[SciPy-Dev] SciPy 1.2.0 release schedule

Ralf Gommers ralf.gommers at gmail.com
Wed Nov 21 18:07:17 EST 2018


On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 9:32 AM Tyler Reddy <tyler.je.reddy at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I've pushed the v1.2.x wheels branch -- initially this will aim to confirm
> that SciPy master branch is now passing the Travis & Appveyor wheel builds.
>
> If that is the case, I will proceed with the 3 connected backport PRs to
> the maintenance branch.
>
> Then, I will point the v.1.2.x wheels branch to an appropriate commit on
> the patched maintenance branch for release candidate wheel builds.
>

Sounds like a plan!

Ralf


>
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 at 10:27, Ilhan Polat <ilhanpolat at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Good stuff Tyler. I have to also add to that list the recent pypy3 run
>> failures appearing sporadically (though consistent on my PRs).
>>
>> I am trying triangulate the cause but probably will have to wait until at
>> least tomorrow. Feedback is more than welcome. They seem to be related to
>> cython/numpy versions but one can never be sure.
>>
>> İlhan
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018, 19:35 Tyler Reddy <tyler.je.reddy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Current delays / issues I'm working on--feel free to chime in on those:
>>>
>>> - a few test failures in wheel building matrix:
>>> https://github.com/MacPython/scipy-wheels/pull/37
>>> - hard-to-understand putative patch for one of the failures:
>>> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/9486
>>>
>>> On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 at 08:40, Tyler Reddy <tyler.je.reddy at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I branched 1.2.x around 8:30 am Pacific time on Nov. 9, 2018.
>>>>
>>>> Working on the follow up master branch PR to bump version number /
>>>> notes file, etc. now.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 at 22:49, Tyler Reddy <tyler.je.reddy at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Release note PR is hopefully taking shape now -- I'll allow (another)
>>>>> delay for the branch until tomorrow (morning?) for some (hopefully final)
>>>>> checks on that.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 at 14:35, Tyler Reddy <tyler.je.reddy at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> There are 0 remaining PRs with a 1.2.0 milestone.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is one issue left with a 1.2.0 milestone:
>>>>>> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/9441
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please do take a look over the release notes WIP PR based on the
>>>>>> wiki: https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/9461
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Target is to branch in 5-6 hours or so. Let me know if you see any
>>>>>> issues of course -- Ralf has been coaching
>>>>>> me through pretty well so far I think.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 09:52, Ilhan Polat <ilhanpolat at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hang in there Tyler :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Awesome job so far.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018, 06:08 Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:03 PM Tyler Reddy <
>>>>>>>> tyler.je.reddy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 7 PRs :
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A1.2.0
>>>>>>>>> 3 issues:
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A1.2.0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Awesome, getting there:)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Target: branch sometime on November 8th
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 05:42, Tyler Reddy <tyler.je.reddy at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Alright, I'll extend to Thursday Nov. 8th & see if I can reduce
>>>>>>>>>> that list a bit
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 at 22:27, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:03 PM Mark Alexander Mikofski <
>>>>>>>>>>> mikofski at berkeley.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Tyler and others,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for managing the v1.2 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think PR #8431, Cython optimize zeros API, is ready,
>>>>>>>>>>>> hopefully, to merge. It's been through several rounds of reviews and I
>>>>>>>>>>>> think I've accommodated all of the recommendations, all tests are passing,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and there's been strong support. Anyone please take a look.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/8431
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018, 2:38 PM Ralf Gommers <
>>>>>>>>>>>> ralf.gommers at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 12:55 PM Tyler Reddy <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tyler.je.reddy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is almost 6 months after the 1.1.0 release on May 5, so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably time to plan the 1.2.0 release. It would be a good idea to look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over the PRs with a 1.2.0 milestone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A1.2.0>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and tag anything else that should have this milestone appropriately.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to propose the following schedule:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nov. 5: branch 1.2.x
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nov. 8: rc1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nov. 21: rc2 (if needed)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nov. 30: final release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This looks like a good schedule to me. We'll probably struggle
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get some PRs marked for 1.2.0 merged, but that's always the case.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Tyler, could we shift the branch date by 2-3 days (or up to a
>>>>>>>>>>> week)? There's a couple of PRs that I'd really like to see merged or
>>>>>>>>>>> decided on (for optimize and stats mainly), and there's right now still 18
>>>>>>>>>>> open PRs marked for 1.2.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> A note on the open PRs: what we want to aim for is to have the
>>>>>>>>>>> list of open PRs and open blocking issues at zero, and have at most some
>>>>>>>>>>> non-blocking issues under the milestone left. Normally the release manager
>>>>>>>>>>> starts making those decisions, or pinging people, if other reviewers
>>>>>>>>>>> haven't done so in time. Of course it would be ideal if everyone has
>>>>>>>>>>> another look at
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A1.2.0
>>>>>>>>>>> and bumps or finished off PRs he/she is involved in.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>> Ralf
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> SciPy-Dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> SciPy-Dev at python.org
>>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> SciPy-Dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> SciPy-Dev at python.org
>>>>>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> SciPy-Dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> SciPy-Dev at python.org
>>>>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> SciPy-Dev mailing list
>>>>>>> SciPy-Dev at python.org
>>>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SciPy-Dev mailing list
>>> SciPy-Dev at python.org
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SciPy-Dev mailing list
>> SciPy-Dev at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20181121/51089619/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the SciPy-Dev mailing list