[SciPy-Dev] deprecations - things to remove before 0.8.0

josef.pktd at gmail.com josef.pktd at gmail.com
Thu May 27 21:50:24 EDT 2010


On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 20:58, Warren Weckesser
> <warren.weckesser at enthought.com> wrote:
>> David wrote:
>
>>> It does not to me. Keeping python code has *no* cost from a maintainance
>>> point of view (contrary to compiled code which may be a pain to allow it
>>> to build),
>>
>> Since you specifically emphasized "no", I will respectfully disagree
>> with you about that.  I spent time fixing a bug in ppimport, before I
>> knew that it was deprecated and no longer had a use in scipy--and that
>> it had additional problems besides the small ones I fixed.  My questions
>> about ppimport took up time of other developers.  Developers' time is a
>> cost.  Code that is not going to be maintained, or that no longer solves
>> a problem within the scope of SciPy, should be removed.
>>
>> But not until is has been deprecated for at least one release. :)
>
> "Keeping [properly-marked-deprecated] python code has *no* cost from a
> maintenance point of view ...."

So, is there a policy that applies to morestats.pdf_moments, it just
returns the normal distribution, no change in skew nor kurtosis,
anyone using the function doesn't get what's promised in almost every
case.

kill the function or not?

Josef


> --
> Robert Kern
>
> "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
> enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as
> though it had an underlying truth."
>  -- Umberto Eco
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>



More information about the SciPy-Dev mailing list