[Python.NET] anonymous types from bug tracker

[Barton]

Indeed, the mailing list gets more attention than the tracker. I do, 
however, maintain the tracker as often as I am able.

As the submitter suggests:
[quote]
In method GenericUtil.Register(Type t) there is no test for types which 
t.Namespace is null.
  Simple correction is just check if t.Namespace is null and then don`t 
process that type.
[/quote]

I've had this on my list of things to commit to the trunk, but have 
gotten sidetracked (by, among other things, building up a new Arch Linux 
system). I will do my best to get to my list as quickly as I can.

Thank you so very much,
Barton

On 04/22/2012 09:22 AM, Stephen P. Lepisto wrote:
> Bradley,
>
> Can you provide a simple reproduction case?
>
>
> On 4/21/2012 1:36 PM, Bradley Friedman wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> So I ran into what looks like a bug. Someone else logged it on the
>> sourceforge bug tracker.
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3415722&group_id=162464&atid=823891
>>
>>
>> I worked around it as the submitter suggests. However, I have two
>> queries.
>>
>> Firstly, is the bug tracker the right place to deal with these things?
>> Or is this mailing list the right place. I ask because the referenced
>> bug doesn't seem to have been looked at all that much.
>>
>> Second, is the suggested work around the correct course of action?
>> Should pythonnet ignore anonymous types?
>>
>> Bradley Friedman
>> VFX and Animation
>> Consulting and Technology
>> http://www.fie.us/
>> brad at fie.us
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________
>> Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
>>
>