[SciPy-Dev] Van der Waerden test in Scipy?

[josef.pktd at gmail.com]

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:36 PM,  <josef.pktd at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:15,  <josef.pktd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 09:30,  <josef.pktd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> How to proceed if these issues are addressed:
>>>>> Since it is a new function, it would be easy to integrate it into
>>>>> scipy from the python files, but if you are familiar with git and
>>>>> github, the integration will eventually be easier if you fork scipy
>>>>> and add the function to scipy.stats and make a pull request.
>>>>> A trac ticket would also be useful to keep track of the contribution
>>>>> (I don't know if github will substitute for this).
>>>>
>>>> I think a pull request would be sufficient for tracking.
>>>
>>> Are pull requests indexed and searchable?
>>
>> Indexed, yes.
>>
>> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pulls
>
> This list looks pretty useless to me, if I want to look for something.
> At least I didn't find a way to get all pull requests that went into
> scipy.stats. (Neither did I find a way to search the changesets.)

Since it's almost on topic http://xkcd.com/903/
(Wikipedia, .chm files, and searchability/googleability)

Josef

>
> Josef
>
>>
>>> Until now I always relied that searching in trac shows all relevant
>>> information, but the one-stop searching seems to be gone for now.
>>
>> --
>> Robert Kern
>>
>> "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
>> enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as
>> though it had an underlying truth."
>>   -- Umberto Eco
>> _______________________________________________
>> SciPy-Dev mailing list
>> SciPy-Dev at scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>>
>