[SciPy-Dev] Powell failure on MingW windows build - any insights?

Pauli Virtanen pav at iki.fi
Wed Apr 23 14:29:58 EDT 2014


23.04.2014 02:17, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:
[clip]
>> Having the check that far (34 evals) in the tail may however be 
>> excessive. The other routines check earlier only after a few 
>> iterations, so if you can see how much of the trace is
>> reproducible, that should be OK.
> 
> The course is the same through iteration 14 - is that acceptable as
> a length?

Should be OK.

-- 
Pauli Virtanen




More information about the SciPy-Dev mailing list