[scikit-learn] Sprint discussion points?

Guillaume Lemaître g.lemaitre58 at gmail.com
Tue Feb 19 17:48:15 EST 2019


> Not sure if Guillaume had ideas about the schedule, given that he seems
to be running the show?

Mostly running behind the show ...

For the moment, we only have a 30 minutes presentation of introduction
planned on Monday.
For the rest of the week, this is pretty much opened and I think that we
can propose a schedule such that we can be efficient.
IMO, two meetings of an hour per day look good to me.

Shall we prioritize the list of the issues? Maybe that some issues could be
packed together.
I would not be against having a rough schedule on the wiki directly and I
think that having it before Monday could be better.

Let me know how I can help.

On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 22:23, Andreas Mueller <t3kcit at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yeah, sounds good.
> I didn't want to unilaterally post a schedule, but doing some google form
> or similar seems a bit heavy-handed?
> Not sure if Guillaume had ideas about the schedule, given that he seems to
> be running the show?
>
> On 2/19/19 4:17 PM, Joel Nothman wrote:
>
> I don't think optics requires a large meeting, just a few people.
>
> I'm happy with your proposal generally, Andy. Do we schedule specific
> topics at this point?
>
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-learn mailing listscikit-learn at python.orghttps://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> scikit-learn mailing list
> scikit-learn at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-learn
>


-- 
Guillaume Lemaitre
INRIA Saclay - Parietal team
Center for Data Science Paris-Saclay
https://glemaitre.github.io/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-learn/attachments/20190219/3bf767c0/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the scikit-learn mailing list