[SciPy-Dev] Powell failure on MingW windows build - any insights?
Pauli Virtanen
pav at iki.fi
Wed Apr 23 14:29:58 EDT 2014
23.04.2014 02:17, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:
[clip]
>> Having the check that far (34 evals) in the tail may however be
>> excessive. The other routines check earlier only after a few
>> iterations, so if you can see how much of the trace is
>> reproducible, that should be OK.
>
> The course is the same through iteration 14 - is that acceptable as
> a length?
Should be OK.
--
Pauli Virtanen
More information about the SciPy-Dev
mailing list