[SciPy-dev] don't you think the documentation from 2006.08.14 is obsolete?

[Travis Vaught]

Greetings,

I've just refreshed the api_docs using endo again.  Perhaps Charles  
Harris would like to chime in about the status of an epydoc-generated  
set, or some other approach.

This is for SciPy 0.6.0 (forgot to note that in the header--I'll  
regenerate and upload again).

Nathan, scipy.sparse is still "rudimentary" according to the doc  
string in 0.6.0 (and in svn).  Feel free to update the doc string in  
svn and we'll have it listed with the proper respect in the next  
version of the docs.

Best,

Travis V.


On Oct 17, 2007, at 3:06 PM, Nathan Bell wrote:

> On 10/17/07, dmitrey <dmitrey.kroshko at scipy.org> wrote:
>> However, don't you think the documentation from 2006.08.14 is  
>> obsolete?
>
> Absolutely, it describes my beloved scipy.sparse as "rudimentary"  :)
>
> -- 
> Nathan Bell wnbell at gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> Scipy-dev mailing list
> Scipy-dev at scipy.org
> http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>