[SciPy-dev] the state of scipy unit tests

[Xavier Gnata]

> Nathan Bell wrote:
>> I don't understand your argument.  You propose to make 'fast' be the
>> thing that developers run before committing changes to SVN and then
>> argue that this will lead to more tests being run?  Who runs the slow
>> tests?
> 
> Users. But well, it looks like I am in minority, so let's go for your
> suggestion.
> 
> David


Well looks like "unitary tests" versus "integration tests".
Sounds good. Many users use the svn (for various reasons).
>From there point of view, it could be problem when the svn is really broken.
Small test to be quite sure the svn is not broken and extensive tests
run once per X and/or by users (after a fresh install)

Xavier