[SciPy-dev] The future of the scipy.sandbox and a reminder of upcoming doc-day

[Nathan Bell]

On Jan 2, 2008 2:51 PM, Ondrej Certik <ondrej at certik.cz> wrote:
> > No comments, just agree with everything you said.
> >
> > Actually one comment - how could one plug more solvers to the above
> > architecture?
> > (pysparse comes to my mind)

I would think a JDSYM solver like the one in pysparse could live in
splinalg.eigen

> and blzpack - that one is BSD, so it could even go to scipy.

Likewise for blzpack

-- 
Nathan Bell wnbell at gmail.com