From shekay at pobox.com Thu Jun 2 11:24:45 2016 From: shekay at pobox.com (sheila miguez) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:24:45 -0500 Subject: [pyvideo-data] Pycon coordination Message-ID: Hi everyone, Those of you who are still in pycon mode, don't forget to talk to each other about making a PR with pycon data. Will pointed out in a PR with one talk that a PR with an entire event is easier to manage. I concur, and to explain: The normal procedures is to run a command to scrape a youtube channel to get all of the talks in to files. There will be merge conflicts, duplicate data, and so on if there are multiple branches with partial data or data generated some other way. Talk to each other so that there is no cookie looking and so that the resulting PR is easy to review. -- shekay at pobox.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From shekay at pobox.com Thu Jun 2 20:46:50 2016 From: shekay at pobox.com (sheila miguez) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 19:46:50 -0500 Subject: [pyvideo-data] PyCon related links/resources Fwd: [PyCon-AV] PyCon Captions uploading Message-ID: Hi all, Int he pyvideo api we had a field called related_links, see https://github.com/pyvideo/pyvideo-data/issues/111 for fixing the missing data from pyvideo-data. I'd like for the transcripts/captions for each talk to be linked to the data, if possible. Here's where they are placing data. Once 111 is worked out, links to transcripts could be in the list of related things. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Wolever Date: Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 7:00 PM Subject: [PyCon-AV] PyCon Captions uploading To: mediacaptions at stradagize.com, Pycon Lists Hey all, I?ve got the Google Drive folder we?ll use for collaborating on captions setup and ready to go: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B3GLBsUBOoqsZ01uN3IyQ2xpSm8 There?s a spreadsheet in there which we?ll use to keep track of the caption status for each talk, folders for the caption files, and a short doc describing how to upload the captions (idk if this is totally necessary? But thought I?d stick it in anyway). I?ve chatted with Jonathan and he?s already started to get the spreadsheet filled out. Finally, I?m planning on sharing the folder link (read-only) with anyone who asks about the status of captioning, so we shouldn?t put any potentially confidential information there. David -- https://twitter.com/wolever (416) 906-0403 Founder, PyCon Canada Head of Session Staff, PyCon US _______________________________________________ PyCon-AV mailing list PyCon-AV at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pycon-av -- shekay at pobox.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paul.logston at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 19:59:17 2016 From: paul.logston at gmail.com (Paul Logston) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 16:59:17 -0700 Subject: [pyvideo-data] Pytube using pytube/pyvideo-data Message-ID: Hey Will and Sheila, Wanted to keep you updated with the latest status of things. Since there's a lot of people who are interested in making some changes to the pyvideo-data repo while here at the sprints, I've made PyTube.org pull from the pytube fork of pyvideo-data. I've made you both admins for the repo. Let me know if you need anything regarding permissions for the data repo. P -- Paul Logston (510) 755 - 4474 paul.logston at gmail.com plog.paullogston.com github.com/logston -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From willkg at bluesock.org Fri Jun 3 20:16:10 2016 From: willkg at bluesock.org (will kahn-greene) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 20:16:10 -0400 Subject: [pyvideo-data] Pytube using pytube/pyvideo-data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1464999370.134443.627504337.17261B7F@webmail.messagingengine.com> I don't really understand this plus it's the first I've heard about it, so I'm puzzled. I have a couple questions: Why have people make changes to the pytube fork instead of the pyvideo- data proper repo? Are you planning to take the lead on upstreaming the changes in the pytube fork? If not, then it seems like we end up with two divergent versions of the data. On Fri, Jun 3, 2016, at 07:59 PM, Paul Logston wrote: > Hey Will and Sheila, > > Wanted to keep you updated with the latest status of things. Since > there's a lot of people who are interested in making some changes to > the pyvideo-data repo while here at the sprints, I've made PyTube.org > pull from the pytube fork of pyvideo-data. I've made you both admins > for the repo. Let me know if you need anything regarding permissions > for the data repo. > > P > > > -- > Paul Logston > (510) 755 - 4474 > paul.logston at gmail.com > plog.paullogston.com > github.com/logston > _________________________________________________ > pyvideo-data mailing list > pyvideo-data at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyvideo-data -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paul.logston at gmail.com Fri Jun 3 20:31:31 2016 From: paul.logston at gmail.com (Paul Logston) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:31:31 -0700 Subject: [pyvideo-data] Pytube using pytube/pyvideo-data In-Reply-To: <1464999370.134443.627504337.17261B7F@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1464999370.134443.627504337.17261B7F@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: Gotcha. Let me clarify. None of us at PyCon, who are sprinting on a replacement for pyvideo.org and building the associated tooling for it, have merge permissions for pyvideo/pyvideo-data. In order to move forward more quickly with all of the changes coming down the pipe, we've forked the repo and started to commit to it. I'm not planning on taking the lead to upstream the changes. If a PR is possible, I'd be happy to open one against the pyvideo-data repo. However, since there's a lot more people with merge/admin permissions for pytube's fork (9 people), it might make more sense to make the pytube fork the main data repo. This would take the burden of you to have to review all PRs coming through the gates. What do you think? On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:16 PM, will kahn-greene wrote: > I don't really understand this plus it's the first I've heard about it, so > I'm puzzled. > > I have a couple questions: > > Why have people make changes to the pytube fork instead of the > pyvideo-data proper repo? > > Are you planning to take the lead on upstreaming the changes in the pytube > fork? If not, then it seems like we end up with two divergent versions of > the data. > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016, at 07:59 PM, Paul Logston wrote: > > Hey Will and Sheila, > > Wanted to keep you updated with the latest status of things. Since there's > a lot of people who are interested in making some changes to the > pyvideo-data repo while here at the sprints, I've made PyTube.org pull from > the pytube fork of pyvideo-data. I've made you both admins for the repo. > Let me know if you need anything regarding permissions for the data repo. > > P > > > -- > Paul Logston > (510) 755 - 4474 > paul.logston at gmail.com > plog.paullogston.com > github.com/logston > *_______________________________________________* > pyvideo-data mailing list > pyvideo-data at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyvideo-data > > > > _______________________________________________ > pyvideo-data mailing list > pyvideo-data at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyvideo-data > > -- Paul Logston (510) 755 - 4474 paul.logston at gmail.com plog.paullogston.com github.com/logston -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From willkg at bluesock.org Fri Jun 3 20:57:22 2016 From: willkg at bluesock.org (will kahn-greene) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 20:57:22 -0400 Subject: [pyvideo-data] Pytube using pytube/pyvideo-data In-Reply-To: References: <1464999370.134443.627504337.17261B7F@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: <1465001842.143997.627515665.7E89E1BA@webmail.messagingengine.com> Oh noes! Sheila and I offered several times to help out with any work being done at PyCon and never heard anything from anyone. Fixing permissions issues is not hard, but no one mentioned the need to me. Sheila had set up groups earlier this week, but I hadn't done anything about it because there was no indication anyone would be interested on this mailing list, in the IRC channel or in the github issue tracker. I don't think it makes sense to have two master repositories around. Given that you're going forward with yours, I'm inclined to throw in the towel. Over the last few months, I tried pretty hard to bootstrap pyvideo- data with the intention of passing it off to people who were involved. It's been a disappointing journey. We've got a ton of people on this mailing list, but it's pretty quiet. The IRC channel is quiet, too. The github issue tracker is quiet. After I ended pyvideo, I continued to spend time on pyvideo-data to bootstrap it was because I think it's an important project. The data is valuable for research on historical trends like diversity at Python conferences. It's the only data set that's Python-centric and makes it easier to find Python videos without requiring everyone to post their videos on YouTube. I think it's important to build a site on top of this data that makes the video accessible to people who are otherwise disenfranchised using subtitles/captioning, downloadable files, other formats (mp3 was a popular ask). I hope pytube succeeds in those things. I'll catch up with Sheila at some point in the next few days, but I think it makes sense to end pyvideo-data. If there's anything you need me to do to finish things off or hand things over, let me know. Good luck with the sprints! /will On Fri, Jun 3, 2016, at 08:31 PM, Paul Logston wrote: > Gotcha. Let me clarify. None of us at PyCon, who are sprinting on a > replacement for pyvideo.org and building the associated tooling for > it, have merge permissions for pyvideo/pyvideo-data. In order to move > forward more quickly with all of the changes coming down the pipe, > we've forked the repo and started to commit to it. > > I'm not planning on taking the lead to upstream the changes. If a PR > is possible, I'd be happy to open one against the pyvideo-data repo. > However, since there's a lot more people with merge/admin permissions > for pytube's fork (9 people), it might make more sense to make the > pytube fork the main data repo. This would take the burden of you to > have to review all PRs coming through the gates. What do you think? > > > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:16 PM, will kahn-greene > wrote: >> __ >> I don't really understand this plus it's the first I've heard about >> it, so I'm puzzled. >> >> I have a couple questions: >> >> Why have people make changes to the pytube fork instead of the pyvideo- >> data proper repo? >> >> Are you planning to take the lead on upstreaming the changes in the >> pytube fork? If not, then it seems like we end up with two divergent >> versions of the data. >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016, at 07:59 PM, Paul Logston wrote: >>> Hey Will and Sheila, >>> >>> Wanted to keep you updated with the latest status of things. Since >>> there's a lot of people who are interested in making some changes to >>> the pyvideo-data repo while here at the sprints, I've made >>> PyTube.org pull from the pytube fork of pyvideo-data. I've made you >>> both admins for the repo. Let me know if you need anything regarding >>> permissions for the data repo. >>> >>> P >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Paul Logston >>> (510) 755 - 4474[1] >>> paul.logston at gmail.com >>> plog.paullogston.com >>> github.com/logston >>> _________________________________________________ >>> pyvideo-data mailing list >>> pyvideo-data at python.org >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyvideo-data >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pyvideo-data mailing list >> pyvideo-data at python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyvideo-data >> > > > > -- > Paul Logston > (510) 755 - 4474 > paul.logston at gmail.com > plog.paullogston.com > github.com/logston Links: 1. tel:%28510%29%20755%20-%204474 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lozinski at blogory.org Sat Jun 4 00:00:29 2016 From: lozinski at blogory.org (Christopher Lozinski) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 06:00:29 +0200 Subject: [pyvideo-data] Pytube using pytube/pyvideo-data In-Reply-To: <1465001842.143997.627515665.7E89E1BA@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1464999370.134443.627504337.17261B7F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1465001842.143997.627515665.7E89E1BA@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: Here are my thoughts on the matter. Maybe it would be a good idea if PyCon managed all the PyCon videos under 1 repository, and all the other videos stayed under the PyVideo repository. I am still planning on importing the PyVideo Data to blogory.org/python And allowing people to sort it by category. Chris From paul.logston at gmail.com Sat Jun 4 01:23:57 2016 From: paul.logston at gmail.com (Paul Logston) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 22:23:57 -0700 Subject: [pyvideo-data] Pytube using pytube/pyvideo-data In-Reply-To: References: <1464999370.134443.627504337.17261B7F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1465001842.143997.627515665.7E89E1BA@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: Hey Will, Sounds like there was a miscommunication along the way. I agree that this is a very important project and the care and leadership you and Sheila put in is invaluable. To your point, "I think it's important to build a site on top of this data that makes the video accessible to people who are otherwise disenfranchised using subtitles/captioning, downloadable files, other formats (mp3 was a popular ask)", I completely agree. Check out our Development Philosophy wiki page [0] and About page [1] for details. Also, I'd like to note that we have Jeremy Bowman working on accessibility tests. PyTube is headed in a very positive direction. A direction that will enable the Python community to benefit from the work you and Sheila have done for years to come. As for handing things off, transferring the pyvideo.org domain would really help us maintain the integrity of the links that are already out there in the wild. Would we be able to get that from you? Both Cameron and I have been speaking with the PSF about hosting the pytube site. However, since that could take a while, we'd really appreciate it if you transferred it to the register used for pytube.org; gandi.net. If that transfer is okay with you, feel free to contact me with a transfer authorization code. I'm happy to reimburse you for any registration fees that you've already covered going forward. Just let me know how much. I'm working on a grant proposal to have the PSF reimburse pytube for the domain until it is transferred to them. Thanks again, Will and Sheila, for taking care of and growing this incredible community resource. Best, Paul [0] https://github.com/pytube/pytube/wiki/Development-Philosophy [1] http://pytube.org/pages/about.html On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Christopher Lozinski wrote: > Here are my thoughts on the matter. > > Maybe it would be a good idea if PyCon managed all the PyCon videos > under 1 repository, and all the other videos stayed under the PyVideo > repository. > > I am still planning on importing the PyVideo Data to blogory.org/python > And allowing people to sort it by category. > > Chris > > -- Paul Logston (510) 755 - 4474 paul.logston at gmail.com plog.paullogston.com github.com/logston -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From shekay at pobox.com Sat Jun 4 14:48:01 2016 From: shekay at pobox.com (sheila miguez) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 13:48:01 -0500 Subject: [pyvideo-data] Pytube using pytube/pyvideo-data In-Reply-To: <1465001842.143997.627515665.7E89E1BA@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1464999370.134443.627504337.17261B7F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1465001842.143997.627515665.7E89E1BA@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: Hey all, Due to the lack of conversation on the mailing list, I didn't realize how interested people were in working on things. I've been happy to see activity on github. And now I've been cheered by the enthusiasm of people in the pytube group and what I can see on pytube.org coming out of the pycon sprint. Paul has done well getting people involved. My intuition is that I think it makes sense to sunset the pyvideo/pyvideo-data repo/mailing list and point people over to the pytube repo since that where people are contributing the most. Re pytube philosophy. I do like the About page and Development Philosophy. I've been following the repo too. Re pyvideo.org I've been pondering what ground rules, if any, I'd like to see for passing on the ownership of pyvideo.org. I'd like for it to be in the hands of the PSF, with an understanding that it is in the hands of people who follow the ideals of community and open culture. This is something Will and I have have been talking about, and I've also talked to a couple of people on the PSF board. It's a lot for me to think through and I haven't processed it enough to have a conversation with everyone about it yet. Please be patient with me as I do that. I don't mean to slight anyone in anyway by not already discussing this. In closing, I'm grateful to all of you who are working on this, and also continue to be grateful for all the work Will does. On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:57 PM, will kahn-greene wrote: > Oh noes! Sheila and I offered several times to help out with any work > being done at PyCon and never heard anything from anyone. Fixing > permissions issues is not hard, but no one mentioned the need to me. Sheila > had set up groups earlier this week, but I hadn't done anything about it > because there was no indication anyone would be interested on this mailing > list, in the IRC channel or in the github issue tracker. > > I don't think it makes sense to have two master repositories around. Given > that you're going forward with yours, I'm inclined to throw in the towel. > Over the last few months, I tried pretty hard to bootstrap pyvideo-data > with the intention of passing it off to people who were involved. It's been > a disappointing journey. We've got a ton of people on this mailing list, > but it's pretty quiet. The IRC channel is quiet, too. The github issue > tracker is quiet. > > After I ended pyvideo, I continued to spend time on pyvideo-data to > bootstrap it was because I think it's an important project. The data is > valuable for research on historical trends like diversity at Python > conferences. It's the only data set that's Python-centric and makes it > easier to find Python videos without requiring everyone to post their > videos on YouTube. I think it's important to build a site on top of this > data that makes the video accessible to people who are otherwise > disenfranchised using subtitles/captioning, downloadable files, other > formats (mp3 was a popular ask). I hope pytube succeeds in those things. > > I'll catch up with Sheila at some point in the next few days, but I think > it makes sense to end pyvideo-data. If there's anything you need me to do > to finish things off or hand things over, let me know. > > Good luck with the sprints! > > /will > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016, at 08:31 PM, Paul Logston wrote: > > Gotcha. Let me clarify. None of us at PyCon, who are sprinting on a > replacement for pyvideo.org and building the associated tooling for it, > have merge permissions for pyvideo/pyvideo-data. In order to move forward > more quickly with all of the changes coming down the pipe, we've forked the > repo and started to commit to it. > > I'm not planning on taking the lead to upstream the changes. If a PR is > possible, I'd be happy to open one against the pyvideo-data repo. However, > since there's a lot more people with merge/admin permissions for pytube's > fork (9 people), it might make more sense to make the pytube fork the main > data repo. This would take the burden of you to have to review all PRs > coming through the gates. What do you think? > > > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:16 PM, will kahn-greene > wrote: > > > I don't really understand this plus it's the first I've heard about it, so > I'm puzzled. > > I have a couple questions: > > Why have people make changes to the pytube fork instead of the > pyvideo-data proper repo? > > Are you planning to take the lead on upstreaming the changes in the pytube > fork? If not, then it seems like we end up with two divergent versions of > the data. > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016, at 07:59 PM, Paul Logston wrote: > > Hey Will and Sheila, > > Wanted to keep you updated with the latest status of things. Since there's > a lot of people who are interested in making some changes to the > pyvideo-data repo while here at the sprints, I've made PyTube.org pull from > the pytube fork of pyvideo-data. I've made you both admins for the repo. > Let me know if you need anything regarding permissions for the data repo. > > P > > > -- > Paul Logston > (510) 755 - 4474 > paul.logston at gmail.com > plog.paullogston.com > github.com/logston > *_______________________________________________* > pyvideo-data mailing list > pyvideo-data at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyvideo-data > > > > _______________________________________________ > pyvideo-data mailing list > pyvideo-data at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyvideo-data > > > > > > -- > Paul Logston > (510) 755 - 4474 > paul.logston at gmail.com > plog.paullogston.com > github.com/logston > > > > _______________________________________________ > pyvideo-data mailing list > pyvideo-data at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyvideo-data > > -- shekay at pobox.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paul.logston at gmail.com Sat Jun 4 16:24:11 2016 From: paul.logston at gmail.com (Paul Logston) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 16:24:11 -0400 Subject: [pyvideo-data] Pytube using pytube/pyvideo-data In-Reply-To: References: <1464999370.134443.627504337.17261B7F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1465001842.143997.627515665.7E89E1BA@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: Hey Sheila, Thanks for the update. FTR, no slight is taken here at the PyTube team. We completely understand that its a big change and a fast moving one. Thanks for all your work. Best, P On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 2:48 PM, sheila miguez wrote: > Hey all, > > Due to the lack of conversation on the mailing list, I didn't realize how > interested people were in working on things. I've been happy to see > activity on github. And now I've been cheered by the enthusiasm of people > in the pytube group and what I can see on pytube.org coming out of the > pycon sprint. > > Paul has done well getting people involved. My intuition is that I think > it makes sense to sunset the pyvideo/pyvideo-data repo/mailing list and > point people over to the pytube repo since that where people are > contributing the most. > > Re pytube philosophy. > > I do like the About page and Development Philosophy. I've been following > the repo too. > > Re pyvideo.org > > I've been pondering what ground rules, if any, I'd like to see for passing > on the ownership of pyvideo.org. I'd like for it to be in the hands of > the PSF, with an understanding that it is in the hands of people who follow > the ideals of community and open culture. This is something Will and I have > have been talking about, and I've also talked to a couple of people on the > PSF board. It's a lot for me to think through and I haven't processed it > enough to have a conversation with everyone about it yet. Please be patient > with me as I do that. I don't mean to slight anyone in anyway by not > already discussing this. > > In closing, I'm grateful to all of you who are working on this, and also > continue to be grateful for all the work Will does. > > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:57 PM, will kahn-greene > wrote: > >> Oh noes! Sheila and I offered several times to help out with any work >> being done at PyCon and never heard anything from anyone. Fixing >> permissions issues is not hard, but no one mentioned the need to me. Sheila >> had set up groups earlier this week, but I hadn't done anything about it >> because there was no indication anyone would be interested on this mailing >> list, in the IRC channel or in the github issue tracker. >> >> I don't think it makes sense to have two master repositories around. >> Given that you're going forward with yours, I'm inclined to throw in the >> towel. Over the last few months, I tried pretty hard to bootstrap >> pyvideo-data with the intention of passing it off to people who were >> involved. It's been a disappointing journey. We've got a ton of people on >> this mailing list, but it's pretty quiet. The IRC channel is quiet, too. >> The github issue tracker is quiet. >> >> After I ended pyvideo, I continued to spend time on pyvideo-data to >> bootstrap it was because I think it's an important project. The data is >> valuable for research on historical trends like diversity at Python >> conferences. It's the only data set that's Python-centric and makes it >> easier to find Python videos without requiring everyone to post their >> videos on YouTube. I think it's important to build a site on top of this >> data that makes the video accessible to people who are otherwise >> disenfranchised using subtitles/captioning, downloadable files, other >> formats (mp3 was a popular ask). I hope pytube succeeds in those things. >> >> I'll catch up with Sheila at some point in the next few days, but I think >> it makes sense to end pyvideo-data. If there's anything you need me to do >> to finish things off or hand things over, let me know. >> >> Good luck with the sprints! >> >> /will >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016, at 08:31 PM, Paul Logston wrote: >> >> Gotcha. Let me clarify. None of us at PyCon, who are sprinting on a >> replacement for pyvideo.org and building the associated tooling for it, >> have merge permissions for pyvideo/pyvideo-data. In order to move forward >> more quickly with all of the changes coming down the pipe, we've forked the >> repo and started to commit to it. >> >> I'm not planning on taking the lead to upstream the changes. If a PR is >> possible, I'd be happy to open one against the pyvideo-data repo. However, >> since there's a lot more people with merge/admin permissions for pytube's >> fork (9 people), it might make more sense to make the pytube fork the main >> data repo. This would take the burden of you to have to review all PRs >> coming through the gates. What do you think? >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:16 PM, will kahn-greene >> wrote: >> >> >> I don't really understand this plus it's the first I've heard about it, >> so I'm puzzled. >> >> I have a couple questions: >> >> Why have people make changes to the pytube fork instead of the >> pyvideo-data proper repo? >> >> Are you planning to take the lead on upstreaming the changes in the >> pytube fork? If not, then it seems like we end up with two divergent >> versions of the data. >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016, at 07:59 PM, Paul Logston wrote: >> >> Hey Will and Sheila, >> >> Wanted to keep you updated with the latest status of things. Since >> there's a lot of people who are interested in making some changes to the >> pyvideo-data repo while here at the sprints, I've made PyTube.org pull from >> the pytube fork of pyvideo-data. I've made you both admins for the repo. >> Let me know if you need anything regarding permissions for the data repo. >> >> P >> >> >> -- >> Paul Logston >> (510) 755 - 4474 >> paul.logston at gmail.com >> plog.paullogston.com >> github.com/logston >> *_______________________________________________* >> pyvideo-data mailing list >> pyvideo-data at python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyvideo-data >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pyvideo-data mailing list >> pyvideo-data at python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyvideo-data >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Paul Logston >> (510) 755 - 4474 >> paul.logston at gmail.com >> plog.paullogston.com >> github.com/logston >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pyvideo-data mailing list >> pyvideo-data at python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyvideo-data >> >> > > > -- > shekay at pobox.com > -- Paul Logston (510) 755 - 4474 paul.logston at gmail.com plog.paullogston.com github.com/logston -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From shekay at pobox.com Mon Jun 6 10:32:18 2016 From: shekay at pobox.com (sheila miguez) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 09:32:18 -0500 Subject: [pyvideo-data] Closing down pyvideo-data Message-ID: Hi all, We have an issue for closing down pyvideo-data. https://github.com/pyvideo/pyvideo-data/issues/139 -- shekay at pobox.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From shekay at pobox.com Tue Jun 7 17:15:56 2016 From: shekay at pobox.com (sheila miguez) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:15:56 -0500 Subject: [pyvideo-data] PyCon BoF In-Reply-To: References: <15504c0b45e.be8d718c22160.8553763280266271263@pinkhatbeard.com> Message-ID: Hey, here's the lightning talk. https://youtu.be/yC9m2GInXqU?t=28m47s I feel a little at a loss. I know we said we were shutting down pyvideo.org, but we followed up to guide people here to work on data and do curation tasks. I managed to discover Paul when I was navigating around on github, looking at forks. I didn't discover the work Cameron did. If you emailed or tweeted me, I'm sorry if I lost track of any conversations. I did not mean to overlook anyone. I'm sad that people overlooked us. On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:47 AM, sheila miguez wrote: > Is the lightning talk online yet? > > > > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Cameron Dershem > wrote: > >> I have no preference on a time, but wanted to say I'm hosting a sprint on >> Thursday and Friday to hack on pyvideo.org. I did a lightning talk today >> and have a lot of people who want to help out. I'd also be very interested >> in helping with the data project. >> >> - Cameron Dershem >> Developer >> Indianapolis >> pinkhatbeard.com >> cameron at pinkhatbeard.com >> 312.361.0322 >> >> >> ---- On Mon, 30 May 2016 21:08:12 -0400 * paul.logston at gmail.com >> * wrote ---- >> >> Hey everybody, >> >> I'm thinking of signing up for a pyvideo-data BoF room at PyCon. Anybody >> got a preference for when it happens? >> >> P >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from Gmail Mobile >> _______________________________________________ >> pyvideo-data mailing list >> pyvideo-data at python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyvideo-data >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pyvideo-data mailing list >> pyvideo-data at python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyvideo-data >> >> > > > -- > shekay at pobox.com > -- shekay at pobox.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: