Unexpected behaviour in peak_local_max

[Tony Yu]

2012/4/15 Stéfan van der Walt <stefan at sun.ac.za>

> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Tony Yu <tsyu80 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > That said, I think that it'd be worthwhile to have both absolute and
> > relative thresholding. I'm not sure about the naming though:
> >
> > - `athresh` and `rthresh`
> > - `absthresh` and `relthresh`
> > - `abs_thresh` and `rel_thresh`
> > - `abs_threshold` and `rel_threshold`
>
> `threshold_abs` and `threshold_rel` perhaps?  My personal preference
> is to have the specialization afterwards.
>
> Stéfan
>

Sounds good. I've added these parameters (along w/ a few other changes) in PR
#176 <https://github.com/scikits-image/scikits-image/pull/176>.

-Tony
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/attachments/20120416/d7daa3db/attachment.html>