Nested scopes, and augmented assignment

Antoon Pardon apardon at forel.vub.ac.be
Fri Jul 7 08:02:41 EDT 2006


On 2006-07-07, Fredrik Lundh <fredrik at pythonware.com> wrote:
> Antoon "I'm no nincompoop, but I play one on the internet" Pardon wrote:
>
>> I don't see the contradiction. That Namespaces and names lookup are
>> fundamentel parts of the Python language, doesn't mean that 
>> the right behaviour can't be implemented in multiple ways and
>> doesn't contradict that a specific explanation depend on a specific
>> implementation instead of just on language definition.
>
> the behaviour *is* defined in the language definition, and has nothing 
> to do with a specific implementation.

As far as I can see I didn't write anything that contradicts this.
It is possible that at some point my choice of wording was bad
and that I gave the impression that i somehow wanted to contradict
this. If that happened my appologies.

> have you even read the language
> reference ?  do you even know that it exists ?

You mean this, I suppose:

http://docs.python.org/ref/naming.html

-- 
Antoon Pardon



More information about the Python-list mailing list