[SciPy-Dev] Deprecating misc.radon

[Travis Oliphant]

I'm fine with that if it exists in scikits-image.   I'm sure you will point people to that function in the docstring and in the deprecation warning. 

-Travis

On Feb 18, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Would anyone be opposed to deprecating misc.radon for 0.11? It's a small untested and undocumented function that doesn't really fit anywhere. In scikit-image there's a much better-looking radon function, see http://scikits-image.org/docs/dev/auto_examples/plot_radon_transform.html.
> 
> Ralf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20120218/7baf4f51/attachment.html>