[SciPy-dev] SciPy improvements
David Cournapeau
david at ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Fri Apr 13 02:40:18 EDT 2007
Matthieu Brucher wrote:
>
> The project page mentions SVM. In addition to SVM I'm interested in
> things like PPCA, kernel PCA, RBF networks, gaussian processes and
> GPLVM. Are you going to try to go in the direction of a modular
> structure with reusable bits for for all kernel methods, or is the
> plan to targeted specifically SVM?
>
>
> Don't scipy have SVMs already ? Perhaps not as modularized at it could
> be ?
> PPCA is PCA IIRC (Tipping 97, it's part of my Phd thesis), KPCA is not
> a big deal if kernels are in a module, and if they have a method
> taking 2 arguments. BTW, even the svd could directly take a kernel as
> an argument, the default kernel being the scalar product ?
> I'm in favour of fine-grained modules - like for the optimisation
> module I proposed -, and allowing pepole to choose which kernel they
> want, even if the kernel was designed for SVM, is a good thing, the
> "kernel trick" should be almost universal :)
The project is first about unifying *existing* packages: basically, make
them first class citizen doc-wise and api-wise, so that they can be
moved out of the sandbox. SVM, EM for mixture fall in this category.
cheers,
David
More information about the SciPy-Dev
mailing list