[python-uk] Job Ad: Senior Python Engineers -Skimlinks - London
Michael
sparks.m at gmail.com
Wed Feb 4 16:47:06 CET 2015
But surely the bikeshed should be blue!
Michael
On 4 February 2015 at 15:38, Peter Inglesby <peter.inglesby at gmail.com>
wrote:
> It seems like several of the arguments for keeping the current behaviour
> are that it's amusing when somebody gets it wrong. As somebody who once
> accidentally reply-alled criticism of my supervisor to my entire department
> at university, I'm not sure that it always is amusing, and so I'm in favour
> of changing the behaviour.
>
> On 4 February 2015 at 15:26, Michael <sparks.m at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Accidental replies are the spice of life.
>>
>> The only downside of the reply-to header is the fact that people randomly
>> complain about it every other year or two, resulting in 20 arguments in
>> favour, 20 arguments against, then a discussion about how voting for or
>> against it might be a good idea, and in the majority of cases most people
>> going "meh, can't be bothered", and a minority deciding that voting is a
>> good idea, and then sometimes they remove it but most often they don't.
>>
>> On the upside, they poke a bit of life into things, resulting in the
>> original poster going "oh, why did I bother? They're just talking about
>> reply-to rather than our fussball table!"
>>
>> :-D
>>
>>
>> Michael.
>>
>> On 4 February 2015 at 14:16, Andy Robinson <andy at reportlab.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm one of the list admins. There are a couple of others. Happy to
>>> make a change if a significant majority feel that way.
>>>
>>> However, sometimes accidental replies are the only thing keeping the
>>> list alive ;-)
>>>
>>> On 4 February 2015 at 14:12, Sven Marnach <smarnach at google.com> wrote:
>>> > Maybe we could just get rid of the pointless "Reply-To" header? It
>>> can be
>>> > disabled by a list admin on the Mailman admin page.
>>> >
>>> > I get the impression that at least one person per month falls victim
>>> to it.
>>> > The reverse, people accidentally answering just to the sender instead
>>> of the
>>> > whole list, seems better than people accidentally sending private
>>> emails to
>>> > everyone.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Sven
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > python-uk mailing list
>>> > python-uk at python.org
>>> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andy Robinson
>>> Managing Director
>>> ReportLab Europe Ltd.
>>> Thornton House, Thornton Road, Wimbledon, London SW19 4NG, UK
>>> Tel +44-20-8405-6420
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> python-uk mailing list
>>> python-uk at python.org
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> python-uk mailing list
>> python-uk at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> python-uk mailing list
> python-uk at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-uk/attachments/20150204/c05fe3aa/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the python-uk
mailing list