[SciPy-Dev] Summarizing the scikit-signal discussion

[Travis Oliphant]

I wish you all well.   I think this is unfortunate, however.  

I think it would be better to make a branch of scipy.signal and develop all you want there.    There is a need for active development in scipy.signal.  

But, I can understand wanting a faster development cycle and wanting less interference with design decisions based on a larger project goals until you are farther along.

Ultimately, I'm excited people will be writing more signal processing code for Python.   

-Travis


On Jan 13, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Jaidev Deshpande wrote:

> Hi
> 
> We've jumped to a separate scikit project only because it will be
> easier to develop and maintain.
> 
> Once it gets off the ground, the community can choose to put the
> project wherever they like.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jaidev
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev