[Pythonmac-SIG] Extensions for static versus frame
tmk
lists@netelligent.biz
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 16:48:06 +0200
Yo,
Overall, I'm really happy with Jack and Just design for Python
install on Mac OS X, ie using a framework install. and a launcher
app in (/Applications/Utilities).
I think Michael's suggestion for Python extensions is right on the spot.
They should go into a user-accessible place. And to me, the best
place on Mac OS X is clearly the .../Application Support/Python
folder under any of the Machine, Network, or User domains (meaning
MacPython should really look into each of theses places like any
well-behave Mac OS X app).
Like Robin, I'd also be glad to contribute monetary support to the
further advancement of a well integrated Mac OS X
Python especially the Cocoa/PB/IB integration.
= tmk =
On Wednesday, July 17, 2002, at 11:17 AM, Michael Hudson wrote:
> Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@oratrix.com> writes:
>
>> yes, it is. Just and myself had a session of heavy MachoPython
>> design last week, and here's what we've come up with. please
>> comment.
>
> A thought I had a while back. Feel free to ignore it.
>
> What is the current opinion on extension modules? Currently they tend
> to end up deep down in
>
> /Libary/Frameworks/Python.framework/.../site-packages/
>
> Wouldn't it be nice if one could build a loadable bundle type thing
> that could be installed alongside the framework, or in
>
> /Library/Application Support/Python
>
> or somewhere? This could include headers for e.g. Numeric.
>
> Cheers,
> M.
>
> --
> $ head -n 2 src/bash/bash-2.04/unwind_prot.c
> /* I can't stand it anymore! Please can't we just write the
> whole Unix system in lisp or something? */
> -- spotted by Rich van der Hoff
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
>