From nilsc.becker at gmail.com  Mon Jun  8 08:52:00 2015
From: nilsc.becker at gmail.com (Nils Becker)
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 08:52:00 +0200
Subject: [Python.NET] Decref in RunString
Message-ID: <CAC_ACBV4XNkMFgf4-BaYx6s_DzJQNvdnVOeePTUwfKoWmkZtrQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello there,

I have a quick question concerning the "RunString(string code, IntPtr
globals, IntPtr locals)" routine. In it the parameter "locals" is
decref'ed. Maybe I am missing something (could be, I do not know much about
reference counting), but should something which the user passes be
decref'ed?

My use case is the following: I embed python into C# and have a stateful
wrapper around PythonEngine which manages a global and local dictionary.
Therefore, I need the local dictionary I pass to RunString to be accessable
(and sane) after the call.
I noticed that locals contained random content after I called RunString and
created new variables in the code.
After I removed the Decref call in RunString, it seems to work as I would
expect it to.

Cheers
Nils
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150608/ae29e1fe/attachment-0001.html>

From giannicristian at msn.com  Mon Jun  8 09:44:16 2015
From: giannicristian at msn.com (Gianni Iannelli)
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 09:44:16 +0200
Subject: [Python.NET] Python for .NET load .dll
Message-ID: <DUB131-W178E8AC778063768283F60DABF0@phx.gbl>

Dear All,
I have a problem loading an external dll using Python through Python for .NET. I have tried different methodologis following stackoverflow and similar. I will try to summarize the situation and to describe all the steps that I've done.I have a dll named for e.g. Test.NET.dll. I checked with dotPeek and I can see, clicking on it, x64 and .NET Framework v4.5. On my computer I have installed the .Net Framework 4.I have also installed Python for .NET in different ways. I think that the best one is download the .whl from this website http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#pythonnet . I have downloaded and installed: pythonnet?2.0.0.dev1?cp27?none?win_amd64.whl. I can imagine that it will works for .NET 4.0 sinceRequires the Microsoft .NET Framework 4.0.
Once I have installed everything, I can do these commands:
>>> import clr
>>> import System
>>> print System.Environmnet.Version
>>> print System.Environment.Version
4.0.30319.34209It seems work. Then, I have tried to load my dll typing these commands:
>>> import clr
>>> dllpath= r'C:\Program Files\API\Test.NET'
>>> clr.AddReference(dllpath)

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<pyshell#20>", line 1, in <module>
    clr.AddReference(dllpath)
FileNotFoundException: Unable to find assembly 'C:\Program Files\API\Test.NET'.
   at Python.Runtime.CLRModule.AddReference(String name)I have also tried to add '.dll' at the end of the path but nothing changed. Then, I have also tried different solutions as described in:http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14633695/how-to-install-python-for-net-on-windows,http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13259617/python-for-net-unable-to-find-assembly-errorhttps://github.com/geographika/PythonDotNet
and much more.... Unfortunately, it doesn't work and I get different errors. I know that exists IronPython but I was trying to avoid to use it.
Thanks for your help! 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150608/3c7352c9/attachment-0001.html>

From brian.d.lloyd at gmail.com  Mon Jun  8 17:10:42 2015
From: brian.d.lloyd at gmail.com (Brian Lloyd)
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 11:10:42 -0400
Subject: [Python.NET] Python for .NET load .dll
In-Reply-To: <DUB131-W178E8AC778063768283F60DABF0@phx.gbl>
References: <DUB131-W178E8AC778063768283F60DABF0@phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <CAEtbAyMKbv+vo0AZhHBPKk7Wz5qdyW3mv0Cw04WWLAoW0+GM5Q@mail.gmail.com>

You probably need to escape those backslashes, no? e.g.

'C:\\Program Files\\API\\Test.NET'


On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Gianni Iannelli <giannicristian at msn.com>
wrote:

> Dear All,
>
>
> I have a problem loading an external dll using Python through Python for
> .NET. I have tried different methodologis following stackoverflow and
> similar. I will try to summarize the situation and to describe all the
> steps that I've done.
>
> I have a dll named for e.g. Test.NET.dll. I checked with dotPeek and I can
> see, clicking on it, x64 and .NET Framework v4.5. On my computer I have
> installed the .Net Framework 4.
>
> I have also installed Python for .NET in different ways. I think that the
> best one is download the .whl from this website
> http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#pythonnet . I have downloaded
> and installed: pythonnet?2.0.0.dev1?cp27?none?win_amd64.whl. I can imagine
> that it will works for .NET 4.0 since*Requires the Microsoft .NET
> Framework 4.0.*
>
>
> Once I have installed everything, I can do these commands:
>
>
> >>> import clr>>> import System>>> print System.Environmnet.Version>>> print System.Environment.Version4.0.30319.34209
>
> It seems work. Then, I have tried to load my dll typing these commands:
>
>
> >>> import clr>>> dllpath= r'C:\Program Files\API\Test.NET'>>> clr.AddReference(dllpath)
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "<pyshell#20>", line 1, in <module>
>     clr.AddReference(dllpath)FileNotFoundException: Unable to find assembly 'C:\Program Files\API\Test.NET'.
>    at Python.Runtime.CLRModule.AddReference(String name)
>
> I have also tried to add '.dll' at the end of the path but nothing
> changed. Then, I have also tried different solutions as described in:
>
>
>    -
>    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14633695/how-to-install-python-for-net-on-windows
>    ,
>    -
>    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13259617/python-for-net-unable-to-find-assembly-error
>    - https://github.com/geographika/PythonDotNet
>
>
> and much more.... Unfortunately, it doesn't work and I get different
> errors. I know that exists IronPython but I was trying to avoid to use it.
>
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> _________________________________________________
> Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
>



-- 
 47 Lining    *Brian Lloyd, SVP Engineering*  Cloud Advisory and
Development Services  M +1.540.845.2975 | E brian.lloyd at 47lining.com | W
www.47lining.com  This message and any attachments are confidential and
intended solely for the individual(s) or entity to which it is addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or distribute the
email or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by return
e-mail.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150608/e3fa9b37/attachment.html>

From tony at pyxll.com  Mon Jun  8 17:26:19 2015
From: tony at pyxll.com (Tony Roberts)
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 15:26:19 +0000
Subject: [Python.NET] Decref in RunString
In-Reply-To: <CAC_ACBV4XNkMFgf4-BaYx6s_DzJQNvdnVOeePTUwfKoWmkZtrQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAC_ACBV4XNkMFgf4-BaYx6s_DzJQNvdnVOeePTUwfKoWmkZtrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+XbcsZ+CaxhbbzpOiawkZWGK_Ssam5DV+OD2uRB=651-Vupfw@mail.gmail.com>

Looks like a copy and paste error from RunString(string code) to me.

If you want to send a pull request to fix it (with a unit test if you have
one - I don't think RunString is currently covered by the tests) I'll merge
it.

thanks!
Tony


On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 7:52 AM Nils Becker <nilsc.becker at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello there,
>
> I have a quick question concerning the "RunString(string code, IntPtr
> globals, IntPtr locals)" routine. In it the parameter "locals" is
> decref'ed. Maybe I am missing something (could be, I do not know much about
> reference counting), but should something which the user passes be
> decref'ed?
>
> My use case is the following: I embed python into C# and have a stateful
> wrapper around PythonEngine which manages a global and local dictionary.
> Therefore, I need the local dictionary I pass to RunString to be accessable
> (and sane) after the call.
> I noticed that locals contained random content after I called RunString
> and created new variables in the code.
> After I removed the Decref call in RunString, it seems to work as I would
> expect it to.
>
> Cheers
> Nils
> _________________________________________________
> Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150608/0418b345/attachment-0001.html>

From tony at pyxll.com  Mon Jun  8 17:22:33 2015
From: tony at pyxll.com (Tony Roberts)
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 15:22:33 +0000
Subject: [Python.NET] Python for .NET load .dll
In-Reply-To: <CAEtbAyMKbv+vo0AZhHBPKk7Wz5qdyW3mv0Cw04WWLAoW0+GM5Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <DUB131-W178E8AC778063768283F60DABF0@phx.gbl>
 <CAEtbAyMKbv+vo0AZhHBPKk7Wz5qdyW3mv0Cw04WWLAoW0+GM5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+XbcsbeXuCCEyoBb64yM0FiGcBPfQ+R+Fj78YVQ+hg5fNuV+Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I seem to remember some problems possibly related to this... those binaries
you've found are quite old now. As a first set I would recommend checking
out the latest source from github and building the pythonnet binaries
yourself. It should be as simple as running "python setup.py install" (or
bdist_wheel/bdist_egg to build the wheel/egg if you prefer).

The git repo is here: https://github.com/pythonnet/pythonnet/
Or if you are using python 3 use this one:
https://github.com/renshawbay/pythonnet

Best regards,
Tony


On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:10 PM Brian Lloyd <brian.d.lloyd at gmail.com> wrote:

> You probably need to escape those backslashes, no? e.g.
>
> 'C:\\Program Files\\API\\Test.NET'
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Gianni Iannelli <giannicristian at msn.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>>
>> I have a problem loading an external dll using Python through Python for
>> .NET. I have tried different methodologis following stackoverflow and
>> similar. I will try to summarize the situation and to describe all the
>> steps that I've done.
>>
>> I have a dll named for e.g. Test.NET.dll. I checked with dotPeek and I
>> can see, clicking on it, x64 and .NET Framework v4.5. On my computer I have
>> installed the .Net Framework 4.
>>
>> I have also installed Python for .NET in different ways. I think that the
>> best one is download the .whl from this website
>> http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#pythonnet . I have downloaded
>> and installed: pythonnet?2.0.0.dev1?cp27?none?win_amd64.whl. I can imagine
>> that it will works for .NET 4.0 since*Requires the Microsoft .NET
>> Framework 4.0.*
>>
>>
>> Once I have installed everything, I can do these commands:
>>
>>
>> >>> import clr>>> import System>>> print System.Environmnet.Version>>> print System.Environment.Version4.0.30319.34209
>>
>> It seems work. Then, I have tried to load my dll typing these commands:
>>
>>
>> >>> import clr>>> dllpath= r'C:\Program Files\API\Test.NET'>>> clr.AddReference(dllpath)
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "<pyshell#20>", line 1, in <module>
>>     clr.AddReference(dllpath)FileNotFoundException: Unable to find assembly 'C:\Program Files\API\Test.NET'.
>>    at Python.Runtime.CLRModule.AddReference(String name)
>>
>> I have also tried to add '.dll' at the end of the path but nothing
>> changed. Then, I have also tried different solutions as described in:
>>
>>
>>    -
>>    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14633695/how-to-install-python-for-net-on-windows
>>    ,
>>    -
>>    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13259617/python-for-net-unable-to-find-assembly-error
>>    - https://github.com/geographika/PythonDotNet
>>
>>
>> and much more.... Unfortunately, it doesn't work and I get different
>> errors. I know that exists IronPython but I was trying to avoid to use it.
>>
>>
>> Thanks for your help!
>>
>> _________________________________________________
>> Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
>>
>
>
>
> --
>  47 Lining    *Brian Lloyd, SVP Engineering*  Cloud Advisory and
> Development Services  M +1.540.845.2975 | E brian.lloyd at 47lining.com | W
> www.47lining.com  This message and any attachments are confidential and
> intended solely for the individual(s) or entity to which it is addressed.
> If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or distribute the
> email or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by return
> e-mail.
>
>
>  _________________________________________________
> Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150608/5f05aedf/attachment.html>

From giannicristian at msn.com  Mon Jun  8 17:59:21 2015
From: giannicristian at msn.com (Gianni Iannelli)
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 17:59:21 +0200
Subject: [Python.NET] Python for .NET load .dll
In-Reply-To: <CA+XbcsbeXuCCEyoBb64yM0FiGcBPfQ+R+Fj78YVQ+hg5fNuV+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <DUB131-W178E8AC778063768283F60DABF0@phx.gbl>,
 <CAEtbAyMKbv+vo0AZhHBPKk7Wz5qdyW3mv0Cw04WWLAoW0+GM5Q@mail.gmail.com>,
 <CA+XbcsbeXuCCEyoBb64yM0FiGcBPfQ+R+Fj78YVQ+hg5fNuV+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <DUB131-W23B88E612BFE49F9DCD308DABF0@phx.gbl>

Thanks! Is it working now! I think I have done some error trying different way of backslash and similar. I have added to the sys.path the folder where the libraries are (path without ending slash), and then, add. Now it's working.
Thank you very much

From: tony at pyxll.com
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 15:22:33 +0000
To: pythondotnet at python.org
Subject: Re: [Python.NET] Python for .NET load .dll

Hi,

I seem to remember some problems possibly related to this... those binaries you've found are quite old now. As a first set I would recommend checking out the latest source from github and building the pythonnet binaries yourself. It should be as simple as running "python setup.py install" (or bdist_wheel/bdist_egg to build the wheel/egg if you prefer).
The git repo is here: https://github.com/pythonnet/pythonnet/Or if you are using python 3 use this one: https://github.com/renshawbay/pythonnet
Best regards,Tony


On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:10 PM Brian Lloyd <brian.d.lloyd at gmail.com> wrote:
You probably need to escape those backslashes, no? e.g. 
'C:\\Program Files\\API\\Test.NET'
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Gianni Iannelli <giannicristian at msn.com> wrote:



Dear All,
I have a problem loading an external dll using Python through Python for .NET. I have tried different methodologis following stackoverflow and similar. I will try to summarize the situation and to describe all the steps that I've done.I have a dll named for e.g. Test.NET.dll. I checked with dotPeek and I can see, clicking on it, x64 and .NET Framework v4.5. On my computer I have installed the .Net Framework 4.I have also installed Python for .NET in different ways. I think that the best one is download the .whl from this website http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#pythonnet . I have downloaded and installed: pythonnet?2.0.0.dev1?cp27?none?win_amd64.whl. I can imagine that it will works for .NET 4.0 sinceRequires the Microsoft .NET Framework 4.0.
Once I have installed everything, I can do these commands:
>>> import clr
>>> import System
>>> print System.Environmnet.Version
>>> print System.Environment.Version
4.0.30319.34209It seems work. Then, I have tried to load my dll typing these commands:
>>> import clr
>>> dllpath= r'C:\Program Files\API\Test.NET'
>>> clr.AddReference(dllpath)

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<pyshell#20>", line 1, in <module>
    clr.AddReference(dllpath)
FileNotFoundException: Unable to find assembly 'C:\Program Files\API\Test.NET'.
   at Python.Runtime.CLRModule.AddReference(String name)I have also tried to add '.dll' at the end of the path but nothing changed. Then, I have also tried different solutions as described in:http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14633695/how-to-install-python-for-net-on-windows,http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13259617/python-for-net-unable-to-find-assembly-errorhttps://github.com/geographika/PythonDotNet
and much more.... Unfortunately, it doesn't work and I get different errors. I know that exists IronPython but I was trying to avoid to use it.

Thanks for your help! 		 	   		  

_________________________________________________

Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org

https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet


-- 


47

Lining






Brian Lloyd, SVP Engineering


Cloud Advisory and Development Services


M +1.540.845.2975 | E brian.lloyd at 47lining.com | W www.47lining.com






This 
message and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the
 individual(s) or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the 
intended recipient, do not read, copy or distribute
 the email or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by 
return e-mail.

















_________________________________________________

Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org

https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet

_________________________________________________
Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150608/7bc8d0bd/attachment-0001.html>

From aklein at bluemountaincapital.com  Mon Jun 15 21:57:03 2015
From: aklein at bluemountaincapital.com (Adam Klein)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 19:57:03 +0000
Subject: [Python.NET] surveying the landscape ...
Message-ID: <60CDCA83B420BB48BF95B8AF66CE7FFF45C211C7@NYMBX02.bcna.corp>

Hello all,

We are using Python.NET at BlueMountain to interface between our large .NET code base and the cpython ecosystem for interactive, exploratory computing. By way of background, I was a major contributor to the pandas library for a time; my firm is behind the Deedle library (https://github.com/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle).
To state the obvious, the project has proven hugely valuable. BlueMountain has an interest in making sure the library doesn?t languish. To that end, we?re interested in contributing to the project in terms of manpower and possibly funding development. I?d like to get a better sense of a few things:

- is there a BDFL ? is Brian Lloyd still active; or is Tony Roberts steering the ship (being the top code contributor recently on github?) It looks like python 3.x integration and more recent work is happening on on renshawbay/pythonnet? Is pythonnet/pythonnet still the official repo?
- who manages releases to PyPI?
- is this PythonDotNet mailing list the appropriate clearinghouse for all discussions related to the project?
- are there other institutions that are public users of this project?
- is there an official vision or roadmap for future releases?

I see that python 3.x support looks like it?s happening on renshawbay/pythonnet (awesome). For other wish-list items or proposed contributions, is it best to start opening issues on the pythonnet/pythonnet github site? How are pull requests managed?

I?m also wondering if there?s any collective / documented knowledge about the inherent limitations and pitfalls of the library and/or where development resources are needed?

Best,
  Adam



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150615/85a40c72/attachment.html>

From brian.d.lloyd at gmail.com  Mon Jun 15 22:32:13 2015
From: brian.d.lloyd at gmail.com (Brian Lloyd)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:32:13 -0400
Subject: [Python.NET] surveying the landscape ...
In-Reply-To: <60CDCA83B420BB48BF95B8AF66CE7FFF45C211C7@NYMBX02.bcna.corp>
References: <60CDCA83B420BB48BF95B8AF66CE7FFF45C211C7@NYMBX02.bcna.corp>
Message-ID: <CAEtbAyM7sQb10DScfrGujXaC8nCL435ZUBw5Kg2sfMsZkMx2KA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Adam - thanks for the note, and happy to see Python for .NET is useful
to you. I can't answer all of the questions, but can take a swing at a few:

- is there a BDFL ? is Brian Lloyd still active; or is Tony Roberts
steering the ship (being the top code contributor recently on github?) It
looks like python 3.x integration and more recent work is happening on on
renshawbay/pythonnet? Is pythonnet/pythonnet still the official repo?


I'm still above ground, but not really active on the Python for .NET
project recently, mostly due to creation of a cloud-centric business, shift
of focus etc. I still follow developments, but without a business driver
can't justify a lot of bandwidth on it. Tony and others are probably better
candidates for BDFL ;)


- who manages releases to PyPI?


That I don't know. the answer may be "nobody" right now - while there are a
number of active contributors to the

project, it really hasn't gotten the critical mass that most OSS projects
need to have dedicated release responsibilities,

etc. While releases may have been made to PyPI, I'm not sure anyone views
it as a responsibility at this point (correct

me if I'm wrong guys).


- is this PythonDotNet mailing list the appropriate clearinghouse for all
discussions related to the project?


As far as I know, this is the main conduit for discussion, and the place
where the most active contributors chat.


- are there other institutions that are public users of this project?


I can't name names, but I've had discussions with numerous companies that
are active users. The sweet spot seems to be in the financial industry
(driving trading models, etc.) People are using it for mission critical
things that are managing real money.


- is there an official vision or roadmap for future releases?

I would say probably not - while some folks like Tony have really stepped
up to push to project forward, it takes a bigger commitment to have
roadmaps, etc. I think the project may still be too "niche" for that to
happen organically - people have day jobs and contribute as they can to
achieve their own goals (which is great!), but it usually requires funding
or a wider ecosystem to support more mature product management activities.

Hopefully this is helpful, if not all ideal answers :)

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Adam Klein <aklein at bluemountaincapital.com>
wrote:

>  Hello all,
>
>
>
> We are using Python.NET at BlueMountain to interface between our large
> .NET code base and the cpython ecosystem for interactive, exploratory
> computing. By way of background, I was a major contributor to the pandas
> library for a time; my firm is behind the Deedle library (
> https://github.com/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle).
>
>  To state the obvious, the project has proven hugely valuable.
> BlueMountain has an interest in making sure the library doesn?t languish.
> To that end, we?re interested in contributing to the project in terms of
> manpower and possibly funding development. I?d like to get a better sense
> of a few things:
>
>
>
> - is there a BDFL ? is Brian Lloyd still active; or is Tony Roberts
> steering the ship (being the top code contributor recently on github?) It
> looks like python 3.x integration and more recent work is happening on on
> renshawbay/pythonnet? Is pythonnet/pythonnet still the official repo?
>
> - who manages releases to PyPI?
>
> - is this PythonDotNet mailing list the appropriate clearinghouse for all
> discussions related to the project?
>
> - are there other institutions that are public users of this project?
>
> - is there an official vision or roadmap for future releases?
>
>
>
> I see that python 3.x support looks like it?s happening on
> renshawbay/pythonnet (awesome). For other wish-list items or proposed
> contributions, is it best to start opening issues on the
> pythonnet/pythonnet github site? How are pull requests managed?
>
>
>
> I?m also wondering if there?s any collective / documented knowledge about
> the inherent limitations and pitfalls of the library and/or where
> development resources are needed?
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>   Adam
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________
> Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
>



-- 
 47 Lining    *Brian Lloyd, SVP Engineering*  Cloud Advisory and
Development Services  M +1.540.845.2975 | E brian.lloyd at 47lining.com | W
www.47lining.com  This message and any attachments are confidential and
intended solely for the individual(s) or entity to which it is addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or distribute the
email or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by return
e-mail.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150615/e329cfb0/attachment-0001.html>

From brad at fie.us  Mon Jun 15 23:35:40 2015
From: brad at fie.us (Brad Friedman)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:35:40 -0400
Subject: [Python.NET] surveying the landscape ...
In-Reply-To: <60CDCA83B420BB48BF95B8AF66CE7FFF45C211C7@NYMBX02.bcna.corp>
References: <60CDCA83B420BB48BF95B8AF66CE7FFF45C211C7@NYMBX02.bcna.corp>
Message-ID: <7DBB5EA3-0D73-4E2B-B876-833847F1B150@fie.us>

I'll chime in and say the lack of these kinds of legitimate "stake-holder" systems and responsibilities has forced me to turn away from depending my work on this project. I still keep up on it in hopes that it will turn around.  If a legitimate player were to step up and contribute to a responsible, active and stable future for the project, I'd likely reconsider my stance and begin active support again. It's hard to justify putting much into it as one guy with limited resources.  It needs full multi-platform release and development support both as a python module and a .net embedding toolkit, both for Python 2.x and 3.x.  That's a lot of work to commit to getting set right and maintaining.

> On Jun 15, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Adam Klein <aklein at bluemountaincapital.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
>  
> We are using Python.NET at BlueMountain to interface between our large .NET code base and the cpython ecosystem for interactive, exploratory computing. By way of background, I was a major contributor to the pandas library for a time; my firm is behind the Deedle library (https://github.com/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle).
> To state the obvious, the project has proven hugely valuable. BlueMountain has an interest in making sure the library doesn?t languish. To that end, we?re interested in contributing to the project in terms of manpower and possibly funding development. I?d like to get a better sense of a few things:
>  
> - is there a BDFL ? is Brian Lloyd still active; or is Tony Roberts steering the ship (being the top code contributor recently on github?) It looks like python 3.x integration and more recent work is happening on on renshawbay/pythonnet? Is pythonnet/pythonnet still the official repo?
> - who manages releases to PyPI?
> - is this PythonDotNet mailing list the appropriate clearinghouse for all discussions related to the project?
> - are there other institutions that are public users of this project?
> - is there an official vision or roadmap for future releases?
>  
> I see that python 3.x support looks like it?s happening on renshawbay/pythonnet (awesome). For other wish-list items or proposed contributions, is it best to start opening issues on the pythonnet/pythonnet github site? How are pull requests managed?
>  
> I?m also wondering if there?s any collective / documented knowledge about the inherent limitations and pitfalls of the library and/or where development resources are needed?
>  
> Best,
>   Adam
>  
>  
>  
> _________________________________________________
> Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150615/016a2add/attachment.html>

From btribble at ea.com  Tue Jun 16 01:08:54 2015
From: btribble at ea.com (Tribble, Brett)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 23:08:54 +0000
Subject: [Python.NET] surveying the landscape ...
In-Reply-To: <7DBB5EA3-0D73-4E2B-B876-833847F1B150@fie.us>
References: <60CDCA83B420BB48BF95B8AF66CE7FFF45C211C7@NYMBX02.bcna.corp>
 <7DBB5EA3-0D73-4E2B-B876-833847F1B150@fie.us>
Message-ID: <BY1PR0701MB122334B95900D31C06645213B5B80@BY1PR0701MB1223.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>

Adam, I?m ecstatic that there?s a player out there who is making good use of Python.net, and who would like to help contribute. Organizational and logistical issues aside, I?m all for anything you can throw at the project! Someone correct me if I?m wrong, but I believe Brian Lloyd has largely yielded this project to Tony and the community. Based on Brian and  Tony?s past posts, I?m fairly sure they?ll welcome any and all contributions to the project.

It may sound sacrilegious to some, but I would love to see the PTVS (https://pytools.codeplex.com/) folks get involved with the project. They?re turning out a solid product, and this fits solidly in with what Microsoft is trying to do with PTVS, .NET Core, Azure etc.


From: PythonDotNet [mailto:pythondotnet-bounces+btribble=ea.com at python.org] On Behalf Of Brad Friedman
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 2:36 PM
To: A list for users and developers of Python for .NET
Subject: Re: [Python.NET] surveying the landscape ...

I'll chime in and say the lack of these kinds of legitimate "stake-holder" systems and responsibilities has forced me to turn away from depending my work on this project. I still keep up on it in hopes that it will turn around.  If a legitimate player were to step up and contribute to a responsible, active and stable future for the project, I'd likely reconsider my stance and begin active support again. It's hard to justify putting much into it as one guy with limited resources.  It needs full multi-platform release and development support both as a python module and a .net embedding toolkit, both for Python 2.x and 3.x.  That's a lot of work to commit to getting set right and maintaining.

On Jun 15, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Adam Klein <aklein at bluemountaincapital.com<mailto:aklein at bluemountaincapital.com>> wrote:
Hello all,

We are using Python.NET<http://Python.NET> at BlueMountain to interface between our large .NET code base and the cpython ecosystem for interactive, exploratory computing. By way of background, I was a major contributor to the pandas library for a time; my firm is behind the Deedle library (https://github.com/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle).
To state the obvious, the project has proven hugely valuable. BlueMountain has an interest in making sure the library doesn?t languish. To that end, we?re interested in contributing to the project in terms of manpower and possibly funding development. I?d like to get a better sense of a few things:

- is there a BDFL ? is Brian Lloyd still active; or is Tony Roberts steering the ship (being the top code contributor recently on github?) It looks like python 3.x integration and more recent work is happening on on renshawbay/pythonnet? Is pythonnet/pythonnet still the official repo?
- who manages releases to PyPI?
- is this PythonDotNet mailing list the appropriate clearinghouse for all discussions related to the project?
- are there other institutions that are public users of this project?
- is there an official vision or roadmap for future releases?

I see that python 3.x support looks like it?s happening on renshawbay/pythonnet (awesome). For other wish-list items or proposed contributions, is it best to start opening issues on the pythonnet/pythonnet github site? How are pull requests managed?

I?m also wondering if there?s any collective / documented knowledge about the inherent limitations and pitfalls of the library and/or where development resources are needed?

Best,
  Adam



_________________________________________________
Python.NET<http://Python.NET> mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org<mailto:PythonDotNet at python.org>
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150615/b4701bf7/attachment-0001.html>

From tony at pyxll.com  Tue Jun 16 11:16:47 2015
From: tony at pyxll.com (Tony Roberts)
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 09:16:47 +0000
Subject: [Python.NET] surveying the landscape ...
In-Reply-To: <BY1PR0701MB122334B95900D31C06645213B5B80@BY1PR0701MB1223.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <60CDCA83B420BB48BF95B8AF66CE7FFF45C211C7@NYMBX02.bcna.corp>
 <7DBB5EA3-0D73-4E2B-B876-833847F1B150@fie.us>
 <BY1PR0701MB122334B95900D31C06645213B5B80@BY1PR0701MB1223.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <CA+XbcsagJnY0V_M8WSPTiciCisp0B4aTqsS3qmnx3ueHys89Aw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Adam,

from my point of view it'd be great to have more people involved. I've been
doing some development, but more or less out of necessity (I enjoy working
on the project when I can, but don't really have the time to commit to it
much more than I have been unfortunately).

To give you some background around why there's the renshawbay repo as well
as the main repo; Initially I created the renshawbay repo as there were
various changes I needed to make to the project while it was hosted in
sourceforge, and for me it was easier to manage that in github. I added
Python 3 support, and later some stuff around subclassing .net classes in
Python. It was then decided to move the project to github, so we created
the pythonnet repo directly from the sourceforge repo rather than fork the
renshawbay repo. The thinking back then was that we should do a 2.0 release
based off that fork, and then once that was stable look at merging in the
Python 3 work from the renshawbay fork.

So, to answer your first question - pythonnet/pythonnet is the official
repo, but most new development (new features etc) has taken place on the
renshawbay/pythonnet fork in the python3 branch (which maintains support
for Python 2).

There's no official roadmap that I'm aware of. There are some issues and
milestones in the github repo, but AFAIK no one is actively working on
those right now. There are only a couple of issues remaining for the 2.0
release however.

Pull requests to the official repo are reviewed and merged by the project
owners (of which I'm one). So far those have been bug fixes or changes
necessary for the 2.0 release. I keep the renshawbay fork up to date with
any commits to the main repo.

For what it's worth, here's what I'm aware of that needs attention:
    - Finalizing and releasing to PyPI the 2.0 release for Python 2.x only
    - Testing and getting the renshawbay python3 branch working on
non-windows platforms (the linux build currently has problems, and I've not
tested any mac builds)
    - Merging the renshawbay python3 branch into the main pythonnet fork
    - Updating the docs

If you're able to help at all that would be much appreciated.

Best regards,
Tony


On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:08 AM Tribble, Brett <btribble at ea.com> wrote:

>  Adam, I?m ecstatic that there?s a player out there who is making good
> use of Python.net, and who would like to help contribute. Organizational
> and logistical issues aside, I?m all for anything you can throw at the
> project! Someone correct me if I?m wrong, but I believe Brian Lloyd has
> largely yielded this project to Tony and the community. Based on Brian and
>  Tony?s past posts, I?m fairly sure they?ll welcome any and all
> contributions to the project.
>
>
>
> It may sound sacrilegious to some, but I would love to see the PTVS (
> https://pytools.codeplex.com/) folks get involved with the project.
> They?re turning out a solid product, and this fits solidly in with what
> Microsoft is trying to do with PTVS, .NET Core, Azure etc.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* PythonDotNet [mailto:pythondotnet-bounces+btribble=
> ea.com at python.org] *On Behalf Of *Brad Friedman
> *Sent:* Monday, June 15, 2015 2:36 PM
> *To:* A list for users and developers of Python for .NET
> *Subject:* Re: [Python.NET] surveying the landscape ...
>
>
>
> I'll chime in and say the lack of these kinds of legitimate "stake-holder"
> systems and responsibilities has forced me to turn away from depending my
> work on this project. I still keep up on it in hopes that it will turn
> around.  If a legitimate player were to step up and contribute to a
> responsible, active and stable future for the project, I'd likely
> reconsider my stance and begin active support again. It's hard to justify
> putting much into it as one guy with limited resources.  It needs full
> multi-platform release and development support both as a python module and
> a .net embedding toolkit, both for Python 2.x and 3.x.  That's a lot of
> work to commit to getting set right and maintaining.
>
>
> On Jun 15, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Adam Klein <aklein at bluemountaincapital.com>
> wrote:
>
>  Hello all,
>
>
>
> We are using Python.NET at BlueMountain to interface between our large
> .NET code base and the cpython ecosystem for interactive, exploratory
> computing. By way of background, I was a major contributor to the pandas
> library for a time; my firm is behind the Deedle library (
> https://github.com/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle).
>
> To state the obvious, the project has proven hugely valuable. BlueMountain
> has an interest in making sure the library doesn?t languish. To that end,
> we?re interested in contributing to the project in terms of manpower and
> possibly funding development. I?d like to get a better sense of a few
> things:
>
>
>
> - is there a BDFL ? is Brian Lloyd still active; or is Tony Roberts
> steering the ship (being the top code contributor recently on github?) It
> looks like python 3.x integration and more recent work is happening on on
> renshawbay/pythonnet? Is pythonnet/pythonnet still the official repo?
>
> - who manages releases to PyPI?
>
> - is this PythonDotNet mailing list the appropriate clearinghouse for all
> discussions related to the project?
>
> - are there other institutions that are public users of this project?
>
> - is there an official vision or roadmap for future releases?
>
>
>
> I see that python 3.x support looks like it?s happening on
> renshawbay/pythonnet (awesome). For other wish-list items or proposed
> contributions, is it best to start opening issues on the
> pythonnet/pythonnet github site? How are pull requests managed?
>
>
>
> I?m also wondering if there?s any collective / documented knowledge about
> the inherent limitations and pitfalls of the library and/or where
> development resources are needed?
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>   Adam
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  _________________________________________________
> Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
>
>  _________________________________________________
> Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150616/21bfcfda/attachment.html>

From rharding64 at yahoo.com  Tue Jun 16 12:10:05 2015
From: rharding64 at yahoo.com (Ron Harding)
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:10:05 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [Python.NET] surveying the landscape ...
In-Reply-To: <CA+XbcsagJnY0V_M8WSPTiciCisp0B4aTqsS3qmnx3ueHys89Aw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+XbcsagJnY0V_M8WSPTiciCisp0B4aTqsS3qmnx3ueHys89Aw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1730384795.4550639.1434449405945.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>

i'm still new with ironpython, along with using python 2.7, platformio, pyserial, pyvisa.?
I am an EE who cross trained into MS .NET programming from embedded micro-controller systems development and manufacturing. ??
I primarily use python on embedded linux systems such as beaglebone black, raspberry pi, seeeduino arch.?
although i also have netduino devices running MS .NET micro framework.?
does python.net run on .net micro framework? ?
thanks
Ron
??The desire that guides me in all I do is the desire to harness the forces of nature to the service of mankind.




?Nikola Tesla?Radio Power Will Revolutionize the World? (Modern Mechanix & Inventions, July, 1934) 


     On Tuesday, June 16, 2015 2:37 AM, Tony Roberts <tony at pyxll.com> wrote:
   

 Hi Adam,

from my point of view it'd be great to have more people involved. I've been doing some development, but more or less out of necessity (I enjoy working on the project when I can, but don't really have the time to commit to it much more than I have been unfortunately).
To give you some background around why there's the renshawbay repo as well as the main repo; Initially I created the renshawbay repo as there were various changes I needed to make to the project while it was hosted in sourceforge, and for me it was easier to manage that in github. I added Python 3 support, and later some stuff around subclassing .net classes in Python. It was then decided to move the project to github, so we created the pythonnet repo directly from the sourceforge repo rather than fork the renshawbay repo. The thinking back then was that we should do a 2.0 release based off that fork, and then once that was stable look at merging in the Python 3 work from the renshawbay fork.
So, to answer your first question - pythonnet/pythonnet is the official repo, but most new development (new features etc) has taken place on the renshawbay/pythonnet fork in the python3 branch (which maintains support for Python 2).
There's no official roadmap that I'm aware of. There are some issues and milestones in the github repo, but AFAIK no one is actively working on those right now. There are only a couple of issues remaining for the 2.0 release however.
Pull requests to the official repo are reviewed and merged by the project owners (of which I'm one). So far those have been bug fixes or changes necessary for the 2.0 release. I keep the renshawbay fork up to date with any commits to the main repo.
For what it's worth, here's what I'm aware of that needs attention:? ? - Finalizing and releasing to PyPI the 2.0 release for Python 2.x only? ? - Testing and getting the renshawbay python3 branch working on non-windows platforms (the linux build currently has problems, and I've not tested any mac builds)? ? - Merging the renshawbay python3 branch into the main pythonnet fork? ? - Updating the docs
If you're able to help at all that would be much appreciated.
Best regards,Tony

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:08 AM Tribble, Brett <btribble at ea.com> wrote:

Adam, I?m ecstatic that there?s a player out there who is making good use of Python.net, and who would like to help contribute. Organizational and logistical issues aside, I?m all for anything you can throw at the project! Someone correct me if I?m wrong, but I believe Brian Lloyd has largely yielded this project to Tony and the community. Based on Brian and ?Tony?s past posts, I?m fairly sure they?ll welcome any and all contributions to the project.?It may sound sacrilegious to some, but I would love to see the PTVS (https://pytools.codeplex.com/) folks get involved with the project. They?re turning out a solid product, and this fits solidly in with what Microsoft is trying to do with PTVS, .NET Core, Azure etc.??From: PythonDotNet [mailto:pythondotnet-bounces+btribble=ea.com at python.org]On Behalf Of Brad Friedman
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 2:36 PM
To: A list for users and developers of Python for .NET
Subject: Re: [Python.NET] surveying the landscape ...?I'll chime in and say the lack of these kinds of legitimate "stake-holder" systems and responsibilities has forced me to turn away from depending my work on this project. I still keep up on it in hopes that it will turn around.? If a legitimate player were to step up and contribute to a responsible, active and stable future for the project, I'd likely reconsider my stance and begin active support again. It's hard to justify putting much into it as one guy with limited resources.? It needs full multi-platform release and development support both as a python module and a .net embedding toolkit, both for Python 2.x and 3.x.? That's a lot of work to commit to getting set right and maintaining.
On Jun 15, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Adam Klein <aklein at bluemountaincapital.com> wrote:
Hello all,?We are usingPython.NET at BlueMountain to interface between our large .NET code base and the cpython ecosystem for interactive, exploratory computing. By way of background, I was a major contributor to the pandas library for a time; my firm is behind the Deedle library (https://github.com/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle).To state the obvious, the project has proven hugely valuable. BlueMountain has an interest in making sure the library doesn?t languish. To that end, we?re interested in contributing to the project in terms of manpower and possibly funding development. I?d like to get a better sense of a few things:?- is there a BDFL ? is Brian Lloyd still active; or is Tony Roberts steering the ship (being the top code contributor recently on github?) It looks like python 3.x integration and more recent work is happening on on renshawbay/pythonnet? Is pythonnet/pythonnet still the official repo?- who manages releases to PyPI?- is this PythonDotNet mailing list the appropriate clearinghouse for all discussions related to the project?- are there other institutions that are public users of this project?- is there an official vision or roadmap for future releases??I see that python 3.x support looks like it?s happening on renshawbay/pythonnet (awesome). For other wish-list items or proposed contributions, is it best to start opening issues on the pythonnet/pythonnet github site? How are pull requests managed??I?m also wondering if there?s any collective / documented knowledge about the inherent limitations and pitfalls of the library and/or where development resources are needed? ?Best,? Adam???

_________________________________________________
Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
_________________________________________________
Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet

_________________________________________________
Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet

  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150616/dd60d977/attachment.html>

From vincenzo.gis at gmail.com  Thu Jun 18 12:06:48 2015
From: vincenzo.gis at gmail.com (Vincenzo Gisondi)
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:06:48 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [Python.NET] Pythonwin crash on from import
Message-ID: <loom.20150618T114048-4@post.gmane.org>

After recompiling the solution project of pythonent accordance with the 
procedure oleskii for the .NET framework 4, I'm having a problem with my 
code. Here are the first few lines where the crash occurs.


import sys, clr

sys.path.append ("G: / bin_EESPORt")
clr.AddReference ("ASAM.HILAPI.Implementation")
clr.AddReference ("ASAM.HILAPI.Interfaces")
clr.AddReference ("dSPACE.HILAPI.EESPort")
clr.AddReference ("dSPACE.HILAPI.EESPort.Interfaces")


from System import *
from System.IO import *
from System.Threading import *

from ASAM.HILAPI.dSPACE.EESPort import *      #here crash PythonWin
from ASAM.HILAPI.Implementation.EESPort.Error import *
from ASAM.HILAPI.Interfaces.EESPort import *
from ASAM.HILAPI.Interfaces.EESPort.Enum import *
from ASAM.HILAPI.Interfaces.EESPort.ErrorFactory import *
from ASAM.HILAPI.Interfaces.EESPort.ErrorObjects import *


When in debug mode i execute the line below Pythonwin crash:

from ASAM.HILAPI.dSPACE.EESPort import *   #here crash PythonWin


The PC system is windows 7 64-bit.

The IDE used is PythonWin with Python 2.7.9 MSC v.1500 32-bit (Intel)] 
on win32.

The Frameworks installed are: .NET Framework 4 Client Profile, .NET 
Framework 4 Extended, .NET Framework 4 Targeting Multi-Pack and Visual C 
# 2010 Express.

Thank you in advance deposit for the help, I really need your help


From tony at pyxll.com  Thu Jun 18 15:42:20 2015
From: tony at pyxll.com (Tony Roberts)
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:42:20 +0000
Subject: [Python.NET] Pythonwin crash on from import
In-Reply-To: <loom.20150618T114048-4@post.gmane.org>
References: <loom.20150618T114048-4@post.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <CA+Xbcsb9n152+2h+gnjUKFO1tN=rJZq7cUKdXkMPw7s9xJt+7g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Vincenzo,

are you using the pythonnet/pythonnet repo on github? If so, you can modify
the setup.py file to build a debug version (set CONFIG="Debug" near the top
of the file). You can then attach the visual studio debugger to your python
process and step through the C# code. If you're using the source from
sourceforge I suggest you try the latest code from github instead and see
if that fixes your problem.

Without a stack trace or more information about the crash it's hard to tell
what might be going wrong I'm afraid.

Tony

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:06 AM Vincenzo Gisondi <vincenzo.gis at gmail.com>
wrote:

> After recompiling the solution project of pythonent accordance with the
> procedure oleskii for the .NET framework 4, I'm having a problem with my
> code. Here are the first few lines where the crash occurs.
>
>
> import sys, clr
>
> sys.path.append ("G: / bin_EESPORt")
> clr.AddReference ("ASAM.HILAPI.Implementation")
> clr.AddReference ("ASAM.HILAPI.Interfaces")
> clr.AddReference ("dSPACE.HILAPI.EESPort")
> clr.AddReference ("dSPACE.HILAPI.EESPort.Interfaces")
>
>
> from System import *
> from System.IO import *
> from System.Threading import *
>
> from ASAM.HILAPI.dSPACE.EESPort import *      #here crash PythonWin
> from ASAM.HILAPI.Implementation.EESPort.Error import *
> from ASAM.HILAPI.Interfaces.EESPort import *
> from ASAM.HILAPI.Interfaces.EESPort.Enum import *
> from ASAM.HILAPI.Interfaces.EESPort.ErrorFactory import *
> from ASAM.HILAPI.Interfaces.EESPort.ErrorObjects import *
>
>
> When in debug mode i execute the line below Pythonwin crash:
>
> from ASAM.HILAPI.dSPACE.EESPort import *   #here crash PythonWin
>
>
> The PC system is windows 7 64-bit.
>
> The IDE used is PythonWin with Python 2.7.9 MSC v.1500 32-bit (Intel)]
> on win32.
>
> The Frameworks installed are: .NET Framework 4 Client Profile, .NET
> Framework 4 Extended, .NET Framework 4 Targeting Multi-Pack and Visual C
> # 2010 Express.
>
> Thank you in advance deposit for the help, I really need your help
>
> _________________________________________________
> Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150618/cec6c074/attachment.html>

From germanocarella.list at gmail.com  Sat Jun 20 15:34:44 2015
From: germanocarella.list at gmail.com (germano carella)
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:34:44 +0200
Subject: [Python.NET] Python .net and wpf: it's possible?
Message-ID: <55856BF4.1060009@gmail.com>

Hi,
I'm Germano From Italy.

I'm trying to write a wpf application using python for .net.
import clr
clr.AddReference("wpf\PresentationFramework.Classic")
clr.AddReference("wpf\PresentationCore")
from System.Windows import Window,Application

class MyWindow(Window):
  def __init__(self):
   Window.__init__(self)
   self.LoadComponent("page.xaml")

Application.Run(MyWindow())

InvalidOperationException!

There is something I heve to do?
What is wrong?
Thanks!
Germano

From tony at pyxll.com  Mon Jun 22 11:43:07 2015
From: tony at pyxll.com (Tony Roberts)
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 09:43:07 +0000
Subject: [Python.NET] Python .net and wpf: it's possible?
In-Reply-To: <55856BF4.1060009@gmail.com>
References: <55856BF4.1060009@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+XbcsaDfdU1kh0NBhHG=UPGFJtE9s5jOJBOTj1TJZ4297t3iQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Germano,

It helps to look at the full exception and stack trace, not just the
exception type. In this case you probably got this error
"System.InvalidOperationException: The calling thread must be STA, because
many UI components require this." which tells you that the main thread
you're calling Application.Run from is not an STA thread.

The following code shows how to create and show a WPF Window.

Regards,
Tony

// window.xaml

<Window

    xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
    Title="Test Window"
    Height="300"
    Width="300" />


import clr
clr.AddReference(r"wpf\PresentationFramework")

from System.IO import StreamReader
from System.Windows.Markup import XamlReader
from System.Windows import Application, Window
from System.Threading import Thread, ThreadStart, ApartmentState


def app_thread():
    stream = StreamReader("window.xaml")
    window = XamlReader.Load(stream.BaseStream)
    Application().Run(window)

thread = Thread(ThreadStart(app_thread))
thread.SetApartmentState(ApartmentState.STA)
thread.Start()
thread.Join()





On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 2:34 PM germano carella <
germanocarella.list at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> I'm Germano From Italy.
>
> I'm trying to write a wpf application using python for .net.
> import clr
> clr.AddReference("wpf\PresentationFramework.Classic")
> clr.AddReference("wpf\PresentationCore")
> from System.Windows import Window,Application
>
> class MyWindow(Window):
>   def __init__(self):
>    Window.__init__(self)
>    self.LoadComponent("page.xaml")
>
> Application.Run(MyWindow())
>
> InvalidOperationException!
>
> There is something I heve to do?
> What is wrong?
> Thanks!
> Germano
> _________________________________________________
> Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150622/3dd49060/attachment.html>

From hmansell at bluemountaincapital.com  Mon Jun 22 16:00:36 2015
From: hmansell at bluemountaincapital.com (Howard Mansell)
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:00:36 +0000
Subject: [Python.NET] surveying the landscape ...
In-Reply-To: <60CDCA83B420BB48BF95B8AF66CE7FFF45C2BD94@NYMBX02.bcna.corp>
References: <60CDCA83B420BB48BF95B8AF66CE7FFF45C211C7@NYMBX02.bcna.corp>
 <7DBB5EA3-0D73-4E2B-B876-833847F1B150@fie.us>
 <BY1PR0701MB122334B95900D31C06645213B5B80@BY1PR0701MB1223.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
 <CA+XbcsagJnY0V_M8WSPTiciCisp0B4aTqsS3qmnx3ueHys89Aw@mail.gmail.com>
 <60CDCA83B420BB48BF95B8AF66CE7FFF45C2BD94@NYMBX02.bcna.corp>
Message-ID: <6D44D8323DD7AF45A2786ED793BC8F8944F61E8A@NYMBX02.bcna.corp>

Hi All

Would any of the past contributors be willing and able to work on the project more actively if we at BlueMountain funded the development?  We don?t have pre-existing deep technical knowledge of the project, so contributing directly is more difficult for us.

Feel free to email me directly if you are interested.

(BTW, Brett ? I agree having more active support from PVTS guys would be useful.  Not sure whether they are able to contribute, though)

Thanks
Howard


From: PythonDotNet [mailto:pythondotnet-bounces+aklein=bmcm.com at python.org] On Behalf Of Tony Roberts
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 5:17 AM
To: A list for users and developers of Python for .NET
Subject: Re: [Python.NET] surveying the landscape ...

Hi Adam,
from my point of view it'd be great to have more people involved. I've been doing some development, but more or less out of necessity (I enjoy working on the project when I can, but don't really have the time to commit to it much more than I have been unfortunately).

To give you some background around why there's the renshawbay repo as well as the main repo; Initially I created the renshawbay repo as there were various changes I needed to make to the project while it was hosted in sourceforge, and for me it was easier to manage that in github. I added Python 3 support, and later some stuff around subclassing .net classes in Python. It was then decided to move the project to github, so we created the pythonnet repo directly from the sourceforge repo rather than fork the renshawbay repo. The thinking back then was that we should do a 2.0 release based off that fork, and then once that was stable look at merging in the Python 3 work from the renshawbay fork.

So, to answer your first question - pythonnet/pythonnet is the official repo, but most new development (new features etc) has taken place on the renshawbay/pythonnet fork in the python3 branch (which maintains support for Python 2).

There's no official roadmap that I'm aware of. There are some issues and milestones in the github repo, but AFAIK no one is actively working on those right now. There are only a couple of issues remaining for the 2.0 release however.

Pull requests to the official repo are reviewed and merged by the project owners (of which I'm one). So far those have been bug fixes or changes necessary for the 2.0 release. I keep the renshawbay fork up to date with any commits to the main repo.

For what it's worth, here's what I'm aware of that needs attention:
    - Finalizing and releasing to PyPI the 2.0 release for Python 2.x only
    - Testing and getting the renshawbay python3 branch working on non-windows platforms (the linux build currently has problems, and I've not tested any mac builds)
    - Merging the renshawbay python3 branch into the main pythonnet fork
    - Updating the docs

If you're able to help at all that would be much appreciated.

Best regards,
Tony


On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:08 AM Tribble, Brett <btribble at ea.com<mailto:btribble at ea.com>> wrote:
Adam, I?m ecstatic that there?s a player out there who is making good use of Python.net, and who would like to help contribute. Organizational and logistical issues aside, I?m all for anything you can throw at the project! Someone correct me if I?m wrong, but I believe Brian Lloyd has largely yielded this project to Tony and the community. Based on Brian and  Tony?s past posts, I?m fairly sure they?ll welcome any and all contributions to the project.

It may sound sacrilegious to some, but I would love to see the PTVS (https://pytools.codeplex.com/) folks get involved with the project. They?re turning out a solid product, and this fits solidly in with what Microsoft is trying to do with PTVS, .NET Core, Azure etc.


From: PythonDotNet [mailto:pythondotnet-bounces+btribble<mailto:pythondotnet-bounces%2Bbtribble>=ea.com at python.org<mailto:ea.com at python.org>] On Behalf Of Brad Friedman
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 2:36 PM
To: A list for users and developers of Python for .NET
Subject: Re: [Python.NET] surveying the landscape ...

I'll chime in and say the lack of these kinds of legitimate "stake-holder" systems and responsibilities has forced me to turn away from depending my work on this project. I still keep up on it in hopes that it will turn around.  If a legitimate player were to step up and contribute to a responsible, active and stable future for the project, I'd likely reconsider my stance and begin active support again. It's hard to justify putting much into it as one guy with limited resources.  It needs full multi-platform release and development support both as a python module and a .net embedding toolkit, both for Python 2.x and 3.x.  That's a lot of work to commit to getting set right and maintaining.

On Jun 15, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Adam Klein <aklein at bluemountaincapital.com<mailto:aklein at bluemountaincapital.com>> wrote:
Hello all,

We are using Python.NET<http://Python.NET> at BlueMountain to interface between our large .NET code base and the cpython ecosystem for interactive, exploratory computing. By way of background, I was a major contributor to the pandas library for a time; my firm is behind the Deedle library (https://github.com/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle).
To state the obvious, the project has proven hugely valuable. BlueMountain has an interest in making sure the library doesn?t languish. To that end, we?re interested in contributing to the project in terms of manpower and possibly funding development. I?d like to get a better sense of a few things:

- is there a BDFL ? is Brian Lloyd still active; or is Tony Roberts steering the ship (being the top code contributor recently on github?) It looks like python 3.x integration and more recent work is happening on on renshawbay/pythonnet? Is pythonnet/pythonnet still the official repo?
- who manages releases to PyPI?
- is this PythonDotNet mailing list the appropriate clearinghouse for all discussions related to the project?
- are there other institutions that are public users of this project?
- is there an official vision or roadmap for future releases?

I see that python 3.x support looks like it?s happening on renshawbay/pythonnet (awesome). For other wish-list items or proposed contributions, is it best to start opening issues on the pythonnet/pythonnet github site? How are pull requests managed?

I?m also wondering if there?s any collective / documented knowledge about the inherent limitations and pitfalls of the library and/or where development resources are needed?

Best,
  Adam



_________________________________________________
Python.NET<http://Python.NET> mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org<mailto:PythonDotNet at python.org>
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
_________________________________________________
Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org<mailto:PythonDotNet at python.org>
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150622/2fa61a7e/attachment-0001.html>

From anthoff at berkeley.edu  Mon Jun 22 23:50:47 2015
From: anthoff at berkeley.edu (David Anthoff)
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:50:47 -0700
Subject: [Python.NET] surveying the landscape ...
In-Reply-To: <6D44D8323DD7AF45A2786ED793BC8F8944F61E8A@NYMBX02.bcna.corp>
References: <60CDCA83B420BB48BF95B8AF66CE7FFF45C211C7@NYMBX02.bcna.corp>
 <7DBB5EA3-0D73-4E2B-B876-833847F1B150@fie.us>
 <BY1PR0701MB122334B95900D31C06645213B5B80@BY1PR0701MB1223.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
 <CA+XbcsagJnY0V_M8WSPTiciCisp0B4aTqsS3qmnx3ueHys89Aw@mail.gmail.com>
 <60CDCA83B420BB48BF95B8AF66CE7FFF45C2BD94@NYMBX02.bcna.corp>
 <6D44D8323DD7AF45A2786ED793BC8F8944F61E8A@NYMBX02.bcna.corp>
Message-ID: <BAY407-EAS312734E9473298AD62B788D87A10@phx.gbl>

I have the credentials to the pypi listing, and I uploaded the one dev release we made. I also am an owner of the github.com/pythonnet organization, but I think there are three other owners as well.

 

I have moved to other projects in my work, so I won?t be making any contributions to this project going forward. I?d obviously be happy to hand over the pypi credentials and anything else to whoever steps up on this project.

 

Best,

David

 

From: PythonDotNet [mailto:pythondotnet-bounces+anthoff=berkeley.edu at python.org] On Behalf Of Howard Mansell
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 7:01 AM
To: pythondotnet at python.org
Subject: Re: [Python.NET] surveying the landscape ...

 

Hi All

 

Would any of the past contributors be willing and able to work on the project more actively if we at BlueMountain funded the development?  We don?t have pre-existing deep technical knowledge of the project, so contributing directly is more difficult for us.   

 

Feel free to email me directly if you are interested.

 

(BTW, Brett ? I agree having more active support from PVTS guys would be useful.  Not sure whether they are able to contribute, though)

 

Thanks

Howard

 

 

From: PythonDotNet [ <mailto:pythondotnet-bounces+aklein=bmcm.com at python.org> mailto:pythondotnet-bounces+aklein=bmcm.com at python.org] On Behalf Of Tony Roberts
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 5:17 AM
To: A list for users and developers of Python for .NET
Subject: Re: [Python.NET] surveying the landscape ...

 

Hi Adam,

from my point of view it'd be great to have more people involved. I've been doing some development, but more or less out of necessity (I enjoy working on the project when I can, but don't really have the time to commit to it much more than I have been unfortunately).

 

To give you some background around why there's the renshawbay repo as well as the main repo; Initially I created the renshawbay repo as there were various changes I needed to make to the project while it was hosted in sourceforge, and for me it was easier to manage that in github. I added Python 3 support, and later some stuff around subclassing .net classes in Python. It was then decided to move the project to github, so we created the pythonnet repo directly from the sourceforge repo rather than fork the renshawbay repo. The thinking back then was that we should do a 2.0 release based off that fork, and then once that was stable look at merging in the Python 3 work from the renshawbay fork.

 

So, to answer your first question - pythonnet/pythonnet is the official repo, but most new development (new features etc) has taken place on the renshawbay/pythonnet fork in the python3 branch (which maintains support for Python 2).

 

There's no official roadmap that I'm aware of. There are some issues and milestones in the github repo, but AFAIK no one is actively working on those right now. There are only a couple of issues remaining for the 2.0 release however.

 

Pull requests to the official repo are reviewed and merged by the project owners (of which I'm one). So far those have been bug fixes or changes necessary for the 2.0 release. I keep the renshawbay fork up to date with any commits to the main repo.

 

For what it's worth, here's what I'm aware of that needs attention:

    - Finalizing and releasing to PyPI the 2.0 release for Python 2.x only

    - Testing and getting the renshawbay python3 branch working on non-windows platforms (the linux build currently has problems, and I've not tested any mac builds)

    - Merging the renshawbay python3 branch into the main pythonnet fork

    - Updating the docs

 

If you're able to help at all that would be much appreciated.

 

Best regards,

Tony

 

 

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:08 AM Tribble, Brett <btribble at ea.com <mailto:btribble at ea.com> > wrote:

Adam, I?m ecstatic that there?s a player out there who is making good use of Python.net, and who would like to help contribute. Organizational and logistical issues aside, I?m all for anything you can throw at the project! Someone correct me if I?m wrong, but I believe Brian Lloyd has largely yielded this project to Tony and the community. Based on Brian and  Tony?s past posts, I?m fairly sure they?ll welcome any and all contributions to the project.

 

It may sound sacrilegious to some, but I would love to see the PTVS ( <https://pytools.codeplex.com/> https://pytools.codeplex.com/) folks get involved with the project. They?re turning out a solid product, and this fits solidly in with what Microsoft is trying to do with PTVS, .NET Core, Azure etc.

 

 

From: PythonDotNet [mailto: <mailto:pythondotnet-bounces%2Bbtribble> pythondotnet-bounces+btribble= <mailto:ea.com at python.org> ea.com at python.org] On Behalf Of Brad Friedman
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 2:36 PM
To: A list for users and developers of Python for .NET
Subject: Re: [Python.NET] surveying the landscape ...

 

I'll chime in and say the lack of these kinds of legitimate "stake-holder" systems and responsibilities has forced me to turn away from depending my work on this project. I still keep up on it in hopes that it will turn around.  If a legitimate player were to step up and contribute to a responsible, active and stable future for the project, I'd likely reconsider my stance and begin active support again. It's hard to justify putting much into it as one guy with limited resources.  It needs full multi-platform release and development support both as a python module and a .net embedding toolkit, both for Python 2.x and 3.x.  That's a lot of work to commit to getting set right and maintaining.


On Jun 15, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Adam Klein <aklein at bluemountaincapital.com <mailto:aklein at bluemountaincapital.com> > wrote:

Hello all,

 

We are using  <http://Python.NET> Python.NET at BlueMountain to interface between our large .NET code base and the cpython ecosystem for interactive, exploratory computing. By way of background, I was a major contributor to the pandas library for a time; my firm is behind the Deedle library ( <https://github.com/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle> https://github.com/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle).

To state the obvious, the project has proven hugely valuable. BlueMountain has an interest in making sure the library doesn?t languish. To that end, we?re interested in contributing to the project in terms of manpower and possibly funding development. I?d like to get a better sense of a few things:

 

- is there a BDFL ? is Brian Lloyd still active; or is Tony Roberts steering the ship (being the top code contributor recently on github?) It looks like python 3.x integration and more recent work is happening on on renshawbay/pythonnet? Is pythonnet/pythonnet still the official repo?

- who manages releases to PyPI?

- is this PythonDotNet mailing list the appropriate clearinghouse for all discussions related to the project?

- are there other institutions that are public users of this project?

- is there an official vision or roadmap for future releases?

 

I see that python 3.x support looks like it?s happening on renshawbay/pythonnet (awesome). For other wish-list items or proposed contributions, is it best to start opening issues on the pythonnet/pythonnet github site? How are pull requests managed?

 

I?m also wondering if there?s any collective / documented knowledge about the inherent limitations and pitfalls of the library and/or where development resources are needed? 

 

Best,

  Adam

 

 

 

_________________________________________________
Python.NET <http://Python.NET>  mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org <mailto:PythonDotNet at python.org> 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet

_________________________________________________
Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org <mailto:PythonDotNet at python.org> 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150622/1fd400f3/attachment-0001.html>

From jared at quantconnect.com  Tue Jun 23 06:24:21 2015
From: jared at quantconnect.com (Jared Broad)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:24:21 -0400
Subject: [Python.NET] Architecture Advice
Message-ID: <CAOtdhqnxtY1pqFZ5mVGTNBmHM5D7z82UiwQ=7muiZVuS=bxChQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello All,

Python.Net looks amazing, I'm excited to get into it. I wanted to ask some
general architecture advice to see if what we're attempting to do is
possible, and if so, how I could best lay out the design.

We've got a large open source C# application called Lean which runs
.NET/Mono DLL's we call "Algorithms" -- (
https://github.com/QuantConnect/Lean) we'd like to allow it to support
python algorithms.

Ideally, we'd like to keep all the maintenance and core code base in C#,
and invoke events in Python event handlers. Users would write python
algorithms (implement event handlers) which would be called from C#.

They would need access to C# properties in the C# base class, and the
ability to call C# methods in the base DLL. Ideally we wouldn't require a
stand alone python wrapper program.

I'd welcome thoughts on how to architect this in a high performance way!

Thank you!
Jared

LEAN open source - https://github.com/QuantConnect/Lean

Python algorithm frame -
https://github.com/QuantConnect/Lean/tree/master/Algorithm.Python


-- 
Jared Broad

www.quantconnect.com
Phone-USA: +1 917 327 0556
*Democratizing Finance, Empowering Individuals*
Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/QuantConnect> | Twitter
<https://twitter.com/#!/QuantConnect> | LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/quantconnect> | Skype: jaredbroad

Want to know more about Algorithms? Check out our infographic!
<http://bit.ly/YBTnRd>
?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150623/b8a31622/attachment.html>

From tony at pyxll.com  Fri Jun 26 11:43:21 2015
From: tony at pyxll.com (Tony Roberts)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 09:43:21 +0000
Subject: [Python.NET] pythonnet 2.0.0 released
Message-ID: <CA+XbcsbvjwvFSWrv2h5HguR4NYQ-bok9JDhJvvOC8vfGXAH40g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I've finally gotten round to finishing off the last couple of things that
were blocking an 'official' 2.0.0 release (to do with packaging as
wheels/source dist).

There is now a 2.0.0 release available on PyPI (
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pythonnet), with binary wheels for Windows (32
and 64 bit) and a source distribution for Linux and Mac.

The next task will be to integrate the changes from the
renshawbay/pythonnet fork to add Python 3 support.

cheers,
Tony
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150626/1a731318/attachment.html>

From aklein at bluemountaincapital.com  Fri Jun 26 16:50:17 2015
From: aklein at bluemountaincapital.com (Adam Klein)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 14:50:17 +0000
Subject: [Python.NET] pythonnet 2.0.0 released
In-Reply-To: <CA+XbcsbvjwvFSWrv2h5HguR4NYQ-bok9JDhJvvOC8vfGXAH40g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+XbcsbvjwvFSWrv2h5HguR4NYQ-bok9JDhJvvOC8vfGXAH40g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <60CDCA83B420BB48BF95B8AF66CE7FFF45C36163@NYMBX02.bcna.corp>

Congrats and thank you!

From: PythonDotNet [mailto:pythondotnet-bounces+aklein=bmcm.com at python.org] On Behalf Of Tony Roberts
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 5:43 AM
To: pythondotnet at python.org
Subject: [Python.NET] pythonnet 2.0.0 released

Hi,

I've finally gotten round to finishing off the last couple of things that were blocking an 'official' 2.0.0 release (to do with packaging as wheels/source dist).

There is now a 2.0.0 release available on PyPI (https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pythonnet), with binary wheels for Windows (32 and 64 bit) and a source distribution for Linux and Mac.

The next task will be to integrate the changes from the renshawbay/pythonnet fork to add Python 3 support.

cheers,
Tony
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150626/fd0b4576/attachment.html>

From tony at pyxll.com  Fri Jun 26 16:39:13 2015
From: tony at pyxll.com (Tony Roberts)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 14:39:13 +0000
Subject: [Python.NET] pythonnet 2.1.0.dev1 released
Message-ID: <CA+XbcsZfmvsJHzdhp9YMJ-ucua611f3LBf8h8EFAQR17SMtxxg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I've merged the changes from the renshawbay/pythonnet fork into the develop
branch in pythonnet/pythonnet and released it as 2.1.0.dev1.

Binary wheels for windows (2.6 to 3.4, x86 and x86_64) have been uploaded
to PyPI, along with the source dist for Linux and Mac. You can install it
with pip with the --pre argument:

> pip install --pre pythonnet

New features are:
 - Python 3 support
 - Managed types can be sub-classed in Python and have virtual methods
overridden.
 - Uses dynamic objects for cleaner code when embedding Python
 - Better Linux support (work with or without --enable-shared configure
option)

Now the Linux build works for Python built with and without the
--enable-shared configure option, AFAIK, there's no need for the npython
executable anymore so I've removed it. If it is still needed for some use
case I've not considered please let me know and I will reinstate it.

cheers,
Tony
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150626/7953cd7f/attachment.html>

From btribble at ea.com  Fri Jun 26 21:58:26 2015
From: btribble at ea.com (Tribble, Brett)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 19:58:26 +0000
Subject: [Python.NET] pythonnet 2.1.0.dev1 released
In-Reply-To: <CA+XbcsZfmvsJHzdhp9YMJ-ucua611f3LBf8h8EFAQR17SMtxxg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+XbcsZfmvsJHzdhp9YMJ-ucua611f3LBf8h8EFAQR17SMtxxg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BY1PR0701MB12232699F3B39E8F73D7BA63B5AD0@BY1PR0701MB1223.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>

Wow, awesome!

From: PythonDotNet [mailto:pythondotnet-bounces+btribble=ea.com at python.org] On Behalf Of Tony Roberts
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 7:39 AM
To: pythondotnet at python.org
Subject: [Python.NET] pythonnet 2.1.0.dev1 released

Hi,

I've merged the changes from the renshawbay/pythonnet fork into the develop branch in pythonnet/pythonnet and released it as 2.1.0.dev1.

Binary wheels for windows (2.6 to 3.4, x86 and x86_64) have been uploaded to PyPI, along with the source dist for Linux and Mac. You can install it with pip with the --pre argument:

> pip install --pre pythonnet

New features are:
 - Python 3 support
 - Managed types can be sub-classed in Python and have virtual methods overridden.
 - Uses dynamic objects for cleaner code when embedding Python
 - Better Linux support (work with or without --enable-shared configure option)

Now the Linux build works for Python built with and without the --enable-shared configure option, AFAIK, there's no need for the npython executable anymore so I've removed it. If it is still needed for some use case I've not considered please let me know and I will reinstate it.

cheers,
Tony


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150626/8c1a2824/attachment.html>

From mc at mclaveau  Sat Jun 27 15:36:21 2015
From: mc at mclaveau (mc at mclaveau)
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:36:21 +0200
Subject: [Python.NET] pythonnet 2.0.0 released
In-Reply-To: <CA+XbcsbvjwvFSWrv2h5HguR4NYQ-bok9JDhJvvOC8vfGXAH40g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+XbcsbvjwvFSWrv2h5HguR4NYQ-bok9JDhJvvOC8vfGXAH40g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <558EA6D5.9050501@mclaveau.com>

Thank you very much!!
-- 

Le 26.06.15 11:43, Tony Roberts a ?crit :
> Hi,
>
> I've finally gotten round to finishing off the last couple of things 
> that were blocking an 'official' 2.0.0 release (to do with packaging 
> as wheels/source dist).
>
> There is now a 2.0.0 release available on PyPI 
> (https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pythonnet), with binary wheels for 
> Windows (32 and 64 bit) and a source distribution for Linux and Mac.
>
> The next task will be to integrate the changes from the 
> renshawbay/pythonnet fork to add Python 3 support.
>
> cheers,
> Tony

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150627/bd813e4d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: C:\Users\CLAVEAU\AppData\Roaming\Thunderbird\signatures\sign-styloplume.GIF
Type: image/gif
Size: 9129 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/attachments/20150627/bd813e4d/attachment.gif>