[SciPy-dev] Inclusion of cython code in scipy
Prabhu Ramachandran
prabhu at aero.iitb.ac.in
Fri Apr 25 12:55:14 EDT 2008
David Cournapeau wrote:
> So I don't see how a discussion about C++ and stl is relevant for
> numpy/scipy. The original email was about including cython code: if the
> choice is between no code and cython code, I know which side I am on.
The thread has meandered far from the original topic. Sorry for helping
it along. I'll start another thread once I put together what I've been
talking about.
Just to be clear. I have nothing against Cython or Pyrex and even use
Pyrex in some of my own code. There are cases when it is an excellent
option. I don't think Nathan had said anything of the sort either.
I'll elaborate the problem I see later on and start a new thread about it.
> Swig has problems too, BTW. For example, when I was working on
> scipy.cluster last year, I could not regenerate the source file because
> of SWIG version mismatches, and at the end, I just found easier to
> rewrite the extension in pure C (it was really small).
Of course SWIG has its fair share of problems. Not the least the fact
that it changes so fast, so much -- at least in the past this was a problem.
cheers,
prabhu
More information about the SciPy-Dev
mailing list