github.com > -- http://katyhuff.github.com From andy.terrel at gmail.com Wed Apr 2 15:24:36 2014 From: andy.terrel at gmail.com (Andy Ray Terrel) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 14:24:36 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Total submission count? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Just remember that is 30min total per speaker so more like 25 min with 5 min to transition. On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Katy Huff wrote: > btw, that allows 30 mins per talk (including questions). So, 72 is a > minimum number. That talk length may be potentially flexible (though, I > like 30 mins), and the mini-symposia may have more talks/hour. > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Katy Huff wrote: > >> Talk slots, about 24 per day, for three days. So 72. >> You have access to this part : >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AiP1TmlNKprrdGE1aWV0dGNDMnlCSl9KSTFSX2Nib2c&usp=sharing >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Serge Rey wrote: >> >>> 133 talks/poster submissions >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Anthony Scopatz >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hello All, >>> > >>> > I'd like to put the total number of submissions that we received this >>> year >>> > in the next mailing (also how many slots we think we'll have). Could >>> > someone with access run the numbers please? Thanks! >>> > >>> > Be Well >>> > Anthony >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >>> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >>> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sergio (Serge) Rey >>> Professor, School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning >>> GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation >>> Arizona State University >>> http://geoplan.asu.edu/rey >>> >>> Editor, International Regional Science Review >>> http://irx.sagepub.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Scipy-organizers mailing list >>> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> http://katyhuff.github.com >> > > > > -- > http://katyhuff.github.com > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers From jivanoff at enthought.com Wed Apr 2 16:48:59 2014 From: jivanoff at enthought.com (Jim Ivanoff) Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:48:59 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Registration Message-ID: <500D4ECC-4BFD-4C1D-97FF-F5704B02DB4A@enthought.com> Hi All, Registration pages have been posted and a link placed in the navigation. The registration backend process is a little bit different form last year, this year we are using Enthought?s PayPal account for payment processing. I was hoping to get a few organizers to register in a soft launch and provide feedback - if any issues found - before sending out a general announcement about registration being open. You can pay via a PayPal account, or simply by using a credit card (account optional). Let me know if you have any questions. Jim From bmurphy at enthought.com Thu Apr 3 11:44:43 2014 From: bmurphy at enthought.com (Brett Murphy) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 10:44:43 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Registration In-Reply-To: <500D4ECC-4BFD-4C1D-97FF-F5704B02DB4A@enthought.com> References: <500D4ECC-4BFD-4C1D-97FF-F5704B02DB4A@enthought.com> Message-ID: Jim, Do the payments actually go through if we test drive it? -- Brett Brett Murphy Director, Customer Solutions Enthought, Inc. bmurphy at enthought.com 512-536-1057 On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Jim Ivanoff wrote: > Hi All, > > Registration pages have been posted and a link placed in the navigation. > > The registration backend process is a little bit different form last year, > this year we are using Enthought's PayPal account for payment processing. > > I was hoping to get a few organizers to register in a soft launch and > provide feedback - if any issues found - before sending out a general > announcement about registration being open. > > You can pay via a PayPal account, or simply by using a credit card > (account optional). > > Let me know if you have any questions. > > Jim > > > > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From andy.terrel at gmail.com Thu Apr 3 12:14:23 2014 From: andy.terrel at gmail.com (Andy Ray Terrel) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 11:14:23 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Registration In-Reply-To: References: <500D4ECC-4BFD-4C1D-97FF-F5704B02DB4A@enthought.com> Message-ID: Yes I think Jim was wanting some folks to register and make sure that works before the masses hit the service. The testing version worked but this version is live and will charge folks. -- Andy On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Brett Murphy wrote: > Jim, > > Do the payments actually go through if we test drive it? > > -- Brett > > > Brett Murphy > Director, Customer Solutions > Enthought, Inc. > bmurphy at enthought.com > 512-536-1057 > > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Jim Ivanoff wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Registration pages have been posted and a link placed in the navigation. >> >> The registration backend process is a little bit different form last year, >> this year we are using Enthought's PayPal account for payment processing. >> >> I was hoping to get a few organizers to register in a soft launch and >> provide feedback - if any issues found - before sending out a general >> announcement about registration being open. >> >> You can pay via a PayPal account, or simply by using a credit card >> (account optional). >> >> Let me know if you have any questions. >> >> Jim >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers From scopatz at gmail.com Thu Apr 3 14:03:50 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 11:03:50 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Total submission count? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thank all! And do we have numbers for the tutorials? Be Well Anthony On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Andy Ray Terrel wrote: > Just remember that is 30min total per speaker so more like 25 min with > 5 min to transition. > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Katy Huff wrote: > > btw, that allows 30 mins per talk (including questions). So, 72 is a > > minimum number. That talk length may be potentially flexible (though, I > > like 30 mins), and the mini-symposia may have more talks/hour. > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Katy Huff wrote: > > > >> Talk slots, about 24 per day, for three days. So 72. > >> You have access to this part : > >> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AiP1TmlNKprrdGE1aWV0dGNDMnlCSl9KSTFSX2Nib2c&usp=sharing > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Serge Rey wrote: > >> > >>> 133 talks/poster submissions > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Anthony Scopatz > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > Hello All, > >>> > > >>> > I'd like to put the total number of submissions that we received this > >>> year > >>> > in the next mailing (also how many slots we think we'll have). Could > >>> > someone with access run the numbers please? Thanks! > >>> > > >>> > Be Well > >>> > Anthony > >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> > Scipy-organizers mailing list > >>> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >>> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Sergio (Serge) Rey > >>> Professor, School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning > >>> GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation > >>> Arizona State University > >>> http://geoplan.asu.edu/rey > >>> > >>> Editor, International Regional Science Review > >>> http://irx.sagepub.com > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Scipy-organizers mailing list > >>> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> http://katyhuff.github.com > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > http://katyhuff.github.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From kthyng at gmail.com Thu Apr 3 14:07:25 2014 From: kthyng at gmail.com (Kristen Thyng) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 13:07:25 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Total submission count? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 32 tutorial submissions! Kristen On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > Thank all! > > And do we have numbers for the tutorials? > > Be Well > Anthony > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Andy Ray Terrel >wrote: > > > Just remember that is 30min total per speaker so more like 25 min with > > 5 min to transition. > > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Katy Huff wrote: > > > btw, that allows 30 mins per talk (including questions). So, 72 is a > > > minimum number. That talk length may be potentially flexible (though, I > > > like 30 mins), and the mini-symposia may have more talks/hour. > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Katy Huff wrote: > > > > > >> Talk slots, about 24 per day, for three days. So 72. > > >> You have access to this part : > > >> > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AiP1TmlNKprrdGE1aWV0dGNDMnlCSl9KSTFSX2Nib2c&usp=sharing > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Serge Rey wrote: > > >> > > >>> 133 talks/poster submissions > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Anthony Scopatz > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > Hello All, > > >>> > > > >>> > I'd like to put the total number of submissions that we received > this > > >>> year > > >>> > in the next mailing (also how many slots we think we'll have). > Could > > >>> > someone with access run the numbers please? Thanks! > > >>> > > > >>> > Be Well > > >>> > Anthony > > >>> > _______________________________________________ > > >>> > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > >>> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > >>> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Sergio (Serge) Rey > > >>> Professor, School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning > > >>> GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation > > >>> Arizona State University > > >>> http://geoplan.asu.edu/rey > > >>> > > >>> Editor, International Regional Science Review > > >>> http://irx.sagepub.com > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> Scipy-organizers mailing list > > >>> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > >>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> http://katyhuff.github.com > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > http://katyhuff.github.com > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > _______________________________________________ > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > -- Kristen M. Thyng Postdoctoral Research Associate Department of Oceanography Texas A&M University http://kristenthyng.com From scopatz at gmail.com Thu Apr 3 14:12:56 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 11:12:56 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Total submission count? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Kristen! On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Kristen Thyng wrote: > 32 tutorial submissions! > Kristen > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > >> Thank all! >> >> And do we have numbers for the tutorials? >> >> Be Well >> Anthony >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Andy Ray Terrel > >wrote: >> >> > Just remember that is 30min total per speaker so more like 25 min with >> > 5 min to transition. >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Katy Huff wrote: >> > > btw, that allows 30 mins per talk (including questions). So, 72 is a >> > > minimum number. That talk length may be potentially flexible (though, >> I >> > > like 30 mins), and the mini-symposia may have more talks/hour. >> > > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Katy Huff >> wrote: >> > > >> > >> Talk slots, about 24 per day, for three days. So 72. >> > >> You have access to this part : >> > >> >> > >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AiP1TmlNKprrdGE1aWV0dGNDMnlCSl9KSTFSX2Nib2c&usp=sharing >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Serge Rey wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> 133 talks/poster submissions >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Anthony Scopatz > > >> > >>> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> > Hello All, >> > >>> > >> > >>> > I'd like to put the total number of submissions that we received >> this >> > >>> year >> > >>> > in the next mailing (also how many slots we think we'll have). >> Could >> > >>> > someone with access run the numbers please? Thanks! >> > >>> > >> > >>> > Be Well >> > >>> > Anthony >> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >> > >>> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> > >>> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> > >>> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > >>> > >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> -- >> > >>> Sergio (Serge) Rey >> > >>> Professor, School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning >> > >>> GeoDa Center for Geospatial Analysis and Computation >> > >>> Arizona State University >> > >>> http://geoplan.asu.edu/rey >> > >>> >> > >>> Editor, International Regional Science Review >> > >>> http://irx.sagepub.com >> > >>> _______________________________________________ >> > >>> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> > >>> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> > >>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> http://katyhuff.github.com >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > http://katyhuff.github.com >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > > > > -- > Kristen M. Thyng > Postdoctoral Research Associate > Department of Oceanography > Texas A&M University > http://kristenthyng.com > From kyle.mandli at gmail.com Thu Apr 3 14:33:56 2014 From: kyle.mandli at gmail.com (Kyle Mandli) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 13:33:56 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Registration In-Reply-To: References: <500D4ECC-4BFD-4C1D-97FF-F5704B02DB4A@enthought.com> Message-ID: I just registered which went fine except on the return from paypal where it led to a blank page. I can send the URL that it returned me to if that would help. Kyle On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Andy Ray Terrel wrote: > Yes I think Jim was wanting some folks to register and make sure that > works before the masses hit the service. > > The testing version worked but this version is live and will charge folks. > > -- Andy > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Brett Murphy > wrote: > > Jim, > > > > Do the payments actually go through if we test drive it? > > > > -- Brett > > > > > > Brett Murphy > > Director, Customer Solutions > > Enthought, Inc. > > bmurphy at enthought.com > > 512-536-1057 > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Jim Ivanoff > wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Registration pages have been posted and a link placed in the navigation. > >> > >> The registration backend process is a little bit different form last > year, > >> this year we are using Enthought's PayPal account for payment > processing. > >> > >> I was hoping to get a few organizers to register in a soft launch and > >> provide feedback - if any issues found - before sending out a general > >> announcement about registration being open. > >> > >> You can pay via a PayPal account, or simply by using a credit card > >> (account optional). > >> > >> Let me know if you have any questions. > >> > >> Jim > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Scipy-organizers mailing list > >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From kthyng at gmail.com Fri Apr 4 15:51:33 2014 From: kthyng at gmail.com (Kristen Thyng) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 14:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Tutorial reviews Message-ID: Hi everyone, I've been loosely following along the program committee review emails that have been actively going around, and now just looked at the Tutorials situation to start thinking about those reviews. When I check them out in my dashboard, I see the same setup as I do for reviewing abstracts as part of the program committee. The vote/comment part on the main page for a proposal is generic enough to work, but the google doc is clearly specific to the abstracts. What is the intention for what to do for the tutorials? We could just use the vote/comment section and ignore the google docs. Or make another document in order to standardize the reviewing, like in the program committee setup. I looked at the tutorials notes but it isn't clear to me how this has worked in the past. Thanks, Kristen -- Kristen M. Thyng Postdoctoral Research Associate Department of Oceanography Texas A&M University http://kristenthyng.com From b.e.magill157 at cox.net Fri Apr 4 18:47:23 2014 From: b.e.magill157 at cox.net (b.e.magill157 at cox.net) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 15:47:23 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Did my registration go through? Message-ID: <20140404184723.UA8QO.44922.imail@eastrmwml208> SciPy Organizers, Last night I tried registering for SciPy 2014. When I go finished with filling in the information on the web site and authorizing payment via PayPal, I was forwarded to a blank screen. The URL appeared to be for a welcome page, but what was rendered was completely white. Should've I gotten a confirmation number or something like that? PayPal has a record of my payment to Entought, but that is all. Did my registration go through? thanks, Brian Magill From info at netpressweb.com Fri Apr 4 22:13:13 2014 From: info at netpressweb.com (AMP) Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 05:13:13 +0300 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Community & educational development Message-ID: <09f3305573840cb6aaa4eab8eb8df831@netpressweb.com> PRESS RELEASE The Federal Grants and Loans Directory is now available. Our new and revised 2014 edition contains more than 2800 financial programs, subsidies, scholarships, grants and loans offered by the US federal government. In addition you will also have access to over 2400 programs funded by private corporations and foundations. That is over 5200 programs available through various sources of financial providing organizations. NEW: You will also have access to our live Database that is updated on a daily basis. This product also provides daily email alerts as programs are announced. The Database is also available with IP recognition. This allows you to login without a username or password (Great for libraries or educational institutions who want their users to access the database). Businesses, students, researchers, scientists, teachers, doctors, private individuals, municipalities, government departments, educational institutions, law enforcement agencies, nonprofits, foundations and associations will find a wealth of information that will help them with their new ventures or existing projects. The document is a fully searchable PDF file for easy access to your particular needs and interests. Simply enter your keywords to search through the publication. It is the perfect tool for libraries and educational institutions to use as a reference guide for students who require funds to pursue their education. Contents of the Directory: -Web link to program announcement page -Web link to Federal agency or foundation administering the program -Authorization upon which a program is based -Objectives and goals of the program -Types of financial assistance offered under a program -Uses and restrictions placed upon a program -Eligibility requirements -Application and award process -Regulations, guidelines and literature relevant to a program -Information contacts at the headquarters, regional, and local offices -Programs that are related based upon program objectives and uses Programs in the Catalog provide a wide range of benefits and services for categories such as: Agriculture Business and Commerce Community Development Consumer Protection Cultural Affairs Disaster Prevention and Relief Education Employment, Labor and Training Energy Environmental Quality Food and Nutrition Health Housing Income Security and Social Services Information and Statistics Law, Justice, and Legal Services Natural Resources Regional Development Science and Technology Transportation CD version: $69.95 Printed version: $149.95 To order please call: 1 (866) 858-7604 Please do not reply to the sender's email address as this address is only for outgoing mail. If you do not wish to receive information from us in the future please reply here: rem at netpressweb.com This is a CANSPAM ACT compliant advertising broadcast sent by: AMPU, 4044 W. Lake Mary Blvd., Unit # 104-221, Lake Mary, FL, 32746-2012 Powered by Interspire From jivanoff at enthought.com Sat Apr 5 07:31:59 2014 From: jivanoff at enthought.com (Jim Ivanoff) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 06:31:59 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Did my registration go through? In-Reply-To: <20140404184723.UA8QO.44922.imail@eastrmwml208> References: <20140404184723.UA8QO.44922.imail@eastrmwml208> Message-ID: <158500D4-FCDD-4F06-9A8F-32A0B90067AC@enthought.com> Hi Brian Thank you for your email. Yes your registration went through. We are working to resolve the blank thank you screen. Jim Ivanoff Sent from a mobile device > On Apr 4, 2014, at 5:47 PM, wrote: > > SciPy Organizers, > > Last night I tried registering for SciPy 2014. When I go finished with filling in the information on the web site and authorizing payment via PayPal, I was forwarded to a blank screen. The URL appeared to be for a welcome page, but what was rendered was completely white. Should've I gotten a confirmation number or something like that? PayPal has a record of my payment to Entought, but that is all. Did my registration go through? > > > thanks, > > Brian Magill > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers From jkitchin at andrew.cmu.edu Mon Apr 7 08:41:00 2014 From: jkitchin at andrew.cmu.edu (John Kitchin) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 08:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] registration opening soon? Message-ID: Do you know when registration will be opening? John ----------------------------------- John Kitchin Associate Professor Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu From bmurphy at enthought.com Mon Apr 7 10:19:50 2014 From: bmurphy at enthought.com (Brett Murphy) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 09:19:50 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] registration opening soon? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi John, Registration just opened and we'll be announcing it this week I believe: https://conference.scipy.org/scipy_registration/registration.php -- Brett Brett Murphy Director, Customer Solutions Enthought, Inc. bmurphy at enthought.com 512-536-1057 On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:41 AM, John Kitchin wrote: > Do you know when registration will be opening? > John > > ----------------------------------- > John Kitchin > Associate Professor > Doherty Hall A207F > Department of Chemical Engineering > Carnegie Mellon University > Pittsburgh, PA 15213 > 412-268-7803 > http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From BJ.CTR.Potter at faa.gov Mon Apr 7 15:39:33 2014 From: BJ.CTR.Potter at faa.gov (BJ.CTR.Potter at faa.gov) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:39:33 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Registration open? Message-ID: Hi, I have been watching the square on your home page ( https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/) which says, "Registration will be opening soon." I have gone part of the way through the process and it seems to be open? Is it open or not? If it's open, when does early bird pricing end? I am planning a government purchase, so I have to plan farther in the future. Regards, B. J. Potter Satellite Operations Group - Contract Support with LS Technologies 405-954-2982 bj.ctr.potter at faa.gov From andy.terrel at gmail.com Mon Apr 7 22:59:52 2014 From: andy.terrel at gmail.com (Andy Ray Terrel) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 21:59:52 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Registration open? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi BJ, It is mostly open. Still waiting for a few brave souls to test it out completely for us. https://conference.scipy.org/scipy_registration/registration.php Let us know if everything works for you and we can spread the word this week. -- Andy On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > I have been watching the square on your home page ( > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/) which says, "Registration will be > opening soon." I have gone part of the way through the process and it > seems to be open? Is it open or not? If it's open, when does early bird > pricing end? > > I am planning a government purchase, so I have to plan farther in the > future. > > Regards, > > B. J. Potter > Satellite Operations Group - Contract Support with LS Technologies > 405-954-2982 > bj.ctr.potter at faa.gov > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers From andy.terrel at gmail.com Mon Apr 7 23:20:05 2014 From: andy.terrel at gmail.com (Andy Ray Terrel) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 22:20:05 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Tutorial reviews In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Feel free to ignore the google doc. Sorry that is hit all the reviews, that was unintentional. One thing that is a tad bit different with tutorials, is we would like to have at least one on core libraries and a full track of easy, medium, and advanced. Sometimes you just can't fill it with the proposed and we ask folks to do them. Let me know if you have any other questions. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Kristen Thyng wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've been loosely following along the program committee review emails that > have been actively going around, and now just looked at the Tutorials > situation to start thinking about those reviews. When I check them out in > my dashboard, I see the same setup as I do for reviewing abstracts as part > of the program committee. The vote/comment part on the main page for a > proposal is generic enough to work, but the google doc is clearly specific > to the abstracts. > > What is the intention for what to do for the tutorials? We could just use > the vote/comment section and ignore the google docs. Or make another > document in order to standardize the reviewing, like in the program > committee setup. > > I looked at the tutorials notes but it isn't clear to me how this has > worked in the past. > > Thanks, > Kristen > > -- > Kristen M. Thyng > Postdoctoral Research Associate > Department of Oceanography > Texas A&M University > http://kristenthyng.com > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers From kthyng at gmail.com Tue Apr 8 09:14:07 2014 From: kthyng at gmail.com (Kristen Thyng) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 08:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Registration open? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I can test it tomorrow. Kristen On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Andy Ray Terrel wrote: > Hi BJ, > > It is mostly open. Still waiting for a few brave souls to test it out > completely for us. > > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy_registration/registration.php > > Let us know if everything works for you and we can spread the word this > week. > > -- Andy > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have been watching the square on your home page ( > > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/) which says, "Registration will > be > > opening soon." I have gone part of the way through the process and it > > seems to be open? Is it open or not? If it's open, when does early bird > > pricing end? > > > > I am planning a government purchase, so I have to plan farther in the > > future. > > > > Regards, > > > > B. J. Potter > > Satellite Operations Group - Contract Support with LS Technologies > > 405-954-2982 > > bj.ctr.potter at faa.gov > > _______________________________________________ > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > -- Kristen M. Thyng Postdoctoral Research Associate Department of Oceanography Texas A&M University http://kristenthyng.com From BJ.CTR.Potter at faa.gov Tue Apr 8 09:40:02 2014 From: BJ.CTR.Potter at faa.gov (BJ.CTR.Potter at faa.gov) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 08:40:02 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Registration open? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'm sure my group will not be the first. I've got to battle my way through several layers of red tape before I get to the actual registration. Thanks, B. J. Potter Satellite Operations Group - Contract Support with LS Technologies 405-954-2982 bj.ctr.potter at faa.gov From: Andy Ray Terrel To: BJ CTR Potter/AMC/CNTR/FAA at FAA Cc: "scipy-organizers at scipy.org" Date: 04/07/2014 10:00 PM Subject: Re: [Scipy-organizers] Registration open? Hi BJ, It is mostly open. Still waiting for a few brave souls to test it out completely for us. https://conference.scipy.org/scipy_registration/registration.php Let us know if everything works for you and we can spread the word this week. -- Andy On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > I have been watching the square on your home page ( > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/) which says, "Registration will be > opening soon." I have gone part of the way through the process and it > seems to be open? Is it open or not? If it's open, when does early bird > pricing end? > > I am planning a government purchase, so I have to plan farther in the > future. > > Regards, > > B. J. Potter > Satellite Operations Group - Contract Support with LS Technologies > 405-954-2982 > bj.ctr.potter at faa.gov > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers From kthyng at gmail.com Tue Apr 8 16:51:47 2014 From: kthyng at gmail.com (Kristen Thyng) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 15:51:47 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Registration open? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Seemed like registration worked fine for me. Kristen On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:40 AM, wrote: > I'm sure my group will not be the first. I've got to battle my way through > several layers of red tape before I get to the actual registration. > > Thanks, > > B. J. Potter > Satellite Operations Group - Contract Support with LS Technologies > 405-954-2982 > bj.ctr.potter at faa.gov > > > > From: > Andy Ray Terrel > > To: > BJ CTR Potter/AMC/CNTR/FAA at FAA > Cc: > "scipy-organizers at scipy.org" > Date: > 04/07/2014 10:00 PM > Subject: > Re: [Scipy-organizers] Registration open? > > > > Hi BJ, > > It is mostly open. Still waiting for a few brave souls to test it out > completely for us. > > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy_registration/registration.php > > Let us know if everything works for you and we can spread the word this > week. > > -- Andy > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have been watching the square on your home page ( > > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/) which says, "Registration will > be > > opening soon." I have gone part of the way through the process and it > > seems to be open? Is it open or not? If it's open, when does early bird > > pricing end? > > > > I am planning a government purchase, so I have to plan farther in the > > future. > > > > Regards, > > > > B. J. Potter > > Satellite Operations Group - Contract Support with LS Technologies > > 405-954-2982 > > bj.ctr.potter at faa.gov > > _______________________________________________ > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > -- Kristen M. Thyng Postdoctoral Research Associate Department of Oceanography Texas A&M University http://kristenthyng.com From scopatz at gmail.com Wed Apr 9 22:34:57 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 19:34:57 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Wither Labcoats, Thither Labcoats Message-ID: Hello All, Does anyone know where the labcoats now live? And would any Austinite be able to bring them up to Montreal for PyCon? I'd love to wear one around this weekend as advertisement. Be Well Anthony From scopatz at gmail.com Wed Apr 9 22:36:40 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 19:36:40 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Wither Labcoats, Thither Labcoats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: PS the TIP BOF isn't happening this year so the silver lining is that we won't have competition from other labcoats. On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > Hello All, > > Does anyone know where the labcoats now live? And would any Austinite be > able to bring them up to Montreal for PyCon? I'd love to wear one around > this weekend as advertisement. > > Be Well > Anthony > From stefan at sun.ac.za Thu Apr 10 04:21:27 2014 From: stefan at sun.ac.za (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=E9fan_van_der_Walt?=) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 10:21:27 +0200 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Wither Labcoats, Thither Labcoats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > Does anyone know where the labcoats now live? And would any Austinite be > able to bring them up to Montreal for PyCon? I'd love to wear one around > this weekend as advertisement. They were lying in one of the sprint rooms, so I imagine I took them back to the Enthought offices the next day. That's where I'd start looking, at least. St?fan From bmurphy at enthought.com Thu Apr 10 10:04:10 2014 From: bmurphy at enthought.com (Brett Murphy) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:04:10 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Wither Labcoats, Thither Labcoats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Great idea! I found two coats in the back closet here and handed them to Eric who is headed up there. If you drop them afterwards with Courtenay at the Enthought booth, we'll bring them back (or someone else can too, that's fine). Thanks, -- Brett Brett Murphy Director, Customer Solutions Enthought, Inc. bmurphy at enthought.com 512-536-1057 On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > PS the TIP BOF isn't happening this year so the silver lining is that we > won't have competition from other labcoats. > > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > Does anyone know where the labcoats now live? And would any Austinite be > > able to bring them up to Montreal for PyCon? I'd love to wear one around > > this weekend as advertisement. > > > > Be Well > > Anthony > > > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From kthyng at gmail.com Thu Apr 10 10:42:18 2014 From: kthyng at gmail.com (Kristen Thyng) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:42:18 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Tutorial submission permissions Message-ID: How do I go about adding other people to have permission for viewing and commenting on tutorials in their scipy conference dashboard? Thanks, Kristen -- Kristen M. Thyng Postdoctoral Research Associate Department of Oceanography Texas A&M University http://kristenthyng.com From katyhuff at gmail.com Thu Apr 10 10:43:43 2014 From: katyhuff at gmail.com (Katy Huff) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 07:43:43 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Tutorial submission permissions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: When I needed a set of permissions for the program committee, Sheila made a 'team' with those permissions. Ask Sheila? On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Kristen Thyng wrote: > How do I go about adding other people to have permission for viewing and > commenting on tutorials in their scipy conference dashboard? > > Thanks, > Kristen > > -- > Kristen M. Thyng > Postdoctoral Research Associate > Department of Oceanography > Texas A&M University > http://kristenthyng.com > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > -- http://katyhuff.github.com From sheila at codersquid.com Thu Apr 10 10:50:39 2014 From: sheila at codersquid.com (sheila miguez) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:50:39 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Tutorial submission permissions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'll set up a tutorial review team for you, and you'll be able to add members. On Apr 10, 2014 10:44 AM, "Katy Huff" wrote: > When I needed a set of permissions for the program committee, Sheila made a > 'team' with those permissions. Ask Sheila? > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Kristen Thyng wrote: > > > How do I go about adding other people to have permission for viewing and > > commenting on tutorials in their scipy conference dashboard? > > > > Thanks, > > Kristen > > > > -- > > Kristen M. Thyng > > Postdoctoral Research Associate > > Department of Oceanography > > Texas A&M University > > http://kristenthyng.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > > > > > -- > http://katyhuff.github.com > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From katyhuff at gmail.com Thu Apr 10 10:53:30 2014 From: katyhuff at gmail.com (Katy Huff) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 07:53:30 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Tutorial submission permissions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sheila for the win! On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:50 AM, sheila miguez wrote: > I'll set up a tutorial review team for you, and you'll be able to add > members. > On Apr 10, 2014 10:44 AM, "Katy Huff" wrote: > >> When I needed a set of permissions for the program committee, Sheila made >> a >> 'team' with those permissions. Ask Sheila? >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Kristen Thyng wrote: >> >> > How do I go about adding other people to have permission for viewing and >> > commenting on tutorials in their scipy conference dashboard? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Kristen >> > >> > -- >> > Kristen M. Thyng >> > Postdoctoral Research Associate >> > Department of Oceanography >> > Texas A&M University >> > http://kristenthyng.com >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> http://katyhuff.github.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > -- http://katyhuff.github.com From kthyng at gmail.com Thu Apr 10 10:55:34 2014 From: kthyng at gmail.com (Kristen Thyng) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:55:34 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Tutorial submission permissions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Awesome! Thanks Sheila and Katy! Kristen On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Katy Huff wrote: > Sheila for the win! > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:50 AM, sheila miguez wrote: > >> I'll set up a tutorial review team for you, and you'll be able to add >> members. >> On Apr 10, 2014 10:44 AM, "Katy Huff" wrote: >> >>> When I needed a set of permissions for the program committee, Sheila >>> made a >>> 'team' with those permissions. Ask Sheila? >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Kristen Thyng wrote: >>> >>> > How do I go about adding other people to have permission for viewing >>> and >>> > commenting on tutorials in their scipy conference dashboard? >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Kristen >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Kristen M. Thyng >>> > Postdoctoral Research Associate >>> > Department of Oceanography >>> > Texas A&M University >>> > http://kristenthyng.com >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >>> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >>> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://katyhuff.github.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Scipy-organizers mailing list >>> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >>> >> > > > -- > http://katyhuff.github.com > -- Kristen M. Thyng Postdoctoral Research Associate Department of Oceanography Texas A&M University http://kristenthyng.com From drudd at uchicago.edu Thu Apr 10 11:23:12 2014 From: drudd at uchicago.edu (Douglas Harvey Rudd) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:23:12 +0000 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Scipy conference registration Message-ID: <86FF27A6-80EA-471A-A991-BC73C083939A@uchicago.edu> Hi, I submitted a registration for the Scipy 2014 conference (+tutorial and sprints) several days ago and went through to paypal and completed payment. The paypal form appeared to try to return me to the scipy conference website, but failed to load anything. I'm just emailing to double check that my registration went through properly since I haven't received an email directly from scipy. If it helps, my paypal transaction number is 3RJ84887Y9030944H processed on April 7. Thanks, Douglas Rudd Scientific Computing Consultant Research Computing Center drudd at uchicago.edu From scopatz at gmail.com Thu Apr 10 15:40:52 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:40:52 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Wither Labcoats, Thither Labcoats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Excellent plan, Brett, Thanks so much! Be Well Anthony On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Brett Murphy wrote: > Great idea! > > I found two coats in the back closet here and handed them to Eric who is > headed up there. If you drop them afterwards with Courtenay at the > Enthought booth, we'll bring them back (or someone else can too, that's > fine). > > Thanks, > > -- Brett > > > Brett Murphy > Director, Customer Solutions > Enthought, Inc. > bmurphy at enthought.com > 512-536-1057 > > > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > >> PS the TIP BOF isn't happening this year so the silver lining is that we >> won't have competition from other labcoats. >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Anthony Scopatz >> wrote: >> >> > Hello All, >> > >> > Does anyone know where the labcoats now live? And would any Austinite >> be >> > able to bring them up to Montreal for PyCon? I'd love to wear one >> around >> > this weekend as advertisement. >> > >> > Be Well >> > Anthony >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > > From andy.terrel at gmail.com Thu Apr 10 22:40:55 2014 From: andy.terrel at gmail.com (Andy Ray Terrel) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:40:55 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Scipy conference registration In-Reply-To: <86FF27A6-80EA-471A-A991-BC73C083939A@uchicago.edu> References: <86FF27A6-80EA-471A-A991-BC73C083939A@uchicago.edu> Message-ID: Hello Douglas, We do indeed have you as registered. We're still working through some kinks on the registration. Thanks for your patience. -- Andy On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Douglas Harvey Rudd wrote: > Hi, > > I submitted a registration for the Scipy 2014 conference (+tutorial and sprints) several days ago and went through to paypal and completed payment. The paypal form appeared to try to return me to the scipy conference website, but failed to load anything. I'm just emailing to double check that my registration went through properly since I haven't received an email directly from scipy. > > If it helps, my paypal transaction number is 3RJ84887Y9030944H processed on April 7. > > Thanks, > Douglas Rudd > Scientific Computing Consultant > Research Computing Center > drudd at uchicago.edu > > > > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers From drewwilliamwf58 at gmail.com Sat Apr 12 07:02:25 2014 From: drewwilliamwf58 at gmail.com (John) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 04:02:25 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Promotion for your Website Message-ID: <53491d6c.6877420a.104e.455e@mx.google.com> Dear Sir/Madam Hope you are doing well, Thank you in advance for taking the time out of your busy day to read and consider this. SEO is dead as we know it. The old math of increased back links and stuffing keywords is now a target for Google to identify your site and bury it in the search results. SEO is no longer a math problem, it's a human one. Social indicators are becoming key to Ranking and link algorithms are being retired. It's time for you to see the truth about SEO and adjust accordingly. We understand that your business is unique for you and will make your services unique to your customers. This is why our unique Internet marketing & online promotion services will be customized in a manner to suit your business needs and budget. So, here we got a customized Internet Marketing Proposal for you. Here below is the content marketing activities "Monthly Task and responsibilities" 1. 200 Press Release Submissions (20 press release x 10 press release websites) 2. 20 Press releases, 400+ words written 3. 5 Unique Articles will be written 4. 5 Web 2.0 Properties will be made 5. 5 Unique "how to Articles" will be written 6. 5 Face book Pages will be created 7. 5 Twitter channels will be created 8. Will increase twitter followers? 9. 1 YouTube channel will be created 10. 10 YouTube videos will be created by Animoto.com (paid) 11. Will likes, shares, tweets, reedits, and 1+ in order to get natural back links 12. Anchor text diversity (will not use exact keywords for back links). 13. Will get Natural back links by link worthy articles 14. Will draft & submit 5 articles to Ezinearticles.com 15. Will create Google+ page for your business 16 will distribute 15 posts daily via Google+ Page 17. Will participate in Forum 18. Will create blog for your website 19. Will make 1 post daily on your blog 20. Will bookmark real content to leading 150 Social Book marking sites as dig, delicious 21. Will submit your website to 10 leading Web directories as Dmoz.org On-Page work activities "Follow only first month". 22. Meta tags/Title tag changes 23. Keyword research/Analysis 24. Competitor Analysis 25. Analysis by our Paid SEOMoz Program 26. Heading tag changes 27. Alt tag changes 28. Interlinking wherever required. 29. Keyword density in site content. 30. HTML Site Map 31. XML site map and Submission in webmaster tool 32. Ror.XML File creation 33. Robots.Txt File creation Extra work activities 34. Google Webmaster tool 35. Google Analytics 36. Html to text ratio optimization 37. Keyword Prominence Sounds interesting? Feel free to email us or alternatively you can provide me with your phone number and the best time to call you. A reply from your end would be highly appreciated. Many Thanks John Online marketing Manager Skype: john4webneeds --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com From justinvf at gmail.com Sat Apr 12 11:42:46 2014 From: justinvf at gmail.com (Justin Vincent) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 11:42:46 -0400 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Bug in review tools Message-ID: I'm reviewing tutorial submissions. I get a 500 when I submit reviews of -0 or -1. Seems like the option to score as -0 or -1 is built into symposion, so it seems like it is likely something with the local install. But it doesn't look like we mess with much. Can someone with logs access check out where the 500 might be coming from? Kristen Thyng was also able to reproduce. Best, Justin Vincent algorithmshop.com From sheila at codersquid.com Sat Apr 12 11:44:46 2014 From: sheila at codersquid.com (sheila miguez) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:44:46 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Bug in review tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, We've seen this bug now as well. https://github.com/scipy-conference/SciPy-2014/issues/78 At first we thought it was only due to some peculiarity in staging. We are taking a look now. On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Justin Vincent wrote: > I'm reviewing tutorial submissions. I get a 500 when I submit reviews of -0 > or -1. Seems like the option to score as -0 or -1 is built into > symposion< > https://github.com/pinax/symposion/blob/master/symposion/reviews/models.py > >, > so it seems like it is likely something with the local install. But it > doesn't look like we mess with much. > > Can someone with logs access check out where the 500 might be coming from? > > Kristen Thyng was also able to reproduce. > > Best, > > Justin Vincent > algorithmshop.com > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > -- sheila at codersquid.com From katyhuff at gmail.com Sat Apr 12 12:00:51 2014 From: katyhuff at gmail.com (Katy Huff) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:00:51 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Bug in review tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: fwiw, we're going to focus on your responses to the google form to make our decisions (so, be sure to fill that out!). On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 8:44 AM, sheila miguez wrote: > Hi all, > > We've seen this bug now as well. > https://github.com/scipy-conference/SciPy-2014/issues/78 At first we > thought it was only due to some peculiarity in staging. We are taking a > look now. > > > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Justin Vincent > wrote: > > > I'm reviewing tutorial submissions. I get a 500 when I submit reviews of > -0 > > or -1. Seems like the option to score as -0 or -1 is built into > > symposion< > > > https://github.com/pinax/symposion/blob/master/symposion/reviews/models.py > > >, > > so it seems like it is likely something with the local install. But it > > doesn't look like we mess with much. > > > > Can someone with logs access check out where the 500 might be coming > from? > > > > Kristen Thyng was also able to reproduce. > > > > Best, > > > > Justin Vincent > > algorithmshop.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > > > > > -- > sheila at codersquid.com > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > -- http://katyhuff.github.com From kthyng at gmail.com Sat Apr 12 12:02:48 2014 From: kthyng at gmail.com (Kristen Thyng) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 11:02:48 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Bug in review tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: For tutorials reviews, we're using just this voting/comment form that is present from your guys' setup, but without the google drive form. So, it is more important for us. Of course we can find a work around, say, just using the comments section if needed. Kristen On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Katy Huff wrote: > fwiw, we're going to focus on your responses to the google form to make our > decisions (so, be sure to fill that out!). > > > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 8:44 AM, sheila miguez >wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > We've seen this bug now as well. > > https://github.com/scipy-conference/SciPy-2014/issues/78 At first we > > thought it was only due to some peculiarity in staging. We are taking a > > look now. > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Justin Vincent > > wrote: > > > > > I'm reviewing tutorial submissions. I get a 500 when I submit reviews > of > > -0 > > > or -1. Seems like the option to score as -0 or -1 is built into > > > symposion< > > > > > > https://github.com/pinax/symposion/blob/master/symposion/reviews/models.py > > > >, > > > so it seems like it is likely something with the local install. But it > > > doesn't look like we mess with much. > > > > > > Can someone with logs access check out where the 500 might be coming > > from? > > > > > > Kristen Thyng was also able to reproduce. > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Justin Vincent > > > algorithmshop.com > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > sheila at codersquid.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > > > > > -- > http://katyhuff.github.com > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > -- Kristen M. Thyng Postdoctoral Research Associate Department of Oceanography Texas A&M University http://kristenthyng.com From katyhuff at gmail.com Sat Apr 12 12:05:33 2014 From: katyhuff at gmail.com (Katy Huff) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:05:33 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Bug in review tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Ah, right. yes, of course. On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Kristen Thyng wrote: > For tutorials reviews, we're using just this voting/comment form that is > present from your guys' setup, but without the google drive form. So, it is > more important for us. Of course we can find a work around, say, just using > the comments section if needed. > > Kristen > > > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Katy Huff wrote: > >> fwiw, we're going to focus on your responses to the google form to make >> our >> decisions (so, be sure to fill that out!). >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 8:44 AM, sheila miguez > >wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > We've seen this bug now as well. >> > https://github.com/scipy-conference/SciPy-2014/issues/78 At first we >> > thought it was only due to some peculiarity in staging. We are taking a >> > look now. >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Justin Vincent >> > wrote: >> > >> > > I'm reviewing tutorial submissions. I get a 500 when I submit reviews >> of >> > -0 >> > > or -1. Seems like the option to score as -0 or -1 is built into >> > > symposion< >> > > >> > >> https://github.com/pinax/symposion/blob/master/symposion/reviews/models.py >> > > >, >> > > so it seems like it is likely something with the local install. But it >> > > doesn't look like we mess with much. >> > > >> > > Can someone with logs access check out where the 500 might be coming >> > from? >> > > >> > > Kristen Thyng was also able to reproduce. >> > > >> > > Best, >> > > >> > > Justin Vincent >> > > algorithmshop.com >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > sheila at codersquid.com >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> http://katyhuff.github.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > > > > -- > Kristen M. Thyng > Postdoctoral Research Associate > Department of Oceanography > Texas A&M University > http://kristenthyng.com > -- http://katyhuff.github.com From rsampath at uw.edu Mon Apr 14 13:40:25 2014 From: rsampath at uw.edu (Ramesh Sampath) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:40:25 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Student Registration Request - Part-Time Student + Startup Message-ID: Dear SciPy Organizer, I study a part-time class with University of Washington, Seattle and also do a Startup with a friend that uses Python and SciPy eco-system. I have participated in SciPy over the last couple of years and enjoy it. I would love to participate again this year. I work on my startup full-time that's completely bootstrapped. Given that I am a part-time student, can I register in the Student rate ? Thanks, Ramesh Sampath rsampath at uw.edu - From andy.terrel at gmail.com Mon Apr 14 14:01:09 2014 From: andy.terrel at gmail.com (Andy Ray Terrel) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 13:01:09 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Student Registration Request - Part-Time Student + Startup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Ramesh, Yes. We have always let people use their best judgment on whether they qualify as "student" without getting too lawyerly about it. -- Andy On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Ramesh Sampath wrote: > Dear SciPy Organizer, > > I study a part-time class with University of Washington, Seattle and also > do a Startup with a friend that uses Python and SciPy eco-system. I have > participated in SciPy over the last couple of years and enjoy it. I would > love to participate again this year. I work on my startup full-time that's > completely bootstrapped. Given that I am a part-time student, can I > register in the Student rate ? > > Thanks, > Ramesh Sampath > rsampath at uw.edu > - > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers From elvirabreytenbach at gmail.com Mon Apr 14 15:03:59 2014 From: elvirabreytenbach at gmail.com (Elvira Breytenbach) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] question about registration Message-ID: Hello, I have a questions regarding whether I am eligible to register as a student for the upcoming conference in Austin, TX. I graduated in August of last year, but I am currently a research fellow in an educational/training position. Since I am still continuing my education, would I be eligible to register as a student? Thank you for your time, Elvira McIntyre From scopatz at gmail.com Mon Apr 14 15:06:46 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] question about registration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Elvira, I believe that you would have to register at the Academic price, since you are no longer a student. Be Well Anthony On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Elvira Breytenbach < elvirabreytenbach at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > I have a questions regarding whether I am eligible to register as a student > for the upcoming conference in Austin, TX. I graduated in August of last > year, but I am currently a research fellow in an educational/training > position. Since I am still continuing my education, would I be eligible to > register as a student? > > Thank you for your time, > > Elvira McIntyre > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From rsampath at uw.edu Mon Apr 14 15:54:23 2014 From: rsampath at uw.edu (Ramesh Sampath) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:54:23 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Student Registration Request - Part-Time Student + Startup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <215163E6-6D89-4A2A-BEE1-EE63C3D234CE@uw.edu> Thanks Andy for the confirmation. I have gone ahead and registered for SciPy. Looking forward to it. Thanks, Ramesh Sampath > On Apr 14, 2014, at 1:01 PM, Andy Ray Terrel wrote: > > Hello Ramesh, > > Yes. We have always let people use their best judgment on whether they > qualify as "student" without getting too lawyerly about it. > > -- Andy > >> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Ramesh Sampath wrote: >> Dear SciPy Organizer, >> >> I study a part-time class with University of Washington, Seattle and also >> do a Startup with a friend that uses Python and SciPy eco-system. I have >> participated in SciPy over the last couple of years and enjoy it. I would >> love to participate again this year. I work on my startup full-time that's >> completely bootstrapped. Given that I am a part-time student, can I >> register in the Student rate ? >> >> Thanks, >> Ramesh Sampath >> rsampath at uw.edu >> - >> _______________________________________________ >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers From Debra.Donnelly at sig.com Tue Apr 15 09:29:21 2014 From: Debra.Donnelly at sig.com (Donnelly, Debra) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:29:21 +0000 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Registration for Ernest Mamikonyan? Message-ID: <7EA6F812D3DEA54396465CC74AA8C498094C2D17@xchmbbal504.ds.susq.com> To Whom it May Concern, Please let me know if the registration went through for Ernest Mamikonyan to attend the SciPy 2014 Conference. I tried to register Ernest this morning and used his manager's corporate card as payment for Ernest's registration. At this point I just want to make sure that Ernest is now registered to attend and not his manager who is Geoff Buhn. Can you please clarify this for me before I go ahead and make Ernest's hotel reservations? Also, it looks like the rooms at the AT&T Executive Conf. Center Hotel are going quickly according to the site so thank you in advance for getting back to me today. Sincerely, Debra Donnelly Debra Donnelly SIG, LLP. 401 City Ave., Suite 220 Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 610-617-3083 (W) 610-747-2158 (F) ________________________________ IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses. From dzeff at bashfilms.com Tue Apr 15 12:25:42 2014 From: dzeff at bashfilms.com (Daniel Zeff) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:25:42 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] SciPy2014 - Video and Editing Services Message-ID: To Whom It May Concern, My name is Daniel Zeff and I work for Bash Films in Los Angeles, CA. I am writing in regards to SciPy2014 this July because I believe we could be of great service to your event. We provide video services domestically and abroad for events such as yours. We use multiple cameras, link to presenter slides, pre-build titles with graphics, and edit events live for Professional Quality Videos. Our clients use these videos for their websites and numerous other marketing and sales purposes. *We are unique because we have developed a system that allows us to:* *1)* Deliver Final Edited Videos 24 hours after your event (*in multiple formats*), *2)* Stream your event live over the Internet (*optional*), and *3)* Provide these services at *significantly lower costs* than other companies Our packages include all travel and expense costs for cameras, crew, and post-production services. In addition, we can format and deliver the fully edited videos 24 hours after your event. For a 7-day event in Austin, with HD multi-camera, live Internet streaming (*optional*), and final EDITED videos, pricing starts at just $17,000. Here is a link with Sample Videos and additional information at our *Conference Video Recording Webpage*. I invite you to submit your event for a *Free Quote*. The on-line submission takes 3 minutes and provides us enough information to supply a variety of options to fit within your budget. I wish you the best with your event and look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Daniel Zeff 818-588-3634: Office *www.BashFilms.com* *Additional Event Production Services:* - Promotional Video(s) to help advertise your upcoming and future events - Pre and Post-Presentation interview videos with speakers and/or attendees - Video file delivery via email and download to attendees - Pay per view streaming services to generate additional revenue for your organization -- Daniel Zeff Event Video Representative www.bashfilms.com dzeff at bashfilms.com From jiffyclub at gmail.com Tue Apr 15 13:24:59 2014 From: jiffyclub at gmail.com (Matt Davis) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:24:59 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Server Error Message-ID: Hi SciPy, I'm getting an Internal Server Error with no additional information while trying to submit proposal comments via the SciPy website. I'm currently working on https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/review/94 if that helps. - Matt From andy.terrel at gmail.com Tue Apr 15 14:38:19 2014 From: andy.terrel at gmail.com (Andy Ray Terrel) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:38:19 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Server Error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks for the report. Seems like we have a few issues we are trying to resolve right now. Will let you know if we figure it out... On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Matt Davis wrote: > Hi SciPy, > > I'm getting an Internal Server Error with no additional information while > trying to submit proposal comments via the SciPy website. > > I'm currently working on > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/review/94 if that helps. > > - Matt > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers From katyhuff at gmail.com Tue Apr 15 16:19:10 2014 From: katyhuff at gmail.com (Katy Huff) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:19:10 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Server Error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I think they may all be the same one: https://github.com/scipy-conference/SciPy-2014/issues/78 Did you use a negative value, Matt? (if it is, just don't worry, we are not paying attention to those binary scores, we'll get the overall score out of the google doc) On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Andy Ray Terrel wrote: > Thanks for the report. Seems like we have a few issues we are trying > to resolve right now. Will let you know if we figure it out... > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Matt Davis wrote: > > Hi SciPy, > > > > I'm getting an Internal Server Error with no additional information while > > trying to submit proposal comments via the SciPy website. > > > > I'm currently working on > > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/review/94 if that helps. > > > > - Matt > > _______________________________________________ > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > -- http://katyhuff.github.com From jiffyclub at gmail.com Tue Apr 15 16:20:36 2014 From: jiffyclub at gmail.com (Matt Davis) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:20:36 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Server Error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yup, definitely hitting that error I think. On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Katy Huff wrote: > I think they may all be the same one: > https://github.com/scipy-conference/SciPy-2014/issues/78 > Did you use a negative value, Matt? > (if it is, just don't worry, we are not paying attention to those binary > scores, we'll get the overall score out of the google doc) > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Andy Ray Terrel wrote: > >> Thanks for the report. Seems like we have a few issues we are trying >> to resolve right now. Will let you know if we figure it out... >> >> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Matt Davis wrote: >> > Hi SciPy, >> > >> > I'm getting an Internal Server Error with no additional information >> while >> > trying to submit proposal comments via the SciPy website. >> > >> > I'm currently working on >> > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/review/94 if that helps. >> > >> > - Matt >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> _______________________________________________ >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > > > > -- > http://katyhuff.github.com > From kyle.mandli at gmail.com Wed Apr 16 02:34:57 2014 From: kyle.mandli at gmail.com (Kyle Mandli) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:34:57 +0900 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] "Why I Sci-Py" blog post Message-ID: Hey everyone, At some point, I think someone (Andy) mentioned that we should think about writing a "Why I Sci-Py" post. I was thinking about this the other day and was wondering if anyone had more thoughts on this such as where we post these (e.g. personal blogs, posts on G+, twitter) and what content would be appropriate. Kyle From bmurphy at enthought.com Wed Apr 16 10:31:24 2014 From: bmurphy at enthought.com (Brett Murphy) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:31:24 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] "Why I Sci-Py" blog post In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Would a list of "talking points" help us all to pull these together? It would of course have to be a superset otherwise we risk re-writing the same thing over and over. Are there obvious online newsletters or sites that might be interested in a slightly more substantial post on the conference built around the "Why I SciPy" theme? -- Brett Brett Murphy Director, Customer Solutions Enthought, Inc. bmurphy at enthought.com 512-536-1057 On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Kyle Mandli wrote: > Hey everyone, > > At some point, I think someone (Andy) mentioned that we should think about > writing a "Why I Sci-Py" post. I was thinking about this the other day and > was wondering if anyone had more thoughts on this such as where we post > these (e.g. personal blogs, posts on G+, twitter) and what content would be > appropriate. > > Kyle > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From scopatz at gmail.com Wed Apr 16 12:36:42 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:36:42 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] "Why I Sci-Py" blog post In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Kyle, I think that this a great idea. One thing that we could do is that in the weekly newsletters we could a "Why I SciPy" section at the end that contains links to the latest posts. Would you be willing to help solicit posts? Be Well Anthony On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Brett Murphy wrote: > Would a list of "talking points" help us all to pull these together? It > would of course have to be a superset otherwise we risk re-writing the same > thing over and over. > > Are there obvious online newsletters or sites that might be interested in a > slightly more substantial post on the conference built around the "Why I > SciPy" theme? > > -- Brett > > > Brett Murphy > Director, Customer Solutions > Enthought, Inc. > bmurphy at enthought.com > 512-536-1057 > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Kyle Mandli > wrote: > > > Hey everyone, > > > > At some point, I think someone (Andy) mentioned that we should think > about > > writing a "Why I Sci-Py" post. I was thinking about this the other day > and > > was wondering if anyone had more thoughts on this such as where we post > > these (e.g. personal blogs, posts on G+, twitter) and what content would > be > > appropriate. > > > > Kyle > > _______________________________________________ > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From scopatz at gmail.com Wed Apr 16 12:38:47 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:38:47 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] SciPy2014 - Video and Editing Services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Daniel, I am sorry to tell you but, SciPy has already secured video services for this year. Thanks for your interest. Be Well Anthony On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Daniel Zeff wrote: > To Whom It May Concern, > > My name is Daniel Zeff and I work for Bash Films in Los Angeles, CA. I am > writing in regards to SciPy2014 this July because I believe we could be of > great service to your event. > > We provide video services domestically and abroad for events such as yours. > We use multiple cameras, link to presenter slides, pre-build titles with > graphics, and edit events live for Professional Quality Videos. Our clients > use these videos for their websites and numerous other marketing and sales > purposes. > > *We are unique because we have developed a system that allows us to:* > > *1)* Deliver Final Edited Videos 24 hours after your event (*in multiple > formats*), > *2)* Stream your event live over the Internet (*optional*), and > *3)* Provide these services at *significantly lower costs* than other > companies > > Our packages include all travel and expense costs for cameras, crew, and > post-production services. In addition, we can format and deliver the fully > edited videos 24 hours after your event. For a 7-day event in Austin, with > HD multi-camera, live Internet streaming (*optional*), and final EDITED > videos, pricing starts at just $17,000. Here is a link with Sample Videos > and additional information at our *Conference Video Recording > Webpage*. > I invite you to submit your event for a *Free > Quote*. > The on-line submission takes 3 minutes and provides us enough information > to supply a variety of options to fit within your budget. I wish you the > best with your event and look forward to hearing from you. > > Sincerely, > Daniel Zeff > > 818-588-3634: Office > *www.BashFilms.com* > > *Additional Event Production Services:* > - Promotional Video(s) to help advertise your upcoming and future events > - Pre and Post-Presentation interview videos with speakers and/or attendees > - Video file delivery via email and download to attendees > - Pay per view streaming services to generate additional revenue for your > organization > > -- > Daniel Zeff > Event Video Representative > www.bashfilms.com > dzeff at bashfilms.com > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From dzeff at bashfilms.com Wed Apr 16 13:41:32 2014 From: dzeff at bashfilms.com (Daniel Zeff) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:41:32 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] SciPy2014 - Video and Editing Services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Anthony - Thanks for letting me know and please feel free to pass along our info to your team if we can be of any assistance. We are happy to help advise on many of the recent delivery technologies and would only ask that you and your team speak kindly of us for potential referrals in the future. I wish you the best for your upcoming event! All the best, Daniel On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > Dear Daniel, > > I am sorry to tell you but, SciPy has already secured video services for > this year. Thanks for your interest. > > Be Well > Anthony > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Daniel Zeff wrote: > >> To Whom It May Concern, >> >> My name is Daniel Zeff and I work for Bash Films in Los Angeles, CA. I am >> writing in regards to SciPy2014 this July because I believe we could be of >> great service to your event. >> >> We provide video services domestically and abroad for events such as >> yours. >> We use multiple cameras, link to presenter slides, pre-build titles with >> graphics, and edit events live for Professional Quality Videos. Our >> clients >> use these videos for their websites and numerous other marketing and sales >> purposes. >> >> *We are unique because we have developed a system that allows us to:* >> >> *1)* Deliver Final Edited Videos 24 hours after your event (*in multiple >> formats*), >> *2)* Stream your event live over the Internet (*optional*), and >> *3)* Provide these services at *significantly lower costs* than other >> >> companies >> >> Our packages include all travel and expense costs for cameras, crew, and >> post-production services. In addition, we can format and deliver the fully >> edited videos 24 hours after your event. For a 7-day event in Austin, with >> HD multi-camera, live Internet streaming (*optional*), and final EDITED >> >> videos, pricing starts at just $17,000. Here is a link with Sample Videos >> and additional information at our *Conference Video Recording >> Webpage*. >> I invite you to submit your event for a *Free >> Quote*. >> >> The on-line submission takes 3 minutes and provides us enough information >> to supply a variety of options to fit within your budget. I wish you the >> best with your event and look forward to hearing from you. >> >> Sincerely, >> Daniel Zeff >> >> 818-588-3634: Office >> *www.BashFilms.com* >> >> *Additional Event Production Services:* >> >> - Promotional Video(s) to help advertise your upcoming and future events >> - Pre and Post-Presentation interview videos with speakers and/or >> attendees >> - Video file delivery via email and download to attendees >> - Pay per view streaming services to generate additional revenue for your >> organization >> >> -- >> Daniel Zeff >> Event Video Representative >> www.bashfilms.com >> dzeff at bashfilms.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > > -- Daniel Zeff Event Video Representative www.bashfilms.com dzeff at bashfilms.com From tld at creare.com Thu Apr 17 09:42:00 2014 From: tld at creare.com (Tammy Dugas) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:42:00 +0000 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] SciPy Conference Sponsorship In-Reply-To: <6D7C9D1BF06F8548B40860AF3C1C396D629621B5@NEWCASTLE.creare.com> References: <15D442058611A9469285A4F2597D8FDA62ABC3C8@NEWCASTLE.creare.com> <6D7C9D1BF06F8548B40860AF3C1C396D6296215C@NEWCASTLE.creare.com> <6D7C9D1BF06F8548B40860AF3C1C396D629621B5@NEWCASTLE.creare.com> Message-ID: Have we missed the deadline for sponsorship of this year's SciPy conference in Austin at the Silver Level ($2,000)? https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/sponsorship/ Thank you Tammy Tammy L. Dugas C.P.M. Creare Inc. 16 Great Hollow Road Hanover NH 03755 Direct: 603-640-2302 Fax: 603-643-9505 From tld at creare.com Thu Apr 17 10:04:40 2014 From: tld at creare.com (Tammy Dugas) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:04:40 +0000 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] SciPy Conference Sponsorship In-Reply-To: References: <15D442058611A9469285A4F2597D8FDA62ABC3C8@NEWCASTLE.creare.com> <6D7C9D1BF06F8548B40860AF3C1C396D6296215C@NEWCASTLE.creare.com> <6D7C9D1BF06F8548B40860AF3C1C396D629621B5@NEWCASTLE.creare.com> Message-ID: Thank you Brett, yes, we would like to proceed with the Silver Level Sponsorship. Can you send an invoice or do you need a credit card? From: Brett Murphy [mailto:bmurphy at enthought.com] Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 9:52 AM To: Tammy Dugas Cc: scipy-organizers at scipy.org Subject: Re: [Scipy-organizers] SciPy Conference Sponsorship Hi Tammy, No, it is never too late to join as a sponsor. I've attached the sponsor prospectus which details the benefits of sponsoring. Did you have any questions at this point? Would you like to proceed with a Silver level sponsorship? Thank you for supporting SciPy! -- Brett SciPy Sponsor Chair Brett Murphy Director, Customer Solutions Enthought, Inc. bmurphy at enthought.com 512-536-1057 On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Tammy Dugas > wrote: Have we missed the deadline for sponsorship of this year's SciPy conference in Austin at the Silver Level ($2,000)? https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/sponsorship/ Thank you Tammy Tammy L. Dugas C.P.M. Creare Inc. 16 Great Hollow Road Hanover NH 03755 Direct: 603-640-2302 Fax: 603-643-9505 _______________________________________________ Scipy-organizers mailing list Scipy-organizers at scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers From kyle.mandli at gmail.com Thu Apr 17 18:12:10 2014 From: kyle.mandli at gmail.com (Kyle Mandli) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:12:10 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] "Why I Sci-Py" blog post In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I could help with this, I think being clear we just want something short (a paragraph maybe) containing past experiences, maybe emphasizing specific instances. Writing some examples (and using those to get going) would go a long way to convincing others to spend the effort (and also have an example). Kyle On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > Hello Kyle, > > I think that this a great idea. One thing that we could do is that in the > weekly newsletters we could a "Why I SciPy" section at the end that > contains links to the latest posts. Would you be willing to help solicit > posts? > > Be Well > Anthony > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Brett Murphy wrote: > >> Would a list of "talking points" help us all to pull these together? It >> would of course have to be a superset otherwise we risk re-writing the >> same >> thing over and over. >> >> Are there obvious online newsletters or sites that might be interested in >> a >> slightly more substantial post on the conference built around the "Why I >> SciPy" theme? >> >> -- Brett >> >> >> Brett Murphy >> Director, Customer Solutions >> Enthought, Inc. >> bmurphy at enthought.com >> 512-536-1057 >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Kyle Mandli >> wrote: >> >> > Hey everyone, >> > >> > At some point, I think someone (Andy) mentioned that we should think >> about >> > writing a "Why I Sci-Py" post. I was thinking about this the other day >> and >> > was wondering if anyone had more thoughts on this such as where we post >> > these (e.g. personal blogs, posts on G+, twitter) and what content >> would be >> > appropriate. >> > >> > Kyle >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > > From bmurphy at enthought.com Thu Apr 17 09:51:42 2014 From: bmurphy at enthought.com (Brett Murphy) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 08:51:42 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] SciPy Conference Sponsorship In-Reply-To: References: <15D442058611A9469285A4F2597D8FDA62ABC3C8@NEWCASTLE.creare.com> <6D7C9D1BF06F8548B40860AF3C1C396D6296215C@NEWCASTLE.creare.com> <6D7C9D1BF06F8548B40860AF3C1C396D629621B5@NEWCASTLE.creare.com> Message-ID: Hi Tammy, No, it is never too late to join as a sponsor. I've attached the sponsor prospectus which details the benefits of sponsoring. Did you have any questions at this point? Would you like to proceed with a Silver level sponsorship? Thank you for supporting SciPy! -- Brett SciPy Sponsor Chair Brett Murphy Director, Customer Solutions Enthought, Inc. bmurphy at enthought.com 512-536-1057 On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Tammy Dugas wrote: > Have we missed the deadline for sponsorship of this year's SciPy > conference in Austin at the Silver Level ($2,000)? > > > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/sponsorship/ > > > Thank you > Tammy > > > Tammy L. Dugas C.P.M. > Creare Inc. > 16 Great Hollow Road > Hanover NH 03755 > Direct: 603-640-2302 > Fax: 603-643-9505 > > > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From scipy-organizers at valenciapainting.com Sat Apr 19 12:14:19 2014 From: scipy-organizers at valenciapainting.com (scipy-organizers) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 14:14:19 -0200 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Hi scipy-organizers Message-ID: <20726039215.9741315234@f7.my.com> Course The Course at last. Bishop Bilsborrow Memorial R. On September 20, Franco was seen taking photos of the thug that died. From kellie.kercher at exxonmobil.com Mon Apr 21 09:31:48 2014 From: kellie.kercher at exxonmobil.com (Kercher, Kellie) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 08:31:48 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] SciPy 2014 Conference Registration Message-ID: Hello, Last Wednesday, I registered for SciPy 2014 and I received a PayPal receipt but not an email confirmation for the registration purchase as mentioned. My order number is 2YU34935LE184474D. I attached my PayPal receipt. Please advise/confirm my registration for the tutorials, conference, sprints and women's luncheon. Thank you. Best Regards, Kellie Kercher Software Engineer DSIT RES&ENGR APPLICATIONS ExxonMobil Technical Computing Company 1545 Route 22 East, Annandale, NJ 08801 Office: 908.730.3239 Cell: 314.712.8186 http://goto/kellie From scopatz at gmail.com Mon Apr 21 16:58:23 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:58:23 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] "Why I Sci-Py" blog post In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Definitely! I think that this is a great idea. Why don't you put together a "Call for Why I SciPy" paragraph, Matt & I will take an editing stab at it and then we can broadcast a call for them. Be Well Anthony On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Kyle Mandli wrote: > I could help with this, I think being clear we just want something short > (a paragraph maybe) containing past experiences, maybe emphasizing specific > instances. Writing some examples (and using those to get going) would go a > long way to convincing others to spend the effort (and also have an > example). > > Kyle > > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > >> Hello Kyle, >> >> I think that this a great idea. One thing that we could do is that in >> the weekly newsletters we could a "Why I SciPy" section at the end that >> contains links to the latest posts. Would you be willing to help solicit >> posts? >> >> Be Well >> Anthony >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Brett Murphy wrote: >> >>> Would a list of "talking points" help us all to pull these together? It >>> would of course have to be a superset otherwise we risk re-writing the >>> same >>> thing over and over. >>> >>> Are there obvious online newsletters or sites that might be interested >>> in a >>> slightly more substantial post on the conference built around the "Why I >>> SciPy" theme? >>> >>> -- Brett >>> >>> >>> Brett Murphy >>> Director, Customer Solutions >>> Enthought, Inc. >>> bmurphy at enthought.com >>> 512-536-1057 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Kyle Mandli >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hey everyone, >>> > >>> > At some point, I think someone (Andy) mentioned that we should think >>> about >>> > writing a "Why I Sci-Py" post. I was thinking about this the other >>> day and >>> > was wondering if anyone had more thoughts on this such as where we post >>> > these (e.g. personal blogs, posts on G+, twitter) and what content >>> would be >>> > appropriate. >>> > >>> > Kyle >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >>> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >>> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Scipy-organizers mailing list >>> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >>> >> >> > From kyle.mandli at gmail.com Mon Apr 21 18:52:38 2014 From: kyle.mandli at gmail.com (Kyle Mandli) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 17:52:38 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] "Why I Sci-Py" blog post In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Here's a rough shot at a call and example (which is probably too generic). We could mention the specific length we are shooting for to ease the burden (but not too short to make people stress out about it). I also provided an example below but it's probably too generic. # Why I SciPy SciPy is many things to many people. It can be an opportunity to learn about the newest technologies or maybe old ones that you should have been using. It is a chance to learn about new and exciting features of the packages you use the most. SciPy is also a chance to reconnect to old friends and meet new ones. For many, it is also an opportunity to develop your skills as a scientific software developer and become a better scientist overall. So what makes you SciPy? We are looking for a short paragraph explaining the reasons why you SciPy. Including specific instances or reasons why the conference has had a positive impact on your science are the best! `I SciPy because it is a place where I can learn about new python packages I can leverage in my science and old packages I should have been using. I go to learn about new and exciting features of the packages I use the most. It is also about developing my own skills as a scientific software developer, learning about best practices and new ways to make my own work more effective. I of course go to see old friends and make new ones. Most of all, I SciPy to become a better scientist.` On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > Definitely! I think that this is a great idea. Why don't you put > together a "Call for Why I SciPy" paragraph, Matt & I will take an editing > stab at it and then we can broadcast a call for them. > > Be Well > Anthony > > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Kyle Mandli wrote: > >> I could help with this, I think being clear we just want something short >> (a paragraph maybe) containing past experiences, maybe emphasizing specific >> instances. Writing some examples (and using those to get going) would go a >> long way to convincing others to spend the effort (and also have an >> example). >> >> Kyle >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: >> >>> Hello Kyle, >>> >>> I think that this a great idea. One thing that we could do is that in >>> the weekly newsletters we could a "Why I SciPy" section at the end that >>> contains links to the latest posts. Would you be willing to help solicit >>> posts? >>> >>> Be Well >>> Anthony >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Brett Murphy wrote: >>> >>>> Would a list of "talking points" help us all to pull these together? It >>>> would of course have to be a superset otherwise we risk re-writing the >>>> same >>>> thing over and over. >>>> >>>> Are there obvious online newsletters or sites that might be interested >>>> in a >>>> slightly more substantial post on the conference built around the "Why I >>>> SciPy" theme? >>>> >>>> -- Brett >>>> >>>> >>>> Brett Murphy >>>> Director, Customer Solutions >>>> Enthought, Inc. >>>> bmurphy at enthought.com >>>> 512-536-1057 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Kyle Mandli >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hey everyone, >>>> > >>>> > At some point, I think someone (Andy) mentioned that we should think >>>> about >>>> > writing a "Why I Sci-Py" post. I was thinking about this the other >>>> day and >>>> > was wondering if anyone had more thoughts on this such as where we >>>> post >>>> > these (e.g. personal blogs, posts on G+, twitter) and what content >>>> would be >>>> > appropriate. >>>> > >>>> > Kyle >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >>>> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >>>> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Scipy-organizers mailing list >>>> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >>>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >>>> >>> >>> >> > From jivanoff at enthought.com Tue Apr 22 08:06:12 2014 From: jivanoff at enthought.com (Jim Ivanoff) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 07:06:12 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] SciPy 2014 Conference Registration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Kellie, Thank you for your email. Yes, you are registered for all the events you mentioned. If you have any other questions please let us know. Jim Ivanoff Sent from a mobile device > On Apr 21, 2014, at 8:31 AM, "Kercher, Kellie" wrote: > > Hello, > > Last Wednesday, I registered for SciPy 2014 and I received a PayPal receipt but not an email confirmation for the registration purchase as mentioned. > > My order number is 2YU34935LE184474D. I attached my PayPal receipt. > > Please advise/confirm my registration for the tutorials, conference, sprints and women's luncheon. Thank you. > > Best Regards, > Kellie Kercher > > Software Engineer > DSIT RES&ENGR APPLICATIONS > ExxonMobil Technical Computing Company > 1545 Route 22 East, Annandale, NJ 08801 > Office: 908.730.3239 > Cell: 314.712.8186 > http://goto/kellie > > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers From kthyng at gmail.com Tue Apr 22 09:04:43 2014 From: kthyng at gmail.com (Kristen Thyng) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:04:43 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Stupid internal error Message-ID: Hi guys, So I tried voting with a -0 or -1 on a tutorial and now I can't get back into the tutorial reviews in my dashboard. I thought it would just refuse to work, but it looks like it recorded the vote and now I cannot return to the tutorials review site: https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/tutorials/ So.... can someone reset that or something? Maybe deleting that review would fix it: submission 20 for tutorials. Thanks, Kristen -- Kristen M. Thyng Postdoctoral Research Associate Department of Oceanography Texas A&M University http://kristenthyng.com From aron at ahmadia.net Tue Apr 22 09:07:42 2014 From: aron at ahmadia.net (Aron Ahmadia) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 09:07:42 -0400 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Stupid internal error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I think I've got the same problem, but I can't see https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/talks-posters/ I'm pretty sure all of my reviews are in, so I don't think this is urgent for me. A On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Kristen Thyng wrote: > Hi guys, > > So I tried voting with a -0 or -1 on a tutorial and now I can't get back > into the tutorial reviews in my dashboard. I thought it would just refuse > to work, but it looks like it recorded the vote and now I cannot return to > the tutorials review site: > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/tutorials/ > > So.... can someone reset that or something? Maybe deleting that review > would fix it: submission 20 for tutorials. > > Thanks, > Kristen > > -- > Kristen M. Thyng > Postdoctoral Research Associate > Department of Oceanography > Texas A&M University > http://kristenthyng.com > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers From sheila at codersquid.com Tue Apr 22 10:27:32 2014 From: sheila at codersquid.com (sheila miguez) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 09:27:32 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Stupid internal error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'll take a look at both of these. On Apr 22, 2014 8:07 AM, "Aron Ahmadia" wrote: > I think I've got the same problem, but I can't see > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/talks-posters/ > > I'm pretty sure all of my reviews are in, so I don't think this is > urgent for me. > > A > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Kristen Thyng wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > So I tried voting with a -0 or -1 on a tutorial and now I can't get back > > into the tutorial reviews in my dashboard. I thought it would just refuse > > to work, but it looks like it recorded the vote and now I cannot return > to > > the tutorials review site: > > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/tutorials/ > > > > So.... can someone reset that or something? Maybe deleting that review > > would fix it: submission 20 for tutorials. > > > > Thanks, > > Kristen > > > > -- > > Kristen M. Thyng > > Postdoctoral Research Associate > > Department of Oceanography > > Texas A&M University > > http://kristenthyng.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From scopatz at gmail.com Tue Apr 22 11:26:30 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:26:30 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Stupid internal error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello All, Paul Ivanov and I put in a couple of PRs (#109and #110 ) yesterday to fix some of these issues that the PC was experiencing. I highly doubt that either of these would have caused this issue, but I do want to claim responsibility in case that they did. Be Well Anthony On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:27 AM, sheila miguez wrote: > I'll take a look at both of these. > On Apr 22, 2014 8:07 AM, "Aron Ahmadia" wrote: > > > I think I've got the same problem, but I can't see > > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/talks-posters/ > > > > I'm pretty sure all of my reviews are in, so I don't think this is > > urgent for me. > > > > A > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Kristen Thyng wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > So I tried voting with a -0 or -1 on a tutorial and now I can't get > back > > > into the tutorial reviews in my dashboard. I thought it would just > refuse > > > to work, but it looks like it recorded the vote and now I cannot return > > to > > > the tutorials review site: > > > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/tutorials/ > > > > > > So.... can someone reset that or something? Maybe deleting that review > > > would fix it: submission 20 for tutorials. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Kristen > > > > > > -- > > > Kristen M. Thyng > > > Postdoctoral Research Associate > > > Department of Oceanography > > > Texas A&M University > > > http://kristenthyng.com > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > _______________________________________________ > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From aron at ahmadia.net Tue Apr 22 11:32:27 2014 From: aron at ahmadia.net (Aron Ahmadia) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:32:27 -0400 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Stupid internal error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks for this everybody and sorry for the trouble. Looking at the note, it appears that voting with a "-1" or "-0" caused the problem for both Kristen and I. I guess the only way to fix this is for somebody to go out and undo our votes? Working with the Google Forms is a little frustrating because the Google review form is set up for assessing scientific merit (the questions are about scientific process, novelty), and not about interest/applicability of the talk. I hope it's clear how I ranked the proposals despite this. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. Best, Aron On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > Hello All, > > Paul Ivanov and I put in a couple of PRs (#109 and #110) yesterday to fix > some of these issues that the PC was experiencing. I highly doubt that > either of these would have caused this issue, but I do want to claim > responsibility in case that they did. > > Be Well > Anthony > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:27 AM, sheila miguez > wrote: >> >> I'll take a look at both of these. >> On Apr 22, 2014 8:07 AM, "Aron Ahmadia" wrote: >> >> > I think I've got the same problem, but I can't see >> > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/talks-posters/ >> > >> > I'm pretty sure all of my reviews are in, so I don't think this is >> > urgent for me. >> > >> > A >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Kristen Thyng wrote: >> > > Hi guys, >> > > >> > > So I tried voting with a -0 or -1 on a tutorial and now I can't get >> > > back >> > > into the tutorial reviews in my dashboard. I thought it would just >> > > refuse >> > > to work, but it looks like it recorded the vote and now I cannot >> > > return >> > to >> > > the tutorials review site: >> > > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/tutorials/ >> > > >> > > So.... can someone reset that or something? Maybe deleting that review >> > > would fix it: submission 20 for tutorials. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Kristen >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Kristen M. Thyng >> > > Postdoctoral Research Associate >> > > Department of Oceanography >> > > Texas A&M University >> > > http://kristenthyng.com >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > From katyhuff at gmail.com Tue Apr 22 11:34:09 2014 From: katyhuff at gmail.com (Katy Huff) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:34:09 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Stupid internal error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Aron Ahmadia wrote: > Thanks for this everybody and sorry for the trouble. > > Looking at the note, it appears that voting with a "-1" or "-0" caused > the problem for both Kristen and I. > > I guess the only way to fix this is for somebody to go out and undo our > votes? > > Working with the Google Forms is a little frustrating because the > Google review form is set up for assessing scientific merit (the > questions are about scientific process, novelty), and not about > interest/applicability of the talk. Thanks for this feedback. It's valid, and noted. We'll keep this in mind. > I hope it's clear how I ranked > the proposals despite this. > > Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. > > Best, > Aron > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Anthony Scopatz > wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > Paul Ivanov and I put in a couple of PRs (#109 and #110) yesterday to fix > > some of these issues that the PC was experiencing. I highly doubt that > > either of these would have caused this issue, but I do want to claim > > responsibility in case that they did. > > > > Be Well > > Anthony > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:27 AM, sheila miguez > > wrote: > >> > >> I'll take a look at both of these. > >> On Apr 22, 2014 8:07 AM, "Aron Ahmadia" wrote: > >> > >> > I think I've got the same problem, but I can't see > >> > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/talks-posters/ > >> > > >> > I'm pretty sure all of my reviews are in, so I don't think this is > >> > urgent for me. > >> > > >> > A > >> > > >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Kristen Thyng > wrote: > >> > > Hi guys, > >> > > > >> > > So I tried voting with a -0 or -1 on a tutorial and now I can't get > >> > > back > >> > > into the tutorial reviews in my dashboard. I thought it would just > >> > > refuse > >> > > to work, but it looks like it recorded the vote and now I cannot > >> > > return > >> > to > >> > > the tutorials review site: > >> > > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/tutorials/ > >> > > > >> > > So.... can someone reset that or something? Maybe deleting that > review > >> > > would fix it: submission 20 for tutorials. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Kristen > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Kristen M. Thyng > >> > > Postdoctoral Research Associate > >> > > Department of Oceanography > >> > > Texas A&M University > >> > > http://kristenthyng.com > >> > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > >> > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >> > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list > >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Scipy-organizers mailing list > >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > -- http://katyhuff.github.com From kthyng at gmail.com Tue Apr 22 11:34:58 2014 From: kthyng at gmail.com (Kristen Thyng) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:34:58 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Stupid internal error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yeah, the -0 and -1 thing has been an ongoing problem, but when I had tried it before it didn't block me out of the reviewing system altogether, which it has done now. Kristen On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Aron Ahmadia wrote: > Thanks for this everybody and sorry for the trouble. > > Looking at the note, it appears that voting with a "-1" or "-0" caused > the problem for both Kristen and I. > > I guess the only way to fix this is for somebody to go out and undo our > votes? > > Working with the Google Forms is a little frustrating because the > Google review form is set up for assessing scientific merit (the > questions are about scientific process, novelty), and not about > interest/applicability of the talk. I hope it's clear how I ranked > the proposals despite this. > > Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. > > Best, > Aron > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Anthony Scopatz > wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > Paul Ivanov and I put in a couple of PRs (#109 and #110) yesterday to fix > > some of these issues that the PC was experiencing. I highly doubt that > > either of these would have caused this issue, but I do want to claim > > responsibility in case that they did. > > > > Be Well > > Anthony > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:27 AM, sheila miguez > > wrote: > >> > >> I'll take a look at both of these. > >> On Apr 22, 2014 8:07 AM, "Aron Ahmadia" wrote: > >> > >> > I think I've got the same problem, but I can't see > >> > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/talks-posters/ > >> > > >> > I'm pretty sure all of my reviews are in, so I don't think this is > >> > urgent for me. > >> > > >> > A > >> > > >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Kristen Thyng > wrote: > >> > > Hi guys, > >> > > > >> > > So I tried voting with a -0 or -1 on a tutorial and now I can't get > >> > > back > >> > > into the tutorial reviews in my dashboard. I thought it would just > >> > > refuse > >> > > to work, but it looks like it recorded the vote and now I cannot > >> > > return > >> > to > >> > > the tutorials review site: > >> > > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/tutorials/ > >> > > > >> > > So.... can someone reset that or something? Maybe deleting that > review > >> > > would fix it: submission 20 for tutorials. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Kristen > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Kristen M. Thyng > >> > > Postdoctoral Research Associate > >> > > Department of Oceanography > >> > > Texas A&M University > >> > > http://kristenthyng.com > >> > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > >> > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >> > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list > >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Scipy-organizers mailing list > >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > -- Kristen M. Thyng Postdoctoral Research Associate Department of Oceanography Texas A&M University http://kristenthyng.com From katyhuff at gmail.com Tue Apr 22 11:35:39 2014 From: katyhuff at gmail.com (Katy Huff) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:35:39 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Stupid internal error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Have you tried logging out and back in? On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Kristen Thyng wrote: > Yeah, the -0 and -1 thing has been an ongoing problem, but when I had tried > it before it didn't block me out of the reviewing system altogether, which > it has done now. > > Kristen > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Aron Ahmadia wrote: > > > Thanks for this everybody and sorry for the trouble. > > > > Looking at the note, it appears that voting with a "-1" or "-0" caused > > the problem for both Kristen and I. > > > > I guess the only way to fix this is for somebody to go out and undo our > > votes? > > > > Working with the Google Forms is a little frustrating because the > > Google review form is set up for assessing scientific merit (the > > questions are about scientific process, novelty), and not about > > interest/applicability of the talk. I hope it's clear how I ranked > > the proposals despite this. > > > > Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. > > > > Best, > > Aron > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Anthony Scopatz > > wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > > > Paul Ivanov and I put in a couple of PRs (#109 and #110) yesterday to > fix > > > some of these issues that the PC was experiencing. I highly doubt that > > > either of these would have caused this issue, but I do want to claim > > > responsibility in case that they did. > > > > > > Be Well > > > Anthony > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:27 AM, sheila miguez > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> I'll take a look at both of these. > > >> On Apr 22, 2014 8:07 AM, "Aron Ahmadia" wrote: > > >> > > >> > I think I've got the same problem, but I can't see > > >> > > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/talks-posters/ > > >> > > > >> > I'm pretty sure all of my reviews are in, so I don't think this is > > >> > urgent for me. > > >> > > > >> > A > > >> > > > >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Kristen Thyng > > wrote: > > >> > > Hi guys, > > >> > > > > >> > > So I tried voting with a -0 or -1 on a tutorial and now I can't > get > > >> > > back > > >> > > into the tutorial reviews in my dashboard. I thought it would just > > >> > > refuse > > >> > > to work, but it looks like it recorded the vote and now I cannot > > >> > > return > > >> > to > > >> > > the tutorials review site: > > >> > > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/tutorials/ > > >> > > > > >> > > So.... can someone reset that or something? Maybe deleting that > > review > > >> > > would fix it: submission 20 for tutorials. > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > >> > > Kristen > > >> > > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > Kristen M. Thyng > > >> > > Postdoctoral Research Associate > > >> > > Department of Oceanography > > >> > > Texas A&M University > > >> > > http://kristenthyng.com > > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > >> > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > >> > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > >> > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > >> > _______________________________________________ > > >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > >> > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Scipy-organizers mailing list > > >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > > > > > -- > Kristen M. Thyng > Postdoctoral Research Associate > Department of Oceanography > Texas A&M University > http://kristenthyng.com > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > -- http://katyhuff.github.com From kthyng at gmail.com Tue Apr 22 11:38:33 2014 From: kthyng at gmail.com (Kristen Thyng) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:38:33 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Stupid internal error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yes, and I also just tried a different browser. Same problem, unfortunately. Kristen On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Katy Huff wrote: > Have you tried logging out and back in? > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Kristen Thyng wrote: > >> Yeah, the -0 and -1 thing has been an ongoing problem, but when I had >> tried >> it before it didn't block me out of the reviewing system altogether, which >> it has done now. >> >> Kristen >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Aron Ahmadia wrote: >> >> > Thanks for this everybody and sorry for the trouble. >> > >> > Looking at the note, it appears that voting with a "-1" or "-0" caused >> > the problem for both Kristen and I. >> > >> > I guess the only way to fix this is for somebody to go out and undo our >> > votes? >> > >> > Working with the Google Forms is a little frustrating because the >> > Google review form is set up for assessing scientific merit (the >> > questions are about scientific process, novelty), and not about >> > interest/applicability of the talk. I hope it's clear how I ranked >> > the proposals despite this. >> > >> > Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. >> > >> > Best, >> > Aron >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Anthony Scopatz >> > wrote: >> > > Hello All, >> > > >> > > Paul Ivanov and I put in a couple of PRs (#109 and #110) yesterday to >> fix >> > > some of these issues that the PC was experiencing. I highly doubt >> that >> > > either of these would have caused this issue, but I do want to claim >> > > responsibility in case that they did. >> > > >> > > Be Well >> > > Anthony >> > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:27 AM, sheila miguez > > >> > > wrote: >> > >> >> > >> I'll take a look at both of these. >> > >> On Apr 22, 2014 8:07 AM, "Aron Ahmadia" wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > I think I've got the same problem, but I can't see >> > >> > >> https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/talks-posters/ >> > >> > >> > >> > I'm pretty sure all of my reviews are in, so I don't think this is >> > >> > urgent for me. >> > >> > >> > >> > A >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Kristen Thyng >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hi guys, >> > >> > > >> > >> > > So I tried voting with a -0 or -1 on a tutorial and now I can't >> get >> > >> > > back >> > >> > > into the tutorial reviews in my dashboard. I thought it would >> just >> > >> > > refuse >> > >> > > to work, but it looks like it recorded the vote and now I cannot >> > >> > > return >> > >> > to >> > >> > > the tutorials review site: >> > >> > > >> https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/tutorials/ >> > >> > > >> > >> > > So.... can someone reset that or something? Maybe deleting that >> > review >> > >> > > would fix it: submission 20 for tutorials. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Thanks, >> > >> > > Kristen >> > >> > > >> > >> > > -- >> > >> > > Kristen M. Thyng >> > >> > > Postdoctoral Research Associate >> > >> > > Department of Oceanography >> > >> > > Texas A&M University >> > >> > > http://kristenthyng.com >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > >> > > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> > >> > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> > >> > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> > >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> > >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> > >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> > >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> > >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Kristen M. Thyng >> Postdoctoral Research Associate >> Department of Oceanography >> Texas A&M University >> http://kristenthyng.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > > > > -- > http://katyhuff.github.com > -- Kristen M. Thyng Postdoctoral Research Associate Department of Oceanography Texas A&M University http://kristenthyng.com From sheila at codersquid.com Tue Apr 22 11:40:06 2014 From: sheila at codersquid.com (sheila miguez) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:40:06 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Stupid internal error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi everyone! What I'm doing right now is adding a section to the admin to allow us to remove these negative votes. The django admin does not allow this. I think that is a valid choice, but for the sake of expediency, I'm going to allow super users to do it. For the problem in general, I've been setting up and blowing away the site in staging to see what intervention might resolve everything -- I set up the mysql db from scratch, added users and proposals and reviews to get things in to a similar state as in prod, and then did a few things: * changed the encoding from latin1 to utf8 on the affected columns (used two different methods) * applied the suggested fix from Taavi Results inconclusive. I could add the votes, but then I could not update votes once a negative vote had been made. I'll continue to work on this. Meanwhile, I'll see about deleting the two negative votes (I see only two). thanks for being patient! sorry about this. On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Aron Ahmadia wrote: > Thanks for this everybody and sorry for the trouble. > > Looking at the note, it appears that voting with a "-1" or "-0" caused > the problem for both Kristen and I. > > I guess the only way to fix this is for somebody to go out and undo our > votes? > > Working with the Google Forms is a little frustrating because the > Google review form is set up for assessing scientific merit (the > questions are about scientific process, novelty), and not about > interest/applicability of the talk. I hope it's clear how I ranked > the proposals despite this. > > Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. > > Best, > Aron > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Anthony Scopatz > wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > Paul Ivanov and I put in a couple of PRs (#109 and #110) yesterday to fix > > some of these issues that the PC was experiencing. I highly doubt that > > either of these would have caused this issue, but I do want to claim > > responsibility in case that they did. > > > > Be Well > > Anthony > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:27 AM, sheila miguez > > wrote: > >> > >> I'll take a look at both of these. > >> On Apr 22, 2014 8:07 AM, "Aron Ahmadia" wrote: > >> > >> > I think I've got the same problem, but I can't see > >> > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/talks-posters/ > >> > > >> > I'm pretty sure all of my reviews are in, so I don't think this is > >> > urgent for me. > >> > > >> > A > >> > > >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Kristen Thyng > wrote: > >> > > Hi guys, > >> > > > >> > > So I tried voting with a -0 or -1 on a tutorial and now I can't get > >> > > back > >> > > into the tutorial reviews in my dashboard. I thought it would just > >> > > refuse > >> > > to work, but it looks like it recorded the vote and now I cannot > >> > > return > >> > to > >> > > the tutorials review site: > >> > > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/tutorials/ > >> > > > >> > > So.... can someone reset that or something? Maybe deleting that > review > >> > > would fix it: submission 20 for tutorials. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Kristen > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Kristen M. Thyng > >> > > Postdoctoral Research Associate > >> > > Department of Oceanography > >> > > Texas A&M University > >> > > http://kristenthyng.com > >> > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > >> > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >> > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list > >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Scipy-organizers mailing list > >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > > > > -- sheila at codersquid.com From sheila at codersquid.com Tue Apr 22 11:41:01 2014 From: sheila at codersquid.com (sheila miguez) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:41:01 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Stupid internal error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I bet it is some weird template thing. Someone can race me to seeing if it is a template thing while I get the admin change in. On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Kristen Thyng wrote: > Yes, and I also just tried a different browser. Same problem, > unfortunately. > > Kristen > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Katy Huff wrote: > > > Have you tried logging out and back in? > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Kristen Thyng wrote: > > > >> Yeah, the -0 and -1 thing has been an ongoing problem, but when I had > >> tried > >> it before it didn't block me out of the reviewing system altogether, > which > >> it has done now. > >> > >> Kristen > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Aron Ahmadia > wrote: > >> > >> > Thanks for this everybody and sorry for the trouble. > >> > > >> > Looking at the note, it appears that voting with a "-1" or "-0" caused > >> > the problem for both Kristen and I. > >> > > >> > I guess the only way to fix this is for somebody to go out and undo > our > >> > votes? > >> > > >> > Working with the Google Forms is a little frustrating because the > >> > Google review form is set up for assessing scientific merit (the > >> > questions are about scientific process, novelty), and not about > >> > interest/applicability of the talk. I hope it's clear how I ranked > >> > the proposals despite this. > >> > > >> > Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. > >> > > >> > Best, > >> > Aron > >> > > >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Anthony Scopatz > >> > wrote: > >> > > Hello All, > >> > > > >> > > Paul Ivanov and I put in a couple of PRs (#109 and #110) yesterday > to > >> fix > >> > > some of these issues that the PC was experiencing. I highly doubt > >> that > >> > > either of these would have caused this issue, but I do want to claim > >> > > responsibility in case that they did. > >> > > > >> > > Be Well > >> > > Anthony > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:27 AM, sheila miguez < > sheila at codersquid.com > >> > > >> > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> I'll take a look at both of these. > >> > >> On Apr 22, 2014 8:07 AM, "Aron Ahmadia" wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > I think I've got the same problem, but I can't see > >> > >> > > >> https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/talks-posters/ > >> > >> > > >> > >> > I'm pretty sure all of my reviews are in, so I don't think this > is > >> > >> > urgent for me. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > A > >> > >> > > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Kristen Thyng > > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > > Hi guys, > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > So I tried voting with a -0 or -1 on a tutorial and now I can't > >> get > >> > >> > > back > >> > >> > > into the tutorial reviews in my dashboard. I thought it would > >> just > >> > >> > > refuse > >> > >> > > to work, but it looks like it recorded the vote and now I > cannot > >> > >> > > return > >> > >> > to > >> > >> > > the tutorials review site: > >> > >> > > > >> https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/tutorials/ > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > So.... can someone reset that or something? Maybe deleting that > >> > review > >> > >> > > would fix it: submission 20 for tutorials. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Thanks, > >> > >> > > Kristen > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > -- > >> > >> > > Kristen M. Thyng > >> > >> > > Postdoctoral Research Associate > >> > >> > > Department of Oceanography > >> > >> > > Texas A&M University > >> > >> > > http://kristenthyng.com > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > >> > >> > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > >> > >> > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >> > >> > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list > >> > >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >> > >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > >> > >> > > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> > >> Scipy-organizers mailing list > >> > >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >> > >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > >> > > > >> > > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list > >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Kristen M. Thyng > >> Postdoctoral Research Associate > >> Department of Oceanography > >> Texas A&M University > >> http://kristenthyng.com > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Scipy-organizers mailing list > >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > http://katyhuff.github.com > > > > > > -- > Kristen M. Thyng > Postdoctoral Research Associate > Department of Oceanography > Texas A&M University > http://kristenthyng.com > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > -- sheila at codersquid.com From scopatz at gmail.com Tue Apr 22 11:40:44 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:40:44 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Stupid internal error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sheila, you are my hero. Be Well Anthony On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:40 AM, sheila miguez wrote: > Hi everyone! > > What I'm doing right now is adding a section to the admin to allow us to > remove these negative votes. The django admin does not allow this. I think > that is a valid choice, but for the sake of expediency, I'm going to allow > super users to do it. > > For the problem in general, I've been setting up and blowing away the site > in staging to see what intervention might resolve everything -- I set up > the mysql db from scratch, added users and proposals and reviews to get > things in to a similar state as in prod, and then did a few things: > > * changed the encoding from latin1 to utf8 on the affected columns (used > two different methods) > * applied the suggested fix from Taavi > > Results inconclusive. I could add the votes, but then I could not update > votes once a negative vote had been made. > > I'll continue to work on this. > > Meanwhile, I'll see about deleting the two negative votes (I see only two). > > thanks for being patient! sorry about this. > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Aron Ahmadia wrote: > >> Thanks for this everybody and sorry for the trouble. >> >> Looking at the note, it appears that voting with a "-1" or "-0" caused >> the problem for both Kristen and I. >> >> I guess the only way to fix this is for somebody to go out and undo our >> votes? >> >> Working with the Google Forms is a little frustrating because the >> Google review form is set up for assessing scientific merit (the >> questions are about scientific process, novelty), and not about >> interest/applicability of the talk. I hope it's clear how I ranked >> the proposals despite this. >> >> Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. >> >> Best, >> Aron >> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Anthony Scopatz >> wrote: >> > Hello All, >> > >> > Paul Ivanov and I put in a couple of PRs (#109 and #110) yesterday to >> fix >> > some of these issues that the PC was experiencing. I highly doubt that >> > either of these would have caused this issue, but I do want to claim >> > responsibility in case that they did. >> > >> > Be Well >> > Anthony >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:27 AM, sheila miguez >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> I'll take a look at both of these. >> >> On Apr 22, 2014 8:07 AM, "Aron Ahmadia" wrote: >> >> >> >> > I think I've got the same problem, but I can't see >> >> > >> https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/talks-posters/ >> >> > >> >> > I'm pretty sure all of my reviews are in, so I don't think this is >> >> > urgent for me. >> >> > >> >> > A >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Kristen Thyng >> wrote: >> >> > > Hi guys, >> >> > > >> >> > > So I tried voting with a -0 or -1 on a tutorial and now I can't get >> >> > > back >> >> > > into the tutorial reviews in my dashboard. I thought it would just >> >> > > refuse >> >> > > to work, but it looks like it recorded the vote and now I cannot >> >> > > return >> >> > to >> >> > > the tutorials review site: >> >> > > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/tutorials/ >> >> > > >> >> > > So.... can someone reset that or something? Maybe deleting that >> review >> >> > > would fix it: submission 20 for tutorials. >> >> > > >> >> > > Thanks, >> >> > > Kristen >> >> > > >> >> > > -- >> >> > > Kristen M. Thyng >> >> > > Postdoctoral Research Associate >> >> > > Department of Oceanography >> >> > > Texas A&M University >> >> > > http://kristenthyng.com >> >> > > _______________________________________________ >> >> > > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> >> > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> >> > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > sheila at codersquid.com > From katyhuff at gmail.com Tue Apr 22 11:57:44 2014 From: katyhuff at gmail.com (Katy Huff) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:57:44 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Stupid internal error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Seriously. Three cheers for sheila. On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > Sheila, you are my hero. > > Be Well > Anthony > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:40 AM, sheila miguez >wrote: > > > Hi everyone! > > > > What I'm doing right now is adding a section to the admin to allow us to > > remove these negative votes. The django admin does not allow this. I > think > > that is a valid choice, but for the sake of expediency, I'm going to > allow > > super users to do it. > > > > For the problem in general, I've been setting up and blowing away the > site > > in staging to see what intervention might resolve everything -- I set up > > the mysql db from scratch, added users and proposals and reviews to get > > things in to a similar state as in prod, and then did a few things: > > > > * changed the encoding from latin1 to utf8 on the affected columns (used > > two different methods) > > * applied the suggested fix from Taavi > > > > Results inconclusive. I could add the votes, but then I could not update > > votes once a negative vote had been made. > > > > I'll continue to work on this. > > > > Meanwhile, I'll see about deleting the two negative votes (I see only > two). > > > > thanks for being patient! sorry about this. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Aron Ahmadia wrote: > > > >> Thanks for this everybody and sorry for the trouble. > >> > >> Looking at the note, it appears that voting with a "-1" or "-0" caused > >> the problem for both Kristen and I. > >> > >> I guess the only way to fix this is for somebody to go out and undo our > >> votes? > >> > >> Working with the Google Forms is a little frustrating because the > >> Google review form is set up for assessing scientific merit (the > >> questions are about scientific process, novelty), and not about > >> interest/applicability of the talk. I hope it's clear how I ranked > >> the proposals despite this. > >> > >> Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. > >> > >> Best, > >> Aron > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Anthony Scopatz > >> wrote: > >> > Hello All, > >> > > >> > Paul Ivanov and I put in a couple of PRs (#109 and #110) yesterday to > >> fix > >> > some of these issues that the PC was experiencing. I highly doubt > that > >> > either of these would have caused this issue, but I do want to claim > >> > responsibility in case that they did. > >> > > >> > Be Well > >> > Anthony > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:27 AM, sheila miguez > > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I'll take a look at both of these. > >> >> On Apr 22, 2014 8:07 AM, "Aron Ahmadia" wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > I think I've got the same problem, but I can't see > >> >> > > >> https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/talks-posters/ > >> >> > > >> >> > I'm pretty sure all of my reviews are in, so I don't think this is > >> >> > urgent for me. > >> >> > > >> >> > A > >> >> > > >> >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Kristen Thyng > >> wrote: > >> >> > > Hi guys, > >> >> > > > >> >> > > So I tried voting with a -0 or -1 on a tutorial and now I can't > get > >> >> > > back > >> >> > > into the tutorial reviews in my dashboard. I thought it would > just > >> >> > > refuse > >> >> > > to work, but it looks like it recorded the vote and now I cannot > >> >> > > return > >> >> > to > >> >> > > the tutorials review site: > >> >> > > > https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/tutorials/ > >> >> > > > >> >> > > So.... can someone reset that or something? Maybe deleting that > >> review > >> >> > > would fix it: submission 20 for tutorials. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Thanks, > >> >> > > Kristen > >> >> > > > >> >> > > -- > >> >> > > Kristen M. Thyng > >> >> > > Postdoctoral Research Associate > >> >> > > Department of Oceanography > >> >> > > Texas A&M University > >> >> > > http://kristenthyng.com > >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > >> >> > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > >> >> > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >> >> > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list > >> >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >> >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > >> >> > > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> Scipy-organizers mailing list > >> >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > >> >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > sheila at codersquid.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > -- http://katyhuff.github.com From sheila at codersquid.com Tue Apr 22 12:48:03 2014 From: sheila at codersquid.com (sheila miguez) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:48:03 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Stupid internal error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I need to get back to work a bit, and then I'll dig in to this some more. For a recap: * I deployed a change to be able to remove the mangled votes (sent report to Katy and Kristen with names, users, comments so that we didn't lose anything). * Got Aron to let me know if he could view the dashboard again, he could not. Got a nice stacktrace. Told the rest of the tech chairs about it. Will hop on this again when I can. for the curious: http://dpaste.com/hold/1791520/ SiteTreeError: Sitetree needs "django.core.context_processors.request" to be in TEMPLATE_CONTEXT_PROCESSORS in your settings file. If it is, check that your view pushes request data into the template. On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:41 AM, sheila miguez wrote: > I bet it is some weird template thing. Someone can race me to seeing if it > is a template thing while I get the admin change in. > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Kristen Thyng wrote: > >> Yes, and I also just tried a different browser. Same problem, >> unfortunately. >> >> Kristen >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Katy Huff wrote: >> >> > Have you tried logging out and back in? >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Kristen Thyng >> wrote: >> > >> >> Yeah, the -0 and -1 thing has been an ongoing problem, but when I had >> >> tried >> >> it before it didn't block me out of the reviewing system altogether, >> which >> >> it has done now. >> >> >> >> Kristen >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Aron Ahmadia >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Thanks for this everybody and sorry for the trouble. >> >> > >> >> > Looking at the note, it appears that voting with a "-1" or "-0" >> caused >> >> > the problem for both Kristen and I. >> >> > >> >> > I guess the only way to fix this is for somebody to go out and undo >> our >> >> > votes? >> >> > >> >> > Working with the Google Forms is a little frustrating because the >> >> > Google review form is set up for assessing scientific merit (the >> >> > questions are about scientific process, novelty), and not about >> >> > interest/applicability of the talk. I hope it's clear how I ranked >> >> > the proposals despite this. >> >> > >> >> > Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. >> >> > >> >> > Best, >> >> > Aron >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Anthony Scopatz > > >> >> > wrote: >> >> > > Hello All, >> >> > > >> >> > > Paul Ivanov and I put in a couple of PRs (#109 and #110) yesterday >> to >> >> fix >> >> > > some of these issues that the PC was experiencing. I highly doubt >> >> that >> >> > > either of these would have caused this issue, but I do want to >> claim >> >> > > responsibility in case that they did. >> >> > > >> >> > > Be Well >> >> > > Anthony >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:27 AM, sheila miguez < >> sheila at codersquid.com >> >> > >> >> > > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> > >> I'll take a look at both of these. >> >> > >> On Apr 22, 2014 8:07 AM, "Aron Ahmadia" wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > I think I've got the same problem, but I can't see >> >> > >> > >> >> https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/talks-posters/ >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > I'm pretty sure all of my reviews are in, so I don't think this >> is >> >> > >> > urgent for me. >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > A >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Kristen Thyng < >> kthyng at gmail.com> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> > > Hi guys, >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > So I tried voting with a -0 or -1 on a tutorial and now I >> can't >> >> get >> >> > >> > > back >> >> > >> > > into the tutorial reviews in my dashboard. I thought it would >> >> just >> >> > >> > > refuse >> >> > >> > > to work, but it looks like it recorded the vote and now I >> cannot >> >> > >> > > return >> >> > >> > to >> >> > >> > > the tutorials review site: >> >> > >> > > >> >> https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/tutorials/ >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > So.... can someone reset that or something? Maybe deleting >> that >> >> > review >> >> > >> > > would fix it: submission 20 for tutorials. >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > Thanks, >> >> > >> > > Kristen >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > -- >> >> > >> > > Kristen M. Thyng >> >> > >> > > Postdoctoral Research Associate >> >> > >> > > Department of Oceanography >> >> > >> > > Texas A&M University >> >> > >> > > http://kristenthyng.com >> >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> >> > >> > > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> >> > >> > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> >> > >> > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> >> > >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> >> > >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> >> > >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> >> > >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> >> > >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >> >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Kristen M. Thyng >> >> Postdoctoral Research Associate >> >> Department of Oceanography >> >> Texas A&M University >> >> http://kristenthyng.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > http://katyhuff.github.com >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Kristen M. Thyng >> Postdoctoral Research Associate >> Department of Oceanography >> Texas A&M University >> http://kristenthyng.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > > > > -- > sheila at codersquid.com > -- sheila at codersquid.com From scopatz at gmail.com Tue Apr 22 13:08:02 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:08:02 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] "Why I Sci-Py" blog post In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It is done. On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Kyle Mandli wrote: > Here's a rough shot at a call and example (which is probably too generic). > We could mention the specific length we are shooting for to ease the > burden (but not too short to make people stress out about it). I also > provided an example below but it's probably too generic. > > # Why I SciPy > > SciPy is many things to many people. It can be an opportunity to learn > about the newest technologies or maybe old ones that you should have been > using. It is a chance to learn about new and exciting features of the > packages you use the most. SciPy is also a chance to reconnect to old > friends and meet new ones. For many, it is also an opportunity to develop > your skills as a scientific software developer and become a better > scientist overall. > > So what makes you SciPy? We are looking for a short paragraph explaining > the reasons why you SciPy. Including specific instances or reasons why the > conference has had a positive impact on your science are the best! > > `I SciPy because it is a place where I can learn about new python packages > I can leverage in my science and old packages I should have been using. I > go to learn about new and exciting features of the packages I use the most. > It is also about developing my own skills as a scientific software > developer, learning about best practices and new ways to make my own work > more effective. I of course go to see old friends and make new ones. Most > of all, I SciPy to become a better scientist.` > > > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > >> Definitely! I think that this is a great idea. Why don't you put >> together a "Call for Why I SciPy" paragraph, Matt & I will take an editing >> stab at it and then we can broadcast a call for them. >> >> Be Well >> Anthony >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Kyle Mandli wrote: >> >>> I could help with this, I think being clear we just want something short >>> (a paragraph maybe) containing past experiences, maybe emphasizing specific >>> instances. Writing some examples (and using those to get going) would go a >>> long way to convincing others to spend the effort (and also have an >>> example). >>> >>> Kyle >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Kyle, >>>> >>>> I think that this a great idea. One thing that we could do is that in >>>> the weekly newsletters we could a "Why I SciPy" section at the end that >>>> contains links to the latest posts. Would you be willing to help solicit >>>> posts? >>>> >>>> Be Well >>>> Anthony >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Brett Murphy wrote: >>>> >>>>> Would a list of "talking points" help us all to pull these together? It >>>>> would of course have to be a superset otherwise we risk re-writing the >>>>> same >>>>> thing over and over. >>>>> >>>>> Are there obvious online newsletters or sites that might be interested >>>>> in a >>>>> slightly more substantial post on the conference built around the "Why >>>>> I >>>>> SciPy" theme? >>>>> >>>>> -- Brett >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Brett Murphy >>>>> Director, Customer Solutions >>>>> Enthought, Inc. >>>>> bmurphy at enthought.com >>>>> 512-536-1057 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Kyle Mandli >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Hey everyone, >>>>> > >>>>> > At some point, I think someone (Andy) mentioned that we should think >>>>> about >>>>> > writing a "Why I Sci-Py" post. I was thinking about this the other >>>>> day and >>>>> > was wondering if anyone had more thoughts on this such as where we >>>>> post >>>>> > these (e.g. personal blogs, posts on G+, twitter) and what content >>>>> would be >>>>> > appropriate. >>>>> > >>>>> > Kyle >>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >>>>> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >>>>> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Scipy-organizers mailing list >>>>> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >>>>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > From b89603112 at gmail.com Tue Apr 22 16:46:34 2014 From: b89603112 at gmail.com (hunter chung) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:46:34 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Scipy conference 2014 Message-ID: Hi, Receipt No: 0008-1810-6205-5413 I just used my company's credit card to register. The system used the name on the card as registration name, however it should be me, Tzu-Hung Chung. Can you change that for me? Best, -- *Hunter Tzu-Hung Chung* From scopatz at gmail.com Tue Apr 22 16:48:24 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:48:24 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Scipy conference 2014 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Hunter, We'll ensure that this is fixed as quickly as possible. Be Well Anthony On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:46 PM, hunter chung wrote: > Hi, > > Receipt No: 0008-1810-6205-5413 > I just used my company's credit card to register. The system used the name > on the card as registration name, however it should be me, Tzu-Hung Chung. > Can you change that for me? > > Best, > > -- > *Hunter Tzu-Hung Chung* > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From sheila at codersquid.com Tue Apr 22 22:06:48 2014 From: sheila at codersquid.com (sheila miguez) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 21:06:48 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Stupid internal error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi everyone! I deployed a change and if you've made a negative vote in the past, I'd like to know if you are able to view review dashboards again. I've tried it myself. Many apologies for the fuss. On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:48 AM, sheila miguez wrote: > I need to get back to work a bit, and then I'll dig in to this some more. > For a recap: > > * I deployed a change to be able to remove the mangled votes (sent report > to Katy and Kristen with names, users, comments so that we didn't lose > anything). > * Got Aron to let me know if he could view the dashboard again, he could > not. > > Got a nice stacktrace. Told the rest of the tech chairs about it. Will hop > on this again when I can. > > for the curious: > > http://dpaste.com/hold/1791520/ > > SiteTreeError: Sitetree needs "django.core.context_processors.request" to > be in TEMPLATE_CONTEXT_PROCESSORS in your settings file. If it is, check > that your view pushes request data into the template. > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:41 AM, sheila miguez wrote: > >> I bet it is some weird template thing. Someone can race me to seeing if >> it is a template thing while I get the admin change in. >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Kristen Thyng wrote: >> >>> Yes, and I also just tried a different browser. Same problem, >>> unfortunately. >>> >>> Kristen >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Katy Huff wrote: >>> >>> > Have you tried logging out and back in? >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Kristen Thyng >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Yeah, the -0 and -1 thing has been an ongoing problem, but when I had >>> >> tried >>> >> it before it didn't block me out of the reviewing system altogether, >>> which >>> >> it has done now. >>> >> >>> >> Kristen >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Aron Ahmadia >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > Thanks for this everybody and sorry for the trouble. >>> >> > >>> >> > Looking at the note, it appears that voting with a "-1" or "-0" >>> caused >>> >> > the problem for both Kristen and I. >>> >> > >>> >> > I guess the only way to fix this is for somebody to go out and undo >>> our >>> >> > votes? >>> >> > >>> >> > Working with the Google Forms is a little frustrating because the >>> >> > Google review form is set up for assessing scientific merit (the >>> >> > questions are about scientific process, novelty), and not about >>> >> > interest/applicability of the talk. I hope it's clear how I ranked >>> >> > the proposals despite this. >>> >> > >>> >> > Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. >>> >> > >>> >> > Best, >>> >> > Aron >>> >> > >>> >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Anthony Scopatz < >>> scopatz at gmail.com> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > > Hello All, >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Paul Ivanov and I put in a couple of PRs (#109 and #110) >>> yesterday to >>> >> fix >>> >> > > some of these issues that the PC was experiencing. I highly doubt >>> >> that >>> >> > > either of these would have caused this issue, but I do want to >>> claim >>> >> > > responsibility in case that they did. >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Be Well >>> >> > > Anthony >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:27 AM, sheila miguez < >>> sheila at codersquid.com >>> >> > >>> >> > > wrote: >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> I'll take a look at both of these. >>> >> > >> On Apr 22, 2014 8:07 AM, "Aron Ahmadia" >>> wrote: >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> > I think I've got the same problem, but I can't see >>> >> > >> > >>> >> https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/talks-posters/ >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > I'm pretty sure all of my reviews are in, so I don't think >>> this is >>> >> > >> > urgent for me. >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > A >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Kristen Thyng < >>> kthyng at gmail.com> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > >> > > Hi guys, >>> >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > > So I tried voting with a -0 or -1 on a tutorial and now I >>> can't >>> >> get >>> >> > >> > > back >>> >> > >> > > into the tutorial reviews in my dashboard. I thought it would >>> >> just >>> >> > >> > > refuse >>> >> > >> > > to work, but it looks like it recorded the vote and now I >>> cannot >>> >> > >> > > return >>> >> > >> > to >>> >> > >> > > the tutorials review site: >>> >> > >> > > >>> >> https://conference.scipy.org/scipy2014/reviews/section/tutorials/ >>> >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > > So.... can someone reset that or something? Maybe deleting >>> that >>> >> > review >>> >> > >> > > would fix it: submission 20 for tutorials. >>> >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > > Thanks, >>> >> > >> > > Kristen >>> >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > > -- >>> >> > >> > > Kristen M. Thyng >>> >> > >> > > Postdoctoral Research Associate >>> >> > >> > > Department of Oceanography >>> >> > >> > > Texas A&M University >>> >> > >> > > http://kristenthyng.com >>> >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ >>> >> > >> > > Scipy-organizers mailing list >>> >> > >> > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >>> >> > >> > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >>> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >> > >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >>> >> > >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >>> >> > >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> > >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >>> >> > >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >>> >> > >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >> > Scipy-organizers mailing list >>> >> > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >>> >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Kristen M. Thyng >>> >> Postdoctoral Research Associate >>> >> Department of Oceanography >>> >> Texas A&M University >>> >> http://kristenthyng.com >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >>> >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >>> >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > http://katyhuff.github.com >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Kristen M. Thyng >>> Postdoctoral Research Associate >>> Department of Oceanography >>> Texas A&M University >>> http://kristenthyng.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Scipy-organizers mailing list >>> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> sheila at codersquid.com >> > > > > -- > sheila at codersquid.com > -- sheila at codersquid.com From kthyng at gmail.com Tue Apr 22 22:44:34 2014 From: kthyng at gmail.com (Kristen Thyng) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 21:44:34 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Stupid internal error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Awesome! Things looked fixed from what I can tell. I'll try again in the morning on my laptop but I anticipate it working out. Thanks a ton Sheila!! Kristen On Tuesday, April 22, 2014, sheila miguez wrote: > Hi everyone! > > I deployed a change and if you've made a negative vote in the past, I'd > like to know if you are able to view review dashboards again. I've tried it > myself. > > Many apologies for the fuss. > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:48 AM, sheila miguez wrote: > > I need to get back to work a bit, and then I'll dig in to this some more. > For a recap: > > * I deployed a change to be able to remove the mangled votes (sent report > to Katy and Kristen with names, users, comments so that we didn't lose > anything). > * Got Aron to let me know if he could view the dashboard again, he could > not. > > Got a nice stacktrace. Told the rest of the tech chairs about it. Will hop > on this again when I can. > > for the curious: > > http://dpaste.com/hold/1791520/ > > SiteTreeError: Sitetree needs "django.core.context_processors.request" to > be in TEMPLATE_CONTEXT_PROCESSORS in your settings file. If it is, check > that your view pushes request data into the template. > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:41 AM, sheila miguez wrote: > > I bet it is some weird template thing. Someone can race me to seeing if it > is a template thing while I get the admin change in. > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Kristen Thyng wrote: > > Yes, and I also just tried a different browser. Same problem, > unfortunately. > > Kristen > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Katy Huff wrote: > > > Have you tried logging out and back in? > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Kristen Thyng wrote: > > > >> Yeah, the -0 and -1 thing has been an ongoing problem, but when I had > >> tried > >> it before it didn't block me out of the reviewing system altogether, > which > >> it has done now. > >> > >> Kristen > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Aron Ahmadia > wrote: > >> > >> > Thanks for this everybody and sorry for the trouble. > >> > > >> > Looking at the note, it appears that voting with a "-1" or "-0" caused > >> > the problem for both Kristen and I. > >> > > >> > I guess the only way to fix this is for somebody to go out and undo > our > >> > votes? > >> > > >> > Working with the Google Forms is a little frustrating because the > >> > Google review form is set up for assessing scientific merit (the > >> > questions are about scientific process, novelty), and not about > >> > interest/applicability of the talk. I hope it's clear how I ranked > >> > the proposals despite this. > >> > > >> > Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. > >> > > >> > Best, > >> > Aron > >> > > >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Anthony Scopatz > >> > wrote: > >> > > Hello All, > >> > > > >> > > Paul Ivanov and I put in a couple of PRs (#109 and #110) yesterday > to > >> fix > >> > > some of these issues that the PC was experiencing. I highly doubt > >> that > >> > > either of these would have caused this issue, but I do want to claim > >> > > responsibility in case that they did. > >> > > > >> > > Be Well > >> > > Anthony > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:27 AM, sheila miguez < > > -- > sheila at codersquid.com > -- Kristen M. Thyng Postdoctoral Research Associate Department of Oceanography Texas A&M University http://kristenthyng.com From aron at ahmadia.net Wed Apr 23 09:18:01 2014 From: aron at ahmadia.net (Aron Ahmadia) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 09:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Stupid internal error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Everything's working for me again! Sheila, you rock! A On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Kristen Thyng wrote: > Awesome! Things looked fixed from what I can tell. I'll try again in the > morning on my laptop but I anticipate it working out. > > Thanks a ton Sheila!! > > Kristen > > On Tuesday, April 22, 2014, sheila miguez wrote: > > > Hi everyone! > > > > I deployed a change and if you've made a negative vote in the past, I'd > > like to know if you are able to view review dashboards again. I've tried > it > > myself. > > > > Many apologies for the fuss. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:48 AM, sheila miguez >wrote: > > > > I need to get back to work a bit, and then I'll dig in to this some more. > > For a recap: > > > > * I deployed a change to be able to remove the mangled votes (sent report > > to Katy and Kristen with names, users, comments so that we didn't lose > > anything). > > * Got Aron to let me know if he could view the dashboard again, he could > > not. > > > > Got a nice stacktrace. Told the rest of the tech chairs about it. Will > hop > > on this again when I can. > > > > for the curious: > > > > http://dpaste.com/hold/1791520/ > > > > SiteTreeError: Sitetree needs "django.core.context_processors.request" to > > be in TEMPLATE_CONTEXT_PROCESSORS in your settings file. If it is, check > > that your view pushes request data into the template. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:41 AM, sheila miguez >wrote: > > > > I bet it is some weird template thing. Someone can race me to seeing if > it > > is a template thing while I get the admin change in. > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Kristen Thyng > wrote: > > > > Yes, and I also just tried a different browser. Same problem, > > unfortunately. > > > > Kristen > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Katy Huff wrote: > > > > > Have you tried logging out and back in? > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Kristen Thyng > wrote: > > > > > >> Yeah, the -0 and -1 thing has been an ongoing problem, but when I had > > >> tried > > >> it before it didn't block me out of the reviewing system altogether, > > which > > >> it has done now. > > >> > > >> Kristen > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Aron Ahmadia > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > Thanks for this everybody and sorry for the trouble. > > >> > > > >> > Looking at the note, it appears that voting with a "-1" or "-0" > caused > > >> > the problem for both Kristen and I. > > >> > > > >> > I guess the only way to fix this is for somebody to go out and undo > > our > > >> > votes? > > >> > > > >> > Working with the Google Forms is a little frustrating because the > > >> > Google review form is set up for assessing scientific merit (the > > >> > questions are about scientific process, novelty), and not about > > >> > interest/applicability of the talk. I hope it's clear how I ranked > > >> > the proposals despite this. > > >> > > > >> > Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. > > >> > > > >> > Best, > > >> > Aron > > >> > > > >> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Anthony Scopatz < > scopatz at gmail.com> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > Hello All, > > >> > > > > >> > > Paul Ivanov and I put in a couple of PRs (#109 and #110) yesterday > > to > > >> fix > > >> > > some of these issues that the PC was experiencing. I highly doubt > > >> that > > >> > > either of these would have caused this issue, but I do want to > claim > > >> > > responsibility in case that they did. > > >> > > > > >> > > Be Well > > >> > > Anthony > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:27 AM, sheila miguez < > > > > -- > > sheila at codersquid.com ');> > > > > > -- > Kristen M. Thyng > Postdoctoral Research Associate > Department of Oceanography > Texas A&M University > http://kristenthyng.com > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From contact at startupby.com Thu Apr 24 05:46:44 2014 From: contact at startupby.com (contact at startupby.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 04:46:44 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Thank you for your great startup! Message-ID: Hi. To bring a startup to life is not easy. We know for a fact that many great startups fail due to the lack of knowledge of how to reach customers. I to have previous experience from my past business ventures in this exact area. Let me ask you this; Have you thought about and found the answer these 4 crucial questions: How can I grow my company How can I get viral attention How can I reach my customer for a minimal budget What is the best way to reach out The answer is StartupBY.com here you will expose your startup to the right public and get quick response for a fraction of what a normal marketing or add campaign would cost you. It's really as simple as filling out a mail form Don't waste more time or money get it done NOW before our price update as we soon will increase the price. Click here and fill out the super simple form. It does not take more than 40 seconds normally to get it all done. http://www.startupby.com/submit-start-get-published-vip-customer/ Startupby.com was created by entrepreneurs who experienced what most startups experience. That it's in fact not the actual startup and the many great ideas brought to life out there that is the big struggle. The struggle is in fact how to get people to know about the ideas. We have from past business ventures tried most of the standard ways of getting the business out there. Very few but some has worked! But none of them has worked as needed based on a startups slim budget and need for high exposure We have tested things like: Direct marketing Email news letter SEO SEM Banner ads PR Magazine ads And many more... But we realized ONE thing that was of great importance. That for the first period during your startup you need to reach the people that are ready to test your product and give feedback rather than reach your lifelong customer. The people that do accept if there is a bug or a spelling mistake. Things that your future end customers might not accept. These type of customers is even more interesting for a startup as they will be able to give you so much more than a basic end user customer They will bring you insight Feedback Actively look for and report bugs And if they like your product they will get all their friends to know about it Now that is something that money can't buy! And exactly that is what we have built here. A platform for startups followed by investors, business angels, editors, bloggers, startups, entrepreneurs, and a growing crowd of people that want to be the first who always knows about the latest! And naturally all these people will get what they are looking for at StartupBY.com, built by us with the worlds startups for everyone to follow! And that's exactly where we got our name from. Startup made by you. Which as you publish your startup will beStartupBY.com/YourStartupName Don't ad this on your todo list. ACT Now and fill out the simple form: http://www.startupby.com/submit-start-get-published-vip-customer/ Best regards. Med v?nliga h?lsningar Karl Lillrud From jens.nielsen at ucl.ac.uk Thu Apr 24 07:36:34 2014 From: jens.nielsen at ucl.ac.uk (Nielsen, Jens) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:36:34 +0000 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Confirmation of registration for scipy 2014 Message-ID: Hi I registered and payed for scipy2014 on 15. April but never received any confirmation mail apart from the receipt from Paypal (Receipt No: 0762-7398-4455-4908) neither does my login on the scipy conference page reflect this. Is that normal? Best regards Jens Jens Hedegaard Nielsen, Research Software Developer Research IT Services University College London Tel: 020 3549 5217 (Int 65217) From alainapercival at gmail.com Thu Apr 24 13:29:22 2014 From: alainapercival at gmail.com (alaina percival) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:29:22 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Women Who Code at SciPy Message-ID: Hello! Is it possible to offer a discount code for SciPy to the Women Who Code community and/or a couple free tickets that we could give away? Best Alaina -- Help Women Who Code connect 5 million women in tech by 2019 http://www.wwcode.org/donations/new Alaina CEO, Women Who Code Inc 415-370-1085 *Facebook * | Twitte r Women Who Code is a global organization dedicated to inspiring women to pursue and excel in technology careers. We tripled in 2013 and now have nearly 10,000 members in 10 countries and are launching in a new city every week. We are known for our free weekly technical study groups and larger monthly events including tech talks, hack nights, and career trainings. More than 100 top tech companies including Square, KPCB, Kainos, Heroku, Yelp, and many more have sponsored events for the popular and growing organization. From sarin at eventedge.co Thu Apr 24 15:21:25 2014 From: sarin at eventedge.co (Sarin Shah) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:21:25 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] EventEdge Mobile Apps Message-ID: I?m writing to you in hopes of talking to the appropriate person who handles events and meetings. If it makes sense to talk, how does your calendar look? EventEdge lets you build an app that fits your event. Our apps let your attendees get real time information, network more effectively, and stay connected to your event. For SciPy, this means more interaction, better communication, and less headache, all while saving on event costs. We build our apps custom to match your company and can take care of all the setup and data entry for you. Some clients include Yahoo, The Principal, Radio Shack, and the Milken Institute. If it makes sense to talk how does your calendar look (we are local to Austin)? If not, who is the appropriate person to speak with? Thanks, Sarin Shah ---- Sarin Shah 800-929-8248 x10 sarin at eventedge.co www.eventedge.co From andy.terrel at gmail.com Thu Apr 24 16:20:52 2014 From: andy.terrel at gmail.com (Andy Ray Terrel) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:20:52 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] EventEdge Mobile Apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'll ping Sarin off list. -- Andy On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Sarin Shah wrote: > I?m writing to you in hopes of talking to the appropriate person who > handles events and meetings. If it makes sense to talk, how does your > calendar look? > > > EventEdge lets you build an app that fits your event. Our apps let your > attendees get real time information, network more effectively, and stay > connected to your event. For SciPy, this means more interaction, better > communication, and less headache, all while saving on event costs. We build > our apps custom to match your company and can take care of all the setup > and data entry for you. Some clients include Yahoo, The Principal, Radio > Shack, and the Milken Institute. > > > If it makes sense to talk how does your calendar look (we are local to > Austin)? If not, who is the appropriate person to speak with? > > Thanks, > > Sarin Shah > > > ---- > Sarin Shah > 800-929-8248 x10 > sarin at eventedge.co > www.eventedge.co > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers From andy.terrel at gmail.com Thu Apr 24 16:25:21 2014 From: andy.terrel at gmail.com (Andy Ray Terrel) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:25:21 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Women Who Code at SciPy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Pinged Alaina off list. On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:29 PM, alaina percival wrote: > Hello! > > Is it possible to offer a discount code for SciPy to the Women Who Code > community and/or a couple free tickets that we could give away? > > Best > Alaina > > -- > Help Women Who Code connect 5 million women in tech by 2019 > http://www.wwcode.org/donations/new > > Alaina > > CEO, Women Who Code Inc > 415-370-1085 > *Facebook * | > Twitte > r > > Women Who Code is a global organization dedicated to inspiring women to > pursue and excel in technology careers. We tripled in 2013 and now have > nearly 10,000 members in 10 countries and are launching in a new city every > week. We are known for our free weekly technical study groups and larger > monthly events including tech talks, hack nights, and career trainings. > More than 100 top tech companies including Square, KPCB, Kainos, Heroku, > Yelp, and many more have sponsored events for the popular and growing > organization. > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers From scopatz at gmail.com Thu Apr 24 16:27:53 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:27:53 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Women Who Code at SciPy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Andy On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Andy Ray Terrel wrote: > Pinged Alaina off list. > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:29 PM, alaina percival > wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Is it possible to offer a discount code for SciPy to the Women Who Code > > community and/or a couple free tickets that we could give away? > > > > Best > > Alaina > > > > -- > > Help Women Who Code connect 5 million women in tech by 2019 > > http://www.wwcode.org/donations/new > > > > Alaina > > > > CEO, Women Who Code Inc > > 415-370-1085 > > *Facebook * | > > Twitte > > r > > > > Women Who Code is a global organization dedicated to inspiring women to > > pursue and excel in technology careers. We tripled in 2013 and now have > > nearly 10,000 members in 10 countries and are launching in a new city > every > > week. We are known for our free weekly technical study groups and larger > > monthly events including tech talks, hack nights, and career trainings. > > More than 100 top tech companies including Square, KPCB, Kainos, Heroku, > > Yelp, and many more have sponsored events for the popular and growing > > organization. > > _______________________________________________ > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From scipy-organizers at une.net.co Thu Apr 24 19:37:41 2014 From: scipy-organizers at une.net.co (USATODAY.com) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:37:41 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] BREAKING: New FDA approved product! Message-ID: <23ced162-d872-6e40-4e31-32623042a991@scipy.org.local> Having trouble viewing this email? | View it in your browser http://scipy-organizers.com-gg61.net/?qs=2221C0C5C6081433B007360E2C2 http://scipy-organizers.com-gg61.net/?qs=C69B74799C84B6373FCF145BC5 Obesity does too many terrible things. It ruins lives, cripples and kills men and women. People weighing 120+ kilograms seldom live longer than 55 years, the majority of them develop type two diabetes, high blood pressure, heart diseases and end up with a lethal stroke or broken bones that never heal. You should not become one of obesity victims! You have to fight and to win! Right diet and exercise are vital but now you have approved by FDA a safe and efficient way of losing extra kilograms without additional toil. Get back to normal within weeks! FOR MORE ON THIS STORY, GO TO: USATODAY.COM http://scipy-organizers.com-gg61.net/?qs=3446DDE2E1C2A8C10CE92A52A9 You are currently subscribed to this newsletter with the address: scipy-organizers at scipy.org # . To UNSUBSCRIBE please click here http://scipy-organizers.com-gg61.net/?qs=F327CDB8913D5C26085CC2479FC10&unsubscribe=scipy-organizers at scipy.org . Manage Subscriptions http://scipy-organizers.com-gg61.net/?qs=619EC63421CAD0A9A58D | Help http://scipy-organizers.com-gg61.net/?qs=A1E66CC0AB6515454FCF | Advertise http://scipy-organizers.com-gg61.net/?qs=72011765211CDDF2AA09EF91A | Home Delivery http://scipy-organizers.com-gg61.net/?qs=74F6A85C93A615993B2436E750BC |Privacy Policy - Your California Privacy Rights http://scipy-organizers.com-gg61.net/?qs=A39922CD99D37048E5B5A4C ? 2014 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc. 7950 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, VA 22108 http://scipy-organizers.com-gg61.net/?qs=69677FDBD97ADBC73488EEA7413 From andy.terrel at gmail.com Fri Apr 25 10:30:19 2014 From: andy.terrel at gmail.com (Andy Ray Terrel) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 09:30:19 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Conf webIte down? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yes the dns records are not correct. Enthought's sys admins were managing that. I've sent email to both Chip and Ognen. On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Brett Murphy wrote: > I can't get there... > > -- > > Brett Murphy > Director, Customer Solutions > Enthought, Inc. > bmurphy at enthought.com > 512-536-1057 > > From andy.terrel at gmail.com Fri Apr 25 22:56:46 2014 From: andy.terrel at gmail.com (Andy Ray Terrel) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 21:56:46 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Conf webIte down? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello all, To give you an update on this night of choosing our fabulous talk lineup, apparently DNS is completely Borked on the scipy.org site. (We've even made reddit.) For all those wishing to actually get to the server. I recommend setting your /etc/hosts file to point conference.scipy.org to 162.242.221.143 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hosts_(file) http://community.linuxmint.com/tutorial/view/159 http://osxdaily.com/2012/08/07/edit-hosts-file-mac-os-x/ -- Andy On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Andy Ray Terrel wrote: > Appears to be up again. Still working on a root cause. > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Andy Ray Terrel wrote: >> Yes the dns records are not correct. Enthought's sys admins were >> managing that. I've sent email to both Chip and Ognen. >> >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Brett Murphy wrote: >>> I can't get there... >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Brett Murphy >>> Director, Customer Solutions >>> Enthought, Inc. >>> bmurphy at enthought.com >>> 512-536-1057 >>> >>> From bmurphy at enthought.com Fri Apr 25 10:29:02 2014 From: bmurphy at enthought.com (Brett Murphy) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 09:29:02 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Conf webIte down? Message-ID: I can't get there... -- Brett Murphy Director, Customer Solutions Enthought, Inc. bmurphy at enthought.com 512-536-1057 From katyhuff at gmail.com Fri Apr 25 11:15:36 2014 From: katyhuff at gmail.com (Katy Huff) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 08:15:36 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] The site is down? Message-ID: Hi folks. It looks like the site is down this morning. -- http://katyhuff.github.com From andy.terrel at gmail.com Fri Apr 25 12:31:30 2014 From: andy.terrel at gmail.com (Andy Ray Terrel) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:31:30 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Conf webIte down? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Appears to be up again. Still working on a root cause. On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Andy Ray Terrel wrote: > Yes the dns records are not correct. Enthought's sys admins were > managing that. I've sent email to both Chip and Ognen. > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Brett Murphy wrote: >> I can't get there... >> >> -- >> >> Brett Murphy >> Director, Customer Solutions >> Enthought, Inc. >> bmurphy at enthought.com >> 512-536-1057 >> >> From jakevdp at cs.washington.edu Sat Apr 26 09:11:52 2014 From: jakevdp at cs.washington.edu (Jacob Vanderplas) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 06:11:52 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Submission emails? Message-ID: Hello, Kristen and I want to send out emails notifying proposals our committee has accepted. There doesn't seem to be an obvious way to access the email address of those who have submitted... does anyone know how I can access that information? Thanks, Jake Jake VanderPlas Director of Research ? Physical Sciences eScience Institute, University of Washington http://www.vanderplas.com From sigmamonster at gmail.com Sat Apr 26 09:16:45 2014 From: sigmamonster at gmail.com (Douglas Karabasz) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 08:16:45 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Early Registration / Tutorials Message-ID: I would like to sign up for early registration. However, since tutorials are not set in stone yet can I get a refund if I it does not meet my needs? Thanks, Douglas From andy.terrel at gmail.com Sat Apr 26 11:06:38 2014 From: andy.terrel at gmail.com (Andy Ray Terrel) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 10:06:38 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Submission emails? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Looks like we have to do a little sql joining to get it. If the need is real and you can't interact with the web forms, I can try to get something tonight. -- Andy On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Jacob Vanderplas wrote: > Hello, > Kristen and I want to send out emails notifying proposals our committee has > accepted. There doesn't seem to be an obvious way to access the email > address of those who have submitted... does anyone know how I can access > that information? > > Thanks, > Jake > > Jake VanderPlas > Director of Research ? Physical Sciences > eScience Institute, University of Washington > http://www.vanderplas.com > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers From jakevdp at cs.washington.edu Sat Apr 26 11:29:52 2014 From: jakevdp at cs.washington.edu (Jacob Vanderplas) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 08:29:52 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Submission emails? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I think the need is real, and the need is immediate, as we only have a couple days to send notifications and get confirmations from speakers (unless we're willing to push back the May 1st schedule announcement). If I'm overlooking a way to access the emails via the web forms, please let me know. Jake Jake VanderPlas Director of Research ? Physical Sciences eScience Institute, University of Washington http://www.vanderplas.com On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Andy Ray Terrel wrote: > Looks like we have to do a little sql joining to get it. If the need > is real and you can't interact with the web forms, I can try to get > something tonight. > > -- Andy > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Jacob Vanderplas > wrote: > > Hello, > > Kristen and I want to send out emails notifying proposals our committee > has > > accepted. There doesn't seem to be an obvious way to access the email > > address of those who have submitted... does anyone know how I can access > > that information? > > > > Thanks, > > Jake > > > > Jake VanderPlas > > Director of Research ? Physical Sciences > > eScience Institute, University of Washington > > http://www.vanderplas.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From katyhuff at gmail.com Sat Apr 26 16:07:51 2014 From: katyhuff at gmail.com (Katy Huff) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 13:07:51 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Submission emails? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yes, this is pretty super urgent for us too, for the program committee. In a day or two, we should tell folks whether or not they were accepted, tell them which time slot we've put them in, and tell them to confirm they're attendance. There's a button on the website, but I'm not at all sure what it does. What's the email template it will send? Does it send the comments to the reviewers? Does it put the talk somewhere in the conference schedule? I too would probably just prefer to handle it with an email script. Serge and I will need a csv with the following columns (at minimum): Paper ID, Author Email, CoAuthor Names, CoAuthor Emails, Comments left by reviewers We can fill in the rest. On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Jacob Vanderplas wrote: > I think the need is real, and the need is immediate, as we only have a > couple days to send notifications and get confirmations from speakers > (unless we're willing to push back the May 1st schedule announcement). > > If I'm overlooking a way to access the emails via the web forms, please let > me know. > Jake > > Jake VanderPlas > Director of Research ? Physical Sciences > eScience Institute, University of Washington > http://www.vanderplas.com > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Andy Ray Terrel >wrote: > > > Looks like we have to do a little sql joining to get it. If the need > > is real and you can't interact with the web forms, I can try to get > > something tonight. > > > > -- Andy > > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Jacob Vanderplas > > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > Kristen and I want to send out emails notifying proposals our committee > > has > > > accepted. There doesn't seem to be an obvious way to access the email > > > address of those who have submitted... does anyone know how I can > access > > > that information? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jake > > > > > > Jake VanderPlas > > > Director of Research ? Physical Sciences > > > eScience Institute, University of Washington > > > http://www.vanderplas.com > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > -- http://katyhuff.github.com From scipy-organizers at oracler.ro Sun Apr 27 04:08:15 2014 From: scipy-organizers at oracler.ro (Eat This, Not That) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 10:08:15 +0200 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Never Give Up! Message-ID: <0db01787-c337-d367-200e-5b42c1927065@scipy.org.local> April 26, 2014 Never Give Up! http://gottoloseright.com/xuv/?click=C03D48DFE525585589F335A4B3B7 You're desperate to find the perfect figure? do not give up, we know how to help. You will not believe, but there is a product that will burn excess fat while you are doing household things. interested? You can achieve hormonal balance, fight disease, and lose fat. Click here ? http://gottoloseright.com/xuv/?click=3FA44664C107D9175AA8A7A YOUR PRIVACY RIGHTS http://gottoloseright.com/xuv/?click=1E41974A26F4B47ED1CC4DC29D3C9A | CONTACT US http://gottoloseright.com/xuv/?click=9F2AB880A5C74AE0FD2AB42 | UNSUBSCRIBE http://gottoloseright.com/xuv/?click=B210579296C0C960D80B | MANAGE MY PREFERENCES http://gottoloseright.com/xuv/?click=C133563ABAAA991A9A3F8AD8 COPYRIGHT RODALE, INC Customer Service Department, 400 South 10th Street Emmaus, PA 18098 Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and you will not receive a response.For customer service, please visit www.rodaleinc.com/customer-service http://gottoloseright.com/xuv/?click=F5EEF30949EA7121008E7D69E1 . From matt at plot.ly Sun Apr 27 17:10:39 2014 From: matt at plot.ly (Matt Sundquist) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 14:10:39 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Plotly talk at SciPy 2014 Message-ID: Hey SciPy team, I hope you're well. I thought I'd check-in, as we (Plotly) would love to do a talk and be involved in SciPy. I thought I'd check-in and see if you knew when the talks might be finalized. We'd love to participate. All the best, Matt From katyhuff at gmail.com Sun Apr 27 19:18:12 2014 From: katyhuff at gmail.com (Katy Huff) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 16:18:12 -0700 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Plotly talk at SciPy 2014 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Matt, We'll be finalizing our decisions very shortly. Hopefully this week. Katy On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Matt Sundquist wrote: > Hey SciPy team, > > I hope you're well. > > I thought I'd check-in, as we (Plotly) would love to do a talk and be > involved in SciPy. I thought I'd check-in and see if you knew when the > talks might be finalized. > > We'd love to participate. > > All the best, > Matt > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > -- http://katyhuff.github.com From scipy-organizers at user-PC.kornet Mon Apr 28 03:23:05 2014 From: scipy-organizers at user-PC.kornet (NYTimes.com) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:23:05 +0900 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Today's Headlines: This product is designed to help millions Message-ID: View in Browser http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=0B6A06C4C17AB0EA3FA580 http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=0917AAB863114605C8DE947E02182 Most Popular http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=68CE40302FC1CA8B3F819A555B8A1 | Video http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=0313B5B90FD7A29D95C214E1756C | Today's Headlines Sunday, April 27, 2014 Health More than a year ago, American scientists have developed a product that has helped millions of people around the world to get rid of extra pounds. Are you ready for this? Together we're going to help you lose up to ten pounds in the next two weeks. So dust off those skinny jeans and polish off those stilettos because you're going to look great and feel even better. Continue reading >>> http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=F3C1313ABA088FB30427C9EEEB http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=0F8DA2900B056A00CA8A3294554284 Access The New York Times from anywhere with our suite of apps: iPhone? http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=7F93762F65A2C81315F5B86F9 | iPad? http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=CC4274332672BD7E5911E3 | Android http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=E184C9F5999D9DBF4653 | All http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=FC47287752E976D6AF6E74D4 Save 15% at The NYTimes Store » http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=D74AD6B8BE282C884F8CD8A4 Have questions? Help Section » http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=BAC3CDFACB4B584878B2312 Visit our mobile website at m.nyt.com » http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=4AA5F57EE38F433CF86A998207A7 About This Email This is an automated email. Please do not reply directly to this email. You received this message because you signed up for NYTimes.com's Today's Headlines newsletter. As a member of the TRUSTe privacy program, we are committed to protecting your privacy. Unsubscribe http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=D9E6C3BE7E5113DAEA5DE7135 | Manage Subscriptions http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=ABE19E956E21E01D0C6F983D00060F | Change Your Email http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=C677223411897583F16F0 | Privacy Policy http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=CFAF964799DE1285426EFC7B6E83F8 | Contact http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=56F626060EBC38C3BA968AE685C87 | Advertise http://cowgirljewels.com/sha/?c=9CCB783ABEDED68733269C74E63 Copyright 2014 | The New York Times Company | NYTimes.com 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018 From drobert.pugh at gmail.com Mon Apr 28 15:39:11 2014 From: drobert.pugh at gmail.com (David Pugh) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:39:11 +0100 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Proposal for talks and financial assistance results Message-ID: SciPy, I am writing to check on the status of my proposal entitled 'Python for economists (and other social scientists!)' and on the status of my financial aid application. The deadlines for both speaker and financial sponsorship acceptance have well passed. Am I to infer that my proposal has not been accepted? Please let me know as soon as possible the status of my proposal and funding application as I will soon need to start making travel arrangements if I am to attend SciPy 2014. Look forward to hearing from you! v/r David R. Pugh From matthewturk at gmail.com Mon Apr 28 15:48:36 2014 From: matthewturk at gmail.com (Matthew Turk) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:48:36 -0400 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Proposal for talks and financial assistance results In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi David, Thanks for writing. At present, we're planning to announce the full set of speakers and the schedule on May 1, this coming Thursday. Thanks for your patience! -Matt On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:39 PM, David Pugh wrote: > SciPy, > > I am writing to check on the status of my proposal entitled 'Python for > economists (and other social scientists!)' and on the status of my > financial aid application. The deadlines for both speaker and financial > sponsorship acceptance have well passed. Am I to infer that my proposal has > not been accepted? > > Please let me know as soon as possible the status of my proposal and > funding application as I will soon need to start making travel arrangements > if I am to attend SciPy 2014. > > Look forward to hearing from you! > > v/r > > David R. Pugh > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers From kjordahl at enthought.com Mon Apr 28 20:13:38 2014 From: kjordahl at enthought.com (Kelsey Jordahl) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] scipy.org outage Message-ID: Late last week, the servers for scipy.org, hosted by Enthought, went down after a power failure and subsequently failed to come back up. The failure of the DNS server caused both the main scipy.org site and conference.scipy.org (both hosted offsite), to be offline as our devops team dealt with a cascade of failures to get the domain up again by Saturday morning. We're very sorry for any inconvenience this caused. We plan to migrate scipy.org to updated infrastructure to make sure this issue does not happen again. Kelsey -- Kelsey Jordahl, Ph.D. Scientific software developer Enthought, Inc. 750 Third Avenue (9th floor), New York, NY 10017 kjordahl at enthought.com 1-973-996-8401 http://www.enthought.com From hello at eventifier.co Tue Apr 29 08:01:26 2014 From: hello at eventifier.co (Jazeel Ferry) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:01:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Exciting New Features Available in Eventifier Right Now! Message-ID: <391295015.11872881398772885881.JavaMail.root@grandmogul> Not rendering correctly? View this email as a web page here (http://eventifier.hs-sites.com/launch-exciting-new-features-available-in-eventifier-right-now?ecid=ACsprvs075_AIEQUluc7WqXFCoXqGmFKq9uovfkNn-MC4dls_f7vI2xZqV4l4U1AVlHO22tTfs8W&utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-95lYKYPYnYxpw0VFGglayFLTttgKunhceXHWNKG8Y-Wp2pyQUR_6bfxeTKnK__09Jf47eXOvjluF-rOtZ0iEqT6RpLayMa2PfbFlsaK_p6VV6ygcg&_hsmi=12626983). Eventifier email header (http://eventifier.com?utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz--y-hWR2c2LZgDZcd-DKcYwNIU12MbFx5MhIb8TAHZ5nyBJ5UnDtztJ9Yf3JCRNLAnBE5AjUCyp2_cDsTXHI5Bz08wJu6G-NIfO7hrpLGfUJym1hGQ&_hsmi=12626983) Hi?, At Eventifier we strive to make capturing all of the exciting moments around your event easy, visually delightful, and effortless. We?re very excited to announce new features to help you make your event social media promotion even more successful (http://blog.eventifier.com/exciting-new-features-available-in-eventifier-right-now?utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9ae10BVSnJWeKDNqcBwwzjrwUCCJ30Z0dD0DLAXMGdOZGJXitmJqEwz_aYEW27m8g4UpDjSF_yZVS1z3TY-vCJSrOWDh4B_zuvu95Q5_iL6nDUfj4&_hsmi=12626983)!? Also, if your event is just around the corner it is important to make sure that you have everything in place to deliver a great social media event experience.?We designed?The Ultimate Eventifier Pre-Event Social Media Strategy Checklist (http://offers.eventifier.com/eventifier-pre-event-social-media-strategy-checklist?utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8s8XYaoIeEtv57AgaRAry1VbSJPW34rW1lWD7a5z7lMwMDiR_hEK_IP3Rn2mZmjd6r18I3IHAZpDUmrsdnb-f81ICF9vI1VwCP90RsaatnqtmaHgs&_hsmi=12626983)?to ensure that you have all of the necessary pre-event planning steps at your disposal.? 4.9.14_Eventifier_Blog_New_Features (http://blog.eventifier.com/exciting-new-features-available-in-eventifier-right-now?utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz--30O6wxVPky04t0l0HD5FyO3DwNO6IxgxQTmcdPi0T9ebcLSNxCPtm552Ki_2_iQ5G51Rs7ZLwev4sjFnc8VACOU41I4jyM80oD_AaDfmIZ8kCY7M&_hsmi=12626983) ? Exciting New Features Available in Eventifier (http://blog.eventifier.com/exciting-new-features-available-in-eventifier-right-now?utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz--jjkWvyMYYjBtMn4e6WqZVwrcLOC-WZDz99UUUxzBqkVWVWeF_jfsZp9YCzmTkPvRBtkWRF5TrgOt4opMvRJNqO2-nuKso2MMwuj9C7abbz8nbVeE&_hsmi=12626983) Rig (http://blog.eventifier.com/exciting-new-features-available-in-eventifier-right-now?utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_XH39_tSFkf_lDR9IVSLt2E1xCCYDc56tqpWoLte6MR7-djH14GcQ0OrxDe7-98uFQc6wo9L_B3dmCEund_5X9JM95UTF36yBTPMFpCMgMpNaDr_g&_hsmi=12626983)ht (http://blog.eventifier.com/exciting-new-features-available-in-eventifier-right-now?utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9zbkrzQV2mrEV5JmOVWRHC61HKgx_FlOMvRIzJIpE8nwtTEUN9dzzLW1V5Fnj537Iqn8SrHqac5r6spYo9tbDg82QY73soich1daneov5lTlPHh0E&_hsmi=12626983) Now (http://blog.eventifier.com/exciting-new-features-available-in-eventifier-right-now?utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-84hg0asdrUQPzHLQbq07ro2mNmD3O4F7ZCY2_Gw61jiLQXLjLSNMwHLaryKK0kLqURoUDcsQ91SUYKWmwD8YaQdgVOd4jUW9ZZ7N5Q2MkJ0pamPY8&_hsmi=12626983) If you are looking to integrate social media into your next event experience in a big way, check out these new features. We added?enhanced social analytics, Slideshare and YouTube embeds and more! Pre-Event-Social-Media-Strategy-Checklist (http://offers.eventifier.com/eventifier-pre-event-social-media-strategy-checklist?utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8tBJFGNY0RfT8gygV9OaKn27VZWw-v4iOhSYNLXtq38Wi3ytr9UWybkQ23GBNk1Y4O-A3ztq-1zA6w9BTERVWwnr3VV81OmQLNUlVMscP1lzJbIQc&_hsmi=12626983) The Ultimate Eventifier Pre-Event Social Media Strategy Checklist (http://offers.eventifier.com/eventifier-pre-event-social-media-strategy-checklist?utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9tu5oL7k1YFTBucuqKomErnwkEz4sa_xqTi7qyTlxgB9yWAcufnlpEBEchRvhFX4N17h7wmBfihj-Ji9hEzjupRC5Vq_l3rU9e3aAVYUzth9R_47I&_hsmi=12626983) Wish you had a social media focused event planning checklist? Here it is! Download this and never miss an important step. We hope you find it helpful! Jazeel Ferry, Co-Founder Eventifier P.S. -?Subscribe to the Eventifier blog (http://blog.eventifier.com/?utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9MXgfGdiRZ8au2uxNMaSrEMHHQIH1kGwVZbi5cMaJqf8OB-HLp5NPIK1e6Qu5ukVnInpK5eO9HJygaYkn0c3S_8kQqOtQ5muIVSFXKKDt6ODD12MA&_hsmi=12626983)?for more content like this. If you like it, please feel free to share! Share This! Share on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Feventifier.hs-sites.com%2Flaunch-exciting-new-features-available-in-eventifier-right-now%3Futm_medium%3Dsocial%26utm_source%3Dfacebook&utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_ggKQZvUyAadRukFXeSnvoSbwvq87akitj9vHY-LgWDU0KqcNCp9tgy6YlDI-2UkfBa-8Je48XKz5aILZZNSh9KfjFCBXvfzsk-7WRW3z556Cz4jc&_hsmi=12626983)?Share on LinkedIn (http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Feventifier.hs-sites.com%2Flaunch-exciting-new-features-available-in-eventifier-right-now%3Futm_medium%3Dsocial%26utm_source%3Dlinkedin&utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_Axd5vagG6jKE6z-8t4yAxVfUI-7cmxzHqXsSKMyesTf-OCVNCjj61-7BRto_Nl96swmUBSScAgRl8r8wTAoABDAlo4NK72VhREjVHKV4wDe7jghY&_hsmi=12626983)?Share on Twitter (https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Feventifier.hs-sites.com%2Flaunch-exciting-new-features-available-in-eventifier-right-now%3Futm_medium%3Dsocial%26utm_source%3Dtwitter&url=http%3A%2F%2Feventifier.hs-sites.com%2Flaunch-exciting-new-features-available-in-eventifier-right-now%3Futm_medium%3Dsocial%26utm_source%3Dtwitter&source=tweetbutton&text=Exciting%20New%20Features%20Available%20in%20Eventifier%20Right%20Now%20&utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz--3vjmnxGjil9eVzT4c9UWD_chIQXA-9Sm7d7tCR4JPzjiPKHoqSXDzRHivVYv5vpnKBuT6JzYMfAK-uZqb3DXdsjF3uvT9IvHFH86U2wd3XFZVrhs&_hsmi=12626983)?Share on Google+ (https://plus.google.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Feventifier.hs-sites.com%2Flaunch-exciting-new-features-available-in-eventifier-right-now%3Futm_medium%3Dsocial%26utm_source%3Dgoogle_plus&utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz--zs1WFp3aUerLfIHE1EclTSfULnPXUg6jUsoQrGzdC8vA6aRIecNfqIGC7Z0eAIOZvE0BcCGtFFpnX1slfxBSOVl-PRHOwekLuC3IF9HQxrNAFgiY&_hsmi=12626983)?Share on Email (mailto:?subject=Check out http%3A%2F%2Feventifier.hs-sites.com%2Flaunch-exciting-new-features-available-in-eventifier-right-now%3Futm_medium%3Dsocial%26utm_source%3Demail &body=Check out http%3A%2F%2Feventifier.hs-sites.com%2Flaunch-exciting-new-features-available-in-eventifier-right-now%3Futm_medium%3Dsocial%26utm_source%3Demail) Eventifier ??Eventifier, SpaceBound Web Labs Private Limited ?#886/A-17th E Main, 6th Block ?Opposite to Koramangala Club, ?Koramangala Bangalore - 560 095 Karnataka, ?? ?? India You received this email because you are subscribed to Marketing Information from Eventifier . Update your email preferences (http://eventifier.hs-sites.com/hs/manage-preferences/unsubscribe?v=1&d=eyJlYSI6InNjaXB5LW9yZ2FuaXplcnNAc2NpcHkub3JnIiwiZWMiOjEyNjI2OTgzLCJzdWJzY3Jp%0D%0AcHRpb25JZCI6MjE3NDI3fQ%3D%3D%0D%0A&utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9RIFL8liEEThlHHyPdlH0EzkfrFAEYbb470NTyqWORGMcFSO6g63LNxEe4NxmKqW4AqhRw-hyVY8plKu5AILf3WmfBqSgLz93wjIDUgMe40cWFAu4&_hsmi=12626983) to choose the types of emails you receive. ?Unsubscribe from all future emails (http://eventifier.hs-sites.com/hs/manage-preferences/unsubscribe-all?v=1&d=eyJlYSI6InNjaXB5LW9yZ2FuaXplcnNAc2NpcHkub3JnIiwiZWMiOjEyNjI2OTgzLCJzdWJzY3Jp%0D%0AcHRpb25JZCI6MjE3NDI3fQ%3D%3D%0D%0A&utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9Y8ADYnk9Y_6_UB4BldvEq_HiudIBXODCiTAFPjRy27LkRKgmVSO6VWwFleSt1x7TRtlRSyd9_EXptRLwV_YNsNlSzRH1hjt2LSMZlxri66jlkxHc&_hsmi=12626983)? Powered by HubSpot (http://offers.hubspot.com/email-demo?utm_campaign=TOFU+-+Apr+14+-+New+Eventifier+Feature+Launch&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=12626983&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8lW6yXUxY9dl6bVOTwlI84FlRyta9c3obeufyMARdFgyftb0JgRazal1BgWdwy4NQliTabcta76AzjGf_zw_J3u11voaUY8aM9tn3YyCVQcPqqZlw&_hsmi=12626983) From scipy-organizers at fixed-203-252-165.iusacell.net Tue Apr 29 09:24:16 2014 From: scipy-organizers at fixed-203-252-165.iusacell.net (DrOZNetwork Newsletter) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:24:16 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] You Will Lose At Least a Size Every Fortnight Message-ID: Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. http://svadbu.org/arrangecrashcolinevans/?main=354456343E4F5E53A138FD6 ? Monday April 28, 2014 Daily edition ? Latest HEALTH News You think you are hopeless? http://svadbu.org/arrangecrashcolinevans/?main=FB53E91CE2BDB85F5D33699 April 28, 2014 Well, nobody is going to worship your fat butt, chubby legs and ugly belly. It doesn?t matter that you have tried a score of different nourishing schemes and have changed a dozen of fitness facilities. Remember, only 2% of obese people can succeed with a "sport+no calories" scheme. People whose will is not that strong are offered a safer and faster way out - brand new product that help you lose at least a size every fortnight irrespective how much you eat and how many hours a day you spend motionless. Read more http://svadbu.org/arrangecrashcolinevans/?main=EE7299A943B6E801CD48FF04F492 You are currently subscribed as scipy-organizers at scipy.org To unsubscribe, please click here http://svadbu.org/arrangecrashcolinevans/?main=B52A8807363B0A9A5B3C6F859 . To change your email preferences, please click here http://svadbu.org/arrangecrashcolinevans/?main=DB1C4AC9B894CA06ABF8CA140B . DrOZNetwork, Inc.733 Turnpike Street.Suite 193North Andover, MA 01845USA. From scopatz at gmail.com Tue Apr 29 21:39:17 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 20:39:17 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Early Registration / Tutorials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Douglas, I know that it isa bit hard to find but the refund page [1] says "Refund Policy: 100% refund until Sunday, June 9th. Effective Monday, June 10th we provide 50% and after Friday, June 21st there are no refunds." The tutorials should be announced within the week - which is well before the refund deadline. I hope that this helps. Sorry for taking so long to get back to you. Be Well Anthony + Matt SciPy 2014 Communications Chairs 1. https://conference.scipy.org/scipy_registration/registration.php On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Douglas Karabasz wrote: > I would like to sign up for early registration. However, since tutorials > are not set in stone yet can I get a refund if I it does not meet my > needs? > > Thanks, > Douglas > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From scopatz at gmail.com Wed Apr 30 00:01:04 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 23:01:04 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Confirmation of registration for scipy 2014 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Jens, This is perfectly normal. PayPal is your receipt. Sorry for not responding sooner. Be Well Anthony On Apr 24, 2014 7:36 AM, "Nielsen, Jens" wrote: > Hi > > I registered and payed for scipy2014 on 15. April but never received any > confirmation mail apart from the receipt from Paypal (Receipt No: > 0762-7398-4455-4908) neither does my login on the scipy conference page > reflect this. Is that normal? > > > Best regards > Jens > > > Jens Hedegaard Nielsen, > Research Software Developer > Research IT Services > University College London > > Tel: 020 3549 5217 (Int 65217) > > > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From milapbhojak.exe at gmail.com Wed Apr 30 07:05:22 2014 From: milapbhojak.exe at gmail.com (Milap Bhojak) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:35:22 +0530 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Financial Aid Message-ID: Hello, I Applied for financial aid. could any one tell me the status of financial application ? When will you guys announce selected people ? -- Thanks, Milap Bhojak | Google Developers Group - Gandhinagar | milapbhojak.exe at gmail.com | +91-9898855075 From scopatz at gmail.com Wed Apr 30 09:48:12 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 08:48:12 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Financial Aid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Milap, We are still in review for financial aid. John Wiggins will be able to give you a better idea of when the awards will be announced. Thanks for your patience. Be Well Anthony On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Milap Bhojak wrote: > Hello, > > I Applied for financial aid. could any one tell me the status of financial > application ? When will you guys announce selected people ? > > -- > Thanks, > Milap Bhojak | Google Developers Group - Gandhinagar | > milapbhojak.exe at gmail.com | > +91-9898855075 > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From jwiggins at enthought.com Wed Apr 30 10:18:03 2014 From: jwiggins at enthought.com (John Wiggins) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:18:03 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Financial Aid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2884C547-1287-4AB4-BB9A-B6909548E7CC@enthought.com> Milap, We are planning to announce the financial aid awards on Monday May 5th. -- John On Apr 30, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > Hello Milap, > > We are still in review for financial aid. John Wiggins will be able to give you a better idea of when the awards will be announced. Thanks for your patience. > > Be Well > Anthony > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Milap Bhojak wrote: > Hello, > > I Applied for financial aid. could any one tell me the status of financial > application ? When will you guys announce selected people ? > > -- > Thanks, > Milap Bhojak | Google Developers Group - Gandhinagar | > milapbhojak.exe at gmail.com | > +91-9898855075 > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From bmurphy at enthought.com Wed Apr 30 11:08:15 2014 From: bmurphy at enthought.com (Brett Murphy) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:08:15 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] COS? Message-ID: Hi, Is anyone familiar with the Center for Open Science? Andrew Sallans just applied to be a Community Sponsor. -- Brett Brett Murphy Director, Customer Solutions Enthought, Inc. bmurphy at enthought.com 512-536-1057 From scopatz at gmail.com Wed Apr 30 11:11:06 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:11:06 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] COS? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: yes I am familiar. CoS would make a great community sponsor. Be Well Anthony On Apr 30, 2014 10:08 AM, "Brett Murphy" wrote: > Hi, > > Is anyone familiar with the Center for Open Science? Andrew Sallans just > applied to be a Community Sponsor. > > -- Brett > > Brett Murphy > Director, Customer Solutions > Enthought, Inc. > bmurphy at enthought.com > 512-536-1057 > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From andy.terrel at gmail.com Wed Apr 30 11:22:49 2014 From: andy.terrel at gmail.com (Andy Ray Terrel) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:22:49 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] COS? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: +1 yes they should qualify. On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > yes I am familiar. > > CoS would make a great community sponsor. > > Be Well > Anthony > On Apr 30, 2014 10:08 AM, "Brett Murphy" wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Is anyone familiar with the Center for Open Science? Andrew Sallans just >> applied to be a Community Sponsor. >> >> -- Brett >> >> Brett Murphy >> Director, Customer Solutions >> Enthought, Inc. >> bmurphy at enthought.com >> 512-536-1057 >> _______________________________________________ >> Scipy-organizers mailing list >> Scipy-organizers at scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers >> > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers From ktutunjian at cfa.harvard.edu Wed Apr 30 12:26:24 2014 From: ktutunjian at cfa.harvard.edu (Tutunjian, Kara) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] SciPy2014 Message-ID: Hello, Can you tell me if you are providing any meals (included in the registration fee) at the conference? I need to predetermine the meals allowance for an employee who will attend your conference. Thank you, Kara Tutunjian -- Kara Tutunjian Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory 60 Garden Street, MS 70 Cambridge, MA 02138 617-496-7063 *Recycle it! The CfA has single-streamed recycling for paper, aluminum, plastic, and glass. * *Other special items to recycle through Facilities: batteries, keyboards, computer mice... * From milapbhojak.exe at gmail.com Wed Apr 30 12:34:56 2014 From: milapbhojak.exe at gmail.com (Milap Bhojak) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 22:04:56 +0530 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Financial Aid In-Reply-To: <2884C547-1287-4AB4-BB9A-B6909548E7CC@enthought.com> References: <2884C547-1287-4AB4-BB9A-B6909548E7CC@enthought.com> Message-ID: Thank you very much :) On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 7:48 PM, John Wiggins wrote: > Milap, > > We are planning to announce the financial aid awards on Monday May 5th. > > -- John > > On Apr 30, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > > > Hello Milap, > > > > We are still in review for financial aid. John Wiggins will be able to > give you a better idea of when the awards will be announced. Thanks for > your patience. > > > > Be Well > > Anthony > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Milap Bhojak > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I Applied for financial aid. could any one tell me the status of > financial > > application ? When will you guys announce selected people ? > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Milap Bhojak | Google Developers Group - Gandhinagar | > > milapbhojak.exe at gmail.com | > > +91-9898855075 > > _______________________________________________ > > Scipy-organizers mailing list > > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > > > > -- Thanks, Milap Bhojak | Google Developers Group - Gandhinagar | milapbhojak.exe at gmail.com | +91-9898855075 From scopatz at gmail.com Wed Apr 30 12:39:37 2014 From: scopatz at gmail.com (Anthony Scopatz) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:39:37 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] SciPy2014 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Kara, We have no meals planned for the conference. Be Well Anthony Scopatz SciPy 2014 Communications Co-Chair On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Tutunjian, Kara < ktutunjian at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: > Hello, > > Can you tell me if you are providing any meals (included in the > registration fee) at the conference? I need to predetermine the meals > allowance for an employee who will attend your conference. > > Thank you, > > Kara Tutunjian > > -- > Kara Tutunjian > Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory > 60 Garden Street, MS 70 > Cambridge, MA 02138 > 617-496-7063 > > > *Recycle it! The CfA has single-streamed recycling for paper, aluminum, > plastic, and glass. * > > *Other special items to recycle through Facilities: batteries, keyboards, > computer mice... * > _______________________________________________ > Scipy-organizers mailing list > Scipy-organizers at scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-organizers > From scipy-organizers at une.net.co Wed Apr 30 14:27:20 2014 From: scipy-organizers at une.net.co (FatBurning Product) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:27:20 -0500 Subject: [Scipy-organizers] Knock off 10, 25, even 60 pounds! Message-ID: <93e3a1f4-fe60-9d07-b75e-2ca2c78c0acb@scipy.org.local> Fat guys hate to see themselves in the mirror. Taking care of their fluffy bodies is a real ordeal. Exposing all those bulges and layers of ugly flesh in front of the sporty crowd on a popular beach is the worst nightmare imaginable. Remember that thing can be different for you if you choose to take the right kind of products for burning excessive body fat. Take it regularly for a few weeks (or month if you are really obese) and see new hot and slender you in every single mirror reflection! Learn more here http://lovemyfood.in/birthdaycryadamspencer/?m=7F521CD957894EFEDB8B522D009E . Sincerely, DoctorOZ 8131 Lakewood Main ST STE 205 Bradenton, FL 34203 If you no longer wish to receive communication from us: Unsubscribe http://lovemyfood.in/birthdaycryadamspencer/?m=31B70736DCA40132ACE4C6161