[SciPy-dev] NumPy f2py GSOC project
ross smith
rjsm at umich.edu
Thu Mar 26 16:16:35 EDT 2009
When I looked at that one, It seemed to me like they are trying to use it
to bind fortran and C together with only a thin, fairly transparent python
layer in the middle.
This one, moves the f2py code to Cython to ease development later on and
help with compatibility between Py3k and Py2x.
I don't see any reason why the two projects would be incompatible. if I'm
wrong please correct me.
-Ross
2009/3/26 David Huard <david.huard at gmail.com>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:55 PM, David Cournapeau<cournape at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> 2009/3/27 David Huard <david.huard at gmail.com>:
>> > Ross,
>> >
>> > I still don't understand how you'll test the py3k version of f2py if
>> numpy
>> > is not ported first ?
>>
>> f2py itself could be ported to py3k but to generate python 2. C code,
>> right ?
>>
>
> RIght, and how does this play with the other cython/f2py gsoc project ?
>
>
>>
>> > I would have thought the first step in porting numpy
>> > would be to port the ndarray type and its methods. But maybe that's
>> already
>> > too ambitious for a gsoc ?
>>
>> I think that's very ambitious, even for people already intimately
>> familiar with numpy C core,
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> David
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scipy-dev mailing list
>> Scipy-dev at scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scipy-dev mailing list
> Scipy-dev at scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20090326/c180bc8b/attachment.html>
More information about the SciPy-Dev
mailing list