Examples relicensing proposal

[Juan Nunez-Iglesias]

Sheesh. Licensing is hard. =)

Having read CC0, I'd be ok with the examples being under that license. I'll
let you decide whether you prefer the dual-license complexity.

Juan.



On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Johannes Schönberger <jsch at demuc.de>wrote:

> Hi Stefan,
>
> Basically I am OK with this, but doesn't that mean that we have to ask
> every single person who ever contributed to the examples section for
> permission?
>
> What's the effort to include a small BSD license footnote to a slide
> opposed to asking all these people and having two different licenses
> in the project?
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan at sun.ac.za>
> wrote:
> > Hi, folks
> >
> > I just realised that having our examples licensed under BSD
> > technically means that one has to display the license even in slide
> > shows.  I'd like to make it as easy as possible for people to
> > advertise our tools, so could we consider relicensing those as CC0?
> >
> > Regards
> > Stéfan
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "scikit-image" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "scikit-image" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/attachments/20140128/61290aac/attachment.html>