GSoC project request for comments

[Ronnie Ghose]

+1 as an optional module for additional functionality - I'm not a fan of
monolithic libraries
On Jun 11, 2014 11:18 AM, "Juan Nunez-Iglesias" <jni.soma at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We are trying to make a pretty big decision regarding the API for graph
> segmentation methods as part of Vighnesh's GSoC project. The main question
> is whether to implement our own graph class and build on that, or to use
> networkX. This would add a (potentially optional) dependency to skimage,
> but would use established classes an APIs.
>
> Here's where the relevant discussion on the skimage-gsoc mailing list
> starts:
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/skimage-gsoc/sAhf0ecpHXM/io2LxCU8VC8J
>
> As such a decision has a major impact on the skimage API going forward,
> please take some time to respond to this!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Juan.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "scikit-image" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/attachments/20140611/dea7e3fa/attachment.html>