bags? 2.5.x?
Wildemar Wildenburger
lasses_weil at klapptsowieso.net
Thu Jan 17 16:28:11 EST 2008
Dan Stromberg wrote:
> The author of the bag class said that he was planning to submit bags for
> inclusion in 2.5 - is there a particular reason why they didn't go in?
>
I wouldn't know. Not enough convincing use cases, I guess. Fools ;)
> I keep finding a need for bags. In the past, I've done this sort of
> thing with dictionaries, but it's much nicer to have a bag class, and of
> course it's better to have it in the standard library than to slurp it
> into this, that and the other project.
>
Then again, it is only one class. Also, if I may be so bold, why
wouldn't a simple list fit your needs (other than performance, of course)?
/W
More information about the Python-list
mailing list