[SciPy-Dev] Repository for GSoC project

Jaime Fernández del Río jaime.frio at gmail.com
Tue May 26 12:00:12 EDT 2015


Thanks everyone for the feedback. After some more thinking, I have asked
Aman to start sending PRs directly against the current master of scipy.

To differentiate new from old implementations, we'll probably just prepend
all file names with "ndi_" instead of the current "ni_". We will eventually
start removing old functionality that has been replaced, but for quite
sometime they will both coexist. This means that at some point in time,
e.g. calling `ndimage.filters.uniform_filter1d` may use the new Cython code
paths, while `ndimage.filters.minimum_filter1d` may still be using the old
C code paths.

We will not merge anything, answering Juan's question, until we have tests
that validate that functionality. That does not mean that the functionality
will be available to end users just yet, e.g. we may merge an iterator
before any top level function that uses it. But if it does not have tests,
it does not get merged.

If anyone has a very strong opinion against this approach, please speak up
now!

Jaime

-- 
(\__/)
( O.o)
( > <) Este es Conejo. Copia a Conejo en tu firma y ayúdale en sus planes
de dominación mundial.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20150526/c3cbbecd/attachment.html>


More information about the SciPy-Dev mailing list