builtin functions for and and or?
Brian Beck
exogen at gmail.com
Sun Feb 13 17:19:31 EST 2005
Steven Bethard wrote:
> Another alternative:
>
> not False in (bool(x) for x in L)
>
> Note that this should short-circuit, where min won't.
>
> Steve
Whoops, for some reason the thought that short-circuiting didn't apply
to And entered my mind while trying to post a nice solution. Hard to say
why considering I have to do stuff like this on a daily basis!
Ignore mine except as a novelty, then.
--
Brian Beck
Adventurer of the First Order
More information about the Python-list
mailing list