scikit-image paper

[Juan Nunez-Iglesias]

I'm not positive about this new criterion. My gut feeling is that it should
be a bit nuanced on either side. For example, even if Tony doesn't write a
single line for the paper, I still think he should be an author.
Conversely, I don't think someone who has not thus far contributed a single
line of code, issue, or tutorial should be able to jump in, write a few
paragraphs, and be an author on the paper.

Having said that, I do agree that "core contributors" is too nebulous, so,
for example, I'd be perfectly comfortable having François on the author
list.

Juan.



On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan at sun.ac.za>wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Stéfan van der Walt <stefan at sun.ac.za>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Johannes Schönberger <jsch at demuc.de>
> wrote:
> >> I also thought about contributing one example covering feature
> detection, extraction, matching and some simple image stitching using
> projective transformations... your thoughts? Is this too long?
>
> By the way, you can make really nice panoramas if you export the
> transformed images to TIFF and stitch them together using "enblend".
> Since blending is not really in our scope, it's probably fine to use
> that as the final component, if you want a particularly shiny result.
>
> Stéfan
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "scikit-image" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to scikit-image+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/attachments/20140206/de6304e7/attachment.html>