[SciPy-dev] Dropping djbfft ?

[Matthieu Brucher]

2008/5/13 David Cournapeau <david at ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp>:

> Nathan Bell wrote:
> >
> > I don't see how this addresses David's argument.
> >
> >
>
> I understand that Robert's position is if supporting too many backends
> is a burden, just drop mkl and fftw(2/3). Supporting fftpack and djbfft
> only would certainly be much easier.


Well, for people that want Matlab-fast FFT (and those are the people you
want to satisfy with the plug-in system with numpy), dropping the fastest
libraries is not the best way to get them.
Just my two cents.

Matthieu
-- 
French PhD student
Website : http://matthieu-brucher.developpez.com/
Blogs : http://matt.eifelle.com and http://blog.developpez.com/?blog=92
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20080513/694cc9b2/attachment.html>