[SciPy-Dev] Proposed SciPy 1.3.0 Release Schedule

Thu Apr 25 19:18:07 EDT 2019

The release notes / mailmap PR is open, please do have a look at your
attribution as appropriate: https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/10097

On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 10:59, Tyler Reddy <tyler.je.reddy at gmail.com> wrote:

> There should be no open issues / PRs with the 1.3.0 milestone now. I'm
> going to work on improving the release notes for a while & open a PR for
> that soon-ish.
>
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 15:31, Tyler Reddy <tyler.je.reddy at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Down to 5 open PRs with the 1.3.0 milestone:
>> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A1.3.0
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 at 17:54, Tyler Reddy <tyler.je.reddy at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We are sitting at 20 open PRs with the 1.3.0 milestone:
>>> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A1.3.0
>>>
>>> We were close to 30 recently, so let's try to keep it < 20 over the
>>> weekend / moving into next week.
>>>
>>> On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 at 02:48, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 9:34 AM Mark Mikofski <mikofski at berkeley.edu>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Tyler,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks again for taking on the release management.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there anything that we (as contributors) can do to help? Should we
>>>>> be reviewing the 1.3.0 milestone PR's? What would be most helpful
>>>>> specifically?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Help with reviewing can be a very valuable contribution, not just for a
>>>> particular release but in general. I think many contributors are under the
>>>> impression that you need to be a maintainer to review - this definitely
>>>> isn't the case, as long as you have the knowledge to understand the code in
>>>> a PR you can help a lot. In particular this is the case for larger PRs that
>>>> propose new features, because those are often a lot of work to review and
>>>> require domain-specific knowledge. Here is an example (also tagged for
>>>> 1.3.0): https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/7310, adding a logarithmic
>>>> FFT implementation. Two kinds of things would be helpful:
>>>> - someone who understands FFTs well and can review the implementation
>>>> - someone who needs the feature, and can test it and confirm that
>>>> everything works as expected
>>>>
>>>> A couple more in the same vein:
>>>> - peak declustering for scipy.signal:
>>>> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/9513
>>>> - RotationSpline for scipy.spatial.transform:
>>>> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/9831
>>>> - support for ARFF relational attributes in scipy.io:
>>>> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/9854
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Ralf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I read through the dev guide (
>>>>> https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/dev/index.html) and
>>>>> hacking guidelines (
>>>>> https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/hacking.html), and I
>>>>> looked at the 1.3.0 milestones, and it seems like reviewing PR's with the
>>>>> fewest comments might be the best approach. Would that help?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Mark
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 5:42 PM Matt Haberland <haberland at ucla.edu>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to get #10026 in there, too. SuiteSparse seems to routinely
>>>>>> speed up `linprog` by a factor of 2-4 (when available).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 7:40 AM Mark Alexander Mikofski <
>>>>>> mikofski at berkeley.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Tyler,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for managing the release again! This is a very important
>>>>>>> service for the SciPy community, and I'm very grateful!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you think we could try to add #9568 and #10052 assuming everyone
>>>>>>> agrees they are good?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks again!
>>>>>>> Mark
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 2:13 AM Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 12:27 AM Andrew Nelson <andyfaff at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Would it be possible to add 9990 and 10002 to 1.3.0, or is that
>>>>>>>>> too ambitious?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Those look like they're in good shape, should be doable. I've added
>>>>>>>> them to the milestone. Tyler can always remove them again if we run out of
>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun., 14 Apr. 2019, 07:20 Tyler Reddy, <
>>>>>>>>> tyler.je.reddy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It is almost 4 months after the (slightly-delayed) 1.2.0 release
>>>>>>>>>> on December 17/ 2018, so probably time to plan the 1.3.0 release. It would
>>>>>>>>>> be a good idea to look over the PRs with a 1.3.0 milestone, and tag
>>>>>>>>>> anything else that should have this milestone appropriately.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to propose the following schedule:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> April 25: branch 1.3.x
>>>>>>>>>> April 28: rc1
>>>>>>>>>> May 11: rc2 (if needed)
>>>>>>>>>> May 20: final release
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That works for me. There may be a few items in
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/milestone/37 that we won't get to,
>>>>>>>> but the only real blocker (py37 build issue) on that list is ready to merge.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Ralf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> SciPy-Dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> SciPy-Dev at python.org
>>>>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Mark Mikofski, PhD (2005)
>>>>>>> *Fiat Lux*
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> SciPy-Dev mailing list
>>>>>>> SciPy-Dev at python.org
>>>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Matt Haberland
>>>>>> Assistant Adjunct Professor in the Program in Computing
>>>>>> Department of Mathematics
>>>>>> 6617A Math Sciences Building, UCLA
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> SciPy-Dev mailing list
>>>>>> SciPy-Dev at python.org
>>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Mark Mikofski, PhD (2005)
>>>>> *Fiat Lux*
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> SciPy-Dev mailing list
>>>>> SciPy-Dev at python.org
>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> SciPy-Dev mailing list
>>>> SciPy-Dev at python.org
>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20190425/adb3b4c8/attachment-0001.html>