[SciPy-dev] Nose tests - merged
Robert Kern
robert.kern at gmail.com
Wed Jan 16 14:07:22 EST 2008
Matthew Brett wrote:
> Actually, it would not be too hard to have tests in a benchmark
> directory, with names beginning with 'bench', no decorators. It means
> that the tests have to be renamed from test_ to bench_, and that the
> tests would not, by default, be found by the vanilla 'nosetests
> /my/directory/somewhere', but I guess that's OK (backtracking on
> previous opinion). Better?
I would like the benchmarks to be *not* found unless specifically asked for,
even when just using nosetests instead of scipy.test(). Our use of nose to
collect and run these benchmarks is convenient (and a good idea, IMO), but it is
not the purpose of the tool or the framework to run benchmarks. I think that
explicit action should be required to convince nose to run the benchmarks.
We/I can rig up a simple script (nosebench?) that will configure nose with the
appropriate regexes to find the benchmarks.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the SciPy-Dev
mailing list