[SciPy-Dev] Clarification: is the Extended Summary section optional?

[Benjamin Root]

You may have my keyboard!

Seriously, though, I just registered a username on the wiki (weathergod) and
I would like to help out with documentation.

Ben Root

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:47 PM, David Goldsmith <d.l.goldsmith at gmail.com>wrote:

> I'm working on the docstrings - is any one else?
>
> DG
>
> 2010/6/2 Stéfan van der Walt <stefan at sun.ac.za>
>
> On 2 June 2010 11:35, David Goldsmith <d.l.goldsmith at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I'm encountering many SciPy docstrings
>> >
>> > I'm not talking about NumPy docstrings; I'm not looking at/touching
>> NumPy
>> > docstrings; I'm only going after low-hangingl SciPy fruit.
>>
>> I think Ralf's point was that we have more important things to do than
>> nitpick around whether some functions should have extended sections or
>> not.  Let's get cracking on the many docstrings that are not even
>> close to done.
>>
>> Regards
>> Stéfan
>> _______________________________________________
>> SciPy-Dev mailing list
>> SciPy-Dev at scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Mathematician: noun, someone who disavows certainty when their uncertainty
> set is non-empty, even if that set has measure zero.
>
> Hope: noun, that delusive spirit which escaped Pandora's jar and, with her
> lies, prevents mankind from committing a general suicide.  (As interpreted
> by Robert Graves)
>
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20100602/44f95898/attachment.html>