list.reverse()
Bruno Desthuilliers
bruno.42.desthuilliers at websiteburo.invalid
Tue Apr 29 09:52:25 EDT 2008
Roy Smith a écrit :
(snip)
> The reasoning goes along the lines of, "reverse in place is an expensive
> operation, so we don't want to make it too easy for people to do". At
> least that's the gist of what I got out of the argument the many times it
> has come up.
IIRC, it's more along the line of "reverse in place is a *destructive*
operation, so we don't want to make it too easy for people to forget
about it".
More information about the Python-list
mailing list