[SciPy-Dev] Status of Migrating Issues to Github?

Skipper Seabold jsseabold at gmail.com
Tue Feb 19 07:01:21 EST 2013


On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <thouis at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Skipper Seabold <jsseabold at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Pauli Virtanen <pav at iki.fi> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> 18.02.2013 20:02, Skipper Seabold kirjoitti:
> >> > Just curious what the status of migrating the issues to github for
> scipy
> >> > is? I think this was on the table right?
> >>
> >> It's on the table, but AFAIK nobody is actively working on it.
> >>
> >> Though, I'm still kind of wondering a bit how I'd do bugreports such as
> >> this: http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/ticket/1840
> >>
> >> The data file is an integral part of the report, and cannot easily be
> >> factored out. If I put it in Dropbox or some random place like that, it
> >> won't stay there necessarily for long...
> >>
> >
> > It's a hack, but since the trac links are persistent, we could make the
> Trac read-only or something and insert issue attachments as links into the
> github issues. I haven't looked at the migration scripts how easy it would
> be to do this.
> >
> > Trac Attachment (2/06/13): [Test data file](
> http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/attachment/ticket/1840/estimate_gradients_hang.npy
> )
>
> That's what we did for the numpy trac->github migration.  All the
> attachments from Trac still live there.
>
> An example: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/2490
>
>
Hi Ray,

This looks nice. Do the scripts for this migration live somewhere? Could
you give an estimate (developer time-wise) how much work it was?

Skipper
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20130219/d3abb029/attachment.html>


More information about the SciPy-Dev mailing list