[SciPy-dev] Renaming scipy_core ???
Pearu Peterson
pearu at scipy.org
Sun Jan 1 14:07:37 EST 2006
Renaming and installing scipy_core packages under different namespace
from scipy is certainly possible. Technically it does not simplify
importing packages, we would still need pkgload hooks for setting
scipy.__doc__ and scipy.__all__ without importing scipy subpackages.
It is a bit unfortunate that now, when many of the issues with importing
scipy_core and "full scipy" packages have been resolved and importing
scipy became stable, we need a major renaming patches again. I really hope
it will be the last one if we decide to do it.
OT: Btw, with the current scipy_core from svn
import scipy # (i)
and
from scipy import * # (ii)
do already the right thing with proper scipy.__all__ list, that is,
(i) imports only subpackages that have global symbols and (ii) imports
all subpackages.
Anyway, I am in favor of renaming scipy_core, but preferably to something
shorter. `scicore` sounds good to me, I would propose also `scico` or
`scire`, but they seem to be taken for other project names, note that also
`scicore` is taken. Hmm, also `sciarray` is taken.
As for applying the renaming, it should be mostly a replace scipy->..
task. I'll be tomorrow away but I'll be back on January 3rd to help with
the renaming.
And as for dropping scipy.distutils, scipy.f2py etc from scipy_core, I'm
-1. We have discussed that before. scipy.distutils have many features over
std distutils that considerably simplify maintaining scipy setup.py files
etc. I am continuously cleaning up scipy.distutils to use more and more
std distutils. However, I doubt that scipy.distutils anytime soon or ever,
to be honest, could be replaced with std distutils.
Pearu
More information about the SciPy-Dev
mailing list