[SciPy-Dev] 0.14.1 and 0.15.0 release schedule

[Julian Taylor]

ping, I'd need to know soon what the 014.x plans are, just whether there
will be another 0.14 release or not, I don't need any specific dates.

On 16.10.2014 01:13, Julian Taylor wrote:
> Hi,
> whats the status on 0.14.1? Is this still planned?
> 
> Debian is freezing on the 5. of November and I'd prefer to have 0.14.1
> instead of 0.14.0 in. Though I could also package a git snapshot if you
> don't think you'll do a release before then, just let me know.
> 
> Cheers,
> Julian
> 
> On 18.09.2014 00:50, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Warren Weckesser
>> <warren.weckesser at gmail.com <mailto:warren.weckesser at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:ralf.gommers at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi all,
>>
>>         It's about time for a couple of releases.
>>
>>         0.14.1 fixes some regressions as well as a lot of test failures
>>         against numpy 1.9.0 (due to __numpy_ufunc__) removal. All known
>>         regressions are fixed now, so I plan to tag it this weekend. If
>>         there's anything really urgent that still needs to go in, please
>>         speak up.
>>
>>         For 0.15.0 there are still 17 issues/PRs, but most of those we
>>         should be able to merge/fix relatively quickly. I propose the
>>         following release schedule:
>>
>>         - beta 1: 16 Sep
>>         - release candidate 1: 4 Oct
>>         - release candidate 2: 18 Oct (if needed)
>>         - final release: 25 Oct
>>
>>         Does that work for everyone?
>>
>>
>>
>>     Works for me.  Thanks, Ralf.
>>
>>
>> There are still a few issues to be solved (see
>> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/milestones/0.15.0), so the timing has to
>> shift a bit. I'll be offline for a week, so probably we can do the beta
>> at the end of this month.
>>
>> Ralf
>>
>>  
>>
>>
>>     Warren
>>
>>      
>>
>>         Are there issues/PRs that aren't under the 0.15.0 milestone but
>>         have to go in?
>>
>>         Cheers,
>>         Ralf
>>
>>
>