[SciPy-Dev] pull requests and code review

[Travis Oliphant]

I don't think there should be any time limit on pull requests.     Who is the *we* that needs time to look at them.   I did take time to look at the changes.   The code changes were not extensive (except for the very nice tests), and it is a welcome change. 

Your feedback on the use of inspect is very good.   We can take a look at whether or not it method calls were considered and fix it if it does.  

If you are interested in continuing to review all the optimize changes, I will make sure and give you time to review in the future.    This is where having a list of interested and available parties for different modules would make a great deal of sense.  

Thanks,

-Travis


On Jan 5, 2012, at 6:19 PM, josef.pktd at gmail.com wrote:

> Can we keep pull requests open for more than 3 hours, so we actually
> have time to look at them.
> 
> looking at
> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/commit/c9c2d66701583984589c88c08c478e2fc6d9f4ec#L1R1213
> 
> my first guess is that the use of inspect.getargspec breaks when the
> hessian is a method attached to a class, as we have almost all our
> code in statsmodels.
> We just fixed a similar case in scipy.
> 
> There should be at least time to check whether this kind of suspicions
> are justified or not.
> 
> Josef
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev