From elyraz at mail.com Fri Jun 5 03:41:11 2015 From: elyraz at mail.com (elyraz at mail.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 00:41:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: GLCM with scikit-image In-Reply-To: References: <74a4cdd3-015c-4ca7-ba4f-b5ede4abd49e@googlegroups.com> <3b3cba05-3482-488c-b683-1b34156fa704@googlegroups.com> <9da24452-ae00-49bf-b3e9-0891121416b2@googlegroups.com> <73f054b0-ba24-4cf7-a5f0-166e090679a9@googlegroups.com> <7ddef0ce-064d-450b-b0df-968145517cf7@googlegroups.com> Message-ID: I moved to python 3.4 and scikit_image?0.11.3 amd when I am running a script the: from skimage.util import dtype dtype.log.disabled = True I get this error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:/Users/ZDesktop/untitled/d.py", line 16, in dtype.log.disabled = True AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'log' If I remove the ?dtype.log.disabled = True? script line I get this message: C:\Python34\lib\site-packages\skimage\util\dtype.py:111: UserWarning: Possible precision loss when converting from float64 to uint8 "%s to %s" % (dtypeobj_in, dtypeobj)) Therefore, how can I use the dtype and remove the warning message? Thanks a lot -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From helderomar at gmail.com Fri Jun 5 04:01:02 2015 From: helderomar at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=A9lder_Tomas?=) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 01:01:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: problem with io.imread In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello guys, I had the same issue and it's due to PIL and the libraries needed to read jpeg. It worked fine with png for instance. Pillow has replaced pil, and we might as well remove pil. Remove PIL: *sudo pip uninstall pil* Install the required libraries: * sudo apt-get install libtiff4-dev libjpeg8-dev zlib1g-dev libfreetype6-dev liblcms2-dev libwebp-dev tcl8.5-dev tk8.5-dev python-tk* Install/upgrade pillow : *sudo pip install pillow --upgrade* And your data.imread should work fine now. Hope this helps someone! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefanv at berkeley.edu Fri Jun 5 14:37:22 2015 From: stefanv at berkeley.edu (Stefan van der Walt) Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 11:37:22 -0700 Subject: problem with io.imread In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <87h9qmc87x.fsf@berkeley.edu> Dear H?lder On 2015-06-05 01:01:02, H?lder Tomas wrote: > I had the same issue and it's due to PIL and the libraries > needed to read jpeg. It worked fine with png for instance. > Pillow has replaced pil, and we might as well remove pil. Can we catch this problem and then display a workaround to the user? Would you be interested in working on that? St?fan From stefanv at berkeley.edu Fri Jun 5 14:40:58 2015 From: stefanv at berkeley.edu (Stefan van der Walt) Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 11:40:58 -0700 Subject: GLCM with scikit-image In-Reply-To: References: <74a4cdd3-015c-4ca7-ba4f-b5ede4abd49e@googlegroups.com> <3b3cba05-3482-488c-b683-1b34156fa704@googlegroups.com> <9da24452-ae00-49bf-b3e9-0891121416b2@googlegroups.com> <73f054b0-ba24-4cf7-a5f0-166e090679a9@googlegroups.com> <7ddef0ce-064d-450b-b0df-968145517cf7@googlegroups.com> Message-ID: <87eglqc81x.fsf@berkeley.edu> On 2015-06-05 00:35:54, elyraz at mail.com wrote: > I moved to python 3.4 and scikit_image?0.11.3 amnd when I am > running a script the: from skimage.util import dtype > dtype.log.disabled = True > > I get this error: Traceback (most recent call last): > File "C:/Users/ZDesktop/untitled/d.py", line 16, in > dtype.log.disabled = True > AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'log' The package has changed in the mean time--we no longer use a logging mechanism and you can disable the warning using the standing Python warnings module. St?fan From steven.silvester at gmail.com Sat Jun 6 11:54:30 2015 From: steven.silvester at gmail.com (Steven Silvester) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 08:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: missing kernel or block size in equalize_adapthist In-Reply-To: <4b57c4b4-1f5f-4cf5-a4e6-3b14e657da2f@googlegroups.com> References: <4b57c4b4-1f5f-4cf5-a4e6-3b14e657da2f@googlegroups.com> Message-ID: Hi Kai, We are having a discussion now about how to fix/improve the adapthist block handling: https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/issues/1541. Regards, Steve On Monday, May 25, 2015 at 1:49:53 PM UTC-5, Kai Wiechen wrote: > > > > Hello, > > I am using equalize_adapthist after color deconvolution and some > morphological operations to enhance local contrast of nuclei in > histological images. There are different results when applying > equalize_adapthist when using small patches and larger size whole images > (left small patch, right large size whole image). The CLAHE implementation > in ImageJ has a 'block size' parameter and the implementation in Pixinsight > has a 'Kernel size' parameter to get results depending on the local > context. Is it possible to 'simulate' this behaviour with scikit-image? > > Best regards, > > Kai > > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefanv at berkeley.edu Sun Jun 7 10:34:02 2015 From: stefanv at berkeley.edu (Stefan van der Walt) Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2015 07:34:02 -0700 Subject: Sticker review Message-ID: <87vbeza8px.fsf@berkeley.edu> Hi all, Here is a PR with a potential skimage sticker: https://github.com/scikit-image/skimage-branding/pull/1 What do you think? St?fan From jsch at demuc.de Sun Jun 7 10:49:44 2015 From: jsch at demuc.de (=?UTF-8?Q?Johannes_Sch=C3=B6nberger?=) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 07:49:44 -0700 Subject: Sticker review In-Reply-To: <87vbeza8px.fsf@berkeley.edu> References: <87vbeza8px.fsf@berkeley.edu> Message-ID: Looks nice! How does it look like with a warying white border? On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Stefan van der Walt wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is a PR with a potential skimage sticker: > > https://github.com/scikit-image/skimage-branding/pull/1 > > What do you think? > > St?fan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "scikit-image" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. From msarahan at gmail.com Sun Jun 7 12:35:32 2015 From: msarahan at gmail.com (Michael Sarahan) Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2015 16:35:32 +0000 Subject: Sticker review In-Reply-To: References: <87vbeza8px.fsf@berkeley.edu> Message-ID: Looks great! I'm excited to put one on my laptop. My only comment/question is about the grey space between the k and i. I think it's fine as is, but I wonder why you have grey/cutout there, and not in any of the other large void spaces (like inside the g?) Disclaimer: I have never designed a sticker, and don't know best practices. Among the stickers that I presently have on my laptop, none have cutouts inside the sticker. Best, Michael On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 7:49 AM Johannes Sch?nberger wrote: > Looks nice! How does it look like with a warying white border? > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Stefan van der Walt > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Here is a PR with a potential skimage sticker: > > > > https://github.com/scikit-image/skimage-branding/pull/1 > > > > What do you think? > > > > St?fan > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "scikit-image" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "scikit-image" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefanv at berkeley.edu Mon Jun 8 22:22:57 2015 From: stefanv at berkeley.edu (Stefan van der Walt) Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 19:22:57 -0700 Subject: Sticker review In-Reply-To: References: <87vbeza8px.fsf@berkeley.edu> Message-ID: <87oakp8vsu.fsf@berkeley.edu> Hi Johannes On 2015-06-07 07:49:44, Johannes Sch?nberger wrote: > Looks nice! How does it look like with a warying white border? Varying in which aspect? St?fan From stefanv at berkeley.edu Mon Jun 8 22:26:15 2015 From: stefanv at berkeley.edu (Stefan van der Walt) Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 19:26:15 -0700 Subject: Sticker review In-Reply-To: References: <87vbeza8px.fsf@berkeley.edu> Message-ID: <87mw098vnc.fsf@berkeley.edu> On 2015-06-07 09:35:32, Michael Sarahan wrote: > Looks great! I'm excited to put one on my laptop. My only > comment/question is about the grey space between the k and i. I > think it's fine as is, but I wonder why you have grey/cutout > there, and not in any of the other large void spaces (like > inside the g?) Disclaimer: I have never designed a sticker, and > don't know best practices. Among the stickers that I presently > have on my laptop, none have cutouts inside the sticker. I manually closed the hole inside the g, because someone told me it looked weird. Perhaps it looks even weirder now that it's artificially closed? Here is the original: https://www.dropbox.com/s/yg4lypzmgjd1aoh/sticker_00.png?dl=0 St?fan From stefanv at berkeley.edu Tue Jun 9 01:23:35 2015 From: stefanv at berkeley.edu (Stefan van der Walt) Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 22:23:35 -0700 Subject: Sticker review In-Reply-To: References: <87vbeza8px.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87mw098vnc.fsf@berkeley.edu> Message-ID: <87a8w98nfs.fsf@berkeley.edu> Here is the no-holes version: https://www.dropbox.com/s/yn7p3p1dfs1itc5/sticker_01.png?dl=0 One reason to keep the hole would be to distinguish the two parts: scikit vs image. On 2015-06-08 21:34:50, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote: > @stefanv, I'd favour closing the k-i also. > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Michael Sarahan > wrote: > >> I agree that the open g looks weird. Good work closing >> it. Funny how the triangle between the k and i does not look >> weird to me. I think it's great as is. >> >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, 19:26 Stefan van der Walt >> >> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-06-07 09:35:32, Michael Sarahan >>> wrote: >>> > Looks great! I'm excited to put one on my laptop. My only >>> > comment/question is about the grey space between the k and >>> > i. I think it's fine as is, but I wonder why you have >>> > grey/cutout there, and not in any of the other large void >>> > spaces (like inside the g?) Disclaimer: I have never >>> > designed a sticker, and don't know best practices. Among >>> > the stickers that I presently have on my laptop, none have >>> > cutouts inside the sticker. >>> >>> I manually closed the hole inside the g, because someone told >>> me it looked weird. Perhaps it looks even weirder now that >>> it's artificially closed? >>> >>> Here is the original: >>> >>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/yg4lypzmgjd1aoh/sticker_00.png?dl=0 >>> >>> St?fan >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>> Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this >>> group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to >>> scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. For more options, >>> visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >> Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this >> group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to >> scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. For more options, >> visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> From msarahan at gmail.com Mon Jun 8 22:51:58 2015 From: msarahan at gmail.com (Michael Sarahan) Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 02:51:58 +0000 Subject: Sticker review In-Reply-To: <87mw098vnc.fsf@berkeley.edu> References: <87vbeza8px.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87mw098vnc.fsf@berkeley.edu> Message-ID: I agree that the open g looks weird. Good work closing it. Funny how the triangle between the k and i does not look weird to me. I think it's great as is. On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, 19:26 Stefan van der Walt wrote: > On 2015-06-07 09:35:32, Michael Sarahan > wrote: > > Looks great! I'm excited to put one on my laptop. My only > > comment/question is about the grey space between the k and i. I > > think it's fine as is, but I wonder why you have grey/cutout > > there, and not in any of the other large void spaces (like > > inside the g?) Disclaimer: I have never designed a sticker, and > > don't know best practices. Among the stickers that I presently > > have on my laptop, none have cutouts inside the sticker. > > I manually closed the hole inside the g, because someone told me > it looked weird. Perhaps it looks even weirder now that it's > artificially closed? > > Here is the original: > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/yg4lypzmgjd1aoh/sticker_00.png?dl=0 > > St?fan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "scikit-image" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jni.soma at gmail.com Tue Jun 9 00:34:50 2015 From: jni.soma at gmail.com (Juan Nunez-Iglesias) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 14:34:50 +1000 Subject: Sticker review In-Reply-To: References: <87vbeza8px.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87mw098vnc.fsf@berkeley.edu> Message-ID: @stefanv, I'd favour closing the k-i also. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Michael Sarahan wrote: > I agree that the open g looks weird. Good work closing it. Funny how the > triangle between the k and i does not look weird to me. I think it's great > as is. > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, 19:26 Stefan van der Walt > wrote: > >> On 2015-06-07 09:35:32, Michael Sarahan >> wrote: >> > Looks great! I'm excited to put one on my laptop. My only >> > comment/question is about the grey space between the k and i. I >> > think it's fine as is, but I wonder why you have grey/cutout >> > there, and not in any of the other large void spaces (like >> > inside the g?) Disclaimer: I have never designed a sticker, and >> > don't know best practices. Among the stickers that I presently >> > have on my laptop, none have cutouts inside the sticker. >> >> I manually closed the hole inside the g, because someone told me >> it looked weird. Perhaps it looks even weirder now that it's >> artificially closed? >> >> Here is the original: >> >> https://www.dropbox.com/s/yg4lypzmgjd1aoh/sticker_00.png?dl=0 >> >> St?fan >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "scikit-image" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "scikit-image" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silvertrumpet999 at gmail.com Tue Jun 9 19:03:32 2015 From: silvertrumpet999 at gmail.com (Josh Warner) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 16:03:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Sticker review In-Reply-To: <87a8w98nfs.fsf@berkeley.edu> References: <87vbeza8px.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87mw098vnc.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87a8w98nfs.fsf@berkeley.edu> Message-ID: I'd vote for no-holes. Everything else aside, complicated stickers with cutouts like that usually don't peel off well or reliably if the cutouts aren't connected to the surrounding non-sticker region. On Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 12:23:39 AM UTC-5, stefanv wrote: > > Here is the no-holes version: > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/yn7p3p1dfs1itc5/sticker_01.png?dl=0 > > One reason to keep the hole would be to distinguish the two parts: > scikit vs image. > > On 2015-06-08 21:34:50, Juan Nunez-Iglesias > wrote: > > @stefanv, I'd favour closing the k-i also. > > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Michael Sarahan > > wrote: > > > >> I agree that the open g looks weird. Good work closing > >> it. Funny how the triangle between the k and i does not look > >> weird to me. I think it's great as is. > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, 19:26 Stefan van der Walt > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On 2015-06-07 09:35:32, Michael Sarahan > >>> wrote: > >>> > Looks great! I'm excited to put one on my laptop. My only > >>> > comment/question is about the grey space between the k and > >>> > i. I think it's fine as is, but I wonder why you have > >>> > grey/cutout there, and not in any of the other large void > >>> > spaces (like inside the g?) Disclaimer: I have never > >>> > designed a sticker, and don't know best practices. Among > >>> > the stickers that I presently have on my laptop, none have > >>> > cutouts inside the sticker. > >>> > >>> I manually closed the hole inside the g, because someone told > >>> me it looked weird. Perhaps it looks even weirder now that > >>> it's artificially closed? > >>> > >>> Here is the original: > >>> > >>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/yg4lypzmgjd1aoh/sticker_00.png?dl=0 > >>> > >>> St?fan > >>> > >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the > >>> Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this > >>> group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to > >>> scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. For more options, > >>> visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > >>> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > >> Google Groups "scikit-image" group. To unsubscribe from this > >> group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to > >> scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. For more options, > >> visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matthew.m.mccormick at gmail.com Wed Jun 10 23:53:24 2015 From: matthew.m.mccormick at gmail.com (Matthew McCormick) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:53:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: SciPy 2015 Birds-of-a-Feather Submission Message-ID: Members of the scikit-image Community, As one of the co-chairs in charge of organizing the birds-of-a-feather sessions at SciPy this year, I wanted to reach out to your community to encourage you to submit a BoF proposal. A BoF session is an opportunity to open up a discussion on topics related to scikit-image development, future or just general questions. Please let us know if there is anything we can help with in terms of organization. More details can be found here: http://scipy2015.scipy.org/ehome/115969/259291/?& Kyle Mandli and Matt McCormick -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gashjizhou at gmail.com Fri Jun 12 11:04:46 2015 From: gashjizhou at gmail.com (Ji Zhou) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 08:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: problem with measure.label In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2ca71be1-114a-4593-bf79-fe60f36f2ce8@googlegroups.com> Hi, I have the same issue when using scikit image (Anaconda distribution, which is up-to-date) to label some image objects. Error messages are: from skimage.measure import label import numpy as np ? label(np.zeros(5), connectivity=1) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------TypeError Traceback (most recent call last) in () 2 import numpy as np 3 ----> 4 label(np.zeros(5), connectivity=1) TypeError: label() got an unexpected keyword argument 'connectivity' Could you help? Ji On Monday, 4 May 2015 16:46:09 UTC+1, Julien Derr wrote: > > Hi everyone, it is me again ... > I got this error with the label function > TypeError: label() got an unexpected keyword argument 'connectivity' > > but I used it exactly like written in the help : > > cc= label(binary2,connectivity=2) > > I thought it was maybe a problem of version, but it is written in my own > help when I type ?label, > so what could it be ? ideas? > > thanks again! > > Julien > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefanv at berkeley.edu Fri Jun 12 13:20:39 2015 From: stefanv at berkeley.edu (Stefan van der Walt) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:20:39 -0700 Subject: problem with measure.label In-Reply-To: <2ca71be1-114a-4593-bf79-fe60f36f2ce8@googlegroups.com> References: <2ca71be1-114a-4593-bf79-fe60f36f2ce8@googlegroups.com> Message-ID: <87a8w4yhaw.fsf@berkeley.edu> On 2015-06-12 08:04:46, Ji Zhou wrote: > I have the same issue when using scikit image (Anaconda > distribution, which is up-to-date) to label some image > objects. Error messages are: Can you please verify your version? import skimage print(skimage.__version__) Thanks St?fan From silvertrumpet999 at gmail.com Fri Jun 12 14:33:57 2015 From: silvertrumpet999 at gmail.com (Josh Warner) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:33:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: problem with measure.label In-Reply-To: <87a8w4yhaw.fsf@berkeley.edu> References: <2ca71be1-114a-4593-bf79-fe60f36f2ce8@googlegroups.com> <87a8w4yhaw.fsf@berkeley.edu> Message-ID: I cannot reproduce with everything installed fresh via miniconda on Win7. >>> from skimage.measure import label>>> import numpy as np>>> label(np.zeros(5), connectivity=1) array([0, 0, 0, 0, 0], dtype=int64) On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 12:20:43 PM UTC-5, stefanv wrote: On 2015-06-12 08:04:46, Ji Zhou wrote: > > I have the same issue when using scikit image (Anaconda > > distribution, which is up-to-date) to label some image > > objects. Error messages are: > > Can you please verify your version? > > import skimage > print(skimage.__version__) > > Thanks > St?fan > ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gashjizhou at gmail.com Sat Jun 13 09:50:03 2015 From: gashjizhou at gmail.com (Ji Zhou) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 06:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: problem with measure.label In-Reply-To: References: <2ca71be1-114a-4593-bf79-fe60f36f2ce8@googlegroups.com> <87a8w4yhaw.fsf@berkeley.edu> Message-ID: <6858e0a2-786b-46e2-81d9-56198f864dc1@googlegroups.com> Dear all, Many thanks for the prompt response! I checked the version of scikit image, which suggests that it is 0.10.1. However, after I used conda install scikit-image=0.11.3 I still cannot update the version of iPython notebook. Could you please give me a hand? Cheers, Ji On Saturday, 13 June 2015 02:28:35 UTC+1, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote: > > This looks like a version problem. Connectivity was added in 0.11. > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Josh Warner > wrote: > >> I cannot reproduce with everything installed fresh via miniconda on Win7. >> >> >>> from skimage.measure import label>>> import numpy as np>>> label(np.zeros(5), connectivity=1) >> array([0, 0, 0, 0, 0], dtype=int64) >> >> On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 12:20:43 PM UTC-5, stefanv wrote: >> >> On 2015-06-12 08:04:46, Ji Zhou > >>> wrote: >>> > I have the same issue when using scikit image (Anaconda >>> > distribution, which is up-to-date) to label some image >>> > objects. Error messages are: >>> >>> Can you please verify your version? >>> >>> import skimage >>> print(skimage.__version__) >>> >>> Thanks >>> St?fan >>> >> ? >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "scikit-image" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to scikit-image... at googlegroups.com . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stefanv at berkeley.edu Sat Jun 13 11:33:36 2015 From: stefanv at berkeley.edu (Stefan van der Walt) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 08:33:36 -0700 Subject: problem with measure.label In-Reply-To: <6858e0a2-786b-46e2-81d9-56198f864dc1@googlegroups.com> References: <2ca71be1-114a-4593-bf79-fe60f36f2ce8@googlegroups.com> <87a8w4yhaw.fsf@berkeley.edu> <6858e0a2-786b-46e2-81d9-56198f864dc1@googlegroups.com> Message-ID: <87twubwrlb.fsf@berkeley.edu> On 2015-06-13 06:50:03, Ji Zhou wrote: > I still cannot update the version of iPython notebook. Could you > please give me a hand? What do you mean by this? Do you mean that you cannot access the latest version of skimage? You'll have to restart your notebook kernel. St?fan From jni.soma at gmail.com Fri Jun 12 21:28:14 2015 From: jni.soma at gmail.com (Juan Nunez-Iglesias) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 11:28:14 +1000 Subject: problem with measure.label In-Reply-To: References: <2ca71be1-114a-4593-bf79-fe60f36f2ce8@googlegroups.com> <87a8w4yhaw.fsf@berkeley.edu> Message-ID: This looks like a version problem. Connectivity was added in 0.11. On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Josh Warner wrote: > I cannot reproduce with everything installed fresh via miniconda on Win7. > > >>> from skimage.measure import label>>> import numpy as np>>> label(np.zeros(5), connectivity=1) > array([0, 0, 0, 0, 0], dtype=int64) > > On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 12:20:43 PM UTC-5, stefanv wrote: > > On 2015-06-12 08:04:46, Ji Zhou wrote: >> > I have the same issue when using scikit image (Anaconda >> > distribution, which is up-to-date) to label some image >> > objects. Error messages are: >> >> Can you please verify your version? >> >> import skimage >> print(skimage.__version__) >> >> Thanks >> St?fan >> > ? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "scikit-image" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silvertrumpet999 at gmail.com Sat Jun 13 19:57:07 2015 From: silvertrumpet999 at gmail.com (Josh Warner) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 16:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: problem with measure.label In-Reply-To: References: <2ca71be1-114a-4593-bf79-fe60f36f2ce8@googlegroups.com> <87a8w4yhaw.fsf@berkeley.edu> <6858e0a2-786b-46e2-81d9-56198f864dc1@googlegroups.com> <87twubwrlb.fsf@berkeley.edu> Message-ID: <1a3b0082-112c-4414-b64e-beace1efebd9@googlegroups.com> This sounds like you may have conflicting Python installations. `conda` updating scikit-image successfully means you should have version 11.3 _somewhere_, but your PATH may still be preferentially finding a different Python/IPython different from the one your `conda` points to. Investigate this with `which python` to see what the system is doing when you ask for Python. Further instructions would probably best be obtained through the conda mailing list. On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 3:37:56 PM UTC-5, Ji Zhou wrote: > > I use conda to update scikit image package on mac. However after undating > and restarting the kernel, the scikit image was still 0.10.1 on mac. > > Interestingly, on my Windows machine, the same procedure has successfully > update scikit image. > > One thing I shall point out is that I tried to uninstall anaconda on my > mac and was failed. > > Ji > On 13 Jun 2015 16:33, "Stefan van der Walt" wrote: > >> On 2015-06-13 06:50:03, Ji Zhou wrote: >> >>> I still cannot update the version of iPython notebook. Could you please >>> give me a hand? >>> >> >> What do you mean by this? Do you mean that you cannot access the latest >> version of skimage? You'll have to restart your notebook kernel. >> >> St?fan >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >> Google Groups "scikit-image" group. >> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/scikit-image/-YegZib4VK8/unsubscribe. >> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >> scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gashjizhou at gmail.com Sat Jun 13 16:37:54 2015 From: gashjizhou at gmail.com (Ji Zhou) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 21:37:54 +0100 Subject: problem with measure.label In-Reply-To: <87twubwrlb.fsf@berkeley.edu> References: <2ca71be1-114a-4593-bf79-fe60f36f2ce8@googlegroups.com> <87a8w4yhaw.fsf@berkeley.edu> <6858e0a2-786b-46e2-81d9-56198f864dc1@googlegroups.com> <87twubwrlb.fsf@berkeley.edu> Message-ID: I use conda to update scikit image package on mac. However after undating and restarting the kernel, the scikit image was still 0.10.1 on mac. Interestingly, on my Windows machine, the same procedure has successfully update scikit image. One thing I shall point out is that I tried to uninstall anaconda on my mac and was failed. Ji On 13 Jun 2015 16:33, "Stefan van der Walt" wrote: > On 2015-06-13 06:50:03, Ji Zhou wrote: > >> I still cannot update the version of iPython notebook. Could you please >> give me a hand? >> > > What do you mean by this? Do you mean that you cannot access the latest > version of skimage? You'll have to restart your notebook kernel. > > St?fan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "scikit-image" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/scikit-image/-YegZib4VK8/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From aprier90 at gmail.com Tue Jun 16 11:25:46 2015 From: aprier90 at gmail.com (Anders Prier Lindvig) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 08:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Major and Minor axis length Message-ID: I have been using the scikit-image library for a segmentation task in my master thesis. More specifically I have used the regionprops function for calculation of major and minor axis length of objects. I was wondering why exactly, the eigenvalues are multiplied by 4, before returning the axis length? I realize that you multiply by 2 to get the full length, and I think you multiply by 2 again because of the standard deviation, but I am unsure about this. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jsch at demuc.de Tue Jun 16 23:59:46 2015 From: jsch at demuc.de (=?UTF-8?Q?Johannes_Sch=C3=B6nberger?=) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 20:59:46 -0700 Subject: Major and Minor axis length In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Anders, there is different formulations for axis lengths and eccentricity in literature. At the moment, I cannot recall which formulation I used when I implemented the functions. In the end, it does not matter what scaling factor you use, as long as it is consistent. A quick Google search reveals this page: https://books.google.com/books?id=4gBUz_IkkSsC&lpg=PA230&ots=mAAFbCrng_&pg=PA231#v=onepage&q&f=false which seems to confirm my implementation. Following the references, you should be able to figure out more about that. Hope that helps. Best, Johannes On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Anders Prier Lindvig wrote: > I have been using the scikit-image library for a segmentation task in my > master thesis. More specifically I have used the regionprops function for > calculation of major and minor axis length of objects. I was wondering why > exactly, the eigenvalues are multiplied by 4, before returning the axis > length? I realize that you multiply by 2 to get the full length, and I > think you multiply by 2 again because of the standard deviation, but I am > unsure about this. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "scikit-image" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gashjizhou at gmail.com Wed Jun 17 17:29:02 2015 From: gashjizhou at gmail.com (Ji Zhou) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:29:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: problem with measure.label In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <00c6fc40-12f4-4693-a255-4b4ab44b65a8@googlegroups.com> Dear all, thanks for the help! I eventually figure out the issue is iPython Notebook is referring to a different skimage library, which was included in the Canopy distribution... import os path = os.path.dirname(skimage.__file__) /Users/zhouj/Library/Enthought/Canopy_64bit/User/lib/python2.7/site-packages/skimage So after uninstalling the Canopy distribution, it is working okay now :-) Cheers, Ji On Monday, 4 May 2015 16:46:09 UTC+1, Julien Derr wrote: > > Hi everyone, it is me again ... > I got this error with the label function > TypeError: label() got an unexpected keyword argument 'connectivity' > > but I used it exactly like written in the help : > > cc= label(binary2,connectivity=2) > > I thought it was maybe a problem of version, but it is written in my own > help when I type ?label, > so what could it be ? ideas? > > thanks again! > > Julien > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nadavh.horesh at gmail.com Fri Jun 19 13:16:43 2015 From: nadavh.horesh at gmail.com (Nadav Horesh) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: (Histogram?) plugin behaviour change? Message-ID: Maybe there is a plugin behaviour change, since the color_histogram.py does not function as it used to, I suspect that for some reason the RectangleTool is attached to the image rather to the histogram window. I'd to have instructions how to fix it, since I've build a modification to ColorHistogram that it would be nice to fix. Thanks Nadav -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fboulogne at sciunto.org Fri Jun 19 13:10:32 2015 From: fboulogne at sciunto.org (=?windows-1252?Q?Fran=E7ois_Boulogne?=) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 13:10:32 -0400 Subject: Fwd: Your PeerJ article has been selected as one of our top bioinformatics papers In-Reply-To: <31e101d0aab2$84153f70$8c3fbe50$@peerj.com> References: <31e101d0aab2$84153f70$8c3fbe50$@peerj.com> Message-ID: <55844D08.9050603@sciunto.org> Dear all, The paper has been selected for the Top Bioinformatics Papers - June 2015. See the email of the editor below. Best. Fr. -------- Message transf?r? -------- Sujet : Your PeerJ article has been selected as one of our top bioinformatics papers Date : Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:07:32 -0700 De : Peter Binfield Pour : boulogne at princeton.edu Dear Fran?ois, On behalf of the PeerJ Team, I am writing to let you know that your PeerJ article (?/scikit-image: image processing in Python/? at https://peerj.com/articles/453/) has been named as one of our ?top? bioinformatics articles and is listed in our ?Top Bioinformatics Papers - June 2015? Collection. More information about this Collection is at: https://peerj.com/blog/post/115284878050/ and the Collection itself is at: https://peerj.com/collections/18-bioinf-062015/ Congratulations on this selection! We hope you consider PeerJ for your future publications. Yours Pete Binfield . . . Peter Binfield, PhD Co-Founder and Publisher, PeerJ Email: pete at PeerJ.com Web: PeerJ.com Twitter: @p_binfield & @ThePeerJ Blog: blog.PeerJ.com Check out our new journal in Computer Science From steven.silvester at gmail.com Sat Jun 20 07:54:17 2015 From: steven.silvester at gmail.com (Steven Silvester) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 04:54:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: (Histogram?) plugin behaviour change? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <24fefb1b-23a2-4950-8551-25a2ea0d21c6@googlegroups.com> Hi Nadav, Thanks for spotting that! This was indeed a regression, now addressed: https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/pull/1565. Regards, Steve On Friday, June 19, 2015 at 12:16:43 PM UTC-5, Nadav Horesh wrote: > > Maybe there is a plugin behaviour change, since the color_histogram.py > does not function as it used to, I suspect that for some reason the > RectangleTool is attached to the image rather to the histogram window. I'd > to have instructions how to fix it, since I've build a modification to > ColorHistogram that it would be nice to fix. > > Thanks > > Nadav > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kevin.keraudren at googlemail.com Sun Jun 21 14:58:32 2015 From: kevin.keraudren at googlemail.com (Kevin Keraudren) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 19:58:32 +0100 Subject: Enquiring about companies that rely on scikit-image Message-ID: Hi, I just came back from PyData London, which was a great experience. I thought I would see a bit more image processing outside of an academic context, but Lyst is the only one I noticed. I was surprised by the success of scikit-learn outside of academia [1], and I was wondering if people on the mailing list were aware of companies that would similarly rely on scikit-image? Kind Regards, Kevin [1] http://scikit-learn.org/stable/testimonials/testimonials.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nadavh.horesh at gmail.com Mon Jun 22 01:55:48 2015 From: nadavh.horesh at gmail.com (Nadav Horesh) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 22:55:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: (Histogram?) plugin behaviour change? In-Reply-To: <24fefb1b-23a2-4950-8551-25a2ea0d21c6@googlegroups.com> References: <24fefb1b-23a2-4950-8551-25a2ea0d21c6@googlegroups.com> Message-ID: <9f77a14e-9f42-44cf-ab00-b862a1b97898@googlegroups.com> Thank you. I'll follow. Nadav ?????? ??? ???, 20 ????? 2015 ???? 14:54:17 UTC+3, ??? Steven Silvester: > > Hi Nadav, > > Thanks for spotting that! This was indeed a regression, now addressed: > https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/pull/1565. > > > Regards, > > Steve > > On Friday, June 19, 2015 at 12:16:43 PM UTC-5, Nadav Horesh wrote: >> >> Maybe there is a plugin behaviour change, since the color_histogram.py >> does not function as it used to, I suspect that for some reason the >> RectangleTool is attached to the image rather to the histogram window. I'd >> to have instructions how to fix it, since I've build a modification to >> ColorHistogram that it would be nice to fix. >> >> Thanks >> >> Nadav >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From manandey1 at gmail.com Wed Jun 24 20:46:13 2015 From: manandey1 at gmail.com (Manan Dey) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 17:46:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: HOG feature extraction Message-ID: <3c7d6333-7dcf-4b11-8cbd-6ba2c0ab3953@googlegroups.com> Hi I want to extract HOG features from Handwritten Arabic Line Images. When I run the test_hog.py file from the scimage library from scikit. It runs without any errors but it doesnt print any features as output. Can anyone please help me how to print the features. The link to the program is https://code.google.com/p/pythonxy/source/browse/src/python/scikits.image/PLATLIB/skimage/feature/tests/test_hog.py?repo=xy-27&r=13342d4c8c84fdc4dd3201bbde6201d8ba5b0683 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From silvertrumpet999 at gmail.com Thu Jun 25 19:12:39 2015 From: silvertrumpet999 at gmail.com (Josh Warner) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:12:39 -0700 (PDT) Subject: HOG feature extraction In-Reply-To: <3c7d6333-7dcf-4b11-8cbd-6ba2c0ab3953@googlegroups.com> References: <3c7d6333-7dcf-4b11-8cbd-6ba2c0ab3953@googlegroups.com> Message-ID: <69edff80-495f-499b-bd81-e71f7e48270d@googlegroups.com> Hi Manan, First, that is a very old version of the package. Farther up the tree `version.py` states it's version 0.6.1 - we are currently shipping version 0.11.3. I hope Python(X,Y) isn't still shipping 0.6.1. Before anything else, upgrade your scikit-image installation if needed. Second, the test files is designed to test the package, not as direct examples of usage. They can be helpful to understand how files work, but realize they are unit tests. We run all files matching `test_*.py` in the repo using nosetests in our continuous integration builds. We don't want output from these; they are designed to pass if everything is well. So the fact that you don't get any output is working as intended, and reassuring. That means HOG is operating on your system. The documentation for HOG is located here: http://scikit-image.org/docs/stable/api/skimage.feature.html#hog I hope that helps set you on your way, Josh On Wednesday, June 24, 2015 at 8:15:48 PM UTC-5, Manan Dey wrote: > > Hi > > I want to extract HOG features from Handwritten Arabic Line Images. When I > run the test_hog.py file from the scimage library from scikit. It runs > without any errors but it doesnt print any features as output. Can anyone > please help me how to print the features. The link to the program is > https://code.google.com/p/pythonxy/source/browse/src/python/scikits.image/PLATLIB/skimage/feature/tests/test_hog.py?repo=xy-27&r=13342d4c8c84fdc4dd3201bbde6201d8ba5b0683 > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From geazzo at gmail.com Fri Jun 26 14:32:33 2015 From: geazzo at gmail.com (George Azzopardi) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:32:33 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Pattern and object recognition with COSFIRE In-Reply-To: <87oar05wkt.fsf@sun.ac.za> References: <54900E26.3020607@gmail.com> <87zjan6dee.fsf@sun.ac.za> <6fd44996-fbf4-4151-8bdd-e9e9e0aef928@googlegroups.com> <78dcd628-2008-441b-a478-ff4e2eff39cd@googlegroups.com> <717836ab-0fc4-49f0-8bfb-d25b7fd5acc5@googlegroups.com> <87oar05wkt.fsf@sun.ac.za> Message-ID: <6ec5edfd-f0ff-4727-926e-09b02f4b51a7@googlegroups.com> Hi Stefan, I'm seeing this message rather late. If I'm in still in time, I would be interested to co-mentor a student ... Let me know. You may also contact me directly on email: geazzogmailcom George On Friday, 19 December 2014 01:10:00 UTC+1, Stefan van der Walt wrote: > > Hi George > > On 2014-12-17 12:48:26, George Azzopardi > > wrote: > > I would be very happy and available to work with an undergraduate or a > > postgraduate student (or any other person) to have this parallel > > implementation in Python. I see that you already added it to the > > Requested-features page. You can also add my contact details > (geazzo at gmail) > > there for the interested readers. > > Thank you for getting in touch! If you are interested in co-mentoring a > student, we can consider applying for a Google Summer of Code > sponsorship to develop the color version of COSFIRE. > > > All my papers can be freely downloaded from my > > website: http://www.cs.rug.nl/~george/research-activities/ > > Thank you for this--I've updated the wiki page accordingly. > > St?fan > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ug201313015 at iitj.ac.in Fri Jun 26 16:55:38 2015 From: ug201313015 at iitj.ac.in (Joshi ACHYUT SANJAY) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:55:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: New to scikit-image Contribution Message-ID: <79225f5a-8651-45d5-9a53-d4dc662f897d@googlegroups.com> Hello, I am Achyut Joshi. I am new to the open source development and scikit-image intrigued me. Where and how can I start working? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From vighneshbirodkar at gmail.com Mon Jun 29 05:27:23 2015 From: vighneshbirodkar at gmail.com (Vighnesh Birodkar) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 02:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: New to scikit-image Contribution In-Reply-To: <79225f5a-8651-45d5-9a53-d4dc662f897d@googlegroups.com> References: <79225f5a-8651-45d5-9a53-d4dc662f897d@googlegroups.com> Message-ID: Hello Achyut Head over to the Issues List[1] to see if you can fix something. The wiki[2] also has a list of some features that we want. You will need to clone the repo, make a branch, and raise a pull request to contribute. [1]:https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/issues [2]:https://github.com/scikit-image/scikit-image/wiki/Requested-features Thanks Vighnesh On Saturday, June 27, 2015 at 11:00:28 AM UTC+5:30, Joshi ACHYUT SANJAY wrote: > > Hello, > > I am Achyut Joshi. I am new to the open source development and > scikit-image intrigued me. Where and how can I start working? > > > Thanks > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: